HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-08-09 Aw 'Not
MINUTES
PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
TUESDAY - AUGUST 9, 1983
2:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER
I. The meeting was called to order at 2:10 P.M.
Members Present: Al Cook
Ron Gregory
Charles Martin
Members Absent: Rick Holden
Bernie Leung
Staff Present: Stan Sawa
Steve Smith
Patricia Armitage
On a motion by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Chairman Gregory, the minutes of
the July 26, 1983, meeting were approved as written.
Motion carried unanimously 3-0.
II. Minute motion approving cases found acceptable at the study session.
None
III. CASES:
A. Final Drawings:
1. CASE NO: 189 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MR. WILL MENDELL, 38-899 Island Drive,
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 and STEVEN H. SULLIVAN, A.I.A., P.O. Box 398,
Palm Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for
an addition to an existing building, new parking area, landscaping and trash
area.
LOCATION: North side Frontage Road east of Portola
ZONE: C-1, S.P.
Mr. Smith indicated that the preliminary plans for an addition to the
existing building were approved by the commission at its meeting of July 12,
1983. The final plans and landscape plans were acceptable to staff;
therefore, it would recommend approval.
The commission's only concern was that the proposed awnings facing toward
Alessandro be properly maintained.
Mr. Steven H. Sullivan, architect for this project, was present and agreed.
He did not feel the owner or the tenant would want the awnings to
deteriorate.
On a motion by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Martin, the
final plans were approved.
Motion carried unanimously 3-0.
- 1 -
`W01
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 9, 1983
B. Preliminary Plans:
1. CASE NO: 191 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): JAMES E. RODGERS, 17802 Sky Park
Circle, Ste. 104, Irvine, CA 92714 and PATRICK A. SHEEHY, ARCHITECT,
74-215 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of
plans to construct two 2 multitenant industrial buildings.
LOCATION: East side of Boardwalk Street opposite end of St. James Place
Cook Street Business Center).
ZONE: S.I., S.P.
Mr. Smith stated that this application was a request for preliminary
approval of two multitenant industrial buildings in the Cook Street Business
Center, both buildings would have the same elevations. A precise plan
application will be undergoing review by the planning commission at which
time the parking, circulation and other matters will be reviewed.
The commissioners indicated the building was acceptable aesthetically and
found no problem with the elevations but felt that the planning commission
should be apprised of their concerns regarding parking and circulation for
the building. They recommended that the driveway between the buildings be
set back from the rear of the front building and adequate protection should
be installed to protect the buildings from cars and trucks parking and
backing into the spaces. Other concerns were that there was not not enough
room for trucks to unload and load without creating a circulation problem
and that the plans should be changed to reflect the grade change at the rear
of the building.
A representative of Patrick A. Sheehy Architects indicated that the parking
lot layout was no different from the parking lots of other buildings on Joni
Drive. Tenants requiring loading and unloading of trucks will be assigned to
the units in the rear of the building where more loading space is provided.
Commissioner Cook stated that the buildings on Joni Drive were in the
County. He was skeptical that the uses in the front building would not
require loading and unloading from the driveway.
Commissioner Cook asked if a study had been made to see if the access
areas could be in a central court.
The representative replied that if they had a central court, they would have
ingress and egress problems.
On a motion by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Martin,
preliminary approval was granted subject to staff apprising the planning
commission of the commission's concerns at the time of precise plan
submission and the following two conditions as listed in the staff report:
1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the city fire
marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall
be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy
shall be issued until completed.
- 2 -
*40#
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 9, 1983
CASE NO. 191 C (CONTINUED):
2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading,
lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and
sign program shall be submitted to the architectural commission. No final
inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of
environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved
plans and construction shall have been completed.
Motion carried unanimously 3-0.
IV. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS:
1. CASE NO: 90 C (TIME EXTENSION)
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): JANICE SCHOEN, P.O. Box 465, Palm Springs,
CA 92262 and BERNIE LEUNG, ARCHITECT, 73-960 El Paseo, Suite 4, Palm
Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: One year time extension for a
commercial complex.
LOCATION: South side of El Paseo, approximately midway between Sage Lane
and Ocotillo Drive.
ZONE: C-1
Mr. Smith indicated that this was the third extension of time for the commercial
complex. He reminded the commission that it had denied the time extension at
its meeting of September 14, 1982, due to the possible incompatibility with
existing developments; new membership of the board and solar energy concerns.
The applicant appealed the commission's decision at the meeting of September
28, 1982, at which time an extensive discussion ensued. The time extension was
approved subject to a landscape plan being submitted and approved by the board
prior to the building being built.
Commissioners Cook and Martin (who had not been present at the meeting of
September 28, 1982, when the denial was appealed and then approved), indicated
that there were far more restrictions imposed on builders within the last five
years and the design should be reconsidered.
Mr. Sawa stated that Mrs. Schoen had indicated in her letter that it will be built
this year, the project is out to bid and they are presently trying to secure
financing.
On a motion by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Martin, the time
extension was granted subject to the submission of final working drawings for
reapproval prior to submission to the building department and subject to all
previously imposed conditions.
Motion carried unanimously 3-0.
2. CASE NO: 144 MF (AMENDMENT)
APPLICANT: LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, 45-701 Monroe, Indio, CA 92201
NATURE OF PROJECT: Final approval of landscape plans.
LOCATION: Krug and Masson Street (Southwest corner of Portola and Rutledge
Way.
ZONE: R-1
- 3 -
r *NOVI
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 9, 1983
CASE NO. 144 MF (AMENDMENT) (CONTINUED):
The commission reviewed the landscape plans for this project and felt they were
acceptable.
On a motion by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Martin, the
landscaping plans were approved.
Motion carried 2-0-1 (Chairman Gregory abstained).
V. DISCUSSION ITEMS:
Commissioner Cook was concerned that staff was not upholding sign programs
approved by the commission. The new Fish N'Chips store at the Straw Hat Pizza
building was mentioned as an example. The signs are not only in different places but
also different sizes.
Mr. Smith indicated that in the case of the Fish N'Chips signs, there were new faces
installed in the sign cans of the former tenant, Chandra's. The sizes and location of
the signs are identical to the Chandra signs which were approved by the board in
1982.
Mr. Sandy Baum, realtor, said the signs were placed prior to the sign ordinance being
changed. He felt the commission should take into consideration the users point of
view of the need for visibility, this should be weighed along with the architectural
standpoint.
V I.. ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 3:15.
ya"n��
ST SMITH, Associate Planner
/pa
- 4 -