Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTT 25711 ELDORADO DRIVE/MONTERRA II HOMES FILE 2 1995 PLANNING- OX14MICU RESOLUTION NO. 1431 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CavMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A 108 LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION WEST OF EL DORADO, ONE-HALF MILE SOUTH OF ODUNPRY CLUB DRIVE. CASE NO. TT 25711 WHEREAS, the Planning Camdssicn of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 20th day of March, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of BIRTCHER-DUNHAM for above described project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not significantly impact the environment and a negative declaration is hereby recommended for approval; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planing commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify approval of the tentative tract map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (£) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the planning compassion has considered the effect Of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. TT 25711, subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions. PLANNING CU4IISSICN RESOLUTION NO. 1431 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Cb mission, held on this 20th day of March, 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, ERWOOD, AND WHITLOCK NOES: NONE ABSENT: RICHARDS ABSTAIN: JONATHAN CAROL WHITLOCK, Chairperson ATTEST: A. DIAZ, Sec&t PJ/db 2 ' PLAMING O"USSION RESOIAMION M. 14,31 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE ND. TT 25711 Department of Community Development: 1. The final map shall conform substantially with the tentative tract map as modified by the following conditions. Tentative map approval shall expire two years from date of approval unless an extension of time is granted. 2. Applicant shall obtain clearance from the following agencies prior to construction: Public Works Department Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fine Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Building and Safety Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 3. The applicant shall pay all applicable fees in accordance with city policy including lizard fees. 4. R-1 standards for minimum 10,000 sq. ft. lots applicable to hone construction. 5. Perimeter decorative walls`required at minimum 6' and maximum 8' if used in conjunction with retaining walls. 6. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force, City Fire Marshal: 1. Provide, or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential gallon per minute 1500 for single family, 2500 for multifamily, and 3000 for commercial. The actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 GPM for two hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. 3 IPIM"nG MW SSICN RESOLUTION ND. 1431 2. A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 1 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 3. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), located not less than 25' nor more than 200' single family, 165 multifamily, and 150' commercial from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 4. Provide written certification from the appropriate water company having jurisdiction that hydrant(s) will be installed and will produce the required fire flow, or arrange field inspection by the Fire Department prior to request for final inspection. 5. A combination of on-site and off-site Super fire hydrants, (6" x 4" x 2- 1/2" x 2-1/2"), will be required, located not less than 25' or more than 200' single family, 165' multifamily, and 150' commercial from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. 6. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the County Fire Chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. Once copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department. 7. All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to within 150' of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story. The roadway shall be not less than 24' of unobstructed width and 13'6" of vertical clearance. Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall be 36' wide with parking on both sides, 32' wide with parking on one side. Dead-end roads in excess of 150' shall be provided with a minimum of 45' radius turn-around (55' in industrial developments). Fountains or garden islands placed in the middle of these turn-arounds shall not exceed a 5' radius or 10' diameter. 8. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to 4 PLANKING COMNIISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1431 facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department. Minimum opening width shall be 161 , with a minimum vertical clearance of 13'6". 9. Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy, 10. Curb to be cut or rolled for secondary emergency access. 11. All new residences/dwellings are required to have illuminated residential addresses meeting both city and Fire Dept. approval. Shake shingle roof are no longer permitted in the Cities of Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage or Palm Desert. Department of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 3. Storm drain and retention area design/construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. Design of the on-site retention areas shall be based on the following considerations: a. Those areas of the proposed subdivision which provide for stormwater drainage to the southern portion of the tract shall retain storm waters associated with the differential between the undeveloped and developed condition for a 100 year storm. b. Those areas of the proposed subdivision which provide for stormwater drainage to the southern portion of the tract shall retain storm waters associated with the differential between the undeveloped and developed condition for a 25 year storm. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RES0L0TION ND. 1431 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable City standards. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleraticn/acceleration lanes at all project entry points. "As- built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, half-street right of way at 55 feet on El Dorado Drive and 33 feet on Sandcastle Lane shall be offered for dedication on the final map. 8. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to project final. 9. All public/private improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 10. Landscaping maintenance on' El Dorado Drive and Sandcastle Lane shall be provided by the homeowners association. 11. Waiver of access to E1 Dorado and Sandcastle Lane, except at approved locations, shall be granted on the Final Map. 12. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading platys and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 13. The applicant shall provide for the installation of one-half landscaped median island in El Dorado Drive. A cash payment in lieu of actual installation may be submitted at the option of the Director of Public Works. 14. Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan mist be submitted to, 6 Pid MING Ot 4ffSSICN RFSOLUTIC N ND. 1431 and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 15. Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. 16. Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 17. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the Department of Public Works. 18. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 19. Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 20. Property lines for the individual lots proposed by this subdivision shall be located at top of slope where applicable. 21. As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, any existing utilities shall be undetgrounded per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. 22. Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share of the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension, Interstate 10 Interchange and Bridge Rind, and participate in any assessment district established to construct these facilities. Applicant shall also pay a transportation mitigation fee (TUMF). PJ/db 7 PALM DD C SC R7 FORK HGA o D Wo SIGN PROGRAM Ud11 e Applicant (please print) x-LL) _. Mailing Ad `Ism(-' 1 �1 W1 m(-' Telephone City 4Z2lp 0 lI State 4 jL]2o Z -Code Sign Maker/Contractor (_Z2 �7 67/� Telephone SIGN REQUEST ( Describe type and purpose of the sign(s)). �l ESTIMATED VALUE OF SIGN(S) $ 31 S2bo SIGN LOCATION (Street address, suite no., building/project name, or location In relation to streets I. �•• o d'7l1 C! w �O ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONING Property Owner Authorization: The undersigned states that they are the owner(s)of the property described hareln and hereby give authorization for the filing of this application. Signature Date Landlord of Building The undersigned states that they are the landlord of the building for which the sign (s) is for, and hereby give author- ization and approval for the filing of this application. If some as above, sign in both places. Signature o.,.vo..,e... ,.�_.. Date -g "'e Ci i uF NwLM DESERT of eN Ilobillties relative to any deed restrictions. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve the City of Palm Deser) of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions that may be applicable to the property described herein. Signature Date Si ure / 2—_Z:7 Date (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ACCEPTED BY: ❑ STAFF REVIEWCASE Hou REFERENCE CASE N0. ?1MMOINFMfAI SOrMe9/An-eI7.e2 6EING A SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHEAST I OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOVNSHIP 5 SOUTH. RANGE 5 EAST, S.B.d M_ / MAY. 1990 K .W.L. Associates . Inc . SCALE I "= le i1 1 -- 36as . f 6020 f i i r 71 r A 21 ..?:. ...:?. ..°..].,. 'I1 ». 4•' ..83.r j 66 u67 . u95. 40 24 27 j w.:s,• I L •w3«. li W:9 r I ...�.°. ...',�.. j •+'.L r -" r � 1 Is11 +der . ' w.w«r ..:.:. 57 : t 29 S M •� ' : �1 ... . ,, rr.r { ir.. � .viw. t "r�• I .r.ur ]� f � i - i I 70 m + t 70 p r�Oy Nm r t m ��� m 41 z = D D D� w D^ Dr- `m` oZ T N x D 1nm �N :1m N m yO(j)C) Z m N � Nmo cAm G> . O m N1mr 7cS1 �r `=� ' �. I �' I ' m mz > 7a �� T :.. w 08zm a > mn 7° 93� U3 C) a o nN �O Q3m co mmOc n O Da N rC � 6� Z N NTZ 16 z C t D m > ©{; ?� m1 -a > � z Tel co z Z Z X @.� z IV > 0aU3 > _ n Z N � N r my � m mm a .A > m z 73m0 Nm ., 7 n n c m 7ap� > m O 2 ' ZO \ r0 n O kt i+ > Czil m O - Z Z OO y Z m W O a ;; .•,. � � Z N Z FI Z m -- r T >_ X O N O 713 Z Z mm N z } NK O z � > 70 Z i O C T I 70 - rr�r m 70 70 f m > Z M D z r � N � c� Uzim � � za '7- A C = T C� p C) o n� D O z mOZY m Q �• rn m > c z rvo r 70 m X m --A m o n a go� Z _ _o_ a__o_____ __ " 0 v m Pfi P � t 4 j RESOLUTION NO. 95-49 /! J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ;CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE DECISION OF THE PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION FOR THE TIERRA VISTA DEVELOPMENT. WHEREAS, an appeal of a decision of the City of Palm Desert Architectural Commission was appealed to the. Palm Desert City Council; and WHEREAS, said appeal objected to the dwelling unit size approved on April 11, 1995; and WHEREAS, after a series of public review by the Palm Desert City Council on May it and May 25, 1995, the council determined that a revision of the unit size was in order to assure compatibility with existing development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, that the smallest housing unit having area shall be increased to a size of 2520 square feet; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the minimum unit size on Parcels 10, 9, 8, 7 , 90, 92, 76, 71, 96, 40, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 and 35, - as shown on Attachment "A" , shall be 2662 square feet of living area. i PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council, held on this Sth day of June 1995, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Benson, Kelly, Snyder, Spiegel, Crites , NOES : None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None n � BUFORD A. CRITES, Mayor TTE / i SHEILA R. G LIGAN, ity Clerk City of Palm Deser California i CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT I. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council II . REQUEST: Consideration of appeals .to ..a decision of the architectural review commission granting preliminary approval of revised home plans within the Tierra Vista Development on the west side of Eldorado Drive,. south of The. Lakes. III. APPELLANTS: Robert B. Varner (Sunterrace) 41-705 Harrison Drive Palm Desert, CA 92211 Mr. and MrsC1ftr@WN&FEnj16CTION: .17 FlorenceAPaWVED DENIED Palm Desert8E6&IjL*6V" OTHER IV. CASE NO: TT 25711 MEETING DATE AYES: V. DATE:. May 11, 19MES: ABSENT: ------ uxd VI. CONTENTS: ABSTAIN: VERIFIED BY: A. Staff Recommendation Original on File with City Clerk's Office B. Discussion C. Architectural review commission minutes involving Case No. TT 25711 D. Related maps and/or exhibits -------------------------------------------------------------------- A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: By minute motion deny the appeals and affirm the decision of the architectural review commission. B. DISCUSSION: Tentative Map 25711 was recorded. December 1991 creating 96 single family lots . The lots range in width from 95 feet to 115 feet with lot depths ranging from 125 feet to 140 feet. Typical lots have dimension ranges from 95 ' x 140 ' to 115' x 1301 . Four dwelling units have been constructed. These include the original three model units as well as one unit on Lot #91 .{the Arons) . The failure of the primary 'tract developer resulted in the undeveloped remainder (92 lots) being returned to Desert Aggregate STAFF REPORT TT 25711 MAY 11, 1995 (Granite Cbnstruction) . The tract is a walled and gated project which takes access from Eldorado Drive. Internal streets in the project are 33 feet wide and privately maintained. The previously approved model . units were approved in September 1992 . There were three model plans each having three or more possible elevations to maintain diversity of architecture. 1992 MODELS BUILDIBG BUILDING SIZE GARAGE TOTAL BEDROOMS WIDTH HEIGHT HOOF TYPE PLAN 1 3190 SQ. FT. 619 SQ. FT. 3809' SQ. FT. 3* 70 FT. 17 1/2 FT. HIP 6 GABLE (TILE) PLAN 2 3431 SQ. FT. 620 SQ. FT. 4051 SQ. FT. 3 70 FT. 16 1/2 FT. HIP (TILE) PLAN 3 3717 SQ. FT. 677 SQ. FT. 4394 SQ. FT. 3 72 FT. 16 1/2 FT. HIP (TILE) CURRENT PROPOSED MODELS OPTIDNAL EMUS BUILDING BUILDING SIZE .GARAGE ROOM TOTAL BEDROOMS WIDTH HEIGHT ROOF TYPE PLAN 1 2429 SQ. FT. 515-686 SQ. FT. 171 SQ. FT. 3115 SQ. FT. 3* 70 FT. 1718" HIP ROOF (TILE) PLAN 2 2662 SQ. FT. 487-645 SQ. FT. 158 SQ. FT. 3307 SQ. FT. 3+ 70 FT. 18 FT. HIP (TILE) PLAN 3 2912 SQ. FT. 600 SQ. FT. 226 SQ. FT. 3573 SQ. FT. 3♦ 70 FT. 17.10" HIP (TILE) The applicant originally presented his new plans to ARC March 14 , 1995 where the matter was discussed extensively (see attached minutes) . Mr. Aron was present and spoke to ARC. Mr. Varner submitted a letter which was presented. Issues discussed by Mr. Aron at this meeting were: i) units should be same height ii) should be same number of units iii) maintain similar architecture iv) should retain front courtyard areas v) expressed concern over smaller unit size 2 STAFF REPORT TT 25711 MAY 11, 1995 c Two appeals were subsequently filed to the ARC decision. Mr. Varner filed his appeal April 13, 1995 and expressed concern over the unit sizes . Mr. and Mrs . Aron filed their appeal April 18, 1995 expressing concern that the approval would have a "large negative impact on property value" . C. CONCLUSION: The property is zoned PR-5, planned residential . Code section 25 .24 .250 B provides "All single-story single-family detached buildings shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 25. 16 with the majority of lot sizes determining the standard. " Lot sizes in the tract range from 12,653 square feet to 22, 128 square feet. The majority of lots fall in the 12000-15000 square foot range. For this reason the standards prescribed in Municipal Code Section 25. 16 .060 are appropriate. This code section provides for minimum 1250 square foot homes and maximum 18 foot unit height. The proposed units comply with these standards as well as the setback requirements . The proposed units are smaller than those previously approved back in 1992, but they are still well in excess of the minimum. The ARC considered extensively its prescribed duties as detailed in section 25 . 70.090 (copy attached) . Specifically, subsection 'C' which reads as follows : C. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this title and the general plan of the city; The proposed homes are all 70 foot wide units. Two of the three previous units were 70 feet wide - one was 72 feet wide. This, along with the proposed architecture- and the additional detailing which was required by ARC, should assure that the units are "in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood" . When viewed from the street the units size will not be obvious . A similar concern regarding unit size occurred in the new section of Belmonte which is under construction at Cook and Hovley. Here we had 13-14 existing homeowners with 75 remaining lots. Several 4 09-08-1993 11:3acM FROM Portola Center TO 34696M P•02 MODELS i PHASE I Production Units PHASE II Production Units SI -ERRANOVA ) TRACT NO. 25711 c� 15 14 13 12 11 t0 9 e 7 6 5 . 1 i 16 ORENCE LANE 4 I 93 17 86 87 86 89 90 92 3 � 94 I le e5 60 79 74 73 > 2 O O 95 n I 19 o B4 Bt w 78 ' 75 d 72 1 s 20 83 82 77 76 3 71 96 21 �APPIAN VAY Q v 22 62 63 64 65 65 67 68 70 40 ` o w � p < 23 61 55 54 48 47 41 39 al O O < 24 60 S6 U b3 49 La46 42 38 25 37 59 55 57 52 51 50 45 44 43 of 26 < < LAK N LA E 36 I . 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 1 1 111 NDCAST __ _ _ - - }c ---�L S_A I` TOTFL P.02 - STAFF REPORT TT 25711 MAY 11, 1995 Issues discussed in Mr. Varner' s letter (copy attached) : i) concern over landscaping quality ii) desire to maintain "upscale" neighborhood iii) concern over the lower selling price The application was continued at this time to allow the applicant to address these concerns plus the concerns of ARC which were as follows : i) need additional detailing ( i .e. overhangs, type of materials, corbelling details, materials and color samples) ii) site plan showing existing units, proposed new model complex location, location of first phase iii) courtyards and/or walls iv) extend detail treatment deeper on sides March 28, 1995 the matter was back before ARC. The applicant provided a conceptual landscape plan, eave detailing, material samples and roof tile samples . The plans provided for 3 models each having 3 different elevations . Mr. Varner submitted another letter expressing concern with the size of the homes and their selling price. Mr. Aron was present and expressed similar concerns, as well as concern over the lack of courtyards . Lisa Ballenger spoke and concurred with Mr. Aron's comments . Commission discussed the courtyard concerns; transitioning of landscape treatments, need for additional details to see how plans tie together. The matter was continued once again to allow applicant to provide floor and roof plan with elevations; provide some front yard walls; provide detailed landscape plans . The matter was before ARC for a third time on April 11, 1995 . Additional detailing was provided on the side and rear elevations . As well, courtyards and/or walls were incorporated in 9 of the possible 12 unit combinations . Mr. Aron was present and expressed concern over whether there would be 2 or 3 car garages . The applicant indicated that they would offer purchasers the option of converting one of the garage spaces to habitable space. Preliminary approval was granted subject to the final working drawings delineating front elements being continued around the side yard elevations to a minimum depth equal to the side yard walls and provide for additional depth on the fascia. 3 i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE DECISION OF THE PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION FOR THE TIERRA VISTA DEVELOPMENT. WHEREAS, an appeal of a decision of the City of Palm Desert Architectural Commission was appealed to the Palm Desert City Council; and WHEREAS, said appeal objected to the dwelling unit size approved on April 11, 1995; and WHEREAS, after a series of public review by the Palm Desert City Council on May it and May 25, 1995, the council determined that a revision of the unit size was in order to assure compatibility with existing development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, that the smallest housing unit having area shall be increased to a size of 2520 square feet; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the minimum unit size on Parcels 10, 9 , 8, 7, 90, 92 , 76 , 71, 96, 40, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 , 33, 34 and 35, as shown on Attachment "A" , shall be 2662 square feet of living area. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council, held on this , day of , 1995, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES : ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD A. CRITES, Mayor ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California l5 11 f[oRtnCE LANE n BL 97 ee er 9u 9/ 9Y a�' s If v h -f6 DI W zs f �i �� n 7c 7, ab .r c O AP/AN WAY rr 6r 63 f/ 61 ..66 i7 F9 69 70;.:. `. 90 - t! 96 u:. , 47 F/ N F 11 � b 6o si 5a - 49 I6 KQ I � n � Q 77 J0 S7 C sr & 90 RI K M- I9:' ri f .'LIKEN ivy [ANE �. . 17 SAN,c &LIE LANE y Suntemee Mr . Richard J. Folkers Acting City Manager and Director of Public Works City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON MAY 25 , 1995 AGENDA ITEM IX.A, CASE NO. TT 25711 Dear Mr . Folkers, As per city council instructions, city staff (planning dept . and public works dept . ) are supposed to draft a final resolution about our appeal to a decision of the architectural review commission , granting preliminary approval of revised home plans within the Tierra Vista Development . Our understandings of the meeting are as follows : 1 . Minimum size of the home living area will be 2520 square feet . 2 : Lots along the north side of Sandcastle Lane (Lots 27 thru 35 ) will have minimum size of 2680 square foot living area same size as Sunterrace project smallest home . 3 . Future homes on Lots 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 40 , 67 , 71 , 76 , 90 , 92 and 96 , next to existing homes, will have minimum living area of 2950 square feet . Please mail me a copy of the final report recommended by your staff . I believe you or your staff will not issue any grading or building permits without approval of the final resolution by the city council . I thank you and the Palm Desert City Council for considering our appeal about the impact on our project and the existing homeowners of Sunterrace and Sierranova project . Sincerely, SUNTERRACE PROJE T Robert B. Varner ✓ cc : Ray Diaz 75.795 ARMOUR WAY • PALM DESERT,CA 92260• P.O.BOX 4689 •PALM DESERT,CA 92261 • (619)341-5200 • FAX(619)773.3287 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE DECISION OF THE PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION FOR THE TIERRA VISTA DEVELOPMENT. WHEREAS, an appeal of a decision of the City of Palm Desert Architectural Commission was appealed to the Palm Desert City Council; and WHEREAS, said appeal objected to the dwelling unit size approved on April 11, 1995; and WHEREAS, after a series of public review by the Palm Desert City Council on May 11 and May 25, 1995, the council determined that a revision of the unit size was in order to assure compatibility with existing development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, that the smallest housing unit having area shall be increased to a size of 2520 square feet; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the minimum unit size on Parcels 10, 9 , 8, 7, 90, 92, 76, 71, 96 , 40, 27 , 28, 29 , 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 and 35, as shown on Attachment "A" , shall be 2662 square feet of living area. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a. regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council, held on this , day of 1995, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD A. CRITES, Mayor ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California M N 1.7 G ' F[oAencE LINE + � A BG 07 v 69 9u 9/ 92 � rB BS DO 79 10 13 \I w V v 9s � n 9F sl 1sIV 0 2 qvi/An WAY - it 6! N 61 66 69 50, N 07 44 N R 2 20 � V LA 56 ,1 59 09 - V M 49 zs u < l[ 77 60 37 -31 5/ 50 R� H 09 rL � LAKfN CANE x. P1 L9 t!•• 70 . 9/ B( 79 9J '35 .. SANOCgS7LE - LANE .�.`i' INDEX, All- Olt, - f II ofrd,� �i'j �� �3 �1 3 �� ✓� 7� / 3�� 3d�3 ail 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 January 15 , 199FILEPHONE(619)346-0611 FAX(619)340-0574 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO. : TT 25711 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : SIERRA NOVA c/o PALM DESERT PARTNERS, LTD. , 77-900 Avenue of the States, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised final landscape plan LOCATION: West of E1 Dorado Drive, 1/2 mile south of Country Club Drive ZONE: PR-5 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission approved the revised landscape plan, by minute motion. Commission also - approved variance for 15 foot high kiosk subject to a minimum setback of 15 feet . Date of Action: January 12 , 1993 Vote : Carried 5-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15 ) days of the date of the decision. Any amendments to this approved plan would need to be resubmitted to commission for approval . ) -------------------------- -------P--------- --------------- ---- STAFF COMMENTS : It is y our responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES; In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9 : 00 a .m. the Monday eight days prior to the next meeting. 1 ,s MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION JANUARY 12, 1993 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ I . CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 12 : 25 p.m. Commissioners Present: Current Meeting Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent Rick Holden X 6 1 Frank Urrutia X 6 1 Chris Van Vliet X 7 0 Wayne ,Connor X 6 1 Richard O'Donnell X 5 2 Ronald Gregory X 6 1 Staff Present: Steve Smith Phil Drell Jeff Winklepleck Steve Buchanan Donna Bitter II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: It was moved by Commissioner Van Vliet, seconded by Commissioner Gregory, to approve the minutes of the December 8, 1992 meeting as submitted. Motion carried 5-0-1, Commissioner Urrutia abstaining. It was moved by Commissioner Van Vliet, seconded by Commissioner Gregory, to approve the minutes of the December 22 , 1992 meeting as submitted. Motion carried 3-0-3, Commissioners Holden, Connor and O'Donnell abstaining. III . It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Van Vliet, to approve the following cases by minute motion. Motion carried 6-0. A. Final Drawings : 1 . CASE NO. : TT_25711 _ APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : �S'IERRA NOVA-c/o�PALM_ DESERT - PARTNERS, -LTD.-;-77-900 Avenue of the States, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised final landscape plan LOCATION: West of El Dorado Drive, 1/2 mile south of Country Club Drive ZONE: PR-5 I MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION JANUARY 12 , 1993 Phil Drell presented the revised landscape plans . Commissioners Gregory and Connor felt the plans were acceptable, noting the drip irrigation system. Mr. Drell noted that the wall plants would have to be changed. Commission granted final approval to revised landscape plans . The applicant, Wes Oliphant, reported that Mr. Drell had observed that the kiosks were approximately 12 feet high and as close as 10 feet from the curb in some cases . Mr. Drell noted that the code required 15 feet on the street side setback and it was unclear as to where the kiosk were placed. He indicated that the commission had the authority to grant approval of a variance noting that the kiosk would be used on approximately 30% of the homes . Commission approved variance for 15 foot kiosk, subject to a minimum setback of 15 feet. 2 . CASE NO. : CUP 92-11 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : SONTAG & NOVASCONE, INC. for LOUISE ' S PANTRY, 124 So. Palm Canyon Drive, Palm Springs, CA 92262 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final working drawings for patio enclosure LOCATION: 111 Town Center Way, Suite A ZONE: P.C. ( 3) S.P. Commission continued the request for final approval noting that the Building Department had concerns with the plans as submitted. 3 . CASE NO. : 3075 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS, 74-675 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of low voltage lights in palm trees and relocation of monument sign LOCATION: 74-675 Highway 111 ZONE: P.C. (4 ) 2 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION NOVEMBER 24, 1992 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ I . CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 12 : 15 p.m. Commissioners Present Current Meeting Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent Rick Holden X 4 0 Frank Urrutia X 4 0 Chris Van Vliet X 4 0 Wayne Connor X 4 0 Richard O'Donnell X 3 1 Ronald Gregory, X 3 1 Staff Present: Phil Drell Jeff Winklepleck Steve Smith Steve Buchanan Donna Bitter II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Van Vliet, to approve the minutes of the November 10, 1992 meeting as submitted. Motion carried 4-0-1, Commissioner Gregory Abstaining. III . It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Connor, to approve the following cases by minute motion. Motion carried 5-0. A. Final Drawings: 1 . CASE NO. : CTT-257-11-, APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : SIERRA-NOVA c/o PALM DESERT, PARTNERS, LTD. , ;77-900 Avenue of the States, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final landscape plans LOCATION: West of E1 Dorado Drive, 1/2 mile south of Country Club ZONE : PR-5 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION NOVEMBER 24, 1992 Phil Drell reported that the plans were reviewed by Eric Johnson and found that the four model plans were the old oasis style landscaping. He noted that of the four models, one plan should be desert type and one should be a more lush desert type design in order to show prospective homeowners that these type of plans are available . Commissioner Gregory discussed with the applicant, Wes Oliphant, the commission' s feelings on the designs submitted and the commission' s goal of working towards more drought tolerant designs . Commission continued the case to allow the applicant to revise the landscape plans to include two desert type landscape plans for the four models . 2 . CASE NO. : TT 27561 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : JASCORP for WINTERHAVEN, 79- 811 Country Club Drive, Suite A, Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised exterior wall design LOCATION: South side of Hovley Lane, approximately 730 feet west of Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-5 The applicant discussed how the existing slump stone wall has taken its toll and was requesting approval to add slurry and paint (Meadow Brook X43 ) to the existing wall . This would match the wall at Hovley Collection. Commission approved the wall plan as submitted. Motion carried 4-0-1 with Commissioner Urrutia Abstaining. 3 . CASE NO. : 3075 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : IMPERIAL SIGN CO. for HOLIDAY INN, 46-120 Calhoun Street, Indio, CA 92201 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Reconsideration of location of free standing sign LOCATION: 74-675 Highway Ill ZONE: PC-4 The applicant, Jim Engle, discussed the problems with the approved sign location because of the existing stop sign 2 e; 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 FAX(619)340.0574 November 2 , 1992 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO. : TT 25711 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : SIERRA NOVA C/o PALM DESERT PARTNERS, LTD. , 77-900 Avenue of the States, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final landscape plans LOCATION: West of E1 Dorado Drive, 1/2 mile south of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission continued the case to allow the applicant to revise the landscape plans to include at least two desert type landscape plans for the four models . Date of Action: November 23, 1992 Vote : Carried 5-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15 ) days of the date of the decision. Any amendments to this approved plan would need to be resubmitted to commission for approval . ) --------------------------- ------------------------------------- STAFF COMMENTS : It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES; In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9 : 00 a .m. the Monday eight days prior to the next meeting. L - MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MARCH 10, 1992 rrr:rrr rrrrrrrrrrrarrraarrrrrarrrrarraarrarrrarrr rrrrrrrr rrarrrararrararra 1 . CALL TO ORDER: The meetino_ was called to order at 12: 15 p.m. Commission Members Current Meeting Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent. Ron Greoorv. Chairman X 5 0 Rick Holden X 5 0 Frank Urrutia X 3 2 Chris Van Vliet X 5 0 Kirby Warner X 3 2 Wayne Connor X 3 2 Staff Present: Phil Drell Steve Smith Bob Smith Donna Bitter If . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia. seconded by Commissioner Holden. to aoorove the minutes of the February 25, 1992 meeting as submitted. Motion carried 4-0. III . It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia. seconded by Commissioner VanVliet. to aonrove the following cases by minute motion. Motion carried 4-0. A. Final Drawinas: I . CASE NO. : 3020 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : RAUL SOSA & ASSOCIATES for LAS CASUELAS CAFE. 67-853 E. Palm Canyon Drive, Cathedral Citv. CA 92234 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Sian aooroval LOCATION: 73-703 Highway Ill ZONE: C- 1 The or000sed signage would be Pink neon mounted on a large metal can raceway. Commission aooroved signage as submitted, MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MARCH 10. 1992 r II 2. CASE NO. : __T_ 2571L_ APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : LSIERRANOVA c/o CPACM_ DESERT—PARTNERS. �—CTD.% 77-900 Avenue of the States. Palm Desert. CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final workina drawinas LOCATION: West of E1 Dorado Drive. 112 mile south of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 Phil Drell presented the final working drawings showing the changes made in the overhangs as requested by commission. Commission approved the final working drawings as submitted. 3. CASE NO. : PP 90-13 APPLICANT (ANO ADORESS) : DSL SERVICE CO. . 3501 Jamboree Road. Suite 5000. North Tower, Newport Beach, CA 92658-6030 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final plan approval for "Ross" building LOCATION: Fred Warina Drive and Hiahwav III ZONE: P.C. (3) S.P. Commission approved the final plans as submitted. Motion carried 3-0-1 . Chairman Greaory abstaining. 4. CASE NO. : 3025 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : AMERICAN AWNING CO. for PALM DESERT LODGE, 44-489 Town Center Way 14194. Palm Desert. CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of awninas LOCATION: 74-527 Highway III ZONE: C- 1 S.P. Commission approved the nine awninas as submitted. 2 \ �, �nh� Off ftU o Q� 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 March 13. 1492 FAX(619)340-0574 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO. : TT 25711 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : SIERRANOVA C/o PALM DESERT PARTNERS, LTD. . 77-900 Avenue of the States. Palm Desert. CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final working drawings LOCATION: West of El Dorado Drive. 1/2 mile south of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 ----------------------------11---------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant. the architectural commission approved the final working drawings, as submitted. by minute motion. Date of Action: March 10. 1992 Vote: Carried 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. Any amendments to this approved plan would need to be resubmitted to commission for approval . ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda. new or, revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday eight days prior to the next meeting. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 25, 1992 aaasasaasaaassaasaaa aaaaaaasasaaaaaa:assa:saaaaaaa•saasaasaasasaasasaasaasa 1 . CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 12:25 p.m. Commission Members Current Meetina Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent Ron Greaorv. Chairman X 4 0 Rick Holden X 4 0 Frank Urrutia X 2 2 Chris Van Vliet X 4 0 Kirby Warner X 3 1 Wayne Connor X 3 1 Staff Present: Steve Smith Jeff Winklepleck Steve Buchanan Bob Smith Donna Bitter II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: It was moved by Commissioner Van Vliet, seconded by Commissioner Warner, to approve the minutes of the February 11 . 1992 meeting as submitted. Motion carried 5-0- 1 , Commissioner Urrutia abstaining. Ill . It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Urrut)a, to approve the following cases by minute motion. Motion carried 6-0. A. Final Drawings: 1 . CASE NO. : FTT 2257-1-1 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : SIERRANOVA c/o lPALM DESERT-PARTNERS; �L'TQ._. 77-900 Avenue of the States, Palm Desert, CA 92260; LIFESCAPES, INC. , 4930 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final working drawings LOCATION: West of E1 Dorado Drive, 1/2 mile south of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 Steve Smith outlined the memorandum from the public works staff noting their concerns with the amount of material being used and asked that the applicant decrease some of the plant material . f MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 11, 1992 Chairman Gregory noted that staff was asking that the plant material be pulled apart further to give it a more natural design. He added that the bonsai-dwarf fescue was not recommended in the desert due to the extreme summer conditions noting that the turf would require too much water. The applicant stated that they were trying to make a real strong statement with the landscaping at the entry. Mr. Smith noted that the staff concerns were along the street. Commission approved the final working drawings subject to meeting the conditions listed in memorandum dated February 25, 1992 from Eric Johnson and Frank Gonzalez. 2. CASE NO. : PP 90-13 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : DSL SERVICE CO. , 3501 Jamboree Road, Suite 5000, North Tower. Newport Beach, CA 92658-6030 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final landscape plans LOCATION: Fred Waring Drive and Highway III ZONE: P.C. (3) S.P. Steve Smith presented the final plans noting that Eric Johnson had reviewed them and felt the layout was acceptable; however, he was still concerned with the type of irrigation system being used. He noted that the proposed system was used at the new building at the civic center and discussed the problems this system is having. Mr. Johnson requested that a different manufacturer be used on the irrigation system. Commission approved the final landscape plans subject to the irrigation emitter system manufacturer be clarified at a later date. Motion carried 5-0- 1 , Chairman Gregory abstaining. 3. CASE NO. : PP 91-15 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : HOWARD BREIN CONSTRUCTION CO. . Post Office Box 3237. Palm Desert, CA 92260 MATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final landscape plan LOCATION: 73-805 Shadow Mountain Drive 2 f 1 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260.2578 TELEPHON E(619)346-0611 FAX(619)340-0574 February 28, 1992 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO. : TT 25711 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : SIERRANOVA c/o PALM DESERT PARTNERS, LTD. , 77-900 Avenue of the States, Palm Desert, CA 92260; LIFESCAPES, INC. . 4930 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final working drawings LOCATION: West of El Dorado Drive, 1/2 mile south of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by 'the applicant, the architectural commission approved the final working drawings, by minute motion, subject to meeting the conditions listed in memorandum dated February 25, 1992 from Eric Johnson and Frank Gonzalez. Date of Action: February 25. 1992 Vote: Carried 6-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. Any amendments to this approved plan would need to be resubmitted to commission for approval . ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday eight days prior to the next meeting. 1 w INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM C►TY OF PALM DESERT TO: Phil Drell , Senior Planner FROM: Eric Johnson, Landscape Specialist/frank Gonzalez, Landscape Coordinator SUBJECT: SIERRA NOVA LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW DATE: February 25, 1992 After review and consultation with Eric Johnson (Landscape Specialist) the following recommendations have been made concerning the Sierra Nova Landscape Plan. SHEET 10 & 11 Recommend that the planting spaces between the Brachychiton populneus- bottle tree, Washinqtonia robusta - Mexican Fan Palm and W. filifera - California Fan Palm be increased to accomodate their growth characteristics. SHEET 11 Recommend that the planting spaces between all Cercidium floridum be increased to 25 feet. SHEET 13 Salvia gregqii - Autumn sake recommend increased spacing between plants to 4 feet. Leucophyllum frutescens - "Green Cloud" and "Silver Cloud". Recommend the use of a different plant selection. The specified plant requires increased spacing between plants (i .e. 4' - 5' ) and a planting area which is not so narrow. Cassia artemisioides - feathery cassia recommend the same changes as leucophyllum sp. * Shrubs should be spaced further apart and given a more natural design. " Add some vine on the wall . Page 2 The use of Echinocactus sp. Barrel cactus adjacent to the curb is inappropriate. The use of Bonsai-Dwarf fescue is not recommended, due to the extreme summer conditions exhibited in the Coachella Valley. Recommend Bosmith emitter in place of Rainbird emitter. ERIC J01HNSON FRA G �Z EZ EJ:FG/rh BIRTCHER Th'o Varner Road .y Thusand Palms,CA 92276 Partners[it `.0 Telephone 619 346 0690 America's Progress pp for 50 Years. Z O t(j90 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPABTN'ENT CITY L'P pl`LM DESERT July 25 , 1990 Mr. Ray Diaz City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Ray: In reponse to your conversation with Charlie Sweet , we would like to have bike lanes designated along E1 Dorado Drive. Birtcher is the developer of tentative track #25711 which fronts on E1 Dorado Drive . We believe it would be of benefit to our project and to the community to dedicate a portion of the street to cyclists . Jack Canlon of Sunrise Company also agrees with this request . Please let me know what we can do to accomplish this . Very Truly Yours , p �WM s, Clark R. Wardle Principal CRW/js cc : Charlie Sweet Chicago Dallas Denver Houston Irvine Laguna Niguel Los Angeles Minneapolis Palm Desert Phoenix Portland Seattle Washington,D.C. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION JANUARY 28, 1992 B. Preliminary Plans: 1 . CASE NO. : CrT 257.11, APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : PAL'M-DESERT-ELDORADO`PARTNER_S_—'LTD?. for TER MAk, 77-900 Avenue of the States, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Revised preliminary plans of perimeter streetscape landscaping LOCATION: West of El Dorado Drive, 112 mile south of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 Phil Drell reported that the landscaping plan was conceptual and that the applicant was requesting approval of the pallet selection only. Chairman Gregory noted his concerns with the use of the pine trees. noting the commission's intent in promoting a more water efficient plan. He felt that the pines should be changed to another tree selection. The applicant noted that Eric Johnson was not as concerned with the planting at the entrance of the project. He added that the pines would only be located at the entry. Commission granted conceptual approval only to the revised preliminary landscape plans for the perimeter streetscape. C. Miscellaneous Cases: 1 . CASE NO. : 328 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : PETER F. AND ALCIRA E. THOMPSON, 72-603 Hedghok Street, Palm Desert, CA NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of existing architecture and landscaping to qualify for a certificate of conformance LOCATION: 44-408 and 44-440 Acacia Drive ZONE: R-I Commission felt that the landscaping needed to be upgraded. They requested a tree in the front lawn area as well as increasing the Planter area along the wall . Commission continued the request directing the applicant to provide additional landscaping. Resubmit.tal to include landscape plan as seen from the street. 3 n, l C0MV pq pd u pin 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 FAX(619)340-0574 January 31 . 992 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO. : TT 25711 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : PALM DESERT ELDORADO PARTNERS, LTD. for TERANOVA, 77-900 Avenue of the States. Palm Desert; CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Revised preliminary plans of perimeter streetscape landscaping LOCATION: West of El Dorado Drive. 1/2 mile south of Country Club ZONE- PR-5 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission granted conceptual approval only to the revised preliminary landscape plans for the perimeter streetscape. Date of Action: January 28, 1992 Vote: Carried 5-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. Any amendments to this approved plan would need to be resubmitted to commission for approval . ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday eight days prior to the next meeting. AGENDA ITEM NO.: IV-B-2 DATE: DECEMBER 17, 1991 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION CASE NO.: TT 25711 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PALM DESERT ELDORADO PARTNERS, LTD. for TERANOVA, 77-900 Avenue of the States, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of perimeter streetscape landscaping LOCATION: West of El Dorado Drive, 1/2 mile south of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 DISCUSSION: The proposed landscape plan is not consistent with our current emphasis on low water use design. The applicant has been informed of our new policies and has received a copy of our Landscape Concepts Guide. RECOMMENDATION: Continue for redesign. PD/db MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION DECEMBER 17. 1991 Action: It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Van VI let . to approve the revised preliminary elevation and landscaping plans as submitted. Motion carried 4-0-1 , Chairman Gregory abstaining. 2. CASE NO. : �TT_2 5571-1-' APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): (PALM_-DESERT _EMORADO-PARTNERS, _LTD- for JERANOVA: 77-900 Avenue of the States. Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of perimeter streetscape landscaping LOCATION: West of El Dorado Drive, 1/2 mile south of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 Phil Drell reported that the landscape architect for the project was given a copy of the city's new landscape guide and would be redesigning the plan. Chairman Gregory agreed that the landscapina plan was not acceptable and wanted to see more effort Placed on a water efficient scheme. Action: It was moved by Chairman Gregory, seconded by Commissioner Van Vliet. to continue the plans directing the applicant to redesign the landscaping plan in accordance with the city's new water efficient scheme. Motion carried 5-0. 3. CASE NO. : TT 26970 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : GARY DAUGHERTY/JOHN ERDMANN for MARIPOSA SPRINGS. 462 Graceland, Laguna Beach, CA 92691 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of model homes. elevations and clubhouse (sales office) LOCATION: North side of Country Club Drive opposite Marriott Desert Springs ZONE: PR-5 The applicant. Mr. Gary Daugherty, presented the preliminary Plans. Commissioner Urrutia felt that the front elevations showed some uniqueness, however he noted that he would like to see this 7 , oq NAM nanN 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 FAX(619)340.0574 December 20, 1991 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO. : TT 25711 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : PALM DESERT ELDORADO PARTNERS, LTD. for TERANOVA, 77-900 Avenue of the States, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of perimeter streetscape landscaping LOCATION: West of El Dorado Drive, 1/2 mile south of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission continued the plans,.directing the applicant to re-design the landscaping in accordance with the city's new water efficient scheme. Date of Action: December 17, 1991 Vote: Carried 5-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen ( 15) days of the date of the decision. Any amendments to this approved plan would need to be resubmitted to commission for approval . ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday eight days prior to the next meeting. i 7r a5V1 BIRTCHER Ihm, ,...I rR„nd 'I L,nrn.v,J I'n lln.,( A 'W7n Partners In 'PPlrphunn bin 916 Owl() America's Progress for 50 Years. RECEIVED OCT 4 7990 COMMUOn DEVrLOPMFkt OEP4RIMEM Olir OF PALM OESERt July 25 , 1990 Mr. Ray Diaz City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert , CA 92260 Dear Ray: In reponse to your conversation with Charlie Sweet , we would like to have bike lanes designated along E1 Dorado Drive . Birtcher is the developer of tentative track #25711 which fronts on E1 Dorado Drive . We believe it would be of benefit to our project and to the community to dedicate a portion of the street to cyclists . Jack Canlon of Sunrise Company also agrees with this request . Please let me know what we can do to accomplish this . Very Truly Yours , Clark R. Wardle Principal CRW/js cc : Charlie Sweet C hicagn U,,Ilas I)rirvrr I lu,ulun Irvinr La,;u na Ni,,url 1_,,s An,dcs Minns pulis P ln, Urserl I'hneniu Purdend S.;alllr lNae hinghm, D.C. RCV H'1:XEROX IELEC.OF'IEF,' 7010 9-13-91D 3: 18FIl E193417098:# 1 SEP - 1 S - 90 THU 1 1 4 K W L CASSOC I " -r F- , I NC P . 0 1 KWL ASSOCIATES. IVC. PLANNING 6 ENGINEERING • SURVEY$ 712 EUGENE RD, PALM SPRINGS, CAUFORNU192264 (619) 327.7MI$ FAX KUMBERI 619/327-8906 DATE S. /3 TOTAL $0. OF PAGESI INCLUDING COVER SHEETS / FAX 170. I F47--- 70 99 -- TOI_ZlI/ COMRAWY i 0, L7' MIMI ANY QUESTIO SO PLEASE CALL 6191327-7786. THANK YOU. MESSAGE w z C'Q k us-�o a -�- 4 � � r a FY V !;r:;:EF.Ux ELE00F'I ER 7010 ; 9-11-90 12:30PM ; 6193417098;# S E P - 1 1 - 9 0 T U E 1 ? - 2 G K W L ASSOC I A -F F I N C _ P 0 KWL ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING • ENGINEERING • SURVEYS 712 EUGENE RW PALM SPRINGS. CALIFORNIA 92264 (619) 327.7786 FAX NUMBER: 619/327-8908 DATE: TOTAL NO. OF PAGES, INCLUDING COVER SHEET: FAX NO. : L/6/ /� 31,/— ?Q 9S TO: 4111gg l' 0p� _ COMPANY: 0 t2`saa /2 / r" FROM: �d G � la 5 ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL 619/327-7786, THANK YOU. MESSAGE CJ , d � r1p n rr 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESFn I- CALIFORNIA 92260 --.:.---_.----- TELEPHONE(619) 346-0611 FAX: (619) 341-7090 FAX TRANSMISSION COVER LET_ER -10: DATE: �� ' � � CID I IML: Please hand deliver the F0110w1ng message to: Name: Como,, 4,b Canpany: ^` Clty/State: /` C A FAX Nwiber: FROM: Name: Departinent: ��AMNIw e We are transmitting on Pages ( Including this cover letter) _ ARCH1,41ECTURAL REVIEW Dept. of Planning- ar P g and Community Development M paUM o 0 0 l-R 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 PAID .applicant I please print) -77-`TOy Mg Address Talepnone lM VegeAl- PDl "l226d State Zip-Code REQUEST! (Describe speciflc nature of approval requested). rvi (lyA9t-/ AMPki,¢ 1 D (Pr-teIME*l2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 40 eq,c-, St It Feio f su —I— Lj C(> rU It-,2 D r �flD2,RDd �R �ANPG�i �>= E f ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONING [� • — Property Owner Authorization The undo ed ifates that the are the owner Is) of the property described herein and hereby give author- Ixa f a rnghisefplicallon. 91_ Sign ature / V Oafs Agreement absolving the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities relative to any deed restrlctlona. 1 00 BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve the City Of Point Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions that may be applicable to the property described herein. (� ; Signature Data Applicants Signature Pr+ IM Y A+ *kD P�+24-4le,e� 1-*P- i9y Siq ature Date FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status. Accepted byr ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. ❑ Categorical Exemption 11a=/nv\r\�� Irrt���ntn� — ❑ Negative Declaration /&+a IE u�lOo / Other Ref!rsr^e Cese No. 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 July 25, 1990 A tC11rT➢CTLMAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: TT 25711 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): BIRTCHER DUNHAM, 72-010 Varner Road, Thousand Palms, CA 92276 NATURE OF PROJECP/APPROVAL SOUGBT: Re-submittal of preliminary house plans LOCATION: West of Eldorado - 1/2 mile south of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission continued TT 25711 for reasons stated in the attached draft minutes. Date of Action: July 24, 1990 Vote: 5-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- STAFF CC"=S: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural crnmission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meeting's agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday a week prior to the next meeting. MINUTES ARCHITECIURAL REVIEW QI-MISSION JULY 24, 1990 Commissioner Holden felt the Deep Canyon side of the building was good with the varying setbacks. Commissioner Urrutia noted this would be a goad opportunity to have a nice building at that location. He indicated that the second story could hang over the parking area. Action: Moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Drury, continuing CUP 90-12 to allow the applicant to incorporate the revisions. Carried 5-0. 3. CASE NO: TT 25711 40 APPLICANT (ARID ADDRESS): BIRTC!-IER DU 72 1 Va r Road, Thousand Palms, CA 92276 � Vu�/fC REtgS�O�T TO NATURE OF PROJECT'/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Re-submittal of prelimninary house plans LOCATION: West of Eldorado - 1/2 mile south of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 Mr. Joy outlined the salient points of the case, noting that the plan was revised per previous commission conditions. Commissioner Holden noted that some cosmetic changes had been made, but they did not aesthetically tie-in with the building. He indicated that solar protection had also not been addressed. Commissioner Urrutia stated that the applicant was to provide solar shade on the sides and rear, which had not been done. Commissioner Holden indicated that the revision helped, but was not enough. Action: Moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner McCrea, continuing Case No. TT 25711. Carried 5-0. V. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 2:05 p.m. S SMITH ASSOCIATE PLANNER SRS/tm 8 oV F&AM B&cnN 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code. NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NO: TT 25711 APPLICANT/PROJECT SPONSOR: Birtcher-Dunham 72-010 Varner Road Thousand Palms, CA 92276 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: A 108 lot single family subdivision west of .El Dorado, one-half mile south of Country Club Drive. The Director of the Department of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. 44March 20, 1990 RAMON A. DIAZ DATE DIRECTOR OF COMMUN TY DEVELOPMENT /tm l �k,I b i :RERU_ I ELECUF I ER 7010 ?-24-9J 12:5"PH ; 1 SEP - 24 — G0 P10 F1 1 52 K W L ASSOC: I AT E I NG _ P _ 0 1 KWL ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING • ENGINEERING • SURVEYS 712 EUGENE RD. PALM SPRINGS. CALIFORNIA 92264 (619) 327.7786 FAX NUMBER: 619/327-8908 DATE: TOTAL N0. OF PACES, INCLUDING COVER SHEET. FAX NO. : J14 O ` a T0: I II COMPANY: C D - 1 >^�, — FROM: Is Lin mb ANY QUESTIONSs PLEASE CALL 619/.327-7786. THANK YOU. MESSAGE 1Mo re ree V_ 1) blopz�xl• 2) Adria 3) Laken J 4) Magenta S) Ross 6) LOv6inna 7) Aoti / I 1 MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCEIITECTURAL Q1M mim TUE.MM, JULY 24, 1990 I. The meeting was called to order at 12:30 p.m. Commission Members Current Meeting Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent Ron Gregory, Chairman X 12 2 Rick Holden X 14 0 Russell McCrea R 13 1 Mary Drury x 9 5 Frank Urrutia X 12 2 Wayne Connor X 13 1 Others Present: Steve Smith Pat Bedrosian Phil Drell Brent Conley Phil Joy Tonya Monroe It was moved by Commissioner Holden, sew by Commissioner Urrutia, to approve the minutes of the July 10, 1990 meeting as amended. Carried 6- 0. II. ORAL CLNMINICATICNS• None. III. Moved by CYmni ssi oner MoCrea, seocrx1ed by Commissioner Drury, to approve the following cases by minute motion. CEried 5-0 (Commissioner Comor left at 1:02 p.m. ) A. Final Drawings: 1. CASE NO: 1788 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GO WEST (Puffer Aurora), 73-375 El Paseo, Suite H, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECP/APPROVAL SOUGHT Approval of business identification sign LOCATICN: 73-375 E1 Paseo, Suite H ZONE: Cl S.P. 2. CASE NO: 1787 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PALMS TO PINES CANVAS for UPPER CRUST, Pinyon Pines, Box 69, Mountain Center, CA 92361 DIINVTFS ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 03MIISSICN JULY 24, 1990 INURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOU13ff: Approval of awning and sign program LOCATICN: 73-580 El Paseo ZONE: Cl S.P. 3. CASE ND: PP 90-2 APPLICANT (ARID ADDRESS): SMJ DEVELOPMENT, 40-464 Periwinkle Court, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOI M: Final approval of plans for a 7,200 square foot phase of a 30,000 square foot office ccmplex IACATICN• Caroline Court ZONE: S.I. 4. CASE ND: CUP 90-4 APPLICANT (ADD ADDRESS): WEBCO PACIFIC (The Pueblos), 73-020 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PRIDIECT/APPRDVAL SOUGHT: Final working drawings LOCATION: 73-695 Santa Rosa Way ZCNE• R2 S.O. 5. CASE ND.: 1791 SA APPLICANT (ARID ADDRESS): WALL SYSTEMS PLUS (formerly Atelier), 73-865 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGRT: Business identification sign LOCATION: 73-865 Highway 111 ZONE: C-1 Commission specified that the background color was to match the adjoining businesses (i.e. the off-white color at 99 Cent Video). 2 MINUTES ARCHITECIVRAL REVIEW CCIMIIISSICN JULY 24, 1990 B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO: 358 C APPLICANT (AMID ADDRESS): LYON'S c/o FISCHER ARCHITECTURE, 888 Research Drive, Suite 100, Palm Springs, CA 92262 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval for commercial store front remodel L0CATICN: 73-190 El Paseo ZONE: C-1 IV. CASES: A. Final Drawings: 1. CASE NO: 1750 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): SPORTS FEVER, 73-360 Highway 111 #4, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of sign installation LOCATION: 73-360 Highway 111 ZONE: Cl S.P. Mr. Smith noted that both the applicant and representative were . present. Staff recommended approval of the sign, subject to deletion of the lower line, which he felt made the sign a menu sign and indicated the red color was unacceptable. Ms. Shirley W. Ctibbison informed comussion that she had been utilizing the proposed identification for five years. Her representative, Mark Ross from Imperial Signs, stated that the sign would blend in the sign next door at Un Gallery. Ccnmissioner Urrutia explained to the applicant that when a new sign was requested it was subject to any criteria in affect at that time and it was commission's policy that no sign menus be allowed. 3 MINUTES , ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW C'M+IISSION JULY 24, 1990 Ms. Cubbiscn noted that it was in the ordinance that if the wording was part of her dba it could be incorporated into her sign. She distributed a copy of her dba proof of publication, dated June 25, 1990. Commission reiterated its policy relative to the cluttered appearance created by allowing menu signs and indicated its opposition to the proposed red color. Staff recommended approval of the sign subject to the deletion of the lower line of copy. Staff also indicated that the applicant could appeal the commission's decision to city council. Action: Moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner McCrea, approving Case No. 1750 SA subject to deletion of the lower line of copy. Carried 5-0. 2. CASE No: 359 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROD MURPHY, G.J. MURPHY CONSTRUCTION, 72-764 Arboleda, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Archway addition to rear LOCATION: E1 Paseo/Jensen's Center ZONE: C-1 Mr. Drell outlined the salient points of the staff report and indicated that the proposed archway was for decorative purposes. Commission commented on the fact that the entryways invited entrance to a courtyard that provided no access to the building. The applicant informed connission that he would be returning with plans for a gazebo (i.e. similar to Cedar Creek's open pyramid) for the other entryway; he felt having two different elements would avoid the look of one long facade. Ccmnissioner Drury felt it would be beneficial to review both entryways simultaneously. Commission concurred. The applicant indicated that was acceptable and requested score direction from the commission. Cam>r dssion commented on the proportion, suggested use of stucco or possibly brick to distinguish between the entryways, and felt the height should be restudied and perhaps "stepped up". 4 Dnr�vrEs ARCHITEJCIURAL REVIEW 0CMUSSION JULY 24, 1990 Action: Moved by Coamissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner McCrea, continuing Case No. 359 C to allow commission to review both entryways simultaneously. Carried 5-0. 3. CASE NO: 1789 SA APPLICANT (ADD ADDRESS): DIVA'S HAIR SALON c/o SIGNS BY BULL, 83-480 Avenue 45 #15, Indio, CA 92201 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Awning with signage LOCATION: 73-200 El Paseo ZONE: C-1 Mr. Drell outlined the salient points of the staff report and noted that the applicant was absent due to illness. Commission indicated that the awning was acceptable, subject to size and height matching the awning to the west and the dame not extending below the door. Action: Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Urrutia, approving 1789 SA, subject to the condition that the awning's shape and height tie-in size wise with the awning to the west and the come not extend below the door. Carried 5-0. 4. CASE NO.: 1790 SA APPLICANT (ADD ADDRESS): SIGNS BY BULL for WILLIAM ERNEST BROWN, 83-480 Avenue 45 #15, Indio, CA 92201 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUCGRr: Awning with signage LOMTICN: 73-320 E1 Paseo ZONE: C-1 Mr. Drell outlined the salient points of the case, noting this was the same applicant as the previous case, who was absent. Staff recommended denial based on incompatibility with the building. 5 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW QMVEISSION JULY 24, 1990 Commissioner Drury camiented that not all building architecture lent itself to installing an awning and this might be the case in this instance. Commission suggested the applicant restudy the design to tie-in with the facade and attempt to create a compatible design with the whole building and/or the Gold Shop to the east. Action: Moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Drury, denying Case No. 1790 SA. Carried 5-0. B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO: PP 90-17 APPLICANT (ADD ADDRESS): FOXX & ASSOCIATES, 74-818 Velie Way, Suite 2, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval for 4,800 square foot office building LOCATION: South side of Fred Waring, east of Monterey ZONE: O.P. Mr. Drell outlined salient points of the staff report and recommended preliminary approval. Commissioner Urrutia expressed concern regarding the lack of detail treatment for the blank wall on the east side, noting that landscaping alone would not alleviate the problem; the location of the trash bins was inappropriate; and the pitched roof was out of character due to the lack of setback and two- story height. He axnplimented the applicant on the stone treatment. Mr. Holden explained they were trying to obtain volume and indicated that he could incorporate the changes into the working drawings that would came back before commission. Chairman Gregory felt the changes were too significant and indicated that since a landscape plan was needed, a continuance would be in order. Co mLission concurred. 6 o r�nrl�s ARCHITECTURAL REV1E7A CX7+I+IISSICN JULY 24, 1990 Action: Moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner McCrea, continuing PP 90-17. Carried 4-0-1 (Commissioner Holden abstained). 2. CASE ND: CUP 90-12 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): HARRY LIOSIS, 1317 No. San Fernando Road #351, Burbank, CA 91504 NATURE OF PROJDCT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 19,500 square foot office building I=TICN• Northwest corner of Deep Canyon and Highway 111 ZCNE: C-1 Mr. Joy outlined the salient points of the staff report. Mr. Bernard Leung, representing the applicant, indicated that the plan submitted showed a 32' high building and noted that the plan would be scaled down proportionately. Comissioner Urzutia felt that eliminating the frontage road had merit because of the existing intersection problems. He had no problem with the concept and felt the radius was good. He expressed concern that the two-story building was too close to the highway and felt the fascia was overpowering. He suggested that the second floor be stepped back to relieve the two story affect, a lessening of the fascia impact, and provision of more "finger" planters in the parking area. Upon questioning by Chairman Gregory, staff explained that the plan would conform with the parking lot tree master plan, which calls for one tree for every three spaces. He noted that the height of the building should be the same as the setback to provide an aesthetic balance. He also requested that the applicant provide a more even distribution of the shade trees. Mr. Leung noted that if the second floor was stepped back five feet, that five feet could extend over the rear area without changing the building structurally. He indicated that the owner was hampered by realignment and signal control requirements. Mr. Henry Tasaka noted that vacating of the frontage road and realignment was still at the staff level. 7 6 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CCNPIISSION JULY 24, 1990 Commissioner issioner Holden felt the Deep Canyon side of the building was good with the varying setbacks. Commissioner Urrutia noted this would be a good opportunity to have a nice building at that location. He indicated that the second story could hang over the parking area. Action: Moved by Commissioner issioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Drury, continuing CUP 90-12 to allow the applicant to incorporate the revisions. Carried 5-0. 3. CASE ND: Tr 25711 APPLICANT (ADD ADDRESS): BIRTCHER DUNHAM, 72-010 Varner Road, Thousand Palms, CA 92276 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Re-submittal of preliminary house plans 3 IAQATICN: West of Eldorado - 1/2 mile south of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 Mr. Joy outlined the salient points of the case, noting that the plan was revised per previous commission conditions. Cumdssicner Holden noted that some cosmetic changes had been made, but they did not aesthetically tie-in with the building. He indicated that solar protection had also not been addressed. Commissioner Urrutia stated that the applicant was to provide solar shade on the sides and rear, which had not been done. Commissioner Holden indicated that the revision helped, but was not enough. Action: Moved by Comnissicner Drury, seconded by Cc mnissioner McCrea, continuing Case No. TT 25711. Carried 5-0. V. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 2:05 p.m. STEVE SMITH ASSOCIATE PLANNER SRS/tm 8 MINUTES PAIM DESERT ARCELTECTERIAL CCbNESSION TUESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1990 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - I. The meeting was called to order at 12:20 p.m. Commission Members Current Meeting Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent Ron Gregory, Chairman X 13 2 Rick Holden X 15 0 Russell McCrea X 14 1 Mary Drury X 10 5 Frank Urrutia X 12 3 Wayne Connor X 13 2 Others Present: Steve Smith Pat Bedrosian Donna Bitter II. ORAL CCM MCATICYS• None III. It was moved by Commissioner Day, seconded by Connissi over MoCrea, to approve the following cases by minute motion. A. Final Drawings: 1. CASE NO.: 1797 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): SERGIO ALVEREZ, 27-555 Zachary Court, Palm Springs, CA 92262 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of awning with sign LCC ATICN: 73-375 El Paseo, Unit J ZCNE• Cl S.P. 2. CASE NO.: CUP 90-16 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): TUTTI CUSTI, c/o Joe Brandt, 14 Mt. Holyoke, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOX'- Approval of building addition at restaurant LCCATICN: Columbia Center r MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL C OMM[ISSICN AUGUST 14, 1990 ZONE: PC (3) S.P. Commission approved architectural design only for building addition by minute motion. 3. CASE NO.. 459 C APPLICANT (ADD ADDRESS): ROD MURPHY, G.J. MURPHY OONSTRUCTION, 72-764 Arboleda, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROTECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Archway addition to rear LOCATION: El Paseo/Jensen's Center ZONE: C-1 4. CASE NO.. 1801 SA APPLICANT (ARID ADDRESS): ULTRANEON SIGN 00. for H & H CRAFT AND FLORAL SUPPLY, 5474 Complex Street, Suite 501, San Diego, CA 93123 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Business identification sign LOCT.TION: 72-885 Highway 111 Ccmnissicn approved to continue the request, by minute motion, directing staff to inform applicant of relations listed on staff report. 5. CASE NO.. 1802 SA APPLICANT (ADD ADDRESS): COAST SIGN DISPLAY, INC. for CARL'S, JR., 1345 South Allec Street, Anaheim, CA 92805 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: New signage LOCATICN: 73-125 Highway ill ZONE: C-1 6. CASE NO.: 1798 SA APPLICANT (ARID ADDRESS): MAPLE LEAF PLUMBING & AIR OONDITIONI G, . INC. 74-160 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Identification sign 2 MIIVUTES ARC[IITECIX)RAL ClCD14 SSICN AUGUST 14, 1990 IACATICN: 74-160 Highway 111 ZCNE• C-1 Camnission approved signage only by minute motion. 7. CASE NO.: 360 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): JOSEPH BRANDT, 14 Mt. Holyoke, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SCLUIT: Approval of roof equipment screen design for conrercial building LOCATION: 73-705 Highway 111 ZONE: C-1 8. CASE NO.: 1805 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): LORAN LORAN, 73-080 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SO(GHT• Sign and entry design LOCATION: 73-080 El Paseo ZONE: C-1 B. Preliminary Cages: 1. CASE NO.: CUP 90-14 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS); LAKSHAM WICKRFMESINGHE, 2792 Flyer Place, Los Angeles, CA 90065 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGIT: Preliminary approval for remodel/conversion of single family house into a preschool LOCATION: 73-925 Fred Waring Drive ZONE: R-3 3 MIIV[TTFS ; ARanT'ECIURAL Ca4IISSICN AWUST 14, 1990 IV. CASES: A. Final Drawings: 1. CASE NO.: 1792 SA APPLICANT (ARID ADDRESS): BILLY B'S, 73-403 Highway ill, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of new sign face in freestanding sign (formerly Swensen's) and wall sign LOCATICN: Lucky Center at San Pablo and Highway ill ZONE: Cl S.P. Commissioner Drury asked if the applicant would be willing to change the colors of the sign to ivory and brown instead of yellow and brown. The applicant indicated that he would prefer the Yellow noting has this color stands out along Highway 111. Commissioner Drury noted that commission had a problem with the yellow color on the monument sign. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Co nnissioner McCrea, to approve the sign request with the condition that both the monument and the building signs be consistent using a brown background with ivory letters. Staff to review colors for final approval. Motion carried 4-0. 2. CASE NO.:- 1800 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): IINTERIAL SIGN for STATE FARM INSURANCE, 46-120 Calhoun, Indio, CA 92201 NATURE OF PRMELT/APPROVAL SOLXW: Approval of monimment sign and directional sign for State Farm Insurance LOCATICN: Northwest corner Monterey and Arboleda ZONE: O.P. Steve Smith discussed the various signs presented by applicant showing their locations on the building noting that the client still had not received an occupancy permit for the location. Chairman Gregory instructed applicant to remove the directional sign on Arboleda Street and placing it (without the arrow) low on 4 MLNW S ARCHITECTURAL OONMISSION AUGUST 14, 1990 the back side of the building. Action: It was moved by Camaissioner Holden, seconded by Chairman Gregory, to approve signs subject to a 4" reveal at base of monument sign and deletion of the arrow. Applicant to confirm type style with staff for final approval. Notion carried 4-0. 3. CASE NO.: PP 88-2 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): SaVITZ ENTERPRISES, P.O. Box 3992, Palm Desert, Ca 92261 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary and final approval of landscape plan for a 17 unit senior apartment project LOCATION: South side of Santa Rosa, 200 feet east of San Pascual ZONE: R-2, S.O. Chairman Gregory discussed changes made on plans with the applicant, Harry Schmitz. Action: It was moved by Chairman gory, seconded by Commissioner McCrea, to grant final approval of landscape subject to the following conditions: 1) Addition of two each 5-gallon vines to the north wall adjacent to the spa. 2) Fichus trees to be relocated, aligning with the stripes in parking area. Motion carried 4-0. 3. CASE NO.• 1804 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): SIGNS BY bM for NRS OF PALM DESERT, 945 Boardwalk, Suite B, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SQXT: Business identification sign LOCATION: 44-250 Monterey Avenue 5 MII9[TPES ARCHITECTURAL CU44LSSION AUGUST 14, 1990 ZONE: O.P. Commissloner Drury was concerned with the prominent blue color noting that with letters at 20" in height, this blue will really stand out. She added that there is nothing in the building that is conducive to that color. The applicant stated that when driving by this building, the blue letters don't have the force that the sample has. He added that the color was also the company trademark color. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner McCrea, to approve the business identification signage with the following conditions 1) Monterey Avenue frontage signs be 20" high letters for "NRS" and "National Real Estate Service" being 8-1/2" high. 2) The parking lot sign could read "NRS" at 15" letters and "Of Palm Desert" being 8". 3) Parking lot sign to be moved down closer to the top of the inset above the door (1/3 of the way up from the fascia). 4) The blue color to be changed to a teal with staff reviewing the color prior to final approval. Motion carried 4-0. 4. CASE NO.: 882 SF APPLICANT (ADD AMFES.S): JOHN SIPOS, 73-237 Rod Laver Lane, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PRWE T/APPRUVAL SOUGH • Final working drawings for 17 foot height or single family home LOMTICN• Lot 38, Blazing Star Lane ZONE: R-1 12,000 Steve Smith advised commission that this case was brought before then because the house, while it did not exceed the maximum Might limit allowed, it was in excess of 15 ,feet. All homes between 15 to 18 feet must receive A.R.C. approval to assure neighborhood compatibility. 6 u MII4JTES ARCHITECTURAL CO MISSION AUGUST 14, 1990 Commissioner Drury asked if the 25' front setback was the requirement for this lot. Mr. Smith noted that the minimum setback required was 201 . Commissioner Drury noted that the elevations now show 16'4" for the height of the home. The applicant, John Sipos, informed commission that the homes on this particular street are not much less than 18' in height and are all setback 20' . Commissioner Holden informed Mr. Sipos that some of the things the commission will lock at when reviewing height situations are the possibility of hipping the ends of the roof so that the highest point is not running at the closest point to the neighbors property, how far setbacks are, etc. Mr. SipoS noted that an adjacent neighbor, Bill and Anne Wallace, had asked that he set the house back 25' . Mr. Sipos noted that he has setback the front corner of the house that the Wallace's was concerned about to 22' from the property line. Mr. Sipos also agreed to dropping the height of the home to 16'4". Mrs. Wallace reported that she had looked at the plans originally submitted to the city showing a 25' setback and the applicant is now stating that the house will be setback 21' . Chairman Gregory asked staff if the sukmitter was bound to what is submitted. Mr. Smith noted that these plans were for review only and that nothing has been given preliminary approval. Commissioner Holden asked if Mr. Sipos would be willing to setback his home 25' . Mr. Sipos replied that he would not be willing to do this as he felt this would cause his view to be taken away by the garage on the left of his property. Mr. Smith noted that the commission is to try to establish neighborhood compatibility, not to determine views and/or setback variations. Chairman Gregory suggested that Mr. and Mrs. Wallace would have to find another forum to discuss the setbacks as this issue was something the architectural commission did not get involved with as long as the plans complied with the minimum 20' setback requirements. Commissioner Holden was concerned with approving the height of the house without a grading plan; however, assuming that the grading is where it is now, he had no problem approving it. Mr. Sipos guaranteed the oc miissicn that the grading will be the exact same as it is now. 7 1 MINUTES �. ARC[IITE7CIURAL CU441 SICN AUQ)ST 14, 1990 Action: It was moved by Ccmnissioner McCrea, seeded by Commissioner Drury, to approve the submitted 1614" height on the single family home based on the existing grading. .Motion carried 4-0. B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO.: PP 90-16 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): J & P DEVECAPMERr, 881 Dover ##14, Newport Beach, CA 92263 NATURE OF PROJECP/APPROVAL SOUGM: Preliminary approval of mixed use commercial project UXATICN: 2.1 acres southeast of R.B. Furniture ZONE: C-1 Cc nissioner Holden informed applicants present, Bruce Jordon and John Pettichini, that the major concerns with the proposed project was the overall lack of landscaping. He, added that another concern was how the buildings backed up against the wash noting that as you drive up Highway ill, you will look at the back of the buildings along the wash. In the past the commission approved zero setbacks if the applicant received an agreement with the C.V. Water District to landscape on the water district property to help screen the back of the buildings, however Mr. Smith noted that this has been quite difficult to acquire in the past. Mr. Jordon indicated that 161% of the parking lot area was designated for landscaping. Mr. Pettichini felt that once the alley way is placed and with the curvature of the buildings and the mountain, you will not be able to see the area where cacmissicn was requesting additional landscaping. Mr. Pettichini asked if the placement of vines on the back side of the buildings would be sufficient. Chairman Gregory did not feel this would solve the problem. U%aixman Gregory suggested that the applicant review projects such as the 111 Town Center Way showing the placement of landscaping and additional fascia elements to the back of the buildings. Mr. Gregory saw the need for softening noting that the trellis work would not be sufficient. CmrdSSiC n noted that Building A was located too close to Highway 111. It would have to be moved back allowing for additional landscaping. 8 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL CO M4ISSICN AUGUST 14, 1990 Action: It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner McCrea, to continue the request for preliminary approval directing the applicant to address the following: 1) Restudy the landscaping area along the Magnesia Falls wash and in front of Buildings A, B and C. 2) Meet all city standards in the Master Parking Lot Tree Plan. 3) Pay close attention to the screening of any roof mounted equipment. 4) Continuation of architecture along the channel either through landscaping or making the back of the building look like the front. 5) Preparation of a line of site to present to council. Motion carried 4-0. 2. CASE NO.. PP 90-13 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS); DSL SERVICE CO. , 3501 Jamboree Road,Suite 500, North Tower, Newport Beach, CA 92658-6030 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a retail shopping center UXATICN: East side Highway 111 between Fred Waring and Parkview Drive ZONE: P.C. (4) to be changed to P.C. (3) (regional commercial) Applicant, Jeff Simons, was present. Steve Smith reported that the landscaping plans were conceptual. Mr. Smith noted that staff was concerned with two of the pads being proposed at 2-story developments, adding that the only 2-story developments in the P.C. zone was the hotel which is setback considerably more. Mr. Smith reported that at this point the major building in the project is a supermarket with the loading dock at rear. Staff was not sure how this can work with the adjacent residential properties. Commissioner Drury asked what the maximum height would be for this zone. Mr. Smith replied that the maximum height would be 35', which is what the applicant was asking for. 9 MngJT S ARCHITECTURAL CU4 IISSICK AUGUST 14, 1990 Commissioner Holden was concerned with the plans showing nice overhangs and columns noting that cannission has no guarantee that buildings will be placed on the pads exactly as the plans shwa which could eliminate the column work shown. Commissioner Drury asked about the placement of the median along Fred Waring. Mr. Simon replied that he had been instructed by city staff to lime up the entrance with the Toys R Us entry stating that there would possibly be a traffic signal at this point. Mr. Smith indicated to commission the staff's concern with the landscaped area along the residential area adjacent to the project. It is essentially an 8' planter bordered by a 6' wall. His other concern was with the transition around the end satellite building at Joshua Road. Commissioner Holden felt the buffer along the residential area should be as broad as possible. Commissioner Drury felt the residents will have a problem with the lighting and trash areas along the side of the project. Mr. Smith noted the amount of complaints received on the diesel trucks constantly running along loading docks. Commissioner McCrea felt that conceptual approval would be more appropriate than preliminary approval at this point. Mr. Smith asked commission for their input on the 2-story buildings. Ccmmissic ner Drury did not have any problem with a 2-story building on Highway 111, however Commissioner Holden felt the 2- story buildings should be shifted to be consolidated. Commissioner Drury felt that some berming could be done along Highway ill to offset the height of the 2-story building. Mr. Smith also pointed out that the applicant was seeking a 10$ parking reduction. Action It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner McCrea, to grant conceptual approval of the preliminary plans directing the applicant to address the following conditions; 1) Freeing up the comer of Fred Waring and Highway 111 and adding some studying the buffer on the area behind the market, adjacent to the residential area. 2) The 24' high satellite building at the comer of Joshua Road, as the adjacent residential homes are limited to a height of 18' . 10 M7IVUTES ARCHITECTURAL C1A4-QSSICN AUGUST 14, 1990 Motion carried 3-0-1, with Chairman Gregory abstaining. Commissioner Drury directed applicant to meet with staff to understand what concerns have been raised in the transition between commercial to residential and make an effort to mitigate these issues. 3. CASE NO.: TT 25711 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): BIR'ICHER DUNHAM, 72-010 Varner Road, Thousand Palms, CA 92276 NATURE OF PFDJELT/APPROVAL SOLUU: Resubmittal of preliminary house plans LOCATICN: West of Eldorado - 1/2 mile south of Country Club 7.ONE• PR-5 Applicants, Curt Dunham, Sr., Carey Norwalk, Clark Wardle and Dick Palmer were present. Mr. Norwalk addressed the commission's concerns regarding the lack of window treatments on the project. Commissioner Holden noted that the major concerns were with the large sliding glass doors. Mr. Norwalk noted that they have done a lot of work under Title 24. Commission indicated that compliance of Title 24 was not an appropriate minimums for the desert area. Mr. Norwalk discussed the combination of overhangs and trellis works done throughout the planes. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by CcmTLissianer McCrea, to grant preliminary approval of the working drawings noting their concern with each elevation showing the same trellis regardless of the style or architecture of the actual home. Applicant will need to show the three various rear elevations on final detailed planes. Motion carried 3-1, Ccmmissio ner Holden opposing 4. CASE NO.:• PP 89-12 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GEORGE MBTSOVAS, Post Office Box 5132, Orange, CA 92667 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Revised landscaping plans LOCATICN• 72-918 Highway 111 11 rma[rrFs ARC[IITSM)RAL Oaol-=ICN AUGUST 14, 1990 ZONE: C-1 Mr. Metsovas discussed with connission the problems he was having in locating some of the items indicated on his approved landscaping plans. Chairman Gregory agreed to try to locate the eight 10' and five 12' Washington Filafers and six 36" African Sumac for the applicant. If Chairman Gregory cannot locate the Washington Filafers, commission will allow them to be replaced by hybrids. V. It was passed by a unanimous vote to add the following item tD the agenda: CASE NO.: 1799 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS: LOCAL NEON for 3 DAY BLINDS, 1660 Stanford Street, Santa Monica, CA 90404 NATURE OF PRUJE Cr/APPROVAL SOU(W: Business identification sign LOCATION: 44-489 Town Center Way, Suite B Steve Smith reported that the building is located in the 111 Town Center Way plaza where there is an approved sign program for non- illuminated letters. The applicant in this case is requesting approval of an illuminated sign. Commissioner Holden noted the concerns council had with the glare of the signage at night. He would have not problem approving the sign if commission was assured the sign would not produce glare. Action: It was passed by a unanimous vote to approve the signage as submitted with the condition that the illuminated letters not produce glare. Motion carried 4-0. VI. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 3:40 p.m. TEVE SMITH ASSOCIATE PLANNER SS/db 12 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346.0611 August 17, 1990 , AIna7EICIURAL EW-MA COMMISSION ACTION CASE ND.: TT 25711 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): BIRTCHER DUNHAM, 72-010 Varner Road, Thousand Palms, CA 92276 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Re-submittal of preliminary house plans UXATION: West of Eldorado - 1/2 mile south of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural camLissicn granted approval of preliminary working drawings noting their concern with each elevation showing the same trellis regardless of the style of architecture of the actual hone. Applicant will need to show the three various rear elevations on final detailed plans. Date of Action: August 14, 1990 Vote: Carried 3-1, Ccnmissioner Holden opposing (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- STAFF CONvIENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural cc m3.ssi.cn to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday prior to the next meeting. AGENDA ITEM NO.: IV-B-2 DATE: JULY 24, 1990 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OC"4ISSION CASE NO. : TT 25711 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): BIRTCHE'R DUNHAM, 72-010 Varner Road, Thousand Palms, CA 92276 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPRCVM SOUGHT: Resubmittal of preliminary house plans LOCATION: West of Eldorado - 1/2 mile south of Country Club Drive ZONE: PR-5 DISCUSSION• The applicant will present additional plans in response to the commission's concerns £rcm the previous meeting. REOO44E,IDATICN• Approve preliminary plans. PJ/db I s , MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCFIITECIURAL 0149SSICN T EM", JUNE 26, 1990 I. The meeting was called to order at 12:10 p.m. Ccnmissicn Members Current Meeting Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent Ron Gregory, Chairman x 10 2 Rick Holden x 12 0 Russell McCrea x 11 1 Mazy Drury x 7 5 Frank Urrutia x 10 2 Wayne Connor x 11 1 Others Present: Phil Drell Pat Bedrosian Donna Bitter It was moved by Ccamissioner Holden, seconded by Ca[missioner McCrea, to approve the minutes of the June 12, 1990 meeting as submitted. Carried 3-1, Commissioner Urrutia abstaining. II. Moved by Commissioner oner Urrutia, seconded by Cmud si mor McCrea, {p approve the following cases by minute motion. Carried 4-0. 1. CASE NO.: 1773 SA APPLICANT (Aid) ADDRESS): TRIPLE A. NEON 00. for COAST FEDERAL BANK, 11015 Ctmipston Street, No. Hollywood, CA 91601 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Change existing signs to Coast Federal Bank LOCi1TION: Palms to Pines West, Phase II ZONE: PC 3 S.P. Ccnnission approved, by minute motion, one (1) individual channel letter -sign (maximum 15" in height) to read "Coast Federal Bank" on each of the north, south and west wood fascias in white. Logos were approved as requested. 2. CASE NO.: CUP 84-10 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MAMA GINAS, 73-705 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PMJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of removable glass patio enclosure NIIN[TTFs ARCHITECTURAL CLM-IISSIC N JUNE 26, 1990 3. CASE NO.- 25711 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): BIRTCHER DUNHAM, 72-010 Varner Road, Thousand Palms, CA 92276 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary architectural elevations for a 108 unit single family subdivision LOCATION: West of El Dorado Drive, 1/2 mile south of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 Co missioner McCrea asked the size of the lots. Applicant, Curt Dunham, Sr., noted that the average size was 14,400 square feet. Cc missicner Urrutia asked if there were any intentions to use different materials for the roofing. Mr. Dunham noted that all roofs would be barrel tiles in various colors. He added that there would be a total of nine (9) elevations. These first three elevations were brought for preliminary approval so that they may begin on the working drawings. Commissioner Holden felt a study should be done on the solar protection, especially the larger glass areas as there were no overhangs. Commissioner Urrutia also wanted to see some study given to solar protection as there are not enough overhangs on the east and wrest exposures. Mr. Drell noted that the floor plan did show covered patios on each. Commissioner Urrutia noted that Phase 1 did not indicate any overhangs except on the back. He would like to see the architectural treatment here. Commissioner Urrutia asked that when the remainder of the elevations are presented, the applicant show the different colors on the tile roofs along with color samples for both the roof tiles and the buildings. Mr. Dunham noted that there would be 8 or 10 different colors. Commissioner Urrutia requested to see site plans with the typical landscaping. It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Holden, to grant conceptual approval with a study being placed on the solar protection as noted to applicant by commission. Motion carried 4-0. 4. CASE NO.: PP 90-12 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): BILL WILSON, 70-500 Thunderbird Road, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 5 L MINUTES ARC[IITECIU RAL COMMISSION JUNE 26, 1990 Camu.ssioner Urrutia noted that as submitted, you will be able to look through the letters seeing the back of the lettering on the other side. After further discussions with the applicants, it was moved by Commissioner'issioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Connor, to approve the signage and landscaping plan with the following conditions: 1) Monument sign be integrated with the slope and the maximum point be no higher than 6' above the slope on the west side. 2) The grade be elevated at the center portion of the sign (the "V" section) to 2' at top of sign and landscaping be placed in the "V" section. 3) The name on the monument sign be limited to "Auto Care Center" or "Car Care Center". Motion carried 3-1, CrnTnissicner McCrea opposing. Staff noted that applicant is allowed 3 sq. ft. of directional signs on building identifying what that particular building is. IV. ADJOUiWIM: It moved by Commissioner Urtutia, seconded by Camu.ssicner Connor, ac3j the meeting at 2:25 p.m. Motion carried 4-0. L SENIOR PLANNER PD/db 8 L __ CONT Off rdu Wwn 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 June 29, 1990 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW M44ISSION ACTION CASE NO. : TT 25711 APPLICANT (AMID ADDRESS): BIRTCHER DUNHAM, 72-010 Varner Road, Thousand Palms, CA 92276 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary architectural elevations for a 108 lot single family subdivision LOCATION: West of El Dorado Drive, 1/2 mile south of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural ccnm ssion granted conceptual approval with study being placed on the solar protection as noted to applicant by commission. Date of Action: June 26, 1990 Vote: Carried 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- STAFF rS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday prior to the next meeting. AGENDA ITEM NO.: IV-A-4 DATE: JUNE 26, 1990 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION CASE NO.: TT 25711 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): BIRTCHER, 72-010 Varner Road, Thousand Palms, California 92276 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary architectural elevations for a 108 lot single family subdivision LOCATION: West of Eldorado Drive, 1/2 mile south of Country Club Drive ZONE: PR-5 Discussion• The homes are on 12,000 square foot lots and are similar to those at Monterra. Three styles are shown which meet R-1 , 10,000 standards except for the 18 foot proposed height and adjustments necessary for lot coverage in some instances. Rear elevation patio covers will extend as necessary for solar orientation. Staff feels the architecture is acceptable and recommends approval . PJ/db s Lot 71 Plan 1 1 {{1 a I I I Plan 2 I Lot 2 0 Z5 s M N I Plan 3 1 1 >r Site Plan Model Units scale:1-20•-0" j Birtcher Dunham ELDORADO Lot 1 e 1 i 4293-0400 June 15, 1990 k I MINUPFS PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 20, 1990 Chairperson Whitlock asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposal. There was no one and the public testimony was closed. After further discussion, commission indicated the presentation was not adequate to base a decision on and requested that the applicant provide an accurate landscape plan as well as a site plan and elevation that would depict the changes requested. Chairperson Whitlock reopened the public hearing and asked for a motion of continuance. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, continuing PP 89-34 and development agreement to April 17, 1990. Carried 4-0. E. Case Nb. Tr 257111, BIRTCHER-DUNHAM, Applicant Request for approval of a 108 lot single family subdivision and negative declaration of environmental impact west of El Dorado, one-half mile south of Country Club Drive. Mr. Joy outlined the salient points of the staff report. He indicated that the applicant planned to build a project similar to the Monterra development. He stated that one issue of the map was the extension of Sandcastle Lane, along the southern boundary. He indicated that the second issue was the grading and drainage plan. Initially the drainage plan showed a retention of a 25 year storm on site, however, it was later discovered there was no off-site drainage easement acquired for this project, hence the amended condition of approval for public works condition #22, which required a 100 year retention for the portion of the property draining to the south. Mr. Joy also noted that a letter from the Sunrise Company had been received objecting to the drainage issue and the perimeter wall along El Dorado Drive having a 12 foot setback. The applicant expressed concern about paying the drainage fees as well as retaining the water on the project and the potential assessment district along Cook Street. Staff explained that although the commission might comment on the conditions, the ultimate decision would have to be made by city council since they involved city policy. Staff recommended approval of the project. 5 MIN[lPES PAIM DESERT PLANNIM CSMMISSICN MARM 20,• 1990 Chairperson Whitlock requested clarification as to which conditions reflected the comments made in the Sunrise letter. Mr. Joy indicated that staff disagreed with Sunrise as to the wall setback and no change in the conditions of approval was recommended. He indicated that the condition that was changed as a result of the letter was the retention of the 100 year storm on site. He explained that Sunrise owned the southerly property which was the Sunterra site and they were not willing to grant a drainage easement. Chairperson Whitlock opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the camiission. MR. CURT DUNHAM, 72-120 Manufacturing Road, Suite K in Thousand Palms. He requested a reconuendation from the commission as to the hardship on him to the city council concerning the drainage fees. He felt that if the property were required to retain a 100 year storm on site, then the off-site drainage fees should not be required. He also noted that in public works condition #22 to contribute their fair share of the assessed cost for the Cook Street extension, Interstate 10 interchange, and a bridge fund. He did not mind paying his fair share, but felt it was a "loaded gun" when dollar amounts were unknown. He felt that if commission was sympathetic to their problem he would appreciate a recommendation in favor of a waiver of the off-site drainage fees to city council. He noted that the letter from Sunrise Company was dated March 20, as well as the interoffice memorandum from public works was dated March 20, about the 100 year flood. Commissioner Downs stated that engineering and Mr. Dunham's people would have to discuss the 100 year flood, and indicated that he was involved in getting the original initiation of the overpass at Cook Street and the bridge at Cook Street and was not sympathetic with Mr. Dunham on this issue. Mr. Dunham stated that all he was looking for was a dollar amount. Commissioner Downs stated that a dollar amount had not been determined because the mid-valley parkway issue had not be settled. Mr. Dunham asked at what point the fees would be collected and Mr. Diaz replied that TUMF was recorded at the time of construction and went to regional facilities and the other conditions were covered by the Mello-Roos District, of which the conditions required the applicant to be a part of and Mr. Dunham would be caumitting to a reasonable assessment. Mr. Holtz stated that the establishment of the Mello-Roos District was unknown and was like an assessment district; participation of a certain percentage of the property owners had to be in place before it could be established. Until all those things were in place staff did not know if there 6 . MIN[7i'FS PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION IISSION MARCH 20, 1990 would be a Mello-Roos District. Commissioner Downs informed Mr. Dunham that staff had been including that requirement for approximately one year. Mr. Diaz felt that the figure would be determined some time this year. Mr. Diaz asked if the resolution were to be adopted, if the applicant precluded his objection to the Mello-Roos District if it was conditioned on the tentative map. Ms. Allen noted that the condition did not discuss the Mello-Roos District. Mr. Dunham indicated that he would be going to the city council to get a dollar amount for the bridge at Cook Street. He noted that a 100 year storm would take care of all off-site drainage and there would be no drainage going off-site from their subdivision and did not feel it was an unreasonable request to not participate in the drainage fees if they were not adding any water to the street system. Mr. Holtz explained that the 100 year area Mr. Dunham was required to retain on site was only for the southern portion and the other half drained to the north, so the drainage fees would still have to be collected for that portion. Mr. Dunham felt that if a 100 year storm was being retained on about 60% of the project and 40% was retaining a 25 year storm, then 60% should not have to pay fees. He stated that he did not object to paying for the portion that provides for the 25 year storm, but noted they had to give up an additional lot to retain water on site. Mr. Diaz indicated that it would have to be decided by city council. Commissioner Erwood asked how drainage -fees were calculated and Mr. Holtz replied on an acreage basis. Commissioner Erwood asked if the fee was based on the acreages causing the problem, or on the 40%. Mr. Diaz noted that in the case of the Lakes Country Club they received a waiver for a portion of the site that was not draining to the south and they were retaining water, and only city council could make that determination. Chairperson Whitlock asked if Mr. Dunham had seen the letter from Sunrise and Mr. Dunham indicated that he received a copy an hour earlier. He stated that the project was designed with the 12 foot setbacks per engineering and any change would result in a redesign of the lots, which would be a hardship. He informed commission that he vehemently objected to the 20 feet suggested by Sunrise. Chairperson Whitlock asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR of the project. MR. CHARLIE SWEAT, 74-595 Peppertree in Palm Desert, stated that this project was similar to the MDnterra project in Palm Desert and felt this project would be a first caliber project. Chairperson Whitlock asked if anyone present wished to speak in OPPOSITION to the project. 7 MIIVIfl'ES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 20, 1990 M. ALAN LEVINE, Vice President of Sunrise Company, 42-600 Cook Street in Palm Desert, wanted to go on record as not opposing the project in concept, but some of the specific conditions in design. He stated that staff had adequately addressed their drainage concerns. Regarding the setback, he noted that the Lakes Country Club at the time it was approved was not required to put in sidewalks. He stated that Sunrise owns the entire one-mile frontage on El Dorado from Country Club to 42nd and they were proposing a project on that site that would have a 20 foot setback on the east side of El Dorado for the entire one mile stretch. He noted there was currently a 20 foot setback along the Lakes, which was a half-mile stretch. He felt that what staff was doing was coordinating the one quarter mile on the tract to the south of the present tract with a 12 foot setback and they should agree with that, whereas the entire two mile frontage, half a mile currently and the mile they are proposing would have a 20 foot setback. E1 Dorado would be a major through-way with a median island street along the same lines as Country Club Drive, as well as Cook Street. He noted that there were no 12 foot parkways on either of those streets, therefore, from an appearance sake, that is why they were making their request. The project to the south of Mr. Dunham was approved under the county and recently annexed into the city. Indian Wells had made the same request when the county planning commission reviewed that and their standards were not the same as Palm Desert and to accept those county standards was not the kind of standards for the city of Palm Desert. Mr. Dunham stated that E1 Dorado was not a through-way street as stated by Mr. Levine. Mr. Dunham indicated that it would dead- end at Hovley and there would be a 101 foot street with a parkway down the middle that would only run for one mile and a half, and then go into Indian Wells and open up their gorgeous project which they plan to do there and for them to have to adhere to their standards because they feel it should be as opposed to staff's opinion was wrong. Mr. Diaz noted that at the time the Lakes Country Club developed the area between El Dorado and the then Pennsylvania Avenue, which was now Oasis Club Drive, was in the sphere of influence of the city of Indian Wells and that sphere extended up to Interstate 10 and was their access. At that time E1 Dorado was to extend all the way from I-10 to Highway 111 and then south of Highway Ill past Fairway. Subsequently, El Dorado will no longer do that and when the Lakes development came into Palm Desert, the 20 foot setback was established for that reason and that type of street and that no 8 DEN ss PALM DESERT PLANNUC CC"USSION MARCH 20, 1990 longer is the case. Also, he noted that staff felt that the 12 feet was adequate to match a major development line--such as the Lakes and here. There was half a mile at 20 feet without a sidewalk, a half a mile at 12 feet with sidewalk, and this project would be 12 feet with a sidewalk. Chairperson Whitlock closed the public testimony and asked for oonnission comments. Commissioner Jonathan noted that he would be abstaining. Chairperson Whitlock stated that she was aesthetically concerned about the 20 feet versus the 12 feet. Right off the main thoroughfare of Country Club, having half a mile of 20 foot setback and then going to a 12 foot setback with a sidewalk did not seem appropriate aesthetically. She was inclined to agree with Mr. Levine to continue the appearance of the Lakes from Country Club to E1 Dorado. Commissioner Downs felt that 12 feet with a sidewalk was better than 20 with just a curb; he noted that sidewalks and bikepaths were important. Mr. Joy noted that it was a council policy to require sidewalks and explained his rationale for the 12 feet to provide continuity with the Varner project. Mr. Diaz amended condition #22 to read that, "The applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share of the assessed cost for the Cook Street Extension and Interstate 10 Interchange and the bridge fund and participate in any assessment district established to construct these facilities. " If the applicant disagrees, he can appeal this condition to council. M. Allen asked about a condition for the TUMF fee. Mr. Diaz indicated the following would be added to condition #22 also, "Applicant shall also pay a transportation mitigation fee (TUMF)." Mr. Holtz asked if the Mello-Roos District would come under the description of an assessment district and Mr. Diaz replied yes, and indicated that he worded it "any assessment district" because it might have another name. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, approving the findings as presented by staff. Carried 3-0-1 (Commissioner Jonathan abstained). Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1431, approving Tr 25711 9 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNIM COM>IISSION MARCH 20, 1990 and a negative declaration, subject to conditions as amended. Carried 3-0-1 (Commissioner Jonathan abstained). VIII. MISCELLANEOUS A. Senior housing Age Requirement. rement. Mr. Drell indicated that senior developments required proof of age prior to allowing occupancy and explained that the two in the city were not quite one year old and they would be sending the city an annual report. He stated that proof of age was usually a copy of the birth certificate or driver's license. He noted that Mr. Diaz had conducted an anonymous survey and the developments told him that minimum age was 62 and the average residents were age 80. Commissioner Jonathan asked about repercussions of the age violation. Mr. Drell stated that it would be treated like any other zoning ordinance/development agreement violation and handled with code enforcement and the city attorney. B. Living Desert Reserve Oral Report. Mr. Diaz indicated that since Co mtissioner Richards was the one who had asked for the report and he was absent, the report would be given at the April 17, 1990 meeting. IX. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. X. OCNME"M Staff noted there would be no April 3, 1990 meeting due to a change in legal noticing by CEQA. XI. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Chairperson Whitlock, seconded by Corissioner Dawns, adjourning the meeting. Carried 4-0. The meeting was adjourned at 8:11 p.m. ATTEST: RAMDN A. DIAZ, Secretary CAROL WHITLOCK, Chairperson /tm 10 444 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 PLANNING OOM ILSSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: March 22, 1990 Birtcher-Dun ham KWL Associates, Inc. 72-010 Varner Road 712 Eugene Road Thousand Palms, CA 92276 Palm Springs, CA 92264 Re: TT 25711 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of March 20, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED TT 25711 BY ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO 1431 SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AS AMENDED. CARRIED 3-0-1 (CWMSSIONER JONATHAN ABSTAINED, OOMNISSIONER RICIiARDS WAS ABSENT). Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. .r f 74 PALM DESERT PLANNING CK41SSION RAD/tm cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal s • PLANbMG Coy UMICN FMOUMOQ ND. 1431 A RESOLUTION OF THE -PLANNING CMUSSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A 108 LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION WEST OF EL DORADO, ONE-HALF MILE SOUTH OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE. CASE NO. TT 25711 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 20th day of March, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of BIRTCHER-DUNHAM for above described project; and WHEREAS, said application has .complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not significantly impact the environment and a negative declaration is hereby recommended for approval; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify approval of the tentative tract map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial envirrnmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the planning commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and envirc mientai resources. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. TT 25711, subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions. t PLANNING CCM-IISSION RESOLVTION NO. 1431 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Ccmnission, held on this 20th day of March, 1990, by the following vote, to Gait: AYES: DOWNS, ERWOOD, AMID WHITLOCK NOES: NONE ABSENT: RICHARDS ABSTAIN: JONATHAN CAROL WHITLOCK, Chairperson ATTEST: ' RAP A. DIAZ, Sec et PJ/db 2 V i PLnPNIM CUI IISSICN RESOLUTICN NO. 1431 CONDITIONS OF APPE YJAL CASE NO. TT 25711 Department of Community Development: 1. The final map shall conform substantially with the tentative tract map as modified by the following conditions. Tentative map approval shall expire two years from date of approval unless an extension of time is granted. 2. Applicant shall obtain clearance from the following agencies prior to construction: Public Works Department Palm Desert Architectural Carmission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Building and Safety Department Stridence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the deparbnent of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 3. The applicant shall pay all applicable fees in accordance with city policy including lizard fees. 4. R-1 standards for minimum 10,000 sq. ft. lots applicable to hone construction. 5. Perimeter decorative walls required at minimum 6' and maximum 8' if used in conjunction with retaining walls. 6. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. City FYre Marshal: 1. Provide, or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential gallon per minute 1500 for single family, 2500 for multifamily, and 3000 for oc mnercial. The actual fire flaw available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 GPM for two hairs duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. 3 i PLA►r DU CU44 SSICN R naLunoN No. 1431 2. A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 1 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 3. The required fire flaw shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), located not less than 25' nor more than 200' single family, 165 multifamily, and 150' commercial from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 4. Provide written certification from the appropriate water company having jurisdiction that hydrant(s) will be installed and will produce the required fire flow, or arrange field inspection by the Fire Department prior to request for final inspection.. 5. A combination of cn-site and off-site Super fire hydrants, (6" x 4" x 2- 1 2" x 2-1 2" 1 / / ) will be located , required, not less than 25 or more than 200' single family, 165' multifamily, and 150' commercial from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. 6. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the County Fire Chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. Once copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be i� signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department. 7. All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to within 150' of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story. The roadway shall be not less than 24' of unobstructed width and 13'6" of vertical clearance. Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall be 36' wide with parking on both sides, 32' wide with parking on one side. Dead-end roads in excess of 150' shall be provided with a minimum of 45' radius turn-around (55' in industrial developments). Fountains or garden islands placed in the middle of these turn-arounds shall not exceed a 5' radius or 10' diameter. B. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to 4 I { PLAN NIM CCD14LSSICN RESOLUTICN NO. 1431 facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department. Miniiman opening width shall be 16', with a m;nimLnn vertical clearance of 13'6". 9. Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. 10. Curb to be cut or rolled for secondary emergency access. ' 11. All new residences/dwellings are required to have illuminated residential addresses meeting both city and Fire Dept. approval. Shake shingle roof are no longer permitted in the Cities of Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage or Palm Desert. Department of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 3. Storm drain and retention area design/construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public works prior to start of construction. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable City standards. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and 5 PLANNIM CCbT IISSICN RESOLUTICN ND. 1431 concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration/acceleration lanes at all project entry points. I'm- built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulaticn Network of the City's General Plan, half-street right of way at 55 feet on El Dorado Drive and 33 feet on Sandcastle Lane shall be offered for dedication on the final map. 8. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to project final. 9. All public/private improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 10. Landscaping maintenance on E1 Dorado Drive and Sandcastle Lane shall be provided by the homeowners association. 11. Waiver of access to E1 Dorado and Sandcastle Lane except at approved locations, shall be granted on the Final Map. 12. in accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 13. The applicant shall provide for the installation of one-half landscaped median island in El Dorado Drive. A cash payment in lieu of actual installation may be submitted at the option of the Director of Public Works. 14. Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 15. Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40. of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. 16.. Ccmplete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 6 PIAMMU CU49SSICK RESOLUTION NO. 1431 facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department. Mi.nimmun opening width shall be 16' , with a minimum vertical clearance of 13'6". 9. Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. 10. Curb to be cut or rolled for secondary emergency access. 11. All new residences/dwellings are required to have illuminated residential addresses meeting both city and Fire Dept, approval. Shake shingle roof are no longer permitted in the Cities of Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage or Palm Desert. Department of Public Worics: 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 5C7, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 3. Storm drain and retention area design/construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer' that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. Design of the on-site retention areas shall be based on the following considerations: a. Those areas of the proposed subdivision which provide for stozmwater drainage to the southern portion of the tract shall retain storm waters associated with the differential between the undeveloped and developed condition for a 100 year storm. b. Those areas of the proposed subdivision which provide for stormwater drainage to the southern portion of the tract shall retain storm waters associated with the differential between the undeveloped and developed condition for a 25 year storm. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5 PLANNING OCKffEMION RESOLUTICN NO. 1431 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable City standards. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, canplete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking approval before ccnstxucticn of any improvements is camenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration/acceleration lanes at all project entry points. "As- built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, half-street right of way at 55 feet on E1 Dorado Drive and 33 feet c n Sandcastle Lane shall be offered for dedication on the final map. 8. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to project final. 9. All public/private improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 10. Landscaping maintenance on El Dorado Drive and Sandcastle Lane shall be provided by the homeowners association. 11. Waiver of access to E1 Dorado and Sandcastle Lane, except at approved locations, shall be granted on the Final Map. 12. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, oarplete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 13. The applicant shall provide for the installation of one-half landscaped median island in E1 Dorado Drive. A cash payment in lieu of actual installation may be submitted at the option of the Director of Public Works. 14. Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, 6 PI.AtuM G CI1M1ISSICN RFSO MICN NO. 1431 and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 15. Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert municipal Code shall be provided. 16. Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 17. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroach ent permits by the Department of Public Works. 18. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 19. Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert municipal Code. 20. Property lines for the individual lots proposed by this subdivision shall be located at top of slope where applicable. 21. As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert municipal Code, any existing utilities shall be undergro ended per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility under+gro nding district. 22. Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share of the assessed costs for the Cook Street artension, Interstate 10 Interchange and Bridge FLmd, and participate in any assessment district established to construct these facilities. Applicant shall also pay a transportation mitigation fee ('I[P T). Pi/db 7 r_ CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTb EM OF 03MNIINITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPM TO: Planning Commission DATE: March 20, 1990 CASE NO.: TT 25711 RE¢IEST: 108 lot single family subdivision and negative declaration of environmental impact west of E1 Dorado, one-half mile south of Country Club Drive APPLICANT: BIRTCHER-DUNHAM KM ASSOCIATES, INC. 72-010 Varner Road 712 Eugene Road Thousand Palms, CA 92276 Palm Springs, CA 92264 I. DISCUSSION• The applicants intend to duplicate "The Monterra" type concept that they constructed off Mesa View Drive by creating 12,000 sq. ft. lots and single story homes with gate entry access. The applicants original submittal had to be redrawn to reflect the extension of Sandcastle Lane along the southern boundary of the tract and to provide a secondary emergency access to the site. The application was initially deemed complete and assigned out before camients received revealed that more information must be received prior to this tentative review. Another of the items mission on the original application later deemed necessary was a grading/drainage plan. A revised map that shows this information indicates the subdivision will retain a 25 year storm in two lots reserved for retention purposes. The grading plans stow the proposed pad heights at one to two feet below those of "The Lakes" which are adjacent to the north. The proposed pads also range from two feet above to about ten inches below those of a future subdivision to the west which was processed under the county. The perimeter road improvements will nearly match those of the Varner subdivision to the south. The twelve foot parkway and six foot sidewalk along El Dorado matches Varner's, while along Sandcastle it feet is provided rather than the 8' that the county allowed for a parkway width. The first submittal showed a street adjacent to the wall bordering "The Lakes", while this revised map now shows lots backing up to the country club. Previously a senior citizen project was approved for the site by the county explaining the S.O. overlay zoning that was applied to the site at annexation in addition to the P.R.5 base zoning. II. R]MCP EMMTICN: 1. Approve Findings 2. Adopt Resolution No. approving Tr 25711 III. ATMCHMENTS• 1. Resolution 2. Legal Notice 3. Plans 4. Comments from other agencies Prepared by: Reviewed and Approved by: PJ/db 2 PLANNIM OOMMII.48ION IUMO UTICN NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A 108 LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION WEST OF EL DORADO, ONE-HALF MILE SOUTH OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE. CASE NO. TT 25711 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 20th day of March, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of Birtcher-Dunham for above described project: and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89," in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not significantly impact the environment and a negative declaration is hereby recomTended for approval; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify approval of the tentative tract map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the planning commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. PLANNING 0OK-USSION RESOLVPION NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Comnission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. TT 25711, subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 20th day of March, 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CAROL WHITLOCK, Chairperson ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretaxy PJ/db 2 PLANNIM CX74-USSICN RESOLUTION NO. CXNDrrICIS OF APPROVAL CASE ND. TT 25711 Department of CYmmmity Development: 1. The final map shall conform substantially'with the tentative tract map as modified by the following conditions. Tentative map approval shall expire two years from date of approval unless an extension of time is granted. 2. Applicant shall obtain clearance from the following agencies prior to construction: Public Works Department Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Building and Safety Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 3. The applicant shall pay all applicable fees in accordance with city policy including lizard fees. 4. R-1 standards for minimum 10,000 sq. ft. lots applicable to hone construction. 5. Perimeter decorative walls required at minimum 6' and maximum 8' if used in conjunction with retaining walls. 6. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. City Fire Marshal - 1. Provide, or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential gallon per minute 1500 for single family, 2500 for multifamily, and 3000 for conTe=ial. The actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 GPM for two hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. 3 PLANNIrIG OLM+IISSIM RESCILU ON NO. 2. A fire flow of 1500 gpn for a 1 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 3. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), located not less than 25' nor more than 200' single family, 165 multifamily, and 150' comyercial from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 4. Provide written certification from the appropriate water company having jurisdiction that hydrant(s) will be installed and will produce the required fire flow, or arrange field inspection by the Fire Department prior to request for final inspection. 5. A combination of on-site and off-site Super fire hydrants, (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), will be required, located not less than 25' or more than 200' single family, 165' multifamily, and 150' connercial from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. 6. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the County Fire Chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. Once copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department. 7. All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to within 150' of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story. The roadway shall be not less than 24' of unobstructed width and 13'6" of vertical clearance. Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall be 36' wide with parking on both sides, 32' wide with parking on one side. Dead-end roads in excess of 150' shall be provided with a minimum of 45' radius turn-around (55' in industrial developments). Fountains or garden islands placed in the middle of these turn-arounds shall not exceed a 5' radius or 10' diameter. 4 PLANNIM OCN IISSION RESOLVPION NO. 8. Whenever' access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department. Minimum opening width shall be 161 , with a minimum vertical clearance of 13'6". 9. Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. 10. Curb to be cut or rolled for secondary emergency access. 11. All new residences/dwellings are required to have illuminated residential addresses meeting both city and Fire Dept. approval. Shake shingle roof are no longer permitted in the Cities of Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage or Palm Desert. Department of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 3. Storm drain and retention area design/construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable City standards. 5 PLANNING QOMUSSICN RESOLUTION ND. 6. As required under Palm Desert bhmicipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration/acceleration lanes at all project entry points. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, half-street right of way at 55 feet on E1 Dorado Drive and 33 feet on Sandcastle Lane shall be offered for dedication on the final map. 8. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to project final. 9. All public/private improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 10. Landscaping maintenance on El Dorado Drive and Sandcastle Lane shall be provided by the homeowners association. 11. Waiver of access to El Dorado and Sandcastle Lane, except at approved locations, shall be granted on the Final Map. 12. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 13. The applicant shall provide for the installation of one-half landscaped median island in El Dorado Drive. A cash payment in lieu of actual installation may be submitted at the option of the Director of Public Works. 14. Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 6 PLANNIM OOMNffSSICN RF5OLUrION NO. 15. Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. 16. Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 17. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the Department of Public Works. 18. A cxmplete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 19. Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 20. Property lines for the individual lots proposed by this subdivision shall be located at top of slope where applicable. 21. As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, any existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each respective utility districts recrnmendaticn. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. 22. Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share of the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension, Interstate 10 interchange and Bridge Elmd. 7 1 i73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 ' i TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 - !y CITY OF PALM DESERT Y, i�''^'',• LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. TT 25711 1 ' i NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing wlII be held before the Palm •, '� Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by Birtcher-Dunham for .� approval of a 108 lot single family subdivision and negative declaration of environmental Impact west of Eldorado Drive - half mile south of Country Club Drive, also described as: A.P.N. 632-030-010 • '1 vl�J ._____ —_�: ��1], - -j' ran••. PR-4,,•: , .;t THE LAKES •,i A COUNTRY CLUB •!• �JJ `' +� 1� `,2j11\ i, TiSi:b:! p•• ,1 , •�litif)' • �' : j •. 1 1 y �P.R.-Y S.P. P.R.-4' P.R.-69.0. f O.P. P.R.-10 t ;.P . P.R.-6 ewuunu , SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, March 20, 1990 at 7:00 p.m. In .� the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive. - Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all Interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be -limited to raising only those Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described In this notice, or In written _ correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. . . PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ. Secretary March 9, 1990 Palm Desert Planning Commission r • , . .Y INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Phil Joy, Associate Planner FROM: Joseph S. Gaugush, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 25711 DATE: January 26, 1989 In reviewing the above referenced tentative map the following deficiencies were noted: (1) East/west street along southern project boundary ( 30 foot half-street right-of-way ) . (2) Delineation of public/private streets. (3) Provisions for storm water control. (i.e. on-site retention) (4) Proposed street grades on perimeter streets. (5) Provisions for emergency access. (6) North/south and east/west midpoint cross-sections. Prior to further review and formulation of conditions of approval for this proposed subdivision we are requesting that the tentative map be revised to reflect those items delineated above. JOSEPH S. GAUGUSH, P.E. RECENE •N ATER ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY FE3 ' � 1990 ��srRL�t COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DI�,TFALNE�ESERTNT CITY POST OFFICE BOX 1058•COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236•TELEPHONE(619)39&2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS TELLISCODEKAS,PRESIDENT THOMASE.LEVY,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS,VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY JOHN P.POWELL KEITH H.AINSWORTH,ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER DOROTHY M.NICHOLS REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS THEODORE J.FISH January 30, 1990 File: 0163.1 Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Gentlemen: Subject: Tentative Tract 25711, Portion of Southeast Quarter, Section 10, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian This area lies on the sandy area in the northern portion of Palm Desert and is considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is designated Zone C on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. The district will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this district. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 16 and 70 of Coachella Valley Water District for domestic water service. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 53 and 80 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Plans for grading, landscaping, and irrigation systems shall be submitted to Coachella Valley Water District for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. If you have any questions please call Bob Meleg, stormwater engineer, extension 264. Yours very truly om Levy General Manager-Chi ngineer R F: lmf cc: Don Park Riverside County Department of Public Health 79-733 Country Club Drive, Suite D Bermuda Dunes, California 92201 TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY :qwi.::q.Niarc councy PFC: 10357 ?Lanninc mpawmEnc January 22, 1990 Ramon A. Diaz , Director of Planning Le,a V �� City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Dr . JAN 25 1990 Palm Desert , CA 92260 CoMMONITY JEgj,p;rc ; C'11 pF PALM DESERT 4qIN=P11 Re: Tentative Tract 25711 Dear Mr . Diaz : Thank you for providing the Riverside County Planning Department an opportunity to comment on Tentative Tract 25711 . In February 1988, the Board of Supervisors approved for this site a 300 unit congregate care complex pursuant to Conditional Use Permit No . 2952. I have for your information enclosed a reduced site plan of this previous proposal . For your site planning purposes, I would draw your attention to the "proposed street" as shown on the southerly boundary of the plan approved under CUP 2952. This roadway is not shown on the tentative tract submitted to my office for review. As I recall , this street is necessary to provide circulation and access to existing residential development to the west , including a large community care facility. I would strongly recommend that the tentative tract be redesigned to adequatefV address this traffic concern. ° l might' add that incorporation o'f a street along the southerly boundary could 'also 'provide an opportunity for secondary access into 'the proposed 110 lot subdivision. Should you have ,any -questions, or require further information, please feel free .to ;contact me at (619) 342-8277. 'Very truly yours, RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Ro . Streeter , Planning Director Padl F. Clark , Principal Planner PFC: jmp Enclosure 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TH FLOOR 79733 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SUITE E RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 BERMUDA DUNES, CALIFORNIA 92201 (714) 787-6181 (619) 342-8277 FUT�E WS�N� �OPERTY L� I c ,IV Gn A4 ad la� Im IND, >ig p ( " � � � =_� � m m r tL% DFWE PHI IM RIP" I 3;q 91 1` w m jij;p .1 11 R 11 - 9 a? z . ...... if 1 -4 kk ...... ;;I i ig § • h • w S Lo �I t .i� p�`�4o99 , m ywa viW� 0 Z u c y� 81-aeeiz`L II f' INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Department of Community Development/Planning Attention: Phil Joy FROM: Richard J. Folkers, Asst. City Manager/Public Works Director SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 25711, BIRTCHER-DUNHAM DATE: March 20, 1990 As a result of further review of the subject tentative tract with respect to drainage Public Works Condition of Approval Number 3 should be revised to read as follows: (3) Storm drain and retention area design/construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. Design of the on-site retention areas shall be based on the following considerations: (A) Those areas of the proposed subdivision which provide for stormwater drainage to the southern portion of the tract shall retain storm waters associated with the differential between the undeveloped and developed condition for a 100 year storm. (B) Those ares of the proposed subdivision which provide for stormwater drainage to the southern portion of the tract shall retain storm waters associated with the differential between the undeveloped and developed condition for a 25 year storm. RICHARD J. FOLKERS, . J I 'r SUNUSE COMPANY I'. MAR 2 0 1990 March 20 , 1990 CDMMUNnI DEVELUP6IENT DEYAVALNT city��F'PgLM DESERT Department of Community Development City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attn: Mr. Ray Diaz RE: Tentative Tract No. 25711 Dear Mr . Diaz : As the owners of Section 11 , the west half of Section 14 , and the east half of Section 15 (property adjacent to the above referenced tentative tract) , we wish to object to the proposed conditions of approval for the subdivision which only require the on-site retention of a 25 ,year storm. i The proposed design of E1 Dorado Drive (per Tract No. 23940 ) indicates that all storm water in excess of the 25 year storm will drain to the south to the intersection of 42nd Avenue and El Dorado Drive. We are proposing to construct a project on portions of Sections 14 and 15 which will include the extension of El Dorado Drive to the south as a private street. Therefore, this excess storm water, as well as all of the storm water from Tract No. 23940 , will be draining onto private property and not onto a public street as is required by your subdivision ordinance. We have discussed our concerns with both the Public Works staff and the Planning Department staff and they have informed us that at the public hearing on March 20, 1990 , they will be recommending a change in the Conditions of Approval to require the on-site rettention of the 100 year storm flows . we wish to go on record in support of the staff ' s recommendation of requiring the on-site retention of the 100 year storm flow. 1{ 42-600 Cook Street, Suite 200, Palm Desert, California 92260, Telephone (619) 568-2828 Builder of A,,e,Kcnb Finest Country Club Comrnuniti— Mr . Ray Diaz March 20 , 1990 Page 2 We also respectfully request that the Conditions of Approval require a 20 foot wide parkway (or an 8 foot setback from the right-of-way to the perimeter wall ) along E1 Dorado Drive to conform to the existing parkway width along The Lakes Country Club portion of E1 Dorado Drive. This would also conform to our plans for improvement of the east side of E1 Dorado Drive in connection with our Indian Ridge Country Club project. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, SUNRISE COMP Y llan Levi Vice President, Engineering AL/sl cc : Richard Polkers - City Engineer Phillip K. Smith, Jr. - Executive Vice President, Sunrise Co. I� - CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF 0344 NITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT T0: Planning Camiission DATE: March 20, 1990 CASE NO. : TT 25711 REQUEST: 108 lot single family subdivision and negative declaration of environmental impact west of El Dorado, one-half mile south of Country Club Drive APPLICANT: BIRT=-DUNHAM KWL ASSOCIATES, INC. 72-010 Varner Road 712 Eugene Road Thousand Palms, CA 92276 Palm Springs, CA 92264 I. DISCUSSION• The applicants intend to duplicate "The Monterra" type concept that they constructed off Mesa View Drive by creating 12,000 sq. ft. lots and single story hones with gate entry access. The applicants original submittal had to be redrawn to reflect the extension of Sandcastle Lane along the southern boundary of the tract and to provide a secondary emergency access to the site. The application was initially deemed complete and assigned out before comments received revealed that more information must be received prior to this tentative review. Another of the items mission on the original application later deemed necessary was a grading/drainage plan. A revised map that shows this information indicates the subdivision will retain a 25 year storm in two lots reserved for retention purposes. The grading plans show the proposed pad heights at one to two feet below those of "The Lakes" which are adjacent to the north. The proposed pads also range from two feet above to about ten inches below those of a future subdivision to the west which was processed under the county. The perimeter road improvements will nearly match those of the Varner subdivision to the south. The twelve foot parkway and six foot sidewalk along E1 Dorado matches Varner's, while along Sandcastle 11 feet is provided rather than the 8' that the county allowed for a parkway width. The first submittal showed a street adjacent to the wall bordering "The Lakes", while this revised map now shows lots backing up to the country club. Previously a senior citizen project was approved for the site by the county explaining the S.O. overlay zoning that was applied to the site at annexation in addition to the P.R.5 base zoning. II. RE O M ENDATICN: 1. Approve Findings 2. Adopt Resolution No. approving TT 25711 III. ATTACHMM. 1. Resolution 2. Legal Notice 3. Plans 4. Cccmients from other agencies Prepared by: __'� , Reviewed and Approved by: PJ/db 2 FLANNIM OCU14 SSICN RESOLUTION N O- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A 108 LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION WEST OF EL DORADO, ONE-HALF MILE SOUTH OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE. CASE NO. TT 25711 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 20th day of March, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of Birtcher-Dunham for above described project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the project will not significantly impact the environment and a negative declaration is hereby recommended for approval; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify approval of the tentative tract map: (a) That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the planning commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert .and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. PLANNING OC H41SSICfi RESOLiIPION NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the crnmission in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Tract Map No. TT 25711, subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 20th day of March, 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CAROL WHITLOCK, Chairperson ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary PJ/db 2 PLANNING O(MKISSION RESOLUTION NO. OONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE N0. TT 25711 Department of Conu"Aty Development: 1. The final map shall conform substantially with the tentative tract map as modified by the following conditions. Tentative map approval shall expire two years from date of approval unless an extension of time is granted. 2. Applicant shall obtain clearance from the following agencies prior to construction: Public Works Department Palm Desert Architectural COmILission City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Building and Safety Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 3. The applicant shall pay all applicable fees in accordance with city policy including lizard fees. 4. R-1 standards for minimum 10,000 sq. ft. lots applicable to hone construction. 5. Perimeter decorative walls required at minimum 6' and maximum 8' if used in conjunction with retaining walls. 6. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. City Fire Marshal: . 1. Provide, or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential gallon per minute 1500 for single family, 2500 for multifamily, and 3000 for commercial. The actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 GPM for two hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. 3 PLANNIM C I-MSSICN RESOLUTION NO. 2. A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 1 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 3. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" ), located not less than 25' nor more than 200' single family, 165 multifamily, and 150' conmercial from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 4. Provide written certification from the appropriate water company having jurisdiction that hydrant(s) will be installed and will produce the required fire flow, or arrange field inspection by the Fire Department prior to request for final inspection. 5. A combination of on-site and off-site Super fire hydrants, (6" x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), will be required, located not less than 25' or more than 200' single family, 165' multifamily, and 150' connercial from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. 6. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the County Fire Chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. Once copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department. 7. All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to within 150' of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story. The roadway shall be not less than 24' of unobstructed width and 13'6" of vertical clearance. Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall be 36' wide with parking on both sides, 32' wide with parking on one side. Dead-end roads in excess of 150' shall be provided with a minimum of 45' radius turn-around (55' in industrial developments). Fountains or garden islands placed in the middle of these turn-arounds shall not exceed a 5' radius or 10' diameter. 4 PLANNING CCM USSION RESOLUTION NO. 8. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department. All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles. Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure. All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department. Minimum opening width shall be 16' , with a minimum vertical clearance of 1316". 9. Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. 10. Curb to be cut or rolled for secondary emergency access. 11. All new residences/dwellings are required to have illuminated residential addresses meeting both city and Fire Dept. approval. Shake shingle roof are no longer permitted in the Cities of Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage or Palm Desert. Department of Public Works: 1. Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 2. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 3. Storm drain and retention area design/construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. 4. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. 5. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable City standards. 5 PLANNING CC"IISSION RESOLUTION NO. 6. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is camiiced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration/acceleration lanes at all project entry points. "As-built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. 7. As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Plan, half-street right of way at 55 feet on El Dorado Drive and 33 feet on Sandcastle Lane shall be offered for dedication on the final map. 8. Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to project final. 9. All public/private improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. 10. Landscaping maintenance on E1 Dorado Drive and Sandcastle Lane shall be Provided by the homeowners association. 11. Waiver of access to El Dorado and Sandcastle Lane, except at approved locations, shall be granted on the Final Map. 12. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 13. The applicant shall provide for the installation of one-half landscaped median island in El Dorado Drive. A cash payment in lieu of actual installation may be submitted at the option of the Director of Public Works. 14. Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement markings- 6 PLANNING Oa44ISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15. Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. 16. Ccmplete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. 17. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the Department of Public Works. 18. A canplete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 19. Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 20. Property lines for the individual lots proposed by this subdivision shall be located at top of slope where applicable. 21. As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, any existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each respective utility districts reconmendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. 22. Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share of the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension, Interstate 10 interchange and Bridge Fund. 7 i CSuq 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 k� TELEPHONE 1619)346-0611 ------- -_---- ---� CITY OF PALM DESERT '' '` 'j LEGAL NOTICE ' / CASE NO. TT 25711 1 { NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a pub] is hearing wi 11 be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by Birtcher-Dunham for - -.I , . approval of a IOB lot single family subdivision and negative declaration of environmental Impact west of Eldorado Drive - half mile south of Country } Club Drive, also described as: r' A.P.N. 632-030-010 Ir THE LAKES Y ir�T COUNTRY CLUB 'D1 _ `v 1 , P.R.-0 S.P. o I P.R._j P.R.-5 S.O. O.P. i 1; PR.-10 i.P P.R.-6 f S.1 �I -P:R-6�' SAID pub lc hearing will be held on Tuesday, March 20, 1990 at 7:00 p.m. in 4 l the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be I imited to raising only those Issues '� ""-�' ` '•you or someone else - . raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or In written correspondence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to,to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary March 9, 1990 Palm Desert Planning Commission { ' r INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Phil Joy, Associate Planner FROM: Joseph S. Gaugush, Senior Engineer SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 25711 DATE: January 26, 1989 In reviewing the above referenced tentative map the following defici-encies were noted: (1) East/west street along southern project boundary ( 30 foot half-street right-of-way ) . (2) Delineation of public/private streets. (3) Provisions for storm water control. (i.e. on-site retention) (4) Proposed street grades on perimeter streets. (5) Provisions for emergency access. (6) North/south and east/west midpoint cross-sections. Prior to further review and formulation of conditions of approval for this proposed subdivision we are requesting that the tentative map be revised to reflect those items delineated above. JOSEPH S. GAUGUSH, P.E. W ATEq 3 rt ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY �� 1990 ��ST RICS COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DIUR=B ;F',s oN,6- POST OFFICE BOX 1058• COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236•TELEPHONE(619)398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS TELLIS CODEKAS,PRESIDENT THOMAS E.LEVY,GENERAL MANAGER CHIEF ENGINEER RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS,VICE PRESIDENT DERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY JOHN P.POW ELL KEITH H.AINSWORTH,ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER DOROTHY M.NICHOLS REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS THEODORE J.FISH January 30, 1990 File: 0163. 1 Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Gentlemen: Subject: Tentative Tract 25711, Portion of Southeast Quarter, Section 10, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian This area lies on the sandy area in the northern portion of Palm Desert and is considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is designated Zone C on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. The district will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this district. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 16 and 70 of Coachella Valley Water District for domestic water service. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 53 and 80 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Plans for grading, landscaping, and irrigation systems shall be submitted to Coachella Valley Water District for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. If you have any questions please call Bob Meleg, stormwater engineer, extension 264. Yours very truly om Levy General Manager-Chi ngineer RF: lmf cc: Don Park Riverside County Department of Public Health 79-733 Country Club Drive, Suite D Bermuda Dunes, California 92201 TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY : nmDE C® PFC: 10357 Mannine i)E?A: _ uninj :mEni: January 22, 1990 Ramon A. Diaz , Director of Planning City of Palm Desert 73-51O Fred Waring Dr . Palm Desert , CA 92260 CIiY ,4 I'q.,rA UL3CRr Re ; Tentative Tract 25711 Dear Mr . Diaz : Thank you for providing the Riverside County Planning Department an opportunity to comment on Tentative Tract 25711 . In February 19ee, the Board of Supervisors approved for this site a 300 unit congregate care complex pursuant to Conditional Use Permit No . 2952. I have for your information enclosed a reduced site plan of this previous proposal . For your site planning purposes , I would draw your attention to the "proposed street" as shown on the southerly boundary of the plan approved under CUP 2952 . This roadway is not shown on the tentative tract submitted to my office for review. As I recall , this street is necessary to provide circulation and access to existing residential development to the west , including a large community care facility . I would strongly recommend that the tentative tract be redesigned to adequately address this traffic concern. I might add that .incorporation of a street along the southerly boundary could also provide an opportunity for secondary access into the proposed 110 lot subdivision. Should you have any questions , or require further information, please feel free to contact me at ( 619) 34P-82'77. Very truly yours , RIVERSIDE CDUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Ro Streeter , Planning Director J P�adl F . Clark , Principal Planner PFC: jmp Enclosure 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TH FLOOR 79733 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SUITE E RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 BERMUDA DUNES, CALIFORNIA 92201 (714) 787-6181 (619) 342-8277 oko.�a,., ® O—�I�T�7� '�. ` ~ /`mil' '�O�Ti-T}��-I��' M J L�•�.,,���-a(�`'}Jr„�it 'ir ` �+.{, /� GO 0 o 7 d 'Tl _ \ (i.'111t91111� �I ;l eWe. t � rooxo B p I• p t!t ! { cE JE{{ o eeeee® c w t I {{l till tilrs.{ Iff @ TDo �� � t x�ni��Fl jEk,�"a+�5d�� I � .- —j�J_�._i-__-• �� s s �--,] { ��� cn m t d _�ill �' k Y II a pP N mSte. y s M � •� V� f„ l��t�f �Jfe� ll✓ . yr JQ�, h3 , „- 215 POR�• Z �r� �s4� �/�� A�\�P v✓ti�I �rNY-ILY / l •- cStwl���Q � �' vtSL i r �fYin e y SUNUSE COMPANY 9919� \JV1 W�9 MAR 2 0 1990 March 20, 1990 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAKIMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT Department of Community Development City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attn: Mr. Ray Diaz RE: Tentative Tract No. 25711 Dear Mr. Diaz : As the owners of Section 11, the west half of Section 14 , and the east half of Section 15 (property adjacent to the above referenced tentative tract) , we wish to object to the proposed conditions of approval for the subdivision which only require the on-site retention of a 25 year storm. The proposed design of El Dorado Drive (per Tract No. 23940 ) indicates that all storm water in excess of the 25 year storm will drain to the south to the intersection of 42nd Avenue and El Dorado Drive. We are proposing to construct a project on portions of Sections 14 and 15 which will include the extension of E1 Dorado Drive to the south as a private street. Therefore, this excess storm water, as well as all of the storm water from Tract No. 23940, will be draining onto private property and not onto a public street as is required by your subdivision ordinance. We have discussed our concerns with both the Public Works staff and the Planning Department staff and they have informed us that at the public hearing on March 20, 1990, they will be recommending a change in the Conditions of Approval to require the on-site retention of the 100 year storm flows . We wish to go on record in support of the staff ' s recommendation of requiring the on-site retention of the 100 year storm flow. 42-600 Cook Street, Suite 200, Palm Desert, California 92260, Telephone (619) 568-2828 Builder of America's Finest Country Club Communities Mr. Ray Diaz March 20, 1990 Page 2 We also respectfully request that the Conditions of Approval require a 20 foot wide parkway (or an 8 foot setback from the right-of-way to the perimeter wall) along E1 Dorado Drive to conform to the existing parkway width along The Lakes Country Club portion of E1 Dorado Drive. This would also conform to our plans for improvement of the east side of E1 Dorado Drive in connection with our Indian Ridge Country Club project. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, SUNRISE COMP Ilan Levi Vice President, Engineering AL/sl cc : Richard Folkers - City Engineer Phillip K. Smith, Jr. - Executive Vice President, Sunrise Co. INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Department of Community Development/Planning Attention: Phil Joy FROM: Richard J. Folkers, Asst. City Manager/Public Works Director SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 25711, BIRTCBER-DUNNAM DATE: March 7, 1990 The following should be considered conditions of approval for the above- referenced project: (1) Drainage fees, in accordance with Section 26.49 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 507, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. (2) Drainage facilities shall , be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Northside Area Drainage Master Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. (3) Storm drain and retention area design/construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. (4) Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to recordation of final map. (5) Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable City standards. (6) As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to recordation of final map. Such offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt paving and concrete sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration and provisions for deceleration/acceleration lanes at the all project entry points. "As- built" plans shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the acceptance of the improvements by the city. (7) As required by Sections 26.32 and 26.44 of the Palm desert Municipal Code, and in accordance with the Circulation Network of the City's General Palm, half-street right of way at 55 feet on E1 Dorado Drive and 33 feet on Sandcastle Lane shall be offered for dedication on the final map. (8) Improvement plans for water and sewer systems shall be approved by the respective service districts with "as-built" plans submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to project final. (9) All public/private improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of grading permits. (10) Landscaping maintenance on El Dorado Drive and Sandcastle Lane shall be provided by the homeowners association. (11) Waiver of access to E1 Dorado Drive and Sandcastle Lane, except at approved locations, shall be granted on the Final Map. (12) In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. (13) The applicant shall provide for the installation of one-half landscaped median island in El Dorado Drive. A cash payment in lieu of actual installation may be submitted at the option of the Director of Public Works. (14) Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. (15) Full improvements of interior streets based on residential street standards in accordance with Section 26.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code shall be provided. (16) Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval and be recorded before issuance of any permits. (17) Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the Department of Public Works. (18) A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. (19) Pad elevations, as shown on the tentative map are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. (20) Property lines for the individual lots proposed by this subdivision shall be located at top of slope where applicable. (21) As required under Section 12.16 and Section 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, any existing utilities shall be undergrounded per each respective utility districts recommendation. If determined to be unfeasible, applicant shall agree to participate in any future utility undergrounding district. (22) Applicant shall agree to contribute their fair share of the assessed costs for the Cook Street Extension, Interstate 10 interchange and Bridge Fund. - -- ---------- -- - RICHARD J. FOLKERS, P.E. (js91tt2S111.cnd1 � 044,,,, RIVERSIDE COUNTY vCy FIRE DEPARTMENT f ;-� _' L In C UNTY IN COOPERATION WITH THE i V' CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY ! _ f "' RIVG `�RSI�L... �••• AND FIRE PROTECTION I3iJ c_l; Sub d Pl.�9i/5 �910!/E!!�GLEN J. NEWMAN FIRE CHIEF �- RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE a Titiv__ COVE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I ce OCa a G 6 44.900 EL DORADO DRIVE I { INDIAN WELLS.CA 92210' — P REF,, ZS71! 00 4or S&ONN lSil7N / N sF lriK�'E�• rT AW, A66 With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plan check. the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with City Municipal Code , NFPA , UFC, and UBC and/or recognized Fire Protection Standards : Provide, or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential gallon per minute 1500 for sin le family, 2500 for multifamily , and 3000 for commercial . The actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 GPM for for two hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating presure . A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 1 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site . The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant (s) (6" x 4" x 2 -1/2" , x 2-1/2" ) , located not less than 25 ' nor more than 200 ' single family, 165 ' multifamily, and 150 ' commercial from any portion o t.:F buif3ing(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways . Hydrants installed below 3000 ' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel " type . Provide written certification from the appropriate water company having juriftdiction that hydrant (s) will be installed and will produce the required fire flow; or arrange field inspection by the Fire Department prior to request for final inspection. A combination of on-site and off-site Super fire hydrants . (6" x 4" r. 1/2" x 2-1/2") , will be required, located not less than 25 ' or more than 200 ' single family, 165 ' multifamily, and 150 ' commercial from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways . The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant (s) in the system. Prior to the application for a building permit , the developer shall furnish the original and. two copies of the water system plan to the County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the County Fire Chief . Upon approval . the original will be returned . One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements . Plans shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department . " All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to within 150 ' of all por ins of the exteri'or walls the first story . The roadway shall be not less than 24' of unobstructed width and 13 ' 6" of / vertical clearance . Where parallel parking is allowed , the roadway shall be 36 ' wide with parking on both sides, 32 ' wide with parking on one side . JDead--end roads in excess of 150 ' shall be provided with a minimum 45 ' radius turn-around (55 ' in industrial developments) . Fountains or garden islands placed in the middle of these turn-&rounds shall not exceed a 5 ' radius or 10 ' diameter. The minimum width of interior driveways for multi-family or. apartment complexes shall be : a . 24 feet wide when serving less than 100 units, no parallel parking; carports or garages allowed on one side only. 28 feet wide when serving between 100 and 300 units ; carports or garages allowed on both sides, no parallel parking. C . 32 feet wide when serving over 300 units or when parallel parking is allowed on one side . d. 36 feet wide when parallel parking is allowed on both sides . Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates , barriers , guard houses or similar means . provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire / Department . All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when V/ activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles . Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure . All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department . Minimum opening width shall be 16' , with a minimum vertical clearance of 13 ' 6" . A dead end single access over 500 ' in length may require a secondary access . sprinklers , or other mitigative measure .C41Jpm04 me-r- Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy . A-second-ac-cess-i-s-rwquY rv'd—T-h-i-s-can-be-acc-emp3-i-shed-b -two -ma-i-r- NQi laccess_poi_rtz-frrnn-main-r-ac��wt�y-nr-arr-emergernr_�gate_d�cce�s irt� a2adjrrit�i�g-develapman# �r'e -Code -M BE Cur Oe 1 &Uojf b (fv^e�-11Id access / A11 new re v' cd ,cos/dwellings required to have illuminated residential addresses meeting both City and Fire Dept approval . Shake shingle roofs V are no longer permitted in the Cities of Indian Wells , Rancho Mirage or Palm Desert . ins regarding the meaning of these conditions should be refer red togthetFire Dept . Fire Protection /Inspection Staff at Phone (619) 346-1870 or Indian Wells Station 55, 44-900 El Dorado Dr. Indian Wells Calif . 92260 . Sincerely, Glen Newman Ranger In Charge County Fire Chief By Clyde Chittenden Fire Protection Specialist 1Y OF 1ROVE -Z.Z-qd AR-1 L 7' R BY �y Title s, LDale TO; eP711 of or j PAV-N* A-#-N.-jroy REF;J-7- 257// With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plan check the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with City Municipal Code, NFPA, 1JFC, and UBC and/or recognized Fire Protection Standards : The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial building's per Uniform �Fire Code Sec . 10 . 301C . Provide , or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential gallon per minute 1500 for single family, 2500 for multifamily, and 3000 for commercial . The actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 GPM for for two hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating presure . A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 1 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site . The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant (s) ( 6" x 4" x 2 -1/2" x 2-1/2" ) , located not less than 25 ' nor more than 200 ' single famil , 165 ' multifamily, and 150 ' commercial from any portion of the buildings) as measured along approved vehicular travelways . Hydrants installed below 3000 ' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel " type . Provide written certification from the appropriate water company having jurisdiction that hydrant (s) will be installed and will produce the required fire flow, or arrange field inspection by the Fire Department prior to request for final inspection . A combination of on-site and off-site Super fire hydrants , (6" x 4" x 2- 1/2" x 2 1/2" ) , will be required located not less than 25 ' or more than 200 ' single family, 165 ' multifamily, and 150 ' commercial from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways . The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant (s) in the system. 1. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type , area separations , or built-in fire protection measures . Please be advised the proposed project may not be feasible since the existing water mains will not meet the required fire flows . Please check with the water company prior to obtaining an approval from the Planning or Building Department . Prior to the application for a building permit , the developer shall furnish the original and..two copies of the water system plan to the County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the County Fire Chief . Upon, approval , the Joriginal will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority, Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements . Plans shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department . " Comply with Title 19 of the California Administrative Code . Install a complete fire sprinkler system per NFPA 13 . The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front , not less than 25 ' from the building and within 50 ', of an approved hydrant , Install a fire alarm (waterflow) as required by the Uniform Building Code, 3803, for sprinkler system. Install tamper alarm on supply valve for sprinkler systems . Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes . Install a fire alarm as required by the Uniform Building Code and/or Uniform Fire Code . Install panic hardware and exit signs per Uniform Building Code , and/or Uniform Fire Code . Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet #10 , but not less than 2A10BC in rating. Fire extinguishers must not be over 75 ' .walking distance. Install a hood/Duct automatic fire extinguishing system. Install a dust collecting system as per the Uniform Building Code , Section 910a and Uniform Fire Code Section 76 . 102 . All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to within 150 ' of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story . The roadway shall be not less than 24 ' of unobstructed width and 13 ' 6" of vertical clearance . Where parallel parking is allowed . the roadway shall be 36 ' wide with parking on both sides, 32 ' wide with parking on one side . Dead-end roads in excess of 150 ' shall be provided with a minimum 45 ' / radius urn-around (55 ' in industrial developments ) . Fountains or garden Jislandsace in the middle of these turn-grounds shall not exceed a 5 ' radius or 10 , diameter. The minimum width of interior driveways for multi-family or. apartment complexes shall be : a . 24 feet wide when serving less than 100 units, no parallel parking; carports or garages allowed on one side only. J b. 28 feet wide when serving between 100 and 300 units ; carports or garages allowed on both sides , no parallel parking. C . 32 feet wide when serving over 300 units or when parallel parking is allowed on one side . d . 36 feet wide when parallel parking is allowed on both sides . Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates , barriers , guard houses or similar means . provision shall be made to Jfacilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department . All controlled access devices that are power operated shall have a radio-controlled over-ride system capable of opening the gate when activated by a special transmitter located in emergency vehicles . Devices shall be equipped with backup power facilities to operate in the event of power failure . All controlled access devices that are not power operated shall also be approved by the Fire Department . Minimum opening width shall be 12 ' , with a minimum vertical clearance of 13 ' 6" . Occupancy separation will be required as per the Uniform Building Code , Sec . 503 . A dead end single access over 500 ' in length may require a secondary access , sprinklers , or other mitigative measure . Install Panic Hardware and Exit signs as per Chapter 33, Sections of the Uniform Building Code . Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy . This project may require licensing and/or review by State agencies . Applicant should prepare a letter of intent detailing the proposed usage to facilitate case review. Contact should be made with the Office of the State•Fire Marshal (818-960-6441 ) for an opinion and a classification of occupancy type . This information and a copy of the letter of intent should be submitted to the Fire Department so that proper requirements may be specified during the review process . All new residences/dwellings are required to have illuminated residential addresses meeting both City and Fire Dept approval . Shake,. shingle roofs are no longer permitted in the Cities of Indian Wells , Rancho Mirage or Palm Desert . All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions should be referred to the Fire Dept . Fire Protection /Inspection Staff at Phone (619) 346-1870 or Indian Wells Station 55 , 44-900 E1 Dorado Dr . Indian Wells Calif . 92260 . An approved NFPA I- or NFPA 13R sprinkler sysv-m is required for all buidings over 5000 square feet in size. Area separation will not exempt the building from this requirement.. EXEMPTION; One and two family residences. --------------------------------- / A second access is required. This can be accomplished by two main ✓ access points from main roadway or an emergency gated access into an adjoining development. Sincerely, Glen Newman Ranger In Charge County Fire Chief By Clyde Chittenden Fire Protection Specialist "" ,, ea• S 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 992260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ANU CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO(S) : PROJECT: i APPLICANT: �Iz7CNtE7--_76Ulj fAM Enclosed please find materials describ.ing a project for which the following is being requestedr r}�c, A rry OTZA rtpr �( WESA o� l��Rrnr�o A� JE �3a - o3o—OIO The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is .being forwarded to you for conxnents and recommended conditions of approval , Tiie city Is Interested minera in the probable impacts on the environment ( including land, air, water, ls, flora, fauna, noise, objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and 'recorixnended conditions of. approval based on your expertise and area of .concern. Your comments and reco[Tviendep conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 4:30 P.m. land division corrunittee, The land division committee (Comprised to be discussed by the Of community development; city bul lding. off•i,c:.lal , city engineer,Comrised OF diirecto, and a representative of., Cvwu) ,tii .l,1. -discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the planning commission through the staff report. Any Information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the land division conxlittee. Sincerely, _ �ve1.! ATtIJ �+�1 io-� ------------------------------------- RAMON A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF COMi1UNITY. DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING /tm Attachments __ __ PLEASE RFilmn r1AP wllll_f'(]11l1Cl1rr TENTATIVE MAP TRACT NO. 25711 \� THE N.E.1/L OF THE 5-E.1/4 OF SECAO, T.SS.,R.6E.,S.B.8.13 W IN THE COUNTY OF ZZ°•` Y RIVERSIDE,CITY OF PALM DESERT, l ` - CALIFORNIA. .YNUARY,1990 - V?3J.5 I If N 4e 31 � I '' 1 r ! S Lz r?1 17. Jf i K \ i I t ENG/N£EP fI f) } i1 ]f k"c >f i >J d >s i \)\ R n i % � eJ e: y y g ff +! n sa ... no /ef i /N 1P5 9 7 + IV je ff t1 z/ I1a S1 IV a If /\` /„\: N \ \\ } N 1 { �J 632020006 , ,—_- -- �ri� Y Sunrise t Partners'. 'Ij /81DJ I 76006 Country try Club DY U' Palm Desert. CA 92260 �I 'iz�esQ°.f,0 z'Zb0 it J I I I t . ` LABELS COMPLETED j 1 LABELS PRINTE❑ I LJ LII 632020013 Sunrise Desert Partners .J 16006 Country Club Or ��. Palm Desor t. CA 92260 � I I i UI *** LABELS COMPLETED "' I LABELS PRINTED I' _ ` I LI 632030010 �' 6320'JB>.r . ... . n �^� I Grossman Miller Enterprises RobertI21 Brea Canynn 12tl 6t0 ]e I� P 0 BoWlnuL, CA91789 � Palm D 92261 I I I Ir III `*' LABELS COMPLETED *"* 2 LABELS PRINTED I' I L: I I li J j 632030023 j •I vista Be, CD Inc. J 11111 E Tahqultz St. B209 V Palm Springs. CA 92262 J 04. I I r r , 1. 1 ' i I ' L I 3231209z 1 0an Lak. C. J Ken b ar bar YCl ler OonF ose I I' Lakes Co 27 Eastf' 5632 'a 75005 Country Club Dr Rolling Hil s,' CA 90. La Ca iada CR 91011 Palm Desert, CA 92260 J I I I - 632. 13001. Q!� j 632313002 j 632313003 J Pat Ingr War n eke �g-9n Claire M Redivivo I Laurence H & Rita Deutsch 1129 Anq Or '/ (� 4446 TobJ.as Ave 16133 Ventura Nlv St. BJO Beverly t CA 90210yp7� Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Encino. CA 91436 J I I 632313004 632313005 632313006 J Lucille M Busch Edward L & Jean Rimpau I Roy A & Jacquelyn Hadaway 366 Runninq. 5pring Dr j 628 Via Lids Nord P 0 Box 1181 L Palm Desert, CA 92260 Newport Bch, CA 92663 Bellingham, W. 9822] J I I I I 632313007 1 632313008 632313009 J Mel Baumwohl Richard H & Constance Halstad William L & Y Newman 372 Running Spring Or 1 5270 Cresent Dr 5201 Villa9e Cir v Palm Desert. CA 92260 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 1 Temple City, CA 91780 J I I V 632313010 632313011 632313012 J Zara L Farrar I Eugene C & Eugenia Frey - I Stephanie L Gross 1 65 Hallmark Cir 1715 Daronet P1 25880 Tournament Rd No 109 Menlo Park. CA 94025 j Fullerton. CA 92633 Valencia. LP 91355 � I 632313013 632313014 632313015 Anthony R Pann I Richard b Janet Brasher I Alan M b Jane Krub Leer 13412 Ventura Blv Ste 300 9000 No 42nd 1205 Woodview Ter L- Sherman Oaks. CA 91423 Bellevue, We 9800A I Los Altos. CA 94022 l 1 1 11 632313017 632313018 L G32313016 _J David K & Julie Stern 1 Joseph 0 & Norma Gorman Ralph & Grace Pontius 400 Running Spring Or I 402 Running Spring, Or 12643 Cheshire St L Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert. CA 92260 1 Norwalk, CA 90650 II I ! I 632313019 11 632313e20 1 632313021 , 1 George H & Saralee Mcmillen Jay K & Carolyn Palmer I Arthur W b Dorothy Brown 406 Running Spring Or f 408 Running Springs Or 1 410 Running Spring Or I I Palm Desert, [A 92260 I Palm Desert, CA 92260 I Palm Oesert, CA 92260 J I I I I 632313022 632313023 I 632313024 Leroy A & Leeann Weick-Pf 1 Robert E & Cristie Bateman Robert B & Elinor Gaunt 412 Running Spring Dr 11 1]]11 Kennon 21625 Hawthorne Palm Desert, CA 92260 1 Yorbe Linda, CA 92686 T.r,ance, CA 90503 I I 11 I 632313025 632313026 1 ,/ Martin M & Merle Jacobson Suntice Desert Partners 2435e Bridle Trail Rd 75005 Country Club Dr Hidden Hills, CA 91302 Palm Desert, CA 92260 .� I i I — ' .. .-. " LABELS COMPLETED I I 197 LABELS PRINTED .I I I 1 I I 632361030 63236]031 632361032 l S andcas tie Homes Ltd 'I San - e om San as 4800 Tyrolite St 4800 T e 1 0800 Tyr 1 t 1, Riverside. CA 92509 Riv rstd CA 92509 Rlversi e. CA 92509 ti Q, u _ �vo'oblss"e MA 0/8-/35 k LOr 8 TRA 018-/387. a W.f c, y. y w ° a n n •' yer.cz � � � 1"•� a � 'C b �♦ Y- G v AOD cq ® r, 4�,° P 3 5^Ao3 ICY 4g 4n u J 4 QyY' 1 2 �.1 ;4n���^ i•' .0 y~�� Oq m ti V (n � nn-- ° 0 ' N i4 ✓ m®L l:I51.i0 310.54 O L'1i° ki1a.3 v4 FAIM DESERT L/M/r5 rR.A. 0/8-060 A e°o roe of 8�3.gi 1341 /°4 7,-RA.075 -036 a e Vl i 6I7 � m r E I 207.3& 3/20/ 7/85 J n 1 1400,99' ¢.90' PM/45/76 4 S w avo a 000 o00 0 DOD 03( _ j, ea N l c UJ N (x� iG34.03co v b A O .,, q� \ � Q qti doo � o, w a � n ��• �7 ki�o F 0 F �1 A VI Y lull, ? co n W g (b C' bAti i !331 81 ' 4lk `N w 2G5 / ril Q) 11 10 :lcti d 0 O / R C 15 O ® � N ,YB 7L _N,Q Lb \ � ,Z N N o /e _ F DRIVE No a 0 b W Y �4• \ F U' 0 \ O Van A � ° e OOKOV I m \ n R N. w o� A �+ a' nv:s/ ° V ® � n C q m s n b tt O o W i Z o _o tz 2 i m n2 O ti �,. y � \r•.n, (N In N � O W a � A r353.,8G 83 :" \�•Q OIB-OB6 43 W v1�• 4 d /44 GQ F N N Q) L� v � s N iaia, U�o 1h J \ y V n \ v r -W. C I y �.'� r >oU S y d cp � b 1� h o•`Tce>eI � O IqtA m tN b n n n Y w (u o n ry W \m W to U /6.5^ fm m u s V ry P. nO 4 S i.19 az To 44�.4B N a @ 1 �A cocvko W(qko b O'3' J e O U rol `•yyq ?/ 96'�.. 41 03 O O ti O a al2v s9 m�3 W °b' OR/VE 2n D -0 E o,b�' T ` m� ' u BLUE . RIVE 5' 's, z en cal_, 03 T.R.A.O/8-062 1 CITY a OF x-3 PALM ELDORADO DESERT LIMITS u x-z U No-03' 241 DRIVE /z. z -5 Q) 'b ti y m w a W O .�,• 4 � � \ � 4 • \ \ n , m u u u � � m 7 0 t� F �bn V a 4 N � 0 +n {; L ` � Q q V 20 Q. o41 °e L'sM �CriS � v o 1 � w 2 4,, w C .� ja,.L:,�T,e.,✓ � a y � � n ° Lorrs 37 I Yr3) ee.9e (� c.n.iy 37 'y 38 39 � A /✓xc3 � 3B ' n 39' 36 rn 36 ° b n � /L 9.i= a. LI. 99 to. e0. 62.Is Qd. C v 3 35 34 $ ywo. y.36 Be3e1, i M :3o.eo p P ' 91 —�L'�'Tl� c ✓8 53 vT 4AIt / J ^9s c.s1 150 26 27 28 29 B 42 Z. w a 25 24 03 2'j . � 22 2/ a u w O 2/ M v O R 19 y31 :, - o„.B✓l / 40" VIA. WVs, a, r OLMA Se7t f li[7pIRF .ti tV. z Lor 'B" I^�' S1/l '46 're L81 /6 /7 20 /8 /9 w 4 w T Lc Lrnz �°asz �3. /4 /3 36/ s"N15 /2 (;n.23 /2 (.1.15 // 0 P 4 / ! v R i n /O y /i/. r✓ /S/.Of \ a N Y Ng 3 3 3.. 3a. N r p B 8 B O.ee � 14 V � P 6 r [ .. I Zl BB /✓n✓ /1/.)/ i r Lor „B., p R 7V L-E 6634�-Fi 03 N � yp '� n93/ B%2 N 0.Oa'S 'E y ( � w � U 0 r — — — � n i G 0 4 I I N � n m � o ; w ® ► � ly I � I. y I a I � n U11 ! C/TY LIM/TS TR A./B62 �� 0 r ) Kzol n n � I_ e N n7 SIN U O� o a a �•Nyy m�G y 33sV �l / vl i W m � „ Q m V O Z m w ty � b O O � w o OAS/A CLUB OR/VE (PENNSYLVAN/A AVE) - V � I IT • i � ( b W\� z Nn � O a u w RIVERSIDE COUNT` LANNING DEPARTMENT It PROPERTY OWNEko CERTIFICATION 104!4! - FIRST dMMICAM TETIE QadSQ RANCF I LYSA DELEUN , certify that on CQPMANY DECEMBER 18, 1989 the attached property owners list was prepared by First American Title Insurance Company pursuant to appli- cation requirements furnished by the Riverside County Planning Depart- ment. Said list is a complete and true compilation of owner of the r subject property and all other property owners within 300 feet of the property involved in the application and is based upon the latest equalized assessment rolls. I further certify that the information filed is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that incorrect or erroneous information may be grounds for rejection or denial of the application. NAME: LYSA DELEON TITLE REGISTRATION: Customer Service Representative ADDRESS: 3625 Fourteenth Street Riverside, California 92502 PHONE (8-5) : (714)-787-1730 SIGNIATURE: DATE: 12/1 9 CASE: See Attached Form No.1068-1(Rev.7/88) Exhibit A to Preliminary Report i SST A MERIc ti H Preliminary Report First American Title Insurance Company a EXHIBIT A LIST OF PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS (By Policy Type) 1. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY-(7-88) SCHEDULEB EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage(and the Company will not pay costs,attorneys'fees or expenses)which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which ore not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments,or notices of such proceedings,whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Anyfacts,rights,interests or claims which are notshown bythepublic records6utwhich could be ascertained by an inspection of Ike land orwkich may6easserted6y persons in posses- sion thereof. 3. Easements,liens or encumbrances,or claims thereof,which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims;(b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;(c) water rights,claims or title to water,whether or not the matters excepted under(a),(b),or(c)are shown by the public records. - EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Compony will not pay loss or damage,cosh, attorneys'fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a)Any low,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning laws,ordinances,or regulations)restricting,regulating,prohibiting or relating to(i)the occupancy,use,or enjoyment of the land;(ii)the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land;(iii)a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which Ike land is orwas apart,or(iv)environmental protection,or the effect of any violation of these laws,ordinances or governmental regulations,except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (6)Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. I 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other matters: (a)whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (6)not known to the Company,not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but known lathe insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c)resulting in no doss or damage to the insured claimant; - (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy;or (e)resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability orfailure of the insured at Dateof Policy,or the inability or Failure of any subsequent owner of the indebted ness,to comply with the applicable"doing business"laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceabilily of the lien of the insured mortgage,or claim thereof,which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 2. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY FORM B- 1970(AMENDED 10-17-70) SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE 1. Anylow,ordinance or governmental regulation(Including but not limited tobuilding and zoning ordinances)restrictingor regulating or prohibiting the occupancy,use or enjoyment of the land,or regulating the character,.dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land,or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimen- sions of area of the land,or the effect of any violation of any such law,ordinance or governmental regulation. 2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records at Date of Policy. 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other matters(a) created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;(b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest by this policy and not disclosed in writing by the insured doimontto the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder;(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;(d) attaching or created subse- quent to Date of Policy; or(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 3. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY FORM B- 1970(AMENDED 10-17-70) WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and notas an Extended Coverage Policythe exclusions setforth in paragraph 2 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULEB This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the matters shown in parts one and two following: Pad One: I. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights,interests,or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by on inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements,claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the aublic records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortogr `vea, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct sun" ould disclose, and which are not shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims;reservations or exceph-._,n patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;water n�...,,claims or title to water. 6. Any lien,or right to a,lien,for services,labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 1857723 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 3625 FOURTEENTH STREET, (P.O. BOX 986) RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502 (AREA 714) 684-1600 BIRTCHER-DUNHAM PROPERTIES 72010 BARNER ROAD THOUSAND PALMS, CALIFORNIA 92276 YOUR NO. 25711 DATED AS OF DECEMBER 13, 1989 AT 7:30 A.M. �.v RODERICK W. JO ON - TITLE OFFICER THE FORM OF POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE CONTEMPLATED BY THIS REPORT IS: IN RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED APPLICATION FOR A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, THIS COMPANY HEREBY REPORTS THAT IT IS PREPARED TO ISSUE, OR CAUSE TO BE ISSUED, AS OF THE DATE HEREOF, A POLICY OR POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE DESCRIBING THE LAND AND THE ESTATE OR INTEREST THEREIN HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, INSURING AGAINST LOSS WHICH MAY BE SUSTAINED BY REASON OF ANY DEFECT, LIEN OR ENCUMBRANCE NOT SHOWN OR REFERRED TO AS AN EXCEPTION BELOW OR NOT EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE PURSUANT TO THE PRINTED SCHEDULES, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF SAID POLICY FORMS. THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS FROM THE COVERAGE OF SAID POLICY OR POLICIES ARE SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A ATTACHED. COPIES OF THE POLICY FORMS SHOULD BE READ. THEY ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THIS REPORT. THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS HERETO) IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED. PAGE 1 1857723 TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: GROSSMAN MILLER ENTERPRISES, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: IN FEE THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF PALM DESERT AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 25711 BEING A DIVISION OF THE FOLLOWING: THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN. AT THE DATE HEREOF EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS CONTAINED IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. GENERAL AND SPECIAL COUNTY TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1989-90. FIRST INSTALLMENT $8, 911.81 DELINQUENT, PLUS PENALTY $891 . 18 . SECOND INSTALLMENT $8, 911 . 81 . CODE NO. 075-012 . ASSESSMENT NO. 632-030-010-1. 2. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES, IF ANY, ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3. 5 COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. 3. AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE PUBLIC OVER ANY PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY INCLUDED WITHIN PUBLIC ROADS. 4. THE EFFECT OF A RECORD OF SURVEY ON FILE IN BOOK 34 PAGE 39 OF RECORDS OF SURVEY, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 5. THE FACT THAT THE OWNERSHIP OF SAID LAND DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY RECORD RIGHTS OF INGRESS OR EGRESS TO OR FROM A PUBLIC STREET OR HIGHWAY. PAGE 2 1857723 6. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN INDEBTEDNESS IN THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL SUM OF $270, 000.00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS AND/OR OBLIGATIONS SECURED THEREBY RECORDED OCTOBER 16, 1980 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 190940 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. DATED: SEPTEMBER 4, 1980 TRUSTORC JOHN D. GARBER AND CLARE C. GARBER, HUSBAND AND WIFE TRUSTEE: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: CHARLES EDGAR BRUMFIELD, A MARRIED MAN, AS HIS SOLE AND SEPARATE PROPERTY. THE BENEFICIAL INTEREST UNDER SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS ASSIGNED TO PATRICIA A. BRUMFIELD, BY MESNE ASSIGNMENTS OF RECORD. THE EFFECT OF AN ASSIGNMENT OF DEED OF TRUST, WHEREBY MITSUBISHI BANK OF CALIFORNIA PURPORTS TO ASSIGN THE BENEFICIAL INTEREST BY ASSIGNMENT, RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1985 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 274120 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. NOTE: AT THE DATE OF SAID INSTRUMENT AND THE RECORDATION THEREOF THE ASSIGNOR, TRUSTEE OR BENEFICIARY HAD NO RECORD INTEREST IN SAID DEED OF TRUST NOR HAVE THEY SINCE ACQUIRED ANY. 7. THE EFFECT OF A QUITCLAIM DEED FROM DAPHNE PAYNE LEWIS MARZICOLA TO E. GEORGE MARZICOLA, RECORDED JANUARY 26, 1981 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 13934 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. NOTE: AT THE DATE OF SAID INSTRUMENT AND THE RECORDATION THEREOF THE GRANTOR HAD NO RECORD INTEREST IN SAID LAND NOR HAS HE SINCE ACQUIRED ANY. 8. THE EFFECT OF AN OPTION AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 EXECUTED BY JOHN D. GARBER AND CLARE C. GARBER, AS OPTIONOR, AND BY E. GEORGE MARZICOLA, AS OPTIONEE, RECORDED MAY 6, 1981 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 82187 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 9. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN INDEBTEDNESS IN THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL SUM OF $1, 575,000.00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS AND/OR OBLIGATIONS SECURED THEREBY RECORDED JULY 22, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 204795 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. DATED: JUNE 22, 1988 TRUSTOR: GROSSMAN MILLER ENTERPRISES, A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP TRUSTEE: T.ICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: GARLAND-GEMBER CORP. , A NEVADA CORPORATION. PAGE 3 1857723 NOTE: COPIES OF THIS PRELIM WERE SENT TO: KWL AND ASSOCIATED 712 EUGENE ROAD PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA 92262 ATTENTION: BOB LOTITO PLAT ATTACHED/PT PAGE 4 619-06 sE TRA o _� 632 - 031= 075-036 018-135 018-138 C 1 F m w CL L 0.r U N e9.4s'w`e O U C --^Z.zs G E h a O j 4m Ew 4 I Clw U 5 i v0 'a � C.0 » Po, Par / For. 2 I� L O ^ !m Q % U 0. Q c CD L 359A& 3 _ 9.rtAC.NG V t- m {p CD _ C QJ E E y^ VrQV Y V b -k I H a i Z a°°o Cx IY 155114$� + sa'� p55 O � C U O E a ay IF oo-0 $ Par 3 q DATE OLD NO NEW O W 7 4/e9 n ae /9.40AcM' 36 � 4Q Q�sY_f 0 b wz ©3/9AcNl. o /3z-/s o d PGr.1 Lo'A\ DATE ao AM NEMNn 942�07 1Y = 271./9\ Av. ' S S 3 2 /S 15114 N se,At ,.S•E 13 PG.35 T/e5 9 l6,SZ PM 64166-68 Pomel Mw 13406 I-06 1 17,18 PM10117-8 Pa-ce/Mbp 1795/ I-8 /e 'G'0 /Lve7 /Q /9,10 M.B.173/59-60 Tract No.22547-R 20 PG." P.M. 145176-77 Force/ Map 22646 11/e7 7^y f P/ PM. 153193-9 4 Parcel Mop 23696 /ee /6 rr,ra PM 15 5114-15 " " 23287 2/ee 9 /1/ee 22 P .36 Z6 4. •MERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY- 1970 WITH A A.ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE(AMENDE, •17-70) SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE 1. Anylaw,ordinance orgovernmental regulation(including butnot limited tobuilding and zoning ordinances)restrictingor regulating orprohibiting the occupancy,useorenjoyment ofthe land,or regulating the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land,or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimen- sions or area of the land,or the effect of any violation of any such law ordinance or governmental regulation. 2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records at Date of Policy. 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other matters(a) created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;(b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy or acquired the insured mortgage and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder;(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured cloimant,(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(except to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to any statutory lien for labor or material or to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy). 4. Unenforceabiliyof the lienof the insured mortgage because of failure of the insuredot Date of Policy orof any subsequent owner of theindebtednessto complywith applicable"doing business"laws of the state in which like land is situated. 5. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY- 1970(AMENDED 10-17-701 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Association Lenders Policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy,the exclusions set forth in paragraph 4 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the matters shown in parts one and two following: Part One: I. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights,interests;or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by on inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements,claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims;reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;water rights,claims or title to water. 6. Any lien,or right to a lien,for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 6. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY- 1987 WITH A.LT.A ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE(10-21-87) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs,attorneys'fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a)Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning laws,ordinances,or regulations)restricting,regulating,prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,use,or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is orwas a part;or (iv) environmental protection,or the effect of any violation of these laws,ordinances or governmental regulations,except to the extent that a notice of the enforcementthereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (6)Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a viola tion or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rightsof eminemdomain unless noticeof the exercise thereof hosbeen recorded inthe public records at Dateof Policy,but not excludingfrom coverage any taking which hasoccurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3., Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters: (a)created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (6)not known to the Company,not recorded in the public records at Dateof Policy,but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c)resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; - (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services,labor or material or the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at date of policy);or (e)resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Dateof Policy,orthe inabilty or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable"doing business"laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lienof the insured mortgage,or claim thereof,which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Anystatutory lienforservices,labor or materials(orthe claim of prioriyof any statutory lienforservices,labor or materials over the lien of theinsured mortgage)arising from an improve- mentorwork related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Dateof Policy and is not financed in whole c r in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY- 1987(10-21-87) WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Association policy is used os o Standard Coverage Policy and not as on Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 6 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. (continued on back) SCHEDULE This policy does not insure against loss or damage(and the Company will not pay costs,attorneys'fees or expenses)which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights,interests,or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements,claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims;reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;water rights,claims or title to water. 6. Any lien,or right to a lien,for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 8. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY- 1987 (10-21.87) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs,attorneys'fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a)Any law,ordinance orgovernmental regulation(including butnot limited to building and zoning laws,ordinances,orregulations)restricting,regulating,prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,use,or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensionsor area of the land crony parcel of which the land is orwas apart;or (iv) environmental protection,or the effect of any violation of these laws,ordinances or governmental regulations,except to the extentthot a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (6)Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a viola- tion or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rightsof eminentdomain unlessnoticeof the exercise thereof hosbeen recorded inthepublic records at Dateof Policy,butnotexcluding from coverage any taking which hasoccurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters: (a)created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b)not known to the Company,not recorded in the public records of Dateof Policy,but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c)resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d)attaching or created subsequent to.Date of Policy;or - (e)resulting in.loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant hod paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 9. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER POLICY- 1987(10-21-87) WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS W hen the American Land Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as on Extended Coverage Policy the-exclusions set forth in paragraph 8 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULEB This policy does not insured against loss or damage(and the Company will not pay costs,attorneys'fees or expenses)which arise by reason of: Part One: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts,rights, interests,or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements,claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other fads which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims;reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;water rights,claims or title to water. 6. Any lien,or right to a lien,for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed by low and not shown by the public records. 10. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY- 1987 EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B,you are not insured against loss,costs,attorneys'fees and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning: • land use • land division • improvements on the land • environmental protection This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters which appear in the public records at Policy Date. This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks. 2. The right to take the land by condemning it,unless: • a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records on the Policy Date ' • the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding on you if you bought the land without knowing of the taking 3. Title Risks: • that are created,allowed,or agreed to by you • that ore known to you,but not to us,on the Policy Date unless they appeared in the public records _ • that result in no loss to you • that first affect your title after the Policy Date this does not limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks 4. ' Failure to pay value for your title. _ 5. Lack of o right: • to any land outside the area spedr -'1v described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A or • in streets,alleys,or waterways the h your land /^' • This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title Risks. 7i CASE NO. ��ao Environmental Assessment Form TO THE APPLICANT: Your cooperation in completing this form and supplying the information requested will expedite City review of your application pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The City is required to make an environmental assessment on all projects which it exercises discretionary approval over. Applications submitted will not be considered complete until all information necessary to make the environmental assessment is complete. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Name, address , and telephone number of owner, applicant or project sponsor: 8/2TG.UEQ —QiiNs/4wq 3 06go �dS✓Jw10 9 z y 7 i 2. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted con- cerning the project (such as architect, engineer, or other repre-sentative) : .C�1NG ,llssoc%¢r�s /,✓c _ .4e -7-7 Lo7--1 1Z U�,e ���� � 5��✓�� C,v 9z264 327 7786 3. Common name of project (if any) : .410A&r TN�S Tic�E 4. Project location (street address or general location) : o,0 Ecc�ec Urt/✓E pc� sodY eveff NE .G4/GES' o_/�c7- 5. Precise legal description of propert meets & bounds i (lot and tract number, or ' of sF �4 alr S cTio.�J /D T S S�� �2. ti E s B,B E yI 6. Proposed use of the site (project for which the form is filed; describe the total undertaking, not just the current application approval being sought) :_ CONST,wcT .%O sjoo�rigL Lo 7-S. 7. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects (describe how this project relates to other activities , phases , and develop- ments planned, or now underway) : 8. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, to go forgard, including those required by the City, Regional , State and Federal agencies (indicate sub- sequent approval agency name, and type of approval :required) �NGia s/6t�F-,Pr, -,civo� .�4o�r /.��v.¢o✓s,�s ed) q s EXISTING CONDITIONS : 9. Project site area: 6 (Size of r � -5'�7Acres property in sq. ft. or acreage) 10. Present zoning: 'P,Q-S (Proposed zoning) : ,%y,.�� 11 . General Plan land use designation: 12. Existing use of the project site: �2�rs��7 !J.✓/wspts 13. Existing use on adjacent properties : (Example - North, Shopping Center; South, Single Family Dwellings; East, Vacant, etc. ). 14. Site topography (describe) : osoha6� /ergs 15. Are there any natural or manmade drainage channels through or adjacent to the property? NO !/ YES 16. Grading (estimate number of cubic yards of dirt being moved) : �.S Do0 C. y 17. List the number, size and type of trees being removed: 18. Describe any cultural , historic, or scenic aspects of the project 19. Residential Project (if not residential do NOT answer) A. Number and type of dwelling units (Specify no. of bedrooms) : B. Schedule of unit sizes : C. Number of stories Height feet. D. Largest single building (sq. ft. ) (hgt. ) E. Type of household size expected (population projection for the project) : F. Describe the number and type of recreational facilities : G. Is there any night lighting of the project: H. Range of sales prices or rents : $ to $ I. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 0 Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . . . . % Landscaping, Open, Recreation Area . . . . . . % i 20. Comm er ia1 , Industrial , Institutional or Other Project: A. Type of use(s) and major function(s) ( if offices , specify type & number) : B. Number of square feet in total building area : C. Number of stories Height feet. D. Largest single building (Sq. Ft. ) (Hgt. ) E. Number of square feet in outdoor storage area: F. Total number of required parking spaces number provided ' G: Hours of operation: H. Maximum number of clients, patrons , shoppers , etc. , at one time: I. Maximum number of employees at one time: J. If patron seating is involved, state the number: K. Is there any night lighting of the project: Yes No L. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . Landscaping and Open Space (Recreation) . . . o i Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects : Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary) . YES NO , 21 . Change in existing features of hillsides , or substantial alteration of ground contours. 22. Change in the dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the project vicinity. 23. Subject to or resulting in soil errosion by wind or flooding. 24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 25. Change in existing noise or vibration level in the vicinity. Subject to roadway or airport noise (has the required acoustical report been submitted?) 26. Involves the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances , flammables or explosives. 27. Involves the use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy. 28. Changes the demand for municipal services (police, fire, sewage, etc. ) 29. Changes the demand for utility services , beyond those presently available or planned in the near future. 30. Significantly affects any unique or natural features, including mature trees. 31 . Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public land or public roads. 32. Results in the dislocation of people. i YES NO 33. Generates controversy based on aesthetics or other features of the project. [ ] Additional explanation of "yes" answers attached. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation, to the best of my ability, and that the facts , statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of my,knowledge and belief. .eaa r TLo7-1ro ttJG r,K5 �,c� ,- N Print or Type For f . ,,4,v ignature Date INITIAL STUDY FEE: $30. 00 (Make check payable to the City of Palm Desert and sub— mit with this form. ) i C�04�1 .1�;7J,Ir� pl°Ql��il DG�C�G�� FoRm N®o 73-510 Fred-Waring Dr., Palm Desert, Ca. 922130 TENT41ARML MAP %PPLOCA70H nRYA . Dept.of Planning and Community Development Applicant (Dose W� i�n', y 72 O/O !/AAZAIIE i- .paonTelephone ska~oG 90 Mallinq Address �/OdSAtJO / 4L�15 l.� 977-2 ZID Code City Sfare REQUEST! (Describe specific nature of approval requested I. , �pi-ad�tG 49 7—Z' /119 LoT 4;1::o%s�o/ S�6dr/isforl PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: T/DnAI �O %/OeJ ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONING P R Property Owner Authorization The und"gnod states that they are the owner(s) of the property described herein and hereby give author• izotion for the-Piing of this appliccatiti-onn•.. I nature Date Agreement absolving Me Im Dsss" of all liabtltties rotative to any deed restrictions. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve ft/e City, Galcable tom/o1 the Desert at all described regar ding ng any deed restrictions 2 that y ' Signature Date — Applicants Signature Signature Date (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status Accepted by: ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. 2 (� ❑ Categorical Exemption ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ Other Reference Case No. TENTATIVE MAP TRACT NO,. 25711 ti o �I THE N. E. 1 /4 OF THE S . E . 1 /4 OF SEC . 10 T. 5S. R. 6E.> S. B. B. & M . IN THE COUNTYOF > rN RIVERSIDE , CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA . JANUARY, 1990 N \'\ ✓ N 1, 3- P.90=,3�(o PAD=39� I PAp=339 P,40=335 PAO=3,q0 PA0=3Z.� P,qp=32./ A40=3i7 PAO.3/2 PAO, -8 PAv-3o.4 P.1110 ./ �� - �„ F.F. -35./ F.F. '.34•� F.F. =`34.4 FF. '340 FFr335 �F. =33/ F.F.-32.& F.F.=3Z2 -r 3l7 F.F. -J+•3 F.F. =30.9 \ F•F-3o. . 10 17 r, ` OWNER PAD=34 8 h5 �3 i I �p �� I 3 ! SRO ssn�Ati S p 1 A o� , � 21 I V1/L L ER ENTERf'�/SES �h� nib y'�Z '1��� ��c t 3� .° h� • ' 3��.t I �I _ X� ,qo i 2 . 9� SC,4LE� /"=BrO 4 OLiFORN/A GENERi4�9C 90 �o 90 90 �u �1 �- F.F. 5TQEET aso06 z� lr/ z I �. . oo-r.c. Burp/ 5 a rc. . '\ � �/✓'/ �� / o 5 0 0 o 3 3 9 h 6 5 2 6 2 ti A� 3 o ti 6 , h o ca o C L 0 � c- 3�A' ti9 L 1.9 p• / 3 (,• i .SUBL7/V�L7LC� PAD=34 PAv=33.� PA 33 5 PAD-330 P,4 32•!o PAD-3t./ P,4D=3/.7 >Ao=30.4 8 �_ � PAD=3/.3 P,ov=3o8 P�40=30•� 9 �9 _ titi h p �\ FF. -3S3 FF=344 F. F. =34.0 ,:F.=33.6 F.i. =33•/ o F.F.=3Zlo F.F.=32.2 o F.F.=3/.8 o F.F.=3✓.3 a F.F.=3/./ 9 c � . �� -�� m a 0 4 6q c�.ti�E e �. �K � � \ �^ � � � f o lO 59 5T SGv , 5 �'� 53Igo 52 l 8 f f iv �I ti 'h 9, 1• � 3 b Y,`rll 'L 5 , � PAv=3d•8/ 4� PAD=35.5 �, /I f 20 Pi40=3S.10 �� �P.4v=374 3 3�.5� PAO 3T.4 b,�. ��'' !(a/' �.- ,� =3S8 �.� n� �s.0co P.9o=35.8 o=3Gt9 K wL 4SSOC/l1TE5, //vC F•F. =379 F.F.=37.9 FF.r:31o3 FF'3lo•3 F.F. =3/.4 Y1 = 7/Z E0GENE ROAD f-�, F.F. -3�•D F 53, f o FF 3i3 R 0 g0:c f'QL M SPR/A/G,5) C,4 92 2 6 4 & T TZ o z �3 �' ti �� /30 /9) z 7 - »B6 l ° 6v ° �° P tih 9 y�° `� 3h 1 M PAO=3lo.0 h /08' `V 0, Q PAO=3/.2 /►� 3 ��"� U T/L 171,65 �i4D=36.0 �w ^9rg7/ 9 oI PAD=37./ 4 PAO=.3/Q 30 / 2� �'` 1 h 4 ' 4 . COACNEL L 4 l/�4L L E W,4 TEF{ O S R/C T / c Y =3�'G F =.77l0 .F. = D /cF. -3 - /•9 - 2 TUTU E BY OTHERS F .3�•5 F.F. 3 r� Q F•F. /. A' ,4 / R/V/4 G C O �- i t f,. I � 3 7 � ,NON. GAS SOf/T/-/ER C L FO ,4 S i32 W 3 p 3�% \ �' 9A 3 �• 49 �/ �'c 1 �QZ �� � T �'c �Q8 7� 1 1 74 C' 30" (� -- - EcECTfl/C SUU7NEREN C,4C/FU4.1 ;'9 F_Pi5%Cn N' LQ d V 9 o Q �' 9 G 1 1Q 5w�nc4lX ! TEL E,� ONE GENER L TELEf'f-('7� _ h e �.v p a' I o B to 4 I $CHGL�L L l_57,0/CT oESEPT 9ANl�'S UiU/�/E� SGMGi�L O/STP/CT 3 G / G /40 /�8' / ' 1� b } S' 2 I GABLE Tl� PALMEP CABLE !//siON �� l3�' /40' �� t PAD=3iC. ��. 9 i �,; u v2 , , '/4 /Fr 2% 2^�. FT T P,4D=3/v2 �' � PAo=3lo.S 35e. IR o,4v=.'4' •Z °5Af PAOr3oe8 PAD=34.5 IfbTt ��•$°�F,F=32./ t ill /i�,'/� GENEF�AL NOTES �Q I tiJ' G B' CURB £' 4PPROX /JRE4 4',1 S r 4 �� F•f•r9&-7 F.F. =37.0 ,� F.F, =.3(o.T F.F.=35.3 1y =35.0 =325 2 8 Cum /3 \, A ,�� 0 v P al durTEe A C. lll-r 'OVE2 GUTrEQ PRESENT ZON//V G P!�' S 19 1 1 7� CL455 AGG. BASF OROPOSEO ZON/NG v f� S o, 9 d > s A a 0 � k c �� r . L FX 7:NG 4/1 0 CJS�- V 4C,4A T Y111 . i-hh G �°�' 3 �.2s 1 �/ 3a.Te ZE e'3 / T T.` 0 a/ f ' --- � 1C, Z 5 C ion PRO POSE-"O L ANO �/SE /O�S/NG,E `-A ti1/, ;� -�:T> . .c E - - -- - A/T.S. sE� r - - a.sa/o � �,e o•so� �, sAit/vC•95r E LAit/E _ __ Y�op F. . . 0• _ ba �J ' �fG �IV /� � � �' ,� >�� �,�? �,, �,, i Mkt. o (7 Z 1 / o/ Q2 0, h fi 21. I ,�cL/ �. ? � op1 a R a �' v PAD=3(o.0 P.9D'3�o•O DADs35(o PA0=35./ PAv=54.7 PAvs I ���.t Q �''° R=�D' O, Q �� n 3 .34 e P.►v=33.8 P,4D33.3 PAD=32 9 8' �I - � � � AF.F.=3G.5 F.F. =36.5 F.F. =3�./ F.`F.=35.� " FF=352 F.F.=3�A.7 r'' F.F,=343 "� F.F. -33.8 n' F.F.=33•¢ � � yo��c �r � �� 3' �•�_ _ � 55' 55' XP . . � ,I�4' _ ��� 8 Z � � 8� 7.9 ,78 77 ��D /Z n --- IAv=3i 3 �i 0AZ=A1 Al� b.-. 3 v 3i (� �h SPACE 30. . 47 A 3 41 �i� i P.9D=349 � 'h• t. � y.5 /, - v �s ,«% 0 � � F.F. -3/.$ Z� .� 9' 9 34 101 PAv=35.� _ ° o%ciL quo PAO 39r, c P,4D=34.3 ,c3 A t, , ot64 !0 AD=3Q3 FG. � - �� W -- � � i � � � �� � h ` •�4 h� Q I',y " 3�•f � 0 /Q8 � ° B"Gv,PB �g"cuzBE Al �• - -_ O 3 t 0 0 F GurrE,e GcAs51rAGG a4sE .4C PdM'T a�EP GurrE'2 PAv=34.4 0 190,E PAO 3SD '��t7' > ' /¢D' �v F.F. =3/.2 �, 2(0 a� PxVr_435�� s _ A� ti9�. TrIc7le IL 5ECT101V _ _ P340-34.2 n, T S FF=349 � F.F-3✓F.5 tis F.P'-35.5 �, F.F. -34d vs P,4v334 � L9? FF. 3 ti/ y=tea•/ O ELGY.P,4Gt� DAP/!�E P � L .b �.3� 0 4T �� �� �.94 A _ ;� Me o o /OT pxa ,3o•0 tF.0 A- �, � � /t�p rn 8� ��f� - - ----- ��C � �F� ;4� �o>D F.F. X.33.a Ql L ;� 46' �l 4/ � `V J 0 90 1 /ioc ZT ti(�c o F.F.=33.5 _ �I f F.F. =34•Z �,� I �F. =342 F.F=32.8 '�1j o PAD=3Z./ � � o I� / 8 /d3 - � : A �' o �� � - I � A - �o F.[a � � � �� FF. 29.9 � 2� 'h10 � ''G'U,PB �' U7TE�P � Cn" GU,?B E GUTTEiP - PAv=385 D-3Z 3 3a O G 3� A ��� P.o-3i/ �� _ 9 V510. o - _ - °i -- - 3 F.`"-33.0 v� FF� 32.8 FF. -3/•!0 �� � F.F. =3/•Z � P.4D=29.o ��a � F.F=33.3 F G 0 9 ti� A s �I G 9 3 c 3 % 2�.c �r ,/ F.F. =Z9.5 tig A C. oYM'r O✓ER I C p --- � <+8 / / Qy` �� P.00=Zg$ GLA55 lI AGG BA5E n , k^ �0��. ��� 1�9,�G� "� �0�y/ ���� C� 6 2 05 �/ •,2�� , vo ��� ��� TiP T ���. �� I - = 9 ¢ TY�/CAL 5'ECT/D�l/ B S EE _ �1�1 ` ��_ Al T5. 1A1TE�P/DAP ST�PEET 5' r /tot)G /0ti PAD-3Z9 P,4D=32�T DAD=32.4 PAO=3✓9 P.4D=3/-a I PAD=3/•O PA0=3o?S P.ID=3o•/ PAD=29.10 PAO= 9.2 PAO=28/ ti� �\� �� 2� - - +' =32.4 h1 Fes' M1 =30/ .7 F v=Z8.3 Nk-li: 3/.D =30. FF FF=2 �F.=29.2 A OTf \ �!32 33 34 3 369 7 3 39� 41 w91`. - �, g � 2 PRO✓EC v ti ti�f�. 3 G �ti�0• 31�G 13��b D.�oD9'o \ 25�°0 5 9ge 25° J 2A� 1 VIC//v/ T Y M,4 P Q 1• �,.�• � • �5f1�!/OC,95'TL E' L.4/t/E -� -- 2 2 5EGT/0A.1 A -A SC,4�E h�.PiL• /"_go � r ��.�� �-r �:� ��� �/w w �° L`•3 I O/lO=3(e.0 � PA = (e.0 � PAD=�S.lo 1 -_ - _-- --� .,- 3V - } Z I -- - 1 - -- -- - - - 39 39 - - - _ - --- _ 7 - 32 T!o ovE u - AREA o #� 32 -- - W - _ - - - - - - i i 1 PRELIMINARY TREE LIST SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME' M NT RRA - BUTIA CaPITATA PINDO PALM PREPARED F . CHAMAEROPS HUMALI MEDITERRANEAN' FAU'PALM AFFILIATED CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. • 7- 00 -AVENUE OF THE STATES - - i _ cb 0 CYCAS REVO UTA SAGO PALM DESERT, _ - -----CALIFORNIA 92260 1 345-2626(619) u� ��A • i c Su eta c• _ IF I 0 • - JACARANDA ACT U tAA w x, x j - - ' - -- - - ---f yMo v a • r- AUTO GATES • PROJECT PILASTERS r• • ?� low SIR 20% MOW RMILM"EMM-Aftka Z I( PERIMETER WALL BRIDCIES , D - - k WASHINOTONIA ROBU TA MEXICAN FAIN PALM s f-5roYw ............................ . l G LO t4 tooX -0A I I ' i _ 1 3AC, . 12 — I s \ 1 l k4jA I t A o GROUNDCOVERS & SHRUBS _ I • 1. Jr ..1 ` •' , - - _ ' `,=: ;- _-•i_. - -: f,-!- . - - ""`J - Jam- - • . • __ - _._. - IL •�' '� i''�• '• - - -------- — - -- - -- — - -- - - - -- I RIVEPosep DIDAj &&rt Room ark /2/,e U VLOVA J A eo(0 . .� �Qi1/1 bl W � . ��e ELDORADO 1 S GUARDHOUSE e - - PROJECT SIGN MONUMENTATI f EDWOOD HEADER �VNt e- � NORTH 1 0' S �� WATERFALL & PONDW vod� 6 0 WIDE MEANDERING SIDEWALK Qi� N • 7 Scale. 1 = 20 -0 � � s'j �� • r� _ N oo � LIFESCAPES INC. ' Planners, Landscape Architects RY/ STREETSCAPE I I I A W � 11 III 1A% 1 L 4: Alk 12 1 1 Im L I I 11 TRACT 25711 jAf wo*4 4930 Campus Drive MEN Newport Beach, California (714) 476-8888 JOB NO. # 1716 DATE 6/ .J90 .. i I± i N RY TR T CA I i PRELIMINARY TREE LIST SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME ' . 11(%wAI)i1: FDAl), COMMON NAME ACT 25711 BUTIA C�l'PITATA PINDO PALM - PREPARED FOR: o CHAM PS HUMILIS� MEDITERRANEAN" FAN•^ BIRTCHER/DUNHAM i 72120 MANUFACTURING ROAD SUITE K I THOUSAND PALMS, CALIFORNIA 92276SAGO • 0 CYCAS REVOLUTA 4 _ 30 . � R (619) 3 3 23 • • - o FICUS MICROCARPA NITIGA. MAN LAUREL FIG i ANDA ACUTIFOLIA JACARANDA • , i • i y • MOLLE CALIFORNIA t PROJECT PILASTERS AUTO GATES SCHINUS TEREBINTHIFOLIUS BR AZILIAN PE PPER TREE _ n PERIMETER WALL BR ID IDCIES to '� WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA MEXICAN FAN PALM r - rn x i 1 GROUNDCO EFTS & SHRUBS TURF 7tIlk _ i - .gam r'1 Y • •f ' , I 1 ` f • , •1 • - - _ L 'T_,_ • _ • '• - •. '.. _ • ; ,. I DRIVE ELDORADC GUARDHOUSE PROJECT SIGN MONUMENTATION REDWOOD HEADER NORTH WATERFALL & POND 6"-0" WIDE MEANDERING SIDEWALK Scale: 1": 20'-0" LIFESCAPES, INC. Planners, Landscape Architects E T PE :11 I:= Im I I I 1 11 AI)i I Im AI)i 1 1:) 4930 Campus Drive MONTERRA 11 TR TWI Newport Beach, California - (714) 476-8888 Y�►Y 171991 JOB NO. # 1716 DATE: 8/22/90 IIIIIIIIIIIPAUM IIAawlmw L 'AmmoRkAwwk S I 'IZE IIIIACPAM SMAUA SOW PC" x w W04WICHM)HPOPULMRS soms"a Cx Coo""Vamw SONDIM FIAW ICff" Cff"0%PANW10% ^AM"IMADW my"N" 1ACA I110 mosom CmAww CHUM Ift"LAMM 0 IImum adift,III1VAN 12' F II HTS IIIGAL 5 G,�kl-5GAL IIGAL II5 G� III U:�k L G�L I5 G 5 GAL 5 GAL,5 G�%L IM %NG 5 GA%L DOS NERI WARF G 41-5 I..... PF PHO" ED LEAF PHOTIIJIA 5 G RIM RAPHIOLEPIS 1. 'MAJESTIC BEA DtA HAWTHORN RUP RUELLIA PENINSULARIS RUELLIA 5 GAL SL SALVIA LEUCANTHA MEXICAN SAGE I GAL xCC XYLOSMA CONGESTUM 'COMPACTA' DWARF XYLOSMA GAL PAPjT -AE A!�AVE VICTORIAE-REGINAE QUEEN VICTORIA AGAVE 5 AV AGAVE VILMORINIANA OCTOPUS AGAVE 3 DIA ICE CERE��S PERLJVIANUS PERUVIAN APPLE 3 4 DW DASYLIRION WHEELERI DESERT SPOON 5 GAL EC ECHINOCACTUS GR GOLDEN BARREL C 12' 18" DIA EUM EUPHORBIA MI CROWN 9 -HQR II74 ISOREENING RU", TaAm V"OMCKAMR JM&#AW* IIIIIIIIIIipow-II-j- d by ffi ct,wner b ISU Contractor, please contact the developer for status oy ed and civil action taken Imat�rial is lu red scale (Aonidrella Auranti w w Icc IILF r IIff- %9 A r%IIN F P A LMSq FLOWERIN G D I N G 0 Iz EXISTING PLANTING TO REMAIN H A 4 S PROJ. NO: 9519 II0 3 / 27 /95 IMAIN ENTRY+4 ITRAP FENCE IW / 20' GATE APPIAN ti-T IKING TO REMAIN IIIIIII -7w W IISHEET NO:IItIIII