The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1986-03-11 � � hl I NUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL CQMMISSION TUESDAY - MARCH ll, 1986 2:00 P.M. COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE * � � � * �« � � . � � .� * � * � * � * � ,� � # � * » � * � � ;� ,� � � � � «. � � I . 7he rneeting was called to order at 2:UtJ pm after a ��ne hour stuciy �ession. �;�mm;ss i on Members C�arrent Meet i nc� Year to C�ate �� Present. Absent Pres�nt. � A,bsert. Ron Gregory, (:h�irman X � � A I G��l� X -� I M�ry Ur��>-y x 3 ? Cr�ar� i e Mart i n x 5 C Russell MrCrea X 5 �� Rick Holden. A1t.errratF X � � `�taff PrPs�nt.: h.�y D i az �>t.eve �mith Phil Joy Phil Drel { K:en We 1 i ei� Donna Gamez I t was mov�d hv Cammi ss i an�r M�rt i r„ secc�ndr�d ry r;ommi C�=i or�Pr Mr.CrQa t�� app�'��e the rninutes �f F�bruary 25, 198h as written. C;�rried 3-U Il . Moved by Commissioner McCrea, secon+ded by Cam►issioner Nfartin to approve the foliowing cases by minute motion. Carried 3-0 1. GASE N0: illr> 5A AFPL I CANT (AND ADDRESS) ; DAV I C1 & fiAF�L�AkA L I NDER< P.U. Br�x E>_34. R�nr_ht� Mir�3cae, CA 9227C1. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL 50UGHT: Ap�roval nf awn�nt� with sign�,��e. IOCATIQN: 73-t7� �I P�seo ZONE: C- 1 S.P. 2. CASE N�D: 293 C: APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : F .E . DUMS/E.E.D. GEVE:LC)PMEf�il� C:C!MPA,NY, 25�41 i�'�sa r�e Al icia, �uite �tJtJ. l_r�g�na Hi 1 ks. ��A �2F>`�3. � � MINllTES ARCHITEGTURAL COMMISSION MARCH 11, 1986 NATIlRE OF PROJEC7IAPPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approvai af two office/ind�astrial buildings h�vina a combined totr�i floor c�rea �t 26,�70 square fieet. LOCATION: �outhwest corner Baardwalk and Mediterranean �venue. ZONE: 5ervice 3ndustrial Subject to landsc.ape plan being appr�ved prior to buildiny F�ermit i ssi�anre. 3. CASE N0: 29�J C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GUY EVANS, 83-777 Avenue 45, Indio. CA 92201 ; JONN GREGORY ASSOCIATES, 72-6�1 Spyglass, Paim Desert. CA {j2260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVA� SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans f�r a 20,U00 square fr�ot cff i ce/waret�Quse cam�al ex, L�ATION: Northe3st corner c�f Corporate Way and Lennnn Place. ZONE: �. I . 5ubject to approval of landscape plan whi �h includ�s existing landsca�inq and a block wall being installer� �t thP nort.h prnpert�� line. 4. CASE N0: 7y� MF APPIICANT (AND ADDRESS): ATLANTIS Ct7NSTRUCTIUN, �'.��. @ax �t3�;-�?, Palm Desert. CA `3226U. NATURE OF PRfJJECT/APPROVA� SOUGHT: Pr�liminary approval of 1(�� partm�rtt. un i ts. LOCATION: �red Waring [)rive west of S�n FaScual . ZONE: R--3 Subj�ct t.c� the addition of soiar proter_tion on the west �ar.ing second story windr�ws. 2 �' � MINUTES ARCHITECT�RAL COMMISSI�N MARCH 11, 19$6 [It. CASES: A. Final Drawings: 1. CASE N0: M i rlo!' Construct i on APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : Mk. & MRS. FAhRELL, 73--012 ��kyw�rd, P:3lm UPsert. CA 9226U. MATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL 50UGHT: To install raisr�d wood dec.k. LOCATION: 73-U12 �i�Yward zon��: �-� hir. D i az i nd i cat�ci that st�fif suggests that ti�e aPP� �car�t gei'. approv�i f��om the ��jacen�t property owners that are affected. Mr . Dc�ug f�i chards stated that the reaCon fc�r want i nc� the deck ra i�c��l was for tr�� v i?w. He not.ed that th� owner oF the �roperty to t.he rear was out of �tat�� and would k�e difificult to reach. t:ommissianQr Martin agreed with Mr. Diaz and indicatecJ that plannin+� c�mmission has been known t� incfude the r�nters a�provai in a situ�tion ? ike this. Ne s��c�gested that the anplicant take sc�m� photos and al�� measur� the difference between the two lots. Chairman Gregar�° thought. t.hat the� should have a lin� �fi sictht r�raw i na. Mov�d b� Commissioner McCre�:�. seconded kay Commi��aioner Mart.in ta continu� this case to allow for additional information. C�rried 3-C7 2. CA5E NO: 1117 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : HERTZ CORPORA1�fON, bv Im�aeri�l 5ian CompanY. �6-1��1 Ca 1 houn �>fir�et, I nd i o, C:A `�2201 . NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: ApProval of aclditi��nal s7gnage f�r° Hert�z Corporat i on, LQCATION: East side of E! P�sec�. ZONE: PC {3) i � � MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION MARGH il, 1986 Mr. 5m�th indicated that in 19t33 commission approv�d the American (:;��r Wash s i gn w i th the cond i t i on that they rpnur;e t.h� s i ze to 4' X 9` . -1`he prc�poseci s i gn does not appear to he i ntegrr�ted wi th the car wGish s i qn. Mr. Bill Bird expl�ined tt��t. they are � smali business trying to get some tvpe of identity t� iet p�op7e know where they are l�cat�d. He indicated that he was wii 'ling to work with thE corrzmissiun t� find a sign that would be a�prc�priate. He ques� ioned the use of � fr�estand i n�.� s i gn. Cha i rman Greqory r n��i i cated that i t wc�u 1 d bp appropr'i ate tc� hav� � ,i�i nt s i qn w i th the car wash. 7he same can cou 1 d be us�ci ,i ust t.he face wauld have to be changed. He fieit that the �ign as �ropased i��ks likt its just stuck on the tc�p of ,�nother sign. Commissioner Martin didn't have a problem with Hertz h�ving a siqn as long as it was designed correctly. The space for a free�tandin� sicrn has been utilized. Comm i ss i oner McCrea suggested that the Nertz s i gn be 1 ocat�d at tr�c bottom of the car wash siqn. Mav�d by C.ommissioner McCrea, seconded by Cc�mmissioner Martin t� refer this case t�ack to the anplicant fc�r restudY. Carried 3-� B. Preliminar� Plans: ! . CASE N0: 2��7 C APPLICANT (ANO ADDRESS) : D 8 D QFVELOPMENT CC�7MF'ANY, 711 E. Irnperial H�ghwayT S�aite 20t1, Brea, CA 92621 ; CRAIG GOM!�5 A�50CIAfES, 1535 Manr�vi�� Avenue. Newport Beach, CA y1663. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPRQVAL SOIIGHT: Preliminary review of arcr�iter_ture for a 2�'.8 r�om hotel with ancillary u�>�s. LOCATION: So«theast carner ot Highway lli and �arkview C)rive. ZONE: !�C-4 Mr. Cra i g Combs, arch i te.r.t, �xp 1 a i ned th� prc�j ecfi anc� i nd i c�ted '�h<jt the re�r t�wer was to be i+�w+-?red because of the heiaht limit. 4 �w` `� MIMUTES ARCHTTECTURA� COMMISSION MARCH 11, 1986 Commissioner Mar�tin st�ted that he liked the different level towers and haped that the applicant woulc! go to city c�uncil for apprav�i �f the ��lans as drawn. He a1s�a liked th� sty1P of the praject. MT-. t�ombs indicated that th� r�oors to the rooms w�r� reces�ed in 1F3' . Commis5ioner Martin questioned the problem with th� mx�id carts that would be s�en. Mr. Combs indic�ted that thev would remain in the receas and not be seen. The landsc�pe archi�ec•t proceeded to ex�lain the landscape �ian and i ndi cated t.hat there wou id be water feature:� thrc�ughout the pr�.�ject. with severai grade chang�s. C:1-�:�irman Gregary suggested that a pl�nting m�teriai that wouid casca�e over the sicie af the n�rth wall shauld �e pfanted. Commissioner Martin advised that thF roof mounted ��uipment. wii ! neFd to be �c�equat.a1y scrPener_i. It was moved by Commissioner McCrea, secon�ied by Commissioner Martin td� qrant ��rplimin�rY approval . ��rrSed 3-Q 2. CASE N0: 2�6 MF APPIICANT (AND ADDRESS) : AL VANl1EF�VELI7EN< 430U E. l� P.�I ma. An�he i m, t;A. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: I'reliminary a�provai c�f r�n 8 �.�n4t �partment compl�v. LOCATION: N�rthwest cornPr Qf Shar�aw !-iills and Oriftwood Drive. ZQNE: k-:� Mr. 5mith inr_1ic�ted that commission had referred this k�ack tc� the appficant for restudy af solar pr�tectinn 3nd ��niformity af elevafii�ns and detailing incnnsistenr_ies. Commissioner Msrtin f?lt that mansard tile roofs were inappropt-i�t� fc�r th i s bu i 1�1 i nc� and that he st i 1 ) saw no so I ar �r��t�c,t i or�. H� tnc�u�ht th<�t n�thina had changed since �he last su�amittal , Chairman Gregory �elt that the landsca�e plan was accept�hie ff�r preliminary apprc�v�l only. � K � �' � MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSI�! MARCN 11, 1986 Moved by C�mrnissioner Martin, seconded by Cc�mmissioner McCrea to .r,ontinue this item far restudy of architecture. sGlar prot.ection anc� deletian of tile mans��rd r�of. Carried 3-0 IV. DISCUSSIQN ITEMS: 1. CASE N0: 296 C APPL I CANT (AND ADDRESS) : L7ESER7 C I T f E� E3AP�f I 5T C;NURCN, P,0. Bt�x 2215, �alm Desert, CA 922F�1 . NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT. Preliminary approval ��t= c-hurch farilities. LOCATION: Fast side of Portala, nc�rth af Country C.lub. ZONE: PK-5 Cc�mmissianer Martin felt that this building did nat. �ppear ta �e �:3 church and that there should be some redesi�n. The ap�lic�nt indicated �hat this building was temparary and would k�e useci for apprc�x i mate I y three to t=i ve years. Chairman Gregory sugcaested that a gQad lan�sc�pe F�1an �e prepare�d. Commission�r Martin thought th�t t.here should he lush gr�wth arounc_i the temporary building. Applir_ant submitted photos of the propose� building and indic�teci that once their sanctuar_y was �uilt the temp�.�r�ry would t�e rPmoved. Mr. Weller nc�ted that the tem�arary huilding has to be hancfi .r..ap acc:essi�ile and advised the apr�licant to speak with the truildinc� department for further inform�tion. it was movPd b.y Commissioner Martin, seconded t�y Commissioner McCrPa to continue this case with t.he recommendation to seek professional assistance with ,� landsrape p1an. �;arried 3-0 V. ADJOURNMENT: The mePting was adia�rned at �: 15 p.m. STEVE SM17H, Associate Pianner /�iq ��