HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-09-09 vow
MINUTES
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING
TUESDAY - SEPTEMBER 9, 1980
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I. The meeting was called to order at 2:38 p.m. after a 12 hour study session.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rick Holden
Bernie Leung
Charles Martin
Eric Johnson
Phyllis Jackson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Vern Barton
Al Cook
STAFF PRESENT: Stan Sawa
Phil Drell
On a motion by Barton, seconded by Leung, the Board approved the minutes of
August 28, 1980, subject to revisions to Case Nos. 164 MF and 200 MF (Park
Design).
Carried 3-0-2 (Leung, Martin, Johnson, with Holden and Jackson Abstaining)
II. Minutes Motion approving cases found acceptable at the study session:
Case No. 151 MF (Time Extension) - TOM TROLLOPE - Six month extension on
approval of final plans for six unit residential project at northwest corner
of Tumbleweed Lane and Sage Lane.
On a motion by Martin, seconded by Holden, the Board moved to grant the
requested six month time extension.
Carried 5-0 (Holden, Leung, Martin, Johnson, & Jackson)
III. CASES
Case No. 129 C - GERALD J. CHAZAN and ROBERT RICCIARDI - Final approval for
plans for commercial building in new Safeway shopping center on the westerly
side of Palms to Pines Shopping Center between El Paseo and Highway 111; Tony
Araiza was present.
The Board reviewed the final working drawings submitted by the applicant. It
was noted that the pedestrian signs were not permitted in this situation and
sign above the roof line is also not permitted.
On a motion by Holden, seconded by Leung, the Board moved to grant approval
of final working drawings subject to the pedestrian sign and sign above the
roof being deleted.
Carried 4-0-1 (Holden, Leung, Martin, Jackson, with Johnson Abstaining) .
Case No. 497 SA - CROCKER BANK c/o COMMERCIAL SIGN AND LIGHTING, INC. -
Approval of business identification signs for Crocker Bank at 73-833 Highway
111; Sharon Washbrook was present.
The Board reviewed the submitted exhibits and indicated that they felt the
main sign facing Highway 111 was not acceptable. The Board felt that indivi-
dual letters, approx. 14" in height, was appropriate. The applicant stated
that the bank wished to use this sign because of the temporary nature of the
business at this location. The Board felt that the length of time in the
building makes no difference in the sign design.
On a motion by Leung, seconded by Martin, the Board moved to continue this
item in order for the applicant to submit a revised design for the sign facing
Highway 111, utilizing the following criteria:
1. Letters to be a maximum of 14" in height.
2. Colors and lighting type to be submitted.
Carried 5-0 (Holden, Leung, Martin, Johnson and Jackson) .
continued. . .
;ow Now
MINUTES
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING
SEPTEMBER 9, 1980 Page Two
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Case No 111 C - WELLS FARGO BANK c/o COMMERCIAL SIGN AND LIGHTING, INC. -
Approval of Logo on new Bank building at the southwest corner of Lantana Ave.
and El Paseo; Sharon Washbrook was present.
The applicant presented the actual logo which would be mounted in the stucco
wall on the west side of the structure, adjacent to the entry. It was noted
the logo size would be 1 sq.ft. with colors to be aluminum and black.
On a motion by Holden, seconded by Martin, the Board moved to grant approval
of this request.
Carried 5-0 (Holden, Leung, Martin, Johnson and Jackson).
Case No. 216 MF -SOUTHWESTERN ENTERPRISES, INC. and RONALD GREGORY - Approval
of perimeter wall and landscaping plan along Mesa View Drive for single family
subdivision on the east of Highway 74, south of Homestead Road; Ed Wright and
Ronald Gregory were present.
The applicants made a presentation explaining the landscaping concept. They
stated that a letter should be or will soon be submitted to Staff indicating
a desire to form a Homeowners Association to maintain the landscaping around
the perimeter. They also presented an adendum to the landscaping plan which
showed landscaping on the south side of Mesa View Drive, east of Prairie
Drive.
The Board indicated their concern regarding erosion of slope areas and in-filling
behind the garden walls. The applicant indicated that they would provide slope
planting and irrigation for any slope areas within the individual lots. They
felt that this was a condition of the tract, but also indicated that they would
provide it even if it was not a condition.
It was noted that the wall design would have to be reviewed by the Flood
Committee of the City.
Staff noted that if any significant changes are required to the perimeter
treatment that it would be returned to the Board for approval .
On a motion by Holden, seconded by Martin, the Board moved to grant approval
of this request, subject to the following revisions:
1. Planting at left-turn pockets to be reduced in height.
2. Slope protection of private lots shall be provided through planting and
permanent irrigation (to be approved by the Design Review Board) .
3. Prior to any work on the perimeter treatment commencing, Flood Committee
approval shall be obtained.
Carried 5-0 (Holden, Leung, Martin, Johnson, and Jackson) .
Case No. 178 MF - TRANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. - Revised preliminary approval
of 60 unit residential project at the northeast corner of Portola Avenue and
Magnesia Drive; Bill Lo was present.
The Board reviewed the exhibits submitted by the applicant. The Board felt
the submittal was incomplete in that it did not contain roof plans and sections
through the units. The Board noted a concern with regard to sun shading of
the window areas. The Board felt that a minimum of 6 to 8 feet is necessary
to provide pro er shading on the east and west elevations. An extensive
discussion folMed regarding energy concerns of the Board and the community
in general . It was noted that utility costs, especially electricity for
summer cooling is on the rise and, therefore, architectural design should
incorporate features to minimize energy usage.
With regard to window shading, it was noted that the original approval did
not require review until final working drawings are submitted. The Board
stated that an interim review would be advantageous to both the Board and the
applicant.
The relationship of the property line to the bank of the wash was discussed
continued. . .
• ;� tire``
MIN6TES
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING
SEPTEMBER 9, 1980 Page Three
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
along with the alignment problem along Magnesia Falls Drive.
The Board felt that the changes proposed by the applicant were acceptable.
On a motion by Holden, seconded by Johnson, the Board moved to grant revised
preliminary approval of this request.
Carried 5-0 (Holden, Leung, Martin, Johnson, and Jackson) .
IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS
Unity Church Worldwide - Exterior remodeling of building at 73-669 Highway 111;
Rick Holden was present. The Applicant presented plans for an exterior remodel-
ing and a small mechanical room addition for discussion. The Board presented
the applicant with some guidance.
V. ADJOURNMENT - 4:36 P.M.
STAN SAWA, Associate Planner
/lr