HomeMy WebLinkAbout0215 MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMn�ISSION MEETING
WEDNESDAY - FEBRUARY 15, 1978
1 : 00 PM - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
I . CALL TO ORDER
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Palm Desert Planning
Commission was called to order by Chairman Berkey at 1 :05 p .m. in
the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall .
�. II . PLEDGE - Commissioner Reading
III . ROLL CALL
Present : Commissioner KELLY
Commissioner KRYDER
Commissioner READING
Commissioner SNYDER
Chairman BERKEY
Others
Present : Ralph J. Cipriani - Associate Planner
Clyde Beebe - Director of Public Works
Ron Knippel - Assistant Planner
Kathy Shorey - Planning Secretary
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. MINUTES of the regular meeting of the Planning Commission
of January 31 , 1978 .
Commissioner Kelly noted that on page six, second
�r.. paragraph, lst sentence "any longer" should be
deleted.
On a motion by Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner
Kryder, the minutes were approved as amended; carried unanimously (5-0) .
V. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Cipriani noted that all written communications received
would be covered under the appropriate cases .
VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS
Chairman Berkey explained the Public Hearing process to those
present .
A. Case Nos . CUP 18-77 and 67C, HUGHES INVESTMENTS , Applicant
Request for appraval of a Conditional Use Permit and
Preliminary Design Review to construct and operate a
grocery store , restaurant, and related retail shops in
a commercial center within the C-1 , S .P . zone generally
located east of Highway 74 and north of E1 Paseo .
+i�r.
Mr. Cipriani noted that the applicant had giveri a verbal request
that the case be continued indefinitely.
On a motion by Commissioner Reading, seconded by Commissioner
Kelly the case was cont inued indefinitely; carried unanimously (5-0) .
Minutes
Palm Desert Planning Commission
February 15, 1978 Page Two
VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont . )
B. Case No. PM 11796, CHARLES HAVER AND ASSOC. , Applicant
Request for approval of a Tentative Parcel DRap to both
divide and assemble various parcels of land for develop- �
ment purposes at a site located north of El Paseo and �
east of Highway 74 within the C-1 , S .P, zone. �
�
Mr. Cipriani noted that the applicant had requested an inde-
finite continuance and he then stated the reasons for the staff
recommending that the case be denied without prejudice which include :
The applicant has asked for an indefinite continuance for related
Case No. CUP 18-77 in order to greatly modify the proposed develop-
ment which will necessarily require a revised tentative parcel map;
and, as the Planning Commission is confronted with time constraints
which compel the Commission to take action on submitted parcel maps
during a limited time period, the applicant ' s request for an inde-
finite continuance makes it imperative to act on the submitted parcel
map at this time .
On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner
Reading, the Commission denied the request without prejudice by
Planning Commission Resolution No. 333; carried unanimously (5-0) .
VII . OLD BUSINESS
A. City Council request for Study and Report on Case No.
C/Z 12-77.
Commissioner Kelly noted that the minutes from the City Council �
meeting did not change her mind and that by recommending R-1-12, 000 �
she was acting on behalf of the citizens. Commissioner Kryder concur-
red with Commissioner Kelly . Commissioner Snyder read a statement
sum�arizing the views of t�.he Commission (see Exhibit A) . Commis-
sioner Reading noted his agreement with Commissioner Snyder. Chair-
man Berkey agreed with the other Commissioners and read his state-
ment (see Exhibit B) . Commissioner Kelly asked that the comments of
the Commission at this meeting be forwarded to the City Council and
perhaps the Council would take a second look at the request . Commis-
sioner Snyder asked to review the Staff report prior to its going to
the Council .
On a motion by Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner
Kryder, the Commission reaffirmed their previous recommendation of
R-1-12, 000 to the City Council ; carried unanimously (5-0) .
B. Status Report on the Cove Communities By-Pass Project.
Mr. Cipriani noted a letter received from CVAG (see Exhibit C)
noting that CVAG will present the problem to the Technical Advisory
Committee on February 23, 1978.
Chairman Berkey noted that since CVAG was handling the situa- _�
tion that Staff could discontinue their study but keep in touch with �
CVAG as to their progress. �
VIII . NEW BUSINESS
A. Advanced Planning Program for 1978-80
Mr. Cipriani noted that two major and two minor studies could
be handled by the Staff in the coming year and that the housing
element has to be completed by July of 1979 . He also noted the im-
portance of a Specific Plan covering the area west of the Palm Valley
Channel. There was some discussion as to the location of the BLM
land.
Minutes
Palm Desert Planning Commission
February l5, 1978 Page Three
VIII . NEW BUSINESS (Cont . )
Chairman Berkey noted the land behind the dikes east of
Highway 74 should be considered. Commissioner Reading asked if
the flood control issue would be covered. It was noted that this
was covered in the Master Drainage Plan. Commissioner Kelly noted
that a minor study should be the school situation.
'�""' There was some discussion regarding what happens after a
representative from one of the agencies speaks. Mr. Cipriani indi-
cated that nothing usually happens as the speakers usually generalize .
Chairman Berkey suggested that a minute motion or memo to the City
Council noting the concerns of the Planning Commission might be appro-
priate. Cammissioner Snyder stated that a plan should be created that
would get end results. Commissioner Kelly stated that the Commission
has initiated several important issues and results have come about
that are noticable and perhaps some pressure should be applied to the
school district. Mr. Cipriani noted that the third item on the list
of future studies could draw on all the resources we have heard and
use their information in this study.
Commissioner Snyder suggested that each Commissioner give serious
thought to each of the subjects and give their opinions at the next
meeting. Chairman Berkey stated that the matter would be continued to
the next meeting to be discussed further at the Study Session prior to
the meeting.
IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTIONS
A. Review of cases acted on by the Design Review Board at their
�
meeting of February 7, 1978.
Mr . Cipriani reviewed Case No. 40C and informed the Commission
of the completeness of the Case and how much the City, Staff and the
Design Review Board appreciated this type of application. He then re-
viewed Case No. 71C and noted that the Design Review Board had re-
luctantly approved _ alternat ive 'C' of the revised landscaping plan.
Mr. Cipriani noted that Staff was suggesting that the sidewalks be
deleted and stepping stones used in their place. Commissioner Snyder
commended the Design Review Board for coming up with something new.
Mr. Cipriani then reviewed Case No. 109MF and stated that the plans
had been submitted a year ago bu� were held updu� ta some undergrounding
problem. He noted that the air conditioners would be relocated.
On a motion by Commissioner Reading, seconded by Commissioner
Snyder, the Commission approved the actions of the Design Review Board
by Planning Commission Resolution No. 334; carried unanimously (5-0) .
X. DISCUSSION ITEMS
Mr. Cipriani noted some late items received from the Riverside
County Planning Department. With regard to TT No. 11909 it is not in
Palm Desert ' s Sphere of Influence; PM No. 11349, no comments ; PM No.
11908, no comments; and, C/Z No. 2363, IRWIN SIEGEL, Applicant , Mr.
�,,,,, Cipriani noted that the Change o� Zone request is not warranted at
this time and it does not comply with adjacent property which is Del
Safari . Mr. Cipriani noted a draft letter that if approved by the Com-
mission would be forwarded to the County Planning Department stating
the recommendations of the Commission .
On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner
Reading the Commission directed the secretary to forward the Commissions�
recommendations which are in compliance with the staff recommendations
to the Riverside County Planning Department ; carried unanimously (5-0) .
Minutes
Palm Desert Planning Commission
February 15, 1978 Page Four
X. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Cont . )
Mr. Cipriani noted a letter forwarded to the Planning Com-
mission from Mr. Gary Wiedle of CVAG, received �rom the Office of
Planning and Research of the State of California in which they note
that they are conducting three three-day planning trainin� programs
during 1978. Mr. Wiedle wants an indication of the interest that
the Commission might have. Commissioner Snyder stated that CVAG -
should be notified that the CQmmission is willing to participate.
On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner Kelly
the Commission agreed to participate in the program; carried unanimously
(5-0) .
XI . ORAL COM�7LTNICATIONS - None
XII . COMMENTS
A. City Staff
r.Zr. Cipriani introduced Mr . Ronald KnippPl to the Commission
stating that he would be the new Assistant Planner. He also
noted that the Study Session prior to the February 28th meeting
would begin at 5 : 00 due to the length of the agenda.
Mr. Beebe noted an error in the Design Review Board minutes
that were with the Resolution pertaining to the actions of
that Board. Mr. Cipriani noted that the minutes were correct
as written .
Commissioner Kelly asked if the Painters Path parking �
problem had been resolved. Mr. Beebe stated that the condi- '�
tions would take care of the parking problem and that if
necessary it would be required that the street be resurfaced.
Commissioner Reading asked Mr. Beebe if there were any
more signs to be installed at the San Diego Federal Savings
site on San Pablo. Mr. Beebe stated that the signs and street
surface markings were on the drawing board. Commissioner Kry-
der stated that the Planning Priorities Committee , which he
was a member of, had decided that the street would have a 2-
way left turn lane and he asked Mr. Beebe if this was still
being considered. r�r . Beebe noted that the street was wide
enough and that it would definitely be considered.
Gommissioner Reading also asked Mr. Beebe if there was a
si�nal light planned �or San Luis Rey. Mr. Beebe noted that
it was a City project and was in the works . Commissioner
Reading asked if it would be possible to use Redevelopment
monies �or the project . Mr. Beebe noted he would check into
it .
B. City Attorney - Not Present
C. Planning Commissioners
Commissioner Kryder referred back to the letter received
from CVAG with regard to the By-Pass stating that he felt
a committee was not what needed but that some teehnical adv3ce
was needed and a decision made after this advice is reviewed
and then a committee formed. He suggested that a technical
advisor be hired and send his advice to CVAG.
Minutes
Palm Desert Planning Commission
February 15, 1978 Page Five
XII . COMMENTS (Cont. )
Chazrman Berkey noted that the best way to do this is
with the right representation . A representative from Cal-
trans and the County should be the guiding light as the
proposed routes are within their territory. He noted that
Supervisor McCandless was interested. It was suggested that
the Staff draft a letter stating the Commissions comments
�.•+ and forward it to CVAG. Commissioner Kryder stated that he
would help the Staff with the letter. It was suggested that
a letter be sent to the supervisor requesting that the County
go to Caltrans and ask for an Engineer' s design of a by-pass.
Mr. Beebe noted that a feasibility study would take into
consideration the economics and the right-of-ways involved.
Chairman Berkey gave some background on what had happened
20 years ago when the State had acquired the right-of-ways
from Palm Springs almost to Cathedral City. It was to be
used as a by-pass/expressway north of Highway 111 . The people
fought the issue and the State abandoned the idea.
XIII . ADJOURNMENT
On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner
Reading, the meeting was adjourned at 2 :20 p .m. ; carried unanimously
(5-0) .
�
_� �--� '
,��1�'//' �� � ,
i l , a-�,1,�
RALP J. PRIANI , Acting Secretary
ATTEST:
./�
GEORGE BERKEY, Chairma
/ks
�..
EXHIBIT A
- .:�^�:_irs,.--tl,.;� ,� ?-:.:� ,,
T L .y' .7r L . -. - . . .. { �':,�•',��
„�.-r '-s - �� � . . . . . . . . � . ,.
. . , . . , ,.. , ,�^ •�.+ _:ti,m a !• �4.�'� - :f. -S� I,�� _s. "t'�:_ r s . __ - .
�'� � .� , � .:
���� �Q��c��� ��y��� ��� �C�"�-��t��
LG�� �G-�✓�Z�e2J
C��K�' -Cl��J ��
-t��
� � � .� u� l'�� �� �-vt-� ��
,
�-e�.� ���t��-�v< � �-��-�� c ��-�
� � - � � �
!.�—t�..��-�-��..� ���..�-� ���,�-•--.��� -�./��. �
. ,C,C �(.� �%6�c,�c-Z� �ZtiL�-� •.�C-Q/ G�I�C.L� Cs� �'�-�
�� „%��
�,,�„�" _-��'�-�.�G � ��!-� �c�-� .��c.� f�
�,i"� _ , � �
j �, � —���, s��-� C
- ��.�`� �,C��-�� ��
��,,��v�..� �c-� ,, �"�r�z- �,r�2�k.- � -� �-��'
, .�, ��j ���� ��-
' � "��.�� �.�L%�C�'v� ,����d��..� L
4 iX ���4� .�� o
�nz� �
����� �' '� ..� ��
.�¢.E�,�-c.�C!�'i� ��e-���"��-�% C� .
�.�� /�oZ�, G G'�' -� �� � ' G'G��L-�
� '
i i�Lz�-'�-�.rZ�CJ --c�� /. ,��LLG 1'1��� 4
��-� C' - �C/�e�,� .��� �
� � �
�"� n ��� . -e,���� .-��--� �a�t��� .
�� � .
��� � .%��e.� G��-������ G['�--���.�:�
�' /� , � / - / � �
�Z`-, ..L%��c.�t� �L ,�i.c'�L.���C� G�,C����L�^=��`� ��
�,�,��urt� , �� �L��G- ��e-e�-✓ -��ec.�� ��G�.-�--
� ���:.; ��..e�¢� /l-�'-d-�- c-{���-L���� ���
� �a�ti�t� �c�.�-�-� .�.c� ��-�� - e..��
C,E'i �tX <X-C-,!�- ,;/d�'GGy'��-�t-�l'!�-rt'J ' �����1.��� ��U�.�iE%��f
.�����..�-�-.� ,,�..� �� �
������ ��� � �������:�
� � �-�
.� ,��;�.� . .,� � �c.���.,�
,�'`
�XHItiIrl� A
,
_��-� �L� .-�.�� ���� ����� �-�' �L��
��-���.� .,�� ��ar��, ��� : .�� � �'� �-�' .�
�� �� � .
--��� � .���-�-�--c-a/ �.' �Z Z-e�� C�.c���
,
�j -'��-�-�".���� ��cc�✓ C��-�� �t-e-
;
C " c�� �..�%���c.�G-�.-�-�' °
��.��.= �� . . �,� . .
o - ���
�-�t-� �o � �c.,�. C�� .�� G -t,�
_ , �� � ��� .
L�y--��-C�� C�u� �?z.c,� � n�-r� .�� . �
-�� , -t���►�� <z�
� ���-�: � .����� �� ��'�..��
. . �� ,
��-�.-���.� _�� ���e�'�� a �'��,.•
--� `�� � �.���
, ��
� � . ��� ��� � ��� � ��
��' . . �
<� -, �=���� � � ' t�-- ,�y ✓
- �� LG�
��.� ;�-�, .�� .
�'�-��:�- � "� �� � � c.� -
��� �. � .� �� �:�'-�
�
��-�-����z�,.� ��� C��,� ��t�� ..����.,,
s
.�� � �_��--� � C���..� ���_,��,�..��..
��
���'� ���.��Cr� �� �Ze.� C�c.�
���rL' ��'�2-�-e"� �-C.�� ✓l� ��-t��--�
C-t,� '�-``-- ' c`�� �- � ^,�-`_ -�'`� �T��.;�� ��-t� C.�.� L 2�
��� ��� -, � - � �,�%
C'X���/ Z L.��2-�'�C._s7� �;�?�_�(�L-GL
� �
�'�' �L� � -�L� � �� G�s�� d
�� �(�g��G�� �t..��-` f,��t..� G i�
«/�
/1'l� t/ ��-�'!�'�, ...�-� .���-c��C!- _ �� �=c�GL•�
2�`�%� �j !����,
..'�1-.�' C-G'�c • G�slc�� �-c�Z��,fL ��' .�L�-�'-� G� �
� � � ��p _ • �
�'-��'�L� � c� �c..�-,G� -�c� �-E��-�J
,
�� ��� ���.� .��� ��� � �
�z����� ��� �-� r�-�. �-�� -��
� . � � =�i��a c�.e,��-e��—�
i ����
� , � ,�.�
C���' � � '.-�zv rc� �'1��,.�1-L��
���L'���r�-�� _-�—�
' ��lL� ���'�� L�c-C�� `� .
, i
EXHIBIT B
1 �
--�t— �e �r L (/S c � _�ix--- �L- - -�-�� L.✓� �� ���+4E.,.�
/ �— ----,-- .
� � �2 v t�o t,:k"��7 /.r - �t�.'G�.�'1__^'1'�.�.�r�_ ��}� -
��,.� G�R R��c.. .--�y - -- -
�. � f� I� ' .
�
,. �
/f�rJ 'M t q ,� �.. � .., ��/
�.,€�---- -- -�-- ,._ f
---- - —_� -- �- - -- — - --- --- --
� "�— /c}(�t�_-�1� _���-- 1 � �- �''� --�L"�-� �a`a�,-°, `Q "`�
�; � i✓oRyy, , 7�t s ��,<- <��, c �,� � �sevL �vi
� , ,
.
/� �t __�7'� � � . . � �a�,7,r�,�,--��'�_ f T �i LC. ���,�_�
�_- --- -- --- , , ,
, , �—��_.e�'� �-l�� � "" V�,G �,�>✓ r�l�.����( b y- - -'"� -�''7`��"0�,.�c.�
f �
;s �'��C,a �l c v7 � _--
� �1-��, 0� Zo.�. �.�./ � G�rsT� �� P����io..� G'�`?�►Y
.
A �` �i �� __��i�__�� ,���-��^��'�
�
_ �'...,. ��7" d� I�� c��4����, �•��� a! �'�-�el1_,_�c� Q�� c.e _
� 0 F �. ��vses _ �c-.S� .,/c.z 7�t L.a.�. c� r x ���c� �,�.�
, l
, ,
� I7E'i4. Gr�}-1�r��.,�7"� � v�'��; rr f;�l o�' f� �G•��
__� 1 . ; _�--� _
� --- ---° --- •� - -- -
, , , .
�R��?- �- ' .�.t�. �-. c 7 ..S�,o��� /+ro7` .6.Q. �S i�,v� f% ���- --
�� `——��-i��_���- 'r � � _� - ,D�,�LrcG--- C�VE���G,.� �.,✓
�� !`f�r� �� � ct �� �'_ �_ /�0 d .�-�' /�oss �v�=yi�7���
, T '
�
��-� � �'.� .=:.��.'�l. �,s���,� �..�i �.,oT �.�. u��;� .� � ��
� �
4��'I�:��� �� �..1�+" -� -- --�i' '_ J �' �� �,� �,/,a � � " `1
, �, . , . � —� � p , c�.
�.y Y 1 r.4� � l� �1 Q--C-.� �'7'faV . ____ ._.—-- —_ __ _._-___ -.—.
—�-�----------
�, ��/��_—S�fLC('7. ��� _:._�t7� - /S L 1/PG�Q'Lt�_ �+^�y_. _ R! P.�.J ��.S s^�.S
',� - / �
� C!!�1�^�.�lQ..-• - ---- -- -- -
EXHIBIT C
�
COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION of GOVERNMENTS
County of Riverside
Coachella • Desert Hot Springs • Indio
Palm Desert • Palm Springs • RancFio Mirage �
February 14, 1978
Mr. Paul Williams, Planning Director
City of Palm Desert
45-275 Prickly Pear Lane
Palm Desert, California 92260
Dear Paul,
Last January 18, 1978, you invited me to attend a meeting of the Palm Desert
Planning Comr.mission where I was asked to report on the status of planninq in the
area of alternate routes to Highway 111. At that meeting, I discovered that your
Planning Commission, as well as representatives from other Cove Communities, are
extremely interested in the problem of high-density traffic on Highway 111. At
that meeting, I indicated that the Coachella Valley Association of Governments'
staff and facilities could be used by you and other interested parties to help
facilitate youur studies regarding the Highway 111 situation.
�f
I am now able to re�ort that on January 31, 1978, the CVAG General Assembly met and
among other things, requested that the Association of Governments conduct a study
regarding possible alternate routes to Highway 111. This subject was brought up by
Mayor Russell Beirich, City of Palm Springs, who commented that this ongoing problem
has been considered from time-to-time and further stated that he felt that it would
be appropriate now for CVAG to study this problem in detail and recommend viable
solutions.
The General Assembly directed me to present this problem to the Technical Advisory
Committee which meets on February 23, 1978, and ask this c�roup of_ City Managers to
recommend a method for CVAG to study this problem. I expect that the Technical
Advisory Committee will suggest the creation of a special committee to study this
problem which would include all CVAG member agencies, as well as representatives
from the Cities of Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage and CALTRANS.
We will be in further contact with your City regarding our study of alternate routes
to Highway 111, but inasmuch as your Planning Commission has voiced a concern about
this matter in mid January, I thought that you would be interested in the recent
developments that have taken place at the CVAG level.
Very truly yours,
�
t/" �Q�
GAR WIEDLE
Executive Director
GW:kf
74-'133 EI Paseo, Palm Desert, Calif. J2260 • [7'14) 346-'1127