Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0207� NIIIV(TI�S PAIM DESF�ZT P1C�II�IIV'Il� QM�SSIC[�I N�PIl� �Y - � �, 1989 !, 7:00 P.M. - (�IVIC C�fI�2 Q�LL ��NBIIZ 73-510 ��tID WAItII� DRIVE '� � * � � � � * * * � � �e � * * * * * * * * * * * * * �c A HALF-HOUR STUDY SESSION WAS HQ�D IN TI-IE OOUNCIL C��I�ER OONFERIIVC;E ROOM AT 6:30 P.M. I. CALL T0 ORDII� Chainnan �i�x�od called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ' II. PLIDG� OF ALI�I�IVCE Comnissioner Dawns led in the pledge of allegiance. III. ROLL (�I.L Members Present: Rick Er�,��od, CZzai�z Bob I)owrLs Faith Ladlaw Carol Whitlock Members Absent: Jim Richarr3s Staff Present: Ray Diaz � Dick Folkers Phil Joy Catherine Sass Kandy Allen Tonya Monr�oe IV. APPEtC1VAI, OF NIIN[TI'FS: Consideration for approval the January 17, 1989 meeting minutes. Action: Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Cannissioner powi�.s, approving the January 17, 1989 meeting minutes as submitted. Carried 3-0-1 (Cannissioner Ladlaw abstained). V. S�[�Tg1RY OF �L AiCrI(�I Mr. Diaz indicated there were no pertinent planniuzg ca�mission ite�ns at the last council meeting, but inforn�d oatmission that at a study session with the architectural aatmission a c�nittee had b�xi fonned to look at the sign ordinance as to aesthetic impacts and the architectural process. He noted that any changes wr�uld cane to the carn�tission for review. rir. NQN[IPFS PALM DL'SIIZT F'I.ANNIl� Q,NNiISSIC[J FII3R�Y 7, 1989 � VI. �ENr C�I.�IDAR A. Ca.se No. PMW 88-12 - N�ZV�1 DAVID INVFS'IrgN.PS, Applicant Rec�uest for appraval of a parcel map waiver to allow consolidation of three lots into one on the north side of E1 Paseo between Highway 74 and Sage Lane. B. (`.ase No. PNL�i 88-14 - BARBATTI & JCEID15C1J, Applicant Request for appraval of a parcel map waiver to allow consolidation of four lots into one, located on the riortheast corner of Alessandro Driv2 and San Jacinto Avenue. C. Ca._� Nos. PP 86-43 and PM 21142 - PAN�,A SN�IL,LW�, Applicant Re�uest for approval of a one-year t�me extension for a 243 unit serv_or housing project on 23 acres on the ru�rth side of FYed Warirlg Drive, 1400 feet east of Cook. 1 ! Action� � Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by CaYmissioner Dawns, adopting the consent calendar by minute motion. C',arried 4-0. VII. PUBLIC HE;ARII� A. Continued Case No. PP 88-21 - WINDSOR FINANCIAL OORP., AppliCants Request for approval qf a 14,QQQ square foot catmercial stxucture and negative declaration, located southeast of E1 Paseo and Larkspur. Mr. Jay outlined the salient points of the staff report. He explained that a reciprocal access with the property to the east could rx�t be obtained, t7ut indicated that acceptable circulation had been obtained by the project. N�. Jay modified Camiunity Developnent Condition No. 6 to read, "A reciprocal access easement shall be recorded on the subject property granting access to the property to the east." He rx�ted that when the eastern property develops, an access eas�t w�uld be required by the applicant at that t�me. Staff recarmended appraval, subject to the oondition as modified. 2 � NfIN[TI'FS PALM DESIIZ`P F'I,7�II1II� 0.'�T�IISSI�T PT�3IZ[T11RY 7, 1989 �r.. I�. Diaz stated that this was the third situation on the stre�t where � adjoi ni nc� property c�mers did r�ot agree on a mutual access agreement that staff felt would improve the street situation and benefit all concerned (i.e. property adj acent to Tai Pei, proj ect ad�acent to City National Bank, and the proposed project). He felt that the word needed to go out, citing problems in Palm Springs, where r�o access frcm one parking lot to another is available. He indicated that if the property awners would not dr� their part and 000perate, there wasn't much the city could do. He r�oted that staff was doing their part and requiring mutual access agrec�nP.nts be executed and recorded and thexi when the adjoi ni rx� property awner decides to develap the city could get the agre�nent then. He felt that it was unfortunate that the city had to resort to these tactics when it shauld be everyone cooperating. Staff felt that it wauld not be fair to deny the applicant the right to develop just because his neighbor wo�.ildn't cooperate. Mr. Diaz reiterated that this was the third t�me this had happened with property awners on the south side of E1 Paseo. Chaizman Erwood opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the catmission. MR. DAVID GILMURE, representing Wind.sor Financial Corp., fully ;` intend to adhere to all conditions of approval, including the mutual access agre�nent. Chairman E�v��ood asked if anyone present wished to speak in FA�7OR of the pro j ect. There was no one. Chai�z ��n�od asked i f arYyone present wished to speak in OPPOSITIO�T to the project. There being rx� one, the public testimony was closed. Co�missioner Whitlock stated that in view of the fact that the project had been approved by the El Paseo Merchants and already gone through the architectural review, she found r�o problem, especially with the parkuzg as pravided. Action: Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Conmissioner Ladlaw, aciopting the findi.rigs as presented by staff. Carried. 4-0. , Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Ccamissioner Ladlaw, adopting Planning Carmission Resolution No. 1331, appraving PP 88- 21, subject to conditions as amended. Carried 4-0. 3 `.. r�QIVCIPES PALM DESERT FrLATII�LII� ��SSI�I �BRtTARY 7, 1989 � � r/ B. Case No. TT 24254 - BARCX�I DEV�3APNN�NNP, AppLicant Request for apprr�val of a 94 single family Yxxne � subdivision located on the r�orth side of Havley Lane, 1900 feet west of Portola Avenue. Mr. Jay outlined the salient points of the staff report. He noted that the applicant had pravided elevations for two-stoYy hr.x►�es and received conceptual appraval fran the architectural caimission. He explained that the two-story hcmes would be located within the interior of the project and one-story along the perimeter. Staff reca�._nded approval based on the follawing reasons: 1) zonir�g is PR rather than R-1 and PR zonir�g allaas up to 30' of building height, and these homes wc�uld be 24' high; 2) PR zor�irx� is intended to give flexibility to the cxcmLission and the ca�mission has pawer to grant the two-story in the interior of the project; and 3) pro�ect calls for consolidation of five par�cels and with this type of integrated develo�zt, the developer stiould be allaaed to do satiething extra. He felt that the city was looki.rxJ for consolidation of lots. He also ;n�;cated that arwther factor to aonsider was the two-story San Tropez Villas adjacent to this project. Staff reaomnended appraval with mod.ification to Public Works Condition No. 13 to include 50' � streets on cul-de-sac lots. r% Cannissioner Ladlaw asked for and received clarification regard.ing the location of the two-story lots and cul-de-sac stxeets. Chairman Er�,x�od questioned Public Works Condition No. 8 regarding landscaping maintenance for the property outside the wall, r�oting that Nbnterey Meack7ws was required to post a maintenance bond.. After discussion, Mr. Folkers detern�ined that further language needed to be added. Mr. Diaz stated that the oondition could read that the applicant shall cause to have established a landscaping district under the 1972 Landscaping and Lighting Act for the maintenance alo�g Hovley Lane. The applicant concurred with the amended coru3itions. Chairman ���od o .� the public testirrony and asked the applicant to address the oamtission. MR. DII�IIVIS FREQ�IAN, 41-625 Eclectic, clarified that they were planning four or five unit types ranging fran 1750 to 2500 square feet and the drawing on display was only one representation--there would be altered elevations to pravide a mix. He thought that �here wr�uld also be a mix along the north property line because they would be facing a two-story develoFrnent, as well as two-story on the McBail property. ; a 4 ; � P+iIN[fI'� PALM DFSL�T PLAN[1ING QM�IISSIO[�I FI�RUAIZY 7, 1989 0.. Mr. Diaz indicated that the McBail property did r�ot have appraved ' plans so staff was recccnnending one story alor�g that property line. Mr. Jay stated that the only perimeter locatioaz they oould have two story would be along the San Tropez prope.rty. N�. FYeeman stated that they would also be vexy seiLsitive with tw�-story and one-story privacy. He indicated they w�uld build the develognent in a maruzer to keep people from looking doum into saYieone's back yard. He r�oted their previous success with their twr�-story develognerit in La ¢iinta. He indicated that it was their intention to have an assessnent distxict; single- family no association bond for the first tw� months and then tY�e 1972 Act. N�. Diaz inforn�ed the developer that with the condition, it meant that the applicant w�uld pay for the establishment of the distxict and the assessnPazt erigineer. Mr. FY�eeman concurred. CaYmissioner Whitlock requested further clarification on the location of the two-story units since it would make up 40$ and 3�xxaing that the perimeter would have to be single-stoYy. N�. FYeeman indicated that the two-stozy units would be primarily within the cul-de-sac ;� stxeets, notirig that they might not be able to acccnq�lish 40g, but that was what they were requesting. He stated that most of the two- stozy uni.ts w�uld be back to back. C7�airman E���od asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVI'�t of the proj ect. There was rx� one. C7�ainnan ���od asked if anycx�e ' wished to speak in OPP06ITIC[J to the project. MR. Q�LJQ{ FARANEL,A, representirig the Casa Blanca Homeowners ' Association, stated that he was concerned with graduzg. He felt grading shr�uld be done so that m single-family dwellings oould look into their property. Mr. Jay explained that the applicant had sui�nitted grading plans and the pad heights were approximately six feet belaw the adjacent hanes in Casa Blanca and single family hanes vx�uld be nine feet abave the pad elevations of the Casa Blanca develogne,nt. Also, in discussions regarding the alley way, a condition was included that this project wr�uld be constructing a wall along the Casa Blanca boundary and about 25' away f�xn the Casa Blanca wall. He stated that a Casa Blanca representative indicated that they might be tearing c7awri their wall in the future and the new wall fran this develognent would be the boundary between the two projects. Mr. Jay also informed cannission � 5 • � DZIIV[TPES P11IM D}�ER`P PL,�1I�II�II� QNI�IISSIC[�i ' I�RUARY 7, 1989 that a condition had been added. for prospective hcme buye.rs notifying � them that two-story hanes will be built within the pro�ect. MR. DANIEL BARNES, 41-613 Aventine Court in Casa Blanca, expressed concern about units per acre and asked if it was within the city's projections for that area. Camtissioner powns stated that the proposal was lawer than what aauld be allawed. Mr. Jay stated that the zoazing allaas five units per acre and this developne:nt was requesting 3.96 and Casa Blanca is five units per acre. Mr. Barnes asked about price projections. Mr. Diaz explained that the city canriot require a specific price on any unit, e,xcept for affordable housing. Mr. Barnes was coaicerned about elevations blockiu�g his views to the west, rx�ting a past problem between Nbnterey Meac3aws and the Sagebrush oa�lex. He also asked about the wider�ir�g of the road. He rnted that the road was widened up to the west boundary of Casa Blanca and after that it reverts to two lanes up to Nb�terey. He asked if there were any consideration to widening the stxeet all the way daHm. � Mr. Diaz explained that this project wruld be aonditioned to widen ? the road in front of its project, but beyond that to the west would � be widened when that property develops. Ntr�. Barnes felt that going frcm two lanes to four lanes to tw� lanes created a dangerous driving situatioa�. Chairman Er�x�od closed the public testi.mony. Commissioner powns stated that he was in fawr of the pro�ect. Cc�nmissioner Whitlock concurred, mavirig for approval, sub�ect to the two-story units being in the interior, in addition to amencbnents to public works conditions 8 and 13 and the assessme,nt district. Commissioner Ladlaw expressed concexn about starting a precedent within PR-5 zorliuzg, but Mr. Diaz did rx�t feel a precedent would be started. Action• Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Cam�issianer Daw�Ls, adopti.ng the findings as presented by staff. Catried 4-0. 6 � MIIV[T�ES PAI�! DFSL�2`P FL,ANrTD�1G 0."M�aSSIC�I � F�R[�IZY 7, 1989 `"' Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seaonded by Carmissioner Dawns, adopting Plaru�irig Catmission Resolutian No. 1332, appraving TT 24254, subject to conditions as ame.nded. Carried 4-0. � C. Ca�se No. PP 88-22 - OLIPHANP, LIZZA & ASSOGIATFS, Applicant Request for appraval of a precise plan of design to allaw construction of tw� i.r�istrial buildiixJs (18,770 square feet total) on St. Charles Place ; in the Palm Desert Business Center. � Ms. Sass outlined the salient points of the staff report. She noted that prelimina.ry appraval had been rer,eived from the aYr,httectural carmission. Staff re�r�ded approval. Commissioner powns asked about the status of the new parkirx� ; requiremexit for the ir�dustxial area. Nfr. Diaz explained. that an amer�nent was being considered to cha��ge the parkirx� requir�ne.nt to 4 per 1,000 or 1 per 250 square feet, along with the potential limitations in percentages of retail use. He stated that this proj ect is six spaces aver, but rx�ted that with the precise plan, , specific requireinents can be placed on what perceaztage of building � will be allaaed for retail. Mr. Diaz indicated that the ordir�lce amenchnent sYx�uld be before the cannission the first meeting in March. Upon questioning by Cainussioner Ladlow, Ms. Sass clarified that there would be no cai�act car stalls in this develognent. Ntr�. Diaz stated that the spaces wc�uld all be nine feet. Clzairman Er�x�od opened the public testimony and asked the applicant ' to address the catmission. MR. TONY LIZZA, applicant, asked if the cannissian had any • , questions. Ccmnissioner Dawns asked haw much of the building would be retail. Mr. Lizza stated that he hoped none of the buildu�g w�uld be retail, but storage tenant�, sorne light industrial/printers, media type and graphics people. He stated that he wc�uld not purs�ue retail. Caimissioner Dawns asked if the applicant w�uld have ariy problem with limiting retail uses to 200. Mr. Lizza stated that was fine. . 7 u.. N�N[TrFS PAIM DFSERT PLAN[�T1T� QNP�SSI�I F�RUAitY 7, 1989 � Chairman F�w�od asked if any�ne present wished to speak in FAWEt or � OI'P06ITICi�I to the proposed. There being no ane, the public testimoaly was Closed. , Commissioner pown moved to approve the pro�ect with the added � condition that n�ot aver 30� of the gross area be used for retail withiuz the existing parkuzg spaces. Action: Moved by Commissioner powns, seconded by Commissioner Ladlaw, adopting the findings as presented by s�aff. Carried 4-0. Moved by Commissioner powns, seconded by Commissioner Ladlaw, , aclopting Planning Catmission Resolution No. 1333, approving PP 88- 22, subject to conditions as amPx�ded. Carried 4-0. D. Ca� No. PP 88-23 - � FIS(�iF�22, Applicant Request for approval of a 3,755 square foot ca�iercial building on Palm Desert Drive South. Mr. Diaz noted that two letters had been distributed to the ? caianission fran N�. William Daugherty, one requesting a continuance .,ri� and one listing concerns. ' Ms. Sass outlined the salient points of the staff report. She rx�ted that the parking had been redesigned to provide sufficient parking for �the new builclirig and in the future when Henny Penny developed, a continuous parking pattern w�uld be established for all the lots. Ms. Sass stated that prel�minazy appraval had be�.n granted by the architectural cannission. She indicated that in the fin,al parkirx� situation the applicant would take two spaces f�ccn the Panard buildu�g's parking, which was aver parked, and redesign of the one row of parking would be c�one. The applicant was also conditioned to record necessasy access agre�nerits. She stated that the cx�mer of the Henny Pe.nny lot wanted scme type of division between the properties, which could be achieved with a small landscaped area or just curb stops for the parking spaces. Mr. Diaz stated that staff would not recommend a wall or a landscaping because it would have to be remaved when the property develops. Mr. Diaz recarmended the condition that a small asphalt berm be installed to separate the property. Mr. Diaz stated that cannission might want to re� to the arr.tzitectural ccRmission 8 ' � N1IN[TI'ES PAIM DESERT F'LArII1II� C�NMISSI�i Fk�R(J�1RY 7, 1989 ""' that trees to pravide shade for parkirig areas be installed in the landscape areas as a condition of approval. Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the catmission. MR. ROBERT RICCIARDI, 45-275 Prickly Pear Larbe, stated that he was representing George Fischer and was the arrhitect on the Panard builduzg and two-story medical/law offices. He felt the whole block needed to be considered like the Pre.sident's Plaza. He indicated that a 20 �oot alley was to serve these businesses. He stated that all the properties in the back w�uld eventually have to be considered a can�n parkirig lot and the city shQuld re-stripe the lot to �mprave efficiency. He addressed Mr. Daugherty's letter and felt that separating th� properties would not be beneficial for anyone. He felt that the parkirx� was sufficient, noting there was only one restaurant in the block. Camlissioner Dawns asked if N�. Ricciardi had a problem with the ' berming or black top. N�. Ricciardi stated that he did nQt have a problem, but did riot feel it was beneficial and would not achieve anything. Mr. Ricciardi felt that people would proUably drive aver them, but indicated that if the carmission wanted the,rn, they would be � provided. Mr. Diaz rec�ded that the berm be painted white. Cainussioner Downs stated that it wc�uld be added as a aondition. C�airman Estix�od asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVt'�2 of the proposal. MRS. MARY STOLTZMAN, 74-055 Highway 111, cx�mer of the Panard Center, was in favor of the developrn�nt, and indicated that the rear parkirig lot had been a problem with every rain and asked that public works examiuze the drauzage onto Highway 111. She indicated that this was the first she had heard that she would be dedicating two of their parking spaces to this project and wasn't aware that there was any P,.�ctra spaces on her property. Also, regarding the frontage road, the Panard Center has 160' frontage and the whole center is taken up with the slip ramp and evezy day people take the slip ramp and make a U-tzuzz to go west. She asked that the city look at a super block ooncept. She met with the architect regarding the landscaping and requested that the big trees in the front be kept, if possible. 9 � � NIII�1(TI'I� PALNI DLSII�T PLAIVII.II� QNI��SSICH�I FII3RiTAItY 7, 1989 4 � � Ms. Sass stated that a microfiche copy of the parking plan for the Panard building on the east and west side aisles sY�aw the spaces labeled "future shared parking" and the aisle on the left side was the one under discussion. Also included was a letter f�an George Fischer saying that he refused to grant a reciprocal access agree.�nent, but he wr�uld lease them his proper-ty to back aut o�. Ms. � Sass noted that agreements were not recorded and a lack of cooperatian was apparent between the pnaperty awners. The two spaces in question would not be dedicated, but wes�e to be st�red parking and has to be agreed to by both property owners as a condition of appraval of this project. MR. SAt�IDY SAUM, 45-800 DeeP Canyon, spoke regarding maintenarice of the alley due to its poor conditian. He asked who was responsible for the maintenance. Mr, Folkers indicated that the propert�y awr�ers were to maintain the alley, which raised questions as to what oould be dr,�ie to alleviate this problem in the future. Cannissioner Dc�vrLs felt that if thi.s question oould not be anaCwered, a continuance wr�uld be in order. Staff concurred. i , Mr. Ricciardi stated that he had no probleins with the cannission ,.� addux� the conditions and Mr. Fischer would wr�rk with the two adjacent property cx�mers for the joint parki.rig. He inclicated that the properties all go to the alley and is an easem�zt for vehicles to go through and must be maintained by the propes-ty awners. He felt there were no unar�Swered questions. Mr. Diaz stated the issue of the alley and haw the oatmission might want to condition that is under consideration, sinr,e the property awners were not maintainirx� it, and what the city cauld or oauldn't clo shQuld be addressed; he mted that mthiiu3 oould happen until the agreements are signed. He stated that there was receptivity by the catmission to apprave the project and a two-week continuanr,e for the . applicant to obtain a written agreement would allaw staff time to review the alley situation and catie up with a c�ditio�. Mr. Ricciardi felt that if the project were �itioned with these stipulations, he could move on with other th.ings. He requested appraval. Staff did rx�t feel a two-week continuance was urireasonable to study the alley and felt that it was sanething that needed to be examined. Mr. Ricciardi was not sure if the signatures could be obtained in t� ; 10 � � PAIM DESII2T F'I�1I�IIJ'Il� C�M�SSIC[�J F�RLTAFtY 7, 1989 v..r weeks--he stated that the alley was made up of many property c�me.rs and did riot wish for a continuance. Chairman E�`x�od clarified that staff is saying that a cc�ditioaZ might be added to this develog�lent pertauzing to ma3.ntenance of the alley and staff need,s tYie twr�-week continuarice to obtain correct w�rding for a condition for this proj ect, and ori future pro�ect when they occur. Staff stated that staff would recz�mend oontinuance or denial based on the inability to }ntiaw fully the alley situatioaz. Mr. Ricciardi agreed to the two weeks, but irxiicated that the alley affects many property c�mers and might take quite scme t�me. Ccmnissioner Dc�n1s maved for a continuance to February 21, 1989. Action: Moved by Commissioner powns, seconded by Cannissioner Whitlock, continuirlg PP 88-23 to February 21, 1989. Carried 4-0. A 12-MINUTE RECESS TAF�1 AT THIS POINT. THE TIME WAS 8:18 P.M. � E. Case No. PP/QJP 88-12 and TT 23904 - NF�RRIO►IT 04d�P RFSO�R`I5, INC., APPLIC'AI�fP Request for appraval of a precise plan of design and conditional use permit to construct and operate a 236 unit timeshare project and subdivide 31 acres into lots for such purposes. Ms. Sass outlined the salient points of the staff report and recamlended apprrval. Ca�nussioner Ladlaw asked for and received clarification regarding requirements for garages and cazports. Chairman Erwood opened the public testimony and asked if the applicant wished to address the catmissioan. I�. ID McMULLIN, �ecutive Vice President, spoke in support of the timeshare project and felt that the industry had imprcnred over the last few years. He stated that he had been inwlved in the t�meshare industry on a national and international level for ten years. Ntr. McMullen infonned carnussion that in attendance with him was Bob Miller, the general mariager; Soott Turner, John 11 �.. i i D�IIIV[TI'F� ! PALM DES�P PI,ANt1II� �M�SSI(�I i FEBRUARY 7, 1989 = ! � � Nicholson, and Joe Scalo, legal oounsel; Bob Ecaa�roth; Robert � Cal.houn, who wauld be living here in the desert; Robert Altevers, architect; Steve Kellogg of the Peridian GYoup, the 1and.scape archi.tectural firm th.at did the hotel; Paul Gilmore of ASL �gineering; and it was noted that Jahn Ceriale, manager of the hatel, was present but had to leave earlier. ; Mr. McMizllen stated that the project was sulxnitted to the city � and received unanimous appraval fran the eoanrnuc developnent � advisozy catmittee and received preliminaYy appraval fran the architectural cannission. He indicated they had met with the city council on the zonisx� issue. He noted that when the zcx-�ing ordinance issue was before the commission previously, the suggestions made at that time had beeri irmozporated by the city council. • Nll�. BOB ALTEVERS, their architect, went tY��ough their general � plan and described the use and am�n,ities to be provided. N42. STEVE KELL,OC�G described in detail the landscaping feat�u�es to be provided on the site. � Camussioner Whitlock asked where constructio� wauld begin if the � project was scheduled to take faur to six years to canplete. N�. � McMt�llen replied that they would phase the project as it sold and � would start building the central facility buildiz�gs and entzyways first, and then five or si.x of the buildiuigs for the first phase, ` starting fran the tennis court side adjacent to Cook Street. He � indicated that the nearest buildirig to Coo3t Street was roughly 2Q0 ` feet or more. � Cannissioner Ladlaw requested clarification on the ni�nUer of swinming pools and roan capacity. Ntr�. McM�,�llen explained that the roans could sleep up to si.x people with the couch, and three swiimiing pools would be pravided. Ccmnissioner Ladlaw questioned if three sw�zg pools wr�uld be sufficient if the pro�ect were aperating at maximi.un capacity ' (approximately 1200 people). Ntr�. McMullen stated that they oould ' handle that many people in parking and in the facility and r�ted that with the hr�tel pools, there w�uld be a total of five. Cnairman ���od asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAW[t or OPFOSITICR�I to the proposed. There being nc� one, the public testim�ny was closed. .. Action: ! Moved by Commissioner powns, seconded by Catmissioner Whitlock, , adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-0. � � � 12 � MIIV[II�S PAI1�i DL,SF.RT F'LAI�TII� 0.'I�T�IISSI�I F�R[TARY 7, 1989 �... Moved by Commissioner powns, seaonded by Cannissioner Whitlock, adopting Plannuzg Catmission Resolution No. 1334, approving PP/CUP 88-12 and TT 23904, subject to aonditions. Carried 4-0. VIII. Nii None. IX. ORAL �NNiJNI(�TICHVS None. X. �IP$ A. Caimissioner Dawr�s questioned if a minute motioa� was needed to direct staff to prepare an arne.ru�nerit to allaw no more than 30� be given with parkirig for retail in the industrial area. Staff felt this was not necessary sii�ce it was sc.heduled for the first meeting in March. �r.. B. Cnainnan ErF�od askecl for an update c¢z the grading issue raised by Catmissioner Richards at the last meeting at Highway 74 and Mesa View. N�. Diaz indicated that grading was oontinuing on , the project and N�. Holtz was currently working � the matter, N�. Diaz stated that he wauld have more details and a report for the next meeting. XI. Moved by Commissioner powns, seconded by Cannissione Whitlock, adjourriing the meetirlg. Carried 4-0. meetirig was �ounzed at 9:18 p.m. ,> �� . ,��'��'���� . f �, .r R�1MON A. DIAZ, Secret ATTEST• L � IC�iARD ERWOOD, Cnairman /� 13 +...