HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-02-23 � �
NICIV[�FS
PAIM DF�SIIZT QI�MISSIQ�i
ZLtESL1AY - F�,RY 23, 1988
1:00 P.M. �IITY S�TICES �E FiOQ�4
73-510 F1ZID WARIIVG DRIVE
� � �e * * �r � �e � * �c � * � �r * * � * �e �r * * �e * �c * �r * �c �c � * �c * � * �c �e
I. The meeting was called to order at 1:00 gn after a one hour study session.
Catmission Members Glazrent Meeting Year to Date
Present Absent Present Absent
Ron Gregory, Chai.zman X 3 1
A1 Cook, Alternate X 2 2
Mary Druzy X 4 0
Russell McCrea X 3 1
Rick Holden X 4 0
Steve Sullivan X 4 0
Others Present: Steve Smith
Phil Drell
Donna t'�omez
F`rankie Riddle
It was moved by Calmissioner Sullivan, seconded by Comnissioner Drury to
approve the minutes of February 9, 1988 as written. Carried 4-0-1
(Catm.issioner Gregozy abstaining).
II. N�VUPE NX7PI�i C�SFS:
I�10rIE
III. CASFS:
A. Final Drataings:
1. C�1SE 1�U: 1417 SA
APPLICANP (AI�ID ADDRFSS): NEW�ORTER TRAVEL, 73-160 El Paseo, Palm
Desert, CA 92260.
1�7.URE OF PROJ�GT/APPRaVAL SOUC�iT: Approval of awning with signage.
LOCATIOrT: 73-160 E1 Paseo.
7.0[�• C-1
� �
NIIIVIIPF�
ARCHITF7CI[JRAL Q'�MISSI�i
�R�RY 23, 1988
Commissioner Druzy was concerned about the awning going the full
width of the building, and too many signs (total of 3) being located
in a small area. She asked what w�uld happen if new businesses in
the back came to the CaYmission for sign appraval and there was no
space for the signs. It was noted that the back offices are not
entitled to signage space, only the ones fronting E1 Paseo, these
offices pay higher rent for the frontage space.
Mr. Smith reported that the anly way the back offices could obtain
sign space was if the awner/manager reserved sign space.
Mr. Smith suggested that the awner install a 3 square foot pedestrian
sign at a 90 degree arigle.
It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by CaTmissioner
McCrea to apprave the sign with the follawing changes:
1. 'I'hat "Palm Springs Reservation Inc." be centered over the east
section of the building (approximately 6 feet fran the corner).
2. That the address may be printed in the middle.
3. That the logo may be added to the Newporter Travel portion of
the sign.
Carried 5-0
2. C?�SE rA: PP/GUP 86-50
APPLIC�NP (At� ADDRFSS): R.C. ROBERTS, 801 A Stxeet, San Rafael,
CA 92901.
1�12URE OF PROJ�C,T/APP�L SOUC3iP: Final landscape plans for 426
unit mobile home/RV park.
I,OCATIoN: North side of FYank Sinatra Drive at the end of Del
Safari Drive.
7A1�' R-1-M
Chairman Gregory indicated that the trees on the fairway are
unacceptable except for the Jacaranda and Olive trees. Other
concerns of the Cam�ission involved the front wall area and curbs.
Accordingly, it was moved by Commissioner McCrea, seconded by
Cannissioner Druzy to continue this case to allaw for resubmittal.
Carried 5-0
2
� �
N�ES
AKQ-IITF�G'�U12�L aC[�T�SSIC�i
FF�R'[lARY 23, 1988
3. CASE NO• PP 87-21
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): JAC�C TIAI�K), 73-301 Highway 111, 2nd
floor, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
I��JRE OF PROJ�C,T/APPftOVAL SOIX�iT: Final plan approval.
I�OCATIC�I: Northeast side of St. James Place.
Z,��'
Mr. Smith indicated that this is the area in which the drainage
retention basin is located, in front of this building, and that it
negatively impacts the landscaping treatme.nt.
Catmissioner Gregory suggested that the plans be revised by the
architect and then resubmitted to the Catmission for review.
It was moved by Commissioner Sullivan, seconded by Camtissioner
Drury to continue this case. Carried 5-0
4. CASE 1�U• 1341 SA
APPLICANT (Ai�m ADDRF.SS): EAGLESON'S BIG ArID TALL, 44-425 Tc7wn
Center Way, Sp. D6, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
1�17.URE OF PRQ7�C.T/APPROV�L SOI�P: Deternunation of acceptability
on the aolor of the sign as installed.
I�OQ�TI�i• Ahmanson Center.
7�• PC 3
Mr. Smith advised Comnission that it had come to his attentiari that
the sign installed for Eagleson's does r�ot meet the appraved color
sche�►e.
Cam�ission met at the site and concluded that the color installed
was rlot the approved color. The Catmission also noted that the
oolor installed was very close to the color appraved for the Southern
California Edison sign on the adjacent unit. In addition, the
approved orange #2564 has not been used by any of the te.nants on the
center.
Accordingly, it was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by
Catmissioner Drury to apprave the color of the sign as installed, and
to replace the approved orange colors, Acropoly 206 and Plexiglas
2564, with the orange Plexiglas 2119. Carried 5-0.
3
�...% �
N�F:SS
ARCfIITDCI[Jl2AL �IM�IISSI�T
F�RtmRY 23, 1988
5. CASE NO• 1432 SA
AP'PLIC�INP (A1�ID ADDRF�S): VILLAC"E L.�CXJNGE, 72-795 Highway 111, Palm
Desert, CA 92260.
1�,7.URE OF PRUJ�GT/APPR(xTAL SOUC�P: Approval of parapet sign.
IACATI�i: Palms to Pines West, Phase 1 (Next to Periguins).
7�O1�• PC 3
The applicant wishes a painted black sign with logo on the parapet.
Mr. Smith reported that the existing sign is approximately 15 ft.
long and 8-10 in. high, which makes is approx:i.mately 10-12 sq. ft.,
and the proposed sign is 18 ft. long, 18 in. high, which makes it
approximately 27 sq. ft. The business is entitled to a total of 25
sq. ft. of sign.
Mr. Smith indicated that the wr�rd "cocktail" could be deleted and
the signs would then ca�ply with the size limit.
C�aLi.ssioners DruYy and Gregory were opposed to painting the sign
on the parapet. They suggested som� other type of sign be utilized.
Commissioners Holden and Sullivan were opposed to the sign being
placed on the parapet.
CaYmissioner McCrea is not concerned about the sign being placed on
the parapet, but is opposed to paintirig the sign on the parapet.
It was moved by Calmissioner DruYy, seconded by Caimissioner McGYea
to approve the co�cept of a sign beirig placed on the parapet, but
denying the sign being painted o� the parapet. AnQther type of sign
should be proposed. Carried 3-2 (Cannissioners Holden and Sullivan
oPL�osin5)-
6. C�SE DA• (70C 88-1
APPLICANP (AI�ID ADDRESS): IRVING FEIGER, 3574 Bogert Trail, Palm
Springs, CA 92264.
1�ZURE OF PROJ�CP/APPROVAL SOUC�IT: Certificate of Conformance
for a 13 uni.t apartment aariplex.
I�OCATIO�T: 45-875 Ocotillo.
7�: R-3 (3) S.P.
The applicant te,�rporarily withdrew request.
4
�w.. �
�
ARCHI� �T�SSICN
F� 23, 1988
B. Prelim?*��'y Plans:
1. C�1SE N0: 88-2
APPLIC�,NP (Ai�D ADDRFSS): MARVIN-DAVID INVES'II�VTS, 2901 S. Palm
Canyon Drive, Palm Springs, CA 92262.
I�ZURE OF PI�D�7�C.T/APP�D�TAL SOIX�iT: Pr'Ali mi nar�r appraval for 22,660
square foot retail cam�ercial canple,x.
I,OC'ATIQ�i: North side of E1 Paseo, between Sage Lane and Highway 74.
7.�• C-1
The Comnissioners were conr.erned about the follcywing items: The
proposed 6 foot walkways being too narrow, awning, traffic
circulation and drop off specifically, and the lack of articulation
an the El Paseo elevation.
The architect stated that a loading space can be put where the
existing handicapped parking is located. The handicapped will be
m�ved to ar�other location.
C�airn�an Gregory suggested that the gap between the tw� buildirigs be
filled in. He suggested that the architect contact the awner of the
other building.
Cannissioner Dnary suggested that the proposed white for the parapet
be changed to anr�ther tyne of white. Also mentioned was that the
oolor of the building needed to be toned dawri.
Chainnan Gregory replied that additional landscaping is needed
for the back building. He suggested six palm trees be planted in
this area.
Commissioner Sullivan would like to see more variation in the
elevati� of the facade of the buildirigs.
Chairman Gregory suggested that the parapet facing the parki.ng
lot looking south be lawered a few feet, and parts of the parapet
that people are rx�t able to see be left as is.
Ccamissio�er Druzy suggested that the plans be reviewed again after
the changes have been made.
The applicant agreed to cut back the E1 Paseo elevation 5 ft. on
each end to create roan for additional landscaping.
It was moved by Ca[n�issioner McC�rea, seconded by Comnissioner Druzy
to apprave the concept of the su�mitted plans and that prel�m�na,-�
5
� �
NII�T�ES
AF�IITF7CI.URAL �M�IISSI�i
FE�R[g1RY 23, 1988
plans be submitted next. Carried 4-1 (Commissioner Sullivan
opposing).
1V. NLIS(;EC.I�NflCJ[75:
None
V. ORAL (X�T�iINICATI�S:
Ms. Maggie McDonald aaner of the office caYtplex where Our Place Restaurant
and Gifts for Golfers are located attended the meeting.
Ms. McDonald indicated that her understandirig is that the Cam�ission
reviewed and approved the awnings in question. She, as the building
awner, also reviewed and approved the awnings. Unfortunately, what has
been installed is not what she approved.
It was stated that business operators are supposed to get the approval of
the awners to put up awnings and signs. It is also their responsibility
to advise the awner of changes.
Ms. McDonald stated that she wants to establish a stanr�a,�r��zed consistency
for awnirx�s and signs on her center.
Nfr. Smith reported that the banner at Gifts for Golfers is a temporaxy
banner and was approved for 30 days. After the 30 days is up, the sign
will came c�m.
The Catmission thought that the idea of standardizing the consistency of
awnirigs and signs was a good idea.
VI. .
The meeting was adjaurned at 2:15 p.m.
; ,
,
�'c..�L�- �
S SMITH, iate anner
/fr
6