HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-03-28 �,.�' 'rr++''
NIIN[TrES
PAL,M DESmT �NMC.SSIQ�i
7.t7FSOAY - N�� 28, 1989
12:00 P.M. SFRVICES QOI� 1�R
73-510 FRID i�IRII� IXtIVE
�r * �t �c �c �r �t �r �c * �c �t * * �e � � * �c � � �r � * * �c �e �r * �c �c �r �r * � * � �r �c
I. The meeting was called to order at 12:00 pn.
Camtission Members Ctarrent Meetirx3 Year to Date
Present Absent Present Absent
Ron Gregory, Chairman X 6 0
Mary Drury X 5 1
Russell McGYea X 6 0
Rick Holden X 6 0
Steve Sullivan X 6 0
Others Present: Pat Bedrosian
Frankie Riddle
Catherine Sass
Ken Weller
Brent Conley
Phil Drell
Steve Smith
Phil Joy
It was moved by Commissioner McCxea, seconded by Catm.issioner Holden to approve
the minutes of the March 14, 1989, meeti.ng as submitted. Carried 4-0.
II. Nbved by Sullivan, seoor�ded by M�re,a to ap��ave
t3�e follawirr� c�ses by mirnite m�tion. Carried 4-0.
1. CASE NO• 1333 SA
APPLIC?1N`P (ArID ADDRFSS): FRID FEFtI�T, (El Paseo Plaza), 73-061 El
Paseo, Suite 205, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPf�)VAL SOUC��P- Awnings and signage within
interior court,yard.
IACATI�i: 73-200 El Paseo.
7�• C-1
2. CASE 1�U• 1569 SA
APPLIC�NP (ArID AD�S): DESERT KIT(��(V DESIGN, 73-241 Highway
111, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
1�1ZURE OF PEi��7FGT/APPRWAL SQX��; Replacement of awning canvas
and new signage.
� �
NiIN�7PFS
ARQ3IZ�CIUItAi� �T�SSI(�T
N�ttC�i 28, 1989
I�(X'ATI�i: 73-241 Highway 111.
7�• G1
3. (�SE NO• 1563 SA
APPLICANP (Al�ID ADDRFSS): TAE KWt�N-DO CIIV'I'ER, 72-695 Highway 111,
Palm Desert, CA 92260.
I�12[7RE OF PR�7H7GT/APPR(7VAL SO[X�P: App�val of amended sign (sign
colors proposed as green on white).
I,OCATI�i: 72-695 Highway 111, Suite A6 (Von's Center).
7�O1�• PC (3)
Case appraved with the reminder that the signage and action pictures
in the windaas are to be removed, per pervious camiission action.
III. CASES:
A. Final DrawitlgS:
1. CASE NO• PP 87-37
APPLIC�INP (Al�ID AD�S): (700K HOVLEY STRE�P ASSOCIATES, 41-555
Cook Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECP/APPROVAL SQJC�iT: Approval of final working
drawings.
I+OCATIoI�I: South side of Havley Lane, approximately 1300 feet east
of Portola Avenue.
7.0[�: PR 17.5
Commission was concerned about the lack of south and west solar
protection and t,hr�ught this was requested on the prel i m;na,� plans.
Ms. Sass stated that catmission had r�ot previously requested the
addition of solar projection on the south and west elevations.
Ms. Sass indicated that the architect representing this project
agreed to extend the south and west solar protection as directed by
catmission.
2
� �
��
ARQ�IITDCT[IRAI, �T�SSI�T
N�,ItQ3 28, 1989
It was moved by Commissioner Sullivan, seconded by C�issianer
McGYea to approve this case with the directiari south and west solar
protecti� be extended. Carried 3-0-1 (C�airman Gregory abstained).
2. (�1SE 1�A: PP 88-21
APPLICANP (AI�ID ADDRESS): WINDSOR FINANCIAL, 16-255 Ventura
Boulevard, #614, E�ci.no, CA 91436; N-K ARC�iITEGTS, INC., 20101 S.W.
Birch Street, Suite 210, Santa Ana Heights, CA 92707.
NAT[JRE OF PROJ�7C,T/APPI�TAL 9Q��T: Final Approval of a 14,000
square foot cam�ex�cial buildux� and landscaping.
I+O('ATI�i: Southeast of Larkspur and El Paseo.
7�IE: Gl
Mr. Joy stated that Mark Graham would address the c�missions
concerns on the street side elevation and other aoncerns they may
have.
Mr. Graham of N-K Architects indicated that 20" bumper stops will be
placed at curb to 18' , building will be 2' above street level,
sidewalk will be pulled up and building will be framed, air
conditioning units will be covered, planters on rlorth and west side
of building are law rise planters, and the gradirig plans have riot
been sulxnitted and will outl;n;r,�r grading changes on the plans.
Planters should be planted in the ground because they will burn-up in
the sumner time.
C�airnlan Gregory requested the follawing changes to the landscapi.ng
winc�nill palms changed to mediterranean palm, crape myrtle be
evergreen, add twn tria�xJular planters on the south property wall,
fountain grass to be purple fountain grass, impinged area of wall
must have a raw of shrubs, and extend block wall south to real area.
It was maved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner
Sullivan to continue this case for applicant to su�cnit revised
grading, building elevation and landscape plans, subject to all
changes and requested revisions. Carried 4-0.
3. CASE 1VC)• SF 89-1
APPLIQ�NP (ArID A�RFSS): ANGEL H. VIERA, 7348 Van Alden Ave.,
Reseda, CA 91335.
3
� '�
�
AR�aT�CIURAL �N1��SSI�I
Ng1RC�i 28, 1989
i�,ZURE OF PRQ7F]C,T/APP�OVAL SOUCC��: Approval of tw�-story 23' high
single family ha«e.
IACATIdI�I: 73-121 Santa Rosa Way.
7,a1�: R-2 (7)
Cam�ission indicated that thi.s case would have to be approved by the
city council, but gave architectural co�nnents on project.
CaYmission Holden felt that two-story Yx�mes next to one-story Y�nes
sl�uld have larger setback requirements and �ie stepping on the
�tw�o-story portion of the Yxxne. There should also be sane kind of
rec�merided to council.
It was moved by Cannissioner Holden, seconded by Caimissioner McC`rea
to direct applicant to city council for consideratian of appraval
with the above re�r�clations. Carried 4-0.
4. CASE 1�A: 1533 SA
APPLIC�P (Ai�D ADDRFSS): D & A SHADE OOI��ANY, (David of London),
6$-704 Perez Road, Cathedral City, CA 92236.
1�12URE OF PRUJ�C,T/APPROVAL SOqGE1T: Amended awning approval.
L�OCATIQ[�T: 73-700 Highway 111.
7�• Gl
Commissioner Sullivan asked if the applicant received build:ing
owners written approval. Applicant stated that it written appraval
frann the buildirig owner has not been obtained as of yet.
Commissioner Holden informed the applicant that council has
established an interim policy on awnings and that the proposed
awning c3r�es not confonn to the p�licy as proposed. He stated that
even if comnission apprnves the awning it will be called up before
council.
Chairman Gregory suggested to applicant that this cam�ission deny
the case and have the applicant go before the council for approval
with a written approval fran the building awner as a course of
action. '
4
� �
�
ARC�IITF�(,'I.Ul2AL C�T�SSI�i
N�RC�i 28, 1989
The applicant felt that Catmissioner Sullivan should abstain fn�xn
the vote because his office was located in the building and thus had
an interest in the project. After further discussian an the matter,
Caimissioner Sullivan agreed to abstain fran the vote, but noted
that he had r� financial interest in the building.
After further discussion, the catmission decided that since the
project was appraved before the establishment of the interim policy
it should be reviewed outside of the interim policy guidelines.
It was maved by Camlissioner McCxea, seconded by C�airman G`r'egoiy to
approve this case as revised, subject to the condition that the case
being referred to council and that at that time the applicant have a
written approval of the awning fran the building awner. Carried
2-1-1 (Commissioner Sullivan abstained and Commissioner Holden
opposed).
1�7I�: Ca►missioner McC.'`rea excused himself fran the meeting.
B. pre].iminary P1aI1S:
1. CASE IVC)• GUP 89-4
APPLIC?�NP (ArID ADDRFSS): FRED FERN, 73-061 E1 Paseo, Suite 205,
Palm Desert, CA 92260.
I�ZURE OF PROJE7(,T/APPRUVAL SOUC��T: Facade Remodel for commercial
r,cxnplex.
IAC�TIC�1: North side E1 Paseo, 200 feet east of Highway 74.
ZO[�: C-1
Commissioner Holden was concerned about the parkirx� lot spaces
available for the south e,xistirig lot, south side solar protection
not shown on plan and building height, and type of landscaping
proposed and hav will it incorporate with the building.
Mr. Drell nr�ted that a condition of the planning catmission was that
the south existing parking would have 44 spaces and be an emplayee
parking lot. The landscaping is not provided at this t�me, but is
proposed as not hiding the building front. Catm.issioner Holden felt
that landscaping in front of the building w�ould riot hurt business.
5
� wwr�
�
AR(�iITF7CIURAL CxNMLSSI�i
N�,RQi 28, 1989
Cacmission r�oted that a trellis is being proposed, l�t asked if the
original proposal was for teriants to provide individual awnings.
Architect stated that individual awnirigs were the original proposal,
but changed to the trellis. Catmission recxx�mended that the trellis
}�e chanqed to canopy. The architect agreed to the canopy instead of
the trellis. Also, noted was the breezeway on the east which will be
�,'li mi nat2d. CO[nT1.iSSlOri CkJ2S I'�Ut '�l'Ltirik it Sl']�Uld be r'P.IT10�Ted.
CaYmissioner Holden requested that the plans outline haw the building
will relate to the Fidelity Federal buildirx�.
Camtissioner Sullivan was concerned about the arches at the rear, and
the effects of the high, vertical, over-hangless elevations on El
Paseo.
It was moved by Camiissioner Holden, seconded by Ccnmissioner McCxea,
to grant conceptual approval, subject to plans showing solar
protectian, relatian between this buildirig an+d the Fidelity Federal
building, to be continued to the next meeting. Carried 4-0.
2. (�1SE I�U' PP 89-6
APPLICANP (AND ADDRESS): DAVE MANOOKIAN, P.O. Box 2846, Palm
Desert, CA 92260; BERNAEtD LEU1vG, 73-550 Alessandro, Suite 2, Palm
Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJEGT/APP�VAL SO[7C�iT: Preli mi nari Approval for a
43,600 square foot tw�o-story office building (no land..scaping).
I,OQ�TI�i: North of Alessandro between San Pascual and San Juan.
Z0�• Request to O.P
Mr. Bernard Leung outlined the project. The l�uilding material,
architecture and height has been softened so that it will blend
in with the existing residential area. Roof to be man,sard roof and
will cover the air conditioning units.
Ccmnissian asked the height of the roof. Mr. Leurig noted that the
height of the buildirig is 25' .
Cannissioner Sullivan was concerned about the long continuous look of
the building elevation. He asked what type of signage was being
proposed. Mr. Leung stated that signage has ryot been oonsidered as
of yet, and that the building elevatian has a 4' setback fran the
columns to the building fascia to break the continuous look.
6
� �
NII�ATrFS
ARC�IITflCI[IItAL �T�SSI�i
N�iRC�3 28, 1989
Cannissioner Sullivan also asked if there w�uld be a problem with
people entering from the front of the building instead of parking lot
entrance, and if the tawer was large enough proportionately the
building. Mr. Leurig did not feel that there would be a probl�n with
people entering fran the front, and that the tawer could be widened
to be proportionate to the building.
CJaimissioner Holden was concerned about the cantinuous roof elevation
and over-all size of the building and its closeness to the street in
front (Alessandro). He did not feel that softening the building
materials would necessarily blend it in with the residential area.
FYnm the colu��s to the property line is 9' of setback area and the
additional easement area will expand setback area.
Chairman Gregory was concerned that the building is proposed as
using the maxitrnun land coverage with mininnun setbacks for a proj ect
this size. He suggested that sane type of break-up of the building
elevation be considered to relieve the long continuous look of the
proj ect.
Mr. Manookian suggested that the sidewalk and building entrance be
combined to one walkway/entrance to meander through the project,
which waould allaw more land,scape area. Comnission stated that Mr.
Manookian would have to agree to a public ease�nerit on the walkway
and have to maintain it as well.
It Was moved }�y Cha.irman Gregory, seconded by Cannissioner Sullivan
to continue this case to allaw the applicant to revise plans to
address the camtissions concerns on 1) Undulation of vertical and
horizontal building face and roof articulation; 2) Screening of air
conditioning units, landscapi.ng of front setback and walkway area;
3) Perpendicular access/sidewalk; 4) Extended line of site from
second floor to reflect impact on surrounding residence; and 5) The
use of maxutnun land coverage with minimum setbacks. Carried 3-0.
3. (�1SE N0: PP 89-7
APPLICAN'P (AND ADDRESS): JAMES LONDON, 1542 Linda Sue Lane,
�cinitas, CA 92024; C��ARLES MARTIN, 40-840 Thunderbird Lane, Rancho
Mirage, CA 92270.
1��ilRE OF PROJE7Cr/APPROVAL SO[�P: Prel�minarY APProval for a four
plex (no landscaping).
7
� ��
�
ARQ3ITF7CI[JRAL �T�IISSIOI�T
N�,f.tQ3 28, 1989
LOCATI�i: South of Shadow Mountain Drive, 400 feet west of
Portola.
ZO[�: R-3
Mr. Joy indicated that his concern was that each of the garages are
joined together and that the garage cioors are 16' wide and offset 4'
to the inside, placirig them next to the garage walls.
Cam�ission felt that this w�ould make for a tight fit on the inside
of the garages and tight space for backing out. This design requires
more pavement for driveways and places one of the entrances between
the garages as a nan�aw walkway.
Chairman Gregory was concerned that the proj ect is proposing to use
maximwn allaaed setbacks with mini.m�un landscaping.
Discussions pursued possible solutions to resolve catmission's
concerns.
Mr. Drell suggested that the project be granted a 2' adjustment on
the garages so that they can be pulled out sane and elevate the
garage problem.
It was moved by Chairman Gregory, seconded by Ccnmissioner Holden to
continue this case for restudy on the articulation of the garages,
driveways and entrances. Carried 3-0.
IV. NLISC�,I,�1rIDOqS:
V. ORAL �7NICATI�LS:
VI. •
The meeting adjourned at 2:55 p.m.
. O --�.
.C.. �
S th, Assoca.a e Planner
/fr
8