Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-01-08 � � � MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD TUESDAY - JANUARY 8, 1980 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. The meeting was called to order at 3:00 p.m. after a two and one-half hour study session. MEMBERS PRESENT: A1 Cook Rick Holden Eric Johnson Bernie Leung Charles Martin MEMBERS ABSENT: Vern Barton Phyllis Jackson STAFF PRESENT: Stan Sawa Murrel Crump It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Cook, that the minutes of December 27, 1979, be approved as written. II . Minute motion approving cases found acceptable at the study session� None. III . CASES Case No. 79 C (Amendment) - BOB SHERIFF, SIGNMAKER and C. G, DUNHAM - modification of sign program to allow larger sign for one tenant in commercial complex on the south side of E1 Paseo between Lupine Lane and Sun Lodge Lane; Countess Von Huellessem and husband were present. The Board reviewed the request as submitted by the Countess. The Countess stated that the lettering of the name would be too small to read. The Board suggested that the sign remain at 4'x10" with the letters being increased in size. The Countess agreed to ask that the signmaker design a new sign with larger letters. On a motion by Johnson, seconded by Martin, the Board denied this request. Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Johnson, Leung, Martin). Case No. 125 MF - KINGS POINT c/o LEO PAWLISA - approval of lighting for tennis courts located within project on the west side of Highway 74 between Willow Street and Shadow Mountain Drive; Leo Pawlisa was present. The Board reviewed the submitted lighting plan for the tennis courts, On a motion by Johnson, seconded by Cook, the Board approved this request. Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Johnson, Leung, Martin) . Case No. 188 MF (DP 09-79) - PACIFIC COAST BUILDERS and BALLEW-MCFARLAND - preliminary approval of site plan, landscaping plans, floor plans, and elevation plans for Phase I Residential Area and golf course at the north- east corner of Cook Street and Country Club Drive; Steve Fleshman was present. The Board reviewed the submitted exhibits for this project, Blowsand treatment and perimeter wall treatment was reviewed in the Phase I Area. Solar protection of the units was discussed for the various floor plans. The possibility of utilizing a trellis and wide overhangs for solar protection was discussed with solar protection being desirable on the south, east, and west. The model plans were reviewed in detail with suggestions being given to the applicant for roof treatment and provisions for a 20'x20" clear garage. The applicant stated that a pool would be placed in front of the model area in the future when converted to residences for sale. The landscaping list was reviewed with suggestions for revisions given to the applicant. Additionally, it was deemed desirable to provide the trees within the cul-de-sacs since the applicant indicated that the Fire Department agreed to their provision provided the hydrant was located near the open end of the street. The golf course plan was reviewed in detail with some ` ` M I N UTES ;�,. ,,,,�. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 8, 1980 Page -2- III. CASES (Continued) Case No. 188 MF (DP 09-79) (Continued) suggestions made for revision of trees. The size of the trees in the golf course area was reviewed, with it being stated that the sizes should be increased. The applicant indicated that presently the developers do not wish_ to provide any cart storage in the Phase T Area� Possibly in the future some cart storage will be provided within the units, On a motion by Johnson, seconded by Martin, the Board granted preliminary approval of the site plan, architectural plans, and landscaping plans for the Phase I Area, excluding the clubhouse building, subject to the following revisions : l. Utilize gable roof for connection between unit types Nos. 5 and 6. 2. On floor plan No. 6, adjacent to the family room, utilize columns with a trellis for solar screening. 3. On the east, west, and south, provide solar protection through the use of wide overhangs (three to four feet) and trellis structures; solar protection to be indicated on final working drawings. 4. Review atrium areas that receive large amounts of watere 5. Revise garage plans so that clear 20'x20' (with no encroachments) garage is provided for all units . 6. That landscaping changes be made as follows: a. Eliminate Phoenix Reclinata. b. Use 5chinus Terebinthifolius Ulnus Parvifolia (Drake) for street trees. c. Eliminate Cotinus Coggygria (not adaptable). d. Eliminate Chilopsis Linearis (do to fact that is deciduous and not a good dense structure). e. Delete Cercidium F�oridum and consider use of California Pepper (multi-stem) as alternate, f. Add multi-stem Cerayonia Siliqua for blowsand protection, g. Use Pinus Canariensis for street tree. h. Utilize the following trees within the golf course area: l. Pinus Canariensis 2. Fraxinus lldei Majestic Beauty and Modesto Ash 3. Prunus V "Krauteri" 4. Eucalyptus Microtheca 5. Ceratonia Siliqua 6. Schimus Molle' 7. Pinus Pinea 8. Pinus El�Jarica 7. Provide trees and other landscaping in cul-de-sacs as shown on prelimi- nary landscaping plan. Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Johnson, Leung, Martin) . Case No. 128 C (ADJ 20-79 - HENRY KOHLER and BOB PITCHFORD - preliminary approval of commercial building plans for building at 73-180 E1 Paseo; Bob Pitchford was present. The Board reviewed the submitted �lans for the commercial building on E1 Paseo. The Staff considerations in the report to the Board were discussed with No. 5 being deemed unnecessary. Mro Cook indicated that he would bring the matter of the door in the adjacent building to the attention of the Building Board of Appeals and Condemnation. MI NUTES '�"` `"'�` DESIGN REVIEW BOARD January 8, 1980 Page -3- III. CASES (Continued) Ca�e lVo. 128 C (ADJ 20-79) (Continued) Discussion regardinq a parking lot ensued with it being indicated that a recorded easement exists for the parking lot and adjacent properties surrounding it. Additionally, it was indicated that it is desirable to complete the paving at the rear of the lot even if it is on the adjacent property. However, the extent of such paving was an issue which was left unresolved. It was deemed desirable to provide some additional shrubs and ground cover planting areas at the front and rear of the building where feasible. On a motion by Johnson, seconded by Holden, the Board approved this request, subje�t to the following revisions : 1. On the final working drawings, show ad,jacent parking lot layouts, grades and extent of paving to insure compatibility with proposed construction. 2. Provide additional landscaping areas (shrubs and ground cover) at the front and rear of the building where feasible. 3. Use five gallon size Star Jasmine on beams at front and rear of building. 4. Approval of this request is subject to approval of an adjustment for parking. Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Johnson, Leung, Martin). Case No. 192 MF - DONALD L. BALCH - approval of preliminary and final plans for two duplex units on individual parcels on the west side of Monterey Avenue, approximately 70 feet north of Sonoraa the applicant was not present. Staff indicated that this item was continued from the last meeting., It was determined that an additional continuance to the meeting of January 29, 1980, was appropriate. Therefore, on a motion by Johnson, seconded by Cook, the Board moved to continue this item to January 29, 1980. Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Johnson, Leung, Marti.n� Case No. 73 C (Si n Proqram) - IRA JOHNSON, ARCHITECT - approval of sign program for new commercial complex on the north side of Highway 111 approximately 150 feet west of Portola Avenue; applicant was not present. The Board reviewed the amended sign program which had been preuiously reviewed at the meeting of December 27, 1979. Staff indicated that the applicant had wished to pursue the submitted sign program with the directory sign being reduced proportionately to a height of five feet, Discussion ensued regarding the directory sign and building name sign. On a motion by Cook, seconded by Johnson, the Board approued this request, subject to the following revisions : l. That the building name and address be placed on the front of the building with the name only at the rear of the building. 2. That a directory be allowed utilizing 3"x30" tenant signs; location of directory to be within the courtyard area further away from the street than presently proposed, Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Johnson, Leung, Martin), IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS - None. V. ADJOURNMENT - 4:22 p.m. �� STAN SAWA, Associate Planner