HomeMy WebLinkAbout1030 MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY - OCTOBER 30, 1984
6:00 P.M. - CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE
A STUDY SESSION WAS HELD PRIOR TO THE MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER
CONFERENCE ROOM, AT 6:00 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Downs lead in the pledge of allegiance.
III. ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present: Commissioner Downs
Commissioner Erwood
Commissioner Richards
Commissioner Wood
Chairman Crites
Commissioners Absent: None
Staff Members Present: Ray Diaz
Stan Sawa
Phil Drell
Phil Joy
Doug Phillips
Barry McClellan
Tonya Monroe
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Approval of the minutes of the meeting of October 16, 1984.
Action:
Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, approving the
October 16, 1984, minutes as submitted. Carried 4-0-1 (Commissioner Erwood
abstained.)
V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION
Mr. Diaz summarized the actions of the city council at its meeting of October 25,
1984.
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Case No. DP 09-81, TT 18027, and 229 MF - ROBERT WARD, Applicant
Request for approval of a one-year time extension of a
development plan, design review case, and a tentative
tract map to allow the construction of ten condominium
units in the PR-7 zone located at the southeast corner of
Fairhaven Drive (future) and Park View Drive.
saw
Action:
Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, approving a
one-year extension for DP 09-81, TT 18027, and 229 MF, with previous conditions.
Carried 5-0.
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 30, 1984
VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Continued Case No. PP 84-39 GARY LEEDS, Applicant
Request for approval of a Negative Declaration of
Environmental Impact and a precise plan of design to allow
construction of a 113 room hotel in PC (4) S.P. zone on
2.27 acres located on the south side of Highway 111,
approximately 680 feet east of Shadow Hills Road.
Mr. Diaz explained that this item was continued with instructions to staff to
prepare a resolution of denial, and allowing the applicant to modify the proposed
plans.
Mr. Sawa indicated that the resolution of denial had been prepared; however, he
felt that the revised proposal submitted by the applicant, which included additional
property obtained from the Brown Brosche project, thereby allowed the applicant
the percentage of required open space that was the major concern of the
commission. Staff recommended approval.
Chairman Crites inquired about the status of talks with the City of Indian Wells
regarding the frontage road extension. Mr. Sawa replied that there was no change
in Indian Well's position at this time.
Chairman Crites opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to address the
commission.
MR. JOE PISCOTTA, architect, explained that the open space provided for
in their project was beyond the required amount. He felt that this project
would be an asset to the community and discussed the consideration of a
circulation road.
Commissioner Downs asked if any problems existed with the adjoining property
owners. Mr. Sawa replied no.
Commissioner Richards asked if the project would meet the open space
requirements if a road was required. Mr. Sawa indicated that he did not have exact
figures, but that it would be close. Mr. Piscotta replied that only half of one
percent would be lost.
MR. GARY LEEDS, developer, felt that the architect and staff adequately
explained the project and further outlined the proposed amenities.
Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or
OPPOSITION to the proposed project.
MR. BERNIE SOLOMON, 73-185 Iron Tree Drive, expressed concern
regarding drainage and a traffic signal. Mr. McClellan explained that a
traffic signal would be installed, and no access would be allowed onto
Highway I I I until it is energized.
MR. CHARLES HAVER, 74-390 Highway 111, further explained the drainage
provisions.
Commissioner Woods inquired about the city's liability if the project were to be
approved and additional water and damage occurred. Mr. Doug Phillips replied that rrrr
there was a possibility that the city could be liable. Mr. McClellan indicated that
the project would contribute minimal additional water.
Commissioner Richards felt that existing developments should be protected. Mr.
Haver indicated that the drain at Portola would help.
MR. DON McNEILLY, Chamber of Commerce, felt that the project would
benefit the city in many ways.
-2-
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 30, 1984
MR. SANDY BAUM, 45-800 Deep Canyon, represented the
Commercial/Resort Subcommittee and read a letter of recommendation for
the project from that committee.
MR. MARK SIMON, 45-406 Driftwood, was from the Mountain Villas
Homeowners Association and expressed approval of the project. He asked
that the city require no lights on the tennis courts. Mr. Sawa replied that
there would be no lights.
Commissioner Wood asked for and received clarification on the installation of the
four-way traffic signal.
Chairman Crites closed the public testimony and asked for and further comments
from the commission.
Commissioner Richards asked what the next change was from having three project
condensed into two relating to the unit sizes. Mr. Sawa indicated that exact
figures were not available at this time. Commissioner Richards expressed approval
for the cooperativeness of the applicant in the changes that were made.
Action:
Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, to adopt the
findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-0-1 (Commissioner Erwood abstained.)
Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, to adopt
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1005, approving PP 84-39. Carried 4-0-1
(Commissioner Erwood abstained.)
B. Continued Case No. PP 84-41 - BROWN BROSCHE FINANCIAL INC. (Super
8 Motel), Applicant
%No
Request for approval of a precise plan of design to allow
construction of a 70 unit motel on 1.39 acres in the PC (4)
S.P. zone located on the south side of Highway 111,
approximately 450 feet east of Shadow Hills Road.
Note:
The applicant withdrew his request and no further action was necessary.
*Chairman Crites asked if anyone present for the Founded of the Retarded case wished to
speak with the applicant, a conference room was available for discussion prior to the case
coming before the commission.
C. Case Nos. DP 07-81 (Amendment #2), C/Z 84-16, and TT 19970 - DEEP
CANYON GROVES, Applicant
Request for approval to allow construction of 12 casitas
units in a portion of a currently vacant rear section of the
Granada Royale complex located 1,000 feet south of
Highway 111 and 600 feet east of Deep Canyon Road.
Mr. Joy outlined the staff report, suggested the additional condition requiring
school impact fees, and recommended approval.
Chairman Crites asked about the consistency with resort commercial if the
property is rezoned. Commissioner Richards explained that this had been the
original plan.
Mr. Diaz explained that staff is evaluating this project on its own merits.
-3-
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 30, 1984
Commissioner Downs asked if these casitas could be changed to time shares. Mr.
Diaz replied no. Commissioner Downs abstained from further discussion due to
previous involvement.
Chairman Crites opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to address the
commission.
MR. BERNIE SOLOMON, 73-185 Iron Tree, reviewed the project and
explained that he would like to rent the casitas through the hotel to provide +rr
the city with room tax.
Commissioner Wood asked what the density would be. Mr. Sawa replied 213 units
for 9.25 acres. Commissioner Wood asked if this complies with density
requirements. Mr. Sawa indicated that there would be 23 units per acre.
Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or
OPPOSITION to this project.
MR. VIC EFFINGER, Sorrento Court, explained that he lives adjacent to the
Granada Royale and that he was not opposed to it when it was built, but
expressed concern regarding the noise level. He explained that a buffer was
supposed to be planted to help with the noise. He also explained that it took
four to five calls to the city council to clean up the rubbish that had been
dumped.
Chairman Crites directed city staff to contact code enforcement. Mr. Diaz
explained that dumping has occurred from adjoining developments. The noise was
caused from the blower on the air conditioning unit, and that the barrier was on the
original plan and was not approved. Mr. Solomon replied that he had cleaned up
trash that wasn't theirs.
MR. DAN SPERITY, 405 Monocco Circle, expressed concern regarding the
noise also.
Chairman Crites closed the public testimony.
Commissioner Richards felt that planting would help create a buffer for Hidden
Palms residents. Mr. Solomon concurred.
Chairman Crites agreed with Commissioner Richards regarding Mr. Solomon's
fulfillment of committments, but could not justify the need for any additional
density. Commissioner Wood replied that the adjoining area is zoned PC (4), and
was the principle of the plottage. Chairman Crites felt there was no problem
leaving it as it was.
Action:
Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to adopt the
findings as presented by staff. Vote: 2-2-1 (Commissioners Erwood and Crites
voting nay, Commissioner Downs abstained.)
Mr. Diaz noted that this case would go to the city council without a
recommendation.
A FIVE MINUTE RECESS WAS CALLED AT 8:23 P.M.
D. Case No. CUP 84-9 - VALLEY CHRISTIAN ASSEMBLY, Applicant
Request for approval of a conditional use permit to allow '
conversion of a residential structure located in an R-1
10,000 S.P. zone at the southwest corner of Fred Waring
Drive and Portola Avenue to a church.
Mr. Drell outlined the salient points of the staff report and recommended approval.
-4-
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 30, 1984
Commissioner Downs asked about the traffic impacts. Mr. Drell replied that the
impact was not significant.
Commissioner Wood asked about the parking. Mr. McClellan indicated that off
street parking is required.
Chairman Crites asked about the ingress and egress onto Fred Waring. Mr. Drell
explained that there would be only right turn access.
■w
Commissioner Richards indicated concern regarding the requested upgrading at a
later date. He explained that in the past this was not allowed.
Chairman Crites opened the public testimony portion of the hearing and asked the
applicant to address the commission.
MR. DICK CARLSON, 45-820 Deep Canyon, explained that he was the
pastor. He commended staff on their cooperation and help. He felt this
project would be an asset to the community.
Chairman Crites asked if there would be any objections to the city revoking
occupancy until compliance. Mr. Carlson replied no.
Commissioner Wood asked for and received times when the church would have
services. Mr. Carlson also explained that building would serve as congregation,
classrooms, office.
Commissioner Downs felt that an improvement had already occurred.
Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or
OPPOSITION to this case. Hearing no comment, the public testimony portion was
closed.
Commissioner Erwood felt that a certain amount of time should be given for the
project to be completed, and that would be all. No extensions. Mr. Diaz replied
that the commission might not want to limit themselves, and that if the applicant
did apply, the commission could refuse the extension.
Commissioner Richards explained that if a problem occurred, a difficult situation
could occur.
Action:
Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to approve the
findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-0-1 (Commissioner Richards abstained.)
Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to adopt
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1006, approving CUP 84-9, subject to
conditions. Carried 4-0-1 (Commissioner Richards abstained.)
A FIVE MINUTE RECESS WAS CALLED AT 8:55 P.M.
E. Case No. CUP 01-82 (Amendment #0 - FOUNDATION FOR THE
RETARDED OF THE DESERT, Applicant
Request for approval of an amendment to a conditional use
permit to allow the use of a metal structure with patio
cover at the rear of the existing building and other minor
exterior additions in the P (public) zone located at the
low southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Sagewood
Drive.
Mr. Sawa explained the request and indicated that as a result of the meeting with
the applicant and concerned homeowners, the applicant would like to continue this
case to review the design.
Chairman Crites opened the public hearing.
-5-
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 30, 1984
MR. WENDELL VEITH, architect, explained that after talking with adjacent
homeowners, a change of design would benefit the project and satisfy the
neighbors. He asked for a continuance to the December 4, 1984, meeting.
Chairman Crites explained that anyone wishing to speak in regard to this project
might do so at the December 4 public hearing.
Commissioner Richards suggested that a couple of people be selected to speak for
the group.
Action:
Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to continue
this case to the meeting of December 4, 1984. Carried 5-0.
VIII. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
A. Request for adoption of a planning commission resolution approving an
amendment to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Plan.
Action:
Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1007, recommending to city council approval
of an amendment to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Plan.
B. Chairman Crites asked if the commission would like to have a planning
commissioner represent the commission at the city council meeting of
November 8, regarding the George Fox hearing.
Action:
Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, to have
Chairman Crites represent the planning commission at the November 8, 1984, city
council meeting. Carried 4-0-1 (Chairman Crites abstained.)
C. Commission requested staff to investigate status of Cahuilla Hills.
Action:
Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, directing
staff to investigate the Cahillea Hills matter. Carried 5-0.
IX. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
NONE.
X. COMMENTS
Mr. Diaz noted that the new clock had been installed in the council chamber.
Commission requested relocating the clock so that it could be seen by the
commission.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to adjourn the
meeting. Carried 5-0.
The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
�wI
RA ON A. I Z, e
ATTE
f
U ORD�RI PES, Chairman
�� -6-