The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTT 25639 COOK STREET/DESERT MIRAGE HOMES 1991 PRECIS E PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT ZONE CHANGE PARCEL MAP VARIANCE C.U.P. REFER TO: APPLICANT: LOCATION ' 5 � 5 ,ti _ � _ - ti,?ti'✓ - N -C{i; REQUEST: '� ` ' EX TINGZONE: --� PREPARATION PROGRESS P DATE BY COMMENTS APPLICATION RECEIVED LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT NOTICES SENT FIELD INVESTIGATION )EPTS. NOTIFIED BUILDING I ENGINEERING I FIRE POLICE RECREATION & PARKS SCHOOL DISTRICT DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FLOOD CONTROL PRELIMINARY MEETING T STAFF REPORT �5b i FINAL PLAN APPROVAL GL� tI PRECISE PLAN (6) LANDSCAPING PLAN (5) PLAN. DIRECTOR MOD. (6) HEARINGS & ACTIONS DATE ACTION VOTE REVIEW BOARD HEARING P.C. HEARING PUBLISHED P.C. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.C. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. RESOLUTION NO. EFFECTIVE DATE RECORDED FOR DATA-BANK zoNING MAP CORRECTED Dry-35 EH4U0 . j SUBDIVISION MAP QPPUCgMCH PORN : �®��4unu®un4 ®4 ®uvnBv�aoaa�®w�0 a®ProB�� a BaBmo�a�Buu� ¢OBnBaBmuu a /POELCO 1�E�fioPr�E„iT /Applicant (please print) LOUIL (G 19) 2 PA�� PLALA J v/C S oO 7r4) 97-5'_11Z Mailing Adareu Telephone heVJNE CA 927/¢ Clty State Zip-Coda REOUEST: (Descrthe speclfic nature of approval requested). S`yd�IlJ/rlOn� Qf ./10?�0�! 9 2 i9G� li✓� �D Jli/GLG �Ar�itry/ LoiJ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: /✓a�TNfir� QvAx%Fe OF T116 �(p!/j//£.A.fi t421/giZigL OF THG .VOAa''71FAJT ~ dvnzLrZ- Of JEG 4 TSS� .PEE xsx4, ExcEy:i ✓G Tr�EaEf�dr7 Tidy: �"J-7XZ4--1 SS fE�r Cook ST.� -- ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONING P�-S Property Owner Authorization The undersigned states that they are the awns-ls) of the properly described herein and hereby give author Izatlon for the filing of this application. �}/l9cfi�� }I.t�/OY1 Z4yiOh _ _ '.. atwe- Date '--' Agreement absolving the City of Patin Oeserl at oil Ilablllhes relotlw to any deed restrictions. 1 00 BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrfetl imbN to the property described herein. C Si ura Date 6 Applicants Signature nature Date (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status ACWted by: ❑ Ministerial Act E.A.No. ❑ CatNegative DlratinExemption C n S2 Ha, ❑ Ne alive Declaration W LS w� ❑ Other Reference Coss No. nmworrerral azevicm era ear-ez { CA SC IYV. ENTL Ti'!_ SOTOIVISIOiq C'r,E: LIST NOTE: Applications will not be processed until the application and all required materials are round to be comoiete. ncei, .: I . Completed Application Farm (one cony) Ii. Supplemental Infona_ion - tdritten SLem�--tents and Reports - Subdivision building or development plan (Design Review Plans) - Storm Water Control Method - Preliminary soils report and grading plan - Proposed landscaping and irrigation - Proposed covenants, conditions, and restrictions (C.C. & R's) - Method of sewage disposal - Private street maintenance program., (if applicable) III. Property Owner's Information - Typed listing of owners, assessor's parcel numbers (two copies) J - Assessor's Parcel map(s) (one set) I1I - Gummed mailing labels (two sets) IV. Address labels for project sponsors (three sets) V. Tentative Subdivision Map Exhibit - Twelve (12) full size maps - One full size sepia - Twenty-three reduced copes (831" x 11", or 13") VI. Environmental Assessment Form (received by Planning Division two weeks prior to formal filing of application) VII. Application filing fee: $250.00 + $2.50 per lot TEIT;;TIVE SUBODISICPI C-':EZ LIS- Pace VdII. Optional plans and exhibits, as required by the Department or Environmental Services - Aerial photo(s) of the site - Other exhibits ( ) S p e--- _ — Tentative Subdivision Map Exhibits Received and Checked by: Planning Division Staff / Date F 1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development/Planning Department FROM: Eric Johnson, Landscape Specialist SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR SHEET P-1, L-1369 FOR DESERT MIRAGE PROJECT ON COOK STREET DATE: January 31 , 1991 (A) Rhurs lancea - African sumac: 42-inch box multi are a line of sight problem. Alternate suggestion is to create a grouping of Washington filifera- California fan palms in the 8 - 12 - 14 foot range as shown. (B) Suggest blending Prosopis chilensis - Mesquite with Schinus molle- California pepper - rather than using just one species or use the 8-Item A Rhurs lancea to blend with Schinus molle. Provide multi-trunk trees in place of standard trees that do not withstand wind stress. (C) Amount of turf should be reconsidered to reduce water use and use alternate plant material in the drainage Swale that could be an adversary to the build up of sand. Consider Dalea gregii or Baccharis centennial . Even if turn area is protected with wall , the area is still a potential for sand build up until all land parcels west of project are completed. (D) Enlargement of Islands A and B indicate excessive large boulders. The quantity could be reduced by fifty perecent in each island and then utilize the boulders on each side of entrance to provide a more balanced entry scene. ERIC JOHNSON EJ/ms i (NOV @V ftlum Emma 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 II CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. TT 25639 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by Roelco Development for approval of a 30 lot single family subdivision on 9.2 acres within the PR-5 zone on the west side of Cook Street between Frank Sinatra Drive and Country Club Drive, also particulary described as: A.P.N. 620-190-016 II I SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, January 16, 1990 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Sun RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary January 5, 1990 Palm Desert Planning Commission of 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 i i TRANSMITTAL FORM TO: DATE: 2 9 gsa� FROM: (DEPARTMENT) NUMBER OF PAGES ( INCLUDING TRANSMITTAL FORM) C T DATE 1P RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROPERTY OWNERS CERTIFICATION I, DEBRA SLONE ,certify that on (print name) NOVEMBER 22, 1989 the attached property owners list was pre- (month-day-year) pared by ORANGE COAST TITLE pursuant to (print company or individual's name) application requirements furnished by the Riverside County Planning Department. Said list is a complete and true compilation of owner of the subject property and all other property owners within 300 feet of the property involved in the application and is based upon latest equalized assessment rolls. I further certify that the information filed is true and correct to the best of my knowledge; I understand that incorrect or erroneous information may be grounds for rejection or denial of the application. NAME: DEBRA SLONE i TITLE/REGISTRATION: BRANCH MANAGER ADDRESS: 73-255 .EL,PASEO; •STE. 3 PALM.DESERT, CA. 92260 (zip) PHONE: 34 SIGNATURE: 2 c DATE: CASE: 626-190-008,009,017 THOMAS H. TAYLOR , RICHARD TAYLOR 820 TROTTER CIR. LAS VEGAS, NV. 89107 626-190-016 JOHN R. & JUDITH MORTON, TRUST 316 LA RAMBLA SAN CLEMENTE, CA. 92672 (P.I.Q.) 620-190-015 ' THOMAS H. TAYLOR RICHARD TAYLOR 22931 CALLE AZORIN LAKE MISSION VIEJO, CA.92692 626-020-038 MORRY DESERT FALLS INC. 600 TAHQUITZ WAY STE. C PALM SPRINGS, CA. 92262 626-020-057,060 VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS INC. C/O JAMES TEMPLE 747 EUGENE RD. PALM SPRINGS, CA. 92264 626-300-001 THRU 626-300-054 VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS 747 EUGENE RD. PALM SPRINGS, CA. 92264 11/20/89 ORANGE COAST :TLE COMPANY PAGE PREPARED FOS REQUESTED hy : REP ! ------ -- --------- -- ---- --- ----------- ---------------- ----------------- ------- APN : 620- 190-003 STIUS ! OWNER ! TAYKAR THOMAS H & RICHARD UEGAL ! 5 . 00 AC IN POP NE 1 /4 OF SEE 4 T5S R6E� MAIL : 820 TROTTER CTRAAS VE GAS Nu R9 0 1 ? Y USE : Y-UC T L D AANAN ZONE ! Pli2M ASD ! 18, 608 IMP : SALE DATE ! 12/00/77 SAUE AMT ! LOAN AMT ! EXEMPT : N BIT : RMS : BD BT14 TOT UNITS : LNTSQFTi 217800 SQFT ; ---- ------ - ----------- ------------------------ ------- --------- -------------------- APN ! 620-190-009 RITUS : OWNER ! TAYLOR THOMAS H & RICHARD LEGAL , 5 , 00 AC IN POP NE 1/4 OF SEC 4 T59 OER S HRS MAIL ; 2 j ANVW USE : YY-UACANT LAND ZONE , R112M ASD ; 10, 608 AMP ; % SALE DATE : 12/00/77 SALE AMT ! LOAN AMT ; EXEMPI ; N OLT : RMS &D BTH TOT UNITS ! LOTSQFT ! 217800 SQFT ; --------------------------------------- ----- ------- --------------------------------- *SEARCH COMPLETE ; 2 RFCORDS READ , RETURNED : THE INFORMATION PROUIDED IS DEEMED RELIABLE , BUT IS NOT GUARANTEED COPYRIGHT TRW 1986 I i ORANGE COAST !TLE COMPANY PAGE 1. PREPARED 17M REQHEOTED BYi It REP : --- -- ----------------------------------------------------- -------------------- ---- APN ; 620-190-n!5 SITU? : nWNFRi TAYLOR THOMAS H & RICHARD LEGAL : 56 , 55 AC M/L IN POP NE 1/4 OF MAIL : 22931 CAILLE AZORTN; LAKE MISSION UTEj CA 9260? HSQ YY-UACANT LAND ASW T119, 581 TMP ; % SALE DATE : 12/0=5 SALE AMT : LOAN AM Ti EXEMPT : H BLT ; RMS &D RTH TOT UNITS : LOTSQrTt 2461218 SQFT ! ---------- ---- ---------------------------------- -------- -- ----------------------------- A OWNER ; MORTON JOHN R TR & JUDITH LEGAL : 9 . 17 AC M/L IN POP NE 1 /4 OF SEC 4 1% A MTIE ! 316 LA RAMBLA; SAN CLEMENTE CA 92672 PHONE ! 714-498-1305 UBE ; YY-UACANT LAND ASO : S19, 10t TMP ; SALE DATQ 01 /00/86 SALE AMT ! LOAN AMT ! EXEMPT ! H BLT ; PMS : BD BTH TOT UNITS : LOTSQFT : 399445 SQFT ! ---------------------------------- ------- ------- -------------------------------------- APQ 620-190-017 STTUS : OWNER ; TAYLOR RICHARD 8 TR LEGAL : 19 , 17 A0 M/L IN POR NE 1/4 OF SEC 4 T5 MAIL : 820 TROFTER CIVILAS VEGAS NU 9910 ? USE ! YR-VACANT - RESIDENTIAL ASO ; 1763, 114 IMP : t BALE DATE ! 05/00/86 SALE AM0 LOAN AMT ! EXEMPT : N BLT ! RMS : AD BIN TOT UNITS : LOTSQFT ! 835045 SQFT : -- ------------------------------------- --- ----- ---------------- ------------------- hSEARCH COMPLETE ; 3 RECORDS READ, RETURNED : THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN DEEMED RELIABLE, BUT TO NOT GUARA(;TEE)) COPYRIGHT TRW 1936 ICI SEARPH OPTIONS SELECTElu CITY CODE ; SALE DATE < YY MM , USE CODE SALE PRTCE T YONING VOTAL ASSESSED 1 SQUARE FEET PRICE PER Sq FT LOTSQFT/ACRE� PERCENT TMPROUED YEAR BUILT OWNER ( OCCUPTEWO , ABSENTEE=A ; BEDROOMS UNITS BATHROOMS TYPE OF PARKING POOL ? ( Y OR N ) 11/20/09 UNIUEPqAL TITLE CORP . PAGE PREPARED FOR : REQUESTED BY � RV REP1 --------------- ----------------- --- ---------------------- ----------------- -------- APH : 626-020-038 SITUS : QWNERI MORRY DESERT FALLS INC ( CR LEGAL : 161 . 65 AC M/L. IN POP PAR 104 PM 100109 mAIL ! AOO TAHQUTTZ WAY STE CIPALM SPRINGS CA 92262 USE ! RX-EXCEPTIONAU PI SID (NO COMP Ago ! 14 , 219 , 400 !MR : A% SALE DATE ; 10/00/88 SALE AMT ! LOAN AMT : EXEMPT : N OLT ! RMS : BD BTH TOT UNITS : LOTSQFT ; 7041474 SqFT : ---------- ------- ----- ---------------------------------------------------- --- ----- *SEARCH COMPLETE ! I RECORDS READ , RETURNED ! I THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS DEEMED RELIABLE, BUT IS NOI OUARANTEED COPYRIGHT TRW 19W.) SEARPH OPTIONS SELECTED CITY CORE : TALE DATE < YY MMV USE CODE SALE PRICE S ZnNTN(.l TOTAL ASSESSED �r' SqUARE FEE ! PRICE PER Sq FT T LOTSqFT/ACRE: PERCENT IMPROVED YEAR BUTLY OWNER ( OCCUPTEWO , ABSENTEE=A ) BEDROOMS UNI T S BATHROOMS TYPE OF PARKTHFi POOL? CY OR N ' 11/20/29 UNTUERSAL TITLE CORP , PAGE I PREPARED FOR : REQUESTED BY : R J REP ! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ APW 626-020-027 SITUS ; OWNEV VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS INC LEGAL ; 11 , 46 AC M/L IN POR PAR 2 PM 100/090 P MAIL : C/O JAMES TEMPLE ; 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USQ YR-UACANT - RESIDENTIAL Aso ! $737, 548 ThPi % TALE DATE ; 02/00/89 SALE AMT : LOAN AMT : EXEMPT ! N BLT : RMS ! BD BTH TOT UNITS : LOTSQFT ; 499197 NET ! ...l..........-.-.............I..........----------------------- ---------------------------------- ----- -- ---- xSEARCH COMPkETE ! I RFCOPD5 READ, RETURNED : 1. THE lNFORMATTON PROVIDED IS DEEMED RELTABIE , BUT 19 NOT GUARANTEED COPYRIGHT TRW 198.5 TEPRPH UPTTONS SELECTEF: CITY CODE ; SALE DATE 4yy MM: USE CODE SALE PRICE T ZONTNG TOTAL ASSESSED I SQUAPC FEET PRICE PEP Sq FT 1 LOTSqrTZACR[ PERCENT TMPROUED YEAR BUILT OWNER (OCCUPTED=O, ABSENTEEM BEDROOMS UNI TS BATHROOMS TYPE OF PARVINIJ POOLT (Y OR N) 11120159 UNTUERSAL TITLE CORP . PAGE PREPARED FOR : REQUESTED BY : K) PEP : -------------- ------ ------------------------------------------------ - -------- APN : 626-020-060 STTUS : OWNER ! WILUAS AT DESERT FALLS THC LEGAL : 24 AC M/L IN POR PAD 2 PM 100/090 Pm MAIL ! C/O jAMFS TEMPLE ; 747 EUGENE RDIPALM SPRINGS CA 922A4 USE ! YR-UACANT - RESIDENTIA! ASB ! 115, 407 IMP SALE DATV 02/00/89 SALE AMT ! LOAN AMT ! EXEMPT ; N BLT ! RMS : BD RTH TOT UNITS ! UOTSQFT ; 10454 SQFT : ----------------- -------------------- -- - ---- - ----- ------ ------------ ------ -------- *SEARCH COMPILETE : I RECORDS READ, RETURNED ; I THE INFORMATION PROUIDED IS DEEMED RELIABLE, BUT IS NOT GUARANTEED COPYRIGHT TRW 1986 UNIVERSAL TITLE CORP . PAGE 1. PREPARED FOR : REPUESTED BY ; pk) REP : ---- ------------- ---------------- - ------ ------------ -------------------- ---- ----- APN ! 626-300-001 GITUS ; OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL ! . 29 AC MIL IN LOT I MR 195/073 TP 2572 MAIL : 747 EUGENE RD; PAILM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE ; RI-SINGLE FAMELY RESIDENCE ASD : 127 , 800 IMP ; I SALE DATE ; SALE ANT : LOAN ANT ! EXEMPT : BUT : RMS01) BTH TOT UNITS : LGTSQFT : 12632 QQFT : ------------------ ---------------------------- - ---- --------------- ---- -------- APN ! 626-300-002 SITIPS : OWNER , UTULAS AT nESERT FALLS CPT LWA0 . 22 AC M/L TN KOT 2 NO 193=3 TR 2572 MAIL ; 747 FUGENE RD ; PALM SPRIMPS CA 9226 -'� USE : RI-SINGUE FAMILY RESIDENCE ASO , 127 , 800 IMP ! X SALE DATE ! SALE ANT ! LOAN AW : EXEMPT ! C: OLT : RMs : BO ATH TOT UNTA'Si LOTSQFT : 95W SQFT � ------ --- ----------------- ----------------------------------- ------------- -------- APN ; 626-200-003 STTUS ! OWNER : UTULAS AT DESERF FALLS ( PT LEGAU : 23 AC M/U IN LOT 3 MA 195/073 TR MAW 747 EUGENE R la: PALM RPRTNGS CA 92264 USE ! RI -SINGLE FAMILY RESTBENCE: ASD : 127, 800 IMP ! SALE DATE ! SALE ANT ! LOAN ANT : EXEMPTi N! BUT ; RM3Qu BTH TOT UNITS ; KOTSQFT : 10019 SQFT : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------................ APN : 626-300-004 SITUS ; OWNER , UILUA2 AT DESERT FALLS ( PT LEGAL ! . 22 AC M/L TN LOT 4 NO 195/073 TR 2372 MATL : 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE ! RI -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ASB : $27, 200 THP ! SALE DATE ; SALE ANT ! LOAN AMT EXEMPT : N OLT : RMS : AD DTH TOT UNITS : LOTSQFT : 9583 SQFT ! ---------- ---------------------------- ---------------- ----------------------------- APN : 626-300-005 SIT US ! OWNER ; VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL : 32 AC M/U IN LOT 5 MB t95/073 TR 2372 MAIL: 747 EUGENE RDjPALM SPRINGS CA-11267 USE ; RI-SINBLE FAMILY RESTDENCF.: ASO : $27 , 200 IMP : SALE DATE : SALE ANT ! LOAN ANT ! EXEMPT ! N 8LT : RM% BA) RTH TOT UNITS ; LOTSQFI ; 13939 2QFT : - ------------------------- ----------------- --- - ------------------------ ----- -- ---- APNi 626-300-006 SITUT : OWNER : VILLA? AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL : 32 AC M/L TH LOT 6 NO 1?5/073 TR 2372 MAW 747 EUGENE RTPALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE : PI-STNGLE FAMTLY RESIDENCE ABU ! 127 , 800 IMP ; SALE DATQ SALE ANT ! LOAN AMT ! EXEMPT : Nt 8LT ! RMS ! BD RTH TOT UNTTS : LOTSQFT ! 13939 SQFT ; ---------------------------- --------------------------------------- ------- - ------- APN : 626-300-007 SITUS ! OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL : . 31 AC M/L IN LOT 7 NO 195/073 TR 2372 MAIL ; 747 EUGENE RDYPALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE ! PI-STHOLE FAMTLV RESIDENCE ASO ! Z27, 800 IMP : % SALE DATE ! SALE ANT ! LOAN ANT : EXEMPT ; N OLT ! RMSIBD DTH TOT UNITS : LOTSQFT : 13504 qQFT : -- ----------- - - --------------- ----------------- -------- --------------- ------------ THE INFORMATION PROVIDED Al DEEMED RELIABLE , RUA 19 NOT GUARANTEED COPYRIGHT TRW j ?0A 11/20/89 UNIVERSAL TITLE: CORP . PAGE 2 PREPARIED FOR ; REPUEi'STED BY : IRV REP : -------- ------------------------------------- ----------- -------------------------- APN ; 626--300-008 SITUS : IWNE:R : VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS ( PT LEGAL : , 23 AC M/L IN LOT 3 MD 195/073 TR 2372 MAIL : 747 EUGENE RDI PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 I)SE: RI-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ASD : 127. 800 IMP : '/. BALE DATE ; SALE: AMT : LOAN AMT : I: XFMPT : N ALT : RMS : DD LATH TOT UNITS : LOTSQPT : 1.001.9 SQFT : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- APN ; 626-300-009 SITUS ; OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS ( PT LEGAL : . 20 AC M/I.- IN LOT 9 MD 1.95/073 TR 237 '. 'FAIL.. : 747 EUGENE RD; PAL.M SPRINGS CA 92264 USE : RI-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ASO : $27, 800 IMP : SALE DATE ; SALE, AMT : LOAN AMT : EXEMPT : N OLT : RMS : DD OTH TOT UNITS : L..OTSQFT : 8712 SNFT : --------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- APN : 626--300-010 SITUS ; OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL : . 20 AC M/I... IN LOT 1.0 MB 1.95/073 TR 237 'FAIL ; 747 EUGENE: RI:I; PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE ; RI-9T.NGLE: FAMILY RESIDENCE ASD : $27, 800 IMP : /. SALE: DATE : SALE AMT : LOAN AMT : EXEMPT ! N OLT : RMS ; BD BTH TOT UNITS : LOTSQFT : 871.2 SQFT : --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- APN : 626-300-01.1. SITUS : OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS ( PT LEGAL : . 2.0 AC M/L. IN I_GT it MR 1.95/073 TR 237 MAIL: 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE :: RI-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ASD : 127, 800 IMP : L SALE DATE ; SALE AMT ; LOAN AMT : EXEMPT : N OLT ; RMS ; BD BTH TOT UNITS : LOTSRFT : 871.2 SQFT : --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- APN : 626-300 -012 SITUS : OWNER , VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS ( PT ,1_FGAk : . 24 Ar M/L. IN LOT 12 MB 195/073 TR 237 rRA:TI._ : - 747 EUGENE RDj PAL..M SPRINGS -CA 11264 -- USE ! RI -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE: ASD : $27, 800 IMP : 4: SALE DATE : SALE AMT : LOAN AMT : EXEMPT : N 81_T : RMS : BD BTH TOT UNITS : L.OTSQFT : 1.0454 SOFT : ----------------------------------------------- ----------------------- ------------ APN : 626-300 -01.3 SITUS : OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS ( PT LEGAL : . 23 AC M/L. IN LOT 13 MB 195/07:3 TR 2.:37 MAIL ; 747 EUGENE RD; PAL..M SPRINGS CA 9:2264 IISE ; RI-SINBLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ASD : %27, 800 IMP ! G SALE DATE : SALE AMT : LOAN AMT ; EXEMPT : N OLT : RMS : DD BTH TOT UNIT% LOT SQFT : 1.0019 SQFT : --------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- APN : 626-300-'01.4 SITUS : OWNER : VI:I_I_AS AT DESERT FALLS ( PT LEGAL : . 23 AC; M/L- IN LOT 1.4 MB 195/073 TR 237 MAIL.. : 747 EUGENE RD, PAI_L-7 SPRINGS CA 9:2264 USE ! RI-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE A SO ; S27, 800 ' MP : SALE DATE:' ; SALE AMT : LOAN AMT ; EXEMPT ! N AL.T : RMS ; BD BTH TOT UNITS : L-OTSQFT : 1.0019 SQFT ; ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------- THE I:NFORMATTCN PROVIDED IS DEEMED REnTABLE , BUT IS NOT GUARANTEED COPYRIGHT TRW 1986. 11/20/89 UNIVERSAL TITLE CORP , PAGE PREPARED FOR ! RQUESTED KV . R U REP ! ------ - --------------------- ----- ------ - -------- -- ------- --- - --- ------------- - APN : 626-100 -015 TITUS : OWNER ! UIULAS AT DESERT FALLS ( PT LEGAL ! . 23 AC M/L IN LOT 15 NO 195/073 TR 237 MAIL ! 747 EUGENE RDIPALM SPRINGS CA 9226-a USE ! RI-SINKLE FAMILY PEST _II NCI Asol 127 , ROO IMP : SALE DATE ! SALE ANT ; LOAN ANT : EXEMPT ! lj AIT : RMq ; BD BTH TOT UNITS : uOTSQFT : 10019 SQFT ; - ...........------ ----................................--- -------------------------- -------------------------- APN ! 626-300-016 SITUS ; OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL ; 26 AC M/L IN LOT 16 MB t95/073 TR 237 MAIL : 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE : RI -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE: ASO ; T27 , 000 IMP : SALE DATQ TALE ANT ! LOAN ANT ; EXEMPT : N OLT : RmS : AD ATH TOT UNITS ; LOTSQFT ! 11326 SqFT ! ------- ---------- - ----------- -- ------- -------- -- ---------------------- ------ ------ APH ! 626-000-017 TITUS : OWNER ! VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS fPT LEGAL : . 24 AC M/L IN LOT 17 MB 195/073 TR 23 ? MAIL ! 747 EUGENE RD ; PAlLM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE ! RI-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Aso ! 127, 800 IMP ; .� SALE DATE ; SALE ANT : LOAN AMT : EXEMPT : N BLT ! RmS ; BA OTH TOT UNITS : LOTSQFT ! 10454 SQFT ; ------------ ----- -------------------------------- ---------------- -------------- APNE 626-300-010 SITUS ; OWNER ! VILLAS AT •DESERT FALLS •CPT LEGAL : 22 AC M/L IN LOT 18 MB 195/073 TP 27'' MAILi 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRYNOS CA 92264 USE ! PI-STNGLE FAMILY RESTDFNCI:i: ASD : $27 , RQ0 IMP ! 111; SALE DATE ; SALE ANT ! LOAN ANT ; EXEMPT ! N RLT : RMSQD DTH TO UNITS ! LOTSQFT : 9583 SQFT ; - -------- --------- ------------------------ ------------------- ------------------------ ARN ! 626-300-019 SITUS : OWNER ! VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS ( PT LEGAL ! 21 AC M/L IN LOT L9 NO 195/073 TR 23 .1 MAIL : 747 EUGENE RO ; PALIM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE ! PI....STNOUE FAMILY RESIDENCE ASO ! 127, 000 IMP : SALE DATE ! SALE AMT : LOAN ANT : EXEMPT : N OLT ! RMS : BD BT14 TOT UNITS ! LOTSQFT ! 9148 SQFT : - ..................................------- --------....-------------................------------ ------ -------- ---- --------- APN : 626-300-020 SITUS ! OWNER ; VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS ( PT LEGAL ; . 21 AC M/L IN LOT 20 MB 195/073 TR 23 ' MATL ; 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE : RI-SINBLE FAMILY RETTDENCL:: AS% 127 , BOO IMP ! SALE DATQ TALE ANT ; LOAN ANT : FKFMPT : H BLT ; RMSiBD BT14 TOT UNITS , LOT3QFT : 9148 SQF0 ...........................-------------------- ---- ------ ---------------------------........................................................... APN ; 626-300-021 STTUS : OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS ( PT LEGAL ; . 21 AC M/L IN LOT 21 MB 195/n77 TR 231' MAIL ; 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE : RI-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ASO : $27 , 200 IMP ! SALE DATE ! SALE ANT ; LOAN AMV EAKMPT : tJ BLT : RMS : BO OTH ..I UNITS : LQT9QFT ; 914T SOFT : ---------------------------------------------------- -------- --- ------ --- ---- -- --- THE INFORMATION PROUTnEn IS DEEMED RELIABLE, BUY 19 NOT GUARANTEED COPYRTRHT TRW 39Q', I I TiNITUERSAI Tj 7 COPP , PABE 41 PREPARED VOW: REQUESTED BY ! RV REP --- - ------------------ ----------------- - -- -- ---------- -- ------------- --- - --------- APN ; 626-500-022 STTUS : OWNER : UILIAS AT DESERT FAuLT CPT LEGAL : . 31 AC M/K IN LOT 22 MB 195/073 TR JZ7 MAIL : 747 EUGENE RD ; PALM SPRINGS CA Y2264 jSE ! RI-SINGLE FAMILY RESTDEN&F Asu ! 127 , soo IMP ! X SALE DATE ! HALE AMT LOAN ANT : EXEMPT ! N OLT : RMs : BO wTH TOY UNITS ; LOTSQFTi 13504 SQFT : ---- --- ------- --- --- ------------------------ --------------- ------------------ APN ! 626-100 -023 SITU0 OWNER ; VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL ! . 24 AC M/L IN LOT 23 MR 195/073 TR 23 ? MAIL ! 747 EIMENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 UBE ; Rl-SINRLE FAMILY RESTDENCF� AGD : 12 00 7, 8 IMP : ro E SAL DAT0 SALE ANT ; LOAN ANT ; ZXEMPT ; N .;LT ; RMSIBO BTH TOT UNITS : UQTSQFT : 10454 2QFF ; --- ----------- -------- ------------------------- ---- - ----- -- --------------- APN ; 626-300-02A STTUS : OWNER : UILUAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT IEGAL ! . 25 An M/L IN COT 24 MB 195/073 TR 217 MAIL , 747 EUGENE RNPALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE ; RI -SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AS% 127, 800 IMP ! SALE DATE ; SALE ANT ; LOAN ANT : EXEMPT ! N OLT : PMB : BD BTU TOT UNITS : LOTSQFT ; 10390 SQFT ! - --------------- ----------- --- ------------------------------ -------------------- APH ; 626-300-025 SITUS : OWNER : UILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEQALi . 27 AK M/L IN LOT 25 MA 195/073 TR 237 MAIL ; 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE ! RI-SINGLE FAMILY REGTOENCE� AbB ; t27, 800 TMV 51 SALE DATE : SALE AMT � LOAN ANT : EXEMPT ! iN ani ! RMG ! 8D RIM TOT UNITS , LOTSQFT ! 11761 SQFT : i.::L''N 626-300-026 STTUS : OWNER ! UTLLPS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL : 31 AC M/L IN LOT 26 MB 195/073 TR 23 ? MPTIC : ?47 EUGENE ROVALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE ! RI-STNGLE FAMTUY RESTD ENCI:--. ASO : 127 , 800 imp ! HALF DATE : SALE AMT ! LOAN AM0 EXEMPT , N OLT ! RMS ; 8D BTH TOT UNITS : UOTSQFT : 13504 SQFT : -------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APN ! 626-300-027 SITUS : OWNER ! UTLUAS AT DESERT FALLS ( PT CERAL ! 29 AC M/C IN LOT 27 M8 195/073 A 23 .'s MAIL ! 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA 922A4 USE ; RI-STN5LE FAMILY RESIDENC(i: Asw $27, 800 fMP ! SALE DATE ; SALE AM0 LOAN ANT ! EXEMPT ; N BLV ! ,Ufa : 80 RTH TOT UNITS : LOISQFT ; 12632 SqFT : --------------------------------------------- ----------------------- --- -- - ----- APN ; 626-300 -029 STTUS ; OWNER : UTLLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT U=L ! 29 AC M/L IN LOT 2B MB 195/073 TR 20, MAIL ! 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE ! PI-TXNGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ASO ! $27 , 800 TMPi SALE DAT& SALE ANT : LOAN ANT ; EXEMPT ; N OLT ! RMS00 BT14 TOT UNITS : f.OT2QFTi 12632 SQFT ! ------ -------------------------------- ------------------------------------ --- THE INFORMATION PROUTBED IS DEEMED RELIABLE , BHT 10 NOV GUARANTEED COPYRIGHT TRW 1986 11 /20FRO UNIVERSAL rT - Copp PAGE PREPARED WO& REQUESTED an R u PEP : ----------- ---------------------- --- -------------------- APN ; 626-300-029 STTUS ! OWNER ; VILLAS AT DESERT FAUUS ( PT LEGAL ! . 28 AC M/L IN LOT 29 MR 191/073 TR 237 MAIL : 747 EUGENE PWPALM SPRINGS CA 9226,-'� USE : RI-OTNIGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ASB : 127 , 800 IMP : GALE DATQ SALE ANT : LOAN ANT : EXEMPT : N OLT : RMG : BD HTH TOT UNITS ! LOTSQFT ; 12197 SQFT : --- ---------- ------------- ------- ------------- --- ------ ---------- -- ----------- APQ 626 -300-030 BITHS : OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT FAULS vPT LEGAL : 25 AC M/L IN LOT 30 MR 194/Q73 IR 23 '' MAIL : 747 EUGENE RB; PALM SPRTNGK CA 92264 USE ! RI-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND ! 127, 300 IMPi SALE DATE : SALE AN I ! LOAN ANT : EXEMPT : H BLT ; PHS &D BTH TO UNETT : LOTSQFT : 10090 SqFT : ------------- ----------------- ---------------------- -------- --------- ------------- APN : 626 -300-031 SITU& OWNER ! VWLAS AT DESERT FALUS CPT LETiAl ; . 22 AC NO IN LOT 11 M8 195/073 TR 23 ,., MATW 747 EUGENE RWPALM SPRTNRR CA 52264 USE ; PI-SINWE FAMILY RESTDFNCE. ASO : S27 , 800 W ! SALE DATE : SALE AMT ; LOAN ANT ! EXEMPT : N PUT ! RM500 BTH TOT UNITS : LOTSQFTi 0583 SQFT ; --- -------- ----------- ----- ----------- ---------- ----------------------------- ----- APH , 626-100-032 SITUG : OWNER ! UILUAT AT DESERT WCUS CPT LEGAL : . 22 AC M/1 IN LOT 32 NO 195/070 TP 237 MAIL : 747 EUGENE RBIPALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE ! PT-SINOLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ASD ! M27 , 000 THP : SALE DATE : SALL AM0 LOAN AMT ; EXEMPT : N OLT : PMS : BD BTH TOT UNITS ; LOTSqFT ; 9523 SQFT : -------- ------ -------------- ----------------------------------- --------- --------- APH ! 626-300-033 STTUS ; OWNER ! VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL ; 23 AC M/L IN LOT 33 MR 195/073 TR 23 - MAIL ! 747 FUMENE RDIPALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE : RI-STNOLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ASD : •127 , 900 IMP : SALE DATE : SALE ANT : LOAN ANT ; EXEMPT : N PUT : RMS : BTJ BIH TOT UNITS ! LOTSQFT : IQ019 SQPT : --- ---------------- ----- ------------------------------------- ------ ---------- APN : 626-300-014 21TUS ; jWNER ! VILLAS AT DESERT FALCO CPT CEGAU : 30 AC M/L IN LOT 54 MR 195/073 TR 23 '' MAIL ; 747 EUGENE RD ; PAlLM SPRING$ CA 92264 USE ! RI -SINOLU FAMWY RESIDENCE AW S27, 800 IMP ; SALE D ATE ! RA LE AMT ! LOAN ANT ; EXEMPT : N OLT : RMS : BD BTH TOT UNITS : LOTSQFT : 13068 SQPT : ----------- -------- ------------------------------ -------- ---------------- --------- APH : 626-300-035 SITUT : OUNEP ; UILLaS AT DESERT FAS 0 I 5 • 7 23UL LEGAL ; . 2 O193/ - MAIL : 747 EUGENE RBIPALM SPRTNSS CA 92264 080 PI-SINGLE FAMTLY RESTDENCI�K AST) i 127, 800 TMP , SALE DATE ! SALE AMT : LOAN AMI EXEMPT : N BUT ! RMS ! RD BTH TOT UNITS : LOTSQFT ; 8712 SQFT : ------- ------- ---------- -------- ---------- --- ------ ----- ----------------- ------- THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS DEEMED RELIABLE, BUT T1 NOT GUARANTEED COPYRIGHT TRW 1906 1.1J20/ 39 UN.T.VI=RSAL TT E CORP , s PAGE 6 PREPARED POP; REQUESTED & RVREP---- -------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- APN : 626--300 -036 SITUS : OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL : . 21 AC M/I_. IN LOT 36 MO 1.9. /073 TR 237 MAIL ; 747 EUGENE RDj PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE : RI-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ASO : R27 . 800 IMP : 'TALE. DATE: : SALE AMT ; LOAN AMT : EXEMPT : N OL.,T ; RMS : 80 BTH TOT UNITS : LOTSQFT : 9'1.48 SQFT : ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- APN : 626-300-037 SITUS : OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL_ : , 21. AC M/L. IN LOT 37 MLi 1.95/073 TR 237 MAIL : 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE : RI-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ASO : $27 . 800 IMP ; 1t SALE DATE : SALE: AMT : LOAN AMT ; EXEMPT : N BCT : RM S ; t 4 BTH TOT UNITS : LOTSQFT : 91.43 SQFT ; --------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- APN : 626--300--0:38 SITUS : OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL : . 24 AC: M/I_ IN LOT 30 MD 1.95/073 TR 237 MATT.- ; 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE ; RI-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ASO : $27 . 80Q IMP : %/ SALE DATE: SALE AMT : LOAN AMT : EXEMPT ; N BLT : RMS : BD BTH TOT UNITS : LOTSQFT ; 10454 SQFT : --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- APN : 626-300-039 SITUS : OWNER ; VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL_ : . 22 AC M/!_ IN I_QT 39 MD 1.95/073 TR 237 MAIL ; 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA 9226.1 USE : RI-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AST? : $27, 800 7:MP : Z SALE DATE : SALE AMT ; LOAN AMT ; EXEMPT : N BLT : RMS : BO BTH TOT UNITS : L.OTSQFT : 9983 SQPT : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- APN : 626-300'-040 SITUS : OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL ; . 21 AO M/I- IN LOT 40 MR 1.95/073 TR 237 MAIL : 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRTNGS CA 92264 USE : RI-SINGLE: FAMILY RESIDENCE: ASO ; Z27 . 800 IMP ; i SALE DATE : SALE AMT ; LOAN AMT : EXEMPT : N $I_T : RMS : BD BTH TOT UNITS : LOTSQFT ; 91.48 .SQFT : APN ; 626-300--041. SITUS ; OWNER ; VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL_ : . 20 AC M/L- IN LOT 41. MR 1.95/073 TR 237 MAIL : 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA 9 264 USE : RI-SINOUE FAMILY REESIDENCE. ASO : $27: 800 IMP : i SALE DATE : SALE AMT : LOAN AMT ; EXEMPT : N BLT : RMS : BD BTH TOT UNITS : LOT QFT : 871.2 SQFT : --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- APN : 626-300-042 SITUS : OWNER ; VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL : 22 AC M/1._ IN LOT 42 MB 1.95/07:3 TR 237 MAIL. ; 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE : RI-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ASL1 ; $27: 000 IMP : SALE DATE. : SALE AMT ; LOAN AMT ; EXEMPT ; N ALT : RMS ! BD RTH TOT UNITS : I_OTSQFT ; 9503 SQFT ; ------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- THE INFORMATION PROVIDED 19 DEEMED RELIABLE, BHT IS NOT GUARANTEED COPYRIGHT TRW ],= - - UNIVERSAL- T' P CORP , PAGE: 7 PREPAREU VOO: REQUESTED 1 RV REP : -...---_.--..........-.-.-.._- ___ __--.-...----.-..--.....------...-------..-..--.....---------..-.- ------..--.....-----._....._._-..--.-..- ---.-.--- APN : 626-300 -043 STTUS : OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL : . 23 AC M/L.. TN L..OF 43 H13 1.95/073 TR 237 MAIL : 747 EUGENE; RD; PAL.M SPRINGS CA 92264 USE : R1. -STNGL.E FAMILY RESIDENCE ASO : S27, 800 IMP ! u BALE DATE: SALE AMT : LOAN AMT : EXEMPT : Y. P•L.T : RMS : DD 8TH TOT UNITS : I_GTSQFT : 1.001.9 SQFT : ---.-.-......--.--- --_..--.-._------- -----------'__._._-.----__ ---...__..-.__...__-.-----__----------_..-._ ------- - -.-....----._....._ A-RN : 626-•300-044 STTUS : OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL : , :34 AC M/L- IN I_GT 44 MB 1.95/073 TR 231 MAIL : 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE : RI-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AST1 : $27, 800 IMP : x SALE: DATE : SALE AMT ; LOAN AMT : EXEMPT : N TILT : RMS : BD BTH TOT UNITS : I-OT'SQFT : 1431.0 SQ T : -------------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------------- APT. : 626-300-045 SITUS : OWNER ; VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL ; , 23 AC M/I... IN LOT 45 MB 1.95:07:3 TR 237 MAIL : 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE : RI-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ASD : $27, 800 IMP : Y SALE DATE : SALE AMT : LOAN AMT : EXEMPT : N BL..T ; RMS ; BD BTH TOT UNITS : LOTSQFT : 1001.9 ShQF'T : ....-- --......-.-.... --.----....._.__.._-..---_.- --_..---.-----_.-..---..-_.-..--..-.-....._._.__.-_._._-......-._... --..-...-_.- -_....._.--.-..-"------- APN : 626 -300-046 STTUS : OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT PALLS CPT LEGAL. : 22 AC M/I.- IN LOT 46 MB 195/073 TR 237 MAIL. : 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA, 92264 USE : R1.- INGLF FAMILY RESIDENCE ASD : $27, 000 IMP , SALE DATE:: : SALE AMT : LOAN AMT : EXEMPT : N DLT : RMS : I+D BTH TOT UNTT? : I-OTSQFT : 9583 SQFT : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- APN ; 626-300 -047 S:I:TUS : OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL : 23 AC M/I._ IN LOT 47 MO 1.95.'073 TR 237 MAIL- ; 747 EUGENE RD; PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE : RI-STNGL..E: FAMILY RESIDENCE: ASD : $27: &O IMP : V. SALE DATE : SALE AMT : LOAN AMT : EXEMPT : N OLT : RM900 BTH TOT UNITS : LOTS6IFT : 10019 bgFT : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- APN : 626-:300-049 STTUS : - OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL. : . $23 AC; M/I- IN LOT 40 MD 1.95/07:3 TR 237 MAIL.. : 747 EUGENE RD; PAI._M SPRINGS CA 92264 USE : RI--SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AID ; $27, 500 IMP : SALE DATE ; SALE AMT : LOAN AMT : EXEMPT : N BL-T : RMS : BD BTH TOT UNITS : LOTSQ T : 1.2197 SgFT : ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- APN : 626-300 -049 STTUS : OWNER : VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL : . 35 AC M/I- IN LOT 69 MB 1.95/073 TR 217 MAIL : 747 EUGENE RD; PAL..M SPRINGS CA 92264 USE ! YY-VACANT LAND ASD : %22, .500 IMP : SALE DATE : SALE AMT ; LOAN AMT : EXEMPT : N OL.T : RMS : jD PTH TOT UNITS : L,OT'SQFT : 15246 SQFT : ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS DEEMED RELIABLE, BUT IS NOT GUARANTEED III' COPYRIGHT TRW 1956 11/20/8? IJNT :111ERG1..: _. T E COPP . PAGE G PREPARED VOW; REQUERTEL Y : REP : - ---------- -- ------------------------------------------- ----- ---- ---- - ------------ APO : 626-500-050 SITUS : "KNER ! VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL ! . 89 AC M/1 IN LOT K NO 195/073 TR 207,*.. =10 747 EUGENE RDIPALM SPRINGS CA 9226;' I. YS-VACANT - MISC . iMPROUEM EN If ASO ! $57 , 3no imp : SPLF DATE : SALE PHTi LOAN ANT : EXEMPT : NJ OLT ; RMS ; BD BTH TOT UNITS : LOTSqFT ! 107oR TQFT ! ---------------------------- ----------- ------- ----------------- -------------- --- APN ; 626-300-051 SITUS ; OWNER ! VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS CPT LEGAL ! 2 74 W M/L IN POP LOT C AND LOTS R , li�� MAIL : 747 EUGENE RDIPALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE : Y2-UACANT - MISC , !MPROVEMENT ASD : 1176 , 500 IMP ! BALE DATA TALE AMT : LOAN ANT ! ETEMPT ! N 811 : PMS : 8D BTH TOT UNITS ; LOTSQFT : 119354 SqFT : ------------------ -- ------ ----- -------------------------- ----------- ----- --- ----- APN ! SITH0 OWNER : VILLAS AT DRSERY FALLS CPT LEWAL : . 26 AC M/L IN POR LOT AB NO 195/07$ T!'' MAIL ; 747 EUGENE RDYPALM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE ! YT-UACANT LAND ASO ! $16 , 700 IMP : BALE DATE ; BALE ANT ; LOAN ANT ; EXEMPT : N OLT : RM5QB BTH TOT UNITS : LOISQFT ! 11326 SQFT ! ---- ---------- ------------------------------ ---------------------- --- - ------- ........ APN : 626-300-051 SITUM OWNER ; VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS ( PT LEGAL ! . 30 AC M/L IN POP LOT 70 NO 195/073 TR MAIL : 747 EUGENE RD ; PAKM SPRINGS CA 92264 USE ! YS-UACANr - MISC iMPROUEMENC ASD ; 11.?, 300 imp ! IX SALE DATE ; SALE ANT : LOAN ANT ; EXEMPT ; N 8LT ; RMS ! RD YTH TOT UNITS ! LOTSQFT ; 11068 S"FT : ---------------- --------------- - ----- -------- --------------- -------- ------- --- ---- APNi 626-300-054 SITUSz OWNER ; WILIAS AT DESERT FALLS ; PT IEGAL : i5 AC M/U IN LOT 72 MD 195/071 TR 201 MAIL ! 747 EUGENE RD ; PALM SPRTNGS CA 92264 USE ; YY- VACANT LAND ASD ; 110, 000 IMP : SALE DATE ; SALE A= LOAN ANT : FIEMPT : N DLT ! RMS &D BTH TOT UNITS : UOTSQFT : 6534 TqFT ! ------------------------ - ---- - ---- --- ----------------------- ----- ------- -- -------- kSEPPCH COMPLETE : 54 RECORDS READ, RETURNED : 54 THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS DEEMED RELIABLE , BUT K NOT GUARANTEED COPYRIGHT TRU iYEA 626-190-008,009,017 THOMAS H. TAYLOR RICHARD TAYLOR 820 TROTTER CIR. LAS VEGAS, NV. 89107 626-190-016 JOHN R. & JUDITH MORTON, TRUST 316 LA RAMBLA SAN CLEMENTE, CA. 92672 (P.I.Q.) 620-190-015 THOMAS H. TAYLOR RICHARD TAYLOR 22931 CALLE AZORIN LAKE MISSION VIEJO, CA.92692 626-020-038 MORRY DESERT FALLS INC. 600 TAHQUITZ WAY STE. C PALM SPRINGS, CA. 92262 626-020-057,060 VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS INC. j C/O JAMES TEMPLE 747 EUGENE RD. PALM SPRINGS, CA. 92264 626-300-001 THRU 626-300-054 VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS 747 EUGENE RD. PALM SPRINGS, CA. 92264 i � I i I i 626-190-008,009,017 THOMAS H. . TAYLOR, RICHARD TAYLOR 820 TROTTER CIR. LAS VEGAS, NV. 89107 626-190-016 JOHN R. & JUDITH MORTON, TRUST 316 LA RAMBLA SAN CLEMENTE, CA. 92672 (P.I.Q.) 620-190-015 THOMAS H. TAYLOR RICHARD TAYLOR 22931 CALLE AZORIN LAKE MISSION VIEJO, CA.92692 626-020-038 MORRY DESERT FALLS INC. 600 TAHQUITZ WAY STE. C PALM SPRINGS, CA. 92262 626-020-057,060 VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS INC. C/O JAMES TEMPLE 747 EUGENE RD. PALM SPRINGS, CA. 92264 626-300-001 THRU 626-300-054 . VILLAS AT DESERT FALLS 747' EUGENE RD. PALM SPRINGS, CA. 92264 j INrFIUFFICE NEMORAND M City of Palm Desert TO: Clyde Chittenden, Palm Desert Fire Marshal FROM: Assistant City Manager/Director of Ccnminity Development DATE: April 20, 1990 SUBJBCr: Attached Street Name Request Please provide your comments to the department of community development as soon as possible on the acceptability of the attached proposed street name. Thank you. �RAMON A. DIAZ \\ ASSISTANT CITY MANAGE} DIREKTOR OF CO'MUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING /tm aGUSON 46-414 ROUDEL LANE 1990 LA DUINTA, CA 92253 CO,Y,hlUtviG dtl a.,r:,-_ (619) 342-O0SB April 4, 1990 City of Palm Desert Planning Dept. Attn: Mr. Ramon A. Diaz, Dir. of Comm. Development 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, Ca 92260 Subject: Project name and street name for Tract 25639, Cook Street, mile south of Frank Sinatra Drive. Dear Mr. Diaz, In behalf of my client, Desert Mirage Ltd. , Inc, I am requesting approval of proposed project name and street name for subject tract. Project name proposed is "Desert Mirage". One street name, "Desert Mirage Drive", is proposed for the interior loop street. Please review and let me know if these names are acceptable with the pertinent City and City contract agencies. Enclosed for reference is a copy of the approved tentative map. Final tract map and improvement plans have been submitted to Public Works for first plan check. Please call if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, � Z�Daniel Fer EZr^ encl. IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT - -♦ TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 = ' r BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST '- QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF �La ii THE NORTHEAST OUARTER OF _-Y� - SEC. 4 T.S.S. R.6.E S.B.B.M. .�•j.`'=-�S�t}_� petlm DECEMBER 1989 -+. -� ~j'�=•fJ�! J i N1 17 � 28 .an• .er •� .om 29 19 — I-1 21 __ n•a P` ==mace-- a -. I QVO LI [Rd u L1 LJ 11 L@&Q IJ fl 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. TT 25639 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by Roelco Development for approval of a 30 lot single family subdivision on 9.2 acres within the PR-5 zone on the west side of Cook Street between Frank Sinatra Drive and Country Club Drive, also particulary described as: A.P.N. 62.0- 190-016 I SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, January 16, 1990 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to tl-re city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Sun RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary January 5, 1990 Palm Desert Planning Commission INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM CITY OF PALM DESERT TO: Planning Department JAN 3 1990 FROM: Brent Conley "O"Urmrr DEVELaPMEN u.ctrr cin IF PALM DESEet SUBJECT: TT25639 DATE: January 3, 1990 The Police Department does not have any comment on the project. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at ext. 288. Brent Conley Crime Preventi n Officer eb FROM: l9ren# (nonleg CRIME PREVENTION TO: /-�G�✓/✓i.✓( Ae,iF.' 77- 26-16 39 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE 346.0611 PALM DESERT,CA 92260 EXT. 288 c :f1;U;; 73-5 10 1 IIEO WAHING DIIIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFOIINIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 RCQl1I_!31 FOfl COIiII1:Pl1S A"O COMIIIONS OF APPIiOVAL CASs rJc,(,) : 7-7_266-3,9 PROJECT: S6tl/o%pi3ion o <��. x . fa. nPPL I cnr•1 r: Fnr, lO^erl ueotedplea^n: fln(l teing rcd materir)- Is dr ,crihing 3 protect for which the following Is // / / �9.,2 � �3 l Y �l ,�-ee ors �,. .� ac.-� s� ✓%O�S' �f ,ti/ pl{r J/ `3 {"-�� / t ��n � /gyp �Fr.% !/, ,✓�r' c�� w- &.70 u L O � a TS'.r �IrF es le, 1 rc l .i.n hrd clal;a wa: s �P/)Pl lcant � C2C7 -/tO —O/� for ccnnmants and re( nn endedg ootul l t irons of i approval .l s l he city r Is rdi Interested to you In thr, probable impacts on the environment ( Including land, air, water, minerals , flora, fauna, nolse, objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and concern.rpronnnende(I condlt.ions Of approval based on your expertise and area of Yol". comments and recononenfed conditions of approval roust be received by this office prior to 4 : 30 l:,.m. _ �17�/ jLIO In Order to be discussed by the land division comtnlf:tee, lire hi+l) ' dlvislon committee (comprised of director of connnunity development, city bu1 )(11ng official , city engineer, fire marshal ,and a rep"(1sertaLive of CVWU ) (rlII (liscuss the comments and recommencipci conditions of approval and will forward them to the planning commission through the sr,nff= report. Any InfOI-11)(1tion received by this office after the recelpt deadline will noL be discussed by the land dlvislofi conanittee. Sincerely, -------- RANON A . DIAZ O I REC I OR OF COI IIIIIN I TY UGV1=I.OI>f l�PI I /PLAIJN I tJG ' /Lm A1;1'arhlttnllt^ ITT!,;;_ LII III lag';^rtlf, MMYTES ARCHIITECIURAL MMISSION JANUARY 23, 1990 5. CASE NO.: APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): L. TIANO AND COMPANY, 75-110 St. Charles Place, Suite 1, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJELT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary architectural design approval and landscaping plan approval LOCATION: Parcel located east of 75-110 St. Charles Place with frontage on St. Charles Place ZONE: SI Applicant, Steve Mason, reported that there is a 25' setback on the Hovley Lane side of the project which will not be landscaped. Commissioner Urrutia was concerned that there was no access to the building from this side of complex. Applicant indicated that the Fire Dept. would not allow any parking in this area; therefore, he saw no need to have access on this side. Chairman Gregory felt this area should be landscaped to to keep the area clean for trash and debris. It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner Urrutia to continue the request requiring applicant to present site plan in relation to the properties surrounding Project. Carried 5-0 6. CASE NO.: TT 25639 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CROELCO-DEVff6R�4R4T, 2 Park Plaza, Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92714 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary landscape plans LOCATION: Cook Street north of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 Commission continued case requiring applicant to provide grading plan. Note that applicant was not present. Carried 5-0. 7. CASE NO-: PP 89-34 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): RAY PATSCHECK/BILL ROSSOWRN, 640 No. Tustin #103, Santa Ana, CA 92705 5 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 January 24, 1990 AFbQIITflC1VRAL REVIEW 0944 SSICK ACTION CASE NO.: TT 25639 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROELOO DEVELOR ENT, 2 Park Plaza, Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92714 4 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary landscape plans 1 I LOCATION: Cook Street north of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural cawdssion continued case requiring applicant to provide grading plan. Note that applicant was not present. CI Date of Action: January 23, 1990 Vote: Carried 5-0 ICI (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of I the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. ) -- STAFF OCC4-=S: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be Placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m, the Mnday i prior to the next meeting. I 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 January 9, 1990 ARCHI ECTLWAL REVIEW 0144ESSICN ACTICN CASE NO. : TT 25639 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROELCO DEVELOPMENT, 2 Park Plaza, Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92714 NATURE OF PROJECP/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary landscape plans LOCATICN: Cook Street North of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission continued the case as the applicant was not present. Date of Action: January 9, 1990 Vote: Carried 5-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- STAFF CUTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday prior to the next meeting. ACENDA ITEM NO.: IV-B-3 DATE: January 9, 1990 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CCM IISSICN CASE NO. : TT 25639 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROELOO DEVELOPMENT, 2 Park Plaza, Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92714 NATURE OF PROTECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary landscape plans LOCATICN: Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 of Northeast 1/4, Sect 4 T55, RGE SBBM 620-190-016 ZONE: PR-5 DESCRIPTION: Fifty feet of landscape from the curb has 38 feet of landscape setback with an additional 12 feet of parkway. The landscaping is grass, African slimacs, California pepper, Mexican fan palm. Shrubs include dwarf oleander, hibiscus, cape honeysuckle. Small plants include flame vines, dwarf lantana and African daises. REQ MVENDATIC N: That the preliminary landscape plans be approved. SM/db ISTEROFFICE Nmn�Arro�M City of Palm Desert TO: Clyde Chittenden, Palm Desert Fire Marshal FROM: Assistant City Manager/Director of Community Development DATE: April 20, 1990 - SUBJECT: Attached Street Name Request Please provide your comments to the department of ccamunity development as soon as possible on the acceptability of the attached proposed street name. Thank you. RAN�N A. DIAZ ASSISTANT CITY DIRECTOR OF CU44UNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING /tm le;V X,411Eo Tim- �J PN SIN RHU + W� 6Lq� 46-414 ROUDEL LANE "t 4 1990 C••� LA QUINTA, CA 92253 COMMUNITY DEVELSPfvrtrg DEPPoflMU11 (619) 342-0058 CITY VF PALM DESERT April 4, 1990 City of Palm Desert Planning Dept. Attn: Mr. Ramon A. Diaz, Dir. of Comm. Development 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, Ca 92260 Subject: Project name and street name for Tract 25639, Cook Street, a mile south of Frank Sinatra Drive. Dear Mr. Diaz, In behalf of my client, Desert Mirage Ltd. , Inc, I am requesting approval of proposed project name and street name for subject tract. Project name proposed is "Desert Mirage". One street name, "Desert Mirage Drive", is proposed for the interior loop street. Please review and let me know if these names are acceptable with the pertinent City and City contract agencies. Enclosed for reference is a copy of the approved tentative map. Final tract map and improvement plans have been submitted to Public Works for first plan check. Please call if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely,` ��iiti.G-L9 �L/1-r---- Daniel Ferguson, PP.E. encl. �I IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST rnlr QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 TS.S. R.6E S.B.B.M DECEMBER 1989 -+::,t-If per o.o.,..%7 aiv w - 17 19 // �• .'i—D�—'3'=S=—•JTFEFl �—�� I 'a._..�..a � 23 PK I • RIVERSIDE COUNTY ME iOois�A e.rw i FIRE DEPARTMENT �4'6ppE PNOTEC-N'PY U, IN COOPERATION WITH THE . _ COUNTY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY C i OF -s'- AND FIRE PROTECTION RIVERSIDE,,.. GLEN J. NEWMAN FIRE CHIEF RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE COVE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 44.900 EL DORADO DRIVE TELEPHONE: (714) 6573183 INDIAN WELLS, CA 92210 eef`L1 of S7�OzEr T T C- Nr91 �E7" AlRwe-E lwb s��T `T ffzxe,y �� bE ,Q G�>llrr��✓��n/ i 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 j February 14, 1990 ARQIITEL'TURAL RE� CC144 ESSICN ACTION i CASE NO.: TT 25639 APPLICANT (ARID ADDRESS): RAM DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION CO., Post Office Box 2608; Palm Desert, Ca 92260 NATURE OF PIWECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary landscape plans LOCATION: Cook Street north of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural ccumission approved the preliminary landscape plans by minute motion. Date of Action: February 13, 1990 Vote: Carried 4-0, Chairman Gregory abstaining (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- STAFF OCKvIENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday prior to the next meeting. e� 0 pad um B&QBn _ T - 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 January 24, 1990 ARCHTFOCZURAL REV19A OOM IISSICN ACTION CASE NO. : TT 25639 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): RAM DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION CO., Post Office Box 2608, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Prelinuxkiry landscape plans LOCATICN: Cook Street north of Country Club ZONE- PR-5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission continued case requiring applicant to provide grading plan. Note that applicant was not present. Date of Action: January 23, 1990 Vote: Carried 5-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- STAFF COM4ENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural co rdssion to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be Placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Nbnday prior to the next meeting. CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Camnission DATE: January 16, 1990 CASE NO.: TT 25639 REQUEST: Approval of a tentative tract map subdividing 9.2 acres of PR-5 zoned land located on the west side of Cook Street between Frank Sinatra Drive and Country Club Drive into 30 single family lots having minimLrn lot sizes of 9,140 square feet. APPLICANT: ROELCD DEVELOPMENT 2 Park Plaza, Suite BOO Irvine, California 92714 I. BACEal U ND: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The site is square shaped, vacant 9.2 acre property which slopes southwest to northeast. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LANDSCAPE: North: PR-5/Vacant South: PR-5/Vacant East: PR-3/Desert Falls Country Club West: PR-5/Vacant C. ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: The site is zoned PR-5, five dwelling units per acre, and the general plan designation is residential low density (3-5 dwelling units per acre). The zoning is consistent with the general plan. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LAYCx1T• The proposal is to create 30 single family lots having minim= lot areas of 9140. The average lot size will be 9275 square feet. The development has one access onto Cook Street. Lot size ranges from 9140 to 11040 square feet. The dwellings will be single story and access will be by public mad within the development. The development is surrounded by a six foot masonry wall. III. ZONE RDQUIR114ENTS: The PR zone allows density to be determined based on gross acreage and hence a total of 45 units would be permitted (9.2 acres x 5 units per acre). STAFF REPORT CASE NO. TT 25639 JANUARY 16, 1990 The PR zone establishes basic requirements as follows: Code Requirements Perimeter setback 20' from public street 31 Maximum building coverage 40$ 35% Miniimmu lot area as approved 9140 acres Front (201 ), Side (51 ), Rear (15' ) Yards as approved 20,5,15 Minimum separation between single family detached units 10' 10' Maximum building height 30' - two story 18' Private mad street width 301 , 321 , 40' 36' In addition, section 25.74.190 permits commission to impose such conditions it deems necessary to carry out the general purpose of the section. In other single family developments in the PR zone, the city has applied the basic R-1 zone standards. R-1 8,000 standards apply- units will be 18 feet in height, side yards will be 5 feet and 9 feet, coverage is 35%. IV. EMMINiS• 1. The proposed map, its design, k%wavenents, type of development, and density are consistent with the State Subdivision Map Act, the Palm Desert Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance, and General Plan. 2. The design of the ,subdivision and required mitigation measures insure that the project will not result in environmental damage, injure fish or wildlife, degrade water quality or create public health problems. 3. The map will not conflict with public easements. 4. The map will allow unrestricted solar access to all lots. V. RECOMMEMMON• Approve the findings and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. approving TT 25639, subject to conditions. — Prepared b4D& L Reviewed and Approved try�L-!:� �- SM/db 2 PLANNING QIMMION F1ESOLUTIN-ND. A RESOLUTION OF THE PL-lq ING CU4 IISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVIING A 30 SINGLE FAMILY LOT TENTATIVE TRACT TRACT MAP ON 9.2 ACRES ON THE WEST SIDE OF COOK STREET BETWEEN FRANK SINATRA DRIVE AND COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE. CASE NO. TT 25639 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 16th day of January, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by Roelco Development for approval of a 30 single family lot subdivision on 9.2 acres within the PR-5 zone on the west side of Cook Street between Frank Sinatra Drive and Country Club Drive; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify approval of the tentative tract map: 1. The proposed map, its design, improvements, type of development and density are consistent with the State Subdivision Map Act, the Palm Desert Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance, and General Plan. 2. The design of the subdivision and required mitigation measures insure that the project will not result in environmental damage, injure fish or wildlife, degrade water quality or create public health problems. 3. The map will not conflict with public easements. 4. The map will allow unrestricted solar access to all lots. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. TT 25631, subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions. PLAN IIM M4IISSICN RESOLUTION NO. , i PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Cb mnission, held on this 16th day of January 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CAROL WHITLACK, Chairperson ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary SM/db 2 L PLANNIM C 344ISSICN RESOUM N NO. CO DMCNS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. TT 25639 Department of C mu unity Develcp errt: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of oc mnuiity development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall c mmence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall beornre null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any. use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be Presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. That the setbacks and cover coverage limits for single family dwellings in this project shall be as required in the R-1 zone for 8,000 square foot minimum lot area as prescribed in section 25.16.060 of the zoning ordinance. 6. Property will be subject to $600.00 per acre fringe toed lizard mitigation fee. Departmert of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 3 PLANNITC CL MMMICN RE scLUrICN No. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 3. Storm drain and retention area design/construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications sha11 be Submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is cormienced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration/acceleration lanes at all the project entry points. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to project final. 8. All public improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 9. Landscaping maintenance on Cook Street, including lots "E" and "F", shall be provided by the homeowners association. If no homeowners association is formed, the applicant shall provide for the formation of a landscape and lighting maintenance district. All costs associated with the formation of the subject district shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 10. Waiver of access to Cook Street except at approved locations shall be granted on the Final Map. 4 PLAN DG CX24USSION RESOLUTION NO. 11. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. p ,nook 12. The applicant shall provide. for installation of landscaping in the existing median island i:. Eeno along the property frontage. In the event that such landscaping is installed by others prior to the final map approval, the applicant shall provide for the reimbursement to the City of Palm Desert of those costs associated with the landscape installation. 13. Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 14. Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. 15. Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 16. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the Department of Public Works. 17. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 18. Pad elevations, as sham on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 19. Property lines for the individual lots proposed by this subdivision shall be located at tap of slope where applicable. 20. As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be underground per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility ceding district. 5 PLANNING Oa44ESSICN RESCLUPICN NO. , 21. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 55 feet on Cook Street and full right-of-way at 60 feet on "A", "B", "C" and "D" streets shall be provided on the final map. 22. Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share of the assessed casts for the Cook Street Extension, Interstate 10 interchange and Bridge Fund. City Fire Marshal . 1. Provide, or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flow of 1500 gpm and the actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. 2. A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 3. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x awn 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), located not less than 25' nor more than 1W 200 from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 4. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the County Fire Chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. 5. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. The roadway shall be not less than 241 of unobstructed width and 13'6" of vertical clearance. Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall be 36' wide with parking on both sides, 32' wide with parking on one side. Dead-end roads in excess of 150' shall be provided with a minimum 45' radius turn-around (55' in industrial developments). 6 L ��}{�� /�'y��.�T(�} p��[ry�}��(�L} may\ /I PLANNIM CCD14 SSICN R�Tl'ICN NO. 6. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-cmtrolled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. all controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department. Minimum opening width shall be 12' , with a minimum vertical clearance of 13'6". 7. Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. 8. All new residences/dwellings are required to have illuminated residential addresses meeting both city and Fire Dept. approval. 9. Shake shingle roofs are no longer pexmitted in the Cities of Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage or Palm Desert. SM/db 7 oV NAM D&(nn 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 January 16, 1990 Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code. Ia33kTIVE DEXXARATICK CASE NO.; TT 25639 APPLICANT/PROJECT SPC SOR: ROELOD DEVELOPMENT, 2 Park Plaza, Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92714 PROJDCP LIESCRIMCN/LOCATICN: 30 lot residential subdivision on 9.2 acres of PR-5 zoned land located on the west side of Cook Street between Frank Sinatra Drive and Country Club Drive The Director of the Department of Cam¢ulity Development, City of Palm Desert, California has farad that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. RAMON A. DIAZ DATE DIRECIOR OF CCK4JNITY DEVELOPMENT RD/db WATFq ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058•COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236•TELEPHONE(619)39&2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS TELLIS CODEKAS,PRESIDENT THOMAS E.LEVY,GENERAL MANAGER CHIEF ENGINEER RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS,VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY JOHN P.POWELL KEITH H.AINSWORTH,ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER DOROTHY M.NICHOLS REDW INE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS THEODORE J.FISH - December 27, 1989 File: 0163.1 Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Gentlemen: Subject: Tentative Tract 25639 Portion of Northeast Quarter, Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian This area lies on the sandy area in the northern portion of Palm Desert and is considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is designated Zone C on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. The district will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this district. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. Plans for grading, landscaping, and irrigation systems shall be. submitted to Coachella Valley Water District for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. If you have any questions please call Bob Meleg, stormwater engineer, extension 264. Yours very ttruly, om Levy General Manager-Chief Engineer RF:gh cc: Don Park Riverside County Department of Public Health, Indio TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY i SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 4 COMPANY 1981 LUGONIA AVENUE • REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA MAILING ADDRESS: BOX 3003, REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA 92373-9982 Decmeber 21, 1989 City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 ATTENTION: Ramon A. Diaz RE: Case # TT 25639 Thank you for inquiring about the availability of natural gas service for your project. We are pleased to inform you that Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be provided from a 4" gas main in Cook Rd. at Country Club Drive without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractural arrangements are made. You should be aware that this letter is not to be interpreted as a contractural commitment to serve the proposed project, but only as an informational service. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the conditions under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. Typical demand use for: a. Residential (System Area Average/Use Per Meter) Yearly Single Family 799 therms/year dwelling unit Multi-Family 4 or less units 482 therms/year dwelling unit Multi-Family 5 or more units 483 therms/year dwelling unit These averages are based on total gas consumption in residential units served by Southern California Gas Company, and it should not be implied that any particular home, apartment or tract of homes will use these amounts of energy. b. Commercial Due to the fact that construction varies so widely (a glass building vs. a heavily insulated building) and there is such a wide variation in types of materials and equipment used, a typical demand figure is not available for this type of construction. Calculations would need to be made after the building has been designed. To insure the existing facilities are adequate to accommodate the new development, an engineering study will be required. Detailed information including tract maps and plot plans must be submitted to the Gas Company Market Services Representa- tive, 1-800-624-2497, six months prior to the actual construction of the natural gas pipeline. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs, please contact our Area Market Services Manager, P.O. Box 3003, Redlands, CA 92373-0306, phone 1-800-624-2497. Sincerely, Roger Bau an Technical Supervisor RLB:me cc: Environ Affairs - ML209B 1; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 4 COMPANY 1981 LUGONIA AVENUE • REDLANDS. CALIFORNIA MAILING ADDRESS: BOX Son REDLANDS. CALIFORNIA 923MN82 Decmeber 21, 1989 City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 ATTENTION: Ramon A. Diaz REs Case 3 TT 25639 Thank you for inquiring about the availability of natural gas service for your project. We are pleased to inform you that Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to 1,the project could be provided from a 4" gas main in Cook Rd. at Country Club Drive without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractural arrangements are made. You should be aware that this letter is not to be interpreted as a contractural commitment to serve the proposed project, but only as an informational service. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the conditions under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. Typical demand use fors a. Residential (System Area Average/Use Per Meter) Yearly Single Family 799 therms/year dwelling unit Hulti-Family 4 or less units 482 therms/year dwelling unit Multi-Family 5 or more units 483 therms/year dwelling unit These averages are based on total gas consumption in residential units served by Southern California Gas Company, and it should not be implied that any particular home, apartment or tract of homes will use these amounts of energy. b. Commercial Due to the fact that construction varies so widely (a glass building vs. a heavily insulated building) and there is such a wide variation in types of materials and equipment used, a typical demand figure is not available for this type of construction. Calculations would need to be made after the building has been designed. To insure the existing facilities are adequate to accommodate the new development, an engineering study will be required. Detailed information including tract maps and plot plans must be submitted to the Gas Company Harket Services Representa- tive, 1-800-624-2497, six months prior to the actual construction of the natural gas pipeline. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs, please contact our Area Harket Services Hanger, P.O. Box 3003, Redlands, CA 92373-0306, phone 1-800-624-2497. Sincerely, Roger Bau an Technical Supervisor RLBemc Ir t:. cct Environ Affairs - HL209B RIVERSIDE COUNTY �EM7 of F/A FIRE DEPARTMENT d�eE pE reorF M4� IN COOPERATION WITH THE \' CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY c COUNTY AND FIRE PROTECTION C RIVERS/D E- . . DF GLEN J. NEWMAN c- -FIRE CHIEF RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE COVE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 44.900 EL DORADO DRIVE - TELEPHONE: (714) 6573183 INDIAN WELLS, CA 92210 December 21 . 1989 TO; City Of Palm Desert . Ray Diaz Dir . Comm. Dev. /Planning REF :TT 25639 With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced TT25639 , the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Uniform Fire Code . City Municipal Code and/or recognized Fire Protection Standards : Provide , or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flow of 1500 gpm and the actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure . A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site . The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant (s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1 2" ) located not/ less than 25 ' nor more than 200 ' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways . Hydrants installed below 3000 ' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel " type . Prior to the application for a building e PP g permit , the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the County Fire Chief . Upon approval , the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types , location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements . Plans shall be signed by a Reaistered Civil Engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification : "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County P Fire Department . " Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes . The roadway shall be not less than 24 ' of unobstructed width and 13 ' 6" of vertical clearance . Where parallel parking is allowed . the roadway shall be :36 ' wide with parking on both sides . 32 ' wide with parking on one side . Dead-end roads in excess of 150 ' shall be provided with a minimum 45 ' radius turn-around (55 ' in industrial developments) . l� Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates . barriers . cuard houses or similar means . provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department . All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles . Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure . All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department . Minimum opening width shall be 12 ' . with a minimum vertical clearance of 13 ' 6" . Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy . All new residences/dwellings are required to have illuminated residential addresses meeting both City and Fire Dept approval . Shake shingle roofs are no longer permitted in the Cities of Indian Wells . Rancho Mirage or Palm Desert . A'_ 1 questions regarding the meaning of these conditions should be referred to the Fire Dept . , Fire Protection /Inspection Staff . Sincerely . GLEN NEWMAN Ranger in Charge County Fire Chief By m Reeder ire Protection Specialist bbm INTEROFFICE MHOWDUM TO: Depart "t of Community Development/Planning Attenti n: Stephen McGrath FROM: Richard�J. Folkers, Asst. City Manager/Public Works Director SUBJECT: TENTATI �5� TRACT 25639, ROELCO DEVELOPMENT DATE: Jan44,x , 1989 U@--att i + t ' "44".ed conditions of approval ed ro ' . (1) Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. (2) Drainage facilities shall. be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. (3) Storm drain and retention area design/construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. (4) Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. (5) Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable City standards. (6) As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration/acceleration lanes at the all project entry points. "As- built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. (7) Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to project final. (8) All public improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. (9) Landscaping maintenance on Cook Street, including lots "E" and "F", shall be provided by the homeowners association. If no homeowners association is formed, the applicant shall provide for the formation of a landscape and lighting maintenance district. All costs associated with the formation of the subject district shall be the responsibility of the applicant. (10) Waiver of access to Cook Street except at approved locations shall be granted on the Final Map. (11) In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. (12) The applicant shall provide for the installation of landscaping in the existing median island in Country Club Drive and Frank Sinatra Drive along the property frontage. In the event that such landscaping is installed by others prior to the final map approval, the applicant shall provide for the reimbursement to the City of Palm Desert of those costs associated with the landscape installation. (13) Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. (14) Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. (15) Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. (16) Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the Department of Public Works. 1 (17) A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. (18) Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. (19) Property lines for the individual lots proposed by this subdivision shall be located at top of slope where applicable. (20) As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. (21) As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 55 feet on Cook Street and full right-of-way at 60 feet on "A", "B", "C" and "D" streets shall be provided on the final map. (22) Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share of the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension, Interstate 10 interchange and Bridge Fund. RICHARD J. FOLKERS, P.E. (js9\tr25639.iou) q�.:_ A CASE NO. Environmental Assessment Form TO THE APPLICANT: Your cooperation in completing this form and supplying the information requested will expedite City review of your application pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The City is required to make an environmental assessment on all projects which it exercises discretionary approval over. Applications submitted will not be considered complete until all information necessary to make the environmental assessment is complete. 6EINERAL INFORMATION: - 1 . Name, address , and telephone number of owner, applicant or project sponsor: ,2oELCO ]Jl-✓ELOPMt.✓ 2 // L/1 PU T£ g0O /.0 yin/E . 2. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted con- cerning the project (such as architect, engineer, or other repre- sentative) : i7/K.G' ,ODgI,✓sa,./ ,G'D,�LCO E✓L-LDPMP.J� PAP$NE,e, i'.O, 60�.' ZGog .�✓vir, IJ�Pfer CA 9zZG/-ZLoB �G19) 34�• 94s7 3. Common name of project (if any): /i✓o,✓�) 4. Project location (street address or general location) : vrEJ� srA6 WD,� Jf,Pf� �¢ M/LE So✓iN Di= `/1i9�✓/i J'lNAi7�A AB��. 5. Precise legal description of property (lot and tract number, or meets & bounds) : NE �� o� 7W� sE %1 oP THa N c. %�- of• J'�c ¢ TSs .�f J'.gBr�� Exc��i.✓G- TirE11EfJ[a.•.� �•r/G g�Ji6B-Z� SS i=EET 6. Proposed use of the site (project for which the form is filed; describe the total undertaking, not just the current application approval being sought) : �vBy�yiJio. l O� Pl1oPF�zr�/ iv;a �D J'J.✓Gt.� 6�.��Ly LD%I 7. Relationship to a larger project or series of project projects (describe haw this P j t relates to other activities , Rtoses , and develop- ments planned, or now underway) : Nb 2c%AT/D.✓ 8. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, to go forward, including those required by the City, Regional , State and Federal agencies (indicate sub- sequent approval agency name, and type of approval required) : GJTY GOACNELCA untLE WAT-Ir JdTJZJG EXISTING CON ITIONS : 9. Project site area: 9. 2 f1CBES (Size of property in sq. ft. or acreage) 10. Present zoning: le'X_:5- (Proposed zoning) :_ p,e_S 11 . General Plan land use designation: 12. Existing use of the project site: ✓*CA, J 13. Existing use on adjacent properties: (Example - North, Shopping Center; South, Single Family Dwellings; East, Vacant, etc. ). nJo�rt! VV7CA.17- E�ti GOOC IT. CU✓NT�y CU..�+ LJhJ' On/ OPf? JlJ>f COUK- S T Jb✓T/� — V/rtA..JT L✓Crf - VA6A.✓r NoT€; P O E.JT Te S30 l./cJ T?J �'p✓TN �wE.1'T, 14. Site topography (describe) : "gT/A J4fj X4/ :.ea,'! .4;r :ELOPE EL ^�- S�EG /1LMOJl /�lU VF-CsfiAi/d.y� 15. Are there any natural or manmade drainage channels through or adjacent to the property? NO ✓ YES 16. Grading (estimate number of cubic yards of dirt being moved) : /D. COO 17. List the number, size and type of trees being removed: J,Jo ✓� 18. Describe any cultural , historic, or scenic aspects of the project site: hJa>✓E .t„✓ow„/ of A..i�I dJU,vtcA..Je .� 19. Residential Project (if not residential do NOT answer) A. Number and type of dwelling units (Specify no. of bedrooms) : 7;VIS !J' Lt "LIP 0,V1rA0,1 on/t-)/ A; TH,.r 7-1ME- B. Schedule of unit sizes : C. Number of stories Height feet. D. Largest single building (sq. ft. ) (hgt. ) E. Type of household size expected (population projection for the project) : F. Describe the number and type of recreational facilities : G. Is there any night lighting of the project: H. Range of sales prices or rents : $ to $ I. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 0 Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . . . % Landscaping, Open, Recreation Area . . . . . . . % 1 20. Commercial , Industrial., Institutional or Other Project: A. Type of use(s) and major function(s) ( if offices , specify type & number) : B. Number of square feet in total building area: C. Number of stories Height feet. D. Largest single building (Sq. Ft. ) (Hgt. ) E. Number of square feet in outdoor storage area: F. Total number of required parking spaces , number provided G.' Hours of operation: H. Maximum number of clients, patrons , shoppers , etc. , at one time: I. Maximum number of employees at one time: J. If patron seating is involved, state the number: K. Is there any night lighting of the project: Yes No L. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . . Landscaping and Open Space (Recreation). . . Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects : Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary) . YES NO 21 . Change in existing features of hillsides , or substantial alteration of ground contours. 22. Change in the dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the project vicinity. 23. Subject to or resulting in soil errosion by wind or flooding. 24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or ✓ alteration of existing drainage patterns. 25. Change in existing noise or vibration level in the vicinity. Subject to roadway or airport noise (has the required acoustical report been ✓ submitted?) 26. Involves the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances , flammables or explosives. 27. • Involves the use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy. 28. Changes the demand for municipal services ✓ (police, fire, sewage, etc. ) 29. Changes the demand for utility services , beyond those presently available or planned in the ✓ near future. 30. Significantly affects any unique or natural features, including mature trees. 31 . Change in scenic views or vistas from existing ✓ residential areas or public land or public roads. 32. Results in the dislocation of people. 1 YES NO 33. Generates controversy based on aesthetics or other features of the project. [ ] Additional explanation of "yes" answers attached. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation, to the best of my ability, and that the facts , statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of my,knowledge and belief. 17�+.✓�� .eciran/ P.�' RoEcev s>EvF�rr,�T Name,(Print or Type For /2-/3-- 87 Signature Date INITIAL STUDY FEE: $30. 00 (Make check payable to the City of Palm Desert and sub- mit with this form. ) MINUTES ARC TrBCISJRAL REVIEW OCNAESSICN JANUARY 9, 1990 LOCATION: Southwest wrner of Portola Avenue and Country Club ZONE: PR-5 Applicant, Brad Boe, requested approval of additional height limits to units immediately adjacent to Casa Blanca project. Mr. Bow requested that the. units be 21' and 22' on the single story units noting that the majority of the units would not be seen from Country Club Drive. Applicant felt that the views of the mountains from Casa Blanca would not be blocked by these units. Chairman Gregory asked what the height of the Casa Blanca units were, which Mr. Smith reported was 161 . Commissioner Urruti.a felt that the city has put an 18' height limit on units and this should be conformed to. He felt the applicant could achieve the look he wanted within the 18' height limit. Commissioner Holden noted that the city also has to look at sun control and felt the applicant should provide some type of relief on the windows. It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner McCrea, to refer request back to applicant to make the following revisions: 1) Maximum height for single story krone to be 18 feet 2) Height of two-story units be brought down in proportion to the single story units 3) Applicant to follow city's latest drought resistant landscaping plan for the median islands on Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue. Carried 4-1, Chairman dory abstaining. 6. CASE NO.: TT 25639 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): �ROaxU DEUEL0-P-RTw—r-,72 Park Plaza, Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92714 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary landscape plans LOCATION: Cook Street north of Country Club Drive ZONE: PR-5 Case was continued as applicant was not present 5 AGENDA ITEM NO.: IV-B-3 DATE: January 9, 1990 ARCHITECIVRAL REVIEW Oa4-nSSION CASE NO.: Tr 25639 APPLICANT (ARID ADDRESS): ROELOO DEVELOPMENT, 2 Park Plaza, Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92714 NATURE OF PROJECP/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary landscape plans LOCATION: Northeast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 of Northeast 1/4, Sect 4 T55, RGE SBBM 620-190-016 ZONE: PR-5 DESCRLPTION• Fifty feet of landscape from the curb has 38 feet of landscape setback with an additional 12 feet of parkway. The landscaping is grass, African slimacs, California pepper, Mexican fan palm. Shrubs include dwarf oleander, hibiscus, cape honeysuckle. Small plants include flame vines, dwarf lantana and African daises. 1002 4ENnATION• That the preliminary landscape plans be approved. SM/db MINUTES PALM D>SERr ARCS nMMURAL C Dt4I.SSION TIESDAY, FEBR ARY 13, 1990 hhi I. The meeting was called to order at 12:15 p.m. Camussion Members Current Meeting Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent Ron Gregory. Chairman x 3 0 Rick Holden x 3 0 Russell McCrea x 3 0 Mary Drury x 2 1 Frank Urrutia x 2 1 Wayne Conner x 3 0 Others Present: Steve Smith Phil Drell Catherine Sass Pat Bedrosian Donna Bitter It was moved by 0c missicner Holden, seconded by Commissioner McCrea, to approve the minutes of January 9, 1990, as submitted. Carried 4-0, Commissioner Drury, abstaining. It was moved by Coo nissioner Holden, seconded by Coamission,er McCrea, to approve the minutes of January 23, 1990, as amended. Carried 5-0. II. Moved by C1bmmissicn Dray, seconded by Saner McCrea, to approve the following cases by minute motion. Carried 5-0. 1. CASE NO.: APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): RANCHO MIRAGE BUILDERS (for Greta Unlimited), 73-130 E1 Paseo, Suite A, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PFKXM •T/APPROVAL SC1GM: Approval of high density foam letters with gold anodized faces (1" thick x 14" high) LACMCN: 73-130 E1 Paseo, Suite A 7.CNE: . Cl 2. CASE NO.. 1697 SA APPLICANT (AND AIDS): BUSINESS OASIS, Post Office Box 12830, Palm Desert, CA 92225 NATURE OF PROOBOr/APPROVAL SCU1GiT• Approval of 2' x 8' painted wood business identification sign m DU34JTES A 1C IITEMURAL COM IISSIM FEEMARY 13, 1990 LCXATTCN: 41-625 Eclectic Street, Suite 0-1 and P-1 ZONE: Cl Approved by minute motion with the condition that the applicant remove the signs located in the window. 3. CASE NO.: PP 89-19 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): OLIPHANT/LIZZA ASSOCIATES, 77-900 Avenue of the States, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PRWELT/APPROVAL SOUGRr• Final landscape approval for retail/office complex LOCATION: Northeast corner Highway 111 and Portola ZONE: C-1 O/P Approved by minute motion with the conditions that the applicant conform to the city's parking lot tree ordinance and the planters within the isles be continuous. 4. CASE ND.: 1702 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST, SCIENTIST, 74- 025 Larrea Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PRWEM/APPROVAL SOUG[fr: Approval of sign showing hours of services LOCATION: Corner of Larrea and Portola ZONE: C-1 5. CAUSE NO.: PP 89-21 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): BIRTCHER-DUNHAM (for Toys R Us), 72-010 Varner Road, Thousand Palms, CA 92276 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final working drawings IO(ATION• highway 111 at Fred Waring Drive ZONE: PC (4) Final working drawings approved by minute motion with the condition that the landscape drawings be presented within thirty (30) days of issuance of building permits: 2 , rmv[rrFs AR(HITE ORAL CXNT'IISSICN FIMRY 13, 1990 6. CASE NO.: PP 90-3 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): L. TIANO AND OMPANY, 75-110 St. Charles Place, Suite 1, Palm Desert, A 92260 NATURE OF PId JECr/APPROVAL SOI M: Preliminary nary architectural design approval and landscaping plan approval LO(ATICN: Parcel located east of 75-110 St. Charles Place with frontage on St. Charles Place ZONE: SI 7. CASE NO.. TT 23681 APPLICANT' (ADD A 3)RFSS): C HAZAN OC NSTRUCTICN, 72-624 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary and final approval of four (4) single family models with landscaping IUCATICN• Skyward and Alamo ZONE: R1 10,000 8. CASE ND.: TT 25639 APPLICANT (ADD ADDRESS): (ROELCU"DEVELOPN4"NT--; 2 Park Plaza, Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92714 NATURE OF PROJELV/APPROVAL SOUQU: Preliminary landscape plans LOCATICN: Cook Street north of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 9. CASE NO.: PP 89-28 APPLICANT (ADD ADDRESS): AR(HISTRUCIURE, 42-280 Beacon Hill, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGRr: Preliminary approval of landscaping plans for six (6) unit apartment complex U ATICN: South side Fred Waring Drive, east side of San Pablo ZCNE• R-3 S.O. 3 MINLn!ES ARC IITECIURAL CCB1-IISSICN FE WdMY 13, 1990 III. CASES: 1. CASE NO.: 1696 SA APPLICANT (AND AMFEESS): ANGEGO'S, 72-835 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECP/APPROVAL SOUGU: Approval of striped (green and white) awning as installed and proposed illuminate business identification sign UXATICN• 72-835 Highway ill ZCNE: Cl Steve Smith reported on the two issues at hand - 1) green and white awning made out of material presented and 2) an internal illuminated sign. Staff had concerns with the proposed sign as it did not seem to fit in at its present location. Applicant noted that the . front awning already existed and the side awnings are retractable; therefore, he did not feel permits were needed. Sign will read "Angelo's Restaurant". Applicant reported that the awnings retracted back against the wall. Ms. Drury noted that the sign would not fit because of the location of the awning. It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner Holden, to approve the awnings as presented with the conditions that the end panel on the awning be installed at the western most end of building and the sign be redesigned to property fit the location. Carried 5-0. 2. CASE NO.: PP 89-34 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): RAY PATSCHECK/BILL ROSSWORN, 640 No. Tustin #103, Santa Ana, CA 92705 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of revised landscape and architectural plans IUCATICN: 44-211 and 44-213 San Pasqual 4 NIINLnES ARC IITFCiURAL C344 SSICN FM ARY 13, 1990 7.CNE• R2 S.O. Ms. Sass reported that the applicant had cut back on the front planter area in order to install the proposed security gate. It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner Conner, to approve the preliminary landscape and architecture plans with the following conditions: 1) The two uncovered parking spaces be screened in an effective manner by bermi g and/or landscaping 2) Round off comers for easier access to project Carried 5-0 3. CASE ND. APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MAY CO., c/o Doug Sisnrns, Palm Desert Town Center, 77-840 Highway 111, Palm Desert, ca 92260 NATURE OF PROJE{,T/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary plans for 21,000 square foot expansion of May Oo. LOCATICN• 72-840 Highway ill 7.CNE: PC-3 C cmmissi.cn discussed with the applicant the various options for shade trees. Chairman Gregory asked applicant if the May Go. could re-design the entry way adding an attractive awning out to the street. Applicant replied that it would require some study but did riot feel May Co. should have a problem with that. It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by CbYmrissicner McCrea, to approve the preliminary plans with the following conditions: 1) Applicant to continue corbeling along north side of building. 2) Applicant to design some type of over-hang terrace at entry on the west and the south side of building to provide shade. Carried 5-0 4. CASE NO.: 1698 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PRECISIM SIGN GROUP, INC. (for Toyo Tires), 28043 Del Rio Road, Temecula, CA 92390 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of internal illuminated cabinet sign 5 MINEJTES ARC IITDCAIRAI, OC M4ISSICN FFBMP" 13, 1990 I,OCATICN: 41-625 Eclectic #M2 7.CNE: SI Representative from Precision Sign Group, George Agnello, was present. He noted that the owner has an existing sign on the building now. Staff was not sure where the submitted sign would be installed as the building is inside the Howley Tire Center. It was moved by Commissioner Conner, seconded by Commissioner Drury, to continue the request directing staff to take photos of building and pull building plans to determine exact location. Mr. Agnello was instructed to have owner present at next meeting (February 27, 1990) for further review. Carried 5-0. IV. ADJOLMME T: The meeting adjourned at 1:45 p.m. S SMITH ASSOCIATE PLANNER SS/db 6 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 ; TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 February 14, 1990 ARCEIITEMWAL REVIEIA QT44ISSION AMOK CASE NO.: TT 25639 APPLICANT (ARID ADDRESS): RAM DEVELOPMENT & OoNSTRUCTION 00. (ROELCO), Post Office Box 2608, Palm Desert, Ca 92260 NATURE OF PR0=/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary landscape plans LOCATION: Cook Street north of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission approved the preliminary landscape plans by minute motion. Date of Action: February 13, 1990 Vote: Carried 4-0, Chairman Gregory abstaining (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- STAFF Oa44 NTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. ODNTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Nbnday prior to the next meeting. NOTICE OF DETE KINNTIM 5 1990 Negative Declaration COMPA4NhY OEVEiurMENT UEPAtt1MEDlT TO: (X) Clerk of the Hoard of Supervisors CITY OF PALM DESERT perv' ( ) Secretary for Resources County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St., Rn 1311 4080 Lemon Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92502 FROM: CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. CLERK OF THE BOARD Neg DedanaoWNto Determination Filed W P.R.C.21182 ,It Project Title/Ccnmton Name: TT 25639 FEB 021990 Date of Project Approval: January 16, 1990 3- �— Removed' _ State Clearinghouse Ninnber (if submitted): N/A Ca Pu Contact Person: Philip Drell awl de,8tateofCaWomio Project Location: West side of Cook Street 1,400 feet south of Frank Sinatra Drive. Project Description: 30 lot single family subdivision. This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project ( ) will, (X) will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared in connection with this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Negative Declaration may be examined at the above city hall address. 3. Mitigation measures (X) were, ( ) were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations ( ) was, (X) was not, adopted for this ` roject. _ �- ""-' \ `ice ""-•,�-K-�., . Signa d Title Date Reo6ived fof Filing Please return date-stamped copy inThenclosed envelo J NOTICE OF DEPEVIN TION Negative Declaration s 1990 COMMUNITY DEVEWPMBT DEPARVAt.W TO: (X) Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Cnr N PnUA DBERr Peru' ( ) Secretary for Resources County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St., Rm 1311 4080 Lemon Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92502 FROM: CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in oanpliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. CLERK OF THE BOARD Nag pedaraftgWc D� 2 tan �p� POSTED Project Title/Camummon Name: TT 25639 Date of Project Approval: January 16, 1990 FL 2�90 q Remand'. Clearinghouse Number (if submitted): N/A pub Contact Person: Philip Drell ,Stateotl Jftrnia Project Location: West side of Cook Street 1,400 feet south of Frank Sinatra Drive. • Project Description: 30 lot single family subdivision. This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project ( ) will, (X) will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared in connection with this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Negative Declaration may be examined at the above city hall address. 3. Mitigation measures (X) were, ( ) were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations ( ) was, (X) was not, adopted for this roject. ] LPL Sign Title z AI 21 Date Weived or Filing Please return date-stamped copy in the enclosed envelope. 90MV 0 FdA m o o 0 n 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 PLANNING OCK4ISSION MEETING NUMCE OF ACTION Date: January 19, 1990 Roelco Development 2 Park Plaza, Suite 800 Irvine, CA 92714 Re: TT 9 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of January 16, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED TT 25639 BY ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION N). 1413 CARRIED 3-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. 6 i RAYON A. DIAZ, SE PALM DESERT PLANNINGSSION RAD/tm cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal PLAID CEDNLLSSICN RES (r4 ND. 1413 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CCMNISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A 30 SINGLE FAMILY LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ON 9.2 ACRES ON THE WEST SIDE OF COOK STREET BETWEEN FRANK SINATRA DRIVE AND COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE. CASE NO. TT 25639 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 16th day of January, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by Roelco Development for approval of a 30 single family lot subdivision on 9.2 acres within the PR-5 zone on the west side of Cook Street between Frank Sinatra Drive and Country Club Drive; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify approval of the tentative tract map: 1. The proposed map, its design, improvements, type of development and density are consistent with the State Subdivision Map Act, the Palm Desert Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance, and General Plan. 2. The design of the subdivision and required mitigation measures insure that the project will not result in environmental damage, injure fish or wildlife, degrade water quality or create public health problems. 3. The map will not conflict with public easements. 4. The map will allow unrestricted solar access to all lots. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Cammission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. TT 25631, subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions. PLANNIPT OaTUSSION RE.SOLUUCIN NO. 1413 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Plaiui.ng Caianission, held on this 16th day of Janes vote, to wit: 1990, by the following AYES: JONATHAN, RICHARDS, AND WHITLOCK NOES: NONE ABSENP: DOWNS AND ERWOOD ABSTAIN: NONE CAROL WHITLOCK, Chairperson ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secret SM/db l l 2 PLANNUC COM"IISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1413 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. TT 25639 Department of Camamity Development- 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Ccnmission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. That the setbacks and cover coverage limits for single family dwellings in this project shall be as required in the R-1 zone for 8,000 square foot minimum lot area as prescribed in section 25.16.060 of the zoning ordinance. 6. Property will be subject to $600.00 per acre fringe toed lizard mitigation fee. Department of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 3 PLANNING COM ffSSION RESOLUTION NO. 1413 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 3. Storm drain and retention area design/construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration/acceleration lanes at all the project entry points. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to project final. 8. All public improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 9. Landscaping maintenance on Cook Street, including lots "E" and "F", shall be provided by the homeowners association. If no homeowners association is formed, the applicant shall provide for the formation of a landscape and lighting maintenance district. All costs associated with the formation of the subject district shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 10. Waiver of access to Cook Street except at approved locations shall be granted on the Final Map. 4 . PLANNING QM IISSION RFSOLLUION ND. 1413 11. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 12. The applicant shall provide for the installation of landscaping in the existing median island in Cook Street along the property frontage. In the event that such landscaping is installed by others prior to the final map approval, the applicant shall provide for the reimbursement to the City of Palm Desert of those costs associated with the landscape installation. 13. Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 14. Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. 15. Ccmplete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 16. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the Department of Public Works. 17. A complete prelim;nari soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 18. Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 19. Property lines for the individual lots proposed by this subdivision shall be located at top of slope where applicable. 20. As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be underground per each respective utility districts recommendation. if determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. 21. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's 5 PLANNING; Co"MISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1413 General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 55 feet on Cook Street and full right-of-way at 60 feet on "A", "B", "C" and "D" streets shall be provided on the final map. 22. Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share of the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension, Interstate 10 interchange and Bridge Fund. City Fire Marshal: 1. Provide, or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flow of 1500 gpm and the actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. 2. A fire flow of 1500 gpn for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 3. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), located not less than 25' nor more than 200' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 4. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the County Fire Chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. 5. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. The roadway shall be not less than 24' of unobstructed width and 13'6" of vertical clearance. Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall be 36' wide with parking on both sides, 32' wide with parking on one side. Dead-end roads in excess of 150' shall be provided with a minimum 45' radius turn-around (55' in industrial developments). 6. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. all controlled access devices 6 • PLANNING CQ NIISSION RFSOLUrICK NO. 1413 that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department. Minimum opening width shall be 12' , with a minimum vertical clearance of 1316". 7. Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. 8. All new residences/dwellings are required to have illuminated residential addresses meeting both city and Fire Dept. approval. 9. Shake shingle roofs are no longer permitted in the Cities of Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage or Palm Desert. SM/db 7 MINUTES PALM DESERT PIAMMG 00W SSION d JANUARY 16, 1990 currently being implemented through the administrative procedure. He indicated that the ordinance would allow the city to give the information to the developer/builder early in the planning process. Mr. Diaz indicated that the plan was initiated by city council and reviewed by the city's landscape consultant and he, John Wolmuth, and Phil Joy worked together to revise the amenftent. Staff recamiended adoption of the resoluti.cn reco mending approval of the ordinance amendment to city council. Camussioner Jonathan indicated that he could not find the language for one tree between six spaces to count for covering both sides on a double aisle. Mr. Diaz indicated that was in there, but might need to be stated more clearly. CIonnissicner Jonathan asked when the effective date of the enwxbient was and Mr. Diaz stated that it would be 30 days after adoption by the city council, but indicated that staff was administratively applying those standards now. Ca[missicner Richards noted that in places where trees are desired (i.e. country clubs) after a while they grow tall and require topping. He wondered if the city had considered what would happen if trees got too tall and the problems that could be created for trees planted along the frontage road. He asked who would be responsible for maintaining the trees. Mr. Diaz explained that the property owner would be responsible, however, he felt that one benefit of deep watering were deep roots and less problems of blowing over. Chairperson Whitlock indicated that of the trees being recamiended very few require topping and would possibly be thinned out. Chairperson Whitlock the public testimony and asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposal. There being no one, the public testimony was closed. Action: Moved by Ckmnissioner Jonathan, seconded by Chairperson Whitlock, approving the findings as presented by staff. Carried 3-0. Moved by Cmmissioner Jonathan, seconded by Chairperson Whitlock, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1412, recommending approval of ZOA 89-2 to city council. Carried 3-0. C. Case No. TT 25639 - ROMM D0VffDMW, Applicant Request for approval of a tentative tract map subdividing 9.2 acres of PR-5 zoned land located 3 MlNHES PALM DESERT PLANNIM CCMMISSICN JANUARY 16, 1990 on the west side of Cook Street between Frank Sinatra Drive and Country Club Drive into 30 single family lots having minimum lot sizes of 9,140 square feet and minimum lot widths. Mr. McGraph outlined the salient points of the staff report, noting a correction on public works condition #12 to say Cook Street, and fire department condition #3 should say 200, not 100. He recommended approval. Commissioner Jonathan asked about provision for a deceleration lane. Mr. Gaugush stated that condition #6 provided for a right-turn ingress into the property. Commissioner Richards stated that he did not see a problem with single family houses being constructed there. (riairperson Whitlock the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the commission. MR. MICHAEL FMINSON, Roelco Development, stated that he hoped the commission would approve the project and was present to answer any questions. Chairperson Whitlock asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSWION to the proposal. There was no one and the public testimony was closed. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Jonathan, approving the findings as presented by staff. Carried 3-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Jonathan, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1413, approving TT 25639 subject to conditions as amended. Carried 3-0. D. Case Nos. PM 25673 and VAR 89-8 - PERRY ASH9Y, Applicant Request for approval of a variance to the zoning ordinance to permit the creation of two 10,890 square foot lots whereas the existing R-1 13,000 zoning requires a minimum of 13,000 Square feet per lot and approval of a tentative parcel map for a lot split of an existing 21,780 square foot lot into two 10,890 square foot lots located on 4 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF CO41MTY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Camnission DATE: January 16, 1990 CASE ND.: TT 25639 RDQiJEST: Approval of a tentative tract map subdividing 9.2 acres of PR-5 zoned land located on the west side of Cook Street between Frank Sinatra Drive and Country Club Drive into 30 single family lots having minimum lot sizes of 9,140 square feet. APPLICANT: ROELCO DEVELOPMENT 2 Park Plaza, Suite 800 Irvine, California 92714 I. BAC 0ROUND: A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The site is square shaped, vacant 9.2 acre property which slopes southwest to northeast. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LANDSCAPE: North: PR-5/Vacant South: PR-5/Vacant East: PR-3/Desert Falls Country Club West: PR-5/Vacant C. ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: The site is zoned PR-5, five dwelling units per acre, and the general plan designation is residential low density (3-5 dwelling units per acre). The zoning is consistent with the general plan. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LAYOUT: The proposal is to create 30 single family lots having minimum mi im lot areas of 9140. The average lot size will be 9275 square feet. The development has one access onto Cook Street. Lot size ranges from 9140 to 11040 square feet. The dwellings will be single story and access will be by public road within the development. The development is surrounded by a six foot masonry wall. III. ZONE REQUIREMENTS: The PR zone allows density to be determined based on gross acreage and hence a total of 45 units would be permitted (9.2 acres x 5 units per acre). STAFF REPORT CASE ND. TT 25639 JANUARY 16, 1990. The PR zone establishes basic requirements as follows: Code Requirements Proposed Perimeter setback 20' from public street 38' Maximmun building coverage 40% 35% Minimmun lot area as approved 9140 acres Front (20' ), Side (5' ), Rear (15' ) Yards as approved 20,5,15 Minimiun separation between single family detached units 10' 10' Maxiimun building height 30' - two story 18' Private road street width 301 , 321, 40' 36' In addition, section 25.74.190 permits commission to impose such conditions it deems necessary to carry out the general purpose of the section. In other single family developments in the PR zone, the city has applied the basic R-1 zone standards. R-1 8,000 standards apply- units will be 18 feet in height, side yards will be 5 feet and 9 feet, coverage is 35%. IV. FINDINGS: 1. The proposed map, its design, improvements, type of development, and density are consistent with the State Subdivision Map Act, the Palm Desert Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance, and General Plan. 2. The design of the subdivision and required mitigation measures insure that the project will not result in environmental damage, injure fish or wildlife, degrade water quality or create public health problems. 3. The map will not conflict with public easements. 4. The map will allow unrestricted solar access to all lots. V. RE OM ENMTION• Approve the findings and adopt Planning Ccnudssion Resolution No. approving TT 25639, subject to conditions. Prepared �7 Reviewed and Approved` t�� SM/db 2 I PLAN IIM C0MMIMICN iv d ad ND- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING OJAAISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A 30 SINGLE FAMILY LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ON 9.2 ACRES ON THE WEST SIDE OF COOK STREET BETWEEN FRANK SINATRA DRIVE AND COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE. CASE NO. TT 25639 WHEREAS thePlanning a nnin g Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 16th day of January, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by Roeloo Development for approval of a 30 single family lot subdivision on 9.2 acres within the PR-5 zone on the west side of Cook Street between Frank Sinatra Drive and Country Club Drive; and WHEREAS, said application has oamplied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify approval of the tentative tract map: 1. The proposed map, its design, improvements, type of development and density are consistent with the State Subdivision Map Act, the Palm Desert Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance, and General Plan. 2. The design of the subdivision and required mitigation measures insure that the project will not result in environmental damage, injure fish or wildlife, degrade water quality or create public health problems. 3. The map will not conflict with public easements. 4. The map will allow unrestricted solar access to all lots. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the conmission in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. TT 25631, subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions. PLANNING OC IISSION RESOLUTION NO. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Crnrtaission, held on this 16th day of January 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CAROL WHITLOCK, Chairperson ATTEST: RAMN A. DIAZ, Secretary SM/db 2 PLANNIM CU4 IISSICN RESSOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. TP 25639 Department of Community Development: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of community development/planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. That the setbacks and cover coverage limits for single family dwellings in this project shall be as required in the R-1 zone for 8,000 square foot minimum lot area as prescribed in section 25.16.060 of the zoning ordinance. 6. Property will be subject to $600.00 per acre fringe toed lizard mitigation fee. Department of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 3 PLANNIM OOMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 3. Storm drain and retention area design/construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, cxmplete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration/acceleration lanes at all the project entry points. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to project final. 8. All public improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 9. Landscaping maintenance on Cook Street, including lots "E" and "F", shall be provided by the homeowners association. If no honeowners association is formed, the applicant shall provide for the formation of a landscape and lighting maintenance district. All costs associated with the formation of the subject district shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 10. Waiver of access to Cook Street except at approved locations shall be granted on the Final Map. 4 PLANNIM CCI -IISSICN RFSSOUNICN NO. 11. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 12. The applicant shall provide for the installation of landscaping in the existing median island in Country Club Drive and Frank Sinatra Drive along the property frontage. In the event that such landscaping is installed by others prior to the final map approval, the applicant shall provide for the reimbursement to the City of Palm Desert of those costs associated with the landscape installation. 13. Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 14. Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. 15. Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 16. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the Department of Public Works. 17. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 18. Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 19. Property lines for the individual lots proposed by this subdivision shall be located at top of slope where applicable. 20. As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be underground per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. 5 PLANNIM CCMyIISSICN RFSCEMICN ND. 21. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 55 feet on Cook Street and full right-of-way at 60 feet on "A", "B", "C" and "D" streets shall be provided on the final map. 22. Applicant shall agree to contribute their ,fair share of the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension, Interstate 10 interchange and Bridge Rmd. City Fire Marshal: 1. Provide, or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flow of 1500 gpm and the actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. 2. A fire flow of 1500 gpn for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 3. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), located not less than 25' nor more than 100' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 4. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the County Fire Chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. 5. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes. The roadway shall be not less than 24' of unobstructed width and 13'6" of vertical clearance. Where parallel parking g is allowed, the roadway shall be 36' wide with parking on both sides, 32' wide with parking on one side. Dead-end roads in excess of 150' shall be provided with a minimum 45' radius turn-around (55' in industrial developments). 6 PLANNING CU44 SSICN RLaOLUTICN ND. 6. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. all controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department. M;nimLmi opening width shall be 12' , with a minimum vertical clearance of 1316". 7. Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. 8. All new residences/dwellings are required to have illuminated residential addresses meeting both city and Fire Dept. approval. 9. Shake shingle roofs are no longer permitted in the Cities of Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage or Palm Desert. SM/db 7 I oq FMM Dcr��73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346.0611 January 16, 1990 Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code. NEGATIVE DEXIARnmlCN CASE NO.; TT 25639 APPLICANT/PRO.7ECT SPONSOR: ROELCD DEVELOPMENT, 2 Park Plaza, Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92714 PROJECT DES RIPrION/LOCATICN: 30 lot residential subdivision on 9.2 acres of PR-5 zoned land located on the west side of Cook Street between Frank Sinatra Drive and Country Club Drive The Director of the Department of Ctnuunity Development, City of Palm Desert, California has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. RAMON A. DIAZ DATE DIRECTOR OF CCtTLJNITY DEVELOPMENT RD/db W pTER ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY �/ST RICj COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058•COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236•TELEPHONE(619)398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS TELLIS CODEKAS,PRESIDENT THOMAS E.LEVY,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS,VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY JOHN P.POWELL KEITH H.AINSWORTH,ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER DOROTHY M.NICHOLS REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS THEODORE J.FISH 4:,AL112��Llj G33 \\., December 27, 1989 Cif J c 2 9 1989 File: 0163.1 CO;Y;�tiNl + Di:Sciul'mtNl DLPArIIMcN; CITY .IF PALI'd DESERT Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Gentlemen: Subject: Tentative Tract 25639 Portion of Northeast Quarter, Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian This area lies on the sandy area in the northern portion of Palm Desert and is considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is designated Zone C on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. The district will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this district. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. Plans for grading, landscaping, and irrigation systems shall be submitted to Coachella Valley Water District for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. If you have any questions please call Bob Meleg, stormwater engineer, extension 264. Yours very truly, ttruly, om Levy General Manager-Chief Engineer RF:gh cc: Don Park Riverside County Department of Public Health, Indio TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA JACOMPANY 1981 LUGONIA AVENUE • REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA MAILING ADDRESS: BOX 3DD3, REDLANDS. CALIFORNIA 92373-9982 Decmeber 21, 1989 City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Dr. i �s Palm Desert, CA 92260 1989 ATTENTION: Ramon A. Dial 6o'6hiur.�rr sE'vr,�aPs�F.W DEPxKI:�16•n clfY IF PALM DESERT RE: Case # TT 25639 Thank you for inquiring about the availability of natural gas service for your project. We are pleased to inform you that Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be provided from a 4" gas main in Cook Rd. at Country Club Drive without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractural arrangements are made. You should be aware that this letter is not to be interpreted as a contractural commitment to serve the proposed project, but only as an informational service. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the conditions under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. Typical demand use for: a. Residential (System Area Average/Use Per Meter) Yearly Single Family 799 therms/year dwelling unit Multi-Family 4 or less units 482 therms/year dwelling unit Multi-Family 5 or more units 483 therms/year dwelling unit These averages are based on total gas consumption in residential units served by Southern California Gas Company, and it should not be implied that any particular home, apartment or tract of homes will use these amounts of energy. b. Commercial Due to the fact that construction varies so widely (a glass building vs. a heavily insulated building) and there is such a wide variation, in types of materials and equipment used, a typical demand figure is not available for this type of construction. Calculations would need to be made after the building has been designed. To insure the existing facilities are adequate to accommodate the new development, an engineering study will be required. Detailed information including tract maps and plot plans must be submitted to the Gas Company Market Services Representa- tive, 1-800-624-2497, six months prior to the actual construction of the natural gas pipeline. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs, please contact our Area Market Services Manager, P.O. Box 3003, Redlands, CA 92373-0306, phone 1-800-624-2497. Sincerely, i Roger BauglWan Technical Supervisor RLB:mc CC: Environ Affairs - ML209B SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 14 COMPANY 1981 LUGONIA AVENUE • REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA MAILING ADDRESS: BOX 3003. REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA 92373-9982 Decmeber 21, 1989 City of Palm Desert \ ,L �q 73-510 Fred Waring Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 s 1989 ATTENTION: Ramon A. Diaz c'DtAlior,„ IL,LL111 N CIiY X PALM DESLRi RE: Case # IT 25639 Thank you for inquiring about the availability of natural gas service for your project. We are pleased to inform you that Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to ,F-the project could be provided from a 4" gas main in Cook Rd. at Country Club Drive without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractural arrangements are made. You should be aware that this letter is not to be interpreted as a contractural commitment to serve the proposed project, but only as an informational service. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the conditions under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. Typical demand use for: a. Residential (System Area Average/Use Per Meter) Yearlv Single Family 799 therms/year dwelling unit Multi-Family 4 or less units 482 therms/year dwelling unit Multi-Family 5 or more units 483 therms/year dwelling unit These averages are based on total gas consumption in residential units served by Southern California Gas Company, and it should not be implied that any particular home, apartment or tract of homes will use these amounts of energy. b. Commercial Due to the fact that construction varies so widely (a glass building vs. a heavily insulated building) and there is such a wide variation in types of materials and equipment used, a typical demand figure is not available for this type of construction. Calculations would need to be made after the building has been designed. To insure the existing facilities are adequate to accommodate the new development, an engineering study will be required. Detailed information including tract maps and plot plans must be submitted to the Gas Company Market Services Representa- tive, 1-800-624-2497, six months prior to the actual construction of the natural gas pipeline. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs, please contact our Area Market Services Manager, P.O. Box 3003, Redlands, CA 92373-0306, phone 1-800-624-2497. Sincerely, Roger Baug6dan Technical Supervisor RLB:mc Ir F.. cc. Environ Affairs - ML209B RIVERSIDE �ALIFOTY *11IT fFQ e w FIRE DEPPARTMENT OE�pF AE PROTE r MNY 'd IN COOPERATION WITH THE '[ COUNTY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION p •_ -R IVERSIDE.aT i F GLEN,]. NEWMAN i FIRE.CHIEF9 d v �,-t; z / 1989 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE COVE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU cc4R!IjM r 'alei i::' -i:ie� i,�r,a'�1^tM.' PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 44.900 EL DORADO DRIVE CiiY :•F V.^,th: DLSER1 TELEPHONE: (714) 657.3183 INDIAN WELLS, CA 92210 December 21 , 1989 TO; City Of Palm Desert . Ray Diaz Dir. Comm.Dev. /Planning REF:TT 25639 With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced TT25639 , the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Uniform Fire Code , City Municipal Code and/or recognized Fire Protection Standards : Provide, or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential fire flow of 1500 gpm and the actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure . A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site . The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant (s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" ) , located not less than 25 ' nor more than 200 ' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways . Hydrants installed below 3000 ' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel " type . Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the County Fire Chief . Upon approval , the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types , location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements . Plans shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification : "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department . " Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes . The roadway shall be not less than 24 ' of unobstructed width and 13 ' 6" of vertical clearance . Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall be 36 ' wide with parking on both sides , 32 ' wide with parking on one side . Dead-end roads in excess of 150 ' shall be provided with a minimum 45 ' radius turn-around (55 ' in industrial developments) . Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers , guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department . All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio—controlled over—ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles . Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure . All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department . Minimum opening width shall be 12 ' , with a minimum vertical clearance of 13 ' 6" . Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. All new residences/dwellings are required to have illuminated residential addresses meeting both City and Fire Dept approval . Shake shingle roofs are no longer permitted in the Cities of Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage or Palm Desert . All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions should be referred to the Fire Dept . Fire Protection /Inspection Staff . Sincerely, GLEN NEWMAN Ranger in Charge County Fire Chief v� By m Reeder yi re Protection Specialist bbm INTEROFFICE NENORANDUN TO: Depart ent of Community Development/Planning Attenti n: Stephen McGrath FROM: Richard\. Folkers, Asst. City Manager/Public Works Director SUBJECT: TENTATI\TRACT 25639, ROELCO DEVELOPMENT DATE: Jantl ?y�, 5., 1989 �� conditions of approval €o *sue �fr� - ed ro ' (1) Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. (2) Drainage facilities shall. be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. (3) Storm drain and retention area design/construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. (4) Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. (5) Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable City standards. (6) As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration/acceleration lanes at the all project entry points. "As- built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. (7) Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to project final. (8) All public improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. (9) Landscaping maintenance on Cook Street, including lots "E" and "F", shall be provided by the homeowners association. If no homeowners association is formed, the applicant shall provide for the formation of a landscape and lighting maintenance district. All costs associated with the formation of the subject district shall be the responsibility of the applicant. (10) Waiver of access to Cook Street except at approved locations shall be granted on the Final Map. (11) In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. (12) The applicant shall provide for the installation of landscaping in the existing median island in Country Club Drive and Frank Sinatra Drive along the property frontage. In the event that such landscaping is installed by others prior to the final map approval, the applicant shall provide for the reimbursement to the City of Palm Desert of those costs associated with the landscape installation. (13) Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. (14) Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. (15) Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. (16) Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the Department of Public Works. F 'C1, (17) A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. (18) Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. (19) Property lines for the individual lots proposed by this subdivision shall be located at top of slope where applicable. (20) As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, all existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. (21) As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, dedication of half-street right-of-way at 55 feet on Cook Street and full right-of-way at 60 feet on "A", "B", "C" and "D" streets shall be provided on the final map. (22) Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share of the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension, Interstate 10 interchange and Bridge Fund. RICHARD J. FOLKERS, P.E. (jsgltr25639.iom) SunLine T Transit MEMBER AGENCIES Cathedral City Coachella Desert Hot Springs Indio La Quinta Palm Desert J A N 12 1990 Palm Springs COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARWENT Rancho Mirage OITY OF PALM DESERT Riverside County January 8, 1990 Mr, Ramon A. Diaz Director of Community Development/Planning City of Palm Desert 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: E 25639 Dear Mr. -Diaz: Thank you for the opportunity to review the above referenced plans. SunLine Transit Agency currently does not operate transit service in the vicinity of this property. However given the arterial nature of Cook Street, it is conceivable that SunLine Transit Agency will in the future provide bus service along this street. Therefore we ask that either the developer, be required to build transit mitigation measures on the property or pay an equivalent amount of money into a trust fund for future transit amenities. I refer you to a letter dated November 11, 1989 from SunLine Transit Agency to you regarding the .creation of a mechanism whereby a cash payment by developers can be made. . Given the uncertain date, at which SunLine will be providing transit service in this vicinity, we strongly suggest that ;a cash payment be made into the trust fund. If you have' any questions about this please feel free to call me. If the developer would rather build the transit amenities, we then ask that a bus turnout be constructed on Cook Street just south of the main entrance into the project. In addition we ask that a passenger waiting shelter be constructed at this location. 32-505 Harry Oliver Trail • Thousand Palms, California 92276 • (619) 343.3456 Mr. Ramon A. Diaz January 8, 1990 Page 2 SunLine Transit Agency has suggested standards for bus turnouts and passenger waiting shelters. We will be happy to work with the City ,and with the developer to develop a mutually agreeable design. Yours Very Truly, SONLINE TRANSIT AGENCY Debra Astin Senior Planner DA/cmb AUTHORIZATION REGARDING PROCESSING OF GOVERNMENTAL APPROVALS, PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS TO: CITY OF PALM DESERT All Departments and Divisions This Authorization is given this 15th day of November, 1989, by John and Judy Morton, as Trustees of the Revocable Declaration of Trust dated November 7, 1985 ("Optionor") for the benefit of Edward C. Ellis, Charles T. Collett and Michael M. Robinson (col- lectively "Optionee") . RECITALS A. Optionor and Optionee have entered into an Option Agreement dated November 15, 1989, pursuant to which Optionor has granted Optionee the right to purchase certain real property located in the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, which is more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property") . B. Optionee proposes to develop the Property as a residential subdivision, which development will necessitate applying for and obtaining various governmental licenses, authorizations, consents, permits and approvals and will further necessitate various inspec- tion activities in respect to the Property. C. This authorization is given to permit Optionee the power and ability to pursue all activities reasonably desired to be pursued by Optionee toward the inspection of the Property and the process- ing of all applications, permits, licenses, authorizations and the like relating to any development of the Property proposed by Optionee. AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZATION 1. To and including December 30, 1989, Optionee and their agents, employees, representatives and independent contractors are autho- rized to enter onto the Property for the purpose of obtaining information with respect to the Property and proposed development of the Property, including, without limitation, performing engi- neering, surveying, architectural, geological and soil studies, tests and inspections, and for such other purposes as Optionee reasonably deems necessary in order to satisfy itself as to the physical condition of the Property, soil conditions and any other characteristics of the Property. Optionee is authorized to obtain, at Optionee ' s sole cost and expense, all governmental permits and authorizations required by any governmental agencies having juris- diction over the Property for the performance of Optionee' s inves- tigation work on the Property. -1- 2 . Optionee is fully authorized and permitted to meet with and discuss the Property and development of the Property with all governmental agencies and, if reasonably requested by Optionee, Optionor shall make appearances to the extent he is available for appearances, at meetings on behalf of Optionee and the development of the Property proposed by Optionee. 3 . Optionee is fully authorized and permitted to apply for and obtain all permits, consents, licenses, authorizations and approv- als including, without limitation, mapping, zoning approvals and/or changes to same, required or desired by Optionee for Optionee' s contemplated operation, development and/or uses of the Property and other related activities concerning the Property, including, without limitation, executing all applications, documents and other materials required or otherwise requested by Optionee to be exe- cuted in connection with the land use processing and related matters concerning the Property and Optionee' s proposed development of the Property. 4 . All work performed with respect to Optionee ' s requests and/or pursuant to this Authorization shall be at Optionee's sole cost and expense and Optionor and Optionor' s Property shall not be liable for any cost or expenses pursuant thereto. 5. Optionee has the right to assign its interests hereunder without the consent of Optionor to a partnership, joint venture, corporation or other entity or association in which the Optionee, individually or collectively, retain at least forty percent (40%) ownership. 6. This Authorization may be extended by written notice of extension hereunder signed by Optionor. Executed as of the day and ye =RORTON, San Diego, California. J DI H A. MORTON, Trustee -2- EXHIBIT A The land referred to in this Agreement is situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: The Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, as shown by United States Government Survey; Excepting therefrom from the Easterly rectangular 44 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; also excepting an easement for road purposes over the North 20 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 4 , Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, being approximately 9. 34 acres. Subject to: Covenants, conditions, and restrictions, now of record, if any; and rights, rights of way and ease- ments for public utilities, water companies, alleys and streets, now of record, if any. c+ II AUTHORIZATION REGARDING PROCESSING OF GOVERNMENTAL APPROVALS, PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS TO: CITY OF PALM DESERT All Departments and Divisions This Authorization is given this 15th day of November, 1989, by John and Judy Morton, as Trustees of the Revocable Declaration of Trust dated November 7 , 1985 ("Optionor") for the benefit of Edward C. Ellis, Charles T. Collett and Michael M. Robinson (col- lectively "Optionee") . RECITALS A. Optionor and Optionee have entered into an option Agreement dated November 15, 1989, pursuant to which Optionor has granted Optionee the right to purchase certain real property located in the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, which is more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property") . B. Optionee proposes to develop the Property as a residential subdivision, which development will necessitate applying for and obtaining various governmental licenses, authorizations, consents, permits and approvals and will further necessitate various. inspec- tion activities in respect to the Property. C. This authorization is given to permit Optionee the power and ability to pursue all activities reasonably desired to be pursued by Optionee toward the inspection of the Property and the process- ing of all applications, permits, licenses, authorizations and the like relating to any development of the Property proposed by Optionee. AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZATION 1. To and including December 30, 1989, Optionee and their agents, employees, representatives and independent contractors are autho- rized to enter onto the Property for the purpose of obtaining information with respect to the Property and proposed development of the Property, including, without limitation, performing engi- neering, surveying, architectural, geological and soil studies, tests and inspections, and for such other purposes as Optionee reasonably deems necessary in order to satisfy itself as to the physical condition of the Property, soil conditions and any other characteristics of the Property. Optionee is authorized to obtain, at Optionee' s sole cost and expense, all governmental permits and authorizations required by any governmental agencies having juris- diction over the Property for the performance of Optionee ' s inves- tigation work on the Property. -1- 2 . Optionee is fully authorized and permitted to meet with and discuss the Property and development of the Property with all governmental agencies and, if reasonably requested by Optionee, Optionor shall make appearances to the extent he is available for appearances, at meetings on behalf of Optionee and the development of the Property proposed by Optionee. 3 . Optionee is fully authorized and permitted to apply for and obtain all permits, consents, licenses, authorizations and approv- als including, without limitation, mapping, zoning approvals and/or changes to same, required or desired by Optionee for Optionee 's contemplated operation, development and/or uses of the Property and other related activities concerning the Property, including, without limitation, executing all applications, documents and other materials required or otherwise requested by Optionee to be exe- cuted in connection with the land use processing and related matters concerning the Property and Optionee' s proposed development of the Property. 4 . All work performed with respect to Optionee' s requests and/or pursuant to this Authorization shall be at Optionee ' s sole cost and expense and Optionor and Optionor's Property shall not be liable for any cost or expenses pursuant thereto. 5. Optionee has the right to assign its interests hereunder without the consent of Optionor to a partnership, joint venture, corporation or other entity or association in which the Optionee, individually or collectively, retain at least forty percent (40%) ownership. 6. This Authorization may be extended by written notice of extension hereunder signed by Optionor. Executed as of the day and year first above written, at San Diego, California. JORVIR. MORTON, Trustee JU ITH A. MORTON, Trustee -2- i EXHIBIT A The land referred to in this Agreement is situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: The Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 4, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, as shown by United States Government Survey; Excepting therefrom from the Easterly rectangular 44 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 4 , Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; also excepting an easement for road purposes over the North 20 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 4 , Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, being approximately 9. 34 acres. Subject to: Covenants, conditions, and restrictions, now of record, if any; and rights, rights of way and ease- ments for public utilities, water companies, alleys and streets, now of record, if any. 1' PAcf / of ✓08 ND. 33/-/ RGUSON /Z -// -g9 FN SIN CIIN ,c%�Lco Df✓EcvPr�E.✓T � covsT,2rx7xr/ co, 46-414 RDUDEL LANE -LA QUINTA, CA 92253 (619) 342-0058 RETEN7101V ,BfIS/N CALCULATAW5 T2Nr47-1V2- 71-f4Cr 25639 WEST S/DE OF %¢ M/. 1-04171/ OE cL'?.Nt' s/�✓AT<A DR. j�,C'A/NRGc G,2/Tf,Z/A AS OUTL/.:/ ,P /n/ 711E NO,¢T11S4� /I LEA I�RAIJVACE MASTE.F PLA v IPAJ<D APZIIL/ 1987, EX(�rPT TyA^ PEz c/T/ F�=�v/e<-.� .✓T TN/S P/Zo✓EGT WH/CN /,5 U./DE.Z /D //ICES W/�-L 6.t` T�EATr'Jj /is f/ /O-f)G ->` �,�=,irLDPMP_�/T ,2EBt/i2�a/G ,QET.�/✓T/O�/, PF.�'_ /Z AA+C+LWAV 4- 38 Lfln/DSCAPE LOT ALD ✓G T.NE Ce4e .ST, 1--AONTAGE WILL BE 41f,5�P Fo b /hEA.✓pE,r2/NG S/DEWAL,� fl.✓D ,ecTEiJT/oA/. /2fiCr/T/oN ISAJih/ DEJIG�/ r TOTAL ACEA TZ/BuTAzy TD 0eF "NTo../ gi-Wl = 5. 20 //ceES Fwz), GHAaT fl /N MnrT� PcA i ,¢FPonT /ihoEzviouS Cn /Ee = So� AND ,t'UN -O" S7-0,2AGE V040M4 X-C40/.2E4) = 2000 C.IF PF,e Aee-F F,C'O/^, C11/IZ7- 'B „ .19ZrA A.P,1Vfr1-%FA1 r M✓LTiPL/F,e = /.35- PEf£i✓T/On/ VOL Ur,,E AC--61 U/,¢fD = 2 000 x /.35 ae 9.2 Z4, 540 C.F. F,C'Or� ,J'TD,2AGf VOLUIrj,E UILGUL9T/0,JJ� A✓A/CABLE JT0.2AGE AT MAC Y✓A%E,Z Ju .C'4CF Of 259. 2 = 373 o t /O O/0 t S050 t SBBO = 24 670 C.F. AVA/LA6LE SToA-96,5 /,v PeYwfLLS > ¢ X /76) = GBfJ TOTAL iI✓A/G. JToZA6� 7 z5� 350 c.f Gfi < F E qGi 7�� o_K �7 Q lip N0. 25203 ml �-; Dec. 31, 1939 k>� CIVIL > ' I1/)nl/EL fF-R6 On/ DATE RCZ 25203 EXA. /2-31-09 -- SUBJECT .�Tlae./ $AJ/r/ PAGE 2 OF - - - PROJECT 9. 2 AC, JOB NO .. LOCATION W S_": .CoDAG� "Si: /¢ M/. S D i�N•C.fi.�� ,aq BY G7• F,E/I�UJUn/ CLIENT DATE A-oE�ca -4 �l I 1 h h Q � W h V 1�I v � e I e� w N 1 4J � N SUBJECT - ------- PAGE 3 OF - PROJECT - . . . _ JOB NO LOCATION - BY CLIENT ,D£�/F2ooriE,.iT - DATE -- -- {lOELCO 0 � J h OC h . o � � l� k Nl- - at,LL SUBJECT4, i �:. . . : - PAGE- - -_--- --- - _._ PROJECTS.-;.;• , - - - _ __. JOB NO .�-_ i LOCATION ._.- . . . BYFE;�GUSIJN - _-- -- --- -- ' LIENT ---- - -r-- �- - ' - - �--- -- -- ��-lw ✓�.LvyNJ�nJT - - - _ DATE -i -4 � . - -- - � --- ....- h Z Wsl j . `' O a Q ►. { m CA 1� F N N, SUBJECT PAGE s OF - PROJECT JOB NO LOCATION CLIENT DFI/ELOPM6NT DATE J � _ :. - - _ j m N J � V - W l N M o - � ti Lv V3 - - -- T •~_"• j�__�':.-� i�.1_i-J--��l��i i j_= -i-l:� - 1�.1 � � .ice- 1ii _ - _1_ - -; - - � -- PirGE 6 of N � (V � N N ti�0 tilo,�oe H 3 N s 0 6S Y p U p O N N RAGE 7 of q �z-il—s9 N 9 �_,_ _ . 0 tits°oQ 4 �, h . � 3 N � W h I h � N `` N a _ � z 'o ti I os� � o `, S� � ��P�y ,�4 i I 1 ti Y 0 O U O O v N N N a /ZD.ELCO �r�FG4oi�E.✓i {� U 4 6000 /2-11-59 YII a w a rw 5000 4000 G7 H W 3000 x w 2000 W 1000 E M i w 0 0 0 z 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 a ACTUAL IMPERVIOUS COVER (PERCENT) a I RECOMMENDED VALUES FOR PERCENT IMPERVIOUS COVER FOR I VARIOUS YPES OF DEVELOPMENT I T i iParks and Golf Courses (Turf) 10 $ Single Family Residential 40, 000 S. F. , (1. 0 Acre) Lots 20 $ 20, 000 S. F. (0.5 Acre) Lots 40 $ —� 7, 200 to 10, 000 S. F. Lots 50 $ 4i i Multiple Family Residential Condominiums 65 $ Apartments 80 $ Mobile Home Parks 75 $ Commercial, Downtown, Business or !' Industrial 90 $ �i it CHART A L:D:ETNTION STORAGE CITY OF PALM DESERT OLUME CHART NORTH SPHERE HYDROLOGY STUDY AL mw /.Lp�GCO-�' DEJELO�MfiJJ� iz-W-�9 1. 7 1. 6 1.5 1. 4 1. 3 F 1. 2 z 1. 1 w E 1. 0 Q a 0. 9 a 0.8 0. 7 0. 6 0. 5 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 DRAINAGE BASIN ACREAGE CHART B AREA ADJUSTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT MULTIPLIER NORTH SPHERE HYDROLOGY STUDY l N � NI �� NI `JJ I I C, P=uS. I P-2cS.f �I P us.0 P 4.L l` �. \� �/JGc /O of /25_ '74.5 74.5 I� 0to lb d' \ y zc4.3 N� P=ZG2.7 NI �':pc�3 NI P-26/.9 \ tiu 26 \N9 r7 ZG l•� ��. I �N _ I0 /28 v / 1�'L 60b i v ' S� � � I y / 11 I / / 4 Z59 1• l Z Z, � � h° o.3z f i -� h° c o,s2 /0 k' (tis°'�.4'COOK Iti/"� ti S' 1 T Piv6 r - To zy r � a p �uc low• .—._--. _ _._ — TO nAA� ;iJ L`� CJ ESERT .�A LLS wAL CO Un./--RY C Lc.✓g -- _TENTAT/VC TACT - _/Z-//-89 W.o. 33/-/ AGUSON /2 -// -69 FN SIN Fi1N POELCP�i7 DP✓EWPr�E../T 46-414 RDUDEL LANE LA QUINTA. CA 92253 (619) 342-0056 RErE/vTrorJ aAsr/v CALCULAT/ONS TE ri 17IVf- TR/4CT 25639 LOClIT/On/ : W.C5' SIDE OF COO. STREFT %¢ M/. 50ZI7i,/ Of f.eAWe S/Nsli-4A Pe. �,2A/NA6E G,QiTP2/A AS OUTL/,✓FV /N 741E NOQ:11S/ICE /)2FA 1�eA/NAL-E MASTE.P P4s1r/ PATFD APQ/L 1907 ExccPT Tye)%, PE2 C/TY R'6vieE�iEi✓T T)I/S T,eEATFI/ �4S f! /O-fIG t D,tF/ELO/�Mri./T ,E'EQ t/i2��r/G ,QET.L�i✓TlQ^/, PF.Z CITY T/JE /2- PiL¢.+Gr/A5/ -/- 38 ' LRn/DSCApE LOT ALo,✓G T.NE COLD ST. 1 0/✓rA6E WILL ,BE urJ-C:P FU MEn.✓pf,ZING S/DEx/nG,c i1NU Pc-riJT/4n/. i2ETc�✓T/oN �I1i�/ DEJ/Gn/ F TOTAL A.¢EA TZ/BUTA,ey TD 2ETFn/TO J 6Ar/n/ = 5. 20 AcefS /Cwo,�? CynzT "/I /N /-7A17E?- PLA i ,eEyoILT /MPEewouS Cov're = So% AND ,eUN O`f 57o eA6E VOLUME 2000 C,F. PEFZ fIc2E Feoi GN9Zr B 19,9er4 1gA1Vrrr7FA1T MULTiPL/Fe = /.3-5 QErEi✓r/OW VOLUME 2L-6IU/QED = 2 3.5 >e 9.2 241 540 C.F. `,eU/"J J'TD,2AGf VOLUME fi9LCULATIO../J� A✓A/LA6LE JT0,2AGE.. AT MAJl. WAi E,2 SU,erACE Of 259. 2. 3730 t /0 0/0 t 5'050 t SBBo = 24, G70 G F. AVAILABLE STOA46f / V PAYWAUGS > ¢ >e 170 = OSD ToTAL ✓A1L• JTozA6X 350 G.f. No. 25N t\A ^J) Dec. 37, 1509 d r CIM / `Cr�Lk \\FOP /2-/I- 99 11AN/EL j,ER n/ DATE RCZ Z5203 ExA. /2-3/-89 .-- SUBJECT \ . . DATE > OF PROJECT sa6 3z JOB NO @ecION : a0 ; _, �J &a^1 CLIENT � -R«a, . ) � \ � � « � x - § 5 \2 � % y a a ; x \ \ \ ( e � � a & SUBJECT - - PAGE ,3 OF -- PROJECT - - . . ._ . ,_ JOB NO LOCATION BY CLIENT DATE ROELto Q � J O W h . 1 V h Z - `.l PAGE OF Ott_PROJECTS JOB N0. . 33/ --/ =- .+-- LOCATION. BY. ,U. FE.LGUSL?N --- --DATE - ---_- ._.�'.. CLIENT '--- Q J V :- N q ec F N O - SUBJECT . . _ . PAGE s" OF -- PROJECT JOB NO - LOCATION BY .Z), `ER,--vs -- CLIENT ,DE�/ELD�MEn/T DATE 12 J i -- - - V - --h - - - - - -- -: _ _ - - --- --- Vi .._.� -Ziz V _ V� M - - - PAGE OF 59 N �? 1.4 qzi hl N � N N I " rL��OQ rylo�pQ bi 3 N N q U to I 31 U Sz � 1O it a 6S Y p U I p O N PAGE 7 of N 9 0 i 3 ti N I� N O� rl) V1 VV I I Y O O U O O v N N �v - AMIL R: �06LC0�2• vrJ�LOOME./i U 6000 a � w 5000 I U 0 4000 w a H .J w 3000 x w 0 2000 w 1000 F w 0 0 0 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 x ACTUAL IMPERVIOUS COVER a (PERCENT) � I RECOMMENDED VALUES FOR PERCENT IMPERVIOUS COVER FOR VARIOUS TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT i i iParks and Golf Courses (Turf) 10 $ Single Family Residential 40, 000 S. F. (1. 0 Acre) Lots 20 $ ! 20, 000 S. F. , (0. 5 Acre) Lots —� 7, 200 to 10, 000 S. F. Lots 40 $ 50 $ � Multiple Family Residential I Condominiums 65 $ Apartments 80 $ f Mobile Home Parks 75 $ f :. Commercial, Downtown, Business or !' Industrial 90 $ CHART A DETENTION STORAGE CITY OF PALM DESERT VOLUME CHART NORTH SPHERE HYDROLOGY STUDY yAGc J Of iLO�LCO '' DE�EG.pPMFiJT 1.7 1. 6 1. 5 1.4 — 1. 3 a 0 U 1. 2 Gam. 2 1. 1 w E 1. 0 O a 0. 9 a t 0. 8 0.7 0. 6 0.5 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 DRAINAGE BASIN ACREAGE CHART B AREA ADJUSTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT MULTIPLIER NORTH SPHERE HYDROLOGY STUDY - i I � I I 1 I ss SSA I I I � I I 78' \ 78 o . 1 � II Ch Ilk - J b 8 e N ?c 41 ? R co N In 8� 73 G 74 ' 745 ' 75 ' T7 I � J @00 � ` 1 - � I rn o �• w ss IS, w I fi00 \ T' IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 r BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST - -- _N_ - PALM QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OFTHE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 TS.S. R.6E. S.B.B.M. .: e .r DECEMBER 1989 --------- � 12 _ 13 14 1� 16 �9 n1e7... ��E�'� •�i 27 28 P 'lam• a ar,m ar.Aa�r.. 23 2420, • :- _ 's 1 , Zrsel xcr .•"�-.• -i- 1 H ; im— __ I szIDa�i.c.S IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT _. . ..,__-_._ TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST -- _i, "� a QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF !,L` THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF -Y�j - SEC. 4 TS.S. R.6.E. S.B.B.M. -+ DECEMBER 1989 roomm Iw p_ 13f �14 /& IYJ Iw•. p ,1- '�'++._`. ,, ,1.{M x(FI lei Wf17 57 ` ��µ. I- �� l~.• a 4 3• aR90•' I _ vein .. T�+ aW 1 ;' W 4• 3,• P2,•. a. ,.1.•, .I . 22 IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST I k PALM QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 T5.S, R.6E. S.B.B.M. DECEMBER 1989 ion OR iIce 7- TZ 12 13 14 15 17 27 1 26 SO sta==11 19 7 20 21 4 3 2 IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT .. . _F.. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 re ? BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF '.` THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 TS.S. R.6.E. S.B.B.M. - -� DECEMBER 1989 A Ia.o9 �� •F op i 1 ' J2 p_ 13 14 � max++ ix•. p ..-. � 1, �I�Il 4(FI ? ' _.-...- / i1,7..i lk TI 19 — >.. _x`• 26 -• it N �� ..�, 1_ n €r�_ rl.• w• !I ?• k• '� :I 22 1 IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 15.S. R.&E. S.B.&M, DECEMBER 1989 3m 12 13 14 15 16 2r.- 'k, 27 28 30 A000 ey) 19 aeee 26 25 24 23 20 4 3 2 N\ IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST - _ �-_L .. - PA.ri QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OFTHE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF -Y��- ___ SEC. 4 TS.S. R.6E. S.B.B.M. DECEMBER 1989 op �• �� I- a 12, & ./o.4..� 15 In.. / $, —D —'ll'—Yu•t�—<�STREF! i—A 27 pB 29r TJ 3O � � IK \ .E J 7. I �' s.. � � . P19 ml �_ M a� w•i aRa r T e.�, .R,• 3., IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 f BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF �[ THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF _YJ - _ �___ •` =`I SEC. 4 TS.S. R.6.E. S.B.B.M. ry r- f. Gr.r.♦�j{ DECEMBER 1989 ++r• .. ..-.=� orno- m ry xn ell op rn�— 15 N.V: •..� � II.iN I 1 17 _ 77 'IB�N 29 30A ICI\ re..m rtaz=11 a, Ana� 23 g• iO_.a ,r P� 21 ,..o.. a ..e. 4, . 2. ✓1 N. Im.1 ii 1 Mo r 7 1 IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT t TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST PAIM !J.. QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 T5.$. R.6.E. S.B.B.M. DECEMBER 1989 .......... I. 17 27 1 28 29 J9 7 24 20 4 2 22 77-z��- IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 E �� BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST '- -=-^ rnir QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 TS.S. R.6.E. S.B.B.M. DECEMBER 1989 � � F Imo, 2`—mod / // v1e• .�_.D__'3^=Yu.i—_�STNEFT a—�� _ I '�..v�.� �'•.�...� ja / I � k P�ti• ? '^=""tee .. ' 21 � f .F�•l�. 3., P..., �• �..., F �l Lam, (F 71-1 Tee._ M -��-�— I—a.�ar' —i_ •_I—..— � S I a... `�..a.._.� I � _ IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 _ /.E BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST - rnir QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF - !THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 T.S.S. R.6.E. S.B.B.M. ys �I.:YyI.'i DECEMBER 1989 �\ 2 - '))��'liwa• ' Intel_ ifaf /eW /rs / /• •'I 'D'"'ia-9arf�_I�STNEET � �� P_ 1 I m....e..0 �._..� / a-a/ .c n •a ae1 HI :� ,\ F rvv M u _ 27 zz 7 J 20, +. 6 •.cs-a i.- ;e-T-9__l.rr'�7€ri—� 1 i a M:I MOnO oc-! � I .act IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST ,. � rnlr iiea•n�L—__` QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF ! THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF ..Y; - SEC. 4 TS.S. R.6E. S.B.BM. =. -1 DECEMBER 1989 o.o•e m.cn m 3co f -: 1 • 1 i S {{{{{ 4, ..aw 1�. N 1, n.1x 4yFl 1,' 15 �17 �7 Z8 Z9 ti •'� 3D ;;26 z 1 m2-mac r� J IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST _ -:�,•�n� rmw QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 TS.S. R.6E. S.B.B.M. -' DECEMBER 1989 Atltltl jL1J _ � .... TT ,(oo �.If,u• Inge fJ..f.�'�4• 15 ( 27 l8 "a 29 y 30 At 79, 21 h•�I �. 2. 8. ^N• A� 1 iY• +o.enr<o z~ o Pow 71 ' --- I'—�=00.[. _-tq•>/L�.'�_ I-oI�G T _I i_'_.__ I }L''i c-�%,.� IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT .. . ..t.. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 E � BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST rmw 'ur:a QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF ' THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 TS.S. R.6.E. S.B.B.M. DECEMBER 1989 mronm -mot— ..... t Ti pol- ^Ir 13 14' IJ ,ere• w ti / 27 2 e �9 30 �w� 18 Pl9 �� ..�...e..��e .. /6 25 70, 21 ",e"`_` -:•I :. � it .,,...�e...o�.a`aa<k^ :*ssn IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST PALM QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 T5,S. R,6E. S.B.B.M, DECEMBER 1989 --- -- ----- -tea --- ....... C ol 0 27 7 28 P 29 id 7 r 4 3 1 22 L IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT -..1.-.-. .=1. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 E BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST - -" --- - ' . ` QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF ` e` SEC. 4 T5.S. R.6.E. S.B.B.M. DECEMBER 1989 m fa m m •..; q, 12 14 rt^��"l � /l ,I D _'.1^-9w•f�_fa3TNEET_a �� _ I IR... .J �........ »So a al7•f 'v" h ' 27 'laaae aL9 � 0, tl _r oF4_• e.E', i _3-e'oai�q__fsr��-1�j � / M-.m.• ....�_. e 19 jq 26 .4,v r e o2 a ..•v. f22 � on•w Cm�K __��.� _I—faa�6fT _I— �_t .. tjl y. .4..-ems+ n� IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST rniw :mnlm QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 TS.S. R.6.E. S.B.B.M. DECEMBER 1989I'�_'-"r'�`1 ell \ Ir— v/ / u•q— x L �I i I • � IF Lj � 14 % 27 6 a 29 y 3O B - 7, I R 3 2 �' 1 � I 1 o .. ..e....... m! ,. !d, vi ' I Sma==+K52 IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT .. ............v-. - TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 T.5.S. R.6E. S.9.8M. DECEMBER 1989 \ " \ I r°°' ,� ate`--e—�/ �• �,�o;% p t"•I - [\ 27 pa aw, 29 30 Q iK•\ ."r~ s.,"..m. ,E.,m a �• 3• Q �• �'.I �• t Mmeelo z« P.v a �.e.. .. if /m`a`w+.e...�� ••,41 I I a ry a..zrwc.ew...v�arrvwl �� I IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST -^ -� - rA.1,14 QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF ---mot THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 TS.S. R,GE. S.B.B.M. -/ OECEMBER 1989 -+ i .. ptlNtl .•• 0 .00 XV 9G0 :.. 11 - _-�- i w.� -- SSSI' 'z�_ 1-3• p� 1 //9 30 I� 7 Z 28 29 _ IM1 -v, m.<<..e..,...�. ems.. 21 n w nic, 3, ti i MO/Oa.O oa-! ♦ • iu a:e r i , . �I —tr--�—_ Imo-tom•.,,..-�.,.. Tj c— ��• S—� '�....A.., ....�. �..a..... I 4.�_S IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT -..r.- ...... TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 "E BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST ---rniw i nb QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OFTFIJI HE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 TS.S. R.6E. S.B.B.M. DECEMBER 1989 �+.• �"' - 1 �16 27 iz 29•y 30 ICI IK r - a,.,md,•.,...,, 26 2.5 20, —aB - 2F• F �,a•ma..r2s-• IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT - TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEASTN-_ .- I--`-j. �E� {1.6b QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF ;!_a-�: THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 TS.S. R.6.E. S.B.B.M. -,rip DECEMBER 1989 I 5 II 12 13 / Id, B� 15 '� // a� .—.D.�'.i^_ o✓i�—T STPEFT �i_� � � I m..�..v�.x V4.�.�.T.-...x z7 'za .P 29 so ✓Tq i .T-9__lsT.fl€ri—J-1;i / Y•e�*,w ....-�_ e IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT .. . _t.- TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 - BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST • rniu QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 T.S.S. R.6E. S.B.B M. DECEMBER 1989 - _y�.�.�{ I:— 30 a w S _II II '2 iD �f,��'•� Imo' n16 � \ Y^a. ... /__ • ....a„ems.., 'fi.� �• uAx�y, ?i _ I 25 2a zry .II ... �aa ert9 . ol $II�T�_ 1 ...aa... e 4• �• R �• �• '..•.,1 jam• 11 ..��.a 3'Si'.Tm•.a.Y2`y.� IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT .. -..t.-.._..-c. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST re I'm 'ur:aa i i' _ QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 TS.S, R.6.E. S.B.B.M. DECEMBER 1989 . \ no+e `6I:1 • rw_I_ 13 14 15�/. As• fi �/ alO• .�—D�_'ll^=9ert�_"STFF��—�� 1 a...� 27 28 F 29•y 3.. =- i .7,..• 1 26 '25Il �r• �3• .I ^I20 W w .2.. :.2,• `t E ,.�.moa.c� Po-s t� -1 - IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT - TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 T � ' BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OFTHE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 9 TS.S. R.6.E. S.B.B.M. DECEMRER 1989 =+ •r� y.,L'.. n— // rfe .Ii—.D=�'i•-9ori—_�•9TFFF�� I ruo• I �ws f 2'0�$ / 4 IIY. fwT.F=��RT.MI �� rfwl po'-.s.w .JE &'� �u 27 JP�1. L,B.. 29 3� IF t�h J a..-..a..... V H•4 �!Im r ih •• i i••••a m.. i .Ih - - r1 •: Amin,....o 2 29 za01 � q-, �_.ffVM C✓.. .m•, —� =��c-nr �4J�—_ cr _ .L. 1af1'_ rrn II _.,. �.��_. e f M IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST - -rnir * QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OFTHE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 T.S.S. R.6.E. S.B.B.M. DECEMBER 1989 12 Nil ,.I j d•/ . , Zr [ �- 29 so ! lF 26 25 a zu.. .=R20 21 . (Ib I 6 1R•.r/M iOn..�rp /4 a �4iu, N• ry /N•. L I i fir, MYO.LO Z E f IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT .. ...1......:c. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25639 - ' BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST '-PAIN QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OFTHE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 4 TS.S. R.6.E. S.B.B.M. ; DECEMBER 1989 Li IT T op r17 wQr a< 27 "e'a 2w'9 9 so K _ I�• '.N r I is i 70 I • I F,\ _ _ - SJ o $ �aysrrw� n r 4,.,� ..3..• z : .2r AT it .we.oe. Po n x2 yt. <<,, to 73-510 FNED WAILING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (019) 346-OG11 RCQl1LSh FOR CONi11=htIS AM) COH011IONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO(:;) : T�2S63� PRO,JECi : si/i✓isyo� o�a��l�x . f Z �l ��y/� �Oq� Crz 3 l APPL I CAN r: ✓ n �z .Svi� BOA Enclosed ple:,sn find m describing a project for which the following Is eing reciue;ted � 'v[17*4 K �J �tQLI� � t <-�OKJ'�� /+�`"S'.S �J✓c9 �Z7 I u� a a:nr hed data was � preprn ed by tie applicant and is being forwarded to you for comnunts and recommended conditions Of approval . the city is Interested in the probable Impacts on the environment ( Including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise, objects Of historical or aesthetic significance) and rr-,commended conditions Of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. YOur' commu'nts and recommended conditions oi` approval must be received by this Office prior to 4 :30 p.m. — irllf . J�,j� 1� In order to be discussed by the land division Ccnnmittee• the Ii dlvislon committee (comprised of director Of community (lovelopinent, city building official , city engineer, fire marshal , and a representative of CVWD) wIII discuss the consents and recnminended conditions of approval and will forward them to the planning comrnlssion through the staff report. Any Informkation received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division committee. Sincerely, ---------------------------------------- PANON A. DIAZ DIRECiOR OF COMIUNITY DEVEI.OPNENI /PLANNING /trn Ala:ar.hmenl s RESiJLTS OF PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT, A.P.N.# 620-190-16, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA DECEM 3ER 12, 1989 ES-0254-BD1 - _ i DECEMBER 12, 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS RESULTS OF PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT, A.P.N.# 620-190-16. PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................1 2.1 Setting..........................................................................................................1 2.2 Regional Hydrogeology............................................................................2 2.3 USDA Soil Classification............................................................................2 3.0 SITE ASSESSMENT METHODS..................................................................................3 3.1 Site Reconnaissance..................................................................................3 3.2 Aerial Photograph Review......................................................................3 3.3 Review of Soil Engineering Report........................................................4 3.4 Agency Contacts.........................................................................................4 3.5 Personal Contacts........................................................................................5 4.0 CONCLUSIONS...........................................................................................................5 5.0 CLOSURE...................................................................................................................6 LIST OF REFERENCES......................................................................................................8 Figure - 1 Vicinity Map Figure - 2 Site Map Figure - 3 Photographs Earth Systems Environmental , Inc. A Member of The Earlh Systems Group 79-811 B Country Club Dr. • Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 • (619)345-9772 • FAX(619)345-7315 December 12, 1989 Job -Number: ES-0254-BD1 Doc. Number: 8912-002.RPT Ram Development and Construction Company P.O. Box 2608 Palm Desert, California 92261-2608 Attention: Mr. Michael Robinson SUBJECT: RESULTS OF PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT, A.P.N.# 620-190-16, PALM DESERT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of preliminary environmental assessment activities conducted to date at the above referenced site. The purpose of this investigation was to determine, based on available information, whether past land use at or near the site has involved the use, storage or release of hazardous materials. The scope of site assessment work authorized by Mr. Michael Robinson included a site reconnaissance, interviews, review of available public and historical records and aerial photographs, and the preparation of the preliminary site assessment report. Included with the report are a Vicinity Map (Fig. 1), Site Map (Fig. 2), and Site Photographs (Fig. 3). 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 Setting The subject property is located near the southwest comer of Frank Sinatra Drive and Cook Street in the Palm Desert area of Riverside County, California. The surface area of the subject parcel of land is approximately 9 acres. The subject site is bounded by Cook Street to the east, and vacant land on the north, south, and west. At present, the site consists of vacant desert land with little vertical relief. The topography of the site is nearly 'flat and the surrounding land surface slopes very gently to the south. Vegetation at the site consists of short grasses, weeds and a few larger shrubs. Ram Development 2 December 12, 1989 2.2 Regional Hydrogeology The project site is located in the central Coachella Valley near the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains, east of Indio 'Mountain. The Coachella Valley is part of the tectonically active Salton Basin. This basin is a closed, internally draining trough that has been filled with a complex series of continental clastic materials during Pleistocene and Holocene time (Van de Camp, 1973). The San Andreas rift zone dominates the structural geology of the Coachella Valley. The Banning and Mission Creek faults, which are parts of the San Andreas system are responsible for earthquakes recently felt in the Coachella Valley. Other regional faults that have produced significant seismic events in the Coachella Valley are the San Jacinto, Imperial and Elsinore faults. The site is located in the active blowsand area of Riverside County. The project area may at one time have been covered by the waters of ancient Lake Cahuilla, a predecessor to the modern Salton Sea. This ancient body of water has left behind extensive lake bed deposits and relict shorelines. The depth to the uppermost ground water surface in the vicinity of the subject site is believed to be in excess of 80 feet below grade. The uppermost aquifer is primarily unconfined within the permeable alluvium. The depth to the main drinking water aquifer in this area is in excess of 200 feet. The regional ground water gradient is southerly, in the flow direction of the Whitewater River and towards the Salton Sea. 2.3 USDA Soil Classification The majority of the soils on the site are designated as Myoma fine sand. Typically, the site soils consist of well-drained or moderately well drained soils that formed in alluvium. Slopes are 5 to 10 percent. Typically, the surface stratum is light brownish grey, very fine sandy loam about 10 inches thick. The substratum is light brownish grey, highly micaceous, very fine sandy loam stratified with silt and silt loam at greater depths. These soils may contain a few fresh water shells and are moderately alkaline. The soils below a depth of 20 feet may be stratified with silty clay loam or be silty clay loam. Surface runoff is slow, and permeability ranges between approximately 6.0 to 20.0 in./hr, and pH ranges between approximately 7.9 and 8.4. Ram Development 3 December 12, 1989 3.0 SITE ASSESSMENT METHODS 3.1 Site Reconnaissance The property was visited on November 2, 1989, by an engineer from Earth Systems Environmental, Inc., to identify possible sources or evidence of contamination related to hazardous materials. The following observations were made: The properties surrounding the site are largely undeveloped virgin desert land, with the exception of Desert Falls, a private country club/golf course located east of the property. Major utilities (gas, electric, and water) are located beneath Cook Street, along the eastern edge of the property. No gas stations, dry cleaners or other commercial or industrial facilities known to store hazardous materials are located in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. The site is sparsely vegetated with native grasses, weeds, and shrubs. Very little debris was observed on or along the property. No material deemed to be potentially hazardous was observed. Inspection of the site did not indicate any unusual staining, discoloration or odors in the surficial soils. There are currently no structures located on the site and there are no signs (old foundations, etc.) of previous development. It appears that the only grading that has taken place on the property is that which was associated with the construction of Cook Street. There is an abandoned water well located on the western edge of the property. At the time of the site reconnaissance, there were no tire tracks or other indications that the well had been used recently. It is not known if the well has been properly abandoned in accordance with State of California Water Well Standards. 3.2 Aerial Photograph Review Available historical aerial photographs of the site were reviewed for evidence of past land disturbances or previous development on the property. Features described on the images are interpretive and valid only for the date of flight. The following features relative to land use history were identified: Ram Development 4 December 12, 1989 1973- Subject property appears to be vacant desert land. There are no structures evident and the surrounding land is undeveloped (9/27/73). 1977- Site appears similar to the 1973 photo with the exception that the country club located to the east is under construction (Soil Survey U.S.D.A. 1975, Sheet 11 of 19). 1988- The site is undeveloped and appears similar to the previous photos. The surrounding properties to the west, north, and south are still undeveloped while the property to the east is in the final phases of construction (4/88). 3.3 Review of Soil Engineering Report According to a soil engineering report prepared by Buena Engineers, Inc. dated December, 1989 for the subject site, the predominant soil type encountered at the surface was a greyish brown, very fine to medium sand. Review of the boring logs for the 5 borings excavated on December 6, 1989 did not indicate any noted evidence of discoloration or chemical odors indicative of possible soil contamination. Ground water was not encountered in any of the borings while excavating to a maximum depth of 25 feet below grade. Based on other geotechnical investigations conducted by Buena Engineers, Inc. in the vicinity of the subject site, the depth to ground water is generally in excess of 100 feet below grade. 3.4 Agency Contacts The U.S. EPA National Priorities List, Supplementary Lists and Supporting Materials (NPL, CERCLIS) were reviewed for the possible presence of sites within a one mile radius of the subject property that would pose a "risk to human health or the environment". There are no listings within a one mile radius of the subject property. The State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List (HWIS), was reviewed for hazardous waste and substances sites within a one mile radius of the subject property. Note that DHS, BEP, Cortese, and CWMB lists are referenced therein. No nearby contaminated sites were listed. The State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) list of Underground Storage Tanks was reviewed for leaking underground storage Ram Development 5 December 12, 1989 tanks within a one mile radius of the subject property. No leaking tank sites were listed in the immediate area of the subject site. The State of California DHS Abandoned Site Information System (ASPIS) was reviewed for the presence of hazardous waste sites within a one mile radius of the site. There were no sites listed. 3.5 Personal Contacts The Regional Water Quality Control Board was contacted regarding the possible presence of contaminated wells listed in accordance with State of California Assembly Bill AB 1803. There are no known contaminated wells located within 2 miles of the subject site. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS The information gained through this limited investigation indicates a lack of obvious sources of potential contamination immediately upon the property. The undeveloped condition of the site, the lack of apparent hazardous materials observed during the site reconnaissance, and the undeveloped nature of the surrounding properties appear to limit the potential for significant contamination to be present on the property. The site reconnaissance indicates that the property is undeveloped and free of visible surface contamination. Based on review of historical aerial photographs, it appears that there has been no past development on the subject site. Review of regulatory agency listings produced no information that would indicate the existence of leaking underground fuel tanks within a one mile radius of the property. The only source of potential environmental liability identified during this investigation is the abandoned well on the subject property. Improperly sealed wells are known to be capable of transmitting surface runoff into ground water aquifers, thus resulting in degradation of ground water quality. If the well is not intended for use as part of the planned development of the property, we recommend that the well be destroyed in accordance with proper State of California requirements. Water well destruction should be performed by a licensed well drilling contractor. Ram Development 6 December 12, 1989 Based on the data obtained during this preliminary environmental site assessment, there appears to be minimal potential for significant occurrences of hazardous materials at the site. It is the opinion of Earth Systems Environmental, Inc. that further investigation of the property is not warranted at this time. If additional information regarding the past use or possible presence of hazardous materials at the site is uncovered, then the need for additional work should be reevaluated. 5.0 CLOSURE This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Ram Development and Construction Company as it pertains to the property located near the southwest comer of Frank Sinatra Drive and Cook Street (A.P.N. 620- 190-16) in Palm Desert, California described herein. The conclusions and recommendations rendered are opinions based on readily available information obtained to date within the scope of the work authorized by the client. The client must understand however, that even the most comprehensive scope of services may fail to detect potential environmental liability on a particular site. Undocumented, unauthorized releases of hazardous materials, the remains of which are not readily identifiable by visual inspection, are difficult and often impossible to detect within the scope of such an investigation. This report should not be regarded as a guarantee that no contamination, beyond that which could have been detected within the scope of this investigation, is present beneath the property. All work has been performed in accordance with generally accepted practices in geotechnical engineering, environmental engineering, engineering geology and hydrogeology. No other warranty, either expressed or implied, is made. Ram Development 7 December 12, 1989 Thank you for this opportunity to have been of service. If you have any questions regarding this report or the information contained herein, please contact this office at your convenience. Sincerely, EARTH SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 4�L—o�er Robert Mohle Staff Engineer C.E.G.#1409 RM/JL Ram Development 8 December 12, 1989 LIST OF REFERENCES California Department of Health Services/TSCD Abandoned Site Program Information System, June 9, 1989. California Office of Planning and Research, Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List, June, 1989. California State Water Quality Resources Control Board, List of Underground Storage Tanks, Colorado River Basin Region, June 15, 1989. Personal contact, Ms. Julie Maurer, State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board, October 12, 1989. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of The Coachella Valley Area, Riverside County, September, 1984. United States Environmental Protection Agency, National Priorities List, Supplementary Lists and Supporting Materials, March, 1989. United States Geological Survey, 7.5 minute Map of Indio Quadrangle, 1975. Lf VICINITY MAP PROJECT SITE r - — DINAH SHORT ait 193 192 r 9 Z crRnro roRo o1i 71 ;c=; ck- Cr O �t Z mrr W•�q•� irl�ll i�l„11r;,r rinw � �bruanm.r ~ r °•r�'i(i .•i ilfOifrlilr hr111rIPnlllrlu Plrlgn �HO • COUNTRY o CLUB "' I R 40 AGE m c Bermuda 202 o W O o Dunes ® °° o � 204 PALM ; 1 O F ED WARIN QE35 IT r�. r'rl H, INDIA 4 WELL 212 '; a 213 214 SITE MAP NO. � t / 40.5l1 PROJECT SITE 1 i Ato04A Aoo4i 3004A lAe W h ' ! O O v OG141 /�f7AtA _ 1i SITE PHOTOGRAPHS PROJECT SITE LOOKING NORTH 1 1- PROJECT SITE LOOKING SOUTH ~� SITE PHOTOGRAPHS at Aw t PROJECT SITE LOOKING EAST j- r PROJECT SITE LOOKING WEST ...:_ .__. "..._ .. .3._.'.. _ .... . .._. _.. .... GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT APN 620-190-016 30 LOT SUBDIVISION PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR RAM DEVELOPMENT B7-1859-P1 DECEMBER 13, 1989 BUENA ENGINEERS INC . Buena Engineers,Inc. M�gffrBM INt 79-811 B COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE • BERMUDA DUNES,CALIFORNIA 92201 PHONE(619)345-1588 FAX (619)345-7315 December 13, 1989 B7-1859-P1 89-12-778 Ram Development P.O. Box 2608 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Project: APN 620-190-016 Cook Street Palm Desert, CA Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Report Presented herewith is our Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared for the proposed residential subdivision to be located in the Palm Desert area of Riverside County, California. This report incorporates the tentative information supplied to our office and in accordance with the request, recommendations for general site development and foundation design are provided. This report was prepared to stand as a whole, and no part of the report should be excerpted or used to exclusion of any other part. This report completes our scope of services in accordance with our agreement. Other services which may be required, such as plan review and grading observation are additional services and will be billed according to the Fee Schedule in effect at the time services are Please contact the undersigned if there are any questions concerning this report or the recommendations included herein. Respectfully submitted, �(BUENA ENGINEERS, INC. Reviewed a f� ` o,C 041210 Tm Exp.331-91 R. Layne Richins Staff Geologist Joseph R. D1�P�P Brett L. Anderson Civil Enginee Project Engineer RLR/BLA/JRV/th HD/SER/Copies: 6- Ram Development 1 - P. S. File 1 -VTA File BERMUDA DUNES BAKERSFIELD LANCASTER SAN LUIS OBISPO VENTURA TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK........................................................................1 SITEDESCRIPTION.....................................................................................................2 FIELD EXPLORATION..................................................................................................2 LABORATORY TESTING..............................................................................................3 SOILCONDITIONS.....................................................................................................4 GROUNDWATER.........................................................................................................4 REGIONALGEOLOGY..............................................................................................4 LOCALGEOLOGY.....................................................................................................5 GEOLOGICHAZARDS...............................................................................................6 Primary.................................................................................................................5 Secondary.........................................................................................................6 Non-Seismic.......................................................................................................6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.....................................................7 SITE DEVELOPMENT AND GRADING.....................................................................8 Site Development - Grading.......................................................................8 Site Development - General.....................................................................10 Excavations......................................................................................................11 TrafficAreas......................................................................................................11 UtilifyTrenches..................................................................................................11 STRUCTURES..............................................................................................................12 Foundations.....................................................................................................12 Slabson Grade..............................................................................................13 Settlement Considerations..........................................................................14 Frictional and Lateral Coefficients............................................................14 SlopeStability...................................................................................................14 Expansion.........................................................................................................14 AdditionalServices.........................................................................................15 LIMITATIONS AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS...........................................15 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................17 APPENDIX A Site and Vicinity Map Logs of Borings APPENDIX B Summary of Test Results Table 29-A APPENDIX C Standard Grading Specifications r December 13, 1989 - 1 - 137-1859-P1 89-12-778 INTRODUCTION This Geotechnical Engineering Report has been prepared for the proposed residential development to be located in the Palm Desert area of Riverside County, California. A It is assumed that the structures will be of lightweight one (1) and two (2) story construction. It is assumed that the buildings will be supported by normal continuous or pad footings. B. Structural considerations for building column loads of up to 20 kips and a maximum wall loading of 2.0 kips per linear foot were used as a basis for recommendations related to the construction of the C. These are estimated values since foundation plans were not available at the time of production of this report. If design loading is to exceed these assumed values, it will be necessary to reevaluate the given recommendations. D. All loading is assumed to be dead plus reasonable live load. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of our services was to evaluate the site soil conditions, and to provide conclusions and recommendations relative to the site and the proposed development. The scope of work includes the following: A A general reconnaissance of the site. B. Shallow subsurface exploration by drilling. C. Laboratory testing of selected soil samples obtained from the exploratory borings drilled for this project. D. Review of selected technical literature pertaining to the site. E. Evaluation of field and laboratory data relative to soil conditions. F. Engineering analysis of the data obtained from the exploration and testing programs. G. A summary of our findings and recommendations in written report. BUENA RS__ INC . December 13, 1989 - 2 - 137-1859-P1 89-12-778 Contained In This Report Are: A Discussions on regional and local geologic and soil conditions. B. Graphic and/or tabulated results of laboratory tests and field studies. C. Discussions and recommendations relative to allowable foundation bearing capacity, recommendations for foundation design, estimated total and differential settlements, lateral earth pressures, site grading criteria, geologic and seismic hazards. Not Contained In This Report: A This report does not address the potential presence of hazardous materials in any manner. SITE DESCRIPTION The site of the proposed project is located on the west side of Cook Street between Country Club and Frank Sinatra Drives in the Palm Desert area of Riverside County, California. A The site is presently vacant with scattered desert brush, short grass, weeds and debris. B. The property is fairly level throughout with a very slight overall slope to the north. C. Cook Street is paved and there is curb and gutter in place along the east edge of the site. D. There may be underground utilities along Cook Street. FIELD EXPLORATION Exploratory borings were drilled for observing the soil profile and obtaining samples for further analysis. A Five (5) borings were drilled for soil profiling and sampling to a maximum depth of twenty-six (26) feet below the existing ground surface. The borings were drilled on December 6, 1989, using an eight (8) inch diameter hollow-stem auger powered by a CME 45-B drilling rig. The approximate boring locations as indicated on the attached plan in Appendix A, were determined by pacing and sighting from existing streets and topographic features. The boring locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. R II FICA 9 Mr. IN F C Af I Nr December 13, 1989 - 3 - 137-1859-P 1 89-12-778 B. Samples were secured within the borings with a two and one-half (2.5) inch diameter ring sampler (ASTM D 3550, shoe similar to ASTM D 1586). The samples were obtained by driving the sampler with a one hundred forty (140) pound hammer, dropping thirty (30) inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler one foot was recorded. Recovered soil samples were sealed in containers and returned to the laboratory for further classification and testing. C. Bulk disturbed samples of the soils were obtained from cuttings developed during excavation of the test borings. The bulk samples were secured for classification purposes and represent a mixture of soils within the noted depths. D. The final logs represent our interpretation of the contents of the field logs, and the results of the laboratory observations and tests of the field samples. The final logs are included in the appendix A of this report. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types although the transitions may be gradual. LABORATORY TESTING After a visual and tactile classification in the field, samples were returned to the laboratory, classifications were checked, and a testing program was established. A Samples were reviewed along with field logs to determine which would be further analyzed. Those chosen were considered as representative of soil which would be exposed and/or used in grading and those deemed within building influence. B. In-situ moisture content and unit dry weights for the core samples were developed in accordance with ASTM D 2937. C. The relative strength characteristics of the subsurface soils were determined from the results of direct shear tests. Specimens were placed in contact with water at least twenty-four (24) hours before testing, and were then sheared under normal loads ranging from 0.5 D. Classification tests consisted of: Expansion Index (UBC Standard No. 29-2), Maximum Density-Optimum Moisture (ASTM D 1557), and. Hydrometer Analysis (California Test Method 203). E. Refer to Appendix B for tabular and graphic representation of the test results. December 13, 1989 - 4 - B7-1859-P1 89-12-778 SOIL CONDITIONS As determined by the borings, site soils were found to consist primarily of fine windblown sands. The boring logs in Appendix A contain a more detailed description of the soils encountered. A The soils were found to be fairly loose in the upper few feet but density generally increases with depth. B. The soils were found to be very dry throughout. C. Clay and silt contents of the soils exhibit low plasticity. Expansion tests indicate soils to be in the 'very low' to 'low' expansion category in accordance with Table 29-A in Appendix B of this report. Refer to section F of the structures section for specific explanations and requirements dealing with expansive soil. D. Soils should be readily cut by normal grading equipment. GROUNDWATER Free groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings. The depth to groundwater in the area is generally in excess of one hundred fifty (150) feet. Fluctuations in groundwater levels may occur due to variations in rainfall,temperature and other factors. REGIONAL GEOLOGY The project site is located in the central Coachella Valley. The Coachella Valley is part of the tectonically active Salton Basin. This basin is a closed, internally draining trough that has been filled with a complex series of continental clastic materials during Pleistocene and Holocene time (Van de Camp, 1973). The San Andreas rift zone dominates the geology of the Coachella Valley. The Banning and Mission Creek faults, which are parts of the San Andreas system are responsible for earthquakes recently felt in the Coachella Valley. Other regional faults that have produced events felt in the Coachella Valley are the San Jacinto, Imperial and Elsinore faults Based upon the historical and prehistorical record, the Coachella Valley segment of the San Andreas fault system is likely to generate a magnitude seven (7.0) or greater earthquake within the next fifty (50) years. The potential for a magnitude seven (7.0) earthquake within the next fifty (50) years is estimated by Seih (1985) as 'High' (50%-90%). _LN r 1. . . . , . ... - . - .. _. Se, pi�� .S7• N + 'N" Beatty y\ One Pme 9��\ �{Ir � 10 T.Iora %2 I1 , n 1 0�„9 •: 36• 0 s + Irene MODeta Cn:a ke OARLOCK Bosenfnw I� /Taft Baser \S�7ebcb ' / 35• t ? 3, Boslo. Lomooc BIG FINE 1 4 Lontosrer a e $pNTA YNE Casro ql, t ° SITE SWIG Borfwro Vera 'aBFI L osa-er on Berroraro T. oMi 4 _ LA +. 34• Souo Ron b\�+ Soma crue Is. T +P� rfnw Ya< y�s`r \ pok�e S". °y Ce.1" ese Lvq ocn Ebrore � inch: 9 'i Cerana Pam,• p Is. Ocemsae Borega - y. Eu:Sao P� 121• Son + c�a^`. I+ oy + Bra.kr 33' 120• \ Cimente o l l El Catro +4 Y Son Ne4e Yocv_a �p r.(11C0 / tl—s•. ..�..� y urns � �- ro 1 1 + ; + 32• a9• + Emeaoea ,p \qy • 0 50 too \� G4 0 50 Soo t50&- 40Uq B( 4 Cold. IIB• u7• IV e5• Base map of southern California region with major faults Fault Map of Southern California Figure 1 BUENA ENGINEERS , INC. * grom Hillman et al (1973) , fr DATE: 12-13-89 FIDE No: 571859'PI Lo , L/ 1927 (6) T Bishop`\ one Pine \\ . °ru/ore t 1 ` ochino Lok Bakersfield° t ♦ \ 1 �1 °Boker 1952(7.7,6.4,6.1,6.1) i °/dojo ve 1947(62) -= °Son/o fdorio 1916 (6) °Borslow\ _____--'GofmOn \ \ —��Son;o orGoro Po/ndo/e ,\ 1941(6.0) � � 1986 5.9 . I925(63) \ 1971 (6,4) _ o on Beroordino__,, / _ a o ��Los A,age/e 1948 • :.� W, s SITE 1918(6.8)/ °°,-�/ndio° 1933 (63) 1937(6.0) n \ 1954(6.2) �r ® e l 1968 (6,4) gorr go growler 1942(6.5) \ ° 1940(6.7) 1915(61/4 6�/< �-, i N °Son D%ego Yumo Mencoli 1934(6.5) 1934 TO 1915 (7.1) J 1935(6.0) '� • O /00 Miles Ensenoao. 1956(6.8,6.1,6.3, T 0 /OO 200 Kms. � . 1940(6.0) / 1954(6.3 6.01 Earth Quakes of magnitude 5.9 and '.rinml c Epicenter Map of greater in the Southern California Southern California Region , 1912 - 1972 (including the Figure 2 North Palm Springs Earthquake). From Hileman et al (1973) BUENA ENGINEERS, INC. DATE: j2-13—$9 FILE NO. P-0-1859-P( December 13, 1989 - 5 - 137-1859-P1 89-12-778 LOCAL GEOLOGY The proposed development is located north of Country Club Drive and west of Cook Street in the Palm Desert area of Riverside County. At the present time the site is within an active blowsand area and the primary sediments encountered were well sorted aeolian deposits. The project site is approximately four (4) miles southwest of the San Andreas fault system. Figure 3 shows the project site in relation to the local geology. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS A Primary Seismic Hazards: Primary seismic geologic hazards that may affect any property in the seismically 1. Fault Rupture: a. The project site is not located in any Alquist-Priolo special study zones. Nor are any faults mapped through or adjacent to the project area. At the time of drilling no surface expression of faulting was observed. b. Fault rupture would most likely occur along previously established traces. However, fault rupture may occur at other locations not previously mapped. 2. Ground Shaking: a. Strong ground motion is the seismic hazard most likely to affect the site during the life of the intended structures. Using methods developed by Seed and Idriss (1982) the following table was compiled for anticipated accelerations which may be experienced during an earthquake at the project site. TABLE 1 Estimated Maximum Maximum Repeatable Approximate Design' Acceleration Acceleration Ground Distance to ECLLdt Earihauake in Rock in Soil" Accelerations Project Site San Andreas 7.5 .599 .44g .29g 4.0 mi Richter Magnitude Deep Cohesionless Soils e nru . eur . eroe ur P .yam ° - � .� .. ,.�' _-.. -1: •'o-tl.c ISF�<.�.,-S-,.c.. .�,_�: Pam=: S< r". i r — 77 — - — -- �\ Vim., c C �_� v �4• �`� .: ` •� ` + 1'.�J,coy Il r(r k l,Lt\✓ 1 m( �! I Ct�.:�:i I Ct. �?CI 1 7 \��'. - li�...1-:� 5+ t � rt Sot 111 iA�Y'- .l�" ,-r-1' ":c.� k`.T � !ecl i•1l t � b� dr0 -E,� ` , .� rw IV)^,. camZI I. 5 r:, ll�� .1L i�,lt t.,fccwrtJ^A° , �' '. ,::''. �`. '�(- }� - x. •�}^'�_ 5`: __ /. Ylt < Ca t w �» ✓� \. , \r,.-7 'r t i E \,� Fr 'a n, 1 \ rn —�ti''�. 1Ci7 ef.gj' � I rG �.11� NY Iley .t.. 4G R V$ E SY E VjA PEVGS_lT5 ILy��+t.'_• C"�?:q'r'':Tll CCI f �`RE. y fi ,rLit svrcosJVY (:�. ! c' Erg ��/( E ` /_�J, —'.:GK S.CFEL,.\E A\ \ KEECOAN LA ��.r f��T,.\•: Il-1'.`,rs G IU.. ..N :% .fr, F,r.. t � �.�\.a I �, '. � �S_ FS ' <J':.' ,1c �s ` - '. -. I' Y '• +., r i ,\{... i5T_.efiUN:l:I. .J•'„yJ`r .� '-oGi o-_ I `. 'c:-Cc 1 c -�„'.:'J�J'.�'`y'`:5.£�'.`�<aG'a'2- /`tr.•'.::''y.` __ �' :.-n" C:p LL.C�C RE r CF(` "ITS fM � L -E �r �..T ?\ TIE. GI! t € _ ! '11 \ rui. rr+t pr ..Ei>=F.T ! j GR t i � ` _ .`-r' .s s.- r. s s� - iy/ 0 1 c I! i ':( eGl � ' . c<,; jri�2TI-N \ b ' 11 �-Jyli 1, `" c: l /�:.\.< �• 5 F. ION � '774 �. J yt i . .[y �' >q -tic f , °'ir,- , I f, = Ccl Ek l'+r > '. P``. =� % \ sr- �D ��^� •'? _o.. .CI �� SSr ^1 E L r \ . ri_ 1 . J;'trr�rE a-.s4 k 1 SN' �e i• . I� lu 4 t S--'q.5 y BUS. �Tv+\.}. _ > ` t' prJ '� c I`1` .1 rd 1 ,�Q�`1 ° .. � � �i!\ �rY�m� v � ?t .> >ty�� 2tRVATl07 •rl _ Cc , 91 ./ / .I. CFI ,`„ :i, -..'c3'� A 9p� J-v, Ji/sue%.t1�sz ✓'3 't ... C a �fxi . r/ Crn `.u:.�.-Y.c..r.- - �< >: - J. cS!l O&KI` ;'ram.. F J 1 Gc:^ C�- f'Vc"�--'[". COr' �-\q �'J'c� .'.'.:; �. C. 1'-r t: AFi 'DIE•; �."ci.,c f•• _ ? tT fG°a.': _ }'-5 O CY'-: .. . .`4=.!T ,q :.. '_�`..� .•� C:�V'7:d'7� •rr^"fl':. ' .c L.`_i/-'%:�e �_ �-Gf/�./•��I 13 _ I '+;:. �:4[0..•:i�[ofl�< C['c�� _! �.:_r�G�'�.�:`'ry:i:s�� Fcf,;' '�._v r � !;S,' :'��'✓rG'�F'-[ �r•.°`G'.::�5::':C,p'.-..`:..=t.t. .yam MAP OF PROJECT SITES ldorthy �- _- '•�. _`.:_t'�, CELATIO!I T0, LOCAL GEOLOGY SANTA AHA MAP SHEET star I:2soroo ;: F�_3 �. ... tl..' �, p FIGURE 3 BUENA ENGINEERS , INC. )O:`' �,I \J Si f� '- t-�� •.� l.,[ fu`M ]OBE ��={^\ /::}.-` eS�F':_ �:1.�'' .. rG•�. .i__ :. ''�.': DATE: 12-121-09 '1659-�I FILE NO. (3l December 13, 1989 - 6 - B7-1859-P1 89-12-778 b. Because of the aeolian sedimentary nature of the soils on site, ground shaking characteristics are expected to include low frequency vibration with relatively high amplitudes. Duration of shaking could be from fifteen (15) to thirty-six (36) seconds. The project area is mapped in Ground Shaking Zone IV C (thick alluvium and soft sediments) as designated by the County of Riverside, California. Ground Shaking Zones are based on distance B. Secondary Seismic Hazards: Secondary seismic geologic hazards that may affect the project site area include subsidence, liquefaction and ground lurching. 1. Subsidence, whether seismically related or not, is considered a potential hazard in this area. Historic records report significant episodes of subsidence in the Coachella Valley area due to seismic forces and/or heavy rain fall and flooding. 2. Liquefaction is the loss of soil strength as a result of an increase in pore water pressure due to cyclic seismic loading. Conditions for liquefaction include relatively high water table (within 40' of surface), low relative densities of the saturated soils and susceptibility of the soil to liquefy based on grain size. No free groundwater was encountered in our exploratory borings. Also, the project is not located in the Riverside County liquefaction 3. Ground lurching is generally associated with fault rupture and liquefaction. Because of the sites distance from any known .active' faults, the possibility of ground lurching affecting the site is considered low. 4. Other secondary seismic geologic hazards that may result from an earthquake include tsunamis (tidal waves) and seiches (waves oscillating in an enclosed area, i.e., storage tanks, lakes). Based on the project sites geologic location and topography, it is our opinion that the probability of the above hazards affecting the property are negligible. C. Non-Seismic Hazards: Other geologic hazards that could affect the project site include landslides, flooding and erosion. 1. No evidence of past landsliding was observed at .the site nor are any known landslides mapped in or around the project site. the subject property is not at the immediate base of any steep hills and is located on relatively flat ground. BUENA ENGINEERS, INC . December 13, 1989 - 7 - 137-1859-P1 89-12-778 2. Flooding and erosion are always a consideration in and regions. The properties flat topography suggests this is an area of deposition. No gullies or areas of active erosion were observed on site. Increased erosion, either fluvial or aeolian, may occur as a result of construction activity. 3. The site is mapped in the Riverside County 'Active Blowsand Areal. The owner may wish to consider the installation and maintenance of windbreaks during construction. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on a review of a selected technical literature and site investigations, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the intended development provided it is designed around the noted geologic hazards. The following is a summary of our conclusions and professional opinions based on the data obtained. Recompaction of soil will be required to limit settlement and improve bearing capacity. A The primary geologic hazard relative to site development is severe ground shaking from earthquakes originating on nearby faults. The site is located in Southern California which is an active seismic area. In our opinion, a major seismic event originating on the San Andreas fault zone would be the most likely cause of significant earthquake activity at the site within the estimated design life of the proposed B. Settlement due to seismic factors or flooding is a potential hazard in the Coachella Valley area. C. Areas of alluvial and aeolian soils may be susceptible to erosion. Preventative measures to minimize seasonal flooding and erosion should be incorporated into site grading plans. D. Fluvial or aeolian erosion may affect the site during construction. E. Other hazards including liquefaction, landslides and tsunamis and seiches are considered negligible. F. It is our opinion that the upper native soil will not provide uniform or adequate support for the proposed structure without the recommended sitework. To decrease the potential for consolidation and to provide a more uniform and firm bearing support for the proposed structures, we recommend constructing recompacted soil mats beneath all foundations and slabs-on- G. The project site is in seismic Zone 4 as defined in Section 2312 (d)2. of the Uniform Building Code. It is recommended that any permanent structure be designed according to the current additions of the Uniform Building Code and Standards. BUENA ENGINEERS. INC . December 13, 1989 - 8 - B7-1859-P1 89-12-778 H. It is further recommended that any permanent structure constructed on the site be designed to accommodate expected repeatable ground accelerations in the range of .29g for a duration of up to thirty-six (36) seconds. I. Adherence to the following grading recommendations is necessary to mitigate potential settlement problems due to seismic forces, heavy rainfall, flooding and the weight of the intended structure. SITE DEVELOPMENT AND GRADING Prior to any construction operations, areas to be graded should be cleaned of vegetation and other deleterious materials. Appendix C, 'Standard Grading Specifications' contains specific suggestions for removal and disposal of deleterious substances and, as such, forms a part of these Site Development and Grading Recommendations. A. Site Development - Grading Site grading should be visually checked by Buena Engineers, Inc., or their representative prior to placement of fill. Local variations in soil conditions may warrant increasing the depth of recompaction and/or overexcavation. 1. Prior to site grading any existing structures, stumps, roots, foundations, pavements, leachfields, uncompacted fill and trash piles, any abandoned underground utilities should be removed from the proposed building and paving areas. The top surface should be stripped of all organic growth and non- complying fill which, along with other debris, should be removed from the site. 2. Depressions resulting from these removals should have debris and loose soil removed and be filled with suitable fill soils adequately compacted. No compacted fill should be placed unless the underlying soil has been observed by Buena Engineers, Inc. 3. In order to help minimize potential settlement problems associated with structures supported on a non-uniform thickness of compacted fill, Buena Engineers, Inc. should be consulted for site grading recommendations relative to backfilling large and/or deep depressions resulting from removal under item one above. In general, all proposed construction should be supported by a uniform thickness of compacted soil. 4. Testing showed soils are fairly loose in the upper few feet and quite dry. Soils of this type can be susceptible to consolidation when water is added at the in-situ conditions. Therefore, to control differential settlement and to produce a more uniform bearing condition, foundations should bear on compacted soils. Compaction is to be verified by testing. BUENA ENGINEERS. INC . December 13, 1989 - 9 - B7-1859-P1 89-12-778 a Due to the granular nature of the majority of the site soils, it is expected that compaction may be obtained to a depth of three (3) to four (4) feet by heavily watering and compacting from the surface. 6 Building areas to receive more than one (1) foot of fill should be moistened to above optimum moisture to a depth of three (3) feet below original grade or the bottom of footings, whichever is greater. The surface should be compacted so that at least ninety (90) percent of maximum density is obtained to a depth of two (2) feet below original grade or the bottom of footings, whichever is greater. Fill material should then be placed in eight (8) inch layers in a loose condition at or near optimum moisture and compacted to a minimum of ninety (90) percent of maximum density. 7. Building areas to receive less than one (1) foot of fill and building areas that are in cut areas, should be moistened to at or above optimum moisture to a depth of three (3) feet below the bottom of the footings. The exposed surface should be compacted so that a minimum of ninety (90) percent of maximum density is obtained to a depth of two (2) feet below the bottom of the footings. If applicable, fill material should then be placed in thin layers at near optimum moisture and compacted to a minimum of ninety (90) percent of maximum density. The intent is to have at least two (2) feet of soil compacted to a minimum of ninety (90) percent of maximum density compose the building pad beneath the footings and to have an additional foot of moisture penetration. Compaction is to be confirmed by testing. 8. These grading requirements apply to building areas and at least five (5) feet beyond building limits. 9. Auxiliary structures including freestanding or retaining walls shall have the existing soils beneath the structure processed as per items six (6), seven (7) and eight (8) above. The grading requirements apply to three (3) feet beyond the face of the walls. If plans for auxiliary structures and walls are provided for our review, these recommendations may be revised. 10. It is anticipated that during-grading a loss of approximately one tenth (1) of a foot due to stripping, and a shrinkage factor of about ten (10) to fifteen (15) percent for the upper three (3) feet of soil, may be used for quantity calculations. This is based on compactive effort needed to produce an average degree of compaction of approximately ninety-three (93) to ninety-four (94) percent and may vary depending on contractor methods. Subsidence is estimated between one-tenth (.1) to three- tenths (.3) of a foot. RIIFNA FNf.INFFRC INf December 13, 1989 - 10- B7-1859-P1 89-12-778 B. Site Develooment - General 1. The following general requirements listed in this section are superceded by the recommendations in the 'Grading' section A above. 2. Previously removed soils, once cleaned of rocks larger than eight (8) inches in greatest dimension, and other deleterious material, may be placed in thin layers and mechanically compacted back to finish grade. 3. Import soil used to raise site grades should be equal to or better than on-site soil in strength, expansion, and compressibility characteristics. Import soil may be prequalified by Buena Engineers, Inc. Comments on the characteristics of import will be given after the material is on the project, either in- place or in stockpiles of adequate quantity to complete the 4. Fill and backfill should be compacted to the minimum of ninety (90) percent of maximum dry density obtained by the ASTM D 1557 test method. 5. Areas around the structures should be graded so that drainage is positive and away from the structures. Gutters and down spouts should be considered as a way to convey water out of the foundation area. Water should not be allowed to pond on or near pavement sections. b. Added moisture within previously compacted fill could result in a number of reactions at the surface depending upon the amount of moisture increase, the in-place density of the soil, in- situ moisture content and soil type. Although the soil could in reality be expanding, collapsing, moving laterally due to the phenomenon "creep', the result is usually movement and will most likely manifest itself visually in structural slabs and street areas as cracks, (horizontal, lateral or vertical displacement). 7. The apparent cure to the problem is to not introduce excess moisture into fill material once in place. To help minimize increased moisture into the fill material, site drainage and landscape is critical. Site drainage should be in the form of roof gutter, concrete brow ditcher, ribbon gutters and gutters, storm drain and other drainage devices. Landscaping should be such that water is not allowed to pond. Additionally, care should be taken so as not to over water landscaped areas. BUENA ENGINEERS . INC . December 13, 1989 - 1 1 - B7-1859-P1 89-12-778 8. Failure to control increase in moisture content to compacted fill could result in settlement which could compound the problem by rupturing water lines or other services and/or utilities, thus introducing additional moisture into the underlying soil. 9. The Recommended Grading Specifications included in Appendix C are general guidelines only and should not be Included directly into project specifications without first incorporating the site specific recommendations contained in the soil Site Development - Grading section of this report. Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code contains specific considerations for grading and is considered a part of the 10. It is recommended that Buena Engineers, Inc., be retained to provide soil engineering services during construction of the grading, excavation, and foundation phases of the work. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to start of construction. C. Excavations 1. All excavations should be made in accordance with applicable regulations. From our site exploration and knowledge of general area, we feel there is a potential for construction problems involving caving of relatively deep site excavations (i.e. utilities, etc.). Where such situations are encountered, lateral bracing or appropriate cut slopes should 2. No surcharge loads should be allowed within a horizontal distance measured from the top of the excavation slope, equal to the depth of the excavation. D. Traffic Areas 1. Streets should be provided with one (1) foot of subgrade compacted to ninety (90) percent of maximum density. 2. On-site parking should be provided with one (1) foot of subgrade compacted to ninety (90) percent of maximum 3. Final preparation of subgrade will depend on paving section E. Utility Trenches 1. Backfill of utilities within road right-of-way should be placed in strict conformance with the requirements of the governing agency (Water District, Road Department, etc.). ____ BUENA ENGINEERS. INC . December 13, 1989 - 12- B7-1859-P1 89-12-778 2 Utility trench backfill within private property should be placed in strict conformance with the provisions of this report relating to minimum compaction standards. In general, service lines extending inside of property may be backfilled with native soils compacted to a minimum of ninety (90) percent of maximum density. 3. Backfll operations should be observed and tested by Buena Engineers, Inc., to monitor compliance with these recommendations. STRUCTURES Based upon the results of this evaluation, it is our opinion that the structure foundation can be supported by compacted soils placed as recommended above. The recomendations that follow are based on 'very low' expansion category soils. A Foundations It is anticipated that foundations will be placed on firm compacted soils as recommended elsewhere in this report. The recommendations that follow are based on 'very low' expansion category soils. 1. Table 29-A gives specific recommendations for width, depth and reinforcing. Other structural consideration may be more stringent and would govern in any case. A minimum footing depth of twelve (12) inches below lowest adjacent finish grade for one (1) story structures and eighteen (18) inches for two (2) story structures should be maintained. 2. Conventional Foundations: Estimated bearing values are given below for foundations on recompacted soils, assuming fill import (if required) to be equal to or better than site soils: a. Continuous foundations of one (1) foot wide and twelve (12) inches below grade: i. 1300 psf for dead plus reasonable live loads. H. 1650 psf for wind and seismic considerations. b. Isolated pad foundations 2' x 2' and bottomed twelve (12) inches below grade: i. 1500 psf for dead plus reasonable live loads. H. 2000 psf for wind and seismic considerations. 3. Allowable increases of 200 psf per one (1) foot of additional footing width and 250 psf for each additional six (6) inches of footing depth may be used. The maximum allowable bearing will be 2000 pcf. ____. BUENA ENGINEERS INC . December 13, 1989 - 13- 137-1859-P1 89-12-778 4. Although footing reinforcement may not be required per Table 29-A; one (1) number four (#4) rebar at top and bottom of footings should be considered in order to span surface Imperfections. Other requirements that are more stringent due to structural loads will govem. 5 Soils beneath footings and slabs should be premoistened prior to placing concrete. 6. Lateral loads may be resisted by soil friction on floor slabs and foundations and by passive resistance of the soils acting on foundation stem walls. Lateral capacity is based partially on the assumption that any required backfill adjacent to foundations and grade beams is properly compacted. 7. Foundation excavations should be visually observed by the soil engineer during excavation and prior to placement of reinforcing steel or concrete. Local variations in conditions may warrant deepening of footings. 8. Allowable bearing values are net (weight of footing and soil surcharge may be neglected) and are applicable for dead plus reasonable live loads. B. Slabs-on-Grade 1. Concrete slabs-on-grade should be supported by compacted structural fill placed in accordance with applicable sections of this report. 2. In areas of moisture sensitive floor coverings, an appropriate vapor barrier should be installed in order to minimize vapor transmission from the subgrade soil to the slab. The membrane should be covered with two (2) inches of sand to help protect it during construction. The sand should be lightly moistened just prior to placing the concrete. 3. Reinforcement of slab-on-grade is contingent upon the structural engineers recommendations and the expansion index of the supporting soil. Since the mixing of fill soil with native soil could change the expansion index, additional tests should be conducted during rough grading to determine the expansion index of the subgrade soil. Also, due to the high temperature differential endemic to desert areas, large concrete slabs on grade are susceptible to tension cracks. As a minimum, we recommend that interior slabs-on-grade be reinforced with 6" x 6" / #10 x #10 welded wire fabric. Additional reinforcement due to the expansion index of the site soil should be provided as recommended in section F below. Additional reinforcement may also be required by the structural engineer. Q I I C W ♦ C M G I M C C 0 C I N r December 13, 1989 - 14- 67-1859-P1 89-12-778 4. It is recommended that the proposed perimeter slabs (sidewalks, patios, etc.) be designed relatively independent of foundation stems (free-floating) to help mitigate cracking due to foundation settlement and/or expansion. C. Settlement Considerations 1. Maximum estimated settlement, based on footings founded on firm soils as recommended, should be less than one (1) inch. Differential settlement between exterior and interior bearing members should be less than one-half (1/2) inch. 2. The majority of settlement should occur during construction. D. Frictional and Lateral Coefficients 1. Resistance to lateral loading may be provided by friction acting on the base of foundations, a coefficient of friction of .48 may be used for dead load forces. 2. Passive resistance acting on the sides of foundation stems (300 pcf, equivalent fluid weight), may be included for resistance to lateral load. 3. A one-third (1/3) increase in the quoted passive value may be used for wind or seismic loads. 4. Passive resistance of soils against grade beams and the frictional resistance between the floor slabs and the supporting soils may be combined in determining the total lateral resistance, however the friction factor should be reduced to .33 of dead load forces. 5. For retaining walls backfilled with compacted native soil, it is recommended that an equivalent fluid pressure of thirty-five (35) pcf be used for well drained level backfill conditions. E. Slope Stability Slope stability calculations were not performed due to the anticipated minimal slope height (less that 5). If slopes exceed five (5) feet, engineering calculations should be performed to substantiate the stability of slopes steeper than 2 to 1. Fill slopes should be overfilled and trimmed back to competent material. F. Expansion The design of foundations should be based on the weighted expansion index (UBC Standard No. 29-2) of the soil. As stated in the soil properties section, the expansion index of the on-site soil is in the very low (0-20) classification. However, during site preparation, if the soil is thoroughly mixed and additional fill is added, the expansion index may change. Therefore, the expansion index should be evaluated after the site preparation has been completed, and the final foundation design adjusted accordingly. BUENA ENGINEERS, INC . December 13, 1989 - 15- B7-1859-P1 89-12-778 G. Additional Services This report is based on the assumption that an adequate program of client consultation, construction monitoring and testing will be performed during the final design and construction phases to check compliance with these recommendations. Maintaining Buena Engineers, Inc., as the soil engineering firm from beginning to end of the project will help assure continuity of services. These test would be additional services provided by our firm. The costs of these services are not included in our present fee arrangements. The recommended tests and observations include, but are not 1. Consultation during the final design stages of the project. 2. Review of the building plans to observe that recommendations of our report have been properly implemented into the design. 3. Observation and testing during site preparation, grading and placement of engineered fill. 4. Consultation as required during construction. LIMITATIONS AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS The analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are based in part upon the data obtained from the four (4) borings performed on the site. The nature and extent of variations between the borings may not become evident until construction. If variations then appear evident, it will be necessary to reevaluate the recommendations of this report. Findings of this report are valid as of this date. However, changes in conditions of a property can occur with passage of time whether they be due to natural processes or works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards occur whether they result from legislation or broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of one (1) year. In the event that any changes in the nature, design or location of the building are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and conclusions of this report modified or verified in writing. BUENA ENGINEERS, INC . December 13, 1989 - 16- B7-1859-P1 89-12-778 This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative, to insure that the information and recommendations contained herein are called to the attention of the architect and engineers for the project and are incorporated into-the plans and specifications for the project. It is also the owners responsibility, or his representative, to Insure that the necessary steps are taken to see that the general contractor and all subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. It is further understood that the owner or his representative is responsible for submittal of this report to the appropriate governing agencies. Buena Engineers, Inc., has prepared this report for the exclusive use of the client and authorized agents. This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices. No other warranties, either expressed or implied, are made as the professional advice provided under the terms of this agreement, It is recommended that Buena Engineers, Inc., be provided the opportunity for a general review of final design and specifications in order that earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications. If Buena Engineers, Inc., is not accorded the privilege of making this recommended review, we can assume no responsibility for Our scope of services did not include any environmental assessment or investigation to determine the presence of hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, surface water, groundwater or air, on, below or around this site, Prior to purchase or development of this site, we suggest that an environmental assessment be conducted which addresses END OF TEXT Appendices BUENA ENGINEERS, INC . December 13, 1989 - 17- B7-1859-P1 89-12-778 REFERENCES 1. Envicom, Riverside County, 1976, Seismic Safety Element. 2. Greensfelder, Roger W., 1974, Maximum Credible Rock Accelerations from Earthquakes in California, CDMG Map Sheet 23. 3. Ploessel, M. R. and Slosson, J. E., 'Repeatable High Ground Accelerations from Earthquakes', 1974 California Geology, Vol. 27, 4. Seed, H. B. and Idriss, I. M., 1982, Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes. 5. Seih, Kerry, 1985, 'Earthquake Potentials Along The San Andreas Fault', Minutes of The National Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council, March 29-30, 1985, USGS Open File Report 85-507. BUENA ENGINEERS, INC . APPENDIX A Site and Vicinity Map Logs of Borings BUENA ENGINEERS, INC . --�� PROPOSED SUBDlVISION 30 LOTS 5: 17 ACRES I 3. (311 q. (07 =y 1 26 27 I 25 2 � < n 019 '• ,:,� I 7 I 24 29 6 23 -z0 i 20 24' /• 4 3 2 --- COOK ST. PARCEL NO.: 620 -190 -16 ORAWN PALM DESE;RT, CA, S CA.L E I„ -ICC ' DATE : II-2-89 j WRAI 420 - 190 - 0/6 Goo K ST&MT ,P9Lh•L. / ESERT , A APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATIONS Buena Engineers, Inc. DATE: /Z -%•/-89 FILE NO.: 97-/0s9-/o } f APN 620-190-16 Date: 12/6/89 Location: Per Plan BORING NO. 1 File No. B7-1859-Pt m m m c a 3 > o r m E m 3 DESCRIPTION ~ o o 6 6- REMflRKS 0 a '— rn d M ? a o o 0 0 A 1 : Grey brown very fine SP 20 to fine sand 5 P2 10 22 110.5 0.8 100 15 36 108.4 0.7 98 20 50 25 50 - Relatively undisturbed Total Depth = 26' ring sample No Free Water No Bedrock 30 ® No recovery 35 40 45 50 APN 620-190-16 Date: 12/6/89 Location: Per Plan BORING NO. 2 File No. B7-1859-P1 m m m c a 3 m r m E m 3 DESCRIPTION o o m a REMRRKS m e i. U m 'o 2 ccE 0 Al : Grey brown very fine SP 14 to fine sand 5 13 10 18 15 28 ® No recovery Total Depth = 16' No Free Water No Bedrock 20 25 30 35 40 45 L5O I APN 620-190-16 Date: 12/6/89 Location: Per Plan BORING NO. 4 File No. B7-1859-P7 m m c 3 > 2 P E. U c DESCRIPTION o a REMRRKS cc E co j a a o U 0 Al : Grey brown very tine 3P to fine sand 5 10 - Total Depth = 10' No Free Water No Bedrock 15 20 25 30 35 Ld45 APN 620-190-16 Date: 12/6189 Location: Per Plan BORING NO. 3 File No. B7-1859-P1 m m c 3 16 -6a 3 > 2 r m mm 3 DESCRIPTION o c m a REMARKS m c % 0 U ° 'o ¢ E a o o U - 0 A1 :Grey brown very fine SP 10 to fine sand 5 14 10 24 15 35 ® No recovery Total Depth = 16' No Free Water No Bedrock 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 4 .. � .. . ..,. ...,. ,--. . ,. ... ,. )T tom;... . . . ... APN 620-190-16 Date: 12/6/89 Location: Per Plan BORING NO. 5 File No. B7-1859-PI m m m m o m- 3 > > m E v c DESCRIPTION o 0 Q a REMRRKS -o =1 E o — m a N a o c 0 0 Al : Grey brown very fine SP to fine sand 5 10 - Total Depth = 10' No Free Water No Bedrock 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 { APPENDIX B Summary of Test Results Table 29-A BUENA ENGINEERS, INC . I December 13, 1989 B7-1859-P1 89-12-778 TEST RESULTS BORING/DEPTH 1 @0-5 USCS SP SOIL DESIGNATION Al MAXIMUM DENSITY (pcf) 110.7 OPTIMUM MOISTURE (%) 12.4 ANGLE OF INT. FRIC. 33.50 COHESION (psf) 40 EXPANSION INDEX 0 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION (%) GRAVEL 0.0 SAND 94.0 SILT 3.4 CLAY 2.6 SOIL DESCRIPTIONS: Al: Grey brown very fine to fine sand (SP) BUENA ENGINEERS, INC . December 13, 1989 B7-1859-P1 89-12-778 IN-PLACE DENSITIES RELATIVE BORING & DEPTH DRY DENSITY % MOISTURE COMPACTION 1 ® 10.0 108A 0,7 98% 15.0 110.5 0.8 1000/0 BUENA ENGINEERS, INC . 67-1859-Pl MOISTURE CONTENT IN PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT H O O LL U m 112 U W a m 110 z O Q. z r � e 108 z W O Y C 10 12 14 METHOD OF COMPACTION ASTM D-1557-78, METHOD A or C SOIL TYPE MAXIMUM DENSITY OPTIMUM MOISTURE Al 110.7 pcf 12.4% Boring 1 @ 0-5' MAXIMUM DENSITY — OPTIMUM MOISTURE CURVES B7-1859-P1 4.0 a 3.5 F— O LLO 3.0 1 a 2.5 Y 2.0 cn ' W F- 1.5 U 0 Z 1.0 Uj = 0.5 U) 0 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 NORMAL LOAD (KIPS / FOOT 2 ) DIRECT SHEAR DATA Soil type: Al Boring and depth: 1 @ 0-5' Angle of internal. friction: 33.50 Cohesion: 40 osf ® Samples remolded to 90% of maximum density O Samples relatively undisturbed 1 I TABLE NO. 29-A MINIMUM FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS }— 0 Footings for Slab & Raised Floor Systems (2) (5) (10) Concrete Slabs 3yi" Minimum Thickness u All Peri- Interior foot- Reinforce- v L X meter ings for slab ment for Premoistening Weighted L Footings and raised continuous control for soils Piers under Expansion ° i F- (6) floors (6) footings Reinforce- Total under footings, raised floors bc Index - a c (3) (8) ment (4) thickness piers and slabs o E '� 'o Depth below natural of sand (5) (6) Zn 8 surface of ground and finish grade 720 1 6 12 6 12 12 None 6x6- Moistening of Piers allowe Very Low 2 8 15 7 18 18 Required 10/10 ground prior to for single (Non-Ex- 3 10 18 8 24 24 WWF 2" placing concrete floor loads pansive) recommended only 1 6 12 6 15 12 120% of optimum 2 8 15 7 18 1.8 moisture conterit Piers allowe 21-50 3 10 18 8 24 24 1411 top 6x6- to a depth of fpr single Low and bottom 10/10 4" 21" below lowest floor loads WWF adjacent grade. only Testing Required 1 6 12 6 21 12 144 top 6x6- 130% of optimum 2 8 12 8 21 18 and bottom 6/6 WWF moisture content 51-90 3 10 15 8 24 24 or #3 to a depth of 27" Piers not Medium ext24" e.w. 4" below lowest allowed ars 24" in . footing adjacent grade. and bent 3' into slab (9) Testing Required 1 6 12 6 27 12 145 top 6x6- 1407 of optimum 2 8 12 8 27 18 and bottom 6/6 WWF moisture content 91-130 3 10 15 8 27 24 or #3 to a depth of 33" Piers not High @ 24" e.w. 4" below lowest allowed 7-Mars Cd 24" in ext. foog adjacent grade. and bent 3' into slab (9)tin Testing Required Above l30 Very High Special Design by Licensed Engineer/Architect FOOTNOTES TO TABLE 29-A 1. Premoistening is required where specified in Table 29-A in order to achieve maximum and uniform expansion of soils prior to construction and thus limit structural distress caused by uneven expansion and shrinkage. Other systems which do not include premoistening may be approved by the Building Official when such alternatives are shown to provide equivalent safeguards against 2. Underfloor access crawl holes shall be provided with curbs extending not less than six (6) inches above adjacent grade to prevent surface water from entering the foundation area. 3. Reinforcement for continuous foundations shall be placed not less than three (3) inches above the bottom of the footings and not less than three (3) inches below the top of the stem. 4. Reinforcement shall be placed at mid-depth of slab. S After premoistening, the specified moisture content of soils shall be maintained until concrete is placed. Required moiture content shall be verified by an approved testing laboratory not more than twenty-four (24) hours prior to placement of concrete. 6. Crawl spaces under raised floors need not be premoistened except under interior footings. Interior footings which are not enclosed by a continuous perimeter foundation system or equivalent concrete or masonry moisture barrier complying with UBC Section 2907 (b) shall be designed and constructed as 7. A grade beam not less than twelve (12) inches by twelve (12) inches in cross section, reinforced as specified for continuous foundations in Table 29-A shall be provided at garage door openings. 8. Foundation stem walls which exceed a height of three (3) times the stem thickness above lowest adjacent grade shall be reinforced in accordance with Sections 2418 and 2614 in the UBC or as required by engineering design, whichever is more restrictive. 9. Bent reinforcing bars between exterior footing and slab shall be omitted when floor is designed as an independent, 'floating" slab. 10. Fireplace footings shall be reinforced with a horizonal grid located three (3) inches above the bottom of the footing and consisting of not less than number four (#4) bars at twelve (12) inches on center each way. Vertical chimney reinforcing bars shall be hooked under BUENA ENGINEERS, INC . APPENDIX C Standard Grading Specifications BUENA ENGINEERS, INC . C-1 STANDARD GRADING SPECIFICATIONS PROJECT: APN620-190-016 CLIENT: RAM DEVELOPMENT 1. These Standard Grading Specifications have been prepared for the exclusive use of our client for specific application to referenced project in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. 2. These specifications shall be integrated with the Engineering Report of which they are a part. Should conflicting statements be found between these standard specifications and the Itemized recommendations contained in the main body of the engineering report, the latter shall govern. 3. Buena Engineers, Inc., referred to as the soil engineer, should be retained to provide continuous soil engineering services during construction of the grading, excavation and foundation phases of the work. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from that anticipated prior to start of construction. 4. The presence of our field representative will be for the purpose of providing observation and field testing. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. The contractor for this project should be so advised. The contractor should also be Informed that neither the presence of our field representative nor the observation and testing by our firm shall excuse him in any way from defects discovered In his work. It is understood that our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety on this project. Job and site safety will be the sole responsibility of the contractor. 5. If the contractor encounters subsurface conditions at the site that (a) are materially different from those indicated in the contract plans or in specifications, or (b) could not have been reasonably anticipated as inherent in the work of the character provided in the contract, the contractor shall immediately notify the owner verbally and in writing within 24 hours. This notification shall be a condition precedent before any negotiations for 'changed or differing site conditions' can proceed. if the owner determines that conditions do materially so differ and cause an increase or decrease in the contractor's cost of, or the time required for, performance of any part of the work under this contract, then negotiations shall commence between owner and contractor to provide equitable adjustment to owner or contractor resulting therefrom. BUENA ENGINEERS, INC . C-2 6. Whenever the words 'supervision', 'inspection', or "control' appear they shall mean periodic observation of the work and the taking of soil tests as deemed necessary by the soil engineer for substantial compliance with plans, specifications and design concepts. 7. These specifications shall consist of clearing and grubbing, preparation of land to be filled, filling of the land, spreading, compaction and control of the fill, and subsidiary work necessary to complete the grading of the filled areas to conform with the lines, grades and slopes as shown on the accepted plans. 8. The standard test used to define minimum densities of compaction work shall be the ASTM Test Procedure D 1557. Densities shall be expressed as a relative compaction in terms of the maximum density obtained in the laboratory by the foregoing standard procedure. 9. Field density tests will be performed by the soil engineer during grading operations. At least one (1) test shall be made for each five hundred (500) cubic yards or fraction thereof placed with a minimum of two (2) tests per layer in isolated areas. Where sheepsfoot rollers are used, the soil may be disturbed to a depth of several inches. Density tests shall be taken in compacted material below the disturbed surface. When these tests Indicate that the density of any layer of fill or portion thereof Is below the required density, the particular layer or portion shall be reworked until the required density has been obtained. 10. Earth-moving and working operations shall be controlled to prevent water from running into excavated areas. Excess water shall be promptly removed and the site kept dry. Fill material shall not be placed, spread or rolled during unfavorable weather conditions. When the work is interrupted by heavy rain, fill operations shall not be resumed until field tests by the soil engineer indicate that the moisture content and density of the fill are as previously specified. 11. Compaction shall be by sheepsfoot rollers, vibrating sheepsfoot rollers, multiple-wheel pneumatic-tired rollers or other types of acceptable compacting rollers. Rollers shall be of such design that they will be able to compact the fill to the specified density. Rolling shall be accomplished while the fill material is within the specified moisture content range. Rolling of each layer shall be continuous over its entire area and the roller shall make sufficient trips to insure that the required density has been obtained. 12. Existing structures, foundations, trash, debris, loose fill, trees (not included in landscaping), roots, tree remains and other rubbish shall be removed, piled or burned or otherwise disposed of so as to leave the areas that have been disturbed with a neat and finished appearance free from debris. No burning shall be permitted in the area to be filled. BUENA ENGINEERS, INC . C-3 13. When fill material includes rock, large rocks will not be allowed to nest and voids must be carefully filled with small stones or earth and properly compacted. Rock larger than eight (8) inches in diameter will not be permitted in the compacted fill without review as to location by the soil engineer. 14. Organic matter shall be removed from the surface upon which the fill, foundations or pavement sections are to be placed. The surface shall then be plowed or scarified to a depth of at least eight (8) inches and until the surface is free from ruts, hummocks or other uneven features which would tend to prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used. Specific recommendations pertaining to stripping and minimum depth of recompaction of native soils are presented in the main body of the soil report. 15. Native soil free from organic material and other deleterious material may be used as compacted fill; however, during grading operations the soil engineer will re-examine the native soils for organic content. 16. Imported material should be tested and reviewed by Buena Engineers, Inc., before being brought to the site. The materials used shall be free from organic matter and other deleterious material. 17. Where fills are made on hillsides or exposed slope areas, greater than ten (10) percent, horizontal benches shall be cut into firm undisturbed natural ground to provide a horizontal base so that each layer is placed and compacted on a horizontal plane. The initial bench at the toe of the fill shall be at least ten (10) feet in width on firm, undisturbed natural ground at the elevation of the toe stake placed at the natural angle of repose or design slope. The width and frequency of succeeding benches will vary with the soil conditions and the steepness of slope. 18. The selected fill material shall be placed in layers which, when compacted, shall not exceed six (6) inches in thickness. Layers shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly blade-mixed during spreading. After each layer has been placed, mixed and spread evenly, it shall be thoroughly compacted to a relative compaction of not less than ninety (90) percent. The fill operation shall be continued in six (6) inch compacted layers, as specified above, until the fill has been brought to the finished slopes and graded as shown on the accepted plans. BUENA ENGINEERS, INC . C-4 19. When the moisture content of the fill material is not sufficient to achieve required compaction, water shall be added until the soils attain a moisture content so that thorough bonding is achieved during the compacting process. When the moisture content of the fill material is excessive, the fill material shall be aerated by blading or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is reduced to an acceptable content to achieve proper compaction. 20. Existing septic tanks and other underground storage tanks must be removed from the site prior to commencement of building, grading or fill operations. Underground tanks, including connecting drain fields and other lines, must be totally removed and the resulting depressions properly reconstructed and filled. Depressions left from tree removal shall also be properly filled and compacted. 21. The methods for removal of subsurface irrigation and utility lines will depend on the depth and location of the line. One of the following methods may be used: 1) Remove the pipe and compact the soil in the trench according to the applicable portions of these grading recommendations, 2) The pipe shall be crushed in the trench. The trench shall then be filled and compacted according to the applicable portions of these grading specifications, 3) Cap the ends of the line with concrete to mitigate entrance of water. The length of the cap shall not be less than five (5) feet. The concrete 22. Abandoned water wells on the site shall be capped according to the requirements of the appropriate regulatory agency. The strength of the cap shall be at least equal to the adjacent soils. The final elevation of the top of the well casing must be a minimum of thirty-six (36) inches below adjacent grade prior to grading or fill operations. Structure foundations should not be placed over the BUENA ENGINEERS, INC . 1 l 73-510 PNCD VVAIIING OIIIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPI10HE (GI9) 340-0011 RC Ot1ES 1 FUR COMIE1115 AND COI ID I T IONS OF APPROVAL CAsr_ HO(S) : `TT 266V PRO•JECI APPI. I CAN I : "epP�c Fnrloxd plea e find c r.l m;3tr.r' Ir-IIs de;crlhlnq 3 project for which the following Is jieing recluste : , r✓�/ � iZvrt / �/ /_ � �/�CPi-�j tS� S✓p � 73�� 0/7 cc a�ya'T IGGiS, GTYl� CJr / F 5� i+ f> 'C l�l , r<. �.Yj f oVL sC�c Y <jr T,S'.I; �t l•E. SL�'d'/J? cCx��jr� 1>`1.`G•t�Gp�' die exa�cr, e �ton�s�' �SS �5 �� I u? n ,i;n hrd CLal:a wa; 5 y t�n/CP�i�c� C2�7 to you for r:Onmonts and recotimendedrr Conditions POFlapProv l .is lleencityrisrdindterested In the probable imrracts on the environment ( including land, air, water, minerals , flora, fauna, noise, objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and rroimmencied conditions Of approval based on your expertise anti area of concern. YOVr cornmrnts :and recom"'enried collditIons of approval must be rece,lved by this ,I Office prtur to 1 : 30 p.m. _ ��j.� �, � 1 In Or to be discussed by the land division crrmmrlttee. the Ir d ' d1VlslOn committee (comprised of director of communil:y develol,mu?nt, city huilding official , city engineer, fire rnrirshal , and a rehr esentatIve of CV1,10 trill rilscuss the co nnnents and reconnnended conditions of approval and wIII forward them to the planning commission through the staff report-. Any Information received by this office after the recelPt deadline will not be discussed by the land division connnittee. Sincerely, ---------------------------------------- RANON A . DIAZ DIRECTOR OF C0111111N11Y DEVEI.OPHrNI /PLANNING /Im A1;1 ar.hmcnt� IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT 1 i II WOJOER►ALMS R01 1 37 :!3FRANK US (SINATRA J3111 I R ^( VII .1 3 -- I (TENTATIVE TRACT NO,, 25639 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST AiTt r i ADOBE L WRINGS�^ LOl( _- P A , I y■ {{EB. I G f`COuq)k • �.l�. a.I{.� � � I ( U.Y iHY I QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF _Y � `• I �I 1 I /` J ° I $ tII1 I , 7 IOES(giFA4} � I 1 ( SUNCAESr I�+� 1 W i C- i,(;g(�o• i ICUUNIgY CI(/B �� I , , -- clue`�:�1 ; I ...w�'-i.'`•(" .u)..xc I � J ., �• , W 1, THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF ....�!`w' .I.�(.. 1 (� - ' I i I�' �( v��a t 1 �''` 1, 3 , i ia�n\ Cnl� t]1� V. lo SEC . 4 T. S. S . R. 6.E. S . B . B. M. Q ---� F-------4d� I r ,••�a1N51>f� �;i raN�ati - 1,�-nar wr+low. ro+ru(.0 al 13.E .(. ~ MAAAIOTT � �' '.rk tA[ R.AMSJ.4 ��• (I w}g..i"-'"It vw` � w {t eI 'xr.k y, I C ■ > I `��1�♦OESEAT SPA(NGS r f��> •(r T„ I Y } j G A ■I 'I'l qE��T B ,Vd D EC E M B E R 1989 4 �/ //� �Q/� aj 3 20 4Q �00 W i ` ��-�,�` , ,« Rw.7 I ✓brc"u-"tI�4l / ` �(dC'u+y"'"°I ;�!��NY4N ai� i'(�V�tl�( .. II __CPi lCMISL_ J�k- e< a. :. `;�' SF Iw'-�� ,5•• 1 --�' `'� t'f 19YR30N' 1�IIOiL. O / 0 200 3 1'�G�W1( �. �� bo.yk yI I- ��C7 , I ual(�a clq ' S�' - I. �; 4[^.#d i 4a-'-°•y''�• ,., ..., n , ems . •wµ--I-eN�.+ _ QRE _-__OWN•$E' c4 C_ C-E = / r- �00 7# 5 'I' �.1 #r" AA iiM� b E' I I:nf fi ,1!I, --�G oqo � 1 I I ,yrt-'"- '•_ r-�IL-r9 7-�g}l - - -- I YL!ti..IW 1� Is - 1 1 T IlY'�' I EgEY qr o L ...+V' ��/w F K•{'CdiilUrq% s �I� u l IIEI aq�l _s,�_ F I I I / ,'�j�- CL UI (NNC[SII VEq q •�� / / I - - 1 i.; i, __.. F�IU ` _ `� o _v I.I.iH4t n /3'7 54 ' G5) 4S 4S �� - #AL s'I -- s ALM Digh n / - 2 I COLLEGE Of THE DESEA i G��-��^G;-- P µr AI "Y I ; - j AA.0 - _-_ I� 40� 940 J• 00¢ 4�� /440� al� r■ ' � W. � TN it�tl�- I ��l�r •�� +� �1 r I i OcguI_IEWO --- I ,r-I I ' BBOa� V�I S � fRED I.� 1 WAKING i � �I allnaa //, 040 P=2G7. 2 �I �= 6 �I P= 2G5�8 �= 26 .2 I-A"IA �1 �µ w - ,Gs +CO✓_E� M4lGVAIV /�C /�A�///V crtk(w. �; ( {264. � e 1 5 @� E , -< W y 3: a Iq I I cones- S/t�EwALE� D �I� � 8„ STREET � 2��. 9520'� � • 94 0 / re OW/VE�ZS O r, -74-S 7 4.S' J J TYf�/C A 4- SECTION Qv c�TT��e�(g /�• E/VT/'E'AN E /12 (/O/-/^/ MOR.TON { �,/U(C�/TH MOE�7r✓+/`! ' P 266•0 / C C7 /�/E 3✓6 LA kr2A MEE3LA / / 82162.7 //g� ✓ �`'�� '•'` � �J"'c�o'7`� e �0 9/40 to 9275 9275 ¢ 9/40 _ _ _ N 9400¢ i�1u-`, 1 N I J tl I Oil �j J 9400�\ �� >.. 1 I A/dI�L/CANT' J 1�J f'-2G6 I P 266.3 P-265.6 P- 65.0 - • . ROELCO P ENT _ P 26 3.�o ' ( 3O' 2 PARK .aL AZA, SU/TE 8 �,. 00 b4?V/NEB C,4 927/4 %") •S� =74.5 74.5_ /'74.5 :.; /� /8 /8/ /z , LOCAL r-/9 .346 94010¢ a -4457 t� 00 oo/ S jo n ) J 9/40 75`� 9275 ' 9240 P" 262 8 -4 4 ROC.JOEL- LANE tiC' /L�o•S A•C. /� �//NC7 �` �-A C�V//`/TA CA• 26 J �I P- 263.9 Zi P 263,5 P=� , ! NI P = 2G3.0 (u l (263) _ f G2. 7 \ N 940010 �N C AC Ae! Q E �� . 2 .�cREs 9400¢ / n� �. 1 �� 1 60.6 0 I coNc. c�vTT�k�z C9• 8. P= 262./ w 1 ' P=264.0 N /2a /- EX/ST/N� LANb USE STREET B 5' - 9400 Z STiee7eT 21 �I_I��OQ'� � • �-� oJ4 ' / � 1 ``1 0 �= 26/.5 i III S/N�L_E k�AM/L_Y RES/G7ENT/,v,L ��V J � h� o=x3.7 / 9400` Y 9400` _5400`� \01 )8010`� 940 E X/ST// Z.ON/N� 1pEP _S 1 Rl I � � m ` � PR O�O 5 E 0 P= 263.4 P=263.2 ,o=262.E "A 262. / I N a0 I �MA50NRy vt�L1LL I \ 1 I P' / U_rAL-/T/E$ p wA--r E CQIAC H ELL A �/A L_L_E�' LOT "E,. - 5.D 259.7 /OT ..F.. ��lD . � -- � l �^c 30 I gp . .(� `o` �� O _ - ,QrwE�� rrP) _ 2 N CAL/FO.PN/�q EX. 45 CURB 8 c,& EO/SON Co. ' °�� I � -�- �h ,tih°�;��EX�sT /e"�WAT. MA/it/ ,�h�•�. � z I�-�J /a"'w �'' E'��c T.�/c. TEL.EV/S/O/�/ �L.ME/E CAQL,EV/8/Q/�! ki - - N - - SAS SOGJTHEKZN CAL/�OR�//A r �� E�/ST. �tilEO/AN �: OPEC//LAG Llo�.Ivrl � ' I -� EX/S r, /2" &Z_WE�P EX/5T. SEIyER A__ffH ( ASSESSO/E�S �A EL NUMBED -- I �- /• ALL STREE7'8 Sf,IOwN ACE �/BL-IC EME,PGENCY l�Ef//CGE ST�2EETS. vJW. ' i (bESERT �AL_L-8 w•�L.L.. �J 34 /2e c. TUTi�L_ No. pE� L_078= '30. 3. 7bT,�L. LETTE�zE(p LOTS cov�/Ti�7' c Lv(�3 I I FOR LANOSCAP/n.�G .S70A7".kVATE�P �PETENT/ON�. � 1 PAD M E•�/�/C7E�Z//v�� i fU I I EwSTiivG /M/oRO�/�ME/V7-'S I • TY�/CAL.. SECT/O/\! t�_,'� � .. .� .� (Zoo he S`r"�zEET ;1 /V.T-S• e IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT E I _.. ■ NMIMSRDI I 3) a3 FRANK (SINAYR DO IwoNUER ALMS 1 I 77- TENTATIVE TRACT NO,, 25639 jr iE GRfl NS 401F•' Cf1VNiRl' s/TE r I' 113�+ _counsL�,It.S 'nl,a •.I 1� . BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST 4 = P1u BR} o o NDJef uL$ SPRINGS F w, t O OUNif, _ ,.� 3 rr ' ' C 3 (VIXv QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF -.-T � 1= g(e ; 8 IofsterfAtty 1 � c [uuNrnr Yt a � SUNCRfSr �cLur 3■� 2• '• i 'wort ow 3 .' . •�I THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF '. 11 ` a :�_; o �R �<<: s dEj --- -4AI -} - SEC . 4 T. 5. S . R. 6.E. S . B . B. M. . �acaoFl :.;T rr.a� s 31AT raa.w.v ^' ,u er 1,3r., .r Iv d'r re Al liAriV.�"'� •e,'y 3t LP - `� 3 tF �� T¢.�. aARRarr ■ F M3. Q{,, pv1�r• S' '- � � 'wit I C 4 t I 1 pr cjp OfSERr taNGt I IE ycl3 Y'S` frLy, t s� •-4f0 INf R d I•y H [Z7 / x D EC E M B E R 1989 aj i ;;Rr aSPA r�.l�, ; �wq �l 20 40 60 , - I 8i__ ?I eE'!�n1334�4__iCfl'N4 29 ///'� �M/ ups ulae�_ l�tK 1KM4 s N . 1. .�+y'pp�E�� T^-' 1�- `a"r L�1Wg3fN7 O O DO �.jl�f!'�3YYi,.},W- 7L1"�.. �•' I [R T.1•.�7N VJ" cQ 3L �_� 1.� FTj 4 I Z 1' - Cam.....'• • _ R` U-ISni GN,N Y�.i y�� _--��_ �._ N trr`i7 c. -- �- --�---- �3 .�t}9r�k I 1 I I Yr l I a•X M \ ' l ro' 1 f-• 1.11 w 5 a � 1 � 1I1;� 6 •'�� I i.µlcn[�IN I [NNON rE �•1 'y •y } �j'Y � � C_,L�L.G . / � i '/_ I CM'�PARR.4f ��OP'dd 'tl .!._� _i ESL 10 4rfy�I'. QJ 1 I , ;�z r ppr � -r rua o le le !Ll• Pi - !YjWu w ` Y[I,[ 11� I I I I ram(h�T - iRI -'�- k SE ift PA b�QR'P �CLVB - _ ��ru eF VI! V �� uNrRr I UtL1CNtIL VER q Iswju-� a IL I 1-� •=�a'�a, � �•,�`��_=11 �1�.� � I �" � I 4s tesre YH t -�rj coM / Wrw6�rrasd-s �=-T ALM Of fR} �P - I u`J COLLEOf OF/Nf OfSfR I 1_T� P \ � •.rtK sutauu of E( I - -'tr}y� I � 3 30 /Lb Jr- �■� '}' _�- � ..� to �� - I P N 9.400 940 �- j4--oo 400 ✓5 4O `(� /• 1 I CENItA I A I T"- ■' a `~ o, I p B � I(� �/ i I � OI � � OI / /.r �I J�J // �O 80O� �I J fRED I " � WARING" i DR I .,_� `_�. i r t}�i.•a I U' •� J ftN RWIJi 11, 040 P= 266.3 P=267 2 �_ � J J �cln.0 MEtG�✓.�/�/ �.QSE/NG CJ7.IIN, �..t�A s'1 /[fP ":1 9' � ? I .L -u N,I / 1 N}�.; i `V� C/•r✓'Y/p--� 8,STREET ~ `^ , co�.r- s/rc�E.,�.,�>,L,� 94 0 t�, U 19 8"�✓ �' 2�0� 9520 N O '�4.s' -7 Y/P/C A 4- SECT/O/V v7-T�t�e 8 _ I P 266.0 / 3/Co LA (ri?A MtBLA //8 G_B, 2�02.7 //8� � �c�6.J r•_••.•-' SA/�/ CLEMENTE� CA. �J'G�.�o'7`G. �0 9/40 N 9275 N 9275 N 9/40 r 940 �c 1 N / J �� / J I J 9400`\ AI�PL/CAAd-r O ,� NI NI113 W /�=?G6 I �_ �6.3 P=265.6 P= 65.0 i ROELCO DEVELOPME�(/T 3.6 t: 2 PARK /oL.4ZA g •c0 /25 , .. 301 3• SU/TE 00 � /�PV/NE, CA 927/4 7/4) 975-//7/ v) `; /� ✓0 wo- /8 /z ' LOCAL r6/9) 346-4457 /� •S� _74.5 '74.5 �4.5 • -9400 ti Oj�I/ 9400co 9/40 75 9275 '/ 9240 P= 2102.8 <l�-�/4 ROVtt7EL LA/�/E 26 J �I �� /e 1 /�•s A,-c. /tip , �I P- 263.9 (j i f' 263.5 N I P=2� / (tl l P = 263.0 I 1 (ZG3) _ \ �EAG E ¢ � G 2. 7 � � � 940010N I co/.sc. S/'vEwA�.K �. 2 .mac R.Es 9400 / n ��1 60.6 J caNc. c p J ~T4 5' -4•5' �� a' P= 262.P=264.0N18. /28_ I EEC/ST/�/ L.ANb USE 0.5�= STRE ET TY�/ca�4( SECT/ON 9400 / /NTEI�2 /0�2 ST/eEET ( o 2 /V.TS- Iy/�OJdOSE L.ANb E I � R O 1 2v J • �O G=c'-3� \ 9400¢ .9.400� p� .94GV r , ti _ 01 I �� i � Oj � 0 � 3 � � 22 � ` � PROA05EO ZO/V//VCR PR -S P=263.4 P=2G3.2 P=262.6 � P=262./ c\ �b P= A l�I NJA50N,PY 1/ .4ZL ' _ /�' /os _�4 " � ' • cB I c•B � /ai_ � Q 5 D 259.7 z O T IF- 0 Y/ WATEv22 CpAGHELLA /ALLEY LOT 'E - - - _ � � rz 3o I 3O - �- _J SE wER L_o TEt�b/gT��CT EY o ,PYWELL KTYP) __ _ �_'• �, , .. `• -� EL.ECT/2/C SOUTHE,PN CAL/FO.P�//�q C'/ EX. 8 CURB GUI EO/SON GO. h°� �• I i -� h°�h�. h°�\c,,rEXl5r /6' W,9T. MA/N h�U r�S8�' �r TELE/'��IO�/E EN��AL EL�C T(�2/C. ti /4i - p ti `ti lti �• �3Ti�¢EET I J q /a"w TELE�/jS/O/VL MER CA6LE V/S/QI`/ kj N I C7AS soUTf-/ERN CAL/F+OR�//A EX/ST. MED/AN OPEN/NG ho �A$ CO. EX/5T /2" SE�VE�P� 00� S �A�'CEL. N�.JMBEI �o -- I /MOTE STREETS Sf-�owN A�2� �x/BL/c EMEt�PGE/VCY IiEH/CGE' STREETS. E/`/T.tZ,a./�/cE To MA80Ni'F?Y /t' WALL 3. 7bTAL LET7-E�Eb LOTS= �. LOTS tbESERT SAL-�.-S I - I FOR LA�/OSCAP/n/G' � .STb,4MyV�1TE�P �PETENT/ON�, i t caNc. PAD S/IC7E WALK t -�i I I x I TY�/CAL SECTION coo K STREET ' N.T.S. m 'L tz "7777-TZ-77 TF!'777, v" TRW7— ReW Estaft khmutim 77, 1.800.527.9663 620-1-9 rC A 018-074 N t SEC. 4 r 5s. R6E-. 65 4:JO 42 1� M� 3J 34 A RA NK-—t- -SINA TRA--z DR jorc__ 0. r POR M > LOT 9 02 /633 MO. ArA ',14 i j NO. 1 2 L I to r C', 141' (40.66 0 04A6,; ) 40.391 6 A 300 % /,��11 4, so R b T T 4 T, .4, CA' I rr S;r 122 J, 4.- -1 1� 10.00Aek POP P41?2 No. I too) Nall Ac -M 15 Ar CAW LDr 2 2 97 Lor z zo 00*0 Pot 2 wow 61 top 5 rac 5 354C DAU CLO PLAr 41 hh ,T/s 5#1" its dr/w go N "RI9EN019 MAP Air."a Arpr AV? COMM. CALA /61 65Ac T7 T 7777-M-77"R757 7 7� Pot I Par 2 V 00-3 k:da � � f ,..,.r,�� q,� .w+'f�.`,`:. �JfE �„fi_ I q rD 8,; 'Io/9 O —COU NTRY r_Lb6_ 7, ,Ti 1, ------ -- -- Q) LL-6