Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0805 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - AUGUST 5, 1980 7:00 P.M. - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I . CALL TO ORDER The regularly scheduled meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Miller in the City Hall Council Chambers. II . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Commissioner Berkey III . ROLL CALL Members Present: Commissioner Berkey Commissioner Richards Chairman Miller Excused Absent: Commissioner Kryder Commissioner McLachlan Staff Present: Carlos Ortega, Acting Director of Environmental Services Murrel Crump, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Associate Planner Phil Drell , Assistant Planner Linda Russell , Planning Secretary Others Present: Clyde Beebe, Director of Public Works Eric Vogt, Fire Marshal IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of regular meeting of July 16, 1980. Mr. Crump noted one correction: Page 1, under Public Hearing (A) , second paragraph, second sentence, should read: "Mr. Crump replied that there was not and further explained that the original approval was for a one-year period and the applicant is now seeking a one-year extension to file the final map." Motion was made by Commissioner Berkey, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to approve the minutes as amended. Carried unanimously (3-0) . V. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A. Memorandum from Carlos Ortega: Designation of Acting Zoning Administrator and Acting Secretary to the Planning Commission. B. Request for Comments - Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission: Cathedral City Incorporation. There were no comments from the Commission on these matters. C. Letter from Palm Desert Board of Realtors: Proposed Office Location--General Plan Consistency. Commissioner Berkey abstained from discussing this matter and excused himself from the dais noting that he is a member of the Palm Desert Board of Realtors. Mr. Crump reviewed the letter with the Commission which stated that the Palm +► Desert Board of Realtors is requesting consideration of a rezoning from R-3 to Commercial indicating that there is a question regarding General Plan consistency. Commissioner Richards explained that the City is presently discussing a General Plan Update, and this particular section of the General Plan Land Use Element needs further study and should be reviewed as a whole. MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 5, 1980 Page Two * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * V. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS (Cont. ) Mr. Crump recommended that this letter be received and filed and it be included in the General Plan Update considerations. MR. FRANK GOODMAN, 77-900 Avenue of States, requested that the Commission con- sider this particular site for commercial uses during the General Plan Update discus- sions. By Minute Motion the Commission agreed to receive and file this letter and con- sider the request in their General Plan Update discussions. Commissioner Berkey returned to the dais. VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Case No. VAR 05-80 - MARK L. BROWN AND DANIEL LEVIN, Applicants Request for approval of a Variance from off-street parking standards (12 spaces required, 3 spaces allocated) to permit a four station beauty salon to be located in Suite 24-A of El Paseo_Village, a commercial complex within the C-1 (General Commercial ) zone located on the south side of El Paseo between Lupine Lane and San Pablo Avenue. Mr. Crump explained that the applicant had telephoned Staff requesting that this case be withdrawn, but no written confirmation had been received. Therefore, Mr. Crump recommended a continuance to September 2, 1980. Motion was made by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Berkey, to continue this case to September 2, 1980. Carried unanimously (3-0) . B. Continued Case No. PM 16258 - STEIN-BRIEF/VISTA GROUP and WAGNER-STANFORD CONSULTANTS, Applicants Request for approval of a Parcel Map to create four parcels on 29.29 gross acres for the development of a 390 unit hotel/condominium complex, a racquet club, two restaurants and commercial shops, within the PC(4) , S.P. (Planned Commercial Resort, Scenic Preservation Overlay) zone located at the southwest corner of Highway 111 and 44th Avenue. Mr. Sawa presented this case pointing out how the parcel would be divided and identifying the uses for each. He recommended two additional conditions to read as follows: No. 10) All off-site street improvements shall be installed in the first phase of development; No. 11) Improvements to the Palm Valley Storm Channel shall be installed as required by the Coachella Valley Water District and approved by the Director of Public Works prior to development of Parcel No. 4. Chairman Miller opened the Public Hearing asking if the applicant cared to make a presentation. MR. DAVE WAGNER, Engineering Representative of Stein-Brief/Vista, stated he would like an additional condition stating that they could file multiple final parcel maps. He explained the purposes for this request were for financing and consolida- tion. He also requested that Condition No. 10 be modified to read: "As the phases are developed, all off-site street improvements adjacent to each phase, shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Works." Commissioner Richards asked Staff for a clarification on the application procedures for the subdivision maps. Mr. Crump explained that the applicant could either file a reversionary map or re-parcel . He further explained that the Commis- sion may want to establish phasing procedures far this project. Commissioner Richards felt reluctant to approve the multiple phasing and stated he would like to see the overall project take form. Mr. Wagner clarified his request explaining that they would like to install all the off-site improvements adjacent to this development as they proceed with the project versus doing it all at once. MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 5, 1980 Page Three * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont. ) Chairman Miller expressed his concern for the overall development of the project. Mr. Wagner explained that they would have to come before the Commission shortly for the Tentative Tract Map. He assured the Commission that the Hotel/Condo- minium project would not be abandoned. After further discussion, the Commission and Mr. Wagner agreed to continue this matter until a multiple phasing plan could be presented. Motion was made by Commissioner Berkey, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to continue this case to September 2, 1980. Carried unanimously (3-0) . C. Case No. DP 02-78 (Amendment) - COLUMBIA FINANCIAL CORPORATION (Sam M. Teitler, Vice President) , Applicant Request for approval of an amendment to a previously approved Development Plan to allow a 4,184 square foot restaurant use in a portion of a commercial complex on approximately 3.5 acres, within the PC(3) , S.P. (Planned Commercial , Regional , Scenic Preservation Overlay) zone generally located at the southwest corner of Highways 74 and 111. Mr. Sawa reviewed the staff report and stated that Staff did not feel there would be a problem in regards to parking. He recommended approval of this amendment. Commissioner Richards asked Staff if the applicant could put three (3) more restaurants in building "A". Mr. Sawa replied they could only if they requested an amendment and the Commission approved the additional restaurant uses. Chairman Miller opened the Public Hearing and asked if the applicant cared to make a presentation. MR. ALFRED COOK, Representative, briefly stated that the Development Plan as originally approved is consistent with the requested amendment. MR. SAM TEITLER, Applicant, requested approval of this Amendment. Chairman Miller closed the Public Hearing. There being no questions from the Commission, motion was made by Commissioner Berkey, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to approve this case by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 620. Carried unanimously (3-0) . D. Case No. 09-80 - CHACAHUALA, LTD. , Applicant Request for approval of a Development Plan to allow the construction of a 117 unit condominium development on approximately 38 acres within the PR-3 (Planned Residen- tial , maximum density 3 d.u./ac. ) zone generally located at the southeast corner of Homestead Road and Alamo Drive. Mr. Crump presented this case explaining that this development represents a revision of expired DP 09-78. He stated that the major change to the original Develop- ment Plan was the undergrounding of a drainage system rather than surface drainage. He further explained that there was now concern as to reviewing developments within areas of special flood hazard. Also noted, was the new requirement for the applicant to prepare a Flood Hazard Report. He recommended continuance until such report is prepared and accepted. Chairman Miller opened the Public Hearing asking if the applicant cared to make a presentation. MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 5, 1980 Page Four * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont. ) MR. A.T. WILKS, Architect, gave a brief review on the background of the project and indicated there was a time element problem. He asked for approval with the contingency that they would provide the City Engineer all the necessary informa- tion on drainage. MR. JIM MCGIRR, Engineer, explained the drainage plan for the project and stated that the plan conforms to Ordinance 221. Mr. Beebe, Director of Public Works, stated that the developer has complied with the storm drain plan. He pointed out that Ironwood and Cove Construction have already installed their drainage pipes, which lead to this project. Mr. Beebe recommended that the Commission approve this case subject to compliance with Ordi- nance 221 and approval from the Flood Review Committee. Mr. Crump explained that the Tentative Tract Map does not agree with the proposed Development Plan. Mr. McGirr pointed out that all the improvement plans have gone through plan check and are ready with a few minor revisions. He also pointed out that Mr. Williams, former Director of Environmental Services, stated that the Tentative Tract Map does conform to the Development Plan. MR. ROBERT HAYWARD, 73-360 Broken Arrow Trail , stated that he did not receive notice about this project and expressed his concern for the drainage problems in his area. Mr. Crump explained the procedures on noticing the residents within 300 feet of the project boundary. Commissioner Richards asked Mr. Beebe to explain what the Flood Review Committee did. Mr. Beebe explained who it was composed of, and what decisions they made. Commissioner Berkey asked Mr. Beebe if he thought this development would miti- gate any flood dangers in the Silver Spur area. Mr. Beebe replied that the developer did plan for a 100-year storm, but there were no guarantees that the area would not get hurt. MRS. JENSEN, Buckboard Trail , addressed the Commission on drainage considera- tions and a culvert to be placed on Portola Avenue near Haystack. Mr. Beebe explained that because of legal problems, the dip on Portola has not been repaired. Mr. McGirr assured the Commission that the Development Plan would be in proper order if approved. Chairman Miller closed the Public Hearing. Commissioner Berkey suggested they approve this project subject to the condi- tions implemented for DP 09-78; compliance with Ordinance 221; and, extend it to October 22, 1980. Mr. Crump explained that it was not an extension and suggested a continuance to August 20, 1980, for preparation of a Resolution approving the project. After further discussion, Commissioner Berkey suggested approval subject to the following: conditions implemented for DP 09-78; compliance with Ordinance 221; requirements by the Fire Marshal 's letter dated July 15, 1980; and compliance with the requirements of the Department of Environmental Services. Motion was made by Commissioner Berkey, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to approve this case by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 621, subject to those conditions stated. Carried unanimously (3-0) . MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 5, 1980 Page Five * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont. ) Chairman Miller asked the Secretary to present the next Public Hearing item on the agenda. Mr. Crump requested that the Commission consider items "E" and "F" together because the proposals shared a similar conflict with the adopted C.O.D. Specific Plan Circulation Element. E. Case No. DP 08-79 and 178 MF - TRANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Applicant Request for approval of a twelve month time extension of an approved Development Plan and Preliminary Design Review Case to allow construction of sixty (60) apartments and associated recreational amenities on approximately 10.87 acres within the PR-5 (Planned Residential , maximum density 5 d.u./ac. ) zone located on the east side of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater Storm Channel . F. Case No. CUP 09-80 - MARCO POLO MOBILE VILLAGE, Applicant Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow continued use of a 144 space mobile park located on 18.8 acres of which 3.7 acres are to be further developed, increasing capacity to 166 spaces, within the R-M (Mobile Home) zone located on the west side of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater Storm Channel . Mr. Crump began his presentation on these two requests by noting that the conflicts with the adopted Circulation Element needed to be addressed before consider- ing the merits of the individual projects. He reviewed each of the proposals in light of the planned right of way for Magnesia Falls Drive (43rd Avenue) . Mr. Crump indicated that there may be a question as to the feasibility of implementing Magnesia ... Falls as planned, recognizing the proposals which were now before the Commission for consideration. He pointed out to the Commission three alternatives for action on these cases, and recommended that the Commission consider a continuation of the Public Hearing until the matter of Magnesia Falls alignment and right of way width was further studied in the forthcoming General Plan Update. Chairman Miller opened the Public Hearing asking if the applicants cared to make a presentation. MARCO POLO MOBILE VILLAGE, Applicant, stated that they are willing to dedicate 30 feet of their property if they are allowed to use that land. He asked for approval . MR. JACK NUVELL, Engineer for Transcopic, 71-537 Highway 111, stated he disagreed with Staff on the alignment of Magnesia Falls Drive. He believed it was consistent, and provided a sketch illustrating what he thought the alignment should look like. He also pointed out that the improvements easterly to the Park line up with Magnesia Falls. He asked that the Planning Commission find that the Develop- ment Plan is consistent with the intent of the Specific Plan and grant approval . Commissioner Richards clarified the intent of the Staff recommendation, which was to continue these cases until the conflict between the proposals and the Specific Plan is cleared up. Commissioner Berkey asked Staff when the Development Plan would expire. Mr. Crump replied that the Development Plan would stay active until the Planning Commission takes action. Mr. Nuvell was concerned with other future changes required by the Specific Plan. Mr. Crump replied that the applicant could use the present Circulation Element on the Specific Plan as a guide for their development. MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 5, 1980 Page Six * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont. ) MR. BILL LO, Representative of Transcopic, stated that his problem was one of timing. He asked the Commission to take action subject to the Circulation Element being resolved. He pointed out that there was no mention of this problem by Staff until recently. Commissioner Berkey suggested that this case be approved- subject to a condition stated as follows: "Conformance to any subsequently adopted Circulation Element policy, with implementation approval granted herein not permitted until that policy has been adopted." The applicant concurred. Chairman Miller closed the Public Hearing. After further discussion, it was determined to approve Case Nos. DP 08-79 and 178 MF. Motion was made by Commissioner Berkey, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to approve these cases by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 622, subject to the mentioned condition. Carried unanimously (3-0) . By Minute Motion Case No. CUP 09-80 was continued indefinitely until a new Circulation Element policy is adopted. Carried unanimously (3-0). G. Case Nos. DP 12-79, CUP 06-79 and 120 C (Amendments) - ERNEST W. HAHN, INC. , Applicant Request for approval of a six month time extension of an approved project, exception from ordinance standards for perimeter treatment, and approval of plan amendments to allow the construction of a Regional Shopping Center, associated parking and fire facilities on approximately 64 acres within the PC(3) , S.P. (Regional Planned Commer- cial , Scenic Preservation Overlay) zone and R-3(9) , S.P. (Multi-family Residential , maximum density 1 d.u./9000 square feet) zone, bounded generally by State Highway 111 on the south, Rancho Grande on the north, Monterey Avenue on the east and the northerly extension of El Paseo on the west. Mr. Crump presented this case reviewing the staff report and pointing out the revised site plan features. He recommended a one year time extension rather than six months, and modified approval of the amendments. He added that Condition No. 5 may be revised to include specific items recommended by the Redevelopment Agency Traffic Consultant, which the Commission finds appropriate to include. He reviewed those recommendations. Chairman Miller opened the Public Hearing asking if the applicant cared to make a presentation. MR. MILLAR ARCHULETA, Architectural Representative, 74-440 N. Figueroa, Los Angeles, clarified the amount of area for landscaping. He indicated his objections to some of the Consultant's recommendations and explained why they have requested some of the design changes. MR. BILL GOLUBECK, Traffic Engineer Consultant for Hahn, addressed the Commis- sion on the matter of parking and the recommendations by the Redevelopment Agency Traffic Consultant. He reviewed the suggested list of revisions and stated his objections to some. He indicated that they concur with items 2, 7, and 8 as stated. Mr. Crump reviewed the Conditions of Approval . MR. BILL LYLE, stated he had no objections to the Conditions of Approval , with modifications to draft Condition No. 5. MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 5, 1980 Page Seven * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont. ) After some discussion, Mr. Archuleta indicated he would suggest an additional Item No. 9, to read as follows: "Provide curvature along the northerly loop road in the proximity of the Theater." MR. JIM MCGETTA, Bullocks, stated why he would like the landscape area north of the Plaza Way entrance to be split to provide access to the mall . Chairman Miller closed the Public Hearing. Motion was made by Commissioner Berkey, seconded by Commissioner Richards , to approve this case by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 623, with the amended conditions as follows: Add to Condition No. 5, Items 1 (amend to 33 feet versus 35 feet) , 2, 7, 8, and 9 as stated with the Redevelopment Agency Traffic Consultant's listed recommendations. Carried unanimously (3-0) . VII . OLD BUSINESS - NONE VIII . NEW BUSINESS - NONE IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS Consideration of cases acted on by the Design Review Board at their meeting of July 29, 1980. 214 MF - Mr. Sawa presented the case indicating the Design Review Board had approved this request with four revisions. He briefly reviewed the revisions and noted the Board's concern about repetition of architecture (essentially the same as two previous projects) and energy conservation. 134 C - Mr. Sawa presented the case indicating the exterior changes proposed to the "Copa de Oro" Restaurant. He noted the Board granted preliminary and final approval of the plans as submitted. Motion was made by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Berkey, to confirm the actions by the Board by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 624. Carried unanimously (3-0) . X. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - NONE XI . COMMENTS - NONE XII . ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Berkey, to adjourn the meeting at 10:33 p.m. Carried unanimously (3-0) . MURREL CRUMP, Acting Secreta ATTEST: � 1 CHARLES MI ER, Chairman /dj