HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-09-11 CITY OF PALM DESERT
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 11,2018
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 12:30 p.m.
IL ROLL CALL
Commissioners Current Meeting Year to Date
Present Absent Present Absent
Chris Van Wet, Chair X 14
Karel Lambell, Vice Chair X 12 2
Doug Brewer X 9 5
Allan Levin X 14
Michael McAuliffe X 12 2
Jim McIntosh X 11 3
John Vuksic X 13 1
Also Present
Eric Ceja, Principal Planner
Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner
Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner
Pedro Rodriguez, Supervisor Code Compliance
Janine Judy, Recording Secretary
Cancelled meeting:2127118,4/10/18
111. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None
IV. APPROVAL'OF MINUTES: August 28, 2018
Action:
Commissioner Levin moved to approve the August 28, 2018 meeting
minutes with minor changes. Motion was seconded by Chair Van'Viiet and
carried by a 6-0-1.vote, with Lambell, Levin, McAuliffe, McIntosh, Van Wet,
and Vuksic voting YES and Brewerabsent. '
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
MINUTES September 11, 2018
B. Preliminary Plans:
1. CASE NO: CUP 17-0028
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: PANTHER BUDS, LLC, 2 Avenida
Andra, Palm Desert CA 92260
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to
preliminarily approve fagade changes to existing building; Panther
Buds.
LOCATION:74726 Jon! Drive
ZONE: S.I.
Mr. Eric Ceja, Principal Planner, reminded the Commission that this
was presented on August 28, 2018 for approval of a cultivation
facility.At that meeting,the Commission requested that the applicant
place the roof access intemally; that all roof-top equipment be
screened below the parapet; clean up the details of the parapet cap
flashing; restudy the color scheme; and wrap the building
improvements around the side elevations. The applicant has
submitted new plans for review, as well as new exhibits for color
renderings.
MR. ARMANDO CHAVEZ, designer with GLS Architecture,
described the revisions made since the last meeting. He and the
Commission discussed the roof-top equipment and ways to ensure
that the equipment remained a minimum of 3"below the roof parapet.
Commissioner Vuksic suggested they Indicate a plustminus on.the
renderings. MR.CHRIS CRANFILL,Panther Buds,said given the flat
roofs on the building it's going to be the front building where most of
the new equipment is going in and it shouldn't be an issue. However,
,they will indicate the plus or minus on the plans.
MR. CHAVEZ presented the color scheme renderings and pointed
out where each color will be located. MR. CRANFILL stated they are
leaning towards color scheme A, however, they submitted color
scheme B to get the Commissioner's comments.
The Commission and the applicants discussed extending the wood
siding all the way to the bottom of the pavement on the south
0.4PWmihVaWn*JudWMIMin ms=lBk1A09ItMn.d= Page 3 of 6
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
MINUTES September 11, 2018
Commission recommended screening the doors. Since that time,
there is now only one door on the north elevation and the applicant
is asking to remove the screening as recommended by the
Commission. Mr.Swartz also mentioned that the applicant would like
to remove the indentations on the west elevation making it flush. He
said this was originally approved with the indentations and a trellis
system.
The Commission discussed the service door on the north elevation
and how it could be screened from the street. Commissioner.
McIntosh felt disguising the door would bring more attention to it. He
recommended articulating the 'trellis on the north elevation and
submit to staff for review and approval.
MR. DUC-HUY HUYNH, El Design, discussed the architecture on
the west elevation wall that was approved at a previous meeting.. He
explained it will be difficult to construct since there is only 8"between
the building and the wall,and by not Including the indentions they will
gain another 10". Commissioner McIntosh suggested they negotiate
with the owner of the gas station to remove the wail. Chair Van Vliet
felt by removing the indentions they will lose a lot of the architecture
on that elevation creating a flat mass. Commissioner McIntosh
recommended leaving the wall as originally approved.
Commissioner Vuksic said having a trellis on the north elevation has
good potential and suggested they create some type of pop-out
around the door that comes out about 18"from the building that has
an artful architectural element on both sides of the door.
Commissioner McIntosh said it wouldn't necessarily hide the door It
would enhance the wall and shift the focus.
ACTION:
Commissioner Lambell moved to continue Case PP 16-396 subject to: 1)
articulating the trellis on north elevation and subject to staff review and
approval; and 2) west elevation shall remain as originally approved. Motion
was seconded by Commissioner McIntosh and carded by a 6-0-1 vote, with
Lambell, Levin, McAuliffe, McIntosh, Vuksic, and Van Vliet voting YES and
Brewerabsent.
C. Miscellaneous Items:
None
0:1PlenninpLanNaJudyUliiL\11�nWnst4 0 1 911 10 9I1Mn,den Page 5.of 6
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
MINUTES September 11,2018
V. CASES:
A. Final Drawings: .
I. CASE NO: MISC is-0009
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: LULULEMON ATHLETICA, 856
Homer Street, 41h Floor, Vancouver, BC V613 2W2
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to
approve an. awning color change; Lulutemon Athletics
LOCATION: 73476 EI Paseo, Suite 119
ZONE: D.O.
Commissioner Vuksic recused himself from this project and left the room.
Mr. Nick Mellon!, Assistant Planner, presented a modification to a
recent approval for Lululemon. At the 'last meeting on August 28,
2018, the applicant requested an awning color change from the
approved black to teal and the Commission continued the,project.
Today they are requesting a change from black to yellow, painting
the benches on the front elevation to yellow, and keeping the existing
pillar color, which is brown. He stated that in the previous meeting
the Commission discussed window graphic details and said this
request can be handled at the staff :level. Staff recommends
upholding the original approval and retain the black, however, the
yellow could work as it is a warn color that fits in with the existing
palette of the center.
The Commission reviewed and discussed the yellow and stated that
It ties In well with the whole block.
ACTION:
Commissioner McIntosh moved to approve plans as presented subject to:
1)window graphic shall be reviewed and approved at staff level. Motion was
seconded by Commissioner Lambell and carried by a 5-0-1-1 with
Commissioner Vuksic abstaining and Commissioner Brewer absent.
a:wwthuwna. MIWw 3101%1e091u,n,d= Page 2 of 6
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
MINUTES September 11, 201a
elevation, as well as wrapping it a minimum of 3'onto the west side
to finish the comers; and wrapping the parapet along the west
elevation of the front building to completely enclose the 4-sided
building.
The Commission and the applicants discussed the landscape
rendering and Mr. Eric Ceja, Principal Planner, stated the final
landscape plan will come back to the Commission for review and
approval.
ACTION:
Commissioner Vuksic moved to approve subject to: 1) color scheme A; 2)
parapet heights shall be noted as a plus or minus dimension to ensure a 3"
minimum height above the mechanical.equipment; 3) ensure that the wood
siding on east elevation goes all the way to the bottom of the pavement on
south elevation adjacent to the neighbor's property; 4) wrap parapet along
the west elevation of the front building to completely enclose the 4-sided
building;and 5)the wood siding on the front building shall wrap on the south
side a minimum of 3' onto the west side to finish corner. Motion was
seconded by Commissioner Lambell and carried by a 6-0-1 vote, with
Lambell,Levin, McAuliffe,McIntosh, Vuksic, and Van Mist voting YES and
Brewer absent.
2. CASE NO:PP 16-396
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: PCG PALM DESERT 'LLC, 133
Penn Street, El Segundo, CA 90245
NATURE OF.PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to
review a freestanding trellis for screening of the electrical room facing
Fred Waring Drive; Walmart Neighborhood Market Shopping
Center.
LOCATION: 72314 Highway 111
ZONE: P.C.—(3)
Mr. Kevin Swartz,Associate Planner, reminded the Commission that
this project came before them on November 28, 2017 for
modifications to the Walmart Neighborhood shopping center. At the
last meeting, there were some concerns with the service doors on
the north elevation facing Fred Waring Drive (Fred Waring) and the
Q-Un iY &*O JWYMQ1MUMM201911E0911mhdm Page 4 of 6
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
MINUTES September 11, 2018
VI. COMMENTS
Staff informed the Commission that a sub-committee was being formed to discuss
construction issues regarding Paseo Hotel.After further discussion,Commissioner
Lambell nominated Commissioners McIntosh; Van Vliei and Vuksic to represent
the Architectural Review Commission.
Commissioner McIntosh asked if there was a requirement on the number of
political signs and the distance between each one. Mr. Eric Ceja,Principal Planner
stated he will review the sign ordinance and discuss with Code Compliance.
Vil. 'ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Lambell moved to adjourn the Architectural 'Review Commission
meeting at2t10 p.m,
�C-
ERIC CC A
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
SECRETARY
VA I JUD
C DING SECRETARY
a.w=HdUmnoaudMRMtWuW&aI MIMIIdama Page 6 of 6