HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-03-18 PC Regular Meeting Minutes CITY OF PALM DESERT
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
• TUESDAY, MARCH 18, 2014— 6:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBER
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Roger Dash called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioner Nancy DeLuna
Commissioner John Greenwood
Commissioner Sonia Campbell
Vice Chair Ken Stendell
Chair Roger Dash
Now
Staff Present:
Robert Hargreaves, City Attorney
Lauri Aylaian, Director of Community Development
Eric Ceja, Associate Planner
Kevin Swartz, Assistant Planner
Monica O'Reilly, Administrative Secretary
111. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner John Greenwood led the Pledge of Allegiance.
IV. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION
Ms. Lauri Aylaian, Director of Community Development, reported that at the
meeting of March 13, the City Council approved modifications to Tentative Tract
34179 (Monterey Ridge) that would eliminate the housing agreement between
the City and the developer. She said that there was a first reading of a proposed
modification to the accessory structure ordinance. However, the Council directed
staff to make revisions that would enhance the protection of views and privacy for
.. residents that are enjoying their backyard.
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 18, 2014
V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MINUTES of the Planning Commission meeting of March 4, 2014.
Rec: By Minute Motion, approve as presented.
Upon a motion by Commissioner Campbell, second by Commissioner
Greenwood, and a 5-0 vote of the Planning Commission (AYES: Campbell, Dash,
DeLuna, Greenwood, and Stendell; NOES: None), the Consent Calendar was approved
as presented.
VII. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER
None
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
None
IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION to approve Tentative Parcel Map 36502
to subdivide a 2.09-acre site into four parcels (three single-family lots and one
retention basin lot) located at 49-425 JFK Trail (APN 655-300-017). Case No.
TPM 36502/HTE 12-410 (DRRS Holdings, LLC and Ross, Johnson and
Associates, 888 Fort Street, 4th Floor, Victoria British Columbia V8W1 H8,
Applicant).
Mr. Kevin Swartz, Assistant Planner, reported that staff met with the applicant
and adjacent neighbors on March 17. It was determined that the neighbors pad
height elevations were incorrect on the map. Staff recommended continuing this
item to a date uncertain to allow staff, the applicant, and the neighbors to come
to an agreement on pad heights. He noted that all parties have agreed to not
speak at this public hearing; therefore, staff recommended not opening the public
hearing. He offered to answer any questions.
Commissioner DeLuna moved, by Minute Motion, to continue Case No. TPM
36502/HTE 12-410 to a date uncertain. Motion was seconded by Commissioner
Campbell and carried by a 5-0 vote (AYES: Campbell, Dash, DeLuna, Greenwood, and
Stendell; NOES: None).
..r
2
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2014\Minutes\3-18-14 min.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 18, 2014
B. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION of a Conditional Use Permit to replace an
existing mono-palm with a new 75-foot AT&T mono-palm located at St.
Margaret's Episcopal Church at 47-535 Highway 74. Case No. CUP 13-414
(AT&T Mobility, 12900 Park Plaza Drive, Cerritos, California 90703,
Applicant).
Mr. Swartz reported that the property is located at St. Margaret's Church on the
west side of Highway 74. He noted that there are currently three mono-palms at
the following heights: 1) Sprint at 711/2 feet; 2) Nextel at 621/2 feet; and 3) Verizon
at 75 feet. He stated that the applicant is proposing to remove the 621/2-foot
Nextel mono-palm and replace it with a 75-foot mono-palm for AT&T, and use
the existing equipment shelter. He presented photos of the equipment shelter,
mono-palms, and site location. Mr. Swartz said the applicant intends to conceal
the antennas inside the mono-palm trunk. The mono-palm would provide
coverage to south Palm Desert AT&T customers. Staff recommended approval
and offered to answer any questions.
Commissioner Nancy DeLuna commented that the proposed mono-palm will be
much taller. She asked if it would be necessary to add live trees to shield the
mono-palm.
Mr. Swartz responded that the mono-palm has been in the current location since
2005, and staff has not received complaints. Staff feels it is visually screened,
and staff is confident that the 75-foot mono-palm is acceptable. He added that
the applicant has not removed the mono-palm. Therefore, he recommended
adding a condition to have the applicant remove the existing mono-palm before
final inspection of the new mono-palm so that there are not two mono-palms at
the same time.
Commissioner Sonia Campbell clarified that the 75-foot mono-palm would be
located between two existing palms, and the grade is going downward so the
mono-palm would not look as tall.
Mr. Swartz replied that is correct.
Vice Chair Ken Stendell asked how many mono-palms are between St.
Margaret's Church and the Presbyterian Church, and what are the heights of the
mono-palms.
Mr. Swartz responded that he believes there is one at the Presbyterian Church,
and the mono-palm is between 70 and 75 feet.
Chair Dash declared the public hearing open and asked for any public testimony IN
FAVOR or OPPOSITION.
3
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2014\Minutes\3-18-14 min.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 18, 2014
MR. TIM MILLER, 5912 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 202, Huntington Beach, California
92649, commented that they have been working on this project for three years.
They decided to take Nextel's site after they found out that they abandoned it.
The proposed site provides enough room for their equipment and pole. He noted
that they need the 75-foot mono-palm because the antennas are concealed
inside the pole. He offered to answer any questions.
Commissioner Greenwood referred to map and asked if there is access to the
shelter on the south side.
MR. MILLER responded that they enter through the north side, and they have
room to go around the tree. He mentioned that the new shelter will be smaller,
and there will be more room to walk around.
With no further testimony offered, Chair Dash declared the public hearing closed.
Commissioner Greenwood moved, by Minute Motion, approving a Conditional
Use Permit to replace an existing mono-palm with a new AT&T mono-palm located at
St. Margaret's Episcopal Church, and adding to the conditions of approval that the
existing Nextel mono-palm shall be removed prior to the AT&T mono-palm receiving
final inspection. Motion was seconded by Vice Chair Stendell and carried by a 5-0 vote
(AYES: Campbell, Dash, DeLuna, Greenwood, and Stendell; NOES: None).
Commissioner Greenwood moved, by Minute Motion, to waive further reading
and adopt Resolution No. 2622, subject to conditions. Motion was seconded by Vice •+
Chair Stendell and carried by a 5-0 vote (AYES: Campbell, Dash, DeLuna, Greenwood,
and Stendell; NOES: None).
C. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION of a Precise Plan to allow the
construction of a 3,600-squ are-foot duplex located at 45-855 Portola Avenue.
Case No. PP 13-421 (Toma Stoianovici, 40-462 Corte Placitas, Palm Desert,
California 92260, Applicant).
Mr. Eric Ceja, Associate Planner, reported that the property is located on the
west side of Portola Avenue, north of Fairway Drive. The proposed duplex would
have two units and separate two-car garages, with a shared driveway providing
access onto Portola Avenue. He said each unit would have a kitchen, living area,
two bedrooms, and two and a half baths. With the aid of slides, he presented
plans and exhibits of the project. He noted that the Architectural Review
Commission approved the plans subject to minor changes. Mr. Ceja offered to
answer any questions.
Commissioner DeLuna asked if there is room for a car to back out without having
to back out onto Portola Avenue to exit the property.
4
GAPlanningWonica OReilly\Planning Commission\2014\Minutes\3.18-14 min.dou
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 18, 2014
Mr. Ceja responded that when staff reviewed the plans, it was determined that
there is adequate turning radius for cars to get in and out of the garage.
However, he is not sure if a car is able to turn around and move forward onto
Portola Avenue.
Ms. Aylaian interjected that she believes the Public Works Department has
reviewed the plans so backing out onto Portola does not need to occur.
Vice Chair Stendell commented that there seems to be adequate parking space
to maneuver in and out of the garage. He asked if there is anything the City can
do to ensure that the garages are used for cars, and limit parking on the
driveway.
Mr. Ceja replied that parking is available on Portola Avenue. He said that he
anticipates the tenants would not want to park in the driveway since it would
prohibit in and out access to the duplex.
Ms. Aylaian added that it is a very common situation throughout the City. She
said people choose to use their garage however they choose to use it. She
stated that there is not an ordinance that prohibits parking in driveways.
Commissioner Greenwood referred to Condition of Approval No. 2, which states
the applicant must install a six-foot ADA-compliant sidewalk on Portola Avenue.
He commented that he drove by the area, and noticed that the sidewalks are
ow segmented. There are some properties that have a sidewalk and some do not. In
addition, there are some setbacks along Portola Avenue that are very tight in
front of the curb. He asked what the reason for installing a six-foot sidewalk is.
Mr. Ceja responded that it is a policy that with new construction, infrastructure
improvements should be installed, such as sidewalks.
Commissioner Greenwood asked if it is up to the City to install sidewalks to areas
that are developed to continue the circulation.
Mr. Ceja replied that it would be up to the City to make those improvements.
Commissioner DeLuna clarified that the proposed project will be conditioned to
install a sidewalk.
Mr. Ceja replied that is correct.
Chair Dash declared the public hearing open and asked for any public testimony IN
FAVOR or OPPOSITION.
MR. TOMA STOIANOVICI, 40-4462 Corte Placitas, Palm Desert, California
92260, stated that he drives on Portola Avenue every day. He spotted the lot,
i0w
5
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2014\Minutes\3-18-14 min.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 18, 2014
which has been vacant for a long time. He said that he thought it was a perfect
opportunity to develop. It is a project that would benefit the City and him. He
stated that he hopes the Planning Commission approves.
Commissioner Greenwood commented that to the north of the site there is a
pedestrian gate, as well as a vehicular gate. He asked what the intent of having a
gate at that location is.
MR. STOIANOVICI responded that the gate is for future access to the power
pole.
Commissioner Greenwood asked if the gate would be an open wrought iron gate.
MR. STOIANOVICI replied that it will be a wrought iron gate with an iron mesh.
He said you would not be able to see through the iron mesh.
With no further testimony offered, Chair Dash declared the public hearing closed.
Commissioner Greenwood commented that the sidewalk is very segmented. If
the City has a plan to move forward to develop the sidewalk, then it is fantastic. If
not, he questions whether or not the condition should be taken out so that the
applicant does not go through that expense. He said he would rather see it
landscaped if there's not going to be a sidewalk.
Vice Chair Stendell tended to agree with Commissioner Greenwood. However, it
is up to an expert engineer to make sure the sidewalk is compatible with
adjoining lots. He said that he walks Portola Avenue coming from Grapevine
Street, and the lack of sidewalk is impairment to the safety of a pedestrian. He
stated that he would prefer a sidewalk up and down the street; however, he
would leave it up to the Public Works Department and recommended leaving in
Condition of Approval No. 2.
Commissioner DeLuna asked if there is a City ordinance regarding new
construction to include a sidewalk. Does the City plan to have sidewalks on both
sides of Portola Avenue?
Ms. Aylaian responded that the General Plan does show a road segment that
would have a sidewalk on each side. When future development occurs, the City
will impose a condition to include a sidewalk. She stated that the City does not
have plans in the immediate future to build sidewalks along that area of Portola
Avenue.
Commissioner DeLuna commented that it is a very attractive design, and
supports the City's recommendation to install a sidewalk at the proposed site.
Commissioner Campbell agreed with Commissioner DeLuna's comment.
6
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2014\Minutes\3.18-14 min.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 18, 2014
Vice Chair Stendell moved, by Minute Motion, approving a Precise Plan to allow
the construction of a 3,600-square-foot duplex located at 45-855 Portola Avenue.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Campbell and carried by a 5-0 vote (AYES:
tow Campbell, Dash, DeLuna, Greenwood, and Stendell; NOES: None).
Vice Chair Stendell moved, by Minute Motion, to waive further reading and adopt
Resolution No. 2623, subject to conditions. Motion was seconded by Commissioner
Campbell and carried by a 5-0 vote (AYES: Campbell, Dash, DeLuna, Greenwood, and
Stendell; NOES: None).
D. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION of a Conditional Use Permit to operate a
6,200-square-foot ballet and dance studio within an existing 18,000-square-
foot building located in the Service Industrial zone at 77-780 Country Club
Drive. Case No. CUP 13-422 (Robert Reinhagen, 77-780 Country Club Drive,
Palm Desert, California 92211, Applicant).
Mr. Ceja reported that the property is located within the Country Club
Marketplace between Park Center Drive and Harris Lane. The proposed studio
will offer dance classes for groups and individuals. He said classes will be offered
Monday through Saturday. Hours of operation are 4:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. during
the weekdays, and 10:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. during the weekends. Mr. Ceja stated
that staff conducted a parking analysis over a 10-day period. The study
concluded that there is adequate parking for the proposed dance studio. Staff
recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit. He offered to answer any
questions.
Commissioner DeLuna asked if there are restrictions placed for the level of noise
that could come out from the dance studio on Sundays.
Mr. Ceja responded that the classes will occur indoors, and the applicant would
have to abide the City's noise ordinance.
Chair Dash declared the public hearing open and asked for any public testimony IN
FAVOR or OPPOSITION.
MR. RON HAGAN, representative for Mr. Robert Reinhagen,' 82-539 Hughes
Drive, Indio, California 92201, stated that Mr. Reinhagen has been a 25-year
resident of the Coachella Valley. He is also the founder and director of the
Coachella Valley High School Academy for the Performing Arts. Mr. Reinhagen
was the former Director of the Indio Performing Arts Center. Mr. Hagan
mentioned that Mr. Reinhagen outgrew the space they have in Indio, and he
looks forward to the Planning Commission approving the Conditional Use Permit
for the dance studio in Palm Desert. He noted that all activities at the dance
studio will be inside. He offered to answer any questions.
low
7
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2014\Minutes\3-18-14 min.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 18, 2014
Commissioner Greenwood asked if the rolling doors would ever be open. He
voiced his concern with children running out into the alleyway.
MR. HAGAN replied that they have no plans to open the rolling doors. He
commented that there is a possibility of opening the doors if they are bringing in a
set for rehearsal purposes.
With no further testimony offered, Chair Dash declared the public hearing closed.
Commissioner Campbell moved, by Minute Motion, approving a Conditional Use
Permit to operate a 6,200-square-foot ballet and dance studio within an existing 18,000-
square-foot building located at 77-780 Country Club Drive. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Greenwood and carried by a 5-0 vote (AYES: Campbell, Dash, DeLuna,
Greenwood, and Stendell; NOES: None).
Commissioner Campbell moved, by Minute Motion, to waive further reading and
adopt Resolution No. 2624, subject to conditions. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Greenwood and carried by a 5-0 vote (AYES: Campbell, Dash, DeLuna,
Greenwood, and Stendell; NOES: None).
Commissioner Greenwood congratulated and welcomed the applicant to the City
of Palm Desert.
X. MISCELLANEOUS
None
XI. COMMITTEE MEETING UPDATES
A. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
None
PARKS & RECREATION
None
XII. COMMENTS
Ms. Aylaian reminded the Planning Commission that the Form 700 is due to the
City Clerk by April 1, 2014.
Vice Chair Stendell commented that he will not be able to attend the Planning
Commission meeting of May 6.
8
WPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2014\Minutes\3-18-14 min.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 18, 2014
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
Upon a motion by Vice Chair Stendell, second by Commissioner Greenwood,
and a 5-0 vote of the Planning Commission (AYES: Campbell, Dash, DeLuna,
Greenwood, and Stendell; NOES: None), Chair Dash adjourned the meeting at 6:43
p.m.
ROG8R DASH, CHAIR
ATTEST:
LAURI AYLAIAN, SECRETARY
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
l.a■
9
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2014\Minutes\3-18-14 min.docx