HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-21-77 .•
` AGENDA
�LM DESERT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD �a,,
TUESDAY - JUNE 21, 1977
5:30 PM - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1. APPROVAL of MINUTES of PREVIOUS MEETING of JUNE 7, 1977.
2. Case #: 72SA
Nature of Project: Commercial Sign
Location: North Side of Highway 111, East of San Pablo
Zone: C-1, S.P.
Applicant: CHIEF SIGN CRAFTS for RED CARPET REALTY
Nature of Approval Sought: Sign (Referred to the DRB by Staff)
Action: APPROVED
3. Case #: 43C
Nature of Project: Commercial Complex - Plaza Taxco II
Location: Southwest Corner of Highway 111 and Sage Lane
Zone: C-1,S.P.
Applicant: CURT DUNHAM
Nature of Approval Sought: Revised Landscaping Plan
Action: APPROVED
4. Case #: 55C
Nature of Project: Commercial Structure
Location: North Side of E1 Paseo, West of Sage Lane
Zone: C-1, S.P.
Applicant: AL KURI
Nature of Approval Sought: Preliminary Site, Floor, and Elevation Plans
Action: CONTINUE
5. Case #: 77MF
Nature of Project: 22 Condominium Units
Location: Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club
Zone: PR-7
Applicant: PALM DESERT VENTURE, LTD.
Nature of Approval Sought: Preliminary Site, Floor, and Elevation Plans
Action: APPROVED
6. Case #: 78MF
Nature of Project: Duplex
Location: West Side of Sunset, South of Abronia Trail
Zone: R-3(3)
Applicant: AMERICAN WEST DEVELOPMENT
Nature of Approval Sought: Preliminary Site, Floor, and Elevation Plans
Action: REJECTED
7. Case #: 76MF
Nature of Project: 193 Condominiun Units
Location: Mountainback
Zone: PR-8
Applicant: BIDDLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.
Nature of Approval Sought: Final Landscaping
Action: APPROVED
8. Case #: 64MF
Nature of Project: Private Health Club
Location: North of Alessandro and 420 Feet East of Portola Avenue
Zone: R-3(4)
Applicant: STEPHEN HERMAN
Nature of Approval Sought: Final Site, Floor, and Elevation Plans
Action: APPROVED
9. Case #: 70MF
Nature of Project: Golf Clubhouse
Location: Ironwood Country Club
Zone: PR-7
Applicant: SILVER SPUR ASSOCIATES
Nature of Approval Sought: Final Site, Floor, and Elevation Plans for Expansion
of Existing Clubhouse
Action: APPROVED
10. Adjournment
. � ,
f p' � �,✓ °�''
.
� �, ��
�
:"r�, ' C����' cO�' � n Z1r�� �o��r�f� •
�.� "�'
,• , 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 �
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT �
� Date : June 21, 1977
REPORT ON: Commercial Sign
� CASE NO. : 72SA ZONE: C-1,S.P.
LOCATION: North Side of Highway 111, East of San Pablo
APPLICANT: CHIEF SIGN CRAFTS for RED CARPET REALTY
NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Sign (Referred to DRB by Staff)
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION:
After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by
the staff and by the applicant, the DRB approved
this project , subject to the attached conditions.
Date of Action: 6/21/77�
l�otion Made By: Leung
� Seconded By: Hobbs �
Vote: Approved 5-0
Reasons for Negative Vote (s) : .
(An appeaZ of the above action may be made in �riting to the City Clerk
of the City of Palm Desert rvithin fifteen (ZS) days of the date of the
. decision.) �
STAFF COhiMENTS:
� �
Case No. 72SA June 21, 1977
The staff referred this case to the Design Review Board principally because
they felt the proposed sign does not meet the following sign review criteria:
"(4) That the size, shape, color, and placement of the sign is com-
patible with and bears a harmonious relationship to the building
it identifies,
(5) That the size, shape, color, and placement of the sign is com-
patible with and bears a harmonious relationship to the neigh-
borhood and other signs in the area."
�,ur �wr
-_�
�
��'f�� O� � � Il� �c��c�r�f�
•� 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT
Date: June 21, 1977
REPORT ON: Commercial Complex - Plaza Taxco II
CASE NO. : 43C ZONE: C-1,S.P.
LOCATION: Southwest Corner of Hiqhway 111 and Saqe Lane
APPLICANT: CURT DUNHAM
NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUG�iT: Revised Landscaping Plan
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTI�N:
After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by
the staff and by the applicant, the DRB approved
this project, subject to the attached conditions .
Date of Action: 6/21/77
Motion Made By: Hobbs
Seconded By: Minturn
Vote : Approved 5-0
� Reasons for Ne ative Vote (s) :
An appeal o the above action may be made in writing to the
City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days
of the date of the decision. )
STAFF COi�IENTS :
r�NUrrs �"'' �
DESIGN RLVI�W BOARD •
MARC1i 29, 1977 Page Th.ree
7. CASE N0. •43C, CURT DUNHAM, APPLICANT
Review of construction plans for a retail complex - Plaza Taxco II -
to be located at the southwest corner of Highway 111 and Sage Lane.
Applicant present.
� The DRB informed the applicant that the minimum tree sizes in Condition
No. 1 were being increased from a 12" to 20" box. Among other suggestions,
Mr. Johnson recommended that the applicant use euculyptus citriodora widely
- and eliminate English Ivy as it burns easily. Mr. Williams asked the appli-
cant to resubmit a landscape plan to reflect the appropriate changes.
It was moved by Mr. Williams and seconded by Mr. Minturn to approve the
construction plans on the condition that a revised landscape plan will be
submitted. Motion carried 4-0 (Williams, Minturn, Johnson, Hobbs).
8. CASE N0. 33MF - SUNRISE CORPORATION, APPLICANT
Review of construction plans for an 80-unit condominium project to be �
located west of Monterey and 660 feet north of Park View Drive. Repre-
sentative of applicant present.
With regard to Condition No. S, the applicant's representative expressed
a desire by the applicant to have the city underground specif ic power lines
south of the project. Mr. Williams said the proper procedure to obtain such
a request would be to petition the City Council who would then �ake a deter-
mination.
The applicant�s representative then referred to Condition No. 6 and asked
the DRB if it would be acceptable if they could continue to construct a
rolled curb as they were presently installing in Rancho Mirage. For the
" sake of uniformity, the DRB expressed approval of this action.
� � The DRB agreed that Condition No. 10 which requires a split rail fence,
would not have to be complied with if the project to the south has provided
a fence at the time of final inspection.
' Mr. Williams stated that the County ordinance would be utiiized with regard
to the pool fencing requirement. Therefore, a pool fence would not be
required as the development is walled and has a gate. The DRB then eliminated
Condition No. 13. �
The discussion then moved to Condition No. 14, which involves the minimum
size of garages. The, applicant's representative stated that this condition
presents a problem as the units have already been sold. As a result, any
alterations made with regard to the size of garages, if they should in turn
alter the floor plans out of necessity, would raise many questions and bring
complaints by the buyers. The DRB stated that it was not their intention to
. create any unreasonable situations or requirements. Mr. Williams suggested
that the applicant meet with staff in order to resolve any problem stemming
from Condition No. 14.
It was moved by Mr. Minturn and seconded by Mr. Johnson that the case be
approved subject to all conditions and a resolution of Conditions No. 14
� with staff. Motion carried 4-0 (Minturn, Hobbs, Johnson, Williams).
9. CASE N0. 32MF, RICHARD COFFIN, APPLICANT
A request for an extension of time of DRB approval regarding a 13-unit apart-
ment complex to be located on the southeast corner of Santa Rosa and San Pas-
cual.
The DRB decided to require curbs and gutters on both Santa Rosa and San
ppscual as a condition of approval rather than �ust on San Pascual.
It was moved by Mr. Minturn and seconded by Mr. Johnson to approve a one-year
time extension subject to all conditions. Motion carried 4-0 (Minturn, Williams
Johnson, Hobbs).
,^` =
1 � �"
� \
�A�..., ��,
�"��-- ����' OO � �s��1.T�. �D��� -G��I1`��'0
���.. � ,,� .
�"tT,• " 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE� PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT
Date: June 21, 1977
REPORT ON: Commercial Structure
CASE NO. : 55C ZONE: C-1,S.P.
LOCATION: North Side of E1 Paseo, West of Sage Lane
APPLICANT: A1 Kuri
NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary Site, Floor, and Elevation Plans
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION:
After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by
the staff and by the applicant, the DRB continue
this project, subject to the attached conditions .
Date of Action: 6/21/77
rlotion Made By:
Seconded By:
Vote.
� Reasons for Ne ative Vote (s) :
An appeal o the above action may be ,made in writing to the
City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days
of the date of the decision. )
STAFF COi�LNIENTS:
,� " ,,�, �v
+�;:;;, 1�
� �
�,�,� C����' OO � �s���.]3�l ��CQT��'o
�t��,. ��., •
��TT,• = 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT
Date: �une 21, 1977
REPORT ON: 22 Condomini um Uni ts
CASE NO. : 77MF ZONE: PR-�
LOCATION- Shadow Mountain Resort and Racquet Club
APPLICANT: PALM DESERT VENTURE, LTD.
NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary Site, Floor, and Elevation Plans
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION:
After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by
the staff and by the applicant, the DRB gnnrnvari
this project, subject to the attached conditions .
Date of Action: 6�21/77
riotion Made By: Hobbs
Seconded By: Leung
Vote- Approved 4-0, Urrutia abstained
� Reasons for Ne ative Vote (s) :
An appeal o the above action may be ,made in writing, to the
City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days
of the date of the decision. )
STAFF COi�L�SENTS:
.
� �
JUNE 21, 1977
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CASE N0. 77MF
1. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all
development plans submitted in behalf of this case (Exhibits A-G) ,
_ and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. In
addition, the applicant shall comply with any and all requirements
or conditions mandated by Case No. DP 07-77 and Case No. CU 03-73.
Any minor changes require approval by the Director of Environmental
Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Planning
Commission.
2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State,
City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied
with as part of the development process.
3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this pro-
ject, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly
completed.
4. All service lines for utilities shall be placed underground.
A complete and detailed landscaping and irrigation plan, fencing,
lighting, and sign plan shall be submitted to the Design Review Board
prior to final approval .
Final construction drawings shall be submitted to the City Fire Marshall
prior to the submittal of plans for Building Plan Check.
(
1
� �
AGREEMENT
I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with
all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building
and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use
permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department
of Environmental Services.
Date Applicant's Signature
r
r�1 � �:.
`�,
1
a��� ��
.'�� ��,f`��' o� ��� ���c�]�f�
'* ,•� " 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE� PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT
Date: June 21, 1977
REPORT ON: Duplex
CASE NO. : 78MF ZO�IE: R-3(3)
LOCATION: West Side of Sunset, South of Abronia Trail
APPLICANT: AMERICAN WEST DEVELOPMENT
NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary Site, Floor, and Elevation Plans
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION:
After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by
the staff and by the applicant, the DRB rejected
this project, subject to the attached conditions .
Date of Action: 6/21J77
Motion Made By: Minturn
Seconded By: Hobbs
Vote: Approved 5-0
� Reasons for Ne ative Vote (s) :
An appeal o the above action may be ,made in writing to the
City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days
of the date of the decision. )
STAFF COi�'IENTS:
,
� vr'�
JUNE 21, 1977
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CASE N0. 78MF
1. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all
development plans submitted in behalf of this case (Exhibits A-C) ,
and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any
minor changes require approval by the Director of Environmental
Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Planning
Commission.
2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State,
City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied
with as part of the development process.
3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this
project, commencing within one year from approval date and being
promptly completed.
4. All service lines for utilities shall be placed underground.
5. Curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be pro-
vided on Sunset Lane in conformance with City Standards and the re-
quirements of the City Engineer at the time of construction or by
future agreement with the City Engineer.
6. Storage facilities shall be provided in all carports.
7. A complete and detailed landscaping and irrigation plan, fencing,
lighting, and sign plan shall be submitted to the Design Review Board
prior to final approval .
� 8. Four (4) parking spaces shall be provided in order to conform to the
` Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance. Carports shall not front on Sunset Lane.
AGREEMENT
I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with
all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building
and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use
permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department
of Environmental Services.
Date Applicant's Signature
"` ' �,, �►'
�
�.�. �
., � �� .
����J' O� �Il�. �D C@ .-�'�@11��'0
* ' � 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPNONE (714) 346-0611
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT
Date: June 21, 1977
REPORT ON: 193-Unit Condominium Project
CASE NO. : 76MF ZO�IE: PR'8
LOCATION: Mountainback
APPLICANT: BIDDLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.
NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final Landscaping Plans
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION:
After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by
the staff and by the applicant, the DRB �proved
this project, subject to the attached conditions .
Date of Action: 6/21/77
Motion Made By: Minturn
Seconded By: Hobbs
Vote: approved 5-0
� Reasons for Ne ative Vote (s) :
An appeal o the above action may be made in writing to the
City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days
of the date of the decision. )
STAFF COi�LNIENTS:
----.
� � �
�
� �...: `
� ry � ,
..� ��f��' O� ���1�. ��c��f�
���* . = 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CAUFORNIA 92260
7ELEPNONE (714) 346-0611
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT
Date: June 21, 1977
REPORT ON: Pri vate Heal th C1 ub
CASE NO. : 64MF ZO�IE: R-3(4)
LOCATION: North of Alessandro and 420 Feet East of Portola Avenue
APPLICANT: STEPHEN HERMAN
NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final Site, Floor, and Elevation Plans
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTI�JN:
After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by
the s taf f and by the applicant, the DRB approved
this project, subject to the attached conditions .
Date of Action: 6/21/77
Motion Made By: Hobbs
Seconded By: MInturn
Vote: Approved 4-0, Leung abstai ned
� Reasons for Ne ative Vote (s) :
An appeal o the above action may be made in writing to the
City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days
of the date of the decision. )
STAFF COi�1.MENTS :
,
' March 29, 1977
�: �"'�" ' .
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
cns� No. 64r�
1. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all requirements
of Case No. CUP 02-77 and to all development plans submitted in behalf of this
case (Exhibit A) , and as revised according to the Design Review Board process.
Any minor changes reqtiire approval by the Director of Environmental Services.
Any suUstantial ct�ange requires approval by the Planning Commission.
2. All requirements of any law; ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and
any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the
development process.
3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, com-
mencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed.
4. Any roof mounted, exhaust, or air conditioning equipment shall be fully con- �
cealed from view from any public rights-of-way and adjoining properties by
architecturally integrated means.
S. All utility service and distribution lines shall be placed underground.
6. Curb, gutter, sidewalk or approved pathways, curb cuts, and tie-in paving
shall be provided in conformance with City Standards for the following:
a) The applicant shall install curb, gutter, and sidewalk along the full
frontage of the subject property on Alessandro Drive.
b) The applicant shall dedicate five (5) feet along the full frontage of the
subject property on Alessandro Drive.
7. Final landscaping (with irrigation system) plans indicating plant sizes and
heights shall be provided to the Design Review Board for approval prior to
issuance of a building permit.
8. Lighting of parking areas and premises shall be provided as approved by the
Director of Environmental Services.
9. Signage shall be provided in accordance with signage plan to be submitted to
the Design Review Board and the Planning Commission for final approval.
10. Traffic control provisions shall be provided as required by the Traffic Engineer.
11. A five (S) foot slump block wall shall be installed in the landscape planter
south of parking stall ��19 and along the east property line �to meet the existing
wood fence. A five (5) foot wood fence shall be provided along the remaining
side and rear lot lines. .
12. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshall -
prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part
of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed.
13. A detailed grading plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval.
14. The applicant shall grant to the City of Palm Desert, easement rights over the
parking lot area of the project site.
15. Parking lot improvements and final construction plans for this total site shall
be submitted to the Design Review Board process for approval.
16. The trash enclosure shall be located on parking space �{19 and shall be inte-
' �rated into the required slump block wall.
17. The landscape plan shall provide for�a minimum of five 20" box trees throughout
the entire pro,ject.
AGREEAfGNT �
I aceept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the
conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will
not ir;Gue a building aermit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed
confirmation has been received by the DeparLment of Environmentnl Services.
rn�r �l �Annlic�nr 's Sirnature)
�.' ' � �
�."'`' �
*�i�
,� ���� OO :� ..�s���. ��CC�S1��'o
. � ;� .
*�,. = 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE� PALM DESERT, CAUFORNIA 92260
TELEPNONE (714) 346-0611
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION R�PORT
Date : June 21, 1977
REPORT ON: Gol f C1 ubhouse
CASE NO. : 70MF ZONE: PR-7
LOCATION: Ironwood Country Club —
APPLICANT: SILVER SPUR ASSOCIATES
�IATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Fi nal Si te, Fl oor, and E1 evati on P1 ans for Ex-
pansion of Existing lu house.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION:
After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by
the staff and by the applicant, the DRB approved
this project, subject to the attached conditions .
Date of Action: 6�2����
Motion Made By: Hobbs
Seconded By: Leung
Vo t e: Approved 4-0, Urrutia abstained
� Reasons for Ne ative Vote (s) :
An appeal o the above action may be made in writing to the
City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days
of the date of the decision. )
STAFF COi�LNIENTS :
,�,� , `�
<
May 10, 1977
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL '
CASE N0. 70MF �
�
1 �
1 . The development af this project shall conform substantiaa�ly to all develop- I
ment plans sul�mitted in behalf of t.his case (Exhibits A-B) , and as revised
� according to Planning Commission action. Any minor changes require approval
� by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires
approval by the Planning Commission. .
2. Al1 requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State , City,
and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part
of the development process. `
. � i
3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, ±
commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. �
�
I
I �
i '
1
; �
, ,
�
. ;
�
;