The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2016-06-21 PC Regular Meeting Agenda Packet CITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, JUNE 21, 2016 — 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260 I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Any person wishing to discuss any item not scheduled for public hearing may address the Planning Commission at this point by stepping to the lectern and giving his/her name and address for the record. Remarks shall be limited to a maximum of three minutes unless additional time is authorized by the Planning Commission. Because the Brown Act does not allow the Planning Commission to take action on items not on the Agenda, Commissioners will not enter into discussion with speakers but may briefly respond or instead refer the matter to staff for report and recommendation at a future Planning Commission meeting. Reports and documents relating to each of the following items listed on the agenda, including those received following posting/distribution, are on file in the Office of the Department of Community Development and are available for public inspection during normal business hours, Monday-Friday, 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260, telephone (760) 346-0611, Extension 484. VI. CONSENT CALENDAR ALL MATTERS LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE ROLL CALL VOTE. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR AUDIENCE REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION AND ACTION UNDER SECTION VII CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER, OF THE AGENDA. AGENDA PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 21, 2016 A. MINUTES of the Regular Planning Commission meeting of May 17, 2016. Rec: Approve as presented. Action: VII. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER Vlll. NEW BUSINESS None IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS Anyone who challenges any hearing matter in court may be limited to raising only those issues he or she raised at the public hearing described herein, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. Remarks shall be limited to a maximum of three minutes unless additional time is authorized by the Planning Commission. A. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION to approve the demolition of an existing building, and construct a new 10,852-square-foot two-story restaurant building with a rooftop lounge located at 73-330 El Paseo. Case No. PP 16- 124 (Kristi Hanson Architects, Palm Desert, California, Applicant). Rec: Waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2670, approving Case No. PP 16-124. Action: B. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION of approval of a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide an existing parcel with three building into three separate parcels with a reciprocal parking easement for shared parking located at 41-555 Cook Street. Case No TPM 37137 (Joe Carman, San Bernardino, California, Applicant). Rec: Waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2671, approving Case No. TPM 37137. Action: X. MISCELLANEOUS None 2 G\Planning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Agenda\6-21-16 agn.docx AGENDA PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 21, 2016 XI. COMMITTEE MEETING UPDATES A. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES B. PARKS & RECREATION C. GENERAL PLAN & SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE XII. COMMENTS XIII. ADJOURNMENT I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda for the Planning Commission was posted on the City Hall bulletin board not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 17t" day of June, 2016. k cp:�, , Monica O'Reilly, Recording Secr ry Please contact the Planning Department, 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260, (760) 346-0611, for assistance with access to any of the agenda, materials, or participation at the meeting. 3 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Comm ission\2016\Agenda\6-21-16 agn.docx CITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION PRELIMINARY MINUTES • TUESDAY, MAY 17, 2016 — 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM SERT, CA 92260 I. CALL TO ORDER Chair John Greenwood called the meeting er at 6:01 II. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioner Nancy DeLu Commissioner Ron Gregory Commissioner Kathleen Kelly Commissioner Joseph Pradett Chair John Gree Staff Prese Douglas Phi , City Ryan endell, velopment E Icip�+ nner stina S, ant Engineer onica O'Rei mi tive Secretary III. GE OF ALL ANC Chair nwoo the Pledge of Allegiance. IV. SUMMAR UNCIL ACTION Mr. Ryan Stendell, Director of Community Development, summarized pertinent May 12, 2016, City Council actions. V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 17, 2016 VI. CONSENT CALENDAR A. MINUTES of the Planning Commission meeting of April 5, 2016. Rec: By Minute Motion, approve as presented. B. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION of a one-year extension for Tentative Parcel Map 36700 at St. Margaret's Episcopal Church located at 47535 Highway 74. Case No. TPM 36700 St. Margaret's Episcopal Church Palm Desert, California, Applicant). s Rec: By Minute Motion, approve the extens' it May 20, 2017), Case No. TPM 36700. Action: C. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATI a o adjust lot line to additional square footage at 1008 Cahuilla (APN 320-023 & 320-030). Case No. PMW 16-92 Cahuilla Palm Desert California Applicant). Rec: By Minute Motion, a o el Map er 16-92. Action: D. REQUES R CO ` DERA ~ to merge two lots at 72372 Southridge Trail (A 652-070-r & 652- -016). Case No. PMW 16-115 (Francis J. Jules D Texas.. icant . x Min ion, appr rcel Map Waiver 16-115. Action: n a motion b ommi ioner Pradetto, second by Commissioner DeLuna, and a 5 e of the PI ing Commission, the Consent Calendar was approved as presented DeLu Greenwood, Gregory, Kelly, and Pradetto; NOES: None; ABSENT: Non ST None). VII. CONSENT I ' S HELD OVER None 2 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\5-17-16.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 17, 2016 VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. APPOINTMENT of a Vice Chairperson. Commissioner Pradetto moved, by Minute Motion, to nominate Commissioner DeLuna for Vice Chairperson for the remainder of the year 2016. Motion was seconded by Chair Greenwood and carried by a 4-0-1 vote (AYES: Greenwood, Gregory, Kelly, and Pradetto; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: DeLuna). B. APPOINTMENT of a Liaison for the Art in Public PI Commission. Vice Chair DeLuna moved, by Minute Motio ominate Commissioner Gregory to be the Art in Public Places Liaison for e er of the year 2016. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Kelly rried b' ``, 4-0-1 vote (AYES: DeLuna, Greenwood, Kelly, and Pradetto; NO one; ABSE one; ABSTAIN: Gregory). IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. REQUEST FOR CONS Q; RATION to "truct a new 2,800-square-foot classroom for Science, logy, En ring, and Math (S.T.E.M.) at Sacred Heart Catholic S o d at 4 Deep Canyon Road. Case No. PP 16-075 (Sacred rt Sch Palm Desert, California, Applicant). Mr. Eric Ce' rincip lanner, esented the staff report (staff report is available c tvofp esert.o He stated that the applicant is proposing a new buil hat off additio curriculum; it does not increase school enrollment. Th , r `: aluated for the proposed project. Staff red.., .ed a and offery nswer any questions. ce Chair De" referred to the playground equipment located at the d of the prop Sh ed if the playground equipment is an addition or a cement of w use o be at that location. Is the size adequate for the eq ent? Mr. Cej rre question to the applicant. Commission oseph Pradetto inquired if there are plans for solar panels on the roof of the proposed new building. Mr. Ceja replied that he would let the applicant answer the question. Chair Greenwood declared the public hearing open and asked for any public testimony IN FAVOR or OPPOSITION. 3 G:\Planning\Monica OReilly\Planning Comm ission\2016\Minutes\5-17-16.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 17, 2016 MR. MATT ACTON, Holt Architecture, Rancho Mirage, California, responded to the questions from the Planning Commission. He said that in previous construction the campus built photovoltaic canopies over the parking lot to the south. He said the playground equipment is a like for like swap of playground area. FATHER HOWARD LINCOLN, Sacred Heart Catholic Church, Palm Desert, California, expressed that the proposed project is something they dearly want because it significantly improves the academics of thei school. He stated that they have the funds for the construction of the c om, and hoped the Planning Commission approved the request. With no further testimony offered, Chair Greenwood d ed ublic hearing closed. Vice Chair DeLuna commented it is an e t use of Ian they have done an excellent job designing the building its into the existing oundings. It is also a step forward academically for r.. udents a moved for val. Vice Chair DeLuna moved, by Minute M ive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2668, appr ase No. PP 16-075, subject to conditions. Motion was seconde mission e Ily and carried by a 5-0 vote (AYES: DeLuna, Gregory, Greenw and Pr o; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None). B. REQUEST SIDE to truct an 8,579-square-foot communi ter b g, an dwelling units for special needs adults at the D Arc cam locate 73255 Country Club Drive. Case No. PP/CU 102 ( Real E Partners, Santa Monica, California, Applicant). r od d that he resides in Sagewood development, which is jacent to t opo roject. He is also the president of the homeowners' sociation. Th re, h used himself from the proceedings. Mr. eja revie the staff report (staff report is available at www. f almde or ). He noted that prior to the meeting the Planning Commi e' re d updated plans for the proposed project. The updates are based on is made by the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) on the building's chitecture. In addition, there are changes to the grading plan that reflect better drainage. Mr. Ceja pointed out two conditions of approval: 1) Any type of lighting in the parking lot or landscape area must be bollard type lighting fixtures not to exceed a height of five feet; and 2) Landscape plans shall be submitted for City staff approval. City staff recommended approval and offered to answer any questions. Commissioner Pradetto asked if the Planning Commission received the updated plans before the ARC could review them. 4 G.\Planning\Monica OReilly\Planning Comm ission\2016\Minutes\5-17-16.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 17, 2016 Mr. Ceja responded that the ARC reviewed the plans the Planning Commission received in their packet, subject to making some changes. The plans submitted prior to the meeting are updated with the recommended changes made by the ARC. Commissioner Ron Gregory commented that his experience with bollard lighting you need a lot more fixtures, and asked if the applicant is aware that there might be an additional cost. Mr. Ceja replied that the applicant is aware of th dition. He noted the condition does not limit additional lighting on the car tructures located on the eastern property line. Commissioner Gregory referred to the land 4 i g requi provide screening between the two-story units and the adj residential p " ies. He asked if 15 to 20 years down the road, would ndscaping still be .; j. to provide a significant barrier. Is there a conditi at the la scaping co ix looked at again to make sure it is still screening ., t ., Mr. Ceja said that with the scape pla ch is reviewed by City staff and the Coachella Valley Water , they co u tinue to follow up through the years with the assistance of mplian epartment and the property maintenance ordinance. Vice Chair DeLuna de ublic h pen a ked for any public testimony IN FAVOR or OPP s N. MR. KIRK DER 'tect, La Beach, California, briefly explained the design intent s tr "ed that they chose to use pre-fab units for„ i. enti so they x minimize the time the project is under uc i S ., n rs also mentioned that there would be a minimal parking mand sinc to do not have cars. He said that they met with the ighbors, and fe y have addressed their concerns. He offered to er any quest Corn 'oner Ka n Kelly commented there was very little attendance at the second in the neighbors. She asked if there was a follow-up meeting with the n that had concerns at the first meeting. Mr. Ceja responded that he attended both meetings. At the first meeting, it was predominately attended by the neighbors. The applicant introduced the proposed project, and the use of hedging or landscape to help screen views. He stated neighbors were satisfied; therefore, neighbors did not attend the second meeting. MR. SAUNDERS stated that this is his first project in the City of Palm Desert and City staff has been wonderful, cooperative, and supportive. He appreciated the efforts City staff has made. 5 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Comm ission\2016\Minutes\5-17-16.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 17, 2016 Vice Chair DeLuna thanked the applicant for recognizing City staff; staff is exceptional. With no further testimony offered, Vice Chair DeLuna declared the public hearing closed. Commissioner Pradetto commented that when he was first appointed to the Planning Commission, he was told that parking plans would be one of the biggest things that the Commission would be focused with a it has been true. He stated that he is not concerned with parking, and f applicant has gone above and beyond and moved for approval. Commissioner Pradetto moved, by Minute Ma , to e further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2669, r ving Ca o. PP/CUP 16-102, subject to conditions. Motion was seconded by issioner Kel d carried by a 4- 0-1 vote (AYES: DeLuna, Gregory, Kelly, Pradetto; NOES: , e; ABSENT: Greenwood; ABSTAIN: None). X. MISCELLANEOUS None XI. COMMITTEE MEETING UPD S A. ART IN PU Mr. Stend orted tha e Art in lic Places Commission (AIPP) discussed the new El o exhi IPP als° 'scussed the merits of purchasing an art piece from the tir n '`Paseo. EC ION ne C. ERAL PLA PDATE TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP Mr. Ste a.l. ced the Joint City-Planning Commission Study Session schedule Irsday, June 9 at 2:00 p.m. in the Administrative Conference Room regar the City's General Plan Update process. Vice Chair DeLuna thanked Mr. Stendell and staff with the Vision San Pablo event. She said that the event was a preliminary implementation of something that the General Plan Update process focused on and thought it was important looking forward into the City's future. The Planning Commission agreed. 6 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\5-17-16.docx PRELIMINARY MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 17, 2016 XIII. COMMENTS Mr. Stendell commented that there are a couple of new faces on the Planning Commission. He said if they had any questions to let staff know. Chair Greenwood welcomed the new Commissioners. XIV. ADJOURNMENT With the Planning Commission concurrence, Chair wood adjourned the meeting at 6:42 p.m. A& JOH ENWOOD, VIC _ . IRPERSON ATTEST: RYAN STENDELL, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNI COMMIS N > MONICA O'REILLY, O TA 7 GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\5-17-16.docx CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REQUEST: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE DEMOLITION OF AN EXISTING BUILDING AND CONSTRUCT A NEW 10,852-SQUARE-FOOT TWO- STORY RESTAURANT BUILDING WITH A ROOFTOP LOUNGE LOCATED AT 73-330 EL PASEO SUBMITTED BY: Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner APPLICANT: Kristi Hanson Architects 72-185 Painters Path Palm Desert, CA 92260 CASE NO: PP 16-124 DATE: June 21, 2016 CONTENTS: Draft Planning Commission Resolution No. 2670 Legal Notice Architectural Review Commission Meeting Minutes of May 11, 2016 Exhibits Recommendation Waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2670, approving a Notice of Exemption in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, and approval of a new two-story restaurant with a rooftop lounge along El Paseo. Architectural Review Commission On May 10,2016,the Architectural Review Commission(ARC)reviewed and approved the project as proposed with a 7-0-1 vote, with Commissioner Lambell absent. The Commission supported the architectural design and the site location.The Commission stated that the design and materials make a very attractive building with clean architectural lines, and will bring excitement to El Paseo. The Commission also stated that the building has appropriate massing in the right locations,and should not impact the neighboring properties. Staff Report Case No. PP 16-124 Grafton's Restaurant Page 2 of 6 June 21, 2016 Executive Summary Approval of staffs recommendation would approve the demolition of the existing 4,000-square-foot jewelry store building, and construct a new 10,852-square-foot two-story building, with a rooftop lounge for a restaurant.A Precise Plan application is required since the applicant is demolishing the existing building and the restaurant is considered new construction.All Precise Plans require approval of the Planning Commission. Otherwise,the building conforms to all development standards including height, land use compatibility, parking of the General Commercial zone, Scenic Preservation zone, and the El Paseo Overlay District. Background A. Property Description: The property is located on the north side of El Paseo east of Sage Lane and west of Lupine Lane. The property has an existing 4,000-square-foot building,with the last tenant being a jewelry store. The rear of the property expands into Presidents Plaza, which is a shared parking lot. The new restaurant will have two entrances; the main one via El Paseo and the secondary one via Presidents Plaza. B. Zoning and General Plan Designation: Zone: C-1, S.P., General Commercial, Scenic Preservation and El Paseo Overlay District General Plan: C-C, Community Commercial C. Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North: C-1, S.P., General Commercial, Scenic Preservation/Commercial Uses South: C-1, S.P., General Commercial, Scenic Preservation and El Paseo Overlay District/Commercial Uses East: C-1, S.P., General Commercial, Scenic Preservation and El Paseo Overlay District/Commercial Uses West: C-1, S.P., General Commercial, Scenic Preservation and El Paseo Overlay District/Commercial Uses Project Description The restaurant will operate daily from 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., seven(7)days a week. The restaurant would have approximately 35-40 full-time and part-time employees. At this time, the applicant is not proposing any nightly entertainment. In the future, if the applicant decides to provide nightly entertainment, an Entertainment Site Plan application would need to be submitted for approval. GAPlanning\Kevin Swartz\Word\Precise Plans\PP 16-124 Graftons Restaurant\PC staff report Graftons Restaurant.doc Staff Report Case No. PP 16-124 Grafton's Restaurant Page 3 of 6 June 21, 2016 Below is the building breakdown, including operations: • Main level is for formal dining and totals 4,600 square feet.The floor consists of front and back entry ways, hostess check-in, elevator, dining area (booths and tables), bar, men's and women's restrooms, bus station, office, storage rooms, and stairs. • Second level is for casual dining and totals 4,330 square feet.The area consists of a lounge area with tables and chairs, elevator, bar with tables and chairs around it, televisions, men's and women's restrooms, kitchen area, storage, and stairs. • Rooftop lounge is for casual seating and totals 1,922 square feet.The seating area consists of 691 square feet,and includes tables and chairs, elevator,fire pit and seating area,glass rails, and planting boxes for trees.The remainder of the roof includes roof top equipment,which will be screened from public view. A. Architecture: The building has rooflines between 14 feet,30 feet,and 39'10".The design includes desert colors and the architecture provides a fresh look from the typical restaurant and bars around the area. The architects wanted to create something dynamic and interesting where people could see the energy inside the restaurant and want to be part of it. The bulk of the front elevation is made of glass with metal "fins," Utah limestone, and curves that emulate movement rather than a static straight front elevation. The circular element is the stairs and elevator tower with different textured glass elements to create additional interest at the front elevation. The flat elements will be a"concrete"finish that will emulate metal. Analysis The use of a restaurant is a permitted use outright and does not require any discretionary approvals. The project requires approval of a Precise Plan by the Planning Commission since the applicant is demolishing the existing building and constructing a new building from the ground up.Furthermore,the project complies with all development standards including setbacks, building height, parking, lot coverage,and land use compatibility.The use of a rooftop lounge is allowed in the commercial zones. Section 25.40.050 Accessory Structures only prohibits roof decks within the residential zones. Staff believes that the proposed project, "Grafton's Restaurant,"establishes a land use that provides an upscale building design that will attract residents and tourists to El Paseo. The high quality architectural design,with the upscale amenities including the rooftop lounge, blends with the vision of the El Paseo Overlay District and is compatible with other land uses along El Paseo. GAPlanning\Kevin Swartz\Word\Precise Plans\PP 16-124 Graftons Restaurant\PC staff report Graftons Restaurant.doc Staff Report Case No. PP 16-124 Grafton's Restaurant Page 4 of 6 June 21, 2016 A. Development Standards: The proposed project complies with the development standards for the C-1, S.P.zone.The table below outlines the development standards,what is allowed by code,and what is being proposed. Development Standard Allowed by Code Project Building height is at 30'with a portion of the elevator Height 30' above at 39'10", which is less than 10% of the roof area. Front 5' 5' Rear Yard 0' 45' Side Yards 0' 0' Lot Coverage No Max 39.5% Parking 77 Shared Parking B. Height/Rooftop Lounge: The proposed restaurant building has an overall height of 39'10", which is allowed by code. The majority of the building is at 30 feet,which is the maximum height for the zone. Section 25.40.040 Height Measurements allow for tower elements to project to a height not more than 65 feet or not more than 25 feet above the zone as long as the area does not cover more than 10 percent of the roof area.That means that a tower element could project up to 55 feet. In this case,the elevator is considered a tower element since it is architecturally integrated into the building design. The elevator projects an additional 9'10".The additional height is four(4)percent of the total roof area, which meets the less than 10 percent roof area requirement. The additional height allows the building to have architectural merit and stand out in a positive way within the El Paseo Overlay District. The existing building to the east is two stories and approximately 27 feet in height. The existing buildings to the west are single story of building heights from 24 feet to 27 feet. The proposed height and site location are supported by staff,as they will not adversely impact any viewsheds or diminish property values. The proposed rooftop lounge is allowed within the commercial zones. The restaurant patrons standing and sitting on the rooftop will be south facing views. The existing properties to the south consist of single-story buildings with commercial uses, and a two-story building with a restaurant located on the second floor,which has an outdoor patio overlooking El Paseo. Further south is a commercial parking lot and beyond that are two-story residential apartments.The apartments are GAPlanning\Kevin Swartz\Word\Precise Plans\PP 16-124 Graftons Restaurant\PC staff report Graftons Restaurant.doc Staff Report Case No. PP 16-124 Grafton's Restaurant Page 5 of 6 June 21, 2016 approximately 350 feet from the restaurant property,with a large amount of trees in between. Staff has determined that restaurant customers on the rooftop lounge will not create any negative impacts in regards to viewing privacy for the retail businesses and the residential properties to the south. Furthermore, the rooftop lounge is consistent with other restaurants along El Paseo with two-story patios like Tommy Bahama Restaurant and Bar, Le Peon, and Sammy's Woodfired Pizza. C. Parking: Chapter 25.46 Off-street Parking and Loading requires restaurants to provide eight(8) parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. The restaurant dining and sitting areas would require 77 parking spaces.The property is part of Presidents Plaza,which is a shared parking lot,and restaurants are a permitted use outright under the El Paseo Overlay District.With the restaurant operating during dinner and late night hours and the large amount of parking within Presidents Plaza and along El Paseo, staff believes that there is sufficient parking for the restaurant and parking will not create a negative impact on the adjacent businesses. D. Land Use Compatibility: The proposed project is zoned C-1, S.P. The purpose of the zone is to provide residents and tourists specialty and general shopping facilities, including restaurants. Also, the property is located within the El Paseo Overlay District. El Paseo is designed as a pedestrian specialty retail, restaurant, and personal services district. The success of El Paseo as a pedestrian commercial district is dependent upon the creation of land uses and creative and imaginative building designs to attract and sustain pedestrian interest. The proposed restaurant is consistent with the proposed land use designations.The restaurant as designed is compatible with businesses along El Paseo,and offers an upscale architectural design that reflects the vision of El Paseo.The business would not interfere with parking as determined by staff and the proposed use would complement the adjacent retail business uses and the other restaurants along El Paseo and in the vicinity, as well as provide an establishment for the residents and tourist. GAPlanning\Kevin Swartz\Word\Precise Plans\PP 16-124 Graftons Restaurant\PC staff report Graftons Restaurant.doc Staff Report Case No. PP 16-124 Grafton's Restaurant Page 6 of 6 June 21, 2016 Environmental Review According to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), staff must determine whether a proposed activity is a project subject to CEQA. If the project is subject to CEQA, staff must conduct a preliminary assessment of the project to determine whether the project is exempt from CEQA review. If a project is not exempt, further environmental review is necessary. Further review from a non-exempt project would result in a Negative Declaration, a Mitigated Negative Declaration, or an Environmental Impact Report(EIR). Generally, an EIR must be prepared if a project may have a significant impact on the environment. In this case, the City of Palm Desert, in its capacity as the Lead Agency for this project under the CEQA, has determined that the proposed project request is categorically exempt under Article 19 Section 15332 In-Fill Development Projects (Class 32) of the CEQA; therefore, no further environmental review is necessary. Submitted By: )6,v =A� Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner Department Head: A6f- Ryan Stendell, Director of Community Development G:\Planning\Kevin Swartz\Word\Precise Plans\PP 16-124 Graftons Restaurant\PC staff report Graftons Restaurant.doc PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2670 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND APPROVING THE DEMOLITION OF AN EXISTING BUILDING AND CONSTRUCT A NEW 10,852-SQUARE-FOOT TWO-STORY RESTAURANT BUILDING WITH A ROOFTOP LOUNGE LOCATED AT 73- 330 EL PASEO CASE NO: PP 16-124 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 21s' day of June, 2016, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by Kristi Hanson Architects for approval of the above noted; and WHEREAS, according to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City must determine whether a proposed activity is a project subject to CEQA. If the project is subject to CEQA, staff must conduct a preliminary assessment of the project to determine whether the project is exempt from CEQA review. If a project is not exempt, further environmental review is necessary. The application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act," Resolution No. 2015-75, in the Director of Community Development has determined that the proposed project is an Article 19 Mass 15: Minor Land Divisions (15315) Categorical Exemption for purposes of CEQA and no further review is necessary; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing'and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons, which are outlined in the staff report reasons to approve the said request: 1. The use of a restaurant is a permitted use outright and does not require any discretionary approvals. 2. The project complies with all development standards including setbacks, building height, parking, lot coverage, and land use compatibility. 3. The high quality architectural design, with the upscale amenities including the rooftop lounge, blends with the vision of the El Paseo Overlay District and is compatible with other land uses along El Paseo. 4. El Paseo is designed as a pedestrian specialty retail, restaurant, and personal services district. The success of El Paseo as a pedestrian commercial district is dependent upon the creation of land uses and creative and imaginative building designs to attract and sustain pedestrian interest. The proposed restaurant is consistent with the proposed land use designations. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2670 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings for approval of the Planning Commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby approve PP 16-124, subject to conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, at its regular meeting held on the 21' day of June 2016, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN GREENWOOD, CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: RYAN STENDELL, SECRETARY' PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION PC Reso 2670.doc PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2670 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO: PP 16-124 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the Department of Community Development/Planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein, which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Building & Safety Department City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building & Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 4. Applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the city against any third party legal challenge to these approvals, with counsel chosen by the City at applicant's expense. 5. If the applicant decides to provide nightly entertainment, an Entertainment Site Plan application,must be submitted for approval. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: 6. The applicant shall submit a grading plan to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Any changes to the approved civil or landscape plans must be reviewed for approval prior to work commencing. 7. The grading plan shall identify all proposed and existing utilities. 8. The applicant shall submit a PM10 application for approval. The applicant shall comply with all provisions of Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 24.12 regarding Fugitive Dust Control. 9. The applicant shall abide by all provisions of City of Palm Desert Ordinance 843, Section 24.20 Stormwater Management and Discharge Ordinance. PC Reso 2670.doc PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2670 10.The applicant shall submit a final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for approval. The WQMP shall identify the Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on the site to control predictable pollutant runoff. Prior to the issuance of grading permit, the Operation and Maintenance Section of the approved final WQMP shall be recorded with County's Recorder Office and a conformed copy shall be provided to the Public Works Department. 11.The applicant shall pay the appropriate signalization fee in accordance with City of Palm Desert Resolution Nos. 79-17 and 79-55 and drainage fee in accordance with Section 26.49 of Palm Desert Municipal Code and Palm Desert Ordinance Number 653. 12.The applicant shall ensure that the sidewalk on El Paseo'is ADA compliant and shall make modifications as needed. 13.The applicant shall quitclaim utility easements that conflict with the building prior to grading permit issuance. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & SAFETY: 14.This project shall comply with the latest adopted edition of the following codes: A. 2013 California Building Code and its appendices and standards. B. 2013 California Plumbing Code and its appendices and standards. C. 2013 California Mechanical Code and its appendices and standards. D. 2013 California Electrical Code. E. 2013 California Energy Code. F. 2013 California Green Building Standards Code. G. Title 24, California Code of Regulations. H. 2013 California lire Code and its appendices and standards. 15.An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed as required per the City of Palm Desert Code Adoption Ordinance 1265. 16.A disabled access overlay of the precise grading plan is required to be submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan review of the site accessibility requirements as per 2013 CBC Chapters 11A & B (as applicable) and Chapter 10. 17.All exits must provide an accessible path of travel to the public way. (CBC 1027.5 & 11 B-206). 18. Detectable warnings shall be provided where required per CBC 11 B-705.1.2.5 and 11 B- 705.1.2.2. The designer is also required to meet all ADA requirements. Where an ADA requirement is more restrictive than the State of California, the ADA requirement shall supersede the state requirement. 19.Provide an accessible path of travel to the trash enclosure. The trash enclosure is required to be accessible. Please obtain a detail from the Department of Building and Safety. PC Reso 2670.doc PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2670 20.All contractors and subcontractors shall have a current City of Palm Desert Business License prior to permit issuance per Palm desert Municipal Code, Title 5. 21.All contractors and/or owner-builders must submit a valid Certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance coverage prior to the issuance of a building permit per California Labor Code, Section 3700. 22.Address numerals shall comply with Palm Desert Ordinance No. 1265 (Palm Desert Municipal Code 15.28. Compliance with Ordinance 1265 regarding street address location, dimension, stroke of line, distance from street, height from grade, height from street, etc. shall be shown on all architectural building elevations in detail. Any possible obstructions, shadows, lighting, landscaping, backgrounds or other reasons that may render the building address unreadable shall be addressed during the plan review process. You may request a copy of Ordinance 1265 or Municipal Code Section 15.28 from the Department of Building and Safety counter staff. DEPARTMENT OF FIRE: 23. Fire Department Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 24. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a:minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a two-hour duration. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC Appendix B and Palm Desert Municipal Code). 25. Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, ,location spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 5 and Chapter 33). 26. Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 27. Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. PC Reso 2670.doc PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2670 28. Required Submittals (Type I Hood Suppression System). Shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. 29.Addressing. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six-inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four-inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). 30.Knox Box. A "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5). PC Reso 2670.doc CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. PP 16-124 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND APPROVAL TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING BUILDING AND CONSTRUCT A NEW TWO-STORY RESTAURANT WITH A ROOF TOP LOUNGE CALLED GRAFTON'S LOCATED AT 73-330 EL PASEO. The City of Palm Desert (City), in its capacity as the Lead Agency for this project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), completed an Initial Study to review the potential environmental impacts of the project and have determined that the proposed restaurant will not have a negative impact on the environment. Proiect Location: 73-330 El Paseo Recommendation: Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution supporting the project request. Public Hearing: The public hearing will be held before the Planning Commission on June 21, 2016 at 6:00 pm. Comment Period: Based on the time limits defined by CEQA, your response should be sent at the earliest possible date. The public comment period on this project is from June 11 to June 21, 2016. Public Review: The project plans are available for public review daily at City Hall. Please submit written comments to the Planning Department. If any group challenges the action in court, issues raised may be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence at, or prior to, the Planning Commission hearing. All comments and any questions should be directed to: Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 (760)346-0611 kswartz@cityofpalmdesert.org PUBLISH: DESERT SUN RYAN STENDELL, Secretary June 11, 2016 Palm Desert Planning Commission i 73-5 I O FRED WARING DRIVE I PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 9 2 2 60-2 5 7 8 TEL: 760 346—O61I irifo@citN,ofpalmdesert.org I t May 11, 2016 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: PP 16-124 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: KRISTI HANSON ARCHITECTS, 71-185 Painters Path, Palm Desert CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to preliminarily approve the demolition of an existing 4,000 square foot building to construct a new two-story restaurant building with a rooftop lounge totaling 10,000 square feet. LOCATION: 73-330 El Paseo ZONE: C-1, S.P. Upon reviewing the plans and presentations submitted by staff and by the applicant, the Architectural Review Commission granted preliminary approval as presented. Date of Action: May 10, 2016 Vote: Motion carried 7-0-1, with Commissioner Lambell absent (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. Any amendments to this approved plan would need to be re-submitted to Commission for approval.) STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the Architectural Review Commission to the Department of Building and Safety. i PPINiF00N PE(Y(LEU PAPFP S1��11 VH)lp:ll 906,b3da MIA38 NOIS30 AM 9019 NOIl00N1SN00 +�g'ZS gY 09ZZ6 0a,llasad wled o ro m 8g M5 sed 13 0£££L �O s V LL H 1�y ��5�'�4��4 +�w��nwu WounOv �i• �B � o z a HE A ^I^1i gm z z sWs - ag Miss "a"s"s"s QY z $ Z a .t.Z tp$ LLz4�i p ��[i2 Cc i if src E,°z,��un Ho� Go ^FZF z w0 PHI U z i g_ey ENi 3<8y� z Edam R z4, u° x Vb'o E7 :> gfigs € s es E $ �" a � < ° gym° 3< is a 9z5 �m g" 's Mfrs ° gig a� x wsg s € �a ya sggx $ n s - f3 q8 g3e 2� fit g 2s =x3 N sad gggg s s s € g € x�o s Q i sad W aa3� a 8 s N gt - g m SN�ffi $ s €' gam €€ a 0W � �as _ 3m3oss 43aE frs� s gao s 32, Sac a �a° sd e E x o a -g3 �yo e a ��" y_ g Ez s M g' 99� �&€ Pgg � •P egggfr ss �yB � € $ s E lei Ig g €€ s€ =s s T- £ m< sn S a s -Tj sga g �• <�o Uti E € 3 Ly az a 0 u 81 � qas g $$ $ & Q� z o x F F F sfF u J�° mog F�8 63 58 F F z W 9 a z ' s` W ° z iiWg�WWWz 0000°-o5z„3m I- to, o LL ° o�o 08'08 S i Em i u z e Gz: ° 8F"S E g y g CC��t .'C��r-��r��z'">33 333 o i� z k ° o < 0 z o00 5a5 DES e 3 < - F C S> 0 W m s F 3 0 Wtw zZ oo III _ o�� m w _ 000�� II ® N N ' o �jU. LLm ?-I I o o8O3ga8p�g�� g� o�oG ?sa mWrc� W � zFh i 02 O' �M GF F1 I� pQz z "O6 6 xgxg3__<� S�� FIZFFFFF4F�S �>O S z6 3z pP� u gg z ii gi_?��k�SS�tl�FFFIFFFIIFiii�ioo VO ~6 �z- W R;lgp �, ° 30 JO iW<00oOZ=a� Hz�ao�x�� i853o«�� 5 <53°�� 0� W W zz r .....r i.. JJ J JJJJ=x. O ��WaaW�kLLOLLig�LL�oo�LL�C?5�3�uuu'u ir� 6„ -0 5 0 0 ,z2 EEG i W 8 $3 L600.1z;W g oo sooZiq aE�WSW W .O mW:9�9�0000��zGES�000000008$WWmW�° W v WooJ03ie`o❑ iz i s =ma f m..mmm�m ON, r ¢ I I L----- € Q ! g z M3 'Jill 8QUA IkNS30 1d30 WIG NOIIO lLLSN00 s rOro � 9ZZ6 WWI SNOiJVY) Mv 0 VD'lJasad wled t4 � HNg CIO� o � b L. .....j 1 11 II I II 00 0 ----- O ------�i T O O O O L_- _ - ,� W ' LIJ-_ - ------------- ---------4 ---------- Q o 0 m ;LL -j O w Ir o oLl I r A '-t---- -+---------- �_ s ----------- / tl O 3 o Q O O 6111" O O 12 O O 1 ;_J_-_, L J_____J _ FF 1 _- W FI D c ! Of --s--- 'Og W 7177 o Lj Lj � oio Q 0 o0 z g (0oO p w % z -- -- ------------------- o i W CO - -- ------- L LL ' -] --L o 0 5� 6�a J� waa 2t 8 o- a � � "gypp �` � ��b w Dueool I I I LL.J OS Lio __J i'o 3 R„ m Sf x fro 3 o As WSW o i 3 gy u x o z TQ S& ��fW sy ' o Yao , ' S zz c z OC � a� mg0000 >g t=-'' f I- F W a Q L z L "'��Vb' 'o s u <<g3; 2 a x 5 s 2i 8t 6 5 85o N o 6 J i � N i I Sly l l H b �L N31A3tl NJIS30 1d30 9078 xollannlsNoa 91I6uC 31V4 '� z �g 09ZZ6 yD'alasaa wled � YSB oased 13 0£££L � o S I N OiJ VY) yd te`� � R N. 5 o o S a� Q Wil . �L 5 >K�6Z�o� :,oi YRMnnu wounar � � t7 $�x � x 03S`dd 13 .h wc7�wu ✓ LLwww� �O I o S :6 } Nf � BNno NY103W�--_ 0aE° � O el P e � c ;SNx ; 61N6 of LLU L Z O d' c c��01z o w 9 !" w R' a ry a N31lnO aw 7 O W rc o m 73 LrBfZ WOO ON/1SDG Ii SL BCZ N 0[L6'B£L cl ~CL €w W 01 ZZ 6C2 H U U Q W g r z z rc U Q M7YM3GIs ONLLSIX �w n U Z w ¢ ¢ O w w a $ UO ? N S: . �n o° a o < O ` sifzaez 3nnM�YeL3s siBzeez siov6ez w rue a Nit "' U�Z¢ rci�OF p � L0093SG6r.6BN ,� a w ��w�A o o6 o �_�� -� _ < a � w iw m o z z o a a w > p — z� (n 2 �� u� w w wuwrc Z � CZ-7 ]y wN6" Lu Jw 'a iF1Fiim w ED o zoc�i rs r N R w yy �$ rmA yyo O w H Ea. U �� ¢ � � ��f��LSa � < ¢ Emu!LL� I I I I I �I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I � I 9'LCz=3ii ONUSIX3 i Or'SCL=3ii 66CZ=344 ON/1SIX3 I I Z I I I I a c ) I I Z— Sd w6CZ II sd or�lez � 2 Q SASZ'Bez ! i in v i f . w Sd%6CZ --- C ` - - Si OL-LEZ Si WLCZ a��-R■2 I Isi ozzft si or eeL o -- LL V LL IfI IS.� si�'Lez s mLe r--- > ¢ 1 IXI IIIL—�—JIII w si BL'9ez si Ba sez = 016Z-LCZ z _ Z Si L9 9EZ Mgez _ �— _ — 01 I{LEE — ——t-3as[a — I I �I 1 Si LC'9Cz Si 9e'9CL 01 GB'9EZ 3158'LCZ Si ZL'9fz _ � 01 LL'9EL '.. .'. -Si rS'9fZ_ 01 'LCZ Si PO 9Ez W 0 ;;Mo B1 E9[CZ US IIZE 9ez at Z98Cz Si Lo'9CL Ol Er'BEZ NOld ON3LN13SY3tl003SOdONd o 113Nua0 0777-- ��Laiscz.. sisosfz sis9rez f- �......... 3190'9EZ�,I - I; I IP 3Hnso-nN3 Hsv&L ONIls1X3—� - S3 rb'eCz I Ol ZI'Mz I Si LL'CBZ 17nYA 310 ONLLSIX3 Si 80 ff2 Olt ccz / Si BO'EE2 17nYA 0313 aNLLS/X3 - y O1 r9Cf2 Si 0up c 'ZEZ L131l7 N31YM ONLLSIX3 I — -- --_ N0 N31�nO NOIM 03SOdONd ll3MA 0350dONd� L7nVA 3379 ONLLSIX3� il31YM.8 ONLLSIX3 ezzfi li or tee 7i erzfz �-uauno Amm ONILS0f3 SiDlil HD�JV r� M31A3N NOIS30 1d30'0018 NOLLONNISNO3 z 9OUIV 31VO YSg` 09ZZ6 VD IJasad wled a oased 13 0£££L �t�Gte ^ho J w VH)I4 S�NOEVY) � o� Nq Y m _Z r iml 4r ti 0 d 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i � j S 1 - 1 t - - - - -- - - - - - - w - - - -- - -- --- - d/ I 1 op I 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 001, I 2 1 1�/ ggg I \ b} 1 I e�e a e SiOlilHONV ° ® _,_ _ _ = k m,m ea,oe § a X § .|�& § : " § � ) ) : ¥§ �• I � VH)l NOiJV ) / \ ,- � ^{/ . - . - § \ q � ( �- U & $ § q # % ) %i§ 44 09ZZ6 YD I�asaa W12d Sly]1 I H D N b' � � M31f3tlN'JIS30 1d30 901E N011711tl1SN0O 9LIfiL/6 31Y4 z 7 g _ ffZ Oased 13 0£££L zE�T "o J N z VH)IP z � � r O ti 2 �3 1 uZ ZZ �o 77 xm � ❑ _ w 0Y00OOO�66H66HP I O _ ❑ oo _. ; �_-_:_- _ w o ---- --- -- i Z Z z � J - - - - - - - - - ;4 �- n k I _ S1D l 1 I H DPAN �� y„bI,o 3 Ya g a 09ZZ6 VD'Oasa4 wled M31A3a MJI534 1d30 9Q1B N011]IIa1SN0� p bi YB`gY oased 13 0£££L J y wzQ A g a g g g go S�NOlJ`d�� . o o o c, Aw �4 �g :,oi we,n:Iwa wowY�Y r`� y N( H)l N az 03Sdd 13 /I.....h �� 41 YOB W� ` Y N � � � aa'v • � � D N o _Cl as D a o LU ■■ � - o Z Q a V a O zI i O a O O t , ® LL z a `4 • o � O Wz v Q i I W °mW I �o— I � i om az i wo A Li LU z / xj i X W S 1� 1 I H �I L o WAR N91S3U ld38 8Q18 NO 1�815N0� 611Y 31V4 a �g 09ZZ67�'4�asa0 Wled rn tP P �� oased 13 Off£G <ECT° b"6 N p sa VH)l o cn NOiAVT) m�J'€ i Wo s A�.i 416 o sg o �°I s8 o zo ° .0-.0E = I I I I °61I I I I .01-,6 .0,0f I I Z Z .Odl I I I c I I I I ill I +J zoo W I --I ————— ——— — ————— II � ux I I I 1 t Mi um I I� I I II � I � I I 1 3 Z �1� YM �� j I A� I zz V I Go w I w FwL IBM — I I � J I I I I I ai i I.;ii it dl I I lut lam I I I I I I IZz I I I I I I I I a I _ I I - I iI I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f-- I I I I Z I I I Z I I I U I I I I Lf' I I §m w S1� 1 I H b' LL c _ w M31A3N NOIS30 1d30 OOlB N0110081SN07 z oveuo Siva �z�� 09ZZ6 VD'1�asa0 Wled j a O g gff `� OaSL, 13 0£££L z _ 3 � 4 �z o SINOEV� r) �, Pa a _ s o o s og r`� s RMR C4r�Qg +aJ rwunwe�wror q J U.VH)l o S O ti 2 a Z Q J d 0 W _ o J W 5 CQ 8 4 _ b w $ F Z Q J d z x N � Z w r $ LU w _ J ng e M � Q r— $ W 51 s s s ' s s 5 SiD lil H D N V �,6,C31N9 7 $ 09N6 VD 71asa4 wled MIAR NOIS30 1d309016 NO1100N1SN07 ZQ �t 8 b J ��0�� oased 13 OEEEL QU.� � o J y �a Y$f C � o _ _ � � Y z � p SINOl�b'�� 6PV aue H 1 oz VH)l ¢ q12 Z g g W_P o„¢ s` s S ct�i c�i u o' a OLD .>',S �► ��¢�`g�og kr Lil M � O ti 2 a 5 �e8 8 s - T i t S n Sly l l H b' �� M3 A3H NOIS30 1d30 OOlB N01170ll1SN07 9 6 M 3 Y0 ,� 7 09ZZ6 VD'77asap wled VH)lZCL a O �� S 'L oased 13 O£££L o ct r�"o §NO;� Y4�g��g ,oj we,nelsaa w°Isn7y / a Spt � � a y �'S' d z M z O ti #F "9 O "I I / \ ' I I' „`\I ,w I I I m `I� w I w I I I I n I O / I & 1 I 1 I I l m � ��s I / I r d -- I I I I 1 O u I I I I I I I I O O O OI I I i----- --- - -J L---------- `\ -- -----------------------------------------------------------J---\----- I � g�i J MElEd HER O O (v� J 0LU LU x sanoat D O O O F \ ---------------------------------------J I Z • "g If LU O J 17ElF—171DF—IElElEEl� a --------------------------- m m ml^ (00 10 O 0 tsq O -7 II ILl El El�DLl Ll x O WQ r � O r & I I F- u 5!e Z 2 t$9 s� I U M33A3N�JI5S23 0 1d3f4 901ry9 oN OunILLSNoO 3 09ZZ6 VD VasaCl wledS1D 11Hd oas'ed 13 0£££L rn CJ SNOiJVY) Fin, G9'/B ro"3 1tlbd z O , 2 "3 a 'l-t\ z I d I LL � (s3Nsne) I � S3%OS ONlll- I j i i r ry I I II I I I 11 I I I � I _i_—_—_—_—_ _— �� _— _—_—_—_—___—___— —_—_— I $LL Y I I I I II h, I ------ -------- --------------------------------------------- - L - - - - - - - - - - 1 I I I I Earl � I I + I I II ----------------- -- -- -------- I (43NSnB)----------------- — (S3Nsne1 4'3 ne) _ o. .,o 53%OS ONI1NVld 1 S3XOe ONNNtlId S3%OB ONLLNYIdI- a I I I = Lu I v ----�-1 -------- — -------------------- ---- -- --- ---- -- ---� ---- --- -------- > LU O LU O LIs/ ---------------� — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—- -—-— — ---—-— - �j I I JJ i f/ - - I -------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------- I ------— ----- � i i uLLl i 8 O oC In m opC; I r Z a I� I 'o I a -------- __ _1----------------------------------------------------'1----------------------_—_---_—_—_—_—_"L I j I I I I �e p M3UN N91S30 1d30 Ode N019H1SN0� 09ZZ6 VD 1asa4 wledSiDlilHO�V oased 13 0£ L U4�1 boo - z g p s w '�Y ¢gr�rg .iod we,nelsay wolsn�y � V y z � C I I I I 52 VH)lp — L-- — 6 I I Z _ .__ __—__ r 1 0 a D r r r I a a� I a I I �ry d✓ I r sj I O r 4 I w l I Z W Z r & O LL I 4m I S I r ' I 9 +e� I I I � I R i I I • I � I I • i ill I I Q I w'7 ill l if J i i I• l� I'� w i'i LLJ LU ill ilI _ Q AV LU I I I Sl��ll H��b' BI,BIlV31V �Y M31AR N91S30 1d30 90IS NOILMUSN00 a $ 09ZZ6 VD*1,asaa wled tc oased 13 0£££L os a"o J N z gg b3 < O C aa gN y Y�Y e pp € SINOiJVY) 0 0 0 J f t7 8 s L- �4£ g u wwnclsa ' a �' cn W y walsn�N � o M O N1 �� VH)lp V I I � I I 1 -------------- I I 1 I 1-7---I I M 9 LU I I 1 I is � Fe ' I F ' I dl — < — s 1 I � I I dos I I I T 1 I I I W 1 I o I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I £ 1 I I I I I II I I I 1 I I I I I II I I I 1 II I I I I II I I I II I I I , I I II I I I I r I I I I I 1 I I I E I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I 1 ql I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I YAW , I I 1 33E I wYW I z I f` W 3t W w lu 3o T LL F UR t C S1��11 H��`d - � �� Bl,8t,C31Vd M31A3b NOIS30 ld30 OO1S NOIIOONISN00 � 5�� O9ZZ6 VD wled « '� �84 oased 13 O£££L S��T rN"o - H oZ wF - S►NO1J`d�� Wy� gip° Mg 1 �9 g m > > x a Za Wof F4r�R� ,oj we,oei:an wois�ay uJ VH)l 0 2 y . bi Lu Lu V V w i w a a ui Lu w W a o. I— oC Z Q O Lu C� I �1 -r 1Jt I'tldJlW1.IYMd1' i� s A%,3 gd$� e 14i �f d i MP: '. y I 'R rl►� > ' w a w a a J Q Lu — W Q F 1 3�asaQ WILd M31AA�NOI530 1d3O 9019 NOUNN1SNOJ ?O 91s0o31� 09ZZ6 VD oy oas'ed 13 0 ££L Pqll§q �rv_e 3 � cVH)l ' ------------- -----------------------------------.................. --------------- ---------------------- 2 z Paz w O ' E:�] El O� i LP c7l , Y t� I 3 ng � Ws' 5 utl 8 a � 4 CD L9W6 VO ISVOO-WOJMAN 09ZZ6 ` :D `11J9SzJa hiVd -P=-3HSNOOW EE 03S`dd ID OEEEL livid OWN 1Nunvism S,NOi:JVHJ �3� * t� -v••• � � � —+e z w 0a pp Fes- x (A Z gV o z z z W cWznzC7W � a, a OU Q o T J=J<cW QLUl ODOO, r kTQQr°o " JJJJ �1U1NQjzc� L'Cnai d YrLL F Z 3nr oierd NVS W ffi z a Z U dnr am" _rit <ikk' nz Fo p zN� F�kZ mpg c Z uu J z Wxp <I �k2 WO JJZm� FS Q Om QJ jz < gpF ZO QFc �Q W a o m Zags iIo Am i� �� z"'�d®$ � .`,S�'� �$ k�� o o�� Ji 10 �� 3 < ' ° ;�� ' ° Lo3 'F r, genius Y<r 11 zs F mJ z o Q m u } a oz� m oen < Q SHIP �u CLO UCO zzz m_m< CQ u<r't O ` C d F U OJ Ny zOx u uo z f F'� fUp U Z ( � L ;U �Z� �F`Y FAO <Jf O '� O _ >U� u �i 2 L OWUO Q U W fJl_ L- L L L Q J `� J C WJ lug p,6 HO m< CC o) to L<m pW � �� u� Ilya a m s� >� <og o°�C pdu pW m °moJo 04 gym_ m i J Z yLp FX zkO FJ Q zmJ uz J <_z�F so O NC Ui < Qjj 4� cC U tit 'gym }/1 �w<pz1 Ir C fen Jm OO Jj FF Nm y"y F k( !pz3 ua V ■ J L pCu W �1fIL2 �+� L �F<O 2O V � � < t J �<u —<O �QOC �I uz p�F doh JYI �� pC< L F� �3 zpp 9 Q } Q U o- a am Q�> o ' UKuL��a� �o o z iWi dog i�k�u p I; �i cloy< �� °gyp 9po I I I I U Ju0 J Fz� <FF1- oU1F�� iNFF /<-~dj rm UD ~zu <� F F J J Y LVO J 1 U < s�Q Y< z°vim F = > L JI Jz mug J 00� Fm'�� Q � °p O} �0~ �= OQpz u CL z��— Q � O� �FUQ ydjQ�<—�kLUJ �y2 < z I pp J�-f CC � � �-< J�Yt � ��mpFC �q � zp� W 1- �Q z ��, 5 Any �`6% ) �� z=�o`imp��C�zF3 0 WK wig Wp Q ~ ~ z Y< LO W ~ 4 m zu I 19 W _N p}zO_Om O mg0 YJ � } u; u Ou_t�— � 2 Ill{{{111pt f 1- pt-J r< Zm U Q~~> C< Or Or �WLz UAL O �^ J < C Z '� � aU- gJ ' O ��- o� ®- LPrj u J Q W O n z��p[ z p�(o ' x F o r �ME& VIM Foz V sQ ba�}Q`�<Q �g � �� o�pm �F U g L OC <�O U OOZ zu f O Q OFO I= F} 1� ZF _}Z z �F PV 6 J s ° °C °r° ��Q� TO o7Z�I"u1 ��ji (y z QyUU c[U z `� z<so UNSup " L �' i J� WQp cLm Wzf>mgF U C>�U1 Ff< F F1 <_N > O f W W Z CL J~ �< �Y �aiQ m°m m°Qg0zu`r'' F s�ie s� sc Q KaF 'U U C =�z pm �Ju p `pO qpC�j W u ® Oyu L� U p LJQ Z w O < < m U Q w ,v 3iU0 a1J?L YUQ ?C Y1CL OJ rNOICZ r �F~<Q<F N mU `� j n>� a O W � Wz U � IC-0 c")) z COH 0 QW Q ° z rr W Q C�J W a LS9Z6 VO'1SVOOlH0c4M3N 09ZZ6 V:D 'iHDSD4 A-lVJ om -nDHSNOOW EE ODSb'd �� OEEEL =,o a lld-ld D-931S lNvund1SDu S,NOi=IVHJ YE 0 3 S V d 13 a w O o J w z I O a I-Fd El N o� ❑_ Wa z o F i N Z N ONIQ-iina U� ° 9NIQ3IfiH 9NIISIX3 WiSIX3 O 0 p O O O e e a e o e e o 0W44 o� w d1 N ° mQF- zJ 3j u Wo Y ooa Zm Ww o s s m m m m mQ o'V0z arc N O a a WIN A mw°:1 zo mw 0 0 Q m m m UwU x Ez HLd az� r �1-u UUw will UQ Q� - w illu c� tt a? a W m zo N Q owU Q =W wQ a Z� dPUu�j a�LLW F� Wi°dm a.§ w0 i w a Q Ej FV Q z wo 'oww w e ` lob = a y J_U a a ly C1a' p J w Lz N Q a• Ua m ry m MF Ro 0°W W c0 d io v ° > _ _ - r I op: �a 1 1 W 1-w g F o 0 • 1 �7 0Xw 0 0 0 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 wz mQ � �w 14 r' wo Luck fqM ° �p p �E wuw@ xi-Q x m NU • • •I ((� w a�AD MNN QNN ilf ,ll 16 Yl ma Al ill Al w °Ew lu p� w q Io? q a3- J quau a o} � ZwUlrc ad)q XE w U U UQ L� N Q' L w= 11yy �Q wLLp E Q QLL Z U N O� q Q o0Q= ro- �wUDrc p3y�W w" z � WQ3 Ul d w 3> KPA ro L q ' O a Q q 1 YiJ3 o I/�1 Z� w 1 � � �✓U" ��J✓ "WWWVVV___ WO azw q �z� � I • Q / M�Lw ✓ w I °m i0z z 1 xWL 1 I • �„ 1 wJ� X w W a X L99Z6 VO'1SV0O lFlOdM3N 09(i(i6 d7 lHDS34 W1bc1 a 11DHSNOOIN CC O�Sb d 1� OEEEL b lldld D1gg1S 1N'dunvisgu SNOLHVUO 03S `dd � 3 '10 ---------- sus i C�C�JD❑D�1 AR O E:1 n 1: jail r a 6 a u = 9NIQ-iIna ° 9NIa7Ina 'N sIX3 D DNrlslX3 a ��z o a w IC J l4u, ZpZ m a Z N >• > � Q V' NF Q � p as Qp U U U J � W LL p Z0J n Qa U prc r LLu a Q W > > m m i�i w U I, Z0 w w u m m uF a o m mu z Wo a e a� a=�7 pa W �w 33 zw i W gW �0 0 a6 a6 u�jLL9 mr iU W Z 10 z L3 Lm Jai AI O J Ya a0. Fm3 Nm 'x< W Qm f a a 6 C' ZZa OryJ �r LLlau� �a �a �ZZ m 7 X� 2Q W 'Wn� airy O 1 U U YZ7 U U Q Q \ I O ,• "��" ZZOl� Wi�ui zgg, i w ' Q o0 3W =l'D amY ra a =0 a z � gwm m ap0 ZZ Zw zX to",W1 �au W 3w F3 JJ)r J a> g> U aa' i.4 LL a a �� it� a amua� ' - n m v s m s I I• r I � I r I I I I ' zp P a- LS9Z6 V�'1SV0O 1HOdM3N 09ZM VO `iHDS3Q W-lt/d -P�HSNOOW EE ODSdd -1D Occez o k - ^ s llb'1d T1ElEl1S 1NdUnvisDu SNOi-4V 1J w a & p a O3SVd 13 - - - W° i T o CD 19 W Z d o O ° L4.J LU p °t ik w �4 3d in �- — �a I Nz I � DNlQiine �NIa�Ina 9NI1SIX3 9NI1SIX3 cl ❑ Y1 N N N N N N F OQ IC OICu� aK r)o U a �v U l7a�vF �J ai N a w i z p ila OL _a yLQW � iW wY QoQg jm� Q Q UU O 3OJ } oN x > a o a as w o w a°W $ o w U a a �U Q_ xL' �a J G N 11 R' rD U � IL �i3 W Q - n 0 > wl z I uj u ° ° 1 y� � o E o o wz XR' Q X. N F T wU 'a g a rLLu J dUd MN, YNN wLU O ° Qpi Q Q 7- a W z JU IC' > '0'0 J 3N z J aQuu U. UQ 7 N �7 t� a,N L � 0}( �� _ - L ` 30 � �3� a �a s m � ° a XE Z !z 1� Z �� 3� Q Zo a mw U aQ q H % OQ ito F =ma w� o 1 cn N w m w N a n s O o0-Q I J O io I Q N 3 WX W �m �oJ d a 1 106 nz Y NQ X -- w 1' X W CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REQUEST: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING PARCEL WITH THREE BUILDINGS INTO THREE SEPARATE PARCELS WITH A RECIPROCAL PARKING EASEMENT FOR SHARED PARKING LOCATED AT 41-555 COOK STREET SUBMITTED BY: Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner APPLICANT: Joe Carman 341 W. Street, Suite 1 San Bernardino, CA 92401 ENGINEER: Egan and Egan, Inc. 44-267 Monterey Avenue, Suite B Palm Desert, CA 92260 CASE NO: TPM 37137 DATE: June 21, 2016 CONTENTS: Draft Planning Commission Resolution No. 2671 Legal Notice Exhibits Recommendation Waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2671, approving a Notice of Exemption from Environmental Impact analysis as it relates to the project, and Tentative Parcel Map 37137 as proposed. Executive Summary Approval of staffs recommendation allows the applicant to subdivide an existing 3.61-acre parcel with three buildings into three separate parcels for sales purposes. The site will remain a reciprocal parking agreement for shared parking. Each parcel meets the development standards in regards to lot size, lot width, and lot depth of the Service Industrial zone. Staff Report Case No. TPM 37137 Page 2 of 5 June 21, 2016 Background A. Property Description: The parcel is located on the southwest corner of Cook Street and Hovley Lane East. The property currently has three existing office buildings. a a Y x M „ >,-,,, Gaffe .�-..:- ':. : : • B. General Plan Designation and Zoning: The property is currently designated Industrial-Business Park (I-BP) in the General Plan and is zoned Service Industrial (S.I.) on the City's zoning map. C. Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North: Planned Residential (P.R.-4) — Desert Springs Marriott Golf Course South: Service Industrial (S.I.) — Industrial Buildings East: Service Industrial (S.I.) — Industrial Buildings West: Service Industrial (S.I.) — Industrial Buildings G:\Planning\Kevin Swartz\Word\TPM 37137 Three Parcels\TPM 37137 Stf Rpt.doc Staff Report Case No. TPM 37137 Page 3 of 5 June 21, 2016 Project Description The proposed tentative parcel map will subdivide the 3.61-acre parcel with three buildings into three separate lots. The breakdown is as follows: • Parcel 1 — 1.07 acres (46,521 square feet) • Parcel 2 — 1.30 acres (56,402 square feet) • Parcel 3 — 1.25 acres (54,550 square feet) The applicant is not proposing to build any new buildings or expand onto the existing buildings. The purpose of the map is to allow the owner to sell off each building individually. The map will have a reciprocal parking easement for shared parking throughout the three new parcels. Analysis The proposed subdivision complies with the Zoning Ordinance, General Plan, and the Subdivision Map Act. Infrastructure improvements, including roads and utilities, have been installed. The Subdivision Map Act requires the applicant to record a parcel map in order to further subdivide the property. Development standards for these parcels include: • Minimum lot size — 20,000 square feet • Maximum lot size — None • Minimum lot width — 100 feet • Minimum lot depth — 100 feet The proposed land subdivision complies with the above-mentioned development standards. Also, the proposed subdivision will not create any new significant environmental impacts to the surrounding areas as the area has already been graded and developed with service industrial buildings. A. Land Use Compatibility: The proposed project is zoned Service Industrial and designated Industrial Business Park in the General Plan. The proposed subdivision creating three new parcels is consistent with the surrounding area, and will allow the applicant to sell the buildings individually. The new parcels meet the development standards in regard to lot sizes, lot widths, and lot depths within the zone. The project does not physically divide an existing community, and does not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation outlined in the General Plan. GAPlanning\Kevin Swartz\Word\TPM 37137 Three Parcels\TPM 37137 Stf Rpt.doc Staff Report Case No. TPM 37137 Page 4 of 5 June 21, 2016 B. Findings of Approval: Findings must be made in order to support the proposed land division as required by Section 26.20.100, Planning Commission Action, of Title 26 Subdivisions, of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans, as amended. The proposed tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation for Industrial Business Park. The zone allows for subdivisions and the new parcels meet the development standards in regard to lot sizes, lot widths, and lot depths. The applicant is not proposing a building and/or buildings as part of this subdivision. There is no specific plan for this development. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. The site was previously improved to comply with City standards. The proposal to subdivide this site does not require additional improvements beyond what has already been installed at the site. The existing development and use of the site have been designed to, and are consistent with, the General Plan and the City's Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance. There is no specific plan for this development. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. The original parcel totals 3.61 acres and has been graded and established. The proposed lot form is physically suitable for potential land users under the Service Industrial zone. Utilities including water, electrical, sewer, and gas are in place and surrounding properties have successfully developed. This further subdivision will not change the layout of the parcel. 4. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantial and avoidable injury to fish, wildlife, or their habitat. The creation of three additional parcels will not cause substantial environmental damage or injuries to fish or wildlife or their habitat since the site has previously been graded and developed. Creation of the new parcels of this site does not create any significant new physical impacts on the environment. GAPlanningXemn Swartz\Word\TPM 37137 Three Parcels\TPM 37137 Stf Rpt.doc Staff Report Case No. TPM 37137 Page 5 of 5 June 21, 2016 5. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The proposal to create three additional parcels will not create a physical change to the existing site and will not cause public health problems. Each lot will have access to a public street, Cook Street. The lots will not create serious public health problems, as utilities are available to support the site. Mitigation measures for dust control and noise will be enforced during any future development of the lots. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The creation of the three new parcels on this site will not impact any existing public easements since access to the site is off of a public street, Cook Street. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not restrict solar access to the property. The project meets all development standard requirements as previously approved under the original subdivision map. Future development of the lots will be subject to the development standards within the Service Industrial zone. The design of this subdivision and orientation of the lots will not impact solar access to adjacent properties or the subject properties. Environmental Review The City of Palm Desert, in its capacity as the Lead Agency for this project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), has determined that the proposed subdivision of property is categorically exempt under Article 19 Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions of the CEQA; therefore, no further environmental review is necessary. Submitted By: Kevin Swartz, Ass ciate Planner Department Head: -P� Ryan Stendell, Director of Community Development G:\Planning\Kevin Swartz\Word\TPM 37137 Three Parcels\TPM 37137 Stf Rpt.doc PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2671 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 37137 TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING PARCEL WITH THREE BUILDINGS INTO THREE SEPARATE PARCELS WITH A RECIPROCAL PARKING EASEMENT FOR SHARED PARKING LOCATED AT 41-555 COOK STREET CASE NO: TPM 37137 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 21" day of June, 2016, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by Joe Carman for approval of the above noted; and WHEREAS, according to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City must determine whether a proposed activity is a project subject to CEQA. If the project is subject to CEQA, staff must conduct a preliminary assessment of the project to determine whether the project is exempt from CEQA review. If a project is not exempt, further environmental review is necessary. The application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act," Resolution No. 2015-75, in the Director of Community Development has determined that the proposed project is an Article 19 Class 15: Minor Land Divisions (15315) Categorical Exemption for purposes of CEQA and no further review is necessary; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing`and"considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts and reasons, which are outlined in the staff report reasons to approve the said request: Findings for Approval: Findings must be made in order to support the proposed land division as required by Section 26.20.100 ,,Planning Commission Action, of Title 26 Subdivisions, of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. 1. That the proposed snap is consistent with applicable general and specific plans, as amended. The proposed tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation'''for Industrial Business Park. The zone allows for subdivisions and the new parcels meet the development standards in regards to lot sizes, lot widths, and lot depths. The applicant is not proposing a building and/or buildings as part of this subdivision. There is no specific plan for this development. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2671 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. The site was previously improved to comply with City standards. The proposal to subdivide this site does not require additional improvements beyond what has already been installed at the site. The existing development and use of the site have been designed to, and are consistent with, the General Plan and the City's Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance. There is no specific plan for this development. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. The original parcel totals 3.61 acres and has been graded and established. The proposed lot form is physically suitable for potential land users under the Service Industrial zone. Utilities including water, electrical, sewer, and gas are in place and surrounding properties have successfully developed. This further subdivision will not change the layout of the parcel. 4. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantial and avoidable injury to fish, wildlife, or their habitat. The creation of three additional parcels will not cause substantial environmental damage or injuries to fish or wildlife or their habitat since the site has previously been graded and developed. Creation of the new parcels of this site does not create any significant new physical impacts on the environment. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The proposal to create three additional parcels will not create a physical change to the existing site and will not cause public health problems. Each lot will have access to a public street, Cook Street. The lots will not create serious public health problems, as utilities are available to support the site. Mitigation measures for dust control and noise will be enforced during any future development of the lots. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The creation of the three new parcels on this site will not impact any existing public easements since access to the site is off of a public street, Cook Street. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not restrict solar access to the property. The project meets all development standard requirements as previously approved under the original subdivision map. Future development of the lots will be subject to the development standards within the Service Industrial zone. The design of this GAPlanning\Kevin Swartz\Word\TPM 37137 Three Parcels\PC Reso 2671.doc PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2671 subdivision and orientation of the lots will not impact solar access to adjacent properties or the subject properties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings for approval of the Planning Commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby approve TPM 37137, subject to conditions. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, at its regular meeting held on the 215t day of June 2016, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN GREENWOOD, CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: RYAN STENDELL, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION GAPlanning\Kenn Swartz\Word\TPM 37137 Three Parcels\PC Reso 2671.doc PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2671 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO: TPM 37137 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the Department of Community Development/Planning, as modified by the following conditions. 2. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein, which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Building & Safety Department City Fire Marshal Public Works Department Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building & Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 4. Applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the city against any third party legal challenge to these approvals, with counsel chosen by the City at applicant's expense. 5. Tentative Parcel Map 37137 shall be recorded within two years from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise, said parcel map approval shall become null,void and of no effect whatsoever. 6. Any proposed change to Tentative Parcel Map 37137 will require an amendment, which will result in a new public hearing. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: 7. The parcel map shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. 8. Utility easements that conflict with existing buildings will be quitclaimed prior to map recordation. 9. Reciprocal easements for access, drainage, and parking between the parcels shall be provided for on the map. 10. Horizontal control requirements shall apply to this map, including state plane coordinates, which shall conform to City of Palm Desert specifications. GAPlanningXevin Swartz\Word\TPM 37137 Three Parcels\PC Reso 2671.doc CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. TPM 37137 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING PARCEL CONSISTING OF THREE BUILDINGS INTO THREE NEW PARCELS LOCATED AT 41-555 COOK STREET. The City of Palm Desert (City), in its capacity as the Lead Agency for this project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), completed an Initial Study to review the potential environmental impacts of the project and have determined that the proposed request will not have a negative impact on the environment. Project Location: 41-555 Cook Street Recommendation: Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution supporting the project request. Public Hearing: The public hearing will be held before the Planning Commission on June 21, 2016 at 6:00 pm. Comment Period: Based on the time limits defined by CEQA, your response should be sent at the earliest possible date. The public comment period on this project is from June 11 to June 21, 2016. Public Review: The project plans are available for public review daily at City Hall. Please submit written comments to the Planning Department. If any group challenges the action in court, issues raised may be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence at, or prior to, the Planning Commission hearing. All comments and any questions should be directed to: Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 (760) 346-0611 kswartz@cityofpalmdesert.org PUBLISH: DESERT SUN RYAN STENDELL, Secretary June 11, 2016 Palm Desert Planning Commission On m OFF ., a , : OF 3� o e I me N.CA OFF In me. I <„ men.Nn ra. Film OFF ON eseemlOFFT,, TENTATIVE a l{ 4 NN. I Ir me I I me / __. _ _. ' _— _— 1 i I me me t -- urell lee - - - - - . . ..._. OF. � ,IF mr, $ AFFIFFICI / � i ,, „- , tem e ' „ - .. Fee " : .,v,�• me , .,. , -, ,..,, OFF i " _ -% ., , 11 en" - � , _ % cn E ` 11 me, om me menleeOF` me Feem ,.. ,.,,.. - , ..i , r ,,, " ,.,„, . 1 termt{'� Am ne...-..mile , , ,vimISI „ a �OFFr %OFF CIII gAme, me me 1s�, yya�� YY Aeol OFFJ OFF OFF Ame OFF ..' em"mI I " ROPOSED 3 PARCEL SUBDIVISION � A All r � *-----'7"- ,.„ ,- _. ...._ ,.�- ,... ,. der_ r < '.- .. .-� \ , IF "OFF 1 t a f' j 5�...- ,�� -- D S BDI S 0 .. . . _._____ ___ -_.�.� - __ nj y _,. .. _..may r „ , � I-, " BEING A PROPOSE U VI I N OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 17452, AS PER O _,11 r . " . " "-ram "-._ l . .,. ... . . . _ feel .. MAPMAPS, } F ml % - - On _ - On OF S :� _ .. _ , , „`fie"I'm tee ,::. _ ! 1 i _ { " ,a ' ^ \ / LINTY OF HRIVERSIDE, STATE OFECALI CALIFORNIA, . _._...,-._,., ,.._. _,.,. t� r ^ _.. ....._.__ .,_ , _,,.„ ON . . / , .-- r}, ; '}> / : . . , I I ., I, 'Fee..� , -,} yi /'' LOCATED N THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF rn ., - �,_„ ..,.._ 'eme ` SECTION 9 TOWNSHIP .. . .-. ... ..: . -. _., ._. _. . . . .. _ _ " �{ .�, ^ :J ' --, tea=' "s 'Inn Fee \ JJ, 1 / -/ 1 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, S.B,M . w _. �•, , in; „, `iNF .,J . , OFF Fe me, f .. In C.yFit me" ` ! men. CC ......_ - ,... .. - , ,. . _—_...... ... '.,. , : men,OFF, s . `"'till'. <-1 \ "Am .. _ . OFF -- I; .I c % �� l CIA , PA MAPPING ROJECTRLDESCRIPTIONPARCEL TO SEPARATE THE EXISTING 3 INDUSTRIAL FLEX BUILDINGS ON THE PARCEL IF" f \ " me me 1 "Flernmen,lnemiI Free,. .. ; mime, -Fe - ^ _ �^_ -._. _......_;. ' ` ; r ' {Client; :`�j,7` ' , ''' SO THAT EACH INDIVIDUAL EXISTING BUILDING SITS ON A SEPARATE PARCEL RECIPROCAL ACCESS AND PARKING S �, r m Feel, / - , , •,\ r� _ -"�`�IIn, •, "- -^ -�, J .- � ., �,l EASEMENT OVER THE ENTIRE PROJECT IS PROPOSED, EXCLUSIVE OF THE BUILDINGS SITES. ALL IMPROVEMENTSALREADY `- in - v %Film �. . OF mCm1. - STRUCTURES, UPGRADES OR IMPROVEMENTS ARE PROPOSED, AND THERE IS NO PROPOSED CHANGE meeme , .: t ! \.t 1 :I 7 OF it NXITHE NO OUSEL Y j J , CC, nm% �/{' CIIme me .. <s % --- _ I -. APPLICANT SUBDIVIDER : OWNER : mrvmem . ... .,/ �H . �: r tee .. J , s 1 1." AXI05 INVESTMENTS, LLC AXIOS INVESTMENTS, LLC j € .... _ m Fr me : s ¢ l „, CARE OF: JOE CARMAN CARE OF: JOE CARMAN o - -- me me t : _._ _ � me Nm— — — — SUITE 1 SUITE 1 _____ - I Fell me me me Immme reememe _ merO me me ; r „ MH _ rrrrrr ' 'I _ ., . ,. µ,..-,. -. ,.„,.m ._., - _ Il, �` A 92401 A 92401 _. ._. _-, > "" �' SAN BERNAR INOD C THE SAN BERNARD NO, C THE me meme Fee, _.. _ _ . . ... ....._. ...,,,,.�. .. ..... "...<®mm„..„_„„_„„,_.„„,„, -;'�.° ., —:� men { ^, jF —'"-......_.. _ ._ . .. . �. . . - lr� - (909) 381 - 0868 (909) 381 -0868 `° IF Fe I mem,pereme me me mer - '-Coll /. .. _.._... P N - PROJECT AD RELACrime DRESS : F. A.men-inee / / € 74923 HOVLEY LANE, NONE T n PFFFF: - - --- - _ _ . . Comm — � — __ .... _ ... -- - - -_ - - - - ' , . . -� . ._. _ .. ..._ -.. . _._...ee I. ... _ -. ,._- _,... . .. . _. _ ._ _. ._.... &mm. . . . ... i'a % ...._._ � PALM DESERT, CA 92260 0^ me Ce, ... . . _._..... .. - r.. . _.. - ...im. _ _ .. . . . . .. ._ ... OFF a T = " " -- - jIr = N � k � 85 'me ........ ......... - - -- " ' - "-'-- ----- T' "--- N89 49 42 E 585 . 22 ( N89 46 17 E 5s4 . s1 >R1 ` , UTILITY COMPANIES . r� o o a .OF_._ _ ,me. . . ,;x,:r^` I men rk me,i :,_,_..,:: OFF --=' %--`"'" 51, ,�- . ��-' L'T.Ij� ._..... ......... ...........__..me me — ........ f ? ,,. .„ . _d; , .. , GAS CO. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS Z ';. j " "- ` Comm "�"'""""" - ....—...__- l .. H- - — POWER CO. SOUTHERN CAUFORNIA EDISON �- — � Do � .:_ , _�. _...._._ _ C/L HOVLEY LANE EAST _ - - - .'" , yI me, line 0 ` `, t, :. - - WATER CO. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT m ¢ •..,F„ o men - . . ... ---_t ... .. .. __ _. ...... _ ... ... ..__ __.. ..... _ .... . . . . . .__ . ... __ . _._ I ... .- , - -- - .." -- - % -% . ... ._... . SEWER CO. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT '. z ¢ w o . . . ._ o PROJECT BOUNDARY men min. mr—O r -1 — — -- - - _ — j / Fr SCHOOL DISTRICT DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT �. _._ — — ..- -e „ / me - I./ z a men. III emem... rnmrN me ..IFIFFF meme In . m €. .., _:_ _ _..._ =N89 49 42 E 444 . 29 N89 46 17 E 443 < 85 Rt-._ ._ „. . — r w .—,t A. , :: . "o . . -" . . ..., , ,-..._,.� ... ?_ , ,.- , I -, - . .. , . - :_ , _...._.. _ - ..—.. _.__m— i to } _ f /' _ . . . __,,. 14 . 79 7 f : _ _ .... _ . - 121 . 25 L_ _ w.. 176 . 12 >, 6 .... � . a „rs — - _ _,_. 9 _ _ �. . . .yr ., 4a, LEGAL DESCRIPTION : : w _ .. , o =g. :n - e I _ f . ^ - . ^ ' - _,_... , ', .a:.., L ` „•�•,,, :L • - ,.... .. ..: ��.' — . " , PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 77452 AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 730 AG 4 1 - _. ,._ ..-._� — ,,,. _ . -�.: ,. _ , ;�� - ;„...,,,, ......... , .. .., ... , ,.: . t.. -= 0 PAGES 1 THROUGH 7, > - , e - E ' : : £ , : 3 .• :. ! ;,.-• - ! { , - L'� INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STATE OF _ ... is _ € _ I =1�,;.. I _ :r ,1 . I`',. t -`- — _: a r� a 1, I 7 7 per' CALIFORNIA,^ 1t1 . 1 . € i '. ! ! 1 . \ i^a .,fit' CALL w • [n j G o N R Cmen g a E ( f me OF OFF 1, me net — � � — f t1 90° 18 ' 04 r ' ; ram x __ .. NO I me F. .; ; .`s.l' _ ,_. = 5 . 00 ' L=39 . 16 I I Q • o _ ..: .. . .. .. .-- - - - - - _ . _ R 2 _ ASSESSOR ' S FEMA PANEL ZONE E INFORMATION m o w s ( € , „_' R 25 00 L 39 . 40 ' ''/�,�' �-/ 2008 - ZONE X - AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0,2% C rl _ z Z { ! 1 T' ( b 89 ° 44 ' 18' )R1 z o a immenner-Or_, :'•E, . a : ._..._ . _ . ._..._. ._._. - - - - - - .......... ._..._ ... . ._. __ - __ — -� �9O ° 18 ' 28 " Ri 7 i � E2 ? - - ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN. LLJ z o IF. A �-e :. .._ `,. i s (R=25 . 00 ' L=39 . 16 ) 1%F - ( - ) I - - — — ¢ ' ." � — — � " a ( R-25 . 00 ' L-39 . 40 ' ) 55 . 00 ' _ ti r i — OFF z € '_.._.... .. _ . E rC -' r a ! : ,., C GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : ZONING : OFF OF! — - -f _ �J GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: I-BP ZONING: S.I . z z � � FFF - v — ° ? �` ? /IF ,E - -= = — — --- - - __ ,I . I ; ' j ? i --- INDUSTRIAL - BUSINESS PARK I-BP SERVICE INDUSTRIALr me m , t ` i tI THE PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN A SPECIFIC PLAN I ...- / •: y ; 1 € -- OR GENERAL PLAN SPECIAL POLICY AREA. {Film; . ,. ;.. '; ........ 3,. , . :: I J me,I ', "' .. .� -c :1 - . GINEER � . . 1 t > , 4 „ ; > . rj CURRENT LAND USE : PROPOSED LAND USE : f t/ ,;t ",) {z i IF me` - , "., / L E G ,r... _:" F A R C E 1 I § F A R C E 2 I PARCEL '` ._ ( EXISTING INDUSTRIAL FLEX BUILDINGS EXISTING INDUSTRIAL FLEX BUILDINGS - <C, 1 %. r : `: ;: / ', ' ' _% / / / / s ® .' / '3 .,: / / / / / / / s ® a I ........— ,,.. � CO 8 I ( s (NO CHANGE OF USE) Q M a �` I _ ± REA 1�. 30± ACRES 1s ' AREA = 1 ± � .... � � LL o ti < �'�` 36 . 00 ' 36 . 00 ' : : AREA 1 . 07 ACRES :� , A 10 25 ACRES I � , �, I� LAND TABULATION : C;:._V\ , ;� ?:i � ,,' ' " ,•,\ :: : ��- mill'i , h11--- coomme l s - ....__. rv�-� r� ) $ r �_ ( ) ( 36 ' ) R1 g '> \,, / 1, .n . , , i > > 36 Rl N i € I l LAND AREA: 0 6r hh \ j 11 CC AmNle meryyIF .men OFF, me OF r ; r / E �( _ GROSS PROPERTY AREA: 3 . 61 ACRES . 157 , 473t S . F . O� N38 Sip ,� ',' �,�I • /, G ,., '<J�� , N. N OFF redeem) - , .me G �. "`"' , w 4 - , 3 �' I ... V °'-i s . I�r' {>, �; ' :�f"' NET AREA OF PARCEL 1 : 1 . 07t ACRES . 46 , 521t S . F . ' N / `.<' ..J ' : : - :, I N > I €i - , '' 'an - i. Ct OFF ..........,. (S co I S Cd r .,'� / NET AREA OF PARCEL 2: 1 . 30t ACRES . 56 , 402t S . F . y t rn d � '' f rn > J { ; C rti ' - iNET AREA OF PARCEL 3: 1 . 25t ACRES . 54 , 550t S . F . /..�. .�,` \ti M1-/ 11 E,. %i ' °: N :< #"� V, t t ',7 } — .� VI !! � �{ CJ \ £ �� 1 Ome> l : i -„ _ .: i PON , Cos ,� t Cs_________ z i:� o t ' Q� / - .Jy - Vr . `OFF \ ) ' 77,ZI M . : ____ . ; ; , a �� ' � I % `\ ION � A 3, COVENANTS, DIESICTIONS AND EASEMENTS INTMEDOCUMENT RECORDED JULY 23, 1985 AS � . : j y H ( � 1 ''i . ete IFi ?. > '_ -' -. -J - rn cs: � 4 ' � q�. I �� - {/' '� `-' �� , INSTRUMENT N0. 161610 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, WHICH PROVIDE THAT A VIOLATION THEREOF SHALL NOT DEFEAT OR I °..! : I N s. t li E L" t r , ,.- - I N ; j wFit ! ;', . iimI r ,{� _ RENDER INVALID THE LIEN OF ANY FIRST MORTGAGE OR DEED OF TRUST MADE IN GOOD FAITH AND FOR VALUE, BUT " " . l . : men .. .,!: :, <� „ , ._: h �'��,,, 1�1 ' Ct vi < DELETING ANY COVENANT, CONDITION, OR RESTRICTION INDICATING A PREFERENCE, LIMITATION OROF �: € I,. I _ _ > t3---- '1 t r - ` ! I a �� i i, £ e �`'.�� :Ir. DISCRIMINATION BASED ON RACE COLOR RELIGION SEX SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS S W ! : r -.,_� ` /- . .-�: - . ., _ . ]r ��{ . tip — DISABILITY, r u ^ - - ` ' s t '£ ` +Ante: '� 1 "`� HANDICAP A ONAL ORIGIN , GENETIC INFORMATION, IF- OFF„ , : , . ; , - ,. ' ,� ' -' �� , I J y N Tl Tl RMATIO , GENDER, GENDER IDENTITY, GENDER EXPRESSION, SOURCE OF 0 71I7 ,, W. _ , ��>. I , " ee . , -p— i ... remr \.`� jIn ,., tv . / : Cot i. -..... I : Lr , , /, ; ; , . , p ;t - :, ' - ...._,,, ,^: _ '.it , "? ___ ,.<� Iw INCOME (AS DEFINED IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE § 12955(P)) OR ANCESTRY, TO THE EXTENT SUCH I - ' , " ( ,€ „ t •,r „ ,:t " -.",,,, ;• : ",t ` ; i!I •" COVENANTS, CONDITIONS OR RESTRICTIONS VIOLATION 42 U . S. C. § 3604(C) OR CAUFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE § o OF rIt F ; ' \ _," .:^ , FF ( jj /' . t - — — — 12955. LAWFUL RESTRICTIONS UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW ON THE AGE OF OCCUPANTS IN SENIOR HOUSING - ;;1 : / : t, a y `4 -:; s .. ...; I 1 .E ,. `,> ;.,I i : NG OR F N I I t : _ :;/ - : — ' ,' �-• I ii- "_,.._.,_,A.,___, I HOUSING FOR OLDER PERSONS SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS RESTRIC70NS BASED ON FAMILIAL STATUS. W o+ fe" me mj, � m,,,",,,, - OFF 1men e € -- ' : !q ,I •. );,, t: � '-,, I ,,.% ., , ! �...;,:;-- 4 DOCUMENT RE-RECORDED JULY 29, 1985 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 166213 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS I- Q -. Il i + OFa : I 1. ." G I „ " u mile. : , ,., ' ? ` {" —�_.. . ? ! - '` DOCUMENTS DECLARING MODIFICATIONS THEREOF RECORDED FEBRUARY 24 986 S .. I :. „ j �.. .me - `'',. `1.:. .. .. _ -, `i I - .,. -' �} ell , { f , ,, ..._.-.o`..,�:„" ( ) , 1 A INSTRUMENT NO, 42190 AND Z Q i - ;,, me • - ' ! �- ! wmme FEBRUARY 25, 1986 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 43288, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. Z me _ ; T _. -Cori € �... I .4 £. , , < : -„ •'/ _ _.,..._ E L t¢' _— U I -..b .:.,<..,,<.....n."..�,u..»n,_._ �,. `',. :�, _ — - ._..-.,. - FAY . -^. �1„� 3 d., , < ,. ,, ,.. ..�..r„�.. ,.,.. i_,_..„.,.-m..,„,,,,,,,,,,,,;, > . . , . . .:.._ ._ { €,,,.,� i ::::j� _ AN E 0 H' W U -; ; rY . ( , -,, . ,� ,. -- , ., ^�^^""^ i t 1 ? - - ! 4 ASEMENT F R PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED OCTOBER 09, 1986 AS INSTRUMENT En .o I .me OFF Orneell { w„ _ 1..., ..f' , , , ._.,> . . _ , ' I E •�4 ; . 251479 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. W Q o " 1 "', '`. ` -"` A,a ; :�-v I E CFF -_ I` I -I c-J"''.a, I IN FAVOR OF: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Z , F� { . ; :1 `. - r " [ �' o i ° ,-^"' .� '•.`I. OF ,., % .._ I ; } ! ,F. i- 'r f I % ,,� � _ AFFECTS: AS DESCRIBED THEREIN z O w w OF m ,jj , E ;J il�.} :J F m ; [ 3! I� I , ':, € /' Ji - n ! ; ":'I`^.. - - - - - - . / , ' ! .� ' V = `� t y.� ': - I - I t { t v `-- - -" -- - - .--.. 5. THE FACT THAT THE LAND LIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 0 3OF ' %t x I '`rr^` I �'�+ v ; I , ' J a. T^pPe�mm '-�mm . ... y ( . ` � ja' ' , REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA, AS DISCLOSED BY THE DOCUMENT RECORDED JULY 18, 1991 AS INSTRUMENT N0. - of - Z °' ij qq 141, CN IF .,, f:,OFF%., I , Ite •-' y... .,.,-._, �.,, I . • � ` fI ,.. 244429 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, a me CA I I melf IC OFF _ I I me me J ,. W I —, ��CoOF ww . .,'169 . 83 , r I s '% , ? ' , ,, ti �. ✓. •" ', •' , •,t ;1 . t -- t` ! `..._ °I�' , !,,,•• ' ' '•- _."""'"""'"146 . 14 .. • , 77 93 _ ' - ' mi-im ` I ._ 6. THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED "RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Fee =. {{ ' ° et� Fitr . " I , - " ` Coo I : - - - - :::,- .-> -••�^•-^- -^- -- -- ^ •- - - ^- - -- ---- 7 . , Ir ` t 6 OF COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT" RECORDED AUGUST O6 2003 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2003- 59 t,w., _< , � U t N89 50 7460 OF / : - ? I / „, `.Cot .:i: : „ . 41 E 493 90 ( N89 47 20 E 493 . 61 ) R1 — r— : —. ._. e W [ ;.l / • ,j> : . . E ......-�- a- / Ir, -- s , �/ I ( OFFICIAL RECORDS. „. ,q . : . , f' { : > M — I � � � 1 { l ': p AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC SIDEWALK AND PEDESTRIAN ,. OF m ,, , ,_ter ; / :�, ; ; ; , , � .. , P BOUNDARY _ I I J i s, } ( ,- s , r-• EN ACCESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, �d ,- rf \I `,.I ' I � _- 1 : ' •"` 1 I j ---^-�. - t RECORDED NOVEMBER 10, 2009 AS INSTRUMENT NO, 200 9-0581 397 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. .,..�, ,. / ..... V ,zem , -1 • 3 -....... ; , r,?._._............ 0 E CITY b E r..t. •�.• - - , '' I : ; ,;, /; . ,._ JI ,_ ; !` I IN FAV R OF: THE F PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION % `•rAllen ''- � ,/ "I (r - - ii. `r AFFECTS: AS DESCRIBED THEREIN G�".) t ., t1 k t If ^ } -` " L: OFF __ . r' ': i : 1: """ y 4 i ...... 8. ANY CLAIM THAT THE TITLE IS SUBJECT TO A TRUST OR LIEN CREATED UNDER THE PERISHABLE AGRICULTURAL /'`� �T ^� .. . .__ __. _ me m `.`,. ! ! , ,? - i '' ` . ' " `c,. - •- -•- - = —'. is ; , - -- I I� .., . fe I COMMODITIES ACT, 1930 (7 U.S.C_ §§499A, ET SEQ.) OR THE PACKERS AND STOCKYARDS ACT 7 U>S,C, 1� V1 ��... ,., --. ,� 7 ; . .. ,. ,.,"', __ - e . { `- - 1' --'- §§781 ET SEQJ OR UNDER SIMILAR STATE LAWS. ( -_...:::. . .._. -__ :: ;:, . ` _ _._ ,.•-", / L , : -, a �% , : _ /fit- I .. - - --i IIF 3 7 q - - - .. , / , E 7 I /'` " --1... f -t 9. WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS. OR TITLE TO WATER, WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. p�� ,' e f /p ItI On r m Icm jj j ..., . Q- ; 1; -£ �,,,/ 4 7v , t t % 10. RIGHTS OF PARTIES IN POSSESSION. 4 (•- ( � .. ( I ImeI. I I I r ,- t -=- � j - THOUSAND Z o _ to , ,__ —1 , j � _._ PALMS ' Iuj / �r� I I LLI 3' - -OFF N .- OFF u I r I I g RD me r—r— I `s p� S i j I me I W > I E : -' " * ? 1 r CATHEDRAL x a _ 000" — — me ( uleol � ; ^, ;;.=5 <.—,ez L. '[ —OFF mm .' 1 me <m OFF �, f ��_` , •`.. ''r� 1 E /� —!,{l i \,3 tC-I 11 :�y T / i r �;...... E I 3 [ £ '� �' ,. Cj h ;��, \... . . i Y "SS ( —' 1 l .S V\ �./ l <: , �s � _ �� : 0 R 1 _ . ;t , , CITY 1• ._ -- i -- ( 3' 1 � t'`�y GERALD FORD t- b' r E 1\ 1„ ... E C trr t; f a: I �tq <A n I % PALM _.. __.• _ __ I es- 1 � 1 � o � . _ DES R k I o y <'\\ FR N S NA -s" " . i �_ ` �`� , ' . '__ i { "� C3 J \'' `t, > A K I TRA 1 [) J Z r<�v 1 . � X,,`+ Lu I ' s Y ^,�, l _.. \?� ,,1 ..�,. :'.,._...... :- j . -z I z ! 1 t� y_ �� =� , .S� �"'ys.!f '� l Y Q ,� 1 3 Feel , \ t� �,^ /V me Anil ,`t. ' 3 , ) ` . , "41 ,t�? < „rfI OFF men a, ' "' ... _. . ... i —� I ,, �[ '.,.„, "'"i j Et . E lt.• .l' � ,\ �til S Q O U K O \ r.,� / \ 1' �i {' j' r`,. 'Ja \� T`- ._... _....... t ; 1 ` �.,J� COUNTRY �' CLUB �� me LJ +� : `7;>. .,, ` J , s� „ ! ; tr s f ; Fro m a f DR / .... effl _ ; lm Z 4 C" , < /,• f) .Y, / �.- ,..\ CotAAF .Or . ._....... / , - I ..... I 111 m HOVELY LN 42ND AVE �{ Q �`� iCC2 _ ..._ _". Ime RANCHO srr� INDIO r � 1 I , ._ m / -."'� `�a 1' �, (` "- .... ........:.„,..r „ 1 '"`^^�. I ' I i ; 1 ° i I ` tQi, a DRAWN BY i < \ ' ,} ° �� _) '„ ' f <,<- - _ _ „„ ' E FRED WARING DR BDE JAV me .f, • �,J/,•„��; .. „ ',, m�""""`an--.hT„ ell me a „<...,....,. .,....._._�<-,I. ,_ ., _ __ ..._ H ..: � . CHECKED BY BDE m Me m / _:. a I , MIRAGE re I Fit . . fJ, ,... _ y E t +: SCALE -- _ come . �.. , _ , Ei r'- me `><,t _ .._ . _ . ....._.... . . ( :� , -- rn EL PASEO r- N AS NOTED V7 _- (. .. —_ [ .-. ✓ 1 I I 5me JOB NUMBER _ <' \•.,J t_.;—_...... a i `; i ` ! Icy ;' t Fie . • L—....... I � �u ML OR 20t60544 (,7 . r1 € � .. . > E -., i ,r, " _ . . .- - - ,.\ '(;.�: - �a'+ - - >r, p DALE MAY 10, 2016 Z >. ...._ p me /e fi : - - - Fro _ . - � � 3 mr,r I L.. [ C ( I 11 �ii .. r j P / INDIAN z 774 WELLS cn S H E E T a 40 20 0 40 80 120 xUn7ACK 0 3 EXISTING SITE PLAN AND PROPOSED DIVISION 1OF1 SCALE: 1 " =40 ' u"" "� VICINITY MAP LA X_ NOT TO SCALE Q U I N TA LLM RIVERSIDE COUNTY THOMAS GUIDE FILE IN 0 , PAGE 818 GRID J6 201605" (j