Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0715 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - JULY 15, 1986 2:00 P.M. - CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE NO STUDY SESSION WAS NOT HELD PRIOR TO THE MEETING. I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Crites called the meeting to order at 2:03 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Downs led in the pledge of allegiance. III. ROLL CALL Members Present: Buford Crites, Chairman Bob Downs Ralph Wood Members Absent: Richard Erwood Jim Richards Staff Present: Ray Diaz Doug Phillips Joe Gaugush Phil Drell Phil Joy Catherine Sass Tonya Monroe IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Consideration for approval the minutes of July 1 , 1986. Action: Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, approving the minutes as submitted. Carried 3-0. V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION Mr. Diaz outlined July 24, 1986, city council actions as they pertained to the planning commission. VI . CONSENT CALENDAR A. Case Nos. PMW 86-14 and PMW 86-16 - KWL ASSOCIATES, Applicants Request for approval of two parcel map waivers *0W consolidating lots 17 and 18 of Palm Vista Unit MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 15, 1986 VAW No. 2, and consolidating lots 19 and 20 of Pa 1 m Vista Unit No. 2. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, approving the consent calendar by minute motion. Carried 3-0. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case No. PP 86-32 DESERT CITIES BAPTIST CHURCH, Applicant Request for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact and a precise plan of design to allow construction and operation of a church facility (and use of temporary modular structure for church services) on five gross acres in the PR-5 zone (planned residential , maximum five dwelling units per acre) , located on the east side of Portola Avenue, approximately 660 feet north of Country Club Drive. Mr. Diaz outlined the salient points of the staff report and indicated that public works wished to delete condition #11 regarding the landscaped median. Chairman Crites noted that the letter from the applicant had not been attached to the staff report. Chairman Crites asked about the comment made by the sheriff's department regarding acceleration and deceleration lanes. Mr. Diaz explained that the public works department had not found the acceleration/deceleration lanes necessary. Mr. Gaugush indicated that Portola Avenue has been widened to its fullest extent, but noted that acceleration and deceleration lanes could be incorporated into the specific design of the project. Chairman Crites strongly urged that this be incorporated as a condition. He also addressed the issue of deleting condition #11 . He felt that the condition should be reinstated until after the consultant studying the north area had completed a recommendation. Mr. Gaugush indicated that if a bond was posted and it was later determined that there would not be a median installed, a refund would be made. Chairman Crites indicated that it would be included in the condition. 2 to MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 1S, 1986 Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. AL BRUN, pastor, explained that this project had been previously approved as PP 85-3, but indicated that it was just a change in parcel location and nothing had been changed. Mr. Brun asked for clarification regarding condition #14 pertaining to the modular structure. Chairman Crites explained that payment needed to be posted for the modular prior to installation. Mr. Brun inquired as to the length of time the church funds would be involved in this bond. Commission determined that two years would be sufficient. Mr. Brun noted that the project would generate little or no traffic during the week. Commissioner Wood asked about the time frame. Mr. Brun informed commission October/November for the modular, and within two to three months start construction of phase I . He stated the church had the finances to begin construction almost immediately. Mr. Diaz informed commission that staff had been instructed to look into a moratorium in the area on everything in the city, which could effect planning commission actions. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. There being no one, the public testimony was closed. Commissioner Wood stated that because of the importance of the location of the project along this major thoroughfare, he would like to make sure the project met all of the city standards. Mr. Diaz replied that it had been to architectural commission and would meet all standards. Action: Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 3-0. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1162, approving PP 86-32, subject to conditions as amended. Carried 3-0. B. Case No. PP 86-23 - TONY LIZZA, Applicant Request for approval of a 6, 000 square foot single story retail furniture store in a C-1 �ftw 3 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 15, 1986 zone located at the northeast corner of San Carlos and Palm Desert Drive (Frontage Road) . Mr. Joy outlined the salient points of the staff report and recommended approval of the project subject to conditions. He noted that the project had received architectural commission approval and also that the applicant would be required to join an assessment district for undergrounding utilities. Commissioner Downs asked if the building would conform to the general design in that area. Mr. Joy showed commission the exterior elevation plans. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to addressed the commission. The applicant replied that he did not wish to address the commission. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. There being no one, the public testimony was closed. Commissioner Downs questioned the use of a blue roof in that area. Mr. Joy explained that most buildings had flat roofs in that area. Commissioner Downs stated that he hesitated to approve a blue roof because of problems in the past. Mr. Diaz explained that the Learning Tree roof problem had occurred because of a change in material , and noted that architectural commission had considered the blue roof. Commissioner Wood noted that a representative from the architectural commission was present and asked him to address the commission. Mr. Rick Holden stated that the feeling of the architectural commission was that the Learning Tree was a bad example also because of the height of the building. He stated that the architectural commission did not object to the blue roof at all . Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 3-0. Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1163, approving PP 86-23, subject to conditions. Carried 3-0. C. Case No. PP 86-26 - MR. & MRS. J. WAMBAUGH, Applicants 1 Request for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact and precise plan for a " 4 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 15, 1986 7900 square foot gross, 6715 square foot net, commercial building located on the north side of Highway III east of Cabrillo Avenue. Mr. Diaz outlined the salient points of the staff report and recommended approval subject to the conditions of approval . Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the commission. MR. WENDELL VEITH, architect, concurred with the staff report and conditions. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed project. There being no one, the public testimony was closed. Action: Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 3-0. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1164, approving PP 86-26, subject to conditions. Carried 3-0. D. Case No. PP 86-30 - PACIFIC EQUIPMENT, Applicant Request for approval of a landscape equipment warehouse/showroom located in a service industrial zone at the northeast corner of Corporate Way and 42nd Avenue. Mr. Joy outlined the salient points of the staff report and indicated that the extra driveway had been eliminated, which would allow for only two driveway approaches. Staff recommended approval subject to the conditions of approval . Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the commission. MR. RICK HOLDEN, 73-330 E1 Paseo, stated that he was present to answer any questions. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. `r 5 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 15, 1986 MR. BILL CALLAHAN asked about screening from Corporate Way. Mr. Holden outlined the proposed wall and roof line. Chairman Crites closed the public testimony. Action: Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 3-0. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1166, approving PP 86-30, subject to conditions. Carried 3-0. E. Case No. PP 86-33 - BERMUDA PARTNERS, Applicant Request for approval of a 9500 square foot office/warehouse project in a service industrial zone on the north side of Lennon Place midway between Corporate Way and Eclectic Street. Mr. Joy outlined the salient points of the staff report and recommended approval subject to the conditions. He explained that they had received preliminary architectural commission approval and outlined the details of the proposed second access to the east and landscaping on this projects property. He noted that the property to the east would be coming for public hearing at the next meeting. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked the applicant , to address the commission. MR. LEONARD MYERS, applicant, agreed with the staff report and to the conditions. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. There being no one, the public testimony was closed. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 3-0. Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1165, approving PP 86-33, subject to conditions. Carried 3-0. 6 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 15, 1986 F. Case Nos. PP 86-36, TT 21791 - GERMAIN DEVELOPMENT CO. , INC., Applicant Request for approval of a negative declaration of environmental impact, precise plan of design and a tentative tract map to create 20 single family lots and detached residences on a PR-5 zoned 5.02 acre parcel on the north side of Hovley Lane, approximately 650 feet east of Monterey Avenue. Mr. Diaz outlined the salient points of the staff report. He noted that commission had reviewed this project at a previous study session. He indicated that city council , the Year 2000 committee, and planning commission felt more single family housing was needed. Mr. Diaz stated that the following condition should be added as #11 to require that the applicant shall meet all recommendations of the Coachella Valley Water District. He also explained that a wall would be provided composed of slump stone and chain link. Staff recommended approval subject to the conditions as amended. Commissioner Wood expressed concern regarding possible CVWD r .. conditions. Mr. Diaz replied that if anything unusual was required the case would be brought back before the commission. Commissioner Downs questioned the three lots being consolidated into one. Mr. Diaz explained that the map was incorrect. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. DAVE GERMAIN, applicant, stated that he was present to answer any questions. Chairman Crites asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed project. MS. EDNA POPPEL, an adjacent property owner, stated that while all major cities have traffic problems, this project was not dense enough. She felt that the density proposed was much too low. MS. CAROL ROBINSON, 46-224 Sagewood, stated that she could not be more delighted to have single family houses built. She indicated that she was not sure if her property was effected or not, but expressed concern about privacy because of the height of the grading, but did not wish to hold the project up. Mr. Diaz explained that while those lots are above the existing 7 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 15, 1986 lots, the applicant would be providing a wall , as well as the position of the proposed houses, would eliminate that problem. Chairman Crites asked if the applicant had sent anyone out to talk with these people. Mr. Germain replied that it would be done. MS. ROBINSON stated that she could not determine how tall the wall should be and expressed concern about her water pressure being very low. Mr. Gaugush indicated that he would contact the Coachella Valley Water District about the matter and stated that she should also contact them. Commissioner Wood stated that he would like to see the developer and residents work together to mitigate any concern about the wall without holding up the project. Chairman Crites stated that this could be added as a condition. Mr. Diaz stated that as condition #12 the applicant would be required to work with adjacent property owners on the final design of the wall at the northerly property line. Mr. Germain agreed to this addition. Mr. Germain noted that there were four lots on Sagewood effected, but that they were a considerable distance away. Mr. Germain indicated that the sideyards back up to the houses. Commissioner Downs commented on the mound of dirt being so high, and also about the applicant talking to the property owners to solve concerns. Chairman Crites noted that this item would not come back if the issue was resolved. Chairman Crites closed the public testimony. Action: Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 3-0. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1167, approving PP 86-36 and TT 21791 , subject to conditions as amended. Carried 3-0. VIII. MISCELLANEOUS A. Chairman Crites reminded the commission of the joint meeting which is scheduled for August 25, 1986. He encouraged everyone to attend. B. Chairman Crites asked that all reports contain the project data information, especially items that have been continued. 8 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 15, 1986 C. Mr. Diaz informed commission that the city was involved in a lawsuit with San Tropez Villas regarding school impact fees. Commissioner Wood asked for and received clarification regarding planning commission responsibility toward requiring school impact fees on developments. IX. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Phillips introduced Mr. Greg Swajian to the city attorney's staff. X. COMMENTS A. Commissioner Wood asked for a copy of the report delineating the three types of senior housing. Staff replied that it would be sent to him. B. Commissioner Wood thanked Chairman Crites for speaking before the Board of Realtors. .. XI. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adjourning the meeting. Carried 3-0. The meeting was adjourned at 3:20 p.m. �r4v RAMON A. DIAZ, Secret ATTEST: UFORD CRITES, Chairman 9