HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-08-16 PC Regular Meeting Minutes CITY OF PALM DESERT
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
⢠TUESDAY, AUGUST 16, 2016 â 6:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBER
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chair John Greenwood called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Present: Absent:
Commissioner Ron Gregory Vice Chair Nancy DeLuna
Commissioner Kathleen Kelly
Commissioner Joseph Pradetto
Chair John Greenwood
Staff Present:
Jill Tremblay, City Attorney
Ryan Stendell, Director of Community Development
Eric Ceja, Principal Planner
Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner
Monica O'Reilly, Administrative Secretary
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chair Greenwood led the Pledge of Allegiance.
IV. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION
Mr. Ryan Stendell, Director of Community Development, summarized pertinent
City Council actions.
V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None
i
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 16, 2016
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MINUTES of the Planning Commission meeting of July 5, 2016.
Rec: By Minute Motion, approve as presented.
B. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION to perform a lot line adjustment to adjust
property lines between parcels at 45-400 Larkspur Lane (APNs 627-262-007,
627-262-008, and 627-262-011). Case No. PMW 16-163 (West River, Inc., El
Dorado Hills, California, Applicant).
Rec: By Minute Motion, approve Parcel Map Waiver 16-163.
Upon a motion by Commissioner Pradetto, second by Commissioner Kelly, and a
4-0-1 vote of the Planning Commission with Vice Chair DeLuna ABSENT, the Consent
Calendar was approved as presented (AYES: Greenwood, Gregory, Kelly, and
Pradetto; NOES: None; ABSENT: DeLuna).
VII. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER
None
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
None
IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION of a Conditional Use Permit to operate a
new cocktail lounge bar within a commercial zone located at 44-750 San
Pablo Avenue, Suite 1. Case No. CUP 16-157 (Mark Green, La Quinta,
California, Applicant).
Mr. Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner, presented the staff report (staff report is
available at www.cityofpalmdesert.org). He noted that staff received one
comment in favor and one comment in opposition. Staff recommended that the
Planning Commission approve the Conditional Use Permit (CUP). He offered to
answer any questions.
Commissioner Joseph Pradetto referred to Condition No. 9 in regard to cleaning
public areas after closing. He asked if the City has added that condition in the
past or is it new.
Mr. Swartz responded that it is new. He said there was a bar on El Paseo called
Napas Tapas that had an issue with trash being left in the public areas so the
City placed a condition on their permit. For this reason, staff placed the same
condition for this proposed bar.
2
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\8-16-16.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 16, 2016
Commissioner Pradetto asked if the condition that was added to Napas Tapas
permit help with the trash issue.
Mr. Swartz replied that Napas Tapas did not comply with the conditions of
approval. As a result, the City Council revoked the CUP and they are no longer in
business.
Commissioner Kathleen Kelly referred to Condition No. 13 pertaining to noise
complaints. She asked how the number of 10 complaints was selected.
Mr. Swartz explained that there was a noise (music) issue at the Palm Desert
Country Club clubhouse. Initially, a condition of three noise complaints was
added to their CUP; however, staff found that a complainant had their whole
household sign the complaint. Therefore, staff felt that 10 complaints would be a
sufficient amount. He said if the Planning Commission decided to change the
number of complaints from 10 to five, he recommended only one complaint could
be received per residence or per business.
Commissioner Kelly referred to a clause that only City staff is authorized to look
at modifying the hours of operation. She asked if there is any reason not to
phrase that more broadly, such as "staff would look at modifying these
conditions."
Mr. Swartz replied there is no reason not to change the phrase, and it does make
more appropriate sense.
Commissioner Kelly pointed to an overhead view of the site, and asked what the
facility behind the parking lot is.
Mr. Swartz believed it was a medical facility.
Commissioner Kelly clarified that there would not be normal activity during prime
time for the applicant's business.
Mr. Swartz replied that most of the businesses in the area close at 5:00 p.m.
Commissioner Ron Gregory mentioned that the Tilted Kilt had some public
reaction to the sound. He asked if staff had specifics such as how many people
complained, and what was the resolution to settle the issue.
Mr. Swartz answered that it was actually South Beach; not Tilted Kilt. South
Beach had outdoor music on their outdoor patio, and the Rancho Mirage
residents complained about the noise. He stated he is not sure how many
complaints were received; however, the resolution was that they had to move the
music indoors.
bow
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\8-16-16.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 16, 2016
Commissioner Gregory questioned if the proposed bar would only have indoor
music. Would there be speakers outdoors?
Mr. Swartz said music would only be indoors. He believed that the applicant may
have karaoke a couple of nights. He noted that any entertainment at the
proposed bar would need to go through the Entertainment Permit process.
Chair Greenwood asked if it is correct that the proposed bar did not go before the
Architectural Review Commission (ARC).
Mr. Swartz replied that is correct. He said the applicant is not making any exterior
modifications. He mentioned that staff took the proposed bar before the ARC as
a miscellaneous item, with no action. At that time, the applicant was looking at
painting a portion of the facade; however, the ARC and staff felt there was no
logical break in the building to paint a different color. They also discussed a new
awning and signage.
Chair Greenwood asked if there was any discussion in regard to the window film.
Mr. Swartz deferred the question to the applicant.
Chair Greenwood asked where the property line presides.
Mr. Swartz replied that it is to the right of the planter area.
Chair Greenwood inquired if staff has seen the proposed improvements for
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance.
Mr. Swartz responded that the Planning Department staff has not reviewed the
ADA improvements; however, the Building and Safety Department did review the
improvements.
Chair Greenwood asked if there was any concern with the diagonal parking
abutting direct circulation adjacent to the curb.
Mr. Swartz replied that concern has not been brought up.
Chair Greenwood inquired if staff is concerned with the rear patio of the bar. He
is concerned there would be noise to the adjacent neighbors, it is a dark parking
lot, and would prefer to see people in the front in terms of the General Plan.
Mr. Swartz believed that the applicant wants to use the rear patio for people to
smoke, and that the noise is a valid point since it faces the neighbors.
Chair Greenwood declared the public hearing open and asked for any public testimony
IN FAVOR or OPPOSITION. mug
4
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Comm ission\2016\Minutes\8-16-16.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 16, 2016
MR. MARK GREEN, Desert Fox Bar, La Quinta, California, communicated that
he originally wanted to open the bar at 2:00 p.m.; however, there was some
a.. opposition so he found it reasonable to open at 4:00 p.m. He felt there is ample
parking in the area, and cited that most of the adjacent businesses close at 5:00
p.m. He also said the rear patio would be available to people that want to drink
and smoke. He offered to answer any questions.
Commissioner Kelly asked the applicant to share what happened to the Palm
Springs location.
MR. GREEN responded that he couldn't persuade the property owner to extend
his stay. He noted that there were hotel rooms directly above his bar, and it was
an unhappy marriage due to the noise coming from the bar.
Commissioner Kelly commented that she saw pictures of signage in Palm
Springs, and she had the impression it is a pub style bar. She asked the
applicant what signage style he envisions for the proposed bar on San Pablo
Avenue.
MR. GREEN responded that the style is an upscale neighborhood bar. He made
clear they would not have loud music and it is not a dance club.
Mr. Swartz displayed pictures of the Palm Springs location and pointed out the
hotel rooms directly above the bar. He also showed pictures of inside the bar,
and said the bar on San Pablo Avenue would look similar.
Commissioner Gregory mentioned that there is not a great view in the rear patio.
He inquired if it would benefit to have a taller wrought iron fence, with some type
of material to make it look more intimate.
MR. GREEN said that he could consider a wall, if the Planning Commission felt it
was necessary.
Commissioner Gregory commented that if he was inclined to use the rear patio, it
would not be beckoning unless he really needed to smoke.
MR. GREEN agreed with Commissioner Gregory. He is only providing a rear
patio for the people that want to smoke.
Mr. Stendell noted that Palm Desert has an ordinance, which does not allow
smoking near the main entrance of a restaurant.
Chair Greenwood asked what the existing lighting in the parking lot is.
MR. GREEN replied that he does not think lighting exists in the parking lot at this
time. He said he would have lighting in the rear patio.
5
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\8-16-16.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 16, 2016
Chair Greenwood asked the applicant what he is considering for the sign design.
MR. GREEN responded that he would be removing the Pregnancy Crisis Center
wording and adding Desert Fox using the existing awning. He would then add the
Desert Fox as a cutout backlit on the upper part of the building.
Chair Greenwood asked the applicant if he is leaving the window film on the
windows.
MR. GREEN answered that he was planning on leaving the window film because
the bar is west facing and there is a heat gain.
Chair Greenwood commented that he likes the idea of seeing some life on San
Pablo Avenue. He said with the reflective window film it would be hard to see a
lively bar. He voiced concern with safety on the back patio.
MR. GREEN remarked that having a rear patio and more people present would
increase the safety of people that are coming and going from their car. In closing,
he said the bar is a walkable destination for people that want to have a drink in
the evening and thanked the Planning Commission.
The following individuals spoke in OPPOSITION to the proposed cocktail lounge
bar for the following reasons and claims: Lack of adequate parking, concern with
safety due to the homeless people, it would attract the homeless people, it is not
good for adjacent businesses, and noise.
MR. EARL WALLACE, adjacent property owner, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
MR. MAX RYE, adjacent business owner, Palm Springs, California.
MR. BRAD WALLACE, adjacent property owner, Escondido, California.
MS. JENNIFER TOBIAS, adjacent property owner, Palm Desert, California.
MR. DAVID O'DONNELL, property owner across the street, Palm Desert,
California, voiced his concern with parking on San Pablo Avenue in general. He
asked what the City plans to do in the long term regarding the parking issue.
Last, he also has issues with the homeless people around his business.
MR. GREEN remarked that he also shares the concern with the homeless
people. He stated that he would not let a homeless person into the bar since they
could not afford to buy drinks. However, he does see a homeless person able to
buy a beer across the street at Circle K for 99 cents. He communicated he has
very high standards, and would not let intoxicated and unattractive people to
loiter his bar. He addressed the music (noise) issue, and voiced that he has
never had bands in his bar. In Palm Springs, he would have a duet come in one .rr
night a week. It is a small cocktail lounge dedicated to conversation; not a disco.
6
GAPlanningWonica Meilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\8-16-16.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 16, 2016
He noted that there are 18 parking spaces behind his building. He declared that
he is a tenant, pays taxes, and why should he be restricted from running a
business. Mr. Green expressed that they should all be able to share the street; it
is a public resource.
With no further testimony offered, Chair Greenwood declared the public hearing closed.
Commissioner Joseph Pradetto questioned if the parking spaces along San
Pablo Avenue in front of the businesses are owned by the property owners or the
City.
Mr. Swartz replied that that it belongs to the City; it is a public street.
Commissioner Pradetto pointed to the parking spaces, and clarified that they do
not belong to the property owners.
Mr. Swartz replied that is correct.
Chair Greenwood asked staff to display an aerial of the property or the site plan
presented in the agenda packets. He referred to the plan and noted that there is
a discrepancy between the site plan and the way the site is actually laid out. He
noted that the space on the northern side (44-750 San Pablo Avenue), seen on
the site plan, would be on the northern parking spaces where a trash enclosure is
shown and not in the center of the aisle. He is concerned how the applicant
currently has the site plan articulated. He explained that the parking on the south
side is backing up against ADA parking egress and there is a trash enclosure
that may not function well.
MR. GREEN agreed that the site plan presented was inaccurate.
Commissioner Pradetto believed that the Circle K attracts a great number of the
homeless in the area and agrees that it is a problem. He felt the homeless issue
may be partially addressed by the condition to have a security guard at the bar.
He does not think the bar would yield to more homeless and felt it is safe. In
terms of parking, he believed the fight was over the public parking spaces and
who gets to use those spaces. City staff and the applicant have worked well
together to make a compelling case in regard to most of the parking for the bar
would occur when parking spaces are not being used by the daytime businesses;
therefore, he is okay with parking as-is.
Commissioner Kelly agreed with Commissioner Pradetto. She felt that the
parking issue was addressed when the applicant agreed to open the bar at 4:00
p.m. instead of 2:00 p.m. She also agreed that there is a homeless problem in
the area, but felt that the proposed use would not exacerbate the homeless
issue. She recommended the following changes to Condition of Approval No. 13
to afford more flexibility to respond to any situations that may arise: 1) Change
the 10 reasonable persons to five (5) unrelated persons; and 2) Change staff will
7
G\PlanningWonica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\8-16-16.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 16, 2016
look at modifying the hours of operations to staff will look at modifying these
conditions. She said it would allow for a quicker response if there are problems,
and allows for a broader range of responses. r.r
Commissioner Pradetto asked Commissioner Kelly if she wanted to make a
motion with those modifications.
Commissioner Kelly moved for approval with the two changes stated above.
Commissioner Gregory commented on the goal of San Pablo Avenue being a
family-oriented area. He wondered if there could be an open window where
people could see inside and see people having fun, which would make the bar
look less spooky. It would also attract the kind of people the City is hoping would
use San Pablo Avenue. He felt the film on the windows is tacky for a place that
could be a nice quality cocktail lounge that attracts attractive people. There are
other options to mitigate the solar problem facing west. Therefore, he would like
to add the removal of the window film to the motion.
Chair Greenwood agreed with the Planning Commissioners comments. He
stated he is sensitive to Mr. O'Donnell's comments, in terms of decisions the
Planning Commission makes could impact other businesses. However, in this
case the proposed bar would be open at a later time so it should not impact the
8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. businesses. He suggested that the applicant gets an
accurate layout of the patio, rear egress, parking lot, and the patio is in
compliance with ADA requirements. He voiced his concern with lighting, noise,
and safety in the rear patio and parking lot. He requested that staff work with the
applicant to establish an acceptable lighting within the rear patio. Chair
Greenwood stated he would also like to have the window film removed.
Commissioner Pradetto asked if Chair Greenwood is adding the condition to
remove the window film.
Chair Greenwood replied yes. He would like the condition added to remove the
window film to create a clearer visual impact to the interior space.
Commissioner Kelly interjected that she has made a motion so Chair Greenwood
would need to amend her motion, with the added condition.
Ms. Jill Tremblay, City Attorney, interjected that since Commissioner Kelly
proposed the motion, the motion belongs to her. Therefore, she is entitled to
make the motion with the new changes. If there is not a second to the motion, the
motion would fail and another Commissioner could propose a different motion.
Ms. Tremblay suggested that Commissioner Kelly restate her motion for the
record.
Commissioner Kelly moved, By Minute Motion, to approve CUP 16-157, ..r
with the following changes: 1) Replace 10 reasonable persons with five unrelated
8
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\8-16-16.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 16, 2016
persons 2) Replace the hours of operation with these conditions; and 3) Add a
condition for the removal of the reflective coating on the windows. Motion was
seconded by Chair Greenwood and carried by a 4-0-1 vote (AYES: Gregory,
Greenwood, Kelly, and Pradetto; NOES: None; ABSENT: DeLuna)
Commissioner Pradetto commented that if Commissioner DeLuna was present,
she would thank the applicant for doing business in Palm Desert. However, he
told the applicant to not disappoint the Planning Commission.
B. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION to demolish an existing fuel station and
construct a new 5,400-square-foot market and fueling station canopy for
Tower Market located at 73-801 Highway 111. Case No. PP/CUP 16-180
(Tower Energy, Torrance, California, Applicant).
Mr. Eric Ceja, Principal Planner, outlined the salient points in the staff report
(staff report is available at www.cityofgalmdesert.org). Staff recommended
approval and offered to answer any questions.
Commissioner Pradetto referred to Condition of Approval No. 26. He questioned
if the developer would be required to pay the impact fees. If so, how much are
the fees.
Mr. Ceja replied he does not know the exact amount. Typically, development
impact fees are not calculated until the developer submits building plans.
Commissioner Pradetto noted that staffs opinion the proposed use is a less
intense than the current use. Therefore, how does staff recommend an impact if
the proposed project would be ameliorated?
Mr. Ceja responded it is because the site is being updated, and there may not
have been impact fees in the past. He noted that this site was developed in the
1950s. Staff may recommend changes to the fee structure or the impact fees.
Commissioner Pradetto asked if there has been a collision history in the lot going
out into San Luis Rey Avenue and the frontage road.
Mr. Ceja replied he did not have statistics on the collision history.
Commissioner Pradetto stated that he drives in the area a lot, and there is a
difference between inconvenient and unsafe. If there is no collision history, he
would characterize the lot as inconvenient.
Mr. Ceja said staff would have to contact the Police Department to get the
collision history. He mentioned that the consolidation of the driveway allows the
applicant to add more landscape and a screen wall around more of the property
low so the uses at the gas station are screened from Highway 111.
9
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\8-16-16.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 16, 2016
Commissioner Gregory commented that the applicant agreed to reduce the
planting area by 50 percent and pointed to the landscape drawings. He noted
that Washingtonia hybrid palms come in different thicknesses. He recommended
an 18-inch base so the palms to get the quality indicated in the landscape
drawings. He also recommended a minimum size of five-gallons of the plant
material, which would give the plants a good head start. Lastly, he wondered if
there should some architectural guidelines along the Highway 111 corridor. The
applicant has made a good effort with the style of the proposed project, but
wondered if there is a more coherent approach that the City may wish to take on
this important corridor.
Mr. Ceja responded that architectural guidelines are an excellent suggestion as
they continue with the General Plan Update. Staff is looking at a Highway 111
corridor plan, and may establish some architecture guidelines as well.
Chair Greenwood referred to the General Plan and asked if there have been any
discussions regarding the frontage road. How will it work with the new site?
Mr. Ceja answered yes. They discussed making all the frontage roads similar. He
said the applicant was able to consolidate the driveways and moved one
driveway to the far west, which allows creating a plaza space the City envisions
with the General Plan.
Commissioner Gregory asked what the hours of operation are.
Mai
Mr. Ceja deferred the question to the applicant.
Chair Greenwood declared the public hearing open and asked for any public testimony
IN FAVOR or OPPOSITION.
MR. MARK VASEY, Tower Energy, Rancho Palo Verdes, California,
communicated that they own and operate 50 stores in northern California. They
own a store in La Quinta, and building another store in Coachella. He offered to
answer any questions.
Commissioner Gregory asked what the hours of operation are.
MR. VASEY replied 5:00 a.m. to midnight.
Commissioner Gregory asked the applicant if they have any problem with his
concerns he expressed in the plant materials.
MR. TIM ROGERS, Tower Energy, La Quinta, California, responded that they do
not have a problem addressing Commissioner Gregory's concerns.
Chair Greenwood asked the applicant what kind of food service they would have r
in the market.
10
GAPlanning\Monica OReiIINPlanning Commission\2016\Minutes\8-16-16.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 16, 2016
MR. VASEY said they would have basic groceries, fresh produce, frozen foods,
and a hot case with chicken fingers, breakfast burritos, etc.
Chair Greenwood asked if the preparation of hot food would require roof
mounted equipment, other than the HVAC equipment.
MR. VASEY replied no. The food equipment would be located in the storage
room, such as a fryer and a hood.
Chair Greenwood inquired if there is a grease exhaust on the roof.
MR. VASEY responded there is a hood that would go up to the roof.
Chair Greenwood asked if the hood had been taken into account on the roof
plan.
MR. VASEY deferred the question to the architect.
MR. NICK FULLERTON, architect, Bigfork, Montana, explained that the roof has
a bathtub top. All the equipment is down so no one would be able to see it.
Chair Greenwood stated he wanted to make sure everything is below the
parapet.
MR. FULLERTON said they would make sure it is under the parapet.
Chair Greenwood pointed to the northwest corner of the proposed market in
conjunction with the adjacent Japanese restaurant. He voiced his concern with
visibility and how the detail is going to work, such as the stucco wrapping around
the corner. He pointed out that the roof of the restaurant is much lower. He asked
if they are opposed to wrapping the stucco around the corner to create a weep
lower to where you would see the stucco wrapped to all points visible from the
northwest corner.
MR. FULLERTON replied that they would wrap the stucco. He said they are also
going to fill in the gap solid, and have a gutter go across the top so the water
would be controlled from both sides. He affirmed that anything exposed would be
stuccoed and finished.
Chair Greenwood asked if the applicant is comfortable with everything the ARC
recommended.
MR. FULLERTON said they are comfortable with the changes made by the ARC,
and they are in the process of making those changes.
With no testimony offered, Chair Greenwood declared the public hearing closed.
11
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\8-16-16.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 16, 2016
Commissioner Pradetto commented on Condition No. 26, which a developer has
to pay impact fees. However, the findings in the staff report expressed this would
have less impact than exists now. He clarified that the argument is potentially the +
previous property owner did not pay the impact fees.
Commissioner Kelly stated that the condition is phrased "increased presence of
structures, traffic, and population,"and she understood the staff report to say that
this is better than what is there now. The automotive repair station created
something very unattractive. However, the new use would have certain impacts
so she is not troubled by the condition.
Commissioner Pradetto stated he is sensitive to a business coming to Palm
Desert and having to pay fees for just the sake of paying fees. He explained that
his bias is if they could avoid charging a fee, he would like to do it. However, the
applicant may want to pay the fee to be done with it. At this time, he is not
prepared to change the condition.
Mr. Stendell interjected that staff continues to face the issues in assessing the
fees as they relate to redeveloping properties and the net impact of developer
impact fees versus assessment of full fees, as if the property were vacant. He
said staff would continue to work cooperatively with the development community
to this end.
Chair Greenwood moved, by Minute Motion, approving Case No. PP/CUP 16-
180, with the addition of two conditions; 1) All palm trees shall have a minimum trunk
size of 18 inches, and plants shall be a minimum of five gallons in size; and 2) All visible
building exteriors shall be finished with paint and/or stucco with no visible concrete
masonry unit (CMU) on the building. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Kelly and
carried by a 4-0-1 vote (AYES: Greenwood, Gregory, Kelly, and Pradetto; NOES: None;
ABSENT: DeLuna).
Chair Greenwood thanked and welcomed Tower Market to the City.
X. MISCELLANEOUS
None
XI. COMMITTEE MEETING UPDATES
A. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
None
B. PARKS & RECREATION
None
12
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Commission\2016\Minutes\8-16-16.docx
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 16, 2016
C. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
Mr. Stendell reported that the Draft Environmental Impact Report would go live
on Friday, August 19, 2016. Staff anticipates the General Plan Update public
hearings with the Planning Commission will occur at the second meeting in
October. He said staff would deliver the information to the Planning Commission
in time for them to review.
XII. COMMENTS
Chair Greenwood commented that as they move forward with the General Plan
and the City corridors, is there an overall theme. What level of architecture and
design is the City trying to achieve? He said that having a meeting to discuss this
topic with the ARC, Planning Commission, and City Council would be of great
value.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
With the Planning Commission concurrence, Chair Greenwood adjourned the
meeting at 7:37 p.m.
J tââ
JO N G EENWO CHAT SON
ATTEST:
RYAN STENDELL, SECRETARY
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
t
MONICA O'REILLY, RECORDING SECRETARY
13
GAPlanning\Monica OReilly\Planning Comm ission\2016\Minutes\8-16-16.docx