HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-04 Draft Minutes �'�'� MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
.
TUESDAY - MARCH 4, 2008
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * � * � * * * * *� * * * * * * * *
,��
I. CALL TO ORDER ��- '�
� �:
Chair erson Tscho called the mee#in to order at 6 � `�i: ' ��
P PP 9 P. . �< .
� � ��-.
II. ROLL CALL �,�� �
Members Present: Dave Tschopp, Chair
Van Tanner, Vice`Chair��=
Sonia Campbell ��>
Connor Limo�M,. -x�:`"
�§,
Mari Schmic�t�w
�
Members Absent: None ��`
� �
Staff Present: M� auri Aylaian, Director of Community Development
ob H�greaves,°�eputy City Attorney
� £'��- Tony Bagato,�,�?rincipal Planner
�� Renee Scfi�ader, Associate Planner
��� ;
.� Tony�a"Monroe, Administrative Secretary
III. E E OF � � �, CE
°�
�ssi r Sch�ft led in the pledge of allegiance.
��` '��� ,r
!V. QPPROVi�#4aOF-MINUTES
:�
Request for consideration of the February 19, 2008 meeting minutes.
Action:
� ,It was moved by Commissioner Campbell, seconded by Commissioner
�=" � �;' ��x�Limont, approving the February 19, 2008 meeting minutes. Motion carried 5-
�: �:
� 0.
V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION
Ms. Aylaian summarized pertinent February 28, 2008 City Council actions.
,�-
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMlSSION MARCH 4 2008
VI. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
VII. CONSENT CALENDAR �
�.
A. Case No. TPM 34211 - WILSQN JOHN��N.'DEVELOPM�NT
�.
MANAGEMENT, Applicant �
�..
Request for approval of a fir�t one-year�time ext nst for
TPM 3421 1 that approved a� � cel map subdividin��83°
acres into 22 parcels located b; .,,� n Portola Avenue a�id
Cook Street north of Gerald Ford {Tech, ology Drivel.
.z�
� .
B. Case No. TT 32655 - PALI1� DESER :w- � DI G COMPANY, LP,
Applicant �x�F�
�:��.
�,�,
Request for approval of a secon, �= ne-year time extension
for TPM 32655 that app�ved a ��i.�4' map subdividing a
69.26-acre site into 270 single-family�lots, modified setbacks
and lot siz�for the 270 lots, and a Negative Declaration of
Environm �� " I Impa�t for prop`�rty located between Portola
Avenue and Cook S�eet soutti of Gerald Ford Drive.
� ^
`�� C C TT 34055'� LM DESERT FUNDING COMPANY, LP,
., App�
��. �'�
a, >:Request f r� proval of a first one-year time extension for
TT 055 � . ich subdivided a 42.2-acre site into 242 single-
. � "_ �ts, modified setbacks and lot sizes for the 242 lots for
pr:� ��
°��y_�cated at the southeast corner of Portola Avenue and
G �d�Ford Drive, 74-255 Gerald Ford Drive.
,�;;%
D. Case No. TT 34057 - PALM DESERT FUNDING COMPANY, LP,
,��r ��
, '`APplicant
,.�� ..
' ��,
Request for approval of a first one-year time extension for
TT 34057 which subdivided a 29.5-acre site into 141 single-
family lots, modified setbacks and lot sizes for the 141 lots for
property located at the southeast corner of Gerald Ford Drive
and Pacific Avenue, 36-200 Pacific Avenue.
2
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 4 2008
E. Case No. TT 34074 - PALM DESERT FUNDING COMPANY, LP,
Applicant
Request for approval of a first one-year time extension for
TT 34074 which subdivided a 10.6-acre site into 72'�gle-
family lots, modified setbacks and lot sizes for.:the 72"lots on
property located south of Gerald Ford Driv�`east of Pacific
Avenue, 74-300 College Drive. . _��
�;.
Commissioner Limont commented that these were the�me_�eve�opers
that came to them last April or May and basically stood in f o�nt�of the
:�,,:x::
Planning Commission and said if they di:° 't get approval that evening,
the projects wouldn't go forward. The µ = ing day she went to the
Landscape Committee meeting only to fi ' � hrough discussion that
the project across the street, The Vineyard 't have a final grading
permit and didn't have an affordab,�e�housing p ' it�he just wanted to
bring that up. For her it was a (ear ,�"� experience. She understood that
these guys are in business and ne' o move their projects forward, but
sometimes she though ey had to !ie extr�ely careful with them. The
names here were very familiar and she we"nt back over her notes and
there they were. It was just an informational comment.
,�
.�,
Action: - �
It was moved .�y Com�'tissioner Tanner, seconded by Commissioner
�„ �� mpbell, pappro��ing the°�ohsent Calendar by minute motion. Motion
;'ted 5-0;-" �
:��
�. ���
VIII. �PUB '�ARINGS
� �� :��
Anyone who�chat�enges any hearing matter in court may be limited to raising
only those issues he, she or someone else raised at the public hearing
described herein, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning
.�.-r. Commi�ion at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Repo ,_, a� " ments relating to each of the following items listed on the agenda
are d �fil ' � e Department of Community Development and are available for public
inspecti° during normal business hours, Monday-Friday, 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.,
73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260, (760) 346-0611.
3
MlNUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 4, 2008
A. Case No. CUP 07-13 - OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
Applicant
Request for approval of a new T-Mobile telecommunications
facility to be comprised of 12 new panel an�ennas �d one
parabolic dish mounted inside a new pinea on� 65-foot
high mono-palm; and construction of a new;, g9 s�uare foot
CMU wall enclosure 6-feet 6-i �s tall �o house four
accessory equipment cabinets, one GPA u�i# an; `b„ttendant
utility panels with an emergency genera �� recep acle to;be z�r
installed at the Holiday Inn Palt�t Desert p�operty locafed a�74-�
675 Highway 111. �
Ms. Schrader reviewed the request arad rec�: � °ended approval based on
the findings contained in the report. ��
��,� � � � � ,.
�,m
Commissioner Schmidt asked abou , - existing tower on the same property.
Ms. Schrader clarified that it is a di nt property; the Southern California
Edison substation is approximateljr�:�250 fe�t�way, but it was already
preparing to bring in ana�her tenant on that sit�; so T-Mobile wouldn't be able
to put an antenna�n fhat particular mono-palm. Commissioner Schmidt
asked if the exist'tng mono-palm was 65 feet tall. Ms. Schrader replied 75
feet.
�NCommissioner �imont a ,ed if this tower would be comparable to others
� ` ch as th�ones:�at St �rgaret's where the pineapple is enclosed and
��
" es the'�equip�ent inside. Ms. Schrader said it would be visually
: �'iparable in ev� �nray. It will be enclosed and the trunk material was
�I�t�� was ass � d by the applicant that everything about it would be
�t�� s��' �wever, � e pineapple will appear a little larger than those at St.
�.Y�
Marga 's�G�hur�h, but would have the same outside structure. Everything
would be;��nclosed within the pineapple and there would be no visible
'��� technological features on the outside.
�,,..
-r �;; There.�v�re no other questions for staff. Chairperson Tschopp opened the
,�.
pub�i earing and asked the applicant to address the Commission.
�;�,
�� MS. LAURA BISHOP, a representative of T-Mobile, said that staff did
,� `
a pretty good job of introducing the project and asked for any
questions. Her address for the record was 22751 EI Prado #2313 in
Rancho Santa Margarita, California, 92688.
There were no questions for the applicant. Chairperson Tschopp asked for
any testimony in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed project. There
4
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 4, 2008
was none and Chairperson Tschopp closed the public hearing and asked for
Commission comments or action.
Commissioner Campbell stated that it blends in very well and the 65-foot
tower would be nicely balanced with the taller and shorter pa�ms.
�h;.
Action:
Commissioner Campbell moved for approvai.
. a';. ���tz�:.
Commissioner Limont asked Ms. Aylaian about existing pa 4� tt�ee t�rers,
noting the location of one close to the Del Taco on Highw 1 ."°ar�d one
near Country Club and Cook towards The-� �" s; both had dying�alm trees.
Ms. Aylaian said she spoke with Spencer'I�night (the City's Landscape
Manager) and he was at the Del Taco site lastw���and said that in the past
there have been dying trees that have be (aced several times and
continued to be a struggle, but those were in g aV hape right now.
�
��:�;
Commissioner Limont asked if thi�� ` �ect was approved with a cor,ditional
use permit, what measures they wou have t�;eFt�Orce and make certain the
landscaping would be�rnaintained. Ms. Ay��n indicated that in the past
there hadn't always been conditions of approval attached to a CUP that
would allow the Ci�t��to revoke the CUP.if the landscaping wasn't maintained.
Since that hadn't'always been done�in the past, there are existing sites
where the landscaping isn°t at the level staff would like. However, for recent
rojects con�litions of appro�al�wwere included which would allow them to take
tion an�`�voke the CUP if the landscaping is not maintained, and that was
. �.:..,
h�t they roposing here.
VWCh � t�n Tsc^�opp ;asked if there was a second to the motion. It was
� sei� `:by Commissioner Tanner. Chairperson Tschopp asked for any
�; �
other comrraents; there were none and he called for the vote. Motion carried
5-0. ,.
It was moved by Commissioner Campbell, seconded by Commissioner
Tanner,Madopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2469 approving Case
f=-" CUf��"1-13, subject to conditions. Motion carried 5-0.
,��,:.����.�
IX. � � MISCELLANEOUS
None.
5
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 4. 2008
X. COMMITTEE MEETING UPDATES
A. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Commissioner Campbell reported on the last meeting. �
�
B. LANDSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION : ��;:��
°�.
Commissioner Limont said sh,e would give an'a,F^ dat at the ne�t
�:,
meeting. ° �
�r �-c : . ;��
C. PROJECT AREA 4 COMMITTEE -
Commissioner Schmidt noted that th'�►;hav not yet met.
��:
D. PARKS & RECREATION ' ���
'�.; :�'
��
,.;-<�;
Commissioner Tanner revie . the items discussed at their last
meeting.
XI. COMMENTS e.
.�>
Ms. Aylaian advised that there were no public hearing items scheduled for
�.
the next me��in� March 18, 2008��
XII. � , AD,IOURN�ME� _;v_ ;
�:.
tt 2I�.: moved b.}�hairperson Tschopp, seconded by Commissioner
�ni�er; �� 'ourning fihe meeting. Motion carried 5-0. The meeting was
djo �; `.6:18 p.m.
,�;r LAURI AYLAIAN, Secretary
AT�T:
�m �.,
,� �` �
. �; -
DAVID E. TSCHOPP, Chair
Palm Desert Planning Commission
/tm
6