The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992-03-10 � �r�` � MINUTES ARCH[TECTURA� REVIEW COMMISSION MARCH !0, 1992 iF�F i i��M�F 3F IF iF IF 1F IF f�F 1F*i�if fk�F f iF�F##�F!F 1F��F f�lF�F�F�F*�F�F iF�F�F�F�IF��7F 1F iF i IF*!F iF 3F R��1F�E�F�lF f�1F f!F�IF��IF�iF�iF 3F f��IF l . CALL TO ORDER: Trie meet:i na was ca 1 1 ed �a order at 12: 15 p.m. C�mm_i ss ion__MernbPrs Cur-rent�Meet in�� Ye;�r _�t�.� .C�ate � �resent Absent Present Absent Rc�r� Grec�orv. Cha i r�man X c� G Rick Holden X 5 0 Frank Urrutia X 3 � Crir i s Van V 1 i ei� X 5 0 K i rbv W�r-ner X 3 �` Wavne Conr�nr X 3 2 Staf=f= �'r�sEnt: Phi 1 Ure11 _._.__.__._...._____._____ S�.eve Smi th Bob Smith Dannd E�itter [ [ . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: I t. was rr�oved by Cornm i ss i aner Urr ut.i a, secandeci by Corrim i ss i oner Ho l den, k.o �pr�rove �thp m i nu�tes of the February 25. 19�2 meet i nca as sut�m i�tt.ed. M�:�t.i on c�arr i eci 4-0. Itt. lt Nas moved by Co�nissioner Urrutia. seconded by Commissioner VanVliet. to apnrove the folloti+in4 cases by minute motion. Matio� carried 4-0. A. Final Drawings: t. CASE NO.: 3020 5A APPL[CANT (ANO ADDRESS) : RAI.lI_ SOSA & AS��CIATE5 for LA5 CASl1ELAS t;AFE. 61-L�53 E. I'a 1 m C�nyon Dr i ve. Catt�edr��1 C i ty, t:;A �32134 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Sign a�apr�oval LOCATION: 73-703 Nighway 111 ZONE: G-1 Th�e G�rc>c�osed s i ynage wau 1 d tie p i nk r�e�n mounted on d 1 arge met.a 1 c�n rac�eway. Cnmm i ss i nn �r�pr-ove�� s i ynac�e as subm i tt,ed. � � MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MARCH 10. 1992 2. CASE h10. : TT 25711 APPL[CANT (AND ADDRESS) : SIERRANQVA c/o PALM DESERT PARTNEF25, L_TD. . 7 7-9p0 Avenu� of the S�ta�tes. �a l m Df�sert, CA '��t�U NATURE OF PROJECTIAPPROVAL SOUGHT: Apr�roval of final workinq �iraw i nUs LOCATION: West of El Dor�ado Drive. 1/2 mile sa�th of Country Club ZONE: PR-5 Phi 1 fJre11 �resented the fin�1 working drawings sriowing the chanaF�s made i n the ovprhanys as rec.�uestec� �iy comm i �s i on. C:orrmi i ss i c�n ar�r�r�oveci tY�e f i na 1 w�r�k 9 nca dr�aw i ngs as subm i tted. 3. GASE t�.: PP 9U-13 APPLICANT fAND ADORESS) : DSL_ SERVICE CO. , 3501 J�mboree Rodd. Su i te 50�)U. North Tower�, Newport Bear_h, GA 92Ei5t3-t-1030 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final �lan dr�prnval for "Rc�ss" bu i 1 c�i ny LOCATION: Fred Wariny Drive �nd Highwav 111 ZONE: P.C. t3) S.P. C_ommissian anG�roved �he final G�1ans as submitteci. Mot.ion carried 3-fi-I . Cha i rman Grecanry absta i r7 i ny. 4. CASE NO. : 3025 SA APPLICANT tAND ADDRESS) : AMERICAN AWNING C0. for PALM DESERT LODGE. 4d-d89 Town Cen�ter Way #t�4, Pa 1 n7 Desert. t:A 92��0 NATURE OF PROJECTIAPPROVAL SOUGHT: Ar�c�rc�val of awninas LOCAT[�1: 74--527 I-I i yhway I 1 1 ZQNE: C- 1 S.P. �c>mm i ss i an aur�rnvec� t,l-�� n i ne awn i ngs as siak�m i tteci. 2 � � MINUTES ARCNITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MARCH t0. 1992 5. CASE NO.: 3(l26 SA APPL[CANT tANO ADDRESS) = AMERICAN AWNING C0. for TSING TAU CH [NESE CUIS[Nf. 44-4t39 Town Center Way #t94, Pa1m D�serr_, CA �2`l_E�0 NATURE OF PROJECT,/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Apr�rovdl of awniny LOCATION: 7A-0�30 Niyhway 111 . Suii:e E ZONE: C-1 S.P. Commission a�c�roved t.tie awnings subiect to the use af a rigid k�ottc�m as opposed to the pr�oposed free han�a i ng bottnm. 6. CASE NO. : 3017 ��A APPLiCANT (AND ADORESS) . MARK PALMER DESIGN,M 75-140 St. Charles I'l�ce. Suire A, Palm Oesert, CA 92Z60 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of business i��en t i t i ca�t i on s i ynaye LOCATION: 7�- 140 St. Ct�arl�s P1acE�, Suite A ZONE: 5. t . Cr�mrn i ss i on auK>roved the s i ynaae sut�j eci: to center i ng the s i anage on tne t=ascia with a minimum tor� �nd bottom border of 4". 7. CASE NO_: 3U29 SA APPL[CANT (AND ADORESS) : SIGNS f.iY BULL far LAS PARRILLAS TACO SHOP, 83-4F30 Av�.�nue 4'�. Un i r_. 15. I nd i o, CA 9220 1 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Apr�rovdl nf business idc�ntific�tion siynaye L.�ATI�N: �7?-�7f�5 H i Uhw�y 1 1 1 , Su i tc� B-1 ZONE: PC;-3 Comrrii�s i on �r�Ur�ved �:he s i gnaUe sub,iect: t:a de 1 et.i on of the p i nk ner�n. 3 � � MtNUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MARCH 10. 1992 8. CASE NO.: 3037_ SA APPLICANT (AND ADORESS) : IMPER1Al_ SIGN C0. for SUPER CUTS, 46- 120 Calhoun Stree�t. [ndio, Ca 9'L201 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAI. SOUGHT: Approval of business i c�ent i f i ca t i on s i ynac�e ZONE: C-1 S.P. Corr�mi ss i r�n aur�rc�ved i.he 5 1 Gfl'dyE sut�,iect to reduc i ng the 1 et.ter s i ze t�o a rnax i mum of t 4" and rarc�pot-t i c�n s i ynaae to a 1 1 aw for more of a b�rder. B. Preliminary Plans: l . CASE NO. : PP 92-] APPL[CANT (ANO ADDRESS) : JAMES PALMER, Posi. Office Box ]U27, hanchc� MirayF�, CA 9L270; JAMES FETRiDGE. Post Office Box 1y63. F'a 1 m C)eserfi:, Cl� y�261 NATURE Of PROOUCT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Apr�rov�l of �reliminar�y 1�n�:iscaa i ny r�1 ans LOCATION: West. side of Monterey Avenue, 1000 feet sUuth of Fred Warina Oriv� ZONE: O.P. C;r�mm i s s i on cont i nueci �.he p 1 ans dt t he ap��1 i cent.'s r-equest and c�irerteci c3PGlicant t� solicit the services nf � r�rnfessiondi 1�ndsc��r.>e arch i t.ect. 2. CASE NO.: T�T 26123 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) : SUNRISE UFSERT PAR�TNERS for INDIAN RIDGE COUNTRY CLU[�. 42-6U0 Cook S��reet, Pa1m Desert. CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Revisions to plans yiven pre 1 i m i nary ar�prov�1 LOCATION: C�unt�ry Club C�rive between 42nd Avenue, E1 Dorado Drive and Qas i s Count:r,y C i ub ZONE: PR--5 4 . �rr� `"� MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIE�i COMMISS[ON MARCH l0, 1992 Gommission �G>pr�ved the revi�ed �lans as 5ubmit:�.ed. 3. CASE NO. : PP 91-14 APPLICANT tAND ADDRESS) : SCHMITZ/ANDER50N ENTERPRISES. Pc�si: OFFic� b�x 3592, Palm Uesert, CA 9226t NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Ar�pravai of revised Ureliminary archi�tectural ar�d landscape plans L�ATION: 44-55� 5an Rafael Avenue ZONE: f�-� Phil Drell uresented i.l�e revised �lans showing thdt the pr�ject w�s ch�nyed �to � sEven ��ni�t �parFment comple�:. Commissio� �,G�Uroved i�he revised r�rei iminary plans as submitted. C. Miscellaneous Cases: l. CASE NO. : 895 SF APPIICANT (ANO ADORESS) : H.B. MAC ARTHUR, 7A-C192 Cover�ed WaUor7 Trail , Palm Ueser��t, CA y2260 NA7URE OF PROJECTIAPPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of 8' wooden fence LOCATION: 74-U92 Covered Wag�n Trail ZONE: Mr. Ure 1 1 no�ed that t.he ar»�i i cartt. was ask i rig for a vdr i ance for the rieiUht and t�he distance the fence would bE ft�om the curb. The ar�u 1 i c��nt, Mr s. MacArtliur, rec�uested t.o rer�1 ace the ex i st i ng 7' w�oc�ien fenr�e and s td�t�d that she nee�ed to keep the 7` h i gP� fence k�eca�ase �f t.h� swimming r�ool in �P�e froni:. yard of Lhe home. Mrs. MacArfi_hur �d��ed tha�t �rhe f ence wou i d be cnmp 1 ete 1 y covered w i th k,ouca�i nv i 1 1 a�.a and a 1�anders. C;ornrr�i ss i or7er Ho 1 den f e 1 t that a 6' f er�ce wou 1 d be ar�propr�i atE sinr_e she wauld be adding the veyetation to screen tt7e fence. He not.e�.� t.riat �nyth�i ng aver 6' wnu 1 d �e cons i dered e structur e and the bu i 1 c�i ng depar Gment� wvu 1 d re�au i r,e �tt�e app 1 i cant to eny i neer� the fence. Cornmissioner Urrui.ia nated that the commissian was 1 i m i �.ed �a r,r,� b' he i yht w i th the c i�ty ard i nance. 5 � � � M[NUTES ARCNITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MARCH 10. 1992 C�rruni ss i on dG�r�roved i:�he f ence a� a max i mum he i ght of 6 feet a 1 ony tt�e firant and front s i deyards. a 1 1 ow i ny for a max i mum of 7 feet bdck from where 1�P�e house starts. 2. CASE NO. : APPLICANT (AND ADDRESSI: MR. AND MR5. GARY REYNO�DS, 47-230 Rose 5aae Court. Palm Desert. CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval oF 18' sinyle family residence LOCATION: 47-310 t-le 1 i�tr�oG�e ZONE: Gorzun i ss i on ar�proved t.he p 1 ans f-or the 18' s i ng 1 e fam i 1 y home as submirted. IV. CASES: A. Final Drawings: 1 . CASE NO. : PP 88-15 APPLICANT �,AND ADORESS) : L. MONDF INTERNATIONAI_ for CUI��NNADE BU[LU[NG. 73-375 El Paseo. Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT(APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of second stary me�r�l awninU �n rear of buildiny L�ATION: Soui�h side of E1 Paseo between Lupine and Saye Lane ZONE: C-1 �rr,e ar�u1 icant, DenniS Me1 i 11 i , K>resented i�he r�roposed si.ruct:u��e w i�tti 3" pos�t.s. He noted t.ha t there wou 1 d be an �ppt�ox i ma�te t3" Gver hana from tt�e r�osts. C�rrxn i ss i oner Urrut i a noted that at tl�e l�s�t rneeting their concerns were that the structure did nut conform t.o t.he ar ch i t.ecture of i:he bu i 1 d i nU. He d i d not fe�1 there was anyt;hiny that showed this had been done. Co�nissioner Urrut.i a noi.ed i.hat i:he back of tF�e bu i 1 d i ng showed a great. dea 1 of ;t.ucco and felt that 'th� s�uccn detail should be carried out in this structure. �ir. Melilli indicated that he was trying t.a creat_e � sP�ade c�ver �nc� �r-crtect the deck frorn the ra i n. He d i c1 r7ot. want t.l�e rn��i r7t:er7dnc� c�rab 1 ems w i th a fabr i c awn i ryg e�n t.he 6 . � � MINUTES ARCHITECTURAI REVIEW COMMISSION MARCH 10. 1992 secc,nc� story. �1ck.i on_ 1t. was maved by Commissioner Holden �a cieny t.he request. as the s tructur� d i�f ne�t �k.i� i n w i th the arch i tecture of the b��i 1 d i ny. Mot:.i�n d i ed due i:� a 1 ack of second. Ct�� irman Greyory nc��k.ed his concerns with the use o� mat�rial ��rc,�:;psed. He f e 1�. t.hat. awn i rigs are us�aa 1 1 y co 1 orf u 1 , and i n th�i s cdsE �r_r,e r�roposed materi�l loaked like it wou)d be somethiny used on a mob i 1 e f�orne awn i nq, �o� sorneth i ng Lhat srtou 1 d be used or� d h i ah enc.� ret�i 1 cen ter. Cc�mmi ss i c>ner lJrrut i a st ated t r�at i f t.he pra�osed struct.ure was a frF�� sfi�3nd i ng shade s�tr�c tur�, he wou 1 d n�t have had �the same typE of r eaci:i on t.o i t.. BecausE� i t� i s ettached to �:he k�u i 1 d i n_y. i t. does not conform to the �rch i tecture of the bu i I c-J i nea. He adde�� t.t7at. cornm i ss i on was i:.ry i ng t.�� see t.ha� the end resu 1 t 1 naked 1 i ke i t w�s part of t�he or i y i na 1 des i yn of the tiu i 1 d i r�y. �ct,i r�n_ 1 t. was mc�ved by C�mrr�i s�i oner Hol den. seconded by Comrr�i ss i aner IJr-rut i�. to cont i nue the rec�uEs�t cJ i r�ect.i ny the appl i can�t to create v si:.ruci�ur e tr�at. wou l d coriform tn t.he nr i g i na l des i gn nf t.he b�a i 1 c�i nc�. Ma�t i on carr i ed 4-U. 2. CASE NO. = 3U2B SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESSI : MARK PALMER DESIGN for JON DOUGLAS REALTORS. 75- 140 St. Charles Place. 5uite A. Paim Desert. CA 9?_260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval �f busir7ess i dent i f i ca�t i on s i canac�e LOCATION: 72-757 Fred Wariny Drive ZONE: U.P. Commissioner Urrutid wcauld like �o see the over�all signage reciuced f t�orn 16" to t?_". Act�i on_, It. wds moved k�y Commitisioner Urrutid, seconded by C�rrxnissioner Hol den. �to apr�rove tt�e s i ynage sut�_iect to the h i yh Fasc i a s i gn be i nc� red�.aceci tca 12" �>ro�a�rt.i ana 1 1 y. Mot i an carr i ed 4-0. 7 . � `� M[NUTES �RCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MARCH 10, 1992 3. GASE NO. : 3C)30 SA APPL[CANT (AND ADORESS) : SIGNS BY BUL.L. for STRAW HAT PIZZA. 83- 480 Avenue 45. Uni�t 15. [ndio, CA 9?_ZUl NATURE OF PROJECT APPROVAL SOUGHT: Awning wii:.h signage LOCATION: 73-]55 Hicahway I11 ZONE: C-1 Comm i ss i oner lJrrut i a fe 1 t. t.hat. i.he aa�1 i cant fa i 1 ed to shaw how the awninc� would fiit into khe �ascia. Mr. Orell n�t.ed that� it was d fa i r 1 y srna 1 1 awn i ne� w i th 12" and 20" 1 e�.ters. Comm i ss i on fe 1 i. tha�t w i�t.h the way �the awn i ny was des i yned, the 1 arye i etter s i ze w�s an edditional dreryit_ectural feature. Action: �� t� waa moved by Cammissioner Van Vliet., seconded k�y Cammissianer H�lden. to approve the signage wi�th the followiny conditions: 1 ) Reduce "Pizza" letters to a rr�ximum of IU", wit.h "Straw Hat" 1 Ettet�s a t l6" �or upper rase dnd 1 t�" 1 ower case. 2) Fdce of i:f��e awn i n,y, above St.raw Hat s i ynage, to be rau 1 1 ed ��ck 'to create a mare "hat.;" type sh�pe. 3) R i yht s i de of awn i ne� t.o be e 1 ongated so that. i 1: i s rnore pror�erivi centered �ver the openiny t�hrnuyh t�he columns. Mation carried 4-U. V. The following cases were added to the agenda by a unanimous vote: 1. CASE NO. : PP 91-13 APPL[CANT (AND ADORESS) : DUGGAN AND StJSAN t_ANR05 c/o GORDON STE[N. 44-858 San Juan Avenue. Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT APPROVAL SOUGHT: Apc�roval of final architectur�31 and landsc�a� workiny drawinys LOCATION: Edsi Uf San Pabla bet.ween Sdnta Rasa Way and Cat.alina Wav ZONE: R-3 PP�i 1 (:�re 1 I G7rf,5f�nted �:.h� f i n�1 work i na draw i ngs w i i:.Y� 1 andscap i ng 8 - � ;,,,�„ M[NUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MARCH 10. 1992 n�t.i na t.F7ai i;here were no ot.her changes on i:he exl:er i or other t.har� what was re��uested bY commission. Actii on s_ )t:. was moved by Comm i ss i oner Uan V 1 i et. seconded by Corrrri i ss i oner Holden, ta approve k.he finai architectural and landscape working drawings as submit.ted. Moi.ion carried 3-1 , Commissioner Urrutia vo�t i nU Na. 2. CASE NO.: TT 24287 APP�ICANT (AND ADDRESS) : T.R.A. ARCHITECTS, 19U0 E. Tahqui�z Ganvon. Palm �prings. CA y�263 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVA� SOUGHT: Approval of revised preliminary archi�tec�tural and landscapiny plans LOCATION: Deep Canyon F2oad, north of Fred Waring Drive ZONE: PR-5 SLeve Smit.h noted that �.he second story homes a�uroved by 1:he nlanniny commission in December 1991 were on the �allowiny lots- 1 tl thru 14, 17 t.t�ru 21 , 25 i:hru 2y and 32 t.hru 36. Action_ It. was moved by C�mmissioner Urrutia, seconded by Chairman Gre.yory, to cont�inue the pr�liminary plans directinq the applic�nt �:o address tl�e fo 1 1 ow i ng: 1 ) F'ravide additionai det.ail on the side Yard elevat.ions. 2) Provide detailed landscapiny plan. 3) Address lack of salar �rvtec�.ion. Mation carrie�i 4-0. 3. CASE NO. : APPLICANT (AND ADDRESSI: SUNLITE DEVELOPMENT, 77-622 Country Cluk� Drive. Suit�e "V". Palm Desert, CA 9226U NATURE OF PRUJECT�APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of 18' single family home LOCATI�N: �)3-1$I l_oma V i sta ZONE: �j . � � MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MARCH 10, 1992 Commission reviewed pians noting i.hat the pians did compl_v wii�h re�uired setb�cks. Action: lt w�s moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Van Vli�t. �to approve �the 18' hei�ht sub_iect to using a hip roof sysi.em rather than the praposed gables. M�t.ion carried 4-0. VI . ADJOURNMENT: lt. was moved by Commissioner Van Vliet, seconded by Commissioner Urrutia, �to adjourn the meetinc� at 2:00 p.m, Motion carrie� 4-0. s��.� ---�--- STEVE SM I�TH ASSOCIATE PLANNER SS/db 1 f1