Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-09-23 'taw NW MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING TUESDAY - SEPTEMBER 23, 1980 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS *************************************************************************** I. The meeting was called to order at 2:30 p.m. after a 22 hour study session. MEMBERS PRESENT: Vern Barton Al Cook Rick Holden Bernie Leung Charles Martin Eric Johnson MEMBERS ABSENT: Phyllis Jackson STAFF PRESENT: Stan Sawa On a motion by Leung, seconded by Martin, the Board approved the minutes of September 9, 1980, subject to revisions to Case No. 178 MF. Carried 4-0-2 (Holden, Leung, Martin, Johnson, with Barton and Cook abstaining) . II. Minutes Motion approving cases found acceptable at the study session: Case No. 208 MF- DAVID HEUSINKVELD - Approval of final working draw- ings for carports and new open parking spaces at 73-415 Shadow Mountain Drive. This item was approved subject to the plans being noted that colors and materials will match existing buildings and that any landscaping being moved to facilitate construction, shall be relocated onto site. Case No. 210 MF- KAUFMAN &BROAD and BOB BUCCI - Approval of revised landscaping and site plan for 47 Unit Condominium Project on the north side of Hovley Lane, approximately 2,250 feet east of Monterey Avenue; Ed Yeager was present. This item was approved as submitted. Case No. 92 MF- VAN HEUISEN-WALTERS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY & WALLACE CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY- Approval of final landscaping plan for 56 Unit Condominium project, located approximately mid-way between Highway Ill and Candlewood Street, at the easterly end of Shadow Hills Road; Greg Van Heuisen was present. This item was approved with the requirement that 5 gallon Oleanders be provided at 5 feet on center on the north and south ends of the tennis court areas. On a motion by Holden, seconded by Cook, the Board moved to approve the above items as stipulated. Carried 6-0 (Barton, Cook, Holden, Leung, Martin, and Johnson) . III. CASES Case No. 159 MF- FRANK OLIVER- Approval of modification to final working drawings for pre-school under construction at the northwest corner of Alessandro drive and Cabrillo Avenue; applicant was not present. Staff presented the report, noting that the items requested previously have been submitted. The Board stated that they were disappointed that the applicant has not followed the approved plans from the begin- ning. The Board felt that the dormers could have been constructed as approved. They generally felt that it would be better to leave the Continues ✓ 'ter►'' MINUTES Page Two DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 23, 1980 dormers as is, rather than paint them. With regard to the landscaping they felt the plan as presented to them, would be acceptable provided that landscaping at the corner be low growing. Other items of concern were discussed including the following: 1 . The Conditional Use Permit requires that a parcel map be submitted, reviewed approved and recorded, eliminating the line between the two parcels prior to occupancy. 2. It was noted that the corner design of the wall does not comply with visibility requirements and must be modified prior to occupancy. 3. The wall on the easterly side of the driveway, must be reduced to a height of 2 feet 6 inches to 3 feet. 4. The curb cut must be relocated to line up with the new driveway. On a motion by Leung, seconded by Barton, the Board moved to approve the requested modifications to allow the dormers to remain as is, and to modify the landscaping plan, subject to all other items of discussion as noted above being complied with prior to final occupancy. Carried 5-0-1 (Barton, Cook, Holden, Leung, Johnson with Martin abstaining) . Case No. 120 C- ERNEST W. HAHN, INC. & MILLARD ARCHULETA ASSOC.- Approval of final working drawings for main Mall Building at the northwest corner of Monterey Avenue and State Highway 111 ; Larry Moline, Bob Ricciardi , Bill Lyle and Ray Gamble were present. The applicants presented exterior elevation plans, interior renderings and other plans indicating what the proposed project would look like. The seven staff concerns were reviewed individually by the Board and applicants. The applicant noted that the parking lot lighting is not included in this request. Therefore, this approval is not to include any parking lot lighting. The applicant indicated that the exterior slump- stone would be a putty or off-white color. Changes to the ceiling over the ice rink and clear story windows were discussed with the applicant explaining the reasons for such changes. It was noted that the exterior elevations shown to the Design Review Board had eliminated the mission tile for all the major department stores. The Board indicated that they felt that the concept of the elevations as submitted was not in keeping with the preliminary approval . They felt the Town Center concept was lost and being replaced with a shopping center which could be located in any urban area. The Board felt the mission tile usage provided a human scale to the project, and softened the impact on the community. Staff noted that if the applicant wishes to eliminate the mission tile on the shopping center, revised elevations will have to be submitted to the Planning Commission and City Council for approval . This is because the original architectural concept would be substantially modified. The applicant stated that they would review the situation and determine what architectural style would be utilized. The landscaping plans were reviewed with the Board indicating suggested changes including the use of deciduous trees in the North Plaza to provide additional openness and light during the winter. It was noted that the water element in the sunken front Plaza had been eliminated due to the subsequent modification to the driveway area in front of the plaza. Continues jr.r �✓ MINUTES Page Three DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 23, 1980 It was also noted that additional shade trees have been provided in order to make the area more usable on a year round basis. The Board also suggested that the applicant review the use of ground cover that could be detrimentally affected by the glare and heat which would reflect off the structure. The Board noted that they would like to review the revised landscaping plans prior to any approvals of the landscaping and irrigation plan. The applicant presented the air-conditioning plans and felt that any roof equipment would be adequately screened by the design of the structure. The applicant indicated that the roof equipment could be painted to match if necessary. Staff informed the applicant that he should contact Palm Desert Disposal so that a review of the trash pickup provisions could be initiated to insure that it will be acceptable to all parties involved. Mr. Martin stated that he would like to know how the applicant intends to save energy through the design of the center. Mr. Holden stated that he generally felt that some of the major design points which were submitted during preliminary approvals had been lost. Mr. Leung and Mr. Martin concurred with this feeling. Staff noted that certain changes are to be expected in refining the final working drawings. However, there reaches a point where the changes become substantial and could require Planning Commission and City Council review. On a motion by Martin, seconded by Barton, the Board approved the final working drawings (as subiiiitted) , excluding the landscaping plans. Carried 5-0-1 (Barton, Holden, Leung, H artin, Johnson, with Cook ab- staining) . Case No. 219 MF- WATT INDUSTRIES, PALM SPRINGS, INC.- Approval of preliminary plans for 128 Unit zero side yard, single family development between Parkview Drive and 44th. Avenue, east of the Palm Valley Storm Channel ; Betty Williams and Sam Kiyotoki were present. Ms. Williams made a presentation indicating the concept behind the project. She indicated that they were attempting to provide quality housing for the working class in price ranges from $103 to $113,000. The Board reviewed concerns they have with the project. Two of the major concerns pertain to shading of grass areas and setbacks for the garages. The Board felt that with the overhangs as provided, there would be insufficient overhangs provided in some areas.Additionally, because of the garage setbacks on the local streets there would be insufficient area for the cars. The Board felt that a minimum of 16 feet should be provided for driveways. The possibility of backing units zero sideyards together was discussed and deemed desirable by the Board. They felt that this would provide a better landscaping area along the street, more street parking, and a more varied streetscape.The Board also felt that at least some of the Units should be provided with a driveway setback of at least 16 feet. They suggested that Unit"C" be utilized on the deeper lots with Unit "A" used on the shorter lots. Continues MINUTES Page Four DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 23, 1980 The applicant indicated that the tennis courts would be recessed at least 3 feet. It was indicated to the Board that the perimeter walls on the streets would be stuccoed with a block wall provided around the balance of the site, painted to match the stuccoed walls. The applicant also indicated that they would re-study the entry from 44th. Avenue. On a motion by Martin, seconded by Holden, the Board moved to continue this item to the meeting of October 7, 1980, in order to allow the applicant to submit revised plans incorporating the discussion as noted above. Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Leung, Martin, Johnson, with Barton leaving during discussion of this item) . Case No. 100 C- DUNHAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY- Verbal request for approval of an amendment to the exterior elevations of the Commercial Complex under construction at the southwest corner of San Luis Rey Avenue and E1 Paseo; Gary Lohman was present. The applicant requested approval to remove the arches facing Highway 111 and provide an alternative architectural treatment. The Board felt the request as submitted was acceptable. On a motion by Holden, seconded by Leung, the Board moved to approve this request as submitted. Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Leung, Piartin, Johnson) . IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS: NONE V. ADJOURNMENT - 5:40 P.M. a�� sztl� STAN SAWA, Associate Planner SS/pa