Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
TT 26553 AVONDALE COUNTRY CLUB HOMES 1998
i *AUTUCK**C015 ** *AU'PUCK**CO28 *****AUTUCK**CO20 I.I..!I.I..I!...I..I..1.1..,i1.,,,!I.J,I,11.....111-1-1!J LIL.11,,,11....{1....1.1,L.L.IL.L.III.11.1.1.1..1....Ill I.II..11....,.f{II......II..I.I...f{.I,.Ill.I....Ill L.I.III.I Manroe Kashcke Donald Conley John K & Frances Mcinerney 281.8 Sandra Ter q 2958 Stonegate L.n 21,4 N Haddon Pl Saint Joseph MI 49085-3126 L Northbrook LK 60062-434.1 Addison IL 60 .101-2145 u *****AUTUCX**C056 o- *****AUTUCK**CO58 *****A.U'TUCK**0001. ILL....!{...IIIl...1..I....1f.11....III III I...I.I.1.!„III.I Kdward L & Maureen Chott Kddie R Bush Clyde. .J & Wise Goodyear 17 Lake Ridge Club Ct J40J J7th St 1.460 2425 Mission St 5 Burr Ridge lL 6052.1-7936 Denver CO 80202-1252 A San Marino CA 91108-1620 r *****AUTOCK**CO18 a *****AUTUCX**c036 *****AUTU(:X**c036 ILI.-Ill L.IJ.,,i III.Ill...II III.L.L.A.1.L I11.".L.I1 11.1....LL.1.1.,.Il,..Ilf...Ill.....II,L.,h,.if{I,.,L..lI Ronald F Corn 0 Howard Ndward & Stephanie Radek 240J,O Lyons Ave 38040 Tandika Trl N 38). 1.0 Tandika Tri N Newhall CA 9.1321-2441 a Palm Desert CA 9221 .1-7082 Palm Desert CA 922.1 .1-7037 40 *****AUTUUR**C036 „ ^^ ^^*AU'1'UCK**C036 ^^^^*AU'1'DL'K**0036 - IL1..,.L1„L1,,,11,.,111..,11111J.J.,,IL III 1!l,,,II,,,1 Wallace S & Laura Mccol.l j0canor Wingren James A Gunderson 381.50 Taudika TrJ N 38270 Tandika TrJ N 75966 Kimberly L,n Palm Desert CA 922.1 .1-7037 Palm Desert CA 92211-7083 Palm Desert CA 92211-7033 **AUTOCK**C036 *****AUTOCK**C036 *****AUTUCK**CO26 Isaac & Muriel Sanders A Charles T & Joan Mccabe Ronald 0 Mcguire 3.81.90 Tandika TH N 38210 Tandika TrI N J. ha Quinta Palm Desert CA 92211-7037 Palm Desert CA 9221t-7083 Irvine CA 92612-2921 **AUTOCK**C01.3 „ ^^ • *^'AU1'Ola(**HO15 - ...11... l,,.L,LI II,I„I„I„h.IIL,,,,,Ih,,IIJJ.l,,.IJ{„I,,,i.11,.,il„! Deborah R. Stone George & Luetta y.riend Burrows 38780 Tandika Trail North 900 W yaJencia Mesa Dr PU Box 1.576 Palm Desert, CA 92211 . Fullerton CA 92835-40.10 � Tacoma WA 98401- 1576 o- _-- J7 Printed - I City of Pale Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(760) 346-0611 FAX(760)340-0574 f March 13, 1998 Mr. and Mrs. Clyde Goodyear 38-230 Tandika Trail Palm Desert, Califomia 92211 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Goodyear: Your letter to the Palm Desert Planning Commission dated February 27, 1998, has been referred to me by Mayor Jean Benson. At this time, an application for the development cited in your letter has not been filed. I understand that discussions have occurred between the developer and the homeowners association, as well as, other residents. A full public hearing will be required for alteration from previous approvals by Riverside County. At that time, you and other members of your committee can present your concerns and recommendations. Thank you for taking the time to share your concerns with us. Sincerely, RAMON A. DIAZ CITY MANAGER drs cc: Jean Benson, Mayor COPY GIVEN TO DATE i. ITL 9'? Reryded Paper CLYDE AND ELOISE GOO EAR o " Wed 2v 38-230 Tandika Trail Palm Desert, Califomia 9221 J RECEIVED February 27, 1998 CC MAR 1 1 1998 ��`^' ' A.,Vr 1b . 601CITY OF PALM DESERTiw.�DYiM CITY MANAGER V' CJdAOLA. W N, 8 TO: Planning Commission City of Palm Desert � ,� Reference: CHANGE OF DENSITY AND ORIGINAL PLANS FOR A DEVELOPMENT OF 36 HOMES ON FRANK SINATRA DRIVE BETWEEN EL DORADO AND COOK STREETS, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA This letter is to advise you that even though there has not been an official application applied for at this time to the City of Palm Desert, many discussions and decisions have already been in progress for the above-referenced project within the Avondale Community! We are concerned property owners in the Avondale Golf Club, especially the homes which abut the project and others that will be affected by the increase of density and traffic. Originally, 22 homes and a residential gate for ingress and egress on Frank Sinatra Drive were approved by the County and are still in effect for this parcel. Subsequently, Crowell Industries has plans to increase the density to 36 homes with no residential gate. We believe that we are entitled to an approval of the Cequa Environmental investigation and report, and wish to be notified and involved in the environmental impact study. We have -already-been in-tD-ach iLI7-tIT orl�ganizat3cn. The feeder street to be used for this project is Mozambique which is less than 100 yards long. The City has advised us that the traffic count will be an average of 360 cars per 24 hours. With this great increase in noise, fumes and traffic, this will create a hazardous and unhealthy environmen- tal condition with no other outlet. When 22 homes and a residential gate were approved (and presumed to be financially successful) , then certainly 36 homes, if approved, should provide a funding for a residential gate and a lucrative profit for a developer. TO: Planning Commission City of Palm Desert Page 2 February 27, 199a If a 50% increase in density is to be approved, then owners' property values and health hazards should certainly be considered first, before an outside developer's profits. "Public Safety Connce�" - The ingress and egress of our Main Gate onto E1 Dorado Avenue will create traffic and a safety hazard without a second Residential Gate being incorporated into the proposed development. We request that the Planning Commission require a second residential gate to avoid the above-mentioned safety concerns! ! Our immediate communities are expanding so rapidly which will increase the burden of our traffic pattern on E1 Dorado Avenue. This is another indication why a second Residential Gate is necessary for the safety of our Avondale Community. "COMMITTEE" FOR PROTECTION OF OUR AVONDALE COMMUNITY SENT BY: CITY OF PALM DESERT; 2- 2-98 2:02PM; 6193417098 619 345 3429; #t1 )1 f I r�` yY Ir'I 'ALIiiyo tJ:eJ� fI1S 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE (619) 346.0611 FAX(619) 341-7098 February _), 1 • 1a;8 38230 I.inU i•.-: (rills rr�< Gi w�(( ° / Palm Desoll. i A `).) SUBJECT: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF THE NORTHERLY PORTION OF AVONDALE COUNTRY CLUB (TENTATIVE TRACT 265533) ht rP ,(a�nse t" tiuur rri rot inquiry the following is prrn•irled. DcvClopnterlt of IIw suhiw-t property' wa^ .)1)proved under the (:ounty of Rivor.side prior to the City'-- alllloxmion of the properiv. Ti-,,,,, approval prf)vicled for the creation of 22 residential lots with aCCess onto I rani•. Sinatr., I )nvo. The proloct was requir0d, among other thin}(,,, to fully improve. Frank Sin.Ilra Drive CUrh, ;cutler, asphalt, paving, Ptc:.) in Conjunction with the CIM010pnlent. 1'ou Itavr inch, ,,U1CI that it is yocn' Understanding that the current property owners are (� consi(lerim, ,,ili<ilficatiunsichange, in the proposed dCvnlopment which ntay include the Y elitttin;lliun „ ripe access onto Frank Sinatra Drive. devc:lopert)��nrr I rl %Viah to )ursue, our lnsi ould be that we have no objection to an OCCCSS 11117., 1 rank S,matra Drivc (right turn ingress/Cgrc,,,, Ort y) as approves under the C:ounty. It snc'Ldd N' 110ted that the above-roformiced requirement for Ihc• Improvements of I rani: Sinllr: F)i witild remain in placr_• arld be 1'e((llll'P.j 1"egardloss oI direct a(:(1P55 to Frank Sin,ttr.I I )rvr. If you have .li), rlui stuns, please feel free to contact lowph S. (iaugn'dh of 111y staff. Very Irtiiy yu,ny, • lam.. KI(:HAKI ) Y I-t-)LKLR'), P.E. ,SSISTANT c_ITY n•IA-.NA(.,ER/Pt)RI.I(.. VVORKS DIRECTOR R Rr:aSC„m�. CC: Engineering Nitimager Phil I 'i<•il, (', nur,lutily F)rwclvpmetit Director co ar.K ,pill! ELECTRICAL ICti f' c"NROPOSAL CONTRACTORS 68i,,,, PEREZ ROAD, UNIT 16A — - rMTyoY a RN4Ar so me" CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 Page No. of Pages some" (760) 324-3079 FAX(760)324-2469 SECURITY GAM INC. CC160 ELECTRONIC ENTRY SPECIA�,STS PAGE 1 OF 3 Gtl.Cary.l.iC N6213ee PROPOSAL SURM,TTEO TO TSAME! PATE AVONDALE HOA 195 FEB. 23 , 1998 STREET 75800 AVONDALE Z-F. INSTALLATIONSSThTE.WOnP CODEPALM DESERT, CA . 92211 ARCHITECT WE OF PUNS ATTN: MR.& MRS . GOODY AR JOBP11ONE We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: WE ARE PLEA,.ED TO SUBMIT OUR PROPOSAL TO FURNISH LABOR, MATERIALS , AND SUPERVISION TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING : ENTRANCE GATE . 1— FABRICATE AND INSTALL ( 1 ) WROUGHT IRON SWING GATE APPRX. 14 'X 6 ' ( INCLUDES HD HINGE POST AND HD HINGES ) 2— FABRICATE AND INSTALL ( 1 ) WROUGHT IRON STATIONARY PANEL APPRX . 4 'X 6 3— FURNISH AK INSTALL ( 1 ) ELITE CSW200 SWING GATE OPERATOR WITH ACCESS DOGR 4— INSTALL (2 ) -SAFETY LOOPS WITH VEHICLE DETEC-q`0 5— FURNISH AN_ INSTALL ( 1 ) DOORHING I30DEL 1601 13A2RIER GATE OPERATOR W:TH 12 ' WOODEN ARM 6— INSTALL ( 1 ; DOWN LOOP WITH VEHICLE DETECTOR 7— FURNISH ANL INSTALL ( 1) HEY COMPANY ^;�'D READER ( INCLUDES GOOSE NEC}: ,TAND, 2 PROTECTION POSTS AND CONCRETE ISLAND) 8— FURNISH ANL INSTALL ( 1) MULTI CODE RFDIO RECEIVER 9— FURNIH AND INSTALL ( 1) FIRE DEPARTMENT RETSWITCH BOX We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor—complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: SEE PAGE THREE ********** Payment to be made as lolows dollars ($ ) 40% DOWN WITH ACCEPTANCE OF THIS PROPOSAL/CONTRACT, AND BALANCE DUE UPc,ti COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION AND DEMONSTRATION As m.nww,n awlant„w,I.m+a.,. i M.„.v..,.,....,."aatee m a NwNHw,nes manner vccap.ng to Ma,bi,b pacuces AnY anwn..,,. .. ,,,vm.vn In am.ap Crh,,s o,,a.hM" eR a ra Authorized 07 .hr.wru m e.awtm.,upon wnnvr. ...�. .,..,,.a.Dvt enextrachuge Overarro=tM $IgnBWTe .maie.NI aymu mn eeen ,mgeni v pu. ...... a.caents a mars oeyov,wr m "Owro,tp Carry hra iwnapp am oimv neraasan ,.v re Qn Nurhha are rvuy ovxb b,Wamse,s Compensaum Insurance Note:This Proposal maybe THIRTY withdrawn by us if not accepted wvthin— ye. Acceptance of Proposal - The above prices,speahcatans and co W,tons are satisfactory am are here v accepteo You are authorized to oo the wwk as specified.Payment wnl be mace es ouu.neo above. Signature Date of Acceptance: Signature OTRACTOR 1 r ' CNThL.pORS - �eR.aw w 687�3o PEREZ ROAD, UNIT 15A ` ROPOSAL CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 Page No. of Pages Key a� m my (760)324-3079 FAX(760)324.2469 swin ► CAM INC. CC160A ELECTRONICPEC ENTRY Sr,i TS PAGE 2 OF 3 A� �RU OA Ce11.COW-LC#VT3 M0-345-3195 FEB. 23 , 1998 eTR5800 AVONDALE L6 . SECURITY INSTALLATIONS Ui"1tf►TLITTc°tERT, CA. 92211 na,«.Tan SAME -7ft'N: MR.& MRS . GOODY fR«ems .aa naNe We hereby submit speclGoebons arm estimates for: WE ARE PLEA:,EL; TO SUBMIT OUR PROPOSAL TO FURNISH LABOR, MATERIAL: , AND SUPERVISION TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: EXIT GATE: 1- FABRICATE AND INSTALL ( 1) WROUGHT IRON SWING GATE APPRX. 14 'X 6 - ( INCLUDE,: hL HINGE POST AND HD HINGES ) 2- FURNISH Ati_ INSTALL ( 1) ELITE CSW200 SWING GATE OPERATOR WITH ACCESS D( OR 3- INSTALL ( _ ) SAFETY LOOPS WITH VEHICLE DETECTOR 4- FURNISH Ati; .INSTALL ( 1 ) DOORKING MODEL 1610 TRAFFIC SPIKES AND ( 1 ) DOORKING MODEL 1615 ILLUMINATED TRAFFIC SIGN 5 - FURNISH A\: INSTALL ( 1 ) KEY COMPANY CARD READER ( INCLUDES GOOSE NECi: LTAND, 2 PROTECTION POSTS AND CONCRETE ISLAND) 6- FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) MULTI CODE RADIO RECEIVER 7- PROVIDE ALL CONCRETE WORK 8- PROVIDE ALL SAW CUTTING 9- PROVIDE ALL ELECTRICAL HOOK UPS 10- TEST AND :;,JUST We Propose hereby to r rmbr material and labor—complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum *M******* SEE PAGE THREE ********** of: Payment � ouow�4 W N dollars (`S OF THIS PROPOSAL/CONTRACT, AND ) BALANCE DUE U:_,N CuMPLETION OF INSTALLATION AND DEMONSTRATION au nuiww,e ouwenrweo b m.,. . a„.,. afLOrOv19 b staMara Oracti[es wr,. ,i. .i.: �an a^�btp n a wor.marWan Tanrgr aWly wa oe e.ealw anv wur.........{ „w.,re..r,rrry Wecncaoms wvawp cave Aurnwaed in.n.na esmnele Meyeemmrs caa.yer ,.,,, , �.. .r...y„n>w aru.arer aria aewe aM Stpnature � carry nre rornaao am arw rwn».. °tlun Wyona as canna Qww m � ✓ CamOensatran buwanre "".«• a,r waaws wa Nay mveraa aY Yaeramen$ Note:This Proposal may be THIRTY Wvomrawn by us it nor a«epted Watten Acceptance of Proposal me awve a:ee rxnobons are saestaatory aria are nmeev accet"W You are"Iftued to do Pre Work as speGlietl Payment wYl be m w u.aanea aoove Date of A«a S"tura prance. Senawre 0'U(.0 SER��cE1 ({ r PROPOSAL CONTRACTORS 66733 PEREZ ROAD, UNIT 15A - _ favwor a Riyay. ' CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 Page No of Pages ��y�iW� (760) 324.3079 FAX(760)324-2469 ib\r R ■y GAM INC. CC160B ELECTRONIC ENTRY SPECu ISTs _ PAGE 3 OF 3 may,caw.L, *Wlw0 PRpPOSy SUBMITTED TO P,pNE OUE AVONDALE HOA 760-345-3195 FEB. 2312 , 1998 STREET "MAYS 75800 AVONDALE DR . SECURITY INSTALLATIONS CITY.STATE AND ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION PALM DESERT, =A. 92211 SAME ARCNITEGT DATE OF PLANS JOB PItlNE ATTN: MR.& MRS . GOODY AR We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: WE ARE PLEASED TO SUBMIT OUR PROPOSAL TO FURNISH LABOR, MATERIALS , AND SUPERVISION TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT: 1- FURNISH INSTALL ( 1) TOSHIBA LOW-LITE 1/3" CCD B/W CAMERA 2- INSTALL ( 1 ) EMI CAMERA HOUSING 3- INSTALL ( 1 ) EMI HOUSING WALL MOUNT BRACKET 4- INSTALL ( 1 ) PANASONIC 9- B/W MONITOR 5- INSTALL ( i ) EAGLE TRANSMISION SYSTEM 6- INSTALL ( 1) 24db DISH-GRID ANTENNAE 7- INSTALL ( 1 ) 14db REC. ANTENNAE 8- INSTALL II ) CHUGAI, 1/3" 4MM A/I LENS DC 9- INSTALL ( i ) TOSHIBA 24HR REAL-TIME VCR NOTES: A- 3 YEAR FACTORY WARRANTY ON SWING OPERATORS B- Z YEAR FACTORY WARRANTY ON ALL DOORKING PRODUCTS C- 1 YEAR LABOR WARRANTY D- PROPOSAL BASED ON CITY APPROVAL E- ALL PERMITS BY AVONDALE F- ALL CONDUITS BY OTHERS AND CO-ORDINATED BY SOUTH BAY SECURITY GATES G- ALL ELECTRICAL POWER BY OTHERS H- CAMERA MONITOR TO BE INSTALLED IN EXISTING GAURD HOUSE TOTAL PRICE INSTALLED $ 23 ,350. 00 We Propose hereby to rurnish material and labor—complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: *TWENTY THREE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED FIFTY & N0/100* dollars ($23 , 350 . 00 ) Payment to be made"Iouowl 40% DOWN W.TH ACCEPTANCE OF THIS PROPOSAL/CONTRACT, AND BALANCE DUE �: .:fN COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION AND DEMONSTRATION At malel,al IS gYa,Wtelb m Ct . .,—.',#it Am-itY I,I ne conIDNNG m a WOIX men4M!IIWVIe1 axa 0,WStanat,a{NaclCes Aulhorured Loses AAJ be eaecutW only uWr w nm'w,txs and writ become an eaVa charge o Slid above ale $lgnaw a eY,vle AS agre9mMlls rmlinyr•,•Jwn s.APi, au'wems or delays beyond our L'Onebl.Owner,b carry fire.Ornadb and Omar nn.eavn mNnarce Our worriers arc tuMy mvered by workmen, Note:This protyo9at may bB THIRTY Carpanealm insurarca wlmdravm by us it not aCCBpIBtl Wrthln nays. Acceptance of Proposal--The above prices.speciiwtions and condBlons are saustactory mu me nenMy accepted You are authoruted to do the work as spectled.Payment will be mace as outlined above. Signature Date of Acceptance_ _—_ Signature I T \ P.R.-9 bn MI IIAI.1 II CfH ' � LIIIIN IIIV 1 n 'PROPERTY L.--.S IILJII IILJII'ILII( L 4r }n r v[ Tli, III ••._ _ �'•� yI P.A.-3 9L J,I. II r—~ I•AlM VrII Il Y Jlrllq fnY(:I llb \' III 51 nl I'At Ls rll'aY>ri9-. y .uI1NTEY r,111, _ City of Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(760)346-0611 a FAX(760)340-0574•http:/Avww.palm-desert.org June 8, 1998 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO: Imperial Irrigation:District CASE NO(S): TT 26553 Amendment PROJECT:i Avondale Villas, LLCM APPLICANT: Century-Crowell Communities 1535 South "D" Street, Suite 200 San Bernadino, CA 92408 Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of an amended tentative tract map to allow the subdivision 8.207 acres into 36 residential lots, 5 street lots, and 3 landscape lots for a total of 44 parcels. Property is located within Avondale Country Club, located at the southwest corner of Eldorado and Frank Sinatra. Also known as A.P.N. 626-030-021 . The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval. The city is interested in the probable impacts on the environment (including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise, objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. July, 10, 1998 to the attention of Steve Smith, Planning Manager in order to be considered. ` Sincerely, Ma in Alvarez, Assistant Planner / a, attachment PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS Regcbp Pepin 11 �o oft p'M0m DD sosF2 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(760)346-0611 •FAX(760)340-0574•http://www.paim-desert.org June 8, 1998 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO: Sheriff Department CASE NO(S): TT 26553 Amendment PROJECT: Avondale Villas, LLC APPLICANT: Century-Crowell Communities 1535 South "D" Street, Suite 200 San Bernadino, CA 92408 Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of an amended tentative tract map to allow the subdivision 8.207 acres into 36 residential lots, 5 street lots, and 3 landscape lots for a total of 44 parcels. Property is located within Avondale Country Club, located at the southwest corner of Eldorado and Frank Sinatra. Also known as A.P.N. 626-030-021 . The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval. The city is interested in the probable impacts on the environment (including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise, objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. June 26, 1998 to the attention of Steve Smith, Planning Manager in order to be considered. Sincerely, IV6 Mar in Alvarez, Assistant Planner /ma, attachment PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS Pape RrJ Paper h Cary ®f Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(760)346-0611 •FAX(760)340-0574•http://www.paim-desert.org June 8, 1998 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO: CVWD CASE NO(S): TT 26553 Amendment PROJECT: Avondale Villas, LLC APPLICANT: Century-Crowell Communities 1535 South "D" Street, Suite 200 San Bernadino, CA 92408 Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of an amended tentative tract map to allow the subdivision 8.207 acres into 36 residential lots, 5 street lots, and 3 landscape lots for a total of 44 parcels. Property is located within Avondale Country Club, located at the southwest corner of Eldorado and Frank Sinatra. Also known as A.P.N. 626-030-021 . The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval. The city is interested in the probable impacts on the environment (including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise, objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. June 26, 1998 to the attention of Steve Smith, Planning Manager in order to be considered. Sincerely, Marti Alvarez, Assistant Planner /ma, attachment 6a PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS R."I. Pepe City of Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(760)346-0611 •FAX(760)340-0574•http://www.palm-desert.org June 8, 1998 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO: Mike McConnell, Fire Marshal CASE NO(S): TT 26553 Amendment PROJECT: Avondale Villas, LLC APPLICANT: Century-Crowell Communities 1535 South "D" Street, Suite 200 San Bernadino, CA 92408 Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of an amended tentative tract map to allow the subdivision 8.207 acres into 36 residential lots, 5 street lots, and 3 landscape lots for a total.of 44 parcels. Property is located within Avondale Country Club, located at the southwest corner of Eldorado and Frank Sinatra. Also known as A.P.N. 626-030-021 . The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval. The city is interested in the probable impacts on the environment (including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise, objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. June 26, 1998 to the attention of Steve Smith, Planning Manager in order to be considered. Sincerely, M rtin Alvarez, Assistant Planner /ma, attachment 6a PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS AeM� Piper ,a City ®f Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(760)346-0611 •FAX(760)340-0574•http://www.paim-desert.org June 8, 1998 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO: Public Works CASE NO(S): TT 26553 Amendment PROJECT: Avondale Villas, LLC APPLICANT: Century-Crowell Communities 1535 South "D" Street, Suite 200 San Bernadino, CA 92408 Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of an amended tentative tract map to allow the subdivision 8.207 acres into 36 residential lots, 5 street lots, and 3 landscape lots for a total of 44 parcels. Property is located within Avondale Country Club, located at the southwest corner of Eldorado and Frank Sinatra. Also known as A.P.N. 626-030-021 . The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval. The city is interested in the probable impacts on the environment (including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise, objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. June 26, 1998 to the attention of Steve Smith, Planning Manager in order to be considered. Sincerely, Ma n Alvarez, Assistant Planner /ma, attachment 6a PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS flxycle0 Pppx 98/684 OO GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS November 16, 1998 A C O U S T I C A L A N A L Y S I S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T R A C T 2 6 5 5 3 A V 0 N D A L E C I T Y O F P A L M D E S E R T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O Prep red by: Prepared for: i i Christop er Jean MR. KENT ARMSTRONG Staff�Engineer CENTURY HOMES 1535 South I'D" St . , Suite 200 Reviewed by: / J San Bernardino, California C�Jo''lyl�,,LyfL�/ 92408 I Gordon Bricken President 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K Santa Ana, California 92705-8518 Phone(714) 835-6249 FAX (714)835-1957 1 ' 98/684 O GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS S U M M A R Y This analysis has been completed to determine the exterior and interior noise exposure and the necessary mitigation measures for the proposed Tract 26553 Avondale project located on Frank Sinatra Drive in the City of Palm Desert . A comprehensive list of recommendations and requirements is given in the following summary. Details are discussed in the body of the report . A. NOISE CONTROL BY BARRIER DESIGN The City of Palm Desert does not require exterior noise mitigation. However, a solid concrete block security wall with a height of six feet is-planned to be erected along the entire length of the north property line of the project . That wall will reduce the exterior noise levels to no more than 64 dBA CNEL at the lots along Frank Sinatra Drive. B. INTERIOR NOISE CONTROL The buildings would be expected to be constructed, as a minimum, in accordance with the outline of Table 8 . This is adequate for all units in the project . C. VENTILATION When calculations depend on having windows closed, as it is in this case, it is good practice (not required) to provide adequate fresh air ventilation without resorting to the opening of the windows, should the occupant desire not to do so. This can be accomplished by installing a "summer switch" and outside ducting to the forced air unit or by installing air conditioning in all units . 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K Santa Ana, California 92705.8518 Phone(714)835.0249 FAX (714)835-1957 2 98/684 D. OTHER ISSUES Golf course maintenance operations will occur in close proximity to the project site . However, it is unclear whether the City will require the project to mitigate such noise levels, and if so, what the design criteria must be . The City must clarify its position on this issue as well as define the land use zoning and applicable noise limits if the project is to produce compliance with Ordinance Number 691 . 3 98/684 0 GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS 1 . 0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a noise impact and design study of the proposed Tract 26553 Avondale project located on Frank Sinatra Drive in the City of Palm Desert . Included in this report is a discussion of the expected exterior community noise environment and the recommendations for control of noise in the exterior and interior living areas . A vicinity map showing the general location of the construction site is presented in Exhibit 1 -- Site Location Map. The proposed development consists of single family housing. 2 . 0 APPLICABLE NOISE CRITERIA The City of Palm Desert requires all residential projects to conform to the requirements of Table 1 . TABLE 1 APPLICABLE NOISE CRITERIA(') Exterior. . . . . .None Interior. . . . . .45 CNEL (1) Please see NOISE RATING METHODS (Appendix 1) for a complete explanation of acoustical terminology. 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K Santa Ana, California 92705-8518 Phone(714)835-0249 FAX(714) 835-1957 4 98/684 3 . 0 EXISTING NOISE LEVELS 3 . 1 ROADWAYS A measurement was performed near the site . The record of that measurement is shown on Exhibit 2 . Measurements are conducted using a Bruel and Kjaer (B & K) Model 2218 Type 1 Sound Level Meter and a B & K Model 2317 Portable Level Recorder. The average noise level reported from the measurement was 61 . 5 dBA Leq. The measurement was taken at a point 45 feet from the existing center of Frank Sinatra Drive and 75 feet from the center of Eldorado Drive . That point was chosen both to avoid the noise of the earthmovers operating on the project site as well as to represent the project limits closest to the freeway and railroad noise sources . Ten minute traffic counts were taken during the measurement period. The results of those counts are given .in Table 2 . TABLE 2 TEN MINUTE TRAFFIC COUNTS AUTOS MEDIUM TRUCKS HEAVY TRUCKS TOTAL TEN MINUTES Frank Sinatra 74 4 0 78 Eldorado 20 3 0 23 Interstate 10 317 22 122 461 HOURLY EQUIVALENT Frank Sinatra 444 24 0 468 Eldorado 120 18 0 138 Interstate 10 1, 902 132 732 2 , 766 PERCENTAGE Frank Sinatra 94 . 9 5 . 1 0 . 0 100 . 0 Eldorado 87 . 0 13 . 0 0 . 0 100 . 0 Interstate 10 68 . 8 4 . 8 26 . 5 100 . 0 The primary function of the measurements is to calibrate the Noise Model (FHWA RD-77-108) used to compute the CNEL data. The model relies on the acoustical metric of the Average Noise Level (Leq) . By taking the traffic 5 98/684 count during the measurement, calculating the Leq value for that sample, and comparing it to the measured sample, it is possible to calibrate the CNEL model for any factors which are present and not adequately identified in the prediction equations . The computer print-out is attached in Appendix 2 . The calculated and measured levels are compared in Table 3 . TABLE 3 COMPARISON OF CALCULATED AND MEASURED AVERAGE NOISE LEVELS Calculated 61 .3* Measured 61. 5 DIFFERENCE + 0 .2 * Assumes a 20 dBA shielding correction for Interstate 10 contribution. The calculated and measured values nearly match. Therefore, no corrections other than the I-10 structure/terrain shielding correction need be applied to the CNEL calculations . 3 . 2 RAILROAD A line of the Union Pacific and Southern Pacific Railroads parallels Route I-10 at a distance of 1, 200 feet from the site . Calculations according to the HUD Methodology were carried out to determine this rail line ' s impact on the site. The calculations are contained in Appendix 3 . The results of these calculations yield a railroad noise level of 52 CNEL. Railroad noise alone does not impact the site . The railroad parameters used for the railroad noise calculations are given in Table 4 on the following page. 6 98/684 TABLE 4 RAILROAD PARAMETERS PARAMETER Number of daily trains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 Percentage at night . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50% Number of locomotive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Number of railroad cars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Speed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 MPH Horn Signal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No Bolted Rails . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No 3 . 3 AIRCRAFT There are no concentrated aircraft operations in the vicinity of the project site. Aircraft noise does not impact the site. 4 . 0 DESIGN NOISE LEVELS 4 . 1 ROADWAYS The expected future roadway noise impact was projected using the Federal Highway Admini- stration' s Highway Noise Prediction Model (FHWA RD-77- 108) together with several roadway and site parameters, which determine the projected impact of vehicular traffic noise, including the roadway cross-section (e .g. number of lanes) , the roadway active width, the average daily traffic (ADT) , the vehicle travel speed, the percentages of auto and truck traffic, the roadway grade, the angle- of-view, the site conditions ( "hard" or "soft" ) , and the percent of total average daily traffic which flows each hour throughout a 24 hour period. The I-10 forecast traffic volume was obtained from CALTRANS data. CALTRANS data was also used for the percentage of truck traffic and to project the distri- bution by .time of day. 7 98/684 The Frank Sinatra Drive forecast traffic volume was obtained by applying a ten year traffic projection, at a growth rate of five percent per year, to the existing traffic volume quoted by the Traffic Engineering Department of the City of Palm Desert . The percentage of truck traffic was obtained from a 1987 Study of Thirty-one Arterial Intersections by the County of Orange. The same source was used to project the distribution by time of day. The input data is listed in Tables 5 and 6 . TABLE 5 TRAFFIC INPUT DATA -- I-10 DAY o EVENING o NIGHT % VOLUME Autos 73 . 0 8 . 6 18 .4 90 . 2 Medium Trucks 73 . 0 8 . 6 18 . 4 6 . 1 Heavy Trucks 69 . 1 6 . 7 24 .2 3 . 7 Volume = 130, 000 ADT Speed = 70 MPH TABLE 6 TRAFFIC INPUT DATA -- FRANK SINATRA DRIVE DAY % EVENING o NIGHT a VOLUME Autos 75 . 51 12 . 57 9 . 34 100 . 0 Medium Trucks 1 . 56 . 09 . 19 100 . 0 Heavy Trucks . 64 . 02 . 08 100 . 0 Volume = 11, 600 ADT Speed = 55 MPH The calculations are contained in Appendix 4 . The calculations yield a combined roadway design noise level of 71 . 6 dBA CNEL at 50 feet from the center of Frank Sinatra Drive . 8 98/684 4 . 2 RAILROAD Railroad noise is not expected to increase . Thus, the railroad noise level will remain at 52 dBA CNEL at the project site. 4 . 3 AIRCRAFT Aircraft noise is not expected to change. Thus, aircraft noise will not impact the site. 4 . 4 COMBINED TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES The transportation source noise levels will combine to produce a total design noise level of 71 . 6 dBA CNEL at a distance of 50 feet from the center of Frank Sinatra Drive . 4 . 5 STATIONARY NOISE SOURCES The project is part of a country club/golf course development . The project is fronted by two golf course fairways . Maintenance of these fairways, tees, greens and rough will cause various sized lawnmowers, sand rakes, leaf blowers, tractors and other landscape maintenance equipment to be operated in close proximity to the project . Such operations could cause objectionable noise levels at the project site . If compliance and/or mitigation is to be examined, then actual compliance limits must be defined by the City of Palm Desert . The City' s former noise ordinance exempted maintenance operations as long as they occurred between certain daytime hours . The current Ordinance Number 691 only states that maintenance operations must occur between the hours of 5 : 30 A.M. and 7 : 00 P.M. It does not specifically exempt such operations as did the former ordinance . Ordinance Number 691 also defines the noise compliance criteria by the land use zoning. However, it offers only Residential, Commercial, Manufacturing/ Industrial, and Agricultural zones and does not define these zones . It is not known which zone the City would define a golf course to belong to, but a 10 dBA noise limit difference occurs whether the golf course is said to be in a Residential/Agricultural or Commercial Zone . These issues must be clarified by the City of Palm Desert if further analysis is to occur. 9 98/684 5 . 0 MITIGATION MEASURES 5 . 1 EXTERIOR The City of Palm Desert does not require exterior noise mitigation. However, the project proposes to erect a six foot high, solid concrete block security wall along the entire north property line of the project . That wall will produce some amount of noise shielding to the first floor level of the lots along Frank Sinatra Drive . Thus, calculations were performed to determine the expected level of shielding. The assumptions for the barrier calculations are listed in Table 7 . TABLE 7 BARRIER ANALYSIS GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS FOR RECEIVER AND SOURCE GEOMETRY R E C E I V E R A S S U M P T I O N S ----------------------------------------------------------------- HORIZONTAL GEOMETRY VERTICAL GEOMETRY Distance behind top-of-roadways Height above pad for ground barrier: 5 ' to 10 ' level receivers : 5 ' Distance behind individual Height above pad for second patio and balcony barriers : level receivers : 14 ' 1 ' to 3 ' ----------------------------------------------------------------- S O U R C E A S S U M P T I O N S ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- HORIZONTAL GEOMETRY* VERTICAL GEOMETRY For roadways with grades no Automobiles : 0 ' above center- greater than 2%, all vehicles line road grade were located at the single lane equivalent acoustic center of Medium Trucks : 2 . 3 ' above the full roadway. For roadways centerline road with over 2°s grade, vehicle grade count was divided in half and located at the single lane Heavy Trucks : 8 ' above equivalent acoustic center for centerline road each side of the roadway. grade ----------------------------------------------------------------- * Single lane equivalent (SLE) location. 10 98/684 The barrier calculations are contained in Appendix 5 . The calculations show that the proposed six foot high security wall will produce exterior noise levels of no more than 64 dBA CNEL at the lots adjacent to Frank Sinatra Drive . 5 . 2 INTERIOR The City' s exposure criteria for new resi- dential construction requires that the interior noise environment, attributable to outside sources, be limited to 45 CNEL. Analysis and recommendations for control of outdoor-to-indoor noise intrusion are presented in this section. The exterior-to-interior noise reduction expected for the planned construction was based on a detailed analysis of sample rooms and units planned for the development . Calculations of the expected typical noise reduction performance were performed for sample rooms . The analysis was based on the typical spectra expected for the primary sources of community noise impact, the typical octave-band transmission loss for each element in the planned building shell, the relative square footage of each element of the planned building shell, the expected typical interior surface treatment, and the acoustical absorption coefficient for each interior surface treatment . Corrections for the "A" Weighted room absorption factors are also included. Each component of the building shell (e .g. exterior wall, windows, doors, etc . ) provides a different amount of transmission loss for each "All Weighted octave- band of community noise. With the knowledge of the building shell components and their individual octave band transmission loss values for the noise sources, calculations of the composite building shell transmission loss can be made for each room. The characteristics of the basic building shell are listed in Table 8 on the following page . 11 98/684 TABLE 8 BASIC BUILDING SHELL CHARACTERISTICS PANEL CONSTRUCTION Exterior Wall Siding or stucco, 2" X 4" studs, R-13 fiberglass insulation, 5/8" drywall Windows 3/32" double pane aluminum horizontal sliders Sliding Glass Door 3/16" double pane aluminum horizontal sliders Roof Tile or shingle over 1/2" plywood, fiberglass insulation, 5/8" drywall, vented Floor Carpeted except kitchen and baths Table 8 construction minimums will provide at least 20 dBA of interior noise reduction. All of the proposed floor plans are single story. Thus, units adjacent to Frank Sinatra Drive will be exposed to exterior noise levels up to 64 dBA CNEL. This will require an interior noise reduction level of only 19 dBA. Therefore, the construction given in Table 8 will be adequate interior mitigation for all of the proposed units . No additional interior noise mitigation is necessary. 5 . 3 VENTILATION When calculations depend on having windows closed, as it is in this case, it is good practice (not required) to provide adequate fresh air ventilation without resorting to the opening of the windows, should the occupant desire not to do so. This can be accomplished by installing a "summer switch" and outside ducting to the forced air unit or by installing air conditioning in all units . 12 EXHIBIT 1 SITE LOCATION MAP yy��y-si•CY�g�i F ' �i SCw 5 FESExvE 'WAN T4S'm36Av -19 T55 RE- �fi tS�3 vwu `: �e ...........Ykr�. .±2Si". - �.r„ f fL f S aT1((p y- y a; _y^ • vaR bllniooi"'uR. °''nmo�COUNTRY yLLUR`! a C1 .'OR t�iNV.• na-" >r�8, ,� k T _ (�py�•P� +' �iL"'t� e W ww�lee �a �!' "I�r r Nf[ m• 3 � 4(q�?i �t4 12 '�'v `' r14{F� < i Ft xppXiNfk ,SWt�1N6y'" W 'E `� � ry� iR .UM n'1R.IU1 ��'��r vOm�t1VENNON�_ u�t16lx�71 �. xWlk��.Y,.,ae�mN.a '4 aY yid' 3•�.�± 9t al mn�ua� '� . � �}I,,a,' . SG✓a... �.� � �-�'ti� '•�� � 'I �� 7m�,' c""- i 34 'i '" ailLH '^ mm y�„ Rr- + ' w�RE} rumor. ytSt'+' �1R k'}'&NOVLEYIN Y � 6 "l� grANIMIfAI• p - `e y.LY2y , y i11D NIXGII�EaLIIA A 5s ' [L+Y. ., - I� p�s v�£•N."!{y$�'� t` sC '+ GOFDPNU� EXHIBIT 2 GATE 11/10/98 100 CHART SPEED .3mm SCALE A , % LOCATION FRANK SINATRA ELDORADO 0 40 60 80 pB 70 80 90 .O el & Kja?r 90- - -90 80- -80 70- -70 DB I rDD AM 80- -60 50- -50 40- -40 QP 0102 90- -90 80- -80 70- -70 DB DO L80- -60 50- -50 40- -40 OO GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS A P P E N D I X 1 NOISE RATING METHODS 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K Santa Ana, California 92705-8518 Phone (714) 835-0249 FAX(714) 835-1957 Page 1 of 3 0 GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS N O I S E R A T I N G M E T H O D S The A-weighted decibel of "A" scale on the sound level meter is often used in the measurement of noise because the weighting characteristics of this scale approximate the subjective response of the human ear to a broad frequency band noise source by discriminating against the very low and the very high frequencies of the audible spectrum. Since community noise is seldom constant, varying from moment to moment and throughout the day, the "A" weighted noise level needs to be further described to provide meaningful data. The Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Department of Transportation, foreign countries and private consultants are now using three time-exceeded percentile figures to describe noise, which .are: (1) L90 is the noise level which is exceeded 90% of any sample time period (such as 24 hours) and is used to describe the background or ambient noise level . (2) L50 is the noise level which is exceeded 50% of the time. It is the median level. (3) L10 is the noise level which is exceeded 10% of the time and is a good descriptor of fluctuating noise sources, such as vehicular traffic. It indicates the near-maximum levels which occur from grouped single events. Being related to the subjective annoyance to community noise, it is a good design tool 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K • Santa Ana, California92701 • Phone(714)835-0249 Page 2 of 3 in the planning of acoustical barriers . More recent noise assessment methods are based on the equivalent energy concept where Leq (x) represents the average energy content of a fluctuating noise source over a sample period. The subscript (x) represents the period in which the energy is computed and measured. Current practice references the quantity to either one (1) hour, eight (8) hours, or twenty- four (24) hours. When referenced to one (1) hour, L eq is also sometimes called HNL (Hourly Noise Level) . Since Leq is the summation of the functional products of noise level and duration, many combinations of noise level, duration time and time history can make up the same Leq value. Thus, an Leq (24) equals 50 means only that the average noise level is 50 dB. During the 24-hour period there can be times when the noise level is higher than 50 dB, and times when it is lower. If the period of the measurement is only a single event, the energy content is not averaged. The energy expression for a single event is simply the sum of the functional product of the noise level and duration time of the event. This term is called Le or SENEL (Single Event Noise Exposure Level) . The summation of Le values averaged over one hour is Leq (1) ' Leq (8) , and Leq (24) ' etc. LeQ is further refined into Ldn (Level Day-Night) and CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) , where noises that occur during certain hours of the day are weighted (or penalized) because they are considered subjectively more annoying during these time periods: (1) Ldn is the sound level in dBA which corresponds to the average energy content of the noise being measured over a 24-hour period including a 10 dBA weighting penalty for sound levels which occur during the nighttime hours of 10 : 00 P.M. to 7 : 00 A.M. This is a rating method recommended by the Environmental Page 3 of 3 Protection Agency because it takes into account those subjectively more annoying noise events which occur during the sleeping hours . (2) CNEL is the sound level in dBA which corres- ponds to the average energy content of the noise being measured over a 24-hour period including a five (5) dBA penalty for noise which occurs during the evening hours of 7 : 00 P.M. to 10 : 00 P.M. , and a ten (10) dBA weighting penalty for noise that occurs during the night- time hours of 10 : 00 P.M. to 7 :00 A.M. For typical high- way vehicular traffic situations, computer analysis has shown that CNEL and Ldn correlate within 0 . 5 dBA. The percentile figures L10 , L50 ' and L90 can be directly scaled from a graphical recording of the measured noise over a particular time period. They are also convenient to implement in automatic measurement equipment. Energy parameters Le , Leq, Ldn, and CNEL require expensive and complicated equip- ment. As a result, engineers have devised ways of estimating Leq (and hence, Ldn) using standard instrumentation and methods. OO GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS A P P E N D I X 2 EXISTING TRAFFIC NOISE CALCULATIONS 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K Santa Ana, California 92705-8518 Phone (714) 835-0249 FAX (714) 835-1957 HOURLY NOISE LEVEL PROJECT TRACT 26553 STREET NAME FRANK SINATRA SITE TYPE SOFT INPUT DATA AUTO METK HVTK SPEED : 25 25 25 % VOLUME : 94 . 9 5 . 1 0 VOLUME = 468 HVY IRK GRADIENT = 0 DBA NOISE LEVEL AUTO 56 . 99 MED . TRK. 55 . 59 HVY. TRK. 0 . 00 TOTAL 59 . 36 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- NOISE LEVEL AT 45 FT -------------------- AUTO MEDIUM IRK. HEAVY TRK. TOTAL ---- ----------- ---------- ----- 57 . 68 56 . 26 0 . 00 60 . 04 -------------------------- LEQ AT SPECIFIED DISTANCES -------------------------- DISTANCE LEQ 50 59 . 36 75 56 . 72 100 54 . 84 125 53 . 39 150 52 . 20 175 51 . 20 200 50 . 33 250 48 . 87 300 47 . 69 350 46 . 68 400 45 . 81 450 45 . 04 500 44 . 36 550 43 . 74 600 43 . 17 650 42 . 65 700 42 . 17 750 41 . 72 S00 41 . 30 1000 39 . 84 HOURLY NOISE LEVEL PROJECT : TRACT 26553 STREET NAME : ELDORADO SITE TYPE : SOFT INPUT DATA AUTO METK EVTK SPEED : 25 25 25 % VOLUME : 87 13 0 VOLUME = 138 HVY TRK GRADIENT = 0 DBA NOISE LEVEL AUTO 51 . 31 MED . TRK . 54 . 35 HVY. TRK . 0 . 00 TOTAL 56 . 10 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- NOISE LEVEL AT 75 FT -------------------- AUTO MEDIUM TRK . HEAVY TRK. TOTAL ---- ----------- ---------- ----- 48 . 67 51 . 71 0 . 00 53 . 46 -------------------------- LEQ AT SPECIFIED DISTANCES -------------------------- DIST.ANCE LEQ 50 56 . 10 75 53 . 46 100 51 . 59 125 50 . 13 150 48 . 95 17.5 47 . 94 200 47 . 07 250 45 . 62 300 44 . 43 350 43 . 43 400 42 . 56 450 41 . 79 500 41 . 10 550 40 . 48 600 39 . 91 650 39 . 39 700 38 . 91 750 38 . 46 800 38 . 04 1000 36 . 59 • HOURLY NOISE LEVEL PROJECT TRACT 26553 STREET NAME INTERSTATE 10 SITE TYPE HARD INPUT DATA AUTO METK HVTK SPEED : 70 70 70 % VOLUME : 68 . 8 4 . 8 26 . 5 VOLUME = 2766 HVY TRK. GRADIENT = 0 DBA NOISE LEVEL AUTO 75 . 88 MBD . TRK. 73 . 73 HVY . TRK. 84 . 03 TOTAL 84 . 98 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- NOISE LEVEL AT 1500 FT -------------------- AUTO MEDIUM TRK . HEAVY TRK. TOTAL 61 . 10 58 . 96 69 . 26 70 . 21 -------------------------- LEQ AT SPECIFIED DISTANCES -------------------------- DISTANCE LEQ 50 84 . 93 75 83 . 2 100 31 . 97 125 81 . G1 15C 80 . 21 175 79 . 54 200 78 . 96 250 78 . 00 300 77 . 2C 350 76 . 53 400 75 . 95 450 / 5 . 44 500 74 . 98 550 74 . 57 600 74 . 19 650 73 . 85 700 73 . 52 750 73 . 22 800 72 . 94 1000 71 . 97 OO GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS A P P E N D I X 3 RAILROAD NOISE CALCULATIONS HUD METHOD 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K Santa Ana, California 92705-8518 Phone (774)835-0249 FAX (714) 835-1957 ADJUST[RNPS FOR DIESEL LO00YOITVES 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 No. of Average Horns Nigit- No. of Adj . No. DNL Locomtives Speed (enter time Trains of Trains Worcchart Barrier Partial 2 Table 9 10) Table 5 (line 2) 3 Attn. DNL Railway N1 x 1 1 S x x x 5 c� _ (9Z - t o 5 y d Railway N2 x x x x Railway N3 x x x x _ ADJUSTTENTS FOR RAILWAY CARS AND RAPID TRANSIT TRAINS 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 DNL Number Average Bolted Night- No. of Work- of cars Speed Rails Horns time Trains Adj . No. chart Barrier Partial B 50 Table 10 (enter 4) (enter 100) Table 5 (line 2) of Trains 4 Attn. DNL ^� Railway M1 I .� x I& x ( x I x 2, x 950 Railway 82 x x x x x Railway N3 x x x x x _ a µ W (D Combined Locomotive and Railway Car DNL Q Railway N1 _ 15 Z Total DNL N Railway A2 for all Date: 7� Railway N3 Railways Signature: a m r r to N RAILROADS - Diesel Locomotives 1000 D NL 75 70 65 60 55 800 _ r . . --i--.: Unacceptable - -- 600 --- 400 I : I I i 200 -' - . -- -- 0 100 ` 80 60 - --I 40 Z - , 20 a 10 .Ap. 8 77 T . _ I 2 40 60 80 100 200 400 600 1 00C 2000 4000 6000 ID,OW I Effective Distance (it) WORKCHART 3 RAILROADS Cars and Rapid Transit 75 •70 65 60 55 10,000 —�-- - 8000 60� Uriacceptab[6 _ 50 4000 -44- -- - - - _ I I I 1 .. i ! , 2000 1000 O 800 600 - ..i i - - - — 0 400 - - - I I T. --i 200 10o _ _ _ _-'- Accspiabl#-_ 1 I 80 60 71, 40 _ I .a-_: 20 I IAi 10 _ 40 60 80100 200 400 600 1000 2000 4000 6000 10,000 Effective Distance (ft) WORKCHART4 0 GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS A P P E N D I X 4 FUTURE TRAFFIC NOISE CALCULATIONS 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K Santa Ana, California 92705-8518 Phone (714) 835-0249 FAX(714) 835-1957 ' FHWA RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL -- ------- ---------------------- PROJECT NAME : TRACT 26553 SITE LOCATION : PALM DESERT DESCRIPTION : FRANK SINATRA DRIVE SITE TYPE : HARD ---------------------------- INPUT DATA AUTO MEDIUM TRUCK HEAVY TRUCK SPEED 55 55 55 % DAY 75 . 51 1 . 56 . 64 % EVENING 12 . 57 0 . 09 0 . 02 % NIGHT 9 . 34 . 19 . 03 % VOLUME 100 100 100 VOLUME 11600 ------ ----AVERAGE IIOURLY NOISE LEVELS AT 50 FEET---- DAY EVENING NIGHT 24 HOUR CNEL --------- ALTO 68 . 77 67 . 00 60 . 94 66 . 87 70 13 MEDIUM IRK . 61 . 73 55 . 41 53 . 89 59 . 49 62 . 56 HEAVY IRK . 61 . 76 52 . 73 53 . 98 59 . 38 62 . 45 TOTAL 70 . 23 67 . 45 62 . 40 68 . 21 71 . 42 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOISE LEVEL AT SPECIFIED DISTANCES DISTANCE CNLL 50 71 . 42 75 69 . 66 100 68 . 41 125 67 . 44 150 66 . 65 175 65 . 98 200 65 . 40 225 64 . 89 250 64 . 43 275 64 . 02 300 63 . 64 325 63 . 29 350 62 . 97 375 62 . 67 400 62 . 39 450 61 . 88 500 61 . 42 5.50 61 . 01 600 60 . 63 650 60 . 28 700 59 . 96 750 59 . 66 800 59 . 38 FHWA RD-77-108 IIIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROJECT NAME : TRACT 26553 SITE LOCATION : PALM DESERT DESCRIPTION : INTERSTATE 10 SITE TYPE : HARD --------------------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT DATA AUTO ?TEDIUM TRUCK HEAVY TRUCK SPEED 70 70 70 % DAY 73 73 69 . 1 % EVE`dIIG 8 . 60 8 . 60 6 . 70 % NIGHT 18 . 4 18 . 4 24 . 2 % VOLUME 67 . 5 5 27 . 5 VOLUME 130000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----AVERAGE HOURLY NOISE LEVELS AT 50 FEET---- DAY EVENING NIGHT 24 HOUP. CNEL --------------------------------------------------------------------------- AUTO 30 . 36 77 . 09 75 . 62 78 . 71 93 . 23 MEDIUM IRK. 78 . 47 75 . 20 73 . 73 76 . 83 81 . 34 * t / r n�- D HEAVY TRA: . 0r . 51 84 . 4 85 . 21 „ i 1 TOTAL 89 . 49 81 . 56 85 . 93 88 . C4 93 . 11 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOISE LEVEL AT 1500 FEET AUTO MEDIUM TR.UCI: HEAVY TiiUCK TOTAL 68 . 46 66 . 51 7 / . 54 78 . 34 NOISE LEVEL AT SPECIFIED DISTANCES DISTANCE CNEL 50 93 . 11 75 91 . 35 100 90 . 10 125 89 . 13 150 88 . 34 1.1 87 . 67 200 8I 225 86 . 58 250 86 . 12 275 85 . 71 300 85 . 33 325 84 . 98 35O 04 . 66 373 84 . 36 4�V o4 . 08 450 83 . 57 500 83 . 11 550 82 . 70 600 82 . 32 650 81 . 97 700 81 . 65 750 81 . 3.5 000 81 . 07 O GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS A P P E N D I X 5 SECURITY WALL NOISE REDUCTION CALCULATIONS 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K Santa Ana, California 92705-8518 Phone (714) 835-0249 FAX (714) 835-1957 BARRIER NOISE REDUCTION ANALISIS ,WALL HEIGHT VARIABLE ------------------------- REFERENCE VEHICLE LEVELS AT 50 FEET ----------------------------------- AUTO . . . . . . . . . = 70 . 13 M . TRUCK. . . . . . = 62 . 56 H. TRUCK. . . . . . = 63 . 87 PROJECT . . . . . . TRACT 26553 DESCRIFTION . . LOT 15 SOURCE ELEVATION . . . . . . . 159 . 8 RECEIVER ELEVATION . . . . . 162 . 4 BARRIER .EL.EVATION . . . . . . 162 . 4 RECEIVER HEIGHT . . . . . . . . 5 DISTANCE TO SOURCE . . . . . 63 DISTANCE TO RECEIVER. . . 10 AUTO NOISE LEVEL . . . . . . 68 . 48646 M. TRI: NOISE LEVEL . . . . . . 60 . 91648 H . TRK NOISE LEVEL . . . . . . 62 . 22647 SOURCE NOISE LEVEL . . . . . 69 . 98 ANGULAR. COP.RECTION(DB ) - 0 WALL HEIGHT AN'L MTNL HTNL TNL III, 0 . 00 68 . 49 60 . 92 62 . 23 69 . 98 -0 . 00 FN 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 6 . 00 61 . 75 54 . 47 56 . 65 63 . 50 6 . 49 FN 0 . 2360 0 . 1798 0 . 0514 BARRIER NOISE REDUCTION ANALYSIS ,WALL HEIGHT VARIABLE ------------------------------------------------------ REFERENCE VEHICLE LEVELS AT 50 FEET ----------------------------------- AUTO . . . . . . . . . = 70 . 13 M . TRUCE. . . . . . = 62 . 56 H . TRUCK . . . . . . = 63 . 87 PROJECT . . . . . . TRACT 26553 DESCRIPTION . . LOT 18 SOURCE ELEVATION . . . . . . . 160 . 2 RECEIVER ELEVAATION . . . . . 161 . 8 BARRIER ELEVATION . . . . . . 161 . 8 RECEIVER HEIGHT . . . . . . . . 5 DISTANCE TO SOURCE . . . . . 63 DISTANCE TO RECEIVER. . . 10 AUTO NOISE LEVEL . . . . . . 68 . 48646 MARK NOISE L:EVEL . . . . . . 60 . 91648 H . TRK NOISE LEVEL . . . . . . 62 . 22647 SOURCE NOISE LEVEL . . . . . 69 . 98 ANGULAR CORRECTION ( DB ) - 0 WALL HEIGHT ANL MTNL HTNL TNL TIL 0 . 00 68 . 49 60 . 92 62 . 23 69 . 98 -0 . 00 FN 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 6 . 00 61 . 91 54 . 61 56 . 80 63 . 65 6 . 33 FN 0 . 2055 0 . 1531 0 . 0375 BARRIER NOISE REDUCTION ANALVSIS ,WALL HEIGHT VARIABLE --------- REFERENCE VEHICLE LEVELS AT 50 FEET ----------------------------------- AUTO . . . . . . . . . = 70 . 13 M . TRUCK . . . . . . = 62 . 56 H. TRUCI: . . . . . . = 63 . 87 PROJECT . . . . . . TRACT 26533 DESCRIPTION . . LOT 21 SOURCE ELEVA'TION . . . . . . . 160 . 2 RECEIVER ELEVATION . . . . . 160 . 9 BARRIER ELEVATION . . . . . . 161 RECEIVER HEIGHT . . . . . . . . 5 DISTANCE TO SOURCE . . . . . 63 DISTANCE TO RECEIVER. . . 10 AUTO NOISE LEVEL . . . . . . 68 . 48646 M . TRK NOISE LEVEL . . . . . . 60 . 91648 H. TRK NOISE LEVEL . . . . . . 62 . 22647 SOURCE NOISE LEVEL . . . . . 69 . 98 ANGULAR CORRECTION AB) - 0 WALL HEIGHT ANL MTNL HTNL TVL TIL 0 . 00 68 . 49 60 . 92 62 . 23 69 . 98 -0 . 00 FN 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 6 . 00 61 . 93 54 . 63 56 . 82 63 . 68 6 . 31 FIN 0 . 2007 0 . 1488 0 . 0353 BARRIER NOISE REDUCTION ANALYSIS , WALL HEIGHT VARIABLE ------------------------------------------------------ REFERENCE VEHICLE LEVELS AT 50 FEET ----------------------------------- AUTO . . . . . . . . . = 70 . 13 M . TRUCK . . . . . . = 62 . 56 H . TRUCK . . . . . . = 63 . 87 PROJECT . . . . . . TRACT 26553 DESCRIPTION . . LOT 24 SOURCE ELEV'ATION . . . . . . . 159 . 5 RECEIVER ELEVATION . . . . . 160 BARRIER. ELEVATION . . . . . . 160 . 3 RECEIVER HEIGHT . . . . . . . . 5 DISTANCE TO SOURCE . . . . . 63 DISTANCE TO RECEIVER . . . 10 AUTO NOISE LEVEL . . . . . . 68 . 48646 M . TRK NOISE LEVEL . . . . . . 60 . 91648 H . TRK NOISE LEVEL . . . . . . 62 . 22647 SOURCE NOISE LEVEL . . . . . 69 . 98 ANGULAR CORRECTION ( DB ) - 0 WALL: HEIGHT ANL MTNL HTNL TNL TIL 0 . 00 68 . 49 60 . 92 62 . 23 69 . 9E -0 . 00 FN 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 6 . 00 61 . 73 54 . 46 56 . 63 63 . 48 6 . 50 FN 0 . 2395 0 . 1825 0 . 0526 BARRIER NOISE REDUCTION ANALPSIS , WALL HEIGHT VARIABLE ------------------------------------------------------ REFERENCE VEHICLE :LEVELS AT 50 FEET AUTO . (. i. . . . . . . = 70 . 1 , I•f. TRLCK . . . . . . = 62 . 5b H . TRUCK. . . . . . = 63 . 37 PROJECT . . . . . . TRACT 2655.3 DESCRIPTION . . LOT 27 SOURCE ELEV:ATION . . . . . . . 157 . 5 RECEIVER EL:EVATION . . . . . 158 . 3 BARRIER ELEVATION. . . . . . 158 . 3 RECEIVER HEIGHT . . . . . . . . 5 DISTANCE TO SOURC.E . . . . . 63 - DISTANCF. TO RECEIV.ER . . . 10 AUTO NOISE LEVEL . . . . . . 68 . 48646 M. TRIC NOISE LEVEL . . . . . . 60 . 91648 H . TRK NOISE LEVEL . . . . . . 62 . 22647 SOURCE NOISE LEVEL . . . . . 69 . 98 ANGULAR CORRECTION( DB ) - 0 WALL HEIGHT ANL MTNL HTNL TNL TIL 0 . 00 68 . 49 60 . 92 62 . 23 69 . 98 -0 . 00 FN 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 0 . 0000 6 . 00 62 . 03 54 . 70 56 . 90 63 . 77 6 . 22 FN 0 . 1825 0 . 1333 0 . 0280 7016110 U.S. vosranF �~ 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA922Wco _ LLJ d6-: *****AU*1'0(;K*-0036 > rn oi`i� � $ Kdward h Stepha pie Kad- 38110 rJ N yW = Halm/etei`f" ( A �2 .'Ill -7037 [ i tilt Mttiti ill ititititiii (A I 1111 „ 1 1 III111,111,„,fIlI till 1111111I11 till 11111 Ill Itill i2f ac.,(� lc����� ��o� S� City of Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(760)346-0611 •FAX(760)341-7098•http://www.paim-desert.org CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO.: TT 26553 Amendment NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CENTURY-CROWELL COMMUNITIES for approval of an amended tentative tract map to allow the subdivision 8.207 acres into 36 residential lots, 5 street lots, and 3 landscape lots for a total of 44 parcels, and a negative declaration of environmental impact as it relates thereto. Property is located within Avondale Country Club,located at the southwest corner of Eldorado and Frank Sinatra. Also known as A.P.N. 626- 030-021. Oil 9 � T 1 PR:3 II LA 11 .. SUBJECTQ�QOQo - .. r. -0RJ?ERTS' is �' _ ,. ,� 'IJIrT`,k` v1, �-�x--I:v/l a FI va . • • ' 1 `P.R.-3 3i jl� r ��J. �i.f M'••: t r,T n�� .0 .'ALM vnlll r Ullcrl:ry I:r l%P `�n.,• BB � •,P 1 III ''` �4:d�1 � ....P-R-r�-r . KV I;I IN111 rnl r.� RLgcIM � r.I ErIr CL wI .. _- •-_... PLgr SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, August 18, 1998, before the Palm Desert Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. Written comments concerning all items covered by this public hearing notice shall be accepted up to date of the Bearing. Information concerning the proposed project and/or negative declaration is available for review in the Department of Community Development/Planning at the above address between the hours of 8:00 a:m. and 5:00 p.m_. Monday"through Friday. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or p1-written corre.spondence delivered to the Planning Commission (or City Council) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISII: Desert Sun PHILIP DRELL, Secretary July 15, 1998 Palm Desert Planning Commission VONDALE POMEOWNERS &ASSOCIATION September 15, 1998 Century Crowell Communities 1535 South"D" Street Suite 200 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Re: Annexation Development The Association has received Elevation and Floor Plan Architectural Drawings for the Four (4) Home Models that are to be built in the Annexed Area. These plans coincide with the Conceptual Site Plan Scheme C (02/27/98) and the Annexation Agreement dated April 24, 1998. The Plans will be retained by Desert Management for reference purposes during the construction period. Sincerely, David H. Bryson,President Avondale Homeowners Association cc. Desert Management C of Palm weft 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(760)346-0611 •FAX(760)341-7098•http://www.paim-desert.org PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: August 19, 1998 Century Crowell Communities 1535 South "D" Street, Suite 200 San Bernardino, California 92408 Re: TT 26553 Amendment #1 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of August 18, 1998: PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED TT 26553 AMENDMENT NO. 1 BY ADOPTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1887, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. CARRIED 3-1 (COMMISSIONER FINERTY VOTED NO, COMMISSIONER FERNANDEZ WAS ABSENT). Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PHILIP DRELL, ECRETARRY� PALM DESERT LANNING COMMISSION PD/tm cc: Coachella Valley Water District Public Works Department Building & Safety Department Fire Marshal Wayne Guralnick Piper PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1887 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING, COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO TT 26553 APPROVING A 36 LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION AT THE NORTH END OF AVONDALE COUNTRY CLUB, AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ELDORADO AND FRANK SINATRA DRIVE. CASE NO. TT 26553 AMENDMENT NO. 1 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 18th day of August, 1998, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by CENTURY CROWELL COMMUNITIES for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 97-18," in that the Director of Community Development has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared; WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify approval of the tentative tract map: 1 . That the proposed tentative map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. 8. The design will allow unrestricted solar access to all lots. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1887 WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the planning commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City,of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby approve Tentative Tract Map No. 26553 Amendment #1 , subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, Exhibit B attached, is certified. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 18th day of August, 1998, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BEATY, JONATHAN, CAMPBELL NOES: FINERTY ABSENT: FERNANDEZ ABSTAIN: NONE SONIA M. CAMPBELL, Chairperson ATTEST: ��4 - PHILIP DRELL Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1887 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. TT 26553 AMENDMENT #1 Department of Community Development: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the Department of Community Development as modified by the following. 2. Final map shall be recorded for at least a portion of the project within two years from the date of this approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Trash provisions including recycling shall be approved by applicable trash company and city prior to issuance of building permit. 6. Applicant shall pay school impact fees as arranged by the Desert Sands Unified School District. 7. Project shall be subject to Art in Public Places fee per Ordinance No. 473. 8. That the applicant submit and receive approval of the architectural review commission of a landscape plan to be installed in the Frank Sinatra Drive parkway. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1887 9. That the single family lots shall be developed in compliance with the following provisions: Maximum Building Height 18 feet and 1 story Minimum Front Setback 15 feet - 20 feet to garage door Minimum Rear Setback 15 feet Minimum Side Yard Setback 10 feet one side, 0 feet on other Street Side Yard Setback 10 feet 10. That the developer shall prepare an acoustical analysis to provide appropriate design guidelines to adequately mitigate noise from the railway and freeway to a level consistent with the Noise Element of the General Plan for residential land use. 11 . That the applicant shall pay a one time fee of $1 ,000 which shall be forwarded to CVAG to be directed to Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan funding. 12. All sidewalk plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to Architectural Review Commission review of final landscape plan. 13. Applicant agrees to maintain the landscaping required to be installed pursuant to these conditions. Applicant shall enter into an agreement to maintain said landscaping for the life of the project, which agreement shall be notarized and which agreement shall be recorded. It is the specific intent of the parties that this condition and agreement run with the land and bind successors and assigns. The final landscape plan shall include a long-term maintenance program specifying, among other matters, appropriate watering times, fertilization and pruning for various times of the year for the specific materials to be planted, as well as periodic replacement of materials. All to be consistent with the Property Maintenance Ordinance (Ordinance No. 801 ) and the approved landscape plan. 14. The project shall be subject to all applicable fees at time of issuance of permits including,but not limited to., Art in Public Places, TUMF and school mitigation fees. Department of Public Works: 1 . Drainage fees in accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.49 and Ordinance No. 653 shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map or issuance of grading permits. 2. Any drainage facilities construction required for this project shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1887 by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. The subject study shall include analysis of the upstream drainage conditions as they impact this project. 3. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to issuance of any permits associated with this project or the recordation of the final map. 4. The project shall be subject to Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF). Payment of said fees shall be at the time of building permit issuance. 5. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. . 6. Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to the issuance of any permits. 7. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the Department of Public Works. 8. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to permit issuance. 9. All public and private improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of any permits associated with this project. 10. Landscape installation on the property frontages shall be water efficient in nature and shall be in accordance with the City of Palm Desert landscape design standards. Plans for the installation of the subject landscape improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. Landscaping maintenance for said landscape as well as that area designated "retention lot" shall be provided be provided through a property owners association. Applicant shall be responsible for executing a declaration of Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions, which declaration shall be approved by the City of Palm Desert and recorded with the County Recorder. The declaration shall specify: (a) the applicant shall oversee the formation of a property owners association; (b) the property owners association shall be formed prior to the recordation of the final map; and the aforementioned landscaping and 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1887 detention basin maintenance shall be the responsibility of the property owners association. 11 . In accordance with the Circulation Network of the Palm Desert General Plan, installation of a landscaped median island in Frank Sinatra Drive shall be provided. Landscape treatment shall be water efficient in nature and plans for the subject landscape improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. Landscape improvements shall be maintained by the subdivider for a period of ninety days from the date of acceptance of the improvements after which time maintenance shall be assumed by the city. 12. Applicant shall comply with the provisions of Municipal Code Section 24.12, Fugitive Dust Control as well as Section 24.20, Stormwater Management and Discharge Control. 13. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to recordation of final map or the issuance of any permits. 14. Waiver of access rights to Frank Sinatra Drive except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 15. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards and the city's Circulation Network. Specific project related offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to the following: * Construction of curb, gutter and paving as well as city standard sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration along Frank Sinatra Drive from Eldorado Drive westerly to Gerald Ford Drive. Rights-of-way as may be necessary for the construction of required public improvements shall be provided on the final map. 16. Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 17. Proposed building pad elevations are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1887 18. Prior to start of construction, the applicant shall submit satisfactory evidence to the Director of Public Works of intended compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) General Permit (Permit # CAS000002) for storm water discharges associated with construction activity. Riverside County Fire Department: 1 . With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plan check, Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with City Municipal Codes, appropriate NFPA Standards, CFC, UFC, and UBC and/or recognized Fire Protection Standards: The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10.301 C. .2. A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 1 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 3. Provide, or show there exists, a water system capable of providing a potential gallon per minute flow of 1500 for single family. The actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 GPM for two hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. 4. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6"x 4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2"), located not Less than 25' nor more than 200' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 5. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes and shall be clearly marked by painting and/or signs as approved by the Fire Marshal. 6 All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to within 150' of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story. The roadway shall be not less than 24' of unobstructed width and 13'6" of vertical clearance. Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall be 36' wide with parking on both sides, 32' wide with parking on one side. 7. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department. 7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1887 8. All new residences/dwellings are required to have illuminated residential addresses meeting both City and Fire Department approval. Shake single roofs are no longer permitted in the Cities of Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage or Palm Desert. ______ ._ D ► 7671 a9as _ ---- Date ` post-itim F ax Note From Go. To ro opt Phone# phone� Fax Fax# �- �r 8 PLANNING COMMISSIOi .iESOLLITION NO. 1887 EXHIBIT A Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 6 (commencing with section 15070) of the California Code of Regulations. NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NO: TT 26553 AMENDMENT #1 APPLICANT/PROJECT SPONSOR: Century Crowell Communities 1535 South "D" Street, Suite 200 San Bernardino, CA 92408 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: Amendment to TT 26553 to allow the subdivision of 8.207 acres into 36 residential lots at the north end of Avondale Country Club at the southwest corner of Eldorado and Frank Sinatra Drive. The Director of the Department of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects may be found in its entirety on file in the Department of Community Development. _ u 8 1998 PHILIP DREL DATE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 18, 1998 Commissioner Jonathan noted that the art galleries he has frequented didn't generate a lot of noise and asked if this art gallery was going to be an exception in some creative way. Mr. Holden didn't think so and asked if there had been any complaints about their existing gallery. Commissioner Jonathan replied no. Mr. Holden indicated that they weren't planning any concerts. Chairperson Campbell asked if anyone wished to speak in FAVOR of the proposal. There was no one. Chairperson Campbell asked if anyone wished to speak in OPPOSITION to this proposal. MS. GERTRUDE NEWMAN, 45-608 Ocotillo Drive, thought this building would create too much of a traffic hazard for them as they are in the residential area. Mr. Drell noted that the project would not have access to Ocotillo. There would be a gated emergency access which would then allow pedestrian access. Chairperson Campbell closed the public hearing and asked for commission comments. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Beaty, seconded by Chairperson Campbell, approving the findings as presented by staff. Motion carried 4-0. It was moved by Commissioner Beaty, seconded by Chairperson Campbell, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1886, approving PP/CUP 98-13, subject to conditions as amended. Motion carried 4-0. C. Case No. TT 26553 Amendment #1 - CENTURY CROWELL COMMUNITIES, Applicant Request for approval of an amended TT 26553 to allow the subdivision of 8.207 acres into 36 residential lots at the north 7 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 18, 1998 end of Avondale Country Club at the southwest corner of Eldorado and Frank Sinatra Drive. Mr. Drell stated that this project involved development of a vacant property associated with the Avondale Country Club. It previously had a tentative map approved for 22 single family lots. The location is on the north side of Avondale adjacent to Frank Sinatra. The amendment was to increase that map to 36 lots and eliminate what had been a proposed gate to Avondale that was going to be part of this project. He explained that Avondale is a planned community development with a golf course and homes and is currently zoned Planned Residential, three units per acre. With the addition of these lots, overall density of the project would still be far below that at 1 .35 units per gross acre. The parcel had been voted for annexation into the Avondale Homeowners Association. Therefore, the project would become part of the country club. Mr. Drell said that there were basically two issues which were also raised in correspondence the Commission received from a Charles McCabe, Charles and Beryl McFarland, Edward Chott and the from Goodyears who live on Tandika Trail which is a street directly south of the proposed project. Issues were the increase in the number of units from 22 to 36 and the elimination of the gated access. Instead, what was being provided were two emergency fire accesses. He indicated there was an internal dispute between property owners adjacent to this map and the overall expressed desires of the Avondale Homeowners Association. He said in Commission packets there was correspondence relative to the Homeowners Association's official position. There was apparently an election concerning the annexation, the design of the project, and accepting the property into the association specifically without a gate. The issue raised by those objecting to the project concerning the gate is that all of the traffic movements generated by the new project would have to go past their area of Avondale to go to the main access. Based on this concern a traffic study was conducted which analyzed the impact of the overall project with or without a gate. The conclusion was that if a gate was opened onto Frank Sinatra, while a portion of the traffic generated by the project would exit that gate, also a portion of the existing homes in Avondale who now all travel to the southeast to exit would also now be traveling to this gate to exit. For example, if they were heading to the freeway and were closest to this access, this would be the most convenient way to leave. Basically, the traffic consultant concluded that in comparing the two, there would be virtually no discernible difference. In essence the increased traffic from existing residents would equal the increase resulting from the new project if there were no gate at all. Based on that staff 8 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 18, 1998 determined that traffic was not an issue in terms of comparing the project with a gate or without a gate. The property and number of units proposed was within the approved zoning and typically they rely on homeowners' associations in these situations to guide the city and advise staff as to the compatibility and acceptable nature of subsequent developments within their jurisdiction. Again, the types of units generally being proposed were not dissimilar to products that have been developed in Desert Falls Country Club that have in addition to very large single family homes moderate sized attached units and stacked two story units. The same occurs at Palm Valley Country Club and to a somewhat different degree in terms of scale at Bighorn Country Club. He explained that the diversity of housing types was not unusual in country clubs and was inherent in the concept of the PR zone. He said that based on a determination of compliance with the zoning, the determination that traffic impacts from one alternative to the other were not significant, based on a question raised as to the Fire Marshal's condition relative to the two emergency accesses there was a letter from the Fire Marshal reiterating his desire to have two emergency accesses, and the again the Homeowners Association, who was in charge of representing the overall best interests of the development, with all of that staff was recommending approval of the map and based on the findings of the traffic study which represented the main identified potential environmental impact and the determination that it was not significant, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact was prepared. He said there was a request for distribution of a copy yesterday of that Negative Declaration and staff had not been able to respond yet. If the person who made the request was present tonight, staff would give them a copy tonight. Chairperson Campbell opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to address the Commission. MR. HARRY CROWELL, of Century Crowell, stated that he has been a nearly 20-year resident of Avondale and member of the Homeowners Association and he was also the developer and part of the team developing the last group of homes in Avondale. He said they have spent a lot of hours and years working on this design, working with the residents within Avondale, and more recently working with City of Palm Desert staff and he believed they have reached full concurrence with all of the city requirements and the requirements of the Homeowners Association and at this time they would like to leave it up to Commission's questioning of anything they wanted to ask him and 9 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 18, 1998 requested that they be able to address any questions brought up by anyone in the audience. Chairperson Campbell asked for clarification that Mr. Crowell lived in Avondale. Mr. Crowell stated that right at the moment he didn't have a home in there but he would be having one as soon as they got some houses started. His brother lives there full time. Chairperson Campbell asked if Mr. Crowell would be able to tell her the price range at which the homes would sell. Mr. Crowell said they would be in the $300,000 to $400,000 price range. Chairperson Campbell asked if that was equivalent to some of the homes in there right now. Mr. Crowell said they were about in the same price range. Some were above, some below. He said there were some very nice homes just completed, one 7,400 square foot home. He said the proposed houses would be from 2,000+ to about 3,000 square feet and would all be finished with pools and landscaping completely on each home. There would be side yard fences and all the landscaping would be in place for the buyer. Chairperson Campbell asked if the homes would lower the property values of the existing homes. Mr. Crowell said he didn't think so. Chairperson Campbell asked if a gate was to be installed on Frank Sinatra, if all the homeowners in Avondale would then be required to pay an assessment toward that gate. Mr. Crowell said there would be a monthly increase in the homeowners dues for everyone in the development. He indicated they have discussed this many years with many of the residents of Avondale and the general consensus was that they prefer a single entrance and exit for security purposes. He said he has been an active member of the 10 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 18, 1998 Riverside Sheriff's Department and the San Bernardino Sheriff's Department for a number of years. He reviewed it currently with Larry Smith, our Sheriff, and Royce Byrd, our previous Sheriff, and in discussing this they both went to the property with him. He also reviewed it with Gary Penrod, their San Bernardino County Sheriff and his senior people, who have also been to the project with him regarding gates and security for people. He as one who lived there prefers the security and they wouldn't get it with a second gate, not without a high cost of a personal 24-hour guard service. He said it was very difficult to man the gate and he felt it would create more traffic through the development, reduce the number of houses and overall he felt the proposal was a very good plan. They have two cul-de-sacs with emergency exits reviewed and suggested by the fire department and police department for emergency ingress/egress and they all feel that Frank Sinatra Drive access could become somewhat of a traffic hazard for people who weren't paying a lot of attention going in and out because as they all know, it is a single purpose road not used by a lot of people and if they travel on that road, sometimes a lot of them don't pay as much attention when they are driving as they could. That was part of their thought process where the entrance on Eldorado was well maintained, monitored and seemed to be adequate according to the traffic reports that were put out. One of the other things was that two thirds of the people who own homes in Avondale don't live there full time so traffic was really reduced from what a normal traffic study would show. Chairperson Campbell asked if there were many school aged children in the community. Mr. Crowell said he didn't know of any. Some grandchildren were there, but not on a normal basis that he was aware of. He has been there a long time and didn't recall seeing very many children. Chairperson Campbell asked if these new homes would attract families with small children that would be going to school that would require quite a few vehicle trips during the day. Mr. Crowell said it wasn't really a family oriented area. Most of the residents were from far away places and as they get a little older they spend more time and there. There were quite a few people that have 11 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 18, 1998 moved in full time from other states, but in his experience they didn't have a lot of full time residents and indicated that perhaps some of the people in the audience could answer that better than him. Commissioner Finerty noted that it said that the vote on the annexation package was 77%. She asked how many people voted. Mr. Crowell said he thought it was almost everyone, but the president was present and could answer that question. Chairperson Campbell asked if anyone wished to speak in FAVOR of the proposal. MR. STAN MATTOON, a resident of Avondale and a member of the Homeowners Association Board of Directors, addressed the Commission. He clarified that 199 of the 270 homeowners voted and it was 77% of those that voted. Regarding children, he thought there was one family in his neighborhood that has two little kids, but they were getting ready to move. He didn't know of any school age children. Most of the residents were retired. Commissioner Jonathan asked if when the Board and residents considered this matter if they were aware of the two primary issues that the Commission seemed to be addressing tonight, specifically the increase of units from 22 to 36 and the elimination of the gated access. Mr. Mattoon replied yes. Chairperson Campbell asked for testimony of anyone in OPPOSITION to the proposal. MRS. ELOISE GOODYEAR, 38-230 Tandika Trail, said that she was assuming that they all saw the picture that was sent in to the Planning Commission. She showed the location of her home and the Wingren's home. She said that Mr. Crowell built her home and the other Crowell built Wingren's home. She said if they were to lie down there in six feet, and she showed the location of their breakfast room and master bedroom, she said their heads would be in both of the rooms. This was why they were speaking about traffic congestion and it being harmful to their property and values. She said she wasn't at the meeting to 12 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 18, 1998 fight this project. She said she looks out at it with her cup of coffee every morning and this vacant lot wasn't nice to look at because it wasn't maintained. Steven's Estate was supposed to keep this prepared and taken care of and it has never been done. The Board had never enforced it to be done. Mrs. Goodyear stated that the traffic condition in Avondale is horrendous. They speed and she can barely back out of her driveway because there was a hill that comes down. They weren't controlling traffic now and she asked what they were going to do with 36 more homes in there. She said she wasn't at the meeting to be a complainer about the project. She wanted it built and Frank Sinatra finished as much as the Commission and it needed to be done, but she didn't like the way it was presented by Mr. Crowell or their homeowners. She informed Commission that she is a real estate broker and she has been State Director for California Real Estate Association, she has been president of homeowners' boards, she and her husband have developed condos, and she presently owns Goodyear Realty in San Marino. She said she wasn't talking over the top of her head just to be talking, she wanted the Commission to listen to her, that she has true cause for why she was here because apparently their Board had a blind and deaf ear and when this vote went through it was a no choice vote. They had nothing to vote for. They either voted for it yes or no. There was no choice of a residential gate put on anything. They felt that was very unfair. Then Mr. Crowell walked in and said he builds 36 homes with no residential gate or he would walk out. That was what the Board told them. The Board never combated, never went back and said, "Mr. Crowell, there are people in here that would like to have a residential gate. They feel that maybe about 80% of the people that are building in the new project would use that gate and it would alleviate some of the traffic." Mrs. Goodyear said they were never listened to and they never went back to Mr. Crowell, that she knew of, to ask if he would build a residential gate. He was now building two and he's got room to put a residential gate, but she couldn't decide that and all she could do was plead with the Commission to listen to their side of the case. Another thing was that this wasn't a very convenient time to have a meeting because there were so many people out of Avondale and out of the desert at this particular time of the year to present themselves and the two letters she brought in tonight, one was a fax and one was delivered today because they weren't aware of the meeting and there were so few people notified, only those within 300 feet, and then people in Chicago didn't get the message. She said she 13 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 18, 1998 didn't want to be lengthy because the Commission would shut her up. She stated that most people don't understand development of real estate and how increased density and traffic would erode their property values and it's always said that if you buy on a busy street you get a bargain. This was a well known real estate fact. She said she has never been involved in a real estate association or ever heard of one where it didn't take 66 and two-thirds vote to pass something of this magnitude. They just flung it out there and didn't say how many votes it would take, just the majority of votes that came in. She felt there were just under 300 votes that could have come in and a lot of people back east were gone and didn't even get the votes and didn't answer. Another thing she did not appreciate was when Mr. Crowell made his presentation to the homeowners. The plans he submitted then has varied to now. She was not saying that they probably are not upgraded, but they were not the original plans and guessed it was an amended plan. She said they videoed that meeting and she knows everything that was said and not said and he was not able to answer lot sizes to the people or other factual questions and it ended up, the presentation, which she thought was in poor taste, with a free cocktail party and they served prior and during the discussions. It was so noisy and unruly that a developer tried to talk on the other side of the room to no avail and Mr. Crowell's table, who was sitting up there, when people got up and made suggestions they booed people that even wanted to know more about what was happening. She said she has proof of everything she was saying. Mrs. Goodyear also said that she was told by one of the planners that Mozambique was always a feeder street. That was not true. When they purchased 15 years ago from Mr. Harry Crowell, it was a dead end street which joined the golf course and it was used only by them for maintenance purposes. Now they were saying it was always a feeder street. She never heard that it was always a feeder street. They could see by the narrowness of the street in the picture, and that happened to be Mr. Crowell's 4 x 4 coming through there when cars were parked on either side, that showed there would be congestion on that street. Plus the fact that people would have to dodge the golfers between three and four and they have to stop at Tandika. If they don't, they will get killed and then they would have to go to the main gate. That meant there would be a lot of pollution, a lot of stopping, and a lot of noise there because it would be continual. It didn't matter whether they are families or whatever. Families could buy in there very easily because it was easy to buy with 14 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 18, 1998 of the gate in analyzing the impact in this particular area would not have an effect. Mr. Reid said he challenged that. He thought that should be reevaluated because if he was going to go north to the freeway, it would be more convenient for him to go out the main gate and faster to go up Eldorado and turn on Frank Sinatra rather than wind his way through the project, and a lot safer. What Mr. Drell was saying was that they were going to add 36 units with the people and the maintenance and the gas company and television and not increase traffic by his house. Mr. Drell said he didn't say that. He explained that what he said was that the completion of the project will increase traffic by his house but in comparing the traffic projected to go by his house in the general area of Tandika the increase in traffic when compared with this project, with a gate and without a gate, looking at those in close proximity to this gate and deciding how many of those people were likely to go north and how many were going to go south, the majority of the people in the project would continue to go south. But again, they were only talking about 36 units in the new project in a 200-unit project. In assigning those existing units, which was a minority but it was enough to make a difference, who are likely to go north, that made up for those proposed units that would utilize that gate and not have to go south. He said he would make the study available to Mr. Reid and thought the study was made available to the Goodyears. (Mrs. Goodyear spoke from the audience and said it wasn't and there was a request from her lawyer.) Mr. Drell indicated that he received the letter from her attorney yesterday and would make it available to him. Mr. Reid said to finalize his position, the addition of a gate in lieu of two emergency gates was not going to affect the security of Avondale. Mr. Drell said he would like to clarify two things. One, the City staff is absolutely neutral relative to whether or not there is a gate. Based upon our study, he didn't see a significant impact either way. Ultimately he felt it was a decision that should be left up to the residents and Homeowners Association of Avondale. If the decision was made that there should be a gate and the people there want a gate, he had absolutely no problem with them having a gate. Relative to security, while he wasn't a security expect, it was again a decision that the residents of Avondale have to evaluate. There were many 17 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 18, 1998 projects that have remote gates, but he didn't know if there was a problem with them. Mr. Reid said that over ten years there has been a reduction in crime rates within the gated communities with the addition of that type of gate because it was unmanned. As he read the map, there was no loss of any lot by putting in a gate. Mr. Drell indicated that typically when they have a gate they needed space for cars to get off the street before they get to the gate and the plan proposed didn't include that and might create that area and they needed a place if people are rejected if by chance they come up to the gate and can't get in and someone gets behind them, they typically needed room to turn around and get out. It would require some redesign of the map but whether they would lose lots, he wasn't sure. Mr. Reid said if they looked at the proposed northeast emergency gate, there is a lot there beside it to the west that was apparently not meant to be built on. It wasn't that large. The loss of that lot would certainly not affect Mr. Crowell's project. Commissioner Jonathan stated that the Commission was very interested in Mr. Reid's comments and asked him to proceed because the Commission tries to limit the speakers to five minutes. He noted there were a lot of people at the meeting that all wanted to be heard also. He requested Mr. Reid to proceed with his concerns. Commissioner Finerty noted that Mr. Reid talked about the ballot that went out to the people. The issue was that when the people buy homes, if they could become members of the HOA. She asked if that was the only question on the ballot. Mr. Reid said yes. Commissioner Finerty asked if Mr. Reid had a copy of the ballot. Mr. Reid said no. 18 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 18, 1998 Commissioner Finerty asked if anyone in the audience had a copy of the ballot. (A lady in the back came forward and gave the ballot to Commissioner Finerty.) Chairperson Campbell asked Mr. Reid where he lived on Tandika and his proximity to the corner of Mozambique and Tandika. Mr. Reid said he lived two houses from the corner. Chairperson Campbell asked if he was the second house from the corner. There was some discussion in the audience and Chairperson Campbell again asked where Mr. Reid lived on Tandika in relation to the corner of Mozambique. Mr. Reid said he was north of the main gate on Tandika, two houses. Chairperson Campbell asked if that was a mile away. Mr. Reid said no. Mrs. Goodyear also spoke from the audience and said it was the first or second duplex there where they come in from the main gate. He and another person were the first ones on the street. Chairperson Campbell thanked them and asked if anyone else wished to address the commission. MR. GEORGE SANDERS, 38-811 Tandika, stated that he was not against the project, but he was against not having a gate exit at the north end of Avondale. He bought his house in 1972 and became a permanent resident in 1977. Any plan he ever saw about the possibility of developing that property always showed an entrance and exit on Frank Sinatra. He said he made a count of the number of units, liveable units, not fillers, because they have two units in several buildings. There would be an increase in traffic of 40% in front of his house and he thought that was quite an increase in traffic. When they buy in a residential area, they don't expect to have all that kind of traffic. He believed that the gate should be put in there and not at a substantial cost to Mr. Crowell. He might lose a lot or two, but he was increasing the number of lots from 22 to 36 without taking into consideration that there should be a gate there. He voted against the annexation of that 19 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 18, 1998 area for the very reason that there was no gate shown on the information that was sent to them. MR. JIM LEWIS, Desert Management, stated that there was a very important point that needed to be brought out. That was that the Association and the developer have been instructed that if a gate was put on Frank Sinatra, if they were exiting the property they would only be able to make a right-hand turn and head east on Frank Sinatra or if they were trying to enter the property, they would have to be traveling east on Frank Sinatra to enter in. Any area that a gate would be installed would be so close to the intersection of Eldorado and Frank Sinatra that they could not have a total traffic flow gate on Frank Sinatra. He felt that was a very important point that hadn't been brought up and discussed this evening. He thought that would clarify many different issues and trains of thought of what constitutes a gate at the north end of Avondale. Mrs. Goodyear spoke from the audience and said she addressed that when she was at the city planning commission and thought it was Mr. Drell that said it was a possibility that they would allow a median there. MR. ERNIE BEALE, a ten-year resident of Avondale Country Club at 39- 740 Tandika Trail, said that between Country Club and Frank Sinatra is exactly one mile. The entrance to the club itself, Avondale Golf Club, bisects that area. In other words, it is a half mile from either Frank Sinatra and/or Country Club into the main entrance of the project. The folks who talked tonight would have the Commission believe that they are living within close proximity of the proposed Avondale gate that considerably inconveniences them and he couldn't see that happening. The traffic they had a picture of he thought was on Monday through Friday where, because they don't live under condominium law and were all single family residences, so each of them had their own gardeners and pool person. Most of them also have people that take care of their homes for them. Consequently, at various times of the day early in the day and in the afternoon these people leave the property, never to be seen again until the next day, hardly causing horrendous traffic that he heard tonight. In addition to that, he asked Commission to take into consideration that the widening of Frank Sinatra was part of this proposal. Currently Frank Sinatra is two lanes, one in each direction. Because there is no stop between Cook and Eldorado, they have a one- 20 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 18, 1998 mile stretch of roadway that is only two lanes wide and it is used like a race track. He even found himself going 50 mph because there isn't anything to stop him. If the gate would permit egress from the project, it would be a very dangerous gate because it would be limited in sight by a hedge and secondly, being a right turn only the driver would have to cautiously exit because he was going into traffic traveling on two lanes under the proposal, each of which would be going 50 mph and as Cook Street and the development of the university across on Frank Sinatra develops, they were looking at a potential speedway. He thought that would be far more dangerous than what they have and the minute or two that people might have to give up to use the main gate. Eldorado had recently been repaved and it would be re-striped and it was the only road that he knew that was six lanes wide and only two miles long and according to the traffic count on it, he wondered how they ever paved it. They did and they were happy for that. He asked the Commission to take into consideration that those of them that live there and have for some time, and it was a golf club closed to the public so they don't get public attendance at their golf matches, the restaurant wasn't open to the public as some of the neighboring clubs are, and from the standpoint of traffic it was at a minimum. Basically at any time of the day, outside of the gardener or pool person parked on the street, no one parks on the street. They all have a 25 mph speed limit, they were careful and from a standpoint of danger, he hasn't even seen a sparrow run over. They don't have kids and they weren't that sort of an area. Most of them were retired people. They have their grandchildren. The greater part of the club members, particularly the ones that live there year round, were members of the golf club and very seldom leave the complex. They love their golf game. The proposal as they've seen it before was voted on in a legitimate manner. The cares and concerns for danger that were brought to Commission by the opponents just didn't exist. He thanked the Commission. Mrs. Goodyear spoke from the audience and asked Mr. Beale if he ever went out at night because there were solid cars parked on Tandika Drive, solid cars. Chairperson Campbell interrupted and asked if anyone else wished to address the Commission. There was no one. Chairperson Campbell asked Mr. Crowell for rebuttal comments. 21 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 18, 1998 Mr. Crowell stated that he just wanted to make a comment about what Mr. Reid and Mrs. Goodyear stated. He said when he first bought into the project about 1978 or 1979, there was a proposed development for that last eight acres. There was a golf maintenance shed and there was an entrance and exit for the golf course maintenance which was moved to the west end of the property and further opened up. With the housing lots developed, there were 22 lots, duplexes, scheduled for that property with no access on Frank Sinatra and as long as he has been aware of the project there has been no proposal for that. Mr. Steven's or his estate a couple of years ago had a plan developed showing an access out on Frank Sinatra which was clearly discussed with many members of the homeowners association of which he didn't recall anyone wanting the gate other than the Goodyears talking about it and Mr. Reid lives right at the entrance to the existing gate on Eldorado. That might be why he wants another exit. It has been thoroughly discussed with many members of the association and the ballot that went out was written by the homeowners association attorney, Wayne Guralnick, and the Board, and it was properly dispersed and votes were counted by the homeowners association and he believed it was an accurate, honorable well-publicized event. They invited homeowners to come for a showing of their proposal prior to the vote so everyone that was in the area and they chose it at the height of the season so they did have a good turn out of 100 or more people. He didn't have a count, but there was a lot of discussion and show and tell and the vote was taken after that meeting, probably a month later, so there was plenty of time for discussion among the homeowners. He said if there were no more questions, he would request a positive vote for them to continue. He thanked the Commission. Chairperson Campbell closed the public hearing and asked the commission for comments. Commissioner Finerty stated that she could appreciate very much the hard work that went into preparing the ballot and went into the fact sheet that went out to all of the homeowners. She, too, was president of a homeowner's association and has been a board member for ten years and she knew how difficult it was to try and balance the wishes of all homeowners. But she has learned whenever they have an issue it is always best to give both sides of the issue. What they do in their association is a point counter point and they include associated costs and potential revenues. The fact here was 22 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 18, 1998 that they wouldn't really know which homeowners want the gate because they were really never asked, according to the material that went out. She would feel more comfortable if another vote was taken of the association with that option, associated costs and maintenance of the gate. Commissioner Jonathan thought that some of the concerns they heard tonight about the gate, traffic and noise were sincere and that there is some validity to them. However, as a planning commissioner looking at the proposed project, it was in compliance with code, whether it has a gate or not it is compliance with code, so that was more of a personal choice on the part of the developer who has taken the added step to consult with the Association. He really tried to shy away from internal issues and appreciated Commissioner Finerty's comments, which he felt were well founded, but he didn't want to get involved in internal matters, whether the ballot was worded properly or not, whether it presented all sides, or whether it presented all sides fairly. From what he could tell there was an internal process that has been undertaken and it has been undertaken in a reasonably fair and comprehensive manner and therefore the conclusion he could see was that the homeowners overwhelming support the addition of the project or the addition to their project as it was presented to the Commission tonight. Given that it is in compliance and he didn't discern any negative impacts to the overall project and certainly not to Palm Desert as a community, he would be in favor of the project as presented. He had one other comment. He said he was very regretful, since Palm Desert is still a small town and most know each other and this process was to enable them to talk to each other and for an application to be heard. He was disturbed that the first brush they got in that communication process from one resident was a letter from an attorney. He said he would hope in the future that they all give communication a shot before they run to their attorney. He was bothered to see that, although it certainly did not impact his conclusion. Commissioner Beaty stated that he was generally in concurrence with Commissioner Jonathan. The issues raised by the opponents didn't seem to be supported by the facts. He wasn't reading on the ballot what was reported and going on the assumption that WPA Traffic Engineering out of Laguna Hills is a certified, competent firm, of which he was sure they were since the City of Palm Desert hired them, and their statements that even though there would be an increase in traffic the gate issue was really a moot point, he would be in favor of the project. 23 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 18, 1998 Chairperson Campbell stated that she, too, concurred with Commissioners Jonathan and Beaty. They looked to the homeowners' association for their say so in matters like this since they were not in the community and as far as the project was concerned, she didn't think it would really impact many of the neighbors that were here with only 36 new homes. She said she lives in a gated community and they didn't seem to have any problems, especially if most people are retired and there weren't many children where the mothers have to go back and forth through the gate. She was also in favor of the project. She asked for a motion. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Beaty, seconded by Commissioner Jonathan, approving the findings as presented . by staff. Motion carried 3-1 (Commissioner Finerty voted no). It was moved by Commissioner Beaty, seconded by Commissioner Jonathan, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1887, approving TT 26553 Amendment #1 , subject to conditions. Motion carried 3-1 (Commissioner Finerty voted no). D. Case Nos. GPA 98-5, C/Z 98-6 and DA 98-2 - DEL WEBB CALIFORNIA CORP. Applicant Request for recommendation of approval to the City Council of: 1 ) the general planning and prezoning for the purpose of future annexation of property generally located north of Interstate 10 and Varner Road, east of Washington Street, west of Adams Street and south of Frances Way to PCD (Planned Community Development); 2) adoption of a development agreement which would, among other matters, vest existing Del Webb Sun City Palm Desert County of Riverside approvals; and 3) certification of an addendum to the County of Riverside Environmental Impact Report as amended for Specific plan No. 281 as it pertains to the above. Mr. Drell explained that this was a pre-annexation adoption of a very comprehensive extensively studied and analyzed specific plan and substantially implemented specific plan for the Del Webb development. They were simply adopting the product of the process that the County has been going through for the last number of years and most recently just amended. They received one letter of comment from the attorneys of the Adams Ranch property to the 24 v� � C�a�� 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(619)346-0611 FAX TRANSMISSION COVER LETTER FAX: (619) 341-7098 T0:�( �4 GLILJ� — ' 1G�iN�l�V DATE: i COMPANY: I' FAX NUMBER: lJ� C FRO .� DEPARTMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- MESSAGE: / Number of pages transmitted A5-� (including cover page) i 31E jE�E Z'l2 11 SM I SS I ON Fz EPC 'I' AUG-19-98 10:21 ID: 7603417098 CITY OF PALM DESERT J08 ICI"ME3 E l2 J33 I lllF C3lQ-tMA-r I ON CODE OK TELEPHONE NUMBER IS497SBO511 NAME( ID NUMBER) 714 79B 0511 START TIME AUG-IS-98 10:09 PAGES TRANSMITTED 045 TRANSMISSION MODE EMMR RESOLUTION STD REDIALING TIMES 00 SECURITY OFF MAILBOX OFF MACHINE ENGAGED 11 -48 THIS TRANSMISSION IS COMPLETED. LAST SUCCESSFUL PAGE 045 II 73 510 FREO WA R:N6 ORtV E,PALM OESERT.CALIFORN:A 92260 TELEPHONE(6l9)346-06'I1 I .57 PAR T12lfN$HS6EZON GOV£R LETTER I I so e �1/lA__%L 11� l(-�`�MJ — /)l•Z•••�i�.� nAxE-�//� /J�`/O�j /' ----------------U------------------------------------------------------ M£SSAGE 0 .AO o s/�--• .�-c.2�s_'�� C6Fill:d� ,9w o t / Num ar o� pagoa traaamittad �� C iz�c iu810g cover gaga) I I I "SEEING DATE: SPEAKERS Oral Communications and/or Public Hearings If you are attending the Planning Commission Meeting to address the Planning Commission,whether it is a scheduled Agenda item or comments under oral communications, please complete the following information and give it to the Chairperson in advance of the meetin Thank you. NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK UNDER ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ABOUT AGENDA ITEM PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IN FAVOR OF OPPOSED TO (CHECK ONE) Completion of this card is voluntary. You may attend and participate in the meeting regardless of whether or not you complete this document. Its purpose is to aid staff in compiling complete and accurate records. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation. "FETING DATE: SPEAKERS Oral Communications and/or Public Hearings . If you are attending the Planning Commission Meeting to address the Planning Commission,whether it is a scheduled Agenda item or comments under oral communications, please complete the following information and give it to the Chairperson injadvance of the meeting. Thank u. NAME t/LIGILL I t.-M t D ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER e� AVQtLA-GLri %, F—I- c 1 WOULD PTO SPEAK UNDER I 2�o J 3 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ABOUT AGENDA ITEM PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IN FAVOR OF OPPOSED TO (CHECK ONE) Completion of this card is voluntary. You may attend and participate in the meeting regardless of whether or not you complete this document. Its purpose is to aid staff in compiling complete and accurate records. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation. &Ux Ak ADVISORY BALL(JFhE: ANNEXATION OF NORTH EM,• PROPERTY INTO AVONDALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION The undersigned, as record owner of a membership in the above-named Association, takes the following advisory action with respect to the proposed annexation of the property at the north end of the subdivision, described in the attached page, which text is made a part of this postcard written ballot by this reference. Q YES �=NSENT- to 7'and' of Ch 'noith 'd of §UbdMsion:into?AVonda ......... annexation 4 w .,,.pn, i�, ...................... .......... 'p ............... ... H' accordanceiwith,.th6�termslponditons�desen'bed,,herei.'.?,,�,,��, _gm Fa IRE NO 4*'Ad NOT;CONSENT165 and,do �appyqye�� Mh6khtioriii6f the:no �en d*d NOT. ' fth' d' f the bdi .�su Ivi into`Avondele Homeowners -oci-ati"o'n:.i'n:'accordaftce'*.W-th the'terms/conditions'described heieIn., Rlu� I $M.*,., Please return this advisory ballot to the Association prior to May 14, 1998 for early tabulation. This ballot must be received postmarked by May 21, 1998, to be counted. DATED: Name (please print) Signature: Your Avondale Address: Board of Directors AVONDALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION c/o Desert Management P. 0. Box 799 Rancho Mirage, California 92270-0799 VONDALE POMEOWNERS �1 OCIATION May 1, 1998 TO ALL MEMBERS OF AVONDALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION: For the past several months, the Board of Directors has been negotiating with the Developer of the property at the north end of our subdivision in an effort to secure terms which would be in the best interests of the entire membership. In spite of the fact that the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for Avondale Homeowners Association (CC&R's) specifically indicate that the Board has the right to annex this property, the Board determined that it will not annex the property unless a majority of those members voting approve. We, therefore, enclose a description of the terms of the Agreement under which the annexation would be approved, and a postcard for you to make your approval or disapproval known. Please review this information carefully. If you have any questions, or wish to review the actual Agreement, you may contact our Association Manager, Cindy Bieter, at (760) 862-1202. Then send the ballot to us no later than May 21, 1998. We are confident that you will find this annexation beneficial to our subdivision and urge you to vote for this addition. The Board of Directors AVONDALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION AVONDALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ADVISORY BALLOT REGARDING ANNEXATION As you may know,there have been many ongoing negotiations related to the annexation of the property at the north end of our subdivision. The enclosed ballot postcard is for the purpose of informally polling the membership to ascertain whether annexation, based upon the terms and conditions below, would be acceptable. If a majority of the votes cast are affirmative on this advisory ballot, the Board of Directors will proceed to annex the north end under the terms of the Agreement. The following terms and conditions have been agreed upon to best serve the interests of the entire membership at no additional cost to the Association or existing Owners in the original subdivision, yet provide realistic requirements for the Developer. They include the following: STREETS AND ENTRANCES • The new developed area may be advertised only as one of the following names: "Avondale Homes", "New Homes at Avondale" and/or "Fairway Homes at Avondale." • All construction traffic shall be required to use the construction access gate along Frank Sinatra. Frank Sinatra Drive between Desert Falls and El Dorado will be widened to a four-lane divided street. The emergency gate as required by the City will be located along this boundary. Barriers will be installed to prevent traffic from accessing the existing Avondale project. • Mozambique Drive will be extended at its current width through the new areas. • Because of the increased traffic at the El Dorado entrance, the Developer will provide $18,000 for the ss Aociation to upgrade the El Dorado entrance. ARCHITECTURAL/LANDSCAPE ISSUES • Any residential unit constructed in the new area will be subject to architectural approval by the Association. • A total of thirty-six units are to be built, each with two-car garages and additional "cart" barn, in the following estimated square footage: Plan 1 (3 units) —2027 square feet; Plan 2 (12 units) —2215 square feet; Plan 3 (10 units) --2400 square feet; Plan 4 (11 units) --2900 square feet. • No two homes of the same elevation will be located adjacent to each other, and there will be no two-story plans. No two Plan 1 homes will be located adjacent to each other. • All architectural structures and dimensions will comply with existing Association requirements (including set- backs), and any pools, patio covers, fencing, gazebos and other structures separate from the residential unit will require approval by the Architectural Committee. The entire project shall have a density factor of 4.5 units per acre, which is below the higher density of the surrounding developments. • A stonewall matching the wall for the maintenance yard will be built beginning at the boundary between Desert Falls and Avondale golf course, along Frank Sinatra, and terminating at Frank Sinatra and El Dorado. • All landscaping within the new common area will be subject to Association approval, and shall include irrigation, low voltage lighting, and a meandering sidewalk outside the perimeter wall along Frank Sinatra, installed at Developer's (not Association's) expense. ASSESSMENTS • The Association shall receive approximately$3500/month for 36 units, or approximately $41,000/year. • The income from these additional assessments will substantially exceed the monthly maintenance expenses required for the additional landscaping and street areas. CONTRIBUTION TO RESERVES AND VOTING ISSUES • The Developer will have no voting rights to any of the lots until they are sold to a retail-purchaser. • Each new retail purchaser will be required to pay$300 to the Association's reserve fund. A conceptual site plan, as well additional information from the Developer, is also enclosed. Please return the enclose advisory ballot no later than May 21, 1998. For further information and/or a copy of the Agreement which was negotiated between the Association and Century- Crowell Communities, please contact our Property Manager, Cindy Bieter, at (760) 862-1202. ADVISORY BALLOT RE: ANNEXATION OF NORTH END PROPERTY INTO AVONDALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION The undersigned, as record owner of a membership in the above-named Association, takes the following advisory action with respect to the proposed annexation of the property at the north end of the subdivision, described in the attached page, which text is made a part of this postcard written ballot by this reference. Q YES I/We CONSENT to and approve of the annexafion of the north end":of the subdivision rrto Avondale Homeowners Associafion an accordance with the terfns/conditions described herein 0 NO I/N+e do NOT CONSENT td'and do NOT approve of the anneXatiOn;of the north end of the subdivision info Avondale Homeowners Association m accordance with the tarms/con dibons described herein Please return this advisory ballot to the Association prior to May 14, 1998 for early tabulation. This ballot must be received / postmarked by May 21, 1998, to be counted. DATED: Name (please print) Signature: Your Avondale Address: J,�4 4 . 41: � , 1 AVONDALE GOLF CONCEPTUALCenturV-Crowell Communities SCHEME C . . GROSSGROSS ACRES: 7.97 ACRES NO. OF UNITS: 36 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS DENSITY: SQUAREPLAN 1 3 UNITS 2027 SQUARE FEET PLAN 3 10 UNITS 00 SQUARE PLAN 4 11 UNITS 2900 SQUARE Vd"C sow 1JM11 ONVe _ .+� ivs/etarr.ecirr. . Csv)/v47 eN.ATA N/LL 3 3 4 4 2 - 4 r � 1 • 2 2 .� � AVONDALE GOLF CLUB Century-Crowell Communities l,ali�oraia a nauorita .hiomo6uiGrr� CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN SCHEME C 02/27/98 GROSS ACRES: 7.97 ACRES NO. OF UNITS: 36 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS GROSS DENSITY: 4.5 UNITS/ACRE PLAN 1 3 UNITS 2027 SQUARE FEET PLAN 2 12 UNITS 2215 SQUARE FEET PLAN 3 10 UNITS . 2400 SQUARE FEET PLAN 4 11 UNITS 2900 SQUARE FEET 36 UNITS TOTAL I HAVE REVIEWED THIS SITE PLAN, AND MY ENDORSEMENT IS AS FOLLOWS: APPROVAL: SIGNATURE DATE DISAPPROVAL: SIGNATURE DATE p 1 l III III III IIIII III II IIII IIIIIIII Board of Directors AVONDALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION c/o Desert Management P. O. Box 799 Rancho Mirage, California 92270-0799 CHARLES & BERYL MCFARLAN 38-051 North Tandika Trail Palm DeSert, CA 92211 August 18, 1998 RECEIVED AUG 18 1998 COMMUNITY BEVELOPME14T DEPARTMENT Planning Commission CITY OF PALM DESERT City of Palm Desert fiw . ' /,C� 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Reference: Case #TT-26553 Amendment O Ladies and Gentlemen: My wife and I reside at 38-051 North Tandika Trail, Palm Desert -- adjacent to the proposed project referenced above. It was always our understanding that 22 homes and a residential gate on Frank Sinatra Drive were all that would ever be developed on subject property. We bought in Avondale Golf Club because of its low density, peaceful, quiet neighborhood. The increase of density to 36 homes and no residential gate are going to be detrimental to our property values, health, hazards and safety of increased traffic patterns on E1 Dorado and the Front Gate. We are definitely against increased density, and above all, there is no reason why a residential gate should not be mandatory on the Northeast corner of the project -- even with a median. Yours truly, Mr. & Mrs. Charles McFarland � 7 ! ! I +18474687699 STMRRT �i� U QW 196 P01 RUG 18 '96 :35 RECEIVED AUG 18 1998" COMMUNITY GEYELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CRY OF PALM DESERT Planning Commi=_sion Palm Desert , Celifornia We are concerned homeowners writing to protest the development , as presently proposed , of the Crowell subdivision to Avondale . The subject property was slated to have fewer than 25 single family homes . The proposed plan now shows more than 35 houses to be built on very small lots . We feel this would negatively impact the entire Avondale community by adding additional , unwanted congestion and by further eroding our property values . We urge you to support the plans that are in place and to enforce the current limitation as to the number of homes allowed . Than You , .'20 Mr . and Mrs. Charles McCabe 38210 Tandika Trail Palm Desert , Ca . CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE: August 18, 1998 CASE NO: TT 26553 Amendment #1 REQUEST: Approval of an amended TT 26553 to allow the subdivision of 8.207 acres into 36 residential lots at the north end of Avondale Country Club at the southwest corner of Eldorado and Frank Sinatra Drive. APPLICANT: Century Crowell Communities 1535 South "D" Street, Suite 200 San Bernardino, CA 92408 I. BACKGROUND: July 23, 1991 the County Board of Supervisors approved TT 26553 creating 22 single family lots at the north end of Avondale Country Club. This map, copy enclosed, provided for a full access connection to Frank Sinatra Drive and connection to Mozambique Drive to the remainder of Avondale. Fifteen of the lots backed onto the existing golf course fairway and the remainder were adjacent to Frank Sinatra Drive. The City annexed this area January 27, 1992. Time extensions have been granted over the years so that the original tentative map is still active. As a result of the death of the property owner, the property ownership has changed. The current owners do not wish to proceed with the plan as approved by the County. Avondale Golf Course is designated low density residential (3-5 dwelling units per acre) in the General Plan and is zoned PR-3 (planned residential three units per gross acre). II. CURRENT PROPOSAL: The current proposal is for 36 residential lots, five street lots and three landscape lots. The plan provides two fire department emergency access gates to Frank Sinatra Drive but no vehicle access to or from Frank Sinatra. STAFF REPORT TT 26553 AMENDMENT #1 AUGUST 18, 1998 The revised plan provides 23 lots adjacent to the golf course and 13 lots adjacent to Frank Sinatra. III. ANALYSIS: The Avondale Homeowners Association advises that it approved the annexation of the property at the north end of its subdivision by ballot as of May 15, 1998, copy of letter attached. The entire Avondale property, some 226 acres, is zoned PR-3, planned residential three units per gross acre. Presently there are 270 lots on 218 acres. Adding the property in question results in 306 units on 226 acres or 1 .35 units per gross acre. The PR zone standards were originally created to regulate country club projects which have large amounts of common open space such as The Lakes, Indian Ridge and Monterey Country Club. The PR zone standards at Section 25.24.240 provides "for a single-family detached the minimum lot area shall be as approved by the development plan." Other sections of the PR zone require lots to conform to the R-1 zone standards (i.e., 8,000 square feet). These standards apply to typical single family lot tracts such as Merano and those along Hovley Lane where there is no common open space such as the golf course. These lots vary in area and width with minimum width of 43 feet and minimum depth of 120 feet. Minimum lot area will be 5300± square feet. These lots are consistent with Section 25.24.240. The applicant indicates that it is his intention to construct a mix of two and three bedroom homes with four floor plans and sizes ranging from 2027 to 2214 to 2400 and 2900 square feet. All units will be single story. The homes will be placed on the lots with a zero setback on one side and a minimum of ten feet on the other side. Front and rear setbacks will be minimum of 15 feet each (note: setback to garage door will be required to be a minimum of 20 feet). The agreement with the Avondale HOA provides for five units minimum 2,000 square feet and 31 units minimum 2,200 square feet and permits zero lot line on one side with minimum ten foot setback on the other side. The requirement prohibits two 2 STAFF REPORT TT 26553 AMENDMENT #1 AUGUST 18, 1998 story units and requires 32 feet streets except for Mozambique which is to be 34 feet. All of these requirements are met on the plan as proposed. IV. ZONING REQUIREMENTS IN CHART FORM: PR ZONE PROJECT Lot Area as approved 5,300 square feet min. Lot Frontage as approved 43 feet Minimum Unit Size 1 ,000 square feet 2,000 square feet Height 24 feet 18 feet max. Parking 2 covered 2 covered Setbacks: Front 15 feet 15 feet 20 feet to garage 20 feet Sides as approved 0 feet to 10 feet min. Rear as approved 15 feet min. V. CONCERNS: The amended plan complies with all code requirements. This would normally result in a quick recommendation of approval. However, we have received four letters (enclosed) in connection with this application. Lyle Schaffer, 38-330 Tandika, objects to the increased density. Deborah Stone, 38-780 Tandika and the Goodyears at 38-230 Tandika, express concerns that without an access from Frank Sinatra Drive that they will experience a significant increase in pass-by traffic at their homes. Mr. William Reid, 38-915 Tandika Trail requests that a full vehicle access be provided to Frank Sinatra Drive. As a result of these concerns staff required the applicant to provide a traffic study to compare the expected volumes with and without the vehicle access to Frank Sinatra. 3 STAFF REPORT TT 26553 AMENDMENT #1 AUGUST 18, 1998 WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc., prepared the study, copy enclosed. Without the access to Frank Sinatra the 36 homes as proposed can be expected to generate up to 340 vehicle trips per day on Mozambique Drive. This is a worse case situation in that it is based on all 36 units being occupied at the same time which in country clubs is not the norm. With a vehicle access to Frank Sinatra some of the proposed 36 units could be expected to use the new access point (75% assumed) and 25% would use Tandika and the Eldorado access. However, some of the existing homes at the north end of Avondale can also be expected to use the new access. The study identified 77 homes which "would find the new access as a shorter route". The study assumed a "conservative" 45% of the trips from the 77 homes would be north. Putting these numbers together and using the "single family" rate the additional traffic on Mozambique would be expected to be 335 vehicles per day if no new access to Frank Sinatra Drive is installed. The traffic study concludes that Mozambique has a design capacity of 1 ,500 daily trip ends. With or without access the traffic volume will fall far below capacity. Mr. Reid noted that he is familiar with a remote gate system which sells for $23,960. The property is within the noise impact area created by the railway and 1-10 freeway. A condition will be imposed to require preparation of an acoustical analysis to assure that the dwellings as designed will comply with the noise limits established for residential acres in the General Plan and the Municipal Code. VI. CONCLUSION: With the additional 36 lots overall density (1 .35 units/acre) will continue to comply with the General Plan and zoning limit of three units per acre. The developer has designed in accord with the agreement with HOA. The only issue with staff is should we require a vehicle access to Frank Sinatra. To require the access would not reduce traffic on Mozambique south of the tract and would result in future costs to all residents at Avondale for the ongoing maintenance cost of the gate. In discussion with representatives of the Homeowners Association, staff was advised that the annexation of this area to Avondale was premised on there being no vehicle 4 STAFF REPORT TT 26553 AMENDMENT #1 AUGUST 18, 1998 access to Frank Sinatra. The concern was long term maintenance costs, security problems of an unmanned gate and the increased south to north traffic movement. The vote on the annexation package was 77%. Counsel for the HOA advised that if the project were approved by the City with a vehicle access gate then the matter would need to be presented to the homeowners for another ballot. Representatives of Avondale Homeowners Association will be present to answer questions at the public hearing. Given the above staff will recommend approval of the tract as designed without vehicle access to Frank Sinatra but with two emergency access points. VII. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission approve TT 26553 Amendment #1 subject to conditions. Vill. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft resolution B. Legal notice C. Comments from city departments and other agencies D. Plans and exhibits Prepared by , Steve Smith Reviewed and Approved by 'Phil Drell /tm 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO TT 26553 APPROVING A 36 LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION AT THE NORTH END OF AVONDALE COUNTRY CLUB, AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ELDORADO AND FRANK SINATRA DRIVE. CASE NO. TT 26553 AMENDMENT NO. 1 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 18th day of August, 1998, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by CENTURY CROWELL COMMUNITIES for the above mentioned project; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 97-18," in that the Director of Community Development has determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared; WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify approval of the tentative tract map: 1 . That the proposed tentative map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. 8. The design will allow unrestricted solar access to all lots. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO'. WHEREAS, in the review of this tentative tract map the planning commission has considered the effect of the contemplated action on the housing needs of the region for purposes of balancing these needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City of Palm Desert and its environs, with available fiscal and environmental resources. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby approve Tentative Tract Map No. 26553 Amendment #1 , subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, Exhibit B attached, is certified. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 18th day of August, 1998, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SONIA M. CAMPBELL, Chairperson ATTEST: PHILIP DRELL, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. TT 26553 AMENDMENT #1 Department of Community Development: 1 . The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the Department of Community Development as modified by the following. 2. Final map shall be recorded for at least a portion of the project within two years from the date of this approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Trash provisions including recycling shall be approved by applicable trash company and city prior to issuance of building permit. 6. Applicant shall pay school impact fees as arranged by the Desert Sands Unified School District. 7. Project shall be subject to Art in Public Places fee per Ordinance No. 473. 8. That the applicant submit and receive approval of the architectural review commission of a landscape plan to be installed in the Frank Sinatra Drive parkway. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 9. That the single family lots shall be developed in compliance with the following provisions: Maximum Building Height 18 feet and 1 story Minimum Front Setback 15 feet - 20 feet to garage door Minimum Rear Setback 15 feet Minimum Side Yard Setback 10 feet one side, 0 feet on other Street Side Yard Setback 10 feet 10. That the developer shall prepare an acoustical analysis to provide appropriate design guidelines to adequately mitigate noise from the railway and freeway to a level consistent with the Noise Element of the General Plan for residential land use. 11 . That the applicant shall pay a one time fee of $1 ,000 which shall be forwarded to CVAG to be directed to Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan funding. 12. All sidewalk plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to Architectural Review Commission review of final landscape plan. 13. Applicant agrees to maintain the landscaping required to be installed pursuant to these conditions. Applicant shall enter into an agreement to maintain said landscaping for the life of the project, which agreement shall be notarized and which agreement shall be recorded. It is the specific intent of the parties that this condition and agreement run with the land and bind successors and assigns. The final landscape plan shall include a long-term maintenance program specifying, among other matters, appropriate watering times, fertilization and pruning for various times of the year for the specific materials to be planted, as well as periodic replacement of materials. All to be consistent with the Property Maintenance Ordinance (Ordinance No. 801 ) and the approved landscape plan. 14. The project shall be subject to all applicable fees at time of issuance of permits including, but not limited to, Art in Public Places, TUMF and school mitigation fees. Department of Public Works: 1 . Drainage fees in accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.49 and Ordinance No. 653 shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map or issuance of grading permits. 2. Any drainage facilities construction required for this project shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. The subject study shall include analysis of the upstream drainage conditions as they impact this project. 3. Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to issuance of any permits associated with this project or the recordation of the final map. 4. The project shall be subject to Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF)• Payment of said fees shall be at the time of building permit issuance. 5. A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 6. Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to the issuance of any permits. 7. Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the Department of Public Works. 8. As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to permit issuance. 9. All public and private improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of any permits associated with this project. 10. Landscape installation on the property frontages shall be water efficient in nature and shall be in accordance with the City of Palm Desert landscape design standards. Plans for the installation of the subject landscape improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. Landscaping maintenance for said landscape as well as that area designated "retention lot" shall be provided be provided through a property owners association. Applicant shall be responsible for executing a declaration of Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions, which declaration shall be approved by the City of Palm Desert and recorded with the County Recorder. The declaration shall specify: (a) the applicant shall oversee the formation of a property owners association; (b) the property owners association shall be formed prior to the recordation of the final map; and the aforementioned landscaping and 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. detention basin maintenance shall be the responsibility of the, property owners association. 11 . In accordance with the Circulation Network of the Palm Desert General Plan, installation of a landscaped median island in Frank Sinatra Drive shall be provided. Landscape treatment shall be water efficient in nature and plans for the subject landscape improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. Landscape improvements shall be maintained by the subdivider for a period of ninety days from the date of acceptance of the improvements after which time maintenance shall be assumed by the city. 12. Applicant shall comply with the provisions of Municipal Code Section 24.12, Fugitive Dust Control as well as Section 24.20, Stormwater Management and Discharge Control. 13. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to recordation of final map or the issuance of any permits. 14. Waiver of access rights to Frank Sinatra Drive except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. 15. Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards and the city's Circulation Network. Specific project related offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to the following: * Construction of curb, gutter and paving as well as city standard sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration along Frank Sinatra Drive from Eldorado Drive westerly to Gerald Ford Drive. Rights-of-way as may be necessary for the construction of required public improvements shall be provided on the final map. 16. Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. 17. Proposed building pad elevations are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18. Prior to start of construction, the applicant shall submit satisfactory evidence to the Director of Public Works of intended compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) General Permit (Permit # CAS000002) for storm water discharges associated with construction activity. Riverside County Fire Department: 1 . With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced Ian check, p PP 9 9 P Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with City Municipal Codes, appropriate NFPA Standards CFC UFC, and UBC and/or recognized Fire Protection Standards: The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10.301 C. 2. A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 1 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 3. Provide, or show there exists, a water system capable of providing a potential gallon per minute flow of 1500 for single family. The actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 GPM for two hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. 4. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (6"x 4" x 2-1 /2" x 2-1/2"), located not less than 25' nor more than 200' from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 5. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes and shall be clearly marked by painting and/or signs as approved by the Fire Marshal. 6 All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to within 150' of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story. The roadway shall be not less than 24' of unobstructed width and 13'6" of vertical clearance. Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall be 36' wide with parking on both sides, 32' wide with parking on one side. 7. Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of gates, barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department. 7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 8. All new residences/dwellings are required to have illuminated residential addresses meeting both City and Fire Department approval. Shake single roofs are no longer permitted in the Cities of Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage or Palm Desert. 8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT A Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 6 (commencing with section 15070) of the California Code of Regulations. NEGATIVE DECLARATION CASE NO: TT 26553 AMENDMENT #1 APPLICANT/PROJECT SPONSOR: Century Crowell Communities 1535 South "D" Street, Suite 200 San Bernardino, CA 92408 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: Amendment to TT 26553 to allow the subdivision of 8.207 acres into 36 residential lots at the north end of Avondale Country Club at the southwest corner of Eldorado and Frank Sinatra Drive. The Director of the Department of Community Development, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. August 18, 1998 PHILIP DRELL DATE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Am 9 CITY OF PALM DESERT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Steve Smith, Planning Manager FROM: Mark Greenwood, Transportation Engineer SUBJECT: AVONDALE COUNTRY CLUB TRAFFIC STUDY DATE: August 6, 1998 The revised traffic study dated July 28, 1998 for the Tract No. 26553 (Avondale) has been reviewed and all of the traffic issues which have been identified to the Public Works Department have.been addressed in the report. The traffic study can be considered as finalized. MARK GR ENWOOD, P. . cc: Richard J. Folkers, ACM/Director of Public Works Joseph S. Gaugush, Engineering Manager Wes Pringle, WPA Traffic Engineering 23421 South Pointe Drive Laguna Hills, CA 92653 W AWPA Z raffic Engineering, Inc. ' TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING July 28, 1998 F'ECFWVIFr* AUG - 5 1998 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Mr. Kent Armstrong CITY OF PALMDESERf Century Crowell Communities 1535 South "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92408 SUBJECT. AVONDALE ACCESS-PALM DESERT Dear Mr. Armstrong: This letter report summarizes our review of traffic engineering factors related to providing vehicular access to the Avondale Tract No.26553 south of Frank Sinatra Drive within Avondale Country Club in Palm Desert. Existing conditions have been reviewed and quantified to provide a basis for the study. Alternative methods of providing access to Tract No. 26553 have been examined. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Tract No. 26553 is located at the northern portion of Avondale Country Club along Frank Sinatra Drive. A total of 36 single family dwelling units are proposed with vehicular access being taken via an extension of Mozambique Drive. This study has been conducted to determine the amount a traffic which will utilize the existing portion of Mozambique Drive both with and without an access connection at Frank Sinatra Drive. 23421 South Pointe Drive 9 Suite 190 • Laguna Hills, CA 92653 • (714) 460-0110 • FAX: (714) 460-0113 -z- Figure 1 illustrates a site plan of the existing and proposed lots within the Avondale Country Club. Figure 2 illustrates the specific site plan of the proposed project, Tentative Tract Number 26553. TRIP GENERATION Studies have been conducted by governmental agencies and consultants to determine trip generation characteristics of various land uses. The trip generation rates were referenced from Trip Generation' and can be found in Table 1. As stated earlier, two scenarios were analyzed in this study regarding access to the proposed development. Scenario I assumes no access on Frank Sinatra Drive and Scenario II assumes access on Frank Sinatra Drive through the proposed project. Access on Frank Sinatra Drive will be limited to right turn ingress and egress. The trip generation rates were applied to the proposed project. As shown in Table 1, the proposed project is estimated to generate 340 daily trip ends of which 25 (5 In,20 Out)trip ends would occur during the AM peak hour,which is between the hours of 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM; and 40(25 In, 15 Out) trips ends would occur during the PM peak hour, which is between the hours of 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. Scenario II, which provides access on Frank Sinatra Drive, not only includes traffic from the proposed project but also includes traffic from existing residences within the Avondale Country Club which will utilize the Frank Sinatra Drive access. The methodology to determine the estimated number of residents which would utilize this new access was based on the distance traveled from a dwelling unit to the proposed access versus the distance to travel from the same dwelling unit through the main gate around Eldorado Drive to Frank Sinatra Drive to the proposed access point. If the distance was shorter to "cut-through" the proposed site to access Frank Sinatra Drive then Trio Generation. Sixth Edition; Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE); 1997. WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. Avondale Access Job #980670 City of Palm Desert , I. • t 4 �+ 1� r ' fd iY '• =O_ J . e-t-.a::-. .^- �� .;�e".L�•. _n'..: •�•� � yF�; `'.Rn 9^iaPa +.. �. p -7 � r�t •_ �.._ � .. , ; .� , ,. �, �;. • �(,t//��a, �, , . fin ' . A VONDALE COUNTRY CL UB AREA SITE PLAN WPA TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. FIGURE I AVONDALE COUNTRY CLUB r /NWIENDED COMPO51TE. PLAN t. iT{4fE TRACT CINiV1LY LILCIM'44�COANLUINITB,LI. .0 . 1VP: 26553 ______ F R A AT K A — -__-_ __-_..-_ __-_ A T R .._ 'PA, Ir Lor L [ 1°: !'.ID I>,. zo i .,i! Uzi ;z3 aA Z' 9 /��.'..'��—+•�c•.j. .c... 14 zr W I 0 PROJECT Si- qw. � 0 ' s•� 01, m OY Ea /DEVELOPER: adlM y 1 •^ IL CtM w C�Ow[LL COMITC&L.P. T� I}lnil- n @♦ . NM ,L.ai �a�,SNa O' f. yq{L S00 eoot TYp SECTOR '' - ENOiN !" NE [p1: n"iAuo'.I[va.r[a raANN MRA oal • ° 1^ u o[sc+. o [azw J :SSE3SCaS PARCEL d, PgOgOlin ACRE AM '2WIIrq tw f4Nt tnr—p N, Avoxo to.Nc A �+—�.� a( I�,•� _ _ '°�rL...a J -`.ES r.c N.rroK�nw�cAr�d.dan�cr TYPI ad.F[PN CKYOIINN Owa CD CAL R SECTO - TYPICAL ..f[Ffq - COK.K.I. v L• .[q da.gKf INTf3p0 WTiEET3 LOT LAYOUT e 14 f; .:.rhV CF[O.dRu v�Ll[. P.[A dLlq tf O [ OISTMCT. 0a u..I[o aLwOOI daMKr t C[epMM iCyS i 1 }J; S ; .TMY AS °upOTMUi GUIDE: J �� ,y i r.f YVfi t']A[[T"OLTgffLo.a ff _1 v..d$ a hG (. _ .1 $� _'...d -L. YN i,I Yo 4.. n .a JUN23i9m AVONDALE COUNTRY CLUB - TRACT ND. 26553 SPECIFIC SITE PLAN WPA TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. -3- TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION Avondale Access TRIP ENDS DESCRIPTOR/ AMPE MHOUR PMPE"HOUR LAND USE SIZE DAILY m OUT IN OUT RATES:") Single Family Residential Dwelling Unit 9.57 0.19 0.56 0.65 0.36 TRIP ENDS: SCENARIO I- Without Access on Frank Sinatra Drive Proposed Project: Avondale Villas 36 DU 340 5 20 25 15 SCENARIO II- With Access on Frank Sinatra Drive Proposed Project: Avondale Villas 36 DU 340 5 20 25 15 Internal Diversion(2) Existing Homes -A(') 54 DU 500 10 30 35 20 Existing Homes -B(') 23 DU 220 5 10 15 10 Total 1 720 15 40 50 30 (1) Trip Generation. Sixth Edition;Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE); 1997. (2) "Internal Diversion"represents an estimated amount of existing traffic within Avondale Country Club that will no longer utilize the main gate but will now divert to the new access on Frank Sinatra Drive. (3) A- Existing Homes on Grahamstown Lane, Tandika Trail Lane, Zanzibar Drive, Temple Lane, Kimberly Lane and Sweetwater Drive between Grahamstown and Tandika Trail. B - Sweetwater Drive west of the Clubhouse and south of Grahamstown Lane. -4- these existing trips were re-routed. It should be noted that a conservative approach was taken. If the distance was slightly less or the same to "cut-through"the site to Frank Sinatra Drive, then the trips from these residential sites were not re-routed. It was estimated that 77 existing dwelling units would change their route and utilize the new access at Frank Sinatra Drive. Trip generation for the existing 77 dwelling units was estimated and is also provided on Table 1. As shown in Table 1 the existing 77 dwelling units are estimated to generate a total of 720 daily trips ends of which 55 (15 In,40 Out)would occur during the AM peak hour and 40(25 In, 15 Out) would occur during the PM peak hour. TRIP ASSIGNMENT Scenario I Under Scenario I, there would be no access on Frank Sinatra Drive, therefore 100 percent of the proposed project traffic would utilize the main gate. Table 2 shows that all of the traffic from the proposed project would utilize Mozambique Drive to enter or exit the site, this would equate to a total of 340 daily trip ends of which 25(5 In,20 Out)would occur during the AM peak hour and 40 (25 In, 15 Out) would occur during the PM peak hour. ' Scenario II Under Scenario II, there would be an access to Frank Sinatra Drive via the proposed project which will be restricted to right turn ingress and egress only. It was assumed that a portion of the proposed project,approximately 25 percent,would utilize Mozambique Drive in order to get to the club house and/or to the golf course. Also, a portion of the existing homes within the Avondale Country Club would utilize the new access at Frank Sinatra Drive. This new access would provide a"short-cut' to Highway 111 and the I-10 Freeway via the Gerald Ford extension. A conservative 45 percent of the trips generated by the 77 homes would find the new access at Frank Sinatra Drive as a shorter route than utilizing the main access for ingress. It was assumed that 25 percent of the trips generated by the 77 homes would use the access at Frank Sinatra as an egress point. WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. Avondale Access Job #980670 City of Palm Desert -5- TABLE 2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION Avondale Access TRIP ENDS AMPEA%HOUR PMPEA%HOUR LAND USE SIZE DAILY IN I OUT IN OUT TRIP ENDS. SCENARIO I- Without Access on Frank Sinatra Drive Posed Project: Avondale Villas 36 DU 340 5 20 25 15 Distribution to Main Access 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% TOTAL TRIPS ONMOZAMBIQUE 340 5 20 25 15 SCENARIO II- With Access on Frank Sinatra Drive Proposed Project: Avondale Villas 36 DU 340 5 20 25 15 Distribution to Club House and Golf 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% Subtotal 85 1 5 6 4 Internal Diversionot Existing Homes - A�3> 54 DU 500 10 30 35 20 Existing Homes -Bc3> 23 DU 220 5 10 15 10 Total 720 15 40 50 30 Distribution to Frank Sinatra Access 35% 45% 25% 45% 25% Subtotal 250 7 10 23 8 TOTAL TRIPS ONMOZAMBIQUE 335 8 1 15 1 29 12 NOTE: A very conservative approach was taken with the distribution percentages for the proposed project that would utilize the club house and play golf. In addition, the estimated number of dwelling units which would divert to the new access point was also low or conservative. -6- As shown in Table 2, a total of 335 daily trip ends would utilize Mozambique Drive of which 23 (8 In, 15 Out)would occur during the AM peak hour and 41 (29 In, 12 Out)would occur during the PM peak hour. ANALYSES Consideration has been given to the two alternative methods of access for the proposed project. These are:Scenario I-No access on Frank Sinatra Drive via the project, proposed p � t,all access would be taken via the main gate to the Avondale Country Club; Scenario 77- Access on Frank Sinatra Drive via the proposed project. Traffic factors related to each scenario are reviewed in the following paragraphs. Scenario I As shown in Table 2 with no access to Frank Sinatra Drive,there would be very little peak hour traffic on Mozambique Drive with a total of 340 daily trips from the proposed project. Typically a non-collector residential street can carry up to 1,500 daily trip ends. It can be seen that with the addition of the proposed project, daily traffic on Mozambique Drive will fall far below the allowable capacity. Scenario II Table 2 indicates that with a connection to Frank Sinatra Drive through the proposed project, the peak hour traffic would continue to be minimal. The daily volumes on Mozambique Drive would be approximately 335 with the connection to Frank Sinatra Drive, with a possibility of more households within the Avondale Country Club area utilizing the new access at Frank Sinatra Drive due to the"short-cut'from Highway 111 and the I-10 Freeway via the Gerald Ford extension. In other words, there is a possibility that a connection at Frank Sinatra Drive could cause more traffic than without the connection. The daily volumes on Mozambique Drive in either scenario would be very minimal based upon the roadway capacity of 1,500. WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. Avondale Access Job #980670 City of Palm Desert -7- SUMMARY This study has reviewed alternative means of providing access to the proposed residential development(Tentative Tract No.26553)located at the northern portion of Avondale Country Club along Frank Sinatra Drive. The analyses has indicated that with the proposed project and either access scenario, there would be very little increase in peak hour traffic. The daily volumes on Mozambique Drive in either scenario fall well below the acceptable range for a non-residential collector roadway, however, the new access at Frank Sinatra Drive may create added traffic on Mozambique Drive due to the fact that it creates a "short-cut' from Highway 111 and the I-10 Freeway via the Gerald Ford extension for residents within Avondale Country Club. We trust that this study will be of assistance to you and the City of Palm Desert. If you have any questions or require additional information,please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, WPA TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Weston S. P gle, P.E. Registered Professional Engineer State of California Numbers C16828 & TR565 WSP:HN #980670 cc. Mark Greenwood, City of Palm Desert WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. Avondale Access Job #980670 City of Palm Desert LEGEND OF SOURCES 1 . City of Palm Desert General Plan 2. City of Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance 3. City of Palm Desert Director of Community Development 4. Visual inspection by City of Palm Desert Community Development staff 5. Cultural Resource Identification and Recommendations for the North Sphere Specific Plan for the City of Palm Desert 6. Palm Desert Northern Sphere Area Specific Plan Circulation Report 7. Northern Sphere Specific Area Plan Technical Studies 8. (Intentionally not used) 9. City of Palm Desert Master Plan of Drainage 10. City of Palm Desert Grading Ordinance 11 . Coachella Valley Water District 12. Sunline Transit 13. North Sphere Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report 14. Riverside County P Fire Department 15. Sheriff's Department/Palm Desert Branch 16. Coachella Valley Fringe-Toed lizard Conservation Plan 17. (Intentionally not used) 18. Traffic study prepared by WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. r-iJVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORiv, 1 . Project Title: N/A 2. Lead Agency and Name and Address: City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 3. Contact person and Phone Number: Stephen R. Smith, Planning Manager Department of Community Development (760) 346-0611 ext. 486 4. Project Location: North end of Avondale Country Club, southwest corner of Frank Sinatra Drive and Eldorado. 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Avondale Villas LLC Century Crowell Communities L.P. 1535 South "D" Street, Suite 200 San Bernardino, CA 92408 6. General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential 7. Zoning: PR-3 (planned residential three units per acre) 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary.) Approval of an amendment to a tentative tract map to create 36 single family lots. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary.) North: Country Club - Emerald Desert South: Country Club - Avondale East: Country Club - Palm Valley West: Country Club - Desert Falls 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None. CITY/RVPUB/1998/32095 PAGE 1 OF 12 FORM "J" ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Land Use and Planning ❑ Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities and Service Systems ❑ Geological Problems ❑ Energy and Mineral Resources ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Water ❑ Hazards ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Noise ❑ Recreation i ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance < DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency): On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. i I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s)on the environment,but at least one effect 1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 1 REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. ❑ Signa� Date � jo t)to Printed Name For CTTY/1997/139904 FORM "J" Page 2 of 12 i EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a Lead Agency cites following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project- specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 1 3) "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. j 4) "Potentially Significant Unless Mitig tion Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially $igniticant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level i (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. w 6) Lead Agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached. Other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. Potentially Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ❑ ❑ ❑ �g( SOURCE(S): r 3 3 b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies i adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? SOURCE(S): 1 , 3 ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? ❑ ❑ ❑ SOURCE(s): 1 , 3 CrrY/1997/139904 FORM "J" Page 3 of 12 t I i Potentially ' Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impart Impact Incorporated Impact d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? SOURCE(s): t t 3 ❑ ❑ ❑ . e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? SOURCE(S): I 3 ❑ ❑ ❑ II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: i a) Cumulatively exceed official re�ional or local population projections? SOURCE(s): t s ❑ ❑ ❑ s i b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? SOURCE(S): 3 ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ❑ ❑ ❑ SOURCE(s): I , 2, 3 III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or jexpose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? SOURCE(S): II ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Seismic ground shaking? soulzu(s): ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? SoURcE(s):-4 ❑ ❑ ❑ r d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? soulzu(s): 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 e) Landslides or mudflows? SOURCE(s): ❑ ❑ ❑ f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ❑ ❑ ❑ SOURCE(S): 'V CrrY/1997/139904 FORM "7" Page 4 of 12 i Potentially Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Potentially Unless Less Than i Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact g) Subsidence of the land? SOURCE(S): 7 ❑ ❑ ❑ 19 h) Expansive soils? SOURCE(S): 7 ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 i) Unique geologic or physical features? SOURCE(S): Al,-7 ❑ ❑ ❑ ;E I IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, d{ainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff?�,soURCE(s): ❑ ❑ s b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? SOURCE(S): ❑ ❑ -, F" c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface { water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or f turbidity)? SOURCE(S): ( / C� ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? soURCE(s): ( / (r ❑ ❑ ❑ e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? o ements. SOURCE(S): 9 ,El ❑ 19 i f) Change in the quality of ground waters, either through direct additionsw o r withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? souRCE(s): /a , ❑ ❑ Idl g) Altered direction or rate of flow ofgroundwater? ❑ ❑ eJ i CrrY/1997/1399t14 FORM "7" Page 5 of 12 i f Potentially Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact h) Impacts to groundwater quality? SOURCE(S): TJ ❑ ❑ ❑ 1�r i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? SOURCE(S): f ❑ ❑ ❑ V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation?SOURCE(S): 2i ❑ ❑ ❑ i 1 i, b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? SOURCE(S): 1/a t ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? SOURCE(S): r 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ �r � J w { d) Create objectionable odors? souRcE(s): 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal t result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? SOURCE(s): ❑ ❑ I l b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves } or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. 1 farm equipment)? souRCE(s): 2 3 ❑ ❑ ❑ Nr c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ❑ ❑ ❑ 10 , SOURCE(S): 3 a d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ❑ ❑ ❑ SOURCE(S): 2 e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ❑ ❑ ❑ SOURCE(S): Z CrrY/1997/1399114 FORM "J" Page 6 of 12 1 < Potentially Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation(e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? SOURCE(S): 3 ❑ ❑ ❑ �; g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? SOURCE(S):-3 ❑ ❑ O VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rar species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, y and birds)? SOURCE(S): �� ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? ❑ ❑ ❑ X SOURCE(S): 4 r ( c) Locally designated natural communities(e.g. oak forest, i coastal habitat, etc.)? souRCE(s): ❑ ❑ ❑ 2!� i d) Wetland habitat(e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? ❑ ❑ ❑ SOURCE(S): I t 9 i e) Wildlife dispersal or mitigation corridors? SOURCE(S): ❑ ❑ ❑ i VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: i a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? El El ❑ SOURCE(S): 1 b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? SOURCE(S): ; ❑ ❑ ❑ i CITY/1997/139904 FORM "J" Page 7 of 12 { i Potentially Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? SOURCE(s): ) r 2 $� '7 ❑ ❑ ❑ IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: j a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? SOUR}CE(s): l ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? SOURCE(S): r 2,3 ❑ ❑ ❑ c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health r hazard? SOURCE(S): 1 a ❑ ❑ ❑ r i d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? SOURCE(S): i 2, )3 ❑ ❑ ®' ❑ e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? SOURCE(S): 3 ❑ ❑ ❑ X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? SOURCE(S): 1/ 7 ❑ ❑ ❑ , b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? SOURCE(S): 112, ] ❑ ❑ ra' ❑ 1a XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? SOURCE(S): t l� ❑ ❑ ❑ i 1 i CrrYn997/139904 FORM "J" Page 8 of 12 Potentially Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Potentially Unless Less 7ban Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact b) Police protection? SOURCE(S): rj ❑ ❑ IR ❑ c) Schools? SOURCE(S): ❑ ❑ ❑ d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ❑ ❑ ❑ SOURCE(S): e) Other governmental services? OURCE(s): ❑ ❑ ❑ I . XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? SOURCE(s): 3 ❑ ❑ ❑ f b) Communications systems? SOURCE(s): 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? SOURCE(S): ( ❑ ❑ ❑ d) Sewer or septic tanks? SOURCE(s): q ❑ ❑ ❑ e) Storm water drainage? SOURCE(s): q ❑ ❑ ❑ f) Solid waste disposal? SOURCE(s): j ❑ ❑ ❑ 4 g) Local or regional water supplies? SOURCE(s): ( ❑ ❑ ❑ L XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? SoURCE(S): (t a t�( ❑ ❑ ® ❑ crry/1997/139904 FORM "J" Page 9 of 12 i Potentially Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? SOURCE(S): 1 2/ I/ ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Create light or glare? SOURCE(S): Z ❑ ❑ ❑ XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? sOURCE(s): rj j 7 ❑ ❑ �g' ❑ Jb) Disturb archaeological resour�es? SOURCE(S): $ ❑ ❑ ❑ J c) Affect historical resources? SOURCE(s): ❑ ❑ P9 ❑ d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which P' would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ❑ ❑ ❑ i SOURCE(S):5 e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? SOURCE(S): 5' { ❑ ❑ ❑ XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ SOURCE(S): �I'-- b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ❑ ❑ ❑ SOURCE(S): � III CTTY/1997/139904 FORM "J" Page 10 of 12 XVI. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration. (Section 15063(c)(3)(D).) In this case a discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier analysis used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. The North Sphere Specific Plan and EIR was prepared for the City and adopted/certified by the City Council. The plan included this property. The North Sphere Specific Plan and its appendices are available for review between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at the Community Development Department at City Hall at 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. All impacts were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the North Sphere Specific Plan and EIR. Identified effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe, on attached sheets, the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. The property is in the fee area of the Coachella Valley Fringe-Toed Lizard. Pursuant to the Coachella Valley Fringe-Toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan the developer has been conditioned to pay a mitigation fee of $600 per acre. This mitigation is specific to this project. The development will add students to schools in the Desert Sands Unified School District. As mitigation the project will be required to pay statutory school fees (currently $1 .93/square foot)• CITY/RVPUB/1998/32095 PAGE 11 OF 12 FORM "J" Potentially Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major proceeds of California history or prehistory? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? r c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past . projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) ❑ ❑ ❑ d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ❑ ❑ ❑ i CIfY/1 997/1 3 991M FORM "J" Page 12 of 12 INITIAL STUDY CASE NO. TT 26553 AMENDMENT #1 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST COMMENTS AND POSSIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES (CATEGORIES PERTAIN TO ATTACHED CHECKLIST) I. LAND USE AND PLANNING The project will not alter the present developed and proposed land use in the area. The planned land use for the area is identified as residential; the project would develop land uses permitted in the residential land use designation. II. POPULATION AND HOUSING a. The project is a residential project on vacant land and will not result in changes in location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the city's population. b. The project is located on vacant land immediately north of Avondale Country Club development and as such represents a logical extension. Any growth induced by this project will be consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance of the City of Palm Desert. C. Site is vacant - site is not designated for affordable housing. III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS a. Project is not in a fault rupture zone. b. The project will result in grading. Such grading will not result in any alterations to geologic substructures. The site is relatively flat so that grading will not create unstable earth conditions. As part of the normal grading activity soil will be moved, displaced, over- covered and compacted. This activity will be done per permit and approved grading plans to assure that the site is properly prepared for the structural developments which will take place on the site. The site is relatively flat and changes in topography and surface relief will be required to assure proper drainage to avoid increased runoff to adjoining properties. The after condition of the property will result in less water runoff from the property to adjoining properties and better direction. The site does not contain any unique geologic or physical features. INITIAL STUDY CASE NO. TT 26553 AMENDMENT #1 The project as stated previously will result in less potential water damage to the site through proper grading, resulting in the appropriate directing of runoff from the site. MITIGATION MEASURES The City of Palm Desert grading and building permits procedures required detailed geotechnical reports addressing grading specifications and the settlement and expansive characteristics of on site soils. All structures must be designed to UBC requirements to insure that buildings are constructed within the acceptable level of risk set forth herein for the type of building and occupancies being developed. IV. WATER a. The site will absorb less water due to ground coverage, however, the landscaped areas will absorb more water because of the plant material. The alterations in drainage patterns will result in a benefit to adjoining property as it is directed in a controlled manner. b. See b. In addition, the Palm Valley Channel was constructed to protect the area in general and site in particular from flood waters coming from the areas that devastated Palm Desert in 1976 and 1979. C. There is no surface water on the site. d. Water will be redirected to drainage facilities designed and constructed to accept the water from the site. e. There is no ground water present on the site. f. The units will use substantial water. The Coachella Valley Water District has indicated sufficient water is available to serve the project. This project will not impact on groundwater recharge capability. g. See e. h. See f. 2 INITIAL STUDY CASE NO. TT 26553 AMENDMENT #1 i. While any development results in the use of water and therefore reduces the amount otherwise available for public water supplies, the Coachella Valley Water District assures that there is sufficient water supplies to accommodate this growth. In addition, the Coachella Valley Water District plans to construct additional water facilities in the Palm Desert area to accommodate current and future development. V. AIR QUALITY a & b. During construction, particularly grading, a potential dust problem is a short term impact. Requiring that the ground be moistened during days in which grading occurs will mitigate this problem. This is required by City of Palm Desert Grading Ordinance. Because the site is already an urbanized setting its development will not result in an overall deterioration of ambient air quality. This conclusion is supported by the discussions relating to air quality contained in a draft environmental impact report prepared for the North Sphere Specific Plan. Completed development of the site will result in less dust leaving the site then currently occurs with the site's vacant condition. C. Development of this site will not result in any climatic changes. This is due to its size and identified uses. d. The proposed development does not call for any odorous land uses. VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION a. The project will generate additional vehicular movements. A traffic study has been prepared which discusses whether a new vehicle access point should be required onto Frank Sinatra Drive. The additional access point would result in 20% more traffic using existing streets in Avondale Country Club. b. Street design and intersections will be designed to meet all city standards and the project will not include incompatible uses. C. The project will take access from existing streets in Avondale. Emergency access and access to nearby uses will be adequate. 3 INITIAL STUDY CASE NO. TT 26553 AMENDMENT #1 d. There will be a demand for additional parking facilities which will be supplied by the project on site in compliance with city code. e. Off street sidewalks will be provided for pedestrians and bicyclists. Street improvements will eliminate traffic hazards to motor vehicles. f. Project will not impact alternative transportation. g. Project will not impact rail, waterborne or air traffic. VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES a. The property is in the designated area of the Coachella Valley Fringe-Toed Lizard. This project will eliminate all fringe-toed lizards within the project boundaries. Pursuant to the Coachella Valley Fringe-Toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan the loss of lizards and habitat can be mitigated by payment of a $600 per acre fee for each acre developed. Project will be conditioned to pay said fee. Mitigation fee will be used by Nature Conservancy to purchase land in special preserves. The Coachella Valley Preserves which will create suitable habitat for lizards as well as other species. The site may contain other dune species which are of statewide concern (i.e., Coachella Valley Milk Vetch). A multi species habitat conservation plan is being prepared by CVAG which will establish preserves and conservation practices to insure the future survival of these dune species. To assist in this process, the project shall contribute $1 ,000 to CVAG to be directed to MSHCP funding. b. No locally designated species. C. No locally designated species. d. No wetland habitat. e. See a above. The dune species of concern are not migratory in nature. The site has been designated for development with mitigation fees within the Coachella Valley Fringe-Toed Lizard Habitat Conservation Plan. 4 INITIAL STUDY CASE NO. TT 26553 AMENDMENT #1 VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES a. The project will comply with adopted energy conservation plans. b. Project will be required to comply with the most current state energy codes energy usage will be less than on previous projects of a similar nature. C. Project will not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of this state. IX. HAZARDS a. The project does not include any substances that could result in explosion or escape of hazardous materials. b. Project will not interfere with city's emergency response or evacuation plan. C. Project will not create health hazards or potential health hazards. d. Project will not expose people to existing sources of potential health hazards. e. Project will not increase the fire hazard in area with flammable brush, grass or trees. X. NOISE a & b. Construction and subsequent operation of residential units will increase ambient noise level. The increase is not expected to create an annoyance to adjacent residential properties. All uses on the site will be required to comply with the city noise ordinance. MITIGATION MEASURES Strict adherence to construction hours and days will be required. Additional measures to mitigate traffic and operational noise will be required. Noise to be mitigated so that noise levels set in the General Plan Noise Element are not exceeded. 5 INITIAL STUDY CASE NO. TT 26553 AMENDMENT #1 XI PUBLIC SERVICES a, b, d, e. The property is presently vacant and serves no productive use. A commitment to urban uses was made as the area surrounding the study area has been developed, and the general plan and zoning maps designated for residential development.. Infrastructure improvements (i.e., storm channel, streets, utilities) have been made and are adequate to serve the proposed development. The proposed land use would increase the economic productivity of the land in terms of land efficiency and greater economic return generated from these uses, versus the current state of the land. The project will result in a net increase on fiscal flow to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency and the City of Palm Desert. All property tax generated on the site after 1979 including those generated by the improvement of this project will go to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency. C. SCHOOLS The property is located within the service area of the Desert Sands Unified School District. The project is consistent with existing zoning limitations. The project shall be conditioned to pay appropriate statutory school impact fees (currently $1 .93 per square foot). XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS a-g. All service providers have indicated the ability to serve the site. XIII. AESTHETICS a & b. The site has a scenic vista to the mountains to the north. Frank Sinatra Drive is not a scenic highway. The proposed development must be approved by the Palm Desert Architectural Commission. 6 INITIAL STUDY CASE NO. TT 26553 AMENDMENT #1 C. New light will be produced but the project will be required to prevent lighting spill over. XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES a-e. The cultural resource study performed as part of the North Sphere Specific Plan found no evidence of any cultural, archeological or historical significance on this site. In addition, state law requires that should any evidence be found during construction, construction must cease and the site cleared. XV. RECREATION a & b. The project is located on a golf course. No impacts are expected on existing recreational facilities beyond that anticipated in the General Plan. 7 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Department of Community Development/Planning Attention: Martin Alvarez FROM: Richard J. Folkers, Asst. City Manager/Public Works Director SUBJECT: AMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 26553; AVONDALE VILLAS DATE: August 11, 1998 The following should be considered conditions of approval for the above-referenced project: (1) Drainage fees in accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.49 and Ordinance No. 653 shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map or issuance of grading permits. (2) Any drainage facilities construction required for this project shall be contingent upon a drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer that is reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. The subject study shall include analysis of the upstream drainage conditions as they impact this project. (3) Signalization fees, in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79- 17 and 79-55, shall be paid prior to issuance of any permits associated with this project or the recordation of the final map. (4) The project shall be subject to Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF). Payment of said fees shall be at the time of building permit issuance. (5) A complete preliminary soils investigation, conducted by a registered soils engineer, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a grading permit. (6) Complete tract map shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to the issuance of any permits. (7) Any and all offsite improvements shall be preceded by the approval of plans and the issuance of valid encroachment permits by the Department of Public Works. (8) As required under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.28, and in accordance with Sections 26.40 and 26.44, complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. Offsite improvement plans to be approved by the Public Works Department and a surety posted to guarantee the installation of required offsite improvements prior to .permit issuance. (9) All public and private improvements shall be inspected by the Department of Public Works and a standard inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of any permits associated with this project. (10) Landscape installation on the property frontages shall be water efficient in nature and shall be in accordance with the City of Palm Desert landscape design standards. Plans for the installation of the subject landscape improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. Landscaping maintenance for said landscape as well as that area designated "retention lot" shall be provided be provided through a property owners association. Applicant shall be responsible for executing a declaration of Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions, which declaration shall be approved by the City of Palm Desert and recorded with the County Recorder. The declaration shall specify: (a) the applicant shall oversee the formation of a property owners association; (b) the property owners association shall be formed prior to the recordation of the final map; and the aforementioned landscaping and detention basin maintenance shall be the responsibility of the property owners association. (11) In accordance with the Circulation Network of the Palm Desert General Plan, installation of a landscaped median island in Frank Sinatra Drive shall be provided. Landscape treatment shall be water efficient in nature and plans for the subject landscape improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. Landscape improvements shall be maintained by the subdivider for a period of ninety days from the date of acceptance of the improvements after which time maintenance shall be assumed by the city. (12) Applicant shall comply with the provisions of Municipal Code Section 24.12, Fugitive Dust Control as well as Section 24.20, Stormwater Management and Discharge Control (13) In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 26.44, complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and approval prior to recordation of final map or the issuance of any permits. (14) Waiver of access rights to Frank Sinatra Drive except at approved locations shall be granted on the final map. (15) Full public improvements, as required by Sections 26.40 and 26.44 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, shall be installed in accordance with applicable city standards and the city's Circulation Network. Specific project related offsite improvements shall include, but not be limited to the following: * Construction of curb, gutter and paving as well as city standard sidewalk in an appropriate size and configuration along Frank Sinatra Drive from Eldorado Drive westerly to Gerald Ford Drive. Rights-of-way as may be necessary for the construction of required public improvements shall be provided on the final map. (16) Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to, and approved by, the Director of Public Works prior to the placement of any pavement markings. (17) Proposed building pad elevations are subject to review and modification in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. (18) Prior to start of construction, the applicant shall submit satisfactory evidence to the Director of Public Works of intended compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) General Permit (Permit# CAS000002) for storm water discharges associated with construction activity. RICHARD J. FOLK" ERS P.E. (tmnp8\tW6553a.cnd) RIVERSIDE COUNTY CA,LIFORNrA ""— m FIRE DEPARTMENT Q0101t ToI Fo,%?. p'oeF�PE PROrIc/,O�I CO " IN COOPERATION WITH THE UNTY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY C r r R/V6RS/DE .r ,.,; AND FIRE PROTECTION C -- GLEN J.NEWMAN li • F FIRE CHIEF RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRERECEIVED COVE FIRE MARSHAL ( pQ 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE 70801 HWY II I V �O ` ` ✓ JUN 10 1998 PERRIS,CALIFORNIA 92370 RANCHO MIRAGE,CA 92270 TELEPHONE(714)657.3183 (619) 346.1870 COMMUNITY BEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - TO: /Vl rZr IN A LVA RE z CITY OF PALM DESERT REF: T T Z 6 553 -�ioo If circled, underlined or noted- condition anp> ;es to project OWith respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plan check, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with City Municipal Code, NFPA, UFC, and UBC and/or recognized Fire Protection Standards: The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10. 301C. A fire flow of 1500 gpm for a 1 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 3� Provide, or show there exists a water system capable of providing a potential gallon per minute flow of 1500 for single family. , The actual fire flow available from any one hydrant connected to any given water main shall be 1500 GPM for two hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. The required fire flow shall be available from a Super hydrant(s) (61' x 41' x 2-1/211 x 2-1/2'r ) , located not less than 25' nor more than 200' single family. w*orlfrom any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. Hydrants installed below 3000' elevation shall be of the "wet barrel" type. 5. A combination of on-site and off-site Super fire hydrants (6rrx4'rx2- 1/2"x2-1/2r' ) will be required, located not less than 25' or more than 200' single family, 165' multifamily, and 150 ' commercial from any portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. -6. Provide written certification from the appropriate water company having jurisdiction that hydrant(s) will be installed and will produce the required fire flow, or arrange field inspection by the Fire Department prior to request for final inspection. 7. Prior to the application for a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and two copies of the water system plan to the County Fire Department for review. No building permit shall be issued until the water system plan has been approved by the County Fire Chief. Upon approval, the original will be returned. One copy will be sent to the responsible inspecting authority. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and may be signed by the local water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." "System has been designed to provide a minimum gallon per minute flow of 1500, 2500, 3000." a. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separations, or built-in fire protection measures such as a fully fire sprinklered building. 9. Please be advised the proposed project may not be feasible since the existing water mains will not meet the required fire flows. Please check with the water company prior to obtaining an approval from the Planning or Building Department. 10. Comply with Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, adopted January 1 , 1990, for all occupancies. 11. Install a complete fire sprinkler system per NFPA 13. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, not less than 25' from the building and within 50' of an approved hydrant. This applies to all buildings with 3000 square feet or more building area as measured by the building footprint, including overhangs which are sprinklered per NFPA 13. The building area of additional floors is added in for a cumulative total. Exempted are one and two family dwellings. 12. Install a fire alarm (water flow) as required by the Uniform Building Code 3803 for sprinkler system. Install tamper alarms on all supply and control valves for sprinkler systems. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes and shall be clearly marked by painting and/or signs approved by the Fire Marshal. 14. Install a fire alarm as required by the Uniform Building Code and/or Uniform Fire Code. Minimum requirement is UL central station monitoring of sprinkler system per NFPA 71 and 72. Alarm plans are required for all UL central station monitored systems, systems where any interior devices are required or used. (U.F.C. 14-103(a) ) 15. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Pamphlet #10, but not less than 2A10BC in rating. Fire extinguishers must not be over 75' walking distance. In addition to the above, a 40BC fire extinguisher is required for commercial kitchens. 16. Install a Hood/Duct automatic fire extinguishing system if operating a commercial kitchen including, but not limited to, deep fryers, grills, charbroilers or other appliances which produce grease laden vapors or smoke. NFPA 96, 17, 17a. 17. Install a dust collecting system as per the Uniform Building Code, Section 910a and Uniform Fire Code Section 76.102, if conducting an operation that produces airborne particles. A carpenter or woodworking shop is considered one of several industrial processes requiring dust collection. All buildings shall be accessible by an all-weather roadway extending to within 150' of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story. The roadway shall be not less than . 24' of unobstructed width and 13' 611 of vertical clearance. Where parallel parking is allowed, the roadway shall be 36' wide with parking on both sides, 32' wide with parking on one side. - - , ' radius ur ound 5 n Indus de pment Fou ta' ga n e of ese un s no d• s ' rds may r ct 19. The minimum width of interior driveways for multi-family or apartment complexes shall be: a. 24 feet wide when serving less than 100 units, no parallel parking, carports or garages allowed on one side only. b. 28 feet wide when serving between 100 and 300 units; carports or garages allowed on both sides, no parallel parking. C. 32 feet wide when serving over 300 units or when parallel parking is allowed on one side. d. 36 feet wide when parallel parking is allowed on both sides. 7 Whenever access into private property is controlled through use of Whenever barriers, guard houses or similar means, provision shall be made to facilitate access by emergency vehicles in a manner approved by the Fire Department. v -ri s ys e c o ted by e he eve f i rp r 0 o t Minimum g 21. A dead end single access over 500' in length will require a secondary access, sprinklers or other mitigative measure approved by the Fire Marshal. Under no circumstances shall a single dead end access over 1300 feet be accepted. 22. A second access is required. This can be accomplished by two main access points from main roadway or an emergency gated access into an adjoining development. 23. Contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy. 24. This project may require licensing and/or review by State agencies. Applicant should prepare a letter of intent detailing the proposed usage to facilitate case review. Contact should be made with the Office of the State Fire Marshal (818-960-6441) for an opinion and a classification of occupancy type. This information and a copy of the letter of intent should be submitted to the Fire Department so that proper requirements may be specified during the review process. Typically this applies to educational, day care, institutional, health care, etc. 6. All new residences/dwellings are required to have illuminated residential addresses meeting both City and Fire Department approval. Shake shingle roofs are no longer permitted in the Cities of Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage or Palm Desert. 26. Commercial buildings shall have illuminated addresses of a size approved by the city. Y 27. All fire sprinkler systems, fixed fire suppression systems and alarm plans must be submitted separately for approval prior to construction. Subcontractors should contact the Fire Marshal's office for submittal requirements. 28 . Conditions subject to change with adoption of new codes, ordinances , laws, or when building permits are not obtained within twelve months. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions should be referred to the Fire Department, Coves Fire Marshal , at Phone (619 ) 346-1870 or the Fire Marshal 's office at 70-801 Highway ill (Rancho Mirage Fire Station) , Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 . OTHER: Sincerely, MIKE HARRIS Chief by MIKE MC CONNELL -- Coves Fire Marshal bbm VJATEq ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY �/STRICt COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058•COACHELLA,CALIFORNIA 92236 •TELEPHONE(760)398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS TELLIS CODEKAS, PRESIDENT THOMAS E.LEVY,GENERAL MANAGER CHIEF ENGINEER RAYMOND R. RUMMONDS,VICE PRESIDENT August 5, 1998 BERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY JOHN W. McFADDEN OWEN McCOOIC ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER DOROTHY M. NICHOLS REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS THEODORE J. FISH File: 0163. 1 RECEIVED AUG 10 1998 Department of Community Development City of Palm Desert COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive CITY OF PALM DESERT Palm Desert, California 92260 Gentlemen: Subject: Tentative Tract No. 26562, Amendment No. 1, Portion of the Northwest Quarter and the South Half of Section 33, Township 4 South Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian This area is designated Zone C on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. Drainage from this area is contributory to the Mid-Valley Stormwater Project. The city shall require mitigation measures to be incorporated into the development to prevent flooding of the site or downstream properties. These measures shall include on-site retention of water from the 100-year storm or other participation in the financing of regional flood control facilities. The district will furnish domestic and recycled water as well as sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this district. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. The district will need additional facilities to provide for the orderly expansion of its domestic water system. These facilities may include wells, reservoirs and booster pumping stations. The developer will be required to provide land on which some of these facilities will be located. These sites shall be shown on the tract map as lots to be deeded to the district for such purpose. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 58 and 81 of the district for sanitation service. Plans for grading, landscaping and irrigation systems shall be submitted to the district for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY Department of Community Development -2- August 5, 1998 City of Palm Desert The project lies within the area of benefit of the Coachella Valley Groundwater Replenishment Program. Groundwater production within the area of benefit is subject to a replenishment assessment in accordance with the State Water Code. If you have any questions please call Dan Farris, principal stormwater engineer, extension 264. Yours very truly, Z�5& c Tom Levy General Manager-Chief Engineer cc: Don Park Riverside County Department of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 TC:md\ser\ds\Ju1y\tt26562 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT July 29, 1998 Mr. Steve Smith Planning Department RECEIVED Palm Desert City Hall 73510 Fred Waring Drive J U L 31 1998 Palm Desert CA 92260 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Dear Mr. Smith: CITY OF PALM DESERT It is my understanding that your department will conduct a hearing on August 18,'concerning the development by Crowell Industries of the vacant property within the Avondale perimeter along Frank Sinatra Drive. Also, I believe that the development would include 1 or 2 emergency entrances and without homeowner egress except through the main gate at Avondale(on Eldorado). I am requesting your consideration that a mandatory homeowner's gate be included in this proposed development in lieu of any emergency entrance. Our residence is in the vicinity of the main gate and without a homeowner's egress on Frank Sinatra Drive, the increased traffic that this development would bring becomes a negative factor which more than deteriorates our present advantage of convenience to the main gate and thus would lower our property's value. Also our north streets(which are not in the best of condition) would be negatively impacted. There is a proposal from South Bay Security Gates, Inc. for a remote-controlled homeowner's gate with camera communication to the main gate for$23,960. The price of this proposal obviously is not a factor and Mr. Harry Crowell stated to me that price was no object but that security was. W. Smith, I am a retired law enforcement executive from Los Angeles County and I established the initial in-house security for The Lakes Country Club. I was also one of the founders of the Resort Community Security Association. During my tenure at The Lakes C.C., I designed the gate system as proposed by South Bay Security Gates, Inc. -this system has since been adopted by The Springs C.C. and Palm Valley C.C., among many other gated communities in Coachella Valley. While a perfect gate security system does not exist, I can assure you that with the present known technology,this system provides the best unmanned gate security available. This can pragmatically be demonstrated by comparing the crime rates from the past ten years to the present of those communities utilizing this system. In any event,the security at Avondale is a moot issue as the golf course maintenance gate on Sinatra Drive is intermittently left wide open and unattended during working hours. Mr. Steve Smith Page -2- I plan to attend the August 18t' session and be available for any questions or testimony should it be desired by the department. I, and many other homeowners living in the north area of our complex, would appreciate your body's serious consideration of this request. Sincerely, William H. Reid 38915 Tandika Trail Palm Desert CA 92211 760-345-6711 { AWN ozl RECEIVED JUL 2 7 1998 IMMUNITY EEVELOPMENT DEPARTI MENT 1Lyze7 BuLtPJr 64LPXd Lane CRY OF PALM DESERT PZoeemoac,il 604Y8 j CLYDE AND ELOISE GOODYEAR 38-230 Tandika Trail Palm Desert, California 92211 RECEIVED February 27, 1998 MAR 051998 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT TO: Planning Commission City of Palm Desert Reference: CHANGE OF DENSITY AND ORIGINAL PLANS FOR A DEVELOPMENT OF 36 HOMES ON FRANK SINATRA DRIVE BETWEEN EL DORADO AND COOK STREETS, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA This letter is to advise you that even though there has not been an official application applied for at this time to the City of Palm Desert, many discussions and decisions have already been in progress for the above-referenced project within the Avondale Community! We are concerned property owners in the Avondale Golf Club, especially the homes which abut the project and others that will be affected by the increase of density and traffic. Originally, 22 homes and a residential gate for ingress and egress on Frank Sinatra Drive were approved by the County and are still in effect for this parcel. Subsequently, Crowell Industries has plans to increase the density to 36 homes with no residential gate. We believe that we are entitled to an approval of the Cequa Environmental investigation and report, and wish to be notified and involved in the environmental impact study. We have already been in touch with this organization. The feeder street to be used for this project is Mozambique which is less than 100 yards long. The City has advised us that the traffic count will be an average of 360 cars per 24 hours. With this great increase in noise, fumes and traffic, this will create a hazardous and unhealthy environmen- tal condition with no other outlet. When 22 homes and a residential gate were approved (and presumed to be financially successful) , then certainly 36 homes, if approved, should provide a funding for a residential gate and a lucrative profit for a developer. TO: Planning Commission City of Palm Desert Page 2 February 27, 1998 If a 50% increase in density is to be approved, then owners' property values and health hazards should certainly be considered first, before an outside developer's profits. "Public Safety Concerns" - The ingress and egress of our Main Gate onto E1 Dorado Avenue will create traffic and a safe hazard te without a second Residential Gate being incorporad into the proposed development. We request that the Planning Commission require a second residential gate to avoid the above-mentioned safety concerns! ! Our immediate communities are expanding so rapidly which will increase the burden of our traffic pattern on E1 Dorado Avenue. This is another indication why a second Residential Gate is necessary for the safety of our Avondale Community. "COMMITTEE" FOR PROTECTION OF OUR AVONDALE COMMUNITY IJOCOELECTRICAL s9 14j PROPOSAL CONTRACTORS 68rj3 PEREZ ROAD, UNIT 15A .— detrnssrwl a Rse,oe,nu, Miz cN� CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 Page No. of Pages SOM�BwxAYc (760)324-3079 FAX(760)324-2469 �VIY �a1�i'�..i INC. CC160 ELECTRONIC ENTRY SPECIA�.STS PAGE 1 OF 3 CaM.COtV.Lic.A`fi21380 PROPosAL SUWITTEO To AVONDALE HOA "'°NE ONTE 760-345-3195 FEB. 23 , 1998 STREET _ 75800 AVnNDALc :-R . ECURITY INSTALLATIONS Cih$iATE AND ZIP CODE .IDB LOCATION PALM DESERT, CA . 92211 SAME MGHI TECT WTE OF PLANS ATTN: MR.& MRS . GOODY AR 0B"0NE We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: WE ARE PLEASED TO SUBMIT OUR PROPOSAL TO FURNISH LABOR, MATERIALS , AND SUPERVISION TO COMPL ETE THE FOLLOWING: ENTRANCE GATE . 1- FABRICATE AND INSTALL ( 1 ) WROUGHT IRON SWING GATE APPRX. 14'X 6 ' ( INCLUDES HD HINGE POST AND HD HINGES ) 2- FABRICATE AND INSTALL ( 1 ) WROUGHT IRON STATIONARY PANEL APPRX . 4 'X 6 3- FURNISH AN: INSTALL ( 1 ) ELITE CSW200 SWING GATE OPERATOR WITH ACCESS DOOR 4- INSTALL (2 ) SAFETY LOOPS WITH VEHICLE DETEC'I_r 5- FURNISH AN. INSTALL ( 1 ) DOORSING YODEL 160' �A"RRIER GATE OPERATOR WITH 12 ' WOODEN ARM 6- INSTALL ( 1 ; DOWN LOOP WITH VEHICLE DETECTOR 7- FURNISH ANL INSTALL ( 1 ) KEY COMPANY CA. ?D READER ( INCLUDES GOOSE NECK Y.TAND, 2 PROTECTION POSTS AND CONCRETE ISLAND) 8- FURNISH ANL INSTALL ( 1) MULTI CODE RFDIO RECEIVER 9- FURNIH AND INSTALL ( 1) FIRE DEPARTMENT SETSWITCH BOX We Propose hereby to ft,rnlsn material and labor—complete in accordanc e ce with above specifications, for the sum of: SEE PAGE THREE ********** Payment to be made as IOIIowS dollars ($ ). 40% DOWN WITH ACCEPTANCE OF THIS PROPOSAL/CONTRACT, AND BALANCE DUE UPC,N COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION AND DEMONSTRATION All n,,em,al n 9u:uantuwl I„Iw of .1•, o. "llar,n a wIXk.ke amaa,n a o g to slahateb!p a ¢es Any 111—.. , n ,enel,Un tram anove spenllcaea vd ns Inwr manner y ever ADIhOriz80 O]sls wnI Culea W e.e Only UPun wane, ..,III LUO 1 in extra charge Over am abWe the Signature esllmate.Nl agreemMlS 9niRgenl uOu, ,n.e alcberRS Of delays aayOM our Cglud Oya r Io carry tire twnaab area Jtne,necessen n�,,,um.e Our workers are fully moll by Warltmens THIRTY Campensalnn Insurance Note:This proposal maybe withdrawn by us if net accepted within . ' yS. Acceptance of Proposal -The above paces,specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are netepv accepted You are autnorized to do the won, as specified Payment will be maoe as ou,had above. Sgnature Date of Acceptance: Signature �►1.00 CT fie SRO CONTRACTORS 1 POSAL. ..cTwor . 66.-"PEREZ ROAD, UNIT 15A s : CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 Page No. of Pages �i�y�ssome" (760)324.3079 FAX(760)324-2469 JKY�Y� GAWfNC. CC160A ELECTRONIC ENTRY SPEC✓ ,TS PAGE 2 OF 3 �A5�yy�$$y���r�pplI,, pp pp,, Call.Cons.Lrc.OW1300 VVIYLAU HOA VMONE FEB. 23, 1998 0-345-3195 76 5�I5800 AVONDALE DR . lE �p SECURITY INSTALLATIONS arrrl�1,sr¢J,rrsOZ1b6`t ERT, CA. 92211 SAME "Xftll: MR.& MRS - GOODY rs' oe Plow We hereby submit specdlcapons and estimates for: WE ARE PLEA--ED TO SUBMIT OUR PROPOSAL TO FURNISH LABOR, MATERIAL , AND SUPERVISION TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: EXIT GATE: 1- FABRICATE AND INSTALL ( 1 ) WROUGHT IRON SWING GATE APPRX. 14 'X 6 ' ( INCLUDE-- hD HINGE POST AND HD HINGES ) 2- FURNISH AN: INSTALL ( 1) ELITE CSW200 SWING GATE OPERATOR WITH ACCESS D( ijR 3- INSTALL ( -, ) SAFETY LOOPS WITH VEHICLE DETECTOR 4- FURNISH Ati;, INSTALL ( 1 ) DOORKING MODEL 1610 TRAFFIC SPIKES AND ( 1 ) DOORKING MODEL 1615 ILLUMINATED TRAFFIC SIGN 5- FURNISH AN: INSTALL ( 1) KEY COMPANY CARD READER ( INCLUDES GOOSE NEE --TAND, 2 PROTECTION POSTS AND CONCRETE ISLAND) 6- FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) MULTI CODE RADIO RECEIVER 7- PROVIDE ALL CONCRETE WORK 8- PROVIDE ALL SAW CUTTING 9- PROVIDE ALL ELECTRICAL HOOK UPS 10- TEST AND TjUST We Propose hereby to I rnlsn material and labor—complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: SEE PAGE THREE ********** Payment be ae as low• - dollars ($ 4� lw % OWN WITH ACCEPTANCE OF THIS PROPOSAL/CONTRACT, AND ) BALANCE DUE UF= -,N COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION AND DEMONSTRATION rW I,YIYryI ra p1ILJllnwO 10 Ou.,a .,.r. rrrr r awOrGrg m Slarmam OracrKeS All, ar�.rrr r r mx. r M CunrrNelry rn a wprhmyWle rryr,r,5, — / ��/7 orals oral ne e.ewlw wu orrn amve specaKauons Involny enn A I ed / e�� v upon wr ne.. .. .va[narge Over arm ama eb //, �G slmlale Nl agrewnrnls 1prL,yeu. .. 'rr,n. r.n.ernµ l> OnIJ $ IurO furry rrre brnp0 arb JIMr ryKe>e,.r. r• Ys Ypm pur rooky qv,N m COegerlsalan InSvarKz r•••r.0 ie Jur wu+ws are hYry Opverp W IM kIm ' Note:Ibis proposal may pe THIRTY withdrawn by u5 if not aCtepled wilfen days. Acceptance of Proposal Tne wa prime,Sp'-flnahom and "51)ra li are 58 mend ry wii an0 arr nnraav accePlep You are ausmriZao to d0 als work as speGlled Payment well ba maon ea uwenao ap0re Spnelure Dale of Aaceprence . __ ._ ...—..._ Sieneture ,co SEltw ELECTRICA- ,t ROPOSAL CONTRACTORS 6by33 PEREZ ROAD, UNIT 15A _ Carmrou A nsssun � A CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 Page No. of Pages SO �/7�BNN (760)324.3079 FAX(760)324.2469 ��Y �M INC. CC160B ELECTRONIC ENTRY SPECIALISTS PAGE 3 OF 3 csfp Cone.LJc aw138it PROPOSM SUBMITTED TO P,Ic,IE DATE AVONDALE HOA 760-345-3195 FEB. 2312 , 1998 STREET JOB NAME 75800 AVONDALE DR . SECURITY INSTALLATIONS CITY.STATE AND ZIP CODE JDB LOCATION PALM DESERT , CA . 92211 SAME MCNITECi DATE OF PLANS JOe PHONE ATTN: MR. & MRS . GOODY AR We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: WE ARE PLEASED TO SUBMIT OUR PROPOSAL TO FURNISH LABOR, MATERIALS , AND SUPERVISION TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT: 1- FURNISH INSTALL ( 1 ) TOSHIBA LOW-LITE 1/3" CCD B/W CAMERA 2- INSTALL ( 1 ) EMI CAMERA HOUSING 3- INSTALL ( 1 ) EMI HOUSING WALL MOUNT BRACKET 4- INSTALL ( 1 ) PANASONIC 9" B/W MONITOR 5- INSTALL ( 1 ) EAGLE TRANSMISION SYSTEM 6- INSTALL ( 1 ) 24db DISH-GRID ANTENNAE 7- INSTALL ( 1 ) 14db REC. ANTENNAE 8- INSTALL ( 1 ) CHUGAI , 1/3" 4MM A/I LENS DC 9- INSTALL ( 1 ) TOSHIBA 24HE REAL-TIME VCR NOTES: A- 3 YEAR FACTORY WARRANTY ON SWING OPERATORS B- Z YEAR FACTORY WARRANTY ON ALL DOORKING PRODUCTS C- 1 YEAR LABOR WARRANTY D- PROPOSAL BASED ON CITY APPROVAL E- ALL PERMITS BY AVONDALE F- ALL CONDUITS BY OTHERS AND CO-ORDINATED BY SOUTH BAY SECURITY GATES G- ALL ELECTRICAL POWER BY OTHERS H- CAMERA MONITOR TO BE INSTALLED IN EXISTING GAURD HOUSE TOTAL PRICE INSTALLED $ 23 , 350 . 00 We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor—complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: *TWENTY THREE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED FIFTY & N0/100* dollars ($23 , 350 . 00 ) Payment to be made as toiiows 40% DOWN III TH ACCEPTANCE OF THIS PROPOSAL/CONTRACT, AND BALANCE DUE P:fN COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION AND DEMONSTRATION J All TaIC101 is 9ua,anittV 10 d i. ie,m All wink lu ne completed m a workmanlike manner , 'f .ding to slamad Waetce> — �.aaYi o,ao lqn hom alone s IhCaldns m riving BMm Authorized onls'MII be eaeculW only UWn'«� nrt.n Je,> jM wN WC an extra Charge over aid al%h'e d Signature eaNhale All a9reemems mnlllw. n..w..so.nes acrbwlls a deMys baywl0 wr I'Unldt.OYmm d �7 fire.Toni and other ne,.es>ery 'naurence Our worters are fully Osvered by Workmen's Note:This proposal may be THIRTY Compensation Inswance withdrawn by us if rot accepted within deys. Acceptance of Proposal—The above prices,specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are nmeby accepted You are authorized to do the work as specified Payment wAl Ot mace as outlmed above. Signature ICI Date of Acceptances _ _..__ —_ Signature SENT BY: �CITY OF PALfi .`,'!ESERT; 2- 2-98 2:02PM; 6193417098 619 345 3429; N1 /1 . yam •✓ice 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE (619) 346.0611 FAX (619) 341-7098 1'tf. � r\drs. C.i,rie <�ili,l-lyl.•;Ir `J/r��,� �`�'`,,�" i(I-�30 Idnrlii•..: frAil r�V ✓Y � //��"`` PaInI Desert, l A 9.1 ) SUBJECT: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF THE NORTHERLY PORTION OF AVONDALE COUNTRY CLUB (TENTATIVE TRACE 26553) In responsc, t'.. ruur fef ent inquiry the fnllOWIng is prrn•irled, Dcvclnpnlarll ui the subjer't property .,I,prnved under the (:aunty of Riverside prior to the City s all1lox tins, of the prnpt?.rly. Ti•,;; approval piovicled for the creation of 22 residential lots with ,access onto I rant. Smatf., ')iivo, The pro{cct was requirc.(I, among other thinks, tO fully irnprove Frank Sinatfa Drive curb, 21111e1, asphalt, paving, etc.) in conjunc:lion with the (JOW1101n'1ent. You heive Inch. ,llt•cl (flat it is your ,ndergcmdiiig that the current properly nwners are consi!{(11ing .'.xliilfiiatii,Itn-; hIwigus to the proposed dtrvelnp rile lit whic.I', may include the CIIiI"IInd11V11 Ili the aCCess rHltc) Fri l r lk 4i natra Drive. \•�'I -I •r ,..L:.... ,l_._ devcdrrper, , .IIPf I �wi•:h to >cu•suc, our x)si oulid be that we have no objection to an access ol, ,1 I rank Suuatra Drive (right turn ingress/egtess on y) as approvec, culrl(1f the ('01.111t)" it slnaLlld 1)i! Ilo ted that the above-rcforenced requirement for Ill(' improvements of rank Sinalr:: 7I1 IVe ovnuld remain in placr- and be. required regardless of direct accPCS to Frank Sinatr.; I )nve. If you haVC .II)'. (turdl(,n5, please feel free to conlact lose0i S. ( ia"RINll [,f Illy skiff. -- 1 . 1 h1(:HAKI ) Y I-(.)LKLKS, N.C. SSIS'>ANT r_ITY M.AN.AGER/P1181.IC: WORKS DIRECTOR RlrasC;fim. cc: lost Il^ 1, Gat.l"-W-h, Engineering .N1ananer Phil 1'Lt'ii, C'.nrnnulnily Devclopment Director DEBORAH R. STONE RECEIVED, 38780 Tana& Trail North Patin Desert-, California MAY 2 7 1998 92211 UOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CRY OF PALM DESERT May 25, 1998 Philip Drell Director of Community Development City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578 RE: Proposed Annexation to Avondale Golf Club Dear Mr. Drell: I am a homeowner at Avondale Golf Club in Palm Desert. The homeowners recently voted on whether or not to annex 7.97 acres at the north end of the property. If the annexation is successful, the property will be developed by Century- Crowell Communities with thirty-six new homes and no additional entrance gate. It is my understanding that prior to any such development, the Developer must submit a proposal to your agency and a public hearing must be scheduled. Please consider this letter a formal request that I be notified by your agency of any up coming hearing regarding the development of the north end of Avondale Golf Club. Although I do not live within 300 feet of the development area, my property will be severely impacted as I live on the street which will become the main street to access the proposed new homes. Thank you for your attention to the foregoing. Sincerely,, ll ��G�- Deborah R. Stone I v1 ATEq ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY �/STRIOt COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058•COACHELLA,CALIFORNIA 92236•TELEPHONE(760)398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS ', TELLIS CODEKAS, PRESIDENT THOMAS E.LEVY,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER RAYMOND R. RUMMONDS,VICE PRESIDENT June 26, 1998 BERNARDINE SUTTON,SECRETARY JOHN W. McFADDEN OWEN MLCOOK ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER DOROTHY M. NICHOLS REDWINE AND SHERRILL,ATTORNEYS THEODORE J. FISH File: 0163. 1 RECEIVED Department of Community Development City of Palm Desert JUL - 1 1998 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 COMMUNITYGEVELOPMEVTDEPNRTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT Gentlemen: Subject: Tentative Tr ct No. 26553 Amendment, Portion of th Nort Sea r of Section 3, Township 5 South, ange 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian This area is designated Zone C on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. Drainage from this area is contributory to the Mid-Valley Stormwater Project. The city shall require mitigation measures to be incorporated into the development to prevent flooding of the site or downstream properties. These measures shall include on-site retention of water from the 100-year storm or other participation in the financing of regional flood control facilities. The district will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this district. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. This area shall be annexed to Improvement District Nos. 58 and 81 of the district for sanitation service. There are existing district facilities not shown on the development plans. There may be conflicts with these facilities. We request the appropriate public agency to withhold the approval of a tract map until utility clearances have been completed with the district. TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY Department of Community Development City of Palm Desert -2- June 26, 1998 Plans for grading, landscaping and irrigation systems shall be submitted to the district for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. If you have any questions please call Dan Farris, principal stormwater engineer, extension 264. Yours very truly, Tom Levy General Manager-Chief gineer cc: Don Park Riverside County Department of Public Health 46-209 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201 TC:J1\svc\ds\]un\tt26553 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT WPM I IRRI Atl IStRICT COACHELLA VALLEY POWER DIVISION 81-600 AVENUE 58 • P. O. BOX 1080 • LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253-1080 TELEPHONE (760) 398-5854 • FAX (760) 391-5999 RECEIVED J U L - 1 1998 IIDPD-DDC June 29, 1998 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT Mr. Steve Smith, Planning Manager City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578 Dear Mr. Smith: Subject: Avondale Villas, LLC, Case No. TT 26553 Amendment, Approval of an Amended Tentative Tract Map to Allow the Subdivision of 8.207 Acres Into 36 Residential Lots, 5 Street Lots and 3 Landscape Lots for a Total of 44 Parcels, Property is Located Within Avondale Country Club Review of the plans for the above mentioned project determined it will impact electric service to the area. Although the Imperial Irrigation District has received the preliminary plans for impact assessment, we will not begin to engineer nor derive cost estimates for this project until the owner/developer/contractor applies for electrical service. This procedure helps to eliminate wasted manpower spent on projects that never reach construction stage. If you have any questions regarding this matter, or if 1 can be of further assistance, please contact me at 398-5818 or John Salas at 398-5834. Sincerely, p ;vz �117 THOMAS F. LYONS, JR., P.E. Senior Engineer CC: J. Salas, III) N 89'48'1 5' E V 11 mr, .�, 1986.68' 1006.09' 1 n � LOT P [ IL 352 6 6,.�t :G.B o Ca T 21 V n ,� C3 63 `\� b20ry r'�_1 o�h cg � �'1 �(/P 19 �` N' 56' 3 pp Cq'00' Jam•' J J J •�` 6. w24 `b!c0 81.64 1: W 264 C,10 /JO �4�1 00• C3 C1 -- P ;r /'% �♦ N 69 24 J. 0. �� , ♦ 4.. 2oJ� r 7 y ,o y e� ti GOLF COURSE F ry sE_ p F � sa �` EMAIL` JS. U g e06 cb c V•b' 5: N6' 1C :Sti / q. 23 cr . _ /♦ \ �♦� � "'' GOLF COURSE FAIRWAY (TV REMAIN) ~�c 1 - l n ♦i / e n / ;7 BF c I Ly RECORDED TRACT NO . 6886 - 1 HEWITT & McGunzE, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW DEAN DUNN-RANKIN 19900 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 1050 MARK R. MCGUIRE CHARLES S. EKON Irvine, California 92612 DENNIS D. O'NEIL WILLIAM E. HALLE (949) 798-0500 • (949)798-0511 (fax) JAY F. PALCHIKOFF ANDREW K. HARTZELL PAUL A. ROWE HUGH HEWITT WILLIAM L. TWOMEY JOHN D. HUDSON JOHN P. YEAGER August 14, 1998 RECEIVED AUG 17 1998 BY TELECOPY AND CERTIFIED MAIL. RRR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT City of Palm Desert Planning Department 7350 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260-2578 Attention: Mr. Steve Smith Re: Amendment to Tentative Tract Map No. 26553 Ladies and Gentlemen: This firm represents Clyde and Eloise Goodyear (the "Goodyears") in connection with the referenced matter. All future correspondence with the Goodyears should be directed to the undersigned. The Goodyears reside at 38230 Tandika Trail in the Avondale Golf Club in Palm Desert. A few years ago, the County approved a proposal by Stephens Estate to construct 22 single family detached houses, complete with residential gate, immediately north of the Goodyears' home. We understand that the City is now in the process of approving an amendment to the Stephens Estate project proposed by Crowell Industries and/or Century Crowell Communities ("Crowell"). This amendment would, among other things, would increase the density of the development to 36 houses and eliminate the residential gate. The Goodyears strongly believe, and we concur, that Crowell's proposed expansion of the development (the "Expansion Project") and the resulting increase in construction, grading, traffic, noise and pollution will result in significant long-lasting deleterious effects on the Goodyears' home and the surrounding environment. The Goodyears therefore strenuously object to the Expansion Project. We hereby request copies of the initial study and any additional environmental analysis conducted for the Expansion Project to date so that we may better evaluate the impact of the Expansion Project on the 08-13-98 Goodyear S:\153\C0RR\98080013.LTR City of Palm Desert August 14, 1998 Page 2 environment. We also hereby request, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21092.2, written notice of any CEQA documentation or actions taken with respect to the Expansion Project. We also believe that the Expansion Project's significant increase in density violates the City's general plan and zoning requirements for the area. The density is substantially higher than the surrounding developments, including that in which the Goodyears reside. This density d,fference°will-inevitably lead to' raffic, safety And 'other quality-of-life problems. The Goodyears believe that a residential gate at the northeast corner of the Expansion Project on Frank Sinatra drive would go a long way toward alleviating their concerns in this matter. Moreover, such a residential gate (which we understand would be relatively inexpensive) would add to the attractiveness of the community and reduce the risk of traffic congestion and accidents. Thank you in advance for your consideration of and attention to this letter. Very truly yours, Dean Dunn-Rankin DDR/ cc: Clyde and Eloise Goodyear Mark McGuire, Esq. 08-13-98 Goodyear S:\153\CORR\98080013.LTR HEWITT & MCGum, LLP ATTORNEYS AT IAw DEAN DUNN-RANKfN 19900 MacArthur Boulevard,Suite 1050 MARK R. MCGIRRE CHARLES S. EXON Irvine, California 92612 DSNNIS D.O'NEIL WILUAM E.HALLE (949)798-050D • (949)798-0511 (tax) JAY F.PAL IOXO P ANnium K.HAR77ELL PAUL A.ROWS HUGH HEWTIT WwAM L TWOMEY JOHN D. HUDsoN JOHN P.YEAGER August 14, 1998 RY TELECOPY AND CERTIFIED MAIL, RRR RECEIVED City or Palm Desert AUG 141998 Planning Department 7350 Fred Waring Drive COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Palm Desert, California 92260-2578 CITY OF PALM DESERT Attention: W. Steve Smith Re: Amendment to Tentative Tract Man No 26553 Ladies and Gentlemen: This firm represents Clyde and Eloise Goodyear (the "Goodyears") in connection with the referenced matter. All future correspondence with the Goodyears should be directed to the undersigned. The Goodyears reside at 38230 Tandika Trail in the Avondale Golf Club in Palm Desert. A few years ago, the County approved a proposal by Stephens Estate to construct 22 single family detached houses, complete with residential gate, immediately north of the Goodyears' home. We understand that the City is now in the process of approving an amendment to the Stephens Estate project proposed by Crowell Industries and/or Century Crowell Communities ("Crowell"). This amendment would, among other things, would increase the density of the development to 36 houses and eliminate the residential gate. The Goodyears strongly believe, and we concur, that Crowell's proposed expansion of the development (the "Expansion Project") and the resulting increase in construction, grading, traffic, noise and pollution will result in significant long-lasting deleterious effects on the Goodyears' home and the surrounding environment. The Goodyears therefore strenuously object to the Expansion Project. We hereby request copies of the initial study and any additional environmental analysis conducted for the Expansion Project to date so that we may better evaluate the impact of the Expansion Project on the �I 08-13-98 Goodyear S:\153\CORR\98080013.LTR City of Palm Desert August 14. 1998 Page 2 environment. We also hereby request, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21092.2, written notice of any CEQA documentation or actions taken with respect to the Expansion Project. We also believe that the Expansion Project's significant increase in density violates the City's general plan and zoning requirements for the area. The density is substantially higher than the surrounding developments, including that in which the Goodyears reside. This density difference will inevitably lead to traffic, safety and other quality-of-life problems. The Goodyears believe that a residential gate at the northeast corner of the i Expansion Project on Frank Sinatra drive would go a long way toward alleviating their concerns in this matter. Moreover, such a residential gate (which we understand would be relatively inexpensive) would add to the attractiveness of the community and reduce the risk of traffic congestion and accidents. Thank you in advance for your consideration of and attention to this letter. Very truly yours, Dean Dunn-Rankin DDR/ cc: Clyde and Eloise Goodyear Mark McGuire, Esq. I 1 08-13-98 Goodyear S A153WORM98080013 ATR GR � HEWYTT & MCGU>t>EtE, LLP ArroRNRYS AT LAW DEAN DUNN•RANKINCNARL 1990D MxArrhur BDulevard,Suim 1050 MASK R.McCunui WILLIA S 5.HALLExoN Wma D.DINER. I ANDI M E.HARTZ Irvine,Glifo 9) 98 JAY F.PALCHiKorF ANORrwK.ItART/R11 (949)798-0500 (949)798.0511 (fax) PAULA.ROWE HUGH HEWnT WILLIAM L.T womEY JOHN D.HUMN JOHN P.YW R RECEIVED AUG 14 1998 Fax Cover Sheet COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT I Date: August 14, 1998 I To: Steve Smith Phone: (760) 346-0611 Fax: (760) 341-7099 From: Dean Dunn-Rankin Phone: (949) 798-0718 Fax: 949 798-0511 Message: Please see attached letter re Amendment to Tentative Tract Map No. 26553 Number of pages including covers she et:t. 3 The information contained in this facsimile transmission is attorney privileged and confidential information intended only for the review and use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized dissemination, distribution, use or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone. Thank you. .a i The RECEIVE® CO2uf d2�lene AUG 17 1998 A on the kkD lJ US i 3 1 `Ci 9 e COMMUNffY GEYFLOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT Palm 0 e Sc.r�- Flc:-n n Lm j Cb(nUrn 1 ss 10-\ �aSC, tJc . iT �lv573 Ame Prr n� — kc)nciczle. GoiF IC lib FrcYA -- 5�c�r e— t 3 g f�c l L� 1�1 rG a 1�cu-� ,6 -�h pal m Gk )°a.Ir G -n+legp— LL s �lPct C&I �C14JCr acQ�l +rt��ak Oq(ns a& CL Cc�resS -fz can 5�q nt f l - Cc�v d c -a do rcsu i +t-/ycr Uuya,,V,- ac l)& +e cam' Cjy) --t� r o a—d- O-S buy- bu i 1� cw S 4.aX 40 /n,�- 0-1yd-- uTzua�r aD 4o P.O. Box 7200 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816-1941 • 208/765-4000 • Fax 208/664.7276 Toll Free Reservations 800/688-5253 L��GLk.�(1er c7Y t j �� o � Ct �� ! cQ- h ecul rxt, , vie " p- C4'k- c.�LC � '�(�t'VYca c e s< ptiucf- Cti .--jqC, IKI a/y,cam. -U GC C U',1 S C� d C , roO t, �� ate : cZ�Nt.(cca� d2cn n�s V tC�ti� bier ; by Lt ►- i�r�- C��vi r� Crc� L*'I- CC c4l i vWILL c�Qc �.e� CQzm� bu " c• i t ;,�; , .. , . "r. ,;. `•�. •' � R1� ,. <' .. _ . . per.... �T_ e ...yy-r ...�.., .- i / � i / / / '� i � � HEwrrT & McGUIRE, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW DEAN DUNN-RANKIN 19900 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 1050 MARK R. MCGUIRE CHARLES S. ExON Irvine, California 92612 DENNIS D. O'NEIL WILLIAM E.HALLE (949)798-0500 • (949) 798-0511 (fax) JAY F. PALCHIKOFF ANDREW K. HARTZELL PAUL A. ROWE HUGH HEWr17 WILLIAM L. TWOMEY JOHN D. HUDSON JOHN P. YEAGER August 14, 1998 RECEIVED AUG 17 1998 BY TELECOPY AND CERTIFIED MAIL. RRR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CRY OF PALM DESERT City of Palm Desert Planning Department 7350 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260-2578 Attention: Mr. Steve Smith Re: Amendment to Tentative Tract Mai) No. 26553 Ladies and Gentlemen: This firm represents Clyde and Eloise Goodyear (the "Goodyears") in' connection with the referenced matter. All future correspondence with the Goodyears should be directed to the undersigned. The Goodyears reside at 38230 Tandika Trail in the Avondale Golf Club in Palm Desert. A few years ago, the County approved a proposal by Stephens Estate to construct 22 single family detached houses, complete with residential gate, immediately north of the Goodyears' home. We understand that the City is now in the process of approving an amendment to the Stephens Estate project proposed by Crowell Industries and/or Century Crowell Communities ("Crowell"). This amendment would, among other things, would increase the density of the development to 36 houses and eliminate the residential gate. The Goodyears strongly believe, and we concur, that Crowell's proposed expansion of the development (the 'Expansion Project") and the resulting increase in construction, grading, traffic, noise and pollution will result in significant long-lasting deleterious effects on the Goodyears' home and the surrounding environment. The Goodyears therefore strenuously object to the Expansion Project. We hereby request copies of the initial study and any additional environmental analysis conducted for the Expansion Project to date so that we may better evaluate the impact of the Expansion Project on the 08-13-98 Goodyear S:\153\CORR\98080013.LTR City of Palm Desert August 14, 1998 Page 2 environment. We also hereby request, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21092.2, written notice of any CEQA documentation or actions taken with respect to the Expansion Project. We also believe that the Expansion Project's significant increase in density violates the City's general plan and zoning requirements for the area. The density is substantially higher than the surrounding developments, including that in which the Goodyears reside. This density difference will inevitably lead to traffic, safety and other quality-of-life problems. The Goodyears believe that a residential gate at the northeast corner of the Expansion Project on Frank Sinatra drive would go a long way toward alleviating their concerns in this matter. Moreover, such a residential gate (which we understand would be relatively inexpensive) would add to the attractiveness of the community and reduce the risk of traffic congestion and accidents. Thank you in advance for your consideration of and attention to this letter. Very truly yours, 22� Dean Dunn-Rankin DDR/ cc: Clyde and Eloise Goodyear Mark McGuire, Esq. 08-13-98 Goodyear S:\153\CORR\98080013.LTR 1'l l • F J t f SMARTGATE 20"fl NO GATE OPERATOR NEVER BEFORE HAS A SWING GATE OPERATOR BEEN BUILT WITH THIS LEVEL OF STRENGTH,RUGGEDNESS AND QUALITY OR BEEN ENGINEERED TO ENSURE TOTAL RELIABILITY, AS WELL AS MAXIMUM SAFETY FOR THOSE WHO COME IN CONTACT WITH IT. BUT THAT'S NOT ALLH THE SMARTGATE 2000 HAS EXCITING SMART FEATURES, NOT AVAILABLE IN ANY OTHER SWING GATE OPERATOR,TO MAKE YOUR LIFE EASIER AND GIVE YOU MORE CONTROL. ACCESSORY POWER-Two 115 VAC outlets and CAP ASSEMBLY-Easy to remove or on-board connection for 24 VDC provide power for SOLID STATE CONTROL BOARD- loosen for manual release of gate and gate operator accessories and installation tools. Advanced electronics monitor and free rotation. control gate operation and provide ` resistance to power surges. GEARBOX-80 to 1 wormgear reduction y bathed in synthetic lubricant that will LED INDICATORS-Indicate status of every r, not thicken in cold temperatures. input and output,simplifying installation and troubleshooting. POWER FAILURE OPERATION-Opens ki gate when AC power fails so people are OBSTRUCTION SENSING-Sensitivity { not locked in or out(optional). set independently for openings and closing cycles to ensure maximum COVER-Spin molded using heavy safety and reliability. duty,UV resistant ABS plastic. CYCLE COUNTER-Tracks number of times ACCESSORY TRAY-Oversized tray has gate is opened and closed to allow better room for loop detectors,Sentex's assessment of maintenance needs. optional battery back-up,etc. MOTOR-1/2 horsepower with _' TAILGATE SUPPRESSION-Makes it very ultra-high quality bearings for veryc, difficult for unauthorized vehicles to follow quiet operation. ': an authorized vehicle in or out. EASY POWER DISCONNECT-Makes DYNAMIC BRAKING-Stops gate precisely, installation and service easier and eliminating "coasting". safer. FRAME-Fabricated from 114"cold rolled CORROSION RESISTANCE-All metal parts have been steel for exceptional strength and rigidify. zinc plated for resistance to corrosive elements. FEATURES UNIQUE TO THE SMARTGATE 2000 BATTERY BACKED 365-DAY CLOCK-Used to automatically open and close the gate on a A�A� scheduled basis and to time/date stamp event records. TELEPHONE LINE INTERFACE WITH BUILT-IN MODEM-Used in service capabilities — described below,as well as to set automatic opening and closing schedules. --- AUTOMATIC SERVICE REQUEST-Call can be placed'd gate stops operating due to a mechanical failure or when the cycle counter indicates that preventive maintenance is needed.Provides the site location and condition.Can be directed to a technician's pager or to service department computer running Sentexs Windows-based software. REMOTE DIAGNOSTICS-Allows servicing dealer to call SmartGate 2000 to determine status of each input and output and to retrieve and analyze records of most recent gate operator events.This speeds the resolution of problems and often eliminates the need for a technician to visit the site. f.3_`� + " SPECIFICATIONSYour Installing SmartGate Dealer. z. DIMENSIONS-20.5"W SAFETY LAB TESTING- by 23"D by 23"H ETL listed GATE SIZE-Up to 18 feet long WARRANTY-3 years and up to 1000 pounds (2 years on electronic parts) ARM SPEED- POWER- 115 VAC,60Hz using 100 per second dedicated 15 amp circuit ELECTRICALr PROPOSAL CONTRACTORS o8733 PEREZ ROAD, UNIT 15A Cpnmbutl a Rui&rnul �� BAY CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 Page No. of Pages S�//�Y 1 f7 (760)324-3079 FAX (760) 324-2469 SECURITY GATES INC. CC174 ELECTRONIC ENTRY SPECIALISTS PAGE 1 OF 3 cam caac Ix 062t380 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO PHONE DATE AVONDALE HOA 760-345-3195 MAR. 11 , 1998 STREET JOB NAME 75800 AVONDALE DR. SECURITY INSTALLATIONS CITY,STATE AND ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION PALM DESERT, CA. 92211 SAME ARCHITECT DATE OF PLANS JOB PHONE ATTN: MR.& MRS . GOODY AR We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: WE ARE PLEASED TO SUBMIT OUR PROPOSAL TO FURNISH LABOR, MATERIALS, AND SUPERVISION TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING : ENTRANCE GATE : 1— FABRICATE AND INSTALL ( 1) WROUGHT IRON SWING GATE APPRX . 14 'X 6 ' ( INCLUDES HD HINGE POST AND HD HINGES ) 2— FABRICATE AND INSTALL ( 1) WROUGHT IRON STATIONARY PANEL APPRX. 4'X 6' 3— FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) SENTE% SMARTGATE 2000 OPERATOR WITH PC COMMUNICATIONS 4— INSTALL (2) SAFETY LOOPS WITH VEHICLE DETECTOR 5— FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1 ) DOORKING MODEL 1601 BARRIER GATE OPERATOR WITH 12 ' WOODEN ARM 6— INSTALL ( 1) DOWN LOOP WITH VEHICLE DETECTOR 7— FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) KEY COMPANY CARD READER (INCLUDES GOOSE NECK STAND, 2 PROTECTION POSTS AND CONCRETE ISLAND) 8— FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) MULTI CODE RADIO RECEIVER 9— FURNIH AND INSTALL ( 1) FIRE DEPARTMENT KETSWITCH BOX We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor—complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: SEE PAGE THREE dollars Payment to be made as follows: 40% DOWN WITH ACCEPTANCE OF THIS PROPOSAL/CONTRACT, AND BALANCE DUE UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION AND DEMONSTRATION All material is andardtPra to be as Striationsc.All work to from completed es In a warns i n involving manner costs wig to standard any upon Any an Orders or is writ on Iram above specifications mien involving a Me Authorised costs will be emculecl only upon entlup orders.and will become el extra charge over and above the Signature — estimate,All agreements contingent upon strikes Accidents or delays bryorM our control.Owner to carry Ore,tornado and other necessary insurance.Our workers are fully coveretl by Workmen s Note:This proposal may be THIRTY Compensation Insurance. withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. Acceptance Of Proposal—The above prices.specifications and _ conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted.You are authorized to do the work as specified.Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature Date of Acceptance: Signature SER ELECTRRICALICAL f PROPOSAL - . CONTRACTORS o8733 PEREZ ROAD, UNIT 15A cwtpvipcvaipTT..�..,&R�,...a.�.mia�i /� . [�.irNG:` VAZKAI Page No. of Pages �/y�1�1� p��/ CATHEDRAL CITY, CA92234 7V V��^^7 wBwxAYr (760) 324-3079 FAX (760)324-2469 SECURM GAM INC. CC174A PAGE 2 OF 3 ELECTRONIC ENTRY SPECIALISTS Will.COrN Lic A`621 380 ` 'AVib ITt HOA 76R0-345-3195 MAR. 11 , 1998 s"n800 AVONDALE DR. SECURITY INSTALLATIONS "I'�'s7�rl��roz52gn9ERT, CA. 92211 SAMEoN MR .& MRS . GOODY AR of Rows 'oa PHONE We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: WE ARE PLEASED TO SUBMIT OUR PROPOSAL TO FURNISH LABOR, MATERIALS, AND SUPERVISION TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: EXIT GATE : 1- FABRICATE AND INSTALL ( 1) WROUGHT IRON SWING GATE APPRX. 14 -X 6 ' ( INCLUDES HD HINGE POST AND HD HINGES ) 2- FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) SENTEX SMARTGATE 2000 OPERATOR WITH PC COMMUNICATIONS 3- INSTALL (2) SAFETY LOOPS WITH VEHICLE DETECTOR 4- FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) DOORKING MODEL 1610 TRAFFIC SPIKES AND ( 1) DOORKING MODEL 1615 ILLUMINATED TRAFFIC SIGN 5- FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) KEY COMPANY CARD READER ( INCLUDES GOOSE NECK STAND, 2 PROTECTION POSTS AND CONCRETE ISLAND) 6- FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) MULTI CODE RADIO RECEIVER 7- PROVIDE ALL CONCRETE WORK 8- PROVIDE ALL SAW CUTTING 9- PROVIDE ALL ELECTRICAL HOOK UPS 10- TEST AND ADJUST We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor—complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: 4„ ******** SEE PAGE THREE ***** ** dollars Payme4ptloQer$ape NWrollpwITH ACCEPTANCE OF THIS PROPOSAL/CONTRACT, AND BALANCE lD7UE UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION AND DEMONSTRATION All material is standard t0 be as s alteration All work xo from Completed m a workmanLke manner Oy �" according to executed only upon Any n orders. or deviation tram above a Charge over invoand above extra AuthoSignature vests will be executed only upon a nllen o strs.and will become el e*tra merge over trol abwve the Signature (6�..f- esOmale.All agreements Contingent upon slakes.accidents or delays beyond our conV01 Owner t0 Carty fire.tornado and other necessary insurance.Our workers are fully Covered by Workmen5 Note:This proposal may be THIRTY Compensation Insurance withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. Acceptance of proposal—The above prices,specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted.You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature Date of Acceptance: Signature �,CO sRI Al/ l PROPOSAL ELECTRICAL * I coNTRACTORS 68733 PEREZ ROAD, UNIT 15A Gomm.ron a Amdi %E: BAY CATHEDRAL CITY, CA92234 Page No. of Pages SCK ��7 (760) 324-3079 FAX (760) 324-2469 CC 17 4B SECURITY GATES INC. PAGE 3 OF 3 ELECTRONIC ENTRY SPECIALISTS CaIM.COM.Lk.#621380 P"N"1fl3Y7T7A3IE HOA 7'15'0-345-3195 OtfAR . 11 , 1998 sTReY5800 AVONDALE DR. S'E'G`tURITY INSTALLATIONS "^PA�'L?Pz'DE`SERT, CA. 92211 5s �BCl`l'1P ON AR'A 1 1 N : MR.& MRS . GOODY AAR OF PLANS JOB PNONE We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: WE ARE PLEASED TO SUBMIT OUR PROPOSAL TO FURNISH LABOR, MATERIALS, AND SUPERVISION TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT : 1- FURNISH INSTALL ( 1) TOSHIBA LOW-LITE 1/3" CCD B/W CAMERA 2- INSTALL ( 1) EMI CAMERA HOUSING 3- INSTALL ( 1) EMI HOUSING WALL MOUNT BRACKET 4- INSTALL ( 1) PANASONIC 9" B/W MONITOR 5- INSTALL ( 1) EAGLE TRANSMISION SYSTEM 6- INSTALL ( 1 ) 24db DISH-GRID ANTENNAE 7- INSTALL ( 1 ) 14db REC . ANTENNAE 8- INSTALL ( 1) CHUGAI 1/3" 4MM A/I LENS DC 9- INSTALL ( 1) TOSHIBA 24HR REAL-TIME VCR NOTES: A- 3 YEAR FACTORY WARRANTY ON SWING OPERATORS B- 2 YEAR FACTORY WARRANTY ON ALL DOORKING PRODUCTS C- 1 YEAR LABOR WARRANTY D- PROPOSAL BASED ON CITY APPROVAL E- ALL PERMITS BY AVONDALE F- ALL CONDUITS BY OTHERS AND CO-ORDINATED BY SOUTH BAY SECURITY GATES G- ALL ELECTRICAL POWER BY OTHERS H- CAMERA MONITOR TO BE INSTALLED IN EXISTING GUARD HOUSE I- AVONDALE TO SUPPLY COMPUTER EQUIPMENT TOTAL PRICE INSTALLED $ 23 , 960 . 00 We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor—complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: *TWENTY THREE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SIXTY & N0/100* 23, 960 . 00 Paymgo� enj3t�o"VITH ACCEPTANCE OF THIS PROPOSAL/CONTRACT, AND ) BALANCE DUE UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION AND DEMONSTRATION All material is guaranteed to be as Specified.All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to Standard practices.Any alteration or deviation from above spedficabona mioftm,extra Authorized costs will be executed only upon written orders.and wlll become an extra charge over and above the Signature— estimate. I'I estimate.All agreements contingent upon strik THIRTY es.accidents or delays beyond our control.Owner to carry file.tornado and other necessary insurance.Our workers are fully covered by Wolemens Note:This proposal may be Compensation msurance, withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. Acceptance of Proposal—The above prices.specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted.You are authorized to do the work as specified.Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature Date of Acceptance: Signature 4. The RECEIVED g Coeur dlene AUG 17 1998 A resort on the kde �iJgvS I 13 .) Ie COMMUNITYGEYELOPM=M � / DEPARTMENT JJ CITY OF PALM DESERT Palm peSefr - QlannLmj Case, tic • i T �1v573 �-mertr�rr�n'i- - f�voncla.le GoiF C1'L)b RLY)r �ebc�rc111 'R . �tiY�er 3 g-7 E3c Tamctd/-a.i rGuL N 6Y- 'h — p jm cac i- 1 F��ylN� �mS Gcl� l I a- w �.� b� t,`n a b I V / 4 9ubl l c, h ea.l'cm t Off(0n �cT C W 1zc>vQ i cw �Jflv- y- e, Civil 61, 42L ' Gt dd I �U-rCd- O/ c5s alncL Gres S -Iv c� 1CJ�- Frt�� s� (Cv C&n, �J2 G (✓ro do CC S U I fL/r cr v1� �� c)✓ ro c� e - p S '� , S u C.uastm 'aF Ore_ ) rt'v,r-1-i5 y s � o f yn wed ur-e a Se- Cara 1,� p !� actin OYI C.E.. b U I J C�linr c O cv✓ -I,- rn avh e l i a CQ fir` G'-�- GtSSt'S�scrn.e�� a)y CAD P.O. Box 7200 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816-1941 • 208/765-4000 • Fax 208/664-7276 Toll Free Reservations 800/688-5253 vY ii lam- c J c rat., cf i lll.U- ire_. Ctm5�t� hem' --fin 02 "q CL G( e i c,`-o S �c� Gam' LQ )� f trC� �.' !�1 Yl U � !Lr f, 6Ury- i " C Q, 1 Y-1 cc C ,&UYA WAA CQ a-4/L& w v . cn 1 }��_.) .. �:�G^a�i�; 1 �' }: 1: • �I •. l�\- ..�a� '. J'� v �� �..f.. � ._ � �-_.'C � _ � kit� r - _ "YG - . ��. =. _ '_. - __'l. —_ - .. __:. � � . . ,� .. _. - ��-z +WPM.� / � � / ' I �� � � �� / � HEWITT & MCGumE, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW DEAN DUNN-RANKIN 19900 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 1050 MARK R. MCGUIRE CHARLES S. EXON Irvine, California 92612 DENNIS D. O'NEH, WILLIAM E. HALLE (949) 798-0500 • (949) 798-0511 (fax) JAY F. PALCHIKOFF ANDREW K. HARTZELL PAUL A. ROWE HUGH HEWrrr WILLIAM L. TWOMEY JOHN D. HUDSON JOHN P. YEAGER August 14, 1998 RECEIVED AUG 17 1998 BY TELECOPY AND CERTIFIED MAIL. RRR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT City of Palm Desert Planning Department 7350 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260-2578 Attention: Mr. Steve Smith Re: Amendment to Tentative Tract Man No. 26553 Ladies and Gentlemen: This firm represents Clyde and Eloise Goodyear (the "Goodyears") in connection with the referenced matter. All future correspondence with the Goodyears should be directed to the undersigned. The Goodyears reside at 38230 Tandika Trail in the Avondale Golf Club in Palm Desert. A few years ago, the County approved a proposal by Stephens Estate to construct 22 single family detached houses, complete with residential gate, immediately north of the Goodyears' home. We understand that the City is now in the process of approving an amendment to the Stephens Estate project proposed by Crowell Industries and/or Century Crowell Communities ("Crowell"). This amendment would, among other things, would increase the density of the development to 36 houses and eliminate the residential gate. The Goodyears strongly believe, and we concur, that Crowell's proposed expansion of the development (the "Expansion Project") and the resulting increase in construction, grading, traffic, noise and pollution will result in significant long-lasting deleterious effects on the Goodyears' home and the surrounding environment. The Goodyears therefore strenuously object to the Expansion Project. We hereby request copies of the initial study and any additional environmental analysis conducted for the Expansion Project to date so that we may better evaluate the impact of the Expansion Project on the 08-13-98 Goodyear S:\153\CORR\98080013.LTR City of Palm Desert August 14, 1998 Page 2 environment. We also hereby request, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21092.2, written notice of any CEQA documentation or actions taken with respect to the Expansion Project. We also believe that the Expansion Project's significant increase in density violates the City's general plan and zoning requirements for the area. The density is substantially higher than the surrounding developments, including that in which the Goodyears reside. This density difference will inevitably lead to traffic, safety and other quality-of-life problems. The Goodyears believe that a residential gate at the northeast comer of the Expansion Project on Frank Sinatra drive would go a long way toward alleviating their concerns in this matter. Moreover, such a residential gate (which we understand would be relatively inexpensive) would add to the attractiveness of the community and reduce the risk of traffic congestion and accidents. Thank you in advance for your consideration of and attention to this letter. Very truly yours, RND� Dean Dunn-Rankin DDR/ cc: Clyde and Eloise Goodyear Mark McGuire, Esq. 08-13-98 Goodyear S:\153\CORR\98080013.LTR F, � - !_'1j. 41. ..;.y•—� t• Y. lid ] . f _ .C� 'y' ' F: j• a a '' Sl .qrp.j} e � vn }'Y . .f a� - - • (n nn } r l J r �.t'-"'ff•,_h^::ter"L-- =' f - �^.4p ' �" v �L SMARTGATE 20*10 VING GATE OPERATOR I NEVER BEFORE HAS A SWING GATE OPERATOR BEEN BUILT WITH THIS LEVEL OF STRENGTH,RUGGEDNESS AND QUALITY OR BEEN ENGINEERED TO ENSURE TOTAL G RELIABILITY, AS WELL AS MAXIMUM SAFETY FOR THOSE WHO COME IN CONTACT WITH IT. BUT THAT'S NOT ALL!! THE SMARTGATE 2000 HAS EXCITING SMART FEATURES, NOT AVAILABLE IN ANY OTHER SWING GATE OPERATOR,TO MAKE YOUR LIFE EASIER AND GIVE YOU MORE CONTROL. ACCESSORY POWER-Two 115 VAC outlets and G}} CAP ASSEMBLY- Easy to remove or on-board connection for 24 VDC provide power for SOLID STATE CONTROL BOARD- i loosen for manual release of gate and gate operator accessories and installation tools. Advanced electronics monitor and free rotation. control gate operation and provide 7 _ resistance to power surges. GEARBOX-80 to 1 wormgear reduction mom! bathed in synthetic lubricant that will LED INDICATORS-Indicate status of every ` not thicken in cold temperatures. input and output,simplifying installation n _ and troubleshooting. p POWER FAILURE OPERATION- Opens gate when AC power fails so people are OBSTRUCTION SENSING-Sensitivity , not locked in or out(optional). set independently for openings and ttt' closing cycles to ensure maximum ! COVER-Spin molded using heavy\ safety and reliability. ! duty,UV resistant ABS plastic. CYCLE COUNTER-Tracks number of times ACCESSORY TRAY•Oversized tray has gate is opened and closed to allow better room for loop detectors,Sentex's assessment of maintenance needs. optional battery back-up,etc. MOTOR- 1/2 horsepower with TAILGATE SUPPRESSION-Makes it very ultra-high quality bearings for very difficult for unauthorized vehicles to follow quiet operation. an authorized vehicle in or out. EASY POWER DISCONNECT-Makes DYNAMIC BRAKING-Stops gate precisely, installation and service easier and eliminating"coasting", safer. t FRAME-Fabricated from 1/4"cold rolled CORROSION RESISTANCE-All metal parts have been steel for exceptional strength and rigidity. zinc plated for resistance to corrosive elements. FEATURES UNIQUE TO THE SMARTGATE 2000 BATTERY BACKED 365-DAY CLOCK-Used to automatically open and close the gate on a � � scheduled basis and to time/date stamp event records. TELEPHONE LINE INTERFACE WITH BUILT-IN MODEM-Used in service capabilities described below,as well as to set automatic opening and closing schedules. - AUTOMATIC SERVICE REQUEST-Call can be placed if gate stops operating due to a f mechanical failure or when the cycle counter indicates that preventive maintenance is ` needed.Provides the site location and condition.Can be directed to a technician's pager J[k6 or to service department computer running Sentex's Windows-based software. REMOTE DIAGNOSTICS-Allows servicing dealer to call SmartGate 2000 to determine status of each input and output and to retrieve and analyze records of most recent gate operator events.This speeds the resolution of problems and often 'G+�1:r ;ts�aa yx'• ;, eliminates the need for a technician to visit the site. .ram, SPECIFICATIONSYour Installing SmartGate Dealer: DIMENSIONS-20.5"W SAFETY LAB TESTING- by 23"D by 23"H ETL listed GATE SIZE-Up to 18 feet long WARRANTY-3 years and up to 1000 pounds (2 years on electronic parts) ARM SPEED- POWER-115 VAC,60Hz using 100 per second dedicated 15 amp circuit DI ELECTRICAL ` s PROPOSAL CONTRACTORS u8733 PEREZ ROAD, UNIT 15A ' CommxcAl a Radnwl /� ��-1 WA`p�I� CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 Page No. of Pages SO Y (760) 324-3079 FAX (760)324.2469 SECURITY GATES INC. CC174 ELECTRONIC ENTRY SPECIALISTS PAGE 1 OF 3 Dye corr. Lic 062t380 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO PHONE DATE AVONDALE HOA 760-345-3195 MIAR. 11 , 1998 STREET JOB NAME 75800 AVONDALE DR. SECURITY INSTALLATIONS CITY.STATE AND ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION PALM DESERT, CA. 92211 SAME ARCHITECT DATE OF PLANS JOB PHONE ATTN : MR.& MRS. GOODY AR We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: WE ARE PLEASED TO SUBMIT OUR PROPOSAL TO FURNISH LABOR, MATERIALS, AND SUPERVISION TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: ENTRANCE GATE: 1— FABRICATE AND INSTALL ( 1) WROUGHT IRON SWING GATE APPRX . 14 'X 6' ( INCLUDES HD HINGE POST AND HD HINGES ) 2— FABRICATE AND INSTALL ( 1) WROUGHT IRON STATIONARY PANEL APPRX . 4'X 6 ' 3— FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) SENTEX SMARTGATE 2000 OPERATOR WITH PC COMMUNICATIONS 4— INSTALL (2) SAFETY LOOPS WITH VEHICLE DETECTOR 5— FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) DOORRING MODEL 1601 BARRIER GATE OPERATOR WITH 12' WOODEN ARM 6— INSTALL ( 1) DOWN LOOP WITH VEHICLE DETECTOR 7— FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) KEY COMPANY CARD READER (INCLUDES GOOSE NECK STAND, 2 PROTECTION POSTS AND CONCRETE ISLAND) 8— FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) MULTI CODE RADIO RECEIVER 9— FURNIH AND INSTALL ( 1) FIRE DEPARTMENT KETSWITCH BOX We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor—complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: ** ******* SEE PAGE THREE ***** *** Payment to be made as follows: dollars ($ ), 40% DOWN WITH ACCEPTANCE OF THIS PROPOSAL/CONTRACT, AND BALANCE DUE UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION AND DEMONSTRATION All material is guaranteed to be as alteralM.All wok to be completes m a workmanlike manneracco costs ill to executstandard praonlyu on Any alteration q d Wit bn TOM above a charge ionsOver andai o e the Signal Authorized costs well be agreements is cupon wneen orders.and will become an extra charge over and above the Signature BSOmale.All agreem¢nts conVngent upon Si.aeCidenls or Delays beyoM our control.Owner to Carry tire.tornado aM otter necessary insurance.Our workers are fully covered by workmen's Note ns This proposal may be THIRTY Compensation Insurance withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. Acceptance of Proposal—The above prices.specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted.You are authorized to do the work as specified.Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature Date of Acceptance: Signature pxcOELE, RIC..`���Fr PROPOSAL CONTRACTORS ti6733 PEREZ ROAD, UNIT 15A COmmontl a geswoei ��y�f7�� BAY CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 Page No. of Pages SO 1 BAY (760) 324-3079 FAX (760) 324-2469 SECURITY GATES (NC CC174A PAGE 2 OF 3 ELECTRONIC ENTRY SPECIALISTS Call.(,q,p Lic p621380 PaoA'Q�baN'�'? 12 HOA 760-345-3195 MAR . 11 , 1998 eTRi AVONDALE DR . SECURITY INSTALLATIONS cTMpzbr,1tERT, CA . 92211 SAMEION ARi MM+R .& MRS . GOODY AAR OF PLANS OB PHONE We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: WE ARE PLEASED TO SUBMIT OUR PROPOSAL TO FURNISH LABOR, MATERIALS, AND SUPERVISION TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: EXIT GATE: 1— FABRICATE AND INSTALL ( 1) WROUGHT IRON SWING GATE APPRX. 14 -X 6 ^ ( INCLUDES HD HINGE POST AND HD HINGES ) 2— FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1 ) SENTEX SMARTGATE 2000 OPERATOR WITH PC COMMUNICATIONS 3— INSTALL (2) SAFETY LOOPS WITH VEHICLE DETECTOR 4— FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) DOORKING MODEL 1610 TRAFFIC SPIKES AND ( 1 ) DOORKING MODEL 1615 ILLUMINATED TRAFFIC SIGN 5— FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) KEY COMPANY CARD READER ( INCLUDES GOOSE NECK STAND, 2 PROTECTION POSTS AND CONCRETE ISLAND) 6— FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) MULTI CODE RADIO RECEIVER 7— PROVIDE ALL CONCRETE WORK 8— PROVIDE ALL SAW CUTTING 9— PROVIDE ALL ELECTRICAL HOOK UPS 10— TEST AND ADJUST We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor—complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: *It******** SEE PAGE THREE dollars Payme4nt 1o3oe raq� NonpwITH ACCEPTANCE OF THIS PROPOSAL/CONTRACT, AND BALANCE DUE UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION AND DEMONSTRATIOI/N/n as odi to is guaranteed is s. n specified All work to from completes e a workmanlike manner Al malirg to standars practices.Any alteration or serration be c above specifications involving ever Authorized Costs will he executed Only upon written orders and will become an extra charge Over and above the Signature !E estimate.All agreements Contingent upon stokes.accidents or delays beyond Our control.(Tuner to Carry fire.tomaso and other necessary Insurance.Our workers are fully Covered by Workmen's Note:This proposal may be THIRTY Compensation Insurance withdrawn by us it not accepted within days. Acceptance of Proposal—The above prices,specifications and conditions are sat ssfactery and are hereby accepted.You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature Date of Acceptance Signature ER n.�C ELESFIICAL f PROPOSAL CONTRACTORS 68733 PEREZ ROAD, UNIT 15A G.vnmertul S ReIxtenel - �/y��� p �/ CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 Page No. of Pages SO 1 fl BA (760) 324-3079 FAX (760)324-2469 CC174B SECURITY GATES INC. PAGE 3 OF 3 ELECTRONIC ENTRY SPECIALISTS Call Conti.tic.#621380 P"RY'l3Y9T9AtL'E HOA 7'eU-345-3195 °iAR . 11 , 1998 B" "5800 AVONDALE DR. SEMRITY INSTALLATIONS c'r?A''L'PY21DT�5'ERT , CA. 92211 ICa` EON AMN: MR .& MRS . GOODY An OF PLANS JOB PHONE We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: WE ARE PLEASED TO SUBMIT OUR PROPOSAL TO FURNISH LABOR, MATERIALS, AND SUPERVISION TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT : 1- FURNISH INSTALL ( 1) TOSHIBA LOW-LITE 1/3" CCD B/W CAMERA 2- INSTALL ( 1) EMI CAMERA HOUSING 3- INSTALL ( 1) EMI HOUSING WALL MOUNT BRACKET 4- INSTALL ( 1) PANASONIC 9" B/W MONITOR 5- INSTALL ( 1) EAGLE TRANSMISION SYSTEM 6- INSTALL ( 1) 24l DISH-GRID ANTENNAE 7- INSTALL ( 1) 14l REC . ANTENNAE 8- INSTALL ( 1) CHUGAI 1/3" 4MM A/I LENS DC 9- INSTALL ( 1) TOSHIBA 24HR REAL-TIME VCR NOTES : A- 3 YEAR FACTORY WARRANTY ON SWING OPERATORS B- 2 YEAR FACTORY WARRANTY ON ALL DOORKING PRODUCTS C- 1 YEAR LABOR WARRANTY D- PROPOSAL BASED ON CITY APPROVAL E- ALL PERMITS BY AVONDALE F- ALL CONDUITS BY OTHERS AND CO-ORDINATED BY SOUTH BAY SECURITY GATES G- ALL ELECTRICAL POWER BY OTHERS H- CAMERA MONITOR TO BE INSTALLED IN EXISTING GUARD HOUSE I- AVONDALE TO SUPPLY COMPUTER EQUIPMENT TOTAL PRICE INSTALLED $ 23 , 960 . 00 We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor—complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: *TWENTY THREE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SIXTY & N0/100* 23 , 960 . 00 dollars ($ ). Payme46tenVfd`NR"' H ACCEPTANCE OF THIS PROPOSAL/CONTRACT, AND BALANCE DUE UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION AND DEMONSTRATION All material IS guaranteed to s. n alleraed All work to be completed m a workmanlike manner according to executed practices.Any attesters or deviation from above a charge Over iandvioo extra Authorized costs will be executed only upon written orders,and will become an extra charge over and above the Signature estimate.All agreements contingent upon strikes.accidents or delays beyond our control.Owner to THIRTY carry fire.tornado and other necessary Insurance.Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's Note:This proposal may be Compensation Insurance. withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. Acceptance Of Proposal—The above prices.specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted.You are authorized to do the work as specified.Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature Date of Acceptance: Signature The P-CEBVE® , Coeun dene AUG 171998 Arewd on ft faloe U Q vS 13 �pI 18 COMMUNITY GEYELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JJ CITY OF PALM DESERT `rd: Ptzlvn peSer+- Plc�nnvil1 Corn/rnlsslctr, -- �ase- No'• i`fi'a1D553 �-m�-r.!>r�ri.'� - �vorc�a,le GofF Club . RaYL , web eb Tames � n erF �-08 38 a 1 rGu:2-1'�1.6Y�Yt "- li'�m �S w JA be, unahl� wbl i(, h eaXurla- reo�an °� Qom' Plat Y. ecm 'stcjt4- -p/ie, '�csr dOjf , Tra Fes, �� �'�� �- (amJ& - G&4 CtO rCSu I+tmcr vie o C� GQ.ra ��'� c� u c eQ V se- tz 5 e,� c -fer o, -ar a -� rota rqa �° m A l vu5v�h L* 60 UW_)j aly- 00 4 P.O. Box 7200 • Coeur d'Alene,Idaho 83816-1941 • 208/7654000 • Fax 208/664-7276 Toll Free Reservations 800/688-5253 U1ju oy tti0f- -f kc- ov cv-at . der wl,(k be. v►�v�ae.P�-e� fie- �n'o�o� 1�, :dc�^a-, a�,'' � �� _ _ _cI• t1Yn Q,D � yII-f- Cinv, L&u G��c�Y,f�iiYcc_Q d.e.�c-�'n rvu'y► ���,��- VvA r v O V c9G(& ow anlvo c w I z)+ 5c 2z cQ� -Nhe- o6thq amcL �va c ► S ��'�' . d a.P,e_ Wi-(. fie- 5P-ff► 0� `Q bu t I Gov►- Ct-u Ro In ego >� rr- the -�w�A�jw"ru= Vii-Q- tom-- u,,, �S e � vc JCL � � - J SJf4' �- —}� �- �' �Y�, � Y i +{} �' i� �� � `W ':2 k i �. '... W''22.� M� �: � A i _ r.�_ . � ��,� `'�� n �� //� ICI � � � S;, emu. _ � g �� -� .��� ���� HEwITT & McGum, LLP ArMNEYS AT LAW CHAn ESS.E ANNIN 19900 McArthur Boulevard, Suite 1050 MARK R. MCOUIRa CHARLES S.BACN Irvine, California 92612 DENNIS D. O'NEIL ANDREW E.HALL► (949)79&0500 a (949) 798-0511 (tax) JAY F. PALCHIKOPF ANDREW K. HAa7zRLL HUGH HEwrrT PAUL A. ROWS JOHN D. HUDSON WILwAM L.TWOa1EY IOHN P. YRAOER August 14, 1998 RECEIVED RY 1EL COPY AND CERTIFI Q_b1AIL uRR AUG 17 1998 City of Palm Desert COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Department CITY OF PALM DESERT 7350 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260-2579 Attention: Mr. Steve Smith Re: Amendment to Tentative Tract Mao No 2655 Ladies and Gentlemen: This firm represents Clyde and Eloise Goodyear (the "Goodyears") in connection with the referenced matter. All future correspondence with the Goodyears should be directed to the undersigned. The Goodyears reside at 38230 Tandika Trail in the Avondale Golf Club in Palm Desert. A few years ago, the County approved a proposal by Stephens Estate to construct 22 single family detached houses, complete with residential gate, immediately north of the Goodyears' home. We understand that the City is now in the process of approving an amendment to the Stephens Estate project proposed by Crowell Industries and/or Century Crowell Communities ("Crowell"). This amendment would, among other things, would increase the density of the development to 36 houses and eliminate the residential gate. The Goodyears strongly believe, and we concur, that Crowell's proposed expansion of the development (the "Expansion Project") and the resulting increase in construction, grading, traffic, noise and pollution will result in significant long-lasting deleterious effects on the Goodyears' home and the surrounding environment. The Goodyears therefore strenuously object to the Expansion Project. We hereby request copies of the initial study and any additional environmental analysis conducted for the Expansion Project to date so that we may better evaluate the impact of the Expansion Project on the 09-13-9a Goodyear S:\133\COaa\9a0a0013.1TR i City of Palm Desert August 14, 1998 Page 2 environment. We also hereby request, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21092.2, written notice of any CRQA documentation or actions taken with respect to the Expansion Project. We also believe that the Expansion Project's significant increase in density violates the City's general plan and zoning requirements for the area. The density is substantially higher than the surrounding developments, including that in which the Goodyears reside. This density difference will inevitably lead to traffic, safety and other quality-of-life problems. The Goodyears believe that a residential gate at the northeast corner of the Expansion Project on Frank Sinatra drive would go a long way toward alleviating their concerns in this matter. Moreover, such a residential gate (which we understand would be relatively inexpensive) would add to the attractiveness of the community and reduce the risk of traffic congestion and accidents. Thank you in advance for your consideration of and attention to this letter. Very truly yours, Dean Dunn-Rankin DDR/ cc: Clyde and Eloise Goodyear Mark McGuire, Esq. 08.13-98 Goedypr R \153\CORR\OROR0013.�TR ' City of Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(760)346.0611 •FAX(760)341-7098 J http://www.paim-desert.org CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO.: TT 26553 Amendment NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public(tearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CENTURY-CROWELL COMMUNITIES for approval of an amended tentative tract map to allow the subdivision 8.207 acres into 36 residential lots, 5 street lots, and 3 landscape lots for a total of 44 parcels, and a negative declaration of environmental impact as it relates thereto. Property is located within Avondale Country Club,located at the southwest corner of Eldorado and Frank Sinatra. Also known as A.P.N. 626- 030-021. .Y�M1r �1.4l �9 1 -J- -PJl - - 1 SUBJECT rq un '� onunry i , r:111Y PROPERTY / lr.�•, I lol IQQQ i, �.�a •i"a rnw valr r.vrun rrn cl uT i:bSrlr �:r rl.i11J9-"jN III+V1111 1 nLr.< Ijr �.. PLpx SAID public]hearing will be held on Tuesday, August 18, 1998, before the Palm Desert Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. Written comments concerning all items covered by this public]hearing notice shall be accepted up to date of the hearing. Information concerning the proposed project and/or negative declaration is available for review in the Department of Community Development/Planning at the above address between the]lours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. If you challenge the proposed actions in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or pt-wffften correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission (or City Council) at, or prior to, the public,hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Sun PHILIP DRELL, Secretary July 15, 1998 Palm Desert Planning Commission r SmartGate 2000 ! FINALLY, A GATE OPERATOR THAT IS STRONG, RELIABLE . . . r � x , � �`� u �T*+'?s �, .1•.�� -, ?t��� 4a.,�t"Es rl '�^" ���; v �� ��! 'l?�-',�t+,��_�i lye, - �*, Y 'y 'Y F1T� '�i+.+'+1H��•`•�� h� � i f ly£f'. '.`sSF ' t h�.-`�, � :} '�Yi' � "° � t!�'•'� .YifL,`. ?�.Y v �- •'s KA F ( t+ � . .. �a ,�r` � }��• u ti' tt v - 411 I j p I �I +Y �ixi•-� i AND VERY, VERY SMART � � I ( S E N T E V S Y S T E M S SMARTGATE 2^9® SWING GATE OPERATOR NEVER BEFORE HAS A SWING GATE OPERATOR BEEN BUILT WITH THIS LEVEL OF STRENGTH,RUGGEDNESS AND QUALITY OR BEEN ENGINEERED TO ENSURE TOTAL RELIABILITY, AS WELL AS MAXIMUM SAFETY FOR THOSE WHO COME IN CONTACT WITH IT. BUT THAT'S NOT ALLH THE SMARTGATE 2000 HAS EXCITING SMART FEATURES, NOT AVAILABLE IN ANY OTHER SWING GATE OPERATOR,TO MAKE YOUR LIFE EASIER AND GIVE YOU MORE CONTROL. ACCESSORY POWER-Two 115 VAC outlets and CAP ASSEMBLY-Easy to remove or on-board connection for 24 VDC provide power for SOLID STATE CONTROL BOARD- loosen for manual release of gate and gate operator accessories and installation tools. Advanced electronics monitor and free rotation. control gate operation and provide resistance to power surges. GEARBOX-BO to 1 wormgear reduction bathed in synthetic lubricant that will �V ILEONDICATORS-Indicate status of every not thicken in cold temperatures. ff input and output,simplifying installation •- and troubleshooting. POWER FAILURE OPERATION-Opens a gate when AC power fails so people are OBSTRUCTION SENSING-Sensitivity not locked in or out(optional). �� .� set independently for openings and closing cycles to ensure maximum COVER-Spin molded using heavy w ` r Iq 11 safety and reliability. duty,UV resistant ABS plastic. - �. F..;' a. L CYCLE COUNTER-Tracks number of times ACCESSORY TRAY-Oversized tray has gate is opened and closed to allow better room for loop detectors,Sentex's s$"j assessment of maintenance needs. optional battery back-up,etc. MOTOR-1/2 horsepower with TAILGATE SUPPRESSION-Makes it very ultra-high quality bearings for very + difficult for unauthorized vehicles to follow quiet operation. an authorized vehicle In or out. EASY POWER DISCONNECT-Makes DYNAMIC BRAKING-Stops gate precisely, installation and service easier and + eliminating "coasting". safer. FRAME-Fabricated from 1/4"cold rolled CORROSION RESISTANCE-All metal parts have been steel for exceptional strength and rigidity. zinc plated for resistance to corrosive elements. FEATURES UNIQUE TO THE SMARTGATE 2000 BATTERY BACKED 365-DAY CLOCK-Used to automatically open and close the gate on a — scheduled basis and to time/date stamp event records. — TELEPHONE LINE INTERFACE WITH BUILT-IN MODEM-Used in service capabilities i described below,as well as to set automatic opening and closing schedules. AUTOMATIC SERVICE REQUEST-Call can be placed if gate stops operating due to a mechanical failure or when the cycle counter indicates that preventive maintenance is j needed.Provides the site location and condition.Can be directed to a technician's pager - J or to service department computer running Sentexs Windows-based software. REMOTE DIAGNOSTICS-Allows servicing dealer to call SmartGate 2000 to determine status of each input and output and to retrieve and analyze records ofmost recent gate operator events.This speeds the resolution of roblems and often ! , _ %r1t'-rvz-�Y;e eliminates the need for a technician to visit the site. Im -, - • Your Installing SmartGate Dealer: DIMENSIONS-20.5"W SAFETY LAB TESTING- by 23"D by 23"H ETL listed GATE SIZE-Up to 18 feet long WARRANTY-3 years and up to 1000 pounds (2 years on electronic parts) ARM SPEED- POWER- 115 VAC,60Hz using 100 per second dedicated 15 amp circuit C? SERvIcFl PROPOSAL •., CONTRACTORS 68733 PEREZ ROAD, UNIT 15A Cammi 6 R lefc,"el 3, O Page No. of Pages znlzmm/y�� CATHEDRAL CITY, CA92234 S 1�7 BAY (760) 324-3079 FAX (760) 324-2469 CC 174A SECUffff GM INC. PAGE 2 OF 3 ELECTRONIC ENTRY SPECIALISTS Calif Corm.Lil#621380 ...Vb TKU HOA 7fi0-345-3195 MAR. 11 , 1998 ITn800 AVONDALE DR. SECURITY INSTALLATIONS JOB AT ol�'S�ER"MitiERT, CA. 92211 SAMEION Allg (rl: MR.& MRS . GOODY iff .1 ILxcS JOB PHONE We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: WE ARE PLEASED TO SUBMIT OUR PROPOSAL TO FURNISH LABOR, MATERIALS, AND SUPERVISION TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: EXIT GATE : 1- FABRICATE AND INSTALL ( 1) WROUGHT IRON SWING GATE APPRX. 14 'X 6 ' ( INCLUDES HD HINGE POST AND HD HINGES ) 2- FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) SENTEX SMARTGATE 2000 OPERATOR WITH PC COMMUNICATIONS 3- INSTALL (2) SAFETY LOOPS WITH VEHICLE DETECTOR 4- FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1 ) DOORKING MODEL 1610 TRAFFIC SPIKES AND ( 1) DOORKING MODEL 1615 ILLUMINATED TRAFFIC SIGN - 5- FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) KEY COMPANY CARD READER (INCLUDES GOOSE NECK STAND, 2 PROTECTION POSTS AND CONCRETE ISLAND) 6- FURNISH AND INSTALL ( 1) MULTI CODE RADIO RECEIVER 7- PROVIDE ALL CONCRETE WORK 8- PROVIDE ALL SAW CUTTING 9- PROVIDE ALL ELECTRICAL HOOK UPS 10- TEST. AND ADJUST We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor—complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: SEE PAGE THREE ~** **** dollars Pavme4tdo�be D�e NoIIWITH ACCEPTANCE OF THIS PROPOSAL/CONTRACT, AND BALANCE DUE UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION AND DEMONSTRATION All material is guaranteed to be as specified.All work to be completed in a workmanlike manneracce costs wng to standardexecute only ces Any alteration ordeviation from above specificationscharge over involving extra AuthoSignat Red '✓/`///J vests will be executed only upon written orders and will become an extra charge over and above the Signature {6 CG carryestimate,fire All agreements thecontingent eceupon strikes.accidents or rs are beyond our d byol.Owner to THIRTY carry fire,tornado and other necessary Insurance Our workers are hilly covered by Workmen's Note:This proposalmay be Compensation Insurance. withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. Acceptance of Proposal—The above prices,specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted.You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature Date of Acceptance: Signature . 6 ,COLESERv�cFf coNTRACToas 68733 PEREZ ROAD, UNIT 15A PROPOSAL Commerae16 Pmidanuel �c/ NA CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 Page No. of Pages SCKM BAY (760)324-3079 FAX (760)324-2469 CC174B SECURITY GATES INC. PAGE 3 OF 3 ELECTRONIC ENTRY SPECIALISTS Calif.COnO.Llc.#621380 PROAVONVAITE HOA 7'�'b-345-3195 'MAR. ill 1998 ST875800 AVONDALE DR. SM'URITY INSTALLATIONS L`?A''L?Fz' 3EaERT, CA. 92211 90EON AR.ATT'N: MR.& MRS . GOODY AAR OF PLANS JOB PHONE We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: WE ARE PLEASED TO SUBMIT OUR PROPOSAL TO FURNISH LABOR, MATERIALS, AND SUPERVISION TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT: 1- FURNISH INSTALL ( 1) TOSHIBA LOW-LITE 1/3" CCD B/W CAMERA 2- INSTALL ( 1) EMI CAMERA HOUSING 3- INSTALL ( 1) EMI HOUSING WALL MOUNT BRACKET 4- INSTALL ( 1) PANASONIC 9" B/W MONITOR 5- INSTALL ( 1) EAGLE TRANSMISION SYSTEM 6- INSTALL ( 1) 24db DISH-GRID ANTENNAE 7- INSTALL ( 1) 14db EEC . ANTENNAE 8- INSTALL ( 1) CHDGAI 1/3'r 4MM A/I LENS DC 9- INSTALL ( 1) TOSHIBA 24HR REAL-TIME VCR NOTES : A- 3 YEAR FACTORY WARRANTY ON SWING OPERATORS B- 2 YEAR FACTORY WARRANTY ON ALL DOORKING PRODUCTS C- 1 YEAR LABOR WARRANTY D- PROPOSAL BASED ON CITY APPROVAL E- ALL PERMITS BY AVONDALE F- ALL CONDUITS BY OTHERS AND CO-ORDINATED BY SOUTH BAY SECURITY GATES G- ALL ELECTRICAL POWER BY OTHERS H- CAMERA MONITOR TO BE INSTALLED IN EXISTING GUARD HOUSE I- AVONDALE TO SUPPLY COMPUTER EQUIPMENT TOTAL PRICE INSTALLED $ 23, 960 . 00 We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor—complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: *TWENTY THREE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SIXTY &. N0/100* 23 , 960 . 00 dollars ($ ). PaymeOt"VOW"WITH ACCEPTANCE OF THIS PROPOSAL/CONTRACT, AND BALANCE DUE UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION AND DEMONSTRATION All material is guaranteed t0 be as alteraietl.All work t0 from completed m a workmanoly manner costs..ending to executed only upon Any alteration or and from above specifications involving extra Authorized costs will be executetl only upon written orders.and will become an extra charge over and above the Signature estimate All agreements contingent upon strikes accidents or delays beyond our control.Owner to THIRTY carry lire, tornado and other necessary insurance.Our workers are fully covered by Workmen s Note This proposal may be Compensation Insurance withdrawn by us if not accepted within days Acceptance of proposal—The above prices.specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted.You are authorized to do the work as specified.Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature Date of Acceptance. Signature 07/30/1996 16: 26 7603466118 DUDEK & ASSOCIATES PAGE 01 M E M DATE: July 30, 1998 TO: Kent Armstrong OP: Century-Crowell Communities 1535 South "D" Street Suite 200 San Bernardino, CA. 92408 TEL: 909-381-6007 FAX. 909-381-0041 ,FROM: Mike Mc Connell PROJECT: Avondale Country Club RE: Tentative 310PNa. 26553 This letter is to confirm that I have reviewed the Tentative Map No.26553 at Avondale Country Club and following are my findings: L The tentative map meets with the fire department requirements. 11. The Fire Department needs two (2) emergency access from two (2) cul-de-sacs to Frank Sinatra Drive for the following reasons: i. There is no direct access to the property from Frank Sinatra Drive. ii. The main entry gate to Avondale Country Club located on El Dorado Drive is too far away for the property shown on the map. iii. For health and safety reasons two (2) access points are required for all new improvements_ We trust this clarifies Fire Department requirements for the project, Please feel free to contact my office , if you have further question regarding this matter Very truly yours, Mike McConnell Fire Marshal Cove Communities EDWARD L. CHOTT 17 Lake Ridge Club Ct., Burr Ridge, Illinois 60521 August 9, 1998 RECEIVED Mr. Philip Drell, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission AUG 13 1998 City of Palm Desert (AMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive CITY OF PALM DESERT Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578 Dear Mr. Drell: I am the owner of a home located at 38-290 Tandika Trail in the Avondale Country Club Community. I wish to go on record as opposing the approval of the Century Crowell development of 8.207 acres within the subdivision. I feel that the number of homes within the proposed development is much too dense. Further, I feel that the absence of a second gate located on Frank Sinatra 'Drive will cause traffic congestion on the existing streets in Avondale. I request a Cequa Environmental Report because of the anticipated noise, traffic and .fumes. I look forward to your favorable consideration. Very truly yours, Edward L. Chott q yi City of Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(760)346-0611 •FAX(760)341-7098•http://www.paim-desert.org July 17, 1998 Joe Soneji Dudek and Associates 74-140 El Paseo Drive, Suite 5 Palm Desert, CA 92262 5 RE: TT 2653 Amendment #1 Dear Mr. Soneji: As you are aware, we have scheduled the above-referenced matter for a public hearing on August 18, 1998. We have not yet received the traffic study that we requested. In fact, the City's Traffic Engineer advises that he has not been contacted by anyone preparing the study. The traffic study is essential for us to prepare our staff report and recommendations to the Planning Commission. We will need to be in receipt of the traffic study in a form acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer no later than August 7, 1998. If we have not received the traffic study by August 7, 1998, we will have to recommend that the Planning Commission continue the matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, STEPHEN R. SMITH PLANNING MANAGER SRS:kc cc: John W. Pavelak, President Century - Crowell Communities 1535 South D. Street, Suite 200 6a San Bernardino, CA 92408 ucp Ren d wp\wrr\tt26553.amd PaDe CIIV Df P1iIM DESERT 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE _ PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92 260-2 5 7 8 TEL: 760 346-o611 FAX: 760 341-7098 infoC palm-desert.org rr reo v om.xs J U L 21 1998 July 21, 1998 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT Wes S. Pringle, P.E. WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. 23421 South Point Drive, Suite 190 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 SUBJECT: AVONDALE TRAFFIC STUDY (TR 26553) Dear Mr. Pringle: The Public Works Department has reviewed the traffic study for the proposed Avondale project (Tr. 26553) and has the following comments and concerns: ► A site map showing existing and proposed lots and internal and external streets should be included. ► The analysis should also include the "worst case" trip generation which we believe would be the single family residential rate of 9.57 trips per day per dwelling unit. An alternative would be to study the trip generation for the existing portion of Avondale and applying the measured rate to the project. ► The study should indicate that the access onto Frank Sinatra Drive in Scenario II would be right-in/right-out only. ► The study refers to access on Fred Waring Drive several times and should be modified to refer to Frank Sinatra Drive. If there are any questions, please contact Mark Greenwood, Transportation Engineer, at (760) 776-6450. Very truly yours, RICHARD J. LKERS, P.E. ASSISTANT C MANAGER/DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS cc: Joseph S. Gaugush, Engineering Manager Mark Greenwood, Transportation Engineer Steve Smith, Planning Manager _ `mob WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. � A TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING July 16, 1998 Mr. Kent Armstrong Century Crowell Communities 1535 South "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92408 SUBJECT. A VONDALE ACCESS-PALM DESERT Dear Mr. Armstrong: This letter report summarizes our review of traffic engineering factors related to providing vehicular access to the Avondale Tract No. 26553 south of Frank Sinatra Drive within Avondale Country Club in Palm Desert. Existing conditions have been reviewed and quantified to provide a basis for the study. Alternative methods of providing access to Tract No. 26553 have been examined. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Tract No. 26553 is located at the northern portion of Avondale Country Club along Frank Sinatra Drive. A total of 36 single family dwelling units are proposed with vehicular access being taken via an extension of Mozambique Drive. This study has been conducted to determine the amount a traffic which will utilize the existing portion of Mozambique Drive both with and without an access connection at Frank Sinatra Drive. 23421 South Pointe Drive 9 Suite 190 • Laguna Hills, CA 92653 • (714) 460-0110 • FAX: (714) 460-0113 2 TRIP GENERATION Studies have been conducted by governmental agencies and consultants to determine trip generation characteristics of various land uses. Trip generation rates for many single family dwelling units in a country club community within a City such as Palm Desert can be characterized as second homes; therefore "recreational home"trip generation rates have been utilized in this study. These rates are generally lower than the typical single family trip generation rates. The trip generation rates were referenced from Trj'o Generation' and can be found in Table 1. As stated earlier, two scenarios were analyzed in this study regarding access to the proposed development. Scenario I assumes no access on Frank Sinatra Drive and Scenario II assumes access on Frank Sinatra Drive through the proposed project. The trip generation rates were applied to the proposed project. As shown in Table 1, the proposed project is estimated to generate 114 daily trip ends of which 6 (4 In, 2 Out)trip ends would occur during the AM peak hour, which is between the hours of 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM; and 9 (4 In, 5 Out) trips ends would occur during the PM peak hour,which is between the hours of 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. Scenario II, which provides access on Frank Sinatra Drive, no only includes traffic from the proposed project but also includes traffic from existing residences within the Avondale Country Club which will utilize the Frank Sinatra Drive access. The methodology to determine the estimated number of residents which would utilize this new access was based on the distance traveled from a dwelling unit to the proposed access versus the distance to travel from the same dwelling unit through the main gate around Eldorado Drive to Frank Sinatra Drive to the proposed access point. If the distance was shorter to "cut-through" the proposed site to access Frank Sinatra Drive then these existing trips were re-routed. It should be noted that a conservative approach was taken. If the distance was slightly less or the same to "cut-through"the site to Frank Sinatra Drive, then the trips from these residential sites were not re-routed. ' Rip Generation. Sixth Edition; Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE); 1997. WPA Traffilc Engineering, Inc. Avondale Access Job #980670 City of Palm Desert 3 TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION Avondale Access TRIP ENDS DESCRIPTOR/ AMPEA%HOUR PMPEAKHOUR LAND USE SIZE PAILY IN OUT 17V OUT RATES'): Recreational Homes Dwelling Unit 3.16 0.11 0.05 0.11 0.15 TRIP ENDS: SCENARIO I- Without Access on Frank Sinatra Drive Proposed Protect: Avondale Villas 36 DU 114 4 2 4 5 SCENARIO II- With Access on Frank Sinatra Drive Proposed Protect: Avondale Villas 36 DU 114 4 2 4 5 Internal Diversion() Existing Homes - A(') 54 DU 171 6 3 6 8 Existing Homes-B(') 23 DU 73 3 1 3 3 Total 244 9 4 9 11 (1) Trip Generation, Sixth Edition;Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE); 1997. (2) "Internal Diversion"represents an estimated amount of existing traffic within Avondale Country Club that will no longer utilize the main gate but will now divert to the new access on Frank Sinatra Drive. (3) A- Existing Homes on Grahamstown Lane, Tandika Trail Lane, Zanzibar Drive, Temple Lane,Kimberly Lane and Sweetwater Drive between Grahamstown and Tandika Trail. B - Sweetwater Drive west of the Clubhouse and south of Grahamstown Lane. 4 It was estimated that 77 existing dwelling units would change their route and utilize the new access at Frank Sinatra Drive. Trip generation for the existing 77 dwelling units was estimated and is also provided on Table 1. As shown in Table 1 the existing 77 dwelling units are estimated to generate a total of 244 daily trips ends of which 13 (9 In, 4 Out) would occur during the AM peak hour and 20 (9 In, I 1 Out) would occur during the PM peak hour. TRIP ASSIGNMENT Scenario I Under Scenario I, there would be no access on Frank Sinatra Drive, therefore 100 percent of the proposed project traffic would utilize the main gate. Table 2 shows that all of the traffic from the proposed project would utilize Mozambique Drive to enter or exit the site, this would equate to a total of 114 daily trip ends of which 6 (4 In, 2 Out)would occur during the AM peak hour and 9 (4 In, 5 Out) would occur during the PM peak hour. Scenario II Under Scenario II, there would be an access to Frank Sinatra Drive via the proposed project. It was assumed that a portion of the proposed project,approximately 25 percent,would utilize Mozambique Drive in order to get to the club house and/or to the golf course. Also, a portion of the existing homes within the Avondale Country Club would utilize the new access at Fred Waring Drive. This new access would provide a"short-cut'to Highway 111 and the I-10 Freeway via the Gerald Ford extension. A conservative 45 percent of the trips generated by the 77 homes would find the new access at Fred Waring Drive as a shorter route than utilizing the main access. As shown in Table 2, a total of 139 daily trip ends would utilize Mozambique Drive of which 7 (5 In, 2 Out) would occur during the AM peak hour and 11 (5 In, 6 Out)would occur during the PM peak hour. WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. Avondale Access Job #980670 City of Palm Desert 5 TABLE 2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION Avondale Access TRIP ENDS AMPEAKHOUR PMPEAKHOUR LAND USE SIZE DAILY IN OUT IN OUT TRIP ENDS: SCENARIO I- Without Access on Frank Sinatra Drive Proposed Project: Avondale Villas 36 DU 114 4 2 4 5 Distribution to Main Access 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% TOTAL TRIPS ONMOZAMBIQUE 114 4 2 4 5 SCENARIO H- With Access on Frank Sinatra Drive Proposed Project: Avondale Villas 36 DU 114 4 2 4 5 Distribution to Club House and Golf 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% Subtotal 29 1 0 1 1 Internal Diversion() Existing Homes - A(') r23 DU 171 6 3 6 8 Existing Homes -B(') DU 73 3 1 3 3 Total 244 9 4 9 11 Distribution to Frank Sinatra Access 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% Subtotal 110 4 2 4 5 TOTAL TRIPS ONMOZAMBIQUE 139 5 2 5 6 NOTE: A very conservative approach was taken with the distribution percentages for the proposed project that would utilize the club house and play golf In addition, the estimated number of dwelling units which would divert to the new access point was also low or conservative. 6 ANALYSES Consideration has been given to the two alternative methods of access for the proposed project. These are: Scenario I-No access on Frank Sinatra Drive via the proposed project, all access would be taken via the main gate to the Avondale Country Club; Scenario II- Access on Frank Sinatra Drive via the proposed project. Traffic factors related to each scenario are reviewed in the following paragraphs. Scenario I As shown in Table 2 with no access to Frank Sinatra Drive,there would be very little peak hour traffic on Mozambique Drive with a total of 114 daily trips from the proposed project. Typically a non-collector residential street can carry up to 1,500 daily trip ends. It can be seen that with the addition of the proposed project, daily traffic on Mozambique Drive will fall far below the allowable capacity. Scenario II Table 2 indicates that with a connection to Fred Waring Drive through the proposed project, the peak hour traffic would remain very minimal. The daily volumes on Mozambique Drive, however, would increase by approximately 20 percent beyond what the proposed project would add with no connection at Fred Waring Drive. In other words, a connection at Fred Waring Drive would cause more traffic than without the connection. The daily volumes on Mozambique Drive in either scenario would be very minimal based upon the roadway capacity of 1,500. SUMMARY This study has reviewed alternative means of providing access to the proposed residential development(Tentative Tract No. 26553) located at the northern portion of Avondale Country Club along Frank Sinatra Drive. The analyses has indicated that with the proposed project and either access scenario, there would be very little increase in peak hour traffic. There was however, a 20 WPA Traffic Engineering,Inc. Avondale Access Job #980670 City of Palm Desert . - 7 percent increase in daily trips when a secondary access to Frank Sinatra Drive is provided when compared to a single access at the main gate on Eldorado Drive. The daily volumes on Mozambique Drive in either scenario fall well below the acceptable range for a non-residential collector roadway. We trust that this study will be of assistance to you and the City of Palm Desert. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, WPA LZti�TRAFFICE NGINEERING, INC. Weston �/ , i FRE. Registered Professional Engineer State of California Numbers C16828 & TR565 WSP:HN 4980670 WPA Tragic Engineering, Inc. Avondale Access Job #980670 City of Palm Desert City of Pairs Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(760)346-0611 a FAX(760)340-0574 a http://www.paim-desert.org June 8, 1998 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO: Southern California Edison Co. CASE NO(S): TT 26553 Amendment PROJECT: Avondale Villas, LLC APPLICANT: Century-Crowell Communities 1535 South "D" Street, Suite 200 San Bernadino, CA 92408 Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of an amended tentative tract map to allow the subdivision 8.207 acres into 36 residential lots, 5 street lots, and 3 landscape lots for a total of 44 parcels. Property is located within Avondale Country Club, located at the southwest corner of Eldorado and Frank Sinatra. Also known as A.P.N. 626-030-021 . The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval. The city is interested in the probable impacts on the environment (including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise, objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and area of concern. Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. June 26, 1998 to the attention of Steve Smith, Planning Manager in order to be considered. Sincerely, Ma in Alvarez, Assistant Planner /ra, attachment PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS Perycbe Paper I SENT BY: CITY OF PALM ;:ESERT; 2- 98 2:02PM; 6193417098 => 19 345 3429; #1 /1 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA S2260-2578 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 FAX (619) 341-7098 Fobi Liary Mr. 38230 Ianclik--- Trail Palm Ueseit. t � ') ) ) I I SUBJECT: vimIlOSED DEVELOPMENT OF THE NORTHERLY PORTION OF AVONDALE COUNTRY CLUB (TENTATIVE TRACE 26553) Dow Nli. & + .00dyear: I,-. ur 1rt Pill inquiry the t01I0Wjljy, is pI-o%,jrje.CI. of the sLIbie-Ct jjropej-[y Wa- i,)pI0Ved L111CIC1.1 tII('. COUlItY of Rivorside prior to the Citv'sannoxiliioll of the residential11rr))lerty, Ti..: : l prr) al provided for the creation of 22 lots with V:CcSS OWO ji1c, I),oloct was required, ill-n(.)Ilg Other Ill iogs, to t Ul IV improve I iprovo. Frank L)rk'r t.Ulh, giill(W, asphalt, pzivir)g, (-.t(.,) in COI))U1)CIioI1 With the ("J"doprilpi-tt. YOU 11,1\0 11C'd that it is VOL.11 Lindolstanding that the current property ownprN arc cunsid+ ling •,.i1u,:auuro;c.hanl es to the pI-OpOs(.(j (lovelopment which 1141y include the elimill,in(i, nit- access onto Frank Sinatra Drive. WN10 this is 501110thillg Ill*- duvel,)per/u�\ I'l nwj yr lCil ,C) I)UI'SUQ, 01-1- j'6.Siti0!I WOUld be that we havol nc) 01A001011 to an a(.Lvs= uw. • I l ank 'wjAtl,ct E)rivc Hight turn ingresskgr(-tis oIIIY) as approved undor the COU11t)'. it -h I be Imle.0 that the above-rotoronced requirement f(-)I- Ill(' improvements Of I )I I wot I Id remain in place anti d be. 1'(-.(ILJi I P.d regardless of direct access to Frank Simiti.) I 11,vt, If YOU ha%C IILW 110115, Ifli-&,ce feel free to COi)1,1(:l JOWPII 5. GA'1911`Il Of Illy staff. Vely INACHAKI VOLKI-16, P.E. ,�SSIS WORKS DIRECTOR FANT t 'i TY NIANA(.�ER/PUBI K.. CC: loselm, -. (J4wgush, Engineering Manager rmooitviiiy Development Director 7 z cam- T i z4 3I3 e330 l a-IA � l �z eo-.P,� A-av ,/ RECEIVED J U L 2 7 1998 Lys E. s�a66� cOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1745 WteAji,M Lane CRYOF PALM DESERT FtmWoa,IL 6042E PROOF OF PUB' ;ATION This sp 's for County Clerk's filing Stamp (201$.5C.I..P.) RECEIVED '98 JUL 20 RM 1120 4. r STATE OFCAUFORNIA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE„ County of Riverside 1 alma citizen of the Uniled States and a resident of the County aforesaid;I am over the age of eighteen years,and and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. 1 am the principal clerk of a printer of the DESERT SUN PUBLISHING COMPANYa newspaper of general circulation, Proof of Publication of printed and published in the city of Palm Springs, County of RivelIside,and which newspaper has been ................................................. adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Cowl of the County of Riverside,State of ................................................. California;under the date of March 24,1988. Case Number 191236,that the notice,of which the annexed is a printed copy(set In type not smaller than nonpareil),has been published In each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not In any NO.V35 CITY OF PALM DESERT supplement thereof on the following dates to-wit LEGAL NOTICE PP g CASE NO.:TT 26553 public ties ng NOTIill CE held before t a Palm consider a etossehat n Planni CE ng..R`,- CROW ELL COMMUNITIES tOr o allow lusst by lNST7u��bldiv of i amended tentative tract map 5 street slon 8.207 acres Inpteimp o lots torte total of ercels, Vtead.a negative declaratos of envls located southwest IMP ocated et the southwest as it relates thereto. Property Avondale County/ Club, •............. ...u............................• corner of Eldore o end Frank Sinatra. Also known SAIDPNblsc heer°A2wll1 be 1. held on Tuesday. Au- nti. pp g0� l bin the Council Chamberr •0.......................n..n.u.u......n...• at t is Deserin rt CPY Ne11. 7 5Whichd�meaentl Drive. Palm Desert Califomia.are aid r„L n- �e l end ball Into"Written comment9 sons arevctonceorning ad W fa III*year l9 Items covered by this Public hearing notic and/011 be accepted up to the date of the rpaec�'ond/or motion concerning the Proposed P I. negative declaration Is liable for review In the Department of Communit Dev the hours 01 ining at the above ad Tye Monday,through F. Y.f Y OU I certify(or declare)under penalty of perjury that the e.m. and 5:00 Posed a ldna In cou t. Yo ou of foregoing is true and Co TWL challenge the p be Iim ed to ra slog only those issues n ence someone also ruse at the POn cicormssfpong de- scribed in this notice or In Commission (or city Council)et or prig the Iannto the P blo hearing. Pallm council) alkLPlanningt Commission 17aledat Palm jSpMIg9,Ca11fo1711at111!'..:Q�day ' Pub: JUIY t5, 1998 Of _. SIGNATURE r- �E?tE�E TF HE3M I E3S I C)ICI 12EP :-r JUL-10-98 15:06 ID:7603417090 CITY OF PALM DESERT ..708 NUMBER 34 E3 I IIIF 012 MAT I C)r�4 CODE OK TELEPHONE NUMBER 7784731 NAME( ID NUMBER) 7607764731 START TIME JUL-10-913 15:05 PAGES TRANSMITTED 001 TRANSMISSION MODE G3 A) RESOLUTION STD REDIALING TIMES 00 SECURITY OFF MAILBOX OFF MACHINE ENGAGED 00 .46 THIS TRANSMISSION IS COMPLETED. LAST SUCCESSFUL PAGE 001 City of Palm U®sert T3-B10 FREO WARtNG OR.VE, I..PESERT.cgtJFOgN1A 922a0-2S7a TBL6PNONE(7BD)a10-0Olt�!'A%('!a0)0�1-90Ba�ntlpJ/www_palm-tl¢anrLorg CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO_: TT 26533 Amendment NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held ba£om the Palm Dcscrt Planttittg Commission to consider a request by CENTI7RY-CROWELL CO1vIMT7NFI s for approval of an atra otl tentative tract map to allow the subdivision 8_207 acres into 36 residential lots, 5 street lots, and 3 landscape lots for a total oF44 parcols, and a negative doclasation of environtncntal impact as it relates [hereto. Property is located within Avondale Country Club,locaLcd at the southwest comer of Hldorado and Frank Sina[ra. Also Imowtt as A.P.N.626- 030-021_ ew PDai-tr'Fan[Nota 7B7t Daw .� lb ea —06 8— 8/ SAID public hearirag will be held oa Zlresday,Augvst 18, 1998, before the Palm Dasart planning Commission at 7.00 p.m_ in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall, 73-510 Frcd Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which tuna and place all interested persons are invitad to attend and ba hoard_ Written conuaants cone--_g all it..covered by this public be accopted up to data of the haaring. Inrormation City of Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(760)346-0611 •FAX(760)341-7098•http://www.paim-desert.org CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO.: TT 26553 Amendment NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CENTURY-CROWELL COMMUNITIES for approval of an amended tentative tract map to allow the subdivision 8.207 acres into 36 residential lots, 5 street lots, and 3 landscape lots for a total of 44 parcels, and a negative declaration of environmental impact as it relates thereto. Property is located within Avondale Country Club, located at the southwest comer of Eldorado and Frank Sinatra. Also known as A.P.N. 626- 030-021. Nerycv.wbE SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, August 18, 1998, before the Palm Desert Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California,at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. Written comments concerning all items covered by this public hearing notice shall be accepted up to date of the hearing. Information concerning the proposed'project and/or negative declaration is available for review in the Department of Community Development/Planning at the above address between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or,in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission(or City Council) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Sun PHILIP DRELL, Secretary July 15, 1998 Palm Desert Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(760)346-0611 'FAX(760)341-7098'http://www.palm-desert.org CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO.: TT 26553 Amendment NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CENTURY-CROWELL COMMUNITIES for approval of an amended tentative tract map to allow the subdivision 8.207 acres into 36 residential lots, 5 street lots, and 3 landscape lots for a total of 44 parcels, and a negative declaration of environmental impact as it relates thereto. Property is located within Avondale Country Club, located at the southwest comer of Eldorado and Frank Sinatra. Also known as A.P.N. 626- 030-021. -_�- � 'sir•"�`�'h,. ME I • � ' 9 oil �M6 I I - 1]I11 I nU av 1::111 n Nlllr ' SUBJECT PR , fl . M W� YOIJOIJO PF07ER7Y V. `I _, J,� �ej '•'•. •. �n�'" m rn�N vm I1 r r.nc,rnr cl uT 4 •` 1p .I r !.�• � Itly 101 r n4,YRKJ� 1 MIIIV f.1..n1 - P]pN SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, August 18, 1998,before the Palm Desert Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. Written comments concerning all items covered by this public hearing notice shall be accepted up to date of the hearing. Information concerning the proposed'project and/or negative declaration is available for review in the Department of Community Development/Planning at the above address between the]lours of 8;00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or pi written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission (or City Council) at, or prior to, the public he'aring. PUBLISH: Desert Sun PHILIP DRELL, Secretary July 15, 1998 Palm Desert Planning Commission GURALNICK & GILLILAND ATTORNEYS AT LAW WAYNE S. GURALNICK' 74-399 HIGHWAY 111, SUITE M INLAND EMPIRE OFFICE ROBERT J. GILLILAND, JR. 3535 Inland Empire Blvd. NARAN REITMAN PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 Suite 44 ' PROFESSIONAL LAW CORP TELEPHONE: (760) 340-1515 RECEIVED Ont(800) 239-7627 OF COUNSEL: FACSIMILE: (760) 568-3053 SILLDORF, DUIGNAN 8 MAY 2 6 199$ EISENBERG Attorneys at Lew COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CRY OP PALM DESERT PLEASE REFER TO FILE: 88-232 May 21, 1998 Mr. Philip Drell Director of Community Development CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578 Re: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 26553 / APPROVAL OF ANNEXATION Dear Mr. Drell: Please be advised that the members of Avondale Homeowners Association have approved the annexation of the property at the north end of its subdivision, i .e. , Tentative Tract No. 26553, by ballot as of May 15, 1998. As such, the Association and Century- Crowell Communities agree to the provisions contained within the enclosed Supplemental Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions, and Notice of Annexation. We respectfully request that any and all approvals required for the annexable area with its developer, CENTURY-CROWELL COMMUNITIES, be expedited, provided that they are consistent with the provisions of the attached Notice of Annexation. If you have any questions related to the foregoing, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, GURALNICK & GILL�I�L�AND� Wayne r ck /vl Enclosure cc: Client Century-Crowell Communities 88-232.521 PLEASE COMPLETE THIS INFORMATION RECORDING REQUESTED BY: AVONDALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: GURALNICK & GILLILAND 74-399 Highway 111, Suite M Palm Desert, CA 92260 THIS SPACE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS, AND NOTICE OF ANNEXATION TO AVONDALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION [Cover Sheet] D.AWPe11AGMMNNX RT.WAYOB MCANN SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS, AND NOTICE OF ANNEXATION TO AVONDALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION THIS SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OFCOVENANTS,CONDITIONS,AND RESTRICTIONS, AND NOTICE OF ANNEXATION TO AVONDALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION (hereinafter "Agreement") is entered into by and between AVONDALE VILLAS, LLC, a California limited liability company(hereinafter"Developer"),and AVONDALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,a California nonprofit mutual benefit corporation (hereinafter "Association"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Developer is in escrow (hereinafter "Developer's Escrow") to purchase the real property, legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference (hereinafter "Annexable Area"). WHEREAS, the operative and controlling set of covenants, conditions, and restrictions for the Association is that certain "Amended and Restated Declaration of Restrictions for Avondale Homeowners Association", which was recorded on January 4, 1989, as Instrument No. 1139, records of Riverside County, California (hereinafter "Restated CC&Rs'); and WHEREAS, Association is a California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation whose specific and general purposes are recited in the Articles of Incorporation.The primary purposes recited in those Articles are to provide for the maintenance, preservation and architectural control of the residential structures and the common area within the project and otherwise to act and be operated as a"homeowners association'; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Restated CC&Rs, the Association consists of 270 residential lots within Tracts Nos. 4018,4190,6685-1, 18316, 19072,and 19195, more particularly described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference (hereinafter "Avondale Project'); and; WHEREAS , the Association desires to annex all of the Annexable Area of up to 36 improved residential homes and related common area into the Avondale Project, so that the Avondale Project wiii consist of a single project and one association of up to 306 residential lots, which shall be entitled to all the rights and obligations of membership in the Association. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and terms contained herein, the parties covenant and agree as follows: 1. Approval of Annexation by Association Membership.The Association, by and through its Board of Directors, agree to send to the membership an appropriate ballot measure to secure membership approval to annex the Annexable Area into the Avondale Project within twenty (20) days of execution of this Agreement and accompanying payment of Three Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($3,500) in reimbursement for the cost and expenses attendant to this annexation and to make it subject to the Restated CC&Rs and all amendments / supplements thereto. It is the intent of this Agreement that the ballot measure to obtain membership approval will be in accordance with Article Vill of the Restated CC&Rs. D.AWP01%AGMI%ANNX RT.WAY�WM2CANN 1 ANNEXATION AGREEMENT a. If the membership approves said ballot measure, Association hereby agrees that it shall submit the original copy of this Agreement as fully-executed by all parties to the Developer's Escrow to purchase the Annexable Area, with instructions to record this Agreement concurrently with the close of escrow of the Developer's purchase of the subject property. Upon said recordation, the Annexable Area shall be immediately annexed to and merged with the Association and the Avondale Project, and shall be subject to the Restated CC&Rs and any amendments/supplements thereto. In such an event, all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall have full force and effect. Furthermore, the parties agree to execute any and all necessary documentation to facilitate annexation of the Annexable Area into the Avondale Project upon membership approval of the above said ballot measure. b. If for any reason whatsoever the membership does not approve of the annexation of the Annexable Area into the Avondale Project or Developer has not closed Escrow to purchase the Annexable Area on or before October 1, 1998, then (except for Paragraph 18, which shall still be binding on all parties) ail other terms and conditions of this Agreement shall have no further force or effect, and the Association, and respective parties herein shall have no further obligations under this Agreement. In such an event, Escrow shall be instructed to return this Agreement, unrecorded, to the Association's legal counsel, Guralnick & Gilliland. 2. Hours of Operation. Developer agrees that the hours of construction for improvements within the Annexable Area shall be in conformance with applicable City ordinances. On Saturdays, work may be performed by small trades, however, Developer shall use reasonable efforts to limit large trucks or deliveries. Additionally, there shall be no construction work permitted whatsoever on Sundays and holidays. 3. Dust Control. Developer agrees to provide adequate dust control to preclude a nuisance to the homeowners living within the Project. If adequate dust control is not provided after forty-eight (48) hours' notice from the Association to Developer, the Association shall be permitted to order a water truck to provide adequate dust control of the Annexable Area and the Developer shall immediately reimburse the Association for the cost of same. 4. Architectural Control. Developer covenants and agrees that any residential unit constructed on a lot in the Annexable Area will be subject to the architectural control and design guidelines of the Association's governing documents. Developer further covenants and agrees to the following architectural conditions: a. Up to thirty-six(36) single family detached residential units may be constructed within the Annexable Area. Five (5) of the residential units must have a minimum liveable space of 2000 square feet; the remaining thirty-one (31) units must have minimum liveable space of 2200 square feet. No two 2000 square foot homes may be located adjacent to each other. For purposes of this section, livable space would not include any space allocated to a garage or patio. b. Zero lot lines are encouraged to increase the green belt appearance within the side yards, with a minimum of ten-foot (10') side yard setbacks on at least one of the sides of the residential lot. C. Elevations are to be approved by the Association. Association shall be generally agreeable to the elevations which are currently being constructed at Rancho Mirage Country Club by Developer. Any deviation from the approved elevations shall require approval by the Association's Architectural Committee in accordance with Article III of the Restated CC&Rs. Adjacent residential lots may not have the same elevations. d. There shall be no two-story residential lots. OAVW 01WGMMANNX_RTWAAI M2CANN 2 ANNEXATION AGREEMENT e. All pools, patio covers,fencing,gazebos and other structures which are separate from the residential unit shall require approval by the Association's Architectural Committee. f. Except for the extension of Mozambique Drive,all streets installed and/or connected with existing streets shall have a minimum of 32-foot width. The extension of Mozambique Drive shall have a minimum of 34-foot width. Type A curbs and gutters consistent with Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference, shall be installed along the extension of Mozambique Drive and all other new streets. g. Notwithstanding the above, Developer shall be required to submit plans and secure architectural approval in accordance with Article III of the Restated CC&Rs, and the Association and the Architectural Committee will not unreasonably withhold their consent and approval to said plans and specifications. 5. landscape Issues. Developer shall install at developer's sole cost and expense: a. A masonry slump stone wall matching the wall material used for the maintenance yard beginning at the boundary line between the Desert Falls subdivision and the Avondale golf course, along Frank Sinatra Drive, terminating at the intersection of Frank Sinatra Drive and EI Dorado. This wall must be completed within six (6) months of starting any grading on the Annexable Area. b. All landscaping and irrigation systems for the entire common area within the Annexable Area, which shall consist of xeriscape, landscaping, irrigation, and low voltage lighting. All landscaping; irrigation, low voltage lighting and sidewalk plans shall be submitted to the Association for approval prior to installation. C. All landscaping outside the perimeter walls along Frank Sinatra Drive shall include a meandering sidewalk, installed at Developer's expenses. 6. Golf Cart Path. As a matter between the Developer and the golf course, Developer shall be required to re-route the cart path on the golf course between the third green and the fourth tee. 7. Phasing. Construction shall take place in three (3) phases of twelve residential units per phase. 8. Construction Access and Traffic. a. All ingress and egress of construction, including contractors and all related persons, shall be required to enter through the construction access gate at the northern-most boundary of the Annexable Area on Frank Sinatra Drive (hereinafter"Construction Gate"). Developer agrees that it shall install physical barriers to prevent construction traffic into the Avondale Project and to lock the Construction Gate at all times except during normal operating hours, as enumerated in Paragraph 2 above. In light of increased traffic created at the other entrance on El Dorado, Developer agrees to pay for the cost of a new gate entry system, including a transponder unit,to replace the existing card reader, as well as provide transponders to replace the gate cards at a cost not to exceed $18,000. Said funds shall be paid to the Association within ten (10) days of close of escrow or recordation of this Agreement, whichever occurs first, as enumerated in Paragraph 1.a above. b. If a construction trailer is to be utilized, Developer agrees to cause the trailer to be skirted immediately upon the installation. Developer further agrees that the sales and/or construction trailer for homes within the Annexable Area shall be only temporarily installed on the northwest corner of the Annexable Area, until such time as reasonably necessary for Developer to construct a home in the Annexable Area and transfer all sales and construction activity to such home ("Sales Center"). 01HP911AGMIWNNX RTAAAB MrANN 3 ANNEXATION AGREEMENT Notwithstanding the foregoing, the temporary use of the sales trailer shall not exceed six (6) months from the commencement of construction activity for trenching the slab of the Sales Center, or nine (9) months from placement upon the northwest corner of the Annexable Area, whichever occurs first. C. All access of prospective purchasers and all invitees related to sales and marketing activities shall be required to enter through the main gate on El Dorado,and not through any construction access gate or emergency gate located within the Annexable Area. 9. Assessments. On the first day of the first month following the first close of escrow for the sale of a Lot in each Department of Real Estate ("DRE' phase within the Annexable Area (said DRE phasing shall not be less than twelve lots per phase), each owner of a Lot therein (including the Developer), shall be obligated to pay monthly maintenance assessments to the Association, as well as any special assessments that may be imposed by the Association equally on all Lots in the Project. 10. Class of Membership/Voting Rights. Developer shall have no membership or voting rights to any of the lots which may be annexed into the Avondale subdivision unless/ until said lots are sold to a retail purchaser. 11. Damage to Common Area. Developer hereby covenants and agrees to indemnify, hold the Association harmless, and pay for the cost of any damage caused to the Avondale Project by its construction activity within, in, and to the Annexable Area. Said indemnification and agreement to repair shall run with any area within the Avondale Project,whether Common Area, any roads within the Avondale Project, and/or any improvement within any individual owner's lot and/or the Avondale golf course property. 12. Acceptance of Deed and Maintenance of Common Area. a. Developer understands that the Association shall only accept a grant deed to the Common Area of the Annexable Area when: L All improvements have been installed, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications approved by the City of Palm Desert; and ii. Said acceptance has been consented to in writing by the Association's Board of Directors(hereinafter"Acceptance Date"). Association hereby agrees to notify Developer of its acceptance or non-acceptance within thirty (30) days of receipt Developer's request, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. b. Prior to the Acceptance Date, it shall be Developer's obligation to maintain all common areas within the Annexable Area. C. On the Acceptance Date and upon commencement of assessments on all lots in the Annexable Area, the Association does hereby agree to concurrently accept a Grant Deed from Developer to the Common Areas in the Annexable Area, and after such acceptance the Association does hereby agree to accept the responsibility for all maintenance, property taxes and insurance for the common area in the Annexable Area, as defined within the Restated CC&Rs. 13. EntrV Sign. Developer shall have the right to place a sign at the El Dorado entrance, subject to and in conformance with the criteria imposed by the city permits and ordinances and as approved by the Association. DAWP81WGMT\ANNX_RTWAVIB MCANN 4 ANNEXATION AGREEMENT 14. Reserve Fee. Each retail purchaser of a residential lot shall be required to pay Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00) to Association for its contribution toward the Association's existing balance in the reserve account. 15. Deadline for Completion. Once construction has commenced on a particular residential unit and a building permit has been pulled, Developer shall complete construction of that residential unit within twelve months from the date of the building permit, subject to delays caused by acts of God, strikes or other circumstances beyond Developer's control (hereinafter "completion deadline"). In the event construction shall exceed the completion deadline, the Association shall have the right to cause the demolition of any residential unit not receiving a certificate of occupancy within the completion deadline, and charge such costs to the Developer. 16. Insurance. a. Developer shall each secure, pay the premium for,and keep in force until the Acceptance Date, adequate insurance as provided below. Such insurance is to specifically include liability assumed by Developer, respectively, under this Agreement, and particularly: i. Appropriate bodily injury insurance with limits of not less than $2,000,000.00 for each person and $2,000,000.00 for each accident ii. Workers compensation insurance for all Developer employees and other construction personnel that are required by law to be so insured. iii. Property damage liability insurance with a limit of not less than $2,000,000.00 for each accident. b. All policies for liability protection, bodily injury or property damage shall include the Association as additional insureds with respect to operations under this Agreement. C. A certificate of insurance for workers compensation and public liability together with a properly executed endorsement requiring thirty (30) days'written notice of cancellation shall be furnished as stipulated in the preceding paragraph. The certificate shall be delivered to the Association manager. d. Notice of any policy change shall be furnished to the Association within forty-eight (48) hours of such change being made. 17. Indemnification. Developer shall indemnify and hold Association and all owners of lots within the subdivision harmless from all claims, demands, liability and/or expense (including without limitation attorneys'fees) arising out of or encountered in connection with the performance of work in the Annexable Area, whether such claims, demands, liability and/or expense are caused by Developer, or its officers, agents or employees,subcontractors or sub-subcontractors employed on the project,their officers, agents or employees, or products installed on the project by Contractor, subcontractors or sub-subcontractors, excepting only such injury or harm as may be caused solely and exclusively by Association's gross negligence or willful misconduct.Such indemnifications shall extend to claims, demands, expenses and/or liabilities occurring after completion of the project as well as during the work's progress. 18. Reimbursement of Association Costs. Developer agrees to pay directly to the Association a non- refundable amount of Three Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($3,500) in reimbursement for the cost and expenses attendant to this annexation, which amount shall be paid immediately upon execution of this Agreement by all parties. DA1 1yAGMRANNX_RTMAY B&=CANN 5 ANNEXATION AGREEMENT 19. Product Name. Developer agrees that any usage of the term "Avondale" for the purpose of marketing the residential units within the Annexable Area, including without limitation, print/ audio media and signage advertising of any kind,shall be restricted to the following: "Avondale Homes", "New Homes at Avondale", and/or "Fairway Homes at Avondale." 20. General Provisions. a. Further Assurances. Each party shall execute, acknowledge and deliver such other documents and instruments as are reasonably necessary to carry out the intents and purposes of this Agreement. b. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts; each counterpart shall be deemed an original instrument as against the parry who signed it. C. Binding on Successors. This Agreement is binding and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and to their respective successors, assigns and representatives. d. Attorneys' Fees . In the event that any action, suit or other proceeding is instituted to remedy, prevent or obtain relief from a breach of this Agreement, or arising out of a breach of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall recover all of such parry's attorneys'fees incurred in each and every such action, suit or other proceeding, including any and all appeals or petitions. As used in this Agreement, attorneys'fees shall be deemed to mean the full and actual cost of any legal services actually performed in connection with the matters involved, calculated on the basis of the usual fees charged by the attorneys performing such services and shall not be limited to"reasonable attorneys'fees' as defined in any statute or rule of court. e. No Assignment The parties to this Agreement hereby warrant and represent that the parties have not heretofore assigned or transferred, or purported to have assigned or transferred to any person whomsoever, any matter, including claims, released or covered by this Agreement or any part or portion thereof. Further, the parties hereto agree to indemnity and hold harmless the parties hereto from any claims resulting from any person or entity asserting any such claim pursuant to any such assignment or transfer by the indemnifying party. f. Governing Law. This Agreement shall in all respects be interpreted, enforced and governed by the laws of the State of California. In the event that this Agreement must be enforced by a court of law, the parties hereby agree that the said action shall be tried by the Riverside County superior Court of the State of California. g. Arbitration. Any claim, controversy or dispute of whatever nature arising out of or concerning this Agreement shall be resolved by final and binding arbitration according to the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (JAMS) Rules of Practice and Procedure then in effect, except that the parties shall be entitled to only such discovery as is permitted by Code of Civil Procedure § 1283.05 and any amendment thereto or successor statutes. Judgment on the arbitrator's award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Should any party refuse or neglect to appear or participate in arbitration proceedings,the arbitrator is empowered to decide the controversy in accordance with whatever evidence is presented.The arbitrator is authorized to award any party or parties such sums as he shall deem proper for the time, expense, including but not limited to, costs and legal fees, and trouble of arbitration. The arbitration shall be binding on the parties. h. Entire Agreement This Agreement contains the entire agreement and understanding concerning the subject matter hereof between the parties, and supersedes and replaces all prior negotiations,proposed agreement and agreements,whether written or oral,express or implied,of any type OAWPOI\AGMTWNNXRT.WAYkBB 2CANN 6 ANNEXATION AGREEMENT whatsoever, Each of the parties hereto acknowledges that neither any other party hereto nor any agent or attorney or any other party whomsoever has made any promise, representation or warranty whatever, express or implied, not contained herein concerning the subject matter hereof to induce it to execute this Agreement, and acknowledges and warrants that this Agreement is not being executed by such party in reliance on any promise, representation or warranty not contained herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the dates which appear below. AVONDALE VILLAS, LLC, a California limited liability company By: CENTURY CROWELL COMMUNITIES, LP., a California limited partnership Its Manager By: CENTURY HOMES COMMUNITIES, a California Corporation Its General Partner Dated: —v2 cJ By: John W. Pavelak, Presi ent I AVONDALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION A California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation Dated: % _�/ J�� B : •"—' .i�.s�'.�" _ David Bryson, President Dated: By: Jo Gudel, Secretary DAWP911AGMTANNX RT.WA*AI 232CANN 7 ANNEXATION AGREEMENT EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ANNEXABLE AREA TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 26553 BEING A DIVISION OF THE FOLLOWING: THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 AND 4 AS SHOWN BY RECORD OF SURVEY ON FILE IN BOOK 55, PAGES 38 THROUGH 43, THEREOF, RECORDS OF SURVEY, AND A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 16067 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 104, PAGES 96 AND 97 THEREOF OF PARCEL MAPS, BOTH BEING RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA,ALL BEING WITHIN THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 3,TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT -C" (AMAZON DRIVE) OF TRACT 6685-1 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 98, PAGES 10 THROUGH 14, THEREOF, OF MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 03' 12" EAST, ALONG WITH THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "C", ALSO BEING THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN BY RECORD OF SURVEY ON FILE IN BOOK 54 PAGE 36 THEREOF, OF RECORDS OF SURVEY, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, A DISTANCE OF 265.53 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF FRANK SINATRA DRIVE(50 FOOT SOUTH HALF WIDTH) AS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BY DEED RECORDED JULY 6, 1973 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88650 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 48'23" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 398.18 FEET TO THE PO1NT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND TO BE DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 11'37" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 158.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 71 DEGREES 03'33' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 191.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63 DEGREES 20'3O" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 352.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 18'4r EAST, A DISTANCE OF 94.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 DEGREES 41' 47- EAST, A DISTANCE OF 193.87 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT "G" (MOZAMBIQUE DRIVE) OF SAID TRACT 6685-1; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 475.00 FEET, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 03 DEGREES 36' 04', AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.85 FEET, (THE INITIAL RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 77 DEGREES 56' 01" EAST) TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT "G'; THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 19' 57" EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "G", A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF;THENCE NORTHERLY ON A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 545.00 FEET, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 10 DEGREES 31' 52", AN ARC LENGTH OF 100.17 FEET, (THE INITIAL RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 74 DEGREES 19' 57" EAST); THENCE NORTH 51 DEGREES 42' 00' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 241.74 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 15' 00' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 74.72 FEET; THENCE NORTH 81 DEGREES 16' 14" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 81.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 57' 47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 200.12 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 11'37"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 103.04 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID FRANK SINATRA DRIVE (50 FOOT SOUTH HALF WIDTH) AS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 48'23'WEST,ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE,A DISTANCE OF 1,294.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID LEGAL IS PURSUANT TO THE APPROVED CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. PMW 93-11, RECORDED NOVEMBER 24, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 469319. 0:kWPOI%AGMT1(WNXRT.WAI'I M2CANN 8 ANNEXATION AGREEMENT EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF AVONDALE PROJECT That certain real property loomed in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as: 1. Tract 4018, as shown an a map recorded in Book 65, pages 1, 2, and 3 of Maps in the Official Records of Riverside Courmr California, as amended by that certain Certificate of Correction recorded on May 28, 1970 as Instrurrent No. 50357 in Official Records of Riverside County, California; 2. Tract 4190, as showr on a map recorded in Book 68, pages 73 and 74 of Maps in the Official Records of Riverside County, California; 3. Lots 1 throuoh 116, i-clusive, of Tract 6685-1, as shown on a map recorded in Book 98, pages 10 through 14, inclusive of Macs in the Official Records of Riverside County, California; 4. Lots 1 throuoh 16, irdusive, of Tract 18316, as shown on a map recorded in Book 128, pages 31 and 32, inclusive of Maps r the Official Records of Riverside County, Cafrfornia; 5. Parcels 1 through 4, irclusive, as shown on Parcel Map No. 19072, recorded in Book 122, pages 51 and 52, inclusive of Parcel Waps in the Official Records of Riverside County, California; 6. Lots 1 throuoh 22, inclusive, and Lot A of Tract 19195, as shown on Map recorded on September 26, 1984 in Book 144, pages 74 through 75, inclusive, Official Records of Riverside County, California. DAWP61\AGM7WNNX RT.WAY\8 232CANN 9 ANNEXATION AGREEMENT EXHIBIT C r ROAD"wionr rn rr//s PONT a 3/e �6• �/ _6• to Hodims /I�- W i—e I�%R�d•iRus 6•CRbB dFiuAGEUs �• SURALINL 0 e P P e e e CLASS WCONC e/e. I.5Sf CU.fT.IL.F. cu rv.•/SO#L.f County Of Rive-side TYPE i!•CURB REVISIONS 'I D:\NP61\ACHY _JtT.NHY 10 ANI&RATION AGR&ENSNT ZZ 44 ,,11 STANDARD NO. 200 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No sera State of California County Of Riverside '� /,��,J�I ^ ^ `,, / On April 24, 1998 before me, Y Y� fU I(� IL I, DATE NAME,TITLE OF OFFICER-E.G.,'JANE DOE,NOTARY PUBLIC' personally appeared John W. Pavelak NAME(S)OF SIGNER(S) ❑ personally known to me - OR - ® proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. KATHLEEN t-HULME Commission# 1150469 WITNE my nd an ic' seal 1 ^ _ NotaryPublic- California i Riverside County My Comm.Exp'•'es Aug 8,2301 S ATUR FNOTARY OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT ❑ INDIVIDUAL SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF COVENANTS CORPORATE OFFICER CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND NOTICE President OF ANNEXATION TO -AVO TITLE OR TYPE OF UMENT tEOWNERS A OC. TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL 11 ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT NUMBER OF PAGES ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: April 24, 1998 DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S)OR ENTITY(IES) SIGNER(S)OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 01993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION-8236 Rommel Ave.,P.O.Box 7184-Canoga Park,CA 91309-7184 CALWORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT No.5907 State Of California County of Riverside I On April 24, 1998 before me., to,4 L k tME DATE A ,TIT,C�OFFICER-E.G.,-JANE DOE.NOTARY PUBLIC- personally appeared David Bryson and Jo Gudel NAMES)OF 53vER(S) ❑ personally known to me - OR - ❑X proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies). and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. KAiHLEENLHUUAE WITN S mWandand i eal. Commission n 1150469 ZC No -cry_ `cry Public- alitomia i i Riverside eoun Aug 8t3,2001 MYComm.Expl SIGNAT� E T Y OPTIONAL J Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT ❑ SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF COVENANTS,INDIVIDUAL CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND NOTICE © CORPORATE OFFICER OF ANNEXATION; TO AVONDALE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. President= / '.S€ese>=ary TfTLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT pTLE(s) T ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL 11 ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT NUMBER OF PAGES ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: April ?L. 1998 DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S)Oti ENTITY(IES) SIGNER(S)OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 01993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION•82��emmet Ave.,P.O.Box 7184•Canoga Park,CA 91309-7184 a , City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Dr., Palm Desert, CA 92260 I (619) 346-0611 Fax: (619) 341-7098 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP •'a,�xrr��,r>ti�-•-S�i'r..+�+"'s<.��rr '•n�':s. t�"+nt'L.Zik^P.r +n'� �m.�'r7...'.r '�`�i n s= �' ' Depaxtmerit of�Com1M-6My.P e elopment tAPPLICATION FORM .x .u u. - ._,s_. ��-� � @�, ,rw... .. Century-Crowell Communities FApplicariQ(Oease:priiiM 1535 South "D" Street , Suite 200 q09-381 -6007 !lvlailingaP4 Ness S!gki L1eP�ECH(r- San Bernardino, California 92408 LVpa...960 ,CiEY - f QiJF94ZReseribe�speetfic natiirefof�approvalrrequestecl Approve the amended Tentative Map No. 26553 ( last Phase of Avondale Country Club) with proposed zero lot line product PropertyfDescription (Address �t, Portion of the east half of Section 3 , Township 5 South, Range 6 East , S .B. B & M-see Tentative Map for detailed description . 626-030-021 �Assessor�s�arcelti#,�: Existrng:7Oittrtg r PR Property Owner Authorization The undersigned states that they are the owner(s) of the property described herein and hereby give authorization for the bung of this appticanon. '''"`"^^'bbbbb Signature Date Agreement absolving the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities relative to any deed restrictions. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT,Absolve the city of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions that may be appli ble to the property described herein. + Signature Date Applicant's Sign 1at J- I n Si nature Date Reference Case No. Case No. Tr �3 ! Date:. Accepted By: NOTICE OF SI . IAL MEETING OF THE BOARD DIRECTORS OF CENTURY HOMES COMMUNITIES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION On May 15, 1998, at 10:00 a.m., a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors of Century Homes Communities was held at the Corporation's office at 1535 So. "D" Street, San Bernardino, California: SIGNING AUTHORIZATION: RATIFICATION OF PRIOR ACTS WHEREAS, the Corporation is the general partner of Century Crowell Communities, L.P., a California limited partnership ("Century Crowell"); WHEREAS, Century Crowell was formed for the purpose of acquiring land and developing same with single family homes; WHEREAS, the Corporation has determined that it is in the best interests of Century Crowell that ownership in each Century Crowell project ("Project") be vested in a limited liability company or limited partnership ("Project Entity"); WHEREAS, primary responsibility for management of the Projects has been delegated to the corporation's Project Managers, who are Robert S. Reinen, Ed Knight, and Kent Armstrong. RESOLVED, that in connection with the development of any Project, any Project Manager (or Gary Weintraub as Vice President or Assistant Secretary) is authorized to sign on behalf of the Corporation, as general partner of Century Crowell, acting in its capacity as Manager or General Partner of any Project Entity, and as general contractor to the Projects, all agreements, including indemnities, relating to the issuance of surety bonds in connection with the Projects. RESOLVED, that Joyce Montgomery is authorized to sign on behalf of the Corporation, as general partner of Century Crowell, acting in its capacity as Manager or General Partner of any Project Entity and as general contractor to the Projects, all documents as required for the issuance of the DRE Public Report for the Projects. RESOLVED, that copies of these Minutes may be provided to any person or public agency requiring evidence of authorization. ALL SUCH PERSONS OR PUBLIC AGENCIES ARE HEREBY PUT ON NOTICE THAT ALL AUTHORIZED SIGNATORIES HEREUNDER ARE SIGNING ONLY IN THE CAPACITIES SET FORTH HEREIN AND ARE NOT INDIVIDUALLY OR PERSONALLY LIABLE FOR ANY DEBTS OR OBLIGATIONS OF THE CORPORATION, CENTURY CROWELL OR ANY PROJECT ENTITY. All Directors were present and unanimously consented to the above. DATE: May 15, 1998 ATTES J fin W. Pavelak. President �J • � Ernest O. Vincece nt, Assis`tant Secretary UpaMmum koryomtWl 598.doc ' I City of Palm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 4P 1 - - - TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 FAX (619)341-7098 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM TO THE APPLICANT: Your cooperation in completing this form and supplying the information requested will expedite review of your application pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The City is required to make an environmental assessment on all projects which it exercises discretionary approval over. Applications submitted will not be considered complete until all information necessaryto make the environmental assessment is complete. GENERAL INFO MATION- 1. Applicant/Owner or Sponsor Name: Century-Crowell Communities Address, and telephone number of applicant, owner or project sponsor: 1535 South "D" Street, Suite 200 San Bernardino , CA. 92408 Tel : 909-381-6007 Fax: 909-381-0041 2. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning the project (such as architect, engineer, or other representative): Dudek & Associates Attn : Joe SOneii 74-140 E1 Paseo Drive Suite 5 Palm Desert, CA. 92408 3. Project Name (if any): Avondale Villas LLC . 4. Project location(street address or general location): South side of Frank Sinatra just West of Eldorado Drive 5. Precise legal description of property (lot and tract number, or meets & bounds): See Attached Legal Description ReM� Paper 6. Proposed use of the site(project for which the form is filed; describe the total undertaking, not just the current application approval being sought): To subdivide and build 36 detached homes on 8 207 acres with private streets 7. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects (describe how this project relates to other activities,phases, and developments planned, or now underway): This is the last 'increment of Avondale Country Club 8. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project to go forward,including those required by the City,Regional, State and Federal agencies (indicate subsequent approval agency name and type of approval required): Normal approvals from C .V.W.D . , City, etc. required }o $ construct the subdivision EXISTING CONDITIONS: 9. Project site area: 8 . 207 acres (size of property in sq. ft. or acreage) 10. Present zoning: PR (Proposed zoning): PR 11. General Plan land use designation: 12. Existing use of the project site: Vacant 13. Existing use on adjacent properties: (Example-North, Shopping Center, South, Single Family Dwellings; East, Vacant, etc.): Existing golf course on east , south, and west of the project site . Frank Sinatra drive is the north boundary with Emerald Country Club on the north. 14. Site topography(describe): Relatively flat gentle sloping ground 2 15. Are there any natural or manmade drainage channels through or adjacent to the property? NO xxx YES 16. Grading(estimate number of cubic yards of earth being moved): 2, 500 C .Yds 17. List the number,size and type of trees being removed: NONE 18. Describe any cultural,historic, or scenic aspects of the project site: Good view of existing fairways and mountains on the south, west, and east side. 19. Residential Project (If not residential, do not complete this section) A. Number and type of dwelling units(specify number of bedrooms): Total 36 units-4 different flonr plans with 2 and 3 bedrooms B. Schedule of unit sizes: 1-2, 027 sq. ft . , 2-2, 214 sq.ft . , 3-2 ,400 sq. ft . , and 4-2 , 900 sq. ft. C. Number of stories: 1 Height: feet (single story per city}code) D. Largest single building(sq. ft.):2 , 900 Height:_ (single story per city code) E. Type of household size expected(population projection for the project): 2 to 3 people per unit, F. Describe the number and type of recreational facilities: Golf course and clubhouse-some backyard pools (optional to buyers ) G. Is there any night lighting of the project: gone 3 H. Range of anticipated sales prices or rent: $ 250 , 000 to $ 350, 000 I. Percent of total project devoted to: Building. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24. 8 % Paving(including streets):. . . . . . . . . 26 . 3 % Landscaping, Open,Recreation Area. . . . . . 48 . 9 % 20. Commercial. Industrial. Institutional or Other Projects: A. Type of use(s) and major function(s). If offices, specify type and number: B. Number of square feet in total building area: C. Number of stories: Height: feet D. Largest single building(sq. ft.): Height: E. Number of square feet in outdoor storage area: F. Total number of required parking spaces: Number of parking spaces provided: G. Hours of operation: H. Maximum number of clients,patrons, shoppers, etc. at one time: I. Maximum number of employees at one time: J. If patron seating is involved, state the number: 4 K. Is there any night lighting of the project: YES NO L. Percent of total project devoted to: Building. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % Paving (including streets)... .. . . . . . . % Landscaping and Open Space(Recreation) . . . % Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes(attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 21. Change in existing features of hillsides, or substantial alteration of ground contours XX 22. Change in the dust, ash, smoke, fames or odors in the project vicinity XX 23. Subject to or resulting in soil erosion by wind or flooding XX 24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns XX YES NO 25. Change in existing noise or vibration level in the vicinity. Subject to roadway or airport noise. (Has the required acoustical report been submitted?) XX 26. Involves the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives XX 27. Involves the use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy XX 28. Changes in demand for municipal services (police, fire, sewage, etc.) (Limited Increase) XX 29. Changes the demand for utility services beyond those presently available or planned in the near future XX 5 1 30. Significantly affects any unique or natural features, including mature trees XX 31. Change in scenic views or vistas from. existing residential areas or public land or public roads XX 32. Results in the dislocation of people XX 33. Generates controversy based on aesthetics or other features of the project XX _Additional explanation of"yes" answers attached. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in the attached exhibits, present the data and information required for this initial evaluation, to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. NAME(print or type) FOR SIGNATURE DATE INITIAL STUDY FEE: $30.00 (Make check payable to the City of Palm Desert and submit it with this form.) 6 JOHN C.MITCHELL,III,P.C. Attorney At Law Telephone:(303)293-2346 1401 17th Street,Suite 1460 Of Counsel: Facsimile.(3031 293-3656 Denver,Colorado 60202 Patricia A.Luby April 21, 1998 Mr. Philip Drell Director of Community Development CITY OF PALM DESERT 75-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578 RE: Tentative Tract No 26553 Avondale Country Club Dear Mr. Drell: This correspondence constitutes written request for a one-year extension of the above referenced Tentative Tract Map, beyond its current expiration date of July 23 1998. Please place this request on the agenda for the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission bearing. Awaiting your earliest reply. Yours truly, ESTATE OF WILLIAM F. STEVENS By: John C. Mitchell, III, Co-Personal Representative JCMIII/mai PC: Century Crowell Communities Kent Armstrong .......------...... . .------------ -------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- - a a \ asovosco sawn I LPAPMC SCAM 'I CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AVONDALE COUNTRY CLUB .A1M OOR,.fN110lMA �-- o ' ET 1'OMETER 7016170 a•S. vosrpcE 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 RVj/4 CF co >_ o G r n„I,II I,1„L,III,,,,,,iilL..IL,,IL„I„Li FAA/A ✓ lLJ `o g t/ .r, . `ALL 900 aJcnc.ia N'ulle ton LA 92835-40J0 City of Balm Desert 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE(760)346-0611 It FAX(760)341-7098•http://www.palm-desert.org CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO.: TT 26553 Amendment NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by CENTURY-CROWELL COMMUNITIES for approval of an amended tentative tract map to allow the subdivision 8.207 acres into 36 residential lots, 5 street lots, and 3 landscape lots for a total of 44 parcels, and a negative declaration of environmental impact as it relates thereto. Property is located within Avondale Country Club, located at the southwest comer of Eldorado and Frank Sinatra. Also known as A.P.N. 626- 030-021. I Ce I I \ I _ + PROPER PROPERTY Ir :gyp. J ___ri•w. �� - I . r``__ j 1A.• ;'tiS ,`y'11 lit' r4.rr ,•`` l ,,r�}�� h Ya • "J '�.". 1 . F _iIL ii 4i , rvnmrn cliA it I TIN ar slot Inil,r rmHrnr ri.n; .� Rlrycbd P.pel SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, August 18, 1998, before the Palm Desert Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. Written comments concerning all items covered by this public hearing notice shall be accepted up to date of the hearing. Information concerning the proposed project and/or negative declaration is available for review in the Department of Community Development/Planning at the above address between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or pa written correspondence,delivered to the Planning Commission (or City Council) at, or prior to, the public)learing. PUBLISH: Desert Sun PHILIP DRELL, Secretary July 15, 1998 Palm Desert Planning Commission AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY. 1465 SOUTH "D" STREET, SUITE 200 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 PHONE NO. (909) 884-8944 * (800) 865-7666 UPDATED PRELIMINARY REPORT A ✓o,vm�c Date : MAY 18, 1998 To : AMERICAN TITLE ESCROW Your No. : 97-2038 1465 SOUTH "D" STREET, #200 SAN BERNARDINO, CA Order No. : 5237056-48 Attn: NANCY WAYSZ Title Officer: DAVID A. COOPER Effective Date : MAY 8, 1998 at 7 : 30 am The form of Policy or Policies of Title Insurance contemplated by this Report is : X California Land Title Association (Standard Coverage Policy - 1990) American Land Title Association Loan Policy (10-17-92) With A.L.T.A Endorsement - Form 1 Coverage American Land Title Association Residential Owners Policy SCHEDULE A The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is : A Fee Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: EDDIE R. BUSH AND JOHN C. MITCHELL III, CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM F. STEVENS, DECEASED, CASE NO. 91PR1377, FILED IN PROBATE COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, STATE OF COLORADO, ON AUGUST 6, 1991 The land referred to in this report is situated in the City of PALM DESERT, County of RIVERSIDE, State of California, and is described as follows : SEE EXHIBIT " I " ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. FILE NO. 5237056-48 American Title Company EXHIBIT "I" TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 26553 BEING A DIVISION OF THE FOLLOWING: THOSE PORTION OF LOTS 1 AND 4 AS SHOWN BY RECORD OF SURVEY ON FILE IN BOOK 55 PAGES 38 THROUGH 43 , THEREOF RECORDS OF SURVEY, AND A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 16067 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 104 PAGES 96 AND 97 THEREOF OF PARCEL MAPS, BOTH BEING RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ALL BEING WITHIN THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 3 , TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT "C" (AMAZON DRIVE) OF TRACT 6685-1 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 98 PAGES 10 THROUGH 14, THEREOF, OF MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH O1 DEGREES 03 ' 12" EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "C" , ALSO BEING THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN BY RECORD OF SURVEY ON FILE IN BOOK 54 PAGE 36 THEREOF, OF RECORDS OF SURVEY, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, A DISTANCE OF 265 . 53 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF FRANK SINATRA DRIVE (50 FOOT SOUTH HALF WIDTH) AS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BY DEED RECORDED JULY 6, 1973 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88650 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 48 ' 23" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 398 . 18 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND TO BE DESCRIBED; . THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 11 ' 37" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 158 . 59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 71 DEGREES 03 ' 33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 191 .41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63 DEGREES 20 ' 30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 352 . 17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 18 ' 47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 94 . 64. FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 DEGREES 41 ' 47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 193 . 87 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT "G" (MOZAMBIQUE DRIVE) OF SAID TRACT 6685-1; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 475 . 00 FEET, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 03 DEGREES 36 ' 0411 , AN ARC LENGTH OF 29 . 85 FEET, (THE INITIAL RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 77 DEGREES 56 ' 01" EAST) TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT "G" ; THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 19 ' 57" EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "G" , A DISTANCE OF 50 . 00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTHERLY ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 545 . 00 FEET, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 10 DEGREES 31 ' 52" , AN ARC LENGTH OF 100 . 17 FEET, (THE INITIAL RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 74 DEGREES 19 ' 57" EAST) ; THENCE NORTH 51 DEGREES 42 ' 00" EAST, A: DISTANCE OF 241 . 74 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 15 ' 00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 74 . 72 FEET; THENCE NORTH 81 DEGREES 16 ' 14" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 81 . 64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 57 ' 47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 200 . 12 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 11 ' 37" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 103 . 04 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID FRANK SINATRA DRIVE (50 FOOT SOUTH HALF WIDTH) AS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 48 ' 23" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1, 294 . 86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID LEGAL IS PURSUANT TO THE APPROVED CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. PMW 93-11 RECORDED NOVEMBER 24, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 469319 . FILE NO. 5237056-48 American Title Company SCHEDULE B 'At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed exceptions and exclusions in said Policy Form would be as follows : A. Property taxes, which are a lien not yet due and payable, including any assessments collected with taxes to be levied for the fiscal year 1998 - 1999 . B . The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3 . 5 (Commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California. 1 . Easement (s) for the purpose (s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as contained in a document; In favor of : DEL SAFARI MUTUAL WATER COMPANY Purpose : INGRESS, EGRESS AND WATER LINE PURPOSES Recorded: MARCH 6, 1970 Instrument No. 21374 of Official Records Affects : 10 FEET IN WIDTH, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : THAT PORTION OF SECTION 3 , TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, LYING PARALLEL AND TO THE EAST OF THE LINE MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 61 AS SHOWN ON RECORDED TRACT NO. 4018 , LAST POINT ALSO BEING ON THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LOT "K" , 50 FEET WIDE, AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT NO. 4018; THENCE NORTHERLY, NORTH 190 20 ' 00" WEST, 24 .43 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE ON THE EAST, AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 325 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 180 30 ' 00" , AND HAVING AN ARC LENGTH OF 104 . 94 FEET; THENCE TANGENT FROM LAST SAID CURVE, NORTH 000 50 ' 00" WEST, 38 FEET, MORE OR LESS; THENCE NORTH 150 00 ' 00" EAST, 77 FEET, MORE OR LESS; THENCE NORTH 040 00 - 00" EAST, 718 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TERMINATION OF SAID EASEMENT. 2 . The fact that the ownership of said land does not include rights of access to or from the street, highway; :or freeway abutting said land, such rights having been relinquished by the document . i Recorded: JULY 6, 1973 Instrument No. 88650, of Official Records Affects : A PORTION OF SAID LAND ABUTTING FRANK SINATRA DRIVE AS FURTHER DESCRIBED THEREIN. FILE NO. 5237056-48 American Title Company 3 . Easement (s) for the purpose (s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as contained in a document ; In favor of : COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Purpose : PIPELINE AND RIGHT TO ENTER Recorded: MAY 10, 1985 Instrument No. 100022 of Official Records Affects : ALL LOTS AND PRIVATE STREETS, EXCLUDING BUILDING SITES, LYING WITHIN LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, INCLUSIVE, OF RECORD OF SURVEY OF A PORTION OF TH EAST HALF OF SECTION 3 , TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, AS SHOWN ON MAP IN BOOK 55, PAGES 38 THROUGH 43 , INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PORTION LYING WITHIN TRACT 6685-1 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 98, PAGES 10 THROUGH 14 , INCLUSIVE, TRACT 4018 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 65, PAGES 1 THROUGH 33 , INCLUSIVE, TRACT 4190 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 68, PAGES 73 AND 74 , AND TRACT 19195 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 144 , PAGES 74 AND 75, ALL OF SAID TRACTS RECORDED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY. INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO MAINTAIN, OPERATE, RECONSTRUCT, AND REPAIR ALL EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER PIPELINES, FACILITIES AND APPURTENANCES LYING WITHIN SAID PORTIONS OF SAID LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, INCLUSIVE. ALSO INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO MAINTAIN, OPERATE, RECONSTRUCT AND REPAIR ANY FUTURE DOMESTIC WATER OR SANITATION PIPELINES, FACILITIES AND APPURTENANCES APPROVED BY THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT LYING WITHIN SAID PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 4 , INCLUSIVE . SAID PIPELINE AND EVERY PART THEREOF SHALL, WHERE IT CROSSES GRANTOR' S LAND, BE CONFINED TO LANDS HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED, AND SHALL BE SO LAID THAT NOT LESS THAN THIRTY INCHES OF EARTH, MEASURED FROM THE OUTSIDE OF THE PIPE COLLAR TO THE GROUND SURFACE, SHALL COVER SAID PIPELINE, EXCEPT FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES USED OR USEFUL IN THE OPERATION OF SAID PIPELINE, WHICH SAID FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES MAY BE ANY DISTANCE EITHER BELOW OR ABOVE GROUND SURFACE. 4 . A DOMESTIC WATER AND/OR SANITATION SYSTEM INSTALLATION Agreement, on the terms and conditions contained therein, recorded JULY 13 , 1994 as Instrument No. 94-279667, Official Records . Dated: JANUARY 14 , 1994 Executed by: COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC AGENCY OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and: AVONDALE GOLF CLUB FILE NO. 5237056-48 American Title Company NOTES : Note No. 1 : Property taxes for the fiscal year shown below are paid. For proration purposes the amounts are : APN: 626-030-021-6 Fiscal Year: 1997-1998 Code Area : 018-220 1st Installment : $1, 049 . 62 2nd Installment : $1, 049 . 62 Land: $131, 075 . 00 Improvements : $52, 350 . 00 Exemption: $0 . 00 Personal Property: $0 . 00 Bill No. : 0303840 Tracer No. : (NOT SET OUT) Note No. 2 : The charge for a policy of title insurance, when issued through this title order, will be based on the Basic (not Short Term) Title Insurance Rate . Note No. 3 : "Section 12413 . 1, California Insurance Code became effective January 1, 1990 . This legislation deals with the disbursement of funds deposited with any title entity acting in an escrow or subescrow capacity. The law requires that all funds be deposited and collected by the title entity' s escrow and/or subescrow account prior to disbursement of any funds. Some methods of funding may subject funds to a holding period which musts expire before any funds may be disbursed. In order to avoid any such delays, all fundings should be done through wire transfer, certified check or checks drawn on California financial institutions . Note No. 4 : The charge where an order is cancelled after the issuance of the report of title, will be that amount which in the opinion of the Company is proper compensation for the services rendered or the purpose for which the report is used, but in no event shall said charge be less than the minimum amount required under Section 12404 . 1 of the Insurance Code of the State of California. If the report cannot be cancelled "no fee" pursuant to the provisions of said Insurance Code, then the minimum cancellation fee shall be $360 . 00 . Note No. 5 : California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 18668, effective January 1, 1991, requires that the buyer in all sales of California Real Estate, wherein the Seller shows an out of State Address, withhold 3-1/3a of the total sales price as California State Income Tax, subject to the various provisions of the law as therein contained. FILE NO. 5237056-48 American Title Company Note No. 6 : WIRING INSTRUCTIONS FOR AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY ESCROW/SAN BERNARDINO OFFICE ARE AS FOLLOWS: RECEIVING BANK: IMPERIAL BANK 9777 WILSHIRE BLVD. , 4TH FLOOR BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 FEDERAL ROUTING NO : 122201444 ACCOUNT NAME: AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY ESCROW TRUST ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NUMBER: 31-006-597 REFERENCE: TITLE ORDER NUMBER: 5237056-48. TITLE OFFICER: DAVID A. COOPER (THIS INFORMATION MUST BE INCLUDED IN WIRE TEXT) DAC/jl FILE NO. 5237056-48 American Title Company CC: DOUGLAS MARTIN 74-785 HIGHWAY 111, STE. 201 INDIAN WELLS, CA 92210 6L9.-a2 POREWSEC3, T55,R6E rRA oie-1. 626 - 03 <S SCSS.Vt'NI YURY4ff'S ONLY �7 + M M 4 � I . * -, a •''w ,..... Ir. � � 1 F� it 11 w•+, r � — _ _ -� �- __ t . aEI r� .0-I! I I.f .r/I. i,II_� Z .l Itl/• P.M 104196,97 Parcel Mop No. 16067 —�Iro=I- 1_ ASSESSCIP'S nIN+W 676 O! --- - RIVCRSIUE CLR/VTY, CALIF All 19R1 - --- .t IRA ms-W 626 f�14NEU4 SEC 3,75SyR6E - ' r r � _ x S s 4 1 'yfr s O w j o <SA SSLV•S -- v E?C?�q n.2:PSG CCt,:IY C{_ S-1P742? T.RA07s_p(p 626-/9 SbeN 7016 K). irn,CU COmQ{llllq( (Ip52 iPJLT p. 1B'gL IDiS ft. 8% __ _._.- .—. ._ .. . __ ME POR NE114 SECJ, T5S,R6E TRA ms_az 626— .acss"r",.wrosa arar V _ . w .. ✓• z+ o415 � ""•. :• tlswce zz e •ems O © - _ ' r.40 a, a. �rf� »w0 O /O et s s 1t '+ OJtt_ •! Y M • F Y D .rN f r O W .v89B/b-Ia Z;ua4b 6685-/ SI-13SlF'S Jr:P B.' 676 lG II . en'EeSLY C7,vrI C.ZW v SE-r AW ty� cy Q r TAA 075-~ 6Zv IJ ___ comoamm SHEET 3of6 04/21/98 TL1E 09:53 FAX 909 890 0192 001 - ---- -- -- ---------—--------- ---- [x] Single List I PS FORM 3553 [ ] Multiple Lists I Coding Accuracy Support System (CASS) Report -------------------------------------- ------- -- -- CASS CERTIFICATE INFORMATION _ ---------------------- ---- S I Al . I CASS Certified Company Name O I I Postalsoft F I CASS Certified Software Name & version I T I C Postalsoft DeskTcp Encoder 5 . 20 . 01 .B W A I Z4Change Certified Company Name A S R I S I Z4Change Software Name & Version E i i I Configuration Z4Change Configuration STD N/4 ---- -- - - - -- ------------------------------------------- B1 . LIST PROCESSOR I B2 . DATE LIST PROCESSEDI B3 . DATE OF ZIP+4 DATA L i I MASTER FILE: 21-Apr-98 I ZIP+4 FILE: 02/98 I I I Z4CHANGE: I Z4CHANGE- --- I ---------------- ------- T I B4 . ADDRESS LIST_ NAME I B5 . NUMBER OF LISTS i B6 . TOTAL ADDRESSES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- 0 I CASS OUTPUT RATING I TOTAL CODED I PERCENT OF TOTAL ADDRESSES UI ------ --------------------- I --------- ,--..-. -- I -----------_ a T I Cl . RECORDS ZIP+4 CODED I I P I C2 . RECORDS DPBC CODED I I g U I C3 . RECORDS 5-DIGIT CODED I I T I C4 . RECORDS CR RT CODED I I CS . RECORDS Z4CHANGE CODEDI I ------------------------------------ Dl . SIGNATURE OF MAILER f D2 . NAME & ADDRESS OF MAILER AI --------------------------------- I I I I certify that the mailing I L I submitted with this form has been -----------'--' ----------------------- E I ZIP+4 coded (as indicated above) I D3 . DATE SIGNED R I using CASS certified software I meeting all requirements of Domestic Mail Manual A950 . Postalsoft (54601-8231) Form 3553 . April 1996 ,, 1 w ] „ y4•t.`e.nvvf'�yriYt sn{ 5�' r`7Y Cato ■AI ■AS Iso IItD rot A15t AS S E■t rnrosts o■n. ■o trnn tT rs AssO■tO w A OTC r fa tt � 12I TOE AC6DRACT Of ixt DA:A 5■oIR. SEC.34 T.4S.,R.6E efe-lea ASSESSOR'S FlIcits VAT ■ot covltI WIT 018=134 toutu nn 1■sot-irt oR IaDD sit[ osOuas. CITY OF PALM DESERTJ 05f3 :.. ' ,\`,�'•. � is � °;Y::7. rya D t /,y t• . ADr s- f TFq 11 STA\ O n.0 Ac. K '1 ♦ `\ '44 i as 7A. - w 40 S0 _ i rs s to n \ O �•.5 �; `�\e 1, .. .>�:,�•i� '�, { :r av • 1: • i.�ll-1 , .] 1 III 6 A2 c2 /6 5 626 6 6�, 52'\ 6161 1 - „� - t, 10 t 01JUL +',•u E..]ff . ..; i . 2j%( REVYNe-61995 53-52 - q{i r . Y 1i ]. £ ^ lfi. T t ti K} t t��� ../ T f I .. x. - � "S:c ..'Y .,C;'?.Y:'. 1. .... ;t •f`-. �-itt F'�' Mr �. N 89'48'1 5" E ;: _7T.�H1 V I .1 1 1986.68' r 3 1006.09' ^LOT "0'. -- — — — — --w 9B0 59' 1 --Cl 352.03' 86.13' 46.8� 355.a7' 2 2 -�� 1 7 146 44' �,. 204.56' 6 S N C33 1 �L5 rc *—_ ` `�� o I s ., . 20' DR4ridAGE ESM'T —r ��c ue CS %si�i 21 �,^ o'o. c34 L2 C19 \. ca o RETENTION `17 I�O1 a� ES \\ 20� ('�� �o h / C9 ' 14 "� /�� E .i G� AREA r ? L 0 •�St ) 19 O .0 , C10 `?s O C30 i Jp= S 1 0' 3 ob. cs\rta^ J °� �'Le. S �� �� �y1 off. � 'g i o ^ �iC32 �� p 2a O ' 1 2 's 64. 3'5,.. W J 4 S\�� C15 0 - / p L -7 5 6 0�,. F 6y io C7 Al 6 C13 C12 < 24 1 0 7 �\c '�r� \SAL° l ✓ GOLF COURSE FAIRWAY E'.. ;..F-MAIN) tJ, ? i. yt o. r �• fill '14,1 Lc 3 GOLF COURSE FAIRWAY \ •'' 99 �_ l TO KEMAN) / C25 � - - ✓ 73 7 , nF kv rj \ Z 100 RECORDED TRACT NO . 6686 - 1 _ r? - 4, `t ' THIS MAP /S FOR PORE//25EC.3, T5S.,R.6E ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY 4 M M IFF .. p' 2 Q '•y \ — — . e - -/&t.5 L'6°,b > :1 r 9t / ".33 N1p /13.I ^v r.w � S e¢ <,� �>Q /W.7 - 5.l0 s4 e ✓ - � �. It Alt Set SS rc y •b T O P 4�R Q le /CO d , p 5 O P rovlb 1T eyy � 0 N ra3.° oo ��. Q rJ I y, 'bp a O A i a D ��'S rypy O I 5y(a5t w b[so o u° ry. 4 V a >.. Q sor d _ 50 f°i ti vo rOoN �1 0° n�nN v 3Q � Q � F�9.It >4� � Q1 2 0l w NO O i N I O DArr OLv Ao.ljvcw4b. /0-82 2 17 . 6 _ /1/84 3 !a, /? 8./2 /5 /5 PG 24 2/90 7 I4-15 /0194 /4 /6./0 « 6 /9.20 P. M. /04/96,97 Ponce/ Mop NO. /6067 - RS 55/38- 43 2197 D _,Gau ASSESSOR'S MAP 8K 626 PG 03 RIVERS/DE COUNTY, CALIF AUG/982 yo IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA i AMENDED EN A IVE RAC I MA I ' Noo 26553 l MAY 1998 i l I i F R A N K S I AT A T R A D R I V E EXIST. CONC. MEDIAN DIVIDER ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------t---------------------------- ----------- -------------- ------- --------------------------- I I PROPOSED CONC. MEDIAN DIVIDER j f FIRE DEPARTMENT L O 7, ,A , r� FIRE DEPARTM NT j EMERGENCY A IICESS I EMERGENCY ACCESS I PROPOSED CUI B & GUTTER GATE', 20' WIDEI I O GA 7E, 20' WIDE I � ! I i I I N 89'48 23 E 12 4.86 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE & SIDEWALK AREA - s q 6 ! I 146.7' 142.1' 48.0' 50.0' 48.0 S0.0' S0.0' 48.0' S0.0' 48.0' S0.0' 158.0' PROPOSED 6' HIGH BLOCK SECURITY WALL I 147.0' f �h w L O T G �. �, L o T 'H' h 27 3 26 N Q' o �iS. 1 7 1 8 9 59.1' 3 60.0' O 00 20 21 22 23 24 25 q 5-7.6 Z o z 1 52.1' 37.1 29 �� 28 0) 002°°•�2 30 6 14 � ti ") 50.0' 50.0' 48.0' N50.0' - 51,3' P � O. IN O 31 �3 S' ' E PROJECT E 13 L O T 9.5 � , � SITE 12 PRIVATE STREET Q� 46.4' 15.$ 2 2 FRANK SINATRA DRIVE N o, O r'� 3$' 81.6 4 „ 0, S ��L� 1 . L O T ' F ' �$r �' Ar '16�14 E o O \ 7 79 10 LANDSCAPE / RETENTION LOT 0 r, 33 _ 5'00 E \ ram w 7, 6, �� N 69 �� 0<5E 3 "10 �� C 01 34 1 f o 10 42.2,.01 35 �°c �� . G�' w 7 � 44.9'Al 00 � ' ) COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE 6 36 ti �� VICINITY MAP 5 O �'\ !> NOT TO SCALE >, 00 Q u f R/W 55, �0 l i s8� 3 I OWNER / DEVELOPER : 7' 12' 34' 9' 10' -� LANDSCAPE MEDIAN DIVIDER O �- N� A VON D ALE VILLAS, LLC EASEMENT �J �v 636, 2 ��. LEGAL DESCRIPTION : % CENTURY CROWELL COMMUNITIES, L. P. v 1535 SOUTH 'D' ST. , SUITE 200 _`/ Al 6s9�6 3�' THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 AND 4 AS SHOWN BY RECORD OF SURVEY ON FILE IN BOOK 55 SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92408 1 \J 8 1 I PAGES 38 THROUGH 43, THEREOF RECORDS OF SURVEY, AND A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF TEL. (909) 381 - 6007 PARCEL MAP 16067 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 104 PAGES 96 AND 97 THEREOF OF 2 0 % �„ PARCEL MAPS, BOTH BEING IN RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, OF CALIFORNIA, ALL PROPOSED r U - � J BEING WITHIN THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, ENGINEER : 8' WIDE AlSAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: I, f > } DUDEK & ASSOCIATES MEANDERING PROPOSED EXISTING•-� � 6�• , �5�' SIDEWALK 8" VERTICAL 8" VERTICAL �� 4 ` PROPOSED CURB ONLY CURB ONLY 4�" COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT "C" (AMAZON DRIVE) OF TRACT 6685-1 74- 1 40 EL PASEO, SUITE 5 8" CURB AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 98 PAGES 10 THROUGH 14, THEREOF, OF MAPS, PALM DESERT, CA 92260 & GUTTER r' °° RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 03' 12" E ST 50' TEL. (760) 341 - 6660 a� TYP A TI ON 9op,� ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "C", ALO I C L SEC 7938>, BEING THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN BY RECORD OF SURVEY ON FILE, IN k' FRANK SINATRA DRIVE ( STREET ) cs O BOOK 54 PAGE 36 THEREOF, OF RECORDS OF SURVEY, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, ASSESSOR ' S PARCEL No:'. CALIFORNIA, A DISTANCE OF 265.53 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF FRANK SINATRA NOT To SCALE z i b DRIVE (50 FOOT SOUTH HALF WIDTH) AS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BY 626- 030- 021 `„ r^ DEED RECORDED JULY 6, 1973 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88650 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF --� -- --- -- RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 48' 23" EAST, ALONG SAID ACREAGE : SOUTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 398.18 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND TO BE DESCRIBED; 8. 207 Acres PROPERTY , R� THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 11' 37" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 158.59 FEET; LINE THENCE SOUTH 71 DEGREES 03' 33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 191 .41 FEET; `' C R THENCE SOUTH 63 DEGREES 20' 30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 352.17 FEET; ZONING: 32' / 34' THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 18' 47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 94.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 DEGREES 41' 47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 193.87 FEET TO THE WESTERLY PRESENT ZONING . P R 16' / 17' 16' / 17' � PROPERTY �, THENCLINE OE NORTHERLMOALONGOUE DRIVE) OF SAID WESTERLY LINDETOFCNON68ANGENT CURVE CONCAVE 5-1; PROPOSED ZONING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PR 10' MIN. WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 475.00 FEET, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 03 DEGREES 36' 04", UTILITIES: AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.85 FEET, (THE INITIAL RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 77 DEGREES 56' - 01" EAST) TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT "G"; � ELECTRIC . . . . . . . . .IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT r2.0 2.o z� -�- ------ - THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 19' 57" EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "G", GAS. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; WATER . COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT THENCE NORTHERLY ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A SEWER . COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT RADIUS OF 545.00 FEET, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 10 DEGREES 31' 52;' AN ARC LENGTH OF GOLF COURSE TELEPHONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .G. T. E. PROPOSED ROLL ( 100.17 FEET, (THE INITIAL RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 74 DEGREES 19 57 EAST); TYPE CURB & GUTTER + TELEVISION . . . . MEDIA- ONE .THENCE NORTH 51 DEGREES 42 00 AST, A DISTANCE OF 241 .74 FEET; ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . { TYPICAL THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 15' 00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 74.72 FEET; TYPICAL SECTION LOT LAYOUT THENCE NORTH 81 DEGREES 16', 14"�� EAST, A DISTANCE OF 81 .64 FEET; SCHOOL DISTRICT: THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 57 47 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 200.12 FEET; INTERIOR STREETS THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 11' 37" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 103.04 FEET; DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID FRANK SINATRA DRIVE (50 FOOT SOUTH HALF WIDTH) AS NOT TO SCALE CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; TH O M A S BROTHERS GUIDE: THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 48' 23" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1 GRID Al 1,294.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PAGE 8 9 ID t I GRAPHIC SCALE SAID LEGAL IS PURSUANT TO THE APPROVED CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE' NO. PMW '93-11 TOTALS: RECORDED NOVEMBER 24, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 469319. 40 0 20 40 80 160 RESIDENTIAL LOTS . . . . . . . . . . . .36 I STREET LOTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 LANDSCAPE LOTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 r Palm Desert Office: ( IN FEET ) I 74-140 El Paseo, Suite 5 1. inch = 40 ft. TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Palm Desert, CA 92260 & ASSOCIATES Tel. 760.341.6660 A California Corporation Fox760.346.6118 i i \1720\TTM26553A.dwg May 27, 1998 JUDI all 1998 i 11 t I _ 1294.86' — — — — 3 - - Lij o) to ao 2 \ 4 3 4 4 2 4 3 4 2 2 00 12 V 2 3 3 - 791 4.2� 4 7 1 4 � _ 2 2 2°'` 3 3s?7> 3 \ 4 I 2 � 4 � j o i 0 PROPOSED SCHEME: PLAN 1 3 UNITS ' PLAN 2 12 UNITS �93 I PLAN 3 10 UNITS 8) 500 N PLAN 4 11 UNITS a � v`- TOTAL 36 UNITS A ,I G APHIC SCALE .0 0 20 40 160 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN r� AVC) Nu/xLE CC> UNTRY CLUB • - .. „. Palm Desert Office: � IN FEET ) 40 ft.= 74=140 El Pow, Syife s 1 inch � CENTURY VINTAGE HOMES Palm Desert, CA 92260 & A S S O C I A T E S PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Td. 760.341.6664 Fox M.30,6118 \1720\conceptt.dwq March 12. 1998 JUN 1 ' 1999 i I 101-0' 38'•0" 24-4 OPTIONAL PATIO GOA R 17411 I I i I I . I I 8 I I I I - I tI 6 b1 A/C : 01, GREAT ROOM MASTER SUITE I � a� 100— wet barl 1 . 4 i i li 41 � '--0.HLIONN&WALI. I - MASTER I � � I �f r i BATH _ i I Coate I { I _ � I I 1.0 i' i II HALL BAT it walk Ij BEDROOMI en !I closet i! 2/ I� i linen_ I) OPT. DEN I �- I , I LAUNDRY u I U I BEDROOM 3 I GARAGE O ;,• 04 5.0 V. - GOLF CART I STORAGE k - - � SQ L4 I I Y r .x ti. s • .: 97068. 04/2 /98 KN TER ASSC) ATES ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING `b S 100 V0 Al (j oQ OPTIONAL.PATIO COVER ir All 71 I C I I � I I GREAT ROOM R, iI � - A/C ►+ II t II II j; it 11 91-01 HIGH x BEDROOM 2 ;; ;k DINING e'-0r>B6114 KALL /OPT. DEN ROOM I I Ile BATH 2 I � I MI ' 1 N ST OQ } NF Y , ry I � I I t c 1 non co fi ' MASTER ' BEDROOM ; r II II i \ / i walk I SERVIC /x\ ' i+ to closet - f' II fi t t MASTER BATH GARAGE 0 o - 0 2020 j BY i GOLF CART o STORAGE -------------------------------- few" s.0.v I 9 Y 97068.4 02/26/98 y � K N TER & ASSO ATES ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING Y T 101-01, 384" G MON&PATIO covER i - - - - - - --- -- -- - - - - - - - - -. - - - - - x* I I 1 ! I ! I I ! I �^ I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - ---------------- A/C 1 GREAT -_ MORNING ROOM ROOM 1 3'-0' 141C+X AV` i 4'-0' LONG WALL / I ' I N Y i ! I I 11 C TO BEDROOM 2 i , BATH 2 ! I HALL _ I i 4 n r ► „%1 I o 1 1 \ -- o MASTER , BATH LAUNDt�1Fx�\ co "IGHT TeE K MASTER ! I SUITE ... ......i r .u..:, .. s .- k. .:....... L_.,.'x -P" w... .. a.�a...♦ o,....,.e -s s I . -:7..:._.� .re :.... -.. x� _.. ...- h',vim" W' .- .. -'C�r...- _._ ._- ... .._E.. ...... <. ... .... ,. ..... .. ..... ..,. <. .''a, r. ... - II In I closet it 1! II II i� 1 GUEST SUITE GARAGE 1 i 1 BATH 3 GOLF CART 0 STORAGE oil 7 t- - - - - _ — _ - - - -.- - _ — s.ov. I - - — — — — — — — - -� 1 1 y e 97068Ac7cklof p, CIE-aul 1-B 02/26I9 w t� KN TER & ASSC7 ATES ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING y� 101009 40100V / 1 © OPTIONAL.PATIO COVER _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - -- f I ( I I I I 1 I i HB I I 2020 ABY Y NOOK I � o MMA I NIGFE I GREAT I MASTER ROOM SUITE I a o I A/C i - 301HIGH%aI: - - - - - - �� 31-0'film - - - - - 51-0"LONG a CH �.N J DINING -- -- I - - --- - ROOM ' - -- -I .. � _ , �• •� � PANTRY } �, 30'HIGH SHEL.PV1 sOs 1 WALK LIVING BAR ROOM II MASTER f BATH 3O'HI6H SHEl.P o 4 � co F NER bolo MIRRORED SLIDER � I . TH i DEN OPT/ I I BEDROOM 3 11 walk 11 cas 11 In I` _ W z e t 1yp I Poo 01111 low 0 r -tea. .,. .`a' s$.,4 :. •�' .. ... ..: �. n e.-r'.. ... ... .. .::>. :. M .. 1�.. z .. ...tom. -_-_S. .. ._. .. ,... irmor TUBE SKYLIGHT I, I E GUEST SUITE 44 GARAGE GOLF CART ' STORAGE SEAT HB W/ i 9 0-� - S.O.V. `. 0- . s } *s k . 97068.4 cxioj U� )F CIL JB N7140UIaf-,�Iks 02126i98 K N TER & ASSO ATES ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING I I I IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AMENDED ENT^ IVE TRAC MA C Noo 6553 MAY 1998 I � { I, I F R A N K S I N A T R A D R I V E II t EXIST. CONC. MEDIAN DI WDER ---- .. ....................... ............................ ------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- - I I; I PROPOSED CONC. MEDIAN DIVIDER I. LO FIRE 0 FIRE DEPARTMENT L O �+ 'A ' I, "� EM RGENCRY A CESS o g I EMERGENCY ACCESS PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER GATE, 20' WIDE i O } i GA TE, 20' WIDE _ N 89.48 23 ' E 1294.86 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE & SIDEWALK AREA - I I -- 48.0' ` 50.0' 48.0' S0.0' S0.0' 48.0' S0.0' 48.0' S0.0' 158.0' PROPOSED 6' HIGH BLOCK SECURITY WALL 147.0' 1 146.7 142.1' L O T 'G ' . � L O T 'H' 3 C° ''�"' 6 2 7 1 0 ►• 1 5 n 2 6 n j CS � I �� o _ 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 59.1' '01- 3>3, 60.0'Lo ad q o � 10 2 •�. - � q Z 52. 1' 37.1' A� 9�• . �'C o �, � 28 _ 00 �2 30 0 14 0. ��' ^) \ O 50.0' 50' 48.0' 50.0' 51.3' a �8°, 5�6 0 �`� o 31 , 1� 4r PROJECT 1 3 ��, s\ s�8 _ _ L D T E _ ��. y \� ,� N 69 5 SITE 12 �a S° REED, PRIVATE STREET Q� 4. 15•$ _ 32 3$ 2' 46• 4, FRANK SINATRA DRIVE N o, a _ 81 .6 „ �7 p3, 1 1 �� L T �, w. 3' N 81 .16 14 E Q i , s3o 10 ° LANDSCAPE / RETENTION LOT 33 S oo" r, w �� W P�� > 9 4 7' 42 2' 6, �$O �W. ' rl 69 1 \� > 0��� 3 P J OHO �� 0 8 I - _ c�. �� j �� o Goy .01 35 k1� J o 7 42.2' 0 � C' G w Al S 0 44.9' COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE .01 6 ry � 3 6 N it ' VICINITY MAP 861 5 MO' �� �1 \� NOT TO SCALE L zo v 00 ( �. RIW 55' v 3 N O OWNER / DEVELOPER : 1 7' 12' 34' 9' 10 v N LANDSCAPE MEDIAN DIVIDER AVONDALE VILLAS, LLC EASEMENT �� �VJ 63 2 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : % CENTURY CROWELL COMMUNITIES, L. P. ' , ,� O 1 535 SOUTH 'D' ST. , SUITE 200 1 -� 6S• 46 3� THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 AND 4 AS SHOWN BY RECORD OF SURVEY ON FILE IN BOOK 55 78�) SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92408 R 6 1 J PAGES 38 THOUGH 43, THEREOF RECORDS OF SURVEY, AND A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 of TEL. 909 381 - 6007 PARCEL MAP 16067 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 104 PAGES 96 AND 97 THEREOF OF PARCEL MAPS, BOTH BEING IN RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, OF CALIFORNIA, ALL; r 2.0 % PROPOSED -==a J ti BEING WITHIN THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 3 TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH' RANGE 6 EAST, ENGINEER 8' WIDE 1 N SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: MEANDERING PROPOSED EXISTING 6). �7 4, SIDEWALK PROPOSED 8" VERTICAL 8" VERTICAL 4 j� - D U D E K BC ASSOCIATES CURB ONLY ��� COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT "C" (AMAZON DRIVE) OF TRACT 6I685 1 74 1 40 EL PASEO, SUITE 5 8" CURB CURB ONLY i AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 98 PAGES 10 THROUGH 14, THEREOF, OF MAPS, PALM DESERT, CA 92260 & GUTTER 50.00 RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 03 12" EAST, TEL. (760) 341 - 6660 ,. o N ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "C" ALSO 9 TYPICAL SECTION 7 °' (0 93 BEING THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN BY RECORD OF SURVEY ON 'FILE IN FRANK SINATRA DRIVE ( STREET ) O BOOK 54 PAGE 36 THEREOF, OF RECORDS OF SURVEY, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COU�J TY, ASSESSOR ' S PARCEL No. : CALIFORNIA, A DISTANCE OF 265.53 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF FRANK SINATRA NOT TO SCALE f b DRIVE (50 FOOT SOUTH HALF WIDTH) AS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BY 626- 030- 021 DEED RECORDED JULY 6, 1973 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88650 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF --� -- --- -- RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 48' 23" EAST, ALONG SAID ACREAGE : SOUTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 398.18 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE ~ PARCEL OF LAND TO BE DESCRIBED; , 8. 207 Acres PROPERTY THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 11' 37" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 158.59 FEET; LINE THENCE SOUTH 71 DEGREES 03' 33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 191.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63 DEGREES 20' 30„' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 352.17 FEET; ZONING: R 32' / 34' I THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 18' 47 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 94.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 DEGREES 41' 47" EAST, A DISTANCE, OF 193.87 FEET TO THE WESTERLY PRESENT ZONING . PR 10 " " PROPOSED ZONING . . . . . . PR 1s' / 17' 1s' / 17' PROPERTY � LINE OF LOT G (MOZAMBIQUE DRIVE) OF SAID TRACT 6685-1; I LINE MIN THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE'WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 475.00 FEET, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 03 DEGREES 36 04„, UTILITIES: AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.85 FEET, (THE INITIAL RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 77 DEGREES 56' 01" EAST) TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT "G"; ELECTRIC . IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT -2.0 X 2.o z� l ------ -- THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 19 57 EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "G", GAS. . . . . . . . . SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. -�- WATER OACHELLA VALLEY WATERDISTRICT I z A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF, � .0 E I THENCE NORTHERLY ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A SEWER . COACH ELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT RADIUS OF 545.00 FEET, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 10 DEGREES 31' 52" AN ARC LENGTH OF TELEPHONE . PROPOSED ROLL ' ( GOLF COURSE ) 100.17 FEET, (THE INITIAL RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 74 DEGREES 19' 57" EAST); G. T. E. TYPE cuRe & curTER TELEVISION . MEDIA- ONE THENCE NORTH 51 DEGREES 42' 00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 241.74 FEET; " TYPICAL THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 15' 00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 74.72 FEET; TYPICAL SECTION LOT LAYOUT THENCE NORTH 81 DEGREES 16'� 14 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 81 .64 FEET; SCHOOL DISTRICT: THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 57 47 EAST A DISTANCE OF 200.12 FEET; INTERIOR STREETS I ' " DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 11 37 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 103.04 FEET; SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID FRANK SINATRA DRIVE (50 FOOT SOUTH HALF WIDTH) AS NOT TO SCALE CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; TH O M A S BROTHERS GUIDE: THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 48' 23" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1,294.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. j PAGE 819, GRID Al 1 GRAPHIC SCALE SAID LEGAL IS PURSUANT TO THE APPROVED CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. PMW, 93-11 TOTALS: 40 0 20 40 80 160 RECORDED NOVEMBER 24, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 469319. i RESIDENTIAL LOTS . . . . . . . . . . 36 j I I STREET LOTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 LANDSCAPE LOTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Palm Desert Office: ( IN FEET ) M. 74-140 El Paseo, Suite 5 1 inch = 40 ft. TOTAL . 44 Palm Desert, CA 92260 & A S S O C I A T E S1 Tel. 760.341.6660 I. California Corporation Fax760.346.6118 I ! j \1720\TTM26553A.dwg May 27, 1998 1990 , uN M1 I 1 I I IN THE CITY OF PALM DE'z>ERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I AMENDED iTEN �TIVE RAC MAP' N o. 6553 i MAY 1998 4 F R A N K S I N A T R A II. ,D R I V E EXIST. CONC. MEDIAN DIVIDER - - ---------------------------------------------- ' -----------------------------------------------------------------;�---------------------------- -----------= ---,-----_---- ---- - -----------------_----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - (t - - - -- _ - - - 0) - - -------r- I i I -PROPOSED CONC. MEDIAN DIVIDER � I I I. �t FIRE DEPARTMENT j i O FIRE DEPARTMENT LO > > EMERGENCY ACCESS I I� EMERGENCY ACCESS L O T A PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER i O I j WIDE I ( GATE, 20' WIDE GA TE, 20' N 89'48 23 E 129 4.86 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE & SIDEWALK AREA - I z 15$ 0' PROPOSED 6' HIGH BLOCK SECURITY WALL 147.0' 142.1' !, 48.0' 50.0' 48.0' 50.0' 50.0' 48.0' 50.0' 48.0' S0.0 , 146.7' �g w L O T G L o T 'H' 27 " 15 < 1 26 - o O rn 1 7 1 8 1 9 59.1' n o s. 20 21 22 23 24 ! 25 3�3, so.o' o ' T �o 6' 01Z . , LO4. \ , o � 0 2 •�_ I I � ,� q 0 1 1 l 52.1' ' D i 61•3' 3 7.1' \ g�j y X, 0.12 ,- 29 28 I lb .01 30 14 \ 6 50.0 50.0' 48.0' - ----- 50.0' S1.3, i o. 1 S, .01 ?> �� L O T ' E ' �$ 0 �� �o ��, 31 .5� �' PROJECT 1 3 h� s� sQB, - - - N - ti �P N 6g SITE 9 12 �ry� So RFer PRIVATE STREET I P� 4 15.8' 8' 7 CY, / $0 �' 32 3$,2' 811.64, „ FRANK SINATRA DRIVE N ;;76 03,3 1 1 I g L O T ' F ' �. 3' N 81 '1 '14 E i o o S .0 10 LANDSCAPE / RETENTION LOT i 0 r, 33 14 5'00 \ r> w �� PEE > 7 E - 97 422, ^�`� �86' / k� k�0 i N 69 i� O�5 3 PJO �� o 34 O 8 - �' D� Ck r \, p GpJ < 7 2' I 44.9' ( `�sz ' w /V SO 00cP. k8. f v 6320' �ry0 A \ \l COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE `30' � 36 0 8°. 6 VICINITY MAP o 'A ' �� 5 NOT TO SCALE I 00 vv (0 a R/W 55 ^ u �Jv� s8 Q, 3 No OWNER / DEVELOPER : 1 7' 1 Z' 34' 9' 10' N �'+ LANDSCAPE MEDIAN DIVIDER �� ., 2 �. I W A VON D ALE VILLAS, LLC I EASEMENT �� n u 636, �`�, 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : CENTURY CROWELL COMMUNITIES, L. P. 946 0 1535 SOUTH 'D' ST. , SUITE 200 F'S• 1 3 THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 AND 4 AS SHOWN BY RECORD OF SURVEY ON FILE IN BOOK 55 SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92408 PAGES 38 THROUGH 43, THEREOF RECORDS OF SURVEY, AND A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 16067 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN B TEL. (909) 381 - 6007 BOOK 104 PAGES 96 AND 97 THEREOF OF 3 PARCEL MAPS, BOTH BEING IN RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, OF CALIFORNIA, ALL --2'0U -= J BEING WITHIN THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, ENGINEER : PROPOSED8' MDE N SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: MEANDERING PROPOSED EXISTING 6�, DUDEK & ASSOCIATES7 ,r¢ SIDEWALK 8" VERTICAL 8" VERTICAL St " PROPOSED CURB ONLY COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT C (AMAZON DRIVE) OF TRACT 6685-1 74- 1 40 EL PASEO, SUITE 5 8" CURB CURB ONLY GI/ 0' AS .SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 98 PAGES 10 THROUGH 14, THEREOF, OF MAPS, PALM DESERT, CA 92260 & GUTTER ) 50.0 RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 03' 12" EAST, 900, � ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 'PC", ALi5O TEL. (760) 341 - 666 0 * TYPICAL SECTION 79 0 '� BEING THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN BY RECORD OF SURVEY ON FILE` IN I FRANK SINATRA DRIVE ( srREEr ) cn BOOK 54 PAGE 36 THEREOF, OF RECORDS OF SURVEY, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, ASSESSOR ' S PARCEL N o. N CALIFORNIA, A DISTANCE OF 265.53 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF FRANK SINATRA �j NOT TO SCALE DRIVE (50 FOOT SOUTH HALF WIDTH) AS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BY 626- 030- 021 ,b ►p DEED RECORDED JULY 6, 1973 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88650 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 48' 23" EAST, ALONG SAID ACREAGE: - SOUTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 398.18 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND TO BE DESCRIBED; 8. 207 Acres PROPERTY t'J THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 11' 37" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 158.59 FEET; LINE 4 THENCE SOUTH 71 DEGREES 03' 33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 191.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63 DEGREES 20' 30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 352.17 FEET; ZONING: R / 34' R THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 18' 47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 94.64 FEET; 32' 1 THENCE SOUTH 67 DEGREES 41 47 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 193.87 FEET TO THE WESTERLY PRESENT ZONING . . . . . . . . . . . . . PR 16' 17' 16' 17' PROPERTY 10' LINE OF LOT "G" (MOZAMBIQUE DRIVE) OF SAID TRACT 6685-1 ; PROPOSED ZONING . . . . . . . . . PR / / I 1 THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE LINE MIN' WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 475.00 FEET, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 03 DEGREES 36' 04", UTILITIES: AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.85 FEET, (THE INITIAL RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 77 DEGREES 56' ELECTRIC . . . . . . . . .IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT i 01" EAST) TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT "G"; ' THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 19' 57" EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LO'T "G", GAS. . . . . . . . . . .SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. -2'0 % zo �-' --�- ------ - A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; WATER . COACHELLA VALLEY WATER _ E DISTRICT THENCE NORTHERLY ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A SEWER . COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT , RADIUS OF 545.00 FEET, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 10 DEGREES 31' 52" AN ARC LENGTH OF TELEPHONE . . G. T. E. ( GOLF COURSE ) 100.17 FEET, THE INITIAL RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 74 DEGREES 19' 57" EAST); THENCE NORTH 51 DEGREES 42' 00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 241 .74 FEET; TELEVISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MEDIA- ONE PROPOSED ROLL I TYPE cuR6 & currER THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 15' 00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 74.72 FEET; TYPICAL THENCE NORTH 81 DEGREES 16' 14" EAST, , SCHOOL DISTRICT: AST TYPICAL SECTION LOT LAYOUT THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 57' 47" A DISTANCE OF 81 .64 FEET; E A DISTANCE OF 200.12 FEET; DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT INTERIOR STREETS � THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 11' 37" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 103.04 FEET; SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID FRANK SINATRA DRIVE (50 FOOT SOUTH HALF WIDTH) AS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; � THOMAS BROTHERS GUIDE: NOT TO SCALE THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 48' 23" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, A DISTAN�E OF PAGE 819, GRID Al 1,294.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID LEGAL IS PURSUANT TO THE APPROVED CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE' NO. PMW 93-11 GRAPHIC SCALE RECORDED NOVEMBER 24, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 469319. TOTALS: 40 0 20 'a 60 160 i RESIDENTIAL LOTS . . . . . . . . . . .36 I STREET LOTS . 5 i LANDSCAPE LOTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 --�__- - Palm Desert Office: ( IN FEET ) f 74-140 El Paseo, Suite 5 i 1 inch = 40 ft. TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4 i A _Sw.sa_O. C IAA T E 5 Palm Desert, CA 92260 i Tel. 760.341.6660 A California Corporation Fox760.346.6118 \1720\TTM26553A.dwg j May 27, 1998 JUN 1998 i IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I ^,! MENDED EN A IVE RAC MA Noo 6553 Q I MAY 1998 I , F R A N K S I N A T R A D R I V E —————————— EXIST. CONC. MEDIAN DIVIDER ———————————�—————————————————————— ——————————————————————————— — T I I PROPOSED CONC. MEDIAN DIVIDER `t iO FIRE DEPAR ENT I L FIRE DEPARTMENT L D T 'A ' ACCESS GA TE, 20' WIDE PROPOSED C RB & GU TIER GA TE, 20 WIDIE EMERGENCY ACCESS � EMERGENCY A', I Q N 89'48 23 E ___ 1�94,86 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE & SIDEWALK AREA — I a_ 142.1' 48.0' 50.0' 48.0 50.0' S0.0 48.0' 50.0' 48.0' a 50.0' 158.0' PROPOSED 6' HIGH BLOCK SECURITY WALL 14 7•p' L O T G L O T 'H' lot h' o 1 I--_ - --� 2 7 0 1 5 1 6 f 2 6 - I- �s �/ rn o O O � \ 9.1 O 1 7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 6' S 3�3 so.o' o q °6 css. 2 52.1 4 / 1• 3 3 4 6 37.1' AR 'j �•( N 0 2' I �8 0' 1.,4 9 ��� �� W. 29 28 20 00 1 4 �, .0, w 30 o ��' \ 50.0, 50.0' 48.0' 50.0' 51,3' op f �� VC 1' �80• O T 5�6 L D T E' ' 0 �� �,o a� 31 ,5 " E PROJECT 13 Sr\ 2�8, — - - - - ��' \,P N 6g SITE 9 12 rya So FF� PRIVATE STREET Q� 4, 48' �� 32 2' 46'g 1 .6 4, FRANK SINATRA DRIVE N o, „ Lti� w. 1 -16 14 E o toE � 09 10 ry LANDSCAPE / RETENTION LOT ; r, 33 ��5'00 \ r, w �� PEE > 1.4 � 42 2, ^ . •'W. �� i N 69 � i� > � 0�5� 9 �� S w � .0, ryry 39 �\ 3 4 r> �j F J� P��' W GO .ry 7 42 2, 3 5 2°d j , S 44.9'00 �J 63• rye• 7, COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE �8 6 3601 \ �� ,� � ` ti0 VICINITY MAP S hOO' �J� ' t h1 `� , > NOT TO SCALE J L t 00 uj v � I a W R/ 55' U / vJ 28 3 No�, OWNER / DEVELOPER : 1 7' 12' 34' 9' 10 rn LANDSCAPE MEDIAN DIVIDER �� ..� '' O � -A � ' AVONDALE VILLAS, LLC 1 EASEMENT (�, u ` 2 636, �"� J , LEGAL DESCRIPTION : % CENTURY CROWELL COMMUNITIES, L. P. 1535 SOUTH 'D' ST. , SUITE 200 AV 4 1 3a THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 AND 4 AS SHOWN BY RECORD OF SURVEY ON FILE IN BOOK 55 SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92408 PAGES 38 THROUGH 43, THEREOF RECORDS OF SURVEY, AND A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 16067 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 104 PAGES 96 AND 97 THEREOF of TEL. (909) 381 — 6007 � -2.0 PARCEL MAPS, BOTH BEING IN RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, OF CALIFORNIA, ALL PROPOSED U —' ` BEING WITHIN THE EAST ONE—HALF OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, ENGINEER : 8' W►DE N > l SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: I DUDEK & ASSOCIATES PROPOSED MEANDERING EXISTING SIDEWALK 8" VERTICAL 8" VERTICAL 4 y, SUITE 5 PROPOSED CURB ONLY cuRe ONLY ��" COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT "C" (AMAZON DRIVE) OF TRACT 61685-1 74-- 1 40 EL PASEO, 8" CURB 50.00' RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTYBOCALIFORNIA;O GETHENOCEHNORTH 0��DEGREES OF,00F12A EAST & GUTTER �' PALM DESERT CA 92260 ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "C" Aso TEL. (760) 341 6660 t TYPICAL SECTION 793�0'If C° '� BEING THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN BY RECORD OF SURVEY ON 'FIL� IN FRANK SINATRA DRIVE ( STREET ) 8), O BOOK 54 PAGE 36 THEREOF, OF RECORDS OF SURVEY, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, ASSESSOR ' S PARCEL No. : CALIFORNIA, A DISTANCE OF 265.53 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF FRANK SINATRA NOT TO SCALE x _ b y DRIVE (50 FOOT SOUTH HALF WIDTH) AS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BY 626- 030- 021 DEED RECORDED JULY 6, 1973 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88650 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF -� � -- ------ E RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 48' 23" EAST, ALONG SAID ACREAGE : SOUTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 398.18 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THEI PARCEL OF LAND TO BE DESCRIBED; ! 8. 207 Acres PRONERTY I A> THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 11' 37'; EAST, A DISTANCE OF 158.59 FEET; I THENCE SOUTH 71 DEGREES 03, 33 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 191 .41 FEET; R THENCE SOUTH 63 DEGREES 20,' 30��' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 352.17 FEET; ZONING: 32' / 34' THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 18' 47„ EAST, A DISTANCE OF 94.64 FEET; PRESENT ZONING . P R THENCE SOUTH 67 DEGREES 41 47 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 193.87 FEET TO THE WESTERLY 16' / 17' 16' / 17' PROPERTY 10, LINE OF LOT "Go' (MOZAMBIQUE DRIVE) OF SAID TRACT 6685-1; PROPOSED ZONING . . . . . . PR LINE MIN THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF NON—TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE, WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 475.00 FEET, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 03 DEGREES! 36' 04 UTILITIES: AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.85 FEET, (THE INITIAL RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 77 DEGREES 56' ELECTRIC . . . . . . . . .IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT — ----�� OTH,ENCE EAST) NOROTH THE 74 DNORTHWEST EGREES 1g'CO�,NER EAST, ALONG LOT THEGNORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "Got, GAS. . . . . . . . . . . .SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. r20 2D �� — WATER . COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT "� z A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; I ^ � THENCE NORTHERLY ON A NON—TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A SEWER . COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT RADIUS OF 545.00 FEET, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 10 DEGREES 31 ' 52" AN ARC LENGTH OF PROPOSED ROLL ( GOLF COURSE ) „ TELEPHONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G. T. E. 100.17 FEET, (THE INITIAL RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 74 DEGREES 19 57 EAST); TYPE CURB & currER I THENCE NORTH 51 DEGREES 42' 00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 241.74 FEET; TELEVISION . MEDIA— ONE TYPICAL THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 15' 00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 74.72 FEET; i TYPICAL SECTION LOT LAYOUT THENCE NORTH 81 DEGREES 16' 14" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 81.64 FEET; SCHOOL DISTRICT: I THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 57' 47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 200.12 FEET; INTERIOR STREETS I THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 11' 37" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 103.04 FEET; DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID FRANK SINATRA DRIVE (50 FOOT SOUTH HALF WIDTH) AS NOT TO SCALE CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; TH O M A S BROTHERS GUIDE: THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 48' 23" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1,294.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PAGE 819, GRID Al 1 GRAPHIC SCALE SAID LEGAL IS PURSUANT TO THE APPROVED CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. PMW 93-11 RECORDED NOVEMBER 24, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 469319. TOTALS: 40 0 20 40 e0 ,so RESIDENTIAL LOTS . 36 *. STREET LOTS 5 LANDSCAPE LOTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Palm Desert Office: ( IN FEET ) 74-140 El Paseo, Suite 5 1 inch = 40 ft. ; TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 & ASS 0 C I A T E S Palm Desert, CA 92260 Tel. 760.341.6660 A California Corporation Fox760.346.6118 \1720\TTM26553A.dwg , May 27, 1998@N i I IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AMENDED EN A IVE RAC MAP No4w 6553 I I MAY 1998 i I F R A N K S I N A T R A .D R I V E -- EXIST. CONC. MEDIAN DIVIDER ---------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------- --------------------------------------- ----------- ---------------------- ------ I I _ I PROPOSED CONC. MEDIAN DIVIDER j FIRE DEPARTMENT , , I FIRE DEPARTMENT �j i i L EMERGENCY ACCESS EMERGENCY ACCESS •L' O T A PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER GATE, 20' WIDC I GA TE, 20' WIDE I J PROPOSED LANDSCAPE & SIDEWALK AREA ! - I _ i N 89.48 23 E 12: 4.86 q r I 146.7' 142.1' 48.0' S0.0' 48.0' S0.0' S0.0' 48.0' 50.0' 48.0' 50.0' 158.0' PROPOSED 6' HIGH BLOCK SECURITY WALL 147.0' �h w L O T L O T 'H'QQ 27 15 1 2 6 �i CS O ti R / 0) o , N - L s , ,- o Mao s_ 17 1 8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 591 1,> so.o 0 q 57 6LO Z w. o �o? ON q \ ^ Q 438, 37.1' 00 y2' 0 30 14 �� �'� 9° 50.0' 50.0' 48.0' 50.0' 51.,3' `J� �- i �\ g �3 4 5. E �V, 8°� � ��6 L O T ' E ' 0 �c� o ��, 31 -7 PROJECT 13 S\ s�8, _ _ _ - �� - \�P k�. N 69°5 SITE 9 1 2 ^�� S° �'FF PRIVATE STREET Q� 4 15 $' 32 2; 46. FRANK SINATRA DRIVE a"1 3$' _ 81 .64 E >>•p3,3° 1 1 ^�� �8 L O T ' F ' c�. 3, N 8111 6'14 0 Al. 7 10 `� LANDSCAPE / RETENTION LOT 33 _ 1 5 00 r� w Ld 9� 6, �� OES�`F 3 4 9 a �� �' s w .01 Jg O 35 C' 42 2' � �� ' CJ w 7 � 44.9' 00 f�b3 'wry l COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE 36 VICINITY MAP 5 ,o -p�L �'\ , NOT TO SCALE R/W n 55 v s8Q 3 No OWNER / DEVELOPER : 7' 12 34' 9 l0 �1 LANDSCAPE MEDIAN DIVIDER �'� .� O -` AVONDALE VILLAS, LLC 1 EASEMENT � � 6 2 �� �' DESCRIPTION : % CENTURY CROWELL COMMUNITIES, L. P. 36. � LEGAL DESC ION : 1 v I 1535 SOUTH 'D' ST. , SUITE 200 ss 864" 1 �� J THOSE ES PORTIONS ROU OH LOTS 1T A RD F RS SHOWN OBY RECORD OF SURVEY POR ON FILE IN BOOK 55 SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92408 _ P G 38 G HE EO ECO DS SU E , AND TION OF PARCEL 1 OF - 6007 TEL. 909 II 3' PARCEL MAP 16067 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 104 PAGES 96 AND 97 THEREOF OF ) 381 PARCEL MAPS, BOTH BEING IN RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, OF CALIFORNIA, ALL r 2 � Li _ PROPOSED % � J BEING WITHIN THE EAST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, ENGINEER : r, 8' WIDE SAN. BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: I MEANDERING PROPOSED J EXISTING N 6�• ��St DUDEK & ASSOCIATES ". SIDEWALK 8" VERTICAL 8" VERTICAL j 4J' ., �PROPoSED CURB ONLY CURB ONLY ¢�'� COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT C (AMAZON DRIVE) OF TRACT 6685-1 74- 1 40 EL PASEO, SUITE 5 8" CURB & GUTTER 00' AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 98 PAGES 10 THROUGH 14, THEREOF, OF MAPS, PALM DESERT, CA 92260 TYPICAL SECTION "� 9o.O, N 50 ALONNGRECORDS OF THEE NORTHERDLY PROLON�GATIONOOFIA; THENCE THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAIDELOT „C„2 ALSO TEL. (760) 341 - 6660 n _ SO d: C L SEC O �93 BEING THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN BY RECORD OF SURVEY ON 'FILE IN FRANK SINATRA DRIVE ( STREET ) 8) ;, O BOOK 54 PAGE 36 THEREOF, OF RECORDS OF SURVEY, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, ' CALIFORNIA, A DISTANCE OF 265.53 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF FRANK SINATRA ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. : NOT TO SCALE b DRIVE (50 FOOT SOUTH HALF WIDTH) AS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BY 626- 030- 021 LO DEED RECORDED JULY 6, 1973 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88650 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF -- -- --- -- RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 48' 23" EAST, ALONG 'SAID ACREAGE : C SOUTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 398.18 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND TO BE DESCRIBED; 8. 207 Acres PROPERTY t THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 11' 37" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 158.59 FEET; LINE THENCE SOUTH 71 DEGREES 03' 33" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 191.41 FEET; R R THENCE SOUTH 63 DEGREES 20,' 30,�' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 352.17 FEET; ZONING: 32' / 34' THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES THENCE SOUTH 67 DEGREES 411' 47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 193.87 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 94.64 FFEET TO THE WE TERLY PRESENT ZONING PR „ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16' / 17' 16' / 17' PROPERTY 10, � LINE OF LOT G (MOZAMBIQUE DRIVE) OF SAID TRACT 6685-1; PROPOSED ZONING . PR LINE MIN THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 475.00 FEET, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 03 DEGREES 36' 04", UTILITIES: ' I AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.85 FEET, (THE INITIAL RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 77 DEGREES 56' - 01" EAST ELECTRIC . . . . . . . . IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT "G"; GAS. . . . . . . . . . . .SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. s r2.0 2.0 �� -�- ----- -- THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 19' 57" EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "G", � z A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; WATER . COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ^ � THENCE NORTHERLY ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTE,RLY,,, HAVING A SEWER . COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT RADIUS OF 545.00 FEET THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 10 DEGREES 31 52 AN ARC LEND PROPOSED ROLL ( GOLF COURSE ) ' , „ LENGTH o F TELEPHONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G. T. E. 100.17 FEET, (THE INITIAL RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 74 DEGREES 19 57 EAST); TYPE CURB & GUTTER •� TELEVISION . MEDIA- ONE 1 THENCE NORTH 51 DEGREES 42 00 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 241 .74 FEET; TYPICAL THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 15' 00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 74.72 FEET; TYPICAL SECTION LOT LAYOUT THENCE NORTH 81 DEGREES 16' 14" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 81.64 FEET; SCHOOL DISTRICT: THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 57' 47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 200.12 FEET; DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT INTERIOR STREETS THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 11' 37" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 103.04 FEET; } SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID FRANK SINATRA DRIVE (50 FOOT SOUTH HALF WIDTH) AS NOT TO SCALE CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; TH O M A S BROTHERS GUIDE THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 48' 23" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1,294.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PAGE 819, GRID Al GRAPHIC SCALE SAID LEGAL IS PURSUANT TO THE APPROVED CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE' NO. PMW , 93-11 }}I RECORDED NOVEMBER 24, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 469319. TOTALS: 40 o Za .0 80 ,so RESIDENTIAL LOTS . . . . . . . . . .36 jSTREET LOTS 5 • . LANDSCAPE LOTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Palm Desert Office: ( IN FEET ) 74-140 El Paseo, Suite 5 1 inch = 40 ft. , TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44 Palm Desert, CA 92260 & A S S O C I A T E S Tei. 760.341.666o A California Corporation Fox760.346.6118 ► \1720\TTM26553A.dwg May 27, 1998 ulms .... ._. ..._..." ..,. ry. ..... „.. •. .. .:,:s. ..uw.,:.i:rea.....+» :_v:... ..n. .c.;.. a ., w :., a `5B_ill:' . . '.I ,I I� I I I .1 � I . 1, � - I I I I I . I t I . 1 I 1 4v 4",�*� � I � � I 11 N�I ; I ,Z��t, , , - ,� � I ), I � � I '11A.r.j . . � I " ,. ,�"-, � � � I ..'�, , , I �,� I .1 , .1 : , I � I �� . t ,�I'_ I � ��., � I 4 " I I . i I . , - I �0 . I �, � ."I . I I � � I 11 . I I . I � I 11 � ;,.�,k . I � I I I I �V .,,:,�. "A'S4 � � I I . I I , :, - ,, I 11 I � I I � . I �', , "" � . . � . I � . ,'� �i I � ��? , I ,0 I �, 't � I , .� . I "W I � - � . I I I . I, I I I -1 ,�,.I 1, I I ; . I ,I,.,; w � . � � � . "I I 1" , � � I . . �I �, I I I . � , I :t il � '. ), t,0 1 � I I . I V 't . I I I I "�4 � I � I � I 't I I � 1�-, . I , I . ",, 1, . I I I I I I I . . . - I ( I . � I" I I I, I 1, I . � ,: I � , 4 f I . � , . t, - I I I I � I �,� 11 . __ -_____-__ ___ __ i,." --- __ - -___-�-- -I ______ - wbmnwwwmawwwm� ----_� - - � - -_ -_ - -- .1� I - --� I I I . -, I _ -_ __ - I I I I . I � I � � I , �p- I � I " . � � I � I I .1 � . I I , . I I � I . I . .�_. �� � I 'III, i I I � I . I .�Iv' I 1 " I I I . I I I " - I I _�O� I '. I I I 1� . I I , ,; , . �� , . I I I , , 1 I I I * � . I � I I I . .� I "�,I .I, I I I I 1�, .", I I. I I I . � , I � I I � I�,��', , . I �I. 1� I I 1� .. I . 11 I � I I � 1, � I I " i� .., 41 I I I " � I I . 1, � I I" I 11 � , " , , .� . . I " , '' I . I I 1, �:� ", � , .".., . I ,� . I I .:, " . 1 ".. � � I .� '. 1. � I , , . . " . I I � ..�, . . , I, . . . I ' I I I � I I I I � ,? "� . I I � I I I� � I . 11 I � - I 1;� I I I . I . . I I . IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I I I . �� I 1, � - . I I I I ., I 1 : 11, .1 I I I 11; , � � ''I . I . ., I - . I I .1 � I I I � . I I., I ., I � i .1 I � I I �,. . �� I �.4.. 1 1 1 . � �I I � . � , " � I ,' I I ,,, .1 . �I, I . I 10� I I I . . I,I I . ,1,I ". I I I . 4 . I 11 I I I I 1� I � I � . ,* 1, � . I I I . "I , . ,I I j, � I i I ", . : , I 'k I I,;,,I,I,I � . I 14 ., I I I I, � � I 1, I .1 I I 1�I 0. 11 I t � 1, 11 �11 .': � I I I I .. 1. AMENDED 11 . I I I I 1, � - , - ., I .1 I �, . I - I I � 0 . , I � I - : 11 I'� """ , , .�% , I , . I � 1 . I ,�, I " I � ., I I I �. . , . I I I .11 , I .. I I . _ 11 I I ! . I . , . � I , 1 , . . I VC:) NDALE C (DUN RY CLUB .., I �1 _. ' � ,, I . I A � I . '' ' � I 1. I I i I 1 .�, � . .� 1. 1� . 1 . �11 .. _____. _ I � .' " -' '*-, -,, " ,_ __ 1;_ _-__ EN ATIVE TRAC I I . , " Ill I ._ I I 1 .1 I 1. I �1'1 1 I I I � . 0 1 ; I I , I � � � I i , . I 11 I I � COMPOSITE PLAN I I �, . . 1 4,� , . , , - I , - I t " ' ' � I � I i . I � 4 - - 3 . 1 . � I 11 ;, � I I I i f I I I FOR , I, I � " 11 � I I . . I , I I ;, � I _" , I 11 CENTURY CROWELL COMMUNITIES., LP. 1, � '' MAY 1998 / I . I I I . �, I I I - ,, I I I I I . I I I . 1. "! 1, � . I ,� I � 111. - � I * I - - I I I 1. . � - . I I I I I I , I I I I �- _ I I I I � : ' 1. I I � I � . I � �, I :,��, . . 7 I I I I I I 11 , . � � "i, " I � � I I - — I �I � I I I I - I � I . I 1. I �:� ;, '.'' I I t I I I I I I ��, I I I � 1 . I . I I I I I . I , " ," - I � . I "I �1 I � � 1.vl . I I . � I 11 I I .1 I , " , I" , � ! - . � I I I � I � I ' 'I 1 ,'',, -1 I I I . . . I I I 'll � . I I � � I � .., 'I, I k " � , , I � 1� I I � I I I. , 11 � I . I ., " .11 . 1 I I I I I 1� ', � . . � _ . el� e� �' S/ I _� I II I . ;�,�, ';I I - I . � I �_ . . I I � - I I I � I I - , �. , ' ', - 1, � I , I '' �: ,- , ,, � - I 11 I I . . I � � � . 1 I I I . , 4� , ''I." , 11 __-----; � i � � I �, I � � It, . 1 1, I I . t� � .. "j . I I _ �' I I -_ I I ", � � ; I I I I 11 I 11 "I., 11 . 1 I 1 I I 1 . - 11 I I . � I _' . 11 . 1, 11 - � I I 1, -, , '' � I 1 � , . , � I . I 11.,;" .'' I � I I . I I I I I I �_. -1 I 11, I I '' I . ''I I " I � . I I I , I I . I 11 � I � 1 I 1 -11 . � - 1 11 . I � " I I I . I - � . - 11 I 4 � , , � I 1 , I C& , , � I ", ' 'I , 1, I . � . . I I � . � I . � I I � I � I I I I 1, 11 I", � � I I - , ,� , 11 11� 1 4 1, I I t�l I I I 1. I 1 . I I I,` �� I I I � 11 , . � I ,� " I I I I I I � I I I I �, I I . �. ;,� I ' , I � I I I 'll . ��, I - I I ,':,� I I I I 11 �. I � I �� , . , 111� II I I . � 11 I I � ;., � Iyl - . . t .1 � I . ., 1, � '_�i � � � : 1 1 . I I I i . I I . 11 .11, 2 . ". I 11 . %, _ ., . I � I � I I � i, I I - � I � : �1_ � I 11 ,i - I � . � 1 i I - 1 - � I ?, !_. 11 I., �. I I 1. 11 : I � � I ,,' I . I I . . - � I I I I �: � I � I � ,' -11 , 11 � 1, - ' I - . � ti,l I 11 I I . � I '_ : .- � I , I - �� � I I 1, ' 111 1. 1, � I I 11 I � i r " . I I I I I I I _�i 1" . . I I—, .11 . . I � 1, 11 I I 11: I : I , I ;, . I t I , . I I , � � - " . - I � . I I . , '; I � I . 'i, .1 I . .1 I I I I . ; � I I I , . � .1 I . t I .� �, , I 1 . . . " �: It I I I I �.,', I I I I It I 111 . . I I . 11,11,11 . 11 I .- ��, 1� . I 11;� I I �',J I . � 1. . . . I . I I I ' ll I., I I I I � I 11- 1 1, It, , � 1_1. _ - I � I I . � I I .. � 11 . I � i I I - � � , I 1. � I . � , 1 , � I I I 1 : � , I . I - ,� ,� I � I I I . I � � t" , I I . � . . � I I 11 . I I . . 11 . I I . I 1, I I I � . I � I I � - I I I �, I I � � ,� I - I .11 , _ I I I I 'll I. I I " I . - 11 I � I '� I I � . . I I I 11 - � I .. I I I I I I I _1 t I I ' 'I . . I �� " I - I � I I f; I I I I I i I �,: I � I I . -I �, t, I � � � I � I I I. . I - I I I I I I I I I I I : . 1. It . I , , - I I I �j I � I .�, I I 1 . , I I � � � I I . 1 , 11 � 1 . � - I . I 11 '' Ill.: 1_ i , I " . . I I I . I I . " I I I I . I . . � " : � 1 . . .... , I j. I 11,_ . I . I � I I I I I __ � I I 11 . I I 1z � I . �� . :, I 1 . I � I I . '�,, _", t14'' 1 1 ; 'I . .1 I �� � I I I . . � I � . . I I 1" � I 11 1. 1. � . I , , ,�_,','., ;1 ��,,, � " I I . , I Y I . , ; T, I � I 'i ,I� I . . I . I I I I , � I - ,." I, I , �, - I � I I � . . I I- I I , I I � I � I I � I I I- �� , ,I �, ," .� I I . I � I I I I - I � I . I I 1 . �I- - , I I � I � I I 11� I I I I I A �. I I I . , . . I - I I I I - I � I , I �.I � 1 , �,, �-, I� I I I I I I I I . . � � � , � ,III ;, ��,� I I I � I - � I � � I . � ,� , I . I I 1� � I - I I I . � . I �. I I . ", ��� I � . I I I 1� I ,� � .I I , , � I I I I I . . �,. I � ,- .�, � � . I I ; I��, I � 5: . I I ,. 1. , I I � I - ; I I I � I I, �1, .I I �.,., ��. ", ,, �I . I I . I I I.- I I I I t I - - I I I � . I! , t J.,, ,11 � � � I �, �� I " . I I I :, ,.I , I, , "� .1 :i, I I .� -I I I � . . I 1 I . , ,I I I- 11-- ,�I I . � .I . I I ��i �- I I "_ � ,�,t , . ��, � I , , - � . I I I I ,I � . , . I I I '. I I - ,.I , "U�11, . I I � I I I - I I I .1 , I�� , I I � I � I I I I 11 I 1, I. ,� , . �_,,�w,,.-' x I � -I . I I � I - I I . � �� � I I ) � � I � ��I � I I � � . I I I 11 I. I �t% � j,, ; , , �t� I I I I , , � I I. ., ,�I I I I � I I I I � I I " I � � . I I I � I . :,�,, �� ,.: ill, 11 " I I I � I I . 11 � I�_ .I ��I � �� ".�, � I I ,- � I I � I i,� � ;I I� I I I I ,- � �, , 1, I% z I , I I� � � � I � � . 1. . 1, . . I � I I � I � I I . �,11,11 I ��... I I I � � "I � . I I�� I, . . IV.� . I I � I�I -�� I I � . . � I I . . � I I � I � I I I � I I 'i i':.�,, : I � � I I . I ,� - . I I I . I I ,�, �, I , � 11 I ..I I �I,.I I I , I I I I � , � I 11 .I: I �I I� � �. . 11 I, I I . ,,- . � I I I � I - I I"I 1-�11 1,� .1 I � , I I I � I -� , I I I I : ,� � , I . 4 . I I I I I I i",I 1� I. . . I 1 I � I �,,. I � I i,� I .. I . "- . I � I I I., I � . I ,I . . � I I I - I -1 . �I � I �� � 11�, I I I I , - . � �� . I I - I I . _ I I I � I I I I I � I I I � I,i , , I -� I I , . . . � I . I 1 I I . I I 1� t I � , -- -- � . I � I � . I I I I 1� �� , I. . I I ��I �,I I I I . I � I ,�_ .I ,, I I I � I, I I . . I I . I .1 . I , I " I I I � I � . � . I I , � � 1, I I I . I I I � . . � -.1, . I . I -; I r I I 4�, I I I � i 4� , I I � I . I � �. I I �I I � � � I I � I I I I I : I I� .� , .% " 11 I I . I �, I I � � ,� I ,� , I I I I . I � I �,�, 11 . I . I I 1�i I� I �, 4 1 , � 1�1 I I i . I I . I � . I I � I I I . I I I . _ i. �,�,,, � , I I I I I . I I I . I I 11 . I I I � I � �. 1.I I I I I �, I � . I I,I �, I . " , I � , I . , . , � . , I I 1� - 1 1, I F R A IV K I . I 1 , t � - 1, I i. . 'D 1R , 1 ' V E ,- �, .: . ' � I )�" I I � I I I I . �, - 1 . I � I I . I " . , I I I . . � ' " I I I I I I 1 . I 0 � � - � ", � I I I I I, I 11,:k,,�,,'4'�--,�' I I . 1 2 1 EXIST. CONC. MEDIAN DIMER__NA I I . � "� - I I. � 11 I �. - �" � I I . i I , " � _ � I I 11 � I I 1. - ------------------- 1. -- I I I I - ---- - - I I , ' ' , I I --------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- , � I I I � -� ,�, , . . � . � . I I I ,1� � I � I I I., �� , -1 I I I I I I I , 1, I I (;� I I � . �, 11 . I � I I . I I t I 1 . 11 - I I - .1 I ,. . � I I :, - I I I I I � I I I I . I I 1 14 - A � I I I 11� I I - I . , � � . . - I I I - , I .- 4q � ..; �1 4M - - - � . . -, . - , I - - I - I I �. I I I I I I I - - __ - - - - - - - - - - t - I�I . , - y I I 11 I I � I � I . I I I I I � I I I I I I I . . I , I � , � � I I. . I I I � I -� . I I I I I I I I I I I � I . , . � I I I - __�_ - I I �� I i I I 11 I- I . , I . I i , I I I I I I I ., I I I I � , I " il I . I I I �.,�) I I I 11 �. I I "I � ��', � I . - �� i � I I . I I I 11 I I I I - - � I . ! I I I . I : � I w _,-P, ,, __ �. ,,,- - � � I . . , � I I � . I , I I . I I� I I �m, I I , � .1 I I . I . �,I I I . I , � I � I I I I I � I . I I I - � . . I � - -I 11, I I , I ,, I '� I I , I I I . � - ,� I I 11 I � I I I . I --- , � \16- PROPOSED CONC. MEDIAN 01WO&P , I 1 4- . , . I 1.t, I �, .1 , I I '�� � . 11 ", .1 . , I - - 1. � I I �, I I I . � I I 11 I b It I . , � I I I I .- � � I - _'. I. - I I I I I 1_1 I 1: . I� I �. I I � -I. . � I I .1 ,� � I ' I - " � � I I 11 11 I �, . I � I - �_ , -� , 11 � ;,�� � I ,� 11 I I , � � I � - DE I . ��V� � � I�. 1. - I I I � ME PARTMENT I . I � " ---- ,. --- � . ,, , W) -- - I-------.0 I ,� � ',_ , I � I I 10 \-,- FIRE DEPARTMENT L1. , I I � ____ -_ u� - _ I __,___ I I I . I � ____ . --fl-0 I" 11 . . , , I I I I I I I I . I rh;m= I I I � . - I I I mop I I I � 1. I ,� I � � I � � , I . �. - � � I - I I .�, I I , I 11 OSED CURB & GUTTER , , i I ',�.,; � , "�, I I GA Tr, 20' WIDE I . I , I . . I I � -_ � � .I I t I . , r? I I (z) " , . I � � I � AM 20' MDE . - I I I I 11 I I ---t--- . I , - I - ", -LUL--- ___j , i ,I I I I I I � I - I � � I I , I /I f, 1. I I I - � I . . I I ",_ L_,.'I 3 1. - I �- � . � � � 1 _ + - � I . I I I I� �__; -_ I L I I L I � I'll 1�1 I L I . -- 41 ___ - __ I I 1. , \ 1294.86 7 I I I I It". PROPOSED LANDSCAPE & SIDEWALK AREA --�, I I I . 11 I � � - 5 __ I L ___ I ___ - ..I � -11, - -� I I I I .. . L . I 1.11, I L L'L. I L p, . ' ' I "�_ NNI I - - -_ N 89'48'23" E L - - � , I �. I IL I - I I I - ___ -_ I LT I I L I I I I I .- --- - . � I I - _\ I I I � - I F . I I � I I I I I L. I .1 I . I - L I r L I % ,� � �t . �� I I I I L I I I 11 q _ � I I I 11 I . I I .1 I . I I 1. I I � .I � -,*IN, �_ - I I . I I -.'i L 1 . 1.�I I I I _,,�,111 � �I J� I L � I � I . _ - - .1 .1 . I I I I I I I " I I ffL'L � . I i .11 -1 I � I , . I " .� i", . I I :1. , .I I I - . j L:� I I :;,N. I I . . 1. L _ , , I I . 9. .1; I I I - - - . � --- � I I . 1 I � I �1 . ��, I ___---I ___ - - - �,i I , - I . , I . L I . L L I I- , . , ' _ ,;1 " . - . 11 ,.j , _ ' I LL . I 1 2 1 1 1 � I I I I- , . I 11, I� . . I I I ; � L I - 11 , I I I I v I 1, � I �, LL I . I 11 L I 11� I . . I I� I I I I I 1 48.O' ' , 0. I I � ", LOT ��C ' 160.1'r PROPOSED 6' HIGH BLOCK SECURITY WALL �, 175.0" . L � I . � I � I I 1 72.2' zi � 1 168.1, zi I f 50.0'1 48.0' 50.O' 50.0, 48. 50.0, f 48.0' �_, 148-0'� 1 , 7- _ t I . - 1 44 " I 1, � , , I I I I - , . I -_ I 11 I I . I I , I L . � - I I I -- I � 'iff' 1 . � , " , , � t , . I L ""I _ 17 _0 2 I t I I I v L 0 -T � - I I - � .11 I 1 . I . L I k I * I I . I , - --- `-` � I � '� I - . o ___ I I v % I ;a I I .1 I L :�L� I I I 11 � -. I �, I . � I , I � " - I 1. � I - I I I I I I I I . . i I I IT I 11 I I � � I L \ I 1� I I I . I L I I 1. I 11 ,.,�t L .11 I I , I I ln_� - �_�_ I �: ., L � , .. . e I I " I . I t --- _. . 11 f i I , ;IQ � k ;4 1 . � I� 11q, � ,� I I � L � � " L L L t I , 14: . il �__� ! I : I ". . I ��, ' I I L I I - . ..w- I M I I L low---14, I-.1 L I I I � I , I , I 0- � .. L I L I I I I ",I I L I I� I ,I I I I I I I 1 '3 1 1 1 . . L , �, �"," . �� I L . I \ 352' PLAN I . V7---a---� cr- ..L I _ ., , � I V > , L.PLAN 1, I L �, 1. I ,� - . I . I I . . . 1. Q4 I �,, - - ,�� L"'' I . I . - L I L I I I . I LL , � a____t3_ 'i .�', I . P LAN a I � Z � I I 11"J� L - �___ ., , 1 33.,3, ---,- 0 a-1-13----0 at -93--i-113 � . I '. 11 I �,� 4 IL I . I , _ C 48 ' �If r I , I �,� I I I � .PLAN L \ 2B (O - I I - --im 11 L I �11 . I - I I L� 1, I .1 - 23�2)u_i , I 1-0 a----a-- -0 I I - ____________"_ L I 11 't N I I � � I I L ' ' , 1 , ., L" 1. , , I L I I 1, L I I I ,__�� � � � j-'_ I 4AR I I - (� n ., . I I I I I I , I., �, -if, � � .1 .1. � I 1 15, 51.-a- � � . I . .I I ". � - I L- . I 'F'� I : I � " I " I - � ; , L -1 . L \ -_ 1� 1� 1: I I , I � � � " I- 1.1� "'', , 27 1 1 L L 11 I �: 15 � 3B I Cr----0-L 13 M--------r I I . I ; , I . I L I I : I '\ . I I I I L " U) I � ,I� . - �I. I I I ��j"I I I � � �, . I I \ I . I � I c; In - 'L I (z) �� I , I - I r_ I I 11 L . I .1 I I 1 . I I � I . N I . a -5'- .I �, I I I L I I .11 I I ��% � I T_ I I I . L I - - , o) 0 * . I . 'L . - �L� , I 1, . . I � �� I . I � _� I I I I � 11 I I L L I I �' I I � 4' "' 1 11 Y1. . I . -1 11 . 1 . ": L I ' I L " 11 � -- - I I 11 � 0 I � '' �I � I - I . . I 11 . . " I ilz I I I I .- I � 11 N �� to 11_�- 11 I -���, - `�� v , �L_'� 0 , I 'w, � , L I - -1 � . I I I r i� I - 1 22 _. I I . I _� -1 L *0 . I q I 1 n 0 .'' 1 17 -- 7' - .24 ' 25 -- I . L L - 1, p 1, L - I 18 19 21 I ' ll , <1) , I . ,;, I I I I _ I f . 1 j -1, �� I L., I L. I � . , �, I.. I , '" r- .Cd I , ., - AD^ - � - , " L 11. 1 11 1, I "" , . I . 1 (6 - if - 1� . I;- ' DRAIN GE I - IL I I " �� _ , IL . I I I \ -11 7 - i . 23 .. . _�s - 7 1 2: . I I v-- ..I- , . I I I � .1 I I A' I � I I . I . ,� I I , I - . I I n � L I,I _ SEMENT t I I I I . . , � 11 . I'Ll I I I 111�I I I - "'�� -I. � 20 1 IS I � L 4-- . ---I � - .q "I : I �' 41-9 :;�', - ..� I L b LQ � or I , , I I I I � � V . , L I - I �, �L , , , PLAN r t -*� I I -- I 1, I I I - .1 ., I . I , I �, . L I ; 5 - I -A ,��_- ,��, ''. L I I .. 1� . I I I L �L 0 . � 11 ,I' N I I � I 11 I � PLAN A, PLAN ' I " I I �,, I _, , �_4 I I t �' 11 I 11 ; . 11 �, , , I 131 . � . L .. I L'� 1\ . I � L'', . I I I I I I I L � - � 1 ,,, I I I L I e; I / �1� P,> 'ii 2A 1. � ,PLAN PLAN P -AN 11 L I I I I . I I I I � l-, , I , I ,� 12A ; '� I 31 1 ., � .1 . ' 'I I ,", - : 11 ,� � I , , " L I 'L L I IL z . I. I � 1. I I A I - L ;I- .. _�_� - "I -� PLAN L , ". I 3A 51� " PLAN " ' _��_ L I 1 44 , � I- , � , � I . L � 11 I I , I Q�S' i ---Z "I PLAN �5, - �51 I PLAN , � I -No ,.: " ' � I I . I � . I L w � B 2A 4A 2B I 4B I I L 1.11 : � 11 .L I I I �1 * I 'A��;�,�, L I " 44 1 1 L I I I I L 'IV,11 3 1 ,5, 1 1. I I , 11 � 2BR .� � i . , e . I . � I PLAN � " 4B 5 1 . IN 51 1 - , I 11 PLAN � � . . I . I 1%�, , , � I I I I I " . ; L / I . ,� ,,,� I 11 . 1 � . I I I t t I I . L . . 11 . � .& :� I "% I . I I I I � I I I L 4 I I � ',,,"I I I I L � I I 11 2 1 . I L L � . � -I L I L'L I - . - ; ,4'.� i,�"'-,,� ,� ., ,I I � I , I z z 0 1 1 . 11 L�'. 40�k" L I Br% I I 1�. . t . L I :"' L � . . . I.i I - I . 30.7' . 4B __ _"*,� � I L . I I I I � L I ,_ I D. ,i - . . I � � . . L� I I �!. -1 "I r ,,�, � �L I I � I,- / C��". . - , 1. I I I I PLA I . - I I 11 z , i I I . I . 1 I_ - � � , * 1%11 vq 7. ,� ��_� I . - I - I I I I I I I "I L . �i- I I I I,.;,-.,. , I - � � 1 - I, I, 11�' I - I 1 . I . � , I i 4A 13C . /_�:f / .11 if I I I I I I 11 1� c 11 11 11 �� �_ I ---, � 4< ,9�'!,t 1 , , I 1 14 ' ' * ', -, zir�, : I I L L I I I . \ I , � I " 2 � - 31.5'--.r\ ' PLAN - --,;, .1,�� t I ( 'R , L 1) , . I .� , _ - 1 I ) �., 11 I I . '_- - ' ' � I I ?` fo - � L I , , 13� 11 I . . I I - . - 11 L I _[� L I -01-.. I - < I I L., I , . I ,�. I T, . I � i I - � I L I .�o 6 I , , . 1�1 �� . I L I - I . . I ;,�� - I I � I I '0) ... I 6 �, PLAN /--. � "'-< F -0j . - I I I 'L� ,"__,_-.___ , I %.- I I I 11 � I I 11 I � 1 (6 1 �* I 2A "_ i'�O. , __� t� � -�_-,� ly i I � " - I I 11 I \ 1 A � " , to�'_ � . \\�n -.j i, �1' I L . I . � i , .1 � L 11 0 1 L L I L I n "I ,,- j 11 -1 11 � I . k,L, � I 11 \ . ,-%-k '\- 1, I I 31 _ � I L I -,,- � L I I � I I I PROJECT L I 1, I 1� I r. 1 � �11. I L \ I- k-1., I _ �111 I -110 - 19* 1 � I ,'L � � I I , - - 5� �, i HER.TTAGE C.IRCLE . , I i� I r -, 1 ,, r019* L I V, I I � � L 1\ 1 113 I/ PLAN I 'S��, -C I IZ$` � N _�_ �" I . -1 I A.F%F% . LL " L . 10 I I ""-, � L I I . L I I I. I. , 1\-) . I I, " I I . SITE . . I 11 L - _ � I t I �, I . 12 ' ' 11 ��, - -ff;- 1_4 "40 -L - PRIVATE STREET K) L I I I - � I I'll, " I I � Iv- '11� I- 1�.", 11 . .I 11 t, r L I r I 10 � ' 11 . I I I I L . I� I - I L. I I � I I ,. I ,� I I I . I . _ _ I � L 4A ), -(� s�� , I L I I� I I � . I I �,,- I I . ,�-, , � I I I , -3,d ) - I I I . � 1\ '.1 � . _` I � I t I I 11 I . � I : L I I I . ,- � ; . ; I I .I 11� � L I I 11 I I.. I I . I I I I -__- i;;L, L'T I I , I I I I 0 1 L I FRANK SINATRA OR VIC I � I I - . . I I I - . I , I 1, L 11 � . 01, I . I �� PLAI I I '-_�: , .1 01 ,.I _�-, - . � I 11 I - 11 �, 1 168.6' 1 .r I I . - .,., � L - I 1: I I . , 4, - _L t, . L I L� � . I : I � I . I PLAN L - I L . L L L I - � I - . . I'll I I I � . � � .I . I 10� I LL L I . I : I I . I I - I 3AF_ I .1 .. � i 3A I L I �"(. L I I � - I L I I , � �r I . I _ ,� 0 1 I ., I I I I I - . I L LL I " I I -1 I L I � . . _>��_ . I I I : I �_ I . , 11 I 11 I L \,- . I L Q:L I I I I . , � 11 I L I'- 1 1 ,i�j:_N I "_� 1 4�� I I I F, � I 1, I I - . I le I .5 1 L i L � 4IR9 .. I / L L 0 T I I I L " L ,,, , � � . I .1 I � .1 _111� L I 0 .IT"*, I i `1_1 _ ., . "I -A - I r - �, L L I I " __ , __ , ,_ , I 1, ., . O' L . I I - y I � - , L 11, ,.V L I �� L � 0 I - I � I I I �_ . - .1, <_ � I I . 1� I , " , . � 3 ,p -�% _ ,vq- , Lr I I I I. w 11, I I . I L I I �6 1 0 . PLAN . 11 I .o A, "PLAN I :5 I -,- '92.13 1� % I .. I L � I L I I L ,� - . 9:1 � op" . I I ' ' I ,,�L L I r I L I LANDSCAPE / RETENTION LOT , , I k, 01 I I I .lu i 0- . 11 I I w " < '0, w LL' . - . '�, � I I 0 � /4 _' L " ,L 1 .43 A., 1 -., - I . 1, I w I � S� L .-JO _� 0 I I I � . 11 I I. :Q. / .� "J�,o �, I I 01� I � , I car, -, 14B I 'V.I I � 11 12AR I I 1 1$ A! I 1 . r I I I I � P, <Vl I I L I . I. I.L L I I �_ I f L I I (n L' � I I I L � L � -0 L .. I 0. I " - � - , L , . .1 � I - I � � L - I I � I - � ..�_ , 1� 5 . � � - I I I . � . S . w I L " : 11 , . I , 1i 45 11 -, , . L _�,11. ,� . '� , � . t,1� ��', I'- � I .1 � I I � r L I. I I 11 L I I � I 1 . . I-— . 1. - . , 1� Al low A/ L .., 34 , I . .1 0 � ,� L I x� 'L L -, I �� � - 11 I .� I .1 . L : �� , I L I - L I PLAN "� , �� . L 11 ".1 . : 11 L I . I��� 0 L C,0\114 I . . I I .. . . �', .3 B , I I ., � , L' I - I I w 11 � , I I , j I . N ." e t t, .. 1. \ - ILI I I I --,,-_,� .'', " . Y 0 11 1. . , I t- 11 I % I ... � I � L , I /I/ � � kl i I i" - I 11 1. V_&-^ I. I � 11 I;w 11L I . L 0 , I 1. r � I � _', I'll, C'\\""'L - .1 I i I ___� I I L . I , �, 0 1 _. 11 I I ,11\t 1- � � I I I I.- 11 1. I I I - I 0 vo Q . I I " I I ,,,, ; -_ - L . � 8 / I - _______1 . � . 3EIR , , I L� . I . .. . .1 I 0 < . . .LL" " L I � � I I e I 1 1615�z*1 PLAN " <% � 7 :=-� LL �. I I 11 . * A I I I.-, I i�l .. L L I �, "i I Q (r _ � L I J 11 I . . .1 I 1 11 . . I I - 1 6 , ,__ / , _ - , "-- - - , I - I _____ - - - , I _ _ .1 I I 0 1 1 . I I . jj- - 7- IV 0, i IP _ �__ " 1, , \ . � �� I I I 1. � I , I . I . I I __ L ' " 2B 61 1 � � `� I _� , *� �,* . . I 'E� I I I I L � L . I I-. I L (::�� - a . . I � I I I ! 4- � � v L ., " 11 �L I - L I . I . 1, . . I I _j I 11 I L� I L I � - . . -1. �� -, I.e I I , . I I p . , .� I . . I I I � I L . I L __, . � " L -,I--_,, I I I L I 11 L � I . �,I � w � . I . 1 r �101 � --.-f ,�, PLAN ,35 . Ir2) , L . 11 I I 1 7 L ; I i 4 9" �. L - I . � . .� I 'L - L I I 11 1: . L I -1."L I I. , t �,4 1 L ...... L � - - I - I L . ,I:, - 1 41 1 j - 1. '4"' 4AR � �,_'' , I . . '.I � I I I I � 1, , I I 1. 1 I . . I � � I . I . �3 --<9,> Q<-). 01, I PLAN I !i K / I f I- , \ I - � . I I I 1. . , !�) I 11 L I—. L I . I I . I - . . 11 "I 11 -,I - I .r I I . I .js I , 11 - !b I , I I I I ,:� I I . i I I I �_ 01 1 A . 1 ;� I I I � I , r I I 1� 11 I L L I I L ... L I COUNTRY CLUe DRIVE I . - I I � � I L � I . I . $ * L I ,.1 , . . ,1�, " I I I I .- . 1 4 - I �,, I I I. I I L , . I I 1� Jt6_ 6 i I[ I I I � 4 1 xe_`� "I I I I L,,I I _ ,1.I I I I .4 . . L I .L I _: I I I I I I - I- I I I I� 1, I I 11. � I I I 1 . 7 &Y '21 1 1 1 .10' . I I L I I . I I �, � �, L, I I I I , . . � - I � I � I PLAN 3 $ 1 1 3 6 . '' ".1 �* .1 . I ,.,o I L 1 ;, I I . L . t I L - . I � . 14�1- *�_ , 1� � I . 1 L I 0 �, � I - L I I I I 1, - ,� I I. , . I I I I . �, I ., L . - I I I I I I . � � I . � - L I I �� 0 . � . qp : I I I 11 L , I 11 _�. L, e . L I 11 I 1 L I I I �1, 3A - . I I" I I I �. . , I L � I id�, , I I I , I � L, ,-1 I Ir I '' . . t , .", I "I I . b, I I . . I , 0-1 I I - I 11 L I VICINITY MAP . T I L I , I I \ I I I I I !�L I . - I I I 0 . I L 40 � I I r I . I ""I L L , I I � I ,�z:: I I 1, I I L I I I I' I I I � . I I I . , . , I �, . I I � 1�� .6. PLAN I .A �, i I I . I . L I . " . . I I I ", - . I . I I L .. I . I . 1, L, , . � I ')�L' � I I I I I , I I . I _? 5 I / r -';13 . I "I 0�_ - I 11 � I I L I I i I I I � I I I I I v., 1, � f NOT TO SCALE � : ;,,, ,,L� -,"', ' , I!, " I p *. L I L I L I I I - , � I -, I 1 3 B I . , .2 L I ' � 1. � I � L I 9 I. I L 1, I � I 11�_,' I I . �, L-, I I , I *" L . I I � , I . , I ! I . � I I L . I - L � 'L L I � I ;,�� , 'Ir - 1%_ I I I I I ./ . , I I _ �L I I I . I, . I, I ,,.��, I I I . .,i, , 1,1 I ��6L I . I . � I L 1 4 � *I I I I ,.� 't.- ,;�\ I I I I I I "I I I . I I , � I . I I , I 1112 1 L C� 1 1 51 "' L' ., I ,�L J�y I L I I -1 I I � I � -� ,;� I I I L, I I � IV o' .1 I I I I � I L � I - � �� "I I . I I L I I I I I I L L I 11 I ,�� ,I/ L,L I I , , IN :,0" I I ,L' � I i I I L L �L. � I I I I I . ." I I I I I . --�:_-_1'r, , . I , : LL - L I _ �_ � 0�� . " . 1, I I I I I I I� � . I- "I I �L I 11 I I I I � I� � �. !"i_-- -.. I_" I �, 1, � � I . 4 � i , �\ 0 L .. . .1 I � I I ` I I L 11 . i I . � I I � I � I I .,>. 4 6.3' i I - I 11 I I I . I �I I I I I L I -Tt, ; t� L,' "I . .1 I . . I I I�L �L,I I . I I . - I..� I I � : , - L I � -- " , I � L 1 31 4 L \ t-."\ , � I � , I ..'� L ' I I I . I I I � � I I L � -.1 L I � I 1. � 4d�- re�, PLAN I .1 � L I L I I � I - . I I I I I - � I I�, I L . I L I 6 I � i . 0-, . � . 11 , . I I - I i � 1, I I I I -I -___ � I --I*___ . 11, I . I I .1 r L I � L - IL I . I i I IL . . . � I I :: � I : � I I , I I . I-P I I ,, -) , 1 7 � I -I L I . L 1. . r I I I I . : I I 'll, I I I I-, I. I ,. I � I L, iI I I I RIW I I I t Q_ v_j ____1 - j4k_ -0 14A, PLAN .� '� .�, . L I � P I � I I . I I 11 I I I � I I I ._., I I I I L 11 I I-. I I I I r I �11 I I I �. '40, tl� .L . I - I I L L . I I I I "I I I I I L I I .I- . -_11. I , L I . I I I I � 1 55* � 11:�) .7 I 00 , L 11 I ': � I I � - r 1. -- 11 I I I\>,- I . I'll 1. L : , I I "L I I I I I I I I i I I " I - - 1� 11 9 - � ., I I I 1 38' - , . I 1 4 , - _� .,f,>, .4. vi 2A I 1. -A .L . 11 . 1. � I . - I 'u. - , I I � 11 . - 1 . I ' � I r I I . I I � L, I t, 11 __,�*_ - I - I I I - - ' 'OWN ".- � . I ,� 1. 1�se I I (O �L _4 I't .\� I .L, I - I I I I . I I __4 ER / DEVELOPER: - k I � L I . - I 'r - .M, I I � A-- , 3 a - . � . I � I - I . .. _ I I I L I I 81 34' LL 91 � I I � � I to �0) ,,-A I � . . . I . 1�I - I I . 1� ,: - � ,., , I I .�� I . 1, . I I 10, , �� I,- . PLAN . - . . I I - 11111K, , I I _. -, � �` - .- 12' - I - - a I I I I I - I I I I � - �, � 11 I . I . I I tllo_._� - - - - -- . - t I I I . � k $D . I . I I I I .1 I I --,;- I- t AVONDALE VILLAS, LLC I ,I, � , - LANDSCAPE MEDIANT DIVIDER I . 1 11 .1 , I I I I I I r I ,e_ I "I "" L I I 11�� 11 2 -4B . � (n, v I , I L I ,� - i_ I I I I I I - L I ,I r �, L r . , I I 1i I EASEMENT 11 I I C. �& I !�Ia . L I . I L...11 � %\ - I � . L- L � 1. -11 I I . . I I :,�,� I % CENTURY- CROWELL COMMUNITIES, L L.P. I I ., I I ; . 0 _., ' ' LA , � I I I I I 4 . C ",,rl I I 0 , $ 1 1 ; I I . . I 1 61 1 � I . 0 lze� 0 I " I I I L . I L I I I�� 1, L L � .� . � � I I I � C) I , . .1 I 1 . . I . L . '� I I L. I I �! - I I I I. I I I .0 . � 11 .A I t� ,� � I ' ' I- SOUTH ST. , SUITE 2bo I � I i � 1�,L I , /V I . 11 . L t I t V-:� 0 1 L , I I I- I I. ,� 1� I I I 1 4 1 1 53 5 D r I � I � � I I I i . I � I I 'fL W . I L I t . . L I I L � � I . 1 4 1�j 5 � . r I I �,i, . 11 I . 1. 1. �. , , 1 34 , . I �,, � _",� , I ,6 � I PLAN L 4L . L L, I I L I I L ,5-?-� .%, I I � L I 1'�� I -1j. �� . � L I -1 I , ",� 11, I PLAN 11 L. .� I I LSAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92408 .11 I 11� I L L' I L . I I - I I I - I I I I I L � `� . I , , � I !�L I L I I ., I I . : I . 11 I ''I � - ly � t t) -A I . I ! �7 - _') I I I I ', L I I .1 I ), , . I 1� ., I -----_, - I � 6 . I t I . '.I I . I L 1 � . I PLAN I TEL. (909) 381 -6 0 0 7 L � I 11 ________T1 4S4 19,>,�, � I I , ,�,"." - I A" 2 ' PLAN I . 1, � I L - & L I . . I � I * " I . Q IQ - I I L ;1. , I I � �J- t I , - . '* 18 I 1, i I � I L .41 - I - I I 23 � I - I L I I , 11 I 11 11 - - 1�� _�, I I I 11 . I z 3 N 4 , I . P,I ,� L I � L" . �,,�j-L . I I I . 1, , I- I - , I I 11 I I ,il .1 I I 1 20 X - I tr=-=== =-==. !M-- -) , - � L � L I I I I I I __�___=_� I .I �%_- *�, I I . 1 � A ����� 5_7 I - ==- ;==�- U - - .=Z� I L 'L . L I � I I � =::=::7t_�__�!....�......"' -1 �i '. I I I L. .L I � , , . I � L I . � L r I I I . il I PROPOSED F� I < � I I �", I . . � � I I v I . . . ,� L ENGINEER: I L11 . I I 1. 8' 1"DE I i L 04/ I a I"— I L 11 ,�,,I I I . I _ , .1 . � I � L I I -a___- �.L, , -L L 1 _� . I - . I I , ,� L. , I . . I PROPOSEDJ . I ,�if' CL___ 1 ,��, - I I tT� 11 I _. I I . 11 �_,, , . DUDEK & ASSOCIATES -, . - I I - I :11t,� I i I I I It ... I I I I I MEANDERING 8" VERTICAL EXISTING_� � I I 6>1.1 I � I r, SIDEWALK PROPOSED CURB ONLY 8' VERTICAL � ,. L I 191>-. I I I , � � . � . I . 11 .L�11 I I I. IL . 1 21' 1 1 ( I I , 1 74- 140: EL PASEO, SUITE 5 L � I i_ � "I I L \- CURB ONLY -1 I , I � . I L �`�,� . , I . I . I 8* CURB I kk -L . - I I I I L 11 . � ,L 1,I . 1, . 1 , , . I I " " "I . 11 I I " I I I I - 'L- L--l'.�_==:w I I PALM DESERT, CA 92260 9. � .1 I 11 I * . L , , ,� 'L I - � I I I r L - I 1 4,�S, .1 9- t I "I 1. I I I 11 I I - I . I I z� : . , � L I I I �_. - _11: . , I � 11 . I 1, I 11 I : , I 1� . "' . I I I L - :7 1 I I , I I L . 11 1 -7 1 1 r � � I L 11 I . 1, i -6660 11 ,, I . 415 ,9,!51 ,, , . I " . I ' I TEL. (760) 341 - �wl I I . I I I ,. I ,�, I I I I I "I ,� r I I I � I I I I L- 11, I . . . I I I . � I I � I L I � . r TYPICAL SECTION 491 1 1 1 1 -1 :1 'J�! L , I I I I � . I � � . � � . . 'I � I I L 1 7%4* 1 � L L � � . I L , L 4 I . 17 L t� I�'.* .9 -1 I " . I I I & GU TTER 11 I 11� I , . 1�"�_�� , I . 1. I . I I L � :, t,L,1 ' I I �� I I I I I 1: I I I I* I . r I I � I I I I I I L . � 1. � I 1 V4 1 � I I 1, . � I " 1, � I I - . I 'i I . I 11 . . L � � . I 11 11 I L 11 I 11 . I I I I I I �� I I L- . L 1 . . I , 11 � -�i� I I � I I I . _� � , I I I I � , I �.- � 1.,.It I I "I I � I . ''I I-- . I FRANK SINATRA DRIVE I ( STREET ) ,1 � .-�� � 11 ,� I , I 1. - I I I . " 1, . I ��L:�' ' . I . I -. - - --- 1 I I � 1.11 L' I � I I "�, � " I L I I I I I - - ... --TYPICAL BUILDNG TYPES " �, I RPS PARCEL No. : tL.1 I L ___ -------- � I I I L � ,1 I , I 11 I I _.___,_,_L 1. - .1 . 1. �1- . I I I I L I I � : . L' . 1 I I I I . I 'll I I .. � L 1 I I I � 1 . ". - r , � � . I I I . . I I I r I ., L � I . I � I I I - I L _ , '' L I . . . I " � L I I I " � " �. .� I I i . I . I 0 . . I NOT TO SCALE i I . I � I I L , 1 1, I f I L I I I I I , 626-030- 021 . ! , I t I L ( I I 11 ,�, L I I 11 I I L � . I I I 1. I L , I � 11 I - I L I if) :i I _., I I 1, I. I �I L . I - I . �, I L 11 , 11 I � I, 11 ". I L 1, I I� I L I . I I � . L I I T L I �, ,�. L;1. ., �I I �, � I I - L I I 1. - 11 . I I I I � I I . I I - I " �4 1 1 . I .i, I I I I I � 11. I I I . I 1. I I I 1� I , - I I . L L I ! I ,., I � I t I I --. I I I .1 � I L I I .1 I . t L L L L I . . . I �" L -L I . I r I I I I I I I . 11 � I I I I I I I - � I I � � _ I 'ACREAGE: _ . I I I . I I %, I . . 11 I i � LL I 11 � I . I . I 1, I I ., 'L ". . 'L 11 . L , I I . I L LL �,,, 11 I. 1, ; L , I I -1 .. I I I L, . I ,: 1, � � , L t L 11 I II I I I L 11 ;I � � L I I � I i I � I I� I I 11 L 11 L I ; ` L� - ." I 1. I PROPOSED SCHEME: ;i, . 1. I .. � � L I I . I I . I "I � I I , I I ,-',� L . I I , , I 1 r I 1 8. 207 Acres L . _ I I 1, I I I PROPERTY L I ,. , I I L r, I ILI I �. , I I I , _r�", r ,- 11 � I ,�-e I I I I I I I . 11 i . L . . L , I L . . . I I . � 1. L I . , A , , . . I I I , I : _ . I I I _1 I It � LINE I I ' k . I . L � I 11 PLAN, 1 1 . . . , ,, . , . . 3 UNITS I �. .1 � I I I . I . I � I I I I � , . I : � - � I .IL I I .1� . . �! I -L I I r . . L ! . I t I ) ." -__ L I I I i I I I I I � � I I I I I L" . � I L I I I 11 I L I I I � I - I . � 1, �- .. I e I I JE I 11 I . I . I L . . PLAN 2 . . . . . . . . . 11 UNITS I � ZONING: I I .1 I . 'L � .1 . . I -1 11 11 I .11, I I - I i � r I I I I I I I I I I I . L I I.- I I . � 32' 134- - I - I' I � I I � L L I ILI I � I . I . L I _ 1, I" . I - - I I I I I '�'_ I � I � � 1. . I I I I - . ,� , : PRESENT ZONING , , . . . : . . . I . . . I � . I . . . .PR . I I �J� L L � 1. - I -.1 , 1� % . . ; I � , � - - I . I I . �r I . I . . . 1 . I I *1, I I I I . - L . . � I I - .1 _j ..' . . 11 I I � L L _ , . . I I I � I , . I I I . . " I I 11;� I , I I L I � I PL�,N"' 3 . . - 0 UNITS � - �PROPOSED ZONING . . PR .11 - .�L ,�!. 16- / 17- 1 16' / 17' i I PROPERTY . L . I . I �, L I I I -L .1 1, " I . I . . . I . . I I 1 1 � �'. I I I - ' , , . L . . , ' , � � . . . . . . . , , , � 11 .� � , I I -1t I I , I I I'll I I . � I- - I 70, . I �I I ' I ,t, L' I " I , I ,, I . ,�, . 1, -, I : � . : � ! . I . - - I �, I 1. . � - � I L I IL I. 11 1�.',' L_ ,� , - � , � 11 I� L 11 I , I �L . I t, I I L �PLAN 4 . .' - ' I' . 12 UNITS _'..".I - �� 1 ,I,. , I - I �.� I 1, . 1 I I I I L I � , 1 I .. I I'll L I,,t�-11 I * ,I� .11, 7 "I 11 I I I I I I __�,� . I I I � I �, LINE I � L - I I 1, . I . , I,- ., I I . I I "I . I L I I I I .,t ! 1.I I ",I I�I I �� I .11 '' L I 11 . 'L� I .'. I .111� 1. I 1. I . I I ; I I 1, I I I � I . L . I 11, I . .� � I I 1, I I . "I" L ,I I � I I I 'i , I UTILITIES: . 1 11 11. L I ' 'I I - � I I 1� I I ; . .11 , I � i . - . I I � . I � I L L I � . - � I I 1 .1, .1 I L . I L I I I L 1. L L 'L "I L I � ; . I I I I I L I � I � I I I . I'.4 I I I I I I . I i - - I I I I �.L - I 11- , _ I- 11 I ,�� . I I I I � �i � 11 I I ELECTRIC . � . I . .. I , ,IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 11 I IL I I ; � I ; , L I e , - 1.L I TOTAL . . . . . . . . . 35 UNITS , � I I I I I I �: r . I L ' 11 1, � ,� I I : I I I . I� 11 . I I . I � I I �-L I I - I 'L, I . . ILI , . �., L . . � , I L � , , I � I 1, L I I . . � �210 X I 1 I . I I ..... " I I I I I , r I I GAS. ," . . . '. . . . . . .SOUTHERN LCALIFORNIA GAS CO. 11, . � , I -1 ---------.- --- I . . 1 I I I I I I � �" , I � L'11, I I . : I I I I I � I � I L , � ,, .� I I .11 .It", � � I " I �� in :� I I I., . I I I -, I 1, I I L 11. WATER , . �, .COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ,. � I I rL, I � L � . � I I I I L :11 I � � I - I ,� I . " � '. 1, I I . I I � � 1. � 1. I I I I .1 I ; I I I L, I I I . I ,1, t, I L I I I . " 5-i 1 � Z. I I I I I-� � I I I � I I I Li . . I L�, . , I � ' . I . I . , L I I I r ,�' � 11 � :- $EWER , . , , .COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT I I I I � . 1 L I 'll -1 I . � I 1� I - . 11, I I .1, , - - I 1. � . I I I . I , .1 , � . - I . I 1� �L , I I k � I . I I I .. I , I � � I I .. . . L . - . I I 1.11 . � I I ' I I , r . I ,, �, I L � , ��, , I . r I � - �I I I I . . I � I I I L , 11 L ., 11 I I . I I I. I , I L,,7 , , " �, ", .i � 11 I I I I I I I - ,. L I . L -1, I . I I . I � "I .". r � �L, � � . � . � �L . I � . I . . . I I I I I 1. � : I I L I PROPOSED ROLL I I I ( GOLF COURSE ) , L . I I I I L'L I I I . I I - I 1. I L I I. I . I � I I I - I TELEPHONE . . . . . . . . � . i � . .1 . I I . . . .G. T.E. . I - � I I . I 11 11 11 � � � 1, , 11 1, L I I IL I I " I 11 I .L 1. I . IL I I �, I . � - L I I � I . � Z ,. I I � � A . � 11 � I , � TYPE CURB & GU TTER I 1� I I �L 5 , , L . I t �, . . 11 ,� I - . � , TELEVISION . . . . . . . . . . . -ONE . L , - , .� . L L I I L I � r I I I I I 11 I . I ,� � L . . I L . I I L I . . :� L , " . I � L I I I I I I � I . L . ' ' I I � I I . , I L I I I L I � L I . I L . I I . � � � _ . . . . MEDIA . - ill, " i I I I I I ". 4 �,�� I �n I I I . - . I I. I � I I . L I - I I I ", :1 I ' I "I. I L I � �� , �1 I,I I I , I � I I I I I,I I .1 I I I � - , I I L' :. � . I ,:, I I ., I � I. , I � 13,i . I I - TYPICAL I L I I I I I I � I � I j! I ", , , . I I I L 41, 1 L 1� I '? I 1�, % " I I . 1 . LL . I I " I 11 I L - I L I , - I �, I I I I I L . . : � , I I . 'L - , 11 I 1, , . . I I . L L ,. L - I I I'll 11 I I I I L I . I � . I I � I . 11 �,, L I . I I. I . I .1 I L I L 4 1 1 � L � I . . . �i;� I 11 I L I I I I I I- . I . . ,I I �, . I I I I I I . -1 I �� I I . I I . . I I � . , I 1, 1 I I _"L , I 1, ! - � , I - . �z I 1, ' I I �; � � I � . , , ,r . TYPICAL SECT(ON � ,�, - - I . � r I . 11 . I I - L . '", I I 1i , 1. I L- , I I 1 114 . p, t", I I � . ,�,' ", I I . � . L I t .1 I I � � z .g , L SCHOOL , DISTRJCT: . I I I , . I � I I . I I . I LOT L LAYOUT I I I , I I � L ., I " -r I I . L: I I ,I I �� z � I I L I I I I I , � �:, t . , I ' I 1 4 . I ,I - � � _ ,, � I I . ,, L I L . I I . I I I I I I I,.,; , I I . I I, � � I I . I-�� I I � I I I I I I I I I, F �- 1,� �, � I I � . I L,, �!'. I'll � I. � ,L' "�_I � . . � L �I I� I I I ., L I . . I I - 1 ,� I I "I I I : I .1� L I I - DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT I . A il. L I I L I - L '' I . 1 1, 11 11 11 I I �_ , I ,� I - I I I . . I I �, 14 . � I 1, � I L I I I I , 1.- L I I L I "I I "I. L��I - I I .� L I L I I I . . I I � I", I I I "I, I L 11 I I I I " I INTERIOR STREETS I I - I I" '. Li� I I I L L L - 11 I '' . L -1 I " I I I " IL . I IL ''I I' ll ,: I . I , . I I - I I . . I L ) - . I I . '' I - . , 1_ 1 ; I I I I I .4 ,:, , . I � . I I - , --- ____ I I �1,il I .1 . , ��L , : t, 'L i, I I I I 1''. I I I ' I ',, I I 1 I ,� � I : 1�1 1. 11 I 11 � I "Ill 11 I I I L L I I 1 . I . . 11, . .1 1- 1 1 : , � I �. "I ! I I - � I- 'i I I I L L I , I I 1� . I I . � " I I I I I 1.� I I .1 I . .1 �,L'�pt, I I . " I - I I `_,� � .,�_ i I L I � I I � I r . _ 1, A . ' ' I I .'L ! ,, , . I i ,. I I r'. ; , - � " I L . I . I I 1. - I I L I I I I t,Lg 1,4 1 � � L . � * � L - I I I I � I . L I . ' 11 I .. ,: .�� .f, ; : 11 �, I � I I 1, I I L - I - I - ,' ' . I 11 :, 1, -� _.1,� I I ,.� L - , I �i - I I I I I L I I NOT TO SCALE I ,, I 1 I .." 'j , L �, I 'll I I 1, I 1 . I I I I I � I L I I . . I - . 11 � L . THOMAS BROTHERS GUIDE: � 'I."p �'f"� L,".., I 1. I I I I I 11 I '. I : L " ,11 � , �, . . I 11 I " � I I . 1, . i I . - I 11 `1�it, . . ; I I . � I I L. I ` '_ , I 'L I� I I I I I I I 1. � I I ,� -_ L I "I I I � I 4 I I I I I , L I . I . I r I -I I - � L I L � I . . 11 " , ', � I I L I L I I 11 I I L . � �. "_, I I I 1, I I � ; � I I I L I I �L 1. I I � " I I I I . I � L I ,� I I L I I I I I . I 1 %, I '' � I 1. - � � . - 1. I " I I I '' 11 I I _Ir I- I I �� L �� L" �I" I . I I , PAGE 819, GRID Al I I I I I I 1, 11; LL I I 11 �, L I I IL I I " I I 1�,," L � ., . I I I I . I I I I " �L _� I I I I I , I I I 11, e , I I . I � I I . � . I I I I I � I " I I , 1. I � I 1� I I L - ��t -" I . . I I L � L I I 1, ��_ I I I. I I � I . I _1�1 I . I I I I . -,I , .1 I I I I I I I I 1. L I I . I I I � . I � _ I I �, �1 �' I I z I I I I I 11 , 1. 'L , I �, L I L I 1� L . I I L L 1, I . I I � I � I It I . : -1 .� � . . ,4i� I I . 1 I . I - . . , , I- I 11 � L I I I I L . . - 11 .j, , , , _. �' , 11, L. I I I . A L I L I � L I ,, Ir . �, I t: � - I I '�! ' I � I 1� I , I I I 11 I 11 I 1, I 1; . - I � , - I " I I I .1 . 11 I I I I I 11 . I L . I I . , L I ' , � -1; I . - ''I I L;' : l� I I I L L, " I �, 1 I � I '.1 .1- �, I_ . ,,, I � L r , � , � � I I I I I . I I I I - I I , �- I I I L t � L . . I I I L .� . :- I ". - I I I � I I '4 � I I I I " ,� �?'� , I I I � I I � I . I I I I : I I I I I I I � �I I I � . - , � I ,,, , , L � ,p , : I I I I .. I , I i I I � ' 'L i . � I I I, � L ,I L I , z � I � . . I . I, . I I I I . I I . . �L I t" . I I � L � I , I I 11 . L - L' ' I I I I � I - I i, I ,I . I I I I I _ , of 11 1,L. I � I ,TOTALS: I I , I I I I I ,r r . � I L G RAPHIC SCALE I I L� ,�T I� I . L I I 1, I . �I 11 ,� I � ,:�I I I . L' I - � I I I I I .1. � . I . I . I . 11 I . I L I , I �: I . �,_ , .I " I I I I I � I I I . I I ��- I - LL I I . . -� L L , I �:- I ,I ! L L L L I . � ----" , I I I � " I .I I I I I ,, � I I I I . I , I . , I I - . I � I ,,�,, I 11 I I . ' I � I. -I I I , ... I I i - I � L L I I I I � L . � . � I � I ,� I I I ., I , I I I - , i ", I I I I I I. A�`�'L ' _ . , I L I , , . L I I L L I "� . I �,- . I I I � I , , , i , I I 1 ,1, I . i - , . , I . I I I � . ' r : I I I 11 . L I , I I . I I I I 160 � , _. I " I I I I I � I I , - � L I I!- I L I : " -. .RESI DFN TI A 'L � . . . . . 1 .36 1 L I . , � L � I I . I L 40 0 20 40 90 L �I . I . L I I. L . I L -� I I I .� r � I I . I L � I t, ",,,,, It I I -I � � I I I I I � I f � �I . � ".�, I I 11 . . I - � I I r - I. , � X I - r , I � I N. , " I I � � I I I I I . I I I :, I - I L� - , � I . I I - . � '. � Ir L .. I � I I i I 11 I I I I I � .I ,-I I I : I " .,.;� L . t � L I I '�- r . . L I I 1 ,7%! , L . I I- i :, ' 'I . - " I � L . I 11 . I t- , . �ST , , ' 11 lr� r . . ' I 1 . I ,Ft�L '' , , - I . ,,, 1, � _ � �' L 1. , I I I � I - I I I I I I � I r I I L i _� . . I ; L L, �r�,,�';�,-��_,i" L I " I I I I �,;,Z,11,�_.111, 1111_111 I *11 I �,,,, '' I I I 11 I. I 1 . .1 I 11 I , � I" I L L L I � " I , L � � �: . I _____ I , I 1: I I I . I REET LOTS . . . . . . . � � . . I . I I 11 I I . I . I - I 't I 1 I �r . 11 I I�tl 11 I 1-1 �, I I I I . I I , . . I . I . 5 1 1 , jjjjjjjjjjjjp"''� � ����,,�� � L � L I I I . �. L ��, , , �, I I �,,� L ' 1. . � I i � " i i 1�1 . . ' I . L ,",, ,� � I� ' ,' , I . I I I L . I I . . , L I I .1 I I r , L I I I -, 11 I � I I 11 � � L I I "Mjwmwmv&,�__,�w=S� � I I t . 1, , � . I . � I L I I I � . I I i , I I I I I � I t., L " i", 11, � ,� -1 . L �� . I I 11 �'L ; ,- . " 1.11 ,, r,' I I � . I I I , I L 11 ' 'I , I � . I, I -1 I I I I T I I 11 I I L .I I I . I � . r � L � I I ' - , , � I�� . � I I 1, I -1 � I � 11 I I I .�� I I � LL� 1. ",'L �- Ir TS, � I L . I . , 'J`,� L � t , 4 I - 11 I � � I L I , 11 , - � � . 11 , ,� � I 11 I - 'L I. , _1 � I - I 11 L� I I - 1, I I L . � I . . .. . 'L . .- . L � I '_ : 11 11 � I I I 11 , �', I 1 r ,: _ I ., , 11'_,,_ _� �,, * I - � � " 1 99 � I � ,F- --giff, rc I ' �__; . I I L I 11 I . . 1i " r, ' "I' 'I ' , � _ x' ., 11 , . L '' I I I �_ _ I . . � 1. I 'll I I I I ' ' " � - 1 11 � 11 ' r I � 1 . 1 _ I I -1 I - I I 11 L 1, "I ;1 � ,, ,L, IP '�_ __ ,, �_, _' ,, . I I �, .,', ol , _ 1 I 1 . 14� - 1 I .11 - " I I : "'' 'L 11 11 � 1 11 11 .1. 1 � . I I . & & . � , - - , . L . Palm, Desert Office: I I L � I 1. ( IN FEET ) I 11 L ' , � �!, ,.4,� � r 11 I 'L I I '? ' L 'I I I _; ' 11. � , . I I 111� , - Ft I 'O*t % � I , I . I I 1i '. I ., . I I I I L : , :1�, I I�, 11 I . I I ' .45 . � � . 1 I . - I I 1.ff .I I 'L, .� I �, I � �, " .It- I : L, � . � I I I I I I . 1.� t�� �'* _" I " � , r. I I �111� . . 1 .1 . I I I I _ r ; . . . - I ; I L a in ' I I I Inch -' 40 ft. � I _ _.�, ; , 11 �, . I -4 L . I 7 ; L�.� ',-,-,, I� 1 . � I I I , . I . . I ,TO TAL � . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . I I .1 I I r, . I I I �,, � I � � . I . L I I I I I L, 1 ,�L - ' , . ' ' " . � , I I � I r I , I I I I 'r, �,,,� , ,� I I " L..,' '' : I L,:-"�': " 1 L I I I I., �11 � � L I L . 1. I I I . . ; - , 11 � :, it I I � � ,�r , , I . I I r . L I N.", I \\ , �� � , , �` I,,, . I , I �,�.,1�1� 1, � I � . I I ' ' "" � - � � I I 11 I , L I � `_ r . � L, I 11 , I I 1 .7 1 � I I -,� �' I I I , - o I I L . I : ,,,, I I 1 ILI . I . � I I � �,�' ' .LL, j',:. I " I _', I I ",_� , ,-r 1. . .. �� � , ,,, � L �l, I 1, I - . � . I � I "I \, "L �: r I I _ . "I I . I ' .1 L- � " ��`, ,; I I ".� �t � � w� I ,. , ,�� , ; I . i 1, ''I , 11 � I - �_ t�� ., I I I � � . , , , _ . � I 1 74-140 El Paseo, SON 5 1 .I .I . I I r , I , , L - -_ '�,, �f , � I � � I I I I I I . w _�, �,��;�,+',- �4-k- RIP or x , :) I � oil I . I . I - I I '_� , I I I.. _ �� _�,.� 'L I' ll , _.,t:� , " ` I I L L . I � � I I - " I I I I I I �. - ,,� "�. '� � , _�',' - - , I L � I.. � . . I . , I , , _ _ I I . � L, I I I I I L I � I I I L -1 '. , ,, , L,�-" ' '�t�..�_ I�, .1 , �� 'i L I I ., � t, ,, , . � I I I ": I I I ': " �., i' L , - I I I I I I I I 1 114 11- t. ". r L I I t I . . : , I I I I I ,,,, I I I _ I -- I - I 1, � - ' ' '� � 1 ,,,,,, I � ` 1� I I L L I L I - 1. I I . r - I L "I � L I I "' ', I I . 1. - I � I- - I � . I � � .1 1. I 1� - -� I I I � _ � : . I . . " . I 1 I �_ "i�,i " " t '?. , L) - - . 11 I I I I . I �, � ,� I., I �,, 7, - I I I I � �, Palm Desert. CA 92260 - L I I 1. I - . I � _ ' , � ��.�'� 1, _'� . I , ,,,,-� �-";,,', " I I ,�L� � I � - I I �. T E � I I I I - I I . . I I I L� � . 11 t 11 I 1:1 L,�,��,,�',�::, L , ,. I , 11 �t�: , _`I L I . 11 L I I I t. . , t, I 'LL I - � ,� 1-11 1 � r I I I I 11 - � 11 Z, � I:- ,� � �,t, . . r I I I I I -1 ti� I . I , .:S�e(fi �>�, _,�,,s �/ //- C/ , . 11. . �� I I I IL 11 . _ I I - , ., L , I 'll, I 11 t . I I 11 ,., L . I ;r - _� '. � - I I ' , I �,I , I I �� I I I �, . , ` , - , r 11 � L , I %At;�� I I . ''I I I ,� t:, I L I I _� - , - . L I I I I . ,. L I I L I - I � I L . I 1. w . L . . , �. I �., _11' I - ',L T ''_� I I I `��,,�,��,- ". 1. ' L I ,, � �, I - I I I I � I . .r , ,�F' , I . � 4' 1 - TOL no.ul.6660 . I I I I I L I - I I I ," L I I . � I � , I L, I I I L L "I", I . , L,", I �I ' I I I ' � I I . . I, I I L 1. I, I L , . "� I L �I 11 .I I L � � ' ' . � � - . I I I I 1, L , _. � r I .I., I I � , I 11 .11 I I I � L I I . I L 11 "�� I I 1. � I , I., I I ,� I , :1� I � L I I i - I , , � - � I I . I I '�, * c I � I I I � 11 I . L I I I I 11 I � �: I .� ,,: L � ,�, _, f , ' L , !- ��L" � '' '. I , ,*r��' " ' 11 �"' ' I I 11 . ,,1� I I. r,_. " I I . . I .�' t, I 1, . . , I I I I rox 760laSI18 , I � lo, z , . 1'�,_, � L 1. � I�", I ' "I � I I 1 4 . I C a I i to r it i a C 0 r v 0 a I i 0 a ,, � , I I , 1 4 ;��. ,I,�.0� :, ." , ,�,, - , L I I I � � ,�,'. , � I I ,i I I � I I , . I,.�� I L I I L I � , - , - - .�I � � IV . I -1 1�.il I I I- I L:� - "`L 1�� I L I I I I . I . I� I I.: ., � I- I I ,�. I, � �t , , I I I I I .. � 1. , I I I I I� I I I . I - - I I I: , I _ ,',L I r, , I,- t ��� � I ,., ' I. � I ,,, ',, .,,:,�' I I r I% �' '-, I . I I I ,I I I�� �, . I I I I I � I I I . �, I � - . __ . I . .I I I I , ,, " :, . ,L, � ,V,, I.. "�L I - I . I � L � ;�, I, - L I .I:I-,� _, � , - � ,���,,L�'_� - - I. _ ,L"�- I i L I � - I I� I I I . I I.I 1, I—I � L � 11 I , ',., , I . I � ,� . , � _ '.�,:,,, ,.�,, ': �. L � � ' .I - ..ii.i.!Wi..i..di....��, � ,-, - �������� o , 11 I , , . L: � � L , . m -_ - � - . -_ �I. , ... I I�z . __ I � � I .I � . I I I . L L I I I I -,- I I �, I I I . I L I L,L L . - ,I, ,.1 , 11 I , � I L I 4 . ,_', ,. - I � . L I I L- I I , - I � -_I�� � t � 11L, L . I , I 11 . I r- ; _ ,,tL , ' '_L � �` �''' �4� � ' I : ,� i 1: �I,,_it, _,L,, ' � . I '. . I � I I ".",I - I I, I I � I �L � � I .,.1, ',L . L I - .: �, ; I . L �I "!�" 11 I . I I I � I .1 L :�""" ;r "� , I - -98 ,9:59:16 am EST L � I I I � � 11 L I L I . 11 . I , I 11 "', I� I.., ,�,�""� ' L i I _ :, 4 1 �:,*t � I I I . L "t, ,� - L�, I L I I I � I . ., � "; i i" I I I I �r I ,-, 1. .1,I 11 ! , � � -1 1� I I I - I - - I ,�;�� t��, I I . I . -11, - - L L� '� ,_ � � . � I I .1 t, . I '' I I L I I , ' i I L I I I I � I L 1 � I L � "' , " � I I � L, �, , L � I I I I L L I ., � . I I I L I I �11 . -11 I ,� % I . L I I - I t 'e L .' - �C I I 1 11 �. I I .;I � ,�, - � I � . A VONDALE.�olwg , 12 3 . I ". - I ,t, � 4 ��,"L . .. � - I 11 I I - I . � , I I L .. . "I L I I". . . I 11'� _,.� I I I I - I I 11 I j� � ,I L I I " .. �I 11 , '. . � -, ,,,, ,,,,, � � L - . I - 1, I I �� 1-1 , . I , -, !� ,� I L . � I i I I ., I '�.Iit L'. I I L 1 I t. I - , ., � : I I I 1� I , I I_ ,, , I �� . L ,�- - L I � I --, L � ,, L 'r : , , 1, I I I � 11. .1 . . L I 1, L ' 1. , -_, . I ,, , . � � I. I . . L I I I I " ;'L I - I 11 "I , L ._L "," 1pr, , , - L ' "'�!" _ ' - , "�. � I � ,., I ,� ,: , �, " I . 1 L . 11 . I "- ,,, L I . i, I � L I I , I I ., I � L . I � � ', " . L �� 'r r . I I I I L "L . � ',L � , I I � 1.11, _�;,. L I I I 1, �,I 11 11 , ,� , � I I "I 11 't I. I I L I � I 11 �,., I I I I I I r I . I L� I �, , , , . . I I I L - I I I , I I I � I I . . . I _� . L I � � �_41 �, ., I I I 11 I . L'4, 11 , , - . I . � I � I I . ,,,� 11 '. L . 4 I L I 1. . I I I - I I� I , I I � 4� A. � .. ,, , ,1 11 ,. I I ,�, I.� � I I I I - L I �I - `� ' i,-;4, , ,- � � � � I I- I , 1, I I ,I L .. I -I ; L'' . � --' L,, ,� -. � . , I L, f I . I � � I I . . I � . I - I L I I 'I L - ,, I L L �� ,: I .`1��.,� �.I ,, _ ,, , ,. , - L L" I � , � I �I . I , : I : I L � I ��'�"!�',� " L" ,�o t I, L I .1� � L .�. � I L � I . I - � , � ,L::"�, "',�� ��" I L , , ��L.1 I � I L .. ..,� I,� I� 1 L ,��,., �, - I I I " , ,L � - ,., , , � I I ,I I , I , I I I � I I I L I L I � . 1, . � r , I I - . I I , 1. , " I" ", , , , ,,� � �, I. � I., I , '4"�L�,� I " I t I I . I I � - � I I � I 11 . I � "" ,,.� , , " � " - . I ,I I . , I I �, I -�, I I I � I I I I . I I L L �, I I I I I -t I I I L t � "I I I " ,-� , I ,. � , , ",It Z,' L I, I L ,t I . I L I � �� I . L � ',�`�,;�,'L ,, L "'' . ,,,� I I I I � I- -� I L . I I I . L -I I -,":�. � I . L I . I � I � � I I � I I ' I - �,��,��`,,%:,,;�.,- ,",,1 i'L' ';r, ,��;.�:'�; ' I - . I I, - � - � � ;�I - � I I � I I I I � L , , .I I I I. � I I I .� " I � L .1,- '.�: I I I � I I -11 , I ..t, L I I L , I . I '� � I t' L I I ,I �I, I I �L I I I I I " I" � , I I I � ,� I I � - I. I I� , I � - I I I . . I 11 I I I �I ,. -L � �, 1, I I � I, " . ,i, ,41. . �L !f, � i I - .11 '� :",� � , I - I L 2 1 1 1 1 L I L . I I �I � 1�1'I - " _ :x I I I � I r, � I , I , . %� 1, �:, I � � I . I . , , ,r � I , . I . I I I I. - I I I -, � L I �L', I . ," .� I I . I I:�, , - .I I t L I I I t, , � I "," , L 11 I I -V,, ...... L'L, I- I I I L 1� I 1.� I . � I I . I i,,, I I I �� ,,z�11 , , I , I I ,I L � I I � :I , I I - I . I, , � �� ;,�' 1`I ""I I . , I I , I- - : , I I lo ,�1 � I I I I I, I I L ,�L�,L I i , : . I 11 � ,, ft.'�',,��L� � L ,i - 7 , 11, 11 I L" I I . ,,. ,', -'I,'�L ,L'�, �, L, .�11 , , � ., - I L,.I 11 - �I � . I I � I � , I I ,, L, I I L ,.I � ". I 4 I I " ":";,L ,�,, � L,� L .. I . - L I I , I L . I , I I I I . I I I L . : - I I r c I I - i' � " �.,. ,,I., ,��� -, �� �� , � ,, I" �T�, " �, ., �, L . . I I I I .I L 'L' ,�,�I I � � I,. I I I . I � L - I 11 I . , ., I,�L _� � I�,I 1*1� 1 4 L" , , , I . I " I I I L�, I � I I I , I , L I,. I I - , .I I I �. ,,���,i-����,,,� - I I . I L � , � li� I L, I I I . I I I . I . � ,, I * - I-- .L i)�� ,,r�.i�',,�� - � . , I I I , I _ , L " ,. I I I -, tell I L � .-,, � � I v--I . �:�,,' L ", I I I ., I I I I - I ..I .1: , �* `�'�''' r �,,'!�,-i:, I I - ' I , ,�, �, - I I-' I� . I ' � - I", , r ' , ";:, r,,' � . . I I. ,,, I ,.I , .I I i.1,- I I ,,,_ , I 1, t I I, : , - I � I �,I�1 '6 . ", � I I I I i L, I 11, �L� L ,�, . I . � L I 11 I %� ,�1-, _ . ,�, r ' '' � ,:t -, �,� '�'L , ' I I . . �. L I I, �,.,� 1. ,��� I - ,, ,� . � , � . I I � I I I I - - ,� � . I I � I 't I � . I I r- I . . I � I I . � " . L I,, , t _ . '` ' �,. � -I I I � !� I L I ' ': I I ,-. L I , I I ., L I . � � I I I I L I � . I I r � I ,� . .. ,' _r r- , __'�i*�;�,:,'.�L�'t'.,.' ''' -" '_� ' L' I :. I � ;1: L' I ,,,'., - 1 I I -, �, _ it ,:� , L, L . q . . � I I . I I I �I I . 11, , '` ��"�,L � ' '' - � ' 'L ,,� '�,, !, ,, � I � L . 1,'.- I ,ir 1� I I ��� ., �,,��, I � . � i I A �,- �, - , I 1 7. � , : - I � I It I I � I ' L ,,:�� ,._��, : - L I I ,,; . , � . , I: , L I � 1. . � I. I I I I I . I I , , ,L - . ' I I 11 . ". . �, I 11 ; �jL ,"I I I I I I L' I I .1- I ,1 I -. - I - I L �, . I - .1" I � , _' 4' ' i,'�' i . I -1 1. , ,L � � ; I ,;�,� L , " - , -1 , , - L" , ' ' ' -�, t - � � L L. I L �, . I I I I, 1. . � . , , c I �. , I r L I ;" , 1 4 - . I I ,�L 11, �', ' I I I I I .� L I L I I , , " , - 1�,,, I L�� �,��'� , , " ,' r ,.t , , ,� ,,,, ,t I " I� I I � � :;:I t�4 I ,.% I, I ,� . I . I I ,, I I 11 ''4 L , L' ' L , .I� . 1��, �L "'� � 7�,'�, _,r,,�', I . I I _� i�, ,%,� �,,, I#, ",� , _ ": , , I , :, I , L I L - I .�, L I L I . I I I I I I � � I ,, 11 ,�. � . , , L - � . I�, , I I� . I���I L 11 I I L I ,,1� , L ,; , x-11 I", �,,1ii ,'it�'L I I I L .I I I �_ 11 , �! ', 1'r i,� I 1.L I 11. , ,, , , ,� ,,,,:�" I .L" . "I ' " - * 1� "" ,�L L�4'-_ ..�; I � �I I I � � �� , , I I � �i, 1, I L I . L I., � "i ' L I� 1.� I I I ''L � L t I ...... ,4, �'i ,,, I I " I 1 I I ��L � I- � I , I"I� . I I . , , 'r �', . I , I � I � I I ,,,,� , 'i,; :, � -, �, ,,,�, . ,t''.'- , L� - � I, I I I " p r 7 4'. - I I L�,�- ,1, I I L i t,.i ':, - I �, _ , , � ,, , I I �, I I " , Z -11`�,� i �_ . . I,I. L� I r . L . I I I I I I L I I . . L I ��, , �,, ,'�' ��i ,, , ,,�, , %i , I"� I, . 11 .. - � I . , I V,I . �, I , _. 11, I I � I L ,1, I - , , :''i'L . ,L I I - � - ,, . I I L -- � � .�, - , , I , :,� . ��L��� I I�,,z , . ." - . 1. 1 I . . � , 1�1,�':' : L w . � I I � 11 I L , L 1 . , ,, -. , .�: ,� . � : *, �:,� -11.,��, , �L�,� .:� I"'I'' i "L i' �,L,�� ' I � , , � , I I tv ; - I , , , I I :: I, _ " I � I r. �, w -I I I I L I t � I . . . . I . , - I . �_ . , , ' ,�Z I, , ': , . �- . I I I I 11,1� _ � -,,_ - I I , . L , � . I . - , . 11..I.1" I I 1. - I I �1 1 1 f I � I ,� I I I . , - 1, . - I I -r . I I I L. � L I - I I� I, I . I L 11 I I - I � I %*T'L -r , -I : - . ' '' ,,_� ,_,!,7�L�, I . : . I I I 1 1 I �1.1 , . L,I I , I I , . I I I I , .i7, , I I L I L I , I � ' � ,,�� ��� ," � ,, '�, L -� I I I I ' ' .I �� A. L I ' � L I I I I . I . '�" 't � ' ' - 1 � , , I I I . I '�_�A'_` � � , � I�. I I � -I . ' , * - ,.j;��, ,," �", L' , I - I L I � I � I I - I _1� I �. I e , ' t:1 I - , ��', �t � , ,�'� - _ I L'"4 ,� - z . ,_,,F� .�I __�, -. . "I I -r I L I �� L .I L I I L . , I , - - '� ZL' L ; L , I � � I I .I 4 I L , "'" ,_�ii Z_ ,, I I I I r.. . I L - I -1 � r-, I L I I � I ;" i, . . . I,'L '':'t' ; . ',r,,,, , � , , , L " . I I L I I �" 11 ' _L, - I �1 t� '� I I I I . I ,t�� , r .,!,: : ,_ . , ,� 'N I ,� L�",-�-L- '? I I 11 . � I I I . L I � 4 I I I L L' I . . L �� L I I L I L � A . � ,".L � .,I � I �I I I I -,,�- - ,,���� , 1. I r � I . ��� -,_, _ .� i I I I 1� , , ' L ' I t .I I L . . I I ,, , , , L I 11� � ',�', "',i� Li� , ,L. , ,, , I : , _r 11 ,, q* � , A L I �� ,_ ,L _-'L.C' -- , �' I , . I I� , I �- � � ,' , ,� , , T - " r ,,- -.-' I. - 1, I� � I - " - -� � � . -I tr , 11tr_ , --� � , I-.- - -- �.. � �.L�':�7.!,�_,,',,.,-,,,, L I � I, I �, -_- I�I - I_.�i I I"�d �_.�11 A�� '''� ' ' ' L- .1 _i�� -_�� _,�_� � _Z_ _ � . _ . - . - -�: ��_A L�!:�__ ,�- , " ,� I I ,or L 1.. I _ ,� � I I .. I I I I � I' ,;,-_ I I .1 I- . I- .1 - - i A"k L I L, I I I I �_ I I I I I -, .1 .,�, ',, .-,L I -I. I , ,- _ t,� -�tL. __ ��i L'W� ' '-- 1�,_, , --'�--L'_'�'� 4'L ; _: . '�"-'L� -'��4"� :,:,� 4.iL- �_;�___,-.- ,�� �L,,., -�''"-L�'-��-d:L �,.�'L -,__.__�. �_ --i-----,,Z�__ - -- , )11 � - I .� I I _ . L - ,1�I -at.,Is-I ,I� ,I't,"I.,.;�� A,I "''L-..�'�'L, �� ,� -,, , Z_� at�!__ , �, .__�,. - `7", , I ---,�.:,I - .,-,, I I �-�, _�______--- �,�- ,.-,�-� .I I_.I I L --- L.. ,,�I.� _1-1�Ll-__�� ---,-_-J.----___�,-�`-.,'-, -�_____��,.szLlil___ , , I I I I I I I I I I . . L . � I . �I L I � . L . I . . I . I . . L . . . L L I I . . . I . . I I � . . . . . I . L L � � I L I . I I. . I I I I I I . - , T I:- - _' , '' I , , I �== -_ ��i-' I I I I I _� I 1[ I I I V2 C""2 4 "I I I 5 ' 8 w I 5 3 1 . P � . All , ,rPLAN '. 4B 1 4 , I - - I I . I . . . . I . I I I I . . I I I I L I I L I L I I I I I I I L I I . I . . I L I . I L I I . 11. I '. . - . . '. - . I 11. . � . . '. - . . '. . . .1 '. - . . '. - . � '. . . _ - . � L - . . 11. . I I I I . . I '. I I I I I I I f l n % i i rr • fi }i �e NmF v 1 �. loll. f / 01 %oo _,, `' _ �� L . _ � t ►y i r �L� l/ � t t •��� � ` � -�� �' � 111 � r 't `'1 t ` - _ `y`t,i .�.� ,�, �•,� J 00try —� • , / JJ _ ,•> 1. � .i—�►► 1 .0 ► � ,� i I pam FIE , • ,,. +,a 2 r' rt L4:It tt I IF oo� � 1 • I I v • . , 34 �• ��,,, if 0 . ��// ,• .� �; V �� �' •, •4.J. � I A• , `r ., til. l� .! J `' ' t 9y`c�✓' .,�• t j �,, l' Cr ' 1 77 6 s,r�W w 4B 2A 1A eq 97068. 03/04/0'8 I Gt7LF CL�.TB L,A� lei - � CROWELL COMMUNITIES CENTURY PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA , pr K N "TER S. 1 , ASSO ATES I� ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING z ,M