Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-02-08 _ t ; �w' `'�rM�` PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2000 MINUTES **************************************************************************************************** I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 12:30 p.m. Commissioners Present Current Meetina Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent Wayne Connor X 2 1 Ronald Gregory X 3 0 Neil Lingle X 1 0 Richard O'Donnell X 2 1 Chris Van Vliet X 3 0 John Vuksic X 1 0 Staff Present: Phil Drell, Director of Community Development Steve Smith, Planning Manager � Martin Alvarez, Associate Planner Jason Finley, Code Enforcement Officer Kim Chafin, Senior Office Assistant II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner O'Donnell moved, seconded by Chairman Gregory, to approve the minutes of the January 25, 2000 meeting. Motion carried 3-0-3, with Commissioners Lingle, O'Donnell and Vuksic abstaining. III. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. 1 � � � ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 2000 MINUTES IV. CASES A. Final Drawings 1. CASE NO.: SA 00-10 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS� TOP OF THE LINES SIGNS, P.O. Box 179, La Quinta, CA 92253 for LINO'S, INC., 41-700 Corporate Way, Suite A, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of monument sign LOCATION: 74-875 Hovley Lane East ZONE: S.I. Ms. Chafin reported that the applicant proposes a monument sign for Lino's Independent Mercedes Service, to be located at 74-875 Hovley Lane East. The building is currently under construction. The applicant proposes a double-sided sign which will be visible to traffic traveling both east and west on Hovley Lane East. The sign will be located in the landscaped area immediately east of the driveway, centered between the sidewalk and the six-foot block wall which is to be constructed. Staff recommends that the sign be located a minimum of 12 feet from the face of curb to ensure the sign is located on private property rather than the public right-of-way. The proposed sign will be comprised of a split face block base and a double- sided can sign encased in stucco. The block and stucco will be painted to match the building. The can sign will be made of sheet metal, and internal illumination will be provided with HO lamps (maximum 430 ma output). The can will have a white background, and the letters will be a maximum of 10 inches in height in Mercedes' trademark blue color (sample available for viewing at Tuesday's meeting). The sign will indicate the building address at the top and read "LINO'S, INC. an INDEPENDENT MERCEDES SERVICE." 2 � � `�r ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 2000 MINUTES The proposed monument sign complies with the requirements of the City's Sign Ordinance. Staff worked with the applicant to design a sign that will be integrated with the site according to the architectural plans previously approved by the Commission, and finds the design aesthetically acceptable. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review Commission approve the plans with the following conditions: 1. Block (split face) and stucco, with color to match building color; 2. Sign located minimum of 12 feet from face of curb; 3. Monument sign maximum five-foot height and six-foot width; 4. Letter height maximum 10 inches; and 5. HO lamp output maximum 430 ma. Commissioner O'Donnell felt that the proposed signage has excessive verbiage, to which Rose of Lino's Mercedes replied by suggesting that the street address be eliminated. Chairman Gregory commented that his concern about the white background is mitigated by the HO lamp output maximum of 430 ma. Action: Commissioner Connor moved, seconded by Commissioner O'Donnell, to approve the sign with the following conditions: 1) block (split face) and stucco, with color to match building color; 2) sign located minimum of 12 feet from face of curb; 3) monument sign maximum five-foot height and six-foot width; 4) letter height maximum 10 inches; 5) HO lamp output maximum 430 ma; and 6) deletion of the street address. The motion carried 6-0. 3 `'�r�'' �rrr' ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 2000 MINUTES 2. CASE NO.: SA 00-09 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS� TOP OF THE LINES SIGNS, P.O. Box 179, La Quinta, CA 92253 for CUSTOM DESIGNS IN WOOD, 77-690 Springfield Lane, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of business identification sign LOCATION: 77-690 Springfield Lane ZONE: S.I. Ms. Chafin reported that the applicant proposes a non-illuminated wall sign for Custom Designs in Wood, located at 77-690 Springfield Lane. The business occupies both Suites A and B, which has a total of 150 lineal feet of street frontage and faces south. The applicant indicates that the sign will be located in the middle of the front elevation, on the fascia above the blue color band, with the top of the sign even with the height of the building address. The proposed sign will measure 44 inches high by eight feet long for a total area of 30 square feet, and as such, falls within the allowable square footage pursuant to the City's Sign Ordinance. The sign will read "CUSTOM DESIGNS IN WOOD INC," incorporating the business logo in the word "WOOD." Bright blue colored PVC material is to be used, and the applicant has provided a color sample which will be available for the Commission's review at Tuesday's meeting. The proposed signage meets the requirements of the City's Sign Ordinance, and staff believes that the sign is aesthetically acceptable and compatible with the surroundings. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review Commission approve the proposed sign, to be located in the middle of the front elevation, on the fascia above the blue color band, with the top of the sign even with the height of the building address. 4 � � ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 2000 MINUTES Commission discussed at length various options with the layout of the proposed sign. Eric of Top of the Line Signs clarified that the applicant would prefer the text to be located above the blue color band with the logo below the blue color band. Action: Commissioner Vuksic moved, seconded by Commissioner Van Vliet, to authorize staff to approve the revised plans over the counter with the following conditions: 1) entire sign to be located in the middle of the front elevation , with the blue color band around building to be incorporated into the center of the logo element and the text to be located immediately above the logo. The motion carried 6-0. 3. CASE NO.: SA 00-11 APPLICANT(AND ADDRES�: AMERICAN AWNING COMPANY,44-489 Town Center Way, Suite 194, Palm Desert, CA 92260 for RANDALL CHASE GALLERY, 73-255 EI Paseo #21, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of awnings with signage LOCATION: 73-255 EI Paseo ZONE: C-1 Ms. Chafin reported the applicant proposes to install three dome-shaped, burgundy colored awnings at 73-255 EI Paseo, Suite 21. The property faces north and is separated from the business to the east by a breezeway. The storefront measures 20'6", and is thus entitled to 20.5 square feet of signage. The main awning is proposed for the entryway and will measure nine feet at the highest point and will project 4'6" out from the building. The bottom 30- inch portion of the awning is proposed to be in a "Cool Glo Ivory" color and will feature the words "Randall Chase Gallery" in burgundy adhesive vinyl letters with a maximum letter height of 12 inches. Pursuant to the City's Sign 5 . +�rr�rr' � ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 2000 MINUTES Ordinance, the size of the proposed signage proposed falls within the allowable square footage. The business owner indicates that the main awning will serve to protect the afinrork from sun glare which bounces off cars parked in front of the property on EI Paseo, and during the summer, will protect the artwork from direct sun. Two faded, scallop-edged awnings currently hang over the srnall display windows on either side of the entry, and the applicant proposes to replace them with two burgundy colored awnings which will not include signage. Although the plans do not indicate dimensions, the colored rendering depicts awnings which appear to be proportional to the main awning. The proposed signage meets the requirements of the Sign Ordinance, and staff believes that the awnings are aesthetically acceptable and compatible with the surroundings. Staff recommends that the Commission approve the plans as submitted. Action: Commissioner O'Donnell moved, seconded by Commissioner Connor, to approve the plans with the condition that the bottoms of the three awnings line up. The motion carried 6-0. 6 � � ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 2000 MINUTES 4. CASE NO.: SA 00-13 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS�: IMPERIAL SIGN COMPANY, 46-120 Calhoun Street, Indio, CA 92201 for VACATION INN, 74-695 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of business identification signage LOCATION: 74-695 Highway 111 ZONE: PC-4 Mr. Alvarez reported that the applicant proposes changes in the business identification signage at Vacation Inn, 74-695 Highway 111. Sign A will be modified to add the words "& Suites"to the existing "Vacation Inn Hotel" sign. This sign is located on the entry wall of the complex. The letters will remain non-illuminated and will have a gold aluminum background. Sign B will not be installed. Regarding Signs D and E, finro sets of 11-inch reverse channel letters will be installed on the porte-cochere and will read "Vacation Inn." The letters will be green and will have a gold PVC background to the same height as the letters to conceal the raceway. No access is available to eliminate the use of a raceway. Sign F consists of one set of individual channel letters over the porte- cochere, and this will be removed. Sign G consists of a double-sided monument reading "Vacation Inn," and this sign will also be removed. The sign colors, location and sizes are acceptable and compatible with the buildings, and staff recommends approval of the proposal as presented. Action: Commissioner Connor moved, seconded by Commissioner Van Vliet, to approve the plans as submitted. The motion carried 6-0. 7 . „�' � ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 2000 MINUTES 5. CASE NO.: SA 00-15 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS�: WESTERN SIGN SYSTEMS, 1020 Linda Vista Drive, San Marcos, CA 92069 for GOODYEAR, 44-420 Town Center Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of new business identification signage LOCATION: 44-420 Town Center Way ZONE: PC-3 Mr. Alvarez reported that the applicant has requested a continuance to February 22, 2000. Action: Commissioner O'Donnell moved, seconded by Commissioner Connor, to continue the case to 2/22/00 at the applicant's request. The motion carried 6-0. 6. CASE NO.: PP/CUP 98-21, GPA 98-6, C/Z 98-7 APPLICANT (AND ADDRES�: DENNIS GEORGE ORR, AIA, 4088 Via Zorro #B, Santa Barbara, CA 93110 for VILLA PORTOFINO c/o ROYCE INTERNATIONAL, 249 Las Entradas Drive, Santa Barbara, CA 93108 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary and final approval of a temporary sales building for senior health and wellness resort LOCATION: Southwest corner of Country Club and Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-5 Michael Lamelza of Royce International presented the plans for the temporary sales building. Commissioner Van Vliet asked about the project's sell-out schedule, to which 8 . �l�tir' � ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 2000 MINUTES Mr. Lamelza responded by indicating approximately five years. Chairman Gregory pointed out that the guard house has been moved further back from the street at the City's request. Mr. Smith clarified that this approval shall not create any access other than what has been previously approved. Action: Commissioner Connor moved, seconded by Commissioner O'Donnell, to grant preliminary and final approval of the plans as presented. The motion carried 5-0-1, with Chairman Gregory abstaining. 9 :� � ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 2000 MINUTES 7. CASE NO.: C 98-6 APPLICANT �AND ADDRESS� T. MICHAEL HADLEY ARCHITECTS, 23042 Alcade Drive, Suite F, Laguna Hilis, CA 92653 for SHERMAN- SHRADER ENTERPRISES NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of revised working drawings LOCATION: 73-991 Highway 111 (southwest corner of Highway 111 and Portola) ZONE: C-1 Mr. Smith reported that the plans were previously approved for a dental office facility, and now the applicant indicates the use will be general office, but there are no changes to the exterior elevations; so no Commission action is required. 8. CASE NO.: PP/CUP 98-5 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS� MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS, INC., 6649 Westwood Boulevard, Suite 500, Orlando, FL 32809-6090 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final working drawings for villas (Buildings 1000, 1100, 1200, 1300, 1400 & 1500) LOCATION: 36-750 Monterey ZONE: PR-5 Mr. Smith reported that the working drawings are not in conformance with the preliminary plans which the Commission previously approved. The main roof line remains at 36 feet, but the tower elements are now proposed to be 40 feet and 44 feet, which is a height increase over the previously approved plans. Staff finds the revised plans to be superior and would point out that the pop out balconies provide more undulation to the building exterior. 10 . � � ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 2000 MINUTES Commissioner O'Donnell noted that the only height increase in the plan is with the tower elements, and added that he finds the revised plans far superior to the previously approved plans, with which Commissioners Van Vliet, Connor and Gregory concurred. Action: Commissioner Lingle moved, seconded by Commissioner O'Donnell, to recognize the working drawings to be significantly different from the previously approved preliminary plans, and found them to be an improvement over the previously approved preliminary plans, and granted preliminary approval of the revised preliminary plans and final approval of the working drawings. The motion carried 6-0. 9. CASE NO.: TT 29579 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS�: FORD PLUMLEY GROUP, LLC, 68-936 Adelina Road, Cathedral City, CA 92234 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of perimeter and typical landscape plan LOCATION: 73-551 Hovley Lane West ZONE: PR-5 Mr. Alvarez reported that the applicant received preliminary landscaping approval for the perimeter and retention basin at the January 11, 2000 meeting. The project is a 16-lot, single cul-de-sac subdivision located at 73- 551 Hovley Lane East. The approval was subject to comments made by Spencer Knight, the City's Landscape Manager. The plans have been revised to incorporate the comments made by Mr. Knight. Mr. Knight has reviewed the working drawings and has made a couple of minor comments regarding tree and irrigation installation. The applicant also requests approval of the typical landscape plans for the three residential models proposed. The only concern staff has with the typical landscape plans is the need for an additional 24-inch box shade tree on each lot. The City requires a minimum of two, 24-inch box shade trees per lot. 11 . �l�rrr' v�r� ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 2000 MINUTES Staff recommends that the Commission grant final landscaping approval, subject to the comments made by the City's Landscape Manager and a condition that each lot have a minimum of two, 24-inch box shade trees. Action: Commissioner Connor moved, seconded by Chairman Gregory, to grant final landscaping approval, subject to the comments made by the City's Landscape Manager and a condition that each lot have a minimum of two, 24-inch box shade trees. The motion carried 6-0. 10. CASE NO.: TT 29579 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS� FORD PLUMLEY GROUP, LLC, 68-936 Adelina Road, Cathedral City, CA 92234 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary and final approval of 16 single-family residences LOCATION: South side of Hovley Lane, 1500 feet west of Portola ZONE: PR-5 Mr. Alvarez reported that the applicant's proposal will be a continuation of the subdivision currently under construction to the east known as Sandpiper Court. In May of 1999, the Commission approved two models, which eventfully included front yard casitas/third-car garages. The current proposal is referred to as Sandpiper Court West and will feature identical homes and options (i.e., casitas/third-car garages) as those currently approved and under construction to the east. The previously approved homes included finro plans. Plan 1 totals 2,420 square feet, and Plan 2 totals 2,773 square feet. The units features concrete tile, hip roofs and stucco walls with cultured stone veneer at the base. The plans have entry tower elements with a maximum building height of 20'0". The plans also include an optional 344 square foot casita or a side entry third-car garage. The casitas/garages also feature concrete tile roofs, stone veneer and stucco walls. The height of the casitas will be 13'6". The homes meet the minimum setbacks required by the Planned Residential District. Although the casitas and garages are not plotted on the lots, the developer will bring each one back for staff review and approval. 12 • � � ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 2000 MINUTES As required on the previous approval, i.e., Sandpiper Court, the fascia treatment and details on the front elevations are continued around the entire structure. The casitas and/or third-car garages feature courtyard tie-in walls and architectural detailing to match the residential structures. Stucco and trim colors are acceptable. Staff recommends that the Commission grant final approval of the plans as submitted. Action: Commissioner Van Vliet moved, seconded by Commissioner O'Donnell, to grant final approval of the plans as submitted. The motion carried 6-0. B. Preliminary Plans 1. CASE NO.: CUP 99-15 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS� COLUMBIA PARCAR CORP., 73-168 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval to display golf cars in front of building, behind a fence LOCATION: 73-168 Highway 111 ZONE: C-1 Mr. Smith reported that the applicant has requested a continuance to February 22, 2000. Action: Commissioner Connor moved, seconded by Commissioner Vuksic, to continue the case to 2/22/00 at the applicanYs request. The motion carried 6-0. 13 � � ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 2000 MINUTES 2. CASE NO.: PP 84-7 Amendment APPLICANT(AND ADDRESS�: SANBORN ARCHITECTURE, 1227 South Gene Autry Traii, Suite C, Palm Springs, CA 92264 for SHEILA WEINSTOCK, 7071 Consolidated Way, San Diego, CA 92121 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of 11,492 square foot addition to an existing retail furniture store LOCATION: 72-111 Highway 111 ZONE: C-1 Mr. Alvarez reported that the appficant requests approval to add 11,492 square feet to the rear of the existing Legacy Home Furnishings store. The proposal includes a new parking lot in the rear as well as new access from Rio Del Sol (Rancho Mirage) at the west end of the property. A new drive aisle will also be created along the north side of the existing building, connecting the front parking lot and the new rear lot. Roof tiles, stucco color and finishes with match the existing building. The new rear entrance will feature an entry element that mimics the existing front entrance. The addition is compatible with the existing building and meets the development standards of the General Commercial District. A landscape plan will follow at a later date. The building sits on the middle of the City boundary between Rancho Mirage and Palm Desert. The structure is physically connected befinreen the two boundaries. The applicant will require approval from the City of Rancho Mirage to proceed with the project. Staff recommends that the Commission require all mechanical equipment to be below the parapet walls and that all existing exposed mechanical equipment also be screened, particularly along the north side of the building. Staff recommends that the Commission grant preliminary architectural approval, subject to the condition that all existing and proposal mechanical equipment must be screened. 14 • `j(f�'` 's� ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 2000 MINUTES Commissioner Vuksic sketched some modifications on the plans and suggested that the elevations have line weights and shadows, and recommended that a roof plan be submitted. Commissioner Van Vliet indicated that he would like to see the whole project presented instead of just half of the building. Mr. Smith indicated that staff will review the matter with the City Attorney to determine how much latitude the City has with regard to the other half of the building. Commissioner Connor felt that the Commission should at least be presented with drawings which indicate what the proposed addition will look like with the other half of the building as it currently exists. Chairman Gregory requested that a landscape plan be submitted with the revised preliminary plans. Action: Commissioner Connor moved, seconded by Commissioner Lingle, to continue the case to allow the applicant to incorporate modifications suggested by the Commission. The motion carried 6-0. 15 . '�rr+' �r►' ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 2000 MINUTES C. Miscellaneous 1. CASE NO.: RV 99-9 APPLICANT(AND ADDRESS� FRANK PROULX and DIXIE MARTIN, 77- 260 Indiana Avenue, Palm Desert, CA 92211 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval to park RV in front yard LOCATION: 77-260 Indiana Avenue ZONE: R-1 (9,000) Ms. Chafin reported that the subject vehicle is a fifth wheel trailer 24 feet in length, eight feet wide and eight-and-a-half feet high. The applicant would like to continue to store the RV in the driveway. The vehicle is partially screened on the side yard by a tree and a three-foot high Oleander hedge. The applicant proposes to provide additional screening on the side yard with more Oleanders. To screen the vehicle on the front yard, the applicant proposes to plant 15-gallon Ficus or 24-inch box Carolina Cherry hedges. To screen the vehicle from the street, the applicant proposes to install a vine- covered cyclone gate or a wrought iron gate with a privacy screen. The City's RV ordinance requires that recreational vehicles be substantially (not completely) screened, and be aesthetically acceptable; so a judgment call is required in this case. Based on the plans submitted and photographs of the site, staff believes the recreational vehicle would not be substantially screened. Pursuant to RV ordinance requirements, staff mailed notices of this meeting to property owners within a 300-foot radius of the subject property. Staff has received no comments in response to the notices. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review Commission deny the request for approval to store the vehicle in the driveway because the proposed plan would not substantially screen the vehicle. 16 • � � ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 2000 MINUTES Mr. Proulx indicated that the proposed plan incorporates a great deal of landscaping to screen the vehicle. Richard Westphal,42-960 Texas Avenue, spoke in opposition of the request, and indicated that Palm Desert Country Club has had problems in the past with people utilizing RVs as guest quarters. Jodean Westphal, 42-960 Texas Avenue, spoke in opposition of the request and expressed concern about setting an improper precedent. Commissioner Connor was concerned that the RV would be located so close to the street and felt that screening would actually create more of a presence and overpower the streetscape. Chairman Gregory suggested that Mr. Proulx try to store the vehicle elsewhere on the site because otherwise it would be too close to the street, to which Mr. Proulx replied that there is no viable alternative location on the property. , Commissioner Lingle commented that he can empathize with the applicant because he owns an RV and lives in the area, but indicated that he could not support the proposal because of its close proximity to the street. Commissioner Van Vliet acknowledged that this is a difficult situation, and the applicant appears to have examined every alternative, but unfortunately, there is no way to screen this vehicle in compliance with the existing ordinance. Commissioner O'Donnell concurred with his associates and suggested that . the only viable solution is off-site storage since the vehicle simply will not fit in the front yard area. Action: Commissioner O'Donnell moved, seconded by Commissioner Lingle,to deny the request for approval to store the vehicle in the driveway. The motion carried 6-0. 17 ' ry�„ � ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION FEBRUARY 8, 2000 MINUTES 2. CASE NO.: MISC 00-4 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS,� GLORIA G. LEIJA, 76-971 Florida, Palm Desert, CA 92211 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of a front yard wail which encroaches into the front yard setback LOCATION: 76-971 Florida ZONE: R-1 (9,000) Ms. Chafin reported that the applicant requests approval for a permit for a wall which has been constructed within the front yard setback at 76-971 Florida. The subject block wall measures five feet in height and is located 13 feet from the face of the curb. The Zoning Ordinance requires front yard walls between four feet and six feet in height to be located no closer than 15 feet from the face of curb. The Zoning Ordinance authorizes the Architectural Review Commission to make exceptions to these restrictions. In touring the neighborhood, it is evident that many of the existing residences have front yard walls in similar locations. Use of substantial landscaping material serves to soften the appearance and mitigate the massiveness created by the wall height. This request is consistent with others granted by the Commission in this area. Staff believes that this wall will not have a negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood, and would suggest that the area in front of the wall be substantially landscaped pursuant to the plan submitted by the applicant. Staff recommends that the Commission approve the request, subject to implementation of the landscape plan as submitted. Chairman Gregory commented that the proposed landscaping plan would not work, and suggested putting vines on the wall, adding Lantanas, and including a border. 18 ` "�` �, ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION JAT���,.�., A A' �000 ��,� �1C-1�1J MINUTES Commissioner Connor suggested using Filiferas rather than Queen Palms. Action: Commissioner Van Vliet moved, seconded by Chairman Gregory, to authorize staff to approve revised plans over the counter with the following conditions: 1) that additional Lantanas be incorporated into the plan; 2) that Filiferas be used instead of Queen Palms; 3)that vines be added to the wall; and 4) that the plan reflect borders. The motion carried 6-0. 3. Appointment of ARC member to Zoning Ordinance Review Committee (ZORC) Commissioner O'Donnell volunteered to serve as the Architectural Review Commission representative on the Zoning Ordinance Review Committee. 4. Recess and reconvene at Bighorn to view grading of four lots Due to the lateness of the hour, the Commission did not recess and reconvene at Bighorn to view the grading of four lots. V. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 3:00 p.m. STEVE SMITH PLANNING MANAGER 19