HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-07-09 CITY OF PALM DESERT
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
MINUTES
JULY 9, 2002
****************************************************************************************************
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 12:30 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Commissioners Current Meeting Year to Date
Present Absent Present Absent
Ronald Gregory, Chairman X 10 2
Kristi Hanson X 10 2
Neil Lingle X 9 3
Richard O'Donnell X 12 0
Chris Van Vliet X 11 1
John Vuksic X 11 1
Ray Lopez X 10 0
Also Present:
Phil Drell, Director, Community Development
Steve Smith, Planning Manager
Francisco Urbina, Associate Planner
Tony Bagato, Planning Technician
Donna Quaiver, Senior Office Assistant
Spencer Knight, Landscape Manager
Diane Hollinger, Landscape Specialist
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 25, 2002
Commissioner Van Vliet moved, seconded by Commissioner Vuksic to
approve the minutes of June 25, 2002. The motion carried 6-0-0-1 with
Commissioner Gregory absent.
IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
A. City Attorney, Dave Erwin, was present to address the Commission
regarding conflict of interest. A discussion was held and the
1
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
JULY 9, 2002
MINUTES
Commission was informed that they must abstain from any case that is
within 500' of their personal property or of any property that they would
have a financial interest in. They were also informed that they were not
allowed to comment on any such applications as Commissioners. In
order to comment they would need to step away from the Commission
and make this comment as a member of the public.
A. Final Drawings
1. CASE NO.: C 98-12
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): THE LIVING DESERT, 47-900 Portola
Avenue, Palm Desert, CA 92260
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of
giraffe barn.
LOCATION: 47-900 Portola Avenue, The Living Desert
ZONE: P.D.
Action: Commissioner Hanson moved, seconded by Commissioner
Lingle for approval by minute motion. Motion carried 6-0-0-1 with
Commissioner Gregory absent.
2. CASE NO.: SA 02-109
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ANCHOR SIGN, P.O. BOX 6009,
CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29405
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of new
business sign.
LOCATION: 72-885 Highway 111, Palms to Pines Shopping Center
East.
ZONE: P.C.
Mr. Bagato presented drawings for the proposed business signage for
Tweeter Home Entertainment. The Commission was confused as to
the type of sign that was proposed since the plans called for internally
illuminated individual channel letters, however, the representative for
G:Planning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR020709.MIN 2
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
J U LY 9, 2002
AGENDA
Anchor Signs, Tony Rector, stated that they would be reverse channel
letters. The Commission agreed that the reverse channel was superior.
Action: Commissioner Hanson moved, seconded by Commissioner
Lopez for approval of business sign as clarified by applicant's
representative to be reverse channel letters. Motion carried 6-0-0-1
with Commissioner Gregory absent.
3. CASE NO.: PP 01-08
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): KLAFF REALTY, 111 WEST
JACKSON BLVD., CHICAGO, IL 60604
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of
working drawings.
LOCATION: 73-411 Highway 111, northwest corner of San Pablo and
El Paseo. El Paseo Square
ZONE: C-1
Action: Commissioner Hanson moved, seconded by Commissioner
Lingle for approval by minute motion. Motion carried 5-0-1-1- with
Commissioner Vuksic abstaining and Commissioner Gregory absent.
4. CASE NO.: MISC. 02-15
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): BONGARD RESIDENCE, 77-650
Robin Road, Palm Desert, CA 92260
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of 18 feet
high roof for a single family home.
LOCATION: 77-650 Robin Road, east of Warner Trail and west of
Washington Street.
ZONE: RE 40,000
Action: Commissioner Hanson moved, seconded by Commissioner
Lingle for approval by minute motion. Motion carried 6-0-0-1 with
Commissioner Gregory absent.
GRanning0onna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR020709.MIN 3
fir'
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
JULY 9, 2002
MINUTES
5. CASE NO.: MISC. 02-16
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): TRAVIS BUNKER CONSTRUCTION,
691 Industrial Place, Palm Springs, CA 92264
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of 17 foot
high roof for two single-family homes.
LOCATION: 74-835 and 74-879 Sheryl Avenue, west of Cook Street.
ZONE: R-1
Action: Commissioner Van Vliet moved, seconded by Commissioner
Vuksic for approval. Motion carried 6-0-0-1 with Commissioner Gregory
absent.
B. Preliminary Plans
1. CASE NO.: PP 01-02 (A)
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): SANBORN A/E, INC., FOR CANYON
NATIONAL BANK, 1227 S. Gene Autry Trail, #C, Palm Springs, CA
92264
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Revised elevation and
site plan for bank.
LOCATION: 74-150 Country Club, Canyon National Bank
ZONE: O.P.
Action: Request was continued to the July 23, 2002 ARC meeting at
applicant's request.
G:Planning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\AgminWR020709.MIN 4
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
JULY 9, 2002
MINUTES
2. CASE NO.: C 02-03
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PETER TAYTAY (ARCHITECTS
ORANGE), 144 N. Orange Street, Orange, CA 92866
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary design
approval of commercial building.
LOCATION: 77-950 Country Club Drive, Desert Country Plaza, Wells
Fargo Bank
ZONE: P.C.
Mr. Smith stated that the proposed Wells Fargo Bank will be on the
north side of Country Club Drive 300' west of Washington Street. This
is pad #1. He displayed the site plan for the Commission to view. There
is an existing car wash and several restaurants in the vicinity as well as
Gold's Gym. The material board was passed around to the
Commission. The building footprint that is being proposed is
significantly smaller than what had been originally approved on this pad
so there is a landscape effort going in to fill in the area that will not be
used by the building.
Hugh Rose, architect, was present and stated that he combined a
branch bank with an added element of a business center. The west
elevation will have a fair amount of coverage for some of the offices
with room for landscaping. The forms and colors are similar to those of
the rest of the existing center but Wells Fargo wants to have an
individual identity and have used ledge stone all the way around the
building. They are trying to use forms and colors that would
complement the desert setting. Most of the exterior of the building is
driven by shade from an energy standpoint as well as for the comfort of
the tenants. There is a vestibule entry element that faces the parking
lot.
Mr. Smith asked where the signage would be. Mr. Taytay stated that
Wells Fargo will come in with a separate application, but will typically
want a sign facing the parking lot and one on the Country Club side.
Commissioner O'Donnell asked what the highest element on the
building is. Mr. Taytay stated that it would be 25' with the average
height at approximately 20'. Commissioner O'Donnell asked about the
line on the roof on the "D" elevation. Mr. Taytay stated that they will
G:Planning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR020709.MIN 5
`rrrf
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
J U LY 9, 2002
MINUTES
probably end up revising this but they are trying to show the reverse
side of the pitch way in the distance that you would really never see.
Commissioner Hanson stated that she felt that it would be really
important that the architects have some input on where the signs go so
that they know exactly how it's going to be installed, especially if they're
going to put it on the ledge stone. Mr. Smith stated that the center is
limited to reverse channel on the Country Club side. Commissioner
Hanson suggested using flat letters that are back lit.
Commissioner O'Donnell asked what kind of glazing they're using on
the building. Mr. Taytay stated that they will probably use some sort of
tinted bronze.
Commissioner Vuksic asked if Wells Fargo might want signs on either
the east or the west elevations. Mr. Taytay stated that he didn't think
they would want a sign on the west elevation. Commissioner Vuksic
stated that he only sees one spot on the east elevation for a sign, which
is on the rock surface. He wanted to know what this was going to look
like with a sign on a rock element. Commissioner Hanson suggested
using a nice metal letter that's mounted away from the stone.
Commissioner Hanson commented that the lightest color on the
color/material board may be too light and it would look too white. They
might want to consider darkening the color.
Commissioner O'Donnell asked how far the windows are inset. Mr.
Rose stated that along the west side the glazing is along the structural
wall and the battered elements come out approximately 5' and taper
back. The trellis element comes out at least 7' beyond that. There is a
vestibule which is 3'-4' back with a second set of doors to get into the
bank. Most of the other openings are aesthetic. There will be a 6"
furring around the windows to get a 6" shadow line.
Action: Commissioner Hanson moved, seconded by Commissioner
Vuksic for preliminary approval of architecture only. Motion carried 6-0-
0-1 with Commissioner Gregory absent.
GRanning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR020709.MIN 6
*4We NOW
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
JULY 9, 2002
MINUTES
3. CASE NO.: TT 29692
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CYPRESS ESTATES, LLC, P.O. Box
1686, Palm Desert, CA 92260
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval
of architecture and landscaping for eight homes.
LOCATION: 46-200 Portola Avenue
ZONE: R-1
Mr. Smith stated that he would like to add Cypress Estates, LLC to the
agenda with unanimous consent of the Commission. The applicant
would like to discuss some of Commission's requirements from the last
meeting relative to where they were changing the texture of the
exterior.
Action: Commissioner O'Donnell moved, seconded by Commissioner
Hanson for approval to add Cypress Estates, LLC to the agenda.
Motion carried 5-0-1-1 with Commissioner Lingle abstaining and
Commissioner Gregory absent.
Commissioner Vuksic asked why this was submitted late. Mr. Smith
stated that staff became aware of it yesterday. Tom Firek, applicant,
stated that he was waiting for the architect to make the changes.
Commissioner Vuksic commented that he doesn't want the applicant to
think that they're going to allow this again. The Commission doesn't
want to set a precedent where people think that they can just show up
and get something run through.
Commissioner Hanson stated that the tower looked acceptable.
Commissioner Vuksic and Commissioner Hanson made some minor
alterations regarding the location of the stone on the plans.
Commissioner Hanson stated that wherever the towers go all the way
down past the door, there should be stone.
Action: Commissioner Hanson moved, seconded by Commissioner Van
Vliet for approval subject to minor changes made to the plans relating to
the location of accent stone. Motion carried 5-0-1-1- with
Commissioner Lingle abstaining and Commissioner Gregory absent.
G:Planning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocsWgmin\AR020709.MIN 7
*400
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
JULY 9, 2002
MINUTES
C. Miscellaneous
1. Discussion on conflict of interest
2. CASE NO.: PP/CUP 01-30
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): RILEY/CARVER, LLC, c/o The Carver
Company, 74-947 Highway 111, Indian Wells, CA 92210
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Presentation by the
Gateway Subcommittee.
LOCATION: 34-000 Monterey Avenue (Southeast corner of Monterey
Avenue and Dinah Shore)
ZONE: PC
Mr. Smith stated that Commissioner O'Donnell requested to add this
item to the agenda for discussion purposes relative to the advances the
subcommittee has been making in their meetings with the Wal*Mart
architects. Martin Alvarez was present and stated that they are going
to set up another subcommittee meeting to meet with the developer
prior to it coming back to the ARC.
Mr. Alvarez stated that the subcommittee, consisting of Commissioner
O'Donnell and Commissioner Vuksic, met with the Wal*Mart architect
and went over some of the items that this Commission delegated to
these two Commission members. They addressed the treatment of the
wall area underneath the arches. There are some arches in front of the
Wal*Mart building between the entrances to Wal*Mart and Super
Wal*Mart. The Commissioners had requested more detail on the
treatment inside the arched areas. There are going to do wainscot
stone work on the bottom of that area. The subcommittee suggested
adding planters on the back side of the columns to provide for some
type of vine that would grow up the trellis. This was discussed with
Spencer Knight and Diane Holllinger and asked for suggested plant
material that could survive in that location.
Another issue that was discussed was the architectural treatment on
the southwest corner. On the elevations, there was a large expanse
that was left un-articulated. The subcommittee wanted to see some
G:Planning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR020709.MIN 8
err' sw
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
J U LY 9, 2002
MINUTES
type of architectural treatment. The discussion led to the proposal of a
free-standing trellis structure that could serve as a functional sitting
space/eating area.
The cart storage is another issue that was discussed. The architect will
bring back the details for the cart storage at the next meeting.
There was discussion regarding screening of the Garden Center and
what kind of treatments could be implemented to address the wind
issue. Some of the Commissioners felt that there should be more solid
features along the wrought iron fencing. The Wal*Mart architect stated
that Wal*Mart is agreeable to this and will address breaking up the long
expanses of wrought iron and will come back to the subcommittee. The
building colors will come back in a future meeting and then will also
address signage issues for Wal*Mart. They were way over their
allowed limit, per code, although there is a provision in the ordinance for
an exception. Based on the fact that they're sunk way down into the
site, he feels that this could be heard before the Planning Commission.
The kalwall had caused some concern for the Commission. The
subcommittee members had given some direction to reduce the overall
size of the kalwall area and create more of a solid area.
As the architect develops more and more detail on the plans, normally
the process would be that he would come back with the final drawings.
This would be difficult for the Commission to review as it would take a
lot of time to go through the details, therefore, there will be a separate
stage added to the review so that as further details are developed (i.e.
cornices, stonework, etc...) he will come back so that the Commission
can review this thoroughly. Mr. Alvarez stated that we are in the
process of reviewing the design guidelines for the entire center which
encompasses the theme of the center.
The subcommittee did give the architect direction to re-locate the
Pharmacy/One Hour Photo/Optical sign from the north end of the
building to a location closer to the entrance.
Commissioner O'Donnell stated that he's studied the design manual
very carefully and one of the things that he noticed is that he felt that
the architect still needed to add another layer of design. He pointed out
the richness in some of the architectural elements such as the towers
on the smaller buildings. There's nothing distinctive about the proposed
towers for the larger buildings. What the Commission is looking for are
G:Planning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR020709.MIN 9
%fte Sao
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
JULY 9, 2002
MINUTES
the aesthetics. Commissioner O'Donnell studied the book that
Commissioner Hanson lent him regarding Santa Barbara Mission-style
architecture. In going through the book he realized that there is one
portion of Santa Barbara Mission-style architecture that he thinks is the
classic style, which is Spanish Colonial. The argument that he has is
that he doesn't think that the Commission should take what is given to
them by the architect and take each element and say what to do with
each one. It's the architect's responsibility to use the design guideline
and design the whole project, including the big buildings, with the
richness and texture that is represented in the guidelines.
Mr. Alvarez stated that he wanted this information to be passed along
to the rest of the Commission to see if they concur and find out what
their feelings are on the process. The way it's normally done is that the
Commission gets to take a good look at the project and then once it
gets to the preliminary stage they can still make comments. At this
point, there is another layer of review that will be done at which time
they'll look at the consistency with the detailing used in the design
guideline.
Commissioner Hanson stated that she felt that the architect still hasn't
"made it". Commissioner Van Vliet commented that the scale of the
plans is so small that he would like to request that they submit full 1/4
scale or 1/8 scale plans so that they can really see the detail of the
elevations.
Mr. Smith asked the Commission how they want the subcommittee to
proceed. He asked if they want the subcommittee to continue to work
with the architects and when the subcommittee is satisfied or if they feel
that they've reached an impass, then they refer it back to the
Commission. Commissioner Van Vliet commented that this question
should be directed toward the subcommittee as this is a big burden on
them.
Commissioner Vuksic stated that he feels that the Commission gets a
shot at the massing and forms that they see in general and then as the
project is refined they pick on details. He doesn't think that it's
appropriate to have the architects to go back and re-study the massing.
The Commission has been working with them for approximately two
months and have led them to believe that they're getting closer
because each time they have a list of things that they want the
architects to look at and they address those items. To take a step back
G:Planning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR020709.MIN 10
140*01
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
J U LY 9, 2002
MINUTES
and basically ask them to re-design their buildings would be asking a
lot.
Commissioner Hanson stated that she has referred to the design
guidelines all along and the level of detail that is representative in their
design guidelines is not representative in the proposed plans. The
architects have not gone far enough. Commissioner Vuksic stated that
they haven't gone far enough, as far as details, and he feels that this is
something that needs to be done on all projects and not just have a
design submittal and working drawing submittal, but have a schematic
design submittal and a design development submittal where they can
actually see all the details.
Commissioner O'Donnell stated that he doesn't think that the
Commission should have to pick out something and help them along
with it. They are the architects for Wal*Mart and Sam's Club and they
have design standards to guide them and instead they're going outside
the design standards and it doesn't look like Santa Barbara Mission-
style architecture or the design guidelines. The Wal*Mart building itself
does nothing but provide a billboard for a sign. There's no entrance at
the front other than a couple of windows and a sign and that's it. He
had suggested making the passageway with the arches between
"Always" and "Always" more interesting inside. This is when they
discovered that this is where they might be putting the shopping carts.
It has been mentioned several times that there should be some
architecture in the parking lot. The parking lot is approximately 40
acres of asphalt with some small trees. There should be some
architecture in the parking lot to break it up. The other issue is at the
northeast corner where the top of the building is going to be 80' high
from the street level. The site itself hasn't been given the kind of
attention that it deserves. They're planning on building up the northeast
corner by 30'. Coordination between Public Works, landscaping, etc...
should be implemented. Mr. Alvarez stated that they've addressed
those issues and the developer knows where we stand. Commissioner
O'Donnell stated that it's not just the architecture that makes this
project, it's everything else that goes with it such as how does the
ingress/egress work.
Commissioner Van Vliet stated that if the Commission is going to have
an opportunity to provide input on at this project, it should be sooner
than later. Sometimes by the time they review a project it's too late to
make any changes.
Commissioner O'Donnell suggested that the project come back before
the full commission for review periodically since he's going to be out of
town for an extended period of time. Mr. Alvarez stated that there will
G:Planning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR020709.MIN I I
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
J U LY 9, 2002
MINUTES
be a formal presentation on the whole site, possibly including
landscaping at the next meeting. Spencer Knight stated that he's had
many discussions with the landscape architects and then when they
delivered the plans, it was a plain old parking lot. Mr. Alvarez stated
that Public Works does not like the raising of the pads, entrance
circulation as well as other circulation concerns. Letters have been
written to the developer regarding these issues and they'll end up at the
City Council
Spencer Knight objects to the 2:1 slope on the back side. He can't
guarantee that the landscape will hold it up. If it's 2:1, they should have
to terrace it or go to a 3:1 slope. Mr. Alvarez stated that there are a lot
of issues pending. Mr. Knight commented that a project of this size
shouldn't be rushed through. If there are major issues with engineering
and they make the decision to enforce them, then all the work he's
done on the landscaping is for nothing. Commissioner Van Vliet stated
that it seems like the engineering should be done first. Mr. Alvarez
stated that he has received direction from the City Manager to proceed
with the grading plan that was submitted with the 30' grade elevation.
Commissioner O'Donnell stated that it's worth mentioning again that
there are two different groups of architects working on this project. The
first presentation was for the smaller buildings and the second
presentation was for the Wal*Mart and Sam's Club. He's not sure that
they're talking to each other.
Commissioner Hanson stated that the onus is on the architects to
represent to the Commission how their buildings meet their guidelines.
At first glance, it doesn't. Stop thinking with the Wal*Mart box and start
thinking about a Santa Barbara box. It doesn't have as much to do with
massing as it does with the elements within the massing and how
they're put together.
Commissioner Vuksic stated that it's really going to help to have the
drawings at a larger scale. Commissioner O'Donnell stated that a lot of
the details are implicit in the design guidelines. If you study it carefully,
you can see that there are details included. He doesn't see a lot of that
in the Wal*Mart design. Commissioner Vuksic wanted them to come
back with 1/8 scale drawings. The Commission has to stay focused on
what we can define as details. Commissioner O'Donnell stated that
they said they were going to follow their design guidelines and he keeps
expecting the Wal*Mart people to come forward with not just our
comments but the other comments that we make about the next level of
design. He's expecting another layer and yet he doesn't think it's
forthcoming unless we specify what it is and he doesn't think that he
wants to do that.
G:Plan ning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR020709.MIN 12
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
JULY 9, 2002
MINUTES
Commissioner Lingle stated that he feels as though the Commission is
almost thought of as being a nuisance to them and they're moving
straight toward the elected body for approval of their project. A lot of
the issues that we're discussing have already been mentioned.
Commissioner Lopez stated that he's seen this before where design
guidelines have been developed and then when they come back with
the drawings, they've left out a lot of the key elements. If it was
reversed, there's no way that we would approved the book with the type
of architecture that they're proposing.
Commissioner Vuksic stated that when the smaller buildings come in
and we say that it doesn't follow the guidelines, they can say that it
looks like the Wal*Mart. Commissioner O'Donnell is very concerned
that the Desert Gateway is just going to be another commercial
standard shopping center that's going to be loaded with congestion with
no sterling architecture whatsoever. It'll be known as the Wal*Mart
Center, not the Gateway Center.
The Commissioner is in concurrence that they want to see the detailing
and be consistent with the design guidelines and add another layer of
architecture. They also want to see the drawings on a larger scale at
1/8 scale. Commissioner O'Donnell commented that he appreciates
the effort that they have made to date but they don't seem to be hearing
the bigger message and that is to come up to the standards. This is the
feeling of the entire Commission.
D. Commissioner Comments
Commissioner Hanson stated that when the Commission approved the
sign for Open System Imaging on Monterey, they approved the sign
without lighting. They have hard-wired lighting attached to it now and it
looks really bad. She also had a question on the wall on Highway 74
for Sandpiper. Mr. Smith stated that the plans call for the wall to be 8'
high. He and Mike Errante looked at it and they both confirmed that it's
around 5' right now. We are still waiting for the additional 3'.
Commissioner Hanson stated that higher is better in this case.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 1:45 p.m.
STEVE SMITH
PLANNING MANAGER
GRanning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR020709.MIN 13