HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-06-26 -�-� CITY OF PALM DESERT
i
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
MINUTES
JUNE 26, 2018
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 12:30 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Commissioners Current Meeting Year to Date
Present Absent Present Absent
Chris Van Vliet, Chair X 10
Karel Lambell, Vice Chair X 8 2
Doug Brewer X 7 3
Allan Levin X 10
Michael McAuliffe X 9 1
Jim McIntosh X 8 2
John Vuksic X 10
i
Also Present
Eric Ceja, Principal Planner
Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner
Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner
Pedro Rodriguez, Supervisor Code Compliance
Christina Canales, Assistant Engineer
Russell Grance, Director, Building & Safety
Justus Swajian, Planning Intern
Janine Judy, Recording Secretary
Cancelled meeting:2/27/18,4/10/18
III. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 12, 2018
Action:
Commissioner Levin moved to approve the June 12, 2018 meeting minutes
with minor changes. Motion was seconded by Commissioner McAuliffe and
carried by a 6-0-1 vote, with Lambell, Levin, McAuliffe, McIntosh, Van Vliet,
and Vuksic voting YES and Brewer absent.
ARCHITECTURAL RE W COMMISSION
MINUTES June 26, 2018
V. CASES:
A. Final Drawings:
1. CASE NO: MISC 18-0009
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: LULULEMON ATHLETICA, 855
Homer Street, 4th Floor, Vancouver, BC V613 2W2
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to
approve exterior tenant improvements; replace tile band with stucco,
replace fabric awnings w/wood canopy, adding breeze block walls in
front of El Paseo store front windows, new signage, paint existing .
storefront mullions, replace two glazing panels with glass doors;
Lululemon Athletica.
LOCATION: 73470 El Paseo, Suite 119
ZONE: D.O.:
Mr. Nick Mellon!, Assistant Planner, requested that this item be
removed from the agenda to comply with applicant's request.
ACTION:
Commissioner Levin moved to continue Case MISC 18-0009 to comply with
applicant's request to remove from agenda. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner McAuliffe and carried by a 5-0-1-1 vote, with Lambell, Levin,
McIntosh, McAuliffe, and Van VIlet voting YES, Vuksic abstaining and
Brewer absent.
B. Preliminary Plans:
1. CASE NO: MISC 18-0007
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: GRAZIADIO FAMILY
DEVELOPMENT, 149 Palos Verdes Blvd. Suite E, Redondo Beach,
CA 90277
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to
approve a fagade enhancement for a commercial shopping center;
Jensen's Center.
LOCATION: 73547 Highway 111
ZONE: D.O.:
G:\PlanningUanine Audy\ARC\1 Minu[es\2018\180828min.doox Page 2 of 6
ARCHITECTURAL RE A_-4 COMMISSION
MINUTES June 26, 2018
M1
Commissioner McAuliffe recused himself from this item and left the room.
Mr. Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner, reminded the Commission that
this item came before.them on April 27, 2018. He discussed the
scope of work and changes since the previous meeting; a change in
the color palette, addition of palm trees, relocation of one tower on
Building ,D, addition of an arch on the main entry of Building E
(Jensen's) and on Building G removal of one tower on the north
elevation, relocation of outdoor dining, cutting away a portion of an
.existing colonnade, addition of roof-top screening, and the removal
of shutters and addition of canopies. Staff is recommending a
continuance to provide additional exhibits for all sides of the buildings
including the west elevation of Building G to see if there are any
proposed changes and clarification of roof-top screening.
MR. DAVID ANDERSON, Nadel Architects, went through the
recommendations made at the last meeting and discussed those
changes. The Commission and MR. ANDERSON, reviewed and
discussed the relocation of the dining patio. Commissioner Lambell
expressed her disappointment of the relocation from the north
elevation to the east elevation. MR. ANDERSON stated that they
revised the location because of structural impacts on the existing
building. They also discussed the powder-coated BNC awning
trellises, the horizontal trellises, and the open trellises that will extend
the outdoor dining patio.
The Commissioners and MR. STEVE MARTINEZ, Nadel Architects,
discussed the horizontal metal screening that will be placed around
the perimeter of Building F to screen the roof-top equipment. Chair
Van Wet stated it was difficult to understand without having complete
details on the drawings.
Commissioner McIntosh said the proposed screening material has
nothing to do with the building's architecture and should be tied in
architecturally so it doesn't look like a metal box. This is an important
location for the City and the original submittal was a lot more relevant
architecturally and not just another generic storefront. The last
submittal had striking architecture and was a lot more thoughtful and
significant than what is currently being proposed.
Commissioner Vuksic said this doesn't appear that it would work
together as the building is currently being proposed. He feels the
( applicants have gone in the wrong direction and it has lost its soul
and now looks generic. He discussed the gable roof on the Jensen's
GAPlenning\JwlneJudMRC17MInut s12018\180626min.doca Page 3 of 6
ARCHITECTURAL RE'Vr-'W COMMISSION
MINUTES June 26, 2018
entry being in one plane which creates an illusion that it has some
depth and it doesn't. He pointed out that the roof pitches at 6:12 is
really steep and not typically used here in the desert. He said this
pitch doesn't look very tasteful and looks contrived. He understands
that these buildings need to be leasable and attractive spaces for
tenants but you can do that in a much more skillful way than what
has been proposed. He mentioned that the Commission doesn't
dictate a style but whatever style they choose it needs to be done in
a tasteful way.
ACTION:
Commissioner Lambell moved to continued Case MISC 18-0007 subject to:
1) restudy architectural design; 2) restudy depth of the gable roof on the
main element at the Jensen's entry; 3) restudy roof pitch; 4) integrate roof-
top screening into architectural design; 5) submit a roof plan separate from
site plan; 6) provide full construction and architecture details; and 7) submit
elevations showing all sides of the buildings. Motion seconded by
Commissioner Levin and carried by a 5-0-1-1 vote, with Lambell, Levin,
McIntosh, Van Vliet and Vuksic voting YES, McAuliffe abstaining and
Brewer absent.
2. CASE NO: PP 18-0003
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: THE WOLFF COMPANY, 6710 E.
Camelback Road, Suite 100, Scottsdale, AZ 85251
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Discussion and
comments only for a 167-unit senior independent living facility
consisting of two (2) three-story buildings, and a clubhouse on 8.4
acres.
LOCATION: Country Club Drive; 620-430-046 & 620-430-025
ZONE: P.R:5
Commissioner Vuksic abstained from this project and remained in the room.
Mr. Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner, reminded the Commission that
this item was presented as a discussion item only on May 8, 2018.
At that time, the Commission made comments regarding the
architectural design of the project. One of the main concerns was a
lack of recess and treatments on the windows. The applicant has
now added shade elements, increased recess on the windows, and
focused more on the vertical elements of the building. He passed
around the materials board for review.
GAPIannln&Janine JudyWBCllMinutes\20161160626min.dom Page 4 of 6
ARCHITECTURAL REV'.'_.! COMMISSION
MINUTES June 26, 2018
MR. SEAN BELL, Architect, said they incorporated the Commissions
comments into their revised design plans. He went through the
elevations and pointed out the changes made since the last meeting:
addition of window shade elements; over-framing in select locations
with 8" punched openings; simplified overall character of building to
focus more on a volumetric architecture as opposed to a surface
architecture; score lines were pared back; increased mass of
balcony framing; maintained the large overhangs; modified colors to
warm desert tones; eliminated change of color on the same plane to .
emphasize mass; added accent colors to the inside face of the
balcony framing and framed elements; addition of color splashes of
burnt yellow and desert colors; dark color accents assigned to the
base and corners; and, internalized the down spouts.
Commissioner Lambell was concerned with the revision of the
cottages with the change in form, a darker color and a reduction in
horizontal score lines. Commissioner Levin said it now has a military
look to it. Commissioner McIntosh said in the larger buildings it was
quite successful but they have lost something in the design of the
cottages.
The Commission and the applicants discussed ADA path of travel,
fire access, trash enclosures, carport details, screening of the
clubhouse roof-top equipment, and integration of the A/C units,
electrical and water lines into the architectural design.
ACTION:
Commissioner McIntosh moved to preliminarily approve subject to further
design development: 1) clubhouse roof-top equipment shall be screened
from three-story buildings; 2) details for the carports and integration of A/C
units, electrical and water lines into the architectural design shall return for
Commission review. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Lambell and
carried by a 5-0-1-1 vote,with Lambell, Levin, McAuliffe, McIntosh, and Van
Vliet voting YES, Vuksic abstaining and Brewer absent.
C. Miscellaneous Items:
None
GAPIenningUmineJudyNARMIMlnuMs�2016\16g626min.do" Page 5 of 6
ARCHITECTURAL REviLW COMMISSION
MINUTES June 26, 2018
VI. COMMENTS
The Commission discussed the non-functioning fountain at the Arco on Highway
111, the Springfield Hotel and the Verizon Building.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Van Vliet moved to adjourn the Architectural Review Commission meeting
at 2:05 p.m.
ERIC CEJA
PRINCIPAL PL NER
SECRETARY
J NV JUD
C iDING SECRETARY
G?Planning'Jwine Judy\ARC\1 Minutes\2016\160626min.doex Page 6 of 6