Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-09-06 PC Regular Meeting Minutes MINUTES C PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY - September 6, 2011 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Campbell called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Members Present: Sonia Campbell, Chair Nancy De Luna, Vice Chair Van Tanner Roger Dash Members Absent: Connor Limont saw Staff Present: Robert Hargreaves, Deputy City Attorney Kevin Swartz, Assistant Planner Lauri Aylaian, Director of Community Development Missy Wightman, Assistant Planner Tony Becker, Administrative Secretary III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Dash led the pledge of allegiance. IV. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION Ms. Aylaian indicated that the last meeting of the City Council was August 25, 2011, where the City Council approved the second reading of the Zoning Ordinance amendment, which was necessary to allow supermarkets over 60,000 square feet in a PC -3 zone. This was related to the relocation of Von's to the old `Mervyn's building'. The Council also approved the precise plan and development agreement for the construction of a luxury hotel on Highway 74. This will require a second reading for the development agreement itself. Finally, the City Council elected to create an alternative MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 6 2011 redevelopment program. In the event that the new State law is upheld, the City will have an alternative Redevelopment Authority in place and will be able to continue conducting business as well as making annual large-sum payments to the state. Commissioner De Luna asked about the amount itself being charged to Palm Desert. She understood that the state is saying that one amount is owed and that the city is saying that another amount is owed. She wanted to know how that process would occur. Ms. Aylaian indicated that the City of Palm Desert has already challenged that amount. The City of Palm Desert believes that the amount should be around $17 million whereas the State believes that the amount should be nearly $20.5 million. An answer to this challenge should be forthcoming, possibly as soon as January when the constitutionality of the dissolution of redevelopment agencies in the state also is determined. Commissioner De Luna asked if this affected, in any way, the `stay'. Ms. Aylaian said that was correct: that if the constitutionality is upheld, this legal challenge would affect the amount of the first payment of funds to the state. V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Request for approval of the August 16, 2011, meeting minutes. ••r Action: Commissioner Tanner moved and Commissioner Dash seconded the approval of the August 16, 2011 meeting minutes. Motion carried 4-0-1-0 (Commissioner Limont ABSENT). VII. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of two-year time extension of Tentative and Parcel Maps as granted under AB 208. On July 15, 2011, the California State Assembly and Governor Brown signed into law AB 208 thereby granting a two-year extension to all tentative tract and parcel maps. The attached list is a list of all maps that are and would be affected by AB 208. aw 2 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 6 2011 Those approved maps were: TT 28818, TT 31490, TT 32655, TT 34055, TT 34057, TT 34057, TT 34074, TT 31676, VTTM 36284, TT 36342, TPM 34211, TPM 34437, TPM 35483, TPM 35982, TPM 36137, TPM 36120 and TPM 35955 Action: Commissioner Tanner moved and Commissioner De Luna seconded approval of Consent Calendar item(s). Motion carried 4-0-1-0 (Commissioner Limont ABSENT). Vill. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chair Campbell announced that anyone who challenges any hearing matter in court may be limited to raising only those issues he, she or someone else raised at the public hearing described herein, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. A. Case No. CUP 11-197, Mono-rock, AT&T Mobility, Applicant. Consideration of a conditional use permit to allow a new wireless telecommunications facility disguised as three faux boulders to house 12 panel-antennas and two GPS antennas for AT&T Mobility, located on an tow up-sloping terrain within the Stone Eagle development. Assistant Planner Kevin Swartz orally presented his staff report and on- screen presentation to the Planning Commission. He described the subject property and its surroundings. The property is west of Highway 74 and the Palm Valley storm channel located within the Stone Eagle area. Due to an error of noticing surrounding properties, this item was voted upon and approved at the last planning commission meeting, but needed to be re-noticed and re-heard to include the expanded noticed area of 4000' from the property. The applicant proposes to install three faux boulders that would house four panel-antennas each (for a total of 12 antennas) and would install other boulders around the site to match the surroundings. He showed photo renderings of views from the site and views looking at the site with the rocks in place. Mr. Swartz pointed to the ridgeline map and showed where some of the ridgelines were in relation to the proposed site. Mr. Swartz indicated that some letters of opposition and letters in favor of the project were received earlier that day and were presented before the commissioners just prior to the meeting. 3 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 6 2011 Commissioner De Luna asked about the letters in favor and if they applied to both sites (CUP 11-197 and CUP 11-196) or just one site. Mr. Swartz indicated that the letters were for both sites. Staff recommends approval and Mr. Swartz offered to answer questions. Commissioner De Luna wanted to make certain that, other than the wider range of notices being sent out, nothing else has changed from the last presentation. Mr. Swartz said that was so. Commissioner Tanner asked about the micro-wave signals coming from these antennas and wanted to know about the health risks that associate with something like this. Deputy City Attorney Bob Hargreaves answered that question stating that Federal Law preempts local regulations, and in this case has found that when a local municipality is making land-use decisions, it can't take into consideration the electro-magnetic waves. Chair Campbell declared the public hearing `open' and asked the applicant to come forward. Mr. Tim Miller, Trillion Consulting on behalf of AT&T, stated that this project was the exact same project as the one presented at the last planning commission meeting. He offered to answer any questions. Seeing none, Chair Campbell asked for public testimony either in favor of or in opposition to the project. Mrs. Antoinette Carver, 72275 Upper Way West, spoke in opposition to the project. Her concern was for health issues related to micro-waves that come from cell and microwave towers. She has 'Gulf Syndrome Disorder' and stated that she and her husband have built their home and rewired it in such a way that outside radio waves do not interfere with her health. She mentioned that if the Commission didn't like the upper one (the other project site for CUP 11-196) then it should be moved. She asked that the Commission take into consideration the health of people like her, because those people are out there and are affected by towers like this. She also said that she realizes what the City Attorney said about federal law bodes against her, but she would ask again that the Commissioners consider health risks involved in this decision. Chair Campbell declared the public hearing `closed' and asked for commissioner comments. Commissioner De Luna asked staff if there were a prohibition from building anything on a ridgeline. Ms. Aylaian stated that the ridgeline issue .nr 4 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 6 2011 really involves the next case but that the Hillside Ordinance prohibits development across ridgelines. Commissioner Dash commented that, while he appreciates what the citizens' concerns are, legally the Commission's hands are tied and he will vote the way he must. Action: Commissioner De Luna moved and Commissioner Tanner seconded approval of CUP 11-197, subject to the attached conditions. Motion carried 4-0-1-0 (Commissioner Limont ABSENT). Commissioner De Luna moved and Commissioner Tanner seconded adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2561, approving CUP 11-197, subject to the attached conditions. Motion carried 4-0-1-0 (Commissioner Limont ABSENT). B. Case No. CUP 11-196, Mono-rock, AT&T Mobility, Applicant. Consideration of a conditional use permit to allow a new wireless telecommunications facility disguised as one faux boulder to house four panel-antennas and two GPS antennas for AT&T Mobility located on an up-sloping terrain within the Stone Eagle development. woo Assistant Planner Kevin Swartz orally presented his staff report and on- screen photos to the Commission. This project is also the same project that was presented to the Commission in August 2011. Like its counterpart (CUP 11-197), it needed to be re-noticed and re-heard due to a noticing error. Mr. Swartz showed some on-screen photos of the site in question. One week after initial hearing in August, the applicant erected a 9'5" tower and faux boulder to show anyone in the area what they would see at this location upon approval of the tower. Mr. Swartz showed photos of that installed rock and tower in character. Mr. Swartz showed the location of this project on the ridgeline map in relation to the other project, on which the Commission just voted. This project, unlike its counterpart, does occur on a ridgeline in the open space zone. Although the zone doesn't technically fall in the Hillside Planned Residential and, therefore, doesn't have to meet the same ridgeline requirements; staff believes that the intent of the zoning ordinance, as approved by the City Council is to prevent any development on a ridgeline 5 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 6 2011 anywhere in the city. Thus, staff recommends denial of this project and that the commission recommend that the applicant find another location. Commissioner Tanner asked where the Carver residence was in relation to this proposed site. Mr. Swartz had a GIS map and brought it to Commissioner Tanner and the other Commissioners to show them the locations. Commissioner De Luna asked staff if anything is different in this project from the last time it was presented. Mr. Swartz said that staff is now asking for denial, rather than approval since this project falls on a ridgeline. Chair Campbell declared the public hearing open and asked the applicant to come forward again and address the commission. Mr. Tim Miller stated that AT&T has done some extensive research on the location of this site. He stated that he fully understands the issues with the ridgeline and the viewsheds. He stated that the faux rock has been in place for nearly a month and, to his knowledge, there have been no complaints against the rock being placed there hindering anyone's view. He also mentioned that the cellular technology works by line-of-site and in order to provide service to this area, the towers were sited in this location to maximize their reach at the golf course and the surrounding area. He summed up that he respectfully disagrees with the findings and asks for approval of this project. .rr Commissioner De Luna asked if AT&T had searched out alternative sites for the towers. Mr. Miller stated that they worked very closely with the golf course to find a site that didn't impede viewshed as well as finding a location close to a source of power. There will be a need to run cables to and from the antennas and those cables would need to be near a power source and that also would impact the local landscaping and environment—he mentioned that another site might necessitate breaking into a rock outcropping and/or storing equipment above ground. The site that was chosen was the best possible site that had the least intrusive impact on the local environment, and that the members of the golf course endorsed. Chair Campbell asked for testimony on this project. Mr. Bill Carver, 72275 Upper Way West, came forward and asked a few questions about the project: he wanted to know if this tower would only serve the golf course and the golfers; and he wanted to know how many people are members of this course. It seemed to him that only about ten people would be served by having a tower in this area that was largely a No 6 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 6 2011 members' only area and Mr. Carver couldn't understand having a tower tow that served only ten people. There was some confusion about procedure and Ms. Aylaian stated that the speakers should address the Commissioners and the Chair would ask staff or the applicants to respond to any concerns or questions presented. Ms. Antoinette Carver spoke again briefly saying that she couldn't imagine why anyone in this part of Stone Eagle would benefit from the tax revenue that this tower would create. She said that she managed just fine with her cell phone in that area, so why would there need to be more. Commissioner De Luna asked how many lots were part of Stone Eagle's original plan, should they be totally occupied. Mr. Swartz said that the project was approved for 46 single-family lots, a club house and a recreation facility. Commissioner Tanner asked about Mrs. Carver's statement about 'Ramon Creek' and asked if that had varied from the last presentation in August. He said he didn't remember that being part of the initial presentation. Mr. Swartz stated that he too didn't remember that and thought there might be a miscommunication about Ramon Creek. The site that is being suggested tonight is the site that was approved at the last meeting and wasn't discussing any potential future locations. .. Commissioner Tanner clarified that the sole purpose for this tower wasn't necessarily cell service but GPS service for the golf course, that was his understanding. Mr. Miller stated that was incorrect and that the GPS was strictly part of the everyday cell phones that people use and had nothing to do with the golf course. Mr. Miller stated that regardless of the use being ten people or 1000 people using the service, there was a study done by AT&T showing that service was needed in this area and that is why they are asking to locate a tower there—to meet a service need. He stated that over 1,440 people were notified and very few people are present or have written in about it, so that should indicate that most people do not have an issue with this project. Chair Campbell declared the public hearing 'closed' and asked for commission comment. Commissioner Tanner said that he has considered all points of view tonight and he indicated that from last vote to this one the only new bit of information is the ridgeline and he doesn't want to start allowing exceptions for any reason and setting a badly perceived precedent. He motioned for denial. 7 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 6 2011 Commissioner De Luna seconded the motion and said that her vote last time would have been different had she known that this location was on a ridgeline. She said she understands the need for phone coverage up there, but that the applicant should find a new place to have it that doesn't involve a ridgeline. Commissioner Dash indicated that he saw no reason to vote against staff's recommendation for denial and would vote as such. Chair Campbell stated that she feels that most of the commission would have probably voted differently now knowing that this site involves a ridgeline and she too would uphold staff's recommendation. Action: Commissioner Tanner moved and Commissioner De Luna seconded denial of CUP 11-196. Motion carried 4-0-1-0 (Commissioner Limont ABSENT). Commissioner Tanner moved and Commissioner De Luna seconded adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2562, denying CUP 11-196. Motion carried 4- 0-1-0 (Commissioner Limont ABSENT). C. Case No. CUP 11-295, Crossfit Gym, Applicant. Consideration of a conditional use permit to allow Desert Crossfit located within the Pres Monterey Industrial project at 73-605 Dinah Shore Drive in the S.I. zone (Service Industrial). Assistant Planner Kevin Swartz presented his staff report and on-screen presentation to the commission. He described the site, location and the building. The building is located in an industrial park on Dinah Shore. The business would have three full-time employees including the owner/instructor and would be open from 5:45 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday through Friday and 8 a.m. to 11 a.m. Saturday and Sunday. There would be six classes each day with a maximum of 15 students per class. The building has 16 parking stalls and is adequately parked for this use. The interior of the building has a mini-reception area and then a large 'warehouse' area for the workouts. Mr. Swartz wanted to add a note that the class schedule is included in the staff report and that some of the classes begin before normal business hours during the week, so parking wouldn't be an issue because of the staggered hours. Staff recommends approval and offered to answer any questions. 8 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 6 2011 Commissioner Tanner asked if there were any requirements for bathroom facilities in a business like this. Mr. Swartz stated that he was not aware of any. This project was circulated to the Building and Safety Department and they didn't have any comment about that (bathrooms being under their purview). Commissioner Tanner asked if that needed to be a condition. Mr. Swartz stated that if the California Building Code required it, then it certainly would be. Chair Campbell declared the public hearing `open' and asked the applicant to come forward. Ms. Cheryl Cohen, 73800 Dinah Shore Drive, spoke requesting that the Commission approve her CUP to operate Desert Crossfit. Desert Crossfit is a family/community of members who are there not just to workout but to support each other and their community. She said that they hold fund raisers sometimes and also prepare some members for boot camp training. She mentioned that she asked a few of her members to write in support of the gym and those letters should be included in the packet. Commissioner De Luna asked about the fundraisers: would they be held on site and how many people would be in attendance? Ms. Cohen stated that she could potentially have them on site and asked staff if this would be something that she would need to come to the City to get approval for. Ms. Aylaian stated that something of that nature could be granted with a Temporary Use Permit at the planning counter. Chair Campbell asked for any testimony on this project. Ms. Jean Stewart, 74312 Mercury Circle E, came forward to speak in favor of the project. She stated that she is, "...82 years young..." and is a member of Desert Crossfit. She went to her doctor one year ago on every kind of medication for heart and high blood pressure. After talking with Ms Cohen and taking a few classes, she is off nearly every medication and the doctor told her that her heart went from a `Model T' to a "Rolls Royce". She stated that this type of `family' helped her and is just the type of business needed. Chair Campbell declared the public hearing `closed' and asked for commission comments. Commissioner Dash stated that he was pleased to see the number of positive things that this business was doing for the community and its members and would like to welcome them to the city. He made a motion to approve the project. Action: 9 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 6, 2011 Commissioner Dash moved and Commissioner Tanner seconded approval of CUP 11-295, subject to the attached conditions. Motion carried 4-0-1-0 (Commissioner rr.rr Limont ABSENT). Commissioner Dash moved and Commissioner Tanner seconded adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2563, approving CUP 11-295. Motion carried 4-0-1-0 (Commissioner Limont ABSENT). D. Case No. PP 06-05 / TT 36342 amendment #1, Highpointe Communities, Applicant. Approval of an amendment to approved Tentative Tract map 36342 for 196 residential homes to allow: 11 condominium lots totaling 78 condominium units; 69 single-family attached homes; 49 single-family detached homes; and a private recreation facility located on the northwest corner of University Park Drive and College Drive within the University Park Master Plan. Mr. Swartz orally introduced his presentation and report to the Commission. He described the parcel in question and showed maps and photos on-screen. He stated that this is the same map proposal that was brought before the Commission in May 2011, but the only change was to modify the 78 cluster-homes to condominium lots where 78 condominium units could be built. This would allow the developer to sell portions of the project to other developers who would develop the individual units. Mr. Swartz said that the architecture design and style would remain intact and a clause in the conditions of approval that states that no matter who the developer would be, the design must remain the same. Staff recommends approval and Mr. Swartz offered to answer any questions. Commissioner De Luna asked about the off-site parking of the project. She wanted to know what the ratio the city requires for parking to units. The ratio that was approved with the original University Park Master Plan is two covered-parking stalls per home. Commissioner Campbell reiterated that hadn't changed from the last time this project was brought forth. Mr. Swartz said that was correct. Commissioner De Luna asked about the mail boxes on the project and if that would change since different builders would be developing the project. Mr. Swartz reminded the Commissioners that mailboxes are under the purview of the USPS and they determine where and how many no 10 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 6 2011 mailboxes are placed. He stated that the applicant will work closely with the USPS on that part of the project when the time comes. Commissioner Tanner asked if there would be a pool in the recreation facility area. Mr. Swartz stated that there is a pool included. Commissioner Dash asked about the close proximity of both entrances of the complex. His concern was for emergency egress and, the fact that everyone in the complex would be converging on those two gates/ He wanted to know if the Fire Marshal's office had had any input in this conundrum. Mr. Swartz indicated that the Fire Marshal's office has approved this design. He also pointed on the map showing a single exit gate stating that this was an `emergency exit' only gate for that side of the property. But because of the slope of the property, options are limited as to what is feasible. Chair Campbell reminded the Commission that this project was discussed and approved at a previous meeting, and placed before them tonight was simply an amendment to the number of condominiums and that is all that can be discussed at the meeting. Chair Campbell declared the public hearing `open' and asked the applicant to come forward. Mr. Alan Levin, 76768 Bishop PI, Palm Desert, represented High Pointe Communities. He stated that there was a confusion in the original tentative map regarding the homes and, upon recommendation from the City Attorney, came back before the commission to clarify the amount of lots and for what they would be used. He offered to answer any questions. He wanted to address Commissioner Dash's question and stated that the topography of the site didn't allow for any other options for the exit gates because of an existing retention basin and slope. Seeing no one offering any other testimony, Chair Campbell declared the public hearing 'closed' and asked for commission comment. Action: Commissioner Tanner moved and Commissioner Dash seconded approval of Amendment #1 to TT 36342, subject to conditions. Motion carried 4-0-1-0 (Commissioner Limont ABSENT). Commissioner Tanner moved and Commissioner Dash seconded adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2564, approving Amendment #1 to TT 36342, subject to conditions. Motion carried 4-0-1-0 (Commissioner Limont ABSENT). 11 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 6 2011 E. Case No. CUP 11-292, Short-term Rental, Gordon Edlund, Applicant. Approval of a conditional use permit to operate a short-term rental located at 77-271 Ohio Circle, APN: 637-272-014. Assistant Planner Missy Wightman orally presented her staff report and on-screen presentation to the Commission. She described the property and its location within the Palm Desert Country Club area. She stated that the applicant has met all requirements of zoning and code in order to operate a short-term rental in this area. In addition, the applicant has offered not to rent out the house for less than one week. Additionally, the owner would not rent out to anyone under 25 years of age. The applicant has also inserted a 'noise policy violation deposit' into their lease contract which would not be refunded if the city's noise ordinance were violated. Ms. Wightman described the property: there are three bedrooms, a two- car garage and nearly 1,524 square feet of house. This allows for two over-night guests per bedroom and an additional 3 guests during the daytime. Notices were sent out to near-by neighbors to the property (for a total of 43 neighbors) and two letters of opposition were submitted. Two additional people called staff asking what a short-term rental was by definition and left no indication of being in favor of or in opposition to this rental. Staff checked with police and code compliance and found no violations on record within the last two years. Staff recommends approval for the project based on the findings and the extra measures that the applicant has taken to ensure the compatibility with the neighborhood and that ordinances are strictly enforced. Ms. Wightman offered to answer questions. Commissioner De Luna wanted to clarify whether or not a residence that applies for a CUP then is subject to business rules rather than residential rules. She likened the example to visiting a doctor's office: you don't have stacked parking. So since a home is applying for a CUP, does that mean that the parking cannot else be stacked? Ms. Aylaian stated that no, the home would still be required to operate within residential rules. Chair Campbell declared the public hearing `open' and asked the applicant to step forward. Mr. Gordon Edlund came forward and mentioned that the home that was posted on-screen was actually the house to the south. Mr. Edlund 12 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 6 2011 reiterated that he and his wife were happy to add the extra conditions to the lease agreement in order to better screen the renters and put the neighbors at ease. He stated that they screen their renters very carefully because this is their home and they plan to retire there in a few years. Commissioner Dash asked the applicant if they had anyone local that would be managing or looking after the property. Commissioner De Luna interjected saying that a letter was presented to the Commission just prior to the start of the meeting, from a neighbor next door stating that they would oversee the property and would be the contact person while the Edlunds were in Canada. Commissioner De Luna stated that she said that she was pleased to hear that the Edlunds were instituting a minimum age limit as well as local property managers and noise fee mitigations. Chair Campbell asked for testimony either in favor of or in opposition to this project. Ms. Candice Gilmore, 77290 Ohio Circle, stated that she sent in a letter in opposition to this project. She is very concerned about this being a short-term rental since their street is a cul-de-sac and not a through-street. Ms. Gilmore also mentioned that the PDCC CC&R's mentioned that any rental must be approved by the Homeowners Association and the CC&R's must be provided to the renters. She doesn't think that she should have to be calling the property manager on a daily or .. weekly basis for anything that could go wrong. She wanted to reiterate that this is a residential area and wants to keep it small and close knit, and having renters (strangers) there makes her uneasy. She wanted to know how to get in touch with someone on the weekends if she had issues. Commissioner Tanner stated that she should call Code Compliance if she had any issues that she felt needed to be addressed. Seeing no one else offering testimony, Chair Campbell declared the public hearing `closed' and asked for commission comment. Commissioner De Luna began by stating that she is sensitive to both sides of the issue. She stated that she wants to preserve neighborhoods as well and keep them free of party houses and she believes that these strict, self-imposed restrictions are very good for this property and would move for approval. Commissioner Tanner stated that he and the other commissioners are concerned with noise and neighbors' rights to live quietly in the neighborhood of their choice. He said that these CUP applications are designed to have people come in and follow the process and keep people low 13 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 6 2011 above board with the city. It is his fear that if people don't come forth with their application then the City has no recourse when problems do arise, or if too many are denied then those unwilling applicants will just 'go underground' and rent their houses out anyway. He concluded by seconding the motion. Commissioners Dash and Campbell concurred with the previous statements. Action: Commissioner De Luna moved and Commissioner Tanner seconded approval of CUP 11-292, subject to the attached conditions. Motion carried 4-0-1-0 (Commissioner Limont ABSENT). Commissioner De Luna moved and Commissioner Tanner seconded adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2565, approving CUP 11-292, subject to conditions. Motion carried 4-0-1-0 (Commissioner Limont ABSENT). IX. MISCELLANEOUS NONE X. COMMITTEE MEETING UPDATES A. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COMMISSION Commissioner Campbell stated that there hasn't been a meeting for a few months and there potentially could be a meeting next week. B. LANDSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE Commissioner Limont was absent. Ms. Aylaian stated that there wasn't a meeting. C. PARKS & RECREATION Commissioner Tanner said that the Committee didn't have a quorum, so no meeting could be held. D. PROJECT AREA 4 COMMITTEE Commissioner Dash indicated that there wasn't a meeting. XI. COMMENTS Commissioner De Luna commented about a newspaper clipping regarding short-term rentals in Rancho Mirage. This was distributed 14 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 6 2011 shortly before the meeting. Commissioner De Luna requested that each "`W Commissioner review this article: the City of Rancho Mirage is extremely liberal with granting CUPs for short-term rentals and very strict with penalties for noise/party violations of those CUPs. Some fines are upward of $5,000. She stated that no slack given for violators. She thought that this article might give the commission some ideas regarding specific conditions for future CUPs. XII. ADJOURNMENT Chair Campbell motioned for adjournment of the meeting, Commissioner Tanner seconded the motion and the meeting was adjourned at 7:15 p.m. LAURI AYLAIAN, Secretary ATTEST: ,SONIA CAMPBELL, Chair '— Palm Desert Planning Commission /tb 15