HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-21 Draft Minutes
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
TUESDAY – APRIL 21, 2009
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
City Clerk Rachelle Klassen swore in new commissioner Nancy DeLuna.
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Tanner called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Members Present: Van Tanner, Chair
Sonia Campbell
Nancy DeLuna
Mari Schmidt
Members Absent: Connor Limont, Vice Chair
Staff Present: Tony Bagato, Principal Planner
Bob Hargreaves, City Attorney
Kevin Swartz, Assistant Planner
Tonya Monroe, Administrative Secretary
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner DeLuna led in the pledge of allegiance.
IV. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION
Mr. Bagato summarized pertinent April 9, 2009 City Council actions.
V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Request for consideration of the April 7, 2009 meeting minutes.
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 21, 2009
Action:
It was moved by Commissioner Campbell, seconded by Commissioner
Schmidt, approving the April 7, 2009 meeting minutes. Motion carried 3-0-
1 (Commissioner DeLuna abstained, Commissioner Limont was absent).
VII. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Case No. PMW 09-94 – JEFFREY BANCROFT c/o PALM
DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Applicant
Request for approval of Parcel Map Waiver 09-94 to allow a
lot line adjustment at 44-871 San Benito Circle.
Action:
It was moved by Commissioner Campbell, seconded by Commissioner
Schmidt, approving the Consent Calendar by minute motion. Motion
carried 4-0 (Commissioner Limont was absent).
VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Anyone who challenges any hearing matter in court may be limited to
raising only those issues he, she or someone else raised at the public
hearing described herein, or in written correspondence delivered to the
Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing.
A. Case No. CUP 09-126 – QIXING PETROVICH, Applicant
Request for approval of a conditional use permit to allow a
massage establishment in an existing service industrial zone
located at 77-750 Country Club Drive, Suite E (APN 626-
410-040).
Mr. Kevin Swartz reviewed the staff report. He indicated that the applicant
was requesting that the hours be extended from 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.,
so if this conditional use permit was approved, Mr. Swartz requested that
Condition No. 4 be amended to reflect the change from 7:00 p.m. to 8:00
p.m. Mr. Swartz recommended approval of Case No. CUP 09-126, subject
to the conditions as amended.
Commissioner DeLuna asked how many massage therapy establishments
currently operate in Palm Desert. Mr. Swartz explained that in 2007, staff
did an analysis. He didn’t have current data, but in 2007, there were ten
2
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 21, 2009
independent massage establishments, four located within a hotel, and 15
massage establishments as a secondary use. Commissioner DeLuna
noted that all totaled, there were just under 30 establishments. Given the
population, that meant there is one establishment for every 1,650 people.
She asked for confirmation that there had been more since 2007, but Mr.
Swartz was just not sure how many? Mr. Swartz said that was correct.
Commissioner DeLuna concluded there could actually be more than 30
now. Mr. Swartz wasn’t sure. He said that staff would be happy to look into
that. Commissioner DeLuna asked if there had been any ongoing issues
with legal infractions in connection with these establishments. Mr. Swartz
said not the one before them today, but confirmed they have had previous
issues with massage establishments.
Commissioner Schmidt asked what the use in Suite E was prior to this
request. Mr. Swartz replied that it was an office.
Chairperson Tanner asked if there was a circular passed out to other
occupants of this address, and if there had been any kind of discussion.
Mr. Swartz explained that the legal notice was mailed to property owners
within 300 feet of this site. No one came forward in favor or in opposition.
There were no other questions of staff. Chairperson Tanner opened the
public hearing and asked the applicant to address the Commission.
MR. BRANKO PETROVICH, 78-451 Glastonbury Way in Palm
Desert, within Sun City Del Web, stated that it would be ideal for his
wife to be in charge and she could almost walk to the
establishment. They would appreciate if they could extend, at least
in the summer, their hours to 8:00 p.m., because it was still light.
She was planning to have one massage therapist in addition to
herself. His wife would do most of the work and then one office
person to answer the phones. He said there would not be more
than five clients per day. He hoped there would be nice people in
the industrial area, people who worked hard and needed a
massage.
Commissioner Campbell asked for confirmation that there would only be
two people working there; his wife and someone else.
Mr. Petrovich concurred. He said at the beginning it would just be
his wife until they established clients. Right now she works for
Esmeralda part time. She was the best one there.
3
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 21, 2009
Commissioner Campbell reiterated that for now there would be one
person, and then later on there would be another one.
Mr. Petrovich concurred.
Commissioner DeLuna questioned if there would be any additional
services offered besides massage.
Mr. Petrovich said no. Only hot stones, herb massages, and all the
Swedish ones; only those services.
Commissioner DeLuna asked what they would charge.
Mr. Petrovich replied $40 for half an hour and $60 for an hour.
Commissioner DeLuna asked if any appointments would be booked
outside of the establishment, or if everything would occur on the premises.
Mr. Petrovich said on the premises.
Commissioner DeLuna stated that she had some comments and
explained that it wasn’t a reflection on any of the applicants before them at
the meeting, but it was a reflection on those who had gone before them
who maybe abused the law or our system. At the end of the hearing, she
was going to ask that staff be directed through the City Council to
research the possibility of a moratorium being put on these types of stand-
alone massage establishments.
Mr. Petrovich noted that there weren’t any other massage
establishments in the area, only a chiropractor close to Gold’s Gym.
It would be ideal for his wife to walk to the job. That was the reason.
As a point of clarification, Commissioner Schmidt heard the applicant say
there would be a maximum of two employees. She asked if that was in
addition to his wife.
Mr. Petrovich said no, she was number one. As needed, they
would add a second one.
Commissioner Schmidt recommended changing Condition of Approval No.
5 from three employees to a maximum of two. Mr. Swartz agreed. Mr.
Bagato advised that change could be made as part of a motion.
4
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 21, 2009
Commissioner Schmidt asked for clarification that the reason for extending
the hours by one hour would be because of summer daylight.
Mr. Petrovich said that was right, but it wasn’t so critical. If there
was a problem, 7:00 p.m. would be okay.
Commissioner Schmidt stated that she would prefer to leave it at 7:00
p.m.
Mr. Petrovich agreed. He noted that most area businesses closed
at 5:00 p.m. He withdrew the request for 8:00 p.m.
Commissioner Schmidt noted that it would be 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., six
days a week.
Mr. Petrovich said that was correct.
There were no other questions for the applicant. Chairperson Tanner
asked for any testimony in FAVOR of or in OPPOSITION to the proposed
conditional use permit. There was no response and the public hearing was
closed. Chairperson Tanner asked for Commission comments.
Action:
Commissioner Campbell stated that she would move for approval. She
explained that they couldn’t really deny a use, like opening a restaurant or
opening a bar, because there were too many in the city, so she moved for
approval with the change to Condition No. 5 for a maximum of two
employees instead of three. Chairperson Tanner seconded the motion and
asked for discussion. There was no further discussion and he called for
the vote. Motion carried 4-0 (Commissioner Limont was absent).
It was moved by Commissioner Campbell, seconded by Chairperson
Tanner, adopting the findings and adopting Planning Commission
Resolution No. 2498, approving Case No. CUP 09-126, subject to
conditions as amended. Motion carried 4-0 (Commissioner Limont was
absent).
B. Case No. CUP 09-127 – SU YING, Applicant
Request for approval of a conditional use permit to allow the
use of “Spa 111 Massage” in an existing general commercial
zone located at 73-280 Highway 111, Suite 101 (APN 627-
092-020).
5
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 21, 2009
Mr. Swartz reviewed the staff report. He noted that one letter in opposition
was received and was attached to the staff report. He then recommended
approval of Case No. CUP 09-127, subject to the conditions.
Chairperson Tanner opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to
address the Commission.
MS. SU YING, 73-065 Shadow Mountain Drive in Palm Desert,
stated that she got a Palm Desert massage therapy license last
year. She has been doing massage since last year, but prior to that
she did massage in China. She opened a massage shop in China
and had it for two years before coming here. She stated that she
has business experience and massage therapy experience. During
the one year, she built her clientele from her husband’s friends who
were golfers, so clients were mostly from the golf course. She said
her husband supported her to have this business, and her whole
family also supported her efforts in opening this business.
Commissioner Campbell asked if Ms. Ying was currently working as a
massage therapist.
Ms. Ying said yes and explained she worked in La Quinta at the
Spa. The owner is French; they have massage therapy, facials,
nails and all kinds of services. It was a big one, so that impressed
her to have her own business.
Commissioner Schmidt asked if Ms. Ying would be offering any other
services besides just massages.
Ms. Ying said no.
Commissioner Schmidt asked what Ms. Ying charged for her services.
Ms. Ying said she planned to charge $49.99 per hour.
Chairperson Tanner asked if she would have an additional therapist she
would hire and bring into her operation immediately, or if she would just
start with one, herself.
Ms. Ying said she would just start with herself at the beginning of
the business.
6
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 21, 2009
Commissioner Campbell asked if she felt she needed the hours from 9:30
a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
Ms. Ying said those would be the hours for the winter time. The
summer time might be slower and she could open 9:30 a.m. to 7:30
p.m.
Commissioner Campbell asked if she wanted to change the hours to 7:00
p.m. and then in the season during the winter until 9:00 p.m., or if she
wanted them to leave it the way it was proposed until 9:00 p.m.
Ms. Ying said until 7:00 p.m.
There were no other questions. Chairperson Tanner asked if anyone
wished to speak in FAVOR of or in OPPOSITION to the proposed
conditional use permit. There was no one and the public hearing was
closed. Chairperson Tanner asked for Commission comments.
From the letter in opposition that was received, Commissioner Campbell
didn’t think it had anything to do with this massage establishment and said
she wouldn’t hold that against this application. She moved for approval.
Chairperson Tanner seconded the motion and asked for discussion.
Commissioner Schmidt thought this was a tough location. They were all
aware of the Red Barn and its clientele. She was also deeply concerned
by the length of hours. Anything past 7:00 p.m. was inviting trouble to that
area, whether it was summer or winter. It was just a tough spot. She made
that recommendation and wasn’t sure if the applicant would be amenable
to that, but strongly urged 6:00 p.m. or 7:00 p.m. in the evening only.
Commissioner Campbell thought that perhaps Ms. Ying was going to keep
her doors locked.
Ms. Ying spoke from the audience and said that 7:00 p.m. all year
was acceptable.
Commissioner Schmidt reiterated that the hours of operation would be
9:30 a.m. until 7:00 p.m.
Commissioner Campbell amended her motion to reflect that change in
hours of operation from 9:30 a.m. until 7:00 p.m. in Condition No. 4.
Chairperson Tanner amended his second and called for the vote.
7
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 21, 2009
Action:
It was moved by Commissioner Campbell, seconded by Chairperson
Tanner, approving the findings as presented by staff. Motion carried 4-0
(Commissioner Limont was absent).
It was moved by Commissioner Campbell, seconded by Chairperson
Tanner, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2499, approving
Case No. CUP 09-127, subject to conditions as amended. Motion carried
4-0 (Commissioner Limont was absent).
IX. MISCELLANEOUS
None.
X. COMMITTEE MEETING UPDATES
A. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Commissioner Campbell summarized actions from their last
meeting.
B. LANDSCAPE COMMITTEE
None.
C. PARKS & RECREATION
Chairperson Tanner reported that their next meeting was May 5.
D. PROJECT AREA 4 COMMITTEE
None.
XI. ELECTION OF PROJECT AREA 4 COMMITTEE LIAISON
A. Appointment of a Project Area 4 Committee Representative.
Chairperson Tanner asked if there was a volunteer. After some
discussion, Commissioner Schmidt agreed to attend temporarily.
8
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 21, 2009
Action:
It was moved by Chairperson Tanner, seconded by Commissioner
Campbell, by minute motion, appointing Commissioner Mari Schmidt as
the Project Area 4 Committee representative. Motion carried 4-0
(Commissioner Limont was absent).
XII. COMMENTS
1. Regarding the massage establishments tonight, Commissioner
DeLuna expressed concerned about the rising tide. She has
watched over the last few years and these types of establishments
tend to cause other issues, legal issues, and if they want to stem
that tide, she would like to make a recommendation, to ask that
staff be directed to look into a moratorium for stand-alone massage
establishments, not necessarily to recommend simply a radius
restriction, but tying it to lack of other services included.
Chairperson Tanner said they would need a motion to request staff
to look into this. They were on record now. They had gone on
record before asking staff to look at the number of establishments
within an area, but this took it one step further and requested a
report, not at the first meeting in May, but at staff’s convenience
during the next couple of months. Mr. Bagato said that if it involved
a moratorium, that would have to be initiated by the City Council. If
it was a formal request by the Planning Commission, staff would
take it up to City Council for that initiation.
Chairperson Tanner asked if they were asking for the moratorium at
this time, or just a study leading to the potential for a moratorium.
He thought they might be putting the cart before the horse if they
asked for the moratorium. Commissioner DeLuna clarified that she
asked that staff be directed to look into it. Mr. Bagato asked for
clarification on what data staff should include. Chairperson Tanner
replied the per capita ratio. Commissioner DeLuna said the type of
police reports and demographics. Commissioner Schmidt added
longevity. Are they still in business? When did they start? That type
of thing; and the legality of a moratorium. Mr. Hargreaves also
suggested including any impacts on surrounding businesses. He
thought what they probably wanted to do was direct staff to come
back with a report for the whole Commission and then at that point
decide as a Commission if they wanted to make a recommendation
to the City Council.
9
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 21, 2009
Commissioner Schmidt asked if there were any pending
applications coming to them. Mr. Bagato said yes, there was one
that would come before them in May. If a moratorium was adopted
now, it would impact that one. He said staff could come back with
an updated report, because since 2007 they have processed a few
more CUPs. As well, some may have gone out of business. They
would update the numbers and return with another report when
staff presents the next request for a massage, which would be at
the second meeting in May (May 19).
Chairperson Tanner thought that was fine and asked if that worked
for Commissioner DeLuna. She concurred. Chairperson Tanner
indicated that at that point, they could decide whether to accept the
applicant or put them on hold until the moratorium was
contemplated by Council, if they so directed.
Commissioner Schmidt summarized that staff would do a study and
present it to the Planning Commission at a regular meeting. The
Commission could move to send it on to Council and it would
appear on the earliest possible Council agenda. Mr. Bagato said
that was correct. Commissioner Campbell noted that the staff report
would appear under Miscellaneous on the Planning Commission
agenda. Mr. Bagato concurred.
Commissioner Schmidt asked Mr. Hargreaves what the grounds for
a moratorium would be. Mr. Hargreaves said an eminent threat to
the public health and safety. They would have to say that they need
a chance to study this in depth because they are concerned about
public health and safety kinds of issues, and they could put a
moratorium in place until that process is done. Commissioner
Schmidt indicted that not the least of which would be to that
beautiful young woman in that location. Mr. Hargreaves said that
when they talk about a moratorium, there are temporary
moratoriums which are put in place to give them time to study them,
or there could be a permanent ban on any additional stand-alone
massage establishments. Commissioner Schmidt asked if they
could limit the number in operation at any given period of time. If
one closed, another could come in. Mr. Hargreaves said they
needed to have some objective basis for limitations, but they could
ban them outright; they could ban stand-alone massage. And he
thought for years there was a ban on stand-alone massage; at one
point massage had to be attached to resort hotels and then later on
it opened up. Commissioner Schmidt thought it would be helpful to
revisit that ordinance. Mr. Hargreaves said it might be his faulty
10
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 21, 2009
recollection, but that’s what he remembered. Commissioner
Campbell thought he was right. She also felt that if they had
something like this on it, and they had to really prove health issues,
that wouldn’t be easy to do. The same thing with restaurants with C
letters instead of A letters. So would they be banned also because
of that C letter? It would be the same thing.
Commissioner DeLuna thought that when they addressed public
safety, there are some legal issues and some police issues. She
had spoken to Lt. Shouse and there are some police issues which
she could enter into the consideration of public safety which weren’t
before them now, but could weigh in on how they feel about
handling massage establishments as well. She thought that if staff
could do a study, or whatever process staff goes through, they
would at least have some information. Chairperson Tanner agreed
that it was certainly worth looking into; there was no question about
that.
One question he had was if it was a miscellaneous item on May 19,
if the massage establishment conditional use permit would come
before them as part of that, or if it would be put on hold. Mr. Bagato
said that the conditional use permit would be under public hearings,
and then as a follow-up under miscellaneous, they would talk about
the report and the number of them in existence today since the
previous report, and look up some additional data per capita and
see what quick reports they could get from the police department.
He didn’t know what kind of police data they wanted to provide at
this time, because they wanted to do the moratorium to give them
time to research it from a public health and safety standpoint.
Chairperson Tanner asked if that issue would come before them
prior to staff’s report. Mr. Bagato said it would be at the same
meeting, but public hearings follow miscellaneous, so it would be
up to them whether or not they wanted to continue it based on what
they decided to do from information in the report. Commissioner
Campbell didn’t think that was fair to the applicant. Chairperson
Tanner agreed. Commissioner Campbell thought the proposed
conditional use permit should be taken up on its own and kept
separate from staff’s report under miscellaneous.
Commissioner Schmidt asked about the location of the proposed
CUP case. Mr. Bagato didn’t recall. Commissioner Campbell noted
that they couldn’t discuss it at this time because it wasn’t on the
agenda. Chairperson Tanner agreed.
11
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 21, 2009
2. Mr. Bagato indicated that on May 5 the Planning Commission
would be considering the Draft Sign Ordinance. If they had read the
paper recently, his name had been in there a lot regarding this
issue. Since the ordinance is 40 pages, he had a copy available
today for them to take with them, the draft sign ordinance as well as
the current sign ordinance. He said it was also available to anyone
in the public who might be interested. They couldn’t talk about it at
this time and would hold any comments, and there would be a staff
report that would follow, but he wouldn’t plan on recirculating the
draft ordinance. He just wanted to give them plenty of time since it
is 40 pages. He said he would hand it to them on their way out. He
confirmed it would be on the May 5 meeting agenda.
3. Chairperson Tanner welcomed Nancy DeLuna to the Commission.
Commissioner DeLuna said she was very honored to have the
confidence of the City and looked forward very much to serving with
them.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Commissioner Schmidt, seconded by Commissioner
DeLuna, adjourning the meeting by minute motion. Motion carried 4-0
(Commissioner Limont was absent). The meeting was adjourned at 6:42
p.m.
_______________________________
TONY BAGATO, Acting Secretary
ATTEST:
________________________________
VAN G. TANNER, Chairperson
Palm Desert Planning Commission
/tm
12