The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1978-06-20 ARC Regular Meeting Agenda t ''�"� �t AGENDA PALM DESERT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING JUNE 20, 1978 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 . Approval of Minutes of previous meeting of June 6, 1978 2. Case No. : 117MF Nature of Project: 198 single-family, semi-detached condominium units Location: NW corner of Fairhaven and 44th Avenue Zone: PR-7, S.P. Applicant: TERRA INDUSTRIES Nature of Approval Sought: Preliminary site, floor and elevations Action: DENIED 3. Case No. : 82P�F Nature of Project: 48 Condominium Units Location: East side of Portola, south of Goleta Zone: PR-5, N Applicant: PORTOLA VILLAGE Nature of Approval Sought: Final Landscaping Action: APPROVED . 4. Case No. : 128NiF Nature of Project: Mobile Home - Subdivision Addition Location: Silver Spur Mobile Manor Zone: R-M Applicant: BRUCE BEDIG Nature of Approval Sought: Final Landscaping Action: APPROVED 5. Case No. : 93MF Nature of Project: 4 Condominium units Location: East side of Highway 74, north of Verba Santa Zone: R-3, 18,000(3) , S.P. Applicant: WILLARD T. JORDAN Nature of Approval Sought: Final Construction Drawings Action: APPROVED 6. Case No. : 79C Nature of Project: Commercial Complex Location: South side of El Paseo between Lupine Lane and Sun Lodge Zone: C-1 , S.P. Ap�licant: C. G. DUNHAM Na�ure of Approval Sought: Final Construction Drawings Action: APPROVED 7. Case No. : 108MF Nature of Project: 5 Unit Apartment Complex Location: Southwest Corner of Driftwood & Sunset Zone: R-3(3) Applicant: AMERICAN WEST DEVELOPMENT Nature of Approval Sought: Preliminary site, floor and elevations Action: REJECTED � � ` ' �; � Agenda ` Design Review Board June 20, 1978 Page Two 8. Case No. : 116MF Nature of Project: Tri-plex Location: North east corner of Sunset and Driftwood Zone: R-3(3) Applicant: AMERICAN WEST DEVELOPMENT Nature of Approval Sought: Preliminary site, floor and elevations Action: APPROVED 9. Case No. : 84C Nature of Project: Existing Commercial Location: Southwest Corner of San Pablo and San Gorgonio Zone: C-1 Applicant: CIRCLE K FOOD STORES Nature of Approval Sought: Landscaping and Sign Program Action: APPROVED 10. Case No. : 76MF Nature of Project: Condominium Project Location: Mountainback II (Somerset) Zone: PR-8 Applicant: BIDDLE DEVELOPMENT CO. , INC. Nature of Approval Sought: Sign Approval Action: APPROVED 11 . Case No. : 131MF Nature of Project: Mobile Home Subdivision Expansion Location: Portola Country Club Zone: R-M Applicant: PALM DESERT 210 Ltd. Nature of Approval Sought: Site Plan Action: APPROVED 12. Case No. : 132MF Nature of Project: Church Structure & Sunday School Classrooms Location: Northwest corner of Park View Drive and Monterey Zone: PR-7, S.P. Applicant: CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF THE LATTER DAY SAINTS Nature of Approval Sought: Preliminary site, floor and elevations Action: APPROVED 13. Case No. : 133MF Nature of Project: 72 Unit Apartment Project Location: West of Chia extended, between Little Bend and Skyward Zone: R-1 10,000 Applicant: ROBERT RICCIARDI Nature of Approval Sought: Preliminary site, floor and elevations Action: APPROVED 14. Case No. : 134MF Nature of Project: 100 Condominium Units Location: Ironwood Country Club Zone: PR-7 Applicant: SILVER SPUR ASSOCIATES Nature of Approval Sought: Preliminary site, floor and elevations Action: APPROVED �� • i �y � Agenda Design Review Board June 20, 1978 Page 7hree 15. Case No. : 72C ' Nature of Project: Commercial Complex Location: Southwest corner of Highway 111 and Highway 74 Zone: C-1 , S.P. Applicant: ROBERT RICCIARDI FOR COLUMBIA SAVINGS Nature of Approval Sought: Preliminary site, floor and elevations Action: APPROVED 16. Case No. : 78C Nature of Project: Commercial Structure Location: North side of E1 Paseo, east of Portola Zone: C-1 Applicant: BERNARD LEUNG Nature of Approval Sought: Preliminary site, floor and elevations Action: REJECTED 17. Case No. : 83C Nature of Project: Remodeling of existi:ng commercial & new parking lot Location: Northeast corner of Highway 111 and Portola Zone: 'C-1 , S.P. , R-3(4) and R-1 Applicant: HAROLD KAPP Nature of Approval Sought: Site Plan Action: REJECTED 2 . { �`' � DE�IG:� REVI�.ti �3U:�RD D�TE : June 20, 1978 C��SE �0. : 117MF APPLICE'1tiT : TERRA INDUSTRIES LOC��TION : NW Corner of Fairhaven and 44th Avenue ZONING: PR-7, S.P. ST�FF RECOlP.1ENDATION: The principal deficiencies still present in the revised plan submitted are: 1 ) insufficient common open space and 2) the absence of a 20' minimum setback between units as required by the Zoning Ordinance. With regard to the open space issue, Staff believes the private yards have been included in calculating the amount of common open space wich is contrary to the method of calculation prescribed by the Ordi- nace. In addition, the applicant has achieved the common open space shown through the use of two story units in a scenic preservation overlay zone . Additionally, Staff suggests that the pitch of the roof be lowered to accomodate the use of the new roofing material proposed. � t � �' �, �� - ��.�� .i...- . �� n.� � i.,. Y- .�yr� Y. � � �� '] ��_'�,��,'a"�t� ��sas.wi �F,3� ",�'ure� "� � .d 'x;�9Y�+ ty ' -Rol��i �°+� ^�..� -+�� .� '� � fiS%'� a � ��:a.r' +�Y:�M::�o1� � `� �� -��w P`�.��. ��{ �L^'-�i 7, Shi'ti �i�l.::l�, �ry �-�` , �i� r l�4) C'.�3-!141 May 25, 1978 Pl.ai�ii:q C�runissicn Cit� of PaL� Desert a5-275 Fr�ckly Pear Lane PalTn Desert, C� 92560 Dear Ccmmissioner: Terra Industries (Terra) filed all data and doct:nents for a Pla.nned RPsidential Per.nit with the Departsnent of Environ.*n�n�al Services of the Cit;� on �3ay l, 1978. � hearing was schedul.ed �y your Des.ig:i �:evz�w Board (DRB) for May 16, 1978, but, unfortunately, we were not notif ied of th2 heari�y dat� and consequentl.y were not at the hearing to present our case or to discuss the merits of our plan. We did not make tne filing w�thou't first discussing the project and showi:�g preliminaxy d�signs to City planning staff. Certain written suggestions of the staff obcained for tfiese previous discussior.s have been incorpora��d into t�e design for your consideration at the May 30th meeti.ng. On �tay 18th, ��loh Ci.prian-i t2lephoned ou� offic2 a�d advised that the DR5 had rej�cted our preliriinaYy site, f?oor and elevatior: pians. Terra then objected to not beinq notified af the meeting and requested that we be scheauled on the next meeting of t'r.e DRB to e�.plain the projec+�. Terra was scheduled at the DFtB meeting of P4ay 23rd and the projec� was �iscussed. But Terra was inFormed that we could only request. a clariiicarian oi con- cerns expr�ssed by the DR3. At this meeting not all of the me;��ers agpear�d to be in agr�ement witn the concerns and recar,.nendations of the Board, Terra asked tne members oF the DR�.� to explain the 10 it`ms appearing in tn�ir miau�es of their rlay 16th meeting, a copy of which is at�ached as E::hi�it �, but received no co:nerent replies_ We would like to address each of the 10 items below: a. ThA Modular App�arance. This would hardly seem to be a reason for rejection as S�e�sters' Dictionary defines modular as "const�-ucted witn standardized units or dir.lensions for fl�xibil.itv and varietv in use. " (emphasis ad•�ed) . Since f?exibiiity and va;iety are desa.ra'�le land planninJ goa�s ��i.s wo�ilc� se��n to be a reason for agprova� rath�r than denial. b. The Arranger,lent wili not �'unction we11 £or P.�sid�nts. E:{actly what was meant here was nat ex�lai:�ed so �'erra had to assume that r�fe�2r.ce was made to the arrang�ner,t of 4 homes around a motor court. Precisel1 t�� on�;osit' oL tn2 DRB'a statement is true_ The . � '� � P1arL�ing Com:nission May 25, 1978 City of Pal�;� Desert Pagz 2 cluster conuept a.ro�:nd a motor court is r.ot a ne��a idea. It has been uszd very succ�sszully ir. other develonments througnout t�:e Unit�d Stat�s. The particular design of motor court u`iliz�d b1T us has been successfully used by 525 resider.ts in a developr„enz in San Diego, California, built about 5 yeara ago ar.d in a 226 home develo�ment in Orange County ne�x Leisure 69orld builL by our fi�n last y2ar. In both of these cases a*� exhaustive review of develapment plans by very sophisticat2d planning depar'r��.tents did not find a�� functional, weafcness zn tne a.rrang�men� of the hories arour_d a motor court. The purchasers of these homes have never cemplained nor have the� encounter�d any problems with �he azrangement. A clos2 ar:d tnorough exa.-n_.-:a�ion of. tn: plot pla,� disc?o��s thac a c�ntral curved l�op st�eet witn two mea.^.s of access have been provid�il for the n�ii� circulation with the clusters of eight homes around a mo�or court radiatinq frcm th?s central str�et. This arrangemen� (1) avoids garage doors facir_g tre nain str�et which facili�at�s traific flow, (2) m�imizes green belt landscaped areas, (3) provides merz convenient guest parki,ng, (4) Frovides a walkway system sQ?�arated fro;n vehicular traffic, (5) creates a park-like setting by reducing views on pav�d ar2as, (6) cr2at�s larye ooen spaces for recreation, and (7) providas a very private enclosed yard for each homeo��er of a substantial s�z�. c. Land PlarLninq and Use da not Coincide. This conunent was no'� clarified at all and we are at a loss to �:r.1e:r- stand i�s meaning as all City codes and ordinanc��s are net b_y the Iand plan and use. of t�`�e progerty. d. Center Parking Courts will not Function wel1. This ap�arently is tne same comnent as "b" except that tney are not "parkiny" courts, they are motor courts, and �ae have de,r.ons_rat�d, both in fact and in theory, tha� sucn a statement is not a s=ater.�ent oE fact or truth. PaYking is absolutely proh.inited by the CC&q's except in desig:,at�d sp�ces. Tne projec� will have the ap�roUriate sign requir2d by the V2nicl2 Code of t;ze State of California ;vnich pe�:�its a "tow- a;aa1" by ar.yone should a violati.on occur. e. Circulat�_on of Parkinq Unacceptabl�. As pr�vi�usly stated, existir.g projects dQ not prove this to b� trua. The PR 7 zone re1uired 400 covered spaces which has been prov;ded �t the door oL �ach unit and �00 ;uest snac�s presi:mably located�converi�r.�ly to the hone. The development plan has provi�ed 200 guast s�ac�s, none of whic;: are more than 150 fe�t from the entra�ice to Aac;� hcn?. Man1 are locaLec� adjacent to the her„e. Our e�erience has sno�„rn tnat a mini:^�ur,i of one guest space per home snould be provi�ed for develooments of this ti-pe. � Y c�ys 7 PZanning Commis�io:l P•lay 25, 1978 City or Dalm Desert Page 3 f. Access to Building �oo Remote. � Terra feels tri5 to be an unjust criticism based on an analys�s of the guest parking, sinc` this occurs adjacent or a r.ia.ximum distance of 150 ieet to each he�ne. Also, proper sigzing will be d�ne to ider�tify tne location of eac?� entrance_ This should be adequate for any gues� to find tne front door. Additional access to tne rear of the house is provided L'nrough the carport. g. Architecture does not Complement Desert Setting. A review of otner projects prior to the submittal of ou-r plans does not prove this to be true. The buildings have beer. designed by Daniel N. Salerno, a licensed arcnitect and a menber of A.I.A. Mr. Salerno has won many awards for design excellence. He has aaid ''�3Y'�1C111cY d�tE:P.�lOC? �J �;1� G��St�L'� SC.-'��1I1C 1T1 �'f?1S �?�"O]�C� �L`�l L'�;i:*C� sLucco in var:cus shades catr;patible with tne use o� stucco in almosc every development in tne City of PaL� Desert. The use of pop-outs around the wir.dows and doors will create a very pleasing shadow effect without cluttering the exterior. The ends of tne gable roofed buildings are broken up by tne use of wood sningles under th� eaves. The roof line is thin and complimentar� to the size of the buildina and accented by expos�d rafter taiis. The proposed roofing materiai will be comp,st�ble with the desert setting by the us� of rionray concrete tile in a color acc�ptable to the Planning Commission or DRB. h_ Recommend that Shakes not be ITsed on S�des of Structures. Sningles were proposed, not shakes. Shingl�s do r�ot ha�r� the he`vy texture of shakes and should be compatible witn the desr:rt setting. However, should the Ccmmission desire an alternative, �aterial sucn as cedar siding, stained if desired, could be substituted_ i. Corunercial Siz� {20' .� 40' ) Poo1s and Fqtzipment �hould ne Used .in tna Pro�PCL. It is our intention to provide adequat� s;�imming facilities and we would stipulate to pools having a minimum of S00 square feet. G7e would li?�e not to make thern r�ctanqular, but rattier have them ha.r.nonize witn tne Iandscaping design. j . Rework Landscz�e Plan. Only the re�ired schernatic plan was submittecl. It is o�r intention to provide landscaninr wnicn cvill not on1� enhance the desirability of the project hu� wili be a credi� to tn� desert commun�_y. No spaciwic O�JjFC�l0:1 t0 i.ile Dl�ii ..�,U,ti.`!?t�t�i�� W3S OLf2�2c�. �'i�? 1C1t�71� t0 CO[i1D�V Lv1�'�': any re�rie�r� requiremen�s o£ tha City. � � � Planning Com�:iission May 25, 1978 City of Palm Desert Page 4 Enliqhtened by the a�ove a^,_3 tne findings and justifications contair.�d in the City of Pal�i Desert �Tegative Deciaracion for Environme�ztal Ir,ipact (Case D1o. DP05-78 & 117:?^) and the Sneciai cor.ditions for C�se No. 117�4F pro�osed by the Pla�zing �epartment staff (a copy of wnich is attacn�d as E::hibit B) t:�e Cc�t~�ission cannot substar_tiate, S"�1i7DUr� or justiry the denial of the p�oject. tde shall look forwarl to addressing tne Conunission further at the public hearing on rlay 30, 1978. The special conditions contained in E�chibit E can be given consideratio� at that time. Sincerely, TERRP. I�IDUSTRIE5, IP1C. ��C�.:.�_ �, �.�L ROBERT E. KREIS President REK:lc�in Enclosures: Exni'ait � Exhibit B . � � �:S::IB IT A ••l il!1LeS I�d�� L252Y't �i?$iC�CI r22V1P_':J C`30dY'� ;'ay 15, 1°�3 � Fage Fo;�r � J. CdS? IiO. � � ii''c - T�}��ri ?",�iiSii?I�S - `�1"2� lfiil�ldl"�/ Sltc� ��OCr c?1� ciE'.Vd�70nS fer a 200-!_�ri�it c�ndcmini�;,r� pr�ject to be located at the ror��h�.�ie�t COfI'12:" of �airhaven and �:th avenue. �=,pplican� not present. Gn a r�otior� by L'rrutia , seconded by Leung, the Qoard rejected the prelir�inary siLe, floor and ele�,�ations a� sub�nitced ar,d requested that the ap�licant re- j ;�ork the site plan and r?submit it. ihe major concern� and reccm��;enca+ions of the Board inciuded: � a. Tne modular appearance. b. The arrange�rent ��iill no� function �vell for residents. c. Land plann;ng and us� uo ne-� �oirc� uL. d. Cpii��r parki rg courts ;��i� l not functi on :,�el l ,. e. Circula�ion of par�ing unaccep�able. f. Access to buildirg to remote. a. nrcnitecture does no� complement desert seLting. h.. P.ecor�mPnd trat shakes not be used on sid�s ot structures. i . Comrrercial size (20'x�0' ) pools and equipment should be used in oroject. j . P,e�;rork 1 andscape pl an. Carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Leung, P�linturn, Johnson) . � 16. Discussion: , � �. Eoard f-lember Georr� i•1i nt�lrn anno�_inced that thi s r�eeti ng 4��as to be 'r;i s i as� since he is movine to Santa Rosa. He said i�e enjo�ed �;rorkirg t•�iih t"e unard ard had learn�d aJgood ��al . Cnairnan of t'r�e Board Eric Johnsor accepted his re�i gnati on and tranker,' ��ir. P-1i n turn ror hi s tir;e and contri buti ons to tiie Design R�vie�.•r Board. 17. On a motion b� Leung , secon�ed by Urru�ia , the m�e�tiny :�ias t�djourned at 8:2� r.m. Carried 4-0 (Leung, i�inturn, Urrutia , Johnsor,) . //� ,. . _ /7/rr�ir //', �,�� .,,-,� / � ��--; rl��in� /e r� .� `—_ r.,,:�n�D R. h��I!�Pc�, ,�sSOCIa�e (?1a_;ir�r r,';��cc . , � � � , S.'��CI:1L CG:tiDIT�O_,S r0:� C��SE :r0. 117 MF l. Final construction drawings including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenitites, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the Design Review Board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the De- partment of Environmental Services to this project until the afore- mentioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 2. Proposed indentity structure shall be deleted. 3. The entrances to the projectshall be relocated in order to line up to the adjacent streets in order to reduce the impact of traffic on adjacent properties. 4. An additional swimming pool shall be located in the southwestern area of the project. 5. No plan Js shall be located on the perimeter of the project. Those Plan Js shown on the perimeter shall be replaced with Plan Fs. 6. The proposed meandering sidewalks adjacent to the public right-of-ways shall be relocated closer to the public right-of-ways. 7. Meandering masonry walls shall be constructed on all street frontages in place of berming to reduce the noise impact. 8. Each unit shall have one garage and one carport due to the unique configuration of the parking areas. 9. A six foot masonry wall shall be provided along the property line between said project and the vacant site and adjacent church site at the northwest corner of Fairhaven Drive and 44th Avenue. AGREE?�I�NT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply �vith all the conditions set forth , and understand the Department of Buildin� and Safety will not issue a builci- ing permit or allo�v occupancy on the use permitted until this si�ned confirmation has been received by tlie Department of Environmental Services , (Date) (Applicant ' s Sibnature) - 1 �i . . � � DESIG� REti'IE;'� BO:�RD DaTE : June 20, 1978 C�S� NO. : 82MF 9PPLICAVT : PORTOLA VILLAGE LOC:�TION : East side of Portola, south of Goleta ZONING: PR-5, N STAFF R�COl�I11E:VDATION: Landscaping plan for recreation areas should be more detailed and sizes of shrubs proposed around the units increased substantially. . . '� � ��1IiiUTES PALM DE�E?T DESIG;� RE`IIE.J 50ARD MEETING APRIL 25 , 1973 1 . The meeting was called to order at 5:45 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall , after a two nour study session. Members present: Eric Johnson �- George Minturn : Frank Urrutia Phyllis Jackson ; Paul Williams Jim Hill Members absent: Bernie Leung Staff present: Ralph Cipriani Ron Knippel Clyde Beebe It was moved by Jackson , seconded by Urrutia, that the minutes of the meeting of April 4, 1973 be approved as written; carried 4-0 (Jackson, Urrutia, Minturn , Johnson) . - 2. Case No. 66C - JACK MACKEY - Final construction drawings for a commercial struc- ture to be located on the north side of E1 Paseo and west of Lupine �ane. Appli- cant present. On a motion by Minturn, seconded by Jackson, the Board approved the final con- struction drawings subject to the applicant revising the landscaping plan as noted on Exhibit A; carried 3-1 (AYES : Minturn , Jackson, Johnson; ABSTAI^d : Urrutia). � 3. Case . - . No 74C GLANZ AND JOHNSGN - Final construction drawings for a commercial �� structure to be located at the southtivest corner of Highway 111 and El Paseo, east of Portola. Applicant present. On a motion by �ackson, seconded by Minturn, the Board approved the final con- struction drawings with the condition that no permits be issued until final landscaping plans, which plans shall include the placement of structural trees along El Paseo, are approved. Carried 3-1 (AYES: Jackson, Minturn , Johnson ; ABSTAIN: Urrutia) . 4. Case No. 76C - CHESTER DORN - Final construction drawings for the store front remodeling of a building located on the north side of Highway 111 , east of Cabrillo. Applicant present. On a motion by Minturn , seconded by Jackson , the Board approved the final con- structio awings subject to approval of the sign and sign color by staff. Carrie -1 YES: Minturn , Jackson, Johnson; ABSTAIN: Urrutia) . 5. Case N . 82MF PORTOLA VILLAGE - Final construction drawings for a 4II-unit condom nium p ject to be located on the east side of Portola, south of Goleta. Applican esent. � On a motion by Jackson , seconded by Minturn, the Board approved the final con- , struction draurings subject to the applicant revising the landscaping plan and submitting said plans to the Design Review Board. The Qoard recommended that the landscape plan include the following: a. Two rotivs of date palms be provided at the project's perimeter. b. Provide for better definition of ground cover and shrub locations . c. Upsize shade trees at least 50 percent. d. 15-gallon size plant material to be used. e. Plan shall reflect front yard layout. f. Include placement of walls and materials to be utilized on plans. Carried 3-1 (AYES: Jackson, Minturn, Johnson; ABSTAI�d: Urrutia) . � � DESIG� REL'I�;; 30.�RD D:�TL : June 20, 1978 C��S� ti 0. : 128MF APPL I C�1�T : BR(1 . B DI LOC:�TION : _ Silver pur Mobile Manor ZONIVG: R-M ST�FF RECOII!,IENDATION : Staff would recommend approval of the final landscaping plan in light of the additional information received from the applicant (See attached letters) : - � � SILVER SPVR MO�ILE �I��10R � HIGHWAY SEVENTY-FOUR � PqLM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 • 714/346-4219 E C E i V � � June 7, 1978 �UN 9 �9�'8 PALM DESERT CITY �IALL C1TY CLERK'S OFFICE City Clerk Design Review Board City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Gentlemen: Please find enclosed two copies of a memorandum which is submitted for your review and consideration concerning Case No. 128MF; Zone R-M; Mobilehome Subdivision Addition to Silver Spur Mobile Manor. Please calendar this written response for hearing at the next scheduled meeting ot the Design Review Board. It would be appreciated if I am advised of the date of said hearing so that I may plan to be in attendance. Thank you for your courtesy and assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, SILVER SPUR RESERVE � ' uce E. Bedig Managing Partner BEB:pt Enclosures � � � � � � � � !u r�4 �� l�,i�; ENVIRONMEN fAL SEkV10ES CITY QE pALM DESE}�; :-:w.��.a . _,+-. . � � lIE1�10RANDli1�I T0: Design Review Board City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert , CA 92260 DATE: June 6, 1978 RE : Case IVo. 128 b�IF; Zone R-M; Mobilehome Subdivision Addition to Silver Spur Mobile :lSanor, Palm Desert , CA Thank you for the written notice dated May 31 , 1978 , that the action on the amenity improvements has been con- tinued pending the Design Review Board' s review of the rationale supporting the amenity package previously sub- mitted to the City of Palm Desert , Based upon my discussion with hlessrs. Paul A. Williams and Ralph J. Cipriani on June 2, 1978, the following is respectfully submitted for your review and consideration . I am ad�-ised that the Design Review Board and Planning Commission have approved the concept of dedication of the existing rock area to perpetual open space so as to pre- serve, presently and in the future, the natural beauty of this desert formation, except for a lawn area with meandering paths and an open ber�ch and barbeque area for resident social gatherings. The question which I am advised is at issue is whether the addition of a second swimming pool (not therapy pool) at the existing social , recreation and clubhouse area is feasible in terms of resident usage and enjoyment . The reasons supporting the applicant ' s not building a second swimming pool may be summarized as follows : l. The approval of the amenity plans without a second swimming pool would be consistent with the appli- cant ' s concept to broaden the spectrum of amenities available to obtain maximum resident usage according to the residents ' social and recreational preferences . 2. There does not exist sufficient available space within the eYisting social , recreation, clubhouse and swimming area to build a second swimming pool , 3 , The existing swimming pool provides sufficient water area for the residents based upon their use of same. 4 . The expansion and "Kool Decking" of the existing swimming pool deck area with additional furniture will provide the residents with their primary need according to their historical social desires . The November, 1977, residents ' opinion poll and other resident preferences expressed to me confirm that the residents desire additional area around the pool to gather, socialize, and sun themselves with separate toilet facilities. These improvements have been provided for in the plans previously submitted. 5. The present swimming pool water surface area is more than sufficient for adult usage at peak periods . � ' � °'�•"` `�+' bternorandum to Design Review Board Jun� 6 , 1978 Page Two 6 . The question of children usage has not been at issue as the children are provided with definite hours for their eYclusive use. As this is an adult park, any deviation from this policy by mana�ement would conflict with the residents ' interpretation of the adult lifestyle concept of the park, and would be counter-productive to the expressed preferences of the majority of residents to provide only limited children ' s access to pool facilities . 7. The approval of the amenity plan, as submitted, without a second s�vimming pool is consistent �vith the resident opinion poll taken in November, 1977 (a copy of which has been presented to Mr. Paul Williams, AIP, Director of Environmental Services , for his information, reviecv, and files) . 8. The prior owner, at� one time, maintained two swimming areas and eliminated the second pool due to residents ' objections, liability, and mainte- nance disadvantages. 9. The submitted plans include a decision to add an additional therapy pool based upon the following : a. A second therapy pool will allow two constant "hot" temperature levels (higher and lower) so as to be available to a broader range of residents. b. This facility is a desirable addition due to the age of our residents and physical therapy benefits which this amenity provides . c. The second therapy pool will contain a para- plegic device to allow access to our older residents who are denied access to the existing pool due to (1) an inability to ne�otiate the steps, and/or (2) tolerate the higher "hot" temperature maintained by a small minority of residents who treat the single existing therapy pool as their exclusive facility. Accordingly, it is respectfully requested that the Silver Spur Reserve application be approved without the addition of a second swimming pool in the "natural desert park area" or at the existing recreational and clubhouse facility. Please calendar this response for hearing at the neYt scheduled meeting of the Design Review Board. SILVE PUR RESERVE �= - Bruce E . Bedig 1l�Ianaging Partner BEB: pt cc : Paul A. �Villiams, AIP Ralph J. Cipriani � � � 7]. ��o� C��a�i CONSU�TANT 22 Stanford Drive � � � ,-`�.�s.� � s�. � � Rancho Mirage,Califomia 92270 �" 714-328-0529 .��_'`'; - ` . _ ENVIROf�h^:EN;AL SE�<`/ICfS Ju�i'��' �3 j��-9�L$��7 = Design Council Review Board City of Palm Desert P.O. Box 1648 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re- Case #128MF Addit�on to Silvei S�1Y' Mobile r�anor Gentlemen: I would like to comnent regarding this case inasmuch as I was the general partner of the limited partnership that sold this park to Silver Spur Reserve. At the time we purchased the park some eight years ago there were two swimming pools in the park even though the number of residents was about 1/3 of the number now living there ` in view of the numerous additions r.lade to the �ark. The residents at that time did not use the second swimming pool and did not want it in the park and we finally filled the pool in and turned it into landscaping. Since that time and up to June l, 1977 when we sold the park, there was never any indication from anybody in the park that they wanted to have another swimming pool. As a matter of fact, in the seven years I have never seen the present swimming pool used up to anywhere close to its reasonable capacity. For a number of years I was counsel of �sobile Home Com- munities of Denver, Colorado and did the purchasing of large parks across the United States so I believe I can qualify as somewhat knowledgable in park operation and park planning. It is a generally kno�on fact in the mobile home park operations that it is a very serious mistake to have, in a park of this size_,over one swimming pool . Two swimming pools �aill generally result in encouraging peo�le to feel, regardless of how well it is done, that one is better than the other or that r.tanagement does more for one group than the other. Obviously this is not a con- - - ' --=----r %� -� � � Design Council Review Board June 13, 1978 Page 2 dition that is sound in any park and I am sure that if you care to, I can furnish you with many independent operators' opinion on this condition. Of course, I am sure that you understand this does not apply when you have a park that has a family section and an adult section, but it applies to every park that I have been involved with over the years. I have reviewed the plans in detail and in my opinion the amenities , the chang�s, the preservation of open space will lend a great deal to the park and the resi-• dents ' enjoyment of it. I strongly believe that two swimrting pools would take away from the park rather than benefiting it. I strongly urge you to approve the request that the swimming pool be dropped from the plans. Sincerely, ��1 , ._-��/ � � / _.C_._ f � C `� ti �,�r,<;� � -��- . o e�`t� Hubbard CRH/mj cc: Mayor Ed Mullins Alexis New�arar.der Noel Brush Jim McPherson Roy Wilson George Berkey, Chairman of Planning Commission Ronald R. Knippel, Assistant Planner Paul Williams, Director of Environmental Services Bruce Bedig, Silver Spur Reserve, 160 Franklin St. , Oakland, Ca. 94607 � . -- ;;;. : --.: _ _,, �, � � DE�IG� REVIr�'� BO�RD D:1T� : June 20, 1978 C:�SE NO. : 93MF :�PPL IC�:1T : WILLARD T. JORDAN LOC.ITION : East side of Highway 74, north of Verba Santa ZONING: R-3 18,000(3) , S.P. STAFF REC01I1IEVDATION : Approve the final construction drawings. . , ,. _ � � � y SPECIAL CO1vDITIOVS CASE :1.0. 931IF � 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City � Fire P,Iarshal prior to issuance of building permits . Al1 con- ditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Any/all utility service and distribution lines on or abutting the subject property, shall be placed underground prior to oc- cupancy clearance. • 3. Final construction dra�vings including a final landscapin�, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, - walkway layout , and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Design Review Board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the Department of Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 4. Applicant shall furnish evidence of property owners ' association 's approval of subject plans prior to submittal of final construction � � drawings to the DRB. 5• Install or show exists a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPi�i f ire f lotv for a two (2) hour durat ion in addition to domest ic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured along approved vehicular travel ways. 6• Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways . � a. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any � building. : b. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted � chrome yellow and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. ' c. Curb s � ( if installed) shall be painted red 15 feet in either di- rection from each hydrant. 7,� Prior to issuance of a building permit , the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval , one copy will be sent to the Building Department , and the original will be returned to the developer. � 8. , The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification : : "I certif�� that the design of the water system in Case No. 93�,IF is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Tiarshal . " � � � , s. . ,• .. • =. - = ti-- �,— . _ .. � AGREEhiENT ' � � I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand the Deparmtnet of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. ?. (Date) - , ,� �� ,x � T (Applicant 's Signature) - �' '4� �a��r+�°`t ,J�-�+'�'4r- �4 tw�-:� --� eSa. S `-� x �,.� � . t �..��,.+ ~ r'�. �. ,u, ,f" -:..� 4� _ "h ,� a .-;. y_'F�- .... 'a^.;. •�.i..� .�.'d �:a r,"F.Y +t �. �.-,X��.4-'� ,�.'As'-' }° al. y+�' C . ,5 +L2' ,s _ S.�':'�+ -'^} +.r�, x �� 4.4 �'�"'�`�rs.�r'�-r,u �- �� ,_..� ,�':. 4 -.1��,��'"'aP-�e• ...= u,�,:w.s 'n-a�M ow'a'^[«Y`4�,'.e,'_�.. , r,,�.�.� .,_� . ",' _"�,,.�.� ,_ .{,� �-• +et r"''� Yc�.��y'.a�, � .k sY`...� �+•�p�+tr,_��^.s'r.-'�... t�+� -�F'..*x z- ��"�,�' �ti3Fat ��Y,�...� 5 `y ��' i � p� �rtn' g r✓'�7 a,_ � �s. �.;a��"-�,�`^=;�.'°S y,s�..'hy.�...��'.,��'"��:��'�.��i�'�c-��. ~ .�r�-�"e��'!'�z��`��i�--' . .v+��.�4..'t�F].�"i!. a. e �= �� DESIG� REti�IE;'� �30aRD DaT� : June 20, 1978 C��Si. NO. : �q� :�PPLIC�1vT : C. G. DUNHAM LOC�ITION : South side of E1 Paseo, between Lupine Lane & Sun Lodge ZONING: C-1 , S.P. STaFF RECOtii1IENDATION: Approve the final construction drawings. . ` i..' r , � '��11Y� 3�� S��C:.1L CO`;�ITiO:;S C:1Si .`;0. 79C 1• Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the Cit • Fire 1lfarsha.l prior to i�suance of buildin y _ ditions sha.11 be made a part of constructiopeandtno certific�te of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2• Any/all utility service and districtuion lines on or abuttin the subject property, shall be placed underm � cupancy clearance pursua,nt to Section 25. 56b110nofpth�r�,luni�ipal Code. 3. Final construction dra.wings including a final landsca lighting, amenitites , trash storage ping, gr�.ding, plans 3� sign program shall be submitted1toatheaDesign1Revie:v1Board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be partment of Environmental Services to this projecgluntib the afore- y the De- mentioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed . 4• The applicant shall agree to join an cally an undergrounding untility districteSformeddthat1includeslthe subject property within its boundaries . 5. The applicant shall grant to the City of Palm Desert easeme ' a� over the parking lot area of the project site. nt riants 6. Applicant shall provide handicap spaces in the final construction drawings. - 7. Tree wells shall be provided throughout the parking lot . S• Ingress & egress on both Sun Lodge Lane and Lupine Lane shall be limited to one entrance on each street . 9• A six (6) foot masonry wall or equivalent shall be constructed along the south border of the project. la. Where the parking area is situated across the street from in a residential district along Lupine Lane and Sun Loda property masonry wall or berm (3) feet in height shall be erectedewithin the required landscape area to adequately screen the residential pro- perties. AGREE^:1ENT I accept and a�ree, prior to use of this �vith all the conditions set forth per�it or appro�-a.l , to comply of Buildin � an� underst�nd tha.t the Depa.rtment g and Safety will not issue a building permit or allo�v oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this received by the Depa.rtment of Environmenta.lnServicesrmation ha,s been � (llate} <<lpplicant 's Sibnature ) y �^7'��.�.a � � DESIG� REti'IE,`� BO��RD DATE : June 20, 1978 CaSL �VO. : 108MF APPLIC�INT : AMERICAN WEST DEVELOPMENT LOCr1TION : Southwest corner of Driftwood & Sunset ZONING: R-3(3) STaFF REC01IlIEVDATION: The Staff believes the submitted elevations are not compatible with the architectural theme predominant in Palm Desert, but would be more appropriate in New Mexico or Southern Arizona. The landscaping plan will suffice as a preliminary landscaping plan, but is inadequate as a final landscaping plan. More detail will have to be added. If the Board is satisfied with the elevations, Staff would recommend approval of the preliminary plans. � , �--t.:� • e �+lr+Y' �'�yr SPECI:�L CO`:DITIO:�S C�1SE N0. 108i�F 1 . Construction plans shall be sumitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits . All con- ditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Any/all untility service and distribution lines on or abutting the subject property, shall be placed underground prior to oc- cupancy clearance. 3. Final construction drawings including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenitites, trash storage, walkway layout , and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the Design Review Board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the Department of Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. _ 4 . Trash enclosure shall be relocated. 5. Roofs shall be modified. AGREE:IIENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth , and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allo�v oc- cu�zncy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services . (Date) (Applicant ' s Signzture) i!-� � � D�SIG_r" REVI�;'� ,30�'�RD D�:E : June 20, 1978 C�1SE :�'0. : 116MF APPLIC�INT : AMERICAN WEST DEVELOPMENT LOC�ITION : Northeast corner of Sunset and Driftwood ZONIVG: R-3(3) ST9FF RECO�P.IENDATION : The window treatments have been revised and appear� more consistent than those previously submitted. The landscaping plan will have to be more detailed in order to be presented as a final landscaping plan. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plans. � „.,— .. `-� L �' °ww� SPECIaL COVDITIO�'S CASE N0 . 116I47F l . Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. Al1 con- ditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2 . Any/all utility service and distribution lines on or abutting the subject property, shall be placed underground prior to oc- cupancy clearance. 3. Final construction drawings including a final landscaping, grad- ing, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout , and ir- rigation plan shall be submitted to the Design Review Board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the De- partment of Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 4. Window treatments shall be elaborated. � 5. Trash enclosure shall be relocated. AGREE?,1ENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, anci understand that the Depa,rtment of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (Applicant ' s Sionature) �, '�.r �% DESIGV REVIE;+ 30�FD D:�TE : June 20, 1978 cas� :vo. : 84c APPLICANT : CIRCLE K FOOD STORES LOC.�TION : Southwest corner of Sar Pablo and San Gorgonio ZONING: C-1 ST�FF RECOIIIIENDATION: The logo sign proposed for the front of the store should be relocated to the side of the structure. Other improvements proposed appear acceptable and Staff is recommeriding approval of the upgrading of the site. The recommended Special Condition pertains to the proposed signs. ; � � . 1t � � SPECI�L CO\DITIO`S C�SE v0. 84C l. Detailed drawings of the proposed signs shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for approval . 2. Delete the sing proposed for the front of the store and maintain the monument sign only. 3. Redesign the pump canopy using heavy timber in lieu of shingles . AGREE�,fENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a buildinb permit or allo�v oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this sibned confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services . (Date) (�pplicant 's Signa.ture} ? � �✓ � DESIG�V REL'I?';� c30aRD DATE : June 20, 1978 casL tiTo. : 76MF APPLIC��NT : BIDDLE DEVELOPMENT CO. , INC. LOC:�TION : Mountainback II (Somerset) ZONIVG: PR-8 ST�FF REC0111IE�1DATIOiV: Staffis recommending approval of the sign program. ; ,,, ��,,,. �,' DESIG.v REVIE;� BO��I�D D�TE : June 20, 197� cas� :VO. : 131MF aPPLICANT : PALM DESERT 210 LTD. LOC�TION : Portol a Country C1 ub ZONING: R-M STaFF REC01I?,IEVDATION: Approve the proposed additional lots. n' � � �' DESIGN REVIE�N i;'O�DITIO�S CASE :VO . 131h1F AGREEISENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to co:^ply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this si�ned confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (Applica.nt ' s Signature) ,.� , �� atiW.,v r.r►� DESIG�' REti'I�,,', BO�RD D:�TE : June 20, 1978 Ct1SE VO. : 132MF APPLIC�INT : CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF THE LATTER DAY SAINTS LOC.ITION : Northwest corner of Park View Drive and Monterey ZONIVG: PR-7, S.P. STaFF RECOti1?.IENDATION: Approve the preliminary site, floor and elevations. Staff is recommending the following Conditions as Special Conditions in addition to any conditions the Design Review Board may wish to impose. 1 . Applicant shall pay fees into the Palm Desert Planned Local Drainage Facilities Fund in an amount to be determined by the provisions of Ordinance No. 175. 2. Traffic Safety lighting shall be installed in accordance with the approval of the Director of Public Works. 3. Sidewalks, curbs and gutters shall be installed on Park View Drive and on Monterey Avenue in accordance with the City Standards. 4. Necessary right-of-way dedications shall be made on Park View Drive and on Monterey Avenue. The right-of-way shall be 126 feet in width on Monterey Avenue and 88 feet in width on Park View Drive. 5. No driveway entrance on Park View Drive shall be located closer than 150' from the intersection of Park View Drive and Monterey Avenue. � � �.:.�-.. .- ti_,N-._.1 � � DESIGN REVIE�ti' C0�'DITIO:vS CaSE V0. 132MF AGREE:�r1ENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allo�v oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services . (Date) (Applicant ' s Si�nature) < --t., t.: °�r �r,o► DESIG� REVI�:ti BO�RD DAii : June 20, 1978 C�SL VO. : 133MF APPLIC�1vT : ROBERT RICCIARDI LOCATION : West of Chia extended, between Little Bend and Skyward ZONING: R-1 10,000 ST�FF RECO�I�,IENDATION: Staff has recommended that Little Bend be deleted as an entrance and that an emergency access drive to Barberry Lane be developed as approved by the City Fire Marshal and Director of Public Works. A minimum 6' high mounding system or wall system is being recommended along Barberry, Skyward, Chia and Bel Air as Design Review Condition No. 1 . It should be pointed out that the proposed project enjoys no legal access as the applicant does not presently own th� northeastern corner of the site. .:� ...� -� ,� � DESIGN REVIE51� CO�DITIO.vS C�SE N0. 133MF l. A 6 ' high mounding system or wall system shall be provided along Barberry Lane, Skyward Way, Chia Drive , and Bel Air Road. 2 . Applicant shall delete the entrance to the project at Little Bend Trail and provide an emergency access drive via Barberry Lane. AGREE:IIENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this si�ned confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (Applicant ' s Signature) ;� ,.-, ti "'f r '� � DESIGV REVIE;� BO:�RD Da.� : June 20, 1978 C��SE NO. : 134MF APPLICANT : SILVER SPUR ASSOC. LOC:�TION : Ironwood Country Cl ub ZONING: PR-7 STAFF REC0111IENDATION: Approve the preliminary site, floor and elevation plans. The only minor problem staff sees is with regard to the site plan where a 20' separation between groups of units is not achieved in several instances as required by the Zoning Ordinance. This situation can be corrected by either shifting some of the units or providing trellises to connect the units. �r:� � � DESIGN REVIEW CO�DITIO��S CASE V'0 . 134I41F l . A minimum 20 ' separation shall exist between all groups of structures per the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance . AGREEhiENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or alla�v oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (applicant ' s Sibnature) '�1 � � DESIG�1 REVIE�V BO�RD DATE : June 20, 1978 CASE iVO. : 72C APPLICANT : ROBERT RICCIARDI FOR COLUMBIA SAVINGS LOCATION : Southwest corner of Highway 111 and 74 ZONING: C-1 , S.P. STAFF RECOi4I1IENDATION: The proposed preliminary landscaping plan is deficient as some of the requirements of the previously approved Development Plan have not been adherred to. Landscaping around Building 6 is still weak, tree wells have not been provided along� the Highway frontages, nor sidewalks indicated in the preliminary landscape plan. The proposed elevations for the financial institution are acceptable. The elevations for the remaining structures are similar to the existing structures at Prickly Pear Square. Staff has recommended three Special Conditions pertaining to signs and preliminary landscaping. _� �„� �rr�' SPECIaL CO�DITIONS C�SE NO. ?2C l . No signs are approved. 2. Additional landscaping shall be provided adjacent to Building B. 3. Preliminary landscaping plan submitted is not approved as required sidewalks are not indicated nor are tree wells provided. AGREEI2ENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understa.nd that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (Applica.nt ' s Signature) �.� '� . � ,� PLa�tiI�G CO`.1`.IISSIO� RESOLL'TIO� �;0. Page T•.so CO:VDITIO`�S OF APPRO�'AL CaSL NOS . DP 02-78 8: 72C Standard Conditions : l . The development of the property shall conform substantia,lly with that as shown on plot plan marked Exhibit 'q-� ' on file with the Department of Environmental Services, Case No. DP 02-78 , unless otherwise amended by the following conditions. � 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval , the applicant shall first obtain permits andior clearance from the following public agencies : County Department of Public Health Dir. of Public �Yorks - City of Palm Desert Palm Desert Design Review Board Process City Fire 1�larshal - City of Palm Desert Coachella Valley County Plater District Regional tiYater Ouality Control Board �7 Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall ' be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of abuilding permit for the use conternplated here`vith. 3 . A landscaping , grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout , and irrigation plan shall be submitted through the Desi�n Review Process. The building permit when issued shall include the grading, lighting, amenities , trash storage, walkways , and irriaa- tion systems . No final inspection shall be given by the Depart- ment of Environmental Services to this project until the afore- mentioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 4. Construction of the development permitted hereby shall be done as a single project . 5. The sewerage disposal system shall be submitted to and approved by the Coachella Valley County Water District prior to issuance of a building permit. -� 6. Construction shall commence within one ( 1) year after final approval , otherwise said approval shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever . 7. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant shall agree in writzng to any conditions of approval. 8. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in adclition to all the require m�nts , limitations , and restrictions of all municipal ordina.nces and State and Federal Statutes no�v in force, or which hereafter may be in force. �� 9. The fire protection requirements as specified in the Fire blarshal ' s memorandum, attached hereto, shall apply. � 10. All new electrical distrii�ution lines , telephone , cable antenna television , and similar service wires or cables , which are adja- cent to and provide s�rvice to the property bein; developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. 11 . Any possible line-of-sibht problems shall be resolved through the Desi;n Revie�v Boa.rd process durinb their preliminary and final - review. a--:/ '� . . � r� PLa�`I`yG CO`.;`,II SS IO:� RESOLliTIO:v �0. Pa;;e Thr��.�e Snecial Conditions : l . Applicant shall develop and provide a preliminary si�n pr�:;ra.m for total project . 2. Landscapinb shall be up�raded. The number , type , size and loca- tion of trees are not a.pproved. Such approval sh111 be granted � through the Design Review Board process . 3. Submitted elevations a.re , not approved and shall be resubmitted through the Desi�n Review process . 4. Landsc,aping shall be increased around all structures , particularly Buildings A and B. 5. Any a.nd all eYisting overhead utility distribution lines sh�.11 be undergrounded pursuant to the provisions in the Municipal Code . 6. Applicant shall pay fees into the Palm Desert "Planned Local Dra.inage Facilities Fund" in an amount to be determined by the provisions of Ordinance No. 175. 7. Applicant shall make a cash contribution in the amount of 12 50 towards the future signalization of E1 Paseo and Highway 74 . 8. Curbs, gutters and .tie-in paving shall be installed on the perimeter of this development . 9. Sidetivalks shall be installed on El Paseo and Highway 111 . 10. No ingress or egress shall be given to this parcel from High`vay 74 or Highway 111. 11. Traffic safety lighting shall be installed as required by the Director of Public `Vorks. 12 . Right-of-ways shall be dedicated as required by Caltrans . 13 . The median modification on El Paseo shall be the responsibility of the applicant and shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Public �Yorks. 14 . The drainage of storm waters shall be handled in a manner acceptable to CalTrans and the Director of Public �Vorks. AGREE:4IENT I accept and a;ree, prior to use of this permit or approcal , to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allo�v occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received - by the Department of Environment�.l Serviceds. (Date) (�pplicant ' s Sign�.ture) � a�e� � � � DESIGN REVIEN BOARD DATE : June 20 , 1978 CASE iVO. : 78C APPLICANT: BERNARD LEUNG LOCATION: North side of El Paseo, east of Portola ZONING: C-1 STAFF RECOI�711ENDATION : If a 500 sq. ft. structure were placed on this site, two parking spaces could be provided on-site and an access easement obtained from the adjacentproperty owner to insure access to the two spaces. The applicant is proposing to use �the entire site for structure so there appears to be a situation where the applicant is attempting to over-develop the site. �..� �- -,, u � � DESIGN REVIEW CO�DITIOtiS C�S� N0. 78C AGREE:I�ENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a buildinb permit or allow oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (Applicant ' s Signature) � - � ;� DESIGN REVIEW BOaRD DATE : June 20, 1978 CASE N0. : 83C APPLICANT : HAROLD KAPP LOCATION : Northeast corner of Highway 111 and Portola ZONING: C-1 , S.P. , R-3(4) and R-1 STAFF RECONIlI'IENDATION : Staff is recommerrding that the following 4 Design Review Conditions be recommended to the Planning Commission for inclusion in their Conditions of Approval on the Conditional Use Permit being sought. These conditions deal with access, undergrounding, sidewalks and walls. � '' � � � DESIGN REVIEW COtiDITIOVS CASE N0. 83C 1. No access shall be permitted onto San Marino Circle. 2. All existing overhead utility distribution lines shall be undergrounded pursuant to the requirements of the Palm Desert Municipal Code . 3. Sidewalks shall be provided in their ultimate location as approved by the Director of Public Works along Portola and landscaping pro- vided on each side thereof . 4. A 6' foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east property line of the proposed parking lot bounded by San Marino Circle , Portola Avenue , and Alessandro Street . This wall shall be joined at its north point by a 3' masonry wall c�r.ich shall be installed parallel to San Marino Circle and continue parallel along Portola where it shall be set in 4 ' from the future sidewalk. AGREEb4ENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understa.nd that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow oc- cupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (applicant 's Signature) _ � �:..'��" , �