HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-05-17 PC Regular Meeting Minutes CITY OF PALM DESERT
Now PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
• TUESDAY, MAY 17, 2016 — 6:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBER
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chair John Greenwood called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioner Nancy Del-una
Commissioner Ron Gregory
Commissioner Kathleen Kelly
Commissioner Joseph Pradetto
Chair John Greenwood
Staff Present:
Douglas Phillips, City Attorney
Ryan Stendell, Director of Community Development
Eric Ceja, Principal Planner
Christina Canales, Assistant Engineer
Monica O'Reilly, Administrative Secretary
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chair Greenwood led the Pledge of Allegiance.
IV. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION
Mr. Ryan Stendell, Director of Community Development, summarized pertinent
May 12, 2016, City Council actions.
V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 17, 2016
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MINUTES of the Planning Commission meeting of April 5, 2016. rrr
Rec: By Minute Motion, approve as presented.
B. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION of a one-year extension for Tentative
Parcel Map 36700 at St. Margaret's Episcopal Church located at 47535
Highway 74. Case No. TPM 36700 (St. Margaret's Episcopal Church, Palm
Desert, California, Applicant).
Rec: By Minute Motion, approve the extension (until May 20, 2017), Case
No. TPM 36700.
Action:
C. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION to adjust a lot line to obtain additional
square footage at 1008 Cahuilla Falls (APNs 652-320-023 & 652-320-030).
Case No. PMW 16-92 (Cahuilla 2015, LLC, Palm Desert, California
Applicant).
Rec: By Minute Motion, approve Parcel Map Waiver 16-92.
Action:
D. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION to merge two lots at 72372 Southridge
Trail (APNs 652-070-017 & 652-070-016). Case No. PMW 16-115 (Francis J.
Jules, Dallas, Texas, Applicant).
Rec: By Minute Motion, approve Parcel Map Waiver 16-115.
Action:
Upon a motion by Commissioner Pradetto, second by Commissioner DeLuna,
and a 5-0 vote of the Planning Commission, the Consent Calendar was approved as
presented (AYES: DeLuna, Greenwood, Gregory, Kelly, and Pradetto; NOES: None;
ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None).
VII. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER
None
014
2
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\5-17-16.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 17, 2016
Vlll. NEW BUSINESS
A. APPOINTMENT of a Vice Chairperson.
Commissioner Pradetto moved, by Minute Motion, to nominate Commissioner
DeLuna for Vice Chairperson for the remainder of the year 2016. Motion was seconded
by Chair Greenwood and carried by a 4-0-1 vote (AYES: Greenwood, Gregory, Kelly,
and Pradetto; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: DeLuna).
B. APPOINTMENT of a Liaison for the Art in Public Places Commission.
Vice Chair DeLuna moved, by Minute Motion, to nominate Commissioner
Gregory to be the Art in Public Places Liaison for the remainder of the year 2016.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Kelly and carried by a 4-0-1 vote (AYES:
DeLuna, Greenwood, Kelly, and Pradetto; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN:
Gregory).
IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION to construct a new 2,800-square-foot
classroom for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (S.T.E.M.) at
Sacred Heart Catholic School located at 43775 Deep Canyon Road. Case
No. PP 16-075 (Sacred Heart Catholic School, Palm Desert, California,
Applicant).
Mr. Eric Ceja, Principal Planner, presented the staff report (staff report is
available at www.cityofpalmdesert.org). He stated that the applicant is proposing
a new building that offers an additional curriculum; it does not increase school
enrollment. Therefore, parking was not evaluated for the proposed project. Staff
recommended approval and offered to answer any questions.
Vice Chair Nancy DeLuna referred to the playground equipment located at the
end of the property. She asked if the playground equipment is an addition or a
replacement of what used to be at that location. Is the size adequate for the
equipment?
Mr. Ceja referred the question to the applicant.
Commissioner Joseph Pradetto inquired if there are plans for solar panels on the
roof of the proposed new building.
Mr. Ceja replied that he would let the applicant answer the question.
Chair Greenwood declared the public hearing open and asked for any public testimony
IN FAVOR or OPPOSITION.
3
GAPlanningNonica OReilly\Planning Comm ission\2016\Minutes\5-17-16.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 17, 2016
MR. MATT ACTON, Holt Architecture, Rancho Mirage, California, responded to
the questions from the Planning Commission. He said that in previous
construction the campus built photovoltaic canopies over the parking lot to the
south. He said the playground equipment is a like for like swap of playground
area.
FATHER HOWARD LINCOLN, Sacred Heart Catholic Church, Palm Desert,
California, expressed that the proposed project is something they dearly want
because it significantly improves the academics of their school. He stated that
they have the funds for the construction of the classroom, and hoped the
Planning Commission approved the request.
With no further testimony offered, Chair Greenwood declared the public hearing closed.
Vice Chair DeLuna commented it is an excellent use of land, and they have done
an excellent job designing the building so it fits into the existing surroundings. It is
also a step forward academically for the students and moved for approval.
Vice Chair DeLuna moved, by Minute Motion, to waive further reading and adopt
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2668, approving Case No. PP 16-075, subject to
conditions. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Kelly and carried by a 5-0 vote
(AYES: DeLuna, Gregory, Greenwood, Kelly, and Pradetto; NOES: None; ABSENT:
None; ABSTAIN: None).
B. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION to construct an 8,579-square-foot
community center building, and 36 dwelling units for special needs adults at
the Desert Arc campus located at 73255 Country Club Drive. Case No.
PP/CUP 16-102 (Allied Real Estate Partners, Santa Monica, California,
Applicant).
Chair Greenwood stated that he resides in Sagewood development, which is
adjacent to the proposed project. He is also the president of the homeowners'
association. Therefore, he recused himself from the proceedings.
Mr. Ceja reviewed the staff report (staff report is available at
www.cityofpalmdesert.org). He noted that prior to the meeting the Planning
Commission received updated plans for the proposed project. The updates are
based on comments made by the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) on
the building's architecture. In addition, there are changes to the grading plan that
reflect better drainage. Mr. Ceja pointed out two conditions of approval: 1) Any
type of lighting in the parking lot or landscape area must be bollard type lighting
fixtures not to exceed a height of five feet; and 2) Landscape plans shall be
submitted for City staff approval. City staff recommended approval and offered to
answer any questions.
Commissioner Pradetto asked if the Planning Commission received the updated
plans before the ARC could review them.
4
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\5-17-16.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 17, 2016
Mr. Ceja responded that the ARC reviewed the plans the Planning Commission
received in their packet, subject to making some changes. The plans submitted
prior to the meeting are updated with the recommended changes made by the
ARC.
Commissioner Ron Gregory commented that his experience with bollard lighting
you need a lot more fixtures, and asked if the applicant is aware that there might
be an additional cost.
Mr. Ceja replied that the applicant is aware of the condition. He noted the
condition does not limit additional lighting on the carport structures located on the
eastern property line.
Commissioner Gregory referred to the landscaping required to provide screening
between the two-story units and the adjacent residential properties. He asked if
15 to 20 years down the road, would the landscaping still be there to provide a
significant barrier. Is there a condition that the landscaping could be looked at
again to make sure it is still screening?
Mr. Ceja said that with the landscape plan, which is reviewed by City staff and
the Coachella Valley Water District, they could continue to follow up through the
years with the assistance of the Code Compliance Department and the property
maintenance ordinance.
Vice Chair DeLuna declared the public hearing open and asked for any public testimony
IN FAVOR or OPPOSITION.
MR. KIRK SAUNDERS, Architect, Laguna Beach, California, briefly explained the
design intent of the site plan. He mentioned that they chose to use pre-fab units
for the residential units so they could minimize the time the project is under
construction. Mr. Saunders also mentioned that there would be a minimal parking
demand since the tenants do not have cars. He said that they met with the
neighbors, and they feel they have addressed their concerns. He offered to
answer any questions.
Commissioner Kathleen Kelly commented there was very little attendance at the
second meeting with the neighbors. She asked if there was a follow-up meeting
with the neighbors that had concerns at the first meeting.
Mr. Ceja responded that he attended both meetings. At the first meeting, it was
predominately attended by the neighbors. The applicant introduced the proposed
project, and the use of hedging or landscape to help screen views. He stated
neighbors were satisfied; therefore, neighbors did not attend the second meeting.
MR. SAUNDERS stated that this is his first project in the City of Palm Desert and
City staff has been wonderful, cooperative, and supportive. He appreciated the
efforts City staff has made.
5
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\5-17-16.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 17, 2016
Vice Chair DeLuna thanked the applicant for recognizing City staff; staff is
exceptional.
�i
With no further testimony offered, Vice Chair DeLuna declared the public hearing
closed.
Commissioner Pradetto commented that when he was first appointed to the
Planning Commission, he was told that parking plans would be one of the biggest
things that the Commission would be focused with and it has been true. He
stated that he is not concerned with parking, and felt the applicant has gone
above and beyond and moved for approval.
Commissioner Pradetto moved, by Minute Motion, to waive further reading and
adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2669, approving Case No. PP/CUP 16-102,
subject to conditions. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Kelly and carried by a 4-
0-1 vote (AYES: DeLuna, Gregory, Kelly, and Pradetto; NOES: None; ABSENT:
Greenwood; ABSTAIN: None).
X. MISCELLANEOUS
None
XI. COMMITTEE MEETING UPDATES
A. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES '
Mr. Stendell reported that the Art in Public Places Commission (AIPP) discussed
the new El Paseo exhibition. AIPP also discussed the merits of purchasing an art
piece from the existing art exhibition on El Paseo.
B. PARKS & RECREATION
None
C. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
Mr. Stendell announced the Joint City-Planning Commission Study Session
scheduled for Thursday, June 9 at 2:00 p.m. in the Administrative Conference
Room regarding the City's General Plan Update process.
Vice Chair DeLuna thanked Mr. Stendell and staff with the Vision San Pablo
event. She said that the event was a preliminary implementation of something
that the General Plan Update process focused on and thought it was important
looking forward into the City's future. The Planning Commission agreed.
6
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\5-17-16.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 17, 2016
XIII. COMMENTS
Mr. Stendell commented that there are a couple of new faces on the Planning
Commission. He said if they had any questions to let staff know.
Chair Greenwood welcomed the new Commissioners.
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
With the Planning Commission concurrence, Chair Greenwood adjourned the
meeting at 6:42 p.m.
JO N REENW D, \CH JbfPERSON
ATTEST:
f _
RYAN STENDELL, SECRETARY
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
MONICA O'REILLY, RECOR G SECRETARY
7
G1Planning\Monica Meilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\5-17-16.docx