The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2013-06-18 PC Regular Meeting Agenda PacketCITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, JUNE 18, 2013 — 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260 I. CALL TO ORDER IL ROLL CALL III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Any person wishing to discuss any item not scheduled for public hearing may address the Planning Commission at this point by stepping to the lectern and giving his/her name and address for the record. Remarks shall be limited to a maximum of three minutes unless additional time is authorized by the Planning Commission. Because the Brown Act does not allow the Planning Commission to take action on items not on the Agenda, Commissioners will not enter into discussion with speakers but may briefly respond or instead refer the matter to staff for report and recommendation at a future Planning Commission meeting. Reports and documents relating to each of the following items listed on the agenda, including those received following posting/distribution, are on file in the Office of the Department of Community Development and are available for public inspection during normal business hours, Monday -Friday, 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260, telephone (760) 346-0611, Extension 484. VI. CONSENT CALENDAR ALL MATTERS LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE ROLL CALL VOTE. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR AUDIENCE REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION AND ACTION UNDER SECTION VII, CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER OF THE AGENDA. AGENDA PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 2013 A. MINUTES of the Planning Commission meeting of May 21, 2013. Rec: Approve as presented. B. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION of a lot line adjustment (APN 655-170- 034) at Ironwood Country Club. Case No. PMW 13-131 (Michael Mahoney, 73-124 Crosby Lane, Palm Desert, CA 92260, Applicant) Rec: By Minute Motion, approve a lot line adjustment, Case No. PMW 13- 131. Action: C. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION to transfer a portion of golf course Lot 146 to Lot 80 for expanded rear yard (APN's 632-760-009 & 632-760-016) at Indian Ridge Country Club. Case No. PMW 13-171 (Van Surveying, 1775 E. Palm Canyon Drive #110-349, Palm Springs, CA 92264, Applicant) Rec: By Minute Motion, approve a transfer of a portion of Lot 146 to Lot 80, Case No. PMW 13-171. Action: D. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION to combine Lot 4 and Lot 9 (APN's 627- 334-011 & 627-334-010). Case No. PMW 13-103 (Brian Ludington & Jennifer Wilhelmson, 41-750 Rancho Las Palmas Drive, Suite L-2, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270, Applicants) Rec: By Minute Motion, approve combining Lot 4 and Lot 9, Case No. PMW 13-103. Action: E. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION of a one-year extension for the entitlement of Vons No. 3242. Case No. ZOA/CUP 10-228 (DLR Group, 117 East Colorado Boulevard, Suite 500, Pasadena, CA 91105, Applicant) Rec: By Minute Motion, approve the extension (until July 14, 2014), Case No. ZOA/CUP 10-228. Action: VII. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER 2 GAPlanningWonica OReilly\Planning Commission\2013\Agenda\6.18-13 agn.docx AGENDA PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 2013 Vill. PUBLIC HEARINGS Anyone who challenges any hearing matter in court may be limited to raising only those issues he, she or someone else raised at the public hearing described herein, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. Remarks shall be limited to a maximum of three minutes unless additional time is authorized by the Planning Commission. A. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION of a Conditional Use Permit to allow Rover Armstrong A.P.C. to convert 2,370 square feet of storage/warehouse space into office use within an existing 8,619-square-foot office building located at 75-100 Mediterranean in the Service Industrial zone. Case No. CUP 13-98 (R. A. Desert Properties, LLC, 75-100 Mediterranean, Palm Desert, CA, 92211, Applicant). Rec: Waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 2604, approving CUP 13-98, subject to conditions. Action: IX. MISCELLANEOUS None X. COMMITTEE MEETING UPDATES A. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES B. PARKS & RECREATION XI. COMMENTS XII. ADJOURNMENT I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda for the Planning Commission was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 13t" day of June, 2013. Monica O'Reilly, Recording S cretary Please contact the Planning Department, 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260, (760) 346-0611, for assistance with access to any of the agenda, materials, or participation at the meeting. 3 GAPlanningWonica OReilly\Planning Commission\2013Wgenda\6-18.13 agn.docx CITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION PRELIMINARY MINUTES TUESDAY, MAY 21, 2013 — 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260 I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Nancy DeLuna called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioner Ken Stendell Commissioner John Greenwood Commissioner Sonia Campbell Vice Chair Roger Dash Chair Nancy DeLuna Staff Present: Jill Tremblay, City Attorney Lauri Aylaian, Director of Community Development Tony Bagato, Principal Planner Kevin Swartz, Assistant Planner Monica O'Reilly, Administrative Secretary III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Campbell led the Pledge of Allegiance. IV. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION Ms. Lauri Aylaian, Director of Community Development, reported that at the meeting of May 9, the City Council approved the updated California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. The Council also approved a contract with Terra Nova to analyze the potential annexation of Bermuda Dunes, Sun City, the commercial areas within the City's sphere of influence north of 1-10, and a portion of the sphere of influence of Cathedral City. Staff expects the study to be completed in 60 days. The study will be taken to the City Council before or after the summer break. PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 21, 2013 V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None VI. CONSENT CALENDAR A. MINUTES of the Planning Commission meeting of May 7, 2013. Rec: By Minute Motion, approve as presented. B. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION of a lot line adjustment (APNs 626-060- 012, 626-060-013 & 626-060-031) at Avondale Country Club. Case No. PMW 13-106 (Feiro Engineering, Inc., PO Box 12980, Palm Desert, Applicant) Rec: By Minute Motion, approve a lot line adjustment, Case No. PMW 13- 106. Upon a motion by Campbell, second by Dash, and a 5-0 vote of the Planning Commission, the Consent Calendar was approved as presented. VII. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER None VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION of a Conditional Use Permit to operate a 2,686-square-foot hair salon within an existing 6,192-square-foot building located in the Office Professional zone at 44-630 Monterey Avenue, Suites 200 and 201. Case No. CUP 13-127 (Jennifer Anderholt, 44-630 Monterey Avenue, Palm Desert, CA 92260, Applicant) Mr. Kevin Swartz, Assistant Planner, reported that the property is located on the east side of Monterey Avenue, south side of Fred Waring Drive, and north of San Gorgonio Way. The property is zoned Office Professional and Residential Single Family, and designated Office Professional in the General Plan. To the north is Residential Single Family/Atria Hacienda Senior Care facility, to the south is Office Professional, to the east is Single -Family Residential/Single-Family homes, and to the west is Planned Commercial. Mr. Swartz stated that the hair salon would occupy the second floor, and operate seven days a week from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. There would be five licensed cosmetologists working by an appointment -only schedule. He reported that staff conducted a parking survey, and found that the project would have minimal impact to the surrounding businesses during the proposed operating hours. He also reported that staff did not receive comments in favor of or opposition to the proposed use. He displayed site and floor plans. Staff believes that the proposed hair salon would not cause a disturbance to the existing office use tenants and 2 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2013\Minutes\5-21-13 min.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 21, 2013 residential neighborhood. Mr. Swartz stated that staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Conditional Use Permit and adopt Resolution No. 2603. He offered to answer any questions. Commissioner Greenwood stated that the floor plan indicates there are 10 cosmetologist stations so there could potentially be 10 clients. He asked if there would be enough parking in prime season if there are 10 clients and 10 cosmetologists. Mr. Swartz responded that the applicant is present, and that the applicant could address the question. The Planning Commission had no further questions of staff. Chair DeLuna declared the public hearing open and invited the applicant to address the Commission on this matter, followed by any public testimony IN FAVOR or OPPOSITION. MS. JENNIFER ANDERHOLT, 44-630 Monterey Avenue, Suite 200, Palm Desert, California, stated that they have been in the industry for approximately 16 years, and they have a very exclusive type of clientele that is by appointment only. She said that currently there are four to five cosmetologists that work in the salon at different time schedules. Ms. Anderholt stated that in regards to the parking, they (the cosmetologists) are willing to park in public parking at the mall so that their clients could have a parking space. Commissioner Greenwood asked the applicant if they could potentially have 10 cosmetologists and 10 clients at the same time. MS. ANDERHOLT responded that they are not a commercialized or a mainstream salon, and do not take walk-in clients. The reason for having double - sided stations is that they want to be able to have someone at the shampoo bowl, and have another person at a station to have hair color applied. She emphasized that they do not want to be a big salon. MS. LOWELL ELG, 44-630 Monterey Avenue, Suite 200, Palm Desert, California, added that they want to keep the salon strictly a boutique style salon and by appointment only. Commissioner Greenwood stated that within the conditions of approval there is a stipulation of no more than five employees working at one time. He said he wants to make sure there is consistency between what the applicant is agreeing to and what is on the floor plan. MS. ANDERHOLT agreed with Commissioner Greenwood's statement. Vice Chair Dash clarified that the applicant operates by appointment only. 3 GAPlanningWonica OReilly\Planning Commission\2013\Minutes\5-21-13 min.dou PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MS. ANDERHOLT replied that was correct. MAY 21, 2013 Vice Chair Dash asked if that would preclude any type of advertising or signage. MS. ELG responded that they would elect to add a sign on the building so their clients know where they are located. She stated that they do not plan on advertising. Commissioner Campbell commented that she believes what Vice Chair Dash meant to say is that you are entitled to a sign; however, not to have a sign on the sidewalk with an arrow. Chair DeLuna clarified for the record that there would be no other services offered other than just hairstyling. There would be no massage therapists, estheticians, or manicurists. The applicants responded they are only a hair salon. With no further testimony offered, Chair DeLuna declared the public hearing closed Commissioner Campbell moved, by Minute Motion, to approve a Conditional Use Permit to operate a 2,686-square-foot hair salon within an existing 6,192-square-foot building at 44-630 Monterey Avenue, Suites 200 and 201. Motion was seconded by Stendell and carried by a 5-0 vote. Commissioner Campbell moved, by Minute Motion, to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 2603, subject to conditions. Motion was seconded by Stendell and carried by a 5-0 vote. The Planning Commission congratulated and welcomed the applicant to Palm Desert. IX. MISCELLANEOUS None X. COMMITTEE MEETING UPDATES A. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Commissioner Stendell reported that the City entered into a contract to maintain the public art. The Art in Public Places Commission also voted to dispose of two decaying ceramic benches. They also voted to add artists to the registry, which is available online. He gave a brief report on the Docent Program, Desertscapes, and the documentary film series. Last, he mentioned that the City is seeking artists to create artwork for traffic signal cabinets, and Ms. Maria Hunt was authorized to enhance two cabinets that already have been painted. 4 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2013\Minutes\5-21-13 min.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 21, 2013 Chair DeLuna inquired about the two benches that are decaying. She asked if the only two choices are to give them back to the artist or to destroy them. Could they be resurfaced and placed in a public park? Ms. Aylaian responded that if the government wants to give away, sell, or repurpose property that they own, the governing body must declare the property as surplus. Once it is surplused, the government may auction the items or donate them. In addition, public art needs to be deaccessioned. She noted that the benches had deteriorated and could not be repaired. Ms. Aylaian mentioned that the City has an excess amount of plastic wine glasses and napkins available. Chair DeLuna asked if they could be used for the next Art, Food & Wine Festival. Ms. Aylaian responded that the festival was discontinued several years ago. She said that the City offered the items to the organizers of Fashion Week, which they did take some. She believes the Visitor Center is giving wine glasses away; no purchase necessary. B. PARKS & RECREATION None XI. COMMENTS Commissioner Dash asked for the status on signage. Ms. Aylaian said that the next step is a hearing on the entire Zoning Ordinance in front of the Planning Commission in 30 to 60 days. Mr. Tony Bagato, Principal Planner, interjected that he hopes the public hearing will be in July. He said the main ordinance update will be the first hearing then a list of other related items. So there will be approximately five to six separate public hearings, all in the same meeting. The reason for all the hearings are so it does not stop the progress of the remaining code updates if there is an issue with the signage update. Vice Chair Dash inquired if the process would be one in which that the Planning Commission would hear from the citizens then the Planning Commission makes a recommendation to the City Council. Staff replied that was correct. Commissioner Campbell asked for the status on the Larkspur hotel. Ms. Aylaian responded that the City is attempting to sell the property to a developer that was identified through a Request for Proposals process. She noted that the property was previously owned by the Redevelopment Agency. The property has been held up in the dissolution process of the Redevelopment 5 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2013\Minutes\5-21-13 min.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 21, 2013 Agency. In the next 60 days the City hopes to receive authorization to sell the property to the developer. In the meantime, the developer has identified that they want to make enough changes to the project that they are going back though the entitlement process, which would come back to the Planning Commission and City Council for consideration. Chair DeLuna asked if the developer is seeking to change their own plans. Ms. Aylaian responded that the plans were prepared by a previous developer. Commissioner Campbell also asked for the status on the Rosewood Hotel. Mr. Bagato responded that he last heard the hotel developer sent the City information of a contract for getting investors. They hope to meet with the City this summer to give an update of where they are financially. Chair DeLuna asked if the Rosewood Hotel is coming into any deadlines. Mr. Bagato replied that Rosewood has an initial five-year approval, of which they are on their second year. He noted that the City Manager may grant additional years based upon evidence of progress by the developer. Commissioner Stendell inquired if staff foresees a backlash with the update of neon signs. How is the City going to enforce the changes? Mr. Bagato responded that the City would notify business owners in advance of the changes. He said he does not anticipate a backlash from business owners that have neon signs. He noted that the liquor stores are the biggest offenders, and they may not be happy when they are notified. He believes there will be a bigger issue with the pedestal signs on El Paseo. XII. ADJOURNMENT Upon a motion by Stendell, second by Greenwood, and a 5-0 vote of the Planning Commission, Chair DeLuna adjourned the meeting at 6:28 p.m. NANCY DE LUNA, CHAIR ATTEST: LAURI AYLAIAN, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION 6 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning CommissionT013\Minutes\5-21-13 min.dou CITY OF PALM DESERT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: LAURI AYLAIAN, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FROM: BO CHEN, CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP WAIVER NO. 13-131 DATE: MAY 21, 2013 The above -referenced parcel map waiver has been reviewed by the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department and found to be technically correct. Please schedule for Planning Commission action as soon as possible. PMW 13-131: Property Owners: Michael T. Mahoney, and Betty Davis Givens Applicant: Michael Mahoney Representative: McGee Surveying, Inc. 45-100 Golf Center Drive, Ste. G Indio, CA 92201 - - --- -- -- _:for— BO CHEN, P.E. City Of Palm Desert / Department of Community Development PARCEL MAP WAIVER 73-510 Fred Waring Drive • Palm Desert • California • 92260 • 17am 34G-0611 • Fax (7130) 776-6417 Applicant: (4 /c ,L/fl-j�FL Telephone: Mailing Address 7 3._ IZ 4 C2os f3 y Fax number: City: 42AI-M n F SF_rz;— State: CA Zip: c1'1260 Email: Property Lx A-5 "t9LI eA-;,- r Telephone: Mailing Address: Fax number: City: State: Zip: Email: Representative: ---/l/1 c// S- ur��✓r-��.v�, INS Telephone: yS Mailing Address: L/S-%46 &eF C091-Y , s'TLr (4 Fax number: City: J L/ 1.) + State: C "", Zip: g "Z i�i Email: Please send correspondence to (check one): Applicant Property Owner 77K— Representative Project Address(s): 7 3 - l2 y Cko,-Ay Assessor Parcel Number(s): G 55 - f-7D 03y Existing Zoning: General Plan Designation: Project Request (describe specific nature of approval request): � I�• ST fit'/ S'�/t-�`-, f�Fz��zT`1 G��-� Property Owner Authorization: The undersigned states that they are the owner(s) of the property described and herein give authorization for the filing of the application. Is Signature Print Name Applicant / Representative Signature: By signing this application I certify that the information provided is accurate. I understand that the City might not approve what I am applying for and/or might require conditions of approval. .1-// 3 Signature Print Name Dat Property Owner Authorization: Agreement absolving the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities relative to any deed restrictions. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT absolves the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions that may be applicable to the property described herein. Signature Print Name Da e OFFICE USE ONL Y PROJECT NO: PMW 13- /3 DATE: /S / ACCEPTED BY: -^�- City Of Palm Desert I Department of Community Development PARCEL MAP WAIVER 73-510 Fred Waring Drive • Palm Desert a California • 92260 • (760) 346-0611 • Fax (760) 776-6417 Applicant: %l-/ lepAeL ti11Apo"I&j Telephone: C%1,o)7"23--/57/ Mailing Address: 7 3 `- /Z `/ c4P,_0s gy Gt;,e Fax number: City: P/ltm OeSew 1' State: �A Zip: 21" Email: Property Owner:/ D. r 7l u e-w S i I-a-STtx, Telephone: Mailing Address: `7 3 - i .Z o c "_s R y Liz' Fax number: City: rpg-1- ()t,e-A_,r State: 6A Zip: 12z4,6 Email: Representative: / "611 5u.2�r y/�S, /�� Telephone: C 7G�13YZ-zzy� Mailing Address: 0 6u L r- N 5 r`- G Fax number: City: +v State: efl Zip: y 2LO i Email: Mt-00 t14E"4,,Qf/i W G 12" Please send correspondence to (check one): Applicant Property Owner Representative Project Address(s): -7 ._; --12 6 G"rOz, 5 3y G-,4,c-s Assessor Parcel Number(s): j 7a - D 35 Existing Zoning: General Plan Designation: Project Request (describe specific nature of approval request): 4p jit S'T_ e-X,1S7'/A14'r po2?f JPrZ1/t,&5 Property Owner Authorization: The undersigned states that they are the owner(s) of the property described and herein give authorization for the filing of the application. (c r 0L. Signature Print Name Date Applicant / Representative Signature: By signing this application I certify that the information provided is accurate. I understand that the City might not approve what I am applying for and/or might require conditions of approval. 14 / rr f j nature Print Date Property Owner Authorization: Agreement absolving the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities relative to any deed restrictions. 1 DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT absolves the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions that may be applicable to the property described herein. r ,I Signature ' Print Name OFFICE USE ONL Y Date PROJECT NO: PMW i3 •%3% DATE:/s�3 ACCEPTED BY: EXHIBIT "A" P.M.W.13-131 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL "A" ( ADJUSTED PARCEL 4, PARCEL MAP NO.28567) PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO.28567, IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 191, PAGES 25 AND 26, OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, OF SAID COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PORTION: COMMENCNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 4; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4, S 01-37'10" E, A DISTANCE OF 122.97 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4, S 89°52'45" E, A DISTANCE OF 25.16 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, S 89052'45" E, A DISTANCE OF 64.84 FEET TO A POINT ON THE MOST EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4, S 01037' 10" E, 50.02 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 4, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 3 OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO.28567; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, N 89°52'45" W, A DISTANCE OF 66.49 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 3, N 00°16'03" E, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 24,456.0 S.F. (0.561 AC.) MORE OR LESS FOR GRAPHICAL PURPOSES SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS OF WAY, EASEMENTS, OR EXCEPTIONS OF RECORD, IF ANY. PAGE 1 OF 3 PAGES EXHIBIT "A" continued P.M.W.13-131 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL -B" ( ADJUSTED PARCEL 3, PARCEL MAP NO.28567) PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO.28567, IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 191, PAGES 25 AND 26, OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, OF SAID COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE: TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF PARCEL 4 OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO.28567, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 4; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4, S 01 °37' 10" E, A DISTANCE OF 122.97 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4, S 89°52'45" E, A DISTANCE OF 25.16 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, S 89052'45" E, A DISTANCE OF 64.84 FEET TO A POINT ON THE MOST EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4, S 01 °37' 10" E, 50.02 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 4, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 3 OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO.28567; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, N 89°52'45" W, A DISTANCE OF 66.49 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 3, N 00°16'03" E, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL `B" CONTAINS 24,080 S.F. (0.552 AC.) MORE OR LESS FOR GRAPHICAL PURPOSES SEE EXHIBIT `B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS OF WAY, EASEMENTS, OR EXCEPTIONS OF RECORD, IF ANY. PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGES EXHIBIT "A" continued P.M.W.13-131 LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRANSFER PARCEL THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO.28567, IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 191, PAGES 25 AND 26, OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, OF SAID COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 4; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4, S 01-37'10" E, A DISTANCE OF 122.97 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4, S 89°52'45" E A DISTANCE OF 25.16 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, S 89°52'45" E, A DISTANCE OF 64.84 FEET TO A POINT ON THE MOST EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4, S 01.37' 10" E, 50.02 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 4, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 3 OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO.28567; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 3, N 89052'45" W, A DISTANCE OF 66.49 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 3, N 00°16'03" E, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRANSFER PARCEL CONTAINS 3,283.0 S.F. (0.075 AC.) MORE OR LESS FOR GRAPHICAL PURPOSES SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS OF WAY, EASEMENTS, OR EXCEPTIONS OF RECORD, IF ANY. PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGES NO7E- THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED fROY RECORD DATA AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY SHORN HEREON. THIS MAP HAS BEEN APPROVED UPON THE EXPRESSED CONDITION THAT BUILDING PERMI7S SHALL NOT BE ISSUED FOR ANY DEVELOPMENT ►N#HIN THIS AMSTMENT PLAT UN77L NECESSARY DEDICATIONS, IF ANY, HAVE OCCURRED. NOTE.• THERE MAY BE EASEMENTS OF RECORD DELINEATED AND REFERENCED ON THE UNDERL PING MAP, OR THERE MAY BE EASEMENTS WfTHIN THE AREA BEING ADJUSTED THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS DOCUMENT THAT COULD EXHIBIT YET" P. M. W. 13-131 N 895245" W 117.51' 1 60 0 30 60 l � � ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 60 ft. ENCUMBER SAID PARCEL HEREIN. PARCEL 1 —rvf, P.M. NO. 28567 PMB 191/25-26 PARCEL 4 P.M. NO. 28567 PMB 191/25-26 o A.P.N 655-170-03511 3 EASEMENT NOTES PARCEL 1 A DECLARA77ON OF DED/CA77ON 15' IN WIDTH PMW 97-119 REC IN FAVOR OF THE PUBLIC FOR ROAD, PUBLIC z INST. 38129197 3 O.R. U77LITY AND PUBLIC SERVICE USES PER DEED 3 RECORDED AUG 31, 1973 AS INST. NO. 115706, D.R. o PARCEL A' (0.561 AC. t/-) N 89' 245" W 90.00' QVARIOUS STRIPS OF LAND AS SHOWN HEREON OF 64.84' VARYING IMDINS FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL z 25.16' 7POB �cR SUPPLY SYS7EMS /N FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA e EDISON PER DEED RECORDED NOV. 21, 1987 AS ADJUS7FD o Q INST. NO. 430340, O.R. LOT LINE "� QAN EASEMENT TO CC CORPORATION FOR SANITARY — N 89524, SEWER AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECC, 3/3/1998 INST. NO. 75001, O.R. PARCEL 2 A44 30' DECLARA 77ON OF DED/CA 77ON FOR ROAD PURPOSES PER INST. NO. 101717, REC. 8/2/73 A55' WIDE EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC U77LI77ES PER DEED RECORDED 4117180, INST. NO.. 73339 PMB 191/25-26 3 ' — 66-. N 895245" W 142.50' POR LOT LINE BEING ELIMINATED PARCEL B' (0.552 AC. +/-) I PARCEL --� P.M. N0. 28167 o PMB 191/25-26 I I 3 z A.P.N 655-170-034 I I o I � N 895� C R 0 S B Y (� LANE LEGEND: EX. LOT LINE TO REMAIN EXIST. EASEMENT ELIMINATED LOT LINE TRANSFER PARCEL ADJUSTMENT PLAT - CITY OF PALM DESERT 28 100,041 PREPARED BY.• APPLICANT APPROVED BY MICHAEL MAHONEY R. PAGE GARNER 73-124 CROSBY LANE S 2� PALM DESERT, CA 92260J14 z-7 WA YNE A. McGEE DA TE CITY SUR YOR a��21 �t3 L.S. 5479 L.S. 6155 EXP. JIJ1114 CITY OF PALM DESERT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: LAURI AYLAIAN, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FROM: BO CHEN, CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP WAIVER NO. 13-171 DATE: JUNE 6, 2013 The above -referenced parcel map waiver has been reviewed by the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department and found to be technically correct. Please schedule for Planning Commission action as soon as possible. PMW 13-171: Property Owners: Allen Bauman and Leslie Williams, co -trustees, and Indian Ridge Country Club, Inc. Applicant: Van Surveying 1775 E. Palm Canyon Dr., #110-349 Palm Springs, CA 92264 BO CHEN, P.E. City Of Palm Desert / Department of Community Development PARCEL MAP WAIVER 73-610 Fred Waring Drive • Palm Desert • California • 92260 • (760) 346-0611 • Fax (760) 776-6417 Applicant: Van Surveying Telephone: 760-323-1047 Cell Mailing Address: 1775 E. Palm Canyon Dr, #110-349 iC number: 760-250-4465 City: Palm Springs State: CA Zip; 92264 Email: ...surveying@aol.com Property Owner: Allen Bauman 206-412-566 Telephone: 206-335-8266 Mailing Address: 688 Mission Creek Drive Fax number: City: Palm Desert State: CA Zip: Email: allen.bauman@hotmail.com Representative: Telephone: Mailing Address: Fax number: City: State: Zip: Email: Please send correspondence to (check one): xxx Applicant Property Owner Representative ProjectAddress(s): 688 Mission Creek Drive, Palm Desert Assessor Parcel Number(s): 632-760-009 Existing Zoning: P • R • - 5 General Plan Designation: R-L Project Request (describe specific nature of approval request): 5`-% 1 Applicant ! epresen ati' a Signature: By signing this application I certify that the information provided is accurate. I understa hat the might not approve what I am applying for and/ might require conditions of ap roval. 5 ;r!3 i a ure Print Name 16ate OFFICE USE ONLY PROJECT NO: PMW 4Z- / 7/ DATE: WZ--Ll3 ACCEPTED BY: —�--� City Of Palm Desert I Department of Community Development r PARCEL MAP WAIVER 73-510 Fred Waring Drive • Palm Desert • California • 92260 • (760) 346-0611 • Fax (760) 776-6417 Applicant: Van Surveying Telephone: 760-323-1047 Mailing Address: 1775 E. Palm Canyon Dr, #110-349 Cell FAX number: City: Palm Springs State: CA Zip: 92264 Email: vansurveying@aol Property Owner' Indian Ridge Country Club, Inc., a California non-profit mutual benefit corporation 760-250-4465 com Telephone: 760-772-7272 Mailing Address: 76-375 Country Club Drive Fax number: 760-200-0428 City: Palm Desert State: CA Zip: 92211 Email: hwade@indianridgecc.com Representative: Telephone: Mailing Address: Fax number: City: State: Zip: Email: Please send correspondence to (check one): xxx Applicant Property Owner Representative Project Address(s): Por of lot 146 MB 285/88/-100 Assessor Parcel Number(s): 632-760-016 Existing Zoning: P.R.- 5 General Plan Designation: R-L Project Request (describe specific nature of approval request): Transfer a portion of Golf Course Lot 146 (Tract 28227)to Lot 80 for expanded rear yard. PropertX Authorization: The undersigned states that they are the owner(s) of the property described and herein gi a authorization for the filing of the application. Signature Print Name loate I Applicant / Representative Signature: By signing this application I certify that the information provided is accurate. I understand that the City might not approve what I am applying for and/or might require conditions of approval. Signature Print Name Date Property Owner Authorization: Agreement absolving the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities relative to any deed restrict" ns. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT absolves the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regard ig any deed restrictions that may be applicable to the property described herein. Signature OFFICE USE ONLY Print Name � t5 PROJECT NO: PMW r3'/ i% DATE: S�Z•'// ACCEPTED BY: �. EXHIBIT "A" PMW # 13-171 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PARCEL "A" ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS BEING ALL OF LOT 80 OF TRACT 28227 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 285 AT PAGES 88 THROUGH 100 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND A PORTION OF LOT 146 OF SAID TRACT 28227, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SAID LOT 80 TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PORTION OF SAID LOT 146; BEGINNING AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 80, THENCE NORTH 49006'27" WEST ALONG THE PROJECTION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 80 A DISTANCE OF 34.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 53°49'02" EAST A DISTANCE OF 76.27 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE PROJECTION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 80, THENCE SOUTH 45048'31" EAST A DISTANCE OF 17.00 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 80 AND THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 763.50 FEET, A RADIAL BEARING PASSING THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 48036'24" WEST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 80 THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00030'03" A DISTANCE OF 6.68' FEET; THENCE SOUTH 40053'33" WEST AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 66.68 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. COMPRISING 11,910 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "A" SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS -OF -WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD. EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. This descri ion was prepared by me or der my0irection. Steven J. Van, P.L.S. 6500 My license ex ire 6/30/15 Dated: �' � 13 r&� L�'� w Steven J. Van Exp. 06/30/15 Ho. M OF CF�UF�� Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" PMW # 13-171 TRANSFER PARCEL (POR LOT 146, TR 28227 TO LOT 80, TR 28227) ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS BEING A PORTION OF LOT 146 OF TRACT 28227 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 285 AT PAGES 88 THROUGH 100 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 80 OF SAID TRACT 28227; THENCE NORTH 49006'27" WEST ALONG THE PROJECTION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 80 A DISTANCE OF 34.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 53049'02" EAST A DISTANCE OF 76.27 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE PROJECTION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 80, THENCE SOUTH 45°48'31" EAST A DISTANCE OF 17.00 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 80 AND THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 763.50 FEET, A RADIAL BEARING PASSING THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 48036'24" WEST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 80 THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00030'03" A DISTANCE OF 6.68' FEET; THENCE SOUTH 40053'33" WEST AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 66.68 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. COMPRISING 1885 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. This d by me Steven J. \ My license Dated: & was prepared nvrdirection. .L.S. 6500 ,s 6/30/13 0 Steven J. Von o Exp. 06/30/15 ,� � No. ssoo�� OF CP1- Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT "B" N 53'4g.�2" f �6 27' I U - 0 46 �J o U) o I n TRANSFER PARCEL g N 48'36'24" W (R) 36.50' � / � .- 40'53_33" E 66.68' — _N _ i� 13. P.O.B. ----- /' Io oll I I = II I I R-763.50' f f IO NN II ( A-00.30'03" I I LEGEND I �t II I I 1 f f 3' WIDE NEW LOT LINES °Din - II i I to LOT LINES TO REMAIN — — — — LOT LINE TO BE REMOVED r^l 0 f f �% ' ^ A 111 PARCEL "A" f N APN'S 632-760-009 II 3 I AREA = 0.27 +/- AC. f `° r —0 ! 6 i a II ? �f L�0�1 �0 I I I r r Steven J. Van LOo T 770 - .� 'Qh II M o 9 285/88-�100 f Z * . os/M/15 00 � I (off 3'IWIDE� No. 8500�' to (o I �C II OF , EASEMENT NOTES I o COI I i N 26'06'44- W (R) f f Q r f f INST. NO. 2000-421103, REC. 10/25/00 N I I I \11 V L-9.83 f f A Z I A=2T59 SCE INST. NO. 2003-297870, REC. 4/28/03 �.43 f f i L=38.48' VERIZON A=90'00'00" 55.43' 1 T SCE 6' PUE MISSION CREEK DR. r N 40'53'33" E 118.1 V — '--- NOTE: THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FROM RECORD DATA AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON. THIS PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED UPON THE EXPRESSED CONDITION THAT BUILDING PERMITS SHALL NOT BE ISSUED FOR ANY DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THIS ADJUSTMENT PLAT UNTIL NECESSARY 0' 30' 60' 90' DEDICATIONS, IF ANY, HAVE OCCURRED. PLAT TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION - EXHIBIT "A" ADJUSTMENT PLAT -CITY OF PALM DESERT PREPARED BY• APPROVED BY: i' [ � �' � �`'J �+�'��'1 P.'!. W. 13-171 muIn► ter► mn s/oe/ia Tors so s Roue i.ie ra sa6/aa-ioo I.0!1At � L IILi1V AWUJfI1V EVE J. V N P.L.S. 6500 EXP. 6/30/15 6- �3 DA E R. PAGE GARNER P.L.S. 6155 CITY SURVEYOR EXP. 3l31/14 CITY OF PALM DESERT 616113 DATE APPBOT" an so" i" • aw SBl<f' i OF Pl[A/SC!' Nq. tawf.ox i CITY OF PALM DESERT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: LAURI AYLAIAN, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FROM: BO CHEN, CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP WAIVER NO. 13-103 DATE: MAY 1, 2013 The above -referenced parcel map waiver has been reviewed by the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department and found to be technically correct. Please schedule for Planning Commission action as soon as possible. PMW 13-103: Applicant / Property Owner: Brian Ludington and Jennifer Wilhelmson 41750 Rancho Las Palmas Dr., Ste. L-2 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 J BO CHEN, P.E. City of Palm Desert /Department of Community Development PARCEL MAP WAIVER 73-510 Fred Waring Drive • Palm Desert • California • 92260 • (760) 346-0611 • Fax (760) 776-6417 Applicant: //�� / / Telephone: ,�� 77y / 5-9 Mailing City: _ yi75-0 X7XI/ State: Zip: �AEmail: "Fax number: 7— i _ Property Owner: fa/yj-C, Telephone: Mailing Address: City: State: Zip. Email: Fax number: X6 779 �g6 � '1Cl /Fri+ (�•7lhlil.%"1.Lcx-�l Representative: !� ,J Telephone: Mailing Address: Fax number: City: State: Zip: Email: Please send correspondence to (check one): _� Applicant Property Owner Representative Project Address(s): L31- � ;7 4. ay 11-anc4_1d , f>�. . L�) �" 4/ liZo'xyyc/ Jt Assessor Parcel Number(s): 9! % Existing Zoning: &06"4 General Plan Designation: Project Requ st describe sp cific nature of approval request): Property Owner Authorization: The undersigned states that they are the owner(s) of the property described and herein give authorization for the filing of the application. ZCICII,-7�47--N L11 /A3 Signature Print Name Date Applicant / Representative Signature: By signing this application 1 certify that the information provided is accurate. I understand that the City might not approve what I am applying for and/or might require conditio2ns of approval. A"444— Zach" k-e) Signature Print Name Date Property Owner Authorization: Agreement absolving the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities relative to any deed restrictions. 1 DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT absolves the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions that may be applicable to/the propertydescribedherein. / Signature Print Name Date OFFICE USE ONLY PROJECT NO: PMW 3 DATE: S - L0 _1 3 ACCEPTED BY:. �, EXHIBIT "A" vftoe P.M.W. 13-103 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL "A" ( MERGED LOTS) LOT 9 OF PALM DESERT UNIT NO.7, IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 25, PAGES 46 AND 47 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, OF SAID COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; TOGETHER WITH PARCEL 4, AS SHOWN BY RECORD OF SURVEY ON FILE IN BOOK 38, PAGE 100, OF RECORDS OF SURVEY, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL "A" CONTAINS 41,315.4 S.F. (0.948 AC.) MORE OR LESS FOR GRAPHICAL PURPOSES SEE EXHIBIT `B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS OF WAY, EASEMENTS, OR EXCEPTIONS OF RECORD, IF ANY. !oxdkt�� s5a Z WK NOTE.• THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FROM RECORD DATA Al DOES NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTNWW SHOWN HEREON. THIS MAP HAS BEEN APPROVED UPON THE EXPRESSED COND177ON THAT BUILDING PERMITS SHALL NOT BE ISSUED FOR ANY DEVELOPMENT fWTHIN THIS AD.ISTMENT PLAT UN& NECESSARY DEDICATIONS, IF ANY, HAVE OCCURRED. NOTE.• THERE MAY BE EASEMENTS OF RECORD DELINEATED AND REFERENCED ON THE UNDERLYING MAP, OR THERE MA Y BE EASEMENTS WI THIN THE AREA BEING ADJUSTED THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS DOCUMENT THAT COULD ENCUMBER SAID PARCEL HEREIN. LOT 8 M.B. 25146, 47 EXHIBIT "B'y P. M. W. 13-103 \�NNL LAND S �g5 ENE A. MQG' GAG NO. 5479 Exp. 9/30/14 CAL 50 0 25 50 r-w ( IN FEET ) I inch = 50 ft. LOT 4 5' P.U.E. M.B. 21181-84 PCL 1 R.S. 381100 N 89 44 35" E 270.00' ------170.00=-------r-----100.00'-- LOT LINE---- ` BEING ELIMINATED N LOT 9 PALM DESERT UNIT NO. 7 M.B. 25146, 47 A.P.N. 6277-334-010 0 PARG`EL 'A' (0,948 AC N h r 0 z PCL 4 R.S. J81100 A.P.N. 627-334-011 0 h PCL 3 R. S. J81100 3 N h r o >- z J 2 h 170.00' I 100.00' I N 89 44 35" E 270.00' 0 IRONWOOD STREET r 130", LEGEND: EX. LOT LINE TO REMAIN EXIST. EASEMENT - - - - ELIMINATED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLA T - CITY OF PALM DESERT PREPARED BY APPLICANT APPROVED BY - MR. BRIAN LUDINGTON R. PAGE GARNER CIO MCGEE SURVEYING INC. 45-100 GOLF CENTER PKWY., STE. G WA Yl E A. MCGEE A TE INDiq CA 92201 CITY S-URVfYOR L. S. 5479 1 L. S 6155 EXP. J/31114 May 28, 2013 Kevin Swartz Project Planner Planning Department 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Project Name: Attn: Kevin Swartz Voris #3242 Palm Desert Case No: ZOAICUP10-228 Request for Extension of Entitlement = DLR Group Architecture Engineering Planning Interiors 117 East Colorado Boulevard Suite 500 Pasadena, CA 91105 o: 626/796-8230 (: 626/796-8735 This letter is to request a one-year extension of Entitlement for the Vans #3242 Palm Desert Project, referencing Case No: ZOAICUP10-228. According to the Planning Department Records, The reviewed and approves{ entitlement package shall expire on July 14, 2013. The reason for this request is due to the fluctuations within the recent economy. Your time and attention to this extension of entitlement request is appreciated. We look forward to the review and responses after the next planning review meeting. Sincerely, DER Group Matthew DeHart Project Manager Encl: cc: Glady Dumapit, Vons (via email) Pasadena Chicago Colorado Springs Denver Des Moines Honolulu Kansas Cily dlrgroup.com Las Vegas Lincoln Los Angeles Minneapolis Omaha Orlando Palm Springs facebook.com/dlrgroup Phoenix Portland Riverside SacrametitO Seanle Tucson Shanghai iwitier.corn/dlrgroup CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REQUEST: CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) TO ALLOW ROVER ARMSTRONG A.P.C. TO CONVERT 2,370 SQUARE FEET OF STORAGE/WAREHOUSE SPACE INTO OFFICE USE WITHIN AN EXISTNG 8,619-SQUARE-FOOT OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED AT 75-100 MEDITERRANEAN IN THE SERVICE INDUSTRIAL ZONE SUBMITTED BY: Kevin Swartz, Assistant Planner APPLICANT: R.A. Desert Properties, LLC 75-100 Mediterranean Palm Desert, CA 92211 CASE NO: CUP 13-98 DATE: June 18, 2013 CONTENTS: Draft Resolution Legal Notice Applicants Statement of Use Plans and Exhibits Submitted by the Applicant Recommendation Waive further reading and adopt Resolution Use Permit 13-98 to convert 2,370 square into office use for ten offices. Executive Summary No. 2604, approving Conditional feet of storage/warehouse space Approval of staff's recommendation would allow the applicant to convert 2,370 square feet of storage/warehouse space for office use within an existing 8,619-square-foot building. In 1990, the Planning Commission approved PP 90-12 allowing an 8,619-square-foot industrial/showroom building. The building was not constructed until 1994, when Cold Call Cowboy telemarketing firm utilized the building. In 1996, the Planning Commission amended PP 90-12 to allow the applicant to convert the 1,400-square-foot attic into a library, subject to providing 12 additional parking spaces on another site. In 2004, the Planning Commission approved the applicant to restore the building to 6,249 square feet of office and 2,370 square feet of storage/warehouse space. The applicant currently operates Staff Report Case No. CUP 13-98, Rover Armstrong Page 2 of 7 June 18, 2013 a law office in the building, and is proposing to convert and lease the 2,370 square feet of storage/warehouse space into 10 offices. The proposed hours of operation are between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The principal concern regarding the review of this application is that the proposed 2,370 square feet was conditioned by the Planning Commission in 2004 to be restored to storage/warehouse space. The CUP is required to evaluate parking since the property is not zoned Office Professional. Staff conducted a parking survey and found that this use would have a minimal impact to the surrounding businesses during the proposed operating hours. Public Hearing notices were mailed to parties who own property within 300 feet of the subject parcel and placed in The Desert Sun. No letters or comments were received in favor of or opposition to the proposed use as of writing this staff report. Background A. Property Description: The 28,750-square-foot parcel is located on the northeast corner of Mediterranean and Boardwalk. On June 19, 1990, the Planning Commission approved Precise Plan 90-12 allowing the construction of an 8,619-square-foot industrial/showroom building. The project provided 29 parking spaces. The building was constructed in1994. On October 25, 1994, the Architecture Review Commission approved a design modification to the building allowing a 1,400-square-foot attic for storage. The applicant Cold Call Cowboy, a telemarketing firm, utilized the building and had over 28 cubicles, with each one being occupied by two or more callers. On April 16, 1996, the Planning Commission approved an amendment to Precise Plan 90-12 by Resolution No. 1737 allowing the conversion of the 1,400-square-foot attic into a library. The Planning Commission conditioned the approval by requiring that the applicant/owner enter into an agreement to designate 12 parking spaces on another site owned by the applicant within 300 feet of the property. The Planning Commission also conditioned the library as an exclusive use of the applicant only. Any transfer of this right was required to be approved by the Planning Commission. On April 20, 2004, the Planning Commission removed conditions of approval Nos. 2 and 3 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 1737. By removing the two conditions, the applicant terminated the parking agreement to designate 12 parking spaces on another site, and restored the library back to an attic. The Planning Commission also approved the building to be restored back to 6,249 square feet of office and 2,370 square feet of storage/warehouse space. Since August 6, 2012, today's applicant/owner Rover Armstrong A.P.C. has occupied the property as a law office. The office portion is 6,249 square feet and consists of 16 offices, a reception area, three conference rooms, a large file room, three bathrooms, GAPlanning\Kevin Swartz\Word\CUFs\CUP 13-98 Rover Law Office\Planning Commission Staff Report Final.doc Staff Report Case No. CUP 13-98, Rover Armstrong Page 3 of 7 June 18, 2013 and a kitchen. The remaining 2,370 square feet of the overall 8,619-square-foot building is used as storage space. B. General Plan Designation and Zoning The property is currently designated Industrial Business Park (I -BP) in the General Plan and is zoned Service Industrial (S.I.). C. Adjacent Zoning and Land Use North: Service Industrial / Industrial Buildings South: Service Industrial / Industrial Buildings East: Service Industrial / Industrial Buildings West: Service Industrial / Industrial Buildings Project Description The applicant is requesting consideration to convert and lease the 2,370 square feet of storage space into low -intensity office use. The applicant would create 10 offices for professional use by adding cubicles and painting the area. Future users leasing the offices would have access to the conference rooms, kitchen, and bathrooms. A floor plan of the proposed space layout for the use is attached in the exhibits. The expanded office use would maintain typical office hours from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. These hours are consistent with the current law office. Analysis Each zoning designation has permitted uses and conditional uses. Conditional uses in each zone require consideration by the Planning Commission to assure there is adequate parking and land use compatibility with surrounding properties. In this case, the Planning Commission previously approved the building for 6,249 square feet of office and 2,370 square feet of storage. The applicant is asking to convert the 2,370 square feet of storage to office use. Chapter 25.34 Service Industrial District Section 25.34.020 Permitted uses L, states the Planning Commission may by resolution permit other uses which are no more objectionable than uses outlined in the section. This section of the code has been used to approve other uses, including offices, gyms and churches, within the S.I. zone in the City. Staff also accepted the application per Chapter 25.72 Conditional Uses Section 25.72.040 Hearing responsibility, which states "all conditional use permit applications required by the regulations of this chapter shall be heard, and a determination shall be made by the Planning Commission." GAPlanning\Kevin Swartz\Word\CUP's\CUP 13.98 Rover Law Office\Planning Commission Staff Report Final.doc Staff Report Case No. CUP 13-98, Rover Armstrong Page 4 of 7 June 18, 2013 A. Land Use Compatibility: The subject site is designated I -BP (Industrial Business Park) on the City General Plan land use map, and S.I. on the zoning map. The site is adjacent to office use and light manufacturing. There is no residential use in the surrounding area. On April 20, 2004, the Planning Commission previously approved the building for 6,249 square feet of office, and 2,370 square feet of storage. The previous tenant Cold Call Cowboy used the property as a high -intensity call center. Cold Call Cowboy operated in the entire 8,619-square-foot-building. The building contained 28 built-in cubicles, with each cubicle occupied by two or more callers. The proposed use to convert the 2,360 square feet into 10 offices is similar to the existing business and other surrounding office uses, and a more low -intensity use than the previous business. On August 6, 2012, Rover Armstrong A.P.C. occupied the property as a law office. Several of the surrounding businesses conduct light manufacturing within their suites. The proposed additional office space would not generate objectionable noise for the adjacent businesses. The low -intensity office use is an industrial zone and would protect residential neighborhoods from traffic, noise, and parking impacts. Other office uses of this size are currently located within the surrounding area and have not generated complaints from other surrounding businesses. Although the proposed use is not S.I. oriented, since 2012, a large portion of the building has operated as a law office without complaints from neighbors. The proposed 2,370 square feet of additional office space would not interfere with the normal conduct of adjacent businesses. B. Parking: The property provides 29 parking spaces. The existing 6,249 square feet of office space is parked at four spaces per 1,000 square feet requiring 25 parking spaces. The remaining 2,370 square feet of storage/warehouse space is parked at two parking spaces per 1,000 square feet requiring four parking spaces. The site currently has a total of 29 parking spaces, which meets the parking demand. According to the code, the proposed conversion of the 2,370 square feet of storage space to office use would technically require an additional five parking spaces. The applicant is currently operating a law office, with 16 offices for up to 16 employees and one receptionist. The applicant is proposing to create 10 offices to lease out for 10 employees. Between the two businesses there would be a maximum of 27 employees for 29 parking spaces. Staff recognizes that there is enough parking for the employees, but had concerns with clients having available parking. The applicant stated that most meetings with clients occur off -site, and through conference calls. The three conference rooms are mainly used by staff. GAPlanning\Kevin Swartz\Word\CUP'S\CUP 13-98 Rover Law Office\Planning Commission Staff Report Final.doc Staff Report Case No. CUP 13-98, Rover Armstrong Page 5 of 7 June 18, 2013 Staff conducted a parking a parking study for the existing and proposed office use. The table below describes the availability of parking during all hours from Monday, May 27, 2013 to Friday, May 31, 2013. Date Time Occupied Spaces Vacant Spaces Mon. May 27 8:00 AM 15 14 Mon. May 27 3:30 PM 12 17 Tues. May 28 9:00 AM 16 13 Tues. May 28 1:15 PM 10 19 Wed. May 29 10:00 AM 15 14 Wed. May 29 4:00 PM 8 21 Thur. May 30 11:30 AM 17 12 Thur. May 30 2:15 PM 11 18 Fri. May 31 10:30 AM 16 13 Fri. May 31 4:30 PM 7 22 Average Available Spaces 13 16 The parking study concluded that an average of 16 parking spaces were available during the proposed business hours when the office use business would be open. The study indicates with the current 17 staff members the addition of 10 new employees would not pose a parking problem. C. Findings of Approval: 1. That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accordance with the objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purpose of the district in which it is located. The proposed location is in a Service Industrial zone. Chapter 25.34 Service Industrial District, Section 25.34.020 Permitted uses, L. states, "The Planning Commission may, by resolution; permit other uses which are similar and no more objectionable than those enumerated in this section." Since August 6, 2012, Rover Armstrong A.P.C. has occupied the property as a law office. The proposed 2, 370- square-foot office expansion is similar in the type of business conducted at the site and hours of operation would have minimal impacts on parking, traffic, and noise. The current office building and other office facilities that are similar in size are located within the Service Industrial zones within the City, and have not adversely impacted other businesses. The proposed office expansion is no more objectionable than public utility and/or public service facilities which are allowed by right in the zone, and therefore is in accordance with the objectives of the zoning ordinance and purpose of the Service Industrial zone. G:\Planning\Kevin Swartz\Word\CL1Fs\CUP 13-98 Rover Law Office\Planning Commission Staff Report Final.doc Staff Report Case No. CUP 13-98, Rover Armstrong Page 6 of 7 June 18, 2013 2. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it will be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The site has been previously designed to meet setbacks, lot coverage, building height, land use, and parking requirements for office type uses. The proposed 2,370- square-foot office expansion would not create a public nuisance in terms of noise and parking shortages. Therefore, the use would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, welfare, and materially injurious to properties in the vicinity as described in more detail in the staff report. The 2, 370-square-foot office expansion will also conform to all Building & Safety requirements of the State of California for licensing. 3. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the zoning ordinance, except for approved variances or adjustments. The property is located in the Service Industrial zone and the project complies with all provisions of the base zone. The site has already been developed and approved under PP 90-12 allowing the construction of an 8, 619-square-foot office/storage building. The proposed use is consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance since it already exists and meets and/or exceeds the developed standards in the S.l. zone. The 2,370- square-foot office expansion will operate during regular business hours and conditions have been placed on the project to ensure that all the minimum requirements of the Palm Desert Municipal Code are met, including Building and the Fire Department conditions. No variances or adjustments are required for approval. 4. That the proposed conditional use complies with the goals, objectives and policies of the City's General Plan. The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is "Industrial / Business Park (I- B.P)" A primary objective stated in the Land Use Element of the General Plan under Industrial Goals, Policies and Programs is Goal 1, which provides for the development of business parks and non-polluting industrial uses, and which assures compatible integration with other, non -industrial land uses. Policy 6B of the General Plan Land Use Element is to review all business park / industrial development proposals with a special regard for public health and safety issues to ensure that the type and intensity of the use is appropriate for the proposed location and comparative with surrounding land uses. The Circulation Element of the General Plan is meant to address and ensure that transportation issues are addressed in a manner that limits adverse and enhances positive impacts, and to assure that local traffic stays local. The Circulation Element also establishes and directs actions to maintain acceptable levels of service on all community roadways. A goal of the City is to carefully review projects to assure neighborhood character is protected. G:\Planning\Kevin Swartz\Word\CUP's\CUP 13.98 Rover Law Office\Planning Commission Staff Report Final.doc Staff Report Case No. CUP 13-98, Rover Armstrong Page 7 of 7 June 18, 2013 The Planning Commission approved PP 90-12 allowing the construction of an 8, 619- square-foot office/storage building. The building has operated as a call center, which is a high -intensity use. The current law office and the proposed 2,370-square-foot office expansion is suited at this site since the use already occurs and has shown that it is compatible use. The 2,370-square-foot office expansion is using the same built improvements, rather than constructing new ones that would be used a small percentage of time. The office expansion is an industrial zone and would protect residential neighborhoods from traffic, noise, and parking impacts. This project maintains a land use that is consistent with the goals, policies, and programs of the General Plan. The project is consistent with the General Plan in respect to the appropriate use of the proposed location. The business is compatible with surrounding land uses, and offers an excellent service to the community. Environmental Review According to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), staff must determine whether a proposed activity is a project subject to CEQA. If the project is subject to CEQA, staff must conduct a preliminary assessment of the project to determine whether the project is exempt from CEQA review. If a project is not exempt, further environmental review is necessary. Further review from a non-exempt project would result in a Negative Declaration, a Mitigated Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Generally, an EIR must be prepared if a project may have a significant impact on the environment. In this case, the proposed project would be a Class 3: Small Structures (15303) Categorical Exemption for review is necessary. Submitted By: Kevin Swartz, AssistWnt Planner Department Head: Lauri Aylaian, Director of Community Devgfopment New Construction or Conversion of purposes of CEQA, and no further GAPlanning\Kevin Swartz\Word\CUP'S\CUP 13-98 Rover Law Office\Planning Commission Staff Report Final.doc PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) TO ALLOW ROVER ARMSTRONG A.P.C. TO CONVERT 2,370 SQUARE FEET OF STORAGE/WAREHOUSE SPACE INTO OFFICE USE WITHIN AN EXISTNG 8,619-SQUARE-FOOT OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED AT 75-100 MEDITERRANEAN IN THE SERVICE INDUSTRIAL ZONE CASE NO: CUP 13-98 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 18th day of June 2013, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by R.A. Desert Properties, LLC for approval of the above noted; and WHEREAS, according to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City must determine whether a proposed activity is a project subject to CEQA. If the project is subject to CEQA, staff must conduct a preliminary assessment of the project to determine whether the project is exempt from CEQA review. If a project is not exempt, further environmental review is necessary. Further review from a non-exempt project would result in a Negative Declaration, a Mitigated Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Generally, an EIR must be prepared if a project may have a significant impact on the environment. The said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act," Resolution No. 2012-20, in the Director of Community Development has determined that the proposed project is a Class 3: New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures (15303) Categorical Exemption for purposes of CEQA and no further review is necessary; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to approve the said request: Findings for Approval: That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accordance with the objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purpose of the district in which it is located. The proposed location is in a Service Industrial zone. Chapter 25.34 Service Industrial District, Section 25.34.020 Permitted uses, L. states, "The Planning Commission may, by resolution; permit other uses which are similar and no more objectionable than those enumerated in this section." Since August 6, 2012, Rover Armstrong A. P. C. has occupied the property as a law office. The proposed 2,370-square-foot office expansion is similar in the type of business conducted at PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.2604 the site and hours of operation would have minimal impacts on parking, traffic, and noise. The current office building and other office facilities that are similar in size are located within the Service Industrial zones within the City, and have not adversely impacted other businesses. The proposed office expansion is no more objectionable than public utility and/or public service facilities which are allowed by right in the zone, and therefore is in accordance with the objectives of the zoning ordinance and purpose of the Service Industrial zone. 2. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it will be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The site has been previously designed to meet setbacks, lot coverage, building height, land use, and parking requirements for office type uses. The proposed 2,370-square-foot office expansion would not create a public nuisance in terms of noise and parking shortages. Therefore, the use would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, welfare, and materially injurious to properties in the vicinity as described in more detail in the staff report. The 2,370-square-foot office expansion will also conform to all Building & Safety requirements of the State of California for licensing. 3. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the zoning ordinance, except for approved variances or adjustments. The property is located in the Service Industrial zone and the project complies with all provisions of the base zone. The site has already been developed and approved under PP 90-12 allowing the construction of an 8,619-square-foot office/storage building. The proposed use is consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance since it already exists and meets and/or exceeds the developed standards in the S.I. zone. The 2,370-square-foot office expansion will operate during regular business hours and conditions have been placed on the project to ensure that all the minimum requirements of the Palm Desert Municipal Code are met, including Building and the Fire Department conditions. No variances or adjustments are required for approval. 4. That the proposed conditional use complies with the goals, objectives and policies of the City's General Plan. The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is "Industrial / Business Park (I-B.P.)" A primary objective stated in the Land Use Element of the General Plan under Industrial Goals, Policies and Programs is Goal 1, which provides for the development of business parks and non-polluting industrial uses, and which assures compatible integration with other, non -industrial land uses. Policy 6B of the General Plan Land Use Element is to review all business park / industrial G:\Planning\Kevin Swartz\Word\CUP's\CUP 13-98 Rover Law Office\Res No 2604 Rover Armstrong.doc 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.2604 development proposals with a special regard for public health and safety issues to ensure that the type and intensity of the use is appropriate for the proposed location and comparative with surrounding land uses. The Circulation Element of the General Plan is meant to address and ensure that transportation issues are addressed in a manner that limits adverse and enhances positive impacts, and to assure that local traffic stays local. The Circulation Element also establishes and directs actions to maintain acceptable levels of service on all community roadways. A goal of the City is to carefully review projects to assure neighborhood character is protected. The Planning Commission approved PP 90-12 allowing the construction of an 8, 619-square-foot office/storage building. The building has operated as a call center, which is a high -intensity use. The current law office and the proposed 2,370-square-foot office expansion is suited at this site since the use already occurs and has shown that it is compatible use. The 2,370-square-foot office expansion is using the same built improvements, rather than constructing new ones that would be used a small percentage of time. The office expansion is an industrial zone and would protect residential neighborhoods from traffic, noise, and parking impacts. This project maintains a land use that is consistent with the goals, policies, and programs of the General Plan. The project is consistent with the General Plan in respect to the appropriate use of the proposed location. The business is compatible with surrounding land uses, and offers an excellent service to the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of CUP 13- 98, subject to conditions. GAPlanning\Kevin Swartz\Word\CUP's\CUP 13-98 Rover Law Office\Res No 2604 Rover Armstrong.doc 3. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.2604 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, at its regular meeting held on the 18t" day of June 2013, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: NANCY DELUNA, CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: LAURI AYLAIAN, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION GAPlanning\Kevin Swartz\Word\CUP'S\CUP 13-98 Rover Law Office\Res No 2604 Rover Armstrong.doc El! PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.2604 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO: CUP 13-98 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the Department of Community Development/Planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein, which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building & Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 4. All conditions of approval shall be recorded with the Riverside County Clerk's office before any building permits are issued. Evidence of recordation shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development/Planning. 5. Applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the city against any third party legal challenge to these approvals, with counsel chosen by the city at applicant's expense. 6. Any proposed change of this Conditional Use Permit will require an amendment, which will result in a new public hearing. 7. Improvements that are not on the approved site plan may be subject to additional requirements and plan submittals by the Public Works Department. 8. The applicant is approved to convert and lease 2,370 square feet of storage space into low -intensity 10 office cubicles. 9. The applicant will occupy no more than 8,619 square feet of the building for office use. GAPlanning\Kevin Swartz\Word\CUP'S\CUP 13-98 Rover Law Office\Res No 2604 Rover Armstrong.doc 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.2604 10. This project shall comply with the latest adopted edition of the following codes: A. 2010 California Building Code and its appendices and standards. B. 2010 California Plumbing Code and its appendices and standards. C. 2010 California Mechanical Code and its appendices and standards. D. 2010 California Electrical Code. E. 2010 California Energy Code. F. 2010 California Green Building Standards Code G. Title 24, California Code of Regulations. H. 2010 California Fire Code and its appendices and standards. 11. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed as required per the City of Palm Desert Code Adoption Ordinance 1217. 12.A disabled access overlay of the site plan is required to be submitted to the Dept of Building and Safety for plan review of the site accessibility requirements as per 2010 CBC Chapters 11 A & B (as applicable) and Chapter 10. 13. All exits must provide an accessible path of travel to the public way. (CBC 1024.6 & 1127B.1) 14. Detectable warnings shall be provided where required per CBC 113313.8 and 112713.5 (7). The designer is also required to meet all ADA requirements. Where an ADA requirement is more restrictive than the State of California, the ADA requirement shall supersede the State requirement. 15. Provide an accessible path of travel to the trash enclosure. The trash enclosure is required to be accessible. Please obtain a detail from the Dept of Building and Safety. 16. All contractors and subcontractors shall have a current City of Palm Desert Business License prior to permit issuance per Palm desert Municipal Code, Title 5. 17. All contractors and/or owner -builders must submit a valid Certificate of Worker's Compensation Insurance coverage prior to the issuance of a building permit per California Labor Code, Section 3700. 18.Address numerals shall comply with Palm Desert Ordinance No. 1217 (Palm Desert Municipal Code 15.15. Compliance with Ordinance 1217 regarding street address location, dimension, stroke of line, distance from street, height from grade, height from street, etc. shall be shown on all architectural building elevations in detail. Any possible obstructions, shadows, lighting, landscaping, backgrounds or other reasons that may render the building address unreadable shall be addressed during the plan review process. You may request a copy of Ordinance 1217 or Municipal Code Section 15.28 from the Department of Building and Safety counter staff. GAPlanning\Kevin Swartz\Word\CUP'S\CUP 13-98 Rover Law Office\Res No 2604 Rover Armstrong.doc R CITY 01 r Itl[ll Eg [l 73-510 PRLD WARING DRIVE PALM DFSLRT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL:76o 346—o6ii FAX: 760 341-7098 info@palM-dcsert.org CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. CUP 13-98 i NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by R.A. Desert Properties for consideration of a Conditional Use Permit to allow Rover Armstrong A.P.C. to convert 2,370 square feet of storage/warehouse space into office use within an existing 8,858-square-foot office building located at 75-100 Mediterranean Street in the Service Industrial zone. 9 �* rr" >; m►, o - ' Mwi3bvr�a�ids 020 tea. ""kk,:y '1 i 'APN'6320500 i APN 6]20 Yi 751,60 x Awm E / , AAN: Sh06 y t 1♦ Y HSuaep'750 PN�e]2WO�Y2 4Pf! 8820G,r `PN 63206000 AAN't�OsO ,•+,�' ,M+aAPN GJy05001A '] A •-4" j k $seat 1Mxn x x—AE 75121 V4a at }N ^e'^"i°'^4Y7NKp# 75, 61 ry APN: 63 '} ` APN: PJdZ20007 PN 61423QOq AVN:. 12 House!' Hol1.s` t. 7514 HN�aa# 75700 House1,4 0' 11,204 IINotes SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, June 18, 2013, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. Written comments concerning all items covered by this public hearing notice shall be accepted up to the date of the hearing. Information concerning the proposed project is available for review in the Department of Community Development 2�t the above address between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Sun LAURI AYLAIAN, Secretary June 8, 2013 Palm Desert Planning Commission } R.A. Desert Properties, LLC's Application for a Conditional Use Permit STATEMENT OF USE R.A. Desert Properties, LLC is the property owner and applicant for the Conditional Use Permit. It acquired the property from One West Bank after the original property owner, Cold Call Cowboy Productions, was foreclosed. Originally, the property was 6,488 square feet of office and 2,370 square feet storage/warehouse. It has 29 marked off-street parking spaces (including one handicapped space) and six on -street parking spaces directly in front of the building. Cold Call Cowboy used the property as a high -intensity use call center call center for employees to make telephone calls advertising services that they would provide on -site to their customers. Cold Call Cowboy applied for and was granted its application to convert the 2,370 square feet of storage/warehouse space to office, provided that he restrict a separate parcel he owned to be used to provide 12 additional parking spaces. Once Cold Call Cowboy sold the separate parcel, he was required to convert the new office area back to storage/warehouse. In addition to the existing offices, the building contained 28 built-in cubicles (10 of which were in the storage area). Each cubicle was occupied by two or more callers. After the City required the conversion, all of the 28 cubicles were permanently removed. Since August 6, 2012, Rover Armstrong A.P.C. has occupied the Property as a law office. The office portion of the building consists of a reception area, three conference rooms, a large file room, three bathrooms, a kitchen, and 16 offices that occupy 6,488 sq. ft. of space. R.A. Desert Properties, LLC intends to lease the additional 2,370 square feet for similar low -intensity office use. The configuration of the building will allow the use of the 10 existing offices in the area presently designated as storage/warehouse without any construction work other than painting and carpeting. The offices are for professional use and will not be occupied by more than one person each. Applicant's proposed use is much lower intensity than the original occupant's use. Converting the 2,370 square feet of storage/warehouse space will not create an impact on the existing parking conditions at the Property. Respectfully Submitted, Dated: March 7, 2013 R.A. Desert Properties, LLC so Pw mm m r F� Plx qt Jfr s 3� v. .f°:' +'tl "� lAu Wa%, r x1� {rr x r � � � 1 �P r 4 ✓d"`riirfi��' r a it 9 r e r- i lF i fif � � 1 r I r t u 'N t t ' ir` ,� Y ! g ' } r 6" 1a d`.. d fir,; V'r m4 y 1 "i C k Ci !G ,/.. "'� 'h gin°� �l Fl °Pd k _.�',.x,Fvay.rsee�.. i N.M. g, 41 a Ns r g a fi �{� � r r, vi iPg a r h 1 P l if�1 '" Y 0 ox! pow, f d F V a,.�4! zd .,, m.�u . s, w fP.wtd_ ri�14;� Y.�aa„ it � ,4 :, ., . "•l, s d rcaV C�7 u, iulA t �.. �, �� _ ,� d .r � ' �"ti „lr✓" ��t r.' ��`\ \ /✓'",� Nam\ �, ,r"\��'' "r \\ r�'N. �v . y i d-ea! j B 1 Vy I i t' r is 4 -a i. 14 t��i i y i y 11 ,, 3 dL AL- r 777�'�-77 "Ln"I Sq Ai� h. E