HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-02-14 � �
NIINUI�'S
PAIM D�P �MISSICN
Z[IF�Y - F�RY 14, 1989
12:00 P.M. CCNM�tITY SERVICFS � R�CM
73-510 FR'E� �1RIl� DRIVE
�c � �c * * �t * * �t �c �t �c �c * * �e * * * �c * * �r * * �c �t * �c .�c �r � * * �c * �t � �c
I. The meetirig was called to order at 12:00 pm.
CaYmission Me�nbers G�rrent Meeting Year to Date
Present Absent Present Absent
Ron Gregory, Chairman X 3 0
M�y Drury X 3 0
Russell McGYea X 3 0
Rick Holden X 3 0
Steve Sullivan X 3 0
Others Present: Pat Bedrosian
Frankie Riddle
Catherine Sass
Steve Smith
Brent Conley
Ramon Diaz
The minutes of January 10, 1989, meeting were approved with amenc3nents on page
9, paragraph 3 - Mana Gina's - should be canvas drapes. Januazy 24, 1989,
meeting was approved with amenc�nents on page 4, paragraph 2 - the motion sY�ould
read "C2rr'ied 4-1". Carried 5-0.
II. Nbved bY ��Y. � b'Y � � ��
the follo�ai.ng ca�es by mirnrte nntion. Car�cied 5-0.
l. CASE ND• 1491 SA
�1PPLICANP (Al�ID AD�DRF�S): LUQCY S'I'ORES, INC., 6565 Kriott Avenue,
Buena Park, CA 90622.
1�AZURE OF PRU7�C,T/AP'PRU�TAL 90UC��• Approval of change to face of
center identificatian sign.
I,OC�TI�i: Lucky Center, San Pablo and E1 Paseo.
7.C�• C-1, S.P.
Ccnmissioners Sullivan and Holden opposed.
2. CASE ND' PP 86-28
APPLIC�INP (AI�D AD�RESS): AHMANSON �ANY, 1123 Parkview Drive,
Suite 360, Cavina, CA 91724.
� �
NII�A�ES
�SSI�i
F�RLJ�RY 14, 1989
I�12URE OF PRUJ�C,T/APPRCN�IL SOUC��P• Final Appraval of architecture
and landscape plans for pad 8.
IACATI�T: ToHm Center Way and Highway 111.
7�• P.C.(3), S.P.
Landscape plans were not approved. Chairman Gregory abstained.
3. C�1SE ND• 1556 SA
APPLIC?�NP (AI�D AI�RF�S): PALMS TO PINES C',ANVAS, Pinyon Pines, P.0.
Box 69, Mountain Center, CA 92361.
NATURE OF PROJECP/APPROVAL SOUQiT: Appraval of awnings with
signage.
LOCATION: 73-290 E1 Paseo.
7�• C-1, (S.P. )
Cannissioner Holden opposed.
4. C�SE ND• ZT 23982
APPLICANP (AI�ID ADDRESS): BARCON DEVEI,OPN�NT, 41-625 Eclectic
Street, Suite H-1, Palm Desert, CA 92260: MIF� HORTON, 73-842
Masson, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF Pi�7F](,T/APPIiOVAL SOUC�iT: Final Approval of landscape
plans for per�meter of 16 lot subdivision.
I�OCATI�i: S/W of Portola and Hovley.
7.Q�' P.R.-5
5. (�SE ND• PP 88-16
APPLICANP (ArD A�RESS): URI KOF�N, 74-874 Joni Drive, Suite #8,
Palm Desert, CA 92260.
I�12URE OF PF�0�7�CP/APPI�OVAL SO[�: Approval of final working
drawings and landscape plans for industrial building.
I�OCATIO[�1: 74-849 Joni Drive.
7�: S.I.
2
�,. 'r.r�`
NIIN[TI.'F�
AR(�IITF]CIIUftAL �T�IISSIC�I
�'ESRIg1RX 14, 1989
Condition of approval - cbuble the ntm�ber of Natal Pltuns, add 2 feet
in height to Palm Trees, replace Vinca with samething more suitable
and roof parapet is to be sufficient height to the cover mechanical
equipment. Staff to review and apprave revisions.
6. (�1SE Np: PP 86-22
pppLICANp (prID pDDRFSS): USA FAIRFIELD REALTY FLJND, 3179 Ternple
Avenue, Suite 170, Pa�na, CA 91768.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SQX�3`P: Approval of final working
drawirigs and landscape plans for 150 unit senior housing project.
I+OCATI(�i: 7.25 ac. sauth side of Countzy Club, 1600' east of
Nbnterey Avenue.
7,�: PR-5, 5.0.
7. C�SE I�A• PP 87-37
p�ppLl(;�Np (ArID AD�S): OOOK HOVLEY STREEri' ASSOCIATES, 41.555
C,00k Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
NAT[JRE OF P1�7�(.T/APPnOVAL SO[�P: Final Appraval of landscape
plans.
I,OCATI�T: S�th sic�e of Havley Lane approximately 1300 feet east
of Portola Avenue.
7,�: PR-17.5
Staff to review and approve revisions made necessazy by the Public
Works Department. C�airman Gregory abstained.
8. CASE I�A: 1552 SA
p�ppLICAr1T (Ai�D ADDRFSS); pAL,MS TO PINES CANVAS (For Christian
Science Reading Roan), Pinyon Pines, P.O. Box 69, Nbuntain Center,
CA 92301.
1�12URE OF PR�7�7CP/APPl�7VAL SaUC�P: Final Approval of a canvas
awnirig with signage at the Columbia Center.
I�OQITI�T: 72-990 El Paseo.
ZOI�: P.C. (3), S.P.
Camtissioners Sullivan and Holden opposed.
3
�rr�" "�
NIII�AtI'ES
ARQ-iITF7CIURRL �SSI�T
F�R[JARY 14, 1989
9. CASE NO• PP 88-24
p,ppL,I(�Np (ArID ADDRF�S): BOB RITC��'Y, AIA 41-625 Eclectic Street,
Palm Desert, CA 92260.
1�ZURE OF P�OJ�GT/AP'P�L SO[X��P: Preliminary Apprc7val of building
plans and landscape plans.
IAC�TION: East side Melanie Place, east of Cook Street.
ZOI�: S.I. (Sexvice Industrial) upon annexation
10. (�SE NU: PP 87-23 Amer�hnent 2
AppLICANr (ArD AD�RFSS): TIM BUNC�i, 7940 Silverton Avenue, Suite
214, San Diego, CA 92126.
NATURE OF PROJECP/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary Approval of
architecture and landscape plans for a 36, 570 square foot
office/sYxxarnan.
I�OC�1TIOl�i: Southeast of Cook Street and Havley Lane.
ZO[�: S.I.
Granted prel;m;nary approval o� the building plans and conceptual
approval � landscapi.ng plans. Applicant needs to shaw changes in
size, colors, rnunbers, quantity, etc. an land.scape plans.
III. C�SFS:
A. Final Ihraw:i.ng5:
l. CASE I�U• 1555 SA
p,ppLICANp (l�p p�DDRFSS): PALMS TO PINES CANVAS, Pinyon Pines, P.O.
Box 69, Nbuntain Center, CA 92361.
1�Zt7RE OF PROJE7GT/APPROVAL SOUQ�: Appraval of awning with signage
at Midori Restaurant.
I+CX'ATI�i: 73-759 Highway 111
7.(�VE: C-1, S.P.
The applicant outlined the proposed project and Mr. Smith shawed a
colored rendering of the awning and signage for catmission's review.
Awnings an each side of the buildirig have a different design. The
4
� ,�.
�
ARQ�TDCIURAL �T�IISSI�I
FF�R�RY 14, 1989
rectangular awnings cannot be placed an the frontage elevation
because the 5 feet projectian cbes not allaw it.
Camlissioner H�lden asked if the aatmissian should be reviewing this
request when r�thinq has bee,n done to resolve the trellis problem on
the east sic�e of the building. Mr. Diaz indicated that cannission
c;ould either apprave subject to, deny because of, or continue the
matter.
It was maved by Catmissi�er DrvrY, seconded bY Canm-issioner McC�ea
to c�tinue this case to allaw the applicant the opportunity to
address th� trellis an the east side of the buildi.rig. Also, to
restudy th� use of an awning and to better integrate with the
building and the existing awnings. Carried 5-0.
2. C�SE I�• 1558 SA
AppLICANp (ArD AI�RESS): PALMS TO PINES CANVAS, Pinyon Pines, P.O.
Box 69, Nbuntain Center, CA 92361.
I��URE pg pRa7�CT/APp�I, 90[]C�1T: Approval of an awning without
signage.
IACATI�T: 73-151 El Paseo, Suite E.
Zal�: C-1
Mr. Smith shawed a colored rendering of the proposed awning and
outlined tt� request.
Mr. Brooks indicated that they are proposing an awning that is
the same as the e,xisting stucco aver-haix,� on the builcling. Also, he
was just notified that the tenant does want signage on the
neighboring store.
Catmissioner I�lden was concer.ned that if the adjacent storefront
winc3aw is remodeled the awning w�uld look as though it is just
sitting on the storefront window and could interfere with the
entrance cbor. He felt that approval of this case should be held in
abeyance until a decision has been made regarding the Possible
renadeling of the storefront. The applicant asked the catmission if
the awning was f ine with them if the storefront windav was riot
remodeled. Camussioner Holden indicated that the proposed awning
ux�uld be fine in that case. Applicant suggested that this case be
appraved rxyw with the condition that if the storefront window
is r�nodeled this case w�uld have to be resubmitted for conmission's
approval.
5
� �
�
ARQ�TF]CIURAL �T�IISSI�i
FESR�RY 14, 1989
It was moved by Camiissio�er Holden, seco�ided by Comnissianer McCrea
to apprave this case with the c�ndi.tioaz that final installation
deper�ding on the storefro�t wiridaw ch�'uzges, if any, would need to be
resuLnitted to oar�nussioaz for approval. If no changes occur, the
proposed awning is appraved as submitted (withaut signage). Carried
5-0.
B. P�limina�ry PlaI1S:
1. (�1SE ND: PP 86-28
pppZ,I(��Np (A�D p,D�RESS); AI-IlHANSON C'L�ANY, 1123 Parkview Drive,
Suite 360, Cavina, CA 91724.
NAT(A2E OF PROJECP/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary Approval of
architect,ural plans and landscape plans for pad 1.
I�OCATIo[�i: To�m Center Way and Highway 111.
7,0[�: P.C. (3), S.P.
Mr. Smith informed aa�missiari t,hat hand railings were being requested
as part of this request.
Mr, Newsane requested that he be given time to further review the
hand rail situatioaz, because he has not received � from his
architect that he feels is satisfactary. He also, noted that other
minor chariges will be made to the plans.
It was mr�ved tyy Camiissioazez' I-iolden, sec�ded by Ccmmissioner McCrea
to grant preli.mu�azy appraval cn this case, subject to the condition
that th�e railirig arul signage issues being rectified. C,a�ried 4-0-1
(Chairnlan CYegory abstained).
2. C�1SE NO� PP 89-3
pppl,I(�Np (A�D p,pDgFSS): EL, PASEO GRAI�IDE INVESTORS, 45-025 Manitou
Drive, Indian Wells, CA 92210.
NATt)RE OF PRC?JF]C,T/APPIi�TAL SO[X��r' Pr'el�mi r�ar l ApprY7va1 of building
and landscape plar�s for retail/office/restaurant canplex.
IAC�Ti�i: Southeast corner of E1 Paseo and Highway 111.
7.�: C-1
Mr. Diaz outlined the proposed project.
6
� �
NIIN[TPFS
ARCfIITF7�iI7RAL ��SSIQ�i
F�RL]ARX 14, 1989
Chainnan GY�eqory asked how the setbacks of the buildir�g fran Highway
111 canpared to First Bank of Palm Desert. Mr. Clemente explained
that the setback is about 40 feet.
Commissioner Drury asked if this was the building where the
landscaping has to be deleted and the f�tage road will be vacated.
Mr. Diaz indicated that this is that project.
Camtissi�er Holden ir�dicated that the roof sectian of the plans shaw
, the maxim�un parapet height of 30 inches and the roof equipnent is
abave that 30 inches, and also that to the top of the parapet is 30
feet, which is the maxiirnmi height. He rx�ted that the parapet must
screen t1�e roof equignent. N�. Clemente stated that the parapet
wc�uld screen the roof equipn�nt.
Cannissioner Holden requested that the approval be amended to state
that the va�rkirig drawir�gs reflect the parapet screenii'ig the roof
equip[nent.
It was mr�ved by Catmissioner Drury, seconded by Ca�mf ssioner Holden
to grant prel�minar� approval on this case, subject to the amenc�nent
that the working drawings reflect the r,hange of the parapet screening
the roof equipmerit. C',azried 5-0.
3. CASE ND• PP 89-2
APPLICANP (AND ADDRFSS): O. MI(I3AEL HOr�ME, P.O Box 258, Palm
Desert, CA 92260.
NATURL OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SO�IT: Preliminary Approval of
architecture and landscape plans for 2650 square foot professional
office buildirig.
IACATIO[�T: East side of Monterey Avenue, 450 feet south of FY�ed
Waring Drive.
ZOI�: R-2 (7). proposed O.P.
Mr. Diaz outlined the salient points of the project.
It was maved by CaYm.issioner Sullivan, seconded by Commissioner
Drury to grant preliminary approval as sutmitted on this project.
Carried 4-0-1 (CaTmissioner �lden abstained).
7
� �
NIII�AfPES
ARQ�TF]Ci�7RAL C�T�IISSI�t
� 14, 1989
1V. NIIS(EC,LAl�7(7tJS:
1. CASE I�: PP 85-5
p�ppl,I(�1Np (AI�ID ADDRES.S): CHARTER CONIl�lUNITIES, 3160 Camir�o Del Rio
Sauth, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92108.
I�7.URE OF PI�OJF]C.T/APPROVAL SOUC��: Approval on screening of roof
mechanical equipnent.
I,OC�TIot�T: East side of Monterey, north of San Gorgonio.
7,O1�• R-1, 5.0.
Nfr. Diaz requested that the cacmission place the Hacienda De Nbnterey
project an the agenda as an emergency itc�n. This can be clone by a
4/5 �rote of the cannission.
It was maved by Caitnissi�er Drvzy, seconded by Calm.issioner Holden
to place Hacie.nda De Manterey ari the age.nda as an emergency item.
C',arried 5-0.
Mr. Diaz informed the commissian that Hacienda De Monterey has
received a Stop Notice on wr�rk an the air conditionirig units. They
have not screened the air conditioning units.
Mr. Norm Reyrwlds info�med the ca►mission that they received the
stop rx�tice and that was the first indicatioaz they had fran anyone
that tYyexe was a potential problem with the visibility of the air
conditionirig units on the roofs.
CaYmissionex Drury asked what type of relief was being requested.
Mr. Reynr�lds indicated that the Stop Notice needed to be taken care
of, ar�1 then mitigating the visibility of the air c�nditioning units.
After possible solutions to resolve this issue were discussed, it was
decided that they w�uld adjourn the architectural camLission to a
special meeting so Mr. Reyrwld's architect could have sanethirig for
the catmissian to review. It was decided that the special meeting
would be held on Tuesday, Februazy 21, 1989, at 2:00 p.m. at the
Hacienda De Nbnterey job site.
V. ORAL QCNM7NICATI�tS:
Mr, Smi.th infornled the cannission that the planning department will be
directing the c�de canpliance depar-tmerit to �.ns�ect awnings, signs and
signage that were approved by the lrchitectural cxmnission. Citations
will be given to those wh� install sanething other than what was approved.
8
� �
NIITIITI�S
ARC�IITF]LZ[JRAL Q1��SSICN
F�R[JP,RY 14, 1989
He introduced Pat Bedrosian, Code Enforcement Officer who will be
attending the meetings to keep a record of all awnings, signs and signage
approved by the c�nmission, and then �r�spect to make sure they've been
;n�talled per appraval.
Mr. Smith �tlined the action and time frame granted to current businesses
that have installed something other than what was approved by the
camtissio�. He suggested that David of Lo�'s be given 48 hours to
either remave or cover-up the existing signage � awning and reapply for
an awning with signage; Pacific Spa - one week to do the frame work
required oa� ttveir awning. Ca�missioner Holden asked the status of the
Village Lounge sign. Mr. Smith stated that l�e would have Pat Bedrosian
i.n..�pect the sign - Time frame of 48 hours was given so that the required
ch�-iges to the sign can be made.
VI. .
The m�eti.ryg was adjourned to a Tuesday, FebruaYy 21, 1989, at 2:00 p.m.
at the Hacienda De Monterey job site.
,'Adjourned Meeting - Catnrissioners Holden, Sullivan, Drury and McC`rea were
present on the site with Norm ReynQlds of C�ter Communities. The
c�rmissi� cancluded that a framed stuccoed screen would be constructed
around the entire second floor roof with sufficient height to screP.n the
roof equ.ipment fran the sidewalk in front of the tawri center parking lot.
For other buildings a aa�arable vantage point would be �nplayed. Maximum
height of the total stxucture could rx�t exceed 22 feet. The wall shr�uld
cantaan sane architectural detailirig to corYYplement the buildiuyg.
The condenser units mounted on the lawer roofs might be acceptably
camouflaged by painting them to match the stucco. The adequacy of this
approach w�ould be reviewed once some units are painted. The applicant
will also be required to sulanit constructian drawings of the scre�az walls
for architectural camussian appraval. Vote carried 4-0.
.�
;'.
� �
�
_Steve 'th, Associate P1
/fr
9