HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-01-12 � �
�`•�� CITY OF PALM DESERT
� �
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
' ' MINUTES
January 12, 2016
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 12:30 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Commissioners Current Meeting Year to Date
Present Absent Present Absent
Chris Van Vliet, Chair X 1
Karel Lambell, Vice Chair X 1
Paul Clark X 1
Gene Colombini X 1
Allan Levin X 1
Michael McAuliffe X 1
Jim Mclntosh X 1
John Vuksic X 1
Also Present
Ryan Stendell, Director of Community Development
Tony Bagato, Principal Planner
Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner
Eric Ceja, Associate Planner
Pedro Rodriguez, Code Compliance Supervisor
Janine Judy, Recording Secretary
Cancelled meetings:
III. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 24, 2015 and December 8, 2015
Action:
Commissioner Levin moved to approve the November 24, 2015 and
December 8, 2015 meeting minutes. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner McAuliffe and carried by a 7-0-1 vote, with Clark, Lambell,
Levin, McAuliffe, Mclntosh, Van Vliet and Vuksic voting YES and
Colombini absent.
��
� �
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
MINUTES January 12, 2016
V. CASES:
A. Finai Drawings:
1. CASE NO: SA 15-324
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: HOME SMART PROFESSIONALS,
73-301 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to
approve a new monument sign; Home Smart Professionals.
LOCATION: 73-301 Fred Waring Drive
ZONE: O.P.
Mr. Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner, said this request for a
monument sign has been before the Commission a couple of times
and described the current changes.
The Commission reviewed and discussed the sign with the
applicant, MR. KEN STENDELL.
ACTION:
Commissioner Lambell moved to approve. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Clark and carried by a 7-0-1 vote, with Clark, Lambell,
Levin, McAuliffe, Mclntosh, Van Vliet and Vuksic voting YES and
Colombini absent.
2. CASE NO: SA 15-302
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: SIGN-A-RAMA, 41-945 Boardwalk,
Suite L, Palm Desert, CA 92211
NATURE OF PROJECTIAPPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to
approve a new monument sign; Country Club Market Place
LOCATION: 77-750 to 77-780 Country Club Drive
ZONE: S.I.
Commissioner Vuksic recused himself from this case and left the conference room.
Mr. Eric Ceja, Associate Planner, presented a new monument sign
for Country Club Market Place. He indicated where the sign will be
G:\PlanningUanineJudyWRC\1Minutes\2016\160112min.docx Page 2 of 6
ARCHITECTURAL RE EW COMMISSION �
MINUTES January 12, 2016
located. The sign will be out of the right-of-way and won't affect any
line-of-sight triangles and some of the existing architecture of the
building was applied to the sign. The applicant is proposing a sign
that is 7' in height and up to five (5) tenants per each side of the
sign. In order for the sign to comply with the municipal code, staff is
recommending that the sign be brought down to a maximum 6' in
height with a maximum of four (4) tenant panels per each side to
reduce visual clutter; making the sign more proportionate. There
are exceptions that allow for larger monuments signs but it's for
topographic reasons or architectural details that are appropriate.
Commissioner Levin asked about the illumination of the sign and
MR. WILLIAM SIGURDSEN, sign representative, said everything
will be internally illuminated with push-through letters and the
tenant lettering will be routed-out with acrylic behind it.
The Commission and the applicant discussed the height of the sign,
the lettering, color of the tile at the base, and the number of panels.
MR. SIGURDSEN pointed out that the reason the applicant decided
on five panels is because it will only be for the rear tenants. There
are 16 tenants in the rear and currently there is no exposure for
them from Country Club Drive. They will be rotating the panels
giving each tenant an equat amount of exposure.
The Commission and the applicant reviewed and discussed the
sign height, materials, and panels. Commissioner Lambell said she
doesn't see any architectural merit why the sign needs to be 7' tall
with five (5) tenant panels. She feels this will be cluttered and with
logos it will get worse. She agrees with staff that the sign be a
maximum height of 6' with four(4) tenant panets.
ACTION:
Commissioner Lambell moved to approve subject to: 1) maximum height
shall be 6'; 2) maximum of four (4) tenant panels per each side; and 3)
staff to review size and color of monument base. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Levin and carried by a 6-0-1-1 vote, with Clark, Lambell,
Levin, McAuliffe, Mclntosh, and Van Vliet voting YES, with Vuksic
abstaining and Colombini absent.
G:1PlanningUanineJudyWRC\1Minutes\2016\160112min.docx Page 3 of 6
�,
`�'Y °wll�ll�
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
MINUTES January 12, 2016
3. CASE NO: SA 15-375
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: ORANGE THEORY FITNESS, 73-
470 EI Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of
approval for the recovering of six (6) existing awnings with a new
color (orange); Orange Theory Fitness.
LOCATION: 73-470 EI Paseo
ZONE: C-1, S.P.
Commissioner Vuksic recused himself from this case and left the conference room.
Mr. Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner, presented a proposal to
recover six (6) existing awnings with a new color (orange) for
Orange Theory Fitness; the old Visitor Center building. There are
two (2) awnings along San Pablo Avenue that will stay the same
size and shape and will just be recovered. In the rear there will be
four (4) awnings facing the parking lot. He said the business sign
on the awning was previously approved over the counter by staff.
Staff is recommending approval.
The Commission reviewed and discussed the awnings and
signage.
ACTION:
Commissioner Mclntosh moved to approve. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Lambell and carried by a 6-0-1-1 vote, with Clark, Lambell,
Levin, McAuliffe, Mclntosh, and Van Vliet voting YES, with Vuksic
abstaining and Colombini absent.
4. CASE NO: MISC 15-378
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: LOUAY NAOUFAL, 77-005 New
York Avenue, Palm Desert, CA 92260
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to
approve a new front entry carport 20' from the curb and a new roof
height at 16'-3".
LOCATION: 77-005 New York Avenue
ZONE: R-1
G:\PlanningUanineJudyV1RC\1Minutes\2016\160112min.docx Page 4 of 6
`
�rrw' "�rr�
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
MINUTES January 12, 2016
Mr. Tony Bagato, Principal Planner, presented a proposal for a new
front entry carport 20' from the curb and a new roof height at 16'-3".
He stated that the previous homeowner converted the garage to
living space without permits and the current homeowner is
proposing a carport in order to keep that living space. He also said
that after the last big storm, the applicant sustained damage to the
roof. Mr. Bagato worked with the applicant on several design
revisions before submitting this design to ARC. He pulled up
Google map to show different carports styles in the neighborhood
that the applicant can use. Staff is recommending approval of this
current design as it is compatible with the neighborhood.
The Commission reviewed the neighborhood carports and was
concerned with the size of the proposed carport. Mr. Bagato
explained that it has be 20' from the curb for this exception and said
the applicant will remove the garage door and cut into the living
space to get more depth for the car. The Commission reviewed the
driveway width and recommended they narrow the driveway to a
maximum width of 20'
The Commission reviewed and discussed the need to increase the
roof height and felt there wasn't enough architectural merit to allow
the height exception. They were concerned with the amount of
hardscape versus the lack of landscape and recommended the
applicant provide additional landscape and one additional shade
tree.
MR. CARLOS SANCHEZ, designer, arrived at 1:15 p.m. and
explained the project to the Commission. He said that a member of
the household is disabled and the homeowner would like to provide
handicap-accessible parking for a van. The Commission and the
designer discussed the mass of the carport, the roof height, and
landscape.
ACTION:
Commissioner Mclntosh moved to continue Case MISC 15-378 subject to:
1) reducing design mass to be in scale with the house; 2) provide current
pictures of the house and yard; 3) additional landscape and less
hardscape; 4) add one additional shade tree; 5) driveway shall be
narrower. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Levin and carried by a
7-0-1 vote, with Clark, Lambell, Levin, McAuliffe, Mclntosh, Van Vliet and
Vuksic voting YES and Cofombini absent.
G:\PlanningUanineJudyWRC\1Minutes\2016\160112min.docx Page 5 of 6
�' �MI�'
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
MINUTES January 12, 2016
B. Preliminary Plans:
None
C. Miscellaneous Items:
None
VI. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES UPDATE — Commissioner Vuksic — 12/09/15
Commissioner Vuksic reported the following from the last AIPP meeting. The
Palm Desert Community Gallery will feature artwork from Paul J. Hamel and
Randall Weidner in its new exhibition, Mandalas and Fragments, on display
January 28 through April 8; one new artist was added to the registry; the Art
Place on Corporate Way is now part of First Weekend; the Swing `N Hops Street
Party on EI Paseo will take place on February 6; Still Life, Capturing the Moment
is now on display at The Galen through February 21, 2016; there was a recent
all-valley public art meeting for all valley cities that was well attended.
VII. COMMENTS
None
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Upon a motion by Commissioner Mclntosh, second by Commissioner Levin, and
a 7-0-1 vote, with Clark, Lambell, Levin, McAuliffe, Mclntosh, Van Vliet and
Vuksic voting YES and Colombini absent, the Architectural Review Commission
meeting was adjourned at 1:40 p.m.
��
TONY BA ATO
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
SECRETARY
A NE J Y
ORDING SECRETARY
G:\PlanningUanineJudyWRC\1Minutes\2016\160112min.docx Page 6 of 6