HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-02-09 � �
MLNIlPFS
PAIM D�T �NNIISSICN
Z[)ESOAY - �RY 9, 1988
1:00 P.M. CX1�T�IH�IITY S�VICES �IIiII� �Z
73-510 F12ID WARIlVG DRIVE
� * � * * �r �r * �c �t � * �t � * � �r * �t �t � �c � �r � �c �r � * �t * * * �c �r � � � *
I. The meeting was called to order at 1:00 pm after a ane haur study session.
Canttission Me�nbers Glarrent Meeting Year to Date
Present Absent Present Absent
Ron Gregozy, Chairman X 2 1
A1 C.00k, Alternate X 2 1
Ma�Y DrurY X 3 0
Russell McG'Y�ea X 2 1
Rick Holden X 3 0
Steve Sullivan X 3 0
Others Present: Ray Diaz
Steve Smith
Catherine Sass
Phil Drell
Ken Weller
Donna Gomez
It was moved by Cam►.issioner Cook, seconded by Camtissioner Drury to
apprave the minutes of January 12, 1988 as written. Carried 4-0-1
(Caimissioner McGYea abstainin�r).
II. Moved by t7mm�;�;nnPr (�,1c, seoa�ded bY ��Y � aPP�
'�lL f011OFT1I]J Ca.92S by m7�1� mUt.i.O[l. (�C1imiSSio[]�r SulliVall ah4t-ai ni r�r
ori Case No. PP 87-14).
1. (�SE ND: 1412 SA
APPLICANP (AI�ID ADDRESS): A1�IDREINO'S, 73-098 Highway 111, Palm
Desert, CA 92260.
I�Z[7RE OF P1�J�G'T/APPROR7AI. �P: Approval of awning and exterior
modifications.
IACATIO�T: 73-098 Highway 111
Z.U[dE' C-1 S.P.
Appraval subject to the color of the canvas awning to be same color
as Cedar Creek Inn awning with white lettering to read "Andreino's"
only. Lettering to be stitched into the awning and backlit.
� �
�
ARQ�TE7CIURAL �SSI�i
F�R[]At�Y 9, 1988
2. C�SE I�U' PP 87-14
APPLICANP (AI�ID AI�RESS): RAY-AL IIV'PERPRISES INC., 73-170 Ra[tr�n
Road, Tt�usand Pa]ms, CA 92276.
I��IRE OF PROr7DGT/APPI�JVAL 9Q�IP: Nbdification of windaw frame
color for office building under aonstruction.
I+OC�TIo[�i: North side FY�ed Waring Drive west of Nbnterey Avenue.
7.0[�• O.P.
3. CASE 1�• PP 87-21
APPLIC�I�P (ArID ADDRFSS): JAQC TIANO,
1�ZURE OF PRC?J�C,T/APPROVAL SO[�1T: Final plan approval.
L0C�1TI(�I: Northeast side of St. James Place.
7��'
Approval subject to landscape plan being reviewed at the next
meetirig.
4. C�SE 1�A- PP 87-36
APPLIC,AI� (ArID A�RFSS): N�. RIC��ARD OLIPHANT, 77-900 Avenue of
the States, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
NATURL OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of
architecture and landscape plans.
I�OC'ATIo[�t: 74-200 Highway 111, east of Cabrillo Avenue.
7�• C-1 S.P.
5. CASE Nl�: TT 22111
APPLICAN'P (AI�D AD�RFSS): BIR'I'C'�1II2 MESA VIETni, 73-080 El Paseo,
Suite 101, Palm Desert, CA 92260. Valley, CA 92256.
2
�r' �r+
�
ARQ�T�CIURAi� �T�SSI�i
F�R[�RY 9, 1988
1�1ZUftE OF PROJ�C,T/APP�L SOtJQiT: Conceptual approval of per�meter
landscape plans.
I�OCATIo[�I: 38.59 acre tract at the southeast corner of Alamo Drive
and Mesa View.
7�• PR-3
6. (�,SE N0: PP 87-7
A�LIC�NP (AI� ADDRF�S): CT-1ARLES MARTIN, 40-840 Thunderbird Road,
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270; LAUREL, DEVEL�OPN�NT C�O., 2323 S.E. Main
Street, Izvine, CA 92714.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of
architecture for 5280 square foot building expansion at RB Flzrniture.
I�OCATIoI�i: 72-115 Highway 111 at Rancho Drive.
Zal�: C-1
III. (�SFS:
A. F`inal n*'�*�G:
1. CASE NO• PP 87-1
APP'LIC�NP (AI�D ADD�,S): MAFtRIO'IT'S DESII2T SPRINGS RESORT, 74-555
Country Club Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF P1�7FX.T/APPi�TAL SOUC��P: Final approval of per�meter
landscape plans.
LOCATION: 158 acres bounded by Cook Street, Havley Lane and
Portola Avenue, directly south of the existing Marriott develognent.
7A1�• PR-4 0.S.
It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Cam�issioner
Sullivan to c�ntinue this case. Carried 5-0
3
�wr �+
MIN�PFS
ARQiIT�CIUIt�1L �T�IISSI�i
FF�RLlARY 9, 1988
2. (�SE ND: 1424 SA
APPLICANP (ArID AD�S): IN�ERIAL SIQV QONIPANY, 46-120 Calhoun
Street, Indio, CA 92201/JOHN OUTCAULT, 74-133 E1 Paseo, Palm
Desert, CA 92260.
I�IZURE OF Pl�JFX,'T/APP'RC7VAL SOUC�iT: Approval of center sign program.
I+OC�TIO[J: Sauthcaest corner Highway 111 and Painters Path.
7��- Gl
Mr. Smith explained that upon reviewing the original planning
camtissian appraval for this project, it was noted that a condi.tion
of appraval was that at least 5,000 square feet of the first floor
would have to be occupied by a furniture store. This would then
limit the amount of signage needed on the first floor.
Mr. �tcault indicated that they had already leased 3,000 square
feet an the first floor to a funziture business. He n�ted there is
just under 12,000 square feet on the first floor. He prc�vided an
alternate sign program if the c�tission was not in favor of their
first choice.
Catmissioner Druzy asked if it would be possible for them to place
the signs on the stucco face of the building which seem.s to stand out
m�re than any other location.
CaYmissioner Holden noted that when the ccnmission reviews signs they
look to see haw the sign ties in with the architecture of the
building. He ind.icated they have put these large windaws in and riaa
want to hang signs clo�wn in front of th�n which the backs w�ould be
visible fran inside the store. He rx�ted that if the signs were the
same size and placed on the stucco area of the builduzg he w�uld
approve it naw.
Caimission felt the mont.nnent sign was acceptable as su�cni.tted.
It was moved by Camtissianer Drury, seconded by Caimissioner Cook to
approve the montmlent sign and give staff authorization to approve
the wall signs if placed on the plaster face of the building.
Carried 5-0.
4
� �
NII1�AfI�S
ARC��TFX;It7itAL QLM�IISSI�i
F�RY 9, 1988
3. C�1SE Nl�• 1416 SA
APPLIC�NP (AI�ID ADDRFSS): C�T'S APPLIANC�, 73-540 Highway 111,
Palm Desert, CA 92260.
I�12URE OF PROJF]C,T/APPRaVAL SO[]QiT: Approval of awning with signage.
I�OCATI�i: 73-540 Highway 111
7�• C-1
The representative explained the proposal and rLoted there would be
no lighting.
Gannissioner Cook indicated he rather see the awning continue to the
end.s of the building and wrap around the sides to the brick area.
He asked if the corners of the awn.ing would be stitched. The
applicant indicated they would be stitched.
It was maved by Caimissioner Drury, seconded by Catmissioner Sullivan
to apprave the awning subject to the follawing conditions:
1. Awning to extend the full lengtli of the building excluding the
break at the masonzy portion of the buildixig.
2. The ends to retuYn to the fascia at the masonry wall.
3. The awning/sign to wrap around all six sides.
4. Lettering to begin or end 10 feet fran the masonry point.
5. Letters to be no greater than 12".
6. The bottan of the awning to be flush with the fascia.
7. Amana sign to be removed.
Carried 5-0
4. C�1SE NO' 1417 SA
APPLIC�NP (AI�D ADDRFSS): N�niPORTER TRAVEL, 73-160 E1 Paseo, Palm
Desert, CA 92260.
1�12[7RE OF PR0.7flGT/APPROVAL SC7I]GHT: Approval of awning with signage.
5
�r �r*
NLLNUPF�
ARCHITE�[hZAL C�T�SSI�i
F�R[?ARY 9, 1988
IAC�TI�I: 73-160 E1 Paseo.
ZO[�' Gl
Catmissianer Drury noted that the catmission, at the previous review
of this case, had only asked that the awning be broken up.
The applicant felt the awning looked s��oother as ane piece. He noted
that they are two separate businesses awned by the same person.
Commissioner Holden indicated the camu.ssion likes to review the
exact graphics to be placed an the awr�ing and suggested that drawings
detailing the graphics to scale be pravided.
Catmissioner McCrea suggested that "Palm Springs Reservations" add
Inc. after their name to clarify that they are a business.
It was maved by Cattnissioner Drury, seconded by Camiissioner Sullivan
to return this case to the applicant for restudy. Carried 5-0
5. CASE NO• PP 87-29
APPLIC�NP (ArID AD�.S): DOVELArID DEVEL�OPN�V'!', 135 Columbia Drive,
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270.
I�ZURE OF PR�7E7CP/APP�L SO[]C�1T: Appraval of ch�nge to approv�d
plans.
I,OCATI�T: South side E1 Paseo, approx. 180' east of San Luis Rey.
7�• C-1
CamLissiari reviewed the proposed deletion of the planters and sare
members felt that replacing them with potted plants would be
acceptable.
It was maved by Calmissioner McGYea, seconded by Comnissioner Cook
to grant approval. C,arried 3-1-1 (Commissioner Drury opposed,
Catmissioner Sullivan abstaining).
6. (�1SE N0: 288 C
APPLICANP (A� AD�RFS.S): STANLEY B'S C/o IN�ERIAL SIQVS OONIl�ANY,
46-120 Calhoun Street, Indio, CA 92201.
6
�w �.
NiLlVtti'FS
ARQIITF7CIUI2AL C�M�IISSI�i
F�RY 9, 1988
I�R�IRE OF P1�Ca7�C,T/APPROV'AL SO[X�-1T: Approval of manwnent sign.
IAQ�TIo[�t- 73-101 Highway
ZOI�• Gl
The applicant explained the proposal and pres�nted pictures stx7wing
a model of haw the proposed sign w�uld sit on the site. He i.ndicated
it was rather high and said he aould delete the pedestal which is
2-1/2 feet in height.
Cannissioner McC;rea suggested that a sirigle sign be used and felt
that the sign w�ould be too tall even with�ut the pedestal.
Catmissioner Sullivan li.ked the pedestal and suggested that the sign
be parallel with Highway 111 which would make it visible.
CaTmissioner Cook noted that it would be visible fran both sides of
the building if it were one sign placed parallel to Highway 111. He
felt the "V" concept was unnecessazy.
It was maved by Cam�.issioner Holden, seconded by Comm.issioner Cook
to give staff authorizatian to approve the proposed sign if the
applicant pravides a c3r�uble-faced, single plane sign scaled claum.
Carried 5-0
7. (�1SE ND: PP/GUP 86-50
APPLICANP (AI�ID ADDRFSS): R.C. ROBII2TS,
I�ZURE OF PR�7�C,T/APP1�C'1VAL SOUC�: Final landscape plans for 426
unit mobil hane/RV park.
I+OC;�TI�T: North side Frank Sinatra Drive at end of Del Safari Dr.
7�• R-1-M
It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Caim.issioner
Sullivan to oo�tinue this case. Carried 5-0
B. PI�2liminans Pl�:
1. C�SE NCJ: 306 C
APPLICANT (AAID ADDRESS): ONE ELEVEN TOWN CENTER/JOHN ASH
ASSOCIA'PFS, Jonathan Ochshorn, 3600 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 420, Los
Angeles, CA 90010.
7
� �
�
ARCHITE�I[JRAL �T�IISSI�T
�RY 9, 1988
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of
satellite building on Pad 7.
I�OCATIOI�i: Highway 111 and Ta�m Center Way.
7.�VVE• PC 3 S.P.
Camussioner Sullivan n�ted that the applicant had ra:i.sed the taaer
and pulled it out by 6" and he felt that this was riot eryough.
CaYmissioner DruYy felt the east elevation looked less c�7wded and
felt it improved the appearance of that elevation.
N�. Smith noted they had added 3-4 pepper trees on the east elevatio�
to provide additional screenir�g of that elevatian.
Cannissioner Cook felt that bougainvillaea may be an option so that
it can gzr�w up the building walls.
Commissioner Holden felt this plan was adequate for prel�minary
appraval but suggested that additi�al trees be added to the east
elevati� and the tawer be extended to 18" for final submittal. He
felt the heights of the taaers should be brought up slightly as
stxx�m in the first su�nittal.
It was maved by Camtissioner Holden, seconded by CormLissioner Cook
to grant prel�m�na� approval subject to the follawing conditions:
1. Slightly raising and extending to 18" the rear tawers.
2. Restudy the east elevation and parkway landscaping.
Carried 5-0
IV. NIISCC�LAI�IDO[1S:
CaYmissioner Holden explained that the building being ooa�structed adjacent
to his existing building is requesting a charige in the roof material to
Suncrete grey/blue. He asked if the cannission had ariy concerns with the
Proposed ch�"uxJe.
CamLission indicated they had no objection to the change in roof material.
8
�rrr' �,
NIITATl'FS
ARCfIITF)CIURAL �T�SSI�I
F�R[]ARY 9, 1988
V. ORAL �NM)NI(�TI�LS:
None
VI. .
The meeting was adjourned at 2:30 p.m.
� j_ �
�l�-�-�_.. f
STEV� SMITH, Associ Pl
/�9
9