The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992-04-14 � t � �wr�, MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMM1SStON APR[L 14, 1992 *�**;*��.��f.�.,�.�.��.�,�*��**�*�*��.�**.��*��.��►��,�**#�*�.******.�*�: 1 . CALL Td ORDER T�I�ie rr�eefi i rx� was c�l 1 ed �o c�rder at. 12:311 r�,rn, Comm i ss i,�n Mernkiers t:;ur`r�nt Meelt i n<� Yeat�t_o Date . ._ _—.--- __ ___ __ __ �____ .. _ _ --_ F'r e_��er�t. Absent. F'resent Absent. I�c>n C�recaorv. Gtia i rm�n X. � 1 kick Holdcn X 6 U F r�nk I.)rr��t;i r3 X 4 2 (:;P7r i s Van V 1 i et. X 6 U W�vne (:onn<�r, A! t�rnat� X 5 1 �,t:,�ff Present.: F'hi 1 Drc�i 1 ---.._.___._._.__� .._.__ �tEve Sm i th �1eff Wir7kleG�leck Lc�b 5m i�k.h Clonna E3 i t.�:er [[ . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1L w�s rnnved bv Cammissioner Urrutie, seconded b,y Cr�mmissianer Conn�r, ko �r�r�rc�ve rhe m i nu�tes ofi tt�e March 24. 1�y? mer,t:i ng as subm i t teci. Mc>i:.i ran c�rr i ed 4-G. 1tC . It was moved by Comnissioner Urrutia, seconded by Cannissioner Connor, to aoprove the followina cases by minute «btion. Motion carried 4-0. A. Final Drawings: 1 . CASE NO. : 3044 SA APPI[CANT (AND ADDRESS) : SHADEMAKER. 1NC. fc>r BQNNIE GOf�DON. 859 W. 9�tY� Stree�t. 5an J�cintQ. CA y2582 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAI SOUGHT: Anproval of awninc� with s i canaU�� Lt7CATI0N: 73-13U El Pasec�. `}ui1-e M ZONE: C;-1 Jef f W i nk 1 Er�1 eck r eG�orted i.hat. the ar��1 i cani; was r equest:i na t o i�c�te �� casr�t�de typc� �wn i ni� extend i ng 9 feet from thc bu i 1 d i ng. Awn i nca wou 1�i be for eyt. Ur fzer� enc� wt�i t.e w i tt� g" b 1 ack i etter s. He note� r.r,�t tt,� ar�p 1 i cant was r��u i red to U�t an encr�oachment �erm i t f r t�n� t.t�e ��u�1 i c wor�ky der�arit.ment ds tf�ie awn i ng wou 1 d ext:end i n to t.he r i gt�t-of-w�y. Comn�i ss i an ar�proved tf�c-� awn i r��y �s s�ak�nii 1't.ec�l. ' ��y.,r w�r�'" MiNUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION APR[L 14, 19�32 2. CASE NO. : 3�1 C. APPLtCANT (AND ADORESS) : CLK, INC. for C�R�'S .1R. , 73-101 H i Ut7w�v 1 1 1 , `�u i te t . Pa I m 1��-�ser t. CA �226t1 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Apuroval c�f uldyground area LOCATION: 73-I 25 N i yl'�w��y 1 1 ] ZONE: C;- 1 S.P. Jef fi W i r�k I e��1 eck G>r esent�d ttye c�raw i nqs end e 1�vat i or7s �?r� �I�e r�ror�osed p 1 r3ygrnund area. Comm i ss i on�r• Connor c�i i scussed h i s cur�ce�r n w i tt� dny f uture S 1 Clfl'd'QE? that wc>u I d tie p 1�aced ou� f r ont i nc-�i cat i ng thafi tYiEyy h�ve � p 1 avUroun� �rea. �:omm i s s i an approved t Y�e c:>rc��Gsed ��1 aycar�und ar ea w i th t.he eonc�i t.i ar� t.ha1: any s i gnaae mus�t be �r�prc.�veci by s t�t f or comm i ss i on. 3. CASE NO. : 304�� SA APPI.ICANT (ANO ADORESS) : PALMS TO PINES CANVAS for J. LEWiS EiOWK�f�. P i nvon N i nes, f3ox 6��. Mounta i n �enter, CA 92361 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval af awniny witti s i an�3ye and 1 i raht i ng LOCATION: 73-Zb0 F1 Paseo. SuiLE 1-E ZONE: C-1 S.�. P�f i 1 C�r�:�1 1 rer:7or�ted that. t.he rec�uest.ed awn i ny wou 1 ci be a dark 1-ea 1 co 1 or w i th �" 1 et ters. rr,� on i y s i gnaye for tti� bus i ness wc�u 1 d bc� on t.he dwning. Commissio� approved �_-he awniny as submit.ted ,�.�b i ect to tt�c s�turr� L�f�i nc� natched where r�rev i o�as awn i nc� and s i anaae wa� r emc>vec�. 8. Added Agenda Items Approved by Minute Motion: 1. CASE N0.: PP �30-13 APPIICANT (ANO ADORESS) : b5t_ SERVICE �C�. fc�r CIRCUIT C1�C�Y, 3501 Jamk�ore� Raad. S�ite '.iOUt). N�r�th Tower. Newpor�t� Beact7, CA 92658- �03i� NATURE OF F"ROJECT,/APPROVAL SQUGHT: Ar�r�rovd I c>f f i ria i work i ny ��r�w i nc?w: fic�r C.,'i z�ru i t_. (',i fi v 2 , � � F1 f NLfTE:i 1�RCH 1 TECTURAL RE V I E W GtN'IM t S�1 ON APR[L 14. 1992 L�ATION: Fred Warina Drive and Highway 111 ZONE: �.f�'. (3) S.�'. C�rnm i ss i an arawraveci �Y�e f i n�,l wc�r k i ng draw i nys ds s��bm i t.�:ed. 2. CASE 1�. : 304y Sl� APP'L_ICANT (ANO ADDRESS) = VILI_AGE l_OUNGE, ?2.-795 Higl��wey 111 . Sui�fe t8. P�lm C)eser�t, Ca 92'L6t1 NATURE OF PROJECTtAPPROVAL SOUGHT: �1r�c�raval of revised signaye LOCAT[ON: 72-7y� Hiyhwdy lll ZONE: F'C-3 5.�'. Jeff W i nk l e�l eck r�e�ar ted t.Y7ai� t.t�e apr�l i cant� wds att.em�71:i r�g t.o dc� wt�a t Arbv's �i i ri w i Fh tt�e i r s i c�n�Qe us i ny t$" wh i te 1 et rers p 1 aced at. t.l�e same he i Uht. as Pengu i ns. Tf�i s case wc�u 1 d havES i.o go befc�r e the nlanninc� �ommission for appr�val . He als� nated khat the 5 i anaU� wou 1 d have tr� be reduced �ome i n orr�er t.r� meet. code r�uuirements. Existiny wood siyn would b� removed. Commission recommended au��rova 1 of i;t��e rev i sed s i ynage as subm i t.t.ed. [V. CASES: l , CASE NO. : CUP yU-23 A APPL[CANT (AND ADDRESS) : f11STt�RANTF CAFE..' MII.ANG. 73-375 E1 P�3s�o. F'alm Oes�rt, CA ��226U NATURE OF PROJECT,JAPPROYAL SOUGHT: Approval of c.an sign and 5 i dewa 1 k part i t:i ons LOCATION: 73- 375 Ei Paseo ZONE: C-1 �.P. �lef�f W i nk 1 Ep 1 eek r epor�ed t.hat. t.hE apu 1 i cdni� had i nsi.a i 1 ed a can s i<an tt�at was no�t compat i b1 e w i k;C7 th� bu i 1 d i ng s i gnac�e or any ot.her s i ctnaUe on F 1 F��seo. Tf�e i r second request i s for s i d�wa 1 k r��;►-t i t�ons w i th �u ts i dc seat i r�g. These part i�t i ons and tab 1 es wer�� a i re�dv i n5t�i 1 ed. He nat.ed t.h�t. staff was concerneca tt�at. t.hese p�r r_i�r i o�,s wou 1 c:i be movec� Gu t i n tt�e r i gf�t-of-wav as t:t7eY ar�e c�c�rt.akal e. 3 � � MINUTES ARCHITE�TURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AI�(2[L i 4, 1992 St.Gf f recomrr�ended c�en i�1 of i�he can s i Un and fe l i. t.h�t. t.f�e �artitions nEec�ed to �e permanent with the only entrylc�xit being from �.he door t.c� tfie easi:.. Commi ss i oner Connor ayreed wi tt� tP�e denial of the siyn; h�wever, did nnt �eel that the outdoc�r dininc� was accep�able a� the s�}�ce wr�s minimal . Mr. Winkler�leck noted �that the maximum seatiny allowed withou�t �+dd i t.i ona 1 �ark i nc� was t.hreE: t.�k�1 es w i i;h a max i murn seat i ng af 12 dnci rhe area waulc� h�ve to b� completelv on priv�te proper�ty. Mr. Smith not.ed tt��t the Alcaholic BEveraye Cont.rol requires the partitions in arder �to serve alcohol in the outdoor ��ininy area. Mr . C�r E 1 I f e 1 i; 1.hat d 4-�>er son tab 1 e d i d nai. f i i: i n t.P�i s area and thouaht tha�t the ar�r�1 i cant wou 1 d have to con�i ne the i r seat i ny tc� Z or 3 seat t.ables wi�h the �ables being placed ayainsL tlie r�rartitions. Cornmissioner Urruti� felfi tt7at the outdoor seatiny was dcceptab 1 e ds 1 a��U as i t c�i d nai: obstr uct. t�.l�e s i dewa 1 k ar ea. Comm i ss i oner Urruts i a noted that i t was t�oss i b 1 e to at tach tt�e si:.r uct�ar e K�errnanent:l y and d i rec�.ed t.P�e aUU 1 i cdnt t.o urav i de a ��1 an with tables showing how they will n�w use the pdrtitions, keeping i n m i nd t.he i mport.dncE of t.he des�het i cs from t.P�e s�.reet;. He addeci k.h��t tY�e �ee�t a 1 ony tr�e bc�t�tom of the part i t i nns on the s i dewa i k s i cie were very ciangera�as. /�ct:i_on s.- � lt. was moved by Commissioner llrrutia, seconded by CotiKnrssionnr Ho 1 den, t� <�rant pre 1 i m i nary ar�r�rova 1 to the s i dewa 1 k par t i t i ons c�i rect i riy tP�e a��?1 i cant t.a t�>r�v i de st.aff w i t.l� a p 1 an show i ng haw tfie fieer an tt�e bottom c�fi the parritions would be e1 imin�t.ed. Staf f t.o <�rant. f i n�1 apr.�rava 1 . Mot:i on c�rr i ed 5-0. Tt�e ac�r�1 i cant rer�orted th��t the "R i storante" s i gn was be i ng rern�ved t h i s cidt.e dnd not_ed tt�at. �he s i gnage was or i y i rld 1 1 y cies i aned for the p�rk i nea i ot: s i de c�f the bu i 1�i ng. Tt�ey i nci i cated t.hai t.hev wou 1 d cc�me bdck befc>rE tr�e camm 9 ss i on far apnrava 1 of k.t�i s s i yn �1 ong tr�e r��rk i ng �rea at � i dter date. T�t�e appl i cant a 1 sa sh�wed cornmi ss i an where t.wo �dd i t.i ona 1 1 ernps w�u 1 d be �s 1 aced on the ouksid� of the t�uildiny for this dinine� area. This 1 i ahi_i nc� was �ccer.�t ab 1 e t.o camm i ss i an w i t.h the co�id i t.i vn t.hat; t.t�e condui !� not. b� e�posed. Act.i�n_ J t. was �7�ovec� by Comm i ss i oner Ur�r�at i a. seconded bY Coer�r�i sti i cmer N� 1 den . to deny the "�2 i st.orante" s i c_7nage i n des i c�n ar�c:i in�>t.al l�i.ian. Mt�i:�ion carr iNd 5--i1. 4 < �,,r,� �' M(NUTES ARCHITEGTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION APRIL 14. 1992 2. CASE NO. : 1�T 24287 APPL[CANT ,S AND ADDRESS) : T.R.A. ARCHITEC75» 1�)G(1 �. Tahquitz ('.dr7von. Pa 1 m Spr i nc�s. CA 922h3 NATURE OF PROJE�T/APPRUVA� SOUGHT: Apr�raval of findi archirectur�l and l�ndscape workiny drawin��s LOCATION: UeEr� Canvon Road, nori.h of Freci Warinq Drive ZONE: PR-5 F'h i 1 Ure 1 1 ureseni.ed 1�he revi sed pldns showi r�y the cl�enae i n c�lev�tions to r�rovide for �the overhanys as required by commission. He noi.ed t.Y��,t. E r i c Jat7nson fe 1 t. that. the drought to 1 erar7t p 1 dn was ver�v ur�attract i ve anc� d i d nor feel that homeowners wou 1 d use i G, Mr. JGhnson stayyest.ed elfi.ernative G�lant. materials t:o prc�vide acid i t,i ana 1 co 1 or. Corr�n i ss i orier Connor ayreed w i th Mr. J��hnson's c�amm�r�ts. Act i��n: � )1:. was movEd t�y Cammi ss i�ner Vari V 1 i et:, seconc�ed by Comrri i ss i c�ner` Nolden, to ar�pr�ve the elevcj�tions as submitted. Motion carrieci 4- l , Cr�mmissioner Urrutia vat.in�a No. (t was moved by Commissianer Connor, seconded by Chairman Greyory, t.o coni i nue the 1 ands��G�i r�g p 1 an d i rect i ng t.he aG�pl i cant t.o re�tudv the p 1 an G�s noted by Er i c Johnson and prov i cie cir i r� irriyation desiyn for dr�iayhi t.olerant plan. Mot.ion carried 5-0. 3. CASE NO.: F�P �jU-24 APPL[CANT tANO ADORESS} : AVANT �ARDENS for ROBIN PLAZA. �.�£34 W. Foath i 1 1 B 1 vd. . Su i t�e C, Up i�3nd, CA 91 186 NATURE OF PROJECTIAPPROVAL SOUGHTs A�r�roval of irriyation syst��m LOCATION: 5c�ui-heasl: corner of E 1 Pasea and Sage ZONE: C-1 PP�i 1 Ure 1 1 reG�ori_ed t.hat: t.h i s was a case wt�er�e the a��1 i c�nt w�s ci i r�ct��ci to r�r�v i de a r�ro�.xaht ta1 erant p1 an. He n�ted tndr.. rt,i s was cic�ne, however , a sG�ray head i r r i qat i an system was i ns�:a 1 1 e�:�. 5t�ff noted tt7e amc�un t of annua I f 1 owers but fie 1 t that the p 1 ant suk�:�1:.i 1_ui:i ons wesre dc.ceF��=ab 1 c:. �; ` � � MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION APR[L 14, 1992 A�:tion: _......_.�_ It wds moved by Commissioner llrrutia, secanded t�y Commission��r V�n V1 ie�t�, to continue the request �s the �pp1 ican�t was not presen�t wi 1.I�y reauested G>1�ns. Mot.i on carr i ed 5- 0. 4. CASE NO. : 20y5 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : SIGNS BY BULI. for 9y CENT VIDEO, 83- 4$0 Av�nue 45. Unit 15. [ndio. CA 97L01 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPRQVAL SOUGNT: Revised awning wi1�r� signage LOCAT[ON: 73-9b.3 Hi _yhway 111 ZONE: C;- 1 S.P. Ph i 1 Gre 1 1 K>reseni.ed the rev i sed r�1 ans w i th s i gnage not.i ng t.l�at commission had previously sugyested that the awniny be extended a 1 anca i.i��e fron�: ofi t he bu i 1 d i ny. He i nd i cated that tt}e "99 Cent" wou 1 d be 2Ei i nch 1 etters w i th the "V i de�" a�r ZO i nches. Tt��e revis�.�d K�Ians st�ow�d this cl�anye. Commissioner lJrrut.id fe1t. t.f�dt. rhe bc��tom ofi th� awn i nc� shc�u 1 d be enc 1 osed as th i s struc�tur� wt�s tae i ng r.>roF�osed as �n arch i t.ectura I feature. Action: � 1�- was maved by Comrnissioner Urrut.ia, seconded by Commissioner Vari V i i �t . tc� ar��rove the r�ev i sed awn i ng w i th th� fo I 1 ow i rica conditi�ns: I ) 5t.ructure to be 1 owered t.o he i ght of e 1 ernent. at: t.op of rUuf. 2.) No i nterna 1 � i�rrr_ i n� w i th the except i on ofi tf�e s i c�naae itself. 3) Bot.t.om of awn i r�y t�� be enc I osed. 41 Nean at a maximum of 4��00 milliamps. Mc�t.i on car�r i ed 5-C). B. Preliminary Plans: l. CASE NO. : F'P zj2-3 APPLICANT �AND ADDRESS) : BAF2CON GEVFLUPMENT. 41-625 Eclectic, Suite No. H-l . Palm Desert, CA 9726U 6 , �,,,r '�r+`' MINUTES ARGHITECTURAL REYIEW COMMISSION APR[L 14, 1992 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Pr-eliminary ar��rc>val of r.�lans for 2-story office buildinc� LOCATION: Northeast. corner of Alessandro and Pori.old ZONE: R-3 to be rezoned O.P. Steve Smith uresented elevati�ns and site pldn for �.he 2-story offi i ce bu i 1 d i nc� no�t i nca th�3 t the bu i 1 d i ny was too 1 arge �or the amount- o� G�arkiny r.�rovided. He addeci that Eric Johnson was concerned with the 3 1=oot landscape area around the qdrkiny �rea. C;�mrnissioner Urrutia c�iscusseci how the height �n the n�rth end af the building was a problem as it was ad_iacent �to �n R-t zone. Mr. 5m i t.h d i scussed h i s concerns w i t.h cr eat.i ny a r�;qr,er� b�a i 1 c�i rig at. cer ta i n r�o i nts as c� resu 1 t of the s 1 ope of the 1 vt. Cormn i ss i oner Urr�at.i a d i scussed tP�e F:�rob 1 em w i tf�i tt�e second story w i ndows on the sou�tt� s i de of the bu i 1 ri i nc�. Commissioner Holden discussed his concerns wit.h the 8 foot wall alony the fronfi of the buildiny iust. t2 fee�t back from the street. Mr. Dre 1 1 riot.ed t.hat. a w�a 1 1 aver 4 feet h i yh r�ad t.o be at. 1 easi. 15 teet back from the curb, Commissioner Urr�uti� su�agested some type �f terrace wark on tt�e fror�t� wa 1 1 . The ap�1 i cant.. Mr. Denn i s Freeman. intiicated that f7e would rem�ve the wall completely. Mr•. Sm i i.r� i nd i c�t_ed i.hai:. he ��ou 1 d need t o work w i t P� Mr. Freeman �:.n show F7ow he arr i vec� afi the f i aures on the ycauar�e faot�age. Cc�mm i ss i c�rier Urrut i a fe 1 t. i he t.erraee shou 1 d be redes i Uned fnr more usable sp�ce. He added the problem wi�th tt7e glass windows on t.he 2nd f 1 oar- on t he nrarth s i de �f i�Yie bu i 1 d i rig 1 ook i ny down ori the adiacent residential are��. Commissioner llrrutia addressed the f i re ex i t.i ny ��1 an not i ng t.hd� t.Pie bu i 1 d i ng depart.mer7i. wou 1 d re<�uire the aaplic�nt to have an exit c�rridor sysrem unless they a l readv have def i n i t.e �.en�,r7t s. He �i rected t.lie ap��l i cant. t.o discuys this with the buildiny department. Mr. Freeman nc�te� t:hat tl��e 1 andscap i ny �:�1 an was r,edes i c�necJ t.o meet. the r�equ i red 1 5%. Ac t_i_�n: It. wa� movec� by Commissioner Urrutia, seconc�eci by Commissianer Van V 1 i e l. t.o �ardn t r�re 1 i m i nar�y approva 1 �n t,he e 1 evat i ons on 1,v w i tt� 1-P�e fc�1 1 c,w i ng cc>nd i 1.-.i ons: I � Second st.ory w i ndows on nort.h e 1 evat.i ons t o be c,t�scure e�1�s�. `L) Cc�ur ry�rc� w�1 1 on eas t s i c�c,� of bu i 1��i ny t.o be c�e 1 eted. 3) W i nd�w 1�� be r Nm�>vee� on t.he e�st. e 1 evat.i an, nortl�� s i de of 1:.he entrance. .� � � MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMM1SSIf�N APR[L 14. 1992 Comrn i s s i�an car�nt.ed concer.�t-ua 1 ��prov�1 t.o �he �I andscap i ng r�1 an rr-�c�UnizinU ��taffs concerns, primarily re<�ar�in<� the perimet�r I�r�dsceU i ng. P i�ant:er ar ea i s t c� be w i dened. Mot i on car r i e�c� 4-0_ 1 , Ch��i rman Greyory abstc�i n i n�, 2. CASE NO. : F'P �2-� APPLtGANT �AND ADDRESS) : C� & F GEVELOPMENT, SO-8��9 I ndi o B1 vci. , Indio. CA 92201 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: A�praval of revised r�reliminary architectural plans LOCATION: S��«tt�west. c_�nrner of Port.ol�� Avenue and Sant.a Rosa ZONE: R-2 S.O. Ph i 1 Dre 1 1 K�resented i.r�e rev i sed p 1 ans not:i ng t r�e r.hanges i n t..he siF_e r�lan and the 20' yards with the exception ofi �the carn�r. Comrr�i ss i oner Urrut i a fie 1� t.h�,t t.he rev i seci p 1 dn was much� �rior e interestina. Act.i or�: � �� 1 t. wes moved by Camrn i ss i oner� Ho 1 d�n, sec�nded r�y Comrn i ss i oner Van Vii �t, to arant r�reliminary ap�roval af the revised r�lans as subm i t.t.ed. Mot.i an carr i ed 5-0. V. ADJOURNMENT: 1 t. ��ras movecl by Commi ss i oner l)rrut i a, seconded k�y Co�r�mi ss i oner Nol den, �k.� aci,_iourn �:he meet i ny at ?,.:3t] p.m. Mot�i on carr i ed 5-0. ��;` ._.__ %/, _, , � .__.��..__,�---_�_��-�'' � "s��v�: s�r�[TH I�SSC�C 1 ATE PLANNE.R SS/db �