The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2016-03-01 PC Regular Meeting Agenda Packet CITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA • TUESDAY, MARCH 1, 2016 — 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260 I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Any person wishing to discuss any item not scheduled for public hearing may address the Planning Commission at this point by stepping to the lectern and giving his/her name and address for the record. Remarks shall be limited to a maximum of three minutes unless additional time is authorized by the Planning Commission. Because the Brown Act does not allow the Planning Commission to take action on items not on the Agenda, Commissioners will not enter into discussion with speakers but may briefly respond or instead refer the matter to staff for report and recommendation at a future Planning Commission meeting. Reports and documents relating to each of the following items listed on the agenda, including those received following posting/distribution, are on file in the Office of the Department of Community Development and are available for public inspection during normal business hours, Monday-Friday, 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260, telephone (760) 346-0611, Extension 484. VI. CONSENT CALENDAR ALL MATTERS LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE ROLL CALL VOTE. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR AUDIENCE REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION AND ACTION UNDER SECTION VII CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER OF THE AGENDA. AGENDA PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 1, 2016 A. MINUTES of the Regular Planning Commission meeting of February 16, 2016. Rec: Approve as presented. Action: VII. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER VIII. NEW BUSINESS None IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS Anyone who challenges any hearing matter in court may be limited to raising only those issues he or she raised at the public hearing described herein, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. Remarks shall be limited to a maximum of three minutes unless additional time is authorized by the Planning Commission. A. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the placement of a donation recycling station within the Westfield parking lot located at 72-840 Highway 111. Case No. CUP 16-011 (Green Education Foundation, San Jose, California, Applicant). Rec: Waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2664, approving CUP 16-011, subject to conditions. Action: B. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for partial street vacation of San Marcos Avenue and the construction of a 32- stall public parking lot with perimeter wall, landscape, and lighting improvements at the intersection of San Marcos Avenue and San Clemente Circle. Case No. CUP 16-030 (City of Palm Desert, California 92260, Applicant). Rec: Waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2665, approving CUP 16-030. Action: 2 GAPlanningWonica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Agenda\3-1-16 agn.docx AGENDA PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 1, 2016 X. MISCELLANEOUS None XI. COMMITTEE MEETING UPDATES A. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES B. PARKS & RECREATION C. GENERAL PLAN & SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE XII. COMMENTS XIII. ADJOURNMENT I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda for the Planning Commission was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 26t" day of February, 2016. Monica O'Reilly, Recording cretary Please contact the Planning Department, 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260, (760) 346-0611, for assistance with access to any of the agenda, materials, or participation at the meeting. 3 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Agenda\3-1-16 agn.docx CITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION PRELIMINARY MINUTES TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2016 — 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM SERT, CA 92260 I. CALL TO ORDER Chair John Greenwood called the meeting er at 6:01 II. ROLL CALL Present: Chair John Greenwood Vice Chair Sonia Campbell Commissioner Nancy Del-una Commissioner Joseph Pradett Staff Present: Jill Trembl ity Attorn Tony Bagato, cipa Kevin wartz, " 'Ily, istrative Sec ary 4 III. EDGE OF GI Greenwood < the Pledge of Allegiance. Y IV. SUM OF C CIL ACTION Mr. Tony Principal Planner, summarized pertinent February 11, 2016, City Council a ions. V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 VI. CONSENT CALENDAR A. MINUTES of the Regular Planning Commission meeting of January 19, 2016. Rec: Approve as presented. B. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION to merge four existing parcels at 73-703 Highway 111 (APN 627-212-003). Case No. PMW 15-326 (Ray Rodriguez, Casuelas Cafe, Palm Desert, Applicant). Rec: Approve as presented. C. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION to mere rio is into one at 45-400 Larkspur Lane (APNs 627-262-008 & 6 -011). No. PMW 15-365 (El Paseo Hotel, LLC, El Dorado Hills ornia, Applica Rec: Approve as presented. Approved. 3-0-1 (AYES: Campbell, d Pradetto; NOES: None; ABSTAINED: Greenwood). D. REQUEST FOR CONSI o adjus t line between two existing lots at 125 & 119 Netas Co (AP 80- 771-280-015). Case No. PMW 16-012 - killing, D ni , Applicant). Rec: Ap as pre ted Chair Gree d state ould b staining on Item C, Parcel Map Waiver No. PMW 15- a y hair Campbell, second by Commissioner DeLuna, and a 4-0 'of the PI a C' ission, the remainder of the Consent Calendar was app ,x' as presente YES. pbell, DeLuna, Greenwood, and Pradetto; NOES: None). VII. CON T ITEM LD OVER None VIII. NEW BUSINESS None 2 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\2-16-16.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to operate a new restaurant, Alps Village, within the Service Industrial zone located at 77-734 Country Club Drive, Suite F. Case No. CUP 15-382 (Robert H. Ricciardi Architects, Palm Desert, California, Applicant). Mr. Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report (staff report is available at www.cityofpalmdesert.org) and recommend approval of the CUP. He offered to answer any questions. Vice Chair Sonia Campbell clarified that there w o alcohol served on the restaurant patio. Mr. Swartz responded that there would ohol served a patio. He said the applicant received approval from epartment of Alco nd Beverage Control. He noted that the applicant d need to ost two sign t state "No Alcohol Beyond this Point." He point the s" 11n to indicate r e locations for the signs. He also noted that the ad ess owners approved of the patio location. Commissioner Nancy DeLun s he ho om 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., seven days a week is consist with stab ents in the City of Palm Desert. Mr. Swartz r d that consi t for restaurants. He mentioned that the applicant most lik '' close a 'dnight. However, down the road as they get busier, plica not wa o have a condition that would limit their hours. iss os radetto affirmed that the restaurant does not have to be en until 2: m., that they could be open at any time during the hours ecified. Mr': rtz replied t is correct. Vice C a clarified that there is a condition that states no amplified music is a Mr. Swartz replied that is correct. Commissioner DeLuna inquired if amplified music relates to a live band or pre- recorded music. Mr. Swartz responded any live bands. However, the applicant would need to apply for a separate Entertainment Permit for music. He said with this Conditional Use Permit request, there is a condition that no amplified music is allowed. 3 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\2-16-16.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 Commissioner Pradetto commented that there is not a lot of space for amplified music. Chair Greenwood referred to the demarcation line shown on the plan, and noted that it is incorrect for the indication of liquor beverages on the patio. What needs to transpire is the column line to the glass line is where the demarcation line essentially should be located. Mr. Swartz replied that is correct. Chair Greenwood inquired if there was any feedba the adjacent business owners. Mr. Swartz responded that staff did not rece' a y feedb Chair Greenwood declared the public hearin and asked for a iblic testimony IN FAVOR or OPPOSITION. MR. EDDIE SANIN, Alps Village owner, , California, commented that they have a huge support f the neighb business owners, and they are excited to have a new resta he area. Vice Chair Campbell asked th plica owns ther restaurant. MR. SANIN re inform , ommi that his family has owned a restaurant i many 20 ye e commented that he is supporting his family, an ned the re urant fo M. Chair Green a what he foresees happening in the ev the patio. SANIN' ere they plan on having sports events in the restaurant. h mentioned bus owners in the area like to stop by for a cold rage and ap zers. a feels the restaurant would be a nice place and pe I. Chair G o- o ed if all televisions would be inside the establishment. MR. SANIN r ied that is correct. Commissioner Del-una inquired if the television would be located centrally around the bar rather than on the exterior walls close to the outside of the building. MR. SANIN answered that the televisions are already hanging on the inside walls. 4 G1Planning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\2-16-16.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 Mr. Swartz interjected that there is a television hanging above the bar. He referred to the plan, and pointed to the areas where other televisions are located. Commissioner DeLuna asked if the televisions would all be on the same channel or different channels. MR. SANIN responded that the televisions could be set to different channels or events. Commissioner Pradetto asked the applicant if they are for business. MR. SANIN replied yes. Commissioner Pradetto questioned why t p lication efore the Planning Commission. Mr. Bagato explained that per the or ce, the a licant was i approved for a small takeout restaurant (less th 000 s feet, with on 12 tables). However, during the construction proce licant decided to expand the restaurant. For a larger re urant, the ant needed a Conditional Use Permit. Commissioner DeLuna asked het city ` restaurant. MR. SANIN an side a the p Chair Gre od inquire each o f the delineations for the patio seating is one seat. M repli air Green affir that parking is not a concern. X wartz replie t is c ect. With no fu estimon ered, Vice Chair Greenwood declared the public hearing closed. Commission radetto commented that parking is always an issue. While looking over the staff report, he thought parking would be an issue. However, he never hears if there are adequate bike racks. He stated that they have a bias towards motor vehicles and accommodating vehicles, which encourages more vehicle use. He asked how the City could become more sustainable if they maintain a bias towards motor vehicles. Chair Greenwood agreed with Commissioner Pradetto. Because he works with development projects, he mentioned new projects moving forward are under 5 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\2-16-16.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 review of the California Green Code. The code requires a ratio of the overall parking development to be allocated for bike racks. They are also seeing more mandatory electric car stations on commercial development. Vice Chair Campbell commented that most of the businesses in the area close at 5:00 p.m. and she does not see a problem with parking in the evening hours. Chair Greenwood thought it was a valid project for the location. His only concern would be noise for the residential homes. He stated that the City receives noise complaints, the applicant would be sensitive a ake the necessary adjustments to meet those concerns. Vice Chair Campbell moved to waive furt ea and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2662, approving e No. C 15-382, subject to conditions. Motion was seconded by Commissi radetto and d by a 4-0 vote (AYES: Campbell, DeLuna, Greenwood, and tto; NOES: None). The Planning Commission congratu the X ant, and tha • `d him for doing business in Palm Desert. B. REQUEST FOR CONSIAkOZION of a r mendation to the City Council for a Zoning Ordinance A` n ZOA) dify Palm Desert Municipal Code Chapter 25 to allow kee ingl ily residential zones with certain regulat' Case N OA o alm Desert, Palm Desert, California, Mr. Baga ve a Po oint pr ntation, reviewing the staff report (staff report is a le at cit of a sert.or ). He offered to answer any questions. iss ° r ra asked how far bees travel from the beehive. Bagato resp ed t es could travel up to three miles, but generally one o miles. Com oner Pr o questioned if the flight path could be controlled. Mr. Bagat at you cannot control the flight path. He noted that the beehive entrance mu ce away from adjacent neighbors. Commissioner Pradetto asked if a six-foot wall is significant to control the bees. Mr. Bagato replied probably not. He said other ordinances he researched required a six-foot wall. He mentioned that a wall does not have to be six feet. If a wall is four feet, they could add landscaping. 6 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\2-16-16.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 Commissioner Pradetto inquired if re-queening every two years prevents swarming. Mr. Bagato responded that re-queening could help prevent or reduce the possibility of bees swarming. Commissioner Pradetto inquired if there were any comments related to the re- queening provision. Mr. Bagato said that one of the subcommittee me was in favor of the provision of re-queening every two years. However, ked to a planner for the City of Santa Monica. Santa Monica, originally h ovision in the ordinance, but they decided to remove it. Experienced b pe anted the flexibility of re-queening, if the beehive(s) was doing we Commissioner Pradetto asked if the s ;' mmittee considere t by targeting novice beekeepers, they may be p zing sour of the mor psoned and experienced beekeepers that know w e qu es need to b anged. Mr. Bagato answered that a of the s mittee members has been a beekeeper for 30 years, an mmende two-year re-queening. He said the provision is meant to be e < ent is f there is a nuisance with a swarm. Commissioner estion a cha g of a queen is monitored. Mr. Baga plained th a beek r must maintain adequate records and show proof queen' C er clarifie a beekeeper would be forced to buy a an ent eipt or records. 4 Bagato repli at i ect. Co sioner Pra o assumed that swarming could be exacerbated by poor beek g practi However, good beekeeping practices would limit swarming regardl w er provisions are added to the ordinance. Mr. Bagato I ved that to be correct. He noted that bees swarm if a beehive gets too big. There is a provision that would allow a beekeeper to bring in a temporary beehive to help eliminate a swarm or catch a swarm. He stated that the provisions are extreme precautions in the event a beehive(s) become a nuisance. Commissioner Pradetto inquired if the ordinance applies to the hillside areas. Mr. Bagato replied that is correct.. 7 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\2-16-16.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 Commissioner Pradetto asked if a beekeeper had a five-acre property, would they be limited to four beehives. Mr. Bagato replied that is correct. He said that currently there is no limit in the Residential Estates or Hillside zones. Staff developed one standard for two or four beehives. Commissioner Pradetto commented that for a property on the hillside and it is five acres, the ordinance states the beehives should be ' the backyard which is not applicable for the hillside. Mr. Bagato agreed that the hillside is a little subje Commissioner Pradetto asked if there was iscussio arding beehives in the backyard for hillside properties. Mr. Bagato replied no. He said the to, dictates t developme eneral. Commissioner DeLuna pointed to a p r beehive in the PowerPoint presentation, and asked if th,- >'t is a typica ve. Mr. Bagato replied that it is a e ' ive. Commissioner De inquire her ' er a number of bees in any particular beehi Mr. Bagat ied he di t know. mentioned that beehive supers could be added, whi uId inc r he size a beehive. C er stated eoretically a beekeeper could have two es 0, uare-foot lot; however, the beehives could be gigantic d have tho ds o s within two beehives to accomplish the same as four aller beehive he a if that is correct. Or could you limit the number of kept in the s of the eehive? Mr. o respo that they are not limiting the number of bees. If a beehive would g bi ould probably swarm and create another beehive. He noted that he do ve that specific information. Commissioner DeLuna inquired if there are bee farms. Mr. Bagato replied that there are bee farms. Bee farms are usually associated with regular farms because they help pollinate the crops. He communicated there is still a major decline, and most of the commercial beekeeping is done on farms. He referred to an article included in the staff report, and noted that urban beekeeping is doing better than agriculture beekeeping. One reason is there is a lack of pesticides in an urban environment. 8 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\2-16-16.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 Commissioner DeLuna asked if the City would check on the beehives that they are in compliance. What are the recourses if a beekeeper violates the ordinance? Mr. Bagato said that if the City receives a complaint, the beehive would have to be inspected by a Code Officer or a Planner to make sure the beehive(s) meet the regulations. If the beehive is considered a nuisance, the City would fine the beekeeper and could ultimately have the beehive removed. He stated that they are not going to require the registration of beehives, and they would not go out to inspect the beehive when they first come in. The only ti e they would inspect a beehive is when there is a complaint. Commissioner DeLuna asked how the two-year ning process would be monitored. Mr. Bagato communicated that if there i mplaint, the eeper would be asked to provide documentation of the eening. He noted f the queen is purchased, the beekeeper would ne eep a co of the rece Commissioner DeLuna inquired if the Ci ve a beekeeper remove their operation, if they do not co Mr. Bagato responded tha ive is uisance and not deemed appropriate to code, the Ci uld re through an abatement process. Commission Luna erstoo t staff researched the Administrative Use Permit an ditional Permit cess, and asked if staff decided against that proces i Mr `� rep l t is corr a said the subcommittee discussed the p an y felt it was best to introduce the ordinance and allow ckyard be R ing. y issues would arise, staff could make modifications the ordinanc the e. He mentioned that the subcommittee believes would not b of of ople that would want to do beekeeping. Com oner D a affirmed that staff could modify or introduce new regulati if t, as a need to change the ordinance. For example, adding the Admini se Permit process. Mr. Bagato replied that is correct. Vice Chair Campbell asked if the only complaints would come from the surrounding neighbors. Mr. Bagato replied that is correct. 9 G:\Planning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\2-16-16.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 Vice Chair Campbell asked if the bees fly two to three miles, how do they know which beehive is theirs. Mr. Bagato responded that the bees are tied to the queen, and they know how to communicate with each other. Therefore, they know which beehive is theirs. Chair Greenwood questioned if there was any feedback on time that would need to be allocated by Code Compliance by having backyard beekeeping as part of the ordinance. Mr. Bagato replied no. He said that other cities a g backyard beekeeping have not had many issues. He communica the biggest issue is perception. If the City required an Administrati a it, they would need to notify the neighbors and consequently the i bors w et scared without realizing what is really happening with th s. Other Citi talked to said it was a matter of educating the public, a plans to work o Chair Greenwood asked what the Ci oing in terms of cating the public. Mr. Bagato explained that ordinance proved by the City Council, it would be published in the ne a 30 day en the ordinance goes into effect, there would be a publi leas ap d media), City's website, handouts, and the tSide. Chair Green . com ed tha omeone is going to buy a home and they do their d gence in t s of pu sing the home, there would be nothing to let them kn at an nt home er is a beekeeper by right of the zone. He asked if th a is hen staff did their research. aga on at other cities he spoke to did not have any issues. He F ted that p ha take precautions if they are allergic to bees; bees uld bean h n th ronment. Ch reenwood stioned if the ordinance needs to specifically state the size of a 've. Mr. Bagat ded that he could research the size of beehives before it goes to the City C Acil. Commissioner Del-una interjected that she feels the size of a beehive is a valid issue. Vice Chair Campbell asked if there is a requirement in the ordinance that a beekeeper must notify the neighbors of the beehives. Mr. Bagato replied no. 10 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\2-16-16.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 Commissioner Pradetto asked if the City has received complaints about unpermitted beekeeping now. Mr. Bagato responded that staff received an inquiry to find out if beekeeping was allowed on a 10,000-square-foot lot because the beekeeper notified his neighbors to let them know of the beehives. He noted there was not an issue with the beehives; the neighbor was worried having a beehive next door. Commissioner Pradetto clarified that the only way they ould find out about a beehive being a nuisance is through a complaint. Mr. Bagato replied yes. Commissioner DeLuna asked if beekeeper o Id be a d to have a honey business out of their home. Mr. Bagato answered yes. He sai is allowe by the Sta California. However, with a Home Base Busines rmit, t ty requires th he sale of honey is done online, at a farmer's mark fairs. Chair Greenwood asked if uId be a fit for the beekeeper to notify the adjacent homeowners. Mr. Bagato respo that the co brLnnt . ant to add a regulation to the ordinance eeper otify t djacent homeowners. In his personal opi it wo a goo. r a neighbor to know. However, it would create an tion for a. sue tha not an issue. He repeated again it has a lot to do wit ceptio C woo d his con out not being notified by a neighbor that ee a quired if the subcommittee should discuss the matter her. agato said t at thi oint the subcommittee made their recommendation to ave a req ment to notify the neighbors. The Planning Commission coul ort the ommendation, deny the recommendation, or recommend change e ance. He explained that he would add it to the staff report to the City C nd they could discuss the notification process to neighbors. Commissioner DeLuna asked what the subcommittee's objection to the notification or disclosure is. Mr. Bagato responded that if there is a notification, inherently the neighbor(s) would be opposed to the beehive(s). If they are not notified, there is a chance there would not be an issue. 11 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\2-16-16,docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 Vice Chair Campbell inquired if there is an issue, could the beehive be removed from the property? Mr. Bagato replied yes, if the beehive is deemed a health or public safety issue. The City could have the beehive removed through an abatement process. Chair Greenwood expressed the importance of educating the public, and noted that he would like to be notified if his neighbor was going to do beekeeping in his backyard. Commissioner DeLuna commented that in theory, ' re were 10 houses in a row, she asked if all 10 houses could have beehi . Mr. Bagato replied that is correct. Commissioner DeLuna recognized the ssity of bees to th ironment and understands the benefits. She voice concern neighbors n ing notified that beehive(s) are next door to them. Mr. Bagato reiterated that if Planning sion recommended changes to the ordinance, he would he chang n his staff report to the City Council. Commissioner Pr asked w ci s required notification of beehive(s) bas resea Mr. Bagat ponded t he stud approximately 12 ordinances, and about half of them ired a or notifi C . er P also as aff talked to those cities about the permit Oil ro t Bagato repli a on ked to a city in the Los Angeles area. They required F. mit, but he d not re II if they required notification. Corn oner Pr. 'to inquired if there is a list of people that want to start backyar ke once the ordinance goes into effect. Mr. Bagato r ed no. Vice Chair Campbell commented that she does not feel comfortable having too many homes with beehives in one area. She said a certain amount of beehives should be allowed per square miles. Chair Greenwood declared the public hearing open and asked for any public testimony IN FAVOR or OPPOSITION. 12 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\2-16-16.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 With no testimony offered, Vice Chair Greenwood declared the public hearing closed. Commissioner Pradetto asked staff if anyone could have a garage band in a residential area. Mr. Bagato replied technically that is correct. Commissioner Pradetto noted that technically everyone in his neighborhood could have a garage band. He pointed out that people ave the right to do it; however, not everyone is going to have a garage b e feels the same for beekeeping; not everyone is going to be a beeke Commissioner Pradetto stated that the only people that are going to do ing are the people who care enough to do it well. Realistically, he do t neighborhood full of bees. If someone wants to do beekeeping . ' h prope y own by right, he supports the ordinance. Chair Greenwood commented that h- uld suppo - the ordinan eekeepers notify adjacent homeowners, and a staff her researc a size of beehives. Following a brief discussio size of ives, Commissioner Pradetto believed that the subcommit a han approach. He felt that they should give people the freedo do y kn ow to do, and punish the bad actors. He sa' t they c do or ance, and focus more on penalizing the ther th g to re e everything in the hope that nuisances n ccur. Commissio eLuna wledge a benefit bees are to the environment, and the need I k c tion in the country and in the City of P Ho she is c ed not knowing what the size a beehive tY e. sta at she would also like some type of notification. She sported th ina ut is concerned for the public that is allergic to bee ngs. Co sioner Pra o interjected and moved to 1) Add a notification process to adja I roperty ners; 2) Make a correction to Exhibit A; Item C; No. 5, changin ,00 uare feet to 20,000 square feet; 3) Amend the Planning Commis tion to allow a maximum of eight (8) beehives on hillside properties th ' re five (5) acres or larger. Commissioner DeLuna asked if all hillside lots are larger than ordinary residential lots. Commissioner Pradetto responded that large lots are mandatory five acres minimum. 13 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\2-16-16.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 Mr. Bagato noted that not all lots are five acres. There are some lots in BIGHORN and Stone Eagle that are smaller than five acres, which they both have Development Plans and are exempt from different regulations. Commissioner Pradetto continued with his motion to 4) Remove the requirement to re-queen beehive colonies every two (2) years; and 5) Remove the requirement to have a six-foot fence/wall. Vice Chair Campbell stated it is currently mandatory to h e a six-foot wall. Mr. Bagato clarified that a six-foot wall is mandatory ew construction. Commissioner DeLuna asked why they should , ov K rovision to re-queen every two years. She inquired if it is punitive Mr. Bagato replied it could be punitive ' eehive is a nuisa Commissioner Pradetto stated that if keep ; perating and bothering anybody, why require beekeepers to c r practices. If the beehive(s) become a nuisance, the bee er would alized. Commissioner DeLuna aske t It to re n. Commissioner Pr respon th to it is not necessary, and beekeepers w not to a qu hat is doing the job. If the queen is not the jo hen th ange the queen. Commissio eLuna she do' of have a problem with a six-foot fence because she i r � n k od 'ected that the provision also allows for a landscape r rrier. missioner P tto m ed to waive further reading and adopt Planning Commiss esolution 2663, approving Case No. ZOA 16-40, with the following amendmen Add a fication process to adjacent property owners; 2) Make a correction to A ' it T C; No. 5, changing 10,000 square feet to 20,000 square feet; 3) Amend ning Commission resolution to add a provision to allow a maximum of eight eehives on hillside properties that are five (5) acres or larger; and 4) Remove the requirement to re-queen beehive colonies every two (2) years. Motion was seconded by Vice Chair Campbell and carried by a 4-0 vote (AYES: Campbell, DeLuna, Greenwood, and Pradetto; NOES: None). Chair Greenwood thanked the subcommittee and staff for working on the beekeeping ordinance. 14 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\2-16-16.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 XI. MISCELLANEOUS A. APPOINTMENT of a Planning Commissioner to the Cannabis Ad Hoc Subcommittee. Mr. Bagato reported that the City Council approved the ordinance to prohibit cannabis dispensaries and cultivation. However, they requested that staff removes the prohibition on the delivery of medical marijuana. He made clear that it does not technically allow delivery at this time. The Cit Council also requested that staff form a Cannabis Ad Hoc Subcommittee dress the delivery of medical marijuana. Chair Greenwood responded that he would b b n the subcommittee, unless another Commissioner was more int : t d. Commissioner DeLuna moved to appJ air Greenwood t"' Cannabis Ad Hoc Subcommittee. Motion was seconded 11 ce Chair mpbell and ed by a 4-0 vote (AYES: Campbell, DeLuna, Greenwood, Prad OES: None). XII. COMMITTEE MEETING UP TES A. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES Vice Chair Camp orted t the ces Commission selected an artist to cr ign fo ffic s cabinets on the corner of Magnesia F rive a Portola enue. They also selected an artist to be included i 'registry. B. PARKS & h5. GENERAL & IFIC PLAN UPDATE Mr. ato inform he Planning Commission that staff met with legal counsel to dis concer ith the Environmental Impact Report. The remainder of the Genera is ing forward. He mentioned he is working on a Specific Plan that is ties eneral Plan. XIII. COMMENTS Commissioner DeLuna commented that she wanted to go back to the beekeeping item. She asked if anything was added about determining the size of beehives. Mr. Bagato responded that the direction from Chair Greenwood was to further study the size of beehives, which he would do before it goes to the City Council. 15 G:\Planning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\2-16-16.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 Chair Greenwood asked for an update on the empty seat for the Planning Commission. Mr. Bagato replied that the City Clerk recently put a notice in The Desert Sun for the vacancy. It would probably take another month to fill the seat. Commissioner DeLuna inquired if there is an interview process. Mr. Bagato said there is usually an interview with the City Council. XIV. ADJOURNMENT With the Planning Commission concurrence, it wood adjourned the meeting at 7:26 p.m. JOHN OD, VICE CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: RYAN STENDELL, ETA PALM DESERT P ING CON, e ISSIO MO 'REILL O G SECRETARY 16 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\2-16-16.docx CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REQUEST: CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) FOR THE PLACEMENT OF A DONATION RECYCLING STATION WITHIN THE WESTFIELD PARKING LOT LOCATED AT 72-840 HIGHWAY 111 SUBMITTED BY: Eric Ceja, Associate Planner APPLICANT: Green Education Foundation 1177 Branham Lane #198 San Jose, CA 95118 CASE NO: CUP 16-011 DATE: March 1, 2016 CONTENTS: 1. Draft Planning Commission Resolution No. 2664 2. Legal Notice 3. Applicant's Statement of Use 4. Plans and Exhibits Recommendation Waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2664, approving CUP 16-011 for the placement of a donation recycling station in the Westfield Palm Desert parking lot. Executive Summary Staff is asking the Planning Commission to make a "use determination" in accordance with the Palm Desert Municipal Code. Use determinations are necessary for land uses not specifically identified in the Use Matrix for Commercial and Industrial Districts; such as this request for the placement of a donation station within a commercial district. Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission approve this type of use as a conditional use in the Planned Commercial (P.C.) zoning district, consistent with similar and existing uses within these zones. Approval of the CUP will allow the Green Education Foundation to place a "Neighborhood Donation Recycling Station (N.D.R.S) within the Westfield Palm Desert parking lot. The placement of this station is within an underutilized portion of the mall's parking lot, located adjacent to other commercial uses, and does not interfere with vehicle circulation in the vicinity. Staff Report CUP 16-011: Green Education Foundation Page 2 of 3 March 1, 2016 Background A. Property Description: Westfield Palm Desert is a nearly one million-square-foot regional mall located on 62 acres, bounded by Town Center Way to the west, Monterey Avenue to the east, Highway 111 to the south, and residential neighborhoods to the north. The mall was originally constructed in 1982 and was known at the "Palm Desert Town Center." In 1999, Westfield America Inc., purchased the mall and renamed it "Westfield Palm Desert." B. General Plan Designation and Zoning: General Plan: Regional Commercial (C-R) Zoning: Planned Regional Commercial (P.C. — 3) C. Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North: P.C. 3 / S.P. - Town Center Plaza South: P.C. 3 / S.P. - Planned Regional Commercial East: P.C. 3/ S.P. / R-1 - Planned Regional Commercial / Single-Family Homes West: P.C. 3 / S.P. - Planned Regional Commercial Project Description The applicant wishes to place a manufactured "Neighborhood Donation Recycling Station" (N.D.R.S.) within the north parking lot at the Westfield Palm Desert. The donation station allows residents to donate items, such as clothing, shoes, and other household items in a safe and convenient manner. The station consists of a 20-foot by 8-foot shipping container modified with donation chutes, touch screen display, security camera system, and solar panels. The container is painted brown and beige with panels and signs to increase the aesthetic appearance of the station. Analysis Table 25.16.-1 "Use Matrix for Commercial and Industrial Districts" of the Palm Desert Municipal Code (P.D.M.C.) lists permitted, conditionally permitted, and prohibited land uses for each commercial and industrial zoning district in the City. Uses not listed in this table may request that the Planning Commission make a "Use Determination" in accordance with Section 25.72.20. Use determinations do not amend the P.D.M.C. and do not add any new land uses to the use matrix. However, should the Planning Commission support this use staff will bring back a Zoning Ordinance Amendment in the future. A. Land Use Compatibility: GAPlanning\Eric Ceja\Case Files\CUP\CUP 16-011-Green Ed.Fnd\CUP 16-011-PC Staff Report.doc Staff Report CUP 16-011: Green Education Foundation Page 3 of 3 March 1, 2016 The proposed donation recycling station is similar to other existing recycling stations within the City, including facilities located at Albertsons on Deep Canyon and the Monterey Shore Shopping Center. Manufactured containers with exterior modifications and aesthetic enhancements are placed within larger shopping centers where excess parking exists. These containers are primarily used as recycling centers with one (1) or fewer employees present at any given time. These low intensity uses have few employees, generate few vehicular trips per day, are placed in areas not readily visible from surrounding public streets, and are secured and monitored via on-site security or a security camera system. At this particular location, the station is placed within an underutilized portion of parking area and is not visible from surrounding public streets. Improvements to the site are minor, and the use of the donation station is similar to other uses at existing shopping centers and existing commercial uses at the mall. The unit is screened by a block wall and landscape from adjacent residential units to the east. Noise, lighting, and aesthetic impacts to adjacent residential homes are expected to be minor. B. Site Improvements: The applicant will place the manufactured unit within designated parking stalls and outside of the vehicular travel-way. Bollards will be placed around the station to prohibit vehicle contact with the container. No striping or landscape improvements will accompany the unit. C. Findings of Approval: Findings in support of this proposal are contained in the Planning Commission Resolution attached to this report. Environmental Review This project has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has found this project to be categorically exempt, under Class 32: In-fill Development, of the CEQA. Because of the categorical exemption no further environmental review is necessary. Submitted By: �'.---�_ 1. ✓�.. Eric Ceja, Asso iate Planner ,i Department Head: Ryan Stendell, Director of Community Development GAPlanning\Eric Ceja\Case Files\CUP\CUP 16-011-Green Ed.Fnd\CUP 16-011-PC Staff Report.doc PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2664 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) FOR THE PLACEMENT OF A DONATION RECYCLING STATION WITHIN THE WESTFIELD PALM DESERT PARKING LOT LOCATED AT 72-840 HIGHWAY 111 CASE NO: CUP 16-011 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 1st day of March 2016, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by the Green Education Foundation for approval of the above noted; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the request in accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 25.72.020 "Use Determinations" and Section 25.72.050 "Conditional Use Permits"and determined that similar types of uses, including recycling collection centers, exist within the City and are compatible with larger commercial shopping centers; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, has adopted the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Sustainability Plan" on February 11, 2010, which contains goals to increase the City's diversion rate into local landfills and that this proposal will aid in achieving this goal; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act," Resolution No. 2015-75, the Director of Community Development has determined that the project will not have a negative impact on the environment and qualifies as a Class 32 Categorical Exemption for the purposes of CEQA; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the approval of said request: FINDINGS OF APPROVAL: 1. That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accordance with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. The zoning designation for this property is Planned Regional Commercial (P.C.3), which allows for a wide range of principal and accessory commercial land uses. Other similar types of accessory commercial uses, including recycling collection centers, are located in these types of zoning districts because of excess parking and convenience for residents. This particular location is well PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2664 suited for a donation center as it is located in an area frequently underutilized by vehicle parking, and does not impact vehicle traffic or circulation at the site. On- site and remote monitoring of the site ensures that problems such as debris, vandalism and graffiti, are addressed immediately. 2. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The placement of the donation station, at this location, will not impact pedestrian or vehicular patterns at the shopping center. The site is monitored via on-site security and 24-hour video surveillance. All vandalism, debris, or graffiti can be responded to and removed by mall security and the applicant within 24 hours. In addition, the facility is screened by an existing block wall and landscape, and will be minimally visible to surrounding residential properties. Nothing in this proposal is considered to materially impact the public health, safety, or welfare. 3. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this title, except for approved variances or adjustments. The proposed facility is similar to uses within other commercial shopping districts. The facility complies with the development standards for the Planned Regional Commercial zoning district in that the structure is setback from the property line at a distance equal to its height, and that the height of the structure does not exceed the height permitted by the zoning district. The placement of the facility does not impede vehicular or pedestrian mobility through the site and no variance or adjustments apply to this proposal. 4. That the proposed conditional use complies with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City's general plan. The proposed donation station complies with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan and the Palm Desert Environmental Sustainability Plan. The facility is integrated well into the existing 62-acre regional mall site, does not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian circulation, and compliments the surrounding commercial and automotive uses in the vicinity. In addition, the facility is conveniently located to meet the community's needs and does not disrupt existing operations at the mall site. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission in this case. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2664 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit 16-011, subject to conditions attached. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, at its regular meeting held on the 1st day of March 2016, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN GREENWOOD, CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: RYAN STENDELL, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2664 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. CUP 16-011 Department of Community Development: 1. The improvements, placement, and design of the donation and recycling station shall substantially conform to the exhibits on file with the Department of Community Development, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Any proposed changes to this CUP will require an amendment, which will result in a new public hearing. 3. The placement of the donation station shall not interfere with vehicular traffic patterns at the site. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: • City Fire Marshall • Department of Building and Safety Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated. 5. The applicant shall monitor the site 24 hours a day either remotely or in person. All debris, graffiti, and left out items shall be cleared and removed from the site within 24 hours. 6. Any and all lighting shall conform to P.D.M.C. Section 24.16 "Outdoor Lighting Requirements." Building Department: 7. This project shall comply with the latest adopted edition of the following codes: A. 2013 California Building Code and its appendices and standards. B. 2013 California Plumbing Code and its appendices and standards. C. 2013 California Mechanical Code and its appendices and standards. D. 2013 California Electrical Code. E. 2013 California Energy Code. F. 2013 California Green Building Standards Code. G. Title 24, California Code of Regulations. H. 2013 California Fire Code and its appendices and standards. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2664 8. A disabled access overlay of the precise grading plan is required to be submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan review of the site accessibility requirements as per 2013 CBC Chapters 11A & B (as applicable) and Chapter 10. 9. All contractors and subcontractors shall have a current City of Palm Desert Business License prior to permit issuance per Palm desert Municipal Code, Title 5. 10.All contractors and/or owner-builders must submit a valid Certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance coverage prior to the issuance of a building permit per California Labor Code, Section 3700. 5 1 y LM H I � 73-51 o FRED WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL: 760 346—o6ii FAX: 760 341-7098 info@palm-desert.org CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CUP 16-011 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE PLACEMENT OF A DONATION RECYCLING STATION WITHIN THE WESTFIELD PALM DESERT PARKING LOT LOCATED AT 72-840 HIGHWAY 111 The City of Palm Desert (City), in its capacity as the Lead Agency for this project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), has determined that this project is Categorically Exempt from CEQA review under Class 32 — 15332 Infill Development Project. Project Location/ Description: Project Location: 72-840 Highway 111 —Westfield Palm Desert Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit application has been submitted by the Green Education Foundation for the placement of a donation recycling station within the parking lot of the Westfield Palm Desert. The donation station is a repurposed shipping container with solar panels, touch screens and camera system. The station is secured and monitored 24-hours a day by camera. Donation items left outside of the station will be removed within four (4) hours. Recommendation: Staff is recommending approval for the placement of this donation recycling station within the Westfield Palm Desert parking lot subject to Conditions. Public Hearing: The public hearing will be held before the Planning Commission on March 1, 2016, at 6:00 pm. Comment Period: Based on the time limits defined by CEQA, your response should be sent at the earliest possible date. The public comment period on this project is from February 19, 2016 to March 1, 2016. Public Review: The Conditional Use Permit and related documents are available for public review daily at City Hall. Please submit written comments to the Planning Department. If any group challenges the action in court, issues raised may be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence at, or prior to the Planning Commission hearing. All comments and any questions should be directed to: Eric Ceja, Associate Planner City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 (760) 346-0611 ecej a @cityofpal m desert.org PUBLISH: DESERT SUN RYAN STENDELL, Secretary February 19, 2016 Palm Desert Planning Commission (N.D.R.S) Operational Overview Overview The Neighborhood Donation Recycling Station (N.D.R.S.) was designed to collect donations of recyclable items such as clothes, shoes, books, small toys, and household items. Other methods to collect these materials are effective but have some limitations: 1. Municipal curbside collections-These programs usually collect textiles and shoes with other recyclables which result in contaminating the product and makes it unfeasible to recycle. 2. Thrift store operators—Only solicit gently worn clothing and U.S. grade collections for sale in their own thrift stores.Also their collection trailers have limited hours and limited drop off locations. 3. Unattended donation boxes -These boxes attract graffiti; have overflow problems, security problems, and theft problems. Studies have shown that in order to increase diversion rates of textiles, collection locations need to be convenient and available to the user. The "N.D.R.S." provides an easy and convenient way for people to recycle their used household items and textiles right where they shop, work, and live. The N.D.R.S. is a state of the art collection station that is monitored 24hours a day, collects all recyclables and is conveniently located in large shopping centers and shopping malls, or any area suited for its use (sites with high traffic count and parking lots large enough to accommodate a visible and accessible placement location). Construction The N.D.R.S. was designed to minimize the effects of new construction on our natural resources and on the shopping center. it is a "manufactured" prebuilt structure being delivered and installed on site. It can be relocated with ease and is not a permanent structure. The unit itself is a used 20 foot x 8 foot shipping container which we have repurposed into a donation /recycling station. The container is modified at the closest shipping port depot and then delivered and dropped on the agreed upon spot. Our crew will then assemble the bolt-on parts, solar system, touch screen, and camera system. This should take 1-2 days and will have minimal disturbance on the shopping center. Use Users will be able to use a security chute system to drop their items in the N.D.R.S. anytime that is convenient for them. They simply place their items in the chute and push the handle up and the items are deposited inside the container. Since there are 3 chutes, users will not need to wait in any line and will be able to quickly deposit their items and leave. All chutes are designed to block anyone from entering the container.There is also a Handicapped accessible chute to meet ADA regulations. Users will also have access to a touch screen display where they can register to receive their tax deductible donation receipt, receive a "thank you coupon" from a local retailer, or find out where to donate larger items such as furniture or appliances. Anticipated use will be 20-30 people daily. We do not anticipate any issues with users needing to wait or any significant impact on parking due to the 3 available chutes and the fact that the use of the station will be dispersed throughout the day. Service and.Maintenance All N.D.R.S.'s are serviced daily.This ensures a high level of quality maintenance.SeeNDRS service protocol. All N.D.R.S's are monitored "Live" 24 hours a day by our security staff. Therefore, any illegal dumping will be identified as it is happening and a driver will be dispatched to clear out the items within 4 hours maximum. Incidents of vandalism (graffiti) or attempted theft will be reported as it is happening to the shopping centers on-site security. Our security will also dispatch one of our drivers to repair any vandalism or graffiti within 12 hours of occurrence. N.D.R.S. Service Protocol Security Room Responsibilities 1. Monitor all N.D.R.S. locations 2. Initiate contact to GEF for Service by email and texting specified cell phone and calling the GEF service line and leaving a message, calling Supervisor(Subject to change) 3. Documenting all Service activity with "N.D.R.S. number", "date" and "time" on the Service Spreadsheet 4. Call Police or on-site Security for issues of vandalism, theft, loitering 5. All N.D.R.S. location's cameras checked 3 times daily and documented as functioning 6. Computer server checked 2 times daily Service 1: Daily 1. N.D.R.S. contents cleared from chutes and sorted into carts 2. All chutes and touch screen are wiped down 3. Outside N.D.R.S. is swept and cleared of any items left outside 4. N.D.R.S. is checked for damage and damage reported on service form. Service 2:As Needed 1. If the contents of the N.D.R.S. need to be picked up. (The contents will be weighed and both the driver and the site maintenance person will sign as agreeing on the weight of product removed) 2. All chutes and touch screen are wiped down. N.D.R.S. is checked for damage and damage reported on service form 3. Base and all framing (areas that dust collects) brushed off to remove accumulating dust 4. Graffiti reported by our security: on—site security called, all graffiti will be removed with a non-toxic graffiti remover, or touch up paint and sticker replacement will resolve any remaining graffiti. 5. Cameras system, touch screen, and solar system inspected and serviced every 6 months or as needed. "When Corporate deploys service it is tracked and followed up on to ensure completion of service.All weights are entered into the DVS and onto spreadsheet for reporting purposes. CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REQUEST: CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) FOR PARTIAL STREET VACATION OF SAN MARCOS AVENUE AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 32-STALL PUBLIC PARKING LOT WITH PERIMETER WALL, LANDSCAPE, AND LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS AT THE INTERSECTION OF SAN MARCOS AVENUE AND SAN CLEMENTE CIRCLE SUBMITTED BY: Eric Ceja, Associate Planner APPLICANT: City of Palm Desert, CA 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578 CASE NO: CUP 16-030 DATE: March 1, 2016 CONTENTS: 1. Draft Planning Commission Resolution No. 2665 2. Legal Notice 3. Applicant's Statement of Use 4. Plans and Exhibits Recommendation Waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2665, approving CUP 16-030 for the partial street vacation of San Marcos Avenue and the construction of a public parking lot with perimeter wall, landscape, and lighting improvements. Executive Summary Approval of the CUP will allow the City of Palm Desert to vacate a portion of public right-of- way at the intersection of San Marcos Avenue and San Clemente Circle and construct a 32- stall public parking lot with perimeter block wall, landscape, and lighting. This project will be constructed in conjunction with the approved improvements for Alessandro Alley (Alessandro). Staff Report CUP 16-030: City of Palm Desert Page 2 of 4 March 1, 2016 Background A. Property Description: San Marcos Avenue is a 60-foot wide public right-of-way that connects Highway 111 to San Clemente Circle. One hundred feet of San Marcos Avenue, from Alessandro to San Clemente Circle, will be vacated and merged with the two adjoining vacant lots. Each lot is approximately 6,000 square feet in area, and owned by the City of Palm Desert. B. General Plan Designation and Zoning: General Plan: Medium Density (R-M) Zoning: Residential Single-Family (R-1) C. Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North: Residential Single-Family (R-1) — Single-Family Homes South: C-1/ S.P., General Commercial - Various Commercial Businesses East: Residential Single-Family (R-1) - Single-Family Homes /Vacant Lots West: Residential Single-Family (R-1) — Single-Family Homes /Vacant Lots Proiect Description The City of Palm Desert wishes to construct a public parking lot on vacant residential properties owned by the City. The parking lot includes 32 new parking spaces, new landscaping, new lighting, an on-site retention basin, and a perimeter block wall and wrought-iron fence. The parking lot is part of the approved Alessandro project, which includes new paving, new curb and gutters, and new landscape for Alessandro from Las Palmas Avenue to Monterey Avenue. All improvements associated with the parking lot are consistent with the Alessandro project. Analysis The Palm Desert Municipal Code allows parking lots on residential properties, subject to approval of a CUP. Parking lots are evaluated for specific design criteria, such as parking stall dimensions, screening, and landscaping. In addition, a CUP application requires the Planning Commission to consider land use compatibility of the use with surrounding properties. A. Land Use Compatibility: The parking lot is adjacent to detached single-family homes to the west, east, and north. Vehicular access is provided directly from Alessandro and no vehicle access into the residential neighborhood. The parking lot configuration will eliminate all thru traffic within San Clemente Circle, and reduce the total number of vehicles that currently access this street. A pedestrian walkway is provided from the neighborhood and through the parking lot G:\Planning\Eric Ceja\Case Files\CUP\CUP 16-030-Alessandro West Parking Lot\CUP 16-030-PC Staff Report.doc Staff Report CUP 16-030: City of Palm Desert Page 3 of 4 March 1, 2016 to maintain pedestrian connectivity and provide a safe route through the lot and to nearby commercial uses along Highway 111. A six (6)-foot high decorative block wall is provided along the northern property line to screen noise and lighting impacts from vehicles. The screening complies with the City's standards for screening parking lots from residential properties, and staff supports the wall design and pedestrian opening. B. Site Improvements: The parking lot complies with the City of Palm Desert's standards for parking lot design, lighting, landscape, and screening. Driveways and aisle widths are 24 feet and 22 feet in width, which comply with the minimum aisle and driveway widths for two-way traffic. In addition, parking stall dimensions are nine (9) feet in width and eighteen (18) feet in length, and are marked using two "white" hairpin stripes. The design of the parking lot improvements for striping, parking stall and drive-aisle dimension comply with design standards for off-street parking set by the Municipal Code and Resolution 01-5. The City requires a minimum of 15 percent of total parking area be dedicated to landscape, and that at least 50 percent of parking stalls are shaded by trees within 10 years. As proposed, the total landscape area of the parking lot equates to 25 percent of the total parking area. The landscape consists of a mix of trees and shrubs, including Mexican Fan Palms, Mexican Birds of Paradise, Agave varieties, and Daleas. Ground covers such as cobble, boulders, and decomposed granite fill in the landscape space. A number of shade trees, including Tipuanas (14), and Palo Verdes (4), are provided within the parking area. These trees are commonly used in other parking lots around the city because they are fast growing and provide shade. Staff believes that the tree species and their placement are sufficient to provide 50 percent shade coverage of the lot within 10 years. Parking lot lighting is not required in the City of Palm Desert; however, staff supports parking lot lighting at this location. The improvements planned for Alessandro include lighting. A continuation of lighting into the parking lot not only provides nighttime security and visibility but maintains a consistent look and feel for the Alessandro project. All lighting fixtures are pole mounted to a height of 20 feet and are fully shielded to focus light downward and not into surrounding properties. The light source and shielding comply with the Municipal Code, and staff supports the lighting and light levels proposed with this parking lot. In addition, the screen wall and taller shade trees will block light further limiting lighting impacts on surrounding residents. C. Findings of Approval: Findings in support of this project can be made and are included in the resolution to the Planning Commission. Architectural Review The City's Architectural Review Commission reviewed the proposed parking lot improvements at their meeting on February 23, 2016, and unanimously approved the plans subject to: shade G:\Planning\Eric Ceja\Case Files\CUP\CUP 16-030-Alessandro West Parking Lot\CUP 16-030-PC Staff Report.doc Staff Report CUP 16-030: City of Palm Desert Page 4 of 4 March 1, 2016 trees being planted along San Clemente Circle, and boulders and additional landscape plantings in front of the wall opening to restrict vehicles from driving through the wall opening. Environmental Review This project has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff has found this project to be categorically exempt, under Class 11: Accessory Structures, of the CEQA. Because of the categorical exemption no further environmental review is necessary. Submitted By: Eric Ceja, Ass date Planner i Department Head: ko� Ryan Stendell, Director of Community Development GAPlanning\Eric Ceja\Case Files\CUP\CUP 16-030-Alessandro West Parking Lot\CUP 16-030-PC Staff Report.doc PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2665 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PUBLIC PARKING LOT WITH LANDSCAPE, LIGHTING, AND A PERIMETER BLOCK WALL AS PART OF THE APPROVED ALESSANDRO ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS, LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF SAN MARCOS AVENUE AND SAN CLEMENTE CIRCLE CASE NO: CUP 16-030 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 1st day of March 2016, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by the City of Palm Desert for approval of the above noted; and WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did, at their meeting on February 23, 2016, review the landscape and wall plans for the public parking lot and unanimously recommended approval of the plans to the Planning Commission subject to additional landscape requirements; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the request in accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 25.72.050 "Conditional Use Permits" and Section 25.10.030, and determined that public parking lots are a conditional use within the Residential Single-Family (R-1) zoning district; and WHEREAS, the City of Palm Desert General Plan contains specific goals and policies related to improving and enhancing vehicular access along Alessandro Alley and to make improvements to eliminate vehicle access at San Marcos Avenue and San Clemente Circle and to construct decorative block walls and install landscaping to buffer nearby residences; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, has approved plans for street and lighting improvements along the Alessandro Alley, and that the proposal to build a public parking lot along this portion of Alessandro Alley is a part of those planned improvements; and WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act," Resolution No. 2015-75, the Director of Community Development has determined that the project will not have a negative impact on the environment and qualifies as a Class 11 Categorical Exemption for the purposes of CEQA; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the approval of said request: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2665 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accordance with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. The zoning designation for these properties is Residential Single-Family (R-1). Section 25.10.030 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code lists commercial and office parking lots as conditional uses within the R-1 zoning district subject to their proximity to nearby commercial uses. Landscape and �eteening is required for parking lots and should include a three-foot (3) highrimeter block wall and 50 percent shade cover. The applicant has compliet �kt these requirements as a six (6)-foot high block wall is provided alon C)Oinente Circle and new landscape and shade trees are provided thrp6ghout the parking lot. ri w 2. That the proposed location of the conditioilal use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained �� if ,not be detrimental to the ��blic health, safety, or welfare, or be materially in�j40 to pT,ofties or improvements in the vicinity. ' r � h . The proposed improvementsEtNilt e-liml' ate cu t vehicle access from Highway 111 into the residential neighOrh�Se Tis should substantially reduce vehicle traffic within this portion of San`Glemente, le and p maintain the residential character of the nehborhood. Tr pakng 1qf t�y�llprovide new landscape and decorative per►rn ter via design thy#uvill improve 'the aesthetic condition of the currently vacaht'lots and` provide aT, attractive appearance that enhances the adjoining nek, borhood Fking lot fi g? ting is provided for additional security and all lighting imbinpvementstirere fplly sh1"d to reduce light impacts on adjoining residential properties xu 3 Th t the r Qsed No onditional use will comply with each of the applicable iovisions of this title, eX pt for approved variances or adjustments. 77 .. Tfte construction C� a publ'c parking lot at this location complies with the City's parkit10,lot design s�, dards and conditional use permit standards for this type of use Thy harking Ipts screened from adjoining residences, parking lot lighting is fully shielded, �nndscaping is provided to comply with the City's requirement for park'ingtiade trees. No variances or adjustments are required for this proposal. 4. That the proposed conditional use complies with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City's general plan. Goal 2, Policy 5 and 5A, of the City's General Plan Commercial Land Use descriptions encourages the redesign and enhancement of the Alessandro Alley, including improvements for vehicular access and parking. These policies call for 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2665 the closure of San Clemente Circle for vehicular traffic entering Alessandro Alley and San Marcos Avenue. These policies also call for landscape and decorative walls to buffer residents from traffic and parking impacts. The proposed improvements include the closure of San Marcos Avenue at San Clemente Circle, new decorative perimeter block walls, and new landscape. These improvements execute the policies contained within the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit 16-030, subject to conditions attached. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, at its regular meeting held on the 1st day of March 2016, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN GREENWOOD, CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: RYAN STENDELL, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2665 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. CUP 16-030 Department of Community Development: 1. The improvements, placement, and design of the perimeter walls, landscape and parking lot shall substantially conform to the exhibits on file with the Department of Community Development, as modified by the following conditions. Any proposed changes to this Conditional Use Permit will require an amendment, which will result in a new public hearing. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit for constructigh tofar? use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain pees and ",,-., clearance from the r _ following agencies: • City Fire Marshall • City Building Department T Evidence of said permit or clearance from thebc?V agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and j,afety at the time ►fissuance of a building permit for 1,73 the use contemplated. yk } 3. All parking lot lighting shall confalC to P Sect!",24.16 "Outdoor Lighting Requirements." $ M S 4. The applicant sh' comply r1 h the c itions recommended by the Architectural Review Commtg�on by plan fl g additioi a Hshade trees along San Clemente Circle and placing large�ouldersf� e wall oning to prohibit vehicles driving through the landscape r Departm`d"lit of B It'ding artd Safety: 77777 5. Tfi aroject shall cofttply with #} latest adopted edition of the following codes: P A. 20, 3, California ilding Code and its appendices and standards. B. 20 California ?umbing Code and its appendices and standards. C. 2013 Cliforr�ialllechanical Code and its appendices and standards. D. 2013 661 a Electrical Code. E. 2013 Cali Energy Code. F. 2013 California Green Building Standards Code. G. Title 24, California Code of Regulations. H. 2013 California Fire Code and its appendices and standards. 6. A disabled access overlay of the precise grading plan is required to be submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan review of the site accessibility requirements as per 2013 CBC Chapters 11A & B (as applicable) and Chapter 10. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2665 7. Detectable warnings shall be provided where required per CBC 11 B-705.1.2.5 and 11 B-705.1.2.2. The designer is also required to meet all ADA requirements. Where an ADA requirement is more restrictive than the State of California, the ADA requirement shall supersede the State requirement. 8. All contractors and subcontractors shall have a current City of Palm Desert Business License prior to permit issuance per Palm desert Municipal Code, Title 5. 9. All contractors and/or owner-builders must submit a validtCertificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance coverage prior to the issuange6 °a building permit per California Labor Code, Section 3700. .4 , Department of Public Works: . 10.Submit a grading plan to the Department o#gP1V"blic Works for rev and approval. Any changes to the approved civil or land ` a'e plans must be reviewed for approval prior to work commencing. s. 11. Identify all proposed and existing utilities on th " r�"'7J,n an. 12.Submit a PM10 application for a "' t„The appli�� shall comply with all provisions of Palm Desert Municipal Code Seti on 2 '1 regardi gitive Dust Control. } ,. >` 13.Abide by all provisi9r�S�Qf City of" alrt� csert ?tdmance 843, Section 24.20, Stormwater Manage Y Ark,,,Dischar �0'i,dinance. 13.Submit a final 1l ter Quality Managem t Plan (WQMP) for approval. The WQMP shall identify the� st Mac � t Practt (BMP) that will be used on the site to control predictable� I� ti�t�`rur � � F or to the is of grading permit, the Oper ttc�tl Maint i ce Section 6F� e approved final WQMP shall be recorded witpiunty'sRcprdeFice and a conformed copy shall be provided to the Dt�pdrtment of PubI� Wors 4 v I�-x 14. Subrnt landscape pin concurrently with the precise grading plan for review and a p p plicants dvised to use the City of Palm Desert Design Guide when designmg'� aras. Lands plans must meet the following criteria: �:. A. Must be Walter efficient in design and meet the City of Palm Desert's Water , Efficient L4, dscape Ordinance. B. Planting plans must show location of proposed and existing utilities. C. Must match approved civil plans. D. All specs and details must be site specific. E. Applicants must have CVWD approval of their irrigation plans prior to City approval. F. Applicants must have a stamp or signature from the County Agricultural Commissioner before City approval. 5 I I y 111 P M U I R I 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL: 76o 346—o6>ii FAX: 760 341-7098 info@palm-deserr.org CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. CUP 16-030 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PARTIAL VACATION OF SAN MARCOS AVENUE AND CONSTRUCTION OF A THIRTY-TWO STALL PUBLIC PARKING LOT AT THE INTERSECTION OF SAN CLEMENTE CIRCLE AND SAN MARCOS AVENUE The City of Palm Desert (City), in its capacity as the Lead Agency for this project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), has determined that this project is Categorically Exempt from CEQA review under Class 11 — 15311(b) Small parking lots. Project Location/ Description: Protect Location: 44-889 and 44900 San Clemente Circle (APNs 627-071-071 / 627-074-006) Proiect Description: A Conditional Use Permit application has been submitted by the City of Palm Desert for the partial vacation of public right-of-way (San Marcos Avenue) and the construction of a thirty-two (32) stall public parking lot with perimeter block walls, new landscape, and lighting improvements. Recommendation: Staff is recommending approval of the public parking lots as part of the overall Alessandro alley improvements subject to Conditions. Public Hearing: The public hearing will be held before the Planning Commission on March 1, 2016, at 6:00 pm. Comment Period: Based on the time limits defined by CEQA, your response should be sent at the earliest possible date. The public comment period on this project is from February 19, 2016 to March 1, 2016. Public Review: The Conditional Use Permit and related documents are available for public review daily at City Hall. Please submit written comments to the Planning Department. If any group challenges the action in court, issues raised may be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence at, or prior to the Planning Commission hearing. All comments and any questions should be directed to: Eric Ceja, Associate Planner City of Palm Desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 (760) 346-0611 eceja@cityofpalmdesert.org PUBLISH: DESERT SUN RYAN STENDELL, Secretary February 19, 2016 Palm Desert Planning Commission STATEMENT OF USE Alessandro West Parking Lot Improvements The Alessandro West Parking Lot Improvements consists of vacating a portion of San Marcos Avenue, between San Clemente Circle and Alessandro West and utilizing two single family lots owned by the City to create 32 public parking spaces. The public parking lot will include landscaping and LED parking lot lights and a retention basin. A new 5 foot high block wall will be installed on the San Clemente Circle frontage to restrict vehicular access. An opening in the block wall will provide pedestrian access from the residential neighborhood. Split rail fencing will be installed on the west and east sides of the parking lot. i U o w U o z �EgCi � gr !o N LLJ .�n4` a W O 'jilh- Z JO F V F W N � Y ~ �x� aag Z Xp w 1pt�y` i{ wo��Y/s_aZ,�UJ' �R ;is >_ x t F 3H9 0 � p Z{y ONy Wsi wggga LLJ a Qaoz IL LU Q a aaaaaa aLL a I I I I I I I i i A I _ I I I I I ! i j I I i i i I � I I I i I % I i % I � I � 1 i � t � i I � I a I I I wg I 8 � N S Is w a � s N 9wN AWnndg3i MRTCN LINE •_.C._.._/._. �- � g �{k��y��j � a 1 Ca LLJ V) U IS LLJ a� / 1 / 1 § u U _ Z u � o O M c w Q J W N M cn a m 0 l 9 tj Q r Q � a T � Q m M '- Q EE a m m U � - a - \ I L:iLr� w q m � U m u (f) � m w o � w � Q '51 Wo Y Q a 3: w '2 " 4 z o do 'idgsll � W a Wb'd N ;� - Q� B a ' `u oLLO W1S�M OK1NbSS]]b = a a �R U m J o O :1-1 ON." r z I0 °o aa. tu L . o aU wvtu Nb�d ONIlNb�d w ° FUh _ W =31111133HS g o O U a O In a vl 3 V3HV > o .......i ... . .............. o \ a •�--.- 0'9-1-UV3NV See 82 c a • ° � � - a- �e� 8�88 w w Q 8 w 1 Q €mamY s U 8 SN g 3 �. � _ £ E i 0 a32€g aE € I ° � 'smmB22m8 Z dams �: ms ,O ° N A Q ° O W v _ v J p = n U co a. cn CO z zr 4z m o y < pu w FF �N W gift j p U b Z * W U z_Q Z F Zi q QZ -• mpZ -z N� S nz—"" J ..� r- { - II O ZN W a vlW �rc z 1 0 4^�t+' 0A4Dono�oo , "( OOooOo 00': 0 oao _ O 0 c j O OAO�g0�0 O 6 o- qe 9a4�a0ta o- 9 --- _- 000000 oo 0 o up o -moo ap4aop afTBooOAonQgc�ngOn_ a4 �f o�c, - _ OO 09- Qr; 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 OOpo 60 o ci �(5E3 E}0�(T9aQ��10 O'KaCH'0 OQO 0 co 00 o p n Y)j p o Q °O�o�000.0{14000�9_ oa00o Oo0000 0000 0 000 0000op000040�UO'aD�6v6 t,Yoa ppo o.p op0006 - o-�-o-Q�-sapo �o0000000o bo' ooa oo:oo�o�o op4 0P Oo o O000 Oo�o Oo 0 Do 6�n�4o tr�x}'0�o-0.� o0'Ao ap0olo p0o opoo opoo opoo opoo opoo 0 00 0 4o� 004nn64e-e --- 0 0 0 0 � Ore'-0-Ua'�-0a'e-E}o46�0�0 60 o dojo Oo o Oo 0 o Oo' 0�o`_Q� b± � o opoo 0000 opoo opoo oQoo oQOQ o0-okn04o-c0Baotiea-o6-pffo 0000.00 cr-csa-�500000 1 000004c�9os� -0baOE}o6�00 00 00" -0�- - "il 9. :_ poaapoopUoo 00000pQ 00�0 O O0 O 0- a - -' 40 v l � 0 = S"wxr I � � o w LU Q Q O 0 9-1 0 vguv 0 Q .............. .,.... ••• rr . t" LU W y�J° w W W 0 _Z 2 U z Q 0 Y z H Y Z ¢ ¢ W H W W LL C Cl) IL 04 rn qt U N m I` 0 4- C co M th Co co � co LO C'1 d � M � W w W a' N N Lq � N U') N N LO N N -1 O LLI O O O O O O O O O O O J a a J J ❑ ❑ J J J J J (n Lcn a LU Nm w w w 0 o Cl) z0 0 w �- p z zNx a m o Z H N p ¢ Z m J x x I- J U) ` U Q w a m m w Q ¢ ¢ Q ¢ a Z 0 cn U m e tD o `� N "Cr + U) LO in V- Ln LO L U kL a ° g o a 2 oo Of a U) ch oo w m cn W J W M J W Z }a, m How -jO a W W J O Z W p p a Q a a O U " 90a CO0 w a w 0 ❑ can w w 00p HJ z ° ❑ w w w z a w ❑ caw w � Q w ¢ Q J p Z ¢ J Q W a J 0 z ❑ w W Z m O ¢ O p Q Z U U) _ w w z LU w z z Z 0 0 w � = F- z } O z �,� cn z 2 LU> F U 2 U w a m w W 2 O CL� � � OJ pa. x 2 x � J Y JO = Q Y O J LU w w a OU a H 2 0U 2 in w a m U m OU = 0VQ � ww 2 ° ° O J ❑ w C7 Q ❑ O U) z ¢ a Q = U =pp ¢ W O Y U F- Q W U �n z Z cn w p w w Q ❑ n. O U w w z Q = z z Q 1- g w '� -� cn z J V 0 Q 0 U a Q w �O Q = Q U 0 ly ¢ U Y ¢ = Q w 0 m U OU Z Q m o Q H Q p m H w J U) U) p p m W p p U ¢ a ¢ O Q Q D w D w a O O (a ? O W m ¢ a i= m U ❑ a = J O m U ❑ w m = 0000 )13 U N U) w OOo 000 oa Suva O o 0 0 0 •a cn 9 o a ' ° 0 O 0 (10 Z w m o ane+� 1{t�1� z op 0 o p Qp p °Opp°Op 0 0 fn U' Opo°Oo a lamrens 1sL s r x e 133+s 33s 3WHaivw 00"09+61 VIS 4 4 lrn w cli W Z 5 _ � g Cl) w �N "OlV \ f� G Kliw 6 o =- oG O o \ � o I yT _ei Z g W IIL '-�5HItil�[" ml 3 I g sw g U Z a n � 5 f E), S F-3 kl lY 3NI11131N30 ONLLSIX3, — W Q LuV � - - --- 3f1N3Ab' SOOd`dW Nb'S _ eom 3 �aao❑F�3Nl lOJMtlS 0350d08d oz Wa� _ LJ Wi a. z W s Q Ww Cl) _ h N 9 Q n tn t5 Lot u I a I 29 d 1� "a � r Lx�ta*yq 3 t2 OZ X a � N w s N I a sisla I o N og y 3 00 � 3 I � m O .O'LZ ab L F o ,0 ta _ I� N U S N o `r, L a WHolm 00sc+a vls o� � vL336 338 t W � s oVoo 'A__ = o� .2 2 a _ lo s = G in 0 cF R aAa w G - - Iz O X k k k Z � D �ODOOElEDO09100Rli0� J WxIs8 � Az 1 ri 8mo Wd BG60:6 9LOZ/ZL/ZL •6Mp'90-MBZOl1S\IsaM\slaa,ls\alas-uold\s6.1..p\6uuaaul6ua\6ulddow olpuoasalo OZOL-\shafa,d\:l sioz'c Awnrrrr-ru ens m 0 r N r uj I S N 19 V60-Z60-cta O CL � � L 8 ' 9 ®®p 111 Zuj _ a d Z 3 QY� .S'OY V lJ T o Olt s Z a a AT lz O I' I I a 4 a cl 1 I o A U WO r _ U. ei G �nA. l)z w du dAi a W a i pp 04 m 8 w dAi dlc . ^ p v N N N O ❑ N azs ~ p b W _ \ f J t ° n�� ig 3 I Ira w <� Q U - Z ER Cl) 06 O Ir '�lSI'J3tl F LL I' ^ cl S � I 0 T Ws o's & Q J u^� o u N aoz EAsefI OYz J o 5 s a" s �6 'v tavo ;2 a " _ co z � � zrL a - ��ai a _ z _ � _ - � z� _ �5 F4 3�1tl19 00'0010E ° M L$IS 339 lJ o 55 ooa o000000aa a �A �� a m= w 7--o- Ao25 O €p^gg W w coo yoo° �,/ a M r7 E g 3 2 S p cn �l a � I N � N Lu Q a U o-< - \ LL O F w W P oH z nw 00 O � �a �< s to vNNO� � W ❑O gam a C/) U o- (Q wZ o_ uo°� a o w10 CZ o 5 mLU U) Q w Q W LLI w w �; o J ¢ .s.g Z g Q 4444444aZ 11 t'7 •- w _, T�� _ _.L�dld11�}bVli may,, ♦ � + s i� 0 3NfIHO1VY1 o � A q 0 0- o m 9�Nf1M�1. d o d +o d IiM. ♦I ♦ �, --.— E.. II !i o +o t+a �El d N N N � N A F � d d +d +o l yo d q a( +d d N y d w d # ( i '1'0-Z60 LZ4. q 16 A� wwwE �. o ^ +o o ao .�. IS o --- /,I +d d .- �I----�� c a Q _ d d o d�,' o refs -- + ♦ +� ♦ + E� a ? d �i a 6--_-.6� +O +O +O ,� +- I I I y� o � I d - o y� d O I +o +d Is O O b NI O O +O s d .� ♦p +d O O I O N m 'i ICY O .. . D O O D �' N I ; N I O O (_- +O O d , �1:Oi' +V ♦O A O p �- ' m I O Ir l d E„b of O O O e� +o I+ +dl +d c e 0 NO N O __..+yo P o o sa I l m _q d d + ASd o D o _. d . d ♦ -0' IIN b o m N D o ♦o d b �-o D d .co b � ) � I ,4 0 -g +dl +Ci c d o �d +o �y g d 0 0+ � ! All e- o o ,+o c- o ♦ o 0 0 3 ,e ! N p +o d d l l al +d +d ^o ( _ d d CQ d d riTFT 0 o --n +do -�d +G". +d +d o o tl } :0 0 +° +d 1a9 +d I�Iy .7' d' +d d ui +d A ! D oo y. +o $ r .. w ro e n d �;p + o I _ ad ,d j o o d +d +d _^T. O O /�I ! ! -'O---O- ..- ♦ d y +O r° O O 11 I A N O O d a d al N O d a _ + + + ♦ ♦i I +}. ♦ ♦ ♦ 'o c ♦T ♦'d IJ +d�I rd ♦dr_a_ do +o :r• +`" +0 0 0 4! m't i , + ♦ ♦ I II I «I . , . ;,,' d +d d d I d I d of +b m o In I; a O + d I+O+dm d Lam- fd I O7 b = I O � � N � � t N .N ♦ m m � t� �`I O O O d SO W. O O: O O o D _ - I + +d ♦d ♦dx� +C' +o 0 o d _ _.- rd +a r + I +d (d dL_ +o o 0 0a�a e o b' o o I i I +d" ♦d d : :' +N ♦N i ,d --.d o d +d c c - N c - -t- d d .11 �� +d' O O -O- O_..:._Od + O O� O O ,..�®®._ a0 +C(-R$-�iT"' ! i j�,'1 ♦cA—ate O _.+ _ D +d d 1 d j O O O O9pp91� J O O O O O e +O e + N N (per O --C +d + O O N MI T N g O O +d +d +d d1I td o +d +d d •- a•^- p +' +d 9+0 +d O D O D O z ` ' d d a O +d ♦d z O _�+�- '• OI O ad .d d d d d T IS D o d + o b i _ +d d +a d d d d d O b N ,- .- �- N A rm m b� +N � -"" �♦ 1 I+ L�--- z d +O fo N O 1! d +d C ,d +O I+d +d O O.. N O O N m ! N O O r O d +o +0o d O O d I+d d Q. C am '._i-� � _h�q I m 1♦A' * /�+o _,.*o' ♦x' +o LH" ` N I m �d y�+d-"T O A' ♦ ♦ I t f Ic- d o d ,d� I N d o o m �I r I I II W b 7µ�I I ♦ 1LL�---- -(�yi D ao b + d I d +d w O D +•N•' N IN—ki ♦ m _.+"'. _.o O b o a ux dil vm .. o i t++'d= + ♦d I d -so + r8 -- ' �II �ti ad o o -v d +d d + ^ 0 O O O m i m O O F-�a� i i. �V4_ Q 7d-.�d_ d_._+O—�d- 1iK. ei d O Ub O �- m N 1'0 O d O d --0 S 1 I S N t� S 0 0 {3I + _ N � � I d I G O o: d +d +d o o .- m QQ. j m m j•. o c t� a0 1 d a0 yN N d i d C � � +d e O O rE i � d 'd ap � e O1 d D ^ o + i {'I' O O O N 1 b Ib Iti Q + D O N n •^ ~ -+--: -v ♦ r ..�+,.1 .. �o—i0—a0- i ♦� �d I+o ao of tp° d i rd o o + .-.#d +d I - - l ♦d +d d i + ♦d I♦d I d +d I I 0 0 1� p I1! c I o I" o "m' a� �.^'"-wN fl-jm -7♦ ♦ + d d d' d d d d I ad I ( .�'. I ..CLL ♦d +d +d I+ ♦d +d +d d T I I N 0 0 ¢1II �_,i!1 !i I o o 'o o . a . i'' td .-' I I +d. +d ,d t+.�---+d d d +o d ^ +~ ^ i i j �-. 'I' +d ad +d I♦cWWtl (b I o D + + d + ' + ♦ o o A o a N ! a N A A O� +d d d +d ,d d d d ,d d o +d o N A A A IA A T! ^ N O O A V O O O d +d +d +d +a a ,C O ♦d + + d O O O {V I I N I b O IS d ra i ♦ I N d p +D N q d +d d d ;� I N fff N b O A N A A O m m QQ 6 m I I+ aN +O O Id w m m f m O O �—� _- I d l a ♦d rd Y I ♦ f O O PI I m P O O O ♦d O N I q h +A ♦'- +O + �bl +-$ +O O O N O a d d d d ♦d +N d d d ad d d ---m b O in ..yy 0 0 ! I ! ! b : ( ',,�' o, +o o ♦ ♦ A .-+ _�w id +d v1 ri d o o w m a �b .d d +d!-d- N d d +d - _. t3 o N +N I a tli +o cD ♦ I♦ O e� N A N .. ,. q.�,�EENpp b m C f +�I i f ♦ a� O O ! m N~ ♦- O e O e +d +O +O O +d d + a� d .EJ O E N N �I O I IS d d I c 1 +d D - d J ra rd d O D O O O O O O O �� ♦ O ( A_ I ! N O O ♦ + O �I ! m q ! O zi- +a +d 1 +D +b - I o q:]Gd---�dFl a 4- +d + �d o Nl i ` E. I I N C O d O C +b e �] O A a'f N O O p ♦ ♦ - I O O IAA ! I I O I O c O I d ♦o +c P! +d' 0 P N _ .._ o ♦d +o i♦t Ill i rd ad d 0 0 o b o I' 0 0 ., ! n, nI N o 0 0 0 +O ,D o o b d ! d D D .: _ I d �d o d d d.I c d d d +d a � d d + �I I. 0 0 o td o o d o d P d q �. o O O O N ! O O ep O +b ..+0_..O O O O O m I ♦ __ �\� 0 0 n ij l ! o o `G o d r-+d o + m' O . D d �d rd c) o d +d d I o O o � - O +d d +d I o �t{ d o D ao O O q d � y I d +d +d ♦ � J ♦d +d': d D .b +b .d .d O o n ! o !YL O q '- _ ��___�_��____e_�_��_�_� B-3NCNk11WY o O o r+ m D-jNIIG�L1l ' I 0 1 oo Is w~zw L 8 mGg y0�N gd O O W U ge °R-x< n W H U �( LIJ Na N Z< m < WZZO0 Q W o< ^ q 7 WW pw 0 CO LL t F O Z O v< (Q1) W Q W Z f a u U 'a^ 4 J 7 `wmw m a i7 �vJ (n J D U�< � :$�$�g d < z N W N 1 / �< < < V w Z o� 'd Y �j m W W a EJ 281>: R W L.L 7 CO ; a Z o. Q ° 4444444a co N t-z- tzi i w w • Gn d I :i �dl f • A� z � p5 w ` r �d}� kex5pt if LU p11 dek }il ffe$�t•66R�i , ii�! 9 IIE S2 °db o R $ N s w w y ed14�Ef*s`A9ts`�3?3 �d } }}tl .tl n 8 R. N = g J VVV m _ III m m G a G Q y •' l it I� > < g O JpW a t=5 1� �rc III H U e... " OW2 W Y Y � 4 r Q ✓? °� V°j n vase Fr- Y §aq��Q � u Y $ w Y> ` b. u Saw j � oz 0 °figs o o o 99 2 z t y u� d e uN8 z u w o k s z�wk J Ys�Y YYYYYY =tea a s» Bs>fi�fA$�sk�>3>k w 3 C ! 11 - z f o B ° a o U m w u ¢ w W J = = I n I w c J w M I O c F m Y x x x x xx >< m a ^ J a z ^ LO u w LL Z u 2 "'< � w Q = o k o S a N J g O ~ W m2U'30IX1 -' m � 2qti J 2�2 x CC aO 11 aO 6 6 2000 K K C W zW a ��pf' �� '� 8 y �� •Ii 12I � � c_io_�s 5$4 :giap o � aYpaYoYY38 °� j s o zI " < m <^ $ p _be yea 1� ) ! !I ag 10 s B `a 4 a $ 3 m !fill as § a$ $a '8<� IS x x d >< • G o O j Q ^€€ w ¢ Q z 4 Q F W CD m - C z Q E O co llI fill Q. 00 - X= a $? I�` Y_ W,s m o �� z so a sr; ff�� zt o o egeW� � w10 m< $ n �:; o� F o w a wa g=� w^� wF z s�Q=mgg= h co § ✓xi z rc gnN w �< 4 mi m $z-iiw<" W0ciK a� os$ No ~ $ moaaY € o >± �o k a m �> wd igum5� $ °"° > fr so �!< ��m a o10 z Hwy o u om o<ga <�s w k W ow °� Y 5 woo 8 ns < m = z w- g $zY" i �` kk >oo €Fib >�" �o o i<�� $ Sum �� se2 8 mi ��i W'bwo Na �a �mi m� duo i gym` �� ° =F y �< "3� � ? k "ua �i �< g B Y gm6 Q°SF s o$= i a&uo��J� �3 ` -o < oz wu o;b " gm�$w's S $a a�o �o ��< NEPz `zP. i`$ '3 $ �'o zvi9'5j'm! , 2 mo i$ u urn sn xi < o pr` 5 �� o � of $� C` "< o�w wN m$: �i j .^. '"� zpu ok•I``-' . q wo �"'a o six b $8 $ $ wk �E�g�z �o Sd €u o W m z NF a oynj o� s8: �$ me $� i o$ i ems's �u ��ao Fb� ro �"W z $ < p� s� $ate w . 9m" ms "nug $n x wk'i awo mu K'S w u>_ w o <_ u oS W. 2 " I" _ " � miF� �� i a z.G = w &< °$ "°� Gm wok ii <oJ �i "J3`sw `iW Nb� ` <i g3 9gw" u<3 Sok' :g15 u'9 0 00 �"� Film°. "ay �g ng o� x i o mwz "gym Wm oo$ wsYlm < mz as ffWxg w S No F= ps sw ��"i szo 03 Pi�i au aNn�< $n S" € �N� za $< �W< a u «� zF' s8` SL u2o "i �4 8 gmm z�< o m <• uY ~2� $ $� mom $j wa H. 2 � n��u m �"� a $s�af�md�S" Sid: �y��$ ��`� ffz am a -� ,Y. 8n s�o '° �$ tui $I g'cz s Ss '- o G og S� d awRmi' asarc ' �d w a = < �w x� ° < rc �< �m �g Z°,� sa w Fn4� F<� uoi ua <o bw iivJ�J ¢ U rc"ZyFl InFU 6rc.-u $� < w3< gg$ Ow<. �$ao YL s o�^N �WU N< rc �u L"woz s• - zxn u^F 2s <a u � u mao b u� a 3 ubiu w mi H gi Fla w`a < 5 .3% o �'� a �s s a m w u o s� zw o S m 4i up §'Y,I 1�S�3b $ g.-; O E - LW ff �� o_ =wz rvn nos. +3. n d� � W Lz n 3; ry n< . cos rym « j _ � g �� N n J c w Z w 6io Uw $Fo $ tqg_ �w a wx Fu<o z 0 `E o' o oA Jk> 'aa 3 ^N9R w aI "IN R9 w o< g Kh 9 Q i° $ 2a�o °wb i >&ci kmu Wa mi bs n Uw-W N i uo n=�In ^� iZ 2j "� w o � _9qBr" HE so mW dam5° g � oh _ 9mo z aw 2WaW i ii oi = °u i i w s Fo t 2 3�uw>i o�i�$.' �wm$- ?$u�$>�5�g mwgg, 8Ll $XW< a �2 � "<` s u i $ $m � b i�g � « oa a$ ai = bw <a <$ wiWg= $ oo Jw Ou lo 8 �Z $ om i i> $ emo >a ' o9i d 3 ' `us o c " _ °zz � wa � - i s€ u u w . o-5 io 6R 0 < 1 oW < « zo 'E.o; gw< c g g . T<m" u? r,< mw jE ou < N N N N n m m m di r a , GENERAL NOTES 1 , IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS TO (Access Doors CHECK AND VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS AND MAKE KNOWN ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING mn LEFT SIDE CO 00 THEIR WORK . Cal 2 . THESE DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED FOR USE IN A NEGOTIATED CONSTRUCTION O D N I CONTRACT AND , THEREFORE, MAY NOT SPECIFICALLY DETAILS OR SPECIFY z O 00 MATERIALS AND /OR MANUFACTURERS, e"'1 q 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL SAMPLES AND /OR CUT- SHEETS AS Mill 0 O U REQUIRED TO ASSIST OWNER OR HIS AGENT IN MAKING MATERIAL SELECTIONS . p C7 � x 4. FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTIMATING, THE CONTRACTORS SHALL USE THE 0 a MATERIALS SELECTED BY THE OWNER , OR IN ABSENCE OF SAME, HE SHALL PROVIDE AN ALLOWANCE AMOUNT AND SO CONDITION ANY COST ESTIMATE . RIGHT SIDE cm 5. ALL MATERIALS SPECIFIED IN THESE DRAWINGS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN SUCH ( NDRS Sign ) Q� Q ESTIMATE, o i u.j to 6 . NO GUARANTEE OF QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION IS IMPLIED OR INTENDED BY V1 CID THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL D N RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY OR ALL CONSTRUCTION DEFICIENCIES. o Li 7. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL HOLD HARMLESS, INDEMNIFY AND DEFEND O 0 0 THE DESIGNER FROM ANY ACTION INITIATED BY THE INITIAL OWNER OR ANY N SUBSEQUENT OWNERS FOR CONSTRUCTION DEFICIENCIES, MODIFICATIONS OR o N SUCH CONDITIONS WHICH MAY BE BEYOND THE CONTROL OF THE ARCHITECT, 8. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND TRADE STANDARDS M vE . ir WHICH GOVERN EACH PHASE OF WORK , INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO .0i is CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE ( CBC) , CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE ( CMC) , NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE ( NEC) , CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE ( CPC ) , AND zm � E ° a _ - ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES AND LEGISLATION . ' ° a ° ° � o ' z uv a �. ° Q 9 . THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND RECORD THE CONDITIONS OF ALL - ° � � ° ' ° ° as EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING PAVED AREAS, HE SHALL MAKE ENLARGE LOCATION 0 ° ° " ° " U ° c KNOWN ALL EXISTING DAMAGED OR DISREPAIRED ITEMS AND CONDITIONS THAT _ a < ° d e o a ° r cuu ° � ° aa � E ° cocm - MAY WORSEN DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION . _ _ ° � ; " ° " aa " o ' a' a ° a ° SCALE 1 = 100 awogor tvxs ¢ avtade 10, ALL ITEMS IN GOOD CONDITION SHALL BE MAINTAIN IN THEIR PRESENT c. � ° CONDITION AND ANY REPAIR OR DAMAGE WHICH OCCURS DURING 1 Layel QROFESS/ONq CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR, TBA FD CHEN 1 �� \�G T 9�ci 11 , CONTRACTOR SHALL THOROUGHLY EXAMINE THE SITE AND SATISFY HIMSELF nI � AS OF THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THE WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED , u Z3 No. S 4210 Exp. 6 /30/16 12, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AT THE SITE ALL MEASUREMENTS AFFECTING HIS WORK AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CORRECTNESS OF LPlq TRucT \) � SAME. FOF CAL�E�f` 13, NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE f FW3 JING CHEN TSAI S- 4210 EXPENSES DUE TO HIS NEGLECT TO EXAMINE OR FAILURE TO DISCOVER 45 CONDITIONS WHICH MAY AFFECT HIS WORK . e w 5 14, ALL NEW INTERIOR PAINT COLOR , FLOOR , WALLS AND CEILING FINISHES w SHALL BE SELECTED BY OWNER AT THE TIME WHEN IT IS NECESSARY FOR zY THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. 15, ALL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE Ch tg4 LATEST ADOPTED CITY STANDARDS. 7s0L', ^ , 16 , THE STORING OF GOODS AND MATERIALS ON SIDEWALK AND /OR STREET WALL a ^ �i Z W NOT BE ALLOWED UNLESS THE CONTRACTOR HAS APPLIED AND SECURED A I E ,w r SPECIAL PERMIT WHICH ALLOWS SUCH STORAGE TO BE PLACED . •L DESIGN COMPLY WITH 2013 CALIFORIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE . < CBC 2013 Ed . — _ .. _ V CFC 2013 Ed . Ld Ld ^ CMC 2013 Ed . (0 i CPC 2013 Ed . Z CALIFORNIA ELEC. CODE 2013 Ed . U 5� CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE 2013 Ed . I Z • CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE 2013 Ed . �U3 PARKING SIRUCTORE PARKING STRUCTURE � co E SCOPE OF WORK I —� C11EA N 0 S l SCREENS Z � ti a ccKK sg f6 SCREt7J5 O DONATION STATION KIOSK LOCATE AT PARKING LOT `� Sc000slG Q t I 2 Levefs 49, 4579r I FOI)D COURT ;rt VICINITY MAP ' tI ' a' � � macs . . . . . . .: . .. r y — . _... . . . . .. . ._ 2 f��E�s JCPenney 2 Leyms £21CLOSE€1 ALL 2 Levels a ` + I t 1960265 se 84, 933 sr Az t Center Q TommRack - Sierra s�o / I ,_ ... . .. . . . . _ _ ._�... TITLE SHEET Nords C nt Tampico Or / J Whole Footle Market e Rancho Grande Or f SITE PLAN 7Y PROPERTY � � sv,1 �1 r+o uNfoR -- 5 469 1 r2 9 6s� 3 LOCATION a DATE : 03 /04 /15 iJ Macy a 71-840 California , , , —••• __., . _ . .. • .. ,_ .•••. :••. . ••.•..- .. • ..• ... /S tn� JOB No. FCSK140210 ~ SanGorgonsiWa _ �. (� ISSUE & REVISION rg ,I h O Palm Desert Or N '1, 2 a,r11P10 Wild Wings ri m ` �� C 3 ❑ I ` 4 5 Palms to Pines West IIrl1/`ry�'� - ' (JSha in Center 6 SHEET INDEX - 8 10 Al TITLE SHEET & SITE PLAN 12 Aln2 FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATIONS SITE PLAN SHEET NO. SCALE 1 = 1 , 500 Al DRAWN BY: JCT I I ti 0 gal Id i{ �f_ % _r ,- .. _ iElp FF As Ill led F. i e - #.� . 'Sw Ell FBI ru ++ CY - 1 * Zoo _ { +-.. . - r ' 14 `�� 6ii Fit f 11 IL - ,, - y + j C - - - �- Ell — Fly k IF I F. ell FEW rj died —U — �� nit Ed L TI-I E SHOES DON AT STATION,� / { �`K Bob Ell V. vJimor 4 apple. - _ — -- - —1 — leds � CLOTHES ! NOES ppNMO SNDS Dt�NATIOH $iA�14N Fee- Fir . . �; A .. �.. FF N $, f iNEs / _ • - P . : _ FF Fee A `_ , c balm, .��. T FF t �I s 1 . _ o.v �i ^v • :` ® � _ IF • i _ -. _4 Elm MISSION I I w >. s j 4S' E'- _- 1u i i . .—_ � . ' . -- _ mi Few •.r6kA}fh YlilY'Y1:1diI�Mh •1'k'J6iM . . _ F-11 . . , . _ - - -. '., 1.- _ " - From IF �r .> 'ice _ FF DONAT' ,•,•,,• SHOEs CLOTHES iltio w ME Ell "E'd life _ �� ♦ 0 , Wild .. II\\\\\\awl 'o\\\ems_ IF \\\\ der BE died Ed; FF ILL — _ — _ — § �nC t� rVC red tom' : • „�—\ • IIII - � ►, � �� Ivllvllvl , IIIII O1 � \i \ \ �\ ,�, inn• , • , - dided - _ �- ��- ,, . � , � IIII II-I I- . •' . - . . . • de A 1 A 1 . . . ♦ ►00 •�i . ►:❖S� e� Imo\ IA A I 1 A ii>__�,�A . • ® •