HomeMy WebLinkAbout0206 MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY - FEBRUARY 6, 2001
7:00 P.M. - ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCE ROOM
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE
�..
� � * * �. * .� * * * � �. � � �. ,� � * �. � �. * .� �. � � �. �. � * � * � � � � �. � * * �. � �.
I. CALL TO ORDER
Vice Chairperson Lopez called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Jonathan led in the pledge of allegiance.
III. ROLL CALL
Members Present: Jim Lopez, Vice Chairperson
Sonia Campbell
Cindy Finerty
Sabby Jonathan
Dave Tschopp
Members Absent: None
�
Staff Present: Phil Drell, Director of Community Development
Bob Hargreaves, City Attorney
Tonya Monroe, Administrative Secretary
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Consideration of the January 16, 2001 meeting minutes.
Action:
It was moved by Commissioner Campbell, seconded by Commissioner Finerty,
approving the January 16, 2001 minutes as submitted. Motion carried 3-0-2
(Vice Chairperson Lopez and Commissioner Tschopp abstained►.
V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION
Mr. Drell summarized pe�tinent January 25, 2001 actions.
VI. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
� None.
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 6, 2001
VIl. CONSENT CALENDAR �
A. Case No. PMW 00-10 - GHA HOLDINGS III, INC., Applicant
Request for approval of a parcel map waiver to merge lots 7 and
8 at 73-081 Fred Waring Drive.
B. Case No. PMW 00-27 - SUNRISE COLONY COMPANY, Applicant
Request for approva( of a parcel map waiver to adjust lot lines
between lots 137 and 138 of Tract 28227 in Indian Ridge
Country Club, $88 Fire Dance Lane and 878 Fire Dance Lane.
C. Case No. PMW 00-29 - KRISCO, INC., Applicant
Request for approval of a parcel map waiver to allow a lot line
adjustment for lots 7 and 8 of Tract 29525 located on Hovley Court.
Action:
!t was moved by Commissioner Campbell, seconded by Commissioner Finerty, ?
approving the Consent Calendar by minute motion. Motion carried 5-0. �
VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
IX. MISCELLANEOUS
A. Case No. CUP 00-21 - JAMES AND CYNTHIA RITCHIE, Applicants
Per Planning Commission direction on January 16, 2001 , presentation
of a resolution denying a request to allow the short term rental of a
single family dwelling located at 73-015 Amber St�eet.
Mr. Drell indicated that the commission had a resolution of denial before them
ready for adoption.
;
�
2
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 6, 2001
� Action:
It was moved by Commissioner Finerty, seconded by Commissioner Campbell,
approving the findings as presented by staff. Motion carried 3-0-2 (Vice
Chairperson Lopez and Commissioner Tschopp abstained).
It was moved by Commissioner Finerty, seconded by Commissioner Campbell,
adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2041 , denying Case No. CUP
00-21 . Motion carried 3-0-2 (Vice Chairperson Lopez and Commissioner
Tschopp abstained►.
B. Discussion of current status of Case No. PP/CUP 98-15, the Palms to
Pines East Shopping Center Remodel
Mr. Drell explained that basically there was a situation where Rite Aid obtained
a ground lease to build a building. When they ran into financial trouble, they
couldn't perform on their ground lease. The developer then negotiated a
conditional substitute lease with Staples and they came in and processed an
alternative plan. He explained that technically Rite Aid still has control of the
property and the owner has to go through a termination proceeding under the
� lease to terminate them. The owner was about to do that and then Rite Aid
submitted a check and their working drawings. Under normal circumstances,
the Planning Commission approval supersedes the other, but per his letter, he
took the liberty under the code to say that the Commission approved an
alternative and ultimately whoever came in with an intention to pull permits
and had a lease in their hand would proceed. He indicated that the City didn't
have a preference. Whoever controlled the property could pull a building
permit. They would see if Rite Aid came forward to build their building.
Commissioner Campbell commented that they must have done very well at
Christmas time. Mr. Drell said that per the owner it goes up and down on
almost a weekly basis on the decision, but the owner sent them a termination
letter that said they would perform and they would have 60 days to initiate
demolition of the existing building and pull building permits. If they didn't, it
would be terminated and the Staples lease would come into effect.
Commissioner Campbell asked what day the 60 days went into effect. Mr.
Drell explained that it would be 60 days from a week from today, because the
owner technically couldn't send out the termination letter until Staples was
also in a position to get their permits because his lender said not to terminate
the Rite Aid lease until he had assurance of a substitute equivalent tenant.
That wouldn't happen until Staples went through Architectural Review
r..
3
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 6, 2001
i
Commission next Tuesday and obtained approval of their working drawings.
Rite Aid was still a national company and it would take some time for the
termination to get to where it had to get for someone to make a decision. He
noted that there would be no penalty to Rite Aid to back out of the lease.
They had been paying rent for the last year to year and a half on an empty
building. He said it was a complicated situation. He informed Commission
that the work on Highway 11 1 to create their entrance resulted in litigation
since the goal was to get it done initially before Thanksgiving, but there were
some problems that prevented that from happening, so there was a problem
with the contract and that got delayed. He thought that both work on
Highway 1 1 1 and initiation of construction would probably occur in the spring.
Recommended Action:
None.
X. ELECTION OF OFFICERS AND COMMITTEE LIAISONS
A. Election of Chairperson and Vice Chairperson >
Commissioner Campbell asked if Vice Chairperson Lopez would be able to
�
attend most of the meetings this coming year and wouldn't miss as many as
he did the past year. He said yes, he would attend most meetings, but
business would dictate it. He didn't think he would miss as many as last year.
Commissioner Jonathan said that he would nominate Jim Lopez as Chairperson
and Cindy Finerty as Vice Chairperson which he thought was in keeping with
the normal rotation. Commission concurred.
Action:
It was moved by Commissioner Jonathan, seconded by Commissioner Finerty,
electing Jim Lope2 as Chairperson and electing Cindy Finerty as Vice
Chairperson by minute motion. Motion carried 5-0.
B. Appointment of an Art in Public Places Representative, a Civic Center
Stee�ing Committee Representative, Appointment of a Desert Willow
Committee Representative, Appointment of Landscape Committee
Representative, Appointment of a Project Area 4 Committee
Representative, Appointment of a Representative to the Palm
Desert/Rancho Mirage Monterey Avenue Corridor Planning Work Group,
4
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 6, 2001
"""r and Appointment of a Zoning Ordinance Review Committee
Representative.
Commissioner Campbell said that she was on the Art in Public Places
Committee as well as ZORC and she would like to remain on both.
Commissioner Jonathan requested a brief discussion. He pointed out that the
Commission was asked to select a representative to the General Plan
Committee and the Commission went through that process and did that. Then
the City Council disregarded the Commission's appointment and selected two
other Commissioners and he was wondering if they were wasting their time.
If the Council was going to do that, then maybe they should let them appoint
whatever representatives they wanted. He didn't understand if there was a
new procedure where the chairpersons of these committees select the
representatives and said he wasn't aware of what was going on. Mr. Drell
said that with these committees he didn't think there was an issue.
Commissioner Jonathan said he would like to understand what the issue was
with the other committee. What he would like to do is ask Council to explain
their actions before the Planning Commission appointed representatives from
the Commission. He recommended that the current representatives be
� maintained until the Council has an opportunity to comment. He didn't mean
to suggest that the rneetings not be attended, but he couldn't see that it
would hurt to delay the appointment by�a couple of weeks and give Council
an opportunity to address the concerns. Mr. Drell asked if the question was
whether, given their decision to appoint their own members to GPAC, if they
were interested in appointing their own representatives to these committees
as well. Commissioner Jonathan said that was part A. Part 6 was if not, then
what was the rationale for the exception with GPAC. Commissioner Finerty
said she understood where Commissioner Jonathan was coming from. She
understood that he was appointed and they gave it to him. All she could tell
him from her point of view was that she received a letter and she responded
that she would be interested. Then she got another letter asking if she could
attend on Thursdays in the late afternoon and she said yes. Then she received
a call appointing her. Commissioner Campbell said it was the same thing for
her. Commissioner Jonathan said that it was one less meeting he would have
to attend and it's tax season, but his concern was that this Commission had
been given a very free hand and he had never had in all his years had the
Council approach him with regards to an issue on the Commission's agenda,
so it had been wonderful and he thought that was one of the really good
things about the City. For the Council now to interject themselves into the
process, once they made the request of them and they followed the process
�
5
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 6, 2001
and then they came in and changed it was a little bit scary to him. He hoped
he was mis-perceiving whatever it was that happened. Mr. Drell thought they
hadn't really thought about in detail how selections would be made and
perhaps it was his fault. The Council directed him to provide suggestions and
they talked about each of the various standing committees having a
representative on the GPAC and he assumed that each committee would have
the opportunity to pick who would represent them. Maybe that was an
assumption that he made from the direction he received, but maybe they
hadn't really decided how they wanted to do it. Commissioner Jonathan said
he appreciated that. Nevertheless they knew that the Commission went
through the process and knew that the process was completed and they
reversed it. He kind of wanted them to think about it and just explain it to
them and then they could move on. That was it. He wanted to make the
point that they were here and they were a thinking body and they just have a
question. Mr. Drell asked if the Commission wanted staff to write a letter to
the Mayor or if they wanted this to be discussed in a council meeting.
Commissioner Finerty asked if this would be more appropriate for closed
session. Mr. Drell said no. Commissioner Jonathan asked if they could do it
without a letter. He just wanted to do it informally and asked if Mr. Drell could �
convey the Commission's concerns in a question and maybe they could either
choose to respond with a letter or come to one of their meetings under r"�
Miscellaneous. He asked what the easiest way to do this would be. Mr. Drell
said he didn't know if there was an easy way. He said that the Council
probably wanted all of the commissioners on the committee, because Dave
Tschopp was an original suggested member when he was a member of the
Public Safety Commission. There was actually discussion and then they
realized that if they had more than two members, then every time the meeting
met it would have to be a noticed Planning Commission meeting. He
acknowledged that Commissioner Jonathan had been suggested by his peers.
Commissioner Jonathan said that the Planning Commission did what they were
asked and they appointed a single individual and that single individual was
passed over in favor of two others. That didn't sit quite right. It was not
about him personally because he felt like he had been done a favor and he was
avoiding this series of ineetings, so he was totally fine with that and whatever
the result of this was he wouldn't want to change the appointment. He
thought they were eminently well represented, so he was very comfortable
with that. But he was more concerned with the process that was interrupted
at the Commission level and the process that the Council had undertaken. He
also felt that they should think about it and that the question should be asked �
in a non combative way. They just wanted to know what was going on and
6
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 6, 2001
�" what their thinking process was and let them respond and then they could
move on. Mr. Drell thought that the Council thought about other commission
members by virtue of the interests they represented and once they decided
that they ran into the problem with having three. Commissioner Jonathan said
that the Council could tell them that. Mr. Drell explained that he sat in on the
discussions and listened to them. Commissioner Jonathan asked what the
best way was to present this to Council. Mr. Drell said he would talk to the
City Manager and figure out how he wanted it communicated. Commissioner
Jonathan concurred. Chairperson Lopez said that the existing representatives
could just hold their current positions and then they would proceed after
receiving a response. Mr. Drell informed Commission that GPAC was going
to be a highly visible, high profile committee and for that reason the Council
took an extraordinary interest in participating in the selection of inembers.
Commissioner Finerty noted that with regard to the list of committees, the
Landscape Committee had been left off. Ms. Monroe apologized and said that
she would make sure it was added. Commissioner Finerty noted that the
Landscape Committee was a fun committee and she really enjoyed it.
ti�.►
Action:
Commission directed staff to request information from the City Council and
continued this item to the next meeting. Commission concurred 5-0.
XI. COMMITTEE MEETING UPDATES
A. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES - (January 17, 2001)
Commissioner Campbell said that they met at Desert Willow. They
received a request by the Palm Springs Desert Museum Art Council to
exhibit artwork at the Desert Willow Clubhouse. She indicated that
most pieces were generic and near the Pro Shop. The committee was
considering using the hallway between the cocktail lounge and the walls
all the way to the private room to display the various works of art. But
then they came to the conclusion that the lighting was insufficient
there, so they picked the area located past the dining room where there
was another opening with two private rooms where they could show
their artwork and use special lighting.
B. CIVIC CENTER STEERING COMMITTEE - (No meeting)
�..
7
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 6, 2001
C. DESERT WILLOW COMMITTEE - 1No meeting)
D. GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE - (February 1 , 2001)
Commissioner Campbell said that the committee met and they would be
taking a bus trip next week on the 15th. Mr. Drell asked if it was their
impression that the trip was at 1 :30 p.m. Commissioners Campbell and
Finerty concurred. Commissioner Campbell said it would be a couple of
hours. Then they would meet the first Thursday of every month at
4:00 p.m. for the next 12 to 18 months. Commissioner Campbell said
it was very interesting because of all the members. Mr. Drell said there
were 21 members. Commissioner Campbell said they all gave their
qualifications and what they've been doing for the city and so forth and
what they do in business. She felt the committee members were very
well qualified. Commissioner Finerty concurred that it was an
impressive group.
E. LANDSCAPE COMMITTEE - (February 6, 2001 )
Commissioner Finerty thought the only thing of interest was the 12-acre
site with the Visitor's Center. They saw a little bit of the layout and a
little bit of the landscaping and there would ideally be two restaurants
going in. They weren't sure about the location and were still working
all of that out. Mr. Drell said that there was one restaurant for sure
(Cousteau's), but there were probably ten that would want to go there
on the bigger site. Most of the restaurants that ended up going to The
River project wanted to come here first but because this project wasn't
going any where, they ended up going somewhere else. Whichever
restaurant it was would be very high quality. Commissioner Tschopp
asked for clarification on the location. Mr. Drell explained that they
were discussing the 12 acres at the southwest corner of EI Paseo and
Highway 111 near Desert Crossing. Commissioner Campbell noted
there were no plans for a hotel right now. Commissioner Jonathan said
he would have liked to have seen Lobster on this focation instead of at
The River project. Commissioner Finerty asked if the Claim Jumper was
locating in The River project. Mr. Drell said he heard that Claim Jumper
was no longer going in there. Commissioner Finerty was disappointed.
Mr. Drell said a good restaurant to go to was Roy's. Chairperson Lopez
asked if that was the same Roy's from Hawaii. Mr. Drell said yes, that '
it was Roy's from Maui, which was unbelievable. It was one of the
8
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 6, 2001
i"' really expensive restaurants where you felt you were getting what you
paid for. Commissioner Jonathan asked if it was a fish restaurant. Mr.
Drell said it wasn't a fish place. He indicated that Roy's had two
restaurants: in Maui and Kahana. He did agree that Roy's had a lot of
seafood. Chairperson Lopez said that it was Asian, but Euro Asian and
was very unique and fantastic. Great food. Their big display was a
glass front kitchen area where they could see everything being done and
it was world class. Mr. Drell said it was even kid friendly, although the
restaurant here probably wouldn't have kids like in Maui.
F. PROJECT AREA 4 COMMITTEE - (No meeting)
G. PALM DESERT/RANCHO MIRAGE MONTEREY AVENUE CORRIDOR
PLANNING WORK GROUP - (No meeting)
H. ZONING ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE - (February 1 , 2001)
Commissioner Campbell said they reviewed the short term rentals in the
R-1 Zone and actually decided to go ahead and keep it for less than 30
� days because it required a conditional use permit for each individual
case. Commissioner Campbell said they also discussed commercial
building height amendments and they had at least two Council Members
working on that. Mr. Drell said they went on a tour and the suggestion
was that at corners they should create a two-foot setback per one foot
of building height, both in commercial areas and office professional.
Commissioner Campbell explained that the buildings causing this
controversy actually conformed originally, but the street had been
widened. Mr. Drell concurred.
XII. COMMENTS
1 . Commissioner Campbell welcomed Dave Tschopp to the commission.
2. Mr. Drell informed commission that with the commencement of the
General Plan Committee, the City policy would now be to discourage
anyone from applying for general plan amendments or changes of zone,
although there was at least one application already submitted.
3. Chairperson Lopez noted that information was included in their packets
for the League of California Cities conference. He also noted that
r...
9
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 6, 2001
i
f
commission contact forms needed to be turned in. Staff indicated all "'�
the forms were received.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Commissioner Campbell, seconded by Commissioner Finerty,
adjourning the meeting by minute motion. Motion carried 5-0. The meeting
was adjourned at 7:32 p.m.
,---.
PHILIP DRELL�Secretary
ATT T:
JIM L , Chairp rs n
Palm e ert Planning C mmission
<
/tm �
�
10