The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1978-02-07 ARC Regular Meeting Agenda � • �„' ,,� A�ENDA PALM DESERT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 7, 1978 CITY HALL $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1 . Approval of MINUTES of previous meeting of January 24, 1978. 2. Case No. : 97MF Nature of Project: 6 Single-family residences Location: Joshua between 44th and Parkview Zone: R-1 Applicant: W & R DEVELOPMENT Nature of Approval Sought: Roofing Material Action: APPROVED 3. Case No. : 367SF Nature of Project: Single-family residences Location: Alan Circle Zone: R-1-10,000 Applicant: SID CROSSLEY Nature of Approval Sought: Complaint against grading plan for Case No. 367SF Action: CONTINUED INDEFINITLY 4. Case No. : 109MF Nature of Project: 22 Unit Apartment Complex Location: West side of Panorama, South of Highway 111 Zone: R-3 Applicant: A. D. BABCOCK Nature of Approval Sought: Final Construction Drawings Action: APPROVED 5. Case No. : 40C �lature of Project: Commercial Project Location: South side of E1 Paseo, east of Sage Zone: C-1 ' Applicant: DESIGN 2 for CHRIS HAENEL Nature of Approval Sought: Sign Program Action: APPROVED 6. Case No. : 67C Nature of Project: Commercial Complex Location: Northeast corner of Highway 74 and E1 Paseo Zone: C-1 , S.P. Applicant: HUGHES INVESTMENTS Nature of Approval Sought: Preliminary site, floor and elevations Action: CONTINUED INDEFINITELY 7. Case No. : 71C Nature of Project: Commercial Stru�ture Location: 6Jest side of Highway 111 at Rancho P1irage City Limits Zone: C-1 , S.P. Applicant: LAUREL DEVELOPMENT Nature of Approval Sought: Front elevations Action: APPROVED , . '�rr* �+rrr� DESIGN REVIE�ti BOARD D�TE : Feb. 7, 1978 CASE NO. : 97MF APPLICANT: W & R DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: Joshua between 44th and Parkview ZONING: R-1 - STAFF RECOMIITENDATION : Originally the applicant had agreed to utilize tile as a roofing material (See Staff Recommendation of Dec. 6, 1977) . The Board' s decision to approve the final construction draw- ings was based on all of the information presented at that meeting of which the use of tile was part of that body of information . The following sentence taken from the applicant ' s letter appears to be a perfect justification as to why tile or shake roofs ought to be required: To install tile roofs on only 6 homes in the neighborhood would have no effect other than making our proposed residences appear different . One of the objectives of the Design Review Board is to insure variation and diversity in the design and construction of single-family residences. In order to achieve the objective in the subject neighborhood staff recommends that the Board require the use of tile or a combination of tile and shake as a roofing material for the 6 subject single-family resi- dences. . � � t�T & R Development 4145 Paseo de Plata Cypress, CA. 23 January 1978 Ralph Cipriani City of Palm Desert Planning Department 45275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California Dear ??alph: �ae o�ould like to ask for a change in roof material on the 6-homes which we propose to construct on Joshua Rd. and r?anzanita Avenue in Palm Desert (Lots :do. 51, 68, 69, 70, 79 and 80 of the Desert Paradise Tract) . Ori- ginally, the Design Review Board asked that we use either tile or rock and gravel as the roof material, and we indicated that we shall go with tile. iIowever, due to the following reasons we shall like to have approval to go with a rocic or gravel roof. (1) Nlost of the neighborhood is fully developed at this time with single-family residences whose roofs have rocic and gravel material. To install tile roofs on only 6-homes in the r.e_ighborhood would have no effect other than malcing our proposed residences appear different. (2) The cost differential in the choice of materials used on the roof would be significant. In fact, it makes a difference to such an extent that construction of the homes might not be undertaken. The cost increase would not only be for the material itself or the add- itional labor factor, but the roof truss system itself would have to be beefier to support the additional weight. Therefore, we would like to ask that we be included on the aggenda for your next Design P.eview Board meeting so as to obtain final approval on our re- quest. Thank you, I am Yours�sin�er,e�iy;� ��/�/ �� -�-------- Rik Zyber Architec� . y . . . �� . . . . � . . Iye ,�.� . .. ... - � .. � �. �.. � .. � . t . _ . � . .. .� �� . � DESIGN REVIEjP BOARD DATE :Dec . 6 1977 CASE NO. : 97bIF APPLICANT: `9&R DEVELOPERS � r LOCATION: Desert Paradise Tract , on Joshua between 44th and Parkvier• ZONING: R-1 . . '' STAFF RECOI�ZDIENDATION: • � , The applicant has responded to Special Condition No. 3 by proposing the use of tile as a roofing material . Special Condition No. 5 has not been adhered to in the final con- . ` struction drawings. The following list indicates the ele- vations proposed by the applicant . Please compare with the requirements of Special Condition No. 5. Lot 51 `Elevation C ' , Lot 68 Elevation C : . Lot 69 Elevation A ", , Lot 70 Elevation B Lot ?9 Elevation C Lot 80 Elevation B ° Until Special Condition No. 5 is adhered to, Staff recom- mends continuance of the case. - Additionally, the Staff recommends the use of shake as a roofing material for Elevation C as it would appear more compatible with the - - elevation than tile. • _ . . _: _ _; �� _ � ; � . �::. . . „�. . __.s_ � s.,. : . . _ ..� . .;�:,. .-� ;�; r , r" . . ". � . . . . . . .R - � . � � SPECI�L COVDITIONS CASE N0. 97:tiF \ 1. Final construction dra�vings including a final landscaping, grading and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Design Review Board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the Dept. of Environmental Services to this pro- ject until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. � 2. Applicant shall dedicate 30 feet from the Centerline of Man- zanita Court on Lot 51. 3. Applicant shall use tile , shake , or rock as roofing material . � 4. Plant-ons shall be masonry , stucco, or veneer. 5. Elevations labeled A, B, arid C are approved. E�evation A may be used two times, elevation B may be used three times, and elevation C may be used one time . AGREEMENT - I accept and agree , prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth„ and understand the Dept . of Building and, Safety will not issue a building permit or allo�v occupancy on the use permitted until this signed con•firmation has ' been received by the Department of Environmental Services. � (Date) (Applicant ' s Signature) � � � DESIG�I REti IE�V BOARD DATE : Feb . 7, 1978 CASE NO. : 367SF APPLICANT : SID CROSSLEY LOCATIOII : Alan Circle ZONING: R-1-10, 000 ST�FF RECO1�IhIENDATION : Mr. Hill has informed the Planning Staff that due to incomplete information on the grading plan for the pro- posed residence, the Dept . of Building and Safety is withholding any building permits. In addition, con- sideration will be given to line-of-sight requirements which will guarantee that the subject pad remains as low as possible. These controls should adequately address the concerns stated by b�r. Crossley. ' ,. '�'' �+r.r� 1h R C � . �' � � �� '� � '�,,. ,.,�L C.��.� � ,%--��i� �m�s�� ,-�� ,��,� 2 � 197� � ` ��z 7 L, ',s�j� ` 4: f fr � n `✓/�r��+•� �`Lfi �� Y� J �/ a 'itl ��{Ye��-�,ei� !/ ��+� �s �rt.f'�� - C��`s+"T �J�.1"�f $J�� -�� G'� �l 4��-�,�, � i /(/ �!f L£.� �� LC�L� ��'�1� J C' �" �el-�-�v ��-� G�i j�z 5-�� C�.��; .� ��.�,�.� �r� :s c� �-�-� � ,�-� � C�l�f� ct�,�-L�<�� t�: �-�_ �c�,-n o� .�� fj / �� s .��: "� �L�� .�2¢� -� --�' oL<-n � �. � � � L� G'-L�Z�v��Gt-r�G `i C�� t'r�zL 5f� L`�--°t--L� c-�� %aS � � 6/�� -tG. �" ,:c_wt� �` . � /L� � ,�Lc��G'-L�Zk c-C�''s, �' /�Yrr�, � � `k �"�L� � � � cGf �� L�I�zr.�,;.-- .�'�� L�-G !� j'��L�� / � 1 . � L �� `! � `�—t-t'`''j��u4L` C��'�� 2zi, �� ...� G-tr-c� / `Ce�� , �i—_ �_ �i � `C��,f ��-��-:<-4�=�, �—�:- ` r ; ,�� -�-'��'��z ' �rrr 'vrr► DESIGN RE�'IEtiV BO�RD DATE : Feb. ? 1978 cas� �ro. : 1n9MF APPLICANT : A. D. BABCOCK LOCATION: West side of Panorama, south of Highway 111 ZONING: R-3 STAFF RECOM1l7ENDATION: " Final construction drawings for 22 apartment units were approved for the subject site on December 14 , 1976. As a one year time period has elapsed since the original approval, the applicant was required to re-submit the plans. The present plans contain some minor modifications. Staff is recommending approval of the final construction drawings subject to the Special Conditions of Approval as there have been no substantial changes made on the already approved plans. , � � SPECIaL C0�'DITIOtiS CASE N0. 109MF l. All air conditioning equipment shall be fully concealed from view from any public rights-of-way and adjoining properties by means of screening. 2. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided in conformance with City Standards along the full frontage of the property on Panorama Drive. ; 3. Applicant shall relocate any air conditioning compressor units that are located next to bedroom windows . ; 4. All service utility lines shall be placed underground. Any and ; all existing overhead util�ty distribution lines shall be under- grounded pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. AGR�E:IfENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (Applicant ' s Signature) , ;�; � DESIGV REVIE�Y BOARD D�TE : Feb . 7. 1978 CASE NO. : 40C APPLICANT : DESIGN 2 for CHRIS HAENEL LOCATION: South side of E1 Paseo, east of Sage ZONING: C-1 STAFF RECOI�IP,IENDATIOIV: Staff is recommending approval of the sign program. . ��„v ;wr� SPECI:�L CO\DITIO�'S C�SE N0. 40C l. Al1 hanging signs shall have a ten (10) foot minimum separation between signs pursuant to the Sign Ordinance. �AGR�Er,iENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permi� or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safe�y will not issue a building permit or all�«� oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation ha.,s been received by the Department of Environmental Services. �(Date) (Applicant ' s Signature) � � �: DESIGV REVIE�V BOARD D�TE : Feb . 7, 1978 CAS� NO. : 67C APPLICANT : HUGHES INVESTMENTS LOCATION: Northeast corner of Hi�hwa 74 and El Paseo ZONING: C-l . S.P. STAFF RECONI1iENDATION: Continue this case indefinitely at the request of the applicant . ' � � DESIGN REVIE�V BOARD DATE : Feb. 7 , 1978 CASE NO. : 71C APPLICANT : LAUREL DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: West side of Highway 111 at Rancho Mirage City Limits ZONING: C-1, S .P. STAFF RECOh1�IE1VTDATION : Approve Elevation C.