Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRes No 194PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 194 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROV- ING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTIONS OF NOVEMBER 9, 1976. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the Design Review Board actions of November 9, 1976, approving: Case No. 41C - Working drawings for a new 3,000 square foot com- mercial building for JO CRAIL McCART. Case No. 35C - Working drawings for a 3,700 square foot commercial building for HAROLD McCORMICK. WHEREAS, at this time, upon receiving and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons who desired to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board actions of November 9, 1976. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1) That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2) That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of November 9, 1976. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, held on this 16th day of November, 1976, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, KELLY, WILSON NOES: NONE ABSENT: MILLS ABSTAIN: NONE WILS N, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION Nwo NOVEMBER 9, 1976 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. 41C 1. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case (Exhibit A), and as revised according to the Design Review Board Process. Any minor changes require approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Planning Commission. 2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. 3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this pro- ject, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. 4. Any roof mounted, exhaust, or air conditioning equipment shall be fully concealed from view from any public rights -of -way and adjoining properties by architecturally integrated means as shown. 5. All utility service lines shall be placed underground. 6. Curb, gutter, sidewalk or approved pathways, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided in conformance with City Standards for the following: a. The applicant shall improve the full frontage of the site with curb, gutter, and tie-in paving on Larrea to the specifications of the City Engineer. b. The applicant shall install sidewalk along Larrea to the specifi- cations of the City Engineer. 7. Final landscaping (with irrigation system) plans shall be provided to the Design Review Board Process for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. Lighting of parking areas and premises shall be provided as approved by the Director of Environmental Services. 9. Signage shall be provided in accordance with signage plan to be submitted to the Planning Staff for final approval. 10. Traffic control provisions shall be provided as required by the Director of Environmental Services and shall be integrated with the signage plan. 11. Elevations are approved as shown. 12. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshall prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 13. A detailed grading plan shall be submitted to the Building Official Process for approval prior to construction. 14. The parking layout shall be revised to allow for one less space with one-way traffic. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand the Department of Building & Safety will not issue a permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed con- firmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (Applicant's Signature) MINUTES PALM DESERT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 9, 1976 I. The regularly scheduled meeting of the Palm Desert Design Review Board was called to order at 4:45 p.m. in the Conference Room of the Palm Desert City Hall. Members Present: Steve Flashman for Paul A. Williams George Minturn Bernard Leung Jim Hill Bill Hobbs Members Absent: Frank Urrutia Michael Buccino Paul A. Williams II. MINUTES of the meeting of October 26, 1976. The above minutes were approved on a motion by Mr. Minturn and seconded by Mr. Leung. Motion carried 5-0. III. CASE NO. 41C, JO CRAIL McCART, APPLICANT Request for approval of a 3,000 square foot office building on the north side of Larrea, west of Prickly Pear Lane. The Design Review Board reviewed the project and felt that the structure was compatible with the surrounding development. How- ever, they did object to the parking layout. On a motion by Mr. Minturn, seconded by Mr. Hobbs, the Design Review Board approved the project, subject to 14 conditions of approval. Condition No. 14 was added specifying a change to the circulation and a loss of one parking space. The motion carried 4-0, with Mr. Leung abstaining. IV. CASE NO. 35C, HAROLD McCORMICK, APPLICANT Request for approval of working drawings and landscape plans for a 3,700 square foot retail building on the north side of El Paseo, west of Lupine Lane. On a motion by Mr. Minturn and seconded by Mr. Leung, the Design Review Board voted 5-0 to approve the working drawings. V. CASE NO. 34C, J. REID, COMMERCIAL ADDITION Staff presented photos of a project which was constructed contrary to exhibits previously presented to the Design Review Board. In this case, the builder requested that he be allowed to alter his previous approval of the building, to conform to what he has already constructed. On a motion by Mr. Minturn and seconded by Mr. Leung, the Design Review Board voted unanimously to require the construc- tion to conform exactly to the exhibits presented for a building permit. VI. The meeting was adjourned at 5:30 p.m. STEPHEN A. FLESHMAN, Associate Planner