The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTT 26123 TT 26757 INDIAN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB FILE 1 1990 TENTATIVE TRACT - ISE pLAN PARCEL MAP 4 Ci jANGE__------ z VA�ANCE��._- G.0 F�- REFER 1G APPLICAW QUE EXISTIN ZONE PREPARATION PROGRESS DATE BY COMMENTS APPLICATION RECEIVED LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT NOTICES SENT FIELD INVESTIGATION JEPTS. NOTIFIED BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE POLICE RECREATION & PARKS L T VE-- SCHOOL DISTRICT OtStON OF HIGHWAYS MRIEPORT OD CONTROL �L FINAL PLAN APPROVAL PRECISE PLAN (6) LANDSCAPING PLAN (5) PLAN. DIRECTOR MOD. (6) HEARINGS & ACTIONS DATE ACTION VOTE REVIEW BOARD HEARING PC. HEARING PUBLISHED PC. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT NOTIFIED CC,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. ,SOLUTION NO. EFFECTIVE DATE DRIED FOR DATA-BANK Ar' CORRECTED '` n 1 d I`l c/o, lv ' t ^, (f EN61NEEitINA SERVICE COR1ppA;IpM � P CAPMIATAWS M GVl Qf/Oeogown a LUO PLAWWW 9 rAt N.C."KAYE`SCHURKENS PLANNING MANAGER 72,7pp EL PASED SUITE E 1 W6T3i 56BSJ67 PALM DESERT CALIFO NLA 922W EAi(;0:37 3a'-3:i3G , `s/7 1_ VUIS� fRI[ 73-510 FRED NG DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92250 O R rn � A W m6 RUBIN JD SEYMDUR l go RUBIN NESTINE G c12 s4 4211 FIRESIDE C CW] IRYSNE>, CA 92714 W C.3 632270029-1 ILILII „I „II,LJ„I1IJ11LJIL1 �l.a L LF/ 2 5 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 0 cn � BUSSEY PATRICIA J W � 155 BIRCHBARK PL &� DANVILLEP CA 94526 Ww F eU55Z'=5 945063ol;m 1b81 o9i24.f30 U) FGRL.dr'aR.DIMG TIME EXPIRED 4453 rDEERFIELD WAY DANVILLE CA 9452& RETURN TO SENDER <� 1F i 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 Cl No Such Naeber oVecant ❑Athmpyd Npf r__ "T�'"/�_�No Mei�Ikht W rn �� Route Number W kiHITE TH MAS N U a � WIN 'E C ERYL L W w 20542 INGSBURY ST N CHAT CRTHV CA 91311 / 6321 1018-5 l L 1 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 OASIS PALM DESERT HOMEOWNERS ASSN ' C/O KINDEL C ANDERSON 4000 MACARTHUR BLV NO 1000 NEWPORT BEACHIII, CA 92660 1034-6 Vol T Fomwar,di Qrder,, 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 m o - 1 LII rn DOUGLAS MICHAEL S — DOUGLAS JEANINE T 1-4 E> 3632E N DOUGtAS TER \ V > �s GURNEE>, Il 696201037 9 o 25 D MOSS848#RETURNSTO4SENDER 10/23/90 1 � 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 922( UNABLE TO FORWARD o RETURN TO SENDER M rn MOSS BARB , -_ - - - - - - - - - rn MOSS SARAH K R31 . cz Et 3.9648 PACIFIC COAST HWY V ►- MAIIBU* CA - 902b5 W 6 626191040-1 a OCT I":: r:! .'t; 2 5 is 73.610 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 - �. TER 38 922603013 1889 10/19/90 TER FORIARDDING TIME EXPIRED (� RY ORIN 45 INGUS MOUNTAIN RD ' O � T Y BETTY SEDO AZ 86336-5829 RETURN TO SENDER 762 HONEYSUCKLE LN m rn PALM ESERT CA 92260 � o �IJ lS Eiv 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORN IA 922 0 14 W o h M 0 1gRUBIN JDEL SEYMO €PRUBIN ERNESTIN G c� w§ 4211 FIRESIDE CIR l-- gas IRYINEi, CA 92724 Qi q 632270029-1 ii,i„�,LIL„I,,,iI,L•�I„I,L�61„JU,,,iJJJ 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 Lj rn DAVIS PALM DESERT ASSN 9 2 o t/p KINDEL 6 ANDERSON Ld ' dF 4000 MAGARTHUR BLY NO 1000 92660 634101034-6 El F� �P NEMPORI BEAGH9 CA zit EIU�� lCkQCR Z8rding Order Expirea it 73-570 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 M NJrn WRIGHT NORMAN n 0 617 MARIPOSA AVE EL SEGUND09 CA 90245 . 4 632293021-4 � o a f MMW A ftHHD � 73-510 FRED WARING DR E,PALM DESER , ALIFRiJIA9 LO sd 6o cz ;g W F- W �_ o = LIP D O LEY MICHAEL W ET AL 2190 TQ E CENTER PL 317 ANAHEIM# CA 92806 _ :-.-- 632171019-6 II t• r- . � �, i � �.of I�rJ� 'I4�A 3l�I ��• IIII �n;ei.� i � J. ��I�Illllt'�i?�!'ilfil1�1U1!�3� (C- 00 C T 1',7 9 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 M ® @ a' BARTON ROBERT O t1c RAMPTON SUZANNE v F€ 1125 E MAPLE ST NO 15 p GLENDALE--'=A— RAMP125 912052007 IN RETURN TO SENDER 10/18/90 NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE FORWARDUNABLE TO RETURN TO SENDER CASE 50 . 4� =M1R0Pi':=rrAL SERVICES DEPT . IiIITIAL STUDY &`IVIROit E,YTAL EVALUAT1011 CSECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIROFUIENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers , possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets ) . Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in . geologic substructures? — — b. Oisruptions , displacements , compaction, or �. overcovering of the sail ? — c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? — — d. The destruction, covering , or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? — — 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? — — b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature , or any change in climate, — — either locally or regionally? • z, Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a._ C.hanges . in currents , •or the course or — 1 direction of water' movements? ^ b. Changes in-absorption rates , drainage patterns, or the rate and- amount of — — surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of — — flood waters? d. Alteration of .the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ e. Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or with- drawals , or through interception of an - aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? 1. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of plants ( including trees , shrubs , grass , and — — craps )'. b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare, ' or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? S. Animal. life. Will ,the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numoers of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles , or insects )? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare , or endangered species of animals? _ c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area , or result to a barrier to _ the migration or movement of animals? d . 0eterioration to existing wildlife hablta+ L • ' Yes Mavbe No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in : a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Oepletion of any non-renewable natural resource? k 7. Eneray. Will the proposal result in: LEI a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ b. Oemand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.dezelopment of new sources of energy? 8. Risk of Uoset. . Does the proposal involve a risk or an explosion or the release of , hazardous substances ( including, but not limited to , pesticides , oil , chemicals , or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? _ 9. E^anomie Loss . Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? b. A change in the value of property and ,p imprc-,ements exposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted community risk standards ? 10. Noise. 'Jill the proposal increase existing noise levels to the point at which accepted c=unity noise and vibration levels are exceeded? li . Land 'use. Will the proposal result in the a tTereration of the present developed or planned land use of an area? 12. OOen SOace. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in the !emount of designated open space? \ � 13 . Pcoulation. Will the proposal result in: 7"X"' a. Alteraticn or the location, distribution , density, or growth rate of the human population of the Citv? b. Change in the population distribution by L� aye , income, religion, racial , or ethnic grcup , occupational class , hcuseho-ld type? • 4 Yes Maybe No 14. Emoloyment. Will the proposal result in additional new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed , unemployed, and underemployed? 15 . Housino. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of - families in various income classes in the City? b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 16 . Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: ' a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists , or pedestrians? _ ' 17 . Public Services . Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following are!$: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? _ c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? — — f. Other governmental services? 5. Yes Maybe 4o 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures )? 19. Utilities ._ . Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities : r a. Power or natural gas? b. Comrunications system? C. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? _ e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal ? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health — — care provided? 21 . Social Se riices. Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general — social services? _ ZZ. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in: , a . Obstruction of any scenic vista• or view, open to the public? 74 b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area ) attractiveness , pleasantness , — — and uniqueness? 23. Licht and Glare. Will the proposal produce —new I ignt or g are? 24 . Archeoloaical/Historical . Will the proposal result in an a ceracion of a significant archeological or historical site, structure , — object, or building? Yes Maybe No 25 . Mandatory Findings of Sioni�icance. . a. Odes the- project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail 1/ the diversity in the environment? b. Ooes the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental .goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief , definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into I the future. ) — — c. Odes the project have impacts which are indi - vidually limited. but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total Of those impacts an the environment is significant. ) d. Odes the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: f INITIAL STUDY CASE NO. C/Z 90-9 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST CCNMEgM AND POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES (CATEGORIES PERTAIN TO ATTACHED aiECKLIST) 1. EARTH a. The project will result in grading. Such grading will not result in any alterations to geologic substructures. The site is relatively flat so that grading will not create unstable earth conditions. b. As part of the normal grading activity soil will be moved, displaced, over-covered and compacted. This activity will be done per permit and approved grading plans to assure that the site is properly prepared for the structural development which will take place on the site. C. The site is relative flat and changes in topography and surface relief will be required to assure proper drainage and avoid increased runoff to adjoining properties. The after condition of the property will result in less water runoff from the property to adjoining properties, and better direction. d. The site does not contain any unique geologic or physical features. e. The project as stated previously will result in less potential water damage to the site, through proper grading, resulting in the appropriate directing of runoff from the site. Mitigation Measures The City of Palm Desert grading and building permits procedures require detailed geotectmoal reports addressing grading specifications and the settlement and expansive characteristics of on-site soils. All structures must be designed by UBC requirements to insure that the buildings are constructed within the acceptable level of risk set forth therein for the type of building and occupancies being developed. 2. AIR a. During construction, particularly grading, a potential dust problem will be a short-tern impact. Requiring that the grand be moistened during days in which grading occurs will mitigate this problem. This is required by City of Palm Desert Grading Ordinance. Because the site is already an urbanized setting its development will not result in an overall deterioration of ambient air quality. This conclusion is supported by the discussions relating to air quality contained in a 1985 draft environmental impact report prepared for the City of Rancho Mirage by Michael Brandman Associates entitled "Park View Drive Land Use Study". i INITIAL STMY C/z 9o-9 b. The land uses permitted in the PR zone do not provide for any odorous land uses. C. Development of this site per the PR zone will not result in any climatic changes. This is due to the limited uses permitted in the PR zone. 3. WATER a. Water will be redirected to drainage facilities designed and constructed to accept the water from the site. b. The site will absorb less water due to building coverage. The landscaped areas will absorb water because of the plant material. The alterations in drainage patterns will result in a benefit to adjoining property as it will be directed in a control manner. C. See b. d. At this time the project is to prezone the site to facilitate annexation to the city. Future development proposals may impact on the ground waters. Further review will be undertaker when a specific development proposal is received. e. See d. f. While any development results in the use of water and, therefore, reduces the amount otherwise available for public water supplies; the Coachella Valley Water District assures that there is sufficient water supplies to accommodate this growth. In addition, the Coachella Valley Water District plans to construct additional water facilities in the Palm Desert area to accommodate current and future development. 4. PLANT LIFE a. Presently the site contains weeds and sagebrush. The project when completed will introduce a diversity of species to the site. The plants that will be introduced to the site will, however, be material previously used in the desert. b. The site does not contain any unique, rare or endangered species of plant life. C. It is extremely doubtful that the project will introduce any new species into the area. In any event the landscape plan will be 2 INITIAL STUDY C/Z 90-9 reviewed by the architectural inspector of Riverside County to assure that the plants being used do not pose a hazard to agricultural production in the area. 5. ANIMAL LIFE a. The proposed prezoning to PR will not increase or decrease the variety of animal life on the site. b. The site has been identified as being habitat area for the Coachella Valley Fringe Toed Lizard, an endangered species. As mitigation the developer will be required to pay into a fund which will purchase habitat area on the north side of I-10. C. See b and c. d. The project site is an in-fill site and not a suitable long-term habitat for wildlife. 6. NATURAL RESOURCES a. The project will obviously use natural resources, but will not significantly increase the rate of usage of these resources. b. All material resources used on the site are renewable. 7. a. & b. No more than normal usage. In addition, since any future project will be required to comply with the most current state energy codes, energy usage will be less than on previous projects of a similar nature. 8. The site does not contain any substances that could result in explosion or escape of hazardous materials. 9. a. As discussed earlier future development will have a positive impact in terms of drainage impacts an adjacent properties. b. Properties in the area are not subject to unusual geologic hazards. The project will not effect that hazard. 10. NOISE Construction of a residential community will increase ambient noise level. The increase will not be above acceptable community standards. 3 INITI AL STUDY C/Z 90-9 Mitigation Measures Strict adherence to construction hours and days will be required. Additional measures to mitigate traffic and operational noise will be required. Noise from truck deliveries may not exceed the noise levels set forth in the General Plan Noise Element. 11. LAND USE The project will not alter the present developed land uses in the area. The planned land use for the area is identified as low density residential. A low density residential land use is consistent in the area. 12. OPEN SPACE The site in question .is designated as low density residential; its development, therefore, will not result in a reduction in the amount of designated open space. 13. POPULATION a. The prezoning to PR-5 zoning of vacant land will not result in changes in location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the city's population. This zoning land use and density was anticipated in the north sphere specific plan. b. The project will not generate changes in the socio-economic characteristics of the area. 14. EMPLOYNRM While the project will provide a number of new jobs in terms of the value as a whole, in and of itself, it is minor. Most of the jobs created, however, will be filled by residents of the area or those who have come to the valley for other reasons. 15. HOUSING a. The project will not charge the housing picture in the community or region. This is based on the conclusions reached in items 13 and 14. In addition there is currently a large inventory of unsold housing units in the valley; in addition to the number of rental units being developed. b. None - covered in item 15 a. 4 INITIAL STUDY C/Z 90-9 16. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION a. Ultimate development of the property from its vacant state will generate additional traffic movements. The specific plan designated the site for low density residential and the proposed prezoning is consistent with the specific plan. When an actual development proposal is received it will be analyzed based on the actual number of units proposed, its overall potential occupancy rate and the location of points of ingress/egress. b. 'There will be a demand for additional parking facilities which will be supplied by the project an site. C. Except for additional vehicular movements discussed above the project should not generate additional demands on existing transportation systems. In addition these systems have extensive additional capacity. d. Ultimate development of the site may alter the pattern of circulation in that 42nd Avenue (Hovley Lane) will became a complete through street as a condition of development of the property. This will offer a new alternative for east/west traffic and may reduce traffic on other east/west arterials (i.e. Fred Waring Drive, Highway 111 and Country Club). e. Implementation of the mitigation measures as will be conditioned in the tentative map and precise plan should be positive. There are problems currently existing on Country Club Drive and the public improvements required of the applicant will alleviate some of them. 17. PUBLIC SERVICE a-f. None. The property is presently vacant and serves no productive use. A commitment to urban uses was made as the area surrounding the study area has been developed, and the general plan and designated the area for residential development. Infrastructure improvements (i.e. : streets and utilities) have been made and are adequate to serve the proposed development. The proposed land uses would increase the economic productivity of the land in terms of land efficiency and greater econnic return generated fran these uses, versus the current state of the land. 18. PUBLIC FISCAL BALANCE The proposed rezoning will facilitate the annexation of the site to the city. When annexed various fees and taxes will be payable to the city. A 5 l INITIAL, STUDY C/Z 90-9 fiscal impact analysis is being prepared to determine the affects this government change will have. 19. UTILITIES All utilities have indicated an ability to serve the proposed development. 20. HUMAN HEALTH The project will not create hazard to human health in the long or short term nor will it impact the level of conutriity health. 21. SOCIAL SERVICES Low density residential projects typically result in very little increase demand in general social services. This area will be reviewed further in the fiscal impact analysis. 22. AESTHETICS a. When a development proposal is received it will be reviewed by planning commission and architectural review commission to assure compliance with city standards. This will assure retention of any scenic vistas or views. b. The site in the present condition can be termed as aesthetically offensive. The proposed development must be approved by the Palm Desert Architectural Commission. The ultimate development will not be aesthetically offensive. C. For reasons stated in items 22 a and b. 23. LIGHT AND GLARE a. New light will be produced but the project will be required to prevent lighting spill over. In addition the requirement for an engineered lighting plan will assure that this condition is fulfilled. 24. There has been no evidence of any archeological or historical significance of this site. In addition, state law requires that should any evidence be found during construction, construction must cease and the site cleared. An archeological survey will be crnducted prior to any grading taking place. 6 INITIAL STUDY C/Z 90-9 25. Because of the mitigation measures identified herein and required of the project, the proposal will not have a significant adverse impact on the envircranent. SRS/tm 7 PLANNING a3441SSION R MOUITI N ND. 1459 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C244ISSICN OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECU41DDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIROM NTAL IMPACT AND PREZONING SECTION 11 T5S ME TO PR-5 (PLANNED RESIDENTIAL FIVE DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND P (PUBLIC) Ta FACILITATE THE ANNEXATION OF THE PROPERTY TO THE CITY. CASE NO. C/Z 90-9 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 7th day of August, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of SUNRISE DESERT PARTNERS for approval of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and prezcnig Section 11, TSS R6E to PR-5 (planned residential five dwelling units per acre) and P (public) to facilitate the annexation of the property to the city: and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of came pity development has determined that the project will not have an adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared: and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify recommending approval of said prezene and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact: 1. The proposed pre=ni g to PR-5 and P is consistent with the North Sphere Specific Plan. 2. The proposed land use is consistent with the goals and objectives of the North Sphere Specific Plan and Palm Desert General Plan. 3. The proposed pre=ring will not depreciate property values, restrict the lawful use of adjacent properties or threaten the public health, safety o; general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Plwrd ng Wrtnissicn of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. PLADN UG C{MMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1459 2. That the Negative Declaration of Enviromental Impact Exhibit "A" and C/Z 90-9 Exhibit "H" on file in the department of community development are hereby recommended to the city council for approval. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Connissicn, held on this 7th day of August, 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, E1tG1 M, RICHARDS, WHITLOCK NOES: DONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: JONATHAN CAROL WHITLOCK, C airpe n ATTEST: A. DIAZ, S SRS/tm 2 PLA N]Xs OOD4uS.4ION RESOuniaN NO. 1459 EX HEM "A" Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code. NEGATIM DEC ARATUN cASE No: c/Z 90-9 APPLICAM/PRDAEC.T SPCNSM: Sunrise Desert Partners 46-200 Code Street Palm Desert, CA 92260 PROJECP DESCRIPTION/LOMTION: Prezoning of Section 11, T5S R6E, to PR-5 (planned residential five dwelling units per acre) and P (public) to facilitate annexation of the property to the city. The Director of the Department of Crnmmity Development, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to doctment the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. 7 1990 AMa A. DIAZ TE DIRE= OF ODNKINITY SRS/tm 3 '•. it i • AVONOALE PALM VALLEY •••''•.,• I. REGENCY ••••. - PALMS ,'•''.�\ P �COUN:RY CLUB DRIVE I I LAKES ► RESORTER •' W •� s SUBJECT PROPERTY c �} • U PLu . R - 5 N :W 'I I • 4ecd AVENUE I i 17 • IIy o,v CITY OF PALM DESERT Case No. C/Z 90-9 PLANNING COMMISSIL)N RESOLUTION NO. 1459 rg K 1H I pp H 7Rl ,. Date August 7, 1990 — NOTICE OF DEPE[d DT ATIM Negative Declaration TO: (X) Clerk of the Board of Supervisors ( ) Secretary of Resources County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St., Rm. 1311 4080 Lemon Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92502 FROM: City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in canpliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the public resources code. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Title/Common Name: Indian Ridge Prezoning (C/Z 90-9) Date of Project Approval: September 13, 1990 State Clearinghouse Number (if submitted): N/A Contact Person: Steve Smith Project Location: Section 11, T5S R6E Project Description: Prezone property PR-5 and P to facilitate annexation to city. This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project ( )will, (X) will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An environmental impact report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the environmental impact report may be examined at the above city hall address. X A negative declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the negative declaration may be examined at the above city hall address. 3. Mitigation measures ( ) were, (X) were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of overriding considerations ( ) was, (X) was not, adopted for this project. /��/jj,777 l�s.•�0, R�Sl1r ¢'7� `7��G/�,iy,�c.�/ 'tignat�uurree Title Date Received for Filing (Please return date-stamped copy in the enclosed envelope) SEND CONFIRMATION DATE:TIME ` - 1-11-51 2:34F'M LOCAL I. D. �. E158417758 y LOCAL NAME t C?T`( OF 'r'ALt"I DESEF -s w.- SErm .} NO F:ENC:TE _iPT?Of•! LD. 'START TIME _ DURPTIORl #PRGEE L COMf9ENT CCITT G- 1-11-91 2F49 1'44" TOTAL PAGES xEROX TELECOF'IER 7010 1i t r �' 73-51U 1:11LU VVAIIIIJG UIIIVE, PALIO UL"SEII I, CALIFUIINIA 9226U ELEPI ION E(6 19) 346.U(31 I'AA! (G19) 341- 1U9U AX 111ANSN i SS 1UFI CUVLI2 Ll 1 I LN I IUc A1E: �h) f J ) �GIq/ —�—� — 1 I I IL c lease I'and del Iver the f-ollowing messoge Luc I 0 / K \ CaIK9allys � �s V City/SL-aLe: Q FAX Umber: � �Y — �rn 21 E-6-Y � 2UI1: Ueparbnent: —� r5 irr �//l/!� i / /940, ------------------ ----------------------------------------- S biW�s , I- g- Vt ,� , � c7i&2 � � Vc tip/,/ ' WI� / o are transmitting _ Noyes ( including U0 9 cover leLter) _ - VESTING inEFi V OF 2 fKET9 TENTAT/ CVEV`/MAP 26123 INDIAN R/DG£ COUNTRY CLUB .1J_ PAW MWRT, PALM VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB �L`,GQ S ..M (REGENCY PALMS I TTRII ��f f'GAVNrR� � J GL �—T.1I1'E I r ® 1 Or O O � r \O lu , Q \ ® ly l O z` ) ! W � 1 f .o o\ o o o THE WATAGE CLUB (PROPOSED T.T. N0. 2G122) OA C TRY, CLUB ` I Baia zz r_ we.c..ur.WfYM P104C TRY CUY Indian eourrrw•aLB �®-=r:�e _ ____ �:.r•W�.-:�^^-;:ti:";� i SUNRISE COMPANY • �=--�z == �' ' T£NTAT/4E rP 261ZJ fNOIAN R/GGE CIXMTRY CL • C��L' � �� wwvLrra{uLwxa • �� : �m(r�wwo win r..ey • C'�:S�C� SHEET Y OF t SHEETS VESTING TENTATIVE MAP 26123 INDIAN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB PALM DESERT, CAL/ AA } PROPOSED FINISHED SURFACE E k —uC 1 d ba4 Y � G a R SECTION "A— A:' A i 9g � 6 6 f p Y Rj - yby PROPOSED FIMSfEO SURFACE M K , d SECTION "B — BE qq I4I 6 b .h H ..i, 9 Lit I u�m�•°gym gyp, 0 Ind doe ccuNmcWB SUNRISE COMPANY xEe. �— OLTJTION NO. 90-133 I TTFFCMCE NIIKRADDIM CITY OF PALM DESERT TO: Mayor Crites and City Council FRCM: Department of Community Development DATE: September 13, 1990 SUBJECT: Annexation ##27 - Sunrise Company - Resolution request, LAFCD to proceed Attached is a resolution requesting LAFOO to take proceedings for the annexation of 640 acres in Section 11. The prezoning of this property is to be approved by mil on September 13, 1990. This resolution, when approved, will complete the city's application. SS/db CITY COUNCIL CTION: APPROVED RECEIVED DENIED OTHER MEETING DATE AYES: NOES: ' C, ABSENT; ABSTAIN; VERIFIED B-y � Original on File wj _tn Ci Clerk 's Office .. ..�. ` RES0LilPIOAI No. 90-133 , A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION KNOWN AS PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 27. RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, that WHEREAS, the City of Palm Desert desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code, for annexation; and WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited and a description for the boundaries of the territory is set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, this proposal is consistent with the sphere of influence of the City of Palm Desert; and WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposed annexation are as follows: 1. The proposed territory to be annexed is part of the city's sphere of influence and is adjacent to the City of Palm Desert and therefore represents a logical expansion of the city's boundary. 2. The area is experiencing development pressures and requires a higher level of urban services then are currently offered by the County of Riverside. The City of Palm Desert can provide these services. NOW, THEREFORE, this Resolution of application is hereby adopted and approved by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County is hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of territory as described in Exhibit "A", according to the terms and conditions stated above and in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. PASSED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of September, 1990 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BENSON, KELLY, SNYDER, WILSON, CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE i BUFORD A. ES, ayor ATTEST: L SI�ILA R. G GAN, City erk City of Palm Desert, forma EXMIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION All of Secticn 11 T5S R6E RESOLUTION NO. 90-133 A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION KNOWN AS PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 27. RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, that WHEREAS, the City of Palm Desert desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code, for annexation; and WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited and a description for the boundaries of the territory is set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, this proposal is consistent with the sphere of influence of the City of Palm Desert; and WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposed annexation are as follows: 1. The proposed territory to be annexed is part of the city's sphere of influence and is adjacent to the City of Palm Desert and therefore represents a logical expansion of the city's boundary. 2. The area is experiencing development pressures and requires a higher level of urban services then are currently offered by the County of Riverside. The City of Palm Desert can provide these services. NOW, THEREFORE, this Resolution of application is hereby adopted and approved by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County is hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of territory as described in Exhibit "A", according to the terms and conditions stated above and in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985. PASSED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of September, 1990 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BENSON, KELLY, SNYDER, WILSON, CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE i /j BUFORD A. OltTTES, ayor ATTEST: SIEILA R. GILGAN, City erk City of Palm Desert, forma EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESaUPPICN All of Section 11 T5S R6E • 1 P ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS NOTICE OF DEPQ;MMTION Negative Declaration TO: (X) Clerk of the Board of Supervisors O Secret ary es Canty of Riverside 1416 Ninth oStR, Rm.C1311 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92502 Sacramento, CA 95814 FROM: City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Pain Desert, CA 92260 SLIB7EM Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Sec�1�7 t0�E BOAR[ ---- or 21152 of the public resources Code. I;e 1]edaratio QTEHE ter AR[----- s ------------------------------- ------- -- -- ------- filelperP.R.C,21152 Project Title/Ctimmn Name: Indian Ridge Prezoning (C/Z 90-9) POSTED Date of Project Approval: September 13, 1990 SEP1 A 1990 State Clearinghouse Number (if submitted) N/A R''m a �"'P d 1 Contact Person Steve Smith By' 0c,. Project Locatio[r Section 11, T5S RGL Cou tyotnwer"iee,stateolcamof oie to cityot.Description• Prezone property PR-5 and P to facilitate annexation t This is to advise that the City of Pain _Desert has__lnade the following determinations regarding the above described project: I' Thn pm'O t Owi.11, M will tn1-, hnvn n niryniricnnl: nffnra: Cal wl etrvirotnujt�L-. 2' An envirmnental impact report was Prepared for this project Pursuant to the Provisions of CEgA. A copy of the environmental impact report may be examined at the above city hall address. X A negative declaration was prepared for this project Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA• A copy of the negative declaration may be examined at the above city hall address. 3. Mitigation measures ( ) were, M were not, made a condition of the approval of the project: 4. A statement of overriding considerations ( ) was, (X) was not, adopted for this project. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS I��yrkrctut3 Title a LED D Date Received for Filing SEP 14 1990 GER40 A.VA f M10l (Please return date-st tanRped copy in the enclosed envelope) a lr"yft Subo e 6 � � (- l — , 1. CAs-- No . :iZyd- LAFCO 90-95-4 =M1RC)M- ' 1L SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY E.YVIRONIJE.`ITAL EVALUAT1021 CHECKLIST F -NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIROrPIENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers , possible mitigation- - measures and comments are provided on attached sheets) . , Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions , displacements , compaction, or �. overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? �( d. The destruction, covering , or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? ZC e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of _ — soils, either on or off the site? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: - a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temoerature , or any change in climate. either locally or regionally? _ Z, Yet Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: han} , C. . ges . 1 n currents , or the course or I •• direction of water movements? b. Changes in-absorpt-fon rates , drainage �4 patterns, or the rate and' amoUnt of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? v d. Alteration of .the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground waters , / either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? 1. Plant life. dill the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of plants ( including trees , Shrubs , grass , and crops )? JL( b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? , c. Introduction of new species of Plants into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? S. Animal. life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds , Land animals including reptiles-, or-- insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any "unique, — rare, or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. 0eleri0ration t0 e:lstimg wildlife habitat 7 Yes Maybe Nc 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in -the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Oepletion of any non-renewable natural resource? 7 . Eneray. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ b. Oemand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the .deaelopment of new sources of energy? 8. Risk of Upset. . Does the proposal involve a risk o-' f an plosion or the release of , hazardous sub nA races ( including, but not limited to, pesticides , oil , chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? _ 9. E^anomie Loss . Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? - b. A change in the value of property and impro•.er.:ents exposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted co=unity risk standards? 10, Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels to the point at which accepted co=unity noise and vibration levels are exceeded? 11. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the a CT erasion of the present developed or planned land use of an area? 12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in the -emount of designated open space? -- - - -- _ 13. Pcoulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteraticn or the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of the City? _ b. Change in the population distribution by aye , income, religion, racial , or ethnic grcup , occupational class , household type? _ _ ` Yes Mavbe N 14. Emolovment. Will the proposal result in additions new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? 1S. Housina. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 16. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities , or - f demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation 7 or mcvement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists , or pedestrians? 017. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following are!s: a. fire protection? b. Police protection? C. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? f. Other governmental services? _ _ % C Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? x 19. Utilities . . . Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: r a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? v 1L c. Water? v d. Sewer or septic tanks? -fv-- e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: _C a. The creation of any health hazard or Potential health hazard? _ — b. A change in the level of community health care provided? 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general social services? LV1. 22. Aesthetics . Will the .proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista. or view. open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive - site open to public view? c. lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area ) attractiveness, pleasantness , and uniqueness? 23. Lichtand Glare. Will the proposal produce nvl — — e: >gnt or g are? 24. Archealcoical/4istorical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure,object, or or building? 6. Yes Maybe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Stoniiicance. a. Does the- project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail \/ the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental .goals? (A short-term impact an the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into — the future. ) c. Does the project have impacts which are indi - vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact an each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings , either directly or indirectly? xy Initial Study Pr<pared By: INITIAL STUDY CASE PA. C/Z 90-9 ENVIRC WDUAL EVALUATICN C HECYLIST CXM4WM AND POSSIBLE MITIGATICN MEASURES (CATE)ORIES PERTAIN TO ATTACHED QOMIST) 1. EARTH a. The project will result in grading. Such grading will not result in any alterations to geologic substructures. The site is relatively flat so that grading will not create unstable earth conditions. b. As part of the normal grading activity soil will be moved, displaced, aver-covered and compacted. This activity will be done per permit and approved grading plans to assure that the site is properly prepared for the structural development which will take place on the site. C. The site is relative flat and changes in topography and surface relief will be required to assure proper drainage and avoid increased nuoff to adjoining properties. The after condition of the property will result in less water runoff from the property to adjoining properties, and better direction. d. The site does not contain any unique geologic or physical features. e. The project as stated previously will result in less potential water damage to the site, through proper grading, resulting in the appropriate directing of runoff from the site. Mitigation Measures The City of Palm Desert grading and building permits procedures require detailed geotechnical reports addressing grading specifications and the settlement and expamive dkiracteristic:s of on-site soils. All structures must be designed by UBC requirements to insure that the buildings are constructed within the acceptable level of risk set forth therein for the type of building and occupancies being developed. 2. AIR a. During construction, particularly grading, a potential dust problem will be a short-term impact. Requiring that the ground be moistened during days in which grading occurs will mitigate this problem. This is required by City of Palm Desert Grading Ordinance. Because the site is already an urbanized setting its development will not result in an overall-deterioratiar--,of,ambient--air-yvaiity.---Ibis--`. conclusion is supported by the discussions relating to air quality contained in a 1985 draft environmental impact report prepared for the City of Rancho Mirage by Michael Brandnan Associates entitled "Park View Drive Land Use Study". INITIAL STUM C/Z 90-9 b. The land uses permitted in the PR zone do not Provide for any odorous land uses, C. cDevlopnent of this site per the PR zone will no result in any tic changes. This is due to the limited uses permitted in the PR zone. 3. WATER a. Water will be redirected to drainage facilities designed and constructed to accept the water from the site. b. The site will absorb less water due to building coverage. The landscaped areas will absorb water because of the plant material. The alterations in drainage patterns will result in a benefit to adjoining property as it will be directed in a control manner. C. See b. d. At this time the project is to prezons the site to facilitate annexation to the city. Future development proposals may impact on the ground waters. Further review will be undertaken when a specific development proposal is received. e. See d. f. While any development results in the use of water and, therefore, reduces the amount otherwise available for public water supplies; the Coachella Valley Water District assures that there is sufficient water supplies to accommodate this growth. In addition, the Coachella Valley Water District plans to oonstruot additiasal water ate cu facilities in the Palm Desert area to accommodate and future development. 4. PLANT LIFE a. Presently the site contains weeds and sagebrush. The project when completed will introduce a diversity of species to the site. The plants that will be introduced to the site will, however, be material Previously used in the desert. b. The site does not contain any unique, rape or endangered species of plant life.C. It is extremely doubtful that the project will introduce any new species into the area. In any event the landscape plan will be 2 INMAL STUDY C/z 90-9 reviewed by the architectural inspector of Riverside Oou ty to assure that the plants being used do not pose a hazard to agricultural production in the area. 5. ANIMAL LIFE a. The proposed prezoning to PR will not increase or decrease the variety of animal life on the site. b. The site has been identified as being habitat area for the Coachella Valley Fringe Toed Lizard, an endangered species. As mitigation the developer will be required to pay into a fund which will purchase habitat area on the north side of I-10. C. See b and c. d. The project site is an in-fill site and not a suitable long-term habitat for wildlife. 6. NATURAL RESOURCES a. The project will obviously use natural resources, but will not significantly increase the rate of usage of these resources. b. All material resources used on the site are renewable. 7. a. & b. No more than normal usage. In addition, since any future project will be required to comply with the most current state energy codes, energy usage will be less than on previous projects of a similar nature. 8. The site does not contain any substances that could result in explosion or escape of hazardous materials. 9. a. As discussed earlier future development will have a positive impact in terms of drainage impacts on adjacent properties. b. Properties in the area are not subject to unusual geologic hazards. The project will not effect that hazard. 10. NOISE Construction of a residential_coommitv__will in ambient noise level. The increase will not be above acceptable connmity standards. 3 INITIAL S1u7Y C/Z 90.9 Mitigation Measures Strict adherence to construction hours and days will be required. Additional measures to mitigate traffic and operational noise will be required. Noise from truck deliveries may not exceed the noise levels set forth in the General Plan Noise Element. 11. LAND USE The project will not alter the present developed lard uses in the area. The planned land use for the area is identified as low density residential. A low density residential land use is consistent in the area. 12. oPEN SPACE The site in question is designated as low density residential; its developrent' therefore, will not result in a reduction in the aimu nt of designated open space. 13. PoPULATICN a. The prezoning to PR-5 zoning of vacant lard will changes in location, distribution density, or not cult he in thcity'e population. This zoning land use and densityanticipatednt sphere specific plan. b. The project will not generate changes in the socio-economic characteristics of the area. 14. EMPLOYNgS7i Pdnile the project will provide a rrumbar of new jobs in terms of the value as a whole, in and of itself, it is minor. Most of the jobs created, however, will be filled by residents of the area or those who have cone to the valley for other reasons. 15. HOUSiM a. The Project will not change the housing picture in the community or region. This is based on the conclusions reached in items 13 and 14. In addition there is currently a large inventory of unsold housing units in the valley: in addition to the number of rental units being developed. b. None - covered in item 15 a. 4 INITIAL STUM C/Z 90-9 16. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION a. Ultimate development of the property from its vacant state will generate additional traffic movements. Ths specific plan designated the site for low density residential and the proposed prezoning is consistent with the specific plan. When an actual development proposal is received it will be analyzed based on the actual number Of units proposed, its overall potential occupancy rate and the location of points of ingress/egress. b. There will be a demand for additional parking facilities which will be supplied by the project on site. C. Except for additional vehicular movements discussed above the project should not generate additional dam-ids on existing transportation systems. In addition these systems have extensive additional capacity. d. Ultimate development of the site may altar the pattern of circulation in that 42nd Avenue (Hovley Lane) will became a complete through street as a condition of development of the property. This will offer a new alternative for east/west traffic and may reduce traffic on other east/west arterials (i.e. Fred Waring Drive, Highway 111 and Country Club). e. Implementation of the mitigation measures as will be conditioned in the tentative map and precise plan should be positive. There are problems currently existing on Country Club Drive and the public improvements required of the applicant will alleviate some of than. 17. PUBLIC SERVICE a-f. None. The property is presently vacant and serves no productive use. A commitment to urban uses was made as the area surrounding the study area has been developed, and the general plan and designated the area for residential development. Infrastructure improvements (i.e.: streets and utilities) have been made and are adequate to serve the proposed development. The proposed land uses would increase the economic productivity of the land in terms of land efficiency and greater economic return generated from these uses, versus the current state of the land. 18. PUBLIC FISCAL BALANCE The proposed rezoning will facilitate the annexation of the site to the city. When annexed various fees and taxes will be payable to the city. A 5 INITIAL STWy C/Z 90-9 fi scat impact analysis is being prepared to determine the affects this government change will have. 19. VPILITIES All utilities have indicated an ability to serve the proposed development. 20. HWAN HEALTH The project will not create hazard to human health in the long or short term nor will it impact the level of oommmity health, 21. SOCIAL SERVICES Low density residentialdemand projects typically result in very little increase the fiscal social services. This area will be reviewed furttrr in impact analysis. 22. AESTHETICS a. when a development proposal is received it will be reviewed by planning ornmission and architectural review cmudssion to assure alliance with city standards. This will assure retention of any scenic vistas or views. b. The site in the present condition can be termed as aestheti cal Offensive. The proposed development must be approved by the Palm Desert Architectural Camdssion. The ultimate development will not be aesthetically offensive. C. For reasons stated in items 22 a and b. 23. LIGHT AND GLARE a. New light will be produced but the project will be fired to Prevent lighting spill over. In addition the requirment for an engineered lighting plan will assure that this condition is fulfilled. 24. There has been no evidence of any archeological or historical significance Of this site. In addition, state law requires that should any evidence be found during construction, construction must cease and the site cleared. Aarcheological survey will -be conducted prior to any grading taking 6 INITM SUM C/Z 90-9 25. Because of the mitigation measures identified herein and required of the Project, the peal will not have a significant adverse impact on the envirorment. SRS/tm 7 FISCAL IMPACT' IMPACT ON CITY OF PAIN DESERT The fiscal has been an impact of annexation on the City alyzed, and is presented in the schedules which follow. Net annual impact °f Palm Desert projected is: 1991 $ 953, 150 1992 $1, 033, 780 1993 $ 998, 471 1994 $ 958,873 1995 $ 919,020 1996 $ 37, 738 Cumulative fiscal impact Cumulative It should for the six year period is comprised of be noted that developer fee revenue, mits & Fees (Schedule 1C) and New Construction Tax only. Therefore (Schedule 1D) , result from new construction the buiTher these revenues, totalling expected out period, will not continue g $4'278284 during expectednormal revenues after 196 l is adequately meet the associatedsrec mint to 1996 will recurring expenses. PUBLIC REVENUE The public revenue analysis is p supporting Schedules lA throughIDSented in Schedule 1 and Property tax revenue � the additional • detailed in Schedule 1A are sold. assessed valuation that will occur as sun on Additionally, cumulative valuations units year receive a 2. 00$ annual reassessment Provisions from the prior conservatism Proposition 13. In the interest of to the Which will ' no increase is made for additional valuation result from subsequent resales at higher prices. To arrive at taxable assessed of exemption (20$$7 value, the homeowner's residents , 000 per unit is allowed for Permanent of units sold) . A property tax revenue or of 0566* County of RiveIs 25% Of the property taxtrevenue which represents utilized. This tax revenue exchange share, in accordance withethe the 4 agreement between the County of Property r Riverside and the City of Palm Desert, dated September 24, 1981. Retail sales tax revenue to the City of Palm Desert is analyzed in Schedule 1B. The method for projecting average household income and average expenditure on retail sales is explained in the Assumptions section of this report. Revenues from other General Fund sources are calculated in Schedule 1C. Per capita factors are calculated using the City of Palm Desert Financial Plan for the fiscal years 1989/1990 and 1990/1991. Permanent population of 20, 659 is provided by California Department of Finance as of January 1, 1990. It is estimated that the seasonal population is increased by 15, 000 for an { average of six months. This produces a seasonally adjusted {I population for the City of Palm Desert of 28, 159. Special Revenue is analyzed in Schedule 1D. Underlying assumptions are explained in the Assumptions section. PUBLIC COST The public cost analysis is presented in Schedule 2, and supporting Schedules 2A and 2B. The per capita factors presented in Schedules 2A and 2B are computed using estimated costs for 1990/1991, as presented in the City of Palm Desert Financial Plan for Fiscal Year 1990/1991. These amounts are applied to the seasonally adjusted population figure of 28, 159. In Schedule 2A, only those general government expenditures that would increase as a result of annexation of the ro me proposed development nt have been incorporated into the calculation of expenditure factors. Accordingly, fixed_ costs not expected - to increase have"been omitted: - in Schedule 2B, only the relevant and material .Special Fund expenditures have been considered. Page 5 - CITY OF PALM DESERT INDIAN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB ANNEXATION IMPACT ON CITY OF PALM DESERT 19M 1992 1993 1994 1995 19" TOTAL PUBLIC REVENUE SCHEDULE 1 1,167,548 1,420,286 1,582,OS5 1,699,596 1.838,852 SSA717 8,840,OS4 i PUBLIC COST SCHEDULE 2 214,396 3K506 563,615 740.723 917,832 915,979 3,739,052 NET ANNUAL INTACT M150 1,033,780 SK471 SM873 919,020 37,738 4,901,032 CUMULATIVE 911PACT 95&150 1,986,930 2,985,401 AS".274 4.863,294 0,901.032 Ip i t Page 6 IMPACT ON COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE The fiscal impact of annexation on the County of Riverside has been analyzed, and is presented in Schedule 3 and supporting Schedules 3A and 3B. Net annual impact projected is: 1991 $ 74,010 1992 $159,062 1993 $246,877 1994 $337, 455 1995 $430,796 1996 $463, 379 Cumulative fiscal impact for the six year period analyzed is $1, 711, 580. PUBLIC REVENUE The public revenue analysis is presented in Schedule 3A. There are two sources of revenue to the county; property tax assessments and retail sales tax collected. Underlying assumptions are explained in the Assumptions section which appears later in this report. PUBLIC COST The administrative cost factor was calculated using the County of Riverside 1989/1990 Proposed Budget. Only relevant costs were included. As a result of annexation, responsibility for certain services would shift from the County of Riverside to the City of Palm Desert. These costs have not been included. Certain other services would continue to be provided by the County of Riverside. These include general government administration, court administration, public health and sanitation, and public welfare. These costs have been included in calculating the administrative cost factor. - Page 18 - CITY OF PALM DESERT INDIAN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB ANNEXATION SCHEDULE 3 - IMPACT ON COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 TOTAL PUBLIC REVENUE SCHEDULE 3A 128,609 274,326 422,805 574.048 728,053 773498 290I,338 PUBLIC COST SCHEDULE 38 54,598 115,293 175.928 236,593 297,258 310,118 1,189.758 NET ANNUAL IMPACT 74,010 159,062 246,877 337,455 430,796 463,379 1,711,580 CUMULATIVE IMPACT 74,010 233,073 479,950 817.405 1,248.201 1,711,580 - Page 19 - 01/11/91 12:57 002 t44 Of frre 1 GaryN. Cottrell Chief Admintstratim Officer Mischelle Zimmcrinan County Adininishiative Office Assistant CAO January 10, 1991 Local Agency Formation Commission 3403 Tenth Street, Suite 620 Riverside, CA 92501-3676 Attention: Pat Bowler, Assistant Executive Director RE; LAFCo 90-95-4, ANNEXATION 27 TO PALM DESERT, TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 26123 Dear Ms. Bowler: The Riverside County Administrative Office has reviewed the project referenced above and has the following comments. We find that there will be impacts upon county services, however, we have no opposition to the proposed annexation. The proposed project would adversely affect existing library services. The increase in population of 2,845 persons (1,270 dwelling units) would require an increase in funding to the County Library to maintain the current level of service. The current level of service has been recognized as substantially inadequate. The per capita ongoing costs would be $11.35 with capital costs of$141.61 per capita, to maintain the existing level of service. To fund the desired level of service the per capita costs would be $18.28 and $149.11. respectively. This impact may be mitigated by the assessment of a library facilities and collections fee (in 1990 dollars) of$317 per dwelling unit to maintain the existing level of service, or $334 per dwelling unit to achieve the desired level of service. The proposed project would impact County maintained roads: Country Club Drive, Oasis Drive, 42nd Avenue and Washington Street. Therefore, we recommend that a traffic study be conducted to analyze traffic impacts of the proposal on county roadways, and that the project be conditioned to mitigate all impacts. Robert T Andersen Administrative Center 4080 LEMON STREL•T 0 12111 FLOOR•RIVERSIDE,CALIFORNIA 92501•(714)275.1100•FAX(714)275-1105 01/11/91 12:57 003 LAFCo 90-95-4, Pat Bowler, Assist. Exec, Director Page 2 The traffic study should include intersection analyses for the intersections of Washington Street and Country Club Drive, and on Washington Street and Interstate 10. We request a copy of the project map so we may evaluate the internal circulation connections to the county maintained roadway. The proposed project would have an impact upon the Edom Hill Landfill by increasing the daily waste stream. The project proponent should be conditioned to work with its permitted refuse hauler to implement a waste stream reduction program pursuant to AB 939 Chapter 1095 which became effective January 1, 1990. The property tax transfer factor will be .08621127 to be used once the assessed value is established. We concur with the findings of the fiscal impact report for the proposed project. Our analysis indicated that the proposed annexation would reduce the fiscal impact upon the County by reducing some county costs, however, the County will retain its countywide fiscal responsibilities for this project. If you desire additional information, contact me at (714) 275-1114. Respectfully yours, C=4tj�� -- - John Johnson Principal Administrative Analyst ��, ;bi Weston Pringle & Associates TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING October 30, 1990 RECEIVED Mr. Paul Quill Sunrise Company Nov 5 1990 42-600 Cook St., Suite 200 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Mr. Quill: Transmitted herewith is our traffic study for the proposed Indian Ridge development. The study covers 1995 conditions with and without the project and without the Cook Interchange. In addition, 2010 conditions were examined both with and without the project. These analyses indicate the need for circulation improvement with or without the project. In general, project impacts in 1995 are minimal and negligible in 2010. The study reflects comments received from the City on the initial draft. We appreciate the cooperation of the City Staff and especially Mr. Seyed Safavian. Respectfully submitted, WESTON PRINGLE & ASSOCIATES Weston S. Pringle, P.E. Registered Professional Engineer State of California Numbers C16828 & TR565 WSP:hd #901550 680 Langsdorf Drive • Suite 222 • Fullerton. CA 92631 • (714) 871-2931 • FAX:(714) 871-0389 TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE INDIAN RIDGE PROJECT (Palm Desert) Prepared For The Sunrise Company 42-600 Cook St., Suite 200 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Prepared By WESTON PRINGLE & ASSOCIATES October 30, 1990 I INTRODUCTION This study has been conducted to examine traffic factors related to the planned Indian Ridge project. The study was based upon procedures and guidelines of the City of Palm Desert and examines conditions in 1995 and 2010 for various development and circulation system scenarios. Potential problem areas are identified and mitigation measures recommended. The study has been prepared to assist the City of Palm Desert in their review of the development. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site location is illustrated on Figure 1. As indicated, the site is bounded by Country Club Drive, Oasis Club Drive, 42nd Avenue, and Eldorado Drive. Principal vehicular access will be on Country Club Drive and 42nd Avenue with both access points coordinated with adjacent development. A "card gate" access and golf course maintenance access are proposed for Eldorado Drive. Proposed land use includes 1,278 residential units and two golf courses. It is anticipated that 250 units per year would be sold beginning in 1992. On this basis, the project would be built out in 1996. The extension of Eldorado Drive south to 42nd Avenue and the connection of Hovley Lane to 42nd Avenue will not occur during Phase I of the project. EXISTING CIRCULATION CONDITIONS The circulation system in the area is in varying stages of development. Principal elements of the system are described in the following paragraphs. Country Club Drive is an east-west arterial that has been constructed with two lanes in each direction and a raised median for much of its length. East of Oasis Club Drive, the street is only partially improved with one westbound lane and two eastbound lanes. The segment immediately west of Washington Street is fully improved. Signalization is (D v, e 0 MONTEREY AVE. T 7 t0 m R° > PORTOLA AVE. co ( A O m O o O z / rr z N 70 N 2 Z <O< D frt A � = COOK ST. o� r = � c O < a r � z Z EL DR. EL DORADO DR. DORADO r^ .do N OASIS CLUB DR. A y� fTl A m N WASHINGTON ST. WASHINGTON ST. (N) ld C m O z � N 0 0 -2— provided at Cook, Palm Valley Country Club and Washington. A signal is currently proposed at Eldorado Drive. 42nd Avenue/Hovlev Lane is an east-west roadway that has an unconstructed section along the proposed project frontage and west of Corporate Way. Construction of the section from Corporate Way to Portola is currently underway. The existing street sections are currently striped for two travel lanes. Fred Waring Drive is an east-west street with its west terminus at State Route 111. It is a four lane divided roadway between State Route 111 and Portola Avenue, then is connected to both two and four lane widths to the east. Signalization is provided at the major intersections. Eldorado Drive exists as a north-south street south of Fred Waring Drive. It is basically a two lanes facility with raised medians in some sections. North of Country Club Drive, Eldorado is also known as Del Safari Drive. Del Safari is presently striped as a two lane roadway with pavement width for four lanes. It terminates at Frank Sinatra Drive to the north. State Route 111 is an approximate east-west street in the study area, and it the primary arterial serving intra Coachella Valley travel. Currently a four lane divided roadway is provided in most sections with traffic signals at the major intersections. The I-10 Freeway has northwest-southeast alignment in the study area and serves as the primary access to the greater Los Angeles area. An eight lane freeway is provided with ramp interchanges at Monterey Avenue, Washington Street, and Indio Boulevard. All of these interchanges provide full ramp access through a combination of direct access and connections with Varner Road. -3— Cook Street is a north-south roadway located just west of the site which varies from two to four striped lanes. It is currently improved to provide an approximate 70 foot roadway width, from Country Club Drive to Frank Sinatra Drive. Frank Sinatra Drive is the existing northern terminus of this street. Washington Street is a north-south roadway, located just east of the site. Two undivided lanes are provided in the study area with traffic signals at Country Club Drive, 42nd Avenue and Fred Waring Drive. A full interchange is provided at the I-10 Freeway with direction southbound access and northbound freeway access via Varner Road. Portola Avenue is a north-south street with two undivided lanes from north of Fred Waring Drive to south of State Route 111. Portola is in varying stages of development from north of Fred Waring Drive to Gerald Ford Drive. In the vicinity of Frank Sinatra Drive a 70 foot roadway width has been constructed. Frank Sinatra Drive is an east-west street in varying stages of development. Between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street an approximate 70 foot wide roadway has been constructed. East of Cook, a two lane road exists. Monterey Avenue is a north-south roadway which is striped for two lanes and four lanes north and south of Frank Sinatra Drive, respectively. The two lane section is approximately 36 feet wide. A full freeway interchange is provided at the I-10 Freeway with direct southbound access from Monterey and northbound access via Varner Road. In order to quantify existing conditions, AM and PM peak hour traffic data were obtained for 10 intersection identified by the City of Palm Desert Traffic Engineer. Traffic volumes were obtained from previous studies(111�1 and counts conducted by Weston Pringle and Associates. Also, as (1) "Traffic Impact Analysis for the Proposed Business Park II" ASL Consulting Engineers, September 1, 1990. (2) 'Draft-Tentative Tract 25617, Traffic Analysis", Austin Foust Associates, Inc. March 8, 1990. -4— requested, counts were factored to represent peak periods. May data were increased by 15 percent and September data by 30 percent. These intersections were then evaluated utilizing the Operational Methodology of the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. Summary calculation sheets are contained in Appendix A and summarized in Table 1. Review of Table 1 indicates that four intersections are currently operating below Level of Service D or unsatisfactorily. These are related to the I-10/Washington/Country Club area and Fred Waring/Cook intersection. The intersections of Vamer/Washington (N), Vamer/Washington (S) and I-10 Eastbound Ramps/Washington are not signalized at present. All satisfy the CalTrans "Peak Hour Volume Warrant" under current volumes. As a result, signalization has been assumed for analysis purposes. In other words, signals are currently warranted and the need is not related to the project. Also Country Club/Eldorado is currently programmed for signalization. TRIP GENERATION In order to examine the potential traffic impact of the project, it is necessary to estimate the number of trips thatmould be generated. Studies have been conducted by government agencies and consultants to determine trip generation characteristics of various land uses. From this body of information, trip generation rates were selected for this project and are listed in Table 2. By applying these rates to the planned development, estimates were made of trips to be generated. These estimates are based upon standard residential areas which may not be representative of conditions of this project. The planned development would be composed of permanent residents, part time residents and retired residents. This mixture would tend to result in lower trip generation than standard or typical residential land use. A study by Holliden, Recker and Associates conducted for the Coachella Valley Transportation Study found an average rate of 5.91 daily trip ends per dwelling unit. The rate of 8.8 utilized is 49 percent greater than the study found.0 Based upon these data and discussions with the City Traffic Engineer, a 30 percent reduction in residential trip generation was applied and is indicated in Table 3. In addition, the (3) "Analysis of Household Trip Generation Rates"; Technical Memorandum CV-3; Hollinden, Recker and Associates, December, 1985. -5- TABLE 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS - INTERSECTIONS Indian Ridge AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VV/Q DELAY LOS VLC DELAY LOS Vamer/Washington (N) 0.60 6.5 B 0.32 4.9 A Vamer/Washington (S) 1.06 62.0 F 0.86 58.9 E I-10 Eastbound Ramps/ 1.09 * F 0.99 28.2 D Washington Country Club/Washington 1.03 * F 0.72 36.4 D 42nd Ave/Washington 0.70 13.2 B 0.66 16.2 C Fred Waring/Washington 0.68 32.3 D 0.75 26.6 D Country Club/Cook 0.79 32.5 D 0.71 33.6 D Hovley/Cook 0.74 20.9 C 0.59 16.0 C Fred Waring/Cook 0.90 * F 0.72 * F Country Club/Eldorado 0.45 9.4 B 0.42 8.2 B * Meaningless Condition -6- TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION RATES Indian Ridge TRIP ENDS PER DESCRIPTOR .AND USE DESCRIPTOR Daily AM In AM Out PM In PM Out Zesidentialn> Dwelling Unit 8.8 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.3 iolf Course(') Each 600 30 5 15 40 1) "Trip Generation", Institute of Transportation Engineers, 4th Edition. 2) "Trip Generation Manual", City of San Diego, August 22, 1990. TABLE 3 TRIP GENERATION Indian Ridge TRIP ENDS -AND USE QUANTITY Daily AM In AM Out PM In PM Out residential 1,278 11,200 220 600 750 440 solf Course 2 11,200 60 10 30 80 Subtotals 12,400 280 610 780 520 Residential Occupancy Reduction (30%) -3.400 -65 -180 -225 -130 TOTALS 9,000 215 430 555 390 -7— golf course rates are based upon "free standing" facilities where members are dispersed over a broad geographic area. Since these courses are a part of the development, the majority of users would be residents and very few external trips would be generated. As a result, the estimates in Table 3 are conservative or high. TRIP DISTRIBUTION A geographic trip distribution pattern was developed for the site for a circulation system with and without a Cook/1-10 interchange. These distributions are based upon information contained in the CVATSM report, previous studies and discussions with the Palm Desert Traffic Engineer. The distribution patterns are illustrated on Figures 2 and 3. These distribution factors were applied to project trip generation estimates in order to assign these trips to the road system. Figure 4 illustrates PM peak hour volumes for 1995 both with and without the project. OTHER PROJECT FACTORS Consideration has been given to other projects in the area which are proposed but not constructed. These projects are described in Table 4 and their locations indicated on Figure 5. The trip generation for each of these projects has been included in all analyses of future conditions. INTERSECTION ANALYSES Peak hour intersection conditions are the best indicator of traffic conditions. At all other times volumes are less and operational conditions would be equal or better than peak. In addition, since traffic is stopped for a part of the time at intersections, the capacity is less than for mid- block locations where traffic is not stopped. Analyses have been completed for the 10 intersection identified for inclusion in the study by the Palm Desert Traffic Engineer. These analyses include various time periods, traffic conditions and road systems. The following sections of this report discuss each scenario. (4) "Coachella Valley Area Transportation Study", SCAG, December, 1987, Table 3. � N 0 9! a L„ r = t f A M N n (N) '1S NOIONIHSVM 'is N019NIHSVM f� N f N `. K N w to ~ ¢ w Z 4N 0_ (SS300Y ON) O Z (n a 'a0 anm SISYO LLJN Q U II v� W F- w OOY Z •a0 o0v8o0 13 i i3� •ao � — U Ln Lo Is NOW = -3 p p o U) / ¢ O JW OIL \ L I >O U / z I x ? O � j cr Z Z v CY U- V w O (Y 0) 3/V VIOINOCI 01 Q m D� C i n. '3AV .13aIMNOw c 0 m 0 .q,% Lt Io C.IV U /170 �► = ACCESS POINTS t'gRryFR 3 4% 1 SOUny f 3% No Scale fR� P RO o FRANK SINATRA DR. 10% Z _ z 2% a 3 16% f 20% \` Cn R.R. COUNTRY CLUB 44% DR. SUTURE 19% 6% 11% — 27% 37 i� 0 12% — Ck M SITE a% l.i HOVELY via > I I J a 2% LN. 2%1 W ob AVE. 42 a �-- 23% 'yy 18% � � 1% L F 16% I 0 a 5% I FUTURE ST. Z j 6% o v=i 3 FRED �WARING -� 1% DR. f' 10% 15% 1 10% a 1% \5% HIGHWAY 117 0 a J Q W K O 0 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION ULTIMATE SYSTEM (W/COOK) Weston Pringle & Associates Figure 3 999L �— MM —� W L_ (9Z9L) SLOL W SS£L (LZLL) r.Y1 (ZL-F t� ODoo -t £L£L Lo� 1 ZOL _NOiDNIHSYM NO.LONIHSVM �t m Z9tiL �� ^ —► 1Nw co n Go 969 co 00 (LZ£) o . (ZLL) m CO 88Z 0 0 i V 'ma ennI3 SGvo J L69 f (LOS) O Lo 0 NCI N '80 � 0OV800 13 w '60 l3 £8s ��, ott �2 Quo (cgs) (tZa)Z --m J Q JLd U C } o v�j (Om o 3 of 0£LZ (6L8) o m I (ZLL) ZSS m a J. 8 LL = '�— '1S >1000 1 �— ~ _y L99 168 46Z L a (8OL) t (t68) (3) (ZL£L) a0 r im m o n m ao 0) N 3 41 x z D w p lei U O U V CL O (Q K 3nv V10180d Q old Ii m o m rn o� c 'C CL '3AV J.3M31NOP1 c 0 41 �tila 0 Z u i o LO c O m z L 7 O � 0 8 (N) '1S NOIDNIHSVM '1S NOlJNIHSVM v w O �y •aa emo sisvo /O v� LdIU' N w oavaoa •aa oavaoa 13 •aa 13 U J I - �e u W d o O '1S N000 = Q J \� O O / z z N } ER 3 44 z z v 0 � 0 o vi V o 0) F N 3AV b101210d CL Q y w 0 o � w c m L.t< a 3AV J13M31NOW w C cn p 41 a) O N z -8- TABLE 4 OTHER PROJECTS Indian Ridge PROJECT UNr=F CURRENT LUMBER PROPONENT LAND USE A! CRES STATUS Sunrise Company Residential/Golf 750 Units Proposed Landmark Land Co. Commercial/ 31 Acres Under Construction (PM 23118) Industrial 40 Lots Desert I-10 Commercial 13.7 Acres Approved, Not Developments,Inc. (General) Constructed (PM 22402) Rebecca L. Brown Commercial 9.0 Acres Approved (Zone Change) (CZ 4839) (General) i 38 Palms Single-Family 19.2 Acres Proposed (CZ 5423 & TT 24242) Residential 98 Units i Dr. Keith H. Mathahs Commercial 4 Acres Approved, Not (CP 3001) (General) 36,100 SF Constructed Rangeview Investments Mixed-Use Single-Family Proposed (PP 11087) Residential (12 units) Multi-Family (33 Units) 3 Danube Corporation Multi-Family 114 Apartments Approved, Not (PP 10367) Constructed 3 Soloman Development Residential 92 Units Approved, Under (TT 25445) Construction 10 Desert Horizons Residential 91 Units Approved -9- 1995 - No Cook Interchange Existing traffic volumes were increased from the 1990 base to 1995 with an assumed annual growth rate of one percent Other project traffic was also added to each intersection. Analyses of intersection operations were completed with these traffic volumes and the existing road system. Summaries of these analyses for the PM peak hour are contained in Appendix B and the results are summarized in Table 5. Review of Table 5 indicates failing conditions are all except two intersections. The Fred Waring/Washington intersection is projected to have a Level of Service (LOS) of D and the Country Club/Eldorado intersection a LOS B. It is clear from these analyses that significant circulation system improvements will be required without the project. These analyses were repeated with project traffic added to the previous totals. Appendix C contains these analyses and the results are listed in Table 5. Review of Table 5 indicates no significant change in Levels of Service as a result of the project. Improvements of the same intersections are indicated with or without the project The intersection analyses for conditions without the project were re-examined in order to identify circulation system improvements that would mitigate the unacceptable conditions. This was done first for conditions without the project and those analyses summaries are contained in Appendix D. The resulting Levels of Service (LOS) are summarized in Table 6 and indicate LOS D or better at all 10 intersections. Table 7 lists the improvements utilized to achieve these LOS values. The improvements listed in Table 7 do not include consideration of project traffic and also represent current needs. Major reconstruction of the Washington/I-10 interchange is indicated. Also the intersections of Country Club/Washington and Country Club/Cook require improvements which could impact adjacent development. The analyses were then completed with the project and improvements listed in Table 7. This analysis indicated that four intersections would require additional improvements with the project These improvements are described in Table 8. In general, these improvements are refinements -10- TABLE 5 1995 CONDITIONS (No Cook Interchange) Indian Ridge PM PEAK HOUR WITHOUT PROJECT WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION 3M DELAY LOS VLC DELAY IAS Vamer/Washington (N) 0.84 * F 0.95 * F Vamer/Washington (S) 2.98 * F 3.16 * F I-10 Eastbound Ramps/ 2.37 * F 2.63 * F Washington Country Club/Washington 1.43 * F 1.51 * F 42nd Ave/Washington 1.14 * F 1.28 * F Fred Waring/Washington 0.78 28.8 D 0.81 32.1 D Country Club/Cook 1.36 * F 1.38 * F Hovley/Cook 0.83 * F 0.83 * F Fred Waring/Cook 0.79 * F 0.84 * F Country Club/Eldorado 0.68 8.2 B 0.72 8.7 B * Meaningless Condition l -11- TABLE 6 1995 CONDITIONS WITH IMPROVEMENTS (No Cook Interchange) Indian Ridge PM PEAK HOUR WITHOUT PROJECT WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION VLC DELAY LOS VLC DELAY LOS Vamer/Washington (N) 0.64 7.1 B 0.73 8.4 B Varner/Washington (S) 0.97 38.3 D 1.26 19.7 C ** I-10 Eastbound Ramps/ 0.83 12.9 B 0.72 8.4 B ** Washington Country Club/Washington 1.35 36.4 D 1.20 33.5 D ** 42nd Ave/Washington 1.22 19.0 C 0.99 24.3 C Fred Waring/Washington 0.78 28.8 D 0.81 32.1 D Country Club/Cook 0.97 38.9 D 0.87 37.9 D Hovley/Cook 1.35 22.8 C 0.82 23.8 C Fred Waring/Cook 0.77 27.7 D 0.74 25.7 D ** Country Club/Eldorado 0.72 8.7 B 0.74 9.0 B * Meaningless Condition ** Project Improvement *** Signal Phasing Change - Project -12- TABLE 7 1995 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS (Without Project) Indian Ridge INTERSECTION RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS Varner/Washington (N) Convert southbound through lane to optional through or left. Vamer/Washington (S) Add eastbound right turn and westbound left turn lanes and two northbound left turn lanes. I-10 Eastbound Ramps/Washington Add southbound left and through lanes; northbound through and right lanes and two (one left and one right) eastbound lanes. Country Club/Washington Add eastbound left and northbound left turn lanes. 42nd Avenue/Washington Add eastbound left, westbound left and northbound through lanes. Country Club/Cook Add eastbound left, westbound left, northbound left and southbound left lanes. Hovley/Cook Add southbound through lanes. -13- TABLE 8 1995 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT RELATED Indian Ridge INTERSECTION RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS Vamer/Washington (S) Convert eastbound right turn lane to free right. I-10 Eastbound Ramps/Washington Convert eastbound right turn lane to free right. Country Club/Washington Convert eastbound and southbound right turns to free right. Add eastbound through and northbound right turn lanes. Country Club/Cook Convert eastbound right and northbound right to free right. Add eastbound through lane. Fred Waring/Cook Add northbound right turn lane. -14- of those listed in Table 7. It should also be noted that improvements above these are anticipated for buildout conditions. The intersection analyses for these four intersections with improvements are contained in Appendix E and summarized in Table 6. Sketches of each intersection indicating lane requirements for existing, 1995, and 2010 conditions are contained in Appendix K In summary, for this scenario, significant circulation system improvements are required for the I-10/Washington and Country Club/Cook areas without the project. The addition of project traffic does not significantly change the improvement needs. It is also evident that the deficiencies are not due solely to development or street improvements in a single jurisdiction and joint solutions are required. 2010 - Mtimate Circulation System Potential circulation conditions in 2010 were examined in a manner similar to that utilized for 1995. The circulation system was assumed to be completed including the I-10/Cook interchange. A growth rate of four percent per year was applied to all movements at each intersection from 1995 to 2010. Conditions with and without the project were examined and are discussed in the following paragraphs. Analyses were completed for the 10 intersections without the project and with the improvements listed in Tables 7 and 8. These analyses summaries are contained in Appendix F. The results are summarized in Table 9 and indicate unacceptable conditions at all intersections except I-10 Eastbound Ramps/Washington. These analyses were then repeated with project traffic included. Appendix G contains the analysis summaries and the results are summarized in Table 9. There is no change in Level of Service as a result of the project. The analyses for conditions without this project were further examined to identify methods of mitigation. Improvements to achieve LOS D or better were identified for all except the intersections of Country Club/Cook and Fred Waring/Cook which are F and E respectively. The -15- TABLE 9 2010 CONDITIONS (1995 Improvements) Indian Ridge PM PEAK HOUR WITHOUT PROJECT WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION V/C DELAY LOS DELAY LOS Vamer/Washington (N) 1.15 * F 1.20 * F Varner/Washington (S) 1.44 * F 1.42 * F I-10 Eastbound Ramps/ 0.73 11.1 B 0.74 11.2 B Washington Country Club/Washington 1.36 * F 1.47 * F 42nd Aye/Washington 1.13 * F 1.15 * F Fred Waring/Washington 1.33 * F 1.34 * F Country Club/Cook 1.35 * F 1.40 * F Hovley/Cook 1.97 * F 1.09 * F Fred Waring/Cook 1.28 * F 129 * F Country Club/Eldorado 0.96 * F 1.06 * F * Meaningless Condition -16— analyses are contained in Appendix H and results summarized in Table 10. Table 11 summarizes the improvements utilized in these analyses. These improvements are significant in several areas and indicate a need for an overall review of future traffic needs. This review is beyond the scope of a single project and should be a joint study with multi jurisdictional participation. The 2010 analyses with the improvements listed in Table 11 were completed with project traffic added. These analyses are summarized in Appendix I and the results listed in Table 10. Review of Table 10 indicates no changes as a result of the project. In other words, the circulation system improvements required to accommodate 2010 traffic are the same with or without the project. AM PEAK HOUR All analyses in preceding sections have been based upon PM peak hour traffic conditions. As indicated in Table 1, some intersections experience greater operational problems during the AM peak our. In order to address this condition, some AM peak our analyses were completed for 1995. As indicated previously, the project has no significant impacts in 2010 so that analysis of those conditions for the AM peak hour was not felt to be required. Review of Table 1 indicates that the I-10 Eastbound Ramps/Washington intersection has the highest volume/capacity ratio during the AM peak hour. An analysis was completed for 1995 with cumulative and project traffic and previously identified improvements. The analysis is contained in Appendix J and indicates an average delay of 9.2 seconds per vehicle and Level of Service B. The intersection of Country Club and Washington is also currently deficient during the AM peak hour with existing conditions and is a critical intersection in all scenarios. An analysis was completed of this intersection for the AM peak hour in 1995 with cumulative and project traffic and previously approved improvements. This analysis indicated that additional improvements would be required. The addition of a westbound, southbound and northbound through lane -17- TABLE 10 2010 CONDITIONS WITH IMPROVEMENTS Indian Ridge PM PEAK HOUR WITHOUT PROJECT WITH PROJECT 11MRSECTION VLC DELAY LOS VLC DELAY LOS Vamer/Washington (N) 0.78 13.7 B 0.85 18.9 C Varner/Washington (S) 1.12 17.6 C 0.74 18.5 C I-10 Eastbound Ramps/ 0.73 11.1 B 0.74 11.2 B Washington Country Club/Washington 1.01 34.4 D 1.03 36.3 D 42nd Ave/Washington 1.52 34.8 D 0.97 34.7 D Fred Waring/Washington 0.82 26.4 D 0.83 27.1 D Country Club/Cook 1.16 * F 1.21 * F Hovley/Cook 0.99 28.0 D 1.00 25.5 D Fred Waring/Cook 0.98 40.6 E 1.00 43.1 E Country Club/Eldorado 0.65 18.0 C 0.79 30.0 D * Meaningless Condition -18- TABLE it 2010 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS (Without Project) Indian Ridge INTERSECTION RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS Vamer/Washington (N) Add westbound free right turn lane. Varner/Washington (S) Add northbound left turn lane. Country Club/Washington Add eastbound left turn lane. Add westbound through lane. Add northbound right turn lane. 42nd Avenue/Washington Add eastbound through lane. Add westbound through lane. Add northbound left and through lanes. Add southbound left turn lane. Fred Waring/Washington Add eastbound, right turn lane. Add eastbound left and through lanes. Add westbound through lane. Add northbound left turn lane and two through lanes. Add southbound left and two through lanes. Country Club/Cook Add westbound free right turn lane. Add westbound through lane. Add northbound left and through lanes. -19- TABLE 11 (Cont.) 2010 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS (Without Project) Indian Ridge INTERSECTION RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS Hovley/Cook Add eastbound through lane. Add westbound through lane. Add northbound left and two through lanes. Add southbound left and two through lanes. Fred Waring/Cook Add southbound free right turn lane. Add two eastbound through lanes. Add westbound through lane. Add northbound left turn and one through lanes. Add southbound left turn lane. Country Club/Eldorado Add an eastbound through and right turn lane. Add northbound left and through lanes. -20- would be required to achieve an average delay of 30.1 seconds per vehicle and Level of Service D. As has been discussed previously, there is a current need to improve the I-10/Washington interchange area which includes the Country Club/Washington intersection. This need is not related to the project but to existing traffic and total regional growth. The improvement of this area is being studied by others at present and the final design is beyond the scope of this study. This study has further examined the conditions in the area and developed some mitigation methods. PROJECT TRAFFIC CONTRIBUTION The study has indicated the need for area circulation system improvements and that these improvements are required without the project. An examination was conducted to estimate the volume of traffic at each intersection that was attributable to the project in relation to the total traffic demand. These analyses were completed for 1995 and 2010 based upon PM peak hour trips entering each of the ten intersections in the study. The volume data contained in the various Appendices for without and with project conditions were utilized. Table 12 summarizes these calculations and indicates the percent of total traffic at each intersection attributable to the project. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS This study has examined traffic conditions in the area of the planned Indian Ridge development adjacent to the Cigof Palm Desert in Riverside County. Conditions have been examined in 1995 and 2010 with cumulative traffic and with the project. The study identified existing and future problems. It was found that-the.projed would-require no significant impro-vements_above those required without the project. In the 2010 scenario, the project had no significant impacts. The following circulation improvements have been recommended. -21- TABLE 12 PROJECT TRAFFIC CONTRIBUTION Indian Ridge PERCENT PROJECT TRAFFIC INTERSECTION 1995 2010 Vamer/Washington (N) 10 3 Vamer/Washington (S) 8 5 I-10 Eastbound Ramps/Washington 13 3 Country Club/Washington 10 3 42nd Ave/Washington 8 3 Fred Waring/Washington 2 1 Country Club/Cook 2 3 Hovley/Cook 2 Fred Waring/Cook 4 8 Country Club/Eldorado 5 10 -22- Existing Conditions: Traffic signal installation at the following intersections: Varner/Washington (I) Vamer/Washington (S) I-10 Eastbound Ramps/Washington Country Club/Eldorado Hovley/Cook The Country Club/Eldorado signalization is understood to be underway. It may not be practical to signalize the intersections in the I-10/Washington interchange area as the entire area needs reconstruction. This condition should be further analyzed as a part of an areawide effort. 1995 Conditions: The improvements listed in Table 8 with incorporation of the improvements listed in Table 9. 2010 Conditions: The improvements listed in Table 11 would be recommended as a basis. In addition, a comprehensive evaluation of future needs on a regional basis is needed. -23- COMMENTS This study has been conducted in conformance with the directions of the City of Palm Desert Traffic Engineer. The author does not agree with all of these procedures and assumptions and the concerns are presented below. The analysis is based upon peak traffic periods which occur in January, February and March. This is contrary to normal engineering practice where the 30th highest hour is utilized.(, Another example is shopping centers where parking is not designed to accommodated Christmas peaks. These procedures are utilized as they are practical and represent a reasonable expenditure of funds. The capacity analysis methodology utilized for intersections was the Operational procedure from the 1985 "Highway Capacity Manual". This procedure is not intended for use in evaluating conditions 20 years in the future. It results in implied accuracies that cannot be supported from an engineering viewpoint. The use of Level of Service C as a minimum with the above factors is questionable. Level of Service D is the design level recommended and utilized in most areas. In order to achieve Level of Service C, either many more and wider roads are required or no development of land can occur. In summary, the analysis has been conducted in conformance with City procedures. As professionals, Weston Pringle and Associates do not agree with all of these procedures. (5) "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets", American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 1984, Pg. 52. AP2 A; 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 w m 11 DOUGLAS MICHAEL S > DOUGLASJIEANINE T 36320 N DOUGLAS TER W �� GURNEE9 IL r '-^^" E3 F- DOUG320 600313089 1N 09/25/90 W RETURN TO SENDER NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDER pri d24' - SEP C•....�.JE 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 0 NO SUCH NU?� �i TRY$l{EE 9 ❑ UND_LIVFVCiE AS PDDRESSED Q Ld.� r,^` �.., Z CIS �� u,Ltfl �:i FjL�1C.1„7. — -- — -- S i�'Uf';Wrai A7ArVE;;SI j TEtdPOt RlY1T ItI BAXLEY IClG (] � 2323 FIL MORE ❑ �'fSUfi1CSG4T,",DD£;:SS 4J SAN FRAM ISCO• A 94115 ❑ 11LFG7BLE ❑ REFUSED U.DLAIMED CD 626201011-5 _. ( . ••u 14 u 4: n C Cr� 73 FRED RING DRA,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 gE7U w V s MCKNIGHT SHELDON J MCKNIGHT JUDITH S 3475 RIDGEF D DR r MCKN475 913610003 iN 09/26/90 MESTIAKE VILL ETIr CA RETURN TO NO FORWARD ORDER NONRFILE UNABLE TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDER C v 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 i Ocn g 5 GRIN W TERRY BETTY 0 -- ---_ - — — TERRY BETTY M ui N 76238 HONEYSUCKLE LN TERR238 922603008 1889 09/24/90 PALM! DESERT CA 92260 FORWARDING TIME EXPIRED TERRY 'ORIN O 45 MINGUS MOUNTAIN RD SEDONA AZ 86336-5829 1 RETURN TO SENDER IbAd&m ❑7emporarill Mq ''f��7��000nrarding Order Expired ❑Refused C�o4� o� p�� lJ lWfliicienf Address ❑Vacant O No Such Number ❑No flail Recema le 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 ❑A -Not Ko oOfaRf 111 rn 0 AUSTC NC 8383 I SHIRE BLY NO 900 r- dF BEVER HItLSr CA 90211` + W C'2 632293001-6 el :! 1 SEROER D CHEW ov p&Hm B&cnn pRWARDIN F 73-S70 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 w � rn � F W 00 9> MOTT HARRY BARBARA T V cl oL MOT7 17 CRESTA Y£RDES DR vWi ROLLING HILLS ESTATES* CA 90274 634101042-3 SEP 20'S0 y,'- :lll - "� 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 Ei i 00 5 C a BARTON ROBERT 0 V o RAMPTON SUZANNE W cwn 1125 E MAPLE ST NO 15 GLENDALE# CA 91205 - RAMP125 RETURN 9120520054 IN ENDFR 09/21/90 NO FUNABLE T00FORWARD ON ILE RETURN TO SENDER MW 04 ft0m 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 cl CD LU M h Whitehawk Homes at Palm Desert W � _ 155 S. E1 Mol.ino Ave. , # 100 Pasadena, CA 91101 Wp 632-375-001 thru 009 w 632-371-001 thru 013 v3 Q� a 632-373-003 thru 007 632-374-001 thru 008 COW 04 A&M D&w)N 73-510 FRED WAR ING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORN IA 92260 { E r o d� 0 f PALM DESERT RESDRTER ASSNoF+s N wo- 1S BROGKHDLLDk DR tigo o« SANTA ANAV CA 92705 a r w fig �U 6322n047-5 s Hill III IIIII1111IIl,IIIIIilll if lllll l 111 III III E 73-5.10 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 j� 03 c �w i c w o� f N a EMARD PHILIP D FALEY 141CHAEL N ET AL - 0 2190 TDMN£ CENTER PL 317 _ NANEIMr CA 92806 RETURN " \ 632171019-6 TU SENDER ^IM ER F�PIRE0 i 73�510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 Y OS N Y cn -� BALK OF A1iERICA NAIL TR 6 SV �aMard;� n��L a GS o CIO KINDEL E ANDERSON B "��/cI w >� 4000 MACARTNUR BLV NO 1000 �Ab� $� N NEWPORT BEACNv CA rJ 92660 634101039-1 sm - TT ek3rtit[tGs vti.,ep r V� 11lS� QIJ L>✓G�m LJ�7.51J lS 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 \ Q U to y G 52622 026 DEcx > �, gU � 20� 00�. S v5fidr�. �3fl P 9 2� p a T , CA 250 jj Fj% ALM DESERT , ILL,,lI,hJJ 11 11,,,,Li t„ILL I„il,It Ll i �N + n `V�BIS� �� IrCJ� 111 l5 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 e � g a� 626191013 BALABAN , IIARVEY P (] � 6 ABINANTE WP" c� M O N T E R E Y C A 8'3 SALHCiLS fl39 fOJ'Fp5 15 1_,!Gll3�S s BALABANRWARr:TN6 TT,ME EY,RTRED La 4 'FOGS EL BDSQUE OR rteSLF_' BEACH CA y3y53-30S4 RETURN TO SENDER V� W �LI IS\'/ OLl o a �11111J LJVc�"J��iU l5 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 9226e-� U ax p Y. 626-e_[ .LU1. i] SFR01--L . .i0iIN LC.S VERLV A 3961 MYRA AVF LLS ALAt4ITOS, CA 90720 e C OMW 04 p0HH D �4 A� 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,-PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 r�yy CD = o 62 2=1 5C% i , TO CAI L.LIEI EPdUE' > V R(,�.y�! SE170EA 2 1 A =A,`J [) 902 77 REDOtdDO BCIi , A 3 ' FORWARDING OMER'. EXPMED ;:A MW M Rom B@�mNc� -Ta 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 11 U„ �y � CV l C C' a c Ps U �� + r C'ttVs'Ajj£ � O Add - ��,�rr,.rr,rr,t,rr,�r��1„tr��r,t�r�re�►rr�r,er�,rr� 73-510FRED ARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92a0 Li \ `w � M / E W c 626192073 U KOPP , JOAN E C1 w cD 1755 LANSFORD LN � o � „1,I. 55118 �\ I ST PAIJL -, KOPP758* 551186216 1889 10/03/90 v KOPP FORWARDING TIME EXPIRED 809 DEER TRAIL PT SAINT PAUL MN 55118-2750 RETURN TO SENDER ATf£mfTEO•h47 K!i01MPo — •^�� ` 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 CT) „ r -. �y CD 0R1CUH , [_kb-,lARV N Y O 1 14235 �YY 1 VEL I C YYHY IV 0 J Elc�� F- 0 PALM DESERT , CA 92270 W U i O III III,fill,i,a„i,,,,n„i,n 0 Pd m B&qt@N 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 (� � rn HkLL , LRT �! U` 460= VCkNiORE lhd f i ROA. ING MEADONS , IL60008 v W CD pia+ /f `. . � p - �qg0 �ulS� 011 Lr'G� Lfl LJ�I�IJ lS I 73-51 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 y U o F -+ It02&211023 it I- ti-= CLEMMER , JOHN I ELIZABETH p 8A8`i PRODUCTION AVJ SAN DIEGO , CA 92123, co� ' C SENDER INGlRED 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 (�\ cn \� o 626192029 W � GROSSMAN, NEIL800ANNE C L7 23105 CERCA DR V W p VALErdCIA , CA _ 91355— 1 GROS105 RETURN5TTOSSENDER 10/03/90 UNABLE TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDER I J L .��`��i11t 9ii✓\ C�o4� 04 p�0� D�r� � •� �`�:� 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 W ROScf4ZWEIG , STEVEN J Er ( W o 272 S REXFORD DR 0 � 6EvEkLY I ILLS , CA },0212 W o i uE_ ' ... �AP2: M 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 626221066 ) O 9 GREENBERG , RITA AN 4 h000PINE Ld 0 IRVINE , CA 9271.4 U &� V Ld CU Eg (jREEO04 927141029 1789 10/02/90 1 C:) ir GREEN FORWARDING TIME EXPIRED 38505 NASTURIUM WAY PALM DESERT CA 92260 RETURN TO SENDER r rrG�d 73-510 FR9D )RING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 ❑ ._ V\ W 626232059 rnw TATTE AIL , �'iARGhCF„TA Nci� . °T i ST \ 1 U i x� __ aNl'A MONICA , CA 40402 W C.1 � � c i L•I,I I i.,„I::i N,,,,:i,i,I i,HIS I,i L:,:„i 1,i,III 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT ALIFORNIA 92260 1\ ® /PAERTESOR ER ASSN v1 W 42705 A� 632250047-5 6,1lJ,6,L11 4 L7 UI{A, DER 73-610 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 PDRUq�i:J� �RDEP Rt�EIV t API RED WAGNER FERN V CLER'Lt� rn WAGNER BERNICE !�1 ' rn 8591 VOGEL AVE (� WESTMINSTER* CA 92683 a' 626191005-0 WEJ 00 C Iil,l,,If 1[it III II HIII il,l„ I,ii,,,I III III fill,,I '•^V^\ 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92250 .w La AUSTCO NC m sa 8383 M LSHIRE BLV NO 900 64 — (� cx 16 BEVER V HILLSj CA 90211 o 632293001-6 Iiddf4 V � OCTi; 25 is 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 ® L: _ w rn BUSSEY PATRICIA 3 DANYILLE• CA 94525 632292076-1 `1 fw li z �tNDtR O '} tMRNIrdMV Oder EYpgN $ -SIO FREO WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORN IA 92260 \ � o m WILLIAMS BRUCE ` W WILLIAMS GAYS a 40511 PEBBLE BEACH CIR PALM DESERT CA 92260 6321 -0 y 7. 2a zc ocr .� RE;UAkF Sc iJSO .� C � @(3 u F&A Pgmn REASON CNECriE0 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 9 imed_—.Relused.__ re-- unknownIfTs .� No su,I s Address... ri No sucu slrea--numbs! p I No sucb office in slate_-- \U� CO pot Ismail ill this enveloR� \ ® rn 45 (�, 7 SZEY ROBERT ET AL 6 eO SZEYLLE MARY W s 79484 RIZ ALMS CIR V LA pU \ c = A♦ CA 9 � � Z � ?253 632260018-0 L•II flillill 1� RECEIVED 73-510 FRED WAR ING DR IVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 '90 OCT 22 O(9 1 99 CITY CLERKS C . _ ew $RCNN LAURA- LEE Apt% 3NEItPCR7HIRE CT$EACHs CA 4B 0laer 92b60 Q/ 632293005-0 ry OCT I I•SJ y 1 s i 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 JE ® O cn MCKNIGHT w C12Ll � MCKNIGHT ,,, 6 _ B v 3475 RIDGEFORD DRY A ? 10/2^/90 W CD WESTLAKE VILLAGEt MClCN475 TURN TO S ND I\ o RETURN TO SENDER NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE FORWARDUNA13LE TO RETURN TO SENDER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 t � rip starvII p � _ rdi,7 o - order rn BANK OF AMERICA NATL TR s Svcs Expirep Lr� C/O KINDEL S ANDERSON Ial cv 4D00 MACARTHUR BLY NO 1000 92660 -1 V NEWPORT BEACH# CA 6341Q1039 f� MW A ft��lit Ba3s[TR A a.swi J 73310 FREO WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 'w 08DER tXPIF G(J W rn ... ., , �.. ,.:. . HARRY Lo MOTT gARBARA T C-2 MOTT I\ V i— 17 tRESTA VERDES DR �\ o $ ROLLING HILLS ESTATES• to 94274 634101042-3 SUNRISE COMPANY - .5 s . GOLF COURSE BRIDGE SAMPLES RANCHO MIRAGE PALM DESERT Presented to Palm Desert City Council November 12, 1992 42-600 Cook Street, Suite 200, Palm Desert, California 92260, Telephone (619) 568-2828 Builder of Americds Finest Country Club Communities INDEX Pictures of Golf Course Bridges in Palm Desert and Rancho Mirage Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 9 Location of Indian Ridge Country Club Bridges, Sizes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Bridge Study . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Enclosed: IRCC Site Plan s)` ZS x• �F 1♦ s � 1 � --- - - _- 7r - - MIT- �f Morningside CC Rancho Mirage ,r . y � Mor CC ningside `" _ Rancho Mirage u Palm Valley CC } Palm Desert � . � _ �:�- : . _ ' - ' �� - .. j . - - F y�� Syr �-JL��:� VAS _;R'(Ivr�-�-7 ► ti K The Lakes CC Palm Desert AN .c Ifi.r "l' y Marriott Desert Springs Palm Desert 11 1 1 f ,�{ � • I iI � R � x Nor= >; ;z Fo i _... .._. ..�.w y� y� ✓:-. s�'Sf '�'�'�l��7 Tk�.��,Jy�;y.'� i''#+v�"�►d . 'N,�+g, rye.IA �R -74; in t :'� Marriott Rancho Las Palmas Rancho Mirage �i r. R Monterey CC Palm Desert R L T' Y - u 6 Monterey CC Palm Desert � 1 t 1 ' _ 1 t P ll 1 Monterey CC Palm Desert y �p `1I1 1 1 : The Lakes Vit., +� Palm Desert Y Y �-r• :F r 1 i The Springs Rancho Mirage Ylp , 'Y a ' 111 r , i I Ir } • }:4 . � � ■ tea The Lakes CGom� Palm Desert c �_ _ INDIAN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB GOLF COURSE BRIDGES SPAN BETWEEN WIDTH LOAD LAKE EDGES CAPACITY 1. 6 NORTH (PEDESTRIAN) 18' 6' 2,000 LBS. .2. 6 NORTH TEE 30' 10, 11,000 LBS. :3. 6 NORTH GREEN 18, 10, 11,000 LBS. :'4. 7 NORTH TEE 45' 10, 11,000 LBS. 5. 13 NORTH TEE 28' 10, 11,000 LBS. 6. 18 NORTH GREEN 28' 10, 11,000 LBS. - 11 - 01 �- �J� l IJ U it i � I I��IiI�II i `I • nr.: rt n e e. rrcr. -ye ,,.cGl-19 �1 1W SENT BY;Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 3-13-02 ; 3:25PM ; LANDSCAPE ARCH, 5193417096;# 2 AT R ESTA{IISNED IN 1918 AS A FV{UC ,AGENCY al L6�� ,u`) alai? COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT _ .,,�_ 1990 POST OFFICE BOX IDS{ •COACMELLA. CALIFORNIA 92238•TELEPH6REeyuu%W0 .S oqy; Dian rotNI dh v P1LM OEStRf OFFICER{ DIRECTORS rNOMA$E,LEI' GENERALMANAGER.CNI!F ENGINEER TELLIL CODERAE.PRESIDENT {eRNARDINE SUTTON.SECRETARY RAYMONO R RUMMCNOE VICE PRESIDENT OWEN MCCOCIL ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER JOHNW M``ADOE" September 18, 1990 NEDWINE AND SMERRU,ATTORNEYS DORCTMY M,NICNOLS rHeODORE J.Ff$m File: 0163.1 Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Gentlemen: Subject: Tentative Tract No. 26123, Portion of Section 11 , Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian Drainage from this area is contributory to the Mid-Valley Stormwater Project. The interim flood control study for this project is presently being reviewed for adoption by the affected agencies. Mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the development to prevent flooding of the site or downstream properties. These measures may include on-sits retention of water from the 100-year storm and payment of drainage fees or other participation in the financing of regional flood control facilities. Plana for stormwater protective works shall be submitted to Coachslla Valley Water District for review. The district will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the entroftcertainregulations fees and this chargesdistrict. the subdividerlandosaid provide for the paym fees and charges are subject to change. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 16 and 70 of Coachella valley Water District for domestic water service. The district will need additional facilities to provide for the orderly expansion of its domestic water system. These facilities may include wells, reservoirs and booster pumping stations. The developer will be required to provide land on which some of those facilities will be located. These sites shall be shown on the tract map as lots to be deeded to the district for such purpose. TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY II . LI I AV I UA It I V6QP I V I I U I.JI 1.Urlol1 _^INLIQVYrL MI,Vrl. VQ4 VI V Department of Environmental _2- September 18, 1990 ' set-vices This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Noe. 53 and 80 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. Plans for grading, landscaping, and irrigation systems shall be submitted to Coachella Valley Water District for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. If you have any questions please call Bob Meleg, stormwater engineer, extension 264. Yours very' truly, Tom Levy General Manager-Chief Engineer RF:kb/e9 cc: Don Park Riverside County Department of Public Health 79-733 Country Club Drive, Suite D Bermuda Dunee, California 92201 taet�tut rtutr Batt, oitre�er 1 ORDINANCE NO. 627 _ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT AND SUNRISE DESERT PARTNERS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM/COUNTRY CLUB PROJECT IN SECTION 11, T5S, R6E. CASE NO. PREANNEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR VESTING TT 26123 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the. 8th day of November, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing which was continued to December 13, 1990, to consider the request of SUNRISE DESERT PARTNERS to consider the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said city council did find the following: 1. That the development agreement is consistent with the provisions of Section 25.37 Development Agreements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the city council in this case. 2. That the City Council does hereby approve the Development Agreement, Exhibit "A", for Case No. Vesting TT 26123 between the City of Palm Desert and Sunrise Desert Partners. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council, held on this loth day of January, 1991, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BENSON, CRITES, KELLY, SNYDER NOES: NONE ABSENT: WILSON o ABSTAIN: NONE WALTER H. SNYDER, Mayo ES SHEILA R. GI L GAN, ty Clerk City of Palm Deser , California SRS/tm 73 o .510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 - AUSTC ' I C ) fb 8383 IL HIRE BLV NO 900 r, 1= BEVER Y ILLSs CA 90211 6 V 632293001-6 Ii::JL:IIhI:a11:.:,1:fit::4L1 2 5 . r p a gsrugh.f �' CA L1F' �U998196� ' j• C�B4J OD p0� to ° SENDER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 9 ® s w � d uc a^ __ _ a �. BUSSfY r' N PATRICIA J 00 ?> 155 BIR BARX Pg 1�J 6 DANVILL CA, � 94526 Ll 632292076-1 , ILL.J,,LLIJL.,.IL,,:J,1,,,116,�LIL,IL„I ,t !U SASMfl- DEC 20'90 j .F .. � ?�°•a1�5� 2 J Imo. E —'1 (K Nv oq NO M DwA� n ETDh h to f0 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 SENDER ' FORWARDING ORDER EXPIRED o _ rn MOTT HARRY > E $ARBARA T ..__.. .�.� . . ` dig 1-4 c, 17 CRESTA VERDES DR Pi$ W rb ROLLING HILLS ESTATES9 CA 90274 634301042-3 �e a C�84�f 04 °� �G'inl Pik 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 �• rn R MOSS MOSS848* X902653033 iBER 12�26�90 ,\ RETURN TO SENDER r $ MOSS 19g,48 PA UNABLE TO FORWARD CJ Z¢ MALIBUy RETURN TO SENDER .. _. .. }�, ^. w,ll�lilln ntlililln�liiilnlil .. 1"illl"i�l�l��l�IJ RErU/thf `T OECZO'9A �F'-.i t! 7D ° SENDER �'A LJ :I�� y�m £AS(N! CHECKED 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 fief . �asetl'1 l� C stror ss� tSlate�`= SYEYLLER OBERT A �— 6 SZ MARY R ET AL 79484 OR ON ALMS CIR 92253 W LA IN s 632260016-0 11 (DC cza90 y? i. 2 559 I. 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 w c W MCKNIGHT SHELM > rn �� MCKNIGH7 JUDITH;s d= 3475 RIDGEFORD DR Calm 0 , c W C WESTLAKE , VILLAGES CA `6, C-) z- m O" ifs �n 1 tji 632292-6� 3 O u `U(D F 2 J.NLSiAuF�•. C46-�� BB 938195t___._ ..._.!• 73-510 FRED WARI NG DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALI FORN IA 92260 U '6 W cn DnucLAs - -- r�rcL s DOUGLAS JEANINE T 6sl � z 3632E N DQU6LA5 TER ¢ GURNEEs IL 626201037-9 LC157,7 ' lI Q DEC 20'90 '"'�,� �' •� 6 o4M0m o&Q)@Q4 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIF - 0 ,L O CD R o l > �' WRIGHT NDRM�pA s D 1, 617 MARIPOSA AVE 99 EL SEGUNDCv CA (� w Q 632293021-4 a oec20*90 �.��p �ry .0 H3H195i� 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 CiUgM~ ' ® o _ . .. W rn BANK OF AMERICA NAIL TR s SVGS Forwarding time has ex > P C/O KINDEL E ANDERSON PUed — Wi 4000 MACARTHUR BLV NO 1000 C12 �� NE.MPORT BEACH,, .Cp 92660 Vj o 634101039-1 �' /�;Ua.P��iAGE•= fir '`'(0 C L201�g 0. 25 Ba 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 W o o� 9t EMARO PHILIP D FALEY MICHAEL W ET Al W C12 2190 TOWNE CENTER PL 317 U _` ANAHEIM# CA 92806 1I 632171019-6 RETURN SE, '-)ER h f eses �, iJ i 4�I l I a h n1 r - ILd,;,tl,dl;,d�it„..II„,II„Itii„di111„t,1,61 ♦ D o� /: S.ppOS1 0: c *I 0_ DEC 20'90 .��,; :,I y ( 5 . 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 C rn TERRY ORIN 0 RRY jBETTY M W � gi 76238 HONEYSUCKLE lift',- (I w EE PALM DESERT CA 922A F ' y: TEFtR238 922�437Z? ]68 FORWARDING TIME EXPIRED � TERRVORVI D 45 MINGUS MOUNTAIN RD SED13NA A- arq 36-58c 4 TURN TO SENDER I 2 DEC2®r'4'no-s), 0'90 n. �.4LI I' CHEW ov PUM Din 1 5 EN ��398i93i__ __!`• 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 \\ FORWARDING ORDE6 EXPIRED w ( y 9 — WAGNER FERN V Q cc 9q WAGNER BERNICE cx _ 6591 VOGEL AVE Ll w =� WEST14INSTER CA 92663 o $ 626191005-0 64 �, w FC20�95 ^� f 11 .P( SiAu'f 1. 2 , I« W CQ vup& L,f I�Rsssl`s U z� TO O 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 922 LIJJ FOrWardin8 time has ex-, OASIS PAIN DESERT HOMEOWNER ASSN pfrod C/O KINDEL B ANDERSON 4000 MACARTHUR STE 1000 NEWPORT BEACHv CA 92660 634102042-6 W rn tt55 [3 I ,,�,,,�t5 CA C`L�F. i�b 898193 t..___._.; ��u�J �IJ IYaO f�U1� LJ�;I�u u � e�c7 73-510 FRED WARI NG DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIF IA 92260 0t 7 y � Eu Forwarding time has expiry BANK OF AMERICA NATL TR C SVGS C!O KINDEL S ANDERSON 4000 MACARTHUR BLV NO 1000 NEWPORT BEACH9 CA 92660 634102001-9 aDEC 2osD � �l1lS� �� IY,GI�Uuu LJ�7.�IJ lS C��',4 �.�89819a M i« 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 tuohf•� SEKOER rn fmwardin �= BRONN 8 time has expired -2 �0 5 HAMP5HIRE C7 IAURA LEE is . _� NERPORT BEACHt CA 92660 � e 632293005-0 Ii, ,m1,I,d1,,;i.II,111MIttild!it111„4111,,ItI 1 i�L. cauF • � „faI t1wM>< 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 rn h REINO DONALD am.�,i .. xtwr REINO MARSHA No S ':,,:_ _ - 40503 PEBBLE BEACH CIR PALM DESERT CA 92260 9outx nvmbe: arr,iNln�Lfl '\ j _ Do NotRalarlw20i0-0 a 0EG20'BJ C�o4� o� U��GW D � TO O 73-610 FIR WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260MeEF agg rn Forwarding time has e*rgd -9 OASIS PALM DESERT HOMEOWNERS ASSN cla� � C/0 KINDEL E ANDERSON l�4 LU 4000 MACARTHUR SLY NO 1000 NEWPORT BEACHs CA 92660 634201034-6 0E�2U'90 x'I- L 11 y ULI. po ` 4l z 5 �B(} (j o F IS� �U o o �� L� B31B135 ----_-�i. pp 73.510 FRED WARINO DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 &9 ;n E-6 BARTON ROBERT O g: RAMPTON SUZANNE C12ra GLEN E E CA BART125 912052011 IA89 12/21/90�- LE c� T GiENDALE� -LAI FORWARDING TIME EXPIRED G Ifll BARTON 'ROBERT 0 $ 1010 E MAPLE ST #2 GLENDALE CA 91205-1894 RETURN TO SENDER 9 . ay I:�sselss�_�._JK Fq 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 44. °^ixn,� '• ice., y � O WILLIAMS BRUCE ® cO 6 WILLIAMS GAYS(212 y 7npl�4 40511 PEBBLE BEACH CIR Lo v PALM DESERT CA 92260 ca - - -- -- — — 632172009-0 Hill tills 61t,111l,F1l,FJF I'll IldiIJ6,1,11,lIII a.vL'lAuf / C=L�F �B.B90I35I -� ;473-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 �vi L ; cn PALM DESERT RESORTER ASSN R(i(7p \^ 18 SROOKHOLLOM DR 70�fr vlto 1-1 12 SANTA ANAv CA ag 05 SFNOFk O Ll Q 'PALi�(74�r' 0 52001 IN 12/24/90 1 $ — -- b � TO SENDER • NO FORW D ORDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDER A ALLAN LEVIN ASSOCIATES Development Management•Civil Engineering•Land Planning June 13, 1996 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. Steve Smith APPROVED BY: ❑C.C.RES.NO._ Senior Planner 0 .RES.NO.� City of Palm Desert STAFF LETTER ❑ RC ACTION FORM Palm D Fred Waring Dr. BY-4 /�4 Palm Desert, Ca 92260 b�1 Dab CONSn1UC71011 SHALL COMMENCE WIN ONE YEAR OF THIS APPROVAL RE: INDIAN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB -TIME EXTENSION FOR TEMPORARY USE PERMITS FOR DESIGN CENTER OFFICES AND FOR FIELD CONSTRUCTION COMPLEX Dear Mr. Smith: On behalf of Sunrise Company, I respectfully request that the City approve a one year time extension to July 13, 1997, for the Temporary Use Permits for the De- sign Center Offices and for the Field Construction Complex. These permits were approved on July 13, 1992, and were valid for an initial two year period (to July 13, 1994) with provisions for additional one year extensions on the approval. The Indian Ridge Country Club project has approximately sixty buildings pres- ently under construction and anticipates applying within the next two weeks for another eight building permits for the next phase of construction. Therefore, they will need to continue to use the Design Center and Field Construction fa- cilities. These facilities were designed for their present locations to be functional throughout the multi-year construction buildout of the project. If you have any questions, or require any additional information in order to ap- prove this request, please contact me immediately. Please notify me once the time extension has been approved in order that we may keep our files and records up to date. Thank you for your cooperation and expeditious handling of this request. Sincerely, ALLAN LE IN AS OCIATES D�'X 0 Allan R. Levi cc: Jack Conlon - Sunrise Company 76-768 Bishop Place• Palm Desert,CA 92211 •(619)345-0058 Voice/PAX a^ �i BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CLERK OF THE BOARD flP1�' Z j , Ne8 DratiWiNtc Detertrini:,-i 1 Z'� 0*4!9j' Q'dd () ��c� �11R Fil JWP.R.C.21152 73-51 15 �J�D �QEVP4"0G DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA S o p� T eMlte i�611 Rerxv ' yn .0 ros ere. _r y BY ! ByOCPCt Uctoher2, 1990 CouMyo:�ilrllc9id9�S4':actG;itorri CITY OF ALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. VESTING TT 26123, PP 90-21 AND A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY G!VEN that a public hearing will he held hPfore the Palm Desert City Council to consider a request by Sunrise Desert Partners for approval of a Vesting Tentative Tract Map, a precise plan of design, draft development agreement and negative declaration of environmental impact as it pertains thereto for a 1270 unit residential condominium development including 2, 18 hole golf courses, tennis facilities and related amenities on 637 acres located between Country Club Drive and 42nd Avenue and between E1 Dorado Drive and Oasis Club Drive also described as section 11 , T55 R6E. 4 BIN,, -- AVUNUALE — — �f •.�\� PAUi VALLEY PALUS •t COURTRY CLUB DRIVE—jl ' LANES w = = RESORTER c SUBJECT PROPERTY o I a IIIIII 2 U I p N N PR. 5 w ♦unun,.,,4u•nrrttryuiv . 02r.d AVEIIUE — O F- t N �`— �,_ \ \ • lea onive SAID public hearing will be held on Thursday, November 8, 1990, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are Invited to attend and be heard. Written comments concerning all items covered by this F'uhlic hearing notice shall be accepted up to the date of the hearing. InFortnal' ion -.oricorninq th,± proposed pro nc.t and/or negative dpelaration is available for review in the department of community development/planning at the above ;address between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else rai5ed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the planning commission (or city council ) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post SHIFLA GILLIGAN, City Clerk be 0hor 11 1990 City of Palm Qozer•t . California Landau The Landau'1000-Wait Forward Throw from Crouse-Hinds combines power and perfor- mance in a variety of mounting capabilities for / J a variety of applications such as auto lots,park- ing areas,roadways,recreation areas and more. 28 The formed-aluminum,continuously welded housing is finished in dark-bronze polyester powder coat enamel for weatherability and abrasion resistance.The extruded-aluminum, sealed and gasketed door is hinged and - ' - -- fastened with captive retaining screws and fea- tures an impact-resistant tempered-glass lens. 1 1 �-2191e'� Design Features The landau's 750 cutoff angle allows maximum lighting control without unwanted spill light behind the pole.Rotatable Optics allow for side throw in either direction.Choice of single side-mount arms for one,two,three or four fixtures or with the optional multi-unit tenon-mount bracket for two or three units in one direction allow appli- cation control and flexibility while maintaining low glare and sharp-cutoff illumination. Captive retaining screws. i O 0 Formed,anodized,speeuler-aluminum cutoff d reflector Is rotatable for forward-or side- throw Illumination. r Nigh-temperature door gasket prevents entry of contaminants. Extruded-aluminum hinged door with Impact-resistant tempered-glass lens. i i Porcelain socket fits Mogul base 11000-watt l metal halide or high-pressure sodium lamps. �] �J{1f — N , Separate ballast tray allows easy removal ,.. of electrical components. � 3 0 weather- Formed-aluminum housing Rant polyester y --- r weather-end abresion-resistant polYesi¢r � ' powder coat enamel. 0. w • c Continuously welded corners. Footcandle Plot A Footeandlo Plot 8 I Landau Unit-20'Mounting Height 2 Landau Units-20'Mounting Haight Footcandle Values for Catalog Number MFT91 MWNFT Catalog Number-Oty.2-MFT9I MWNFT Isofootcandle lines.Plot 1000-Walt Metal Halide 1000-Walt Metal Hattie A B C D E F O 107,800-Lumen Clear Lamp 107.800-Lumen Clear Lamp 4 4 50.0 20.0 10.0 5.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 3 3 Footcandle Values for Isofootcandle lines-Plot B 2 2 A B C D E F O 1 1 50.0 20.0 10.0 5.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 E 0 a• E 0 i I 2 2 , 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 Footcandle Plot C J Footcandle Plot D L� I Landau Unit-29'Mounting Height 2 Landau Units-28'Mounling Height Footcandle Values for Catalog Number MFT91 MWNFT Catalog Number.Oty.2-MFT9I MWNFT Isofootcandle lines-PlotC 1000-Wan Metal Halide 1000-Watt Metal Halide p B C D E F O ' 107,800-Lumen Clear Lamp 107.800-Lumen Clear Lamp 4 4 50.0 20.0 10.0 5.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 3 3 Footcandle Values for Isofootcandle lines-Plot D 2 2 A B C D E F O 1 I 50.0 20.0 10.0 5.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 F 0 •• 0 1 1 2 2 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 Footcandle Plot E Footcandle Plot F 1 Landau Unit-30'Mounting Height 2Landau Units-30'Mounting Height Footcandle Values for Catalog Number MFT91 MWNFT Catalog Number.Oty.2-MFT9/MWNFT Isofootcandle lines-PlotE 00-Watt Metal Halide 1000-Watt Metal Halide A B C D E F 6 .800-Lumen Clear lamp 107,800-lumen Clear Lamp 4 4 20.0 10.0 5.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 0.25 3 3 Footcandle Values for Isofootcandle lines Plot F 2 2 A e C D E F 6 1 1 50.0 20.0 10.0 5.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 -- 0 •• o I 1 2 2 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 Catalog Number Logic 1 st,2nd&3rd Digits= 4th&5th Digits= 61h Digit— 7th Digit= 8th Digit= 9th& 10th Digits= Product Family Lamp Wattage Lamp Type Ballast Type Voltage Distribution MET=Landau 91=1000 S=HPS W=CWA 0=208 FT=Type IV M=Met.Hal. 2=120 Forward Throw 4=240 3D=Type III 7=277 MCO 8=480 N=Multi Tap Catalog Lamp Lamp Ballast NEMA Net Wt. Shipping Number Wattage Type Type Voltage Beam (Lbs.) Volume(Cu.Ft.) MFT9I MWNFT 1000 MH CWA Multi Tap FT 80 5.0 MFT91 MWN3D 1000 MIT CWA Multi Tap III MFT9I SWNFT 1000 HIPS CWA Multi Tap FT MFT91SWN3D 1000 HIPS CWA Multi Tap III Effective Projected Area(EPA): Frontal=l.9 Sq.Ft.l Profile=25 Sq.Ft, Add 5 Sq. FL EPA for Arm mounts. Options (add as suffix) Accessories (order separately) L Lamp included. OA1016 Photoelectric control, OA1157 12"rectang ular arm. S 2"slipfitter of ri Ili ng(order 105-285V. OA1158 18"rectang ular arm. sliptitter 0A1150 below). OA1O27 Photoelectric control,480V. OA1159 Tenon-mounted crossarm. 1 Single fused.Fuse included. OA1149 Polycarbonate vandal shield. Two units. 2 Double fused.Fuses included. Field installed. 0A1160 Tenon-mounted crossarm. 4 Photocontrol receptacle. OA1150 Slipfitter for tenon mount. Three units. OA1156 6"rectangular arm. OA1161 Direct crossarm mounting kit. Mounting Systems (order separately) MOWN OA1150 OA1156 OA1157 OA1158 00161159 OA1160 Slipfitter for tenon 6"rectangular arm. 12"rectangular arm. 16"rectangulararm. Tenon-mounted cross- Tenon-mounted cross- mount. arm for two units. arm for three units. Note.OA1156,OA1157,OA1158 or OA1161 must be ordered for each fixture when ordering OA1159 or OA1160. General Luminaire shall be Crouse-Hinds Ballast shall be of the high-power factor, series LANDAU,catalog number_ constant-wattage autotransformer type. for use with 1000-watt_lamp. Starting current shall be less than Housing shall be formed aluminum with operating current. continuously welded corners and shall provide Socket shall be Mogul,porcelain-enclosed, protection against the weather.Housing shall and shall have a spring-loaded center con- be separated into two independent optical tact.It shall be properly positioned to allow and electrical compartments. correct location of the lamp in the reflector Door shall be extruded-aluminum,hinged, assembly.It shall be specifically designed continuously gasketed frame with a clear to withstand the high-voltage impulse to tempered-glass lens.Door shall be secured start the lamp. with stainless steel captive screws.In closed Finish All.painted-parts shall be coated with position,door shall register against the con- powder coat thermoset polyester enamel,for- tinuous gasket on the luminaire housing. mulated to provide no appreciable fading Optics Optical system shall be composed characteristics within five(5)years.Color of a formed,anodized,specular-aluminum shall be Dark Bronze. reflector to achieve 750 front cutoff.Optics Listing Luminaire shall be UL listed and shall be field rotatable to achieve front-beam, shall carry a UL label suitable for wet locations. right-beam or left-beam aiming. - y�9 8q i �i i jl s II Crouse-Hinds P.O.Box 824 Vicksburg,Mississippi 39181 601.638:1522 fax 601.634.9606, 1y' w COOPER LIGHTING ;w PER - ADHe l J'I PARKETTE SERIES TENNIS LIGHTING NET SET ECOLOGY LIGHT l Virginia Slims Championship �' a Manhattan Beach Country Club , Chris Evert Lloyd. 1986 Lighted,by Bieber, using eight N 1000-watt Metal Halide Super Parkettes. - r RECEIVI� �:. APR 22 Mon= I DsvewPMErrr � LIGHTING CORPORATION MANUFACTURERS OF QUALITY LIGHTING EQUIPMENT 626 SOUTH ISIS AVENUE, INGLEWOOD,CA 90301 (213) 776-4744 Bieber Lighting, a leader in the outdoor illumination field for over forty years and in tennis lighting for over twenty, presents the Parkette series, NET SET for tennis court lighting. These Net Set ecology lights will provide the comfort of daylight play at night. Net Set's high level of illumination is achieved while minimizing glare due to its unique optical chamber design. Net Set is designed for easy installation and maintenance. TYPICAL COURT LAYOUTS Pole Cap rll —48 all -M ulf, 22' Recommended height for 8 light system-22' For 6 light system—24' Courts may be lighted at lower heights where restricted. Y:•pipe coupling, Minimum pole size: eleatdc INtl T'h"OD. ,'above 9ra Is.+ structural steel. ,2a Concrete looting T ,. Side-by-Side Tennis Court Layout b 18" 22� 22' -40 224' T1 20' �• 120, 120' 30' 70• 3a' 24! 20' 24' II 8 Fixture I 6 Fixture Hotel Paddle Court Layout Tournament Play Layout or Home Play Layout (Drawings not to scale) BIEBER L I G HTI N G CORPORATION FIXTURES ARMS 4' 1 0 1 4 Mini Net Set Accessory light for walkways and parking areas 7available ar �25•• 214d'� sizes. T 1 POLES Standard Net Set un••` 22' 'Pole THeight 9'd•' 1 L 1 L 1 Super Net Set Zu bolt down direct burial bolt down direct burial (Drawings not to scaia) 4"-round pole 4"-square pole SPECIFICATIONS Housing—All aluminum, heavy duty, continuous welded, Electrical Components—All components are of the waterproof, UL listed "for wet locations." Cannot rust. A highest quality obtainable and UL listed. "quick service heavy aluminum plate is welded inside fixture at the power door" available upon request. All ballasts are CWA mounting arm joint for extra strength to withstand heavy high power factor regulating auto-transformers, starting at winds.' Aluminum partitions are installed between trans- -20°F. They are available in metal halide, mercury vapor former, bulb and arm for cooler operation of these com- and high pressure sodium vapor. All wattages and volt- ponents. This construction is stronger than die-cast ages are available. aluminum. Fixture Mounting Arm—A one-piece rectangular steel Optical Chamber—Specially designed for tennis lighting. tube for strength with slipfitter welded to it to fit any pole Consists of a 3-piece scoop-type reflector, die-formed size. Galvanized /2" selbolts hold it in place. Cap is furn- from a marriage of diamond-embossed aluminum and ished with it to keep out moisture. smooth coilzak. This synergistic design is a much more effective method of diffusing light evenly, while minimizing SOCket—Is glazed porcelain with silver coated 600 V glare,than any to date. They produce a square pattern of contacts, mogul base, spring loaded. light. Finish—Is etched, primed and baked using acrylic Lens and Frame Assembly—Lens consists of a /d' enamel. Standard colors are bronze, black, silver white, tempered, high impact heat-resistant glass. The frame green and brown. Custom colors to your specs, no extra and lens are moisture sealed by 2 closed cell neoprene charge. Duronodic anodizing available on special request. gaskets. The lens frame is one-piece die formed 16 gauge aluminum. It is secured by 2 quarter turn captive screws for easy maintenance. The lens frame opens on a full- length heavy duty aluminum piano hinge. All fixtures are factory-tested before shipment. Pole height may vary according to number of lights per court and local ordinances.See recommendations on page 2. 'Standard units approved for up to 125 mph winds.(Engineering available by request.) ORDERING SPECIFICATIONS LIGHT CUTOFF SHIELDS CATALOG LINE OPERATING 4-Sided Light Cutoff Shield LAMP TYPE NO. VOLTS AMPS 35 For Standard Net Set' /1 Meta Watt TEN91 208 17S V Metal Halide TEN91 208 7.8 TEN92 240 6.75 TEN93 277 3.85 351M' ' TEN94 480 3.4 Meta Wan TEN10 1 '" Metal Halide TEN101 208 208 S 5.3 T TEN102 240 4.6 --.32%"_- TEN103 277 4.0 TEN104 480 2.3 bottom view side view 1000 watt TEN110 120 94 'Super Net Set shields are 401114"09'W". High Pressure TEN111 208 5.4 Sodium TEN112 240 4.7 77 2 TEN113 .1 �N ,A„� TEN11 277 2.4 4 Met Wan TEN12 3. Metal Halide TEN121 208 208 2 2 31 TEN122 240 1.95 TEN123 277 1.7 7"TEN124 480 .98 Leading Edge Shield i 1 end view High wan TEN131 208 4.2 2A Back Shield Sodium Pressure TEN132 240 2.1 end view Sodium TENi32 240 2.1 TEN133 277 1.8 TEN134 480 1,05 Other cutoff shields designed to order. MOUNTING ARRANGEMENTS i �-4' 2• 5. � 16' 3. 4. 1 6. 7. 8-- 8' l 8. FINISHES ORDER OPTIONS AVAILABLE EXAMPLE WM — Wall Mounts GL — Black Catalog Mounting LX — Drop Lexan GZ — Bronze hil Arrangement Option Vandal-Proof Lens GH — Brown Flx� Fl� WH — White Gfl — Green TN — Tan TEN112 SUPER 2 gL LX GB — Dark Bronze SL — Silver • CC — Custom Color Special colors and finishes are available. This document contains proprietary information of the Bieber Lighting Corporation and is transmitted in confidence. BIEBER Any reproduction,except disclosure Lre or use of this document is expressly pro- LIGHTING G O R P O R A T O N writing except as Bieber Lighting Corporation may otherwise agree in writing. MANUFACTURERS OF DUALITY LIGHTING EQUIPMENT 6 1986 BIEBER LIGHTING CORPORATION - 626 SOUTH ISIS AVENUE,INGLEWOOD,CA 90301 213 776-4744 PHGNIE 1 11 h ) 1 1 1- 1.11 s I CU.'+T=h RS I11ELER LIGHTING VAOJECT DESCRIVTIONS TYPICAL a -POLE TENNIS COURT y COPIMENTSI INITIAL HORIZ 11-LUM a NET HT 13' ) ON 5 M 4 Ff'IR10 MANUFACTURERS 131EIsER LIGHTING LUMINAIRE DESCRIPTION. SUPER PARKETTId ' TEST REPORT NUMBERS LRL 605-IIC r LA11P DEfiCpIPTIONI IaGO-w 'CL MET HAL LUMkNS 1I0000 .;& LIGHT LOSS FACTORt 1 DALLAEST FACTORS 1 PALE HEIGHT 20 FT ' pI8 FROM LEFT REF LINE 2.5 7.5 12.5 17.5 22. 5 27.5 32.5 3'7. 3 42. 5 47.3 52.5 57•J \ 1C�R 17 nN 'aL FOOTCANDLES _�...« j7. 9 ' w i1 M' it * N I N • ' 1 .2 71 .2 7 8 47. 7 59.0 60.4 69.2 ld. 7 51 .5 32.2 I7.� 9.9d 22.5 600 76.2 63.8 73.2 64.6 65.4 73.7' 73.8 55.5' 39.6 19.�1 ll.p 1. 9 8. 1 72.4 5. 7 59.0 59.b 64 48.4 42, I 19� I�.Q b s � r r rT�64'00 B. q 60.9 71.7 68.0 .2 . 61 .6 50. 8 48. 3 37. 1 24-1 w w 7. 5 t 9 k4.5 3�•, ZQ.4 5.9 85.9 04. 8 85.5 la2*.5 80.6 75.2 67. 6 57. 2.5 ' � w r * r r w r N^• w tt' � , 8= 4 88.5 88. 7 87.3 85.5 02. 2 77.5 70.0 58. 1 46. 1 34.A 22.6 -2.5 # w ' f* w w w * w N +► • w• w e.4100.5� 80.7 87.3 85.5 82.2 77. 5 70, 58. 1 44. 1 34.;y 22.4 .7.5 1~ w ' +� . ♦ ,r 1► �► w >f 20.a 5. 9 d5.9' 84. 8 d5.5 02.5 80.6 75.2 47. 6I 57.9 4, 4.5 33., 2. 5 � w r r M * N N w N • N' tt IE•�,- e.g 68.9 71 . 7 ae.q 67.2 64.0 dl . a 98.8 4d.3 37. 1 24,0 14.6 ' 119 be. l• 72.4 65.7 59.0 59.6 64.2 42. 2 4Q:4 32. 1 MA32/p 22. 5 r * w �► * * * w w w w w �. 6.8 76.1 8 8 73. 2 64. 6 65.4 73. 6 V. 0 55.5 35.4 19:4 11.0 27.5 • r * * + at w w N M l . 2 71 . 3 77.6 67. 7 59.0. 60. 4 69. 2 69. 7 ! l . 5 32'. 2 17:y 9. 11d THE LEFT COLUIN I5 DISTANCE .ALONG THE HORIZONTAL PLANE {. MEASURED FROM THE LOWER REFERENCE.. LINE. LUMINAIRE TILT ANGLE IS MEASURED FRgM VERTICAL AIMING DIN IS MEA9 COUNTER-CLOCKWl% W TH 0 AT 3O-CL�1GK ,'i AVERAGE ll iAL 11,Lv1.jNni'i��i�i MINIMUM INrTIAL ILLUMINATIONI 9.98 UNIFORMITY (AVERAGE/MINIMUM) 1 5.931., 1 1000 wart ana'w��r II I AVC INIT IUJlt4 ON COIU(Ti 74.0 AVC INIT ILLUM ON W41TI 112.0 MIN 114IT JLLUM ON COUIITS 58.8 MIN INIT 1LU44 ON COIU(TI .0 AVG/MIN ON COWS 1.26 AVC/14IN 014 COUI(Tl .?5 FEB-16-193 10:03 ID: TEL NO:213-776-0235 #922 P01 IPvJ Ct)',TOMER; haeR GHr PROJECT 00 0"!Q41101 TYPICAL WPOLE wkNis COIRT, pAnKarr, i �'. . -1 HORIZ ILIUM 0 NET Hv (3 FT ) ON 5 X 5 r. rill+COMMENTS; INITIAL "T MANUFACTumn: BIEBER LIGUTING k 1. LUMINAIRK VKSCV!P'r1I:tN`: PA.WETTE TEST REPOPTAUMBIQ LRL 2thh-SD kill r 1000-W CL HE s". LAMP nrSCRIPTION; I LUMENS 1400001 LIGHT 405A FACTOW VIS FROM LEFT REP LINE 2. 5 7. 5 12. 5 17. 3 22. 5 27. 9 320 37111 420 17. 1 52 5 MORIZONYA, FOUTCANIA I tN Oi %l:P", lilt 'it of) 2' a 1 . 76 1 , 2 16 4 . 14 4. 40 1. 26 1. 75 3. 03 -11 .... .. toy 1 , 1. -1 6. 92 QQ 2- 06 J2, 4 12. 6 13. 3 12. 5 11 . 7 IL . 9 11 . 7 11 9. 1 1 ,1 .1, h,1) 1cf T tiff .7. 5 IN" 37. 7 4 1 . ll� 4 0 :3919 36. 5 36. 5 39. 3 11. 1 2910 20. P 1-�- 0 7.! 0 L 3 J4, q Iq, 5 lys, 66.0 75. 0 11, 0 73- 0. 63- 0 65. 1 72. 1 69. N ..del 'Iflogyph q, 77. 6 04. 2 76. 6 7 72. 0 71, 1 1 1017. 6 30. 4 23a j! 41 7"l- :5 L.3-7 3- I TV F1, 12. 5 'k iF .'1f ` 75. 3 7P. 7 73, 2 10, 9 67. 2 6P, 3 b2, 9 52. P 37. 9 4A , 7, 5 11. . 6 54 . 1 Q. 7 36? 69. 9. PIT,Mys"PI 2. 5 it .91 Q 4 q 77. 2 75, 6 75. 1 74 1 74. 0 70. 6 64. 9 50 H S0. 2 40, 61 '41917j;Q1 .k j. 4 , it w 'A 1 71. 0 70. 6 6419 wo 50. 2 AU. 6 -29! 7 .'I 77. 2 75. 6 7g, l 74. -7jS 69. 2 69, 9 0§ 6 60, 3 65, 0 64 . 0 &W 501 107 ;A, a jump. "I' 71 1, l; " T . 13 17. 9 2'1, T 'I ef (I I-Z -Z-11 k. -17. 5 It 1 . 7 57. 6 3011 21 9 "i'l It. 3 77. 6 �4. 2 7674 71- 3 11, T20 It .4 mill 5 -Z 66. 6 75. 0 70 0 74. 0 63- 13 bn- I 03 11. 0 19. 5 -27. QUA .3�7 0 too nFly 1 37. 7 41 . 4 !a -321s 12. 6 12, 5 ti . 7 11 . 9 11 - 7 1 1 - 2 9. th 6. 52 1 . 40. Z. jp l 0�-' Wil, 12. 4 A W v I Ir it 5 4. 14 4, 40 4 3, 00 3. 11 005 4.26 1. 75 Z- 03 Fill THE LEFT COLUMN 10 DISTANCE ALONG THU HOPI XONTAL. PLANE' MEASURED FROM THE LOWER REPERENCV LINV LUMINAIRE TILT ANGLE 15 MEASURED rKQM 'VV91 KAL r" COILIWTER-CLOCKWInj WI1W U AT 0 AIMING DIn IS WAS AV: RACE INI'TIALVILLUMINATION: Al - 91 "I MINIMUM INITIA" xU.QM1kAFj0M: 3 , 2q I LL ILL IilJ: 1 - �• U�a. _i ��___ i !_ ' 'LIGHTING RESEARCH LABORA'1i,RY Z 47' J'uNiPER AVENUE - ORANGE, CA. 92467 PHONE 1714 F 771--1312 • 08-26-190 lCUSTOMERS 13IEBER LIGHTING PROJECT DEBCRiP'fIAIJt ,f N� KCAL 6-Pi 7L1 1419 CQU�FT_, f ColIMENTSi INITIAL HORIZ ILLUM a NFT K7 13' F ON 5 X FT GRID Y. MANUFACTURER; DI EBER LIGHTING LUMINAIRE DESCRIPTIONS 6Uf,LR PA tE• TEST REPORT NUMBERS LRLL 60-11 LAPIP DEtCRIPTIGNI 100QrW CL MET. HAL• LUIIENS: 1 10000 LIGHT LChIJ FACTI)RS t BAL-LAST FACTORS 1 MOUNTING2. W) IGHT: 20' ' DIg FROM LEFT lifF LINE 5 R"7.a 12.5 17. 5 2.'2. 5 '27. 5 3215 :i7- 5 42. 5 47. 5 52. 5 57.5 i I, HG,RIZONIAL FOOICANDLES 3'>.8 2511 2.6.9 38.( 53. E, b4 55, 7 47.2 «1, 1 11.8 �.� {{• {'� �' it iF N' iF it # iF , N• * it 67. 7 .5'2. 3 36. 1 27. 3 29. 3 41 . 6 57. 0 69. 8 59,3 40. 4 23. 1 12.8 57. 3 46.0 33.9 28.0 2'9. 4 38. 0 510 11 57. 50. 3 36,1 22.0 13. 4 12. 5 52. 6 47. 3 .41 . 0 35. 1I35.8 ,42. 5 47. 11 5'2. 5 45. 0 47, 2 444 17.0 7.5 it f iF il' M 11 N N it M' N 60. 2 56. 7 50. 4 49. 7149. 2 52. 1 57. 41 513, 54. 1 45.4 34. 4 2440 1 61 .E 54. 9 54. 1 51. 3 52. 7 53.9 57. 2 59. E 53.9 45.4 34, b 25. 5 161 . 2 54. 9 54. 1 52. 3 52. 7 53. 9 57, 2 59. ; 53. 9 4544. 46. 6 25.5 ,f T: h0'. 2 ;56. 7 50. 4 49. 7 49. 2 52. 1 57. 4 5f1. 54. 1 45..+ 34.4 23. 8 R -12.5 r .j . * K. 92. 6 '47^3 4.110 35. 1 �35. 4442 -5 A7. '� 52. S 45. 0 37. 2 26, 6 17.0 � i ' -17. 5 457. 3 46. 0 33. 7 28. 0 29. 4 38.0 50. 11 57.2 50,;1 34.:: 22.0 13. 4 -.�f.2. j {t `.� d it * $• M N i<' $ * is �. , I ' 67. 7 52. 3 36. 1 27,3 '29. 3 4I : 4 57.0 69. 8 59. 3 40,4 2J, 1 12-8 j -27, 5 * N ,r ♦i * M ,1f if 63. 9 48. 5 3' . 8 25. 1 :Zb. 9 38.0 53. 11 64 . 'J 55. 7 37. 2 21 . 1 11 .8_I 'fHE L-LFT COLUh1N 19 DISTANCE- ALONG THE 1101112ONTAL PLANE MEASURED FROM 71-IE LOWER REFERENCE L.114F. L'UHlNi-,l RE TILT rliN i_ '�' .{�:A''1'4>,1N 1) I'_K;I1 'v FtR i lCr.L.• A11'11NG DITt IS MEAE CI?UNTER--CLC,CKWISH 1411I.1 0 AT 3 0-CLOCK AVERAGE INITIAL ILLUMINATION, 43. 62 MINIMUM INITIAL ILLUNINATIONt 11 . 79 � . UNIFORMITY (AVERAGE/MINA*IUPt1 s 3. 7 1000 Watt 1500 Watt AVG. INIT ILLU14 ON COI1RTt 49.4 AVG 11111' 1WAIN Otd COURTf 74.1 MIN INIT IL:LUM ON COURTS 28.0 MIN INIT ILLU4 ON C01p.'1 42'.0:' AVO MIN RATIO ON COURxs 1.76 AVG/MIN RATIO, ON WURTI i I 0 � RECEe��D SU USE MA 181993 May 1 A, 1993 COMPANY mxx� a CM �o Sw anxcc� , Mr. Steve Smith �41 �P Associate Planner CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: INDIAN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB - TENNIS COURT LIGHTING Dear Mr. Smith, Enclosed please find copies of the manufacturer's specification sheets for the tennis court lighting fixtures which will be used at the Clubhouse at Indian Ridge Country Club. Please note that the li�lb is recessed within the fixture housing. This will eliminate the*City's concern of light "spill". Please review these specifications with John Wohlmuth. Upon completion of your review and subsequent approval of these fixtures, please notify Steve Buchanan (Building Department) in order that we.may proceed with the fixture installation. If you have any questions or require any additional information in order to approve our request, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your cooperation and expeditious handling of our request. Sincerely, SUNRISE COMPANY. Allan R. Levin Vice President, Project Planning & Development ARL/la cc: Jerry Trammer, w/o attachments Vin Rover, w/o attachments Chris Beebe, Lusardi, w/o attachments Tnnsling.irc 42-600 Cook Street, Suite 200, Palm Desert, California 92260, Telephone (619) 568-2828 Builder of Americas Finest Country Club Communities • ,. - � - �.� �. •�lr�l��fi`��i�ii�Ci i�li , 1�Iii1illf�ll��I y � • r i •t• rtr+� rr vet' SIT, AM MEN Intlj!!1!!i"ll�;!!1_!!_,t.1l�ljfl�� 11 t�Y"1YY1„��,�h�1t!�'�r,��rjri �� ♦ l)� �I.L�.1�h��a�i at !1 �.f I`,I(.J•1`.—•!-�:1�„y T`�``!��!�` 1 A ``�'t°, , ,i, i +iijju+ ��i�i�'/rf -J+ +7 L'�rII/f' �; � ��` e�� ►.7 r `�s� t• i�XSl+al��l'Ii��LI\tG!i1.GlG'i�Ziii!14+f°i\��\!GE�T`y?' I • �`i�` �p,. .1. !_S/�► `1�`X�F�11 i iG6`I�� i. i ,YY, 'i c t �, i 1 ,Ci\ '�,1 t� a �'�i f'�•. '1r (aC•�'�{ fj}; i ^�ii!' �K�'i�E A�1 �t lltl!!!l.�1�?!1#!!.l,:l��Ilj t!,►UY� �,. � ��1 ..• �r��°ti�� ; �` `�`�j ��.�3.�j�r�s�,�.i��. ' ` 1�� ` !�AI l !!f:1! �r ti� at '°� +! '� �:�1�%�",s-1 �•�EL��ir�Y!G'Y�I�'�Ii /��•�i' r,f:'�'� r•�' ,r f,r 1 l.l• 'v" � �^� '�� +�,,� . '+�y tire:E� ;tis"•`jr ' ��-}~ � � l� •'fr�� * `��.l� �.., �'� 1�tll�"p!llY�1l�'1� !�'/ �` \ . v a 1,,.!_l�i�,�xt� , I,��1 •>°�` � �� , �� _'� r�!i� i{i1�il�i!il it/'��`.fJ„ ,��,� �i ,.�Pti1t1:4�Itlti�t� l31.f��t�'''��. r� � '�a �p, a �t :' �i`t• 11u�,.. y ;: ' e ltfi�•� 1�l ~ �> ,�+► 13�1'tti^ "t?1� "'tl[�_1 � f`r ai`� r•�r 1t�Ti � •`�'�'��1+Gi ':11 1 : - ,'• tl '� �, 1� �..f i��. ,� � 1.—:a :. I,� 1 :-, � ]�_tr�•7tr/r� ;_. .,�ttr 1�y-ta il� 'ice• � (.�� p�= 1� y� 1 +�.t to v ... � -+�Yti�i�i�l�iY1�lY1�(� '�►: >' � :r! Imo. l trom�.. ff �l •�. . `^>y O� 11) �f E•T.' �i+'1� � � ! � � F� �w �! �r r ,�,� a•� tsi>�, '��. •�.tr 1 raj i� • 1 1�i�•' � � � �1� . :r�li t..�R `�' ✓: � 1 � ir+ �: 1�� +• �� k.w. •�, ry � T' ^'� �{ � �. ��' � .�7. ``tom `� �� 7i' sra. ` 't' '�.•:II.r `/ /� i 1• �• f ('s. ii '1-A7 i;�l�= C S1:Ily- I Y\ ` l �1 ii•R � �F� .�_ 'i.G. 4 'a'il ,IZ=•�R � a� LJ.i71.1.17yi11..�Y � �'. �. :� r ' MA ++'I/L,;t t!1 :� . R [ �i"i!!!!"l il'11'��9: !it �'' 1.�♦,t,,, .tip �► �--- r € J ; { ♦. W-101 tt is'�� ,. . ,,ttzx7 zl��zst��ti,�:1�� .E�s1��.�•� , . ` � , j�i��E�it ,a R� ! tS .�lI.I:!"1i '! !llellrfr�rfEl1�!Elill 'Yrfx e l .�`' ' 9 •t na+' ......i .t.F d�n r �i�ianQiq.Vi.� 4 �i a `r e E' i � I I 141r 10•1(r I t I I 15V 0 0 0I! I I E9'la' 21 it 28'0' 0 ❑ 25 0' ❑ 0 1 2fi 0' 0 I I I i SMOKE — ,so — o TREE SMOKE SMOKE IA SMOKE MESQUITE SAE — a'a — TREE TREE — Isla' — MESQUITE MESQUITE 3A - Isv — MESQUITE 4A IA 2A — 150 — 1A i i I 20•0, I Ella. C ;20itr 2 I.0' 2 I.Q 2 I.a 2 I•o• STREET 9e' — I I Lw I 0 14'0 0 O G I I D•6'0 0 .L I o•6'G 0 � 0 2i6' ❑ .❑ 0 Ii6 0 0 I o 24W o �I F` I V — 15p � IT9'• — — 15•0' — — ITS COML PALO RDE PALO VERDE PALO RDE PALO RDE n IA IA 2A 2A 3A 3A IA 1A �1 Q I I 2 I•v I•o 31 I_J V I I I I I I I I - �� STR 36' - - - i y 1 c SHEET I OF 2 SHEETS F// (9 FF11VT,�T/VE I�/lAP 26/23 I INDIAN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB PALM DESERT, CALIFXNIA PALM VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB REGENCY PALMS III TENT. TR 125445 r �f -ter i 1 JCOUNTRJ'� CLUB?�s„we ea — i Lam.- ....» -o or z a e!� �►?►�' �+�'-`�,y,,,. _..>:a .-�-�•• i i -- i�•t ..�_-i;�:.C�__e�-+----- -" _�-" wctt�"'si;E' �tf1'1---- \ f '-"��'_�_-.t.- -;\i�-� EiCfJ'�f21R�tY PART OF Q \\\ l r 7tuS PROJECT) J pi�l O � •eL. O SOUTHERh� \ % �i i i > ✓� �� ^( CAL. ED SON ) I� FACILITY �� v! ��E AccE�}� 6C.-f +1 I CD ► } 1 _ 6 C.-323 A I (IMtC.II l I j v � R --�� \ .� � s 7 � o� i h SAG-I4 ��I -I/F / �� ■ 6 J L'6 r° i l i o I (\\ � Vv �- 47 Aw 6. 1 1 � : •� III AC 7 / ��t�� '1 �� g �`, A �� •.A 1 � Is \�J A -� ' ��-'rA �� f� 409 `493 (� J \ f 1 ss\ O J ' f � I I C 1 O II • I+ � .�� 6.C'Po SO ill .-. \v� _ 1"J • 1\ 1 r+" hi a) f IitLJ 1 _ 1 l ► W „ , I I� � I 1 r • 1 , i of . �. I' 1 s�If 1 '� K•! I �_� 6I l 4 tit 1 r i Flu -67 \ Z � f•I � � bt-lL�� r"y � � � LB � \ � a?S�J i ��`f A t 1 I 67 \ III es - 7t� 42 NO %AVENUE�N �� j ' "� r� CARD 69"1 A.C.SS SoavAtrr u4� ' OASIS COUNTRY CLUB THE HERITAGE CLUB (PROPOSED T. T. NO. 26122) , • �- DID?oc" owwR a orm o ER• SUNRISE COMPANY �:al 42-600 COOK STREET ' 1-d Aro 1I-n omralo 1.PAW �� PALM DESERT, CA. 92260 ' s, 7-11, San a1-ar 1!A{A Vlci tepl.n no (619) 568-2828 ya_v, ?.-s1, aa�. PI40✓£CT Nd.MF• INDIAN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB .4•J, ,dn. ow., ire �.,r. a.o Fr1m aos TAt me PROPOSED LAND USE! RESIDENTIAL COUNTRY CLUB / 7, at, r-3Q, Q, w- LEGAL• A •USDIVISION Of SECTION 11, row"smn IS SOUTH, RAND[ R EAST, SAN REAMARDIND M[RIDAN aH , C?TY Of PALM OESERT, COUNTT Of L•eo✓tCT 10] Neamm lamp•E••1 RIVERSIDE, STATE 0► CAL If ORR M. st wo 20 OE KM AP NUMBER, 632-020-006 TMRU 010 & 632-020-013 9 016 • � rac,oas lax vitR ��fz wrTwagiamm ACREAGE• GROSS 64) ACRES Indian ld urruT�s SEWER T WATER- cS NE LLA tELLET WATER- GEDISTRICT GAS' lQIT NC RN CAL.SAS TELEPHONE- GENERAL TELE•110NE . ar10J a>✓1�Jr^.At. EASEMENT AV=• 1a III'ma uat ELECTRICAL SouTMERR CAL. [DlroR TV PALMER CJREnsoN 1w a:as en:��iD! COUNTRY CLUB ° 11. i -• M '= "'� °� � W `� VESTING 7EN7A77�E MAP 26123 P-i+^r , � 'k9R 11. IN] 1�cr�f .. .«„1, a mut I-7 Lc i °�' ""�" VmL�"MIT ion'°" INDIAN RIDGE COUNTRY CL U SUNRISE COMPANY ` TIFF,I r:..Puy.-�m 1r.u. 1a,1 r l,.r>...... l,.w, a-1 nee:-H n.rn1 n im .m uns PAL M C RT G4L/f�4MQ ae1�/.:..�a r1 rFer H tJrrotr�N rm tot. ® 11• .r.... lw lwv at aawn�.• �f r:nu an1.e. d•/+/ ar AUGUST 1990 SCALE 1••200' atrcu. ware. ® «• �• !n b.ar.r o.e,aty w1A r,>:o/.Q+s`.Yalu rr _. ,a l>r�rn.!ar,•��mRtal to I11Gr r raevEv OR4+r L. 1MJ r ENGINEERING SERVICE CQRPORATI" ® y. lr+wcaW. dtr r I„61ama b Or ]A' r•d•[a urA �" (a it CONSULTANTS,1M CIVIL FNOINIFRIlaO i LAND►1AMai 11.E p111c p,m.>_. �l.c util/tJ r1e uLl4 wry r rm9••J r�vr7 il. lMr r L.-.s+.r••�. IJ•1• =K�+��r '�..p,-....v. T>70 FL.ISFO.17 FA •r az tilr OFaFm !ti rr�e M by•t a�.rty at u�.s.rb car —I P — .•/,a►'1aY' . „ara•E T111'10. 1R,r 1>'Uv�R b. 1.10•W, orfl-imT wed. •^II••• F eo-�a i I f ;�, r; _ ��•l►�►�Il�n�•lli � �s•� 't' son . . .�■ t , i�• "�' �. �' ' i'�' � ' 't'�'■'�' 't•�'j` . . rr I I ., �• � ■/ � , •• � ,r li �' a ii �i •1 ,, i � ��,��/�� I lI ! . � ,\ ` � �. . � I � � � � ', �`e'; "S 'i �1 J � � `` ,� � '1 � = I � it , �i �+ I ..� � ' �f�.tl�.. • - •� /.L ' �M, ! ,-J L� w M ;-� •J • _a a- 'J.l �a_ -l.l �..a `-J.l �ti rf� '„% •. •. �� •1• �', � % '■� �� • f �` � � ``I) � _s� J.t_ J.t- ..M��.�l�� w•� -�� • : �� B+ ��}�,t \�� v.V �r r ` �S� •� + Its .1 \ ✓ V Irk r VI ■ it �` � �r" - �� ' • • FF �� r� 1. �,�► . • ��--. � s;,�. _��,.-•s� � �� , I ,, � � � .� r � �f � -+rwu -tin lLa 2f`/■ s • t..,;I1� � 14 i � ,■. ..t � I J� 1 , . i 1 .:,�;,� -. -r�� ,��., � '...`��_. :Ai�� ,��•.-: �i } fly .�` , _�j •, • �. I '�� `�,` ;•" >ij •. MOOT Imp"JoLv- gas--- - .,�.�'� �- � �,. ,� L �- :::: ��.�+�► .� .� _ .,,awe � - \ .: �► . _ .- ,�, '�� v -= . , ,err. • c�'� ! �� . u�,�, � �� . ,� �� .. � � ,�,�` •✓��. ,� � ,�. ,,� Y ref■■, AD A ORA , AAA A OL y04 1. L. - -a .�• �� • RA ��' f �i • /' .- ` += �r - � . � �� % � M ��•1� A � ��t1^ .� � i�-a , r► ■ � ■ �■�. ' r••„, /�•� � , +art II f ,'� �r� *. /� —ter �� l �•�.�� .. -�,._•,� � � .l /._,■•,ys� ■j■�■I■�■ii OWN art •�. '..� ,W— &W- , - 1 i A i I I I Wr , �� ~ � ��`' . �� i �i�'!�■■��' �* "'�►, �' - NL• tea. [_, � �� .��3 1�a.� '�,�,�� •+�. *'�. ` :.1 r� :'►fir ' Me r A � —•,, "� �'� .�� ' ��•��, ,., � i� �� ,��.,� cam%�•, - rt�� ., .►%=� � tiw!J'•:, ELM WWA /��■ � / �� • � -.rr- ',- � � f� --• g �!'-� a .. ■-- i !,f!�'� ��, � � - � � F^-'� ter_ � r a WE MA lie Wo! irs �■• ■■ �■ l■ yr �' ' ��.!7�!, M ' �. r �: +'��-'1F:.11 1 uJa ,� �t'•'!i."w �; 1• - �� • ��ra� � ► r - � 1 ^w •7.r��'.w �".7 V Vj \`' �..` 1 '• :ti a..rA� i 1 1.r�w wf�ti .+'.f -7.r� �` _ �� .1 I� �� \� '� ) �• ' ' � � '. -i .', - � �I �, ' 1� MIN II �� 1, ..fir ,. � / , .y •. , , _ .I. - ., �. J ,�A « .. .. .• .. .. , �� .• .. ,. �..q�_•� 1 (■■„'. .. i_r,(_ I .. .` ., /__i �._-�1 .. .. ■ ■ 1 ■■ t � � 1 +�■■; I ■ - .��t.�r. ■Ja.-Mad■�:;r�.irJ��rsr■-�i■e�i■ '• :� ri•�1 (■■ 11ri I ■■• I J' i I ■■ I J ■�, !■! r. ■ srr1■i■ (!�1 !■, ! 1l � ■■ ■.; , 1 �■.L� ■■ r�..r. ■r■ ..� � � ■_■■_ :! ,� � � ■rtl��d■rr �rr- sr rr. •�■■ �■�■r■�•r�• 1■�■�s� . , , � ' ��-�1��L1►[�1�MAN►t • -. ' .+ . P 111 k t � I ' 4Y - I 1 , REVISIONS I i � I i I COUNTFY CLUB D(IVF 1_SPACES p 9" 0" CA 6 J p, 4. p 19 4" 24 p, ap -p- 28 0' 15 4" 66 p" 30 p' DRI� WaY ! DRIVLW/V BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS - MAIN BUILDING: HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION: 1493 SQ. FT. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE: 2375 >Q I''T. GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE: 15165 SQ FT. T ,.. � - -- ----- � i FIR[ ACCESS LANE f TOTAL BUILDING ARI',A: 19036 SQ. FT. -- SECONDARY BUILDING: 1720 SQ I'T, - i ( ROOM SCHEDULE: ,, 25 2fi � li �� IRP►Gn r IrJN GOLF COURSE BUILDING_INTERIOR 13 3 q 1. SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE . .Y 30 2. ASST. SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE O W 26 31 29 32 --- -- - - z 3. SERVICE MANAGER OFFICE Cu E3 _ _ w _ 4. LANDSCAPE SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE 23 a CL CD 5. OFFICE x ` 22 19 21 20 6. OFFICE • - M 00 7. EMPLOYEE LUNCH ROOM - BULK BIN B. EMPLOYEE LOCKER ROOM --- • 9. REST ROOMS - - 10. COMPUTER ROOM o -- - - �' . 2a w BULK BIN 11. MECHANIC OFFICE M , o Q 12. MECHANIC PARTS STORAGE 13. MECHANIC WORK BAYS ¢"' �' w I`'' 14. IRRIGATION PARTS ROOM � a k ------ -- -- __- - - BU1 K B?N 15. TOOL STORAGE ROOM 16. GENERAL STORAGE ROOM o 17. UTILITY ROOM (PHONE, ELECTRICAL) Ln o 18. GENERAL EQUIPMENT STORAGE i 1 -- -- - BULK BIN ao Q LANDSCAPE BUILDING INTERIOR i U <µ cr, ------ ---- I BULK BIN 19. SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE - --_-----_----_ -- 20. SECRETARY OFFICE 1 - - ----- ;, L�J - a- 4 21. COMPUTER ROOM 22. UTILITY STORAGE ROOM U _ -�- o FULL ISLAND 23. REST ROOM an 1 =- -__ _ 71 a MA LRIAi 5 24. GENERAL STORAGE TT- ?ST_Srlr_ / �_ _ _ - 48,_p, x ❑I i[;RAC� z _ '� 3 -- { a HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION INTERIOR W -- j L[ - _ - 50 -0" MIN U-,: 25. MANAGERS OFFICE - - 26. SECRETARY OFFICE Q i 27. ACCOUNTING OFFICE l9� 28. CONFERENCE ROOM y - - --- ---- -- --- \-- - - - - --- - 29. UTILITY STORAGE ROOM 30. COPIER 31. REST ROOM 32. LUNCH ROOM 1 RASIi 33. CIRCULATION AREA 18 CHID. ' �r SILAM S1AlMN O�ypOR -, IL& - ss W I - - - T O O � SvjA IA1I:I�, J.P. CONSTRUCTION INC. �- Precasters • General Contractors U / 29-�250 No. Rio1007 dt� 50l AIR P.O. 80K 598 Thousond Pobis, a1"forn;j 92276 Telephone (6?9)7345 3493 LLJ � Q O 1ff 0 / � W CD r SITE LAYOUT �� Date 1-0- 12- 90 SITE LAYOUT o - - - - ---- - - Scale 1 = 20 -0 z SCALE 1" - 20'-0' - Drawn C. BELL File r;� ►vane 336SA11, B Sheet QO 31 t2 1 I PLANT LEGEND CANOPY TREESira c ti PROSOPIS CHILENSIS R `` W } Chilean Mesquite RHUS LANCEA M DEL d African Sumac MO EL SCHINUS MOLLE cn California Pepper 32 PATIO TREES 5 4 J ACACIA SALIGNA Blue Leaf Wattle NERIUM OLEANDER (STD. ) ° Oleander DATE PALMS - �/ PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA ❑ ' � Date Palm i • QUEEN PALMS _ �\h�. COCOS PLUMOSA Queen Palm _ C CIRCLE EAGLED � . . SHRUBS W 4 BACCHARIS 'CENTENNIAL' - - � Baccharis BUXUS MICROPHYLLA JAPONICA Japanese Boxwood UM ' CARISSA GRANDIFLORA 'TUTTLEI' -- -- oD- +- - - � ` �, I w - Tuttle Natal Palm CASSIA ARTMISIOIDES + N Feathery Cassia I R 4R 3R 5 0 CASSIA NEMOPHILA 2R I ;. Green Cassia - I IR i I `' Z w II I I Q DASYLIRION ACROTRICHE I I ! •— ► - Desert Spoon II I • - C= _ - - DODONAEA VISCOSA t I ZUj Hopseed Bush �� -_ --� I MODEL � �-- ,t ENCELIA FARINOSA V, W Q ► ► O Brittle Bush I _ � � EURYOPS PECTINATUS 'VIRIDIS' _ I �J 1 Euryops I �- - MODEL j I I I LU UU - - - FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS ~ Ocotillo MODEL 0 U LANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS MODE MODEL I _� Purple Trailing Lantana I I I II LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS i r - /. — — U Texas Ranger , n LIGUSTRUM JAPONICUM TEXANUM \ _ I __ _ - -- �J 1 Wax Leaf Privet MORAEA IRIDIOIDES -� Fortnight Lily y ; MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM PROSTRATLM Myoporum - NERIUM OLEANDER 'PETITE PINK' Dwarf Oleander PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA 'VARIEGATA' _ Varigated Mock Orange ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS 'PROSTRATt'S' Dwarf Rosemary RUELLIA PENINSULARIS Desert Ruellia SALVIA GREGGII Red Sage / VERBENA RIGIDA Verbena .,. XYLOSMA CONGESTUM 'COMPACTA' Compact Shiny Xylosma i f j T N IV AP 6 57 INDIAN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB I � I . PALM DESERT , CALIFORNIA I REGENCY PALMS TENT T R . PALM VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB 25445 Kj qo lah Z 9 boo AB / / \ \ 3 � CLUB - - - . - - — - — — - -- f OUNT Y - - GOT ;9 �. � � _- --� --- 4 -- ---- \ I ( c BOUNDARY r PART Clc \ ) _ \ 18 1 LINE BOUNDARY �� I TH'9 -�P JECT) \ 17 )0 jTHERN \ f - AL. EDISON i `-\ FACILITY \ f 2 14 � �r ............... v - - — - - - - E�) - I 18 ' 17 NT — V ��- -ACC= _- 1 - 4 r /17 r' I 15 ,, 4\� ems \ � l \ �` ►� ti 1 5 16 v � � � ,j A\� J� -- 18 \ 15 \ \ � � U T-1 77 r � cr Ir— j �j 0 h o \ \ \ (P v v y � ' 1 v 18 w I Y � \ zap w w z / \ )C J v ( \ 6 170 f > D \ � \ f,0 � N 1 7 �' ......... �- �� h D 0 \ \ j U 05 ti 8 J r `� 0 \ �` M (n � � � � 13 v v w , m Of Of W10 // w 20 \ ( 2D� g �9p \ \ \ \ ) 1 > a- \ s V I � � i o � � 1 �, \ \ \ \ Q \ X I \ , \ 9 r 1d w \ �, 0 0 —j \ V C� V �� 10 v v r r 7 J/ \ 1 10 ? _ � GOT O - s��z.3o BOUNDAR LINE 42 ND AVENUE 2 OASIS COUNTRY CLUB 5 THE HERITAGE CLUIB (PROPOSED T.T. NO. 26122 ) -- OWNER & DEVELOPER : ' SUNRISE COMPANY 42 --600 COOK STREET /�rE�ST-4T� PALM DESERT , CA 92260 ( 613) 568-2828 covv r cY Cc us o�ivE EASII'�Tr NCYI7'S' � b PROJECT NAME : I NO I AN R I DCE COUNTRY CLUB� 11' easement in favor of Southern (alifornia Fz�scn Cu?>Fany for ' G�� 4 h polo:r_1 ine purposes as recorded August 11, 1922 as ]rstru:rent No. 18451:1; Official korc3s PROPOSED LAND USE FOR FINANCING PURPOSES ONLY h 0 Q2 n, A SUBOIVISION OF SECTION 11. TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH. RANGE 5 EAST. SAN 13ERNARDINO �' W ar,✓ +�E. .l erse�nent in favor of Southern California Fdison C�any for L EGA L powerli.ne pu pcses as recorded June 21, 198 as Instn.}ment No. MERIDIAN. CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 1.14643, Official icYal Records ASSESSOR ' S PARCEL NUMBERS : 632-020-006 THRU 010 , 9CAL E /` 2� i�.e0 c 1 ECT h �i 3 ?.1' e-.,-re t ).:n flavor of Southern California EJiscm Cerny for 632 -020-013 & 016 powerljne purposes as recorded June 25, 1982 as 1r_stU t No. 124734, Official Records ACREAGE GROSS 641 ACRES F.�EO IH4,e/NET I 40' easement in favor of Coachella valley Water District to build UT I L I T I ES : SEWER & WATER — COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT and nai.ntain storm water control facilities as r�a)rdeu October 18, 1983 es Instrument No.. 53268, Ofiic.'.-a1 GAS — SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS N0 7 70 S C',4 e 4 � An irrevocable. offer to dedicate to the public 20' as shown for TELEPHONE — GENERAL TELEPHONE '7 road purposes, public utility and public ae--NriCx?S as recorded ELECTRICAL — SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOISON February 21, 1980 as Instrument No. 33896, Official Records TV — PALMER CABLEVISION © An easement in favor of the County Of Fdverside for road purposes as recorded July 10, 1985 as :Inst_-z.--�er:t NO. 150803, Official TEN T A T � v E MAP 26757 Records I ND I A N RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB • PALM DESERT , CAL IFORNIA 1 1 e n a NOVEMBER 1990 SCALE ; 1 " =200 COUNTRY CLUB _ ENGINEEPING SERVICE CORPORATION CONSULTANTS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING 6 LAND PLANNING - TAT 7 ". YROJ ENGINEER k. .- -. 72 780 EL PASEO,SUITE E-1 SCNU.2KENS COMPANY PALM DESERT 99 92260 VROJ MANAGER SU'NRISE �- 16191`�-5997 ,20BB//t/S DIR ENGINEERING R.0 E W.O. T N IV M AP 6757 INDIAN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB --- - - PALM VALLEY COUNTRY CL UB PALM DESERT , CALIFORNIA � REGENCY PALMS I TENT T R . . I 25445 2 AJ 3 / 3 �; �DR1 V E f -J_ �OUNTRY` CLUB c � 1 \GOT A � 1 / ; �� -- - - - -- - - � Q BOUNDARY v \ (NOT' A PART GP \ \ \ 18 BOUNDARY HIT -,P JECT17 LINE LINE \ \ V >OuTHERfV AL. EDISON � - 1 \ FACILITY 2 v �_ A i v14 v v \ I7 (��/ / IqE --- - I— ) 1 \ / pp 1 15 0 Al / A 16 � � � ' 18/ 15 \ �� -3 � r"j\ - 1 U Cr r 0U) 14LLI \ J LIJ LLJ \ � 6 � , - \ I� h J\ Q 10 \ i \ 1 7 � A -� JI) 0 05 8� \ \ .� 0 \ ,� ,� \ 13 \ U) \ \ \ \ \ i w \ \ \ \ J \ �- � _ w W10 /' ) ` Ir l cn 20 \ 8 f Ld o ( 10 so -' \ \ \ \ r J \ C0 12 � � - z� \ 5 \ \ 0 10 2-25 \� v IFf—7 Q \ ) es �, \ \ \ \ \ �. f \ \ �J _ v - 1 53i2 30 4 2 N D AVENUE 2 2!s �, oo r �� BOUNDAR LINE Z 5 OASIS COUNTRY CLUB - THE HERITAGE CLUB (PROPOSED T.T. NO. 26122 ) OWNER & DEVELOPER : SUNRISE COMPANY 42--500 COOK STREET /�TE�TATE PALM DESERT , GA 92260 CO!/ivT,CY cc us o,�ivF ( 613) 568-2828 O EASII�IT. NOR'E'S G.( ZL ill easement in favor of Southern calxfornia Fd,scn CaT ny for PR 0 l EC T NAME I NO I AN R I O O'E COUNTRY C L U B O p It powerlim purposes as recorded August 11, 1922 as )rst_cwLent No. v Q 1�2U 0 184511, Official Rerorc3s PROPOSED LAND USE : FOR FINANCING PURPOSES ONLY 0 1A, e2seq�nt in favor of Southern California Fd_, n (r��any for L E GA L A SU80 I V I S I ON OF SECT I ON 11. TOIINSH I P 5 SOUTH. RANGE 6 EAST. SAN BERNARD I NO powerline �tises as recorded June 2.1, )_98i as -Tr0tzvnient No. MERIDIAN. CITY OF PALM DESERT. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. �I ].14643, Official Records SCALE i �=200` saeo�EC7- �f 0 ASSESSOR ' S PARCEL NUMBERS : 632-020-006 THRU 010 , �i a 1-l' e-_�,�nent: x z favc,r of Southern California Eiis-;,n Crsmpany for 632 -020-013 & 016 powerline purncees as recorded June 25, 1982 as �rstrvment No. F�EO sKve/,1G J24734, Official Records ACREAGE , GROSS 641 ACRES Oe 0 40' easemiit in favor of Coachella Valley Water_ District to build UT I L I TIES ., SEWER & WATER — COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRI T and na?ntain storm water control facilities as ram_-rde;� C October 18, 1983 as Instrument No. 53268, Of_iic. al Fr_ds GAS — SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS NCJ T� S AL c TELEPHONE — GENERAL TELEPHONE ` An isrevUcable offer to dedicate to the public 7C' as shown for ELECTRICAL — SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON " road Pay-- xGes, public utility and public se�r4_c� as recorded „. February 21, 1980 as Instrument No. 3389�6, Official P.eccJrds TV — PALMER CABLEVISION © An easement in favor of the County of Riverside for road purposes as recorded ��uly 10, 1985 as Instnrment Na. 150803, Official TEN TAT I VE MAP Records 26757 . : INDIAN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB UB PALM DESERT , CAL / FORN / A l � 1 e � a NOVEMBER 1990 SCALE : 1 " = 200 COUNTRY CLUB ENGINEERING SERVICE CORPORATION CONSULTANTS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING C LAND PLANNING PROJ�- ENGINEER TAT C MPA Y -SU-NRISE 72-760 EL PASEO,SUITE E-1 SCNU 2KEivS - � PALM DESERT,CA 92260 VROJ.MANAGER (619)566-5997 �OBB//vs R.C.E W.O. tx 0 2 110 ��' L X\, It IK C 400/ I o i A�� T r r 0 c �2 F t A ., ,. .. ,, .>,. ,.,»-.-, . ..,.-. .,4,, G _ .. ,� .-,. ,r, ,,.._,. ,.n "� :�.�,.'.:: , ,;.< ;k .. ,�'. . ,�,.;:-� ems•,�� -- — ---- —----- ---- --- ---- -- --------�- S `C- ' � _ -4 O a \\ 1 � I ' I ' I 0 0 IA 1 1141 140 o 1. �_j I I 1 � \ --- ` 141 „ g, • V3x 3Y`x,:, o \� I I +S. �:.. i I i j j I I i I I JF I I I: r j + � I I 2. i i I : - X.r.i -.. t. +L r. .a ., rc 8 H r r K> PERIMETER WALL 4,k Lj � . � � a x. COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE "A S ' *-amp-f O ^.OUNTPlr' CLUC r"" Mri. TE r-' WELL SITEANTERIOR PROJECT WALL } _—! PERIMETER WALL Z i I 4 11 bf s j/ � COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE *x J3 �- vk v c o SECTION EEC : COUNTRY CLUM PEKE hCTEP AND CVWD WELL SITE A!t ^YlT h w w �kti- 0 D N .. O Cy w L N � 0 (3 PERIMETER WALL ii LU J z .j �) IX Lu I � OASIS CLUB DRIVE - _-- T � 4. `40 fE v,�, o RETAINING WALL 1 -- -�`/ 0 0. z 4 , SECTION CC : O . SIS CLUC PE L . TEF 4: North 8� 4' t Job No. �y 800 Sheet No. o f i ---—------ kkI fit:, 7x IN ELI- W U..� --TT 'Do F ROtj Wig 31, r- 1 N 7 N! 12 N �\ �� % � �!� � \\ /�� —�� - � � � duo � � � � �� '1 �. � � �� '�%�/� � t � a „ 6_N 10 N 13 N %\ � III -�- o I � � � I � •� I o � �� . ,�� I Lo 9 N OD 1 N 4 N NIP 0 Lly �5 �,', ��'� w / - - q t �' -_ _ j PIN. FL T01M AM( 3 N IN c!f' -� if 17 D.R. 1 N 5 S D.R. 18 S ff77F]. 1 s 4�a 16� N LJ LJ C 6 S J7 . ........ 1 s _AJ ,Arme- z C�act 04 11 S) I s T11 12' c I ---------- kA WE ------- 4F-- - / \ ♦ �y v �1" .� 1 k t_4 XN JOE! i 8 s 114 13 s 1134 8 f7 cp F;q • pie 7 Fc �j ---------- 1 7' 2-co CP 09 The Next Generation in ARNOLD PALMER GROVE COURSE SCORECARD 106 PAUIcF 428 398 605 460 196 -=441- S - - -: - ..., - , • • T_EE -.. AL Country Club Living 18 238 371 1655 528 160 434 330 408 533 471 155 426 3445 I10 Over the past two decades, Sunrise Company CO U=ON 411 386 586 448 184 426 510 230 358 3539 521 152 421 323 395 521 459 148 418 3358 6897 has created the desert's finest country club MEN'S 389 368 560 429 173 412 496 219 341 3367 503 144 410 311 377 508 440 135 400 3228 6615 communities...Sunrise Country Club, Rancho SENIORS 356 347 515 403 150 390 465 191 316 1111 483 138 392 293 348 471 412 120 376 3033 6166 Las Palmas Country Club, Monterey Country WOMEN'S 320 313 460 352 129 348 409 170 294 2795 442 130 346 257 320 415 372 110 338 2730 5525 Club,The Lakes Country Club, Palm Valley PAR 4 4 5 4 3 4 5 3 4 36 5 3 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 36 72 Country Club, and PGA WEST. ARNOLD PALMER DESERT COURSE SCORECARD Now, Sunrise Company has taken the best of Ind tan t e TEE I = 4 i 6 I B 9 !0 11 l2 l3 l4 . 2 each to create the next generation in country u,stx 419 4l0 �188393 362 i91 237 423 542 3565 162 350 518 448 460 546 425 200 429 3538 7103 club living...Indian Ridge Country Club. COMPEfIIA1N 409 400 172 381 350 578 220 410 530 3450 151 342 511 439 452 534 416 190 419 3454 6%4 COUNTRY CLUB Indian Ridge. It's everything Sunrise Company MEN'S 393 384 160 364 331 534 202 386 513 3267 138 320 498 427 443 520 405 168 395 3314 6581 is famous for, in one very private club. SENIORS 340 328 143 348 316 470 192 355 480 2972 122 306 468 395 415 488 367 150 366 3077 6049 WOMEN'S 290 281 121 303 268 446 165 322 418 2614 108 258 413 334 370 440 320 133 330 2706 5320 75-775 Country Club Drive, Palm Desert, California 92260 (619) 772-7000 PAR 4 4 3 4 4 5 3 4 5 16 3 4 5 4 4 5 4 3 4 36 72 The Indian Ridge Country Club master plan has been approved by the City of Palm Desert,California.Improvements and facilities described ['] 1 T C r herein disclose the extent of the improvements and facilities which ultimately may be included.There is no assurance that the future J U v U JL improvements and facilities described will ever be constructed or will be constructed on the schedule herein set forth.The total number, C OM PA l�'Y design,location and layout of homes,landscaping,sideyard walls,lakes,pools and spas,unit mix,and the location,design and layout of recreational facilities may be changed due to a number of circumstances,including governmental requirements and market demand.Sunrise Builder of Americas Finest Country Club Communities Company also reserves the right to make modifications in prices,materials and specifications at any time without prior notice.Ownership of a home does not include club membership or rights in the club facilities.Club membership is subject to approval of the membership committee and to payment of initiation fee and dues.Void where prohibited by law. `PALM VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB ENTRANCE Vw ,�' Am -- xxsrsx} WRY C9ft- goo SweepLUB .-.ter , — COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE ._, , _ � � ao a• -- -a• ,;- _-"r-` _ • S • - BOX CANYON TRAIL ,, _ -- � • asa • „ • • FALCON VIEW CIRCLE RAIN BIRD CIRCLE •: '• v- j - y F gdlRsLW - _ —� Ile Tru W l,e� •:`• *Poe •: �.:. �� w y ,', -. -^ a=_ - -.- . '` •s` } OW TRAIL � •} _ _�--- RED ARROW TRAIL 11 �, asa PE �. - � F O a yl1 WHITE HORSE iRAlt. i 4. • —ID tl ENTRANCE- •!'w� •. , ♦ J r r'., s J s ,, J 41 10 �- a!• r`� �O � _ • F' DEER HAVEN CIRC �. • • z • _ -- - - WHITE HORSE TRAIL . •i•• •• w a/• 1 rd + ••+• 10 _ x `•a ••••` • �,• � v 06 c r -- - ---..- .- - is - :6 , •• " � `a�"�bd �J d . a r • • v . .- • 41 IL 44 p14 ~ -" _ •�i�•a aka i • :� .'• .: 7 -- _ P E LLY DRIVE v .:1r••• • •• >A • 3.4 � � -� a may'. ` • -�' - i •.. • x r � \� — - • � • �tea`' �` '. - r. � _ —_\ .r`r .iy � a s e • ho 0 - • • � �gj ` �a . HAWK HILL ®_•• • fir TRAIL > • • a Y 1 y , iqr 11iGIn w w - � ro r - z - W c ' - - =y - t = j • Y (J w 2 - I -- v DRIVE W T K VE 'jQ' LU It 3: In -dmsa INDIAN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB GOLF COURSE BRIDGES SPAN rtv BETWEEN WIDTH LOAD _ • �'!� is r N ME LAKE EDGES CAPACITY 1 q _ _ SA GRA DE DRIVE 1. 6 NORTH (PEDESTRIAN) 18' 6' 2,000 LBS. 2. 6 NORTH TEE 30' 10, 11,000 LBS. 3 3. 6 NORTH GREEN 18' 10, 11,000 LBS. 4. 7 NORTH TEE 45' 10, 11,000 LBS. 9-1 NM 5. 13 NORTH TEE 28' 10, 11,000 LBS. - _ (iOID CANYON OMkE' _ BOLD CANYON DRIVE ENTRAN 6. 18 NORTH GREEN 28' 10' 11,000 LBS. J . 42ND AVENUE DA 817192 TT- ' o r Am Lf IS 42- S 9 IS 6 M CD r ^ ® �. -� IS IS _f c� ?� L l C�) S -V CD I6 J IS z � ri � � T D l_ i N 9 L S 9L C�DQ s9 o s sL I • �� C�b o - oild 9'd 0 N 5L o - - N � o Q � N l _ d � c _ m , — N l N 9 O� a 9 N Z l - I _ -----o--- N Z- o N L , ` i i I I COUNTRY CLU DRIVE -- _-- ---- _—_ _-_— -- -..__ MZ&HT TOURa►!1'P MASS PL7►N' k Ift COMMON MEA �IIl2QY Trees ,a Cercidiux species Palo Verde CjA* Prosopla species Mesquite I Acacia species Acacia Jacaranda acutifolia Jacaranda Schirus terebinthifolius California Pepper Tree FIRE ACCESS LANE Pal, r WATER I MFTFR Cocos pl umosa Queen Pal' Phoenix dactylifera Date Palm -- - / Brah<a armata Mexican Blue Pals i • I ICAI. TREE dutiw capitata Pindo Palm - 25 28 I 27 I ShZ�ba (5'+) - IRRIGATION Baccharis sarothroides • ■ - _= -> GATE WELL SITE Desert Broom 33 30 I Caesalpinea species Bird of Paradise 26 3` W 1 29 32 -- - Cassia species ■ --- -- ---- -- - ¢ Dodonaea viscosa Hopbush Lo GATE 22 19 21 20 Leucophyllux frutescens Texas Ranger FIRE HYDRANT Jojoba Simmundsia chinensis Jo BULK BIN j Nerium oleander Dwarf Oleander F; w I Bush Morning Glory 24 � q ,, � I BULK BIN i Convolvulus cneorum SCE Carissa grandiflora i Natal Plum CONCHA Ence l i a f a r i nosa BULK BIN SUB-STATION Brittle Bush - Euryops pectinatus Euryops _ w`nI Myrtus communis7 Myrtle aE BULK BIN Salvia re ii 9 g9 Sage BULK BIN - - -- L shrubs (6-7V1 Baccharis centennial Baccharis 8 �_ ._ Lantana montevidensis � --� Lantana 2 _ �'�' � � FUEL ISLAND Rosmarinus officinalis Rosemary _ r- 3 � 5 — �� ;`� eruviani MATERIALS Verbena 9 � �� 3 '-1_-_1_ �, STORAGE p a Verbena --- -� - [j Myoporum parvifolium OOTj((p r 17 4 -FIRE HYDRANT L `` �clwen Agave species Agave 10 14 l 5 / }4 -� I Dasylirion wheeleri Desert Spoon - - - ve Fouquieria splendens Ocot1110 15 R, TRASH " ►• 41!yDDk AREA I� Y, • •� 18 yDDR, • /i w HDDR, STEAM �J STATION 4 _ WATER I; 13 11 STATION 1 AIR 12 STATION + f 11 n AIR • Gq t STATION a 0 i LANDSCAPE PLAN n an t e SCALE, 1• = 20'-0• COUNTRY CLUB SHEET I OF 2 SHEETS TIIV(9 TATI INDIAN RIDGE- COUNTRY CLUB PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA PALM VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB REGENCY PALMS TENT. TR 25 445 jo +,2 s 6 'CCUN TR -� 131 --� CLUB /sr/AG _ _ _ _ o.� t 9� /oF _ F 2-o x 3 WEL w5/TE - x 5 x-b �lJi1✓�iQiey x 4 °'° 3 (NOT A PART OF L//LE L//3/E Q +'\ J ROGK DR/VE R R 0 J E C T) /2 l � / \ /4 /•3 S /? 0 3 /S ! Z /� 4 <<_ 1'75 7 O 3s� / �� A SOUTHERN b 411 0 ' /os O J CAL. EDISON FACILITY V `RE ACCEs 5 \ /SS3 7 iY 8N G.G. - S m 20 2 3 -�_; Z/ r lI O i.3 N � O / �rE 02 �.5 `� - 7 �% W (A I� 27 �_ O 7g� v �� /o- O 35 �' 2 �� QIN J \ 0 i c < g 1 � 1 \ \ G.C.-6 24 \ \�. h C� s� C38 �3 \ Z L.3 6 \� �I 39 � .r z a-¢ 90 14 0 � P / X-3! 20 1 47 \ 4-N \ f/,PE AGCEss /-N O ll 1 1 v Qz Q 0 G.C. 7 �C �o I • 1 1 D - - 30 - 1 0 k TOMAHAWK - ¢�-'u` ' - /04 1,7q, \ 1 4 I 3-N 3 -- \ i97.3 � C,'3 I 79 93 1 .�7,7 5 z N 0 G.C.-I 19-N 0\1f , -�.- 0 d \ ' ( J ` Cn LLJ j 0-5 If �.4/UGE O 10 Ai X Li (�7 Ck V �s o' 3C 13 S'v . LU 78 � LLJ �- \ �- Igo 7gc)II Ai _j ID \\ 95 0 N ��r' ILI w O 98 �� i \ 2�Z O �� y o /7-5 FIRE / O I \ \�- - --�-- / 0/ CC � \ 1 � --- ti/ � \. ACCESS" 4_5 O titi 9l0 32 S 57 k / \L G.�.-z3 \ \ YS7 I Al. Z Z.� z f \ Z � 37 C \ j - � � � �, \ 6-C,Zlo 64 J O � k \ O 7 \ \ 90 Vol 2 oti 9 \ O \ .c.zo I F-7 �\ Y oo \ /3 1-1 KI '9 \ 9-s 9 F- � \ �s �/ �,v 2,s 2 s � 11,7�2 6 0� �-Zo0 o oso _ -- -- - --. 1 / -- - /` �� 1` , 42 ND z A l/ENUE t,o Z,� o o a��' ,�� ' s/11%1Vz/s � CARD GATE ACCESS I THE HERITAGE CLUB (PROPOSED T. T. NO. 26122) OASIS COUNTRY CLUB /�T ECSTgTE UNIT COUNTS OWNER B DE/ELOPER : SUNRISE COMPANY co�NT.c>✓ c�vs o.C�v Lar W. PRODUcr T SCPE NO. OF UNITS 4 2-6 0 0 COOK STREET 1-5 AND 14-22 0100TIL 0 (4 plea) 224 PALM DESERT, CA. 92260 6, 7-11, AND 31-38 PAID VF12DE (duplex) 390 - (619) 568-2828 12-13, 39-51, 53-55, PROJECT NAME INDIAN RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB 4f 60-63, 70-15, 80-84, V W az,+m� .+vE_ AND 98-102 s I TREE (single fam.) 398 PROPOSED LAND USE RESIDENTIAL COUNTRY CLUB 7, 23, 27-301 52, 64- LEGAL : A SUBDIVISION OF SECTION II , TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH , RANGE 6 EAST, �I 69, 85-87, 94-97, AND SAN BERNARDINO MERIDAN, CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF PieOc/ECT h1 103 MESQUITE (simile fam.) 234 Q� RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 24 AND 26 MDDEL HC1dE5 _-24 A.P. NUMBER 632 - 020 -006 THRU 010 & 632-020-013 8c 016 F�EO H%9e/NG I TCIrAI, UN= 1270 O,e vicivirr ,g� I.Or TAHUTATTCrS ACREAGE GROSS 641 ACRES UTILITIES: SEWER a WATER - COCHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1 LClr N0. LAND USE GAS- SOUTHERN CAL. GAS TELEPHONE: GENERAL TELEPHONE ian 1-24 and 26-102 RESIDUnIAL 25 SALES OEMCE Im ELECTRICAL: SOUTHERN CAL. EDISCN TV: PALMER CA13LEVISION EASEMENT NOTES 104 CLUB HOUSE AREA 10T COUNTRY CLUB Al 11' easement In favor of Southern California Edison Cottparry for 105 �� AREA �' 1884511 Offici� t 11' 1982 as Instrument �. A-1 1 U_1 Y VES TING TjN TA T1 VE /VA P 26123 GC-1 TH13J GC-26 GOLF COURSE LrJrS 0 11' easement in favor of Southern California Eriiscn C�panry for w_1 TH13J w-6 WE IL S= L7rs /ND/AN R/OGE CDUIV TRY CL UB C OM PA N Y� po�l� as �� June 21, 1982 as Instrtmmest No. 114643, X-1 TH131 X-34 rrrrERIOR , SUNRISE Official Records Z-1 mm Z-9 EXTERIOR WF>R ICTS PALM DESERT CAL /FORK/A 11, easement in favor of Southern California Edison Company for powerline purposes as recorded June 25, 1982 as Instrument No. 124734, Official Records AUGUST 1990 SCALE : 111= 2001 4Q 40' easement in favor of Coachella valley water District to build and maintain storm crater control facilities as recorded October 18, 1983 as ES V V2EI"I"I" MAF 26123 Instrument No. 53268, Official Records ENGINEERING SERVICE CORPORATION Q5 An irrevocable offer to dedicate to the public 20' as sham for road PROJ ENGINEER CONSULTANTS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND PLANNING purposes, public utility and public services as recorded February 21, 72 780 EL PASEO. SUITE E 1 + 1980 as Instrument No. 3896, Official Records PROJ MANAGER PALM DESERT. CA 92260 66 An easement in favor of the County of Riverside for road purposes as (619) 568-5997 recorded July 10, 1985 as Instrument No. 150803, Official Records DIR ENGINEERING � M_ 8 Z9 O 2100-96 R.C.E. 5 TE11Z_1V S. .PCRB/NS W 0. • 79 __------_ �,... ,: a .. .. ... _ .. ,. .<,.. .. b'. v 9✓ v .:, et,. p,•-,, w...L ,,,Y, .,1 ., x:. .::. : F, , .drc x „ y - � SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS _ TATII INDIAN RIDGE'., COUNTRY CLUB 'ALIT DESERT, CAL/FORNI 210 10 2 _ 200 00 c PROPOSED FINISHED SURFACE 190 190 W > Y r W ISO 180 U Z ! O J U) , Z' WZr- ' 170 � 17a J Z W _ 0 z 160 J 160 -- _ - - - U J W 150 150 W °�° 1 J J � p SECTION , � � p ,z - z o `'' cr O Q L) o t m 4 230 - a F •w U.1 p U y - 220 W W 220 W U z' 3 W + i O Z > Z Q cn ,� o 1 210 '� 210 a w � 200 ~ 200 PROPOSED FINISHED SURFACE J 190 z � � l LLJx « I 180 s - J W ) r 170 - 170- 160 160 150 150 I Pl�"m C T I ON B B ILI w WILY Er D p j !T /w , 1 f o m lAr e' VA t t 50' _ 4wW oelva. 12' 38, � o c _ w ++ iaar ALLON , iN o,C U+VYSA/ TXA/L � Q d p 3 O121 IN 7YA1G,4L SECT/BiV TYP/CAL SEGT/DiV e DAS/s Gt1/B PRIME Al.T.5. 52 Y j Om TbMAANWit : m 8 45 - W2 1 � ' WA �c _ ! _ _ •:. > ...K.,. ,v r.,Y t .1X: ....... _. � f4C-' �.Sh4 ..,ram, .. .,. , ...fix CIL ice.O ace. C Cc ; o y a r, TYP/"z SEC r1oAl ' �. �� ' �• _- � � COdNTRY Gl!/B D.e/YES TyP/eA4 s�'GT/D.V ,.,� a �� Al. T. S. , eMA 1�iE'/!/�E /ND/.4A/ A>Z 6E .DV& N.T.S. 4 1,W Ell- ALP/L 42 XD AYE.IIUE 3.J.�, Ile 0 SGiL E 9' 30' WALL 3/DE /,r.D' 32.o • 3 ,. • I\ `/ / T YRICoAL 5EC 7%vA/ 40 COUNTRY CLUB N.T. Ln 33456 �,; � �, � ENGINEERING SERVICE CORPORATION CONSULTANTS IN CIVIL E 1 R G 6 LAI4O PLANNING UtNRISE, AEXPIRES � � u NG NEE IN P PROJ.ENGINEER C �� .�. 30,14 SCHURKENS r ,PALM DESERT, CA 92260, SUITE , PROJ. (MANAGER (619) 568-5997 ; �, 8Q n NE W VILL Z7 O 2/OQ-9lp DOR. ENGINEERING V�E MAF 26123 R.C.E. W.O. y ,