Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-08-26 i fir+ MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION TUESDAY,AUGUST 26, 1997 I. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 12:30 p.m. Commissioners Present Current Meeting Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent Richard Holden X 20 4 Frank Urrutia X 21 3 Chris Van Vliet X 23 1 Wayne Connor X 22 2 Richard O'Donnell X 22 2 Ronald Gregory X 19 5 Staff Present: Steve Smith Martin Alvarez Pat Conlon Donna Bitter II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Van Vliet, to continue the minutes of the August 12, 1997 meeting. Motion carried 4-0, Commissioners Connor and Gregory Absent. III. CASES: A. Final Drawings: 1. CASE NO.: TT 28549 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): SUNROSE PROPERTIES for TUCSON, 72-850 Somera Road,Palm Desert,CA 92260;A E DESIGN, 73-350 El Paseo, Suite 207, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of perimeter and model complex landscaping plans MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 26, 1997 LOCATION: Washington Street between Fred Waring Drive and Mountain View ZONE: R-1 9,000 Mr. Alvarez presented the landscape plan showing where the lawn would be placed in the retention area as requested by the commission. He reported that Eric Johnson had reviewed the revised plan and found it acceptable. The applicant, Mr. Lance Alacano, showed where they also moved some plant material from under the trees as requested by the commission. Action It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Holden, to approve the revised landscaping plans for the perimeter and model complex as submitted. Motion carried 4-0, Commissioners Connor and Gregory Absent. 2. CASE NO.: C 97-11 APPLICANT(AND ADDRESSh GROWTH CITIES BROADCASTING,41-625 Eclectic Street, Suite M-1, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval to install three satellite dishes LOCATION: 41-625 Eclectic Street, Suite M-1 ZONE: S.I. Mr. Alvarez reported that the commission had asked to see a mock placement of the proposed dishes. He indicated that the applicant was present and had pictures of the mock units extending 8' above the building and noted that there would the three (3) poles that would project above the parapet. Commissioner Van Vliet expressed his concern with the visibility from other buildings. The applicant, Mr. Michael Jones, stated that the pictures presented were taken from the various buildings. Mr. Jones added that there is an existing satellite dish on the roof that is higher than the proposed dishes and you cannot see them at all. 2 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 26, 1997 Action It was moved by Commissioner O'Donnell, seconded by Commissioner Van Vliet, to approve the installation of the three satellite dishes subject to the dishes and poles being painted to match the existing building color. Motion carried 4-0, Commissioners Connor and Gregory Absent. 3. CASE NO.: PP 97-2 APPLICANT(AND ADDRESS).KIRKPATRICK ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, A.I.A.,for EL PASEO RETAIL BUILDING, 1811 Centinela Avenue, Santa Monica, CA 90404 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final working drawings LOCATION: 73-670 and 73-680 El Pasco ZONE: C-1 After a lengthy discussion, the following action was taken: Action It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Van Vliet, to approve the final working drawings subject to the roof mounted equipment not exceeding the height of the parapet and subject to final approval of the landscaping plan prior to applicant obtaining framing inspection. Motion carried 4-0, Commissioners Connor and Gregory Absent. 4. CASE NO.: 4869 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS). IMPERIAL SIGN CO., INC. for CAM'S CORNER, 46-120 Calhoun Street, Indio, CA 92201 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised monument signage and landscaping LOCATION: 74-480 Highway 111 ZONE: C-1 3 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 26, 1997 Commissioner Urrutia noted that the two landscape architect commissions were not present and therefore they would have to continue the revised landscaping plan until the commissioners were present to review and approve the plan. He suggested that the east and southerly signs be moved as close to the respective property lines as possible. Mr. Alvarez indicated that the stucco on the monument sign will match the stucco on the building. Action It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Van Vliet, to approve the revised monument signage subject to moving the east and south signage as close to the respective property lines as possible. The commission continued the amended landscaping plan until the landscape architect commissioners are present to review the amended plans. Motion carried 4-0, Commissioners Connor and Gregory Absent. 5. CASE NO.: C 97-14 APPLICANT(AND ADDREKk GARRY R. TERWILLIGER for KESQ TV-3, 11957 Third Street, Yucaipa, CA 92399 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of perimeter wall and landscaping LOCATION: 42-650 Melanie Place ZONE: S.I. Mr. Smith presented the plans and photographs indicating that it was a minor remodel to the lower level only. Action: It was moved by Commissioner O'Donnell, seconded by Commissioner Van Vliet, to approve the building expansion plans as submitted. Motion carried 4-0, Commissioners Connor and Gregory Absent. 4 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 26, 1997 6. CASE NO.: TT 28287 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS). ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST & ASSOCIATES for BIGHORN GOLF CLUB, 74-410 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260;BIGHORN DEVELOPMENT L.P.,255 Palowet Drive,Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of perimeter wall and landscaping LOCATION: Northern property line of the Bighorn Golf Club ZONE: P.C.D. Mr.Alvarez presented plans as well as a colored rendering of the wall indicating that Eric Johnson approved the plans. The applicants,Mr. Carl Cardinelli and Mr.Dennis Orsborn,were present and noted that the pictures show how they would like the wall and landscaping to be when finished. The wall is on the north boundary of the golf club facing Cahuilla Hills. They indicated that there were some pop-outs and indentations with planting on both sides of the wall. Action It was moved by Commissioner Van Vliet, seconded by Commissioner Urrutia, to approve the perimeter wall and landscaping plan along the northern property line as submitted. Motion carried 4-0, Commissioners Connor and Gregory Absent. B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO.: CUP 94-2, Amendment No. 1 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS).- CASTELLI'S ANDREINOS, 73-098 Hwy 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260; MICHAEL HURST, 73-625 Highway 111, Suite F, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised plans, with landscaping, for addition of 600 square foot free standing building LOCATION: 73-098 Highway 111 5 �... MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 26, 1997 ZONE: C-1 The applicants, Mr.Brian Altman and Mr. Michael Hurst, were present. Mr. Smith presented the revised plans for the addition. Mr. Alvarez reminded the commission that some of their previous concerns were the roof pitches, the lack of undulation, and lighting in the walkway. Mr. Hurst outlined the changes in the elevations showing the undulation and different color variations made. Mr. Conlon asked what the second floor would be used for. Mr. Hurst explained that it would be used for storage. Commissioner Urrutia noted that the commission has not reviewed the signage so it would not be a part of the approval at this point. Mr. Altman explained that the signage would only be visible from the back of the existing building. Commissioner Van Vliet asked about the exterior colors. Mr. Hurst indicated that the stucco colors would match the existing building. Commissioner Urrutia asked to see two or three additional shades of this color added to the new building colors to accentuate the monumental size. Action It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner O'Donnell, to approve the revised plans with the condition that the building color include two or three different shades of the existing building. Signage was not reviewed by the commission at this point. Motion carried 3-1-0, Commissioner Van Vliet Voting No and Commissioners Connor and Gregory Absent. 2. CASE NO.: C 97-15 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESSh SOUTH WEST CONCEPTS for MINI STORAGE COMPLEX, 82-873 Dr. Carreon Blvd., Indio, CA 92201 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of preliminary architectural and landscape plans for mini storage facility LOCATION: South side of 42nd Avenue, 1300 feet west of Cook Street ZONE: S.I. 6 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 26, 1997 Mr. Smith presented the conceptual plan noting that it showed approximately 27' of setback(which is landscaping)adjacent to the street. Commissioner Van Vliet asked if there were elevations available to review. The applicant, John Miller, indicated that there were no elevations as yet. Commissioner Urrutia stated that he did not have a problem with pre-fabricated buildings, but without seeing architectural plans it would be very difficult to approve. Commissioner Urrutia asked if there were any emergency exits. Mr.Miller indicated that there were not. Mr. Smith noted that staff had directed Mr. Miller to the Fire Department on this issue. Mr. Miller explained that the garages would be air conditioned at the option of the tenant and that the air conditioning equipment will be placed on the roof. Mr. Conlon discussed the setbacks and how they relate to required fire walls. Mr. Miller asked if there was any objection to having landscaping similar to the city's maintenance yard which is adjacent to this property. Commissioner Holden explained that this would depend on what the architecture will look like because if the landscaping is needed to screen the building due to the lack of architecture, then this type of simple/low maintenance landscaping would not be acceptable. He explained that if the building has some architectural design appeal to it then a minimal landscape design would be acceptable. Commissioner Urrutia added that it was important to see the architecture and how these buildings will blend together. He added that he would rather see a couple of trees placed in the waiting area between the gates to help soften the area and break up the massive amount of asphalt. Mr. Miller explained that Sav-Most Storage on 42nd Street and Cook Street has 4 parking spaces with no handicap parking, All American Storage (in the same area) has no regular parking and no handicap parking, and Palm Desert Storage also has no regular parking spaces an no handi-cap parking spaces. Mr. Smith noted that these facilities were inherited from the county and therefore the city had no control over the project when it was originally approved and built in the county and that all buildings now have to meet the city's code requirement. Mr. Smith felt that the parking proposed for this plan was acceptable. Note: Commissioner O'Donnell left meeting at 1:15 p.m. Action It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Van Vliet, to continue the request directing the applicant to resubmit the plans with conceptual elevation plans, material samples, and a landscaping plan. Motion carried 3-0, Commissioners Connor, Gregory and O'Donnell Absent. 7 1.rw MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 26, 1997 2. CASE NO.: C 97-13 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): HOWARD L. HAIT for DESERT EYES OPTOMETRY, 42-215 Washington Street, Suite G, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of preliminary site plan and elevations for 1,975 square foot hearing aid health care center LOCATION: 44-650 Monterey Avenue ZONE: R-2 Mr. Smith noted that this property was located to two lots south of Hacienda de Monterey. Commissioner Holden indicated that they are proposing that the existing building be demolished instead of keeping the existing building and painting it. Action It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Van Vliet, to approve the preliminary site plan and elevations as submitted. Motion carried 2-0-1, Commissioner Holden Abstaining and Commissioner Connor, Gregory and O'Donnell Absent. IV. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 1:25 p.m. or ST E SMITH PLANNING MANAGER SS/db 8