The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTT 26553 AVONDALE COUNTRY CLUB 1998 Y air City of Pala Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(760)346-0611 •FAX(760)340-0574•http://www.paim-desert.org PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: May 6, 1998 John C. Mitchell, III Co-Personal Representative 1401 17th Street, Suite 1460 Denver, Colorado 80202 Re: TT 26553, Avondale Country Club The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of May 5, 1998: PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED A ONE-YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 26553 BY MINUTE MOTION. CARRIED 4-0 (COMMISSIONER JONATHAN WAS ABSENT). Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. n PHILIP DRELL SECRETARY PALM DES ER PLANNING COMMISSION PD/tm cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal Pepx MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 5, 1998 F. Case Nos. PP 95-3 and PM 28196 - LORI A. MOSS/RIVERSIDE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Applicant Request for approval of a first one-year time extension for a precise plan of design and parcel map to allow construction of a 135,600 square foot retail center at the northeast corner of —� Monterey Avenue and Dinah Shore Drive. G. 1 Case No. TT 26553 - JOHN C. MITCHELL, III/AVONDALE COUNTRY CLUB, Applicant Request for approval of a third one-year time extension for TT 26553, a 20-lot single family subdivision located on the northwest end of Avondale Country Club, south of Frank Sinatra Drive. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Beaty, seconded by Commissioner Finerty, approving the Consent Calendar by minute motion. Carried 4-0. Vlll. PUBLIC HEARINGS Anyone who challenges any hearing matter in court may be limited to raising only those issues he/she or someone else raised at the public hearing described herein, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. A. Continued Case No. CUP 91-9 Amendment - OLIPHANT & LIZZA, Applicants Request for approval of an amendment to an existing restaurant and valet parking Conditional Use Permit adding 52 valet parking spaces within existing commercial parking lots totaling 106 valet parking spaces to allow a 1 ,000 square foot expansion to an existing 6,000 square foot restaurant at the northeast corner of Highway 111 and Portola Avenue. 3 JOHN C.MITCHELL,III,P.C. Attorney At Lew Telephone:(303)293.2346 1401 17th Street,Suite 1460 - Of Counsel: Facsimile:(303)293-3656 Denver,Colorado 80202 - Patricia A.Luby RECEIVED April 21, 1998 APR 2 8 1998 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CRY OF PALM DESERT Mr. Philip Drell Director of Community Development CITY OF PALM DESERT 75-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578 RE: Tentative Tract No. 2053, Avondale Country Club Dear Mr. Drell: This correspondence constitutes written.request for a one-year extension of the above . referenced Tentative Tract Map, beyond its current expiration date of jM6' 1998. Please place this request on the agenda for the. next regularly.scheduled Planning Commission . hearing. Awaiting your earliest reply. Yours truly, ESTATE OF WILLIAM F. STEVENS By: John C. Mitcbell, II , Co-Personal Representative JCMIIl/mai PC: Century Crowell Communities Kent Armstrong City of Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 FAX(619)341-7098 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: July 2, 1997 Mr. Louis A. Conter 45-590 Hopi Road Indian Wells, California 92210 Re: t7f 26513 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of July 1 , 1997: PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED A ONE-YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 26553 BY MINUTE MOTION. CARRIED 4-0 (COMMISSIONER JONATHAN WAS ABSENT). Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PHILIP DRELL, SIEC4S V! PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION PD/tm cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal FPerycbE MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY - JULY 1, 1997 7:00 P.M. - CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE I. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Ferguson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Beaty led in the pledge of allegiance. III. ROLL CALL Members Present: Jim Ferguson, Chairperson Paul Beaty Sonia Campbell George Fernandez Members Absent: Sabby Jonathan Staff Present: Phil Drell Steve Smith Dave Erwin Tonya Monroe IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Consideration of the June 17, 1997 meeting minutes. Action: Moved by Commissioner Beaty, seconded by Commissioner Campbell, approving the June 17, 1997 minutes as submitted. Carried 4-0. V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION: Mr. Drell summarized the pertinent June 26, 1997 City Council items. VI. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. VII. CONSENT CALENDAR V Case No. TT 26553 - LOUIS A. CONTER, Applicant Request for approval of a second one-year time extension for TT 26553, a 20-lot single family subdivision located on the northwest end of Avondale Country Club, south of Frank Sinatra Drive. Action: Moved by Commissioner Beaty, seconded by Commissioner Fernandez, approving the consent calendar by minute motion. Carried 4-0. LOUIS A. CONTER 45-590 Hopi Road Indian Wells,CA 92210 (760)345AI53 RECEIVED JUN 18 1997 June 18, 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT City of Palm Desert Planning Commission - 73-5 10 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578 Re: Tentative Tract Map No. 26553 Gentlemen: As the representative for the Estate of William F. Stevens through John C. Mitchell, III, attorney and co-personal.representative of the estate,I respectively request a one year(1) extension of time within which to record Tentative Tract Map No. 26553. Further if a longer extension can be authorized i.e., 2/3 years, we would request the longer period of time for the extension be approved. As the request mentioned in our letter dated May 20, 1996,Mr. Steven's estate is complex with some eight beneficiaries and two trustees in all sections of the United States, along with other assets including the Avondale property. It is further requested that if the estate through the courts deed the property to the trust for the benefit of the beneficiaries that all approvals, etc., will pass to the new legal owner, and the trust would be in the same position as the Estate of',71i)liam F. Stevens, deceased is today. We are sorry for the delay, however, you must realize how much time these cases take. If you need any further information, please let me know as I understand this will be heard at the July 1, 1997 meeting of the Planning Commission. Than"v ouis A. Comer Representative LAC/mlm cc: John C. Mitchell, III JOHN C.MITCHELL,III,P.C. Attorney At Law Telephone:(303)293-2346 1401 17th Street,Suite 1460 Of Counsel: Facsimile:(303)293-3656 Denver,Colorado 80202 Patricia A.Luby May 20, 1996 RECEIVED City of Palm Desert Attention: Stephen R. Smith, Planning Manager MAY 21 1996 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260-2575 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT RE: Tentative Tract May No. 26553 Dear Mr. Smith: The undersigned is Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of William F. Stevens, Deceased. The Estate is the owner of the parcel of real property covered by the above Tentative Tract Map. At this time and on behalf of the Estate, I would respectfully request a one (1) year extension of time within which to record Tentative Tract Map No. 26553. Mr. Steven's Estate proved to be quite complex and involved, among other matters, litigation relating to various assets, one of which was the Avondale property. All of these problems have been resolved and the Estate can now proceed to deal with the above property in a rational manner. It would seem counter-productive to allow a map, approved by all concerned, to expire just when the owner is ready and able to proceed to either develop under the plan or transfer the property to a developer who will comply with the requirements relating to the Map. Please let me know if I can supply you with any further information. Yours truly, ESTATE OF WILLIAM F. STEVENS, Deceased By: C , o n C. Mitchell, 111, -Personal Representative JCMIII/mai cc: Louis A. Comer Cory of Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE (619)346-0611 FAX(619)340-0574 May 31, 1996 Mr. John C. Mitchell, III 1401 17th Street, Suite 1460 Denver, Colorado 80202 Re: Tentative Tract Map No. 26553 Dear Mr. Mitchell: Enclosed please find a copy of a notice reporting that Governor Pete Wilson signed AB 771 into law, which grants an automatic one-year time extension to all existing tentative subdivision maps that haven't expired by May 15, 1^.,,; Tentative Tract Map No. 26553 falls within that guideline. If an additional extension is needed prior to the project's expiration in 1997 , please send a request at that time. Sincerely, PHILIP DRELL DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /tm �s . P Vo I D yr MAP BILL SIGNED ! � One-Year Extension of Subdivision Maps Effective May 15, 1996 CBTA is pleased to report that Governor Pete Wilson has signed AB 771, the CBIA-sponsored subdivision map bill, into Iaw. AB 771, now Chapter 46 of the 1996 Statutes, grants an automatic one-year extension to all existing tentative subdivision maps. This means that any tentative map that hadn't expired 'by May 15, 1996, the effective date of the bill, is now automatically extended for one year. AD 771 is an important victory for California home builders because it ensures that hundreds of costly tentative subdivision maps — representing thousands of single-family and multi-family housing units statewide -- will not expire in 1996 ,just as We housing market.rebounds. A well-deserved thanks to the bill's author, Fred Aguiar, R- Chino, for his year-long commitment and strong leadership on this vital housing issue. Thanks also to CBIA members for their.grassroots support on this important measure. You helped us.win! MAY 21 1996 C113111 V15 ASSOCIATES 1107 Ninth Street,Suite 1060.Sscramt=- CA 91$14 (916)443.7933 FAX(916)443-1960 ao .3 yAi C002Y aq paof 0c30(an 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 FAX(619)341-7098 July 25, 1994 Mr. J. Donald Olson The Fox Company 45-110 Club Drive, Suite E Indian Wells, California 92210-8966 Re: Tract 26553 Dear Mr. Olson: I have reviewed your letter of July 18, 1994 requesting street names in Tract 26553 and found both suggestions to be acceptable. 1 . East Avondale Court West Avondale Court OR 2 . Easterly Way Westerly Way If you have any questions, please feel free to call me. Very truly yours , is 4SI N A. DIAZSTANT CITY ANAGER/ CTOR OF CO UNITY DEVELOPMENT /tm eeyciee PaOe 1 July 14, 1993 Mr. Don Olson 45-110 Club Drive Suite E Indian Wells, California 92210 Dear Don; The Architectural Committee of Avondale Homeowners Association has approved the tract map as presented to the Committee for the north end of the Avondale complex. The setback variation for the two houses on the end lots is acceptable to the Committee. S�cerely 0 s �� , ,1 1 z S3 Fred F. gredensburg president Avondale Homeowners Association city ®l Poem Desert 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(619) 346-0611 FAX(619) 340-0574 July 12 , 1993 Mr. Karl T. Boettcher J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 77564 Country Club Drive, Suite 400-B Palm Desert, CA 92260 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 26553 - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Dear Mr. Boettcher: At long last we have completed our review of your correspondence of March 23, 1993 . As stated in previous correspondence to your office, we basically concur with the transfer of the County' s Conditions of Approval to the City of Palm Desert. We completely agree with the specific discussion presented in your March 23, 1993, correspondence on each of the conditions . With respect to the issue of drainage, you have requested verification of the offsite retention requirements . As we discussed, it is the City' s intention to provide facilities to intercept street flows at the intersection of Frank Sinatra Drive and Cook Street. The installation of these facilities will significantly reduce the offsite flows which will impact the proposed development. In addition, the City' s Master Drainage Plan indicates a drain line in Frank Sinatra Drive beginning at the northwest corner of your project and extending easterly. Although not planned for construction the near future, this link will provide additional relief to the project. In the interim, we are requiring that the offsite flows be retained within the subject development and that the retention basin be sized for a 100-year condition with a maximum side slope of 3 : 1. The onsite and offsite street improvement issues presented in your letter (Page 6) appear satisfactory to us . In addition, the issue of landscaping the proposed median island needs to be addressed. At this point, we will not be requiring the actual landscape installation. In lieu of installation, we will require a cash payment for the future installation. The amount of this cash payment will be determined at the time all other fees and exactions are prepared. Mr. Karl T. Boettcher Page 2 July 12, 1993 Finally, the subject of reduced lot count and substantial conformance was recently discussed. As stated, this city has no objection to the reduction in lot count and lot configuration. We wilions map and, therefore,er hese ct allows for minor adjustments the thesubstantialconformance determination. I hope this letter serves to further clarify the issues associated with this project. If you need additional information or have any questions, please contact the undersigned at Palm Desert City Hall . Sincerely, JOSEPH S. GAUGUSH, P.E. SENIOR ENGINEER JSG/ms cc: Richard J. Folkers, Asst. City Manager/Public Works Director Steve Smith, Associate Planner Jeff Barnes, J.F. Davidson Associates J. Donald Olson, Fox Olson Companies i City of Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE (619)346-0611 FAX(619) 340-0574 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: June 17 , 1993 J . Donald Olson The Fox Company 45-110 Club Drive, Suite E Indian Wells, California 92210-8966 Re: . TT 26553 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of June 15 , 1993 . PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED A ONE YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR TT 26553 BY MINUTE MOTION. CARRIED 5-0. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen ( 15 ) days of the date of the decision. RAM N :' S C RY PALM DESERT PLANNI COMMISSION RAD/tm cc : Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal ' F Z MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY - JUNE 15, 1993 7 : 00 P.M. - CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE I . CALL TO ORDER Chairman Spiegel called the meeting to order at 7 : 00 p.m. II . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Cox led in the pledge of allegiance . III . ROLL CALL Members Present: Bob Spiegel , Chairman Paul Beaty Diane Cox Sabby Jonathan Carol Whitlock Members Absent: None Staff Present : Ray Diaz Bob Hargreaves Paul Shillcock Dick Folkers Steve Smith Tonya Monroe IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Consideration of the June 1 , 1993 meeting minutes . Action: Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Commissioner Jonathan, approving the June 1 , 1993 meeting minutes as submitted. Carried 5-0 . V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION Mr. Diaz stated that there were no pertinent items at the June 10 , 1993 council meeting. VI . CONSENT CALENDAR Case No. TT 26553 - THE FOX COMPANY FOR AVONDALE COUNTRY CLUB, Applicant Request for approval of a first one year time extension for a 20 lot single family subdivision located on the northwest end of Avondale Country Club south of Frank Sinatra Drive . This was originally processed by the County of Riverside. MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 15 , 1993 B. Case No. PMW 93-6 - WESTINGHOUSE DESERT COMMUNITIES, Applicant Request for approval of a lot line adjustment for a portion of the general westerly line of Lot C of Tract No . 27228 and a portion of the general southeasterly line of Lot 34 of Tract No. 27520-1 to accommodate the redesign of Tract No . 27228 . Action• Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Commissioner Cox, approving the consent calendar by minute motion. Carried 5- 0 . VII . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case No . GPA 93-3 - CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Request for a recommendation to city council for approval of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact and an amendment to the General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements . Mr. Diaz recommended a continuance to allow the commission to receive the report from a special land use committee that was composed of members from the Planning Commission, Economic Development Advisory Committee, staff and outside representatives . He said it would be before the commission at their next meeting. Commission concurred with the continuance . Action• Moved by Commissioner Jonathan, seconded by Commissioner Cox, continuing GPA 93-3 to July 6 , 1993 by minute motion . Carried 5-0 . B. Continued Case No . CUP 93-3 - RONALD ODEKIRK, Applicant Request for approval of a conditional use permit to construct and operate a 20 acre multi-use, pay for play, recreation facility to be located on 20 acres of 2 THE FOX COMPANY DECEIVE® JUN - 9 1993 COMMUNR DEYEtOPMEM DEPARTMEMi MY OF PALM DESERT 6-7-93 Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert , CA 92260 Re: Tentative Tract 26553, Avondale Country Club Dear Commissioners, This letter is to request a one ( I ) year extension on the above referenced Tentative Map. Due to the present economic conditions the project has been delayed . However , it is the intention of the owner , the Steven ' s Estate, to finalize the engineering and have the Tract ready to record within the next six (6 ) months. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to call me . Sincerely, J -nsId Olson Agent For he Stevens Estate/Tandika Development c. c. John Mitchell Ed Bush Karl Boettcher 45-110 Club Drive 0 Suite E 0 Indian Wells, CA 92210-8966 • Tel: (619) 772-3625 Fax: (619) 772-3629 C J. F. Davidson Associates, Inc. ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE March 23, 1993 PN 9112406 Mr. Joe Gaugush Public Works Department CITY OF PALM DESERT . 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: THE TRANSFER OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TRACT 26553 FROM THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT. Dear Mr. Gaugush: I would like to thank you for taking the time to meet with us during February 1993 regarding the status of Tentative Tract Map 26553. In that meeting, you requested.,. that J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. prepare correspondence that addresses the transfer of the Conditions of Approval from the County of Riverside to the City of Palm Desert. Since the Tentative Tract Map 24553 expires on July 23, 1993,.an extension will be processed and can you provide the necessary forms for this time extension to this office. The.following is a breakdown of the conditions that need clarification when . transferred to the City of Palm Desert. It is understood that nay items not mentioned will not require any changes. The numbers refer to the condition number of the County conditions, dated July 23, 1991. CONDITION NUMBER: 1. All the references to the County of Riverside in this condition and all proceeding conditions shall be understood to refer to the City of Palm Desert. 2. All references to the Road Commissioner in this condition and all proceeding conditions shall be understood to refer to the City Engineer. The street names shall be subject to approval by the Planning Department. Coachella Valley Regional Office 77-564 Country Club Drive, Suite 400-B; Palm Desert, CA 92260•61.9I360-3780 FAX 619/360-3769 0 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Mr. Joe Gaugush Public Works Departn ant CITY OF PALM DESERT March 23, 1993 Page 2 3. The reference to the County ,Surveyor in this condition and all proceeding conditions shall be understood to refer to the City Engineer. The Final Map and any associated easements shall be recorded by the clients title company in conjunction with the City of Palm Desert. 4. The reference to County Ordinance No. 460, shall be understood to refer to the applicable City Ordinances and Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 6. The Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Public.Works Department and the permits shall be issued by the City of Palm Desert Public Works Department. The grading plan shall comply with the U.B.C., Chapter 70, and as amended by Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. The County Ordinance 457, and environmental assessment is not applicable. 7. The Soils Report shall be submitted to the City Public Works Department and the Building and Safety Department. _ 8. It is understood that the City has reviewed and accepted the letter from the County Transportation Department, dated December 26, 1990. Except that the reference to the County Ordinances 460 and 461 shall be understood to refer to the applicable City Ordinances, and that Frank Sinatra Drive will be constructed with a 55 foot half width right-of-way and a 43 foot roadway with a 9 foot median as shown on the Tentative Tract maps. All references to the County Standards shall be understood to be referring to the applicable corresponding City Standard, in particular County Standards; 105 and 101 are understood to be City Standard 307 (without sidewalk) and 302 respectively. In addition, it is understood that the City will accept 4" rolled curb within said tract area and the entry to have standard 6" curb and 24" wide gutter with curb-gutter transitions to be about 10 feet minimum. As for El Dorado Drive (existing) there will be no necessity to provide any street improvement per your site inspection other than at the intersection of El Dorado Drive and Frank Sinatra for drainage. The County Transportation Department reference to a secondary access is not applicable. Mr. Joe Gaugush Public Works Department CITY OF PALM DESERT ., . March 23, 1993 Page 3 The Traffic Signal Mitigation fee and the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee shall be adjusted to the Cities fee structure. All references to the Transportation Department and Director of Transportation in this condition and any proceeding condition shall be understood to refer to the City of Palm Desert Public Work Department, and the City Engineer respectively. 9. The City will not require a submittal to the County Health Department. 10. The Grading Plan will not be required to be submitted to the Coachella Valley Water District Flood Control for review of the drainage. However, a submittal of the grading, landscape and irrigation plan to CVWD will be required to ensure efficient water management. 11. It is understood that the City of Palm Desert Fire.Department has reviewed and accepted the requirements a stated in the County Fire Department IetteF . dated December 10, 1990. A copy of the water plans for this site will be F submitted to the City of Palm Desert Fire Department for approval. 12. The Grading Plan will be required to be submitted to the Public Works Department. All references to the County Ordinance 457 shall be understood to refer to Chapter 27 of the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code. 13. With the exception of submittal of the Grading Plans to CVWD Flood Control, all the requirements of the CVWD letter dated October 30, 1990, shall apply. 14. Perimeter Wall-The subdivider will provide a current acoustical analysis report. for the City's approval. 16. The fees to the CVWD Parks and Recreation shall be replaced by the City. Park Fee.. 17. 1 Prior to the recordation of the Tract Map, the developer will not be required to obtain written clearances from the listed agencies, but will still be required to pay the fee to the nature Conservancy. 18. No written reports to the City are required. 19. This issue does not apply since the 20`lot subdivision together with east retention area, east of lot no. 14 will be constructed as a single phase. Mr. Joe Gaugush . Public Works Departnivnt CITY OF PALM DESERT March 23, 1993 Page 4 20. It-is understood that the site is Toned PR-5 (Planned Residential), and that no change of zone will be necessary. This zoning also includes the golf course acreage. 21. The items listed in this condition (C.C.&R.'s and the sample document conveying title) shall be submitted to the City.Planning Department for approval. 22. No clarifications are required. . 23a. The annexation into the parkway maintenance district will be required. b. The street landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and CVWD. 24. Through 28. The lot size for this land subdivision will be in accordance with existing C.C.&R.'s of Avondale Homeowners Association together with the City of Palm Desert's PR-5 Zoning Conditions Requirements. 29 & 30 No clarifications are required. 31. All privately maintained outdoor.lighting shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Palm Desert Ordinance. 32. Same as for Items 24 through 28, inclusive. 33 &'34 'No environment constraints shed required. 35. Prior to recordation of a Final Tract Map, a hydrological analysis-shall be submitted to the City Public Works Department for approval. It is understood that the City would provide off-site storm drain facilities to intercept the stormwater runoff at Frank Sinatra Drive and Cook Street and divert it away from this site. Therefore, this site will only have to intercept the stormwater runoff from the southerly half of Frank Sinatra Drive from Cook Street to the westerly corner of the site. It is further understood that this site would then retain the on-site and off-site runoff within the retention basin west of Lot.1. This basin would be designed to retain the 100 year storm. 36. No environmental assessment for grading is required. Mr. Joe Gaugush Public Works Department . CITY OF PALM DESERT March 23, 1.993 Page 5 37. , The reference to Ordinance:484, shall be understood to refer to Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. Reference to the Director of the Building and Safety Department shall mean (now) the City Engineer of the Palm Desert City. - 39. Street trees, as described in this condition, are not applicable but subject to requirements of the zoning ordinance. 40. The Coachella Valley Park and ,Recreation Fee shall be replaced by the applicable City fee for Parks. 41. Plans for the gated entry area along Frank Sinatra Drive shall be submitted to the Planning department and Public Works Department for approval. 42. through 44. Any alternate wall or roof design shall be submitted to the City of Palm Desert Building and Safety Department and Planning Department for approval. 46. The installation of any signs shall be approved by Planning Department. 48. The landscaping and street trees shall be in accordance with'the City Zoning Ordinance. In addition, I would like to convey:our earlier understanding on the following issues for your comment, if any. DRAINAGE: Onsite'runoff will be contained onsite.via retention basin except for a portion of area at the entry and offsite flows will remain offsite. It was also mentioned that a portion of the existing tributary offsite runoff will be intercepted by a future regional system. This system will provide some relief to our existing design requirements. Reference is made in a letter sent to you from (JFD) dated December 23, 1991, Item 9 as to what those design requirements involve. We.have requested that the City provide a letter stating the fact and provide confirmation as to what the design requirements for the street and retention basin will be for the interim condition. It was also suggested by the City that 3:1 maximum side slopes be provided for the retention basin. Mr. Joe Gaugush • Public Works Department CITY OF PALM DESERT March 23, 1993 Page 6 STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Onsite) There are no objections by the City suggesting that street improvements for "A Street be improved with a 36750' road section, which is contrary to the Conditions of Approval by the County of Riverside suggesting 36760' road section. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Offsite) Offsite Frank Sinatra Drive profile will have a minimum of 0.4% grades with a sump at the basin near the proposed maintenance building. This design will result in our median curb (south of centerline)'having a maximum differential of 2.2 feet in elevation with respect to the existing -median curb (north of centerline). The City will accept this condition due to its existing constraints. We will also be required to extend the existing median west to.the existing intersection (approximately.300 feet). r Please review the Conditions of Approval from the County of Riverside together with the changes noted above, as well as the.above summary for our understanding of these issues that were presented to your during earlier meetings in behalf of this project. If there is any item(s) that are not properly summarized, please notify J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. as soon as possible so that we may correct it accordingly. We fully appreciate your approval,-'as to the contents of this letter, as soon as possible. Again thank you for the opportunity to review and discuss these issues with you and I am looking forward to a successful project conclusion. Very truly yours, J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Coachella alley Regional Office Karl T. Boettcher, P.E. . Project Manager I•' Ili ! I „ i I i r i I I I I Ail .4ryi I • I Jill HIM J h ' Il I ! I II• i • ' ti N l I ilil Ido"I C, / i 1� rt. S l _I- I r ., +`• ,..F'i5\� a �T�'S';•' 1j.^�:�:i+"•!�,1 �i..MA45. �%�r'3� ^III > ��;�w I.J_i:�� jr"��'�' .°_ �"., �',•�� II 11 ' I • .I I � — S f�IA �dfhST°n. 1 f t 1 1_I i I �� F i i- v £•9/lj �ti_=�" f�i:z II f iIi • ,I�+/ y�♦� oJ�O� N ��.�y4�1 tl��;a•u._ I_ .� � z ,tl ,•Y�St,-, ;aa '.7/�(y�6 A•�.'•n iJ "iviy � r.•• ! _l.. 1 tin � I ,y 'ti J+ hn :'v >�;+^.. It.rif c ,E:.;.li'e• / \7.i J. . -CiS,J ` I � .,,'>r,• ,R_1.rJ �'e L IJ V�� a�___-_~_______ -LLt�:::_�I::a.`�''�'_• -i�`.�:� I I i•�=L=rt_.c - .. �c� �' •F�9/ 3nILa Arur)''Jl/7� JsO>'7'j_nlfi 1�� -�—.y to JtlJi��d 3° .�a''•♦i�J� ,. i�i '�i �i i �i 1 i � i 4 • O 1 N�// �i •�/ � � :i. 1 is I �."°*'"•• yi .}., +, .+A• \ 1 IIfI Ax oj IyA%' `..(\� aI/ \� ^ t..O R ,•vl Y a• / •1 i c O I_ •r'Ig ' , I.p"•Jc� \ s. '"� -'ii//f r �fi 1t RECEIVED JAN 13 1992 oq pad a R@,(mn 1 COMMUNRV DEVELDPMEW DEPARTMEML 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 cm Dr PALM DESERT TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 January 6. 1992 Mr. Michael D. Myers J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 77-564 Country Club Drive, Suite 400-B Palm Desert, CA 92260 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP - TRACT 26553 Dear Mr. Myers: Thank you for your letters of December 11 , 1991 and December 23, 1991 , regarding the above-referenced subject. It is my understanding that members of both the Planning and Engineering Departments have been meeting with you regarding the processing of Tentative Tract 26553. It is also my understanding that those meetings have been beneficial to both parties with respect to the project processing. With respect to the specific items referenced in your letter of December 23, 1991 , my staff has indicated concurrence with your summary of those issues discussed and they are continuing to discuss and address the additional issues. Once again, thank you for your correspondence and be assured of the City's continued cooperation in the processing of this project. Sincerely, BRUCE A. ALTMAN CITY MANAGER BA:JSG/ms cc: Richard J. Folkers, Asst. City Manager/Public Works Director Ray Diaz, Asst. City Manager/Community Development Director Joseph S. Gaugush, Senior Engineer Steve Smith, Associate Planner Matthew Olsen, Project Manager, J.F. Davidson Associates pis'rluRQ TE: wl� hale / <Ic. FOLLOW_LTp •E,M J. F. Davidson Associatess Inc. ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING LAND APE CHITECTURE December 23, 1991 (L PN 9112406 Bruce Altman, City Manager CITY OF PALM DESERT 2 6 og91 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 .4tM.1 v NHW`GfA I �TN RE: STATUS OF TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP, TRACT 26553, APPROVED BY E COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CURRENTLY A PART OF THE PALM DESERT ANNEXATION, AND SUMMARY OF THE DECEMBER 11, 1991 MEETING. Dear Mr. Altman: I would like to thank your staff, Mr. Joe Gaugush and Mr. Steve Smith, for meeting with us on December 11 , 1991 regarding the status of Tentative Tract 26553. They were very helpful in answering questions regarding the processing of this tract after the annexation will take place. It is our understanding that they will be the City's case Planner and Engineer for this project and that any future correspondence will be addressed to them. In that December 11 meeting, we discussed the items outlined in our December 11 , 1991 letter to you. A brief summary of the items discussed are listed below: 1. The annexation has been approved by LAFCO and was scheduled for the protest hearing on December 12, 1991. If significant written protest is not filed at this hearing approval is expected and, the annexation will record 3 to 4 weeks later. An election is not expected. 2. The site will be zoned PR-5 (Planned Residential) by the City, which allows for the single family lots, the golf course, and the golf course maintenance building and operations. 3. The site as shown in the Tentative Map will be recognized by the City. The Conditions of Approval will also be recognized subject to review by the City Staff. The City will allow only one,one year, extension beyond the initial two year period indicated in the Conditions of Approval. 4. The building setbacks will be established in accordance with the PR-5 Zoning. The coverage will be a maximum of 35%. The Standards in the current CCBR's for the Avondale Gold Club will also be used. Coachella Valley Regional Office 77-564 Country Club Drive, Suite 400-B, Palm Desert, CA 92260 619/360-3780 FAX 619/360-3789 Riverside•San Bernardino-Temecula•Palm Desert ' 1 J Bruce Altman, City Ma,.ager CITY OF PALM DESERT December 23, 1991 Page 2 5. The Park Fee, Signalization Fee, Drainage Fee, Fringe-Toed Lizard Fee, Final Map Fee, Plan Check Fee's, Bonds, and deposit for monumentation were confirmed as requiring payment prior to the recordation of the Map. For the T.U.M.F. Fee, Fire Fee, School Fee, Inspection Fee and the Grading Fee payment is required when permits are pulled. There are no additional fees necessary for environmental, entitlement or Tentative Map purposes. 6. The reconfiguration of the site from that as tentatively approved, including the reduction in the number of lots and the shortening of the cul-de-sacs, were reviewed and are considered to be in substantial conformance to the Tentative Map. Therefore, no revisions to the Tentative Map will be required. 7. The concept of mapping the project in two phases, one phase for the single family lots and one for the golf course lots, was discussed. It was understood that this was proposed to defer payment of a portion of the drainage fee. It was also discussed that the golf course lots, Phase II, may never be recorded. The City staff did not have any objections to this concept and also stated that we would not have to process a phasing map. It is understood that J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. could submit the Improvement Plans for the single family lots and that the City would process them without any additional planning or tentative map activity. 8. The relocation of the existing maintenance building was reviewed and the staff did not have any objections at this time. 9. The offsite drainage issue was discussed, and the staff inquired about the volumes of stormwater that might be anticipated vs. the volume of stormwater that could be contained onsite. This was asked because there may be a regional storm channel in the future that will convey this water. Therefore, the staff would consider reducing the design requirements as a temporary solution, knowing the channel will eventually be built to handle the excess stormwater. This would also involve allowing the stormwater to pond in the street until it overflowed the high point and then continued east down Frank Sinatra Drive. However, this is subject to review upon the presentation of approximate stormwater volumes associated with the offsite runoff vs. retention volume available. 10. The staff did not have any objections to the retention basin being located on the west side of the single family lots; this is not currently shown on the Tentative Map. Bruce Altman, City M_ .ager CITY OF PALM DESERT December 23, 1991 Page 3 11. The staff mentioned that the Conditions do require the "repair" of El Dorado Drive as directed by the Director of Transportation. This may also be enforced by the City. 12. The staff mentioned that the cul-de-sac radius as shown was not adequate for emergency vehicles. The radius should be 45 feet to the face of curb. 13. The Conditions of approval indicate that Frank Sinatra Drive should be constructed within a 50 foot half right-of-way with a curb and gutter located 38 feet from the centerline. The City requires that this road be constructed with a 55 foot right-of-way, and a 43 foot roadway with a 9 foot median as shown on the Tentative Map. The above summary is our understanding of the issues that were discussed. If there is any item that is not properly summarized, please notify us at once so that we may correct it. We currently have a meeting scheduled for January 3, 1991. At that meeting, we would like to discuss the following issues: 1. Upon your review of the County of Riverside Conditions of Approval, will the City prepare any formal acceptance of, additions to, or clarifications to these conditions? 2. On December 19, 1991, 1 faxed a copy of our preliminary stormwater volume calculations to Mr. Gaugush. Has the City staff reviewed these estimated volumes? If so, have they established the design criteria to allow this site to feasibly control the offsite flows? 3. The County has previously approved the plot plan for relocation of the existing maintenance building. What will be required to process the county approved plot plan through the City of Palm Desert? 4. What will be the extent of repair to El Dorado Drive? Will this require improvement plans or will this be limited to resurfacing as directed by the inspector in the field? 5. Are there any changes to the requirements for landscaping as outlined by the County? Will this plan be required at the time building permits are issued. Bruce Altman, City Mw,ager ` CITY OF PALM DESERT December 23, 1991 Page 4 We again thank you for the opportunity to explore these issues related to the annexation of this property to the City of Palm Desert and the resulting effects on the current approvals and project design requirements. Sincerely, J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Coachella Valley Regional Office Michael D. Myers / Vice-President Regional Manager cc: Matthew Olsen, Project Manager Ramon Diaz, Director of Community Development Richard J. Folkers, Director of Public Works Joe Gaugush, Senior Engineer Steve Smith, Planner Ed Bush, Owner MCO/vb.ENG.AR1 WALKER, CELANO & ASSOCIATES Consultants on Acoustics 2669 Townsgate Road, Suite 112 Westlake Village, CA 91361 805/497-1902 n FAX 805/495-9933 L F r ' IJ ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS REPORT l.'. FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 26553 r ; RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA I ri i , r i December 3, 1990 l.� `1 t Prepared for: . Tandika Corporation 75800 Avondale Drive j 1 Palm desert, CA 92260 (L l_ I Acoustical Analysis Report Page 1 Tandika Corp., TT 26553 (f December 3, 1990 I ' INTRODUCTION Tandika Corporation proposes to. develop approximately 8.5 acres of land I located at the northerly end of the Avondale Country Club for residential use. Due to the proximity of the site to transportation noise sources including Frank Sinatra Drive, the SPRR right-of-way and Highway 1-10, an acoustical I analysis of the project has been requested by the Riverside County Environmental Health Department. is I CRITERIA ' California State Criteria: The "California Noise Insulation Standards" contained in Part 2, Title 24, CCR ,I of the State Building Code, Appendix 35 Sound Transmission Control specify maximum allowable interior noise level limits, due to exterior noise sources, for new multiple residential structures. The interior noise standard is Ldn or. CNEL 45 with doors and windows closed. The code specifies that a acoustical analysis shall be performed for new residential construction to be located where the CNEL or Ldn exceeds 60 dB in order to insure that the interior noise standards will be met. However, detached single family dwellings are specifically excluded from the standard. i Riverside County Criteria: In a memo dated October 4, 1990, Mr. William D. Redden, CIH of the County of Riverside Department of Health specifies the current Riverside County noise standards for residential development. The requirements are as i follows: The interior noise levels in residential dwellings shall not exceed 45 Ldn (or CNEL) The exterior noise level shall not exceed 65 Ldn* it � , Acoustical Analysis Report Page 2 Tandika Corp., TT 26553 December 3, 1990 J PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is an approximately 8.5 acre parcel located on the southerly side of Frank Sinatra Drive between Sweetwater Drive and Eldorado Drive at the northerly end of the Avondale Country Club in the Palm Desert area of Riverside County. It is to be divided into 22 lots for single family residences and two lots that will remain as golf course fairways. The project will include the extension of Mozambique Drive from its present l northerly terminus to intersect with Frank Sinatra Drive. The Southern Pacific Transportation Company railroad right-of-way is located approximately 1100 It northeasterly of the northeasterly corner of the site and the 1-10 Freeway right-of-way is located approximately 200 ft beyond the railroad. NOISE SETTING AND IMPACTS { Field Measurements: ll In order to characterize the existing noise environment at the project site and I to serve as a basis for the subsequent analyses, an acoustical measurement program was undertaken on November 27, 1990 between approximately 3:30 and 6:30 pm. The measurement microphone was located just north of the northerly property line near the center of the tract. The measurements were taken with a Rion type NA-29E precision sound level J meter octave band real time analyzer connected to a PC compatible Epson portable computer. Each of the measurement periods was 15 minutes total duration and consisted of a series of 900 consecutive 1 second time average -I (LBg1Sed samples. The analyzer simultaneously measured the overall A-weighted level and the A-weighted level in each of the octave bands over the range of 31 Hz to 8000 Hz. At the end of each 15 minute period, the -- analyzer calculated statistical levels for the measurement period and all of the measured and calculated data were transferred to the computer for J storage on magnetic disk and subsequent laboratory analysis. . Prior to the measurements, the overall calibration of the system was checked with a 1 Bruel & Kjaer type 4230 acoustic calibrator. The results of the measurements are summarized in Table 1, below, and copies of the computer printouts are contained in Appendix B. 1 ' I I LAcoustical Analysis Report Page 3 Tandika Corp., TT 26553 CDecember 3, 1990 I (—� Start L� Leg15TIn L90 I Time Intrusive Ambient Background 15:41 69.0 dB 59.9 dB 51.4 dB 18:13 11 64.7 57.0 53.4 Table 1 Measured A-weighted Noise Levels ! ' With usual temporal distribution of traffic, the Ldn is approximately equal (within 1 dB) to the time average noise level (Leq) during the peak traffic period. Therefore, on the basis of the measurement data the estimated present noise exposure at the northerly edge of the site is Ldn 60 to 61 dB. Future Traffic Noise Modeling: The projected year 2010 traffic on Highway 1-10 (per Caltrans) is 51,000 ADT with 1.2% medium trucks and 14% heavy trucks. The time of day distribution was assumed to be similar to the Riverside County standard for secondary and larger highways. The average traffic speed was assumed to be 65 mph. In accordance with the October 4, 1990 County Health Department memo, the future traffic condition on Frank Sinatra Drive was assumed to be 24,000 ADT (level of service C capacity for a four lane secondary road). The truck mix and time of day distribution utilized were the County standard mix, per the same memo, and the average traffic speed was assumed to be 40 mph. 1 These data were used as input to a computerized traffic noise prediction I model based on the FHWA RD-77-108 Highway Noise Prediction Model. The computer model incorporates the reference noise emission levels contained in Caltrans Report FHWA/CA/TL-84/13. Calculations were run utilizing both the standard FHWA hard .site model, per the County memo, and an alternative model that incorporates atmospheric absorption as well as wave . spreading effects and thus produces more realistic results at long distances. The calculated Ldn contour locations for both distance attenuation models are summarized in Table 2, below. It should be noted, that these calculations I are for a "bare site" condition and do not include the shielding that would be, provided by any intervening development and/or roadside barriers. I j �. LJ Acoustical Analysis Report Page 4 Tandika Corp., TT 26553 December 3, 1990 , Ld„ Highway I-10 Frank Sinatra Drive Hard Site Real Site Hard Site Real Site 55 50181 3136 6144 1362 ; I 60 15859 2028 1948 766 65 5018 1242 616 368 70 1589 681 196 154 75 504 319 1 67 65 80 166 138 33 1 33 Table 2 Calculated Year 2010 A-weighted Noise Contour Locations Distance in Feet Relative to Center of Road The County memo specifies that in the absence of specific site information, the distance from the center of the street to the nearest building face should . be assumed to be 85 ft. At this distance, the unmitigated exterior noise exposure at the building, due to the future traffic on Frank Sinatra Drive, would be approximately Ldn 74 based on either site model. The exterior I noise exposure due to 1-10, located approximately 1400 ft away, would be approximately Ldn 71 based on the worst case FHWA hard site model or approximately Ldn 64 based on the more realistic site model. i Railroad Noise: r� The results of recent measurements of two typical SPRR freight operations taken at a nearby site located approximately one half mile west of this project site and the same distance from the tracks as this site were as follows: Eastbound, Leq 60.4 dB for a 2.5 minute sample period Westbound, LeQ 64.9 dB for a 3.5 minute sample period. It was recently reported by a representative of SPRR that an average of approximately 32 trains pass by the site per day, distributed random- uniformly over 24 hours. This translates to an Ldn weighted (nighttime events are multiplied by a factor of 10) equivalent number of 140 operations per day. If it is assumed that the noise produced by an average train event is no higher than the higher of the two measured operations, the Ldn at the site due to the railroad operations would be approximately 60 dB. Acoustical Analysis Report Page 5 Tandika Corp., TT 26553 December 3, 1990 L ( Composite Noise Exposure: The noise exposure at the northerly border of the site due to future design capacity traffic on Frank Sinatra Drive would be approximately Ldn 74, the noise due to the future traffic on 1-10 would be a maximum of Ldn 71 based on the worst case hard site model or approximately Ldn 64 based on the real site model, and the railroad noise would be approximately Ld, 60. The composite of these three sources would range from approximately Ldn 74, assuming the realistic site model for the noise from the 1-10 freeway to a maximum of approximately Ldn 76 assuming the worst case hard site model for 1-10. Thus, this composite exterior noise exposure of approximately Ldn 75 would require the structures to achieve a minimum of approximately 30 dB of exterior-to-interior noise reduction in order to conform with the Ldn 45 maximum interior noise criterion. The County memo also specifies that exterior noise exposures are to be calculated for a location 10 It from the barrier on the site, at an elevation of 3 ft above the ground. At this location, the unmitigated future noise exposure would be approximately Ldn 76. Thus, a barrier providing a minimum of approximately 11 dB of shielding would be necessary to meet the Ldn 65 exterior noise exposure criterion. MITIGATION Outdoor Noise: Attenuation calculations were run for a barrier constructed at the southerly edge of the right-of-way of Frank Sinatra Drive, 50 ft from the center of the street. At the specified location, 3 ft elevation 10 ft from the wall, a top of wall elevation of 8 ft relative to the finished grade in the yard would reduce the future noise exposure to below Ldn 65. The exact details of the barrier construction are not critical, provided that it is of impervious construction and not less than 4 pounds per square foot surface density. Concrete block, stucco plaster over wood frame, precast masonry plank or heavy timber construction would all be acceptable options. Access gates, if required, should be impervious construction (4 p.s.f. minimum) as well and should be provided with overlapping stops at the Acoustical Analysis Report Page 6 Tandika Corp., TT 26553 December 3, 1990 rl j � jambs in order to minimize sound leakage around the edges. Alternatively, n an earth berm or a combination of a berm and a wall could be utilized. Indoor Noise: J Since no building plans have been developed for the project, detailed noise control specifications are not possible at this time. Demonstration of compliance with the Ldn 45 maximum interior noise exposure criterion should be a building permit condition. I Normal residential construction with closed, well sealed windows and doors typically provides approximately 20 dfl of exterior-to-interior noise reduction. Normal construction with windows open for natural ventilation typically provides approximately 10 dB of exterior-to-interior noise reduction. Therefore, since the exterior noise exposure is higher than Ldn 65, closed, acoustically upgraded windows will be necessary in all areas of the project to meet the Ldn 45 interior noise criterion. i , Since the windows will have to be kept closed at least part of the time in order to satisfy the Ldn 45 indoor noise criterion, alternative ventilation may be necessary, per the State and City codes, to provide an acceptable indoor v' windows environment should the residents elect to keep the w ndo s closed to exclude the noise. Normally, air conditioning or the incorporation of a 9 P "summer switch" in a heating only system is adequate to meet the ventilation requirement, provided that the system provides a minimum of 2 air changes per hour with 20% outside air, however this should be verified by a Mechanical Engineer. i. I i J .i i I I i . !_J APPENDIX A ACOUSTICAL TERMINOLOGY DEFINITIONS r f • Appendix A Page Al Definitions The following is not intended as a comprehensive glossary of acoustic terminology, however it will provide sufficient information to allow a better understanding of the technical language contained in this document. _j ■ Decibel (dB) - A unit division on a logarithmic scale whose base is the tenth root of ten, used to represent ratios of quantities proportional to power. [In simple terms, if the power is multiplied by a factor of ten, then ten is added to the representation of the power on the decibel i scale. If 0 dB represents 1 unit of power, 60 dB represents one million units, etc.] ■ Sound Pressure Level (SPL - dB) - The ratio, in decibels, of the mean squared sound pressure to the square of the reference pressure, 20 micropascals. ■ A-weighted Sound Level (SLA - dB) - Sound pressure level measured using the A-weighting network, a filter which discriminates against low and very high frequencies in a manner similar to the human hearing mechanism at moderate sound levels (ref. ANSI S1.4). ■ Time Average Sound Level (L.QT - dB) - The level, in decibels, of the mean squared sound pressure averaged over time period T. This is often referred to as the "equivalent sound level" and hence the "eq" subscript. The equivalence is to a sound of constant level which has the same total acoustic energy content. i ■ Day-Night Average Noise Level (Ld - dB) - The long term average sound level, weighted as follows: a. Frequency response is filtered using the A-weighting network. b. Sounds occurring during the nighttime hours between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. are weighted by 10 dB (equivalently, the number of , noise events is multiplied by 10). ■ Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL - dB) - The long term I average sound level, weighted as follows: a. Frequency response is filtered using the A-weighting network. I : i nn �. Appendix A Page A2 (( Definitions I b. Sounds occurring during the evening hours between 7 p.m. and 10 p.m. are weighted by 5 dB (equivalently, the number of noise events is multiplied by 3.15) C. Sounds occurring during the nighttime hours between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. are weighted by 10 dB (equivalently, the number of noise events is multiplied by 10). ■ Percentile Exceeded Sound Level (LPE - dB) - The sound level (usually A-weighted) which is exceeded PE percent of a specified time period. ■ Sound Exposure Level (SEL - dB) - The logarithmic product of the. average noise level (usually A-weighted) and the time duration. (It is not an actual measured noise level, but rather it is used in the computation of long term averages such as CNEL and Ld,,.) ■ Octave Band Sound Pressure Level (dB) - The sound pressure level measured using a band-pass filter whose upper cutoff frequency is two times the lower cutoff frequency, and which is identified by the nominal geometric center frequency of the pass band. ■ One-Third Octave Band Sound Pressure Level (dB) - The sound pressure level measured using a band-pass filter whose upper cutoff frequency is the cube root of two times the lower cutoff frequency, and which is identified by the nominal geometric center frequency of the pass band. ■ Sound Spectrum -The representation of an acoustic signal in terms of its level versus frequency. The most common method for determining ( : the sound spectrum is with an analyzer consisting of a series or bank of contiguous octave or 1/3 octave band filters and a bar-graph or numerical tabular display, known as a real-time analyzer ■ Ambient Noise - The noise which results from the combination of all sources, near and far. The ambient noise level is expressed as L,,T, Ldn or CNEL as judged appropriate to the situation. ■ Background Noise The steady noise level which characterizes a i given environment in the absence of transient sources. The L Appendix A Page A3 J Definitions L.1 background noise is usually expressed as L9., the noise level which is 17 exceeded 90% of the specified time period. ■ Intrusive Noise - Noise from an identifiable source which causes a discernable change in the existing acoustic environment. Noises can be intrusive by virtue of excessive overall level, or as the result of 1 unusual spectral or temporal characteristics. ■ Noise Contour - A line on a map which indicates locations of constant ambient sound level near or around known sources of noise. In practice, noise contours are often shown as calculated for the dominant sources of noise only. i ■ Noise Reduction (NR) - The difference in decibels, in a specified frequency band, between the average sound pressure levels in two enclosed spaces connected by one or more sound transmission paths due to a sound source in one of the spaces (ref. ASTM E336). ■ Sound Transmission Loss (TL) - The difference in decibels, in a specified frequency band, between the sound.power incident on the "partition' and the sound power transmitted by the partition and radiated on the receiving side (ref. ASTM E90). ■ Sound Transmission Class (STC) -A single number rating of the sound isolating capability of a building construction element with to respect speech, radio, television, and similar sources of noise in offices and dwellings. The rating is derived from the measurement of the sound I transmission loss of the element over a series of 16 contiguous 1/3 octave bands centered from 125 Hz to 4000 Hz. The application of the STC rating to the isolation of sounds due to exterior noise sources such as motor vehicles or aircraft and sounds due to machinery, industrial noise sources, transformers, etc., is specifically excluded by the defining standard (ref. ASTM E413). I APPENDIX B MEASUREMENT DATA AND COMPUTER CALCULATION PRINTOUT SHEETS a Tentotive Tract 26553 - RLversLde County TandLko CorporaLLon MLddLe of North Property Line Mecsu-ements Tcken 11/27/90 18:13-18:28 900 One Second Leq SompLes 60 Leq-57.0 d8 —Rme Line r CO •---CumuLatLve 70 j Typical. LocoL TroffLc w d 60 J v r m 40 30 0 m.n 10% 5 m.n 50% 10 min 90% 15 min ReLctLve Time (mLnutesl / CLnuLoLLve D SLrlbutLon .j 80 15 MLn SompLe Period -: w-• Ll InLrusi.ve - - - 70 —o— Leq Rmbient _ _ ... ........ L90 Sockground J 60 _... Cn 90 _. 00 30 ., ._ . _.. ... :.::. - - a _ 0 20 10 31 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 9000 6000 H-WLd Octave Band Center Frequency - Hz Tentative Tract 26553 - RLversLde County TondLka CorporatLon MLddLe of North Property' Line Msosr ements Token 11/27/90 15:41-15:56 900 One Second Leq ScgQLes 80 Leq-59.9 dS TypLcot Local Traffic —Rme Line CumuLOLLve 70 w J 60 o I-10 50 V'/ �J - .. .J L Q7 3 40 30 0 min 10% 5 mLn 50% 10 mLn 90% 15 mLn ReLOLLve Time (mLnutes) / CumuLatLve D-strlbuLLon e0 :r ._.c. 15 Min SompLe Period-c _ Ll InLrusLve 70 __. _ _ _. :.-. _--.:::_ -0— Leq Ambient r _ _ ._. 7... L90 Background U , L 50 40 N - _. . .- _. a30 _ 10 31 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 R-vtd Octovo Bond Canter Frequency - Hz `iighway Noise Calculation for TT 265S3 29 Nov 1990 - (� Realistic Site Model i, �I Lane Positions, Relative to Center Line Lane 1 : -24 ft . Lane 2: -12 ft . 1 Lane 3: 12 ft . r Lane 4: 24 ft . J .CALVENO Model Used for Noise Emission Levels Vehicle Speed = 40 mph. Auto SEL at 15 m - 71 .6 dB Medium Truck SEL - 80.S d8 Heavy Truck SEL - 85.5 dB L do Contours for FRANK SINATRA FUTURE LOS C CAPACITY reference to centerline of roadway: ! Projected ADT = 24000 Effective ADT - 53376, 2.22 times ADT Effective Medium Truck Mix = 7.4% i Effective Heavy Truck Mix a 12.4% L_dn METERS FEET 4S 1029.6 3378.0 i 50 670.2 2198.9 S5 415.2 1362.1 60 233.5 766.2 65 112.0 367.6 70 47.0 154.2 75 19.7 64.7 80 9.9 32.S i I i ii Highway Noise Calculation for TT 26553 3 Dec 1990 Hard Site Model I Lane Positions, •Relative to Center Line Lane 1 : -24 ft . Lane 2: -12 ft . Lane 3: 12 ft . I .1 Lane 4: 24 ft . CALVENO Model Used for Noise Emission Levels Vehicle Speed - 40 mph. Auto SEL at 15 m = 71 .6 d8 Medium ruck =M i T SEL 80.5 dB Heavy Truck SEL - 85.5 dB L_dn Contours for FRANK SINATRA FUTURE LOS C CAPACITY reference to centerline of roadway: Projected ADT - 24000 Effective ADT - 53280, 2.22 times ADT . Effective Medium Truck Mix - 7.4% Effective Heavy Truck Mix - 12.4% L_dn METERS FEET 45 18756.6 61537.5 50 5939.7 19487.3 SS 1872.8 6144.3 60 S93.9 1948.S 65 187.8 616 .0 70 59.8 196.3 7S 20.4 67.1 80 9.9 32.6 Highway Noise Calculation ( � Realistic Site Model I� Lane Positions, Relative to Center Line Lane 1 : -4S ft . Lane 2: -33 ft . Lane 3: -21 ft . Lane 4: 21 ft. Lane S: 33 ft . Lane 6: 4S ft . rt CALVENO Model Used for Noise Emission Levels Vehicle Speed = GS mph. L_dn Contours. for HIGHWAY I-10 reference to centerline of roadway: Auto SEL at 15 m = 77.6 d8 Medium Truck SEL = 83.8 dB Heavy Truck SEL = 87.S dB Projected ADT = 51000 Effective ADT = 128698, 2.52 times AOT Effective Medium Truck Mix = 2.6% Effective Heavy Truck Mir. = 30.S% L_dn METERS FEET 4S 2140.6 7023. 1 50 1438.6 4719.8 55 95S.7 313S.7 60 618.1 2028.0 GS 378.5 1241 .8 70 207.5 680.8 7S 97.4 319.4 s0 42. 1 138.0 j ,.i i i Highway Noise Calculation Hard Site Model Lane Positions, Relative to Center Line Lane 1 : -45 ft. i Lane 2: -33 ft . 'Lane 3: -21 ft . Lane 4: 21 ft . Lane S: 33 ft . Lane 6: 45 ft . CALVENO Model Used for Noise Emission Levels Vehicle Speed GS mph. L_dn Contours for HIGHWAY I-10 reference to centerline of roadway: Auto SEL at 1S m - 77.6 d8 Medium Truck SEL = 83.8 d8 Heavy Truck SEL - 87.5 d8 Projected ADT - 51000 Effective ADT - 128698, 2.S2 times ADT Effective Medium Truck Mix 2.6% !.' Effective Heavy Truck Mix - 30.5% L_dn METERS FEET 4S IS3128.2 502389.2 50 48310.6 1S8499.3 55 15295.1 50180.9 60 4833.9 15859.4 GS 1529.4 5017.9 70 484.4 1S89.3 7S 1S3.5 503.5 .80 50.6 165.9 i , r , f !. i . I ' Barrier Attenuation Calculations for (� TT 26S53 I J Distance from Barrier to Sources - 26, 38, 62 , 74 !' Elevation of Sources (re Stm of Barrier ) = 0, 0, 0, 0 . Weighted ADT - 53280, Truck Mix = 19.8%. Auto SEL - 73, Truck SEL - 84.7. Distance from Barrier 10 Elevation above Btm of Barrier Grade 3 63 Hz 46.6 d8 125 60.8 250 70.5 500 70.7 1000 70.5 2000 67.3 4000 59.1 8000 45.9 Ldn without Barrier 76.2 dB i Barrier Height above Grade 6 63 Hz 39.8 dS 12S S3.9 2S0 63.0 500 61.5 1000 S9.2 2000 53.8 4000 43.7 8000 28.5 Ldn with 6.0' Barrier 66.8 d8 Barrier Height above Grade 7 j 63 Hz 39.2 dB 125 53.0 250 61 .8 S00 60. 1 1000 57.7 2000 52.2 4000 41 .9 8000 26.4 Ldn with 7.0' Barrier - 65.5 dB I i I i Barrier Height above Grade 8 63 H: 38.5 dB i 12S 52.2 250 60.8 500 S9.0 1000 56.S 2000 50.8 4000 40.4 8000 24.8 Ldn with 8.0' Barrier 64.4 dB Elevation above Btm of Barrier Grade = 6 Distance from Barrier 35 63 Hz 44.4 dB 125 . SB.6 250 68.3 500 68.6 1000 68.3 2000 65.2 4000 56 .9 8000 43.7 Ldn without Barrier 74.0 d8 Barrier Height above Grade 8 63 H: 38.4 d8 125 53.0 250 62.5 500 61 .1 1000 58. 9 2000 53.4 4000 43.8 8000 29. 1 Ldn with 8.0' Barrier 66.4 dB Elevation above Btm of Barrier Grade 1S 63 Hz 44.3 dB 125 5B.S 250 68.3 500 68.S 1000 68.2 2000 65. 1 4000 56.8 8000 43.7 Ldn without Barrier = 73.9 dB Barrier Height above Grade s 8 ` . I; 63 H: 39:3 dB 125 56.8 250 67.8 J f 500 67.0 1000 . 66.4 2000 62.9 (� 4000 54.8 J 8000 41 .6 Ldn with 8.0' Barrier 72.6 d8 i ' 1 I • Barrier .Height above Grade 10 63 Hz 39. 1 dB .. . 12S S3.5 250 63.2 500 GS.0 1000 64.0 2000 S9.3 4000 51.2 8000 37.9 Ldn with 10.0' Barrier = 69.5 dB I Barrier Height above Grade = 12 63 Hz 38.7 dB { I 12S 53.3 250` 62.9 500 61 .9 1000 GOA 2000 55.1 4000 46.8 8000 32.B Ldn with 12.0' Barrier = 67. 1 dB Barrier Height above Grade 14 63 Hz 37.9 dB 125 52.2 260 61 .5 500 59.9 1000 57.7 2000 S2.2 4000 42.4 8000 27.3 Ldn with 14.0' Barrier = 65.2 dB J Avled 1 ' PINKS _A PROVED AL 2 31991 sir 900"OF aremem RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PARCEL NAP CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 26553 AMENDED NO. 1 The tentative land division shall comply with the state of California Subdivision map Act and to the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 460, Schedule A, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This approved tentative parcel map will expire two years after the Board of Supervisors approval date of July 23, 1991 unless extended as provided by Ordinance No. 460. Approval of a revised map or minor change will not extend the life of the tentative map. 1. The land divider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative Tract Map No. 26553, Amended No. 1 which action is brought about within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the land divider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the County fails to promptly notify the land divider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the land divider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. 2. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public as.- required by the Road Commissioner and shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of the Road Commissioner. 3. . Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc. , shall be shown on the final map if within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication shall provide for non-exclusive public road and utility access. All easements, offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded by the County Surveyor. TENTATIVE TRACT NAP NO. 26553 AMENDED NO. 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 2 4. Legal access as required by Ordinance No. 460 shall be provided from the parcel map boundary to a county maintained road. 5. All delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. 6. If any grading is proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of a comprehensive grading plan to the Riverside County Surveyor's Office. The Plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and Safety prior to commencement of any grading outside of County maintained right-of- way. Proposed grading in excess of quantities indicated in Ordinance 457 may require environmental assessment approval from the Planning Department prior to acceptance of the plans by the Building Department. One mylar copy of the approved grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for transmittal to the Road Department. 7. The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Building and Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. *8. The land divider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outlined in the Transportation Department's letter dated December 26, 1990, a copy of which is attached. 9. The land divider shall install all water and sewage disposal facilities in accordance with the-provisions set forth in the Health Department's letter dated December 20, 1990, a copy of which is attached. 10. The land divider shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined by the Coachella Valley Water District's letters dated January 8, 1991, December 14, 1990 and October 30, 1990, copies of which are attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Ordinance No. 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the Road Commissioner prior to recordation of the final map. *AMENDED by East Area Planning Council on April 18, 1991. The EAPC deleted the requirement for sidewalks within interior streets of the proposed land division. TENTATIVE TRACT NAP NO. 26553 AMENDED NO. 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 3 11. The land divider shall provide fire protection improvements in accordance with the Fire Marshal's letter dated December 10, 1990, a copy of which is attached. 12. The land divider shall comply with the land use and grading recommendations outlined in the Department of Building and Safety's memorandums dated December 18, 1990 and December 18, 1990, copies of which are attached. 13 . The land divider shall comply with the water and sewer service recommendations contained in the Coachella Valley Water District letter dated October 30, 1990, a copy of which is attached. 14. The land divider or the land divider's successor-in-interest shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Health Department's Division of Special Services transmittal dated December 13, 1990, a copy of which is attached. 15. The Habitat Conservation Plan has identified this parcel map as being within the boundaries of the mitigation area of the Coachella Valley Fringe-toed Lizard. PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP OR ISSUANCE OF ANY GRADING PERMITS OR BUILDING PERMITS, whichever occurs first, the land divider shall submit to the Riverside County Surveyor's Office a document which demonstrates to the satisfaction of the County that the land divider has provided sufficient mitigation for the taking of habitat area. The total amount of land to be disturbed by this project will be 12 acres, and no improvements are authorized that will disturb an area in excess of this amount of land unless additional sufficient--mitigation has.. been provided. 16. The land divider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District's transmittals dated October 22, 1990 and January 3, 1991. 17. PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP, the land divider shall submit written clearances to the Riverside County Transportation Department that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached conditions relating to the following agencies have been met: Planning Department Health Department Fire Department The Nature Conservancy Coachella Valley Water District TENTATIVE TRACT NAP NO. 26553 ANENDED NO. 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 4 18. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT, the land divider shall prepare and submit a written report to the Planning Director of the County of Riverside demonstrating compliance with those conditions of approval and mitigation measures of this map and E. A. No. 35545 which must be satisfied prior to the issuance of a grading permit. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP, the land divider shall prepare and submit a written report to the Planning Director of the County of Riverside demonstrating compliance with those conditions of approval and mitigation measures of this map and E. A. No. 35545 which must be satisfied. prior to recordation of the final map. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, the land divider shall prepare and submit a written report to the Planning Director of the County of Riverside demonstrating compliance with those conditions of approval and mitigation measures of this map and E. A. No. 35545 which must be satisfied prior to the issuance of a building permit. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT, the land divider shall prepare and submit a written report to the Planning Director of the County of Riverside demonstrating compliance with all remaining conditions of approval and mitigation measures of this map and E. A. No. 35545. The Planning Director may require inspection or other monitoring to assure such compliance. 19. Land division phasing, including any proposed common .open space area improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Department approval pursuant to Section 8 .3 of Ordinance No. 460. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots and shall conform to the intent and purpose of the approval. No approval for any number of units or phases is given except as provided by Ordinance No. 460. 20: PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP, Change of Zone No. 5924 shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors and shall be effective. This land division shall conform with the development standards of the zone(s) ultimately applied to the property. p =ATM TRACT MAP NO. 26553 MUIiDED NO. 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 5 the land divider shall submit Department for review, which k21• PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE 'FINAL NAP royal of that department and the following documents to the Plsubject to thenapp documents shall be sub? Counsel: the Office of the County 1) A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and purchaser of an . on 2) A sample document conveying title to the individual lot or unit which provides that the declarrated of covenants, conditions and restrictions is incorpo therein by reference. submitted conditions and restrictionmoyears, (b The declaration of covenants, owners' association for review shall (a) provide for a minimum term a property (c) provide provide for the establishment ofthe property owners' t or Of the common area by eithch indil er comprised of the ownersrs of each ind vidualo lot or unitas tenantss for ownership provisions Y3�b� association or the owners of County Counsel. in ctim ommon and (dam byth* Officallowing P othsrvise appro "Notwithstanding any provision in this Declaration to the contrary, the following provisions shall aPP1Y� ished erein shall The property owners' association n theblcommonhareal more manage and continuously attached hereto, an particularly described on Exhibitor any-part rior written consent of the-Planning _ shall no sell or thereof , the transfer sfer the �°OmmOTI area' , he County's thereof , f the Or Riverside or Director successor-in-interest. uccessor in-interest county The property owners! as shall have the right to le cost of maintaining the 'COM°On Such owner who assess the owners of each individual lot or unit for the reasons property of any An have the right to lien the Prop assessment all other defaults in the payment of a mshall be p assessmen assessment lien, once created, liens recorded subsequent tc the notice of assessmen l o other document creating the assessment lien. „*�DED by East Area Planning Council on April 18, 1991. TENTATIVE TRACT NAP NO. 26553 AMENDED NO. 1 .CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 6 %substantially' This Declaration shalldeannexedttherefrominatedIabsent the prior amended or property Director of the County of written consent of the Planninsuccessor-in-interest. A Riverside or the County's common it proposed amendment shall ee considered e cebof the i m on affects the extent, g area' . tionand In the event of any conflict between laws or the this property the Articles of Incorporation, the if any, this owners' association Rules and Regulation, Declaration shall control. conditions and Once approved, the declaration of covenants, time that the final map restrictions shall be recorded at the same is recorded. ion easements 22. The common open space areas such as flood the finaltmap and shall be private streets shall be labeled on association. maintained in common by property parkway and median *23. The land divider, shall comply with the following p landscaping installation and maintenance conditions: a, PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL NAP, the land divider shall file an application with the Transportation Department for the or annexation to, a parkway maintenance district formation Of, located within eenwirh- the rYc� for the parkways and median strip accordance Br#ve--e+rd Frank Sinatra Drive in 1972, unless the project is Landscaping and Lighting-act ai enan within an existing parkway maintenance district. No median �l ! landscaping is required within Frank Sinatra Drive o plansttO u City of Palm Desert submit a letter indicating install such an improvement. b. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, the land street landscaping and irrigation divider or the land divider's successors shall secure approval of proposed and Planning Departments. plans from the Transportationwith the All plans and specifications shall be prepared in e and irrigation reproducible format suitable for permanent filing Transportation Department. All landscaping plans shall be coordinated with similar plans for internal development. MENDED by East Area Planning Council on April 18, 1991. *A TENTATIVE TRACT NAP NO. 26553 AMENDED NO. 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 7 C. PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVAL, or at the time of final inspection approval of street improvements by the Transportation Department, whichever is first, the land divider or the divider's successors shall install the landscaping improvements, or shall have completed all necessary financial arrangements therefore, including but not limited to the posting of a landscaping performance bond which shall be released concurrently with the release of any performance bonds guaranteeing the viability of all landscaping which will be installed prior to the assumption of the maintenance responsibility by the district. d. The land divider or the land divider's successors shall be responsible for all right-of-way landscaping maintenance until such time as maintenance is taken over by the district. 24 . All lots created by this land division shall have a minimum area of 10,000 square feet net. 25. Lots less than one-half acre in size shall be calculated in terms of net area excluding all street right-of-ways. 26. When lots are crossed by major public utility easements, each lot of not less than 3600 square feet, shall have a net usable area exclusive of the utility easement. 27. All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section 3.8C of Ordinance No. 460. 28. Corner lots shall be provided with additional area pursuant to Section 3 .8C of Ordinance No. 460. 29. The land divider shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other parties. new electrical, telephone and television services within this land division less than 35kV shall be installed'-"u`nderground as 30. A1.1 approved by the affected utility. TENTATIVE TRACT NAP NO. 26553 AMENDED NO. 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page e 31. All privately maintained street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Decomplynwith Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655. Privately maintained street lights shall be of a low density pressure sodium vapor type. rtion f a lot idth 32. tolbe used shall as ahave building site of av erag60wfeet o with a a mi o minimum average lot shall be 60 depth of 100 feet. rovidedlinmthe Rnlum a zone ge f for hl is fronting on feet, except as p knuckles or cul-de-sac. ECS) shall h the 33. fi Environmental map to deli eate identified environmental concernsdand tshall be permanently filed with the office of the County Survey ECSo . PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE FINAL NAP, a copy ll be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded andwith thecopies Department the of eBuildinglanl map to the Planning Department Safety. 34• The SHEET following °�"County note Acoustical Report No place on t 91E674-021Ewasprepared CONSTRAINT'S this property on December 1990 by Walker, Celano & Associates and is j: on file at the Riverside County Planning Department." riate ic 35• PRIOR calculations and g THE radingCE FPlans=NG prepareed by a California registered civil engineer shall be submitted-to the Department-of Building and -- --- Safety for review. The calculations and plans shall provide for the and for acceptance of off-site stormwaters tribut with h minimal propert off-site their conveyance through the property the stormwater diversion or concentration as . determined byshall Department of Building and Safety. The calculations and p ar demonstrate that the incremental increase of runoff from a natural ndition shall be retained on site unless condition to a developed co coordination with the Road Department allows the u rov dedrfors all drainage purposes. Flood protection shall be p on-site buildings. Calculations at a minimum shall include storms up to a 100 year, 24 hour storm. TENTATIVE TRACT NAP NO. 26553 AMENDED NO. 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 9 ; 36. No environmental assessment for grading within the project boundaries shall be required provided such grading substantially conforms to the grading plan submitted as part of the approved tentative map. The land divider shall comply with all conditions of approval and ECS notes requiring performance prior to the issuance of grading permits. 37. The land owner shall institute blowsand and dust control measures during grading and site development. These shall include but not be limited to: a) The use of irrigation during any construction activities; b) planting of cover crop or vegetation upon previously graded but undeveloped portions of the site; and, c) provision of windbreaks or windrows, fencing, and/or landscaping to reduce the effects upon adjacent properties and property owners. The landowner shall comply with directives of the Director of the Building and Safety Department with regards to the applicable sections of Ordinance No. 484 (Blowsand Control) . All construction and graded areas shall be watered at least twice daily while being used to prevent the emission of dust and blowsand. 38. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a condition so as to prevent a dust and blowsand nuisance and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other wind and water erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety and state air quality management authorities. 39. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING OR GRADING PERMITS, the land �. divider, or the land divider's successor-in-interest, shall enter into an agreement with the Department of Building and Safety for the planting of street trees in connection with the development of this land division pursuant to the requirements of Article XIIIa of Ordinance No. 460. PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVAL, the street trees shall be planted. Any request for exemption from the planting of street trees shall be made prior to the issuance of building or grading permits. 40. PRIOR TO THE IS OF BUILDING PERMITS, the land divider, or the land divider's successor-in-interest, shall (1) enter . into an agreement with the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District to provide for the payment of park and recreation mitigation fees as identified in the District's Master Plan, and (2) shall submit sufficient written evidence to the Riverside County Department of Building and Safety that the park and recreation mitigation fees have been paid to the District. i TENTATIVE TRACT NAP NO. 26553 AMENDED NO. 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 10 41. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, a landscaping, parking, building and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Planning II Department for approval pursuant to the requirements of Section Nos. 18. 12 and 18.30 of Ordinance No. 348 (Planning Department only plot plan) for the gated entry on Frank Sinatra Drive. The name, address and phone number of both the landscape plan preparer and project developer, the property's Assessors Parcel Number(s) , a vicinity map, and the proposed location of all. handicapped parking spaces, trash collection and storage facilities, wall/fence elevations, drainage patterns, Agricultural Commissioner's note and any outdoor I ) lighting shall be shown on this plan. Landscaped areas shall be graded to retain all irrigation water on-site. All plans that depict landscaping within public road rights-of-way shall be submitted to the Road Department for approval. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition throughout the life of this permit. PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVAL of the ` first dwelling, excluding model sales units, the permittee shall install all improvements as shown on the approved plan. 42. PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVAL, each applicable dwelling unit shall incorporate window and exterior wall, roof and �QQ� other design specifications identified in the acoustical analysis prepared on by- Walker, Celano 6 .Associates in December 1990. � r Alternative wall and roof design may be submitted upon written certification from the Special Service Division of the Health -� Department that the alternative design would provide equal or greater reduction in noise levels. 43. PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVAL, a seven (7) foot high decorative masonry wall or combination landscaped earthen berm and decorative masonry wall shall be constructed along the project's northern boundary adjacent to Frank Sinatra Drive (see Health Department Special Division letter dated December 20, 1990) and a six (6) foot high decorative masonry wall shall be constructed along those portions of the project's western and eastern perimeters where no six (6) foot high (measured from finish grade level on the project site property) decorative block wall(s) exist. The wall and/or berm shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Building and Safety, and the appropriate flood control agency, .and7 ` shall be "shown on--all grading and landscaping plans. 44. Notwithstanding the preceding conditions, wherever an acoustical study is required for noise attenuation purposes, the heights of all required walls shall be determined by the acoustical study where applicable. TENTATIVE TRACT NAP NO. 26553 AMENDED NO. 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 11 rtion of the all required drainage facilities 45. po PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVAL of any development permitted hereby, protect the site. Plans for these shall be constructed which re ared lby a California registered civil facilities shall be p P Water District and engineer and approved by the Coachella Valley made a part of the construction plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Prior signs are approved pursuant to this tentative tract map. 46. No the royal re the Planning to the installation of any on-site advertising or directional signs, a signing plan shall be submitted for approval nt to the requirements for Section 18.30 (Planning Department pursua Department only plot plan) or ordinance No. 348. ete walkways to each dwelling entrance 47. Concrete driveways and concr t PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION shall be installed on each lo APPROVAL• all yard areas visible including front yards and, where 48. PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVAL, from road rights-of-way, stem applicable, side yards shall be landscaped with turf or decorative landscaping and street trees. An automatic irrigation system serving visible landscaped areas shall also be installed PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION APPROVAL' }t�_the . 1tgj.-seetien-93�=i- -t3te-$ YF n&qtnj_nnd *49. fn-sceordemt �F--i�is�� ghe--nPp}ienntf eenta-$nearr�-fl�-r►rie2��-�r�-reaonrcea:--- � preteeting- fey �- «nrv-�+ar the nnbdivider-ia-ei3o-'v�� ennty-ef-ittvers•�'i'n'�'�• fee-ia -eeste s�,v:� _ , 1Ph�-fi}rreg- defray - ram-t}ec2ara't�-haa-been Be -Of-Fiah'e'ml- r -reec3a� _ tea-smpnet pr pared-ate a8 c-p7t-fe fiarnndiin4 -S_2 49 the n}}erg ��}tni-i--�-Pnid-�-�e'eonntY-a te�i�mfnntien mime of--fiii _eOde' g-n-reet3ere Ff-thene eennty-ef Riverside at the L' pnrenent-te-�-'t'i�"2•r��f-the-P��'ic'�gO�'� a erntive; fees-are-net-paid;-the-prejeet-in-gaeetien-ahn}}-n feea�s _,_.e- p veeted-�r-fi-na'1'.-'Ae.eercti�►9iY", �•ii-the- 'e'"p� enbsegyent ,,r�l�- -tesete&-and } �t _rot-y r�tentntiveiY apprevals-wi approved- 1991. *DELETED by East Area Planning Council on April 18, FJU:csa OF FRUI � COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE O * �y�TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 999 � DESERT OFFICE F72ANKUN F.SHERKO � APR 2 r_ 194 i Dirt m of Tnnspo lion RIVEFS(DEAOLINTY PLANNING,DEPARTMENT December 269 1990 Riverside County Planning Department 79-733 Country Club Drive, Suite E Subject: TENTATIVE .TRACT MAP No. 26,553 Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 Amended No. 1 Gentlemen: With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced tentative land division map, the Transportation Department recommends that the landdivider provide the following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with Ordinance No. 460 and Riverside County Transportation Improvement Standards (Ordinance No. 461). It is understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline profiles, all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and that their omission or unacceptability may require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though occurring in all . They are intend- ed to be complementary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Office of the Director of Transportation. 1 . The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i .e. , concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/or by securing a drainage easement. All drainage easements shall be shown on the final map and noted as follows: "Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions-;-or--- --- encroachments by land fills are allowed". The protection shall be as approved by the Transportation Department. 2. The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Director of Transpor- tation permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by the Transportation Department. 79.703 COLMMY CLUB DRIVE•SUf7E 04•BERMUDA DUNES,CAUFORNIA 92202•(619)3424767 di _2_ Riverside County Planning Department December 26, 1990, Subject: TENTATIi'E TRACT MAP No. 26,553 Amended No. 1 * 3. Mozambique Drive shall be improved within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with County Standard No. 105, Section "A" (361/601 ) modified by widening to accommodate four car vehicular storage from the stopping position for gate actuation and the curb face of Frank Sinatra Drive and a turn around area with a minimum 38-foot turning radius. This street shall be extended southerly as necessary to connect with existing paved streets. Sidewalk is not required. * 4. Street "A" shall be improved within the dedicated right-of-way in accord- ance with County Standard No. 105, Section "A" (36'/60' ). Sidewalk is not required. 5. Frank Sinatra Drive shall be improved with 8-inch concrete curb, gutter and 6-foot wide concrete sidewalk located 38 feet from centerline and } /xych-up asphalt concrete paving; reconstruction; or resurfacing of sting paving as determined by the Director of Transportation within a C5 -foot half-width dedicated right-of-way in accordance with County Standard No. 101. Improvements shall include the construction of a barrier curb median. 6. Eldorado Drive shall be improved with asphalt concrete reconstruction or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by the Director of Transpor- tation. 7. A secondary access shall be constructed in accordance with County Standard No. 106, Section "B", (32'/60' ). * 8. 6enerete-s*dewa4ks-ska44-be-eenstrueted-througheat-the-4and-64v4s4en-4n aeeefdanee-w4tk-6eunEy-Standards-Ne.-499-and-494-4edfb-ssdewa4kly 9. Standard off-set cul-de-sacs shall be constructed throughout the land division. 10. Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805 shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication. 11. All lot lines shall be radial to the street they access. 12. Lot access shall be restricted on Frank Sinatra Drive and so noted on the final map. 13. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the County of Riverside Transportation Department, a cash sum of $150.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic signal impacts in Traffic Signal Mitigation District #12. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment, a written agreement may be entered into with the County deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. rY -3- Riverside County Planning Department December 26, 1990 Subject: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP No. 26,553 Amended No. 1 14. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) in accordance with the provisions of Riverside County Ordinance No. 673. The TUMF shall be paid at a rate of $26 per average daily retail trip, $66 per average daily non-retail trip and $83 per residential trip. The amount of TUMF may be periodically adjusted by the Board of Supervisors and the applicant shall pay the fee amount in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Very truly yours, Warren R. Stallard Road Branch Office Manager WRS:GS:eb c: Larry Toerper - R/O Bill Stephenson - Survey File * Amended by East Area Planning Council on April 18, 1991. Stf4 ke-Get-Type denotes deletion. Underline denotes addition. Vsmim counEv =� ?Lanninc DRAREMEnL 79-733• Country Club Dr. , Ste. E Bermuda Dunes, California 92201 (619) 342-8277 FAX No. : (619) 775-2062 DATE: October 17, 1990 TO: Assessor's RE: CZ 5924 (TR 26553) Building i Safety (4/5) .Transportation Dept. (2) General Location: Northerly of Country Health Department (2 ) Club Drive and westerly of Eldorado Drive. Fire Protection Flood Control : Applicant: Tandika Corporation RIVCO/CVWD/EBL Zoning District: C.C. 8 P.D. City Sphere: Palm Desert Zoning: R-5 School District: Desert san s Supervisorial District: 4 Gas Company: SCG -(2) Schedule: n/a Waiver: n/a SCE. . .GTE. . .SUPT. APN: 626-030-001; 006; 014; 015. COMMISSIONER BEADLING. . .AVONDALE C.C. HOA SHERIFF'S DEPT.CV REC 3 PARK DIST. . . Proposal : Change zone from existing R-5 to COUNTY PARKS DEPT. �g- OCT N" 1990 Nversir a County Tanspsne5on Dept Doswrt 1^arch Please review the case described above and the attached map/exhibit(s) . Your comments and recommendations are requested prior to AS SOON AS POSSIBLE , or as soon as possible in order to include them in the staff report for this item. Should you have any. questions regarding ttem, please contact Francisco Urbina at (619) 342-8277. RELATED CASE FILE: COMMENTS: hut 4". 611JUA .. No significant traffic impacts. Traffic study is no DATE: November 13, 1990 SIGNATURE: Lc/ 1/�"- ��r Warren R'. Stallard, Road Branch Office Manage PLEASE PRINT NAME AND TITLE• Transportation Department - Desert Office RETURN TO: COUNTY PLANNING�DEPARTMENT, 79733 Country Club Dr. , Suite E, Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TH FLOOR 79733 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SUITE E RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 BERMUDA DUNES, CALIFORNIA 92201 (714) 787-6181 (619) 342-8277 r- COONTY OF RIVERSID� ' DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 4065 COUNTY CIRCLE DR. RIVERSIDE. CA. 92$03 (MAi1i nR AddrPPP - P.O. BDII 7600 92513-7600) PACS s (714)358-4329 December 20 . 1990 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. � 79-733 Country Club Drive , Suite E IL86e1 Q Bermuda Dunes . CA 92201 DEC 27 199 ATTN: FRANC I SCO URB I NA: RIvEWDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT INDIO(FFICF RE: TRACT MAP NO. 26553. AMENDED NO. 1 : A PORTION OF SECTION 3 . T.5S. . R.63 . . S.B.B. S M. LYING WITHIN LOTS 1 AND 4 AS SHOWN ON A RECORD OF SURVEY MAP FILED IN BOOK 55 . PAGES 38 THROUGH 43 OF RECORDS OF SURVEYS, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 16067 FILED IN BOOK 104 , PAGES 96 AND 97 OF PARCEL MAPS, BOTH IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. (24 lots) Dear Gentlemen: The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tract Map No. 26553 and recommends : A water system shall be installed accordinq to plans and specifications as approved by the water company and the Health Department . Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate , with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet , along with the oriqinal drawing to the County Surveyor . The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter , location of valves and fire hydrants : pipe and 'joint specifications , and the size of the main at the .junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Div. 5 , Part 1 , Chapter 7 of the California.. Health and Safety Code, California Administrative Code. Title 22. Chapter 16 . and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when applicable. The plans shall be siqned by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: - I certify that the design of the water system in Tract Map 26553 is in accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Coachella Valley Municipal Water District and that the water services , storage, and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service to such Tract Map" . CINOIIA NOW ELL.9.9.M..U.". y1L IAM1110.11.0.LL.1 KC`N0.K D.Y.N..U.P^ EA C� U.S. DEPUTT DIRECTOR Or HEALTH DEPUTY"term m HEALTH [.I.GALLAGHER.K0.M.PUL.N.A. DEPUTY DIRECTOR Or HEALTH DEPUTY DIRECTOR Of HEALTH PmSOIAL HEALTH 9CRMKE3 EH OHNIENTLL HEALTH XIINCES DIRECTOR Or WEALTH SPECIAL SEIIVICES ADM4 E SUPPORT SCM S HEALTH CENTERS 9W4Mf.BOSS RAMSEY STREET-INUO,CA 12220 9 SLYTHE 243 NORTH SROADNAY .9„MO..CA 92225 CASA SLANCA 7240 MARGUERITA- Rin..(P,.CA 92504 CORONA 503 SOUTH SUCNA VISTA- Cu,A..CA 91 720 0 HEMET SSO NORTH STATE STREET - M.0 1.CA 92345 0INDIO.4-209 OASIS STREET -I.4H.CA 92201 LANE ELSINORE 30195 rRASER DR.- L...Eb�.n4 CA 92330 PALM SPRINGS 3255 TAHOUIT2-MTCALLUM- Palm S,n.p.CA 922G2 PERRIS 237 NORTH-0•ST.- .......C. 923,0 • a,r A5,n( 1520 1 MO(N T. - P'.n.'4•CA 92501 O`RO1100m 5801 HISSION SLvO. - S...r u,.. CIA 92501 Riverside County Planning Dept Page Two Attn: Francisco Urbina December 20 . 1990 This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it will supply water to such tract map at any specific quantities , flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose" . This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. The plans must ¢�submi�d tg '[fie County Surveyor ' s Office to review at LP-%st _rLeeks prior tip th$Leouest fir the recordation of the f This subdivision has a statement from Coachella Valley Municipal Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider . It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map . This subdivision is within the Coachella Valley Municipal Water District and shall be connected to the sewers of the District . The sewer system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the District , the County Surveyor and the Health Department . Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate , along with the original drawing , to the County Surveyor . The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter . location of manholes , complete profiles , pipe and joint specifications and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of, sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles . The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and the sewer district with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the sewer system in Tract Map 26553 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the Coachella Valley Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed tract map. " Riverside County Planning Dept . - Page Three Attn: Francisco Urbina December 20. 1990 _r. ',[f10.iL1_�p3 must be sT,�,�itted to _the County Surveyor ' s Office to rgy_iew at Leas` two weeks prior to the reavestfor the Egg gLdai.-jqn—of the final map . it will be necessary for financial arrangements to be completely finalized prior to recordation of the final map. An acceptable covenant having to do with the maintenance and operation of recreational facilities , must be filed with this Department . We will accept this covenant as a tentative agreement and it will be necessary to record all covenants or agreements etc . , involving the recreational facilities with the Recorder . County of Riverside and a copy of the recorded agreement filed with this Department concurrently with the recording of the final map of this subdivision. Sincerely. � �art nee,�i Mz , vironmental Health Specialist IV SM:dr cc: Nancy Andrew (RBF) COUNTY OF RIVERSIR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 4065 COUNTY CIRCLE DR. RIVERSIDE, CA. 92503 (M.ilinq Addre99 - P.O. 86. 7600 92513-7600) FRCS 0 IT 145 358-4529 REOUVED Date: December 13, 1990 DEC14 199Q To: Francisco Urbina Riverside County Planning Department RNESto OMR6V 79-733 County Club Drive, Suite E p pEpqRMEW Bermuda Dunes, California 92201 ImOFFO: From: William D. Redden, CIH Supervising Industrial Hygienist Division of Special services Riverside County Health Department P.O. BOX 7600 Riverside, California 92513-7600 Report Written by: Dana No Lewis, MPH, MITIndustrial Hygienist Riverside County Department of Health Project Reviewed: Tentative Tract No. 26553 Reference Number: 91-674-021 Applicant: Nancy Andrew Robert 'Bein, William Frost and Associates . 74-416 Highway ill Palm Desert, California 92260 Environmental or Engineering Co. Consultant: N.A. Noise Consultant: Walker, Celano and Associates 2659 Townsgate Road, Suite 112 Westlake Village, California 91361 Review Stage: First Review Information Provided: "Acoustical Analysis Report for Tentative Tract No. 26653, Riverside County, California" December 120 1990 (date deposit received) CIMORA RON[L L.6.$.N..IA.9.A. UAL rAHMNG.R.S-Nl1 PLC NOLK,D.V.IL Wrx CA COYHE.M.S. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HEALTH DEPUTY DIRECTOR W HELLTN L.I.GALLAGHER.M.D..WPJL.WA. DEPUTY DIRECTOR V HEALTH DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HEALTH KRSpYI HEALTH EERVCLS EMVpPNEMTAL HEALTH SERVAZS DIRECTOR Or HEALTH SPECIAL SERVICES A0119L L SUOKRT SEwas HEALTH CENTERS ,AWNING JOSS IUYSEY STREET-S.HH,,CA 92220 0 6LYTHE 263 NORTH BROADWAY -61991.CA 6222E 0 CASA 6LANCA 7240 MARGUERITA- IHnrAid4.CA 22504 CORONA 505 SOUTH BUENA VISTA- CAn4..CA 91720 0 NEWLY 950 NORTH STATE STREET - Kpnl.CA 92343 0 INDIO 46-209 0>SO STREET -1.4fl.CA 92201 LAKE ELSINORE 30195 rRASER DR.- L4u E11,44r4.CA 92330 0 FILM SPRING$ 3255 TAMOUIT2-MLCALLUM-P.I.Ep,#I.CA 9 22 62 0 PERRIS 237 NORTH-V ST.- M1r.n.CA 92370 0 RIVERSIDE 1520 LINDEN ST. - A9.O19..CA 92507 0 RUO.DOV. Sag@ MISSION BLVD.- III.....I..CA 92509 moil Standards 1. The "Noise Element" section of the Riverside County General Plan states "to avoid future noise hazard, the maximum capacity design standard (average daily trips) for highways and major roads" (including airports) "shall be used for determining the maximum future noise level" or, in the case of freeways and airports, the projected conditions for 20 years in the future may be used. 2. The interior noise levels in residential dwellings shall not exceed 45 Ldn (CNEL) . 3. The exterior noise level shall not exceed 65 Ldn. gj,ahwav Prediction Model: Using FHWA RD 77-108 Highway Traffic Prediction Model, the noise consultant shall estimate noise impacts (Ldn) from the Highways (design capacity "C" Level of Service) . Acoustical par ers for Coup y Hiahways: 1. ADT design capacity of 24,000 for an Arterial (Frank Sinatra Drive) as quoted in "Information Pamphlet for Riverside County Traffic Circulation and Roadway Improvement Requirements, Revised 5/11/87" and 51,000 for Interstate 10 as quoted by the Acoustical Consultant. 2. Truck/Auto Mix as follows (Riverside Co. Road Department) : Arterial 4 (Overall Evening $ Night $ $) Auto 92 69.5 12.9 9.6. Medium Truck 3 1.44 0.06 . 1.5 Heavy Truck 5 2.4 0.1 . 2.5 Interstate 10 (Overall $) Day $ Evening $ Night $ Auto 84.8 42.4 10.6 31.8 Medium Truck 1.2 0.6 0.16 0.44 Heavy Truck 14.0 7.28 1.68 5.04 3. Traffic Speed of 40 MPH /arterial and 65 MPH /I710. 4. The distance from the center of Frank Sinatra Road to the nearest building face is estimated to be 80 feet. The distance from the center of Interstate 10 to the nearest building face is estimated to be 1400 feet. 5. Hard Site /arterial, Soft Site /I-10 6. 20 dB, A-weighted attenuation, provided by standard residential design with windows closed. 7. Barrier calculations based on receptor at 10 feet from the barrier and at a 3 foot elevation. 8. Interior calculations based on receptor at a 6 foot elevation inside the dwelling in the room nearest . the noise source. Findings: The consultant's assessment of this project is accurate. Recommendations: The following conditions shall be applied to the project based on the information provided by the acoustical consultant: 1. Seven foot noise barrier, block wall, berm or combination shall be constructed along Frank Sinatra Drive (Lots 116 to Ila and 119 to 122, and continuing west to the end of the cul-de-sac of Street "A") . These walls shall be erected so that the top of each wall extends at least 7 feet above the pad elevation. In cases where the road is elevated above the pad, the wall shall extend at least 7 feet above the highest point between the house and the road. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, an acoustical report shall be submitted and receive approval from Riverside County Health Department, Division of Special Services. The acoustical consultant shall design specifications for first second stories of the dwellings along Frank Sinatra so that a 74.6 Ldn - unshielded (as projected at 65 feet from the . center of Frank Sinatra Drive) will be reduced to an interior level of 45 Ldn. 3. The applicant shall pay review fees to the Division of Special Services, Riverside County Health Department, not to exceed the Division's Hourly Rate. �y. q ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENT. iTR�C COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE sox 1o58•COACHELLA.CALIFORNIA 92236•TELEPHONE(619)998-2651 OFFICERS DIRECTORS THOMAS E.LEVY.GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS CODENAS.PRESIDENT- BERWOINE SUTTON.SECRETARY RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS.VICE PRESIDENT OWEN McCOOK ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER JDHN W.McFADDEN REDWINE AND SHERRILL.ATTORNEYS DOROTHY M.NICHOLS January !S, 1991 THEODORE J.FISH File: 0126.1 . Riverside County Planning Department 79-733 Country Club Drive, Suite E Bermuda Dunes, California 92201 Gentlemen: We have reviewed the conceptual grading plan for tentative tract 26553 and it is acceptable. We have no objection to the approval of tentative tract 26553. We request that grading plans be reviewed by us prior to the issuance of any grading/building permit for tentative tract 26553. If you have any questions please call Bob Meleg, stormwater engineer, extension 264. Yours very truly, `C . om Levy General Manager-Chief Engineer JEC:lmf/el cc: Haney Andrew Robert Bain, William Frost and Associates 74-410 Highway 111 Palm Desert, California 92260 TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY F6 01(p news *iaii7C counni RECEIVED _ MAnninG t7c?dui En% DEC ? 21990 79-733 Cou • Bermuda Ou (d pair r[rtr C.M.D. _ it FAX No. ,ray„ rur n w ¢rlrur ;.aownu�c PATE: 0•cerber 7 1990 Yzt\R11M TO: Assessor's a`oa R 45)AMENDED- Building A Safety (4/5) Ew wsw. rtherly of Country Transportation Dept. (2). r of Eldorado Drive. Health Department (2) r Fire Protection rporation L1044-4ew6*o1 : RIVCO/CMMEBL b P.D. O'/ Zoning: R-5 City Spher% Palm Desert School District: _D Apr Sand Supervisorlal District: 4 Gas Company: S -G _(2) Schedul*: A Maiver: n/a SCE. . .GTE. ..SUPT. OF SCHOOLS. . . APN: 626-030-001; 006; 014; 015. COIMII S AVONDALE C.C. H EC. b PARK DIST. Proposal : To create a subdivision of 23 single family lots. DEC 17 i990 5 3-\ RIVERSIDE C01 tay pARIMENT PLANNINGO of Please review % e case described above and the attached map/exhibit(s) . Your comments and recommendations are requested prior to AS SOON AS POSSIBLE or as soon as possible in order to include them in the staff report for this tem.Francisco you at have any (ti 3 onsregarding this item, please contact RELATED CASE FILE: CZ 5924 COMMENTS: Q .�r, cx'riCP� DATE: Pf 4 /9& 8IGNATURE: PLEASE PRINT NAME AND TITLE: RETURN TO: COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 7973 ountry Clu r. r suits E 4080 LEMON STREET, 9rH FLOOR 79M COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SUITE E RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 BERMUDA DUNES, CALIFORNIA 92201 (714) 707-6181 (619) 342-8277 ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGLnCY NOV ` COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT RIVERSIDE COUNTY POST OFFICE BOX im•COACHELLA,CALIFORNIA 92230•TELEPHONE(679)09BMI pLANNING OFFICE WICERS DIRECTORS THOMAS E.LEW,GENERAL MANAGER4"EF ENGINEER TELLIS CODEKAS.PRESIDENT BERNAROINE SUTTON.SECRETARY RAYMOND R.RUMMONDS.VICE PRESIDENT OWEN MCCOOIL ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER JOIIN W.MCFADDEN REDYANE AND SHERRILL.ATTORNEYS DOROTHY M.NICHOLS October 30, 1990 THEODORE J.FISH - File: 0163.1 Riverside County East Area Planning Council 79-733 Country Club Drive, Suite E Bermuda Dunes, California 92201 Gentlemen: Subject: Tract 26553, Portion of Northeast Quarter, Section 3, Township 5 South Range 6 East San Bernardino Meridian Drainage from this area is contributory to the Mid-Valley Stormwater Project. The interim flood control study for this project is presently being reviewed for adoption by the affected agencies. Mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the development to prevent flooding of the site or downstream properties. These measures shall include on-site retention of water from the 100-year storm, and payment of drainage fees or other participation in the financing of regional flood control facilities. Plans for stormwater protective works shall be submitted to Coachella Valley Water District for review. The district will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this district. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 16 and 70 of Coachella Valley Water District for domestic water service. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 58 and 81 of Coachella Valley Water District for sanitation service. There are existing district facilities not shown on the development plans. There may be conflicts with these facilities. We request the appropriate public agency to withhold the issuance of a building permit until arrangements have been made with the district for the relocation of these facilities. TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY Riverside County East Area —2— October 30, 1990 Plans for grading, landscaping, and irrigation systems shall be submitted .to Coachella Valley Water District for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. if you have any questions please call Bob Meleg, stormwater engineer, extension 264. Yours very truly, am Levy General Manager—Chief Engineer RF:lmf/el0a cc: Don Park Riverside County Department of Public Health 79-733 Country Club Drive, Suite D Bermuda Dunes, California 92201 RIVERSIDE COUNTY cwroaRtt µ— FIRE DEPARTMENT tMtaTMe 4, MOrecrj, cLoRrr1' IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY RfVCRS/DC..,...:. AND FIRE PROTECTION C GLEN J. NEWMAN F FIRE CHIEF December 10, Planning & Engineering Office Planning & Engineering Office 79.733 Country Club Drive, Suite Fjo 3760 12th Street �� Riverside.Indio, CA 92201 G CA 92501 yU (y 8 c6191342.8886 DEC 1� cn417 7•6 606 To: Planning Department 1 WHly PLANINGDO Ilff Re: Tentative Tract Map No. 26553 - Amended 01, IN010 OFFO With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: 1. Schedule A fire protection approved Super fire hydrants, (6" x 4" x 2}" x 2}") shall be located at each street intersection spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction with no portion of any frontage more than 165 feet from a fire hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 gpm for 2 hours duration at 20 psi. 2. Prior to recordation of the final map, applicant/developer shall furnish one blueline copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review/approval. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." 3. The required water system including fire .hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. A temporary water supply for fire protection may be allowed for the construction of model units only. Plans for a temporary water system must be submitted to the Fire Department for review prior to issuance of building permits. 4. MITIGATION Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Fire Department a sum of $400 per lot/unit as mitigation for fire protection impacts. 5. Gates installed to restrict access shall be power operated and equipped with a Fire Department override system. Improvement plans for the entry street and gates shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review/approval prior to installation. To: Planning Department 12/10/90 Re: TT Nap No. 26553-Amd. /1 Page 2. J All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions should be referred to the Fire Department Planning 6 Engineering Staff at (619) 342-8886. Sincerely, RAY REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner By Tom Hutchison Fire Safety Specialist . to 4/cONDEc COUnCY 79-733 .Country Club Dr. , Ste. E Bermuda Dunes, California 92201 iDII� (619) 342-8277 FAX No. : (619) 775-2062 �E� 2 �99Q DATE: D%-cer..ber 7,1990 RIVERSIDE.COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO: Assessor's RE: TR 26553 (EA 355Mj,9ERTOFFICE Transportation Dept. (2) General Location: Northerly of Country Health Department (2) Club Drive and westerly of Eldorado Drive. Fire Protection Flood Control : Applicant: Tandika Corporation RIVCO/CVWD/EBL Zoning District: C.C. & P.D. City Spher% Palm Desert Zoning: R-5 School District: I)Psprt Sand Supervisorial District: 4 Gas Company: SCG (2) Schedule: A Waiver: n/a SCE. . .GTE. . .SUPT. OF SCHOOLS. .. APN: 626-030-001; 006; 014; 015. COMMISSIONER BEADLING. . .AVONDALE C.C. HOA. . .COUNTY PARKS. . .CV REC. & PARK DIST. Proposal : To create a subdivision of . ..SHERIFF'S DEPT. 23 single family lots. Please review the case described above and the attached map/exhibit(*). Yoy,r comments and recommendations are requested prior to AS SOON AS POSSIBLE , or as soon as possible in order to include them in the staff report for this item. Should you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Francisco Urbina at (619) 342-8277. RELATED CASE FILE: CZ 5924 COMMENTS: &)r� DEC 12179 0 COUNTY OF kIVERSIDE BUiL01NG DEPARTMENT 2- / - `J r� SIGNATURE: DATE: PLEASE PRINT NAME AND TITLE: RETURN TO: COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, r#733 Cou try Club Dr. . Suite E. Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TH FLOOR 79733 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SUITE E RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 BERMUDA DUNES, CALIFORNIA 92201 (714) 787-6181 (619) 342-8277 r Tepaxwent od TAding and Satiety RIVERSIDE :�. ;:4 Administrative Office • 1777 Atlanta Avenue, Suite G-5 Riverside, CA 92507 bDecember 18, 1990 DEC 9 RIVERSIDE.COUNTY Riverside Count Planning Department PLANNING DEPARTMENT y 8 P DESERT OFFICE Attention: Francisco Urbina 79-733 Country Club Dr. , Ste. E Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 RE: Tract 26553, Amended O1 Ladies and Gentlemen: The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety.has the following comments and conditions: The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for all on-site and off-site signage advertising the sale of the subdivision pursuant to Section 19.6 of Ordinance 348. Sincerely, awe �t0 Linda Leventhal Land Use Technician II LL:kd (714) 682-8840 9 (714)275-1820 • Fax(714)369-4084 41vrn m Coumj PLanninc immiti mi: 79-733 Country Club Dr. , Ste. E Bermuda Dunes, California 92201 (619) 342-8277 DEC '191990 FAX No. : (619) 775-2062 DATE: Di-cerber 7 1990 RIVERSIDE.COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT OEBERT OFFICE TO: Assessor's RE: TR 26553 (EA 35545) Transportation Dept. (2) General Location: Northerly of Country Health Department (2) Club Drive and westerly of Eldorado Drive. Fire Protection Flood Control : Applicant: Tandika Corporation RIVCO/CVWD/EBL Zoning District: C.C. 6 P.D. City Sphere: Palm Desert Zoning: R-5 School District: oP� roman Supervisorial District: 4 Gas Company: SCG _(2) Schedule: A Waiver: n/a SCE. . .GTE...SUPT. OF SCHOOLS. . . APN: 626-030-001; 006; 014; 015. COMMISSIONER BEADLING. . .AVONDALE C.C. HOA. . .COUNTY PARKS.. .CV REC. & PARK DIST. Proposal : To create a subdivision of . . .SHERIFF'S DEPT. 23 single family lots. Please review the case described above and the attached map/exlt(s). Your comments and recommendations are requested prior to AS SOON AS POhibSSIBLE , or as soon as possible in order to include them in the staff report for this item. Should you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Francisco Urbina at (619) 342-8277. RELATED CASE FILE: CZ 5924 COMMENTS: /U O Aj iL V DEC 17 WO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: Z 90 SIGNATURE: / PLEASE PRINT NAME AND TITLE: &La"—- (!� ✓� c�x� — S ` RETURN TO: COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 79733 Ccuntry Club Dr. , Suite E, Bermuda Ounee, CA 92201 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TH FLOOR 79M COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SUITE E RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 BERMUDA DUNES, CALIFORNIA 92201 (714) 787-6181 (619) 342-8277 j 0A - WUNTY. OF RIVED PARTMENT IDE GRADING SAFETY ION TO: PLANNING/FRNACISCO URBINA r� � FROM: JERRY L. GILLIGAN/JEANNIE M. B1GLE ! O DATE: DEC- 16, 1990 i DEC 191990 APN:16266093-0011- 006,EXHIBIT D014,,h015D Al RIVERSIDE.000NTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT FF Section" has reviewed a conceptual gradin��1GW ding The "Grading the this site. The Plan is acceptable. Consequently, the following Section" recommends approval of this pro3ect if conditions are included, any grading in excess of 50�1a iapproval Prior pl commencing department. the applicant shall obtain a grading to construct from the Building. an Building Code, All grading shall conform to the Uniform rules, and Ordinance 457, and all other relevant laws, County- regulations governing grading in Riverside County- eater than or equal to 3 "in rasa es ground cover. Slopes that Plant and irrigate all slopes Br provided with shrubs vertical height with g t are to be P exceed 15'in vetical heordinance 457 , see form 284-47- and/or trees perwill require Grading in excess of 199 cubic yards performance security to be posted with the Building and Safety department: In instances where a grading plan involves import or export, prior to obtaining a grading Permit, the applicant shall rt/export location from and Safety department- this have obtained approval for the impo may require a the Building rtment- written clearance from the Planning �� date the . All drainage facilities shall be designed to accommodate 100 year storm £lows. Finish floor shall be elevated in conformance to ordinance 457, section 1-B- Portland cement Minimum drainage grade shall be 1% except on concrete where 0.35% shall be the minimum- applicable For the final grading plan, please 2pr-21ae2t eB8284-46. NOTE: grading forms 284-120, Department information from B and Safety These forms are available at the Building Offices. *vra5 r: counEv KAnninc DeAnnrcn: OCT 24 199U 79-733 Country Club Dr. , Ste. E WMIDECDUNTY Bermuda Dunes, California 92201 pLANNt ENT (619) 342-8277 �� FAX No. : (819) 775-2062 DATE: nrtnhpr 17 lggn TO: Assessor's RE: TR 26553 (EA 35545) Building & Safety (4/5) Transportation Dept. (2) General Location: Northerly of Country Health Department (2) Club Drive and westerly of Eldorado Drive. Fire Protection Flood Control : Applicant: Tandika Corporation RIVCO/CVWD/EBL Zoning District: C.C. & P.D. City Sphere: Palm Desert Zoning: R-5 School District: Desert Sand_ Supervisorial District: 4 Gas Company: S .G _(2) Schedule: A Waiver: n/a SCE. . .GTE.. .SUPT. OF SCHOOLS. . . APN: 626-030-001; 006; 014; 015. COMMISSIONER BEADLING. . .AVONDALE C.C. HOA. . .COUNTY PARKS. .-CV REC. & PARK DIST. Proposal :n To create subdivision of 3 . . .SHERIFF'S DEPT. 9 y Please review the case described above and the attached map/exhibit(a) . Your comments and recommendations are requested prior to AS SOON AS POSSIBLE , or as soon as possible in order to include them in the staff report for this item. Should you at ( 3 a have any questions regarding this item, please contact co 277 . RELATED CASE FILE: CZ 5924 COMMENTS: PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP, the land divider must submit to the Planning Department an agreement with the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District which demonstrates to the satisfaction of the County that the land divider has provided for the payment of $1631.70 per dwelling unit in accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance #460. DATE: L' 'Z1. ..9 SIGNATURE: • _ PLEASE PRINT NAME AND TITLE: L V c-4 Lt G ��' �� I �y' "I S �' �-' ( lr RETURN TO: COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 79733 Country Club Dr. , Suite E, Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TH FLOOR 79733 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SUITE E RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 BERMUDA DUNES, CALIFORNIA 92201 (714) 787-6181 (619) 342-8277 �. . ;tvE:13iaE councl ?L,annin DE? mfi1'cn 79-733 Country Club Or. , Ste. EHEDE#VED Bermuda Dunes, California 92201 (619) 342-8277 FAX No. : (619) T75-2062 JAN IS 1991 DATE: December 10 .1990 We 03(,1Yn. TO: Assessor's RE: CZ 5924 (TRp 2 :WW Building & Safety (4/5) Transportation Dept. (2) General Location: Northerly of Country Health Department (2) Club Drive and westerly of Eldorado Drive. Fire Protection Flood Control : Applicant: Tandika Corporation RIYCO/CVWD/EBL Zoning District: C.C. & P.D. City Sphere: Palm Desert Zoning: R-5 School District: vesert 5an s Supervisorial District: 4 Gas Comppanyy• —(2) Schedule: n/a Waiver: n/a SCE. . .GTE. . .SUPT. . . . APN: 626-030-001; 006; 014; 015. COMMISSIONER BEADLING. . .AVONDALE C.C. HOA . ,SHERIFF'S DEPT.6�if+K—&-PARK-D•i51:. . . Proposal : Change zone from existing R-5 I COUNTY PARKS DEPT. (�np (C V 21k : 1. 1990 C.V. RECREATION. Please review the case descrih&BRONTR& the attached map/exhibit(s) . Your comments and recommendations are requested prior to AS SOON AS POSSIBLE , or as soon as possible in order to include them in the staff report for this item. Should you have any questions regarding this item, please contact Francisco Urbina at (619) 342-8277. RELATED CASE FILE: COMMENTS: Prior to the recordation of the final map, the land divider shall submit to the Planning Director an agreement with the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District which demonstrates to the satisfaction of the County that the land divder has provided for the payment of $1243.20 per dwelling unit in accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance i460. C.DATE• I ` 3 I SIGNATURE: PLEASE PRINT NAME AND TITLE: L u c-1 uuu Scly A A) , b Is Z/ M � r. RETURN TO: COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 79733 Country Club Dr. . Suite E. Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TH FLOOR 79733 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SUITE E RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 BERMUDA DUNES, CALIFORNIA 92201 (714) 707-6181 (619) 342.8277 RIVERSIDE COUNTY COLS BYRD, SHERIFF he. ff S � av9V� 46-057 OASIS STREET • INDIO, CA 92201 • (619) 342.8800 NOV O L i�yu •'� October 31, 1990 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT INDIO OFFICE Mr. Francisco Urbina Riverside County Planning Department 79-733 Country Club Drive, Suite E Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 RE: TR 26553 (EA 35545) Dear Mr. Urbina:. We have the following comments regarding the above project. - All house numbers should be at least 6s high and mounted on a contrasting background. - Landscaping design should eliminate areas which might conceal criminal activity. - As population increases, an increase in calls for service can be expected. This will impact fire, medical and law enforcement services. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on plans for construction. Any questions should be addressed to Lt. Gayle Janes at telephone 342-8800. Sincerely, CO15 M. BYRD, SHERIFF Gayle Janes, Lieutenant Palm Desert Station vrm Mailing Address: P.O. Box FFFF, Indio, CA 92201 FOLLOW—UP RESPONSE � • ) ��5� DATE: PROJECT #: g�77� E DEPARTMENT OSS REFERE E -Z � 1 COMMENT OR RESPONSE: y &/ /��_�_a/ /SO �U-�G�� emu✓ �voOg S/�nir�' �, I would like to thank your staff, Mr. Joe Gaugush and Mr. Steve Smith, for meeting with us, on December 11, 1991 regarding the status of Tentative Tract 26553. They were very. . helpful in answering questions regarding the processing of this tract after the annexation will ' take place. It is our understanding that they will be the City's case Planner and Engineer for this project and that any future correspondence will be addressed to them. In that December 11 meeting, we discussed the items outlined in our December 11, 1991. letter to you. A brief summary of the items discussed are listed below: 1, The annexation has been approved by LAFCO and was scheduled for the protest hearing on December 12, 1991. If significant written protest is not filed at this hearing approval is expected and, the annexation will record 3 to 4 = weeks later. An election is not expected. 2. The site will be zoned PR-5 (Planned Residential) by the City, which allows for the single family lots, the golf course, and the golf course maintenance building and operations. 3. The site as shown in the Tentative Map will be recognized by the City. The Conditions of Approval will also be recognized subject to review by the City Staff. The City will allow only one,one year, extension beyond the initial two year period indicated in the Conditions of Approval. 4. The building setbacks will be established in accordance with the PR-5 Zoning. ., The coverage will be a maximum of 35%. The Standards in the current CC&R's for the Avondale Gold Club will also be used. Coachella Valley Regional Office 77-564 Country Club Drive, Suite 400-B, Palm Desert, CA 92260 619/360-3780 FAX 619/360-3789 Riverside•San Bernardino•Temecula•Palm Desert ,f 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 January 6, 1992 Mr. Michael D. Myers J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 77-564 Country Club Drive, Suite 400-B Palm Desert, CA 92260 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP - TRACT 26553 Dear Mr. Myers: Thank you for your. letters of December 11 , 1991 and December 23, 1991 , regarding the above-referenced subject. It is my understanding that members of both the Planning and Engineering Departments have been meeting with you regarding the processing of Tentative Tract 26553. it is also my understanding_that those, meetings have been beneficial to-both parties with respect to the project processing. With respect to the specific items referenced in your letter of December 23, 1991 , my staff has indicated concurrence with your summary of those issues discussed and they are continuing to discuss and address the additional issues. Once again, thank you for your correspondence and be assured of the City's continued cooperation in the processing of this project. Sincerely, BRUCE A. ALTMAN CITY MANAGER BA:JSG/ms cc: Richard J. Folkers, Asst. City Manager/Public Works Director Ray Diaz, Asst. City Manager/Community Development Director- Joseph S. Gaugush, Senior Engineer Steve Smith, Associate Planner Matthew Olsen, Project Manager, J.F. Davidson Associates