Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1121 M]24 TPES PALM DESERT PLANIIIlW-, OU4IISSICN MEETING TUESDAY - NOVE BER 21, 1989 7:00 P.M. - CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 73-510 FRED WARIM DRIVE I. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Whitlock called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLIANCE Commissioner Jonathan led in the pledge of allegiance. III. ROLL CALL. Members Present: Carol Whitlock, Chairperson Bob Dawns Rick Erwood Sabby Jonathan Jim Richards Members Absent: None Staff Present: Ray Diaz Kandy Allen Seyed Safavian ftm Phil Drell Tonya Nbnroe IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES No minutes were submitted for approval. V. SUKAARY OF AIL ACTIC N Mr. Diaz summarized pertinent November 9, 1989 city council actions. VI. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Case No. PMW 89-15 - LUNDIN DEVELOPMENT CD., Applicant Request for approval of a lot line adjustment and parcel map waiver to meet the configuration difference between the R-1 lots and multifamily project approved under TT 24632 on the southwest corner of Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue. Commissioner Richards expressed concern that the project that was approved would be the project built. He also felt that both parts of the project should be built simultaneously. %W f i i M024UTES PALM DESERT PLANNDU CCNMCSSICN NO4R4BBER 21, 1989 art , Action: Moved by Commissioner Jonathan, seconded by Camtissicner Downs, approving the consent calendar by minute motion. Carried 4-1 (Canti.ssioner Richards voted no). Commission felt it would be appropriate to hear item A last. It was moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Catissioner Jonathan, to hear item A last under public hearings. Carried 5-0. i VII. PUBLIC HEARING B. Case No. CUP 89-8 - EISENIOWER M34DRIAL HDSPITAL, Applicant Request for approval of a conditional use permit to operate an adult day care business in the service industrial zone at 42-201 Beacon Hill. Mr. Drell outlined the salient points of the staff report and reconv ended approval. Chairperson Whitlock opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to address the cannission. art MR. LOU BISHOP, architect, indicated that the use of the facility would be an improvement and would provide needed adult care. Commissioner Dawns asked Mr. Bishop if he was satisfied with the conditions of approval. Mr. Bishop stated that he had no seen them; they went to others, but he had no problem. Chairperson Whitlock asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposal; there being no one, the public testimony was closed. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, approving the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, adopting Planning Cc mussion Resolution No. 1395, approving CUP 89- 8, subject to conditions. Carried 5-0. 2 y NIIIV�Tl�S ' PALM DESERT PLAMIW, 0 M USSICN NMIE BER 21, 1989 low C. Case No. CUP 89-10 - BRUCE JON S, Applicant Request for approval of a conditional use permit to operate an animal medical center in the building at 73-386 Highway 111. Mr. Drell outlined the salient points of the staff report and recommended approval. Chairperson Whitlock opened the public hearing and asked if the applicant wished to address the commission. MR. BRUCE JONES, owner and operator, informed co u fission he had been in business for ten years. He indicated that he would be interested in assisting the city with animal control. He felt that noise should be minimal and there would be no outdoor facilities. Commissioner Dons asked if Mr. Jones had any problems with the conditions of approval and Mr. Jones replied no. Chairperson Whitlock asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the. proposal. There was no one and the public testimony was closed. Action: Moved by Commissioner Erwood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, approving the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Erwood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Canrdssion Resolution No. 1396, approving CUP 89- 10, subject to conditions. Carried 5-0. D. Case No. CUP 89-13 - PAMELA SMALLWOOD (FUR T.L.C. ), Applicant Request for approval of a conditional use permit to allow a 164 capacity 24-hour child care facility as part of an approved professional office complex at the northeast corner of Portola Avenue and Country Club Drive. Mr. Drell outlined the salient points of the staff report. Mr. Drell noted that a letter in opposition fran Silver Sands Racquet Club had been received and he read a letter that had just been received, which 3 MINL11ES PALM DESERT PLANNING CCNNLISSICN NUAa43ER 21, 1989 was also in opposition. Mr. Drell asked if this letter represented the board of directors of Silver Sands. MR. JIM GLEASON, 9 La Jolla Drive, addressed the mission and explained that it was not possible to get an official position of the board. Mr. Gleason indicated that Mrs. Smallwood made a presentation to residents of Silver Sands which was approved (they did not know it was to be a 24-hour operation); he concurred that child care was needed, but felt more information was needed about the traffic impact. He felt that the median should be landscaped. Mr. Drell indicated that the median would not be landscaped; it was the decision of the city council that a median in this location was only to control circulation. Mr. Gleason felt that change was occurring that was not in hammy with the master plan of the area. He felt that a 24-hour project would have an adverse impact. Mr. Drell read another letter that had been submitted and he addressed those concerns. He stated that the intensity of the use was established by the approval of the project and commission should determine if the use of a child care facility was substantially different from a medical facility. Commissioner Erwood asked how many feet away the child care center would be from Country Club and Mr. Drell replied approximately 450 to 500 feet and 600 feet from Silver Sands. He noted that the play area would be surrounded by a seven foot block wall. Ccmnissioner Jonathan asked what the planned uses were to the east and north and Mr. Drell replied that to the north was a medical facility and to the east would be residential. Ccnmissioner Richards noted that to the south would be an office structure; Mr. Drell noted that this was the main building of the complex. Chairperson Whitlock opened the public testimony and asked the applicant to address the commission. MRS. PAMELA SMALLWOOD, 71-111 La Paz in Rancho Mirage, stated that she was the applicant and indicated that in response to Silver Sands' concerns, that she has a continuing in the land and the corner building. Mr. Drell noted that a letter had been received from Mary Stoltzman with the request for a seven foot block wall and designed such that all the potential playground equipment be hidden behind the wall so that from the exterior only of the building and the wall would be visible. Mr. Drell addressed access issues. Ccamissicner Jonathan 4 r NIINLJTES PAIM DESERT PLA 44It7 COMMISSION NUVEMBER 21, 1989 i !r � asked if this would be signalized; Mr. Drell replied that it was possible in the future when the residential develops. Mr. Safavian informed commission that a U-turn would not be permitted in the median opening as long as there were no left turns. In the absence of a turn lane in that location, it would hazardous to allow a U-turn in that place. Commissioner Richards asked why there was an opening in the median. Mr. Safavian replied that the raised median was put I there to channelize traffic movement; he indicated that there was not enough street width to allow for a safe, landscaped median. Mr. Diaz stated that a physical barrier could be placed there to avoid left- turns out. Commissioner Richards felt that in the interest of safety with a use that would be more than an office building, he felt more time should be taken now to eliminate potential problems with access. He felt that the median strips should be extended to where U-turns would be acceptable. Conissioner Richards commented that it should be designed right the first time. i MR. BOB HORN, president of T.L.C. , stated that day care facilities were needed; he visited approximately 20 hotels and Eisenhower Hospital; there was also a need to handle sick children. He indicated that all the hospitals and hotels were interested in such a facility. Mr. Horn felt it would be a nice facility, well run, and noise should not be a problem. He felt NOW the traffic issue was under control and indicated that there would probably be six or seven shifts per day. MRS. MARY STOLTZMAN, 74-055 Highway 111 in Palm Desert, stated that she was the adjacent property owner to the north of the proposal. She expressed the following concerns: noise from 164 children, she felt a seven foot wall was needed with landscaping; she felt the spanish/mediterranean theme should be continued; she stated that she would like a condition placed that there be no playground equipment, basketball hoops, etc., showing from her property or Portola and felt the property should be maintained as O.P. She indicated that she did not want to see the one corridor going north where the reciprocal easements were to became a street. She felt the U-turn would be better efficient/better served for both projects and traffic. She indicated that if those items were addressed, she would not be opposed to the conditional use. Chairperson Whitlock closed the public testimony. Commissioner Erwood asked if a condition needed to be added for a seven foot wall. Mr. Drell indicated that was on the plan and it 5 1 M]NJTES PALM DESERT PLArNDU OONMISSION NWEM3ER 21, 1989 low could be reinforced by call it out. Commissioner Erwood asked that it be added as a condition. Comussioner Jonathan felt that it was time for a child care facility in the city and felt it would be hard to find a better location at this time. He felt the raised median made sense, but having a break in the median would result in U-turns and felt the median should be put to where U-turns should take place. He also felt the playground equipment not being visible would be taken care of and did not see additional landscaping as a problem. He stated that subject to those requirements, he would move for approval. Commissioner Richards agreed that this was an appropriate location; concerns about wall height, landscaping and noise he did not feel was a problem when next to a medical office, but felt that steps should be taken in case there were a different type of office use there in the future. He felt it was important to keep this in the motif that this is in an office professional zone and all attempts should be made by the architect and developer to ensure that the next tenant would allow another use. He did not feel that the building should be designed as a single purpose building. He also indicated that staff should look at the whole problem of child care in a bigger way. He was uncomfortable about putting a child care facility anywhere. He noted that this was a big deal and steps should be taken to create an overlay zone, as well as a list of desired locations, so that developers and owners would understand that the city recognizes that there is a need and is meeting its obligation to provide possible locations and requested that staff think about that and bring back an estimate of need for child care centers, suggestions from professionals in the area as to where they might be located so that it is not handled on a spot by spot basis. He seconded the motion for approval. Action: Moved by Commissioner Jonathan, seconded by Commissioner Richards, approving the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Jonathan, seconded by Comnissioner Erwood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1397, approving CUP 89- 13, subject to conditions as amended. Carried 5-0. A. Continued Case No. CPA 89-6 - CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Request for a recommendation to city council concerning approval of a negative declaration of 6 no I NIIIV�II�S PALM DESERT PLANNIIG 00 IISSICN NNENBE R 21, 1989 environmental impact and a revised housing element to the Palm Desert General Plan. Mr. Drell noted that at the last meeting Commissioner Richards requested that this document be distributed to the more prominent committees in the city. He indicated that a presentation was given before the chamber of commerce development committee--they would formulate a recommendation to present to the board of directors and if this is moved to council, they will present their views to city council on December 14, 1989. He also indicated that it was brought before the city's economic development committee which consisted mainly of discussion. He indicated that if there were any changes, that could be incorporated as part of the commission's recommendation to council. Commissioner Downs asked C.ammissioner Richards what the position was of the economic development committee. Commissioner Richards indicated that it was mostly just an informational item to the EDC-- he did not feel there would be an official recommendation from them. Commissioner Richards felt that this was a city concern that did not seem to draw much attention now, but felt it would when it's done. He indicated that staff had noticed the different committees and felt UAW it should proceed. Commissioner Downs indicated that he would be recommending it up to city council. Chairperson Whitlock opened the public testimony and asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposal. There being no one, the public testimony was closed. Action: It was moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Erwood moving this item to city council. Commissioner Richards indicated that he was not necessarily against the motion, but felt that some discussion was needed. He stated that he had some comments to make for the record. He said that his concerns start with basic philosophy and the fact that he was not sure that the motivation for the housing element was clear--from a legal and moral responsibility he said was clear, but how fast and the degree was a matter of choice. He felt the intent of the report was to take the high, fast road. He felt that some of the number crunching was not perfect and staff indicated that it was intended to be in the general area; he felt that all of the development around i DU24JT S PALM DESERT P.LAMIIU Oa+aSSICN N94EMBER 21, 1989 s i the Washington Street area and the fact that the city surrounds Palm Desert Greens, some of those numbers in terms of housing that do occur in the city should be included. An application will be before Lafco in January by residents of Palm Desert Country Club where they indicated they want to be in our sphere of influence and the next step would be to discuss possible annexation. He noted that a lawsuit had just been settled that indicated that some additional acreage might cane into the city in the area near the Sunterra project. He felt that an alternative that could meet some of our needs could be annexation of areas where housing needs are already in existence and the ability to create more is there. He reiterated that one problem was basic philosophy that the housing element itself is limited in the alternatives offered for the means and methods of achieving the goals of the state and moral obligations. He was concerned about the mobile home park purchase; the 1100 unit apartment building and the city would be obligating itself to spending a lot of money and the alternatives were not there. He felt that the report did not discuss the ethnic situations in the valley with people who might feel more canfortable living in hispanic areas because of their comfort zone and alternatives had not been explored on what other cities and counties are doing to meet these problems and have not been given any data to indicate other methods to gain additional time or get more information in handling the same problem. He asked that staff consider his concerns before it was sent to ar/ council until some other alternatives were explored in terms of past projects like One Quail Place and the San Tropez Villas and provide discussion as to their success or failure. He did not see any discussion as to why the city was purchasing the mobile home park and the rent control issues involved with that. He felt these were important issues that need to be addressed, especially specific alternatives such as the suggestion that the market place could be utilized as a method of creating new apartments with the idea that if it were rezoned, a great number of locations for high density apartments change some of the requirements and lowers the costs, some of these things could be achieved instead of looking into a subsidy program, and no discussion was provided as to whether it was good, bad or indifferent. He noted that he had been involved in the investment side of some of these things and there were serious problems as to whether they work, don't work and how they work. Commissioner Richards indicated that if a housing element was going to be created that tells the direction the city wants to go, the commission should have a better idea of all the alternatives, including research on the subject of manufactured housing. Not mobile homes, but houses built by a manufacturer and put on a site, which he felt was one of the lowest and cheapest forms of housing, even cheaper than apartments. He noted there was a section in the 8 a M MTES PAID! DFSERr PLANNUU COMMIISSIM NNENBER 21, 1989 i I S �. city designated that way and has yet to see anything done. He indicated he would like to see the housing element expanded. Commissioner Downs asked for canments frCm Mr. Drell. Mr. Drell stated that if there were a lot of alternatives available, the city would not have this problem and the element basically addresses low and very low income housing--rents between the range of $200-$400 per month. He indicated them were no alternatives to produce housing that meets that need other than subsidization. He noted there might be a lot of housing that the city might be annexing which would address moderate income housing; the element states that the market can and does produce an ample supply of moderate incase housing; the problem is low and very low income housing. He indicated that the problem with One Quail Place and San Tropez Villas has been the fact that for every eight moderate units produced only two lower income units--there isn't enough demand for the eight units to create an internal subsidy to allow the developer to lower the rents on the controlled income ones. He stated that it is recognized in the element that the city is not going to get enough low and very low income units through the process employed with One Quail Place and San Tropez Villas. Catmissioner Richards asked about including discussion of lowering r.. standards and making the development more economically feasible. He noted that the city has high standards and fees that are charged before a building is built. He wanted to see staff attempt to address what could be cone and compare it to other cities. He wanted to see discussion about what other attempts could be tried, including modification of current and existing ordinances. Mr. Diaz stated that the element was not an end-all in itself and there would be continued review as the projects came on-line before commission and council. He felt that the suggestion of looking at the development standards was something that the element did look at and it would be a suggestion that would be carried onto the council that the impact of the elements be examined and as far as fees and other costs, generally affordable housing projects are exempted from those fees. He stated that was something that could be looked at--this element is a start and does not preclude the city from evaluating other things i and that would be brought to the council's attention. Ccnudssioner Richards felt this was a case when a lawsuit and a state law is forcing the city to cane up with a housing element in a short period of time and he requested that the commission explore and leave discussion open and wanted staff to have someone that was an expert in this field describe to the commission what the state-of-the-art alternatives are; examples of where they work and don't work, so that 9 C PALM DESERT PLANNING OC"IISSIM NUM43E R 21, 1989 before it is stated in the housing element that the city wants to spend a serious amount of money. Mr. Drell indicated that the funds committed in this element were redevelopment agency funds which the city collects that must be spent on these programs. Camtissioner Richards stated that that did not relieve the city of the obligation of spending those dollars wisely--he did not feel enough information was available in providing low cost alternatives; he indicated that ;+ some developers put in manufactured housing and then rent it for approximately $350 total per month. Mr. Drell indicated that there are zones that allow that and a rental park was being constructed now; he also indicated that manufactured housing in California was a non-issue in that the city could not discriminate in any form and was considered as any other form of housing. Mr. Diaz stated that the important issue was that the alternatives were open and it would be looked at constantly. Commissioner Jonathan noted there was a motion to send this up to council and stated that he would vote against it--he recognized the F city's obligation to be involved in the solution but he felt it was a matter of degree and methodology and felt he needed to be educated further especially on the alternatives; he indicated that under this plan the city would become a banker, builder, land purchaser and this would involve loans for rehabilitation of low income housing, direct expenditure for rehabilitation, subsidy of law income housing, low ri interest loans, purchase of lots, section 8 rents--subsidy cost unknown, and until he learned more about it, was uncertain with the city becoming involved in the free market place; he also expressed concern with methodology--he liked the self-help housing concept and wondered if some areas could be emphasized and other de-emphasized. Commissioner Elwood noted that there was a lot of discussion on philosophical differences, basically he summarized the undercurrent as that this was making the city of Palm Desert get away from the free enterprise system and would be providing houses. While that might be true, but there is a state mandated law. When taking a position as a planning cc nnissioner, sometimes decisions have to be made that may not personally be agreed with, but the law has to be followed. He had no objection to anyone who says they need more time, but he did object to anyone placing their personal aversion to following the law. It is something that has to be done and a decision to provide low cost housing in Palm Desert was going to have to be made--the method to be used could be worked out. Cannissioner Richards did not feel that he or Cannissioner Jonathan's opinion was that we don't want to do what has to be done; however, that in itself could be an issue. The fact that ten years ago this 10 ,� N 24JTES PALM DFSERr PLAMING OOMISSICN i N94E BER 21, 1989 r.. i city told him that he had to tear down his sign and 18 months later it was legal, they did not cane back and replace his sign. Since that day he questions everything that canes before commission because as a citizen he wants to know why things are done. State law has indicated that the city needs to do something--how many times has this been challenged, where are we in the courts, who else is in the courts was not the issue; he also agreed with Commissioner Erwood, but he was uncomfortable and did not feel he had heard enough about some of the ways things could be done. He felt this was one of the j most important things he had seen. He did not like what happened with One Quail and San Tropez Villas and nothing in the report said anything about earlier attempts. He felt that if an ample supply of apartments could be created, the city might get a price closer to where affordable housing is--he also believed that there are developers out there that if the city gave enough incentives, there might be an alternative there that might create the housing. He wanted to hear from an expert. He wasn't sure if employees of Palm Desert would live in them even if they were given priority. Cost was only one element in determining where a person lives. He wanted more information. Commissioner Jonathan indicated that he recognized a legal obligation to do something, as well as a moral obligation, but was not sure the few law said this is the blueprint, use it. He wanted to know within the requirements of the law, what flexibility exists and what are the proven methods. He felt the problem was to find a way that would allow people working in Palm Desert to live in Palm Desert. He felt they were being fed the solution and while the law might say you have to have subsidized loans and subsidized building, he did not know that. He stated that he would want it to be in compliance with the legal requirements. Camu ssioner Richards asked Mr. Drell about staff sharing with the commission what he knew. Mr. Drell stated that to receive a minimum return on investment when it costs $600 per month to maintain an apartment, you will not get $200-$300 per month rents. It is a problem not being solved by anyone, anywhere. In the past it was solved by subsidies by the federal government; those programs are gone. The city would not be a banker because every program in the element is being implemented--the agency the city has to implement most of these programs is the Riverside County Housing Authority. They would be administering the loan programs, the subsidy program and are in the business of doing these things. They qualify the people. The city would provide the cash through the redevelopment agency which produces by law 206 of the increased property value; tax revenues have to go to housing and are projected to be $2-$3 million r.. 11 Nr<I�I�TI'ES PALM DESERT PLANNDU OOMMISSICN 1VUA BER 21, 1989 i �rrl per year for the next ten years. The city would be taking the place of the federal government that used to run the 235 and 233 and section 8 programs. Section 8 now subsidizes an individual's rent based upon that they can't spend more than 25% of their income on rent and the housing authority would contract with projects. Since the federal government withdrew from the housing programs, the city ` is in the position to provide those funds and they would be provided through the Riverside County Housing Authority, which was the same agency that administered the federal program. The element was not a detailed program on how projects would be developed, when a project is contemplated, everything would be done to lower its cost. The programs would involve private developers and would take many forms. The element outlined what typical costs were and construction costs. There were very little ways of lowering costs without providing money. Waiving a fee is a subsidy--that money has to cane from somewhere else. The program for 1100 units was approved by city i council a year ago; every single program in the element has been approved by the city council. Mr. Diaz clarified that a project for the 1100 units had not yet been before the commission; this is a program that would enable the city to create the 1100 units. That would be before the commission and would not be all at once. If they are not being filled by employees of Palm Desert or those in our sphere of influence, then there would be some argument to go back to those individuals that have given us the regional housing allocation model and tell them there is a problem. Mr. Drell indicated that the element sets a goal and emits the resources to meet the goals. It would be a difficult job reviewing each project by project. This was not a detailed blueprint of a specific project. Commissioner Richards stated that if this is just a goal, why was the state saying this was a very ambitious deal. Mr. Diaz indicated the state was saying that we meet the law. Mr. Drell noted that it was because the commitment had been made to achieve the goals and we were emitting funds to achieve them. Commissioner Richards noted that we have a legal and moral obligation to do certain things; the solution we don't know and the state is saying they want to hear the solution, not the ideas or hopes, but how the law will be complied with--the first part is drawing up the document and then you either do it or you don't. He indicated that he has seen this happen before where staff has cane up with something that is only supposed to be a "this and a that" and the next thing that happens is that it is being used as a hammer to do certain things. Mr. Drell stated that this was a conmitment to build 1100 units and 366 very low and 366 low and use a certain amount of money to do it--it was not a precise plan and 12 ..s NLLNUI�S PALM DESERT PLANNING OCK41MICN NCIV 43ER 21, 1989 ' i ... the detail goes beyond the document. The implementation of the element is five years of work, working with developers and coming up with implementation details to build these units and address the details and alternatives being discussed. Nothing in the element precludes any developer from proposing and investigating or any planning comussioner frccn proposing or investigating a way to take the money and achieve those goals. CamLissioner Richards asked that those words be included in the element; he also wanted to hear from an expert and get an idea of where sane similar examples are being done. Mr. Drell stated that there were some in the city. Commissioner Richards stated that he would like those in the housing element. He wanted to see the use of the word alternatives in the discussion about manufactured housing and some levels of expertise in that area and on what specific suggestions that would come from developers that the city would have to do to get the cost of building down. Mr. Drell indicated that page 13 contained typical costs; he stated that these costs were taken from the project that Wendell Rylee of Cable and Rylee, who came to the city and said he could build low income senior housing and cut costs if he received free i land. That was the form of his subsidy. Connissioner Richards asked if he could show staff and give the name of a company and send reports he receives on companies doing business throughout the United States who maintain a park where they put on manufactured housing and rents are less than $400 per month. Mr. Drell suggested that Cannissioner Richards have the company cane in; he also indicated that language could be added emphasizing the opportunities for private developers or people in the housing field to propose alternative ways to achieve the goals through more effective means, which could be added as a general statement at the beginning of the report or under the manufactured housing section. He also indicated that the words could be added that the element was not exclusive and any proposal which achieves the goals, by definition are compatible with the element. Ccnvissioner Downs noted that Dan Horn builds manufactured housing at a cost of $29 per square foot. Ccnnissioner Richards indicated that he would like to hear frcm an expert. After further discussion Cannissioner Richards emphasized that this document talks about spending a lot of money and listening to staff cover some subjects that he felt uncomfortable with and he wanted to get some outside testimony, examples, and more explanation. He asked that the suggested language be added as indicated by Mr. Drell. Mr. Drell informed commission that he could have the representative from the housing authority cane in to discuss their programs, but it was part of the implementation of the housing element. Mr. Diaz noted that any developer's proposal would be checked out by staff. 13 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING C 44ISSICN NU 43ER 21, 1989 Chairperson Whitlock asked that Commissioner Downs restate his motion. He did so and clarified that the motion was to approve the findings. Mr. Drell noted that the amendments in the areas of any of the subsidy programs that there would be statements added that the method by which the goals and money to be spent shall not be exclusive as i discussed or mentioned in the element and that any proposal from any qualified, reputable source to solve and achieve those goals shall be considered as eligible and consistent with the element, any and all alternatives to achieve the goals shall be considered consistent. Chairperson Whitlock indicated there was another reconmendation that the language of explanation would be inserted at Ccninissioner Richards' request and felt that should be included. Mr. Drell stated that the language would be included in the element prior to it going to city council and staff would distribute the statement to commission to insure that it is consistent with commission's direction. Action: Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, approving the findings as presented by staff. Carried 3-2 (Commissioners Jonathan and Richards voted no). Now Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Commissioner Erwood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1398, recommending approval of GPA 89-6, 1989 Housing Element, and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, as amended, to city council. Carried 3-2 (Commissioners Jonathan and Richards voted no). VIII. MISCELLANBOUS None. IX. ORAL 0144 NICATICNS None. X. CU44ENTS None. 14 Now a'Lu9V 17:..1 PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NMO43ER 21, 1989 i ar Xi. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Commissioner Downs, seconded by Chairperson Whitlock, adjourning the meeting. Carried 5-0. The meeting was a Oounned at 9:29 p.m. 4 '6 l RAMON A. DIAZ, Secret ATTEST: CAROL WHITLOCK, Chairperson /tn r.. 15