Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0618 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY - JUNE 18, 1996 7 :00 P.M. - CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE I . CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Beaty called the meeting to order at 7 : 00 p.m. II . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Fernandez led in the pledge of allegiance. III . ROLL CALL Members Present: Paul Beaty, Chairperson Sonia Campbell Jim Ferguson George Fernandez Sabby Jonathan Members Absent: None Staff Present: Phil Drell Mark Greenwood Marshall Rudolph Tonya Monroe IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Consideration of the June 4, 1996 meeting minutes . Action: Moved by Commissioner Campbell, seconded by Commissioner Ferguson, approving the June 4, 1996 minutes as submitted. Carried 5-0. V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION: Mr. Drell summarized pertinent June 13, 1996 city council actions . VI . ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. VII. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Case No. PMW 96-20 - FOXX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Applicant Request for approval of a parcel map waiver to allow lot line adjustments within Tract No. 24984-2 on Royal Canyon MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 1996 Lane and Grand Canyon Lane located in �■o The Grove. Action: Moved by Commissioner Ferguson, seconded by Commissioner Campbell, approving the consent calendar by minute motion. Carried 5-0. VIII . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case Nos. CUP 96-15 and VAR 96-1 - DENISE ROBERGE, Applicant Request for approval of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact, conditional use permit and a variance to allow the construction of a 33 space parking lot on a 14,899 square foot parcel at the southwest corner of Portola Avenue and Shadow Mountain Drive. Mr. Drell explained that the parking lot would be an overflow lot for the facility that the applicant is remodeling/ building at the corner of Portola and E1 Paseo. They were anticipating that when they have large events or showings at the art gallery that they might need some additional parking. Coincidentally, the city is converting the old library across the street into a community center, which the city anticipates needing additional parking for events . If the request is approved, the city would be negotiating some type of sharing agreement on the use of this lot and would probably provide some city investment for the improvements . If an agreement is reached, the need for a variance would disappear because it would be within 300 feet. Mr. Drell felt this was a good use, at least short term, for the lot. The improvements around it would be completed, i .e. sidewalks and landscaping. If at some time in the future there was a demand for another use it could be converted to a residential use, but it was not ideal for residential because of the commercial project to the north and traffic volume on Portola. Staff felt that the variance findings could be met for the remote lot greater than 300 feet. He stated that he would like to change staff report finding #2 for the variance since the agreement had not been completed. He stated that he would insert the word "potentially" into the sentence so 2 aw MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 1996 that this lot would potentially be intended to serve the Portola Community Center. Mr. Drell recommended approval . Commissioner Jonathan asked if the 33 parking spaces were above and beyond what was required for the Roberge sculpture center. Mr. Drell replied yes . Commissioner Jonathan asked if the parking lot would be subject to the parking lot tree shading ordinance; Mr. Drell concurred. Commissioner Jonathan asked if it was anticipated that there would be some type of shuttle service or if staff thought people would walk between this parking lot and the sculpture garden. Mr. Drell said he wasn't sure, but it was likely that they would provide shuttle service when they have special events . Chairperson Beaty opened the public hearing and asked the applicant to address the commission. MR. LARRY GROTBECK, the applicant, stated that he was present to answer any questions . Commissioner Jonathan asked Mr. Grotbeck if they would provide shuttle service during special events . Mr. Grotbeck informed commission that they haven't resolved that issue, but felt there might be a combination of shuttle service and vow walking to the event. He felt it was close enough that it was within easy walking distance and, if necessary, under special circumstances they could shuttle customers . Mr. Drell indicated that on an on-going basis it could provide employee parking for the restaurant and gallery. Mr. Grotbeck felt that this was a strategic area for a parking lot and besides their use, which might be intermittent in the beginning, they were open to discussions with the church across the street should they also require additional parking. Those were all possibilities and they were willing to talk with them, but they wanted to get it built first and go from there. Chairperson Beaty asked if anyone wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposal . There was no one and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Ferguson felt this was a windfall for the city. The traffic congestion problems in that area are well known and documented and he felt it was wonderful that the applicant was doing this. He said that he would move approval, subject to the findings being amended for the variance with the justification for finding #2 having the word "potentially" inserted in front of "serve the Portola low MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 1996 Community Center" on page 3 of the staff report. With that insertion he would move for approval of the findings . Action: Moved by Commissioner Ferguson, seconded by Commissioner Campbell, approving the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0 . Moved by Commissioner Ferguson, seconded by Commissioner Campbell, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1746, approving CUP 96-15 and VAR 96-1, subject to conditions . Carried 5-0 . B. Case No. CUP 91-16 Amendment #3 - OMRI AND BONI RESTAURANT, Applicant Request for approval of an amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for a 540 square foot expansion of an existing restaurant to provide room for a waiting area, hostess station and aisle (no additional seating) located at 73-671 Highway 111 . �1 Mr. Drell indicated that this restaurant was in a center on Highway 111 that has not been successful in terms of retail uses in these small spaces . This was a very small restaurant that would like to rearrange their interior space to create a more acceptable dining area. He felt the geometry of the space as shown on the floor plan demonstrated the limited dining area. The parking provided for the use was primarily from the parking lot in front of the building and on the frontage road. Since the request was for an extremely small addition to the square footage and essentially no additional seating, staff recommended approval . Chairperson Beaty opened the public hearing and asked if the applicant was present and wished to address the commission. The applicant spoke from the audience and indicated they were present. Chairperson Beaty asked if anyone wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposal . MRS. EDITH MORREY stated that she has a building on E1 Paseo and their parking was in the rear of the 4 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 1996 �► presidential parking area. It was not adequate because of all the restaurants . She said she had to donate 100 feet and she had plenty of parking for her business, but now she didn't have parking. She understood there were supposed to be a certain number of square feet for each footage in the parking area and they were limited to that. She felt there was nothing worse for a business than inadequate parking. She asked how the restaurant seating would be controlled. Chairperson Beaty asked if Mrs . Morrey was aware that the applicant was not requesting additional seating. Mrs . Morrey replied that that was what they said and asked what their capacity was now. If they were adding almost 600 square feet, they would have more customers . Commissioner Jonathan noted that their capacity was 36 seats and if Mrs . Morrey was aware of a violation, then it would be appropriate for her to notify a City of Palm Desert Code Enforcement Officer and then the conditional use permit could be reviewed accordingly. Mrs . Morrey stated that she didn't know what they were " doing in their restaurant. Commissioner Jonathan said the enforcement was difficult because the city didn't have the personnel for them to regularly go into every restaurant and count seats, although they made an effort in that regard. Mrs . Morrey said that if the area is left open, no one would know how many seats they would have. Chairperson Beaty explained that they were restricted to no more than 36 seats. Mrs . Morrey stated that she thought they had more than that now. Commissioner Jonathan said they could get some clarification on that from the applicant. Mrs . Morrey felt that should be a written agreement because it was just left open. 5 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 1996 Commissioner Ferguson asked Mrs . Morrey if she could have III that assurance, if that would alleviate her problem with the application. Mrs. Morrey stated that her problem was that she didn't want more parking spaces used. There is a rental car business there, and they were very flexible. They could have between three and 11 cars parked there. It was too limited. She asked how they could control it and if there was a figure where they base the size of a business on the parking spaces . Commissioner Ferguson replied that there is and the staff report indicated that there was ample parking for the space they currently have. To address her question specifically, the applicant is limited to 36 seats . It was a condition of the use of that property. If they go over 36 seats they will be in violation of their conditional use permit and the conditional use permit could be revoked unless they come into compliance. He said that he has eaten at the restaurant, enjoyed the restaurant, and could understand why there was a space problem. As he understood it the bar and forward area would be moved to another part of the restaurant. Anyone going by that sees someone in the bar or forward area of the restaurant sitting and eating should call Phil Drell, 346- �1 0611, and tell him there is a problem at the restaurant and the city will check it out. Before the meeting Mr. Drell gave him his commitment that he would send someone from Code Enforcement down to enforce it. He was convinced that there were some "teeth" in the resolution. Commissioner Jonathan asked Mrs . Morrey if there was a general parking problem in the entire area. Mrs . Morrey said that it wasn't adequate. Commissioner Jonathan asked if it during the daytime use that tended to be the problem. Mrs. Morrey replied yes, the restaurants were serving lunch and there were numerous cars there. When going by a business if there wasn't a place to park, people would keep going and maybe go somewhere else. She felt it was very destructive to a business . There needed to be adequate parking. Commissioner Jonathan stated that he agreed and concurred with her comments and appreciated her taking the time to tell 6 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 1996 ... the commission that. Although this application would not make the existing problem worse because the seating would remain the same, her comments helped the commission to be aware of the problem and they could be responsive to her concerns on future applications . Mrs. Morrey stated that there would be a building next to hers which would also require parking and there just wouldn't be enough. She voted against it, but she had to donate her parking area to the presidential parking section, which was not working. Commissioner Jonathan asked if Mrs . Morrey thought the new parking facility that will be built on E1 Paseo would help the overall situation. Mrs . Morrey said that perhaps people would walk across the street if Sak' s has adequate parking. She felt that even the mall doesn't have adequate parking. They built that and then added on two more stores . Commissioner Jonathan said that the commission was very sensitive to the parking issue because they recognize how that can impact the quality of life here in the city. He appreciated her comments and would continue to be sensitive to that issue. He felt it was an important one. Mr. Drell informed commission that the city was involved in a design effort to look at rearranging the geometry of that lot. Staff felt that by running long aisles east and west rather than short aisles north and south they could add in that lot between 50 and 80. additional spaces . They would be finalizing that design and taking it to the El Paseo people and hopefully the city council some time this year. The city' s overall economic development policy is to try and address parking problems by creating more parking, not by limiting the success of successful businesses . To a certain extent staff felt that restaurants bring customers to E1 Paseo. He noted that Mr. Fern was trying to put in a restaurant at the old Fidelity Federal Bank at El Paseo and Highway 74 to bring customers to his neighboring retail stores . People feel that after going to restaurants in a commercial area that people stay and shop. Mrs . Morrey stated that her beauty shop has been vacant for two years and the main complaint was that they have to pay ten percent if they have a salon on E1 Paseo. That wasn't conducive to business and she would probably 7 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 1996 have to change it to something different. They won't Wo pay that. No one was parking in the beauty shop area now, although they have had that previously for four years but it was empty now. It was going to grow and she thought it was hurting business . She said she was happy that the restaurant was successful, but she felt it was at the expense of all the other businesses if there wasn't adequate parking. Chairperson Beaty felt the city was addressing that issue with the redesign of the parking lot and thanked Mrs . Morrey for her comments . MR. JOE BRANDT, the owner of the business, stated that they would be creating more parking spaces because he was switching the nail shop, which was there now and which hardly uses any parking spaces, with the delicatessen which is empty right now. The delicatessen had four tables and chairs . In lieu of the nail shop, Omri and Boni would get their space and the nail shop would move into the space where the delicatessen was . They were actually eliminating additional possible parking spaces which would be used for the delicatessen. He felt that by doing the switch, he was giving up the deli and moving the nail shop and creating additional No parking space. During the day time he felt there were not many cars. At night there were more at the restaurants, but Mrs . Morrey wasn't open at night so he didn't see a problem. Chairperson Beaty noted that it sounded like the remodel would in effect remove some seats rather than add seats . Mrs . Morrey said that someone else would go where the nail shop was. Mr. Drell clarified that Mr. Brandt was moving the nail shop into the deli location and the deli use would disappear. Once it was gone, they would lose all their rights to have a deli . Commissioner Ferguson said he had a question for the applicant. He asked how many seats the restaurant currently has . MS. BONI DASHEFSKI stated that she has 36 seats . 8 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 1996 %MW Commissioner Ferguson asked if Ms . Dashefski understood that she was limited to 36 seats . Ms . Dashefski said yes . Commissioner Ferguson indicated that his questions were for the benefit of the public and the record. Chairperson Beaty closed the public hearing and asked for commission comments or action. Action: Moved by Commissioner Jonathan, seconded by Commissioner Fernandez, approving the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0 . Moved by Commissioner Jonathan, seconded by Commissioner Campbell, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1747 , approving CUP 91-16 Amendment #3, subject to conditions . Carried 5-0 . C. Case No. PP/CUP 96-5 - RICK MURO, Applicant Request for approval of a precise plan of design/conditional use permit for a 17,857 gross square foot two story athletic club on the vacant property at the northwest corner of Monterey Avenue and Fred Waring Drive. Mr. Drell explained that not only was there a request for a continuance, but last Friday on examining the map that was used to generate the legal notice it was found that the property in question was identified as only one of the three lots on which the project would be located, therefore, the 300 foot radius took in a smaller area than it should have. Therefore, all those that should have been notified weren't. He said it must be continued to give proper notice. Secondly, since some people were notified and could address the commission, he would briefly run over what the project is and what the issues are. It was a 17 ,000 square foot athletic club and by virtue of its design would probably be the premier athletic facility in this particular area. Staff identified two main issues of concern, one being the parking requirement. The applicant could only park approximately two-thirds of the required parking for the use onsite and is proposing that 38 of the 119 spaces be parked offsite in the 9 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 1996 Darr Eye Clinic parking lot on the south side of Fred Waring art in the evening. Assuming the club is as successful as the applicant hopes it is and the city hopes it is, staff saw the potential for intrusion of the space in the early evening hours into the residential area to the northwest, as well as increased loading of left-hand turn movements to and from the facility from Fred Waring which would direct traffic into that area to exit. Given those issues, staff was not prepared to recommend approval . On the other hand, this is an important intersection of the city which the city and staff would like to see a high quality development on. It has a lot of infrastructure costs which dictate a use which can pay a high rent to pay for the cost of tearing out all the existing improvements, putting in new curbs, gutters and sidewalks, relocating a traffic signal, as well as undergrounding lines and therefore staff had some dilemma in analyzing this and trying to find a way to recommend approval . Mr. Drell felt that it looked like a very high quality facility and was well designed, but staff has concerns about its appropriateness for this particular site. If the commission was willing to consider the 38 spaces which are across the street on Fred Waring, the notice would also have to be expanded from that area since that parking would become part of the project. Therefore, staff would be notifying people on the south side of Fred Waring as well . r The applicant has worked hard to answer staff s concerns, but the solution might not be this site. Chairperson Beaty noted that there would be a more complete staff report at the July 2 meeting if the item was continued. He opened the public testimony for anyone that wished to speak. MS. DIANA LAMAR stated that she has been a desert resident for 191 years and she has owned the property at the corner of Gloriana and Acacia since February 1992 . She would be directly impacted by the traffic. She said that she teaches photography at the College of the Desert and has been associated with the college for ten years. She is a member of the board of the College Astronomy Association and the Desert Camera Club. She noted that lighting has totally deteriorated since she does photograph the night sky. She could no longer do that, even from the overlooks around the city, because of all the additional lights . This structure would also be generating light. She stated that she gave Mr. Smith a letter on June 10 or 11 and was sure that the commission had read it and would not go back into it, 10 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 1996 but had some additional concerns which she had not mentioned. This was a family neighborhood. On Acacia and within three houses on Gloriana, Arboleda and Mimosa there were at least 13 youngsters who do not have sidewalks to play on, they roller blade, skate board in the street, and play ball in the street. The apartment building adjacent to the proposed building is federally owned and subsidized housing. There were handicapped and elderly people in that building and the height of the structure would obliterate the view totally of the people on the second floor. They would have no view. She said spoke to the property manager and that was the family section. Some of those people have been there since the building was built. Handicapped and elderly people needed a view to look at the sky. If there were 1200 cars, which Mr. Muro told her was the projected membership, they would go in and out of there at a constant rate. The facility would be open from 6 : 00 a.m. to 9 : 00 p.m. Staff would have to get there half an hour early to open everything and leave half an hour later after they close to secure the building. That would be 16 hours a day that building is open. After that there is a cleaning crew coming in and if there were only two people, it might be one car, but for a three story building (the third story being underground) they would have to have a rather large cleaning crew. They would be having people coming into that area 24 hours a day. Normally that was a quiet street, especially at night. The athletic club would serve food. Mr. Muro plans to have a juice bar. That means fresh vegetables, fresh fruits, etc . Garbage disposals can and do eliminate most of the waste, but they would not eliminate the soft drink containers, plastic containers, napkins and such. They have virtually no rodents, roaches and no stray animals in that area now because it is vacant. She asked where the location of the dumpster would be and noted that people aren' t too good at closing the lids on the dumpsters because they are heavy. They would attract stray animals and so on. She hasn't seen any but has smelled skunks, raccoons, dogs, cats, and coyotes come down the street once in a while, so it would be an attraction for them, which there wouldn't be in an office professional building. She said that she has spoken to her neighbors and they gave her two letters today. They were too shy to come to the meeting and speak. She was very concerned about the amount of traffic. During the season the people going to the COD Street Fair were all over; there wasn't %NW 11 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 1996 a parking space available on Acacia from Fred Waring to r/ Park View. Saturdays and Sundays were when the Street Fair was open and on Saturdays and Sundays is when the fitness center would be doing their greatest number of people because people work from 9 : 00 a.m. to 5 : 00 p.m. five days per week and they would go there on Saturday mornings . She knew the city wanted to fill that lot and hoped they would find something that pays a high rent for that corner, but didn't feel the fitness center would fit with the neighborhood. She noted that the old Circuit City building was vacant, there were many shopping centers empty, and if he wanted to build there were vacant lots on Monterey, up and down Fred Waring and across from City Hall which were not family neighborhoods . She took photos which she submitted to Mr. Smith that showed a school bus unloading one of the handicapped children that are in the apartment building. That parking lot entrance is right there. She said they could perhaps move the school bus, but didn't know. There would be accidents. Later that day she saw another little boy pushing his brother in a wheel chair coming out of that apartment complex. There were a lot of children and a lot of handicapped people in that area. wo MR. STEVE LAWSON, the operator of the athletic club on Alessandro, said that he wanted to make it a point of record that the parking concern was his genuine and primary concern, not having another competitor in the neighborhood like many might think. Although he wasn't looking forward to dealing with another competitor, the parking was simply inadequate. All they had to do was come by his club to see how inadequate it is . As a matter of record he wanted to make sure that he took the time to come before the commission to share that with them. The hours they are congested are not the hours commission might think. The worst times are 6 :00 a.m. to 8 : 30 a.m. and from 4 : 30 p.m. to 7 : 00 p.m. They have a tremendous amount of businesses that close at 5 : 00 p.m. that were very cooperative with allowing them to not only use the parking in front of their building, but their actual spaces . He cooperated back with them from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. by posting signs on his doors telling his customers not to use the other parking lots during 8 : 00-5:00 . The parking is his primary concern as many good points that were brought up by Ms . Lamar. That and the fact that he sees left-hand turns 12 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 1996 vow specifically in and out of that business being a problem. MR. MIKE HOMME, 46-300 Desert Lily, stated that he owns six commercial buildings along Monterey Avenue. He said that several years ago he was involved with the lots that were now the parking area behind the apartment complex on Monterey Avenue and he didn't know who owns it now, but in those original conversations, and he has no interest with the applicant, there were many discussions about using that parking and the entrance to it on the far south end as an entrance to this property. Also, being involved along Monterey he could fully support Mr. Drell ' s philosophy that a normal office use would not be able to support the burden that that property has placed upon it in terms of the left-turn lanes and bus stop that the city has required. The only uses that are available are uses like this or restaurants who can pay that kind of rent. There was kind of a dilemma there. A normal office use would not support the burdens which were city burdens on the property. Some of the other uses that are able to pay a higher rent would be able to support that property. Chairperson Beaty asked for clarification that Mr. Homme was suggesting that there was extra parking in the apartment lot that could be utilized. Mr. Homme said that he had owned all the lots that the parking behind the apartment building was on, then the Redevelopment Agency bought those lots from him. They had several conversations about the fact that that lot could be used in conjunction with these three lots and that lot has a far south entrance which would put them a little further away from Fred Waring and would give a place for traffic to stack up and that lot and entrance could be considered in any application that belonged to that property. There was a tremendous amount of parking on those lots and it was never full . It was redevelopment money that was used to create that parking and that parking should be part of a community parking area like on E1 Paseo. He didn't know if that changed when it was given to Riverside to manage and didn' t know the legalities, but that was some of the history of the situation. 13 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 1996 There was no further public testimony. Chairperson noted WAO that the public hearing would remain open and asked for a motion of continuance to July 2, 1996 . Action: Moved by Commissioner Ferguson, seconded by Commissioner Campbell, continuing PP/CUP 96-5 to July 2, 1996 by minute motion. Carried 5-0. IX. MISCELLANEOUS A. Palm Desert Water Reclamation Plant No. 10 Percolation Basins, North Expansion, by Coachella Valley Water District. Mr. Drell said that under the special district ' s charter water the district was supposed to advise the city when they were doing a development in the city and the commission makes a determination that what they are doing is consistent with the general plan. This particular site that they are developing is designated for the use they are proposing and is consistent with the general plan. Chairperson Beaty noted that there are existing ponds there and felt the district would be sensitive. Mr. Drell noted that the ponds don't have a bad odor. There was sometimes an odor problem in that area but it had to do with the pumping station. Commissioner Jonathan said that sometimes it was from the trucks that empty into there. Chairperson Beaty stated that insect control was a concern. Commissioner Jonathan indicated that his office is across the street from them and they had an odor problem. Mr. Levy was kind enough to give the commission a tour of the facility. It was impressive what they were doing with the water and how there was not an odor problem. He felt they are doing good things there. Chairperson Beaty noted that he and Commissioner Fernandez live in that area also. Commissioner Fernandez concurred that they do not have a problem. Commissioner Ferguson asked if Mr. Drell made the determination that this is consistent with the general plan. Mr. Drell concurred. 14 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 1996 Action: Moved by Commissioner Jonathan, seconded by Commissioner Fernandez, determining by minute motion that the proposed percolation pond is consistent with the existing General Plan Land Use Designation. Motion carried 5-0 . B. Discussion of Future Planning Commission Study Session Meetings and Topics . Commissioner Ferguson stated that he would like to suggest for the commission's consideration that the next RDA study session concern itself with Desert Willow. He and Commissioner Campbell were at a Section 4 meeting and they were discussing an aggressive timeshare unit project which would be coming before commission in September. It might be a very complex development with the mixture of land uses and he felt it would be helpful to have an overview of the entire project ahead of time to help them evaluate the timeshare project within the overall plan for the entire area. Mr. Drell stated that he would inform Mr. Ortega. Chairperson Beaty noted that there were a couple of �► potentially long hearing items on July 2 and it might not be the best day. Commissioner Ferguson asked what items were scheduled. Mr. Drell indicated the Foundation for the Retarded was continued to July 2, as well as the athletic club. He didn't foresee Mr. Muro's project being a long hearing. There would be people wanting to talk, but it was up to commission to decide. Action: Commission requested that the next study session topic be on the Desert Willow/Section 4 project(s) on July 2 , 1996 at 6 :00 p.m. X. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE UPDATE None. XI. COMMENTS None. 15 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 18, 1996 MI . ADJOURNMENT ri Moved by Commissioner Campbell, seconded by Commissioner Fernandez, adjourning the meeting to July 2, 1996 by minute motion. Carried 5-0 . The meeting was adjourned at 7 :48 p.m. v j � 0 PHILIP DR LL, Secretary ATTEST: PAUL R. BEATY, Chair erson Palm Desert Planning Commission /tm 16