HomeMy WebLinkAbout0301 MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING
TLTESDAY - MARCH 1, 19 9 4
7:00 P.M. - CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE
r.. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I . CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Spiegel called the meeting to order at 7 : 00 p.m.
II . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Whitlock led in the pledge of allegiance.
III . ROLL CALL
Members Present: Bob Spiegel, Chairman
Paul Beaty
Sabby Jonathan
Carol Whitlock
Members Absent: None
Staff Present: Jeff Winklepleck Bob Hargreaves
Joe Gaugush Tonya Monroe
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
"' Consideration of the February 15, 1994 meeting minutes .
Action:
Moved by Commissioner Jonathan, seconded by Commissioner
Whitlock, approving the February 15, 1994 meeting minutes as
submitted. Carried 4-0.
V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION:
Mr. Winklepleck stated that there were no items from the
February 24 council meeting impacting planning commission.
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
None.
VII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - A
None.
VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Case No. CUP 94-1 - NEW HEAVEN DANCE CENTRE, Applicant
,r,� Request for approval of a conditional
use permit to allow the operation of a
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 1, 1994
4250 square foot dance studio at 73-130 �.�i
E1 Paseo, Suites O-U, in the C-1 S.P.
zone.
Mr. Winklepleck summarized the salient points of the staff
report and recommended approval.
Commissioner Jonathan asked if the time frame in which the
survey was conducted included weekends, lunch and evenings;
Mr. Winklepleck replied yes. He indicated that this building
had its own parking lot with 79 parking spaces and
occasionally there was an insignificant overflow from Tony
Roma' s, but not from Carl ' s Jr. or Palomino' s .
Commissioner Whitlock asked what prompted the letter from Mr.
Karcher; Mr. Winklepleck said he spoke to him last week and
his main concern was the lunch hour business; as shown in the
report there would only be 12 people during the day (if there
were more he did not feel there would be a problem) - Mr.
Karcher' s concern was with the entry from Highway 111 and
possible congestion deterring potential customers .
Chairman Spiegel commented that people going to the dance
studio would probably not go to Carl ' s Jr. to park because it
was far enough away; Mr. Winklepleck concurred. ..r
Chairman Spiegel o ened the public hearing and asked the
applicant to address the commission.
MS . SHANNA LANDEL, Vice President, stated that she was
bringing ten years experience to her business and while
the staff report client figures were optimistic, she
hoped the business would do well .
Chairman Spiegel asked for and received clarification on the
facility' s rooms and how they would be used on weekends .
Commissioner Whitlock asked if all types of dance would be
provided; Ms . Landel stated that there would be ballroom,
latin, country western, etc. , but not hip hop styles .
Chairman Spiegel asked what age group she was targeting; Ms .
Landel replied ages from 30 to 80 .
Chairman Spiegel asked if anyone wished to address the
commission in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed project.
There was no one and the public testimony was closed.
Commissioner Whitlock stated that she would move for
approval .
2 �
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 1, 1994
'"r Action:
Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Commissioner
Beaty, approving the findings as presented by staff. Speaking
to the motion, Chairman Spiegel noted that he drove by there
on his way to the meeting and there were plenty of places to
park. He called for a vote. Motion carried 4-0.
Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Commissioner
Beaty, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1640,
approving CUP 94-1, subject to conditions . Carried 4-0 .
IX. MISCELLANEOUS
A. Street Right-of-Way Abandonment - Painters Path between
Fred Warinq Drive and the Palm Valley Channel .
Request for approval of a determination
that the subject right-of-way is in
conformity with the city's General Plan.
Mr. Gaugush stated that he was looking for a minute motion
from the planning commission to the city council stating that
the abandonment of the right-of-way is in conformity with the
""" city' s General Plan. Based on the fact that additional
right-of-way was going to be dedicated as part of the
development itself, staff felt it was appropriate to make
that determination.
Commissioner Jonathan asked for clarification. Mr. Gaugush
explained that currently Painters Path between Fred Waring
Drive and the Palm Valley Channel where it terminates with
the Desert Crossing project, Painters Path was being
realigned further to the south. In order to provide for that
realignment, the city had to go through the process of
abandoning the existing right-of-way. Commissioner Jonathan
asked if the intent was to align it with Painters Path on the
other side of the wash; Mr. Gaugush said that currently it
did physically line up with Painters Path on the other side
of the wash; however, it did not connect due to the
interdiction by the channel . What this realignment would do
was move it again further to the south towards the toe of the
existing foothill. It was not intended to cross the channel .
Commissioner Jonathan asked what the purpose of the
realignment was; Mr. Gaugush replied that it was to provide
for the development of the Desert Crossing project. At the
last meeting the commission approved a parcel map, which was
another implementing element of the development agreement
...
3
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 1, 1994
from 1989 . This action had to take place in order to •�
schedule the proposal before council for the actual public
hearing on the abandonment of the right-of-way. Commissioner
Jonathan asked what happened after the street was abandoned
and if it would go to the property owner; Mr. Gaugush
confirmed that the underlying rights reverted back to the
property adjacent to it. The developer, Lowe Enterprises,
was undertaking the removal of existing improvements.
Commissioner Jonathan asked if there was an easement where
the city intended to move the road southwesterly; Mr. Gaugush
stated that one of the requirements of the abandonment was
that the subdivider rededicate the new alignment--that would
be happening concurrently with the abandonment process . They
would not have a situation where there was no access rights,
it would be a back to back recordation. Chairman Spiegel
asked if there would ever be a plan where Painters Path on
one side would go across with a bridge to the other side; Mr.
Gaugush said that as long as he had been involved in looking
at this property over the years, there were some thought
processes entertained to make the connection a few years
back--those were dispelled due to some public outcry from
adjacent property owners. There was no intent at staff level
and with the current council there would be agreement that it
would not happen.
r
Chairman Spiegel asked if anyone wished to address the
commission on this issue. There was no one.
Action:
Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Commissioner
Beaty, by minute motion determining that the street right-of-
way abandonment of Painters Path between Fred Waring Drive
and the Palm Valley Channel is in conformity with the city' s
General Plan. Carried 4-0.
X. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - B
None.
XI. COMMENTS
1 . Commissioner Whitlock asked for clarification as to why
the oral communications section was after the consent
calendar. Mr. Hargreaves explained that there was a
requirement under the Brown Act that the public be given
an opportunity to comment on any item on the agenda
4 �
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 1, 1994
'� before that item was discussed by the planning
commission. As to non-hearing items, there was a
problem with the old agenda format because people would
have to wait until after the item was discussed to
address it to the commission. Commission discussed
rewording the oral communications section.
2 . Commissioner Jonathan stated that he and Bob Spiegel
went on a tour of the sewage treatment plant with Tom
Levy; he felt the tour was educational. The water
district seemed to be concerned about potential odor
problems and had put in quite a bit of infrastructure
and resources into containing the potential odor
problems, although it was agreed that something happened
occasionally and he would continue to work with Tom Levy
on that. There was one potential problem that was
discussed, which was the ingress and egress into the
project. When currently going south on Cook Street, an
illegal left-turn could be made into the treatment
plant. Since he worked there he could see that being
done all the time by the big trucks serviced septic
tanks . The problem was that there was no left turn lane
there; Cook Street was only two lanes and they stopped
traffic. It was a dangerous spot and was hard to see
� because the road came down there. Also, traffic coming
out of the treatment plant was not supposed to make a
left onto Cook, but they do. Mr. Levy said that he had
offered to pay for the installment of the plastic
diverters if that was an appropriate action. He said
his offer was not accepted, but was still good.
Commissioner Jonathan felt this was something the city
could follow up on because he saw the potential for an
accident.
Chairman Spiegel stated that he learned a lot, even more
than he really wanted to know. He said that he asked
Mr. Levy about the Kaiser Development and he represented
the water and sewage district for the Coachella Valley
and he said there was no way, no matter what problem
they had there, that it would affect our water. The
only thing he personally worried about was the truck
traffic and emissions from that and the trains . From a
ground water standpoint, he had no strong feelings that
it would ever effect our water.
2 . Chairman Spiegel stated he was looking forward to the
conference in San Diego and wished all the commission
could attend.
..�
5
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 1, 1994
3 . It was noted that the joint meeting with the city 'r
council would be rescheduled.
XII. ADJOURNMENT
Moved by Commissioner Whitlock, seconded by Commissioner
Jonathan, adjourning the meeting to March 15, 199 Carried
4-0 . The meeting was adjourned at •22 p.m.
0
_ e—F�f ; ��
N� '���+a�+y��j r �'�1
'�VY��/ 0 �''•f�N�✓ .
RAMON A. DIAZ, ec ary
ATTEST: �
�
RO ER A. SPIEGE , n
Palm Desert Planning ission
/tm
r1
�■i
6