HomeMy WebLinkAbout0502 MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY - MAY 2, 1978
7 : 00 P,M. - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
I . CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission
was called to order by Chairman Berkey at 7 : 00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall .
�
II . PLEDGE - Commissioner Kryder
III . ROLL CALL
Present : Commissioner KELLY
Commissioner KRYDER
Commissioner SNYDER
Chairman BERKEY
Others
Present : Paul A. Williams - Director of Environmental Services
Ralph Cipriani - Associate Planner
Clyde Beebe - Director of PubYic Works
Kathy Shorey - Planning Secretary
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. MINUTES of the special meeting of the Planning Commission
of April 18, 1978,
�,,,, Mr. Williams requested that the following corrections be made
to the minutes.
Page one, under correction of minutes , 'page five,
3rd paragraph, change Pete Battia to Pete Battio"
should read "Pete Bettito" .
Page one, second paragraph from the bottom, delete
lst sentence.
Page three , fifth paragraph, end of second sentence ,
"Avenue and the entrance" should be "Avenue at the
entrance" .
Page five , second paragraph from the bottom, last
sentence, "inforcement" should be spelled "enforce-
ment" .
On a motion by Commissioner Kelly , seconded by Commissioner
Kryder, the minutes were apporved as corrected; carried unanimously (4-0) .
V. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None
�"' VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS
Chairman Berkey announced that prior t�o this meeting, the Com-
mission had met in a Study Session for the purpose of clarifying the
staff recommendations. No decisions were reached. Chairman Berkey
then explained the Public Hearing procedures to those present .
Minutes
Palm Deser�. Planning Commission
May 2, 1978 Page Two
VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont . )
A. Case Nos. DP 06-78 and 118MF - TRANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY, Applicant
Request for approval of a Development Plan and
Preliminary Design Review to a�low construction of
80 condominium units , a clubhouse , tennis courts,
and swimming pools on approximately 13. 5 acres gen- `
erally located at the northwest corner of Cook '�
Street and 44th Avenue.
Mr . Williams reviewed the case and noted the Design Review
Boards concern over the garage doors for Plan No. 2 and the perimeter
wall. He also noted that the project would have a bike system that
would integrate with existing systems in and around the City.
There was some discussion about the tennis courts and whether
they would be lighted. Mr. Williams noted that they would be lighted
and that they would be 27 ft . from the units and that the courts
would be lowered. With regard to the streets, Mr . Williams noted that
the interior streets would be private .
Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked
if the applicant wished to speak at this time .
BILL L0, representing Transcopic , addressed the
Commission and noted only one change in the
Staff report and conditions and that is that
the project will be done in 4 phases not 2 .
The amenities and streets will be completed before
the units will be started.
Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone wishing to speak "�
in FAVOR or in OPPOSITION to the propos�d project . Being none, he
declared the Public Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the
Commission .
On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner
Kelly, the Commission approved the case by Planning Commission Re-
solution No. 353; carried unanimously (4-0) .
B. Case No. TT 12450, DANIEL RUSSIE , Applicant
Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map to
consolidate 15 existing lots to create 4 lots to
provide for 21 condominium units and common open
space on property generally located east of Deep
Canyon , between Sage Brush Drive and Driftwood
Drive.
Mr . Williams reviewed the case and the conditions noting the
area involved on maps covering the site .
Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked
if the applicant wished to speak at this time .
CHARLES ROOT, 73-225 Bursera, project builder, �
noted his agreement with the conditions as
stated.
Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone wishing to speak in
FAVOR or in OPPOSITION to the proposed case.; Being none, he declared
the Public Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission .
On a motion by Commissioner Snyder , seconded by Commissioner
Kelly the Commission approved Case No. TT 12450 by Planning Commission
Resolution No . 354; carried unanimously (4-0) .
Minutes
Palm Desert Planning Commission
n4ay 2, 1978 Page Three
VII . OLD BUSINESS
A. Resolu�ion 78-37; a Resolution of the City Council
of the City of Palm Desert , California, establishing
a priorities list of Future Studies for the 1978-80
Advanced Planning Program and directing Staff to
develop a tentative work program.
� Mr. Williams noted that a work schedule had been started
for Item 1 and that a bus tour would be conducted May 20 to cover
Item 2 . Resolution was received and filed by the Commission.
B. Resolution 78-36; a Resolution of the City Council
of the City of Palm Desert , California, establ�ishing
procedures to be followed when the Planning Commis-
sion and Staff have differing opinions regarding
specific proposals .
Mr. Williams noted some of the points of the Resolution and
stated that the Resolution would be filed and implemented. The
Resolution was received and filed by the Commission.
VIII . NEW BUSINESS - None
IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS
A. Review of Cases acted on by the Design Review Baard
at their meeting of April 25 , 1978.
Mr . Cipriani reviewed the cases noting the Design Review
� Boards concerns with Case No . 115MF. Mr. Lee Martinez representing
the applicant stated that he was in agreement and would comply with
the conditions; Case No. 79C, he noted the conditions and showed
a color rendering of the project ; Case No. 119MF, the Commission re-
quested that it be stated that the landscaping plan would be subject
to Design Review Board review, the Resolution was changed to reflect
this; and Case No. 61MF, there was no discussion .
On a motion by Commissioner Kelly , seconded by Commissioner
Kryder , the Commission approved the actions of the Design Review Board
by revised Planning Commission Resolution No. 355; carried unanimously.
X. DISCUSSION ITEMS - None
XI . ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
CHUCK LUENSMANN, resident of Portola Del Sol , asked the
Commission a few questions : 1) Why is one project approved
with the condition that a fire station be put in but
another project approved without this condition? - It was
explained that the fire station in question is much needed
in the area that is proposed for and the project that is
being asked to participate its creation is creating the
`"" need for said fire station . 2) Is the fire station volun-
teer or fully manned? - He was informed that the station
is fully manned by the Riverside County Fire Department ,
but there are also volunteer fireman needed. The Commission
also advised Mr. Luensmann to attend a City Council meeting
regarding questions pertaining to other fire statioris being
proposed.
Minutes
: Palm Desert Planning Commission
May 2, 1978 Page Four
XI . ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Cont . )
HELEN HUNTINGTON, 73-120 Shadow Lake Dr. , addressed
; the Commission speaking of her concern for the street
behind her property, namely the grade. She also men-
tioned her neighbors wall that has dirt piled up ,
against it due to the high grade of the street . She stated
the Commission and City are not following the conditi:ons
that were approved with the project involved and that
the flood problem should be handled some other way not
by raising the level of the street .
Mr. Beebe stated that he had talked with Mrs . Bean , the
neighbor and they had agreed that the r�ad would be
moved ten feet away from Mrs. Beans ' wall and that Mr .
Lennon would landscape the land by the wall and that if
Mrs. Bean is not satisfied with this after one year, he
will raise her wall .
Mrs. Huntington stated that this does not answer the pro-
blem because raising the road will take away Mrs. Beans '
privacy.
MARY JANE BEAN, 73-901 Shadow Lake Dr. , stated that the
road should conform to the adjacent lots as condition
reads, if this cannot be done then the lots should be
abandoned.
Mr. Beebe read the condition concerning the grading of
the street , noting that they are in compliance with the
condition and by putting the road 10 ft . away from the �
wall it should afford privacy to Mrs . Bean. Further,
he stated that the drainage problem had to be dealt with
and this was the best way to solve it .
Chairman Berkey stated that the drainage problem is being
solved to benefit the residents of the area. He then
thanked the ladies for bringing the matter to the attention
of the Commission and he would have staff check into the
matter further.
ALEXIS NEWBRANDER, asked about the height of the buildings
proposed.
Mr. Williams stated that they will be well '�elow the 18 ft .
level . He also stated that the other solution to the drain-
age problem would be to have the water run naturally down
Shadow Lake , but it was not felt that this was the best
solution for the area involved.
Chairman Berkey stated that everything is being done that
can be done and that this solution will cause the least
damage if any damage at all .
Mr. Leunsmann asked to speak again asking the Commission
about a problem he has with his lot at Portola Del Sol .
He was advised that he should contact the builder but
that he could obtain the conditions for the project from
the Dept . of Environmental Services at any time .
XII . COMMENTS
A. City Staff - None
B. City Attorney - None
Minutes
Palm Desert Planning Commission
May 2, 1978 Page Five
XII . COMMENTS (Cont . )
C. Planning Commissioners
Commissioner Kelly asked about the progress on the
landscaping at Portola Del Sol . Mr . Williams stated he
will follow up on the problem.
Commissioner Kelly also stated she had been advised
r""'' of a line of sight problem on Rancho Road and Portola.
Mr. Beebe stated that he believed �the problem had been
solved already but that he would check it again.
Commissioner Snyder and Commissioner Kryder stated
that they learned a lot at the Cal Chap�er AIP conference
that they attended in Monterey and that they now know
what an efficient staff the City possesses. Chairman
Berkey agreed and noted his appreciation at being able
to attend the conference .
XIII . ADJOURMENT
On a motion by Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner
Snyder , the meeting was adjourned at 8 : 05 p .m. ; carried unanimously (4-0) .
�
( . �N �
� ,�-i �"�'�'w---��
PAUL A. WILLIAMS , Secretary
ATTEST:
G
GEORGE BERKEY, Chairma
/ks
�