HomeMy WebLinkAboutA. Case No. CUP 07-13 - Omnipoint Communicatons Inc. CITY OF PALM DESERT
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
REQUEST: Approval of new T-Mobile telecommunications facility to be
comprised of 12 new panel antennas and one parabolic dish
mounted inside a new pineapple on a 65' high mono-palm; and
construction of a new 209 square foot CMU wall enclosure, 6'6" tall
to house four accessory equipment cabinets, one GPS unit and
attendant utility panels with an emergency generator receptacle; to
be installed at the Holiday Inn Palm Desert property located at 74-
675 Hwy 111.
SUBMITTED BY: Renee Schrader, Associate Planner
APPLICANT: Omnipoint Communications, Inc.
A Subsidiary of T-Mobile USA, Inc.
3257 E. Guasti Rd. Suite 200
Ontario, CA 91761
CASE NO.: CUP 07-13
DATE: March 4, 2008
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Approval of the proposed Conditional Use Permit would allow the installation and
operation of a 65' tall mono-palm and 6'6" tall CMU wall enclosing a 290 square-
foot utility yard. The proposal will require the Planning Commission to grant an
exception to the required separation distances listed in Chapter 25.104 of the Palm
Desert Municipal Code. The facility was approved for its aesthetic and landscape
impacts by the Architectural Commission at its January 22, 2008 meeting.
II. BACKGROUND:
A. Property Description:
The property is located on the south side of Highway 111 between
Hospitality Row and the eastern shared boundary between Palm Desert
and the city of Indian Wells. The hotel property has an existing front parking
lot that faces South Palm Desert Drive, a frontage road on the south side of
Staff Report
Case No. CUP 07-13
March 4, 2008
Page 2 of 7
Highway 111. The proposed mono-palm and CMU wall enclosure would be
located adjacent to the northwest edge of the hotel building.
B. Zoning and General Plan Designation:
Zone: PC-4 Planned Commercial/Hotels and restaurants
General Plan: C-C Community Commercial
C. Adjacent Zoning and Land Use:
North: PC-4 Planned Commercial Resort Center
South: PC-4 Planned Commercial Resort Center
East: PC-4 Planned Commercial Resort Center
West: C-1/SP General Commercial/Scenic Preservation
D. The applicant originally proposed to place the cellular panels on the
building roof, but the request was denied by the Architectural Review
Commission for a lack of style consistency. (See Architectural Review
Commission Action Letter dated September 25, 2007.) The applicant was
asked to return with a mono-palm as the most suitable method for
achieving the necessary coverage at the required height of 65 feet.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The applicant proposes to install a 65' tall mono-palm adjacent to an un-
landscaped northwest corner of the building on the Holiday Inn Hotel property.
(See sheet A-1.) After the preliminary denial from the Architectural Review
Commission, Planning and Public Works Department staff visited the site with the
applicant to analyze the best placement for a cell tower since effective reception
requires the proposed height.
The project also proposes to install a 6'6" CMU wall to enclose equipment, which
would be located in an unused rear portion of the building grounds and has
minimal visibility from the hotel's front parking lot. The equipment enclosure does
not propose to modify the existing sidewalk. (See sheet A-1).
Site Plan:
A. CMU wall:
The site plan proposes a new CMU wall, to enclose a 209 square-foot area
that would house/screen equipment servicing the telecommunications
facility. The wall is proposed to be vine-covered to visually soften the effect.
G:\Planning\Renee Schrader\Planing Case Files\CUP 07-13 T-MobileVnarch4 planning commision\03-04.08 PC Staff Report-Final.doc
Staff Report
Case No. CUP 07-13
March 4, 2008
Page 3 of 7
New landscape is also proposed for the sidewalk area that surrounds the
enclosure.
B. Mono-palm:
The mono palm is proposed to be located at the northwest corner of the
existing Holiday Inn hotel building. The mono-palm is proposed to simulate
a tree and is sited to compatibly integrate with existing architecture,
landscape and the overall atmosphere of the hotel grounds. A visual
simulation of its appearance illustrates its blending with the existing hotel
architecture. Elevations of the mono-palm are illustrated on sheet A-4 of the
plans.
IV. ANALYSIS:
This project will require the Planning Commission to approve an exception as the
proposed mono-palm would be 65 feet in height and as proposed would be
located approximately 250 feet southwest of an existing cell tower within a
Southern California Edison (SCE) substation. The following findings responding
to Palm Desert Municipal Code Chapter 25.104 Commercial Communication
Tower Regulations explain the justification for granting the exception:
Findings of Approval:
In accordance with Section 25.104.050 (Exceptions process), any reduction in the
1,000-foot separation distance for towers over 50 feet in height is prohibited
unless an exception is granted. Pursuant to Section 25.104.050 for separation
distances between commercial communication towers, the Planning Commission
must find:
A. That there is a unique land use characteristic or nearby geographic
feature which results in a compelling technological need to locate the
commercial communication towers and/or commercial communication
antennas in the location and/or at the height proposed.
The land use that characterizes a compelling technological need to locate
at the height and location proposed is the existing inability to provide
sufficient coverage specific to the geographic site and the inability to co-
locate with existing towers. The request for a 65-foot tall mono-palm is the
result of failed efforts by the applicant to co-locate with two other existing
carriers on nearby cell sites. An existing mono-palm is located in a
Southern California Edison substation property approximately 250 feet to
the southwest of the proposed mono-palm at the Holiday Inn. This cell
tower houses one carrier's antennas, with a second carrier's antennas
G:\Planning\Renee Schrader\Planing Case Files\CUP 07-13 7-Mobile\march4 planning commision\03.04-08 PC Staff Report-Final.doc
Staff Report
Case No. CUP 07-13
March 4, 2008
Page 4 of 7
permitted to be developed in the near future, and is not a viable co-
location site due to lack of additional space for any future antennas or
equipment on the substation grounds. A second existing cell site is
located in the Ralph's shopping center on the southwest corner of Cook
Street and Highway 111 and is comprised of panel antennas fitted within
an architectural cupola. There is no additional space for antennas or
equipment at this location and co-location is not possible. Propagation
studies submitted with the T-Mobile application materials demonstrate that
the installation of six panel antennas at a centerline height of 52 feet 9
inches is necessary to ensure comprehensive wireless phone coverage
for Highway 111 to the east and west of the proposed cell site, and to the
surrounding commercial and residential uses. To realize as natural-
looking a "tree" as possible, installation of panel antennas at this
centerline height will result in a mono-palm that is 65 feet at the top of the
fronds.
B. That the unique land use characteristics or geographic features mitigate
any negative aesthetic concerns.
The surrounding area is developed with commercial (PC Planned
Commercial) and multi-family (R-3) buildings. The site itself is lushly
landscaped and is set back considerably from the Highway 111 corridor.
The existing hotel building is approximately 46 feet high and will provide a
solid backdrop for the mono-palm. Existing living palm trees adjacent to
the proposed mono-palm stand at mature heights ranging from 30' to 45'
and will ensure the mono-palm blends with the environment. Additionally,
palm trees on the Highway 111 parkway appear to potentially reach 100
feet in height. The proposed 65' tall mono-palm and 6'6" tall vine-covered
CMU equipment enclosure wall would combine well with existing
development patterns to mitigate any negative aesthetic concerns.
Additional findings for the approval of commercial communication towers are
stated in Municipal Code Section "25.104.030 Permitted Commercial
Communication Towers and Commercial Communication Antennas in Zoning
Districts of City" as such:
New freestanding commercial communication towers/commercial communication
antennas shall not be allowed unless the applicant substantiates to the
satisfaction of the planning commission:
A. That existing towers and buildings do not technologically afford the
applicant the ability to provide service to the service area of the applicant
or service provider.
G:\Planning\Renee Schrader\Planing Case Files\CUP 07-13 T-Mobilevnarch4 planning commision\03-04-08 PC Staff Report-Final.doc
Staff Report
Case No. CUP 07-13
March 4, 2008
Page 5 of 7
A Project Description Letter has been submitted by the applicant and
attached to the Staff Report to provide documentation as to the service
need in the proposed service area. Signal propagation studies were
conducted by the T-Mobile RF Engineer to analyze the optimum
placement for the cellular panel antennas. These studies indicate that the
Holiday Inn property location is an optimum site to provide coverage for
Highway 111 and the surrounding commercial and residential uses.
Adjacent co-location sites were considered by the applicant and include
an existing site in a cupola on a building at the Ralph's shopping center to
the east, and an existing mono-palm at a Southern California Edison
substation to the southwest. Both existing sites are fully inhabited and are
not viable co-location sites for reasons of lack of available antenna and
equipment cabinet space.
B. That the geographical boundaries of the proposed service area cannot
technologically be bifurcated to avoid the necessity for a freestanding
tower/antenna at the height proposed.
As provided in the signal propagation studies, there are four (4) existing T-
Mobile sites currently providing wireless signal coverage to the
geographical area surrounding the proposed cell site. The existing sites
are located to the east, west, northwest and north of the proposed facility.
The area immediately surrounding the proposed cell site is currently
provided with only marginal wireless coverage and T-Mobile subscribers
will experience dropped calls or episodes of "no coverage" in this area.
The existing cell sites cannot provide the needed signal to the area
lacking coverage and an additional cell site is needed. The proposed
Holiday Inn site location will provide the needed wireless phone service in
an area that currently experiences a "gap" in coverage. Because a large
"gap" in the existing T-Mobile coverage exists, a new cell site of a
minimum height of 52 feet 9 inches is needed. As determined by the
Architectural Review Committee, a screen wall addition to the existing
building is not a feasible architectural solution and a new freestanding
tower is necessary for this reason.
C. That the applicant shows compelling technological or economic reason(s)
for requiring a new freestanding facility.
The applicant's reason for the request of a new freestanding facility is
technologically motivated. As described above and depicted in the RF
signal propagation studies, the vicinity around the proposed cell site
currently experiences "marginal" wireless phone coverage. The addition of
a new freestanding facility will enhance the coverage to the area
surrounding the proposed site and will ensure that commuters along
Highway 111 and surrounding commercial and residential T-Mobile
G:\Planning\Renee Schrader\Planing Case Files\CUP 07-13 T-MobileVnarch4 planning cornmision\03-04-08 PC Staff Report-Final.doc
Staff Report
Case No. CUP 07-13
March 4, 2008
Page 6 of 7
customers experience continuous wireless phone service with limited
dropped calls and/or areas of no coverage.
The Planning Commission has the ability to approve exceptions based on"unique
land characteristics or geographic features that result in a compelling
technological reason to locate a commercial communications tower in the
location and/or at the height proposed." The Commission can also make the
finding that characteristics of the proposed site mitigate any negative aesthetic
concerns.
The proposed mono-palm tower meets all development standards excluding the
requested exception. The proposed wireless communications mono-palm is
located in a cluster of existing mature palm trees ranging from 40 to
approximately 100-feet in height as seen in the submitted photosimulation. The
Architectural Review Commission has approved this request based on the
surrounding terrain of existing landscaping and the proposed equipment
enclosure has been designed to not interfere with circulation or visual continuity
of the grounds.
With regard to landscape requirements, the City's landscape specialist has
preliminarily approved the landscape plant materials. However, it is recommended
that the plans meet all planting and irrigation design requirements prior to obtaining
construction permits.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The project is a Class 32 Categorical Exemption for the purposes of CEQA and
no further review is necessary.
VI. CONCLUSION:
Staff has determined that the proposed mono-palm and wall enclosure would be
compatible with adjacent properties; is architecturally consistent with adjacent
properties; and would create no adverse visual impact on adjacent properties,
including visual access of adjacent properties to sunlight. The proposed
enclosure wall and its effect would be softened by proposed vines. During the
field visit when staff met with the applicant, it was ascertained that the placement
of the mono-palm against the side of the building would meet the City's visual
standard. The proposed 65' height meets the standards in Municipal Code
Chapter 25.104 Commercial Communication Tower and Commercial Antenna
Regulations.
The approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the installation of a 65' high
mono-palm and a 6'6" high CMU wall to enclose a 209 square-foot attendant
G:\Planning\Renee Schrader\Planing Case Files\CUP 07-13 T-MobileVnarch4 planning commision\03-04-08 PC Staff Report-Final.doc
Staff Report
Case No. CUP 07-13
March 4, 2008
Page 7 of 7
equipment area would allow T-Mobile to expand its network of
telecommunications facilities in a manner consistent with current market
demand.
VII. RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission adopt the findings and adopt Planning
Commission Resolution No. , approving CUP 07-13, subject to conditions
attached.
VIII. ATTACHMENTS:
A. Draft Resolution
B. Legal Notice
C. Architectural Review Commission Notice of Action and Minutes
D. Exhibits: Aerial vicinity maps, Plans and Photo-simulations
E. Propagation Study
F. Applicant Project Description Letter
Submitted by: Department Head:
Wnee Schrader Lauri Aylaian
Associate Planner Director of Community Development
Approva •
Homer Croy
ACM for Development Services
G:\Planning\Renee Schrader\Planing Case Files\CUP 07-13 T-Mobile\march4 planning commision\03-04-08 PC Staff Report-Final.doc
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO ALLOW: 1) A NEW T-MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
FACILITY TO BE COMPRISED OF 12 NEW PANEL ANTENNAS AND ONE
PARABOLIC DISH MOUNTED INSIDE A NEW PINEAPPLE ON A 65' HIGH
MONO-PALM; AND 2) CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 209 SQUARE FOOT
CMU WALL ENCLOSURE 6'6" TALL TO HOUSE FOUR ACCESSORY
EQUIPMENT CABINETS, ONE GPS UNIT, AND ATTENDANT UTILITY
PANELS WITH AN EMERGENCY GENERATOR RECEPTACLE; TO BE
INSTALLED AT THE HOLIDAY INN PALM DESERT PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 74-675 HIGHWAY 111.
CASE NO. CUP 07-13
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the
4th day of March, 2008, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by Omnipoint
Communications / A Subsidiary of T-Mobile USA, Inc., for the above noted conditional use
permit; and
WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm
Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act', Resolution
No. 06-78, in that the Director of Community Development has determined that the project is a
Class 32 Categorical Exemption for purposes of CEQA and no further documentation is
necessary; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission
did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify approval of said request:
1. That there is a unique land use characteristic or nearby geographic feature
which results in a compelling technological need to locate the commercial
communication towers and/or commercial communication antennas in the
location and/or at the height proposed.
2. That the unique land use characteristics or geographic features mitigate any
negative aesthetic concerns.
3. That buildings and other wireless towers in the vicinity do not technologically
afford the applicant the ability to locate wireless facilities to serve wireless
customers in the area.
4. That the geographical boundaries of the proposed service area cannot
technologically be bifurcated to avoid the necessity for a freestanding
tower/antenna at the height proposed; and
5. That the applicant shows compelling technological or economic reason(s) for
requiring a new freestanding facility.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Palm Desert, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the
Commission in this case.
2. That approval of Conditional Use Permit 07-13 is hereby granted, subject to the
attached conditions.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert
Planning Commission, held on the 4th day of March, 2008, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DAVID E. TSCHOPP, Chairperson
ATTEST:
LAURI AYLAIAN, Secretary
Palm Desert Planning Commission
2
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CASE NO. CUP 07-13
Department of Community Development:
1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file to the
department of community development/planning, as modified by the following
conditions.
2. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date
of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall
become null, void and of no effect whatsoever.
3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions
and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and
state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force.
4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this
approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following
agencies:
Planning Department
Fire Department
Public Works Department
Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to
the Department of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for
the use contemplated herewith.
5. That where co-location may effectively be accomplished without violation of the
provisions of proposed Municipal Code Chapter 25.104 and without reasonable
interference with applicant's existing use, applicant shall allow third party co-location
onto the tower erected under this permit.
6. Applicant agrees to maintain the landscaping required to be installed pursuant to these
conditions. Applicant will enter into an agreement to maintain said landscaping for the
life of the project, which agreement shall be notarized and which agreement shall be
recorded. It is the specific intent of the parties that this condition and agreement run with
the land and bind successors and assigns. The final landscape plan shall include a long-
term maintenance program specifying among other matters appropriate watering times,
fertilization and pruning for various times of the year for the specific materials to be
planted, as well as periodic replacement of materials. All to be consistent with the
Property Maintenance Ordinance (Ordinance No. 801) and the approved landscape
plan.
3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
Department of Public Works:
1. In accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Chapter 27, complete grading plans
and specifications shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works for checking and
approval prior to the issuance of any permits associated with this project.
2. Proposed equipment pad elevations are subject to review and modification in
accordance with Chapter 27 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code.
3. Any landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved concurrently with construction
plans ad no permits shall be issued prior to Landscape plan approval.
4. Applicant shall comply with provisions of Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 24.12,
Fugitive Dust Control, as well as Section 24.20, Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control.
Department of Building and Safety:
1. Project must conform to the current State of California Codes adopted at the time of
plan check submittal. The following are the codes enforced at this time:
2007 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (Based on 2006 UBC)
2007 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (Based on 2006 UMC)
2007 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (Based on 2006 UPC)
2007 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (Based on 2005 NEC)
2007 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE
2007 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
2007 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE
2. All contractors and subcontractors shall have a current City of Palm Desert Business
License prior to permit issuance per Palm Desert Municipal Code, Title 5.
3. All contractors must submit, or have on file, a valid Certificate of Worker's
Compensation Insurance coverage prior to the issuance of a building permit per
California Labor Code, Section 3700.
4. Structural plans and calculations will be required for the mono-palm structure. Design
parameters are currently 85 mph wind speed; exposure C (due to height) and seismic
design category as determined by CBC Chapter 16 Requirements.
4
CITY Of Hill DESERT
I 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE
" lyi
PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260-2578
TEL:760 346-0611
•.,;�1.=;�' j FAX:760 341-7098
.. � in(oCrpalm-desert.org
CITY OF PALM DESERT
LEGAL NOTICE
CASE NO. CUP 07-13
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning
Commission to consider a request by Omnipoint Communications, Inc., to construct a new T-
Mobile telecommunications facility to be comprised of 12 new panel antennas and one parabolic
dish mounted inside a new pineapple on a 65' high mono-palm; and construction of a new 209
square-foot, 6'6" tall CMU wall enclosure proposed to house four accessory equipment
cabinets, one GPS unit and attendant utility panels with an emergency generator receptacle; to
be installed at the Holiday Inn Palm Desert property located at 74-675 Hwy 111.
1r 'w0-0 — w-- u7t, 4I ►a ;Wi" ►�
� ■ : ■. ■. ■■ ■ ;�►. tN1►_ 1�►�ii,
A ■ 0 ■E " Si _ eel
: r '/R•YA CAHY•M "1 w ..I
i ■ OMMEM• ■■ ■I r40 Ro
tro
hr��%1 tittAita 2 04 I/►*11 41 1
Io / p�7 iig i�►p III 1► �1J
,��� ,r# ` i i "Pt j
♦♦ 0 Tr
D 441 4 �,cW IIIIII % II
., Y r' --o, 1111 • —u
r • --I
silk J
1Ai Elsi l i i, j Qj ° l'
STATE HWY 111 itSTATE HWY 111
r_icPALNDESERTD S
I� 1 1;, ,,:isji 0
3 r-.
Et.CAAWT '• �Ws _.e.....c. 1.811
I> IU I ,
af_i_i ,
s0 ATM _ ����1���1 �®e
i t �i U 1�0 1 j LI l I l
0
II 2 HfCOc1RYtS.■ . `, I �IM1U { 1La , 0
EiO�
S \iIiII 1IIipII E
4PRO ELtA YUCCATRER
CiFtrff411i [ ) 1 * Cc
r =D REOC D
SAID public hearing will be held on March 4, 2008, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the
Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California,at which time and
place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard.Written comments concerning all
items covered by this public hearing notice shall be accepted up to the date of the hearing.
Information concerning the proposed project and/or negative declaration is available for review
in the Department of Community Development at the above address between the hours of 8:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at,
or prior to,the public hearing.
PUBLISH: Desert Sun LAURI AYLAIAN,Secretary
February 19,2008 Palm Desert Planning Commission
~~ CITY OF MIA DESERT
...:
-.. 1 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578
'l TEL: 76o 346-0611
...ill!
\._ %✓ FAX: 760 341-7098
info@palm-desert.org
January 24, 2008
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION
CASE NO: CUP 07-13
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATINS, INC. a
subsidiary of T-mobile USA, Inc., 3257 E. Guasti Road, Suite 200, Ontario, CA
91761
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of installation of
a 65 foot tall monopalm and a 290 square foot CMU wall enclosure; T-Mobile.
LOCATION: 74-675 Highway 111
ZONE: PC-4
Upon reviewing the plans and presentations submitted by staff and by the
applicant, the Architectural Review Commission granted approval by minute
motion.
Date of Action: January 22, 2008
Vote: Motion carried 6-0
(An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the
City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. Any
amendments to this approved plan would need to be re-submitted to Commission
for approval.)
STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved
by the Architectural Review Commission to the Department of Building
and Safety.
CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meeting's agenda,
new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the
Monday eight days prior to the next meeting.
0'WO a rtnua nnr
...**............. 140.-....
... ..
.- •.
: .
CITY OF 1111 DESERT
",r 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE
! PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578
*/11 II TEL: 760 346-0611
,, FAX: 760 341-7098
'+��=/ info@Palm-dcscrr.org
September 26, 2007
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION
CASE NO: CUP 07-13
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 3257 E.
Guasti Road Suite 200, Ontario, CA 91761
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of a new
wireless telecommunications facility for T-Mobile USA, Inc.
LOCATION: 74-675 Highway 111
ZONE: PC-4
Upon reviewing the plans and presentations submitted by staff and by the
applicant, the Architectural Review Commission continued Case No. CUP 07-13
subject to allowing applicant to redesign plans to include a monopalm and submit
landscape plant materials for the 209 square foot enclosure to be reviewed by
Landscape Specialist.
Date of Action: September 25, 2007
Vote: Motion carried 7-0
(An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the
City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. Any
amendments to this approved plan would need to be re-submitted to Commission
for approval.)
STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved
by the Architectural Review Commission to the Department of Building
and Safety.
CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meeting's agenda,
new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the
Monday eight days prior to the next meeting.
:)nxnm ok unnto nKU
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
MINUTES SEPTEMBER 25, 2007
B. Preliminary Plans:
1. CASE NO: CUP 07-13
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS,
INC., 3257 E. Guasti Road Suite 200, Ontario, CA 91761
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary
approval of for a new wireless telecommunications facility for
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
LOCATION: 74-675 Highway 111
ZONE: PC-4
Ms. Schrader presented a proposal for 12 cellular panels to be located
along a new ten-foot parapet screen, proposed to be constructed atop
the existing Holiday Inn. It would be ten feet at its highest and would
step down to meet the roof, with four (4) panels on each of the
parapets for a total of 12 facing east, west and north directions.
Included in the request are four (4) cabinets on the ground with two (2)
GPS antennas that would be screened by a six and a half foot block
wall in a new 209 square feet enclosure. The issue the staff has is the
visual impact with both the block wall and the roof element. The
parapet element, while it requires that height in order to receive proper
reception has a step down appearance that is a little intrusive and the
block wall would require additional screening and softening. In its
construction they would remove a few trees and demolish some of the
existing landscape there that softens the property and screens the
restaurant that is next door.
Commissioner DeLuna asked why the block wall had to be placed in
an area where trees would be removed. Ms. Laura Bishop,
Representative, stated that the building is a narrow rectangular
structure that is located on the west of the property towards the front
property line, and the equipment would have to be located reasonably
close to the antenna; otherwise the extension of the cables would be
far too long for it to be usable. It could not be located on the rooftop
because the roof wouldn't be able to support it. What they propose to
do for mitigation is to place three (3) Golden Rain Trees in 48-inch
G\Piannmg\Janne Judy\Word FileskARC Minules\2007\AR07O925.min DOC Page 5 of 8
r
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
MINUTES SEPTEMBER 25, 2007
boxes on the front of the property. Two (2) of those trees would be
located adjacent to the wall and in front of the T-Mobile compound and
one (1) would be located on the other side of the concrete walk. They
are also proposing a hedge around the block wall that would grow in
sufficiently thick to screen it, and the removal of two (2) Flowering Pear
Trees that are not doing well on the north side of the building. Ms.
Hollinger, Landscape Specialist stated that she would review the
landscape plan and then give her recommendations.
Commissioner DeLuna asked why the step down of the parapet was
being constructed in a style that was not compatible with the existing
architectural design. Ms. Bishop stated that was what Verizon
proposed years ago for this building, however the design was flexible.
The only thing T-Mobile needs is the height for the antenna because
they were not putting in an antenna structure such as a palm tree.
Commissioner DeLuna stated that the step down was radical and rigid
looking and something that would catch the eye.
Commissioner Van Vliet asked if they could relocate their antennas
back from the face of the building, away from the parapet edge. Ms.
Bishop stated that they would run into structural issues if they move it
away from the wall of the building. She didn't know if it was possible or
not to move the antennas back and would have to explore that.
Currently they are set against the wall and in order to screen them they
would need to build the walls up. Commissioner Van Vliet felt that was
where the problem was and the parapets would not work.
Commissioner Hanson stated that the parapets didn't go with the
building and adds a degree of oddness to a building that is already a
relatively odd structure. She indicated that it be moved more towards
the center to look more like an enclosure on top of a building that is set
back. Ms. Bishop stated that they couldn't move the antennas totally in
the middle of the building because they would have what is called
foreshadowing. If they move the antennas farther back on the building
you start getting an effect where the antennas are actually hitting the
rooftop. They can move it back a certain distance, but usually if they
move it back they would have to increase the height to account for
that.
G:\Plannng\Janine Judy\Word FIIes'ARC Minutes\2007\AR070925.n,n.DOC Page 6 of 8
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION .•00
MINUTES SEPTEMBER 25, 2007
Commissioner Van Vliet stated that it might be an inappropriate place
to locate it. She stated there were no other locations for that site and
indicated that there was an existing palm tree on SCE substation
immediately north of the property that currently does not have room for
another site.
Commissioner Gregory asked if there was some way it could be
moved back from the edge and somewhat visual from the street, but
not nearly as unattractively visible as with the proposed parapet.
Commissioner Van Vliet stated that if it was far enough back it
probably would be okay.
The Commission discussed the height of the building, line of sight and
location of the panels and screening.
Commissioner Vuksic asked if it would be possible to put in a
monopalm. Ms. Bishop stated that if the City approves a tree, they
would prefer that. The Commission was agreeable to a monopalm.
Ms. Bishop and the Commission discussed the size of the monopalm
and it being tall enough to rise above the rooftop. Commissioner
DeLuna asked how high they would have to go. Mr. Bagato stated that
the code is 65 feet, however they approved the Edison monopalm at
75 feet and at that time the Planning Commission indicated they would
be willing to approve taller ones if the antenna was in the vault and not
on the outside. Ms. Bishop stated that it wouldn't need to be that high
and thought the building was around 40 feet. Commissioner Gregory
stated that the City typically would require some real palms of the
same variety to compliment the monopalm so that it doesn't stand out.
Ms. Bishop stated that there were live palms at that location currently,
and said that if the Commission prefers a monopalm that is typically
the carrier's preferred design.
Action:
It was moved by Commissioner DeLuna, seconded by Commissioner
Lopez, to grant a continuance subject to allowing applicant to redesign
plans to include a monopalm and submit landscape plant materials for the
209 square foot enclosure to be reviewed by Landscape Specialist.
Motion carried 7-0.
G:\Planning\Janine Judy\Word FilesWRC Minules\2007WR070925.min.DOC Page 7 of 8
`'✓ T �I
01-ili( IN
Omnipoint Communications,Inc.,a subsidiary of T-Mobile USA Inc.
3257 E.Guasti Road,Suite 200,Ontario,CA 91761
Application Submitted by: Laura Bishop,Hannah Consulting
22751 El Prado,#2313 Rancho Santa Margarita,CA 92688
Phone: (949)212-9005 Facsimile: (866)291-5828
Project Description and Request for a Conditional Use Permit Approval
for a new T-Mobile Wireless Communications Facility
Applicant: Omnipoint Communications, Inc. a subsidiary of T-Mobile USA Inc.
Representative: Laura Bishop, Independent Consultant, Hannah Consulting, Inc.
Address: 74675 Hwy 111,Palm Desert, California 92260
APN: 625-430-062 and 625-430-065
Zone: PC-4(Planned Commercial - Resort Center)
Introduction to T-Mobile USA Inc.
Omnipoint.Communications, Inc., a subsidiary of T-Mobile USA Inc. (T-Mobile) is
currently in the process of leasing property and obtaining necessary permits for the
development of a new wireless telecommunications facility that will provide coverage to
the community surrounding the subject property in the City of Palm Desert. The new
wireless site will be an integral part of the T-Mobile system serving the City of Palm
Desert. The Project Description provided herein is provided as an accompaniment to the
land use application for a Conditional Use Permit and describes the proposed site,
providing necessary details relating to the proposed development.
Site Description
Proposed Antenna Structure and Equipment Area
The wireless facility will be comprised of 12 panel antennas installed behind new parapet
wall extensions on the rooftop of an existing Holiday Inn building situated immediately
south of Highway 111. Accessory equipment will be installed within a new block wall
enclosure to be located on the ground on the west side of the property. All elements of
the proposed facility will be fully screened from view.
r Application for a Conditional Use Permit for a New Wireless Telecommuni Tons Facility
Submitted by T-Mobile U.S.A Inc.
August 28,2007
The existing building rooftop parapet reaches an overall height of 38 feet above ground
and the proposed parapet wall extensions will reach 46 feet above ground. The new
antenna screens will result in an overall 8 foot(20%)height increase above of the highest
point of the existing building parapet walls along the northeast and northwest corners of
the building. The new parapet screen wall extensions will be finished with stucco
materials to match the existing building color and texture. The screens have been
"stepped down" to provide a lower profile along the north face of the building. Each
screen will be constructed of RF transparent material which will allow the RF signal from
the antennas to propagate to the surrounding area and provide the intended wireless
phone coverage. Fach antenna will be serviced by two coax lines,which will run inside a
new chase to be installed on the north face of the building. The chase will be textured
and painted to match the existing building and will not be a visually obtrusive element on
the face of the existing building. The coax lines will extend from the chase in conduit
installed below-ground, into the new equipment enclosure to connect the cabinets and
antennas.
Four(4)accessory equipment cabinets,two(2) GPS antennas,and attendant utility panels
will be located within a new 22' x 9' — 6" (209 S.F.) equipment to be located along the
west side of the property. The equipment enclosure will be secured by a 6' — 6" tall
CMU block wall with a wrought iron access gate. The CMU block wall will be finished
to match the existing building texture and color and will fully screen the accessory
equipment from view. The existing walkway on the west side of the building will be
relocated to run alongside the exterior of the new equipment enclosure wall. A hedge
wall of new shrubs will be planted along the north and east faces of the proposed
equipment compound wall to ensure the facility appears to be a part of the existing hotel
development and to minimize views of the block wall from the Hwy 111 to the north.
The proposed facility will be a completely stealth installation and will not be visible to
the general public or residents in the community. The proposed design ensures the
aesthetics of the existing building are not adversely affected and that new wireless phone
service is provided in a manner that will not significantly alter the appearance of the
existing hotel building.
Access to the Facility
Twenty-four hour, seven-day a week access to the site is required in the event of an
emergency or equipment failure but the site will typically be un-manned and will only be
visited by T-Mobile personnel approximately once per month, at which time the
equipment will be serviced to ensure it is in working order. The antennas are not
typically accessed once mounted on the building rooftop, unless an emergency failure
occurs or reconditioning is required. The antennas will be accessed via a roof hatch
2
Site No.: IE04749B
Site Name: Holiday Inn Palm Desert
Application for a Conditional Use Permit for a New Wireless Telecommunications Facility
Submitted by T-Mobile U.S.A Inc.
August 28,2007
located on the south portion of the roof. The roof hatch is accessed via a ladder from the
interior of the building.
Access to/from the T-Mobile lease area will originate on Palm Desert Drive South, a
public right of way located immediately north of the subject property, and extend into the
existing parking area of the property. Maintenance vehicles will use an un-assigned
parking space while the site is being serviced. An access easement will extend from
Palm Desert Drive South to the new T-Mobile equipment compound and a grant of an
access easement is provided in the Lease Agreement between T-Mobile and the property
owner.
Impact of the Proposed Site Development on Local Infrastructure
The site will require power and telephone service, which will be secured from the local
utility providers. All power and telephone lines providing service to the site will be
installed in conduit below-ground. The facility will not require water, gas, waste
management, sewer or off-site drainage facilities. The facility will not have a significant
impact on the local power and telephone services, will be accessed only occasionally with
a passenger vehicle, and will pose no adverse impact to the existing infrastructure for this
area.
Affect on the Health, Safety and Welfare of the Community
Operation of the facility will not create any waste, noxious fumes or odors. The antennas
will be constructed to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) standards and will
pose no threat to human health, safety or welfare. The equipment will operate on
electricity or back up battery power in the event of an emergency and will not produce
noxious fumes or odors. The equipment will operate quietly and will emit less than 45
dB at the nearest property line. No hazardous waste will be generated or stored during
the operation of the facility. The aesthetic impacts of the facility are discussed below.
Surrounding Land Uses and Aesthetic Impact of the Proposed Development
The subject property is zoned PC-4 (Planned Commercial — Resort Center) and is
currently developed with a Holiday Inn hotel. The proposed facility will not significantly
alter the appearance of the existing Holiday Inn building and the aesthetic impact to the
property will be minimal.
Palm Desert Drive South borders the property to the north, with Highway 111 lying north
of Palm Desert Drive. A large commercial development is located north of Highway
111. The property to the east is zoned PC-4 (Planned Commercial — Resort Center) and
3
Site No.: IE04749B
Site Name: Holiday Inn Palm Desert
Application for a Conditions]Use Permit for a New Wireless Telecommuniions Facility
Submitted by T-Mobile U.S.A Inc.
August 28,2007
is developed with a commercial hotel structure. The property to the south is zoned PR
(Planned Residential)and is developed with single family residential uses. The proposed
antennas and accessory equipment for the proposed wireless communication facility will
be located a distance greater than 300 feet from the existing residential uses. The
property to the west is zoned C-1 SP (General Commercial; Specific Plan) and is
developed with a commercial use and also an SCE substation facility. An existing
monopalm structure has been installed on the SCE substation facility but there is not
sufficient room for a second facility at this location. The proposed facility will not
adversely impact the existing surrounding land uses because it will be fully screened
from view and will not produce audible noise, fumes or odors, nor will it significantly
impact the existing infrastructure serving the community.
Justification for Site Location and Proposed Height
As depicted on the RF Signal Propagation Studies provided with this application, there
currently exists a "gap" in the T-Mobile coverage in the vicinity of the proposed site
location with only "marginal" coverage provided. This gap in coverage results in no
coverage or "dropped" calls for residents and commuters in the area. To ensure
comprehensive coverage for the area, T-Mobile requires a new site in the vicinity of the
chosen location.
The existing Holiday Inn building provides a structure that can be used as an antenna site
but the rooftop is not tall enough for a site that will effectively propagate the RF signal to
the surrounding proposed coverage area. For this reason, a height extension of 8 feet in
the form of new parapet extensions on the rooftop is requested to allow as much height as
possible for the antenna placement. The commercial development to the east, where an
existing Sprint/Nextel site is located within a building cupola/tower, was approached
regarding a possible site installation but no interest was expressed by the property owner.
There are no other existing tall buildings, billboards, church steeples, free standing signs,
existing communications towers, or water tanks that could serve as a possible site
location for a new wireless facility in the subject search ring. For this reason,the Holiday
Inn rooftop location has been chosen with a slight alteration of the existing building
proposed. The search ring lies in an area that is predominantly level, developed with
commercial and residential developments. The commercial development areas are the
most feasible locations to develop a new wireless facility to provide coverage for this
area. For this reason,the subject parcel has been chosen.
4
Site No.: IE04749B
Site Name: Holiday Inn Palm Desert
Application for a Conditional Use Permit for a New Wireless Telecommunic ions Facility
Submitted by T-Mobile U.S.A Inc.
August 28,2007
The proposed height of 46 feet for the top of the parapet wall extensions will allow a
centerline of antenna height of 43 feet, 8 inches. This is the minimum height that is
acceptable in regards to RF signal propagation to ensure comprehensive coverage for the
area surrounding the site and to ensure coverage effectively extends to the existing sites
to the north, east and west. As provided in the RF propagation studies, coverage to the
east will still not be optimal but will be considerably improved with the installation of the
proposed development.
Co-Location
T-Mobile is amenable to co-location as a site alternative. However, there are no existing
wireless communications facilities that could provide a possible co-location site in the
immediate vicinity of the subject property. An existing monopalm antenna structure is
located within an SCE substation facility immediately west of the subject property. Co-
location on the monopalm facility will not allow the installation of 12 new antennas and 4
equipment cabinets, the minimum required by T-Mobile for effective coverage of the
surrounding areas. A new antenna structure would need to be installed at this location
but there is insufficient space on the SCE property for a second monopalm and 4
equipment cabinets. A Sprint/Nextel site is located on a commercial parcel to the east,
within an existing building cupola, but the property owner for this parcel did not express
interest or return phone calls in regards to a second wireless carrier facility on the
property. For these reasons, co-location is not a feasible alternative for a T-Mobile site in
the immediate vicinity and a new site is needed. The proposed T-Mobile site presents a
site alternative that allows a fully stealth wireless facility installation in an area with
limited T-Mobile coverage and no possible co-location alternatives.
Conclusion
The addition of new parapet wall extensions to the existing Holiday Inn building will
provide a stealth solution for antenna installation and will allow T-Mobile to effectively
service the community with wireless phone coverage. Neither the antenna structure nor
the ground-based equipment will significantly change the appearance of the subject
property. The proposed wireless telecommunications facility will provide local phone
service and is a compatible use for a Commercial/Resort zone. The facility will be
unmanned and will not have a detrimental effect on the health, welfare and character of
the community because no audible noise will be produced, no waste or noxious fumes
will be generated, no hazardous waste will be generated or stored, no significant impact
5
Site No.:IE04749B
Site Name: Holiday Inn Palm Desert
Application for a Conditional Use Permit for a New Wireless Telecommunications Facility
Submitted by T-Mobile U.S.A Inc.
August 28,2007
will be imposed on local power and telephone utility sources, minimal vehicular traffic
will be realized as a result of the development of the facility, and the viewsheds in the
area will not be adversely affected.
T-Mobile requests consideration for the grant of a Conditional Use Permit approval for
the new wireless communication facility proposed herein.
Respectfully submitted,
t
Laura A. Bishop
Hannah Consulting, Inc.
Independent Contractor for T-Mobile USA Inc.
6
Site No.: IE04749B
Site Name: Holiday Inn Palm Desert
3 Imperial Promenade
Santa Ana,CA 92707
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
for
LAND USE AND BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS
SITE NO: IE04749A SITE NAME: Holiday Inn Palm Desert
ADDRESS: 74675 Hwy 111 APN : 625-430-062 and 625-430-065
Palm Desert, CA 92260
Servico Hotels III, Inc., a Florida corporation, owner of the above described property, authorizes
T-Mobile' or their agent, to act as an agent on owner's behalf for the sole purpose of
consummating any land-use entitlement or building permit applications necessary to ensure the
ability to use the property for the purpose of constructing and operating a communications
facility. Owner understands that this application may be denied, modified, or approved with
conditions, and that such conditions or modifications must be complied with prior to issuance of
building permits.
Owner further understands that signing this authorization is not to he construed as a
commitment of any kind, and that all land-use approvals obtained will be subject to the
successful completion of lease negotiations and owner's approval of the project site plans.
Owner:
Servico Hotels III, Inc.,a Florida corporation
By: Deix" 'c� - �` By:
Name: CUGt a p� L'• C e(' r Name:
Title: V+ ` c i? KS e "Title:
Date: 8/i v/rJ 7 Date:
Omnipoint Communications Inc.,a subsidiary of T-Mobile USA Inc
Site Number: IE04749A Site Name: Holiday Inn Palm Desert
•
3 Imperial Promenade
Santa Ana,CA 92707
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
for
LAND USE AND BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS
State of Liee)C-,Act..e1/4.-
County of
This instrument was acknowledged before me by_ a aCp„ti.t
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose
name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal, this 16 day of T , 200/
NOTARY SEAL
ttttttttttttt
/ Nor ti�y,,� Notary Publre� \��'L & _-
(
ExPIRE
GEORQ Print Name �t lxi 1—a--v -e _
A
taaoto I My Commission Expires: k\N?-0 l0
S.CI Ali
•
covN,,,
State of
County of
This instrument was acknowledged before me by
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose
name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal,this day of , 200_.
NOTARY SEAL
Notary Public
Print Name:
My Commission Expires:
Site Number: IE:04749A Site Name: Holiday Inn Palm Desert
T 'Mobiles
3 Imperial Promenade,Suite 1100; Santa Ana,CA 92707
GRANT DEED
iRsrr;,OvAA r•-••
___,,J Flnt a T is Insurance Compel 038998 AEA FOR RECORD
McOORIw1///oueSIW/r AT IMI O'CLOCK
•
AND NOON Rl01II D MAR.Ten DUD AND.MOW OTN IMINI
/WNW MOW.WA.TAN STATt M,TC
FEB - 71995
am Who 0.OAMr1Yt.Arnow.n law
Stamm Mow NMM MOM"Atadlt D/ntenaa.P A.
Self* 1 W Walt DUN./ SON MO M
■■w. �,MeMa11►
AMeae ka lam&
Ott A MIteI,Soo%/floe
/taw ItMal MOM MS MI At/QDOIWtB'o 1iN �1.��/ I/q
TAN Ot•atNe. WM,fM _ Q'I 1/ I58
1 GRANT I /
TN.tM0/11/Ir/01 OIMNN71111I o/awRewl G l5- y 3a-p4 l -2
oOas eITARY 111ANIMI TAX 16 a. 4 415. 43'-uG S-S
1 I rMnerlerete•Mar 14 Ota M Palo Dried
NwMNo- ft Gfi?
i 1 aae•rr•ee tM ram el elmreea a pyM5 remorse.a.
I 1 arllta.i M API elks On ales a1 WA o r osolta rcw Hooray M IAes Al eta era
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION.meats M learn,,Warr eefaraaepet
tNIS
/D/0011O1b►TgN.a NauO eerleratlrt
AOMiy 011AJTI/1 to
fi1VICO HOWLS M.•IC.a Ards gr•re1rt.tom/a. AMC TOM Piet emit ft 3350/
so Il/eaA,leeemmlea tar pigmy Ie Me aunty l_sel.tnll ./war N Grwrw
M an MST'A•ATTAOND/RA5TO AND AND!A NUN NNW.
Lb
11*RCT TO: Tam One erwrwlu ter Mil was tM$ll/fee IWISSO miw t■sre:aa.M.rM..arduets.teeereltene an/aaeeaewe M mae.•.armor•■
DWI M NNW,monsOilsi anew 11I/wag..*lMsI.aM mpaMse-
pew/„ fir 30 t/■t
Como/mat a soma.eewew■en
/TAT/0r eM
co1MTr OP blP tot► tfolt 11 S.S.
eTh's
0A Aeons 4P 1/N .Wen on, p. (+"�["
Lcttaine yl H1� ets J
•Mort*551 In and lei eW Catan,eat•DOM aanewh sharks neemsot
Deal/d•rwyv,es hp4llm N RDA OrremMto.a Waft aan«ellee,
to Woe o1 Mm oat krone.Drww,Warm M ma for plod w tee Si M Well M aaDMaowy
MINNal IS M OA MI MS)Melee MneN!w1M5 lowspo•$M
MOM Ielrtwcot area•aw+.Me/e/M ay Mare toll •tweaeewd
Oa sews In h11AtirA1Mi4 atateewa ages5Tbeel.old op Dy IIMWt0Y
ayn/AMeW on the MersMw5 ter nessentst or Os entity Mon NW .•.—_•,
N ninon we lrwn5M unit aal1Aal Win wlrtelMM. LOIIRp Moneys
Nam!la61� n
*mum Fop load CIUMAIS in WO
ear
/Ipauw
MAD.TAX ITATIAIMTS TO PARTY DOWN ON 10LI AIN IANI N NO PARTY o10N1t.Ia&e.As OMIICT D Alm
•
.. . • . .. - ...
New tow Mblle Cloy A/Ins
WON Noise.Ms. tq1 OMw•ele Ind Wen Pato Soft 1l 14106
T ■ 1V_1 4)11` 4 .
3 Imperial Promenade,Suite 1100; Santa Ana,CA 92707
17" . .
LEGAL _DSSCRIPTIOIZ
•
PARCEL I AND LOT A OF PARCEL MAP NO. 20217, AS
•
58�OF N BY
MAP PARCELJ F I LE MAPB,IN RECORDS OP�RIVERSES 57 IDE
D
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
0.ta•lahtK33%03 IMAM.d
•
..... • •
.....,
T . . \lobil .
3 Imperial Promenade,Suite 1100; Santa Ana,CA 92707
PARCEL MAP
APN # 625-430-062 and 625-430-065
zg
PI
FJJ 1 ‘) Cr
"A. N
_ft
(11104 441k. ,.,4
11; 4---F-
4,, t .. acir4"
tO 'Ida v,...
I 41r04. .. 4;\ 40 .-4
7I/ � \ fsrrr sru• 3
114
t 4,4 v J.sco /• .7 . o I 9/
..� oC�Jv v ��\ `"r, "/ z,
...-. .\ A S...L._
Sez.,. $ __mem s-rmv
.tli etr4"
1/4) :.:4&•
1r '.-� � �� 1
h !I `o �1' ` y �Cii
V �T 4�
bti
r
.-1i I
•
• ;I
kJ • •JI r 9.
H tI • ® �,
3 I
s .rs, rr4 - --- ---- __fii
__1'
1�
:•
r•re/r i"
ii
yh31
•' or• •.rld r I e oM
i8 ` .. ® O`N
r rb.y ® r( +�. C m
aw F 4a
m ve Ni•rr. r r.ssw _— 81�3336 ,
000 � +� ..fir.
Q
Q
h
...-.._"__ — !/r— Ab NA //_- - 31Y18.-_
N 'o l
b ss= b
k
aF