HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-11-26 r
CITY OF PALM DESERT
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
• MINUTES
NOVEMBER 26, 2002
****************************************************************************************************
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 12:30 p.m.
IL ROLL CALL
Commissioners Current Meeting Year to Date
Present Absent Present Absent
Ronald Gregory, Chairman X 17 4
Kristi Hanson X 19 2
Neil Lingle X 14 7
Richard O'Donnell X 17 4
Chris Van Vliet X 20 1
John Vuksic X 19 2
Ray Lopez X 18 1
Also Present:
Steve Smith, Planning Manager
Francisco Urbina, Associate Planner
Tony Bagato, Planning Technician
Donna Quaiver, Senior Office Assistant
Diane Hollinger, Landscape Specialist
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 12, 2002
Commissioner Hanson moved, seconded by Commissioner Van Vliet to
approve the minutes of November 12, 2002. The motion carried 5-0-1-1 with
Commissioner Lingle abstaining and Commissioner Lopez absent.
IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
A.
1
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 26, 2002
MINUTES
A. Final Drawings
1. CASE NO.: RV 02-03
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): DANIEL J. MURPHY, 74-084 San
Marino Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval to park boat
in front driveway behind landscape screen.
LOCATION: 74-084 San Marino Way
ZONE: R-1
Mr. Smith stated that the neighbors within 300' were noticed regarding
this request. Mr. Bagato commented that none of the neighbors were
present at the meeting. The applicant, Daniel Murphy, was present to
answer any questions. The boat is being stored within the front setback
area. The boat is screened from the street. Staff suggests that the
area on the east side of the driveway could be screened with hedges so
that the boat would not be visible when viewing the area from the west.
Commissioner Gregory asked if there have been any objections from
the neighbors. Mr. Bagato stated that this case came from Code
Compliance because the applicant needs a permit for RV storage. He
has not received any written or verbal comments from the neighbors.
Commissioner Hanson stated that with the addition of hedges, it will be
difficult to see the boat. Mr. Bagato stated that when the applicant
parks his truck in the driveway it blocks the view of the boat, but when
the truck is not in the driveway the hedges will help screen the boat
from view.
Commissioner O'Donnell asked if the boat will be parked in this location
for the season or is it moved on a regular basis. Mr. Murphy stated that
it's parked there most of the year, except when he's taking it out for
recreation. Commissioner O'Donnell stated that this falls under the
same conditions as an RV vehicle. To be consistent, the commission
probably should review it in that context. Commissioner Vuksic
commented that RV's are 12' tall. Commissioner O'Donnell stated that
RV's have to be screened visually from the street. This boat is much
lower profile so it should be a lot easier to screen. Commissioner
Lingle stated that we've taken these cases on an individual basis in the
GRIanning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR021126.MIN 2
wr
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 26, 2002
MINUTES
past. When you have an area for an RV that's going to be non-
intrusive, it's reasonable to allow it.
Commissioner Van Vliet asked if this screening proposal would be
acceptable to the applicant. Mr. Murphy stated that this would be fine
with him. Commissioner Gregory stated that assuming that this is
approved, it would apply to this particular boat only. If he wants to park
a larger boat or RV in this area, this approval would not apply.
Action: Commissioner Vuksic moved, seconded by Commissioner
Lingle for approval subject to the addition of landscape material on east
side of driveway. Commission noted that this approval applies only to a
low profile boat, as currently owned by the applicant. Motion carried 6-
0-0-1 with Commissioner Lopez absent.
2. CASE NO.: SA 02-208
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): BEST SIGNS, INC., 1550 S. Gene
Autry Trail, Palm Springs, CA 92264
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of business
signage for the Chop House.
LOCATION: 74-040 Highway 111
ZONE: C1
Action: Commissioner O'Donnell moved, seconded by Commissioner
Hanson for approval by minute motion. Motion carried 6-0-0-1 with
Commissioner Lopez absent.
3. CASE NO.: C 02-05
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): JOE BRANDT, 507 Tomahawk Drive,
Palm Desert, CA 92211
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of
remodel of exterior of building in conjunction with the City of Palm
Desert's Facade Enhancement Program.
LOCATION: 73-020 El Paseo (formerly known as Hooter's)
GRanning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR021126.MIN 3
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 26, 2002
MINUTES
ZONE: PC-3
Mr. Bagato stated that the plans received preliminary approval from
ARC subject to the wood fascia on the parapet being plaster. The
applicant has submitted his plans for final approval without the plaster.
The applicant is proposing metal capping instead of plaster. Joe
Brandt, applicant, was present and stated that he wants to use metal
capping on all three buildings.
Commissioner Van Vliet asked Mr. Brandt what kind of metal was going
to be used. Mr. Brandt stated that he intends to use 26-gauge
galvanized metal. Commissioner Van Vliet asked how he was going to
seam the metal. Mr. Brandt commented that the metal will be soldered.
Commissioner Van Vliet stated that he thought that metal would be nice
if they could make the seams work out properly. The metal generally
comes in 10' lengths so there will be a lot of seams. There could be a
problem with warping unless it's heavy gauge metal. Twenty-six gauge
metal isn't heavy enough. Mr. Brandt commented that he didn't want to
plaster the fascia because it's too hard to get to. Commissioner Van
Vliet commented that it won't be easy to get to the metal fascia either.
Commissioner Gregory wondered if maybe there was too much stone
and the building was losing the contrasting element of having some
plaster with some stone. When it's all stone, it will start losing
definition. Mr. Brandt stated that he's not against that idea. Mr. Bagato
stated that the applicant increased the amount of stone than what was
originally approved. Mr. Brandt stated that he will go back to the
architect to reduce the amount of stone. Commissioner Gregory
commented that stone looks better when used as a support element.
Commissioner O'Donnell asked about the patio. Mr. Brandt stated that
after twenty years of owning the building, he was told that the patio was
on part of the neighboring property.
Commissioner O'Donnell stated that if the ARC is asking the applicant
to reduce the amount of stonework, he needs to know what to cut and
what to leave. The stonework should be used as an accent or a logical
place for it. It should be a structural element.
Commissioner Gregory asked about the metal fascia. Commissioner
Vuksic commented that the metal needs to be of a heavier gauge so
that it stays true and doesn't warp. He would like to see a seam pattern
G:Planning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR021126.MIN 4
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 26, 2002
MINUTES
showing how they intend to connect the sheets of metal. Commissioner
O'Donnell commented that he would like to see the lighting on the patio
be down lighting so that you can't see it as you approach the building
from the north. Mr. Brandt agreed with the down lighting and stated
that there won't be any televisions on the patio. This is not a sports
bar.
Action: Commissioner O'Donnell moved, seconded by Commissioner
Vuksic to continue the request to allow the applicant to return with
revised plans showing (1) that the stonework has been reduced, (2)
metal on fascia needs to be a heavier gauge and show seam pattern,
and (3) use down lighting on patio. Motion carried 6-0-0-1 with
Commissioner Lopez absent.
4. CASE NO.: PP 01-14
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): LEWIS BISHOP, ARCHITECT, 44645
San Onofre Avenue, Palm Desert, CA 92260
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of
architectural plans for church building and dental building on Robert
McLachlan, DDS site.
LOCATION: 72-415 Park View Drive
ZONE: OP
Mr. Smith stated that the church building came to the ARC at the
previous meeting. There was some question as to how the two projects
related to each other. The dental office is ready for final approval as
well as the church building. Mike Hadley, architect for the dental office,
was present to answer questions as well as Lew Bishop, architect for
the church.
Mr. Bishop stated that he tried to avoid adding heavy trim to the church
building around the window and he also thickened the walls. The base
wall is 11 7/8" , not including the stone. It will be approximately 13"
thick with the stone. The bottom of the wall is 15Y2" .
Mr. Hadley commented that there's a stucco trim that projects out from
the stonework around the windows of the dental building to give the
windows some inset.
G:Planning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR021126.MIN 5
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 26, 2002
MINUTES
Commissioner Hanson stated that she didn't mind the differences in the
details between the two buildings. They have a similar flavor but
they're a little different. Commissioner Vuksic stated that the dental
building has substantial detail above the stone but the church building
does not. It also has some other things to break that line.
Commissioner Hanson suggested to the applicant that he think about
where the signage is going to go. Commissioner Gregory suggested
bringing the stone up on the corner pieces. The stone becomes more
of a decorative feature where there are horizontal elements. Mr.
Bishop commented that this is why he took the stone off over the top of
the windows. The church really can't afford to add more stone to the
corners. This would cost a tremendous amount of money.
Commissioner Gregory asked about taking all the stone off. Mr. Bishop
stated that the church would love it. Commissioner Gregory suggested
taking some of the stone off in some places and adding it to other
places. Commission Van Vliet concurred. Mr. Bishop stated that he'd
be happy to take some of the stone off. Commissioner Vuksic
suggested adding foam detail on the corner elements of the church
building. Mr. Hadley stated that the building owner has asked him to
look into the possibility of doing a standby generator. It's not on the
drawings but he would like to show the ARC where they would like it. It
was suggested that staff could approve the location of the generator.
Action: Commissioner Vuksic moved, seconded by Commissioner Van
Vliet for approval of the dental building as submitted. The church
building was approved with the addition of foam detail on corner
elements. Motion carried 6-0-0-1 with Commissioner Lopez absent.
5. CASE NO.: SA 02-212
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): RICHARD GARCIA, ZANTMAN ART
GALLERIES, 73-925 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Request for approval
of change of awning color from black to yellow. Zantman Art Galleries
LOCATION: 73-925 El Paseo
ZONE: C-1
G:Planning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR021126.MIN 6
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 26, 2002
MINUTES
Mr. Bagato stated that the applicant was unable to attend the meeting
but wanted the case to be heard. The sign and wording is going to stay
the same, but the applicant would like to change the color of the sign to
draw more attention to the building. Commissioner Hanson stated that a
gold color would be better than yellow for the awning. Commissioner
O'Donnell and Commissioner Van Vliet concurred. The yellow that is
being proposed is similar to the California Pizza Kitchen and is not
appropriate for this building. Commissioner Hanson stated that
California Pizza Kitchen has yellow awnings because of it's part of their
logo color. Gold will still provide them with what they're looking for.
Commissioner Gregory stated that a more saturated or richer yellow
would be more appropriate. Commissioner Lingle asked if the applicant
is going to bring the color back for us to look at. Mr. Smith stated that if
he feels that they are submitting a color that's close to a saturated
yellow/gold color then staff will approve it. If not, then they will bring the
color in question back to the ARC to look at.
Action: Commissioner Hanson moved, seconded by Commissioner
O'Donnell for approval of the requested color change on the awning
provided it is a gold-yellow color to be approved by staff. Motion carried
6-0-0-1 with Commissioner Lopez absent.
B. Preliminary Plans
1. CASE NO.: C 02-07
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): TED GROULX, P.O. Box 14083, Palm
Desert, CA 92260
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Remodel of front of
building in conjunction with the City of Palm Desert's Facade
Enhancement Program.
LOCATION: 73-261 Highway 111 (Tarbell Realty building)
ZONE: C-1
Mr. Bagato stated that the applicant has submitted revised plans for
review and approval. Previously, the plans were "too glassy". The
addition to the existing Tarbell Realty building is one story and will
encompass the existing parking lot. Mr. Groulx, applicant, was present
and stated that the building is on a frontage road off of Highway 111
G:Planning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR021126.MIN 7
Sow 1"w
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 26, 2002
MINUTES
and there's parking on the frontage road. He originally had one
entrance but Phil Drell suggested having two entrances as there are
going to be two tenants. Mr. Groulx has been working with Spencer
Knight on the landscaping.
Commissioner Van Vliet asked the applicant if he wants to add the
square footage to the front of the building. Mr. Groulx stated that it
would be economically feasible to add square footage. Commissioner
Hanson asked about the lost parking spaces due to the expansion. Mr.
Groulx stated that there are fifteen parking spots that aren't being used
and he was able to save six parking spaces near the expansion.
Commissioner Hanson commented that she thought that the plans were
fine.
Commissioner Hanson suggested adding center mullions on the
windows to anchor it more. Mr. Groulx stated that he was planning to
do that anyway.
Commissioner Gregory asked if all landscape improvements were
being done on a gradual basis. He was wondering about an aesthetic
review and he would like to see the landscape plans come back to the
ARC. Mr. Groulx stated that it's all done. Commissioner Gregory
asked if the additional square footage has been completed. Mr. Groulx
stated that the building hasn't been constructed. He will come back
with the landscape plans for the new portion of the building.
Commissioner Vuksic suggested that the applicant is re-plastering the
existing building. Mr. Groulx stated that the existing building is going to
be painted. Commissioner Vuksic suggested using colors that are a
little deeper. Mr. Groulx commented that he will look into it.
Commissioner Lingle commented that he likes the building the way it is,
but he never liked the landscaping or the color. He's all for project
improvement, but it wouldn't break his heart if it stayed the way it is
right now.
Action: Commissioner O'Donnell moved, seconded by Commissioner
Hanson for preliminary approval subject to (1) adding mullions to
windows on the front elevation, (2) applicant to return with landscape
plans, and (3) a suggestion was made to consider using deeper exterior
colors. Motion carried 6-0-0-1 with Commissioner Lopez absent.
G:Planning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR021126.MIN 8
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 26, 2002
MINUTES
2. CASE NO.: PP 02-16/VAR 02-05
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised
building height and exterior colors for a new 36-unit apartment complex
known as Palm Village Apartments.
LOCATION: 73-610 Santa Rosa Way
ZONE: R-3
Mr. Smith distributed the proposed exterior colors to the commission. It
was suggested during a conversation in study session that the building
height was acceptable. The commission is being asked to comment on
the proposed colors.
Commissioner Lingle stated that the primary color is too pinkish.
Commissioner Hanson didn't like it either. The other three colors are
fine.
Commissioner O'Donnell stated that his issue was with the lack of
shading over the patio areas on the south elevation. A shade exhibit
was presented, but Commissioner O'Donnell did not know what time of
the day, during what season these areas are going to be shaded.
Commissioner Hanson stated that the exhibit indicates the areas that
are covered. Bryce White stated that it indicates the roof overhang. All
of the front balcony area is covered by roof, including the courtyard on
the first level. Commissioner O'Donnell complimented the
Redevelopment Agency on the elevations. He really likes the plans, but
he thinks that there should be more shade. This would be a much more
attractive facade if it had some shading devices to serve a function. He
still doesn't like the detail around the windows. The north elevation is
okay. Commissioner Gregory asked if the windows were inset or are
they flush with the wall. Commissioner O'Donnell stated that his point
is that the outside patios are going to be used, but at certain times of
the year, even with overhangs, the sun will be at a 45° angle. Mr. White
commented that the doors are recessed even further than the balcony.
June 19 is when the sun will be at its highest. In the summertime, there
will be more shade than what's shown on the exhibit. In the wintertime,
there will be less shade. The roofs extend all the way out completely
covering the balcony area. From an aesthetic standpoint, they could
GRIanning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR021126.MIN 9
s
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 26, 2002
MINUTES
put a couple of additional trellises up but they wouldn't actually function
from a shade standpoint. Commissioner O'Donnell disagreed and
stated that the sun would be at a 45° angle. Mr. White stated that it
would be at this angle in the winter, but in the summer the sun moves
to a northerly angle. Commissioner O'Donnell asked if shade studies
were done. Mr. White stated that he has not done any shade studies,
however, from experience of building for a long period of time. In the
summer, the northern windows get the sunlight shining in and in the
winter, the southern windows receive the sunlight. Commissioner
O'Donnell asked Mr. White if he lives in the desert. Mr. White stated
that he's lived in the desert for fifteen years. Commissioner O'Donnell
commented that he would know that if you're going to sit on the patio in
the wintertime, the sun will be reflecting off the walls and it could still be
very uncomfortable. Mr. White commented that he would be glad to
add some additional trellises, but he doesn't know from a shade
standpoint if they are going to function. He wants to do the best for the
project.
Commissioner Gregory asked if the windows were flush with the
exterior walls. Mr. White stated that some of the windows are recessed
since they're using 2 x 6 walls, which are framed in with 2 x 4's. The
commission agreed that this is a great idea.
Commissioner O'Donnell stated that this is a very nice project. He was
pushing for more improvement. Mr. White stated that his approach to
this project is to make it look as nice as he could.
Action: Commissioner Vuksic moved, seconded by Commissioner
O'Donnell for approval of revised building height and exterior colors
with the peach color to be changed to the satisfaction of staff. Motion
carried 6-0-0-1 with Commissioner Lopez absent.
3. CASE NO.: MISC 02-24
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PHILIP BARTMASSER, 8913 Olympic
Blvd., Suite 202, Beverly Hills, CA 90211
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval
of exterior remodel of commercial building in conjunction with Palm
Desert's Facade Enhancement Program.
LOCATION: 73-730 Highway 111, Canyon Building
G:Planning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR021126.MIN 10
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 26, 2002
MINUTES
ZONE: C-1
Action: Commissioner O'Donnell moved, seconded by Commissioner
Hanson to approve by minute motion. Motion carried 6-0-0-1 with
Commissioner Lopez absent.
4. CASE NO.: PP 02-20
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PREST-VUKSIC ARCHITECTS, 74-
020 Allesandro Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval
of building and landscape design for a two-story 32,910 square foot
office/industrial building.
LOCATION: Parcels 14 & 15 on Technology Drive near Gerald Ford
and Cook Street
ZONE: PCD
Action: Commissioner O'Donnell moved, seconded by Commissioner
Hanson to approve by minute motion. Motion carried 5-0-1-1 with
Commissioner Vuksic abstaining and Commissioner Lopez absent.
5. CASE NO.: PP 02-19
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) STEPHEN R. NIETO, 78-120 Calle
Estado, Suite 206, La Quinta, CA 92253
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval
of architecture and landscaping for proposed 5,182 square foot office
building.
LOCATION: 44-750 Village Court
ZONE: OP
Mr. Smith stated that during study session, the commission expressed
concern relative to the ladder and the fact that it could be moved into
the mechanical room and there was an issue with the windows.
Commissioner Hanson stated that after reviewing the plans, they could
move the ladder to the mechanical room. She asked the applicant,
GRanning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR021126.MIN I I
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 26, 2002
MINUTES
Stephen Nieto, if the roof mounted equipment will be screened from
view. Mr. Nieto stated that there is a 4' parapet. Commissioner
Hanson stated that 4' will be minimal because a lot of the equipment
can be higher than that.
Commissioner O'Donnell stated that he was concerned with the
windows on the front elevation in that they seem to be divided by the
columns, whereas the symmetry in the rest of it is so prominent. After
further review, he commented that he doesn't have an issue with the
windows.
Diane Hollinger stated that she has not approved the landscape plan.
Action: Commissioner Hanson moved, seconded by Commissioner
Van Vliet for preliminary approval subject to (1) mounting roof ladder in
mechanical room and continuing roof tile in area where ladder was
originally intended, and (2) approval by Landscape Manager. Motion
carried 6-0-0-1 with Commissioner Lopez absent.
6. CASE NO.: PP 02-17/ CUP 02-30
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): NOGLE ONUFER ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECTS, INC., c/o LINDQUIST DEVELOPMENT, 2398 San
Diego Avenue, San Diego, CA 92110
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval
of three single-family residences.
LOCATION: 46-050 Ocotillo Drive
ZONE: R-3
Action: Commissioner O'Donnell moved, seconded by Commissioner
Hanson for approval by minute motion subject to approval by
Landscape Manager. Motion carried 6-0-0-1 with Commissioner Lopez
absent.
7. CASE NO.: PP 02-18/ CUP 02-32
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): NOGLE ONUFER ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECTS, INC., c/o LINDQUIST DEVELOPMENT, 2398 San
Diego Avenue, San Diego, CA 92110
GRIanning\Donna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR021126.MIN 12
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 26, 2002
MINUTES
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval
of three single-family residences.
LOCATION: 45-500 Ocotillo Drive
ZONE: R-3
Mr. Smith displayed a material/color board for the commission to
review. Commissioner Hanson stated that the colors will blend in nicely
with the neighborhood.
Joe Holasek, applicant, stated that he submitted for ARC review,
precise plan, tentative map and a conditional use permit and he wanted
to verify which of these items they are making a motion on. Mr. Smith
stated that they are only making a motion on the architectural review.
The ARC did not have any issues with this project.
Action: Commissioner O'Donnell moved, seconded by Commissioner
Hanson for approval by minute motion subject to approval by
Landscape Manager. Motion carried 6-0-0-1 with Commissioner Lopez
absent.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 1:40 p.m.
STEVE SMITH
PLANNING MANAGER
G:Planning0onna Quaiver\wpdocs\Agmin\AR021126.MIN 13