HomeMy WebLinkAbout303560 CITY OF PRIM DESERT
3-5 I O FRED WARING DRIVE
`- PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92 2 60-2 5 78
TEL: 760 346-o6II
info@cityofpalmdesert.org
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
NOTICE OF ACTION
August 19, 2015
WVC Rancho Mirage, Inc.
c/o- Starwood Vacation Ownership
9002 San Marco Court
Orlando, Florida 32819
Subject: Consideration of a Recommendation to the City Council Approval of
Development Agreement 96-1 Amendment 2, which Provides a Time
Extension and Modifies Payment of the Project Amenity Fee
The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert considered your request and took
the following action at its regular meeting of August 18, 2015-.
The Planning Commission granted approval of Case Nos. DA 96-1
Amendment 21HTE 15-200 by adoption of Planning Commission
Resolution No. 2654. Motion carried by a 5-0.
Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk, City of Palm
Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.
Lauri Aylaian, Secretary
Palm Desert Planning Commission
cc: File
Building & Safety Department
Public Works Department
Fire Marshal
tu{PRIpEEO ON RF[TEEFO PAPEA
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2654
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL A
SECOND AMENDMENT TO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR
STARWOOD VACATION OWNERSHIP LOCATED AT 39-500
PORTOLA AVENUE
CASE NOs: DA 96-1 AMENDMENT 2/HTE 15-200
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the
181h day of August 2015, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by WVC
Rancho Mirage, Inc. for approval of the above noted; and
WHEREAS, according to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City
must determine whether a proposed activity is a project subject to CEQA. If the project is
subject to CEQA, staff must conduct a preliminary assessment of the project to determine
whether the project is exempt from CEQA review. If a project is not exempt, further
environmental review is necessary. The application has complied with the requirements of
the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality
Act," Resolution No. 2014-41 , in the Director of Community Development has determined that
the proposed project is related to City policy decisions only and will not result in any
significant impacts to the environment; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission
did find the following facts and reasons, which are outlined in the staff report reasons to
recommend approval of the said request:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings for
approval of the Planning Commission in this case.
2. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of Development
Agreement 96-1 Amendment 2.
i
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2654
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Palm Desert, California, at its regular meeting held on the 18th day of August 2015, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: CAMPBELL, DE LUNA, GREENWOOD, PRADETTO, and STENDELL
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ATTEST: KEN S ENDELL, CHAIRPERSON
LAURI AYLAIAN, SECRETARY
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSI N
G:1P1annm,1Mon1ca OReilly\Planning Commission\2015\Resolutions\Res.No.DA 96-1 Amendment HTE 15-200.docx
2