Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-07-02 PC Regular Meeting Agenda PacketTU ES DiAY, J U LY 2, 2013 - 6: OiO P. M. COUNCIL CHAMBER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260 I �01_3 111 M OX011; I C 4; 1 MENIU9141rolm Ut V44, a -aim A June Reports and documents relating to each of the following items listed on t agenda, including those received following posting/distribution ' are on file in t Office of the Department of Community Development and are available for pub 1 I inspection during normalbusiness hours, Monday -Friday, 8-00 a.m.-5-00 p. 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260, telephone (760) 346-061 Extension 484. 1501 i i 11)1,1gu, 141"1"1 11119.341IRM1310013mo 31 M M- LIFE W4101B I I I i A I i I E''I: [A]-IUPX YI#F MORRO MRS] Rec: 1) 'ITaive further reading and adopt Resoon 11o. 260-P, recommieniding to the City Council approval of Amendmient No. 1 to Development Agreement 04-01 to allow the construction of-9i i permanent maintenance facility for the Palm Desert Country CliW#, located approximiatel'y 100i yards northwest of the previous location; or NMLMM�� 1 2) Direic:t staff to prepare a resolutilon of denial, such that the applicant is requireid to construct the permanent maintenance facility for the Palm Desert Country Club at the location approved under Development Agreement 04-01, UM M42 V 0=1 A A - ;IjIG-'U :IOIUMU III . 2 G:TianniingWonica OAOVManning Comm! ssiW201IAqer)MM7-2-13 agn.docx AGENDA PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION J U LY 2, 20113 Igo IIIIIIIINNTM.961 VM lium walm - ;; Please contact the Planning Department, 735 10 Fred Wan'ng Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260, (760) 'A AM 11, for assistance with access to any of the agenda, materials, or participation at the meeting. 3 WiPlannoingWomca ORedly'Planning Commvssionl,2,013'Agenda17-2•13 aqn,docx CITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION PRELIMINARY MINUTES TUESDAY, JUNE 18, 2013 — 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260 Present: Commissioner Ken Stendel Commissioner John Greem Commissioner Sonia Camp Vice Chair Roger Dash Chair Nancy DeLW Jill Trembla—'01 Atto Tony Bagato, ; «ila- Planner trative Secretary III. PLEDGE OF ALLFIE31ANC, x Comft sioner Cam ?ell led the Pledge of Allegiance. IV. SUMMAROF CI�NCIL ACTION ` - None V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION VI. CONSENT CALENDAR JUNE 18, 2013 A. MINUTES of the Planning Commission meeting of May 21, 2013. Rec: By Minute Motion, approve as presented. B. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION of a lot line adjustment (APN 655-170- 034) at Ironwood Country Club. Case No. PMW 13-131 (Michael Mahoney, 73-124 Crosby Lane, Palm Desert, CA 92260, Applicant) Rec: By Minute Motion, approve a lot line at, Case No. PMW 13- 131. C. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION to tr riser a pd of golf course Lot 146 to Lot 80 for expanded rear yard (A�,Ws 632-760 ���� 632-760-016) at Indian Ridge Country Club. Case N � MW 13-171 (Van „eying, 1775 E. Palm Canyon Drive, #110-349, Palprings, CA 92264, Apt) Rec: By Minute Motion, approve a Case No. PMW 13-..171. 334-011 & 627-334-010). ( Wilhelmson, 41-7_0 Ranc CA 92270, Appli���i�s Rec: BV Mthute E. Upon Commission, 1 portion of Lot 146 to Lot 80, come' of 4 and Lot 9 (APN`s 627- VY 13-1 rian Ludington & Jennifer 4 e, ite L-2, Rancho Mirage, mbining Lot 4 and Lot 9, Case No. PMW U ST OR OONSIDERA tO'N of a one-year extension for the 9, m "It,of VanNo. 3242. Case No. ZOA/CUP 10-228 (DLR Group, 117 Coli�r o BOuldVard, Suite 500, Pasadena, CA 91105, Applicant) By Minut", !'! lotion'; approve the extension (until July 14, 2014), Case No. ZOA/CUY�y 10-228. ipbell, second by Stendell, and a 5-0 vote of the Planning lendar was approved as presented. VII. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER None 2 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2013\Minutes\8-18-13 min.dou PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 2013 Vill. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION of a Conditional Use Permit to allow Rover Armstrong A.P.C. to convert 2,370 square feet of storage/warehouse space into office use within an existing 8,619-square-foot office building located at 75-100 Mediterranean in the Service Industrial zone. Case No. CUP 13-98 (R.A. Desert Properties, LLC, 75-100 Mediterranean, Palm Desert, CA 92211, Applicant) Mr. Kevin Swartz, Assistant Planner, reported that the property is located on the northeast corner of Boardwalk and Mediterranean. The, property is zoned Service Industrial. Properties to the north, south, east, and rust is also zoned Service Industrial. In 1990, the Planning Commission appr 8,619-square-foot building. He said that. when Cold Call telemarketing firm utilize Commission amended the Precise 'Plan. 1,400-square-foot attic into a library. In �6 the applicant to restore the building to E 2,370 square feet of storage/Warehouse applicant currently operates'a,law offic convert and lease the 2,370 square fee cubicles. He indicated that the hours Qt 5:00 p.m., Mon Friday He"' tt the applicatio hat proposed, ;37 Planning C ission - be resided Conditional%Ofte Permit P) is required is not zoned Pr Q f�Ih woo Precise Pldt 90-12 allowing an hebuilding was constructed in 1994, J the building. In 1996 the Planning to allow the applicant tio„ convert the 41 the Planning Commission approved 249>.square feet of office space and spac Mr. Swartz reported that the and the applicant is proposing to of storago/warehouse space into 10 )peration are between 8:00 a.m. and ad that -,the principal concern regarding square feet was conditioned by the to storage/warehouse space. The to evaluate parking since the property layer site plan. Hereported that currently there are 29 parking �a>ls, which" is to arking demand. According to the code, the proposed nversion of t3701uare feet of storage/warehouse space to office use Ruud require an tionakF6 a parking stalls. He said that the applicant currently ha o offices for to 16 employees and one receptionist. The applicant is op pr� to creata 0 cubicles to lease out to 10 employees. Between the two busines9: there Id be a maximum of 27 employees for 29 parking spaces. Mr. Swam t�that staff had concerns with not having parking spaces available for': 16 clients. He said that the applicant informed staff that most meetings with "clients occur off -site and through conference calls; however, if parking spaces are needed, employees would park off -site. Mr. Swartz mentioned that staff conducted a parking survey, and found that the use would have a minimal impact to the surrounding businesses during the proposed operating hours. He reported that staff did not receive comments in favor or opposition to the proposed use. Mr. Swartz stated that staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Conditional Use Permit. He offered to answer any questions. 3 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2013\Minutes\6-18.13 min.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 2013 Chair DeLuna declared the public hearing open and invited the applicant to address the Commission on this matter, followed by any public testimony IN FAVOR or OPPOSITION. MR. STEVE ARMSTRONG, 75-100 Mediterranean, Palm Desert, California, asked the Planning Commission if they had any questions. Chair DeLuna asked how many attorneys would be in the office. MR. ARMSTRONG responded that currently there staff. They also lease space to a human resource: couple hours a week. Chair DeLuna stated that assuming the p would be in the office? MR. ARMSTRONG replied there Chair DeLuna stated that the attorneys conference calls. She asked if the othe meeting clients on -site. MR. ARMSTRONG responded', that not all used at once a also meiotic parking spaces,W et and nip Chair DeLue clarified tf" assum would allov�„ o on- arking spaces availa%f „ n t u lable. fully 27 people if all attorneys and some ,y, which they use a , how many people sed. h clients off -site or through leasing the space would be three ,b ference rooms, which are rey,arexa le to use the six adjacent rkngspaces across the street. the facility is fully leased and staffed, it es for two clients, and six to eight parking to the site plan to indicate where parking spaces are Chair Dash asked if th�`occupation would be limited to attorneys. MR ARMSTRONeplied that they hope to have other types of businesses, ;, such as human reatwGrces. Comm issioriai'.! tendell referred to the large central area, and asked if it is for secretarial or administrative staff. MR. ARMSTRONG answered that he visualized having file cabinets, copiers, and a table in the area. Commissioner Stendell stated it is a large area, and he is concerned if more desks and people could be added. MR. ARMSTRONG responded that he does not foresee that happening. 4 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2013\Minutes\6-18-13 min.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 2013 Commissioner Campbell asked if additional people were added, would they have to return to the Planning Commission to change the CUP. Mr. Tony Bagato, Principal Planner, responded that the applicant would have to return to the Planning Commission for approval. Mr. Swartz interjected that Condition of Approval No. 8 states that no more than 10 offices could be created. Commissioner Stendell asked staff if the parking spaces'Qn Mediterranean and Boardwalk are diagonal. Mr. Swartz replied that is correct. He added thaWhert sluff conducts a parking study, they do not calculate off -site parking. r v Commissioner Greenwood inquired whs `-Would happen if th01; operty is sold and purchased. Would the new owd have to dome back the Planning Commission for another CUP? \` Mr. Swartz responded that if.t a building is� fhe new owner would be held to this CUP. If the new owns ted to mods the CUP, there would be an amendment to the CUP whice back ;fie Planning Commission. The Planning Commission had Commissioner Stendell mooed, by Minute Motion, to waive further reading and adopt RdsQtution No. 260 subject to conditions. Motion was seconded by Dash and carried by _,,,,.vote. E The Plan nm emission thanked the applicant and wished him good luck. IX. MISCELLANEOUS None X. COMMITTEE MEETING UPDATES A. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES None 5 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2013\Minutes\8-18-13 min.dou PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION B. PARKS & RECREATION JUNE 18, 2013 Commissioner Dash reported that the water features in the parks will not be replaced when they are no longer working. The reason is that the features are expensive to maintain and to replace broken parts, and second reason is to conserve water. He also mentioned that the "Swim to Win" program held by the Aquatic Center brought an excess of 2,000 people, which made the program very successful. XI. COMMENTS Commissioner Stendell commented that he May, and the facility is one of the best. XII. ADJOURNMENT Upon a motion by Dash, second by Greenwood, Commission, Chair DeLuna adjourned the meshing at 6: ATTEST: TONY BAGATO, SEEi PALM DESERT PLA 6 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commissiont2013\Minutes\6-18-13 min.docx Aquatic Center in early a 5-0 vote' Qf-,the Planning NA, CHAIR I REQUEST, CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 04-01 (PALM DESERT COUNTRY CLUB, APN 637- 020-011) TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT MAINTENANCE BUILDING AT A NEW LOCATION ON THE PALM DESERT COUNTRY CLUB GOLF COURSE LOCATED NORTHWEST OF JOE MANN PARK AND NORTH OF CALIFORNIA DRIVE ill I j�llll!l• Pill illi���ilill M APPLICANT* PID Golf Operations, LLC 77-200 Califomia Ddve Palm Desert, CA 92211 DATE: July 2, 2013 CONTENTS: Resolution Amendment No. 1 to Development Agreement 04-01 Legal Notice Architectural Review Commission meeting minutes Letters in Opposition Department comments =11111 ql��1111111;11 18 =1 1) Waive further readingadopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2605 recommending to the City Council approval of Amendment No. I to Development Agreement (DA) 04-01', allowing construction of a permanent maintenance facility for the Palm Desert Country Club approximiatel'y 1010 yards west northwest of the previously location; or NO2MES= 2) Direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial, such that the applicant is required to construct the permanent maintenance facility foir the Palm Desert Country Club at the location approved under DA 04-01. Staff Report Case No. PP/IAA 12-213 - Palm Desert Country Club Page 2 of 6 July 2, 201:13 ail so a a ^ 9 Executive Summa A subdivision and renovation of the Palm Desert Country Club (PDCC) was approved by the Planning Commission and City Council in 2004. All of the work is compilete, except for the construction of a pieirmanenit maintenance facility. The previous owner/developer declared bankruptcy before constructing the facility, and a new owner (the current applicant) acquiire!d the project. a - A [IBM 0 I:M&O j 0 1 0- The proposed, project site is located northwest of Joe Mann Park, north of California Dnive on the Palm Desert Couint�ry Club Golf Course. WRannunWAI"ony BaqmMStaff Repod.91POOMPlannhig GommoSSIONPOCC Maintenance Path - Ranning Comm Nsiw 7-2-13,docx Staff Report Case No�,, PP/D12-213 - Palmi Desert Country Club Page 3 of 6 July 2, 2013 M141 �-., I N ;f4ff roMmm ROOM PRI I PH �44 I W. "Is North: R-11 OOiO / Residential South: R-1 91,000 / Residential East- R-1 91,000 /Residential West- R-1 9,000 / Residential ftrv-flO2MuVSPaMMqftny BagaidStaff ROPOdSVn)CMAOnn0q Commisvon$POCC Maintenance Fadffy - Maftnq Comrftskn 7- 2'. 1 3,docx Staff Report Case No. P,P/DA 12-213 - Palm Desert Country Club Page 4 of 6 July 2, 2013 The applicant, PD Golf Operations, LLC, has taken over maintenance aind operations at i i I the Palm Desert Country Club. They received approval for a Temporary Use Permit to, i create a temporary maintenance facility, on the golf course whille they developed a plan for a permanent maintenance building plan and structural desigin. That approvall was for six months and expired June 91, 20112 w w The! area originally approved for the maintenance yard, which, is now a barren depression bietween, the proposed site and Joe Mann Park, would be landscaped as I part of the proposed project; a desert, arroyo would be created with decomposed granite cobble, Mexican Birds of Paraidlise, Deer Grassi, and several clusters of Palo Verde and Shoestning Acaci�a trees. go 1 1 Is, io i r.1#1101 Ow EW-1111 ON 61 - I- -all - 0 Wv-fl2%3WoupsV4angtnqVWcrony Bagalo0aH ReP0ftSWDMIHanftng ConvitWOMPEXX Maint"nca Fs*My - Renring CammMWn 7-2•13,docx Staff Report Case No. PP/ DA 12-213 - Palm Desert Country Club Page 5 of 6, July 2, 2013 located, has no setbacks oir lot area requirements, The only development standards that I apply are for build'i'ng height (30 feet) and for parking (comply with the provisions of Chapter 25.58, Off-St�reet Parking and Loading)i. Therefore, the development standards, cannot be used to discriminate between the proposed and the approved maintenance facility locations, The sole measure of the proposed relocation of the maintenance facility is its impact on 10 neighboring residents. H'i mesi on goilf course fairways are typically more desirable than homes near golf course maintenance facilities. The objections to living next to such a maintenance facility are twofold- the visual impact and the noise and distuirba,nice of the operations, When two potential facility locations are surrounded by homes and park facilities, as is the case here, there is no objectively superior location. If the previously approved location is used, neighbors closest to the temporary facility location will be pleased and neighbors closest to the approved location will be d�isappioinited. If the temporary facility location is selected�, the neighbors, closest to the previoiusly approved location will be pleased, but the neighbors closest to the temporary facility will be disappoiinted. The hours of operation, the traffic on the access road ' the number of workers a amount of equipment, the noise generated,, and the amount of parking is the same either location. is locations would need to be enclosed by a 6' high wall, and surrounded by landscape screeining. Both sites would be required to provide enoug 9 parking so that vehicles are not parked on surround streets or outside of the wal�l enclosure. Both sites would be required to dispose of green waste and to limit hours operations to those permitted under the municipal code. I The applicant states that cost is the reason for requesting' a change in the location for the peeport that the cost of constructing the permanent facility at the temporary location is significantly less than that of constructing it at the approved location. Although, long term land use decisions should not be based solely on cost, it is appropriate to note that this, golf course has had difficulty meeting the investment objectives for several previous owners. Construction of a new maintenance facilliity to replace an existing facility at the PaIrm Project, which were the subject of an environmental study and a negative declaration environmental impact, The currently proposed miinor change in location of the facili 1 does not have any foreseeable impact on the environment different from what w analyzed in the! negative declaration. The proposed project is considered a replacerne or reconstruction of existing structures or facilities on the same site having substantial the same purpose and capacity. This is a Class 2 categorical exemption from th requirements of the Califomia Environmental Qual'ity Act (CEQA)and no further stu is required. GAManNriqJony HaqatoiStaff RepoftskPDCOPannng CvnimiWoMPOCC Maintenance Facility- RannIng Comftssi,on 7-2-13,docx Staff Report �,i It Case No. PP/DA 12-213 - Palm Desert Country Club Page 6 of 6 July 2, 2013 Conclusion The impact of locating a permanent maintenance facility to the west northwest of the approved location at the Palm Desert Country Club is manifest only to the neighbors in the immediate vicinity. The purpose of the Planning Commission's public hearing on this proposed change is to allow those residents to voice their concerns, support, and/or objections, and to allow the applicant the opportunity to present a compelling case for approving their request. Staff asks the Planning Commission to receive testimony from the concerned parties, and then forward a recommendation tothe City Council. The Commission may recommend in favor of the relocation by approving the resolution included with the staff report. The Commission may also recommend that the applicant be required to construct the facility in the location previously approved by directing staff to prepare a resolution of denial, which would be brought to the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting. Submitted By: Tony Bagatb, Princi6al Planner Department Head: uri Aylaian, Director of Community Development GAPlannmg\Tony Bagato\Staff Reports\PDCC\Planning Commission\PDCC Maintenance Facility - Planning Commission 7-2-13.docx d WHEREAS, the Planning Commiission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did day 1 d a duly noticedpubl'ic hearing to consider the requestby t PDi Golf Operations, LLC. for approval of the above noted; and w application Palim Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act,"' th'-- project is considered a ClassCategorical - r wn from the requirementsof Q. no further environmental W'HEREASi, at -. rr^ •testimony w w w �, ww�ww w r arguments,of -w persons- w to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the recommendation to the City Couniicil of drequest: 1. The proposed location of - maintenance it is condiltioned, accord with the objectives of the City's zoningil ordinance, i 2. The precise plan and condliltionia,l use willnot ea • .w use or enjoyment of war the vicinity by e occupants- e, for 3. The proposed precise plan will comply with each of the applicable provisions of 4. The proposed w w of sunder generalwhich it will be operated and maintained, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or or be materially injuriousto properties or improvements 1, That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of Planning Commiissi�on in this case. 2. Thiat the Planning Commission does hereby recommend approlval of PiP/DA 12- 2'13, subject to conditions. AYES: NOES: UIVI-Mull . - I I I* IMA 11111010IMMIAVIAZIMAIIii 11101110 CPAPlannlng�Tony BaqatVStaff RepodslPOCCIPanning Corr missiwPannlnq Comnission Resdluflon.docx 0 :JWTIIZIRIIIMCMOI������ M wof-IMM 01 [11IRRUM by_-% 1, The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the Department of Community Develoipment/Planniing, as, modified by the followiffat C(114itiots. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permiit for construction of any use contempilated by this approval, the applicant shall: first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District P,all!mi, Desert Architectural Commission City Fire Marshal Public Works, Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building & Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 3. Applicant agrees to maintain the landscaping required to be installed pursuant to the coniditionsi. The final' landscape plan shall include a loing-term maintenance progra specifying among other matters appropriate watering times, fertilization and prnuning f1j! various times of the year for the specific materials to be plan,ted, as well as period replacement of mateirials, Al�l to be consistent with the Property Maintenanc, Ordinance (Ordinance No. 801), the approved landscape plan, and the current addit�ioi of the City of Palm Desert Plant Maintenance Guide. 4. Access to trash/service areas shall be pilaced so as, not to conflict with parking areasi. Theapplicant shall contact Burrtec Waste and Recycling, I'nc. to provide trash and recycling services that shall include the provisions of and operation of a stinger/bo maneuver the bins, to a collection area above ground from within the underground service area. Depending on the location of the trash and recycle bins, the trash enclosures may be required and shall be consistent with the Palm Desert Municipal Code Chapter 8.12 and other conditions, such as number,, si�ze, and' location of enclosures to accommodate the required number of bAll bins or enclosures must be screened from public view. 5. The applicant shall submit design development plans, to the Architectural Review Commission before review of the construction drawings by the City. GAPJaqq!n9%Tony BaqatoStaff RepoAMPDMPlanning CommlssmntSannng Commissm Res,*jtjmdocx k] 0 Ip a 9 yr IR �-VTRINTWZMIM 3. The applicant shall s,ubm,it a grading plan to the Department of Publ�ic Works, foir review and approval, Any changes to the approved civil or landscape plans must be reviewed for approval prior to work commencing, 4. The applicant shall furnish proof to the Public: Works Department that they've obtained a azardous Materials Permit from the Department of Environmental Health for onsite fueling stationi. 11 1 14Pill! I I I I 111 11111 1 11 -MINATEF. Me 1`50IMMAR. 111 11 111 111 1 1 MERM =0 6. The applicant shabmit a final Water Quality Management Plan (WQ�MP) for approval. The W01MP shall identify the Besit Management Practices, (BM'Ps) that will be used on the site to control predictabile pollutant runoff. The Operation and Maintenance section of the approved WQMP !shall be recorded with Riverside I County Recorder'si Office and a conformed copy shall be provided to the Public Works department. �11� I RONATATJ ANIA IN M' .11110 1111 Ills a. Must be water efficient in design and meet the City of Palm Desert's, Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, b. Planting plans must show location of proposed and existing utilities. c. Must match approved civil plans. d. Allspecs and details must be site specific. e. Appaniit must have CVWD approval of their irrigation plans prior to City approval. f. Applicant must have a stamp or si i gom the County Agiricultural Commissioner before City approval. Ill I IMINUE ITITIMISMI, I =� I = �� The applicant shall pave the access road to the maintenance facility and improve t driveway approach to City standard�s. GAPIarminqUony Bagato'Staff Repod0PDCVFIanNnq CommsslonPaMng CommisMon ResotAomdocx EI 1 :1 W-11 Ll Rq I U3 rexeloR I Iiiiii I 1 1111111 11 Fill I III ��1111 III ��irli I III I!! I i 1 1 11 1 jirl'111�111;1 , 11 a, 2010 California Building Code and its appendices and standards. b. 2010 California, Plumping Code and its appendices and standards. c. 2010 California Mechanical Code and its appendices and standards, d. 2010 California Electrical' Code. e, 2010 California Energy Code. f. Title 24, 2010i California of Regulations g2010 California Fire Code and its appendices and standards. 2. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed; as required per the City of Palm Desert Code Adoption Ordinance 1217. 3. Disabled access is required for the rest�room facilities in the proposed Mainterianod., I Facility per 2010 CBC Chapters 11 B (as applicable) and Chapter 1 0i. IP M1WQARr-M11 I LOIS (411a. M.4 I WMINIENILTJ I I I I I Qqji I or. I jpffllm 5. Address numerals shall comply with Palm Desert Ordinance No. 1173 (Palm Desert Municipal Code 15.15. Compliance with Ordinance 117'3 regarding street address location, dimension, stroke of line, distance from street, height from grade, height from street�, etc. shall ::a shown on all architectural building elevations in deta. Any possible obstructions, shadows, lighting, landscaping, backgrounds or other reasons that may render the building address unreadable shall be addressed during the plan review process. You may request a copy of Ordinance 1173 or Municipal Code Section 1 5i15 from the Department of Building & Safety counter staff. i.. Please contact Cherie-1,11 I'll i�amis, Building and Safety Technician, at the Department of Buiildliiniill & Safety (760-776-6420) regarding the addressing of all buildings and/or suites. ............ 2. The applicant shall provide a fire flow of 15010, gpm for a 1-hour duration at 20 psi residual pressure from a, permanently installed Fired Hydrant before any combustible material is placed on the jobi site. GARani*g'Jony Baqw6SW RepoOMPOCOManning C ommIlsslonPanning Comnsmon Resolulton.docx 19 3. The applicant shall provided proof the existing water system is capable of providing the minimum necessary gipm fire flow for 3000 gpm for commercial buildings prior to any project apipirovals. 4. The applicant shall provide the required fire flow from a permanent wet Barrel Super Hydrant with 11-4" and 2-2Y2:" discharge outlets located not less than 25' and no more than 1501" from any portion of a commercial bg measured via vehicular travelway way prior to any building permits approvals. 5. The applicant shall submit water plans to be reviewed and ad by the Fire Marshal and include verification that the water system is capable of providing the requiired fire flow, 6. The applicant shall install a complete NFPA 13 fire sprinkler systThis appilies to all buildings, with a 3000 square foot total cumulative floor area, The Fire Marshal shall approve the locations of all fire appliances including Post Indicator Valves, Fire Department Connections, and Fire Hydrants. All Fire Appliances shall not be within 2�5 feet of a bung and all re Department Connections shall be within 50 feet of a Fire Hydrant, 7. All valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems and water-flo switches shall be monitored and alarmed per the 2007 California Building and Fil Code. it The applicant shall install a complete NFPA 72 Fire Allarm/Sprinkler Monitoring system as required by the 2007 California Building and Fire Code. 9. The applicant shall install potable fire extinguishers as per N'IFPA 10, The appilicant shiall install a minimurn of 1-2A11i OBC Fire Extinguisher for every 00 square feet, 3' to 5' above grade with no more than 75' walking distance from any point of the business to the extinguisher. The appillicant shall install a "K" class fire extinguisher as required for commercial kitchens within 30' of the hazard area, 1O.The applicant shall install an all weather Fire Department accessible roadway extending to any portion of the building where as a 150' hose lay can be utilized for the inaccessible, building perimeter. Construction type of the same shall be approved by the Fire Marshal and be rated for 80,000 lbs. Tu�rf block will not be accepted, Fire lan J! e access roadway miinimum width is 20 and height clearance is 13'6 Pubilic roadway minimum unobstructed width is 36 with parking on both eA Fire Apparatus Turn around shall be provided for dead end streets: in excess of 150' in length with approved cuil-de-sac or hammer head dimensions, W Tan 3' MO =06 we F, a r, 911 WORM GAAannhgITony Bagald'Staff RepodsTOCUPtanning C ommssionTlanning Commission Resdubmdocx 9 13.The applicant shall install an illuminated building address in accordance to the city standards for size and location. The building address shall be installed on the I building in an unobstructed locale and, the color shall be contrasting to backgroiund, 14.The applicant shall submit t�hree sets of the following plans for review including tenant improvement- • Fire Al�arm System • Sprinkler System • Fire Maiin Underground • Site Plan to Scale i i I 115.Additional conditions will be addressed' at formal review of the building constructior p I l'anis, These conditions can only respond to the preliminary plans reviewed. Th,,--,, applicant shall provide a Master Site Plan to include all fencing, Fire Lanes, and Fird Mains with appliances for review and'approval. GAP IanNng"Jony BaqatoStaff ReportsODCOPIanning CommfsWonOanninq Commjss'on Resdutdon,docx 7 RECORDING REQUESTED BY EXEMiPT FROM FILING FEE PURSUANT AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: TO GOVT. CODE §6103 City of Palm Desert Attn, City Manager a .1titiol . . ...... . . ............... . . . Space Above This Line For Recorder's Use IIIIIIIIIIIIIII, iiiiI 1 1 p11111011!1I i This Amendment to PaIrn Desert Country Cliub Development Agreement No. 04-01 (this "Amendiment") i's made and entered into as of this day of " 2013, by and between the CITY OF PI"" a California miuilniicipal corporation ("City"), and PD GOLF PROPERTIES,, LLC ("Owner") as successor -in interest to PDCC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC AND DAHOON INVESTMENT COMPANY,,(';'P,riod' Owner are, collectively, "the Parties"), pursuant to the authority of Section 6i5864 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California. A. City and Prior Owners entered into that certain Development Agreemenl :14-01 recorded on November 7, 2005 as Document No. 2005-0923097, in the Official Records of Riverside County, California (the "Agreement"). The Agreement was entered into to facilitate the development of certain real property ("Property,"') more, particularly described in the Agreement. B. On or about I Owner succeeded Prir." Owners, as owner of the Property and as a Party to the Agreement. I C. City and' Owner now desire to amend the Agreement in the manner set forth herein piursuan,t to Section 1.5 of the Agreement. DRAFT 6/19/13 1 NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants a �Promisles of the Parties, the Parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Effective Date. This Amendment shalIl become effective on the date, which is two (2) business days after the date, which is thirty (30) days after date of final adoption by thile City of the ordinance approving this Amendment ("Effective Date"). From and after the Effective Date, all references to the Agreement shall autornatically wryemed to mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment, 2. Defined Terms. All', capitalized terms used but not defined herein sh I have the meaning set forth in the Agreement. III 11i Ili ill MINIMUM III 1 11 � 4. Amendment to Section Exhibit C to the A I �greement. From and after the I Effective Diate, the twe!lfthi bullet point on, Exhibit C, "PALM DESERT COUNTRY CLUB GOLF COURSE RENOVATION SUMMARY", is amended to read "Relocate Golf Course maintenance facility to new location directly north of 77620-77670, California Avenue, with 200 feet (minimum) between residential property lines and soluith, wall of maintenance facility enclosure. Site shall be generally as shown on Fornotor Engineering drawing titled "City of Palm Desert SITE PLAN for Maintenance Yard Building Palm Desert Country Club" dated 11/05/2012, and on file in the Department of Community Development of the City of Palm Desert. 5. Amendment of Section 1.7, Notices. Section 1'.7 of the Agreement is hereby amended to provide that notices to Owner be addressed as follows: 6. Covenants Run With Land. It is specifically understood and agreed by and between the Parties hereto that the Agreement and this Amendment shall not be i te severable from Owner's in rest in the Property, and the provisions of the Agreement as ,amended by this Amendment shall constitute covenants which shall run with the Property or any portion thereof uipon the recordation of this Amendment, and that thereafter the benefits and: burdens of the Agiireement as amended by this Amendment successors in initeires,t to the Parties who acquire any interest shall biind and', inure to all' in the Property. DRAFT 6/19/13 2 7. Interpretation. This Amendment shall be interpreted to give each of th4 provisions their plain meaning. The Recitals are incorporated into this Amendment. 8. Entire Agreemen This Amendment is executed in duplicate originals, each of which is deemed to be an original�. This Amendment consists of three (3) pages, which constitute the entire understanding of the Parties as to the matters sej forth in this Amendment., 9. Status of Agreement. Except as modified by this Amendment, the terms and provisions, of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOiF, the undersigned have executed this Second Amendment as of the date and year first above written. I'D Golf Operations, LLC a limilited liability company CITY: CITY OF PALM DESERT, a California Municipal Corporation In Lem Dave Erwin, City Attomey DRAFT 6/19/13 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA S,S. COUNTY OF On , before me, , NotaN- Publi , personally appeared proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) islare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(les), and that by his/hier/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the pierson(s) acted, executed the instrument. MM= W1 ommagilm On , before me, Public, personally appeared proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/hier/their authorized capacity(les), and that by his/hier/their signature(s) oiin the instrument the person(s) or the entity upion behalf of which the person(s) acted, ex�ecuted the instrument. HEMIUM .11 1,21MMUMP11M [SEAL] DRAFT 6119113 4 P I'd 11H 73-;111) FRIA) WANNG DRM R" N1 DISL I U , AH I OkNiiA �)z26o it ILA- 76o 146—o6it N\ 0 10 A I a MOMM&I01111" I L4 Nf--ll t*l: a o ALO,1*M ; I ; 111 syl Ism NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: That the Palm Desert Planning Commission will consider Amendment #1 to Development Agreement 04-011, Palm (Desert Country Club, to allow the construction of the permanent maintenance building at a new location on the Palm Desert Country Club Golf Course located northwest of Joe Miann Park and north of California Drive, APN: 637-0201-011 PUBLIC HEARING: Said public hearing will be held' before the City of Palm Desert Planning Commission on Tuesday July 2, 2013 at 6:010 p,m, in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civilc Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend, and be heard. Written comments concerning all items covered by this public hearing notice shall be accepted Lip to the date of the hiearingi. Information concerning the proposed project is availabille for review in the Department of Community Devellopment at the above address between the hours of 8.010 a.m, and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be firnitect to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Sun Lauri Aylaiani, Secretary June 22, 2013 Palm Desert Planning Commission 73-5 to Ftu,�) WARM; Ditm,, het t D Fs i, x r, (,A 1, u FORN f,% 9 2 ., 6 o — z 5 78 TI'A- 7 6o .3 46—o6 i, i TTI fo"' C it y0f�'I I f5wiesemorg APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PD GOLF OPERATIONS, LLC, 77200 California Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92211 RATURE OF PROJECT/AP'PROVAL SOUGHT: Approval to construct a maintenance building on existing site; Palm Desert Couinty Club. - - --11 N - 0 Upon reviewing the plans and presentations submitted by staff and by the applicant, the Architectural Review Coonzed staff to move forward to Planning Commission and City Council to consider revised location of maintenance facility; and plans shia�ll return to ARC for review of site layout, *uilding design, andlandscape. Date of Action: AprH 24, 2013 Vote, Motin carried 7-0-0-1, with Commissioner Lambell absent (Anii appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days •of the date of the decision. Any 2,mendments to this approved plan would need to be re-submitteid to the kaommission for approval,) STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approv by the Architectural Review Commiission to the Department of BuIldinj and Safety, 44 ARCHITECTURAL REVOI! V COMMISSION MINUTES "A punched opening with wrought iron. He asked the applicant to describe the header detail. I/ MR. WESSMAN described the lime stone detail and thwgetback of the windows, Commissioner Vuksic asked the applicant h9w I r back the stone is going on the highest element, I,/ Commissioner Lambell told the, applicant that the Commission just got these plans this aftern, don and' d'idn't have a chance to look at them. She thought thi§,,sh"ould be continued' to give the Commission a chance to review 1;146m, However, if the rest of the Commission is comfortable wit,�v,'what has been described she was okay with forging ahead,/' She told him next t�ime they would like the plans sooner thaI I'll an hour before the meeting. The Commission felt comfortqbfe going forward, OIrnmissioner McAulifie asked if there will be drawings that will be odated and submitted' so the Commission can have a baseline. N. WESSiMAN answered yes,. Commissioner Lambell moved to approbmifted. Motion was seconded' by Commissioner Colombini and carried by an 8-0 vote, 111 1 1 � Help. !1IF111 —21F. dkir 0 lip . rAwt#iojLomin AATIRE OF P,ROJECT/APPROff, VAL SOUGHT: Approval to construct a maintenance building on existing site; P,al'm Deserl- County Club. am , IF= I Ill I =5715II- 51, ill; -A-EW(s], a - G'PanningUanfne JudyWord Fles%l ARGO WuIeWOI 11 30423nn doex Page 5ofll N ARCHITECTURAL RET,'�NA�i/ gl�l` W COMMISSION MINUTES Commissioner Clark asked if they were currently operating without beriefit of permiit. Commissioner Clark said this has been the case for about eighit or nine months and asked if they were in any hui,rry to improve this s ite. I Ms. Lauri Aylaian, Director of Community Development, said t applicant is not in as much of a hurry as the Citywou6 like for the to b�e, which is a point of contenition. i The Commission discussed, the suitability of the site, and the cooli system for the building. I MR, TED GIENEREUX, Golf Course Superintendent, said the offirm." g and breaoob k rm willl e the only on areas with air cditionin and t rest of the facility will have evaporative coolers. I !kj ism, .00 11 1 1 . a F.Ws"MjjFr9q-Mj-s= , . a I -.9m. 11AL G:'IdNanningWaNne JudyWord Ffleskl ARC% I MinuteM20 1 W 30423mki.docx Page 6 of 11 ARCHITECTURAL REV' �' 'COMMISSION 14 MINUTES April 23, 2013 Commission asked if the! building was fire sprinklered and the 2pplicant stated it was s,prinikleireid per code. The Commission discussed what would be going inside tha. building. MR. GENEREUX said it would be an office, break room, restroom, equipment storage, and a mechanics work bay. Chair Van Wet thought this might be a little premature for this C I ommission to look at the building if it might be relocated! to a different site. He thought the Planning Commission should be looking at this first to finalize the location. Commissioner McIntosh said thiere are a lot of deficiencies in the design that haven't been thought through yet, The applicant is trying to shoe horn into a spot that may not accommodate all their 1 1 i needs., He asked where they wi'll' be washing the equipment as it comes off the golf course. MR, GENEREUX discussed the open space to the east of this building. He indicated they have about ten miachines that are washed off. Commissioner Levin asked where the trash can area was located, MR, GENEREUX said hie didni:'t know. Commissioner Levin thought the applicant didin't have any business being here yet if they haven't thioght through how they are going to operate aind function with this facility, GAPW6ng',Janne AidyWord �qies'kl ARGIlMiriu1esrl,2013�130423min.d�ocx Page 7 of 11 ARCURE`'4 MN aCHITETRAL ,W COMISSIO" MINUTES April 23, 2013 I W a III - - 0 -0 - 9 Z 10-111l MR I&I 1 0 0 0 1 R -6 a - M-R-- -'- -I"- --,- I MR, GENEREUX said the building has nothing to do with us being here today. They can't design the building until they get approved for this location since it is a pre-fab buIildinig. Cornmissioner Lambell asked, staN what the Commission was approving today. GAPIan6agUanine Sudy'Word Pos'O AROO Mindes%'20130 30423min,docx Page 8 of 11 R, ARCHITECTURAL REV1.411 W COMMISSION MINUTES April 23, 2013 I a 1111019 Pr Commissioner Lambell praised the applicant for bringling the g course back to l'ifei. However, she felt the applicant was openin p e nj themselves uto a kg of obo wrms y mving on to Plannin I Commission and City Council !nil that they mlay see things th I Commission didn't see, She expressed' to the appllicant that th was not an architecturally significant building and thought th I a wou�ld get some push back on it because it is a very utilitaria; building. MR. GENEREUX pointed out that the other location was righl beside the park, which they had concerns with and were trying to get it away from the piark. I fral"W7, 1 Inter, MR. GERERE,UX said it's because the site is excavated so everything: they do has to be pumped and elevated;. He apologilized for taking so long and e they have looked at, He wanted the Commission to understand that thils, location is located 3Y2 millesi from the other end of the golf course and they have to deal with moving equipimenit and' noise violations. As a business, they are trying to get openi, so they can get revenue in, the #loor; logistically they are trying to find', a more central location, Mr. Kevin Swartz, Assistant Planner, stated' after discussing thiis with Ms. Aylaian there was probably an easier way for this Commission to handle this, If the Commission cannot come up w ith comments or conditions, they could recommend that staff take this to Planning Commission and City Council for the location. Today this Commission can make a motion that it will come back to the Architectural Review Commission after the location is approved for the full architectural site design. Commissioner Lambell made a motion to authorize staff to milove forward to Planning Commission and City Council to consider revised location of maintenance facility, and' plans shall return to G:P6a41i1mn,gldan6i1e,Ju4AyWollyd FORasA$ SRC'tl MkV ulesh20131 3f1M123mr ridocx Page 9 of 11 I ARCHITECTURAL RE'�,``I/ W COMMISSION MINUTES Apri�ll 23, 2013 ARC for review of site layout, building design, and landscape. Commissioner Coloimbiini made the seconid. Chair Van Vliet asked if there were any further comments. Commissioner Levin asked if there was a constraint to the limits of this site. MR. asked Ms. Nalle if they were limited to that size and she said no. .11R. GE-AIERE1X said in his oplinion there is room to go west on thi ,tlan. Commissioner Levi:n asked if there would be space to expanid what they have. MR, GENEREUX stated this was all zoned Open Spaceand wasn't sure what the constraints were. He asked Ms. Nale if there was a footprint space. Ms. Nalle said this was open space anid there was no si restriction. Obviously they want to make it as small as possible 4 . �ecreasing the visual impact on: the neighbo�rs, but you do e n adequate space o to stre everything. I The Commission and the applicant discussed a satelIlitei site an,,t the financial impacts of having a secondary site. Chair Van Wet asked if there were any further comments. Heariag none he called for the vote, ACTION: Commissioner Lambell moved to authorized staff to miove forward to Planning Commission and' City Council to coinsiider revised location of maintenance facility; and plainsi shall return to ARC for review of site layout, building design, and landscape. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Colom;binii and carried by, a 7-0-0-1 vote, with Commissioner Lambell 01seit. GATIanrinqUanirie Judy'Wwd ReMl ARQIPAnutesAMM130423MO docx Page 10 of 11 I 01 [ANWOT22TIMA REQUEST: COASIDERATION OF APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A MAINTENANCE BUILDING AT A NEW LOCATION ON THE PALM DESERT COUNTRY CLUB GOLF COURSE LOCATED NORTHWEST OF JOE MANN PARK AND NORTH OF CALIFORNIA DRIVE APN: 637-020-011'1 S113MITTED 137' ffiflssy Rale, Assistant Planner APPLICANT: PD, Golf Operations, LLC 77-200 California Drive Palm Desert, CA 92211 [STIT-140M =7J07.'XPz% DATE.- April 23, 20113 CONTENTS: Applicant provided exhibits Department comments ARC minutes and NOA Staff recommends that the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) approve the proposed submittal of plans based on the Commission's comments. N-MA 17MIM. ................... The project site is located northwest of Joe Mann Park just north of California Drive on the Palm Desert Country Club Golf Course. Zone: O.S., Open Space — Golf Course General Plan: R-L, Residential Low Density Staff Report PP/ DA 12-213 Page 2 of 4 April 23,, 2013 North,- i R-1 9,000 Residenti,a, South: R-1 9,000 Residenfia� East- R-1 9,000 Residentla" West- R-1 9,000 Resi'dentia',' The applicant, PD Golf Operations, LLC, has taken over maintenance and operations at the Palm, Desert Country Club. They received approval for a Temporary Use Permit to create, a temporary maintenance facility on the golf course while they developed a plan for a permanent maintenance building plan and structural design. That approval was, for six months that expired June 9, 2012. The previous owner of the golf course, Palm Desert Country Club Development, LLC entered into a development agreement with the City that was approved on Ju,ly 8, 2004 and recorded on November 7, 2005, Ordinance 1068 required the relocation of a permanent golf course maintenance facility near tee box #14 adjacent the City park, and that the routine movement of maintenance equipment be via a path system developed between the 13 th and 1114th fairways. To date, a permanent maintenance facility has, not been constructed. The applicant submitted plans on July 6, 2012, to permanently relocate the maintenance facility within an open space area in the Palm Desert Country Club, Golf Course, and has since been going through various preliminary plan check processes, The new owner must comply with the previously mentioned development agreement and build a permanent maintenance facility located northwest of Joe Mann Park off of California Drive or request the appropriate changes to be approved by the City Council. This item will move forward, after receiving ARC approval, to City Council for final consideration of the new location and proposed building. I This project was presented to the ARC on September 11, 20112 for informal review and comment. The ARC could not formally approve the project until a Water Qual'ity Management Plan (WQM'Pi) was preliminarily approved by the Public Works Department. The applicant's WQMP has now received preliminary approval, G:'aPNaiining4,MissyWightriiauikPP77,,200 CafifwrO DrkARC Staff Repr�e2 docx Staff Report P,P/DA 12-213 4j,41 Page 3 of 4 April 23, 2013 as the dark green body to help the building essentially disappear from view. The floor plan illustrates open storage, one office, one break room, and' restrooms. Building height is not called out on the plans, but the drawings scale to a height of 6"" A 6' high precision tan bilock wall surrounds the building. The plan does not provide t dons that indicate the length of the wall or column locations. The vehicular entrii t to the block wall are protected! by sliding 20' x 6' gates painted to match the block w on the east and west ends of thie site. The wrought iron gate is open to view betwe 11 1 11c the slats. Inside the yard wails, there 'Is space illustrated" for stockpiling DiG, sand, mulc 3 rock, and green waste along the west end of the enclosure, On the east end, there is I existing fueling loc�ation, an existing wel�l, and existing power. The previously noted ne wash rack has been removed from the east side yard., Landed to screen the new location as well as the I existing dirt site where the original proposed maintenance facility was intended! immediately north of Joe Mann Park, Preliminary comments were given to the applicant for incorpioration inito a final set of plans. The submitted appliicationii needs further details, noted on the proposed! steel building pilans. Detailed colors of the Items mentioned above need to be notated on plianis for finial approval. The applicaint should additionally notate various points of height on all revised elevations. It appears as, though the landscape berming has been removed since the last suibmi but no new design features in the landiscaple were incorporated. Staff discussed with t applicant that berming against the wall would not be recommended for approval due safety and security concerns; to keep people outside of this area during nioin-work hour jr where someone could walk up the berm and hop over the wall. Additionally, staff wouls recommend incorporating columns, and changing the, material' on the columns to bre up the long walled fagade. Dimensions need to be illustrated so staff can veri compliance with the undulation of walls every 301' of at least 18" of offset from the m!aii wall. Employee parking was not illustrated in the original proposal, staff req,uested that this bs presented in a revised plan, The revised plan presented to the ARC oni, September 11 11, 2012 illustrated seven parking spaces sized at 9osed area. Thi's was not adequate according to staff s site visits last year when fifteen parked cars were counted outside the temporary facility. The new plans illustrate ten stalls. Staff visited the site again on Monday, April 15, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. and' found fifteen parked employee vehicles; along with green waste not ini, bins, a couch, anid various indoot: G,',,Plannitig4,MssyWughlmantP'P'�77200 Cafifornia DrIARC' SW RWr2,docx 21 t Staff Reair po 2-2 PP/DA 113 Page 4 of 4 April 23, 2013 furnliture serving as a seating area for breaks outside the temporary facility. The new facility needs to be sized adequately, to handle all!, of these needs,. Sliding gate designs remain unchanged since the last submittal, Staff still recommends that the wrought iron bar design be revised to provide opaque screening to this area o from adjacent homes and' golfers so equipment/refuse cannot be seen on a regular basis. Doors must remain closed when not in use. This area has been a highly contentious area over the years to adjacent homeowners who would like a clean facility apipearance maintained. The pilan does not illustrate trash/recycling enclosure areas which must comply with the Palm Desert Municipal Code Chapter 8.12. Conditions stating the, requirements are attached and these must be illustrated on the plans. The revised plans still do no'l illustrate this requirement. Landscape comments have been provided to the applicant and pilans will requiire further i development and approval from Coachella Valley Water Diistrict prior to final City approval. Staff recommends that the Architectural Review Commission approve the proposed submittal with the condition that staff verifies compliance with all! comments and conditions, prior to moving forward to City Council. , Submitted by, Reviewing Manager: Mi4sy Nale, Assistant Planner Tony Bagato, Pdricipal Planner G'Panninq',Mlssy Oghtman'TR77-200 Cahfomr a D6ARC Staff Repor2,docx 7 3-5 1 o Fatt) WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNTA t).,26o-2578 TPL.- 760 346-o6i i 9 =119KNIM APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PD GOLF OPERATIONS, LLiC, 772�Ot California Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92211 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval to construct maintenance bulilding on existing site; Palm Desert Couinty Club. 10107-IN, 04MMMIT11111549 IN VTJ WMAM Upon reviewing the plans and presentations suibmitted by staff and by the applicant�, the Architectural Review Commission cod Case PP/DA 12-213 with suggested comments: 1) keep: all building colors the same; 2) extend lanidscape away from building -, 3) investigate a single slope roof to minimize building heighit�, and 4) ensure adequate parking is available to all employees within the maintenance yard. Date of Actioin: September 11, 2012 Vot�e-, Motion carried 8-0-0-1 , with Commissioner Lambell absent (An apipieal of the above action may be miade in writing to the City Clerk of thd City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision, Any amendments to this approved plan would need' to be re -submitted to the Commission for approval) STAFF COMMENTS- It is your responsibility to submit the plans approv by the Architectural Review Commission to the Department of Buildi and Safety, I CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meeting's agenda, new or revised' plans must be submitted no lateir than 900 a.m. the Monday eight days prior to the next meeting. 1�11 16 6 A 0 N, IMP , ,N 3 ARCHITECTURAL REV,, COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMiBER 11, 2012 ITis. Rale presenited additional site photos and the Commission reviewed and discussed the 11R. stopping at the cornier. She said it would be a lot less orange if it stopped at the corn!er because the buiilding i's not orange. The Commission suggested leaving the tan cornice and stopping the orange at the coIrner. ACTIOiNl: Commissioner Vuksic moved to approve subject to: 1) the narrow column in the center shall be paiInted a thiird color that shall stop at the top of the awnings; third color shall not match the awnings and' reviewed by staff, 2) the orange color shaill stop at the center of thin column; 3) cornice remains the current color and orange color only be on' the front surface and not on the side. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Stendell and carried' by a 7-0-0-2, with Commissioners Lamibell and Tous,chner absent. I Z , INT11"ImMiNers 11 # at T il%ATIRE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGH�T- Approval to conistruct maintenance building on! existing site; Palm Desert Country Club. ACREM Ms. Mlissiy Na�le, Assistant Planner, presented the project and stated thiis is a consideration and approval' for construction of a ma� I g PI intenance buildin• at the alm Diesert Country Club Gollir' Course, The previous owner of the golf course had a development agreement with the City and now that the previous owner has gone It 4Q iV, maintenance of the golf course. PDGO received approval for a temporary maintenance facility that expired on June 9, 20112. On July 6, 20112, they submitted plans for a permanent maintenance facility, Ordinance 1068 required the relocation of a permanent golf course maintenance facility near tee box #14 adjacent to the city Fips�ARC Page 4 of 10 ARCHITECTURAL RE�,I," W COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 park and the routine movement of maintenance equipment be via a path system developed betweeni, the 13 1h and 14" fairways. To date, a permanent maintenance facility has not been constructed. The new, suibmiittal is a 501" x 85' steel building and the steel color is a dark green. She stated details for the window trim, garage doors and'the color was not included in the proposal. Around the facillity they are building a 6' high precision tan block wall. No dimensions were indicated on the wall so staff couldn't tell if it meets the undulation code of columns every 30'. She presented a slideshow of the location for the maintenance building and said it will need a lot of grading work. She pointed out the yellow berming and the temporary maintenance facility right behind it and said they would like to move from the previous location to thi's location as a permanent option. Employee parking was not illustrated in the original pposal, and staff requested they show a new plan showing the parking. She was concerned where the employee parking, would be because this is, in a fairway where houses are located and is visible to the residents. This has been a highily contentious issue with some of the residents in the area. P,DGO has worked' with the residents to try and develop a plan that works for everyone, but the employee parking on the most recent pilan shows niine spoits and when she was out there last week, there were 15 cars parked there. There are a number of Burrte,c biinis because they deal with the muilch and green waste that fal!ls on site. When PDGO revised the plan, the parking reduced a large green waste area, She was coincemed i that the space would not be la,rgiie enough to, provide green waste inside the block walls. G'PiwmjnqUiw�m JWVNVard FloAIARC. Z041 Crnkn&vA Page 5 of 10 71 ARCHITECTURAL RE�3W COMMISSION "'All M'INUTES SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 comments was to keep the berming away from the wall so peopi6 can't get into the facility, Staff recommends continuance since they have to get the WQMP in before they can receive a discretionary approval and asked for the Coimmission�'s com.r, ents. The Commission discussed the previous location of the maintenance facility and; the traffic coming in off California Drive for the new location in the middle of a residential a-rea. Ms. Lauri Aylalan, Director Community Development, said this i. subject to, a public hearing because of all the issues with: this maintenance facility, Whien their contract was approved years ago, there was a different location identified for the maintenance facility, Because they want to use on a permanent basis what has been the temporary location it will have to go back through the public hearing for all' these issues, Commissioner Clark asked if staff has received comments from the Palm Desert Association on this project. Ms. Nale said no comments have been received from ths- association, but she has been dealing with a number of residentia', homeowners around the property. She has notified them that it will go through the architecture review process and is not required to be publicly noticed at this point, but she anticipates people coming to Planning Commission and! City Council when the Development Agreement has to be amended. MR. MO SIHOTA, PD Golf Operations, stated the new owners purchased this property about a year ago and have discussed' with staff about the removal of the blight on the landscape and to get approval' of the temporary structure. In terms of the questions about the location, there are essentially two locatioins; the one you are looking at and one that is 50 yards away, which was once where the previous owners made a commitment to having it t�here, Either way, it will be located in a residential area. They looked at some sites that are away from the residential area which, would be their preference, They talked with Coachella Valley Wat�er District (CVWD) because they have siurplus land adjacent to the of course and from a pure planning point of view it wou,ld make more sense to have it there., However, CVWD is not wil'ling to lease or dispose of their land'. The issue that he anticipates is not going to qF1,wirmWJarmna JwW'WOM Fll"6iAAC C4,ATNPH%Wrl MMU[ft�2012.1 V 20 0. ¢ ,4R'J," A Page 6 of 10 MI SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 Ills I Z Mi as V KIN a --------------- ------ Commissioner ColIombini said they have a 6wall with a 8" high I I buildiIngli so a lot of the building will be exposed. He was conicerned with the mechanical equipment and wondered where it wouIld located. Commissioner Touschner said this building is a little higher than t temporary st�ructure. Sihie asked if they could reduce the height• th-Ls at,211. i11 N 0 0 S 0 Ml 0 0 9 6 0 M The Commission discussed the building beiing the same color so ill will! blend in, Commissioner Clark said! they will need; some landscaping in depth. away from the building In front of the walls to make it go away. He understands staffs concern that they doini't want the berm to come right up to the wall for security,, but how about pushing the berming back around the structure and put 2�4 to 36 box specimens on the berms to really screen them. Page 7 of 10 ARCHITECTURAL RET,"Al W COMMISSION ,inn MINUTES SEPTEMBER 11, 20112 I MR. SIHOTA was not adverse to that, in fact he made a similar piroiploisition to the residents at the outset. Some oibjected because with more foliage on top of the berm it takes away their mountain views, The oniy other location: is 50 yards away and the problem with that location is that it is near a playground' whiich then you would run into liability issues in terms of fumes and pesticides, As much as he would like to have it located off the course, they are trapped by this l'oon. I Chai'rmianil Gregory agreed that having landscaping in depth away from the bulillding would! work. The berms will really mitigate the impact, not necessarily 100%, built you aren't goiing to hurt anyone's views beyond: the peak of the building other than trees growing taller, which may have to be trimmed. The Commission discussed a single sloped roof to get the building iowni. It was suggested' starting with 8' at the back and placing both of the access doors on the high side, which might drop it a little bit more. The Commission reviewed; the amount of employee parking at the maintenance facil'ity and suggested adding a couple more parking spots. The applicanit was not adverse to expanding the footprint to accommodate add'itional parking. Ms. Nale said the interior space may have to be extended because some of the comments they received! from Special Programs i's they have to provide trash and recycling enclosures and those are not meeting the specifications currently. Chairman Gregory suggested this be continued and asked tht applicant if he felt comfortable wilth the directioom stai,ff and' commissiol. MR. SIHOTA was agreeable to the continuance and said he has enough direction from staff at this timei. Commissioner Levin asked the applicant if they have suggested to CVWD about swapping another piece of land fora site that is not so much in the middle, 0,11VAra BLOM 11mg-106-MIJ rJEM-111111 11111INVATI)EI 6W-W E I I MM is Phui�vq%,ja,mro k4y4'Nwd F,1"WRC I Mmfo$QQIZ� Page 8 of 10 ARCHITECTURAL ICE COMMISSION MINUTES would be a second preferred location, but CVWD is not prepared tif discuss it. He said they have exhausted ail their options with CVWD. ACTION: Commissioner Stendell moved toi continue Case PP/DA 12-213 with suggested c�omm:ents: 1) keep al�l building colors the, same; 2) extend landscape away from biuillding; 3) investigate a singleslope roof to minimize building height-, and 4) ensure adequate parking is available to all employees within the maintenance yard. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Levin and carried by an 8-0-0-1 vote with Commissioner nbell ai§�mtt. 2. CASE NO: MISC 12-234 A APPLICANT (AND ADDRE�SS): MARIO'Si ITALIAN CAFt, 7811 Varner Roaid;, Palm Desert, CA, 92211 NATURE OF P,ROJECT/APPiROVAL SiOiUIGHT: Preliminary approval of awning and entry way; Marioi's Italian Caf& LOCATION: 73-155 Highway 111 ZONE: C-1, S.P. Chairman Gregory recused himself and left the conference room. Mlr. Tony Bag�ato, Principal P'lanner, presented the project and stated this, was continued from ail previous meeting. He pointed out that the applicant changed the entry way, removed the balusters, re-di'd the awning, and reduced the signage by, 10% per Commission's direction. Overall the chianges look bietter than the 4irigina!l proposal, Vice Chair Van Vl'iet asked how wide the raised p,lanter was at the entry. MR. MARIO DELGUIDICE, Mario's Italian Cafes, said the heig'm I 011 I was 32"' with a capd , the with is 24", and the pilasters (,',Fi,nnnii*qUarinwi 1uJvV&1J'ij F'11"Anc I "")Nj"" Page 9 of 10 From, inmesOtg1jr�pej TO. fahCykeVjO&CgMC,aat.OQj Cc: tkQLQUIbW2I6i2WQMa'II WUL tUItWQIQdc,rr,cpM; 5dkJhM@jMaIj,CQM; JUUjSg&gMAL=; Uday�211@b=a�t.coml- luanneLa)iaoCll)�apdCLIEEQSiQn.CQrn; )NjobtMaia, Hiefis5a; pscoft46Z3CwMsn coffl!; =kJbmLdgUdnaILLQm,I za,ItbIDbard(A,Qwe9.n � Wmu;i �5) f�xt; YAffCd)paImdr4CrtuOf,Qa) Subject-, Re: IRE; RE: RE: RE: PDCC Mustrations Date: Firday, JWy 06, 2012 8:M38 AMI Thanx. You are correct, we think that this site allows us to significantly improve t asthetics without over taxing the courses financial resources. I M I-M I MUMMMMMMMO M, .0 0 jBTMM!j4jI Mga4A gogg"rol M I I RaTTS I Kevin From- moo-.moes@telus.net] Sent: Thursday, july 05, 2012 11:50i PM TO: faheykevin@comcast,net Ct: tkorourke26@gmaill,combkoltweit@dcrrcoim; sdkihm@gmaii.com; jininisg@igmait.com; tjdavisll@hoom; l'ivanne@noorroom; mwightman@idtyofpalmdesert.org, nscott4623@msn.com; russkihm@gmalf.com; scotthibbard@qwest,,net, tomcusack@cox.net, will'OdIpalmidesertgolf.com Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: PDCC illustrations fencing etc thIait wil�l miask the building. I have been oveirwhelmied by the positive and co-operative attitude of folks in the alrea. I look forward! - with optimism - to ouIr conversation. On J'u:l 5, 2012, Kevin Fahey <aheykeyin@i;Qmi;a,5t, ni wrote: Let me be equally clear and direct with you. Until I receilve a written irespionse to miiy questions there is no, basis for a phone coinversation - that's why I provided thern and asked for an eimiail responise to them. Please senid them as you have with, others. I aim also happy thait youi feel it is okay for myself anid others to express our views to the city s,ince you clearly expressed your views to the city long before your realization it would be better off talking aind learning from one another. Your actions speak for themselves on this issue and so fair they have been Ni MW From: moes@ltelus.net Fmailto:moes@ltelus,ineti Sent* Thursday, July 05, 2012 10:08 PM TO: wheykevili@ I.Qmcaqt, net Cc: tkorQurkeM(damailcom; bkoltw-eitC&dc.rrcom; sdkihm@uimom, innisgLdigmaii.com; Qdavis11@hotmailcQa); luan idnortblandicQuoLmom; ws!ikibm@gmail.i;Qm; sotthibbard.@qm5t.inet; Wrincoack@ox., net - wilfftalmdesertgolflcQmi Subject: Re: RE: RE: PDCC illustrations Thanx Kevin. I'm interested in your views - that's why I asked for your phone number. Please forward it to me. That doesn't mean that youl cannot express your views to the City - but I think thiat we are all better off if we talk and leart froll one anotiiiiier., !1llliilll 111iii Illil;l1lill 1: lill1lil; N 3,M=, City Hall tomorrow. e will simplybe filing our application,.A Hearingde will! be set at a, later time w you, should recieve noticeof will continue 41 canvass opinion anw 1 lookforward to our discussion regard. M w „, w, ,, w, w w • � w w , it - � +w • w w ar - � w: w . � w - ,, .. ^^ w w w. �r r•. w w � w � ww w ww ww w� w w- w w w • www w 111 I'll w-11111111111111111w w •w w w r -. M I_ MRIPUW10111 WIN a 111111_.1 w 0 6 w w • w „ �l . w i•� w • w wr a w w w, w, .���" * 1wt�1 �1w. w wu Ali w�� 111,E �!! 1�•I + ?� w w, 11w" "� w, !� 1 w � � �r +� 11 1 !� 11 � t 1M � � 11;n � 1l a► , � w w ,. w, . �,� "` � �, _: r0o. . ,l i s I• Subject.- ._ PDCC illustrations aw productive �r uw d be M • • i NW Pllease provide phone number. I'm finding th at as we talk to one ainoth!er-it'si far easier to understand the various challenges thalt are at play. Look forward to tal'iki to you, Mole I Im sayingYou are correct in that the concern over the property and views are critical issues to myself and all the communityd while we have been patience and' supportive of the club, this, issue has not been handled well. Communication has been poor and' you have lost credibility in the process. IN aw - �r - - - Wi.� IN r - •-i 11 r w r ,� �• • r me, �~ a� at.• "gor, Kevin Fahey From: moes(d)tel u% net'[ tnai JtQ ; mlQes@itel us. o!et Sent: Thursday, Juily O�-, 20�12 3-5�O PM To: Teri O'Rourke; bikoltwei @dcrr,com Cc: sdkjbm@,Qmail.co,m; innisgOgmail,cQim.; �d,ayi�11@hotmail .Iwo fabeykeyin@c�rmicast, net; �iiiannp.(d)nor: hlandco[icQisi!Dn,!com- ml)Nigbtman@t4fpalmdesert,.or.g; nscott4,G23@msn i rU5skibM@gn)aJl,C,wp; s=hi bbard @qwest. net WMCU15ark@Cox.1 Wilif Subject.* Re. PDCC illustrations H1 Teri. All your poinits are valid and I'm often asked these questions. Vm at the clubhoiuse this afternoon from 2-4. Do you have time to meet. From: "Teri O'Rourke" <korourke26@,gmail,cQm> Date: Thiul, 5 Jul 2012 12:11:24 -07010 To: < moes@telius. net>; <bkoltweit@dc,irr.com> 1,11R. 1111111111ro P". 1111for-m- Well IN 144111-9 1010101-r. MMS larqrpr. MJ-ER3xMHM rw N Ir • +r � � r M w ri �' II II ""� � IIIIw «" mwMAI II r IY � � �, i II � w N •" `w w w dMENIM w . RI • RII II w " w • l f r 1N f Ik w w w w; RI RM RI ! ' w *M dIH RI ' M • Tern O'R u'rke Treasurer, Garden Apartments Homeowners , se natnern Pala Desert, CA 92211 916-919-03,45 From: moes@talus I. N10:13 AM To., !►g",i M dg,II ! All +!IIw •II I,I (WIIIwilmmA« - :I• II. MI'I IbtII�NA IU, III II !I moA IV M M i "r4 I wMli'• � ;I III III' rII« rIIl ; scgJtbibb6rdaaweat net wilf41 palmdesdrtgQJLcQm Subject: Re- PDCC illustrations IN • •" f w Mrs•" M- r r a m! I• w • MWI w w • « LdIl 117F LIT i7vultr Impiruile«p ` gladly consider Thanx for year input, M a W 9-Mol MM 10=I 77695 Michigan Dr. D-IF! Palm Desert, Ca 92211 itth fairway PDCC 1-14111L Develor ipmenIt Review Committee Ir&is Reviewedin Building & Safety by: Russell Grance LWA Missy Wightman 77-200i California Dr., UMM All contractors and subcontractors shall have a current City of Palm Desert Business License prior to permit issuance per Palm desert Municipal Code, Title 5. UUM 5. All contractors and/or owner -builders, must submit a valid Certificate of Workees Compensation Insurance coverage prior to the issuance of a building permit per California Labor Code, Section 3700. 6. Address numerals shall comply with Pialml Desert Ordinance No. 1217 (Pal'm Desert Municipal Code 15,15. Compliance with Ordinance 1217 regarding street address location, dimension, stroke of line, distance from street, height from grade, height from streiet, etc. shall be shown on all' architectural building elevations in detaill, Any �ws possible obstructions, shadlo, , lighting, landscaping, backgrounds or other reasons that may render the building address unreadablei shall be addressed during the plan review process. You may request a copy of Ordinance 1217 or Municipal! Code Section, 15.28 from the Department of Building and Safety counter staff. 7. Please contact Chen'e Williams, Building and Safety Technician, at the Department Bu I ild�ingi and' Safety (7607761-6420) regarding the addressing of all buildings and/1 suii'tesi. 0� 11M -2111 An 11 U DATE- MARCH 29, 2013 cay of Palm Desert Community 00"Iopm'ellt CITY OF PALM' DESERT APR 0 3 2013 InGFISJUH UT requirea traTF/recT Bus Shelter: After reviewing the plans it has been determined that this project will n be conditioned with a requirement for a bus shelter and turnout. i Trash Enclosures,: The plan does not appear to reflect trash enclosures, The planned trash/recyclinig, eniclosure(s) must be consistent with Pailm! Desert Municipal Coda Chapter 8.12. In addition, adequate space for green waste roll off boxes (as reflected on the plan, there are 3 dumpsters) must be prod'ed for on -site within the maintenance yard! or propose an alternative plan that is approved by City staff. Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services must review and sign -off on the plans in relations to the placement and number of trash/recycling enclosures, Review of the plans by Biurrtec will ensure that vehicle circulation for its trucks is adequate to service the complex and to ensure that a sufficient number of enclosures are provided to meet the needs of the complex, The Applicant may contact Jennifer Salciccioll with'Burrtec at (760) 340-6445 regarding this issue, FRANKIE41LDJ)LE DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL PROGRAMS cc: Mark Greenwood, Director of Puborks Russell Granice, Director of Building, and Safety W N, J146 I TO: X PUBLIC WORKS �Chrisitina Caniales) i _2LFIRE MARSHAL �Soni�a Cooley) APPLICANT, PD Golf Operations, LLC 77-200 California Drive Palm Desert, CA 92211 760.345,0222 115!1 . 1 0 A Z 019-11MEM94-10 PROJECT REQUEST: Approval of a Precise Plan, of Development and Development Agreeme amending the design and location of the Previously proposed permanent maintenance facility fo PDor tj alml esert Cuntry Club and Golf Course. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended conditions of approval, The City is interested in the probable impacts on the environment (including land, air, water, minera,lsi, florafaunla, noise, objects of historical or aesthetic significance) and or recommended conditions of approval based on your expertise and areal of concern. IIII I III 1 11 Should you have any questions regIardinig this project, please contact the project pllanner for the case 1escribed above, Project Planner: Missiy Nate Phone: — (760) 346-01611 x.384 -mai�l: mnaje@citYofpaImdesertoLg —Fax: (7601776-6417 V IS, City of Palm Desert, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA, 92260 GAMannngUssy Wlghllman'TR77-200 CM0I Dr�Requeat for Cments aM Condft!Gns 2 docx Palm lesert Fire Marsha In cooperation with Riverside Counity Fire 73-510i Fred Waring Dr. Palm Desert Cai, 92260 Oiffice .760-3!46-1870 Fax 760-779-1959 DEC 13, 2012 l To- Lauri Aylaian, Planning From: Sonia Cooley, Assistant Fire Marsh Re: 12-213, — PD Golf Operations LLC (APN-637-190-005) This letter is in regard to the fire protection conditions concerning the above referenced cas The Fire Department requires the listed fire protection measures be provided in accordance wi the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code andlor the Riverside County, Fire Department Fi Protection Standards, Final conditions will be addressed' when complete buildings plans a rl reviewed: 1, Minimum Required Fire Flow- The Fire Department is required to set a miinimum fire flow fd7r- the remodel or construction of ali commercial buildings in accordance with City of Palm Desert Municipal Code and the California Fire Code., A fire flow of 1500i GPM for an 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any, combustible material' is placed on the job site. Abovegrounid Hazardous Materials Tank Permits- Appliciant/developer shall be responsible for obtaining permits from the Riverside County Fire Department for aboveground fuel storage tanks in accordance with the California Fire Code, At least three copies of plans and specification sheets must be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation, Aboveground fuel tanks shall be tested and labeled to UL 208otected Tank Standard. The test must include the Projectile Penetration Test and the Heavy Vehicle Impact Test. A copy of the tank testing label from an independent test laboratory must be included with the plan submittal, Flammable, Combustible Liquids, and Hazardous Material Permits- Applicant/developer shall be responsible for obtaining permits, from the Riverside County Fire Department for the storage, dispensing or use of any hazardous materials, flammable or combustible liquids in accordance with the California Fire Code. Pians and specification sheets must be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation, A chemical 9.nalysis/classification report by a Fire Department approved independent consultant may be EEMEM, required for plan review, The Fire Department May require an approved Hazardous Materials Management Plan or Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement as a part of the permit, 5. Combustible High Pile Storage Permit- This building has not been reviewed or approved'for high pile/rack storage. Prior to such use, building(s) shall be approved for high -piled storage (materials in closely packed piles or on pallets, or in racks where the top of storage exceeds 12 feet in height, 6 feet for Group A plastics and/or certain other high hazard! commodities) or aerosols products, High -piled' and aerosol stock shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to materials being stored on site. A licensed Fire Protection Engineer must prepare plans for high -piled storage or aerosol storage in aiccordance with The California Fire Code and! adopted; standards, 6. Gated Entrances. Gate openings shall" be as wide as the minimum 20i foot required width of the access lane(s) entering and exiting the development, Gates shall be located at least 35 feet intio the development prop�erly to allow a vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic on the road, 7, Address ait Site- The site address shall be clearly posted at the job site entrance during construction. This will enable incoming emergency equipment and inspectors to locate the job site from the assigned street, PRIOR TO BUILDINn PFRIMIT ISSUANCE 8�. Pila!n Check Fee (New/Sh!ell)- Building plans shall be reviewed by the Riverside County Fire Department. 9Water System P'lans- Applicant aind/or developer shall separately submit 3 sets of water system plans to the Fire Department for review, Plains must be signed by a registered Civil Engineer aind/or waiter purveyor prior to Fire Department review and approval. On -site and Off -site plans shia!l'l be signed by the Fire Department after review and approival. Three (3) copies of the signed and approved water plains shall be returned to the Fire Department before release of a bu!ilding permit. (if applicable) 10. Water Certification. Applicant and/or developer shall be responsible to submit writter certificat�ion from the water purveyor noting thie location and we of existing fire hydrant(s) ai thait the existing water system is capable of delivering 1500 GPM fire flow for an 2 hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. If a water system/hydrant(s) currently does not eixist, the applicant and/or developer shall be responsible to provide written certification that financial arrangements have been made to provide them. (If applicable) 12. Sprinkler System Monitoring. Install an alarm monitoring system for fire sprinkler systemi(s) Z�M with 20 or more heads. Valve monitoring, water -flow alarm and trouble signals shall be automatically transmitted to an approved central station, remote station or proprietary, monitoring station in accordancewith California Building Code, C,alifomia Fire Code and adopted s,tandards. An approved audible sprinkler flow alarm shall be provided on the exterior in an approved location. The location: of the Fire Alarm Control Unit shall be located in an environmentally controlled location in accordance with 101.1�4 (NFPA 72i, 2,010)A C-10 �icensed contractor must submit plans designed in accordance with adopted standards to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation. 13, Fire Lanes- Applicant/developer shall prepare a site plans designating required fire lanes wi�th appropriate lane paintings, and/or signs. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval. 16, Knox Rapid Entry Boix- A rapid entry Knox Box shall be installed on the outside of the building, If a Knox box has already been installed provide keys to the tenant space for inclusion in the main building Knox Box. Key(s) shall have durabile andlegible tags affixed for identification of the correlating tenant space. Special forms are, available from this office for ordering the Knox Boix, If the buildling/facility is protected with a fire alarm or burglar alarm systemi, it is recommended that the lock box be "tamper" monitoring, 17. Knoix Hazmat Box- Install a Knox Hazardous Materials data and key storage cabinet on the eixterior of the building, Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to installation. Special forms are available from t�his office for ordering the cabinet. 18. Egress Door Hardware- All egress door hardware shall comply with the California Buildinw Code. 19. Display Address (BuIlding)- Display street numbers in a prominent location on the address side of building(s) and rear access if applicable. All addressing must be legiblie, of a contrasting color with the background and adequately illuminated to be visible from the street at WI ours. All lettering shall be to Architectural Standards, Please see City of Palm Desert City Municipal Chapter 15.28, 20, Electrical Room Sign- Electrical room door shall be posted "ELECTRICAL ROOM" on the outside of the door, 2 1. occupant Load Sign- Room occupancy load, as approved by the Building Official!, shall be 0111M IA ..................... ZEMM Im 10 NI k WK412 213. 4 Jr I Q 4 ff WZY1 To: Lauri Aylaian, Director of Community Development From: Mark Greenwood', P.E., Director of Public Works Date: December 4, 2012 ,4*M The information provided for the proposed Palm Desert Country Club maintenance building has been reviewed and' the Public Works, Department has the following conditions of approval: The applicant shaill abide by all provisions of City of Palm Desert Ordinance 843, Section 24.20 Stormwater Management and Discharge Ordinance. 3 !1 111 -;1 1111111 19mil 3, The applicant shall submit a grading: plan to the Department of Public Works for revie and appIroval, Any changes to the approved' civil or landscape plans, must be review for approval prior to work commencing. C The applicant shall furnish proof to the Public Works Department that they've obtained a Hazardous Materials Permit from the Department of Environmental Hea!lth for thiss onsite fueling station, �Willillillillillill illillill!llllllllllililill 11111, lip. 6�090 F. Wel UsT-Ma = :1 11111111 11111 0 M, A A 6. The applicant shall submit a final' approval. The WQMP:sh1aUl identify the Best Management Practices (BMPS) that will be used' on the site to control predictable pollutant runoff. Prior to the issuance of grading perm!it, the Operation and Maintenance Section of the approved final WQMP shall be recorded with County's Recorder Office and a conformed copy shall be provided to the Public Works Department, Is 7The applicant shall submit a la,nd�scape plan concurrently with the precise girading pl for review and, approval. Applicants are advised to use the City of Palm Desert Desi Guide when designing plans, Landscape plans must meet the following criteria- 2, Must be water efficient in design and meet the City of Palm Desert's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, b. Planting plans must show location of proposed and existing utilities. c, Must match approved civil pilans. d, All specs and details must be site specific. e. Applicants must have CVWD approval of their irrigation plans prior to City approvail. f. Applicants must have a stamp or signature from the County Agricultural Commissioner before City approvalil. The applicant shall pave the access road to the maintenance facility and improve tfrE driveway approach to City standards. Cfty of Palm Desert Commuinity Dev*pmant g ( Est d'fished' h 1918 apubk s a agenr-y JUL 1 2012 Coachella 'Valley Water District O'e, MIT Rlt61 Directom Pete; Nelson, P'resldent _ Div, 4 Officem John P Powell, it., Vice President - Div, 3 Steven 8, Robbins, General Manager -Chief Engineer Patricia A. Larson - Div, 2 Julia Fernandez, Board Secretary Debi Livesay ® Div 5 Franiz W De Klotz - Div I July 17, 2012 Redwine and Sherrill, Attorneys File: 0163.1 0421.1 0721.1 Missy Wightman 050613-2 Department of (7ornmUnity Development C,ity of Palm Desert 73-5 10 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Ms. Wightman: Sub,ject: Precise Plan and 11ovolr%" .1 This area is protected from regional stormwater flows by the Whitewater River' tormwater Channel and may be considered safe from regional stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is designated Zone X on Federal Flo,od Insurance rate [naps, which are in efl'eet at this time by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Since the stormwater issues of this development are local drainage, Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) does not need to, review drainage design further. CVWI)i will provide domestic water and sanitation service to this, area and such service will be Subject to the satiskiction of terms and conditions established by CVWD and exercised from time to time, including but riot limited to fees and charges, water conservation rneasures, etc. This notice of domestic water and sanitation service availability can only be used and relied upon for the specific property for which it was iSSLIed and shall expire three (3) years tromp date of issuance. Domestic water and sanitation service remains at all times subject to changes in regulations adopted by CW VD's Board of Directors including reductions t in or Suspensions ofservice, CVWD requires detail, repair and ILibe auto shops, car washes, and maintenance facilities to install an oil and sand separator, including a sample box, sanitary tee and running trap with, cleanout, prior to any discharge to its sanitation facilities. T'he size of the oil and sand separator will be determined and approved by CVWD, Installation of the oil and sand separator will be inspected by CVW. Missy Wightnian City of PaIrri Desert July 17, 2012 If you have any questions please call Joe Cook, Domestic Water Engineer, extension 2292. cc: Mike Mistica Yours very truly, ar L Johnson hector of Engineering County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health P.O. Box 1206 Riverside, CA 92502 Palm Desert Golf Operation LLC` 77-200 California Drive Palm Desert, CA 92211 12-213 N TO: MISSY WIGH!TMAN, ASSISTANT PLANNER FROM: FRANKIE RI'DDLE, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL PROGRAMS SUBJECT: PP'DA 12- Z. t 3 DATE: JULY 12, 2012 The submitted precise plan has been reviewed to determine the need for a bus shelter/stop at the project location and inclusion of required trash/recycling, enclosure. Bus Shelter- After reviewing the plans it has been determined that this project will not be conditioned with a requiirement for a bus shelter and turnout. Trash Enclosures: The plan does not appear to reflect trash enclosures. The planned trash/recycling enclosure(s) must be consistent with Palm Desert Municipal Code Chapter 8,12, Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services must review and sign -off on the plans in relations to the placement and number of trashi/recyc:ling enclosures, Review of the plans by Burrtec will ensure that vehicle circulation for its trucks is adequate to service the complex and to ensure that a sufficient number of enclosures are provided to meet the needs of the complex, The Applicant may contact Jennifer Salcic:cioli with Burrtec at (760) 340-6445 regarding this issue,, FRANKIE RID LE DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL PROGRAMS cc: Mark Greenwood', Director of Public Works Russell Gra�nce, Director of Build'ing and Safety '816.020 Owner's responsibi Page I of I 41/ Palm Desert Municipail Code Up Previous Next Main Search Print No Frames TM e 8 HEALTH.A�Mlfl Cbagtgr 2.16 .5QLIQ VASIE Every person in charge ofa residence or residences, whether single-family or multiple-fanjily, shall make arrangements with the person authorized by law, to have removed, not less than once a week, frorn the property LIP011 which the residence or residences are located, all refuse created or produced or brought upon the premises. Every person in charge of a commercial or indUstrial building shall not less than twice a week cause to be '!��nljgygdjLorn.the ( aert Upoilwhich the buildjEgjLlaac teml all refuse created or produced �or brought upon the premises; provided, however, that--' upon written approval of the health officer, refuse created, produced or brought upon the premises of an industrial or commercial building rnay be removed not less than once a week, This latter provision, however, will not apply to floodhandfing establishments from which refuse shall be caused to be removed not less than twice a week. "I"hose foodhandling establishments having a self-contained compactor may, with the written approval of the supervising sanitarian, department of health, have their refuse removed once a week, This approval will be on a case -by -case basis. (Ord. 446, § 1, 198& Ord. 84 § 2, 1975) http:Hqco(le�Lls/codes/palnidesert/view.php?'topic=8-8 Ifs- 8-16-020&fi-arnes=on 8/23/2012 M Palm Deserffire Marshal Office In cooperMion with Riverside County Fire Departotitfit 73-5110 Fred Waring! Drive 'Tel, 760--346-1870 Fax. 760-779-1959 Date: July 12, 2012 To: Missy Wightman - IL— t e--3- Ref: Palm Desert Golf Operations LLC. Project Name: Palm Desert Country Club Golf MaXntenanclz Building. Address: 77-200 Cafifomia Palm Desert CA. 9226iO rg. All elevators shail be minimum crurnev sizJ' Comments: Additional conditions will be addressed at formal review of Sincerely, Nea Stephenson Fire Safety Specialist us= Development Review Committee nise Reviewed In Building & Safety by: Russell' Granice, ri 117= Project Narne- Project Location. - Date: Bgi Comments: ,qmm Thiis project shall comply with the latest adopted edition of the following cod:es A. 20110 California Building Code and its appendices and standards. B2010 California Plumbing Code and its appendices and standards. C. 2010 California Mechanical Code and its appendices and standards. D. 2010 California Electrical Code. E. 21010 California Energy Code. F. Title 24, California Code of Regulations. G. 2010 California Fire Code andits appendices and standards. 2. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed as required per the City of Palm Desert Code Adoption Ordinance 1112117. 3, Disabled access i's required for the restrolom facilities in the proposed Maintenance Facility per 2010 CBC Chapters 11 B (as applicable) and Chapter 101. 4All contractors and! subcontractors shall have a current City of' Palm Desert Business License prior to permit issuanice, pier Palm desert Municipal Code, Title 5. a=. - - ----------- I-- ... . ......... . . . --- . ........ 5. All contractors and/or owner -builders must submit a valid Certificate, of Workees Compensation Insurance coverage prior to the issuance of a building permit per California Labor Code, Section 3700. 6. Address numerals shall comply with Palm Desert Ordinance No. 11217 (Palm Desert Municipal Code 115�,15i. Compliance with Ordinance 1217 regarding street address location, dimension, stroke of line, distance from street, height from grade, height from street, etc. shall' be shown on all architectural building elevations in detail. Any ible obstructions, sh�adows, lighting, landscapingbackgrounds or other reasons possl that may render the building address unreadable shall be addressed during the plan review process. You may request a copy of Ordinance 1217 or Municipal' Code Section 15.28 from the Department of Build ingi and Safety counter staff. 7. Please contact Cherie Williams, Building and Safety Technician, at the Department of I Building and' Safety (760-776-6420)i regarding the addressing of all buildings and/or suites. ' \} -TO: Misisy Wightman, Assistant <® From: Deborah Schwartz, Public Art Coordinator SubjAPN 637-020-011, Palm Desert Country Club Maintenan Facility The Art in Public Places Department recommends that the publ'ic art fee for the Palm Desert Country Club Maintenance Facility be left in the Piublic Art Fund. ©e estimate that the total fee is under $15,000, which will' not alilow for a significant project. i „ Lj '("� u t a�7 Am � Ad AcG hY ail G,ur N t oa Y ¢YiCn� g +y N only�". C r � S � ct �q+fiF av I unit; z t s SA ) 2 t vU� t "gin � 4� t aii ) 0 - 2 2 �4 a w