The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1994-08-09 ARC Regular Meeting Agenda � . � � AGENDA PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION TUESDAY - AUGUST 9, 1994 12 :30 P.M. - COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * STUDY SESSION WILL BEGIN AT 12 :00 NOON REGULAR SESSION WILL BEGIN AT 1 :00 P.M. (OR EARLIER) -- COMMISSION WILL TAKE UP THE AGENDA AT 1 :00 P.M. WHERE IT LEFT OFF AT STUDY SESSION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I . Approval of minutes of the July 26, 1994 meeting. II . Minute motion approving cases found acceptable at the study session. III . ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: 1 . Any person wishing to discuss any item not otherwise on the agenda may address the commission at this point by stepping to the lectern and qiving his/her name and address for the record. Remarks shall be limited to a maximum of five minutes unless additional time is authorized by the commission. 2 . This is the time and place for any person who wishes to comment on non-hearing agenda items . It should be noted that at commission discretion, these comments may be deferred until such time on the agenda as the item is discussed. Remarks shall be limited to a maximum of five minutes unless additional time is authorized by the commission. IV. CASES: A. Final Drawings : 1 . CASE NO: APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : FOXX DEVELOPMENT, 74-818 Velie Way, Suite 12, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of additional second story windows LOCATION: Galleria Building at 73-111 E1 Paseo ZONE• C-1 S.P. . `�"ry �.�✓` AGENDA ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1994 2 . CASE NO: 4333 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : ADAMS AUTOMOTIVE, 74-872 Velie Way #1, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of additional business identification signage at driveway LOCATION: 74-872 Velie Way ZONE: S. I . 3. CASE NO: 4336 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : SIGNS BY MEL for FRAMEMAKERS, 945 Boardwalk, Suite, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of business identification signage LOCATION: 72-185 Highway 111, Suite E ZONE: C-1 4 . CASE NO: PP 92-5 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : LOWE ENTERPRISES, INC. for DESERT CROSSING, 11777 San Vicente Blvd. , Suite 900, Los Angeles, CA 90049; MCG & ASSOCIATES, 200 So. Los Robles Avenue, Suite 300, Pasadena, CA 91101-8461 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised final landscape plan and elevations for Marshalls, Bed, Bath & Beyond, T.J. Maxx, Famous Footwear, Clothestime and Old Navy LOCATION: Southeast corner of Highway 111 and Fred Waring Drive ZONE: P.C. (3) 5 . CASE NO: PP 92-6 APPLICANT (AND ADDRE5S) : MAKENA PROPERTIES for DESERT SPRINGS MARKETPLACE, 33048 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 120, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675; JLV DESIGNS, Post Office Box 12885, Palm Desert, CA 92260 � � AGENDA ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1994 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Review of proposed revisions to landscape plan, building "L" elevations and hardscape plan LOCATION: Northwest corner of Cook Street and Country Club Drive ZONE: P.C. (2) 6 . CASE NO. : APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : PALMS TO PINES CANVAS for COMERFORDS, Pinyon Pines, Box 69, Mountain Center, CA 92361 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of awning with signage LOCATION: 73-740 E1 Paseo ZONE: C-1 S.P. B. Preliminary Plans : 1. CASE NO: PP 94-4 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : GEORGE BUONO for SUNLIFE MEDICAL BUILDING, 42005 Cook Street, Suite 300, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of building elevations for medical office building LOCATION: Southwest corner of San Anselmo and Fred Waring Drive ZONE: O.P. 2 . CASE NO: APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : CHARLES L. MARTIN for ST. GEORGE CHURCH, 40-840 Thunderbird Road, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 3 . � � � AGENDA ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1994 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary plan approval for remodel and addition to church LOCATION: Southwest corner of Larrea and Lantana ZONE: O.P. C. Miscellaneous : Recommendation from E1 Paseo Business Association regarding future awnings to be approved for E1 Paseo businesses . ***************************************************************** DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Donna C. Bitter, of the Community Development Department of the City of Palm Desert, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the Architectural Review Commission meeting of Tuesday, August 9, 1994, was posted on the bulletin board by the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, on Friday, August 5, 1994 . at . August 5, 1994 � ` � � DONNA C. BITTER Senior Office Assistant City of Palm Desert, California 4 , , � �. AGENDA ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 9, 1994 ADDENDUM TO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AGENDA AUGUST 9, 1994 1 . CASE NO. : APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : CITY OF PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, . 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGNT: Review of elevations and landscape plans for remodel of 12 unit apartment complex LOCATION: 73-626 Santa Rosa Way ZONE: R-2 5 .0. 5 �r+ �` CITY OF PALM DESERT MEMORANDUM T0: ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FROM: PAUL SHILLCOCK, ACM/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: AUGUST 3 , 1994 SUBJECT: EL PASEO BUSINESS ASSOCIATION INPUT RE: AWNINGS As a result of the recent controversy surrounding an awning installed on El Paseo that differed in color from that approved by the ARC , the E1 Paseo Business Association was requested to provide input regarding color, materials , etc . for consideration. This discussion was completed at a subcommittee level and included information provided by planning department staff on the past determinations made by the ARC . If was the feeling of the subcommittee that the ARC has done an excellent job to date in regulating the colors allowed and they believe that this is reflected in attractive and appropriate awnings throughout the City and particularly on El Paseo . They did recommend two areas of special consideration when the ARC is reviewing awnings in the future . 1 . They request that high gloss material not be allowed on El Paseo . Regardless of the color chosen, they felt that a glossy material was inagpropriate . 2 . They request that special attention be paid to the coordination of the awning color with that of the building on wtiich it is to be placed. It is apparent that this has been a consideration in the past and encourage that attitude be conti�iued and receive special emphasis . Staff assured the members that the Association would be notified of any appeals of an ARC decision on El Paseo so that they can revie ie ' tuation and testify if necessary. PA L SHILLCOCK ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR /dlg